HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council-Agenda Packets-2/15/2000
Texas
.
~'~~(J
n !Jb.~ -'
~--
;?v, . ~ {lAM.
~. _~ f'v-~
.~()~W;F
Tf)(WfYL ~c " 1ft:
?AOj' ~,' tfPl~
/fa ~ .;Ai. ~. uj/ .
~ /lIJtJ ()-tJ'l-/111
city Of
FEBRUARY 15, 2000
Legal - Gammon lawsuit
Legal - Murray Construction lawsuit
Property Acquisition - John McCain Road
Property Acquisition - Colleyville Boulevard
Property Acquisition - Hall-Johnson Road
Personnel - The City Council may consider the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline or
dismissal of public officers or employ~es, including the City
Manager, City Secretary, C!ty Atlorr.&y;t",3nd'City board and
commission members. A complete '1h~f' of the City boards
and commissions is on file in the City:fi<i,cJ'r.::tary's Office.
p,~ oJ:; &: fJ7 pM. ,
7:30 P.M. - RESUME REGULAR MEETiNG
INVOCATION: Reverend Greg Beutel, Crown of Life Lutheran Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Ross Foster City Attorney
P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 577-7575
\
l
2. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS
ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS, AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS, OR PRESENTATIONS.
PRESENTATION - Proclamation to Stephen Gowdy, Eagle Scout
PRESENTATION - Proclamation for National Lutheran Schools Week
PRESENTATION - Plaques to outgoing Parks and Recreation Advisory Bo~rd
Members
k CONSENT
1\ ,,~~ 3. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1609 .
~ a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council me~ting of February 1,
2000.
b. Approval of the recommendation of the Sign Board of Appeals to grant a
variance to the side yard setback requirements of Section G (2)(c)(4) of
the Colleyville Sign Code, for a free standing "General Business" sign to
be located at 1901 Industrial Boulevard.
c. Approval of the recommendation of the Sign Board of Appeals to grant a.
variance to the front yard setback requirement of Section G (2)(c)(3) of the
Colleyville Sign Code, for a free standing sign to be located at Healthy
Approach, 5100 State Highway 121.
d. Approval of setting a date for a public hearing to discuss and adopt the
Roadway Capital Improvements Plan and to adopt impact fees
e. Approval of Change Order No.1, in the amount of $67,452.98, to the
1999/2000 Street Improvement Program Contract with J. L. Bertram
Construction & Engineering, Inc.
f. Approval of Change Order No.1, in the amount of $12,500, for the
repainting and renovation of Bransford Road 1.0 MG elevated storage
tank contract with Advantage Contract Services, Inc.
g. Approval of Change Order No.1, in the amount of $4,850, to the
Professional Services Contract with Deltatek Engineering for Quality
Control Services for the renovation of Bransford Road 1.0 MG elevated
tank
PUBLIC HEARINGS: .
~ 4. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1201 - Zoning
- .rt-.tI- change requested by Brian Markwood, from AG to R-30 on 2.210 acres located
~"- at 6212 L.D. Lockett Road
~,
~'
~,
~~,
~,
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1202 - Zoning
change requested by John Grant for Asifali Mahomed, from AG to R-30 on Lot 1
and from AG to R-40 on Lot 2, 4.934 acres located at 6208 Pleasant Run Road
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1203 - Zoning
change requested by Miles Fairris, from CC-2 to C-PO (Professional Office) on
0.6923 acres located on the south side of Gateway Drive in the 4100 block
SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1204 - Zoning
change requested by David Cunningham for Faith Christian School, from AG,
CN, CC1 and CC2 to PUD-C on 43.891 acres located on the south side of
McDonwell School Road, west of Remington Parkway
8.
FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1205 - Zoning
change requested by John Lynch for Bob Gammon, from R-20 to PUD-R
(planned unit development - residential) on 6.810 acres located at 3650 Pool
Road
READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-OO-1611 - Approval of
amended Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and Advertising Policy
READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-OO-1612 - Approval of
suspending the effective date of TXU Electric's proposed tariff revisions to permit
the Steering Committee of Cities served by TXU Electric time to study and make
recommendations regarding the proposed changes
STAFF REPORTS:
11. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
REPORTS:
12. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES - JANUARY 24, 2000
IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES - JANUARY 24, 2000
SIGN BOARD OF APPEALS COMMITTEE MINUTES - FEBRUARY 7, 2000
. CITIZEN COMMENTS:
13. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
\ ACTION/RESOLUTION: !
.!:I~ ~~ 14. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTIO~IFYI~
"\I~ COUNCIL AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUA , ~OO _
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1610
ADJOURNMENT:
15. ADJOURNMENT
I certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin board at City Hall on February 11,
200 at 4:30 p.m. / 1 .
LL0- kJ ~
Jea Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special
accommodations, please advise the City Secretary at least 48 hours in advance at 577-
7575, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you.
.~
CITY COUNCIL Two' AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 02115/00 CMO Approval:
Item # :
1
Ordinance # :
N/A
Previous Action: None
DEPT. :
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Executive Session - In accordance with Texas
Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter 0
Sec. 551.071 -
Sec. 551.071 -
Sec. 551.072-
Sec. 551.072-
Sec. 551.072-
Sec. 551.074 -
Legal - Gammon lawsuit
Legal - Murray Construction lawsuit
Property Acquisition - John McCajn Road
Property Acquisition - Colleyville Boulevard
Property Acquisition - Hall-Johnson Road
Personnel - The City Council may consider the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline or
dismissal of public officers or employees, inctuding the City
Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City board and
commission members. A complete list of the City boards and
commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office.
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY
.~
CITY COUNCIL Tms AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 02115100 CMO Approval:
Item # :
2
Ordinance # :
N/A
Previous Action:
DEPT. :
CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS
REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED BY THE
COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS, OR
PRESENTATIONS
PRESENTA TION - Proclamation to Stephen Gowdy, Eagle Scout
Stephen Gowdy, a member of Boy Scout Troop 344, has earned the Eagle Scout
Award, which is the highest honor in scouting. Stephen has earned the Eagle Scout
rank through hard work, persistence, a commitment to helping others, and a desire to
be successful. The Citizens of Colleyvitle are benefiting from Stephen's Eagle Scout
project which was improving the Veteran's Memorial at Sparger Park by adding a
concrete walkway to the monument, a promenade area around the flag pole, and the
installation of three benches. Stephen spent over 200 hours on this project, was
assisted by twenty-five volunteers, and received financial support from the Colleyville
Evening Rotary Club, Stanford Trucking, DFW Concrete, and Charley's Concrete.
( continued)
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY
Agenda Briefing
Presentations
Page 2
PRESENTA TION ~ Proclamation for National Lutheran Schools Week
National Lutheran Schools Week will be celebrated March 5-11, 2000. This celebration
is held annually to publicly highlight the qualities of Lutheran schools which include a
challenging curriculum, caring Christian teachers, and teacher-to-student ratios of one
to twenty. A week of special activities are planned at the Crown of Life Lutheran School
in recognition of this event.
PRESENTA TION - Plaques to outgoing Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Members
Plaques will be presented to Bill Recker (1995-1999), Laura Ann Travis (1995-1999),
and Mike Billings (1990-1999) for their outstanding service on the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board.
....~: ;. :'....~_.- :
:.;...":.
...
~-..~~<-.-........
roclamation
r
CITY OF
~. Colleyville,
i
r
~ Texas
.
WHEREAS: Stephen Gowdy, a member of Boy Scout Troop
344, has eamed the Eagle Scout Award, the highest honor in scouting, a truly
significant milestone; and
WHEREAS, the requirements for the Eagle rank are to eam 21 merit badges; become a
Life Scout and then serve in a troop leadership position for six months; plan.
develop, and carry out a service project worthy of an Eagle Scout; and stand
before a review board of prominent persons to present evidence of his
commitment and observance of the Scout Oath and Law and his
qualifications for the Eagle Scout Award; and
WHEREAS, Stephen has eamed the Eagle Scout rank through hard work, persistence,
a commitment to helping others. and a desire to be successful; and
, i.
.~
WHEREAS, the citizens of Colleyville are'benefiting from Stephen's Eagle Scout project
which was improving .Veteran's Memorial at Sparger Park by adding a
concrete wal~y t~ the m_~nument. 8 p~~.de area around the flag pole,
~. . and the insta)~tion. ~t~~ benches; a,,!d
--_.--....,...... .--------
WHEREAS, Stephen spentover200-hourSontilfs-projecCwas assisted by twenty-five
volunteers, and received financial support from the Colleyville Evening Rotary
Club, Stanford Trucking, DFW Concrete, and Charley's Concrete; and
WHEREAS, Stephen has demonstrated leadership and a commitment of service to his
fellow man by attaining the rank of Eagle Scout.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONNA ARP, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS,
on behalf of the City Council and citizens of Colleyville, congratulate and
commend Stephen Gowdy for this lifetime achievement. Furthermore, we
express our appreciation to Stephen for beautifying one of our parks and
encourage him to use the leadership skills he has learned and demonstrated
to the betterment of mankind.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby set my hand. and seal of the City of Colleyville to be
affixed this 15th day of February 2000.
~f
~1
........
:r'....-......~.-- c""~:~<;),>o"-..".. ~"-"'.:--~~'
- .., -. ~, \1.. ./t...;....,.:!tr
j:~'"~.~~~~~~~~:.,~~",~;,:-~.o/ .~-:~~ (, ~".~ .
~
I
k.
,.
~-
I'
t:
,.,
,
t
~..
!
~.
!t.,..
~'
. i
t
L'
,
r
t.
c.
..
t.~
,.
.-.....~...:.
roclamation
iJo
~
"
CITY OF
Colleyville,
Texas
WHEREAS: National Lutheran Schools Week will be
celebrated March 5-11, 2000; and
'f
WHEREAS, National Lutheran Schools Week is held annually to publicly highlight
the qualities of Lutheran schools which include a challenging
curriculum, caring Christian teachers, and teacher-to-student ratios of
one to twenty; and
WHEREAS, Crown of Life Lutheran School in Colleyville will join the 2.6 million
member Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod in celebrating this year's
. National Lutheran Schools Week theme of "Shine Like Stars"; and
'-..j ... .. 1"' ;
WHEREAS, a week of special activItie'sarepianned at the Crown of Life Lutheran
School in re~nition of this event.-~
....- .' .' -,-' <, ~~---/'"
NOW, THEREFORE,I.OQNNAARP~ MAYOR OF_THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE,
I TEXAS, orl DehalfOf the COlil3yVi11~HY~COiincif, do declare the week
I of March 5-11 as: :',', -- .
~ . .. . - -. .-.....
-.
.,
- ,
.~
._~ .
\
',' '_/ NATIONAL LUTHERAN SCHOOLS WEEK
---- . _#.. . ~,.. ..
in the City of CoIIeyville and wish the Crown of Life Lutheran School
success in their activities. _~ ~
------
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby set my' hand, and seal of the City of
colleyville affixed this 15th day of February, 2000.
~
",- ~'.....\.'vcv'
..... .....-
.. ...,~,
".. .; ,.......~. ,j,.
<:'
,/
"
/
':
'--,
..-,
.....-, . ,~... ,..' r.-
:~.V"',/~.. "-.J-..Ir--.f-l
'"
~.
~_, ..,..~>.~>"..,.~.1._....~'C"'~"Y""'..,.,._...-.--...-._'- '-...-~ -.--'." . 'c',' .
. -.' " ".'\>.-
. .......~
I ... ~ ~ ':. '.
. .
...:.,.:~I;... . r .'.
.' .'.
..... ...:-....
AGENDA ITEM NO. _3_
REGULAR MEETING
OF THE
COLLEYVILLE CITY COUNCIL
CONSENT
READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1609
a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of February 1,
2000.
b. Approval of the recommendation of the Sign Board of Appeals to grant a
variance to the side yard setback requirements of Section G (2)(c)(4) of
the Colleyville Sign Code, for a free standing "General Business" sign to
be located at 1901 Industrial Boulevard.
c. Approval of the recommendation of the Sign Board of Appeals to grant a
variance to the front yard setback requirement of Section G (2)(c)(3) of the
Colleyville Sign Code, for a free standing sign to be located at Healthy
Approach, 5100 State Highway 121.
d. Approval of setting a date for a public hearing to discuss and adopt the
Roadway Capital Improvements Plan and to adopt impact fees
e. Approval of Change Order No.1, in the amount of $67,452.98, to the
1999/2000 Street Improvement Program Contract with J. L. Bertram
Construction & Engineering, Inc.
f. Approval of Change Order No.1, in the amount of $12,500, for the
repainting and renovation of Bransford Road 1.0 MG elevated storage
tank contract with Advantage Contract Services, Inc.
g. Approval of Change Order No.1, in the amount of $4,850, to the
Professional Services Contract with Deltatek Engineering for Quality
Control Services for the renovation of Bransford Road 1.0 MG elevated
tank
MOTION SECOND
AYE NAY ABSTAIN ABSENT
COUNCILMAN SHORT
COUNCILMAN TAYLOR
COUNCILMAN CARROLL
MAYOR PRO TEM THIBODEAUX
COUNCILMAN TIGUE
MAYORARP
RESOLUTION R-00-1609
A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION
UNDER CONSENT ITEMS AT THE REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 15, 2000
WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Consent
Items.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1:
THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Consent Items
as follows are hereby adopted:
a.
THAT the minutes of the regular City Council meeting of February 1,2000,
are hereby approved,
b.
THAT the recommendation of the Sign Board of Appeals to grant a variance
to the side yard setback requirements of Section G (2)(c)(4) of the Colleyville
Sign Code, for a free standing "General Business" sign to be located at 1901
Industrial Boulevard, is hereby approved.
c.
THAT the recommendation of the Sign Board of Appeals to grant a variance
to the front yard setback requirement of Section G (2)(c)(3) of the Colleyville
Sign Code, for a free standing sign to be located at Healthy Approach, 5100
State Highway 121, is hereby approved.
d.
THAT the setting of a date for a public hearing to discuss and adopt the
Roadway Capital Improvements Plan and to adopt impact fees, is hereby
approved.
, !
e.
THAT Change Order No.1, in the amount of $67,452.98, to the 1999/2000
Street Improvement Program Contract with J. L. Bertram Construction &
Engineering, Inc., is hereby approved.
f. THAT Change Order No.1, in the amount of $12,500, for the repainting and
. renovation of Bransford Road 1.0 MG elevated storage tank contract with
Advantage Contract Services, Inc., is hereby approved.
g. THAT Change Order No.1, in the amount of $4,850, to the Professional
Services Contract with Deltatek Engineering for Quality Control Services for
the renovation of Bransford Road 1.0 MG elevated tank, is hereby approved.
Resolution R-00-1609
Page 2 of 2
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
Passed by a vote of ayes,
of , 2000.
ATTEST:
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
nays, and
abstentions on the
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Donna Arp
Mayor
day
MINUTES OF THE
COLLEYVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 01, 2000
The regular meeting of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor Donna
Arp on February 1, 2000, at 6:45 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Councilpersons Jody Short, Mike Taylor, Frank Carroll, Ginny Tigue,
and Mayor Pro Tem Nelson Thibodeaux were present. Mayor Donna
Arp, City Manager Bob Stripling, Assistant City Manager Dianne
McWethy, Financial Analyst Ken Kolsti, Director of Pubtic Services
Bob Whitehead, Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron,
Development Coordinator Clayton Husband, Public Works Manager
Randy Brown, Fire Chief Mike Johnston, City Attorney Ross Foster,
and City Secretary Jean Harris were also present.
1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551,
Subchapter D
Sec. 551.071 -
Sec. 551.071 -
Sec. 551.071-
Sec. 551.072-
Sec, 551.072 -
Sec. 551.072 -
Sec. 551.074-
Legal - Gammon lawsuit
Legal- Potential Litigation - R. C. Small and Associates,
Inc. - Community Center
Legal - Murray Construction lawsuit
Property Acquisition - John McCain Road
Property Acquisition - Colleyville Boulevard
Property Acquisition - Hall-Johnson Road
Personnel - The City Council may consider the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline or
dismissal of public officers _ or employees, including the City
Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City board and
commission members. A complete list of the City boards and
commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office
Mayor Arp explained that the Executive Session had been called in accordance with Texas
Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter 0, Section 551.071 - Legal, Section 551.072
- Property Acquisition, and Section 551.074 - Personnel. She further explained that there
would be no decisions made or action taken during this time. The meeting was recessed
at 6:47 p.m., and reconvened at 7:35 p.m.
City COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
The invocation was given by Debra Flaggman, Member of the Spiritual Assembly of the
Baha'i Faith, after which Ross Foster led the Pledge of Allegiance.
2. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED
BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS, AND ANNOUNCE,..ENTS,
PROCLAMATIONS, OR PRESENTATIONS
Councilman Taylor read a letter from developer Larry Cole regarding the impact fees
recently amended by the Council.
Mayor Arp announced a conference of the Baha'i Faith would be held on Saturday at the
Community Center.
CONSENT:
3. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-OO-1603- Consent Items:
a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of January 18,2000
b. Approval of a request of Kevin and Rachel Master for water service outside
the city limits, 400 block of Styles Lane
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-OO-1603 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Tigue moved to approve Resolution R-00-1603.
Councilman Taylor seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
PUBUC HEARINGS:
4. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1201 - Zoning change
requested by Brian Markwood, from AG to R-30 on 2.210 acres located at 6212
L. D. Lockett Road
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-00-1201.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
5. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1202 - Zoning change
requested by John Grant for Asifali Mahomed, from AG to R-30 on Lot 1 and from
AG to R-40 on Lot 2,4.934 acres located at 6208 Pleasant Run Road
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-00-1202.
Mr. David Reaves, 3244 Hemphill, Fort Worth, representing the applicant, spoke regarding
the request for the R-30 zoning.
There were no others wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
6. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1203 - Zoning change
requested by Miles Fairris, from CC-2 to C-PO (Professional Office) on 0.6923
acres located on the south side of Gateway Orive in the 4100 block
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-00-1203.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
Mr. Miles Fairris, 3211 Norton Drive, applicant, was present to answer questions of the
Council.
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
7. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-00-1204 - Zoning change
requested by David Cunningham for Faith Christian School, from AG, CN, CC1 and
CC2 to PUD-C on 43.891 acres located on the south side of McDonwell School
Road, west of Remington Parkway
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-00-1204.
Ms. Linda Baker, 404 W. McDonwell School Road, spoke regarding the removal of this
property from the tax rolls, the number of students that are Colleyville residents, Southlake
traffic, prohibition of portable buildings, the microwave transmission tower in the area,
entrance on McDonwell School Road, preservation of wildlife, and the Western Gateway
development.
Mr. Butch Ethridge, 404 W. Glade, spoke regarding the school serving as a buffer zone
between the residential property and the commercial property along Precinct Line Road,
the school serving as a magnet for commerce, and working in tandem with the City's Parks
and Recreation Department for practice fields on the school's property.
Ms. Terry Ann Kelly, 3031 Parr Lane, Grapevine, spoke regarding the residents having
choices of public and private schools, shared values of homes and schools, the proposed
school being nondenominational, and the proposed school being strong in both athletics
and fine arts.
Mr, David Cunningham, 2172 Winding Creek, Grapevine, applicant, advised that 65% of
the site would remain green, elementary play fields would not be lit, the school would deed
100 feet of land for roadway or future development, and that the main entrance would be
off of Precinct Line Road. Mr. Cunningham also stated that he feels this is a quality of use
issue, not a tax issue, and that the increased sales tax would offset any lost ad valorem
taxes.
There were no others wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp dosed the
public hearing.
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
Discussion ensued regarding the depth of the property, the 100 foot piece of property to
be deeded to the City, the proposed roadway on the Master Thoroughfare Plan through
the middle of the property, inclusion of wording in the ordinance regarding the trading of
the proposed street for the 100 feet of property on the west, security of the students, traffic
routes, development of Precinct Line Road, preserving commercial property, the size of
the proposed stadium, use of existing retail space, the school's impact on the commercial
property regarding alcohol sales, the size of the proposed auditorium, and the traffic
impact regarding the proposed stadium seating 2,000 people.
It was the consensus of the Council to direct the City staff to meet with the applicant
regarding the desires of the Council and the requests of the applicant prior to second
reading of the Ordinance.
8. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-OO-1605 - Approving a waiver
of perimeter street improvement requirements requested of Paul Millsap for the
Greer Addition at the southwest comer of Glade Road and Jim Mitchell Trail West
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-00-1605 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak conceming this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Carroll moved to approve Resolution R-00-1605.
Councilman Tigue seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
9. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1606 - Approving a final plat
of The Village at Colleyville requested by Richard A. Myers, 21.99 acres and 3.70
acres, a portion being a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, City National Bank of Colleyville
Addition, located on Pleasant Run Road and Colleyville Boulevard
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-00-1606 in its entirety.
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
Mr. Richard Myers, 300 Lloyd Circle, applicant, was present to answer questions of the
Council.
Discussion ensued regarding the property being donated for the library (lot 41), square
footage of lots 41and 42, available parking, value of the donation, and if there would be
a fee simple title to those particular units donated.
Councilman Carroll moved to approve Resolution R-001606, with the following addition to
Section 1: That the final plat of The Village at Colleyville is hereby approved subject to
the plat being signed by all of the owners of the property being platted.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried,
10. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1607 - Approval of
authorizing the City Manager to proceed with the condemnation of the following
parcels on the Hall-Johnson Road project
a. Bluebonnet Hills Cemetery, Parcel Numbers 1, 2, and 4
b. U. S. Post Office, Parcel Number 7 A
c. Barbara Gordon Montessori School, Parcel Numbers 7B and 8
d. Wallace Bowman Tract, Parcel Number 18
e. Richard Baca Property, Parcel Number 24
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-OO-1607 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
Councilman Taylor moved to approve Resolution R-OO-1607.
Councilman Carroll seconded the motion.
Discussion ensued regarding the speed at which the project is moving, the preference of
a two lane roadway, this Resolution not preventing negotiations, and the City offering 10%
above the appraised value for the property.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: Councilman Tigue
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
11. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1608 - Calling a general
election for the purpose of electing Councilpersons to Places 3, 4, and 5, to be held
on May 6, 2000
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-00-1608 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Taylor moved to approve Resolution R-00-1608.
Councilman Carroll seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: Councilman Tigue
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
12. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
Mr. Rich Munson, 1905 Hall-Johnson Road, advised that he has an attorney and that all
correspondence regarding the condemnation should be addressed to him.
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES,
FEBRUARY 1, 2000
Ms. Linda Baker, 404 W. McDonwell School Road, advised that the church being built on
Precinct line Road is almost complete and that the commercial property along Precinct
line Road is almost gone.
ACTION/RESOLUTION:
13. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING COUNCIL
AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 01, 2000 - Reading and
Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1604
This Resolution was not needed.
ADJOURNMENT:
14. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Councilman Carroll moved to
adjourn.
Mayor Pro Tam Thibodeaux seconded the motion.
Ayes: Council persons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the meetfng adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
AYES, NAYS, AND ABSTENTIONS.
, 2000, BY A VOTE OF
Minutes taken and prepared by:
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
8
ccecs
CITY COUNCIL Tw. AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
3B
Resolution # :
R-OO-1609
Previous Action: none
DEPT. :
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Approval of the recommendation of the Sign
Board of Appeals to grant a variance to the side
yard setback requirement of Section G (2)(c)(4) of
the Colleyville Sign Code, for a free standing
"General Business" sign to be located 1901
Industrial Boulevard - by Consent
Reading and Public Hearing
The Kingdom Harvest Church wishes to vary the side yard setback requirement for a
proposed freestanding "General Business Sign" at the Church at 1901 Industrial Blvd.
Signs of this type are required to be setback 30 feet from the side yard to prevent the
potential for blocking the view of a sign on a neighbor's property. Due to the existing
parking lot of the building built in 1983, there is no space to place a freestanding sign.
Therefore they wish to build the sign within five feet (5') of the lot side yard. The
applicant contends:
1) that the required 30 foot side yard setbacks would place the sign in the
paved parking lot, and,
2) the sign would be placed at the same spot as a freestanding sign of the
church that preceded theirs.
(continued)
'iJ~ '177uJ~ t2~
CITY MANAGER
~ 1. T3~
DEPA TMENT HEAD
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-OO-1609
Page 2
The following staff photos show the approximate location of the sign and the following
illustrations submitted by the applicant show the design and the relative position of the
sign to be erected. The applicant intends to anchor the sign in a way that it can be
removed when the church moves to a permanent location, however this would not be a
"portable sign" as they are commonly known. Since this building was built in 1983, prior
to the adoption of the Sign Ordinance in 1991, provisions were not made for a
freestanding sign in the front parking lot. This property is at the end of a dead end
street, and the proposed sign would be placed at the west side yard. Since any
potential traffic would be coming from the west to the east, the sign could not possibly
block a sign on the adjacent property. All other requirements of the Sign Code have
been met by this application.
Summary and Conclusion
The Sign Board of Appeals considered this variance request at it's February ih meeting
and recommended approval by a vote of 4 - O. Attached (under Item 12 of this agenda)
are the draft minutes of the Sign Board of Appeals which describes their discussion.
The Board granted a side yard variance of 25 feet.
Recommendation
Approval of variance request, by approval of Resolution R-OO-1609
(view looking west towards Colleyville Blvd.)
Freestanding Sign Variance Request
Kingdom Harvest Church - 1901 Industrial Blvd.
:":~~opqsi6~GiltbC,n(j~':~'C~;i:}i'{,;'
(view looking west towards Colleyville Blvd.)
Freestanding Sign Variance Request
Kingdom Harvest Church -1901 Industrial Blvd.
60' RO.W.
4r 'CONe, PAVING
INDUSTRIAL
U' '~_~~'::~~':';'.:.'
Pltofo5n>
S ICttJ
f~
~ c.r~
~~ fir. W
d ~I (TO
'\~Dr.f""
C)
il
=
) I
<D
<:>
d
<D
l\J
:>
<:,
<:> Ii(
<:.
...
....
CI
z
LOT
11 'Y
,,., vr
1l0le ....
BLVD.
"0 ... ,h
.; .
CCltC. C &.a,~.,
N 99'20'00'[ 150.00
f'NOvr
11011 ,.IN
:
. '.
'.
, . .
.,
-' '/ . .
.' '. ..... '0' " . , \ .
.' ...: ' , : . . ..:' :'.. . .: .:.::.:, : -: .: : - '.
./, . .. 30': BUILDI 'G:-' \IN~" ,::,: . -.-:.' '
'. ~ -- ....
--~ .... '.
'1
1
}
. ..
. "'. .. " '.
, CONt . ..., :
PARKING' (
~. ..
-'>. ',' .... . ",
: :,,:: ';' .. CONt. ':.' .
u: _' PARKING . .. ~ ' " .'. ~
a' ", '.
u. : ,", ,... "
'f
:
l'
r . . .
. I
, "
J . ..
. '0' . ..' . ,
~ . ~ .' ,0'.. .0.. '(
CONCRETE PARKING ~ . ,. o. . .. . ~ t.' ,.,
'. (Back area new. 1995) _':' ,. ~..... .'. . .. .
:. -.' ". " "..,:/~~/s~,uy~./~
. ... , / / .
. - . ..,. , . ,/'" ,; ,'",.. /
'. ,-,: hWBMSTOWER/
0/ SITE. ,; 0
v Y \)1 ): ~ "NOT INCLUDED ~
1 ~;c~' /~ ~(n
'1 .. - - - - - - -~ - - - - - ~ - 57;
.,.- - ;s~ ~~l~~TY &. DRAINAG~ ESM'T~ ~ 50.00
'r
, ~
I
'0.' ,': .
....
. .
. '.
. '.
'. . .
,,: 0" ," ":.,
,,:., .
00 " .-
o .' ..' .
. .
......
. ..
. .' .
'. .'
.'
. " , '.
" /'"
':' , .,
.
~ . . ..
'. . ,
. . --r
,
: , .
)~
.' .
'tt ~
, .
! ,
")t'
. .
.
.:
T ,.
)- I
. .
:
"i
...
Pff'
......
'. .
., . .0
",. .
,
" .
. .., j ';1
...... ",'
: ..
..
INDUSTRJAL BLVD, . ' .. f!
1901 CI
2 STORY CONC. BLDG. ~ . '.
" . '. " . -(
CONSTRUCTED IN 1983. NEW ROOF. 1994
,. . .:.'
..
\D
o
d
\D
N
~
o
.0
c.
::
o
'"
.: : ,
'f
"r
y
y
~l
'. "
.'Y
;(
"/'" ..
GRASS LAWN
SWBMS TOWER
INGRESSlEGRESS
IN COMMON WITH .
OWNER OF LOT 10,
BLK 1, C'VILLE IN.
DUSTRIAL PARK
'f
LOT 10 1(
BLOCK. 1. ;:
.. ' - . . '
"f
UP
S 99'20'00'\1 150.00
FND I/r
IRON Pili
I P BUILDING PROX 5OOll' PER FLOOR. LOWER FLOOR
'.. .GUBED OFFICES ANO AUDITORIUM. TOP FLOOR ALL
'10 'TCHEN ANO RESTROOM FACILITIES EACH FLOOR,
on ~CUTIVE BATH ON TOP FLOOR.
\ . ELI;.. ,.; POWER. SIX ROOF MOUNTED HEAT PUMPS SIT E
NOIVIOUAL THERMOSTATS FOR SPECIFIC AREAAlC AND
IT ZONING, CliY WATER AND SEWERS. TU ELECTRIC. GTE
EPHONE SERVICE. TlElCOMM TC-22 PHONE SYSTEM INCLUDED,
iPRINKlER SYSTEM THROUGHOUT BUILDING. ,\urOIMTIC
.T/ON SPRINKLERS IN YARD.
BUILDING AND FACILITIES IN TOP CONDITION.
MAP
BEARrNGS OF SrTr MAP RASFn nN PI AT nF rnl I ",VVTr I "' TNnllUP1AI PIPI<'
~
~
I
~
~
~
,
~
~
~
~
,
-
CJ
,
Ci)
"\
.
~
v
~
~
lr)
~ ~ ~ U)
G G G ~
-<(
~ ~ '-.)
~ ~
t<)
,
, l() I
l() 't I
't
~ ~
~ c~
0000 ~~
oo~ ~~
9~ ~~
~~ ~~
u 00 ~~
Z 1--1 ~ Q;j
~Z ~ Q
~~~s;.
~~ ~~
O. rIj
~ ~
~
tJ
't
~
'-Ji
~1 ~
i:.: 1~!
:i!: I ~CIl
t m<<
~ '~~.~
~ Oa
..... ~~~
...... It)-
,... -
ClJ
C\l cr; "
en ffi
w ~ I
~ ~ ~ I
~ @ ~ ~
C!I ..
Z c/.
cn~~:zl
en-::lO
~ 0 ~ <ZI
e5U:sil
~ ~
5 ~
-, ()
t ~
w ....
.., z
o 0
a: -
C1. (f)
-r-
1-
From: L.. ...d Oonn. V."t Fax: +1(817)488-5~
To: SteY. Par.
Fa: 577-7562
PIIglt 1 of 1 Tuesday, January 25,' 2000 9:14 PM
Variance Review Board
City of Colleyville
520 I Bransford Road
Colleyville, Texas 76034
January 25, 2000
To Whom it may Concern,
In addition to the original letter requesting a variance for our church sign, this letter will give
further and updated information.
I. The distances on the site plan were estimates and were hand written onto the plan. The
actual distances are as follows: the distance from the curb of Industrial Boulevard (the
northern boundary line) will be 20 feet. The distance from the side lot line (the west
boundary line) will be five feet. Therefore, the actually variance requested will be 25 feet
from the west boundary line of the lot.
2. The sign will be portable and will be removed and transported to a new location once we
move to a permanent facility. It will not be a permanent structure.
3. The sign will be unlighted.
On behalf of Kingdom Harvest Church, thank you for your consideration. If you need any
more information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
(Signed)
Les Yates
Church Administrator
City of Colleyville
Colleyville, Texas 76034
To Whom it may concern,
January 25, 2000
This letter is to introduce you to Kingdom Harvest Church and to ask for a variance of 20
feet for the purpose of putting up a sign for our church. Our address is 1901 Industrial
Boulevard, The location for the sign is the same place that the previous church had theirs,
Enclosed you will find a site plan with the proposed location, a picture of the proposed
sign, your application form and a check for $125,00,
Please feel free to contact me for any further assistance,
Les Yates
1953 N, Port Ct.
Grapevine, TX 76051
817-488-2095
FAX 817-416-7916
Sincerely,
~~-
Church Administrator
(Q~(5
CITY COUNCIL Two AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg, : 2/15/2000 CMOApproval:
Item#:
3C
Resolution #:
R-OO-1609
Previous Action: none
DEPT. :
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Approval of the recommendation of the Sign
Board of Appeals to grant a variance to the front
yard setback requirement of Section G (2)(c)(3) of
the Colleyville Sign Code, for a free standing sign
to be located at Healthy Approach, 5100 State
Highway 121 - by Consent
Reading and Public Hearing
The owner requests a variance from the front setback of their proposed freestanding
"Freeway Sign" at the Healthy Approach Market, now under construction on SH 121.
This would allow the sign to be placed at 14 feet instead of the required 3D-foot setback
from the front property line (Section G(2)(c)(3) of the Sign Ordinance). The applicant
contends that at the required 30 foot setback:
(1) the sign would be hidden by trees on the adjacent Mac's Bar and Grille
tract, making it difficult to see from the freeway (SH 121), and
(2) the sign would be unfairly situated about 16 feet behind the La Hacienda
Ranch Restaurant, and the Railhead signs, both of which are located
north of the subject property.
( continued)
j(J~ ~~
CITY MANAGER
'- ,) L b
~"nA~.' /~~
D~ARTME~T HEAD
t?ch'
"'Y
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-OO-1609
Page 2
The illustrations submitted by the applicant on the following pages show the design of
the sign and the relative position of the proposed sign on the site. The photo
illustrations show how the sign would appear from the frontage road.
The Sign Board of Appeals previously granted a setback of 14 feet for the La Hacienda
Ranch restaurant sign, to preserve the large trees on the north side of the tract that
would block the sign if the variance was not granted. In September, 1999 the Board
also recommended the same setback for the adjacent Railhead Restaurant sign, since it
would be blocked by the La Hacienda sign which is immediately north.
Summary and Conclusion
The Sign Board of Appeals considered this variance request at it's February ih meeting
and recommended approval by a vote of 3 - 1. Attached (under Item 12 of this agenda)
are the draft minutes of the Sign Board of Appeals which describes their discussion.
The Board granted a variance of 14 feet to be in line with the other two signs along this
frontage road.
However, Section F. (3) of the Colleyville Sign Code states: "The concurring vote or four
members of the Board shall be necessary to render a decision on any matter before the
Board." The applicant felt that he was in a disadvantage position at the meeting
because the Sign Board is currently lacking three members instead of the normal
complement of seven. There are three vacancies on the Sign Board leaving only four
members remaining in the City to vote on any issue. The applicant has submitted an
appeal letter to the City Council for consideration of the front yard set-back request. All
other requirements of the Sign Code have been met by this application.
Recommendation
Approval of variance request, by approval of Resolution R-OO-1609.
(view looking south towards Blockbuster, Glade Road, etc.)
Freestanding Sign Variance Request
Healthy Approach Store - 5100 SH 121
\J I
J Z
0
UJ 0
CD :J
I
~ mllD
o -
.., :3
.., -
~. c.n
IX)
>-
O.
0-
.CD Co\) Or-
en
~~~
.., .::.,
o ~::~\~
< :r ~:\\~
? . ~\~~~
P:t ~:'.~~
CD ".:~\~
- C ..::,:~
CO ,... ::.~~~
~ =: ':~':':\
- ~ '
:J ,." }~
. to ~x
~ 3 ~~
CD at" ~!1i
co · !
U'I~
Q
0....
3 ~
CDr-
~5"
Q.CI
CD
~
Ro:lll
,.,
::l~
~~
Z
...
z><
;~
.,~ U)
::tiP! :-t
o=l
:-0 ...
z N
0 ..
.
?J
P
:u
v'
01
10
o
;;0
~
CD
r
o
C)
-0
o
lO
CD
Z
011
cq
(II
CI!
....
.....
.
fT1
..-\
o
co
- ....
N
<0
)>z
(")fT1
)>0
z(")
-io
I'.)
.....
....
.
....
CD'
o
~I
N
CoI
I
II SPACES
S" U"B'" E c:. T
S,c,,J
II SPACES
...
:&
...
..
ji.
i
II SPACES
o
~HHtX;illil::~
~~~~z~~~~;=
O"lDOl!l":-:,ZZ~
'tJ:'5~~ ClClCl
~iQ'V'1I ~illll!
I/lClZ:.:. OO~
'VOCl:ll::O s;S
.oo~~ O:lO
j;l < 0 Z Z ,., ,.,
9~ClCl l:?l:?
:lll'1l::O
::0'"
~~
g~
l:?l:?
~5se"~N
E~::llli(")~
S! :. ~ I./) >-Z
~ ill ... il 1 ~
.,...c:.
~ .. ill g ~
~ l:? ~ ..
:-;I -4
~ -
~
.
..
P ""'Of\)UlIVl1.CD--NNN;::i~\.:'".:
~~~ l.o....~~C~21./)~~;
8 Ch, \-' ,., ...:
VI '::i ~
o 0 :a
- ,~,.,-
,.. ::0 I ::I)
l.o
ID CID
,. ~
- ....
o '"
. 0
'"'0 Edge
~ ~8 /
'2(l :-0 ~ ~
n. , :I
o ~"'!oJ
~zE ·
Q ~~
3" ~a
"0
0'1
~z
z_
_Z
~o
P!
~N
.
... .
.-
....
I/l
o
...
~
..,
.,
~
."
~o
~State Hiahway 1 21
(Southbound ~ervice Road)
Feb-09-00 06:59A I 0 I 335 5302
P.Ol
I
EVl!III@TT". RCeeRTS. P,E.. _81OENT
GLEN W. w.o......., PIE.. ~XEC v, PRES,
I
INNOVATIVE DEVELOPERS, INC.
February 8, 2000
VIA MAIL & FAX 577.7564
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
P. O. Box 185
Colleyville. Texas 76034
Attention:
Mr_ Barry LeBaron
Community Development Manager
Subject:
Sign Variance for Healthy Approach
5100 State Hwy. 121, Colleyville. Texas
Gentlemen:
This letter is our request to appeal to the City Council of the City of Colleyville, Texas
for an approval of the majority vote rendered by the Sign Board of Appeals held on February
7,2000 at 7:00 P.M. regarding the requested front yard setback variance.
The Sign Board of Appeals met to consider our request for a variance of the 30 foot set
back to allow a set back of 13 1/2 feet. The CIty staff recommended our request suggesting
that they were in the process of reviewing the present ordinance and were going to recommend
a 14 foot setback as part of the new ordinance, The Sign Board of Appeals has previously
granted both the LaHacienda and the Railhead restaurants similar sign variances. These
properties are a short distance to the north of the Healthy Approach property.
The Sign Board of Appeals voted 3 to 1 in favor of our request. Only four members are
on this board and the way the present ordinance is written a win by a majority vote may not be
a win, This appears to strip the applicant of the normal democratic process where the action
of a majority will carry the vote. In this case the ordinance unduly burdens the applicant by
requiring an apparent unanimous vote for t board's decision.
The owners of the Healthy Appr
to create a new store in this community.
requested variance.
cc: Mr. Rick Bradford
GWH:cmp
p \SHERRY\GLENttf.AL TH'l"\ClTroCOL_~
BuiLDING DESIGN AND CO:\JSTRUCTIClN
777 Ma,n Street Swte G-200 · Fort Worth. TexBs 76102.817/335-4500. Fa. 817/335 5Jn?
I
EVERETT A, ROBeRTS. FI,E, , FlRESIOENT
GLEN W. HAHN, FI,E.. EXEC. V, FIRES,
I
INNOVATIVE DEVELOPERS, INC,
r",
..<7 ,-S-
;'_-""'"-..:...c
January 27, 2000
l'
-L
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
P. O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Subject:
Healthy Approach
5100 State Hwy. 121, Colleyville, Texas
Gentlemen:
By this letter we are requesting a variance to the City of Colleyville sign ordinance,
Caption G, "Limitations on permanent on-premises free standing signs", Section (3)
Freeway Signs, page 20.
Because of the site location on the west side of 121 and the number of large trees
in the right of way and within 30 feet of the property line north of the subject site, the
Healthy Approach sign will not be visible to southbound traffic on Highway 121 or the
southbound frontage road.
By allowing this sign to be placed as shown on the accompanying drawings, the sign
can be seen and will meet the needs of owner of this property. Please note the enclosed
pictures of the Railhead Bar B Q and La Hacienda Ranch signs, which are in the same
location behind the property line as per our request.
Again, because of the trees al
ordinance and still have a visible sign.
be located as per the attached drawi
GWH:sbh
Enclosures: Scaled Site Plan
Detail Plan of Actual Sign
Sign Variance Application
Check #80 for $125.00
P.\SHERRYlGLENlHEAl THY\CITY -COL2
gL:~_=--"'~~G ;:'E::S,="" :.~ _,Q =r_~~,:s:q!-,C ~ '::'~
~~, ~^d'" Slc"p' '~lIlt" C; 20". FCi't WOI-tll T(~Xi1S -:611:12. Rl71JJ5 .1500. F". 817'1'3:- rJ,ln~:
~, "'L
1 E
8
.=.
W III !!l
a. <:
a:: ,go
'"
..J 0
W l!!
W a;
III ..... 0 @
~ (/)CJ)w i!
NtJj::i :;.:
...
E
....Zo. IoU
z-o.
zwlXl< cij
C)w<:t: !Z U
_~U..... ~
en o- w b
z UJ3: ::E 0 I
1M OCD:t:CJ) .... -
u W z.... ....
~ ..JoCJ)w a:
>-wzU C)' II
.. 0......_< 5 -..... .
III (/)5
u en ozLtU:CI) 0 <0
II z UJ:;:)UJUU UJ !Z~ ?"'"
a: t(0a:::i:i: a: M
.. 0 UJ-
~ ~ z~a.iI:a. ..J ~o
~ < W
fa ~E~~~ 0 :;:)a. ..J
:> 0
u a: z~ 4(
u:: :;:) z C) 0< ()
<:5 -!z-w-! ..... ::Eo Z en
::!iXi::E!::>- 0
UJ !:!:<3:t:~ ~ LLC\I 0 0
a. ~g en z
CJ) 00<3:> w ;:
:>
w ~
... a: 0
VI~
-0
~~ w
~! 0
c:- ex:
'il a: ....w
(!!1lI C\I..J
'a~ CJ Z ......J
.!!!'tl~ ~-
0 ~s:
Sc:t; ~
....::J1lI J:W
00)( () 8::1
l!I~ 14 0
..J
W ....0
II. I- 100
1lI._ qj iii
::::! II)
llIQl~
Qloe J:
.Ellie 0
_C:::J >
i~t; a:
~!~ :I: 0
11IC:c: u..
E::lII 0
I1I~E .... 0 w <(
-i.c:: a:
Ti~~ ..J ~ !II
oe...lII a: 4(
-Q)E (:) <C z ~
lS... I- 0
11100 f D.. z ii:
- :0.,1:: in W w
~c:::o., ?"'" D. ::;
CIlI1lI1l :I: ()
'tI'bE
C::I::'b <C
..: III c: ....
_' ~ II . 0
c:c:Q) 0
't:::z:1ii I
Q. 'ii E J: Ol
ell Q.'- ~ Ol
.- VI )( ......
'Suje 10
<( ....
C:C:CL W C\l
0.2 i
'bVlGl J: ....
'ii s:: "- ,.;
;;::G)ra:
Q)E- 14 .1 0
u=t;.E ~ z
c:: - a. I ~ W
~~VI Co
CLo'- \4 ?"'" a: ~
Gl._ .c:: ~ 0 0
u"'-
ulllc:: Co
l'lI~O
eli-OIl f ~~~ CD
oe u c:: m
-.Q)o C\I =~~~
Q.~
.'"
0: ,~~
'. oJ U "'~
VIs'"
)0, l: i !t~~~
Cl:ll'll'"
;s--
Q~l;t;;
= :I -' '?
~CIj~i
~ ~-
w'"
E~
DEC-12-~~ SUN 13:~~ JADEE Jo. Davi5
-
In Ll.
m U) CO
.. 0.. Z
X V (;) ~
N (9) :i
.. ~ . C)
N ..j 0 ~ en
II ~ Q.
+ cJ. 0
.... ::we ..J It) 8
,... 0 a
CD 0 < CO)
Zl 0 Cf) . z ~ W
0) ~ ~
CO) x ~ ~
x 0 in Z U) W
CD v ~ 0( a::
v N ~I N ~ ~ w 0
~ .- II) ~
N CD W Q.
II U " 0 a: u
IL ~ 0 0 ~ N ~
~
--- -
- -.--
~
~
I
.~
~
L
.f~
...
~
-'
IT
~
~72 2~8 e3~3
p.e2
e,j )( ... I
z ~ UJ ...
~ w u.. W
U) ~ r 0 2 .2
J:x z CI) ....
C) ~ 5 "..
~~ a; .;i
o. ~ U) Go...
ex: UJ . O"~"
Ilco w 0 z" -
0 ll. .' a: w . ~~ .~
U. ll.CD 0 ...I ~
(N < " ...)(~.
~ .
z 0 co ~o ':':'
0 ~ CI) ....
>w 0 rJ 8~~i
J:~ .J >-
CI) ...J 0
~a: ~ 0::
~( w wA;U~
a: ..J w Z
I~ 0 CD Q ~%
0 ::! ~ 4( OA.
~
tJ ~ w ..,
...
w ~ ~ ~
n:: ....
UJ r 0
--'~''''.'\\,
-.... .." : : b)~
.: .... : : ....~.)1 '.
~ ~~/ ~cn ~ C;"~'~'
:~: :5: <&:l ~:,~:' t'
,... : ~\.f :~ : Q) \II' . Q'"
~o: ~ :'~;~ ~:;' I
,.~. '-"C\j ~'~ 0,,)
",.~..... ~..J ~ i~~ l'
',01' ..,..: : ..-'~.Tb IV
'It,'*;: : ,'~~O__ ....
\\"....;.............
T
Iu
, Q..
oc"i:
......
M <)
Q fin
.~ '3.
f'lV
_ V\
~
~
j
'CO
~
~ /
.
~
~,
......
-
~(UJ~~
o
~(Q)[M~~[E1~ ~~~[M[))
o
~~@[M ~ffi\~~[M[E1
15 ft
PROPOSED SITE
HEALTHY APPROACH
5100 HWY 121, COLLEYVILLE
Cil}" f)f
cce~
CITY COUNCIL \J Tm< AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 2/15/00 CMO Approval:
Item # :
3D
Resolution # :
R-OD-1609
Previous Action: none
DEPT. :
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Resolution R-00-1609 - Approval of setting a date
for a Public Hearing to discuss and adopt the
Roadway Capital Improvements Plan and to adopt
impact fees - by Consent.
Reading and Public Hearing
BackQround
Upon approval of the amendments to the Master Thoroughfare Plan regarding
Thompson Terrace and Glade Road from Village Park to Bluebonnet Road, the
engineering consulting firm of Kimley-Horn has completed the update to the Roadway
Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). Attached (included with this agenda packet) is a draft
copy of the Roadway Capital Improvements Plan. Review of this plan is required every
three years by Chapter 395 of the Local Govemment Code so that the impact fee
charges accurately reflect the estimated costs of making capital improvements outlined
in the CIP.
The attached Resolution R-OO-1609 sets March 21,2000 as the first public hearing date
where citizen input will be accepted regarding the Roadway Capital Improvements Plan
and the proposed impact fee.
( continued)
~~d~
CITY MANAGER ./
6~ ~~~
DEPARTMENT HEAD
tfl7
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-00-1609
Page 2
The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee is schedl,lIed to meet on February 28,
2000 to review the CIP and will forward written comments to the City Council prior to the
March 21 st public hearing.
This resolution adopts a schedule of events associated with the adoption of the Capital
Improvements Plan and Roadway Impact Fee:
Roadway Impact Fee Event Schedule
City of Colleyville
(Final)
Step Event Timina Description of Event Event Date
Number
1 City Council Council initiates update of 26-0ct-99
Workshop Master Thoroughfare Plan.
2 T en days prior to Publish newspaper 19-Nov-99
P&Z meeting advertisement for P & Z
and City Council public
hearing on revised Master
Thoroughfare Plan.
3 At a regular P & Z holds public hearing 29-Nov-99
meeting of the of revised Master
Planning and Thoroughfare Plan and
Zoning Commission makes recommendation to
Council.
4 At a regular City Council holds first 07 -Dec-99
meeting of the City public hearing on revised
Council Master Thoroughfare Plan.
5 At a regular City Council holds second 21-Dec-99
meeting of the City public hearing and adopts
Council revised Master
Thoroughfare Plan.
( continued)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-00-1609
Page 3
6 After City Council Consultant authorized to 22-Dec-99
adopts revised begin revisions to
Master Roadway Capital
Thoroughfare Plan Improvements Plan. (The
process will require
approximately four weeks
to complete)
7 Upon completion of Draft Roadway CIP 24-Jan-OO
the draft Roadway presented to Capital
CIP Improvements Advisory
Committee (CIAC) and
makes recommendation to
City Council.
8 After CIAC reviews Draft Roadway CIP 15-Feb-00
draft Roadway CIP presented to City Council
& CC adopts a resolution
setting a public hearing
date to consider approval
of the CIP and Impact Fee.
9 On or before the Roadway CIP made 15-Feb-OO
first notice of public available to the public.
hearing on the
Roadway CIP and
Impact Fee
10 Not more than 60 Publish first notice of City 17 -Feb-OO
days prior to the Council public hearing on
City Council public Roadway CIP and Impact
hearing. Fee,
11 Before the 30th day Send notice of City 17 -Feb-OO
before the public Council public hearing at
hearing on the CIP least 31 days prior to the
and Impact Fee hearing to any person who
has requested notice in
writing within last two
years.
( continued)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-00-1609
Page 4
12 One week after the Publish second notice of 24-Feb-00
first notice was City Council public hearing
published. on Roadway CIP and
Impact Fee.
13 One week after the Publish third notice of City 02-Mar-00
second notice was Council public hearing on
published. Roadway CIP and Impact
Fee.
14 At least five Last day for Capital 13-Mar -00
working days Improvements Advisory
before the City Committee (CIAC) to
Council public submit written comments
hearing to City Council before the
date of the public hearing.
15 At a regular City Council holds first 21-Mar-00
meeting of the City public hearing on the
Council and on the Roadway CIP and Impact
advertised date Fee,
16 At a regular City Council holds second 04-Apr -00
meeting of the City public hearing on the
Council Roadway CIP and adopts
Impact Fee.
17 Not more than 30 Last day for City Council to 20-Apr-00
days after the approve the Roadway CIP
public hearing and adopt Impact Fee.
Recommendation
Approval of Resolution R-D0-1609 to set the date for the public hearing on the Roadway
Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee.
CC&<e
CITY COUNCIL Tw< AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
3E
Resolution # :
R-OO-1609
DEPT. :
PUBLIC SERVICES
SUBJECT:
Approving Change Order No.1, in the amount of
$67,452.98, to the 1999/2000 Street Improvement
Program Contract with J.L. Bertram Construction
& Engineering, Inc. - by Consent
Previous Action: N/A
Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
On November 16, 1999, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a
contract with J.L. Bertram Construction and Engineering, Inc. of Arlington, Texas for the
1999/2000 Street Improvement Program for an amount not to exceed $277,643.22.
Since commencing construction, four items have been necessary to schedule for
addition to the contract. These items are as follows:
1, Briarwick Lane in Area 1- Remove & replace 241 L.F. of curb and gutter and one
valley gutter to facilitate street drainage. Total amount of $6,892.60
2, Quail Run in Area I - Replace 600 L.F. of 8-inch and 85 L.F. of 6-inch sanitary
sewer line originally scheduled for a later contract. Total amount of $44,360.
(continued)
:zt~ ;o;cJ~ ~
CITY MANAGER
D~~I/
F; AN AL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-00-1609
Page 2
3. Kingston Road in Area IV - Increase in width and length of road by 1,637 S.Y. of
paving. Total amount of $11 ,000.64.
4. Tinker Road in Area IV - Addition of 700 S.Y. of paving for this project to
alleviate a drainage problem of ponding water. Total amount of $5,199.74._
Total Change Order is in the amount of $67,452.98. Total revised contract is in the
amount of $345,096.20.
Financial Impact
Monies are available in the FY 1999/2000 General Fund account number 001-33-6319,
Street Resurfacing, for change order items 1, 3 and 4 totaling $23,092.98.
Monies are available in the 1994 Water and Sewer Bond Funds for change order item
number two in the amount of $44,360.
Recommendation
Recommend the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign Change Order No.1,
in the amount of $67,452.98, to the 1999/2000 Street Improvement Program Contract
with J.L. Bertram Construction & Engineering, Inc. Total revised contract amount not to
exceed $345,096.20.
CHANGE ORDER
CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE (1) TO THE 1999/2000 STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM CONTRACT WITH J. L. BERTRAM CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING
INC.
Pursuant to the provisions of Bid Specifications, this Change Order, when fully
executed, shall constitute the authority to increase the amount of street improvements
to be made as follows:
NCTCOG
SPEC
ITEM NO.
Item Description
Quantities
AREAl
BRlARWICK LANE
8.2
Remove & Replace Curb & Gutter
241 L.F.
Unit Price
$17.60
5.8
Remove & Replace Concrete Valley
1
BRIARWICK
Unit Price
$2,750.00
T otallncrease
$ 6,892.60
QUAIL RUN (Install Sewer Line)
Unit Price
$29.50
$33.00
$280.00
$360.00
$1,650.00
$610.00
$165.00
$4.00
$11.75
Item
1. 6" PVC SS pipe
2. 8" PVC SS pipe
3. REM C. O.
4. NEW SS C. O.
5. MANHOLE, 0-6'
6. 4" SS Service
7. XTRA Depth MH
8. Trench Safety
9. Ditch Repair (227)
10. Remove & Replace
Valley Gutter
11. Repair Concrete
Driveway
85 LF
600 LF
1 EA
1 EA
2EA
3EA
5 VF
165 LF
610 LF
$2,750.00
$20.00
1 EA
140 LF
$ 44,360.00
J 51,252.60
Quail Run Total Increase
T otallncrease Area I
NCTCOG Item Description Quantities
Spec.
Item No.
AREA IV KINGSTON
4.7 Recycle Existing
Pavements 1,637 S.Y.
Unit Price $3.20
5.7 Hot Mix Asphalt
Type D Surface
2"" Compacted Overlay 1,637 S.Y.
Unit Price $3.52
KINGSTON T otallncrease $ 11,000.64
TINKER ROAD
(at Caldwell Hughes)
Grade For Drainage
700 S.Y.
Unit Price $ 2.11
5,7
Hot Mix Asphalt
Type D Surface
2" Compacted Overlay
700 S.Y.
Unit Price $3.52
TINKER ROAD
T otallncrease
$5,199.74
--.J 16.200.38
TOT AL INCREASE AREA IV
The amount of payment to the Contractor shall be adjusted by the addition of
$67,452.98 for additional work as specified above.
The revised contract amount through CHANGE ORDER NO. (1) IS THREE HUNDRED
FORTY FIVE THOUSAND NINETY SIX DOLLARS AND TWENTY CENTS
($345,096.20).
CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
BY
DATE
Jim G. Humphrey, President
J. L. Bertram Construction & Engineering, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE:
BY
DATE
Robert R. Whitehead, P.E.
Director of Public Services
CITY'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE:
BY
DATE
C. Robert Stripling
City Manager
ATTEST:
BY
DATE
Jean Harris
City Secretary
.~
CITY COUNCIL Tm> AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
3F
Resolution # :
R-00-1609
DEPT. :
PUBLIC SERVICES
SUBJECT:
Approving Change Order No.1, in the amount of
$12,500, to the Repainting and Renovation of
Bransford Rd. 1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank
Contract with Advantage Contract Services, Inc. -
by Consent
Previous Action: N/A
Reading and Public Hearing
BackQround
On November 16, 1999, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a
contrad with Advantage Contrad Services, Inc. of Houston, Texas for the repainting
and renovation of the Bransford Road 1.0 million gallon elevated water storage tank for
an amount not to exceed $319,625.
During the process of renovation, it was determined that the tank's 20-inch butterfly fill
valve was leaking. Due to its depth and size, it would be extremely difficult to replace
this valve.
( continued)
'.l114-.- )Q7uu"~ tM.
CITY MANAGER ' ~
(;ii~M,"<~
o RTMENT HEAD
N AL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-OO-1609
Page 2
With the aid of Deltatek Engineering, consideration was given to relocate the valve to
inside the 24-inch tank riser and therefore utilize a 24-inch butterfly valve. This location
will provide better access to the valve and better flow control.
The modified valve location requires the valve to be installed vertically in the riser and
will therefore require a structural support design.
The tank contractor has been able to continue with his renovation work because of the
utilization of a 12-inch drain valve. This procedure, however, continually wets an area
of Bransford Park, preventing the installation of storm sewer pipe for the extension of
Bransford Road.
Financial Impact
Monies are available in the 1998 Water and Sewer Bond Funds.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign Change
Order No.1, in the amount of $12,500, to the Repainting and Renovation of Bransford
Rd. 1.0 MG Elevated Storage Tank Contract with Advantage Contract Services, Inc. for
the installation of a 24-inch butterfly valve.
CMI
StrucIural
EIecIric8l
EtMronmenI8f
WaierlWatewater Plant
Water Stotage F8dIIties
Conatruc1lon Management
Coating Evaluations
Deltatek Engineering
VIA FACSIMILE
December 22, 1999
Mr. Roy Saldivar
Advantage Contract Services, Inc.
7150 Almeda Genoa Road
Houston, Texas 77075
Reference:
Repainting and Renovation of
Bransford Road 1.0 MG Elevated Tank
City of ColleyvilJe, Texas
Request for Change Order
Project No. 6199-006
Dear Mr. Saldivar:
Following our previous conversation, City of Colleyville requesting additional services for the
referenced storage facility. The additional work is described below:
1. Install 24-inch chain operated manual butterfly valve on the existing 24-inch steel wet
riser as shown on the attached drawings.
2. Install two (2) flanged couplings.
3. Furnish and install two (2) pipe supports as sho\\n on plans. Welding shall be performed
by A WS certified welder.
4. Prepare surface and paint in accordance with the Section 09900. The valve interior shall
receive minimum of 10.0 dry mils ofNSF approved primer as specified for tank interior
coating system. The exterior of valve body, flanged couplings, and structural steel shall
receive minimum of8.0 dry mils ofTNEMEC Series 20 or 66 epoxy. An sharp edges of
steel shall be ground smooth prior to paint application.
The following is list of materials furnished by the City of Colleyville and will be available to
Advantage Contract Services, Inc. delivered to the jobsite approximately at the end of February
2000:
· One (1) chain operated manual butterfly valve.
. Set of nuts. boilS. and washers.
. Two (2) Jl8" thick red rubber gaskeJsfullfaced.
. Two (2) flanged couplings.
The project completion date shall remain May 1, 2000 as stated in Section 01010-2, Item 1.05 of
the Contract Document.
11815 Forest Cenlnll [)rtw, SuIt8 2068, OaIIas, Texas 75243. Phone (214) :M8-2239, FAX (214) 348-2357
emllll: deItat8k08iI1Mll.net
Page 2
Bransford Tank
December 22, 1999
Please submit cost proposal in accordance with the attached sheet SK-5A and the above scope of
work,
Should you have any questions, please call me at 214-232-5040.
Sincerely,
DELTA TEK ENGINEERING
.0f~
Bahram Niknam, P.E.
Attachments:
Drawings sheet SK-SA
Shop drawings for valve and couplings
C: Mr. Randy Brown, P.E.
Public Works Manager
City of C olleyville
~
~
t:
i~
>
fZ ~
,,1m
~,I:lE
:.i~
~
~
~
~
~
Ir:
i-i~:
e ....- .
!I~ I
j'i"
a.1
W
p
I
~s-j(?*
~ ~!:: I
: ~ Ii :;
... "\ ~
I .
'CO ·
i" .
- 'IJ.! I
:> i
."' . ". DELTA 1B( ENGI\EERItO
~ ----
~ u... .... CIDfIIlIIIL..... ... _
.......... .....
~,~ t I '';11
;; Ilf
~JI I ;; LI
1.'1 I I '1':-1
r& I l~&
~i &i
.1 J~
I
I
I
"...../...
I~
~~
I'
II
Ii
t
;;
I
I
PEW ISOLATION VALVE
AN) SlPPOR~ STRUCnH:
BRANsrORD ROAD ELEVATED STORAGE TANK
IMPROVEMENTS
11". -
_..--
-- _..--
_.. ....-..-.u:
-- ,.....
==- .1"-001
::.:: ~
~OID 1lOAD, CI'I'1' Of' COL.I.DV&1.l. TDAI
Advantage Contract Services, Inc.
7150 ALMEDA GENOA ROAD
HOUSTON, TEXAS n075
(713) 991-0747
FAX (713) 991-3939
January 27, 2000
Mr. BahiclT1 Niknan, P.E.
Deltatek Engneering
11615 Forest Central Drive. Slite 206B
Dallas. Texas 75243
Re: Repainting and Renovation ci Bransfon:l Road 1.0 MG Elevated Tank
City ci CoIleyville, Texas; Project No. 6199-006
Dear Mr. Niknam:
The follCMling items are being provided as an extra 'NO/1( item on the referenced project for the
proposed cost:
1) Labor and materials for installation of four (4) each pipe support brackets per drawing
SK-5A.
2) Labor for installation of one (1) 24" butterfly vave.
3) Labor for installation ci t'NO (2) flanged couplings.
Our total cost for these items is twelve thousand five hundred dollars ($12,500.00).
Should you have any questions or need further infOl1T1ation please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Sincerely,
Director of Compliance
MF/S\'V
Civil
Structural
Electrical
Environmental
WaterMlastewater Plant
Water Storage Facilities
Construction Management
Coaling Evaluations
Deltatek Engineering
January 28, 2000
Mr. Randy Brown, P.E.
Public Works Manager
City of Colleyville
1601 Hall Johnson Road
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Reference:
Repainting and Renovation of
Bransford Road 1.0 MG Elevated Tank
Installation of New Butterfly Valve
Change Order No. 1
City of Colleyville Project No. 6199-006
Dear Randy:
Deltatek Engineering has reviewed the proposal submitted by Advantage Contract
Services, Inc. for the installation of new butterfly valve. Based on the review of this
proposal, it is my opinion that proposed cost of $12,500.00 is sufficient and justified to
perform this change order. Therefore, it is my recommendation to authorize the
Contractor to proceed with this task.
Cost Analysis
Total contract authorized
Change order for valve installation
Total authorized with change order
T ,pss previom; fI;:IymeT1~
Balance remainine:
$319,625.00
$12,500.00
$332,125.00
$'iR 'ion 00
$273.625.00
Should you have any questions, please call me at 214-232-5040.
Sincerely,
DEL T A TEK ENGINEERING
r{},a1Ml
Bahram Niknam, P.E.
11615 Forest Central Drive, Suite 206B, Dallas. Texas 75243, Phone (214) 348-2239, FAX (214) 348-2357
email: deltatekOairmail.net
CHANGE ORDER No.1
CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE (1) TO THE REPAINTING AND RENOVATION OF
BRANSFORD ROAD 1.0 MG ELEVATED STORAGE TANK CONTRACT WITH
ADVANTAGE CONTRACT SERVICES, INC.
This Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to add the
instillation of a 24-inch Butterfly Valve in the 24-inch Tank Riser of the Bransford Road
Elevated Tank. Valve installation to be complete with all structural modification
necessary to install the valve as per Deltatek Engineering specifications.
Total Contract Authorized on 11/16/99
Change Order No.1
Total Authorized Contract with Change Order
$319,625.00
$ 12,500.00
$332,125.00
CONTRACTOR'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
BY
DATE
Travis R. McKenzie, President
Advantage Contract Services, Inc.
RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE:
BY
DATE
Robert R. Whitehead, P.E.
Director of Public Services
CITY'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE:
BY
DATE
C. Robert Stripling
City Manager
ATTEST:
BY
DATE
Jean Harris
City Secretary
.~
CITY COUNCIL 1m_ AGENDA BRIEFING
For mta. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
3G
Resolution # :
R-Oo-1609
Previous Action: N/A
DEPT. :
PUBLIC SERVICES
SUBJECT:
Approving Change Order No.1, in the amount of
$4,850, to the Professional Services Contract
with Deltatek Engineering for Quality Control
Services for the Renovation of Bransford Rd. 1.0
MG Elevated Tank - by Consent
Reading and Public Hearing
Backaround
On November 16, 1999, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a
professional services contract with Deltatek Engineering in an amount not to exceed
$25,000 for quality control observation and contract administration services for the
repainting and renovation of the Bransford Road 1.0 million gallon elevated storage
tank.
( continued)
'AJ~ YJluv'~ tZ/J.
CITY MANAGER 1 ~
N IAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-QO-1609
Page 2
During the process of renovation, it was determined that the tank's 20-inch butterfly fill
valve was leaking. Deltatek was requested to provide a proposal for the structural
design and quality control inspection for the replacement of the 20-inch underground
valve with a more accessible valve in the tank riser pipe.
Deltatek proposes to provide this scope of services for a total fee of $4,850. The
proposed change order, in the amount of $4,850, will increase the total contract amount
to $29,850.
Financial Impact
Monies are available in the 1998 Water and Sewer Bond Funds.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign Change
Order No.1, in the amount of $4,850, to the Professional Services Contract with
Deltatek Engineering to provide quality control services for the structural design and
installation of a 24-inch butterfly valve for the Bransford Road 1.0 MG Elevated Tank.
...
..;ivil
ructural
.ectrical
Environmental
WaterlWastewater Plant
Water Storage Facilities
Construction Management
Coating Evaluations
Deltatek Engineering
January 19,2000
Mr. Randy Brown, P .E.
Public Works Manager
City of Colleyville
1601 HallJohns':~ ?rI~,d
Colleyville, Texas 76043
Reference:
Bransford Road 1.0 MG Elevated Tank
Repainting and Renovation
Additional Design Services for I\."ew Valve
Project No. 6199-006
INVOICE
Pay Request No. 2D
Period Ending: January 10, 2000
Description
Engineering:
Field measurements and data collection
6 hrs @ $85.00 per hr
Structural design 15 hrs @ $120 per hr
Drafting:
CAD drafting 8 hr @ $50 per hr
Administration:
Purchase administration 4 hrs @ 535 per hr
Onsite inspection on welding and structural steel
Total due this invoice
Amount
$510.00
$1,800.00
$400.00
$140.00
52,000.00
$4.850,00
Please make payment to:
Deltatek Engineering
6424 Lone Grove Court
Frisco. Texas 75034
:2 - /7<1 r
CHANGE ORDER No.1
CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE (1) TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
WITH DELTA TEK ENGINEERING FOR QUALITY CONTROL SERVICES FOR THE
REPAINTING AND RENOVATION OF BRANSFORD ROAD 1.0 MG ELEVATED
STORAGE TANK
This Change Order, when fully executed, shall constitute the authority to add the design
and quality control inspection ~f the instillation of a 24-inch Butterfly Valve in the 24-inch
Tank Riser of the Bransford Road Elevated Tank.
Total Contract Authorized on 11/16/1999
Change Order No. 1
Total Authorized Contract with Change Order
$ 25,000.00
$ 4,850.00
$ 29,850.00
CONSULTANT'S OFFER OF PROPOSED CHANGE:
BY
DATE
Bahram Niknam, P.E.
Deltatek Engineering
RECOMMENDATION OF ACCEPTANCE:
BY
DATE
Robert R. Whitehead I P. E.
Director of Public Services
CITY'S ACCEPTANCE OF CHANGE:
BY
DATE
C. Robert Stripling
City Manager
ATTEST:
BY
DATE
Jean Harris
City Secretary
Roadway
Capital Improvements Plan
And Impact Fee Update
for the
City of Colleyville, Texas
city Of
Texas
DRAFT
February, 2000
KHA No. 061063001
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06 1 0630Ilimpc'fee/docrroc.doc
Table of Contents
Page No.
I. Introduction
1-1
II. Land Use Assumptions
II-I
III. Capital Improvements Plan
111-1
IV. Methodology for Determination of
Roadway Impact Fees
· Service Areas
· Equivalent Service Units
· Cost Per Service Unit
Cost of the CIP
Trips
· Impact Fee Collected Per Service Unit
· Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development
IV-l
V. Conclusions
V-I
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
0610630 l/impct fee/docrrOC.ooc
List of Tables
Page No.
Table 111-1 Capital Improvements Plan Projects ill-2
Included in Impact Fee Calculations
Table 111-2 Upgrade Plan Projects to Serve 111-4
Existing Development
Table IV-l Trip General Rates for Selected Land Uses IV-2
Table IV-2 Current and Projected Land Uses for IV-3
the City of Colleyville
Table IV-3 2000 Equivalent Service Unit Calculations IV-4
Table IV-4 2010 Equivalent Service Unit Calculations IV-4
Table IV-5 Ultimate Service Unit Calculations IV-4
Table IV-6 Projected Growth in Daily Trips per IV-5
Service Area
Table IV-7 Level of Use Table IV-5
Table IV-8 Roadway Typical Section Cost Summary IV-8
Table IV-9 Capital Improvements Plan Projects IV-9
Included in Impact Fee Calculations
Table IV-I0 Maximum Calculated Impact Fee per IV-ll
Service Unit (Trip)
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway ClP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301/impclfee/docrroc.doc
List of Figures
Page No.
Figure 111-1
Capital Improvements Plan Map
ill-3
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301 ""1JCtfeeldoclldoc
I. Introduction
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Gov't Code provides cities with a mechanism for
collecting funds to finance or recoup the costs of certain capital improvements,
including roadway facilities. In August of 1995, the City of Colleyville enacted
Ordinance 0-95-1004, which amended section 11 of the City's Subdivision
Ordinance. The Ordinance deleted section 11 of the existing Subdivision Ordinance
and added a new Section 11 regulating water, wastewater and roadway impact fees.
Section 1.19 of the Colleyville Water, Wastewater and Roadway Impact Fee
Ordinance calls for the City to update the land use assumptions, Capital Improvement
Plan, and impact fee every three years if revisions are determined to be needed. On
December 16, 1997 the City of Colleyville initiated a review of land use assumptions,
capital improvement plan, and impact fees. The purpose of this report is to
recommend revisions to the process by which impact fees are computed, based on
refinements to land use categories and service unit calculations. The report also
updates the calculation methodology based on the adopted revisions to the Land Use
Assumptions and the Capital Improvements Plan.
The report introduces and references two of the basic inputs to the Roadway Impact
Fee: the Land Use Assumptions and the Capital Improvements Plan. Information
from these two documents is used extensively in the remainder of the report. This
consists of a detailed discussion of the methodology for the computation of impact
fees. This discussion-Methodology for Detennination of Roadway Impact Fees
discusses each of the components of the computation and any modifications needed
for the 2000 update. These components include:
· Service Areas
· Service Units
· Cost per Service Unit
· Impact Fee Collected Per Service Unit
· Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development
The final section of the report is Conclusions which presents the findings of the
update analysis and the highlights of the changes between the 1995 and 2000
Transportation Impact Fee Reports.
I-I
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301 "rT'l'Crteeldoclll.doc
II. Land Use Assumptions
The land use assumptions were developed by the City with assistance from Kimley-
Horn and Associates, Inc., and approved by Colleyville City Council on September 1,
1998 as part of Resolution R-98-1408. These assumptions were used in calculating
the number of trips in each service area for use in calculating maximum impact fees.
II-I
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301/impctleeMocllll.doc
III. Capital Improvements Plan
To finance roadway improvements, the city must identify the transportation projects
needed to accommodate projected growth for a ten-year period. The Capital
Improvements Plan (CIP) is a list of the projects. The CIP includes arterial and
collector class facilities which are part of the Master Thoroughfare Plan but does not
include state facilities.
The Capital Improvements Plan that is proposed for the 2000 Impact Fee Update is
listed in Table 111-1 and mapped in Figure III-I. The table shows the length of the
project as well as the facility classification in the Thoroughfare Plan. It was
developed by the Colleyville staff and represents those Thoroughfare Plan projects
that the City intends to build to accommodate the growth projected in the City of
Colleyville Land Use Plan.
The Colleyville thoroughfare system in place is adequate to handle most traffic
generated by the current population. However, there are several existing roads that
are narrow and have insufficient shoulders and/or other design deficiencies. These
facilities are considered sub-standard and the cost to widen these facilities is
considered as improvements to serve existing development. These projects and costs
are provided in the Upgrade Plan, presented as Table 111-2. These projects are
intended to correct existing deficiencies and costs associated with these projects are
not eligible for Roadway Impact Fee fmancing.
III-I
w
W
LL(/)
1-1-
U(/)
<(0
I1-U
~
f"'-......C\lO~'VCOaJO...... cnm<<llt)......ot"J 0
o)CO'VO>a:J~lOLOoaCCI"-C\l\t)coooco 0
C\I CO Mr-J"-..r---a) .q-(")......"::t"~vco C'\I
r--:M\li"':aiuir--:"':ciui.o:fMci~M~lfi~ M
LOCOCXJCO,.....(f')..-......cgC\,l('f)cocovmr--M ..q-
\OlO NNN NlO......MO) LON CO
..,.: ..,.: N
M &9- &9- &9- 619- ~ ~ 69- fI) fA> En- ER- tf) &9- fh W W UJ. M
a::wz
1-0wO
ZLLLLi=
ww~U~~~~~~~~~~*~~~~*~~
~~~~~~~oooo~~o~~gg~~~~
~g~6
W-U
<I]
!:::
o
',0
CIS
"3
u
~
U
o
o
~
....
U
CIS
S
.......
>
c
::::>>
~
en
w
w
LL
~
o
<(
Q.
:E
~~
ern
<(~
o~
It:rfj
00>
mO
mO::
"f""CL
. :!E
~4!
.....'=
-~
~U
wO::
.....<(
.....w
0>:-
O~
!:::
.-
'"d
o
'"d
;:::i
U
.s
'"
....
U
o
...",
8
~
!:::
CIS
5:
<I]
....
!:::
o
8
OJ
;>
8
S
.......
-
CIS
....
.~
U
......
I
.......
.......
......
OJ
:0
c:<:l
t--<
I-~
ucn
wz
-, -
01-
a::cn
11-0
U
COtDvcv"::t"cocoo......cocomlOvCOCO- 0
(OvLOO>COvlt)lt)OOvLOlD..-U')COC\lv 0
q-,....lO..-C")f"'-f"'-r-CO......(")C)tOC")U')O>CON N
Nui"":"':ai"cC",..:r--:cillicOcOoaiocOcO'V ri
r-NLOCOf"'-C")........-CDNCOCONCO......vON v
(01.00 NNN_C\!Cf)(")r----CO("')CCl()<.D co
lOoci ~; cD
MWW6ft~69-MMWWW6l9-utwwwutf;lto 6't
c:
o
~
U
0::
'0;
..
'"
u
-00 -550---0
~~ugg ~uuu~~~n
m~Q~U-----~m~~~~m~
~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~
o~~~~~I~~OO~o~~~ooo~
.5~g~~ .51'~i.~~~~g
~~~-- ~~~~~~~~
'"
Gl
c:
'"
-I
VVNoaaoooaeVVVN"::t"NN
.c
c;,==-
c: E
Gl ~
-I
C")VO N..-vocomCXJv
C\l......O>OOOOOOOM......NCO......C\l,......C\l
o~o ~OciOOaNci
Q;
c:
,Q
13
~
c:
c:
o
Uc: ~
~~co~~......co
,o~.2~I1-~~~
'&~~Ig~I:r:
ii:'iij(/)=ii:(/)(/)
~:r: >
c:
c:
o
.0
~
::s
m
o
I-
.~ ~ ~
U?~~!
ii CH)
~
.c
o
E
o
U:
~I~i~
-I ~ ~
I~I~I~ '
O~..:.::
~ ~ m
g8B
c: ~
o ..::.::: '- ..::.:::
~~Cii~~~(ij~
l:io~.!2I~~~
cri~,~C)cri~,~C)
~a:: > a::
>-
to
~
'0
to
o
a::
c
,Q
13 c:
~ ~ ~I ~ I !!1 I ~ ~ ~ -t
~m~I~I~ ~ m~ ~Ern
.~ ~ rIl'UlI~ OIl&' c: c: U to 0 D-
.~~~~~~~~u~g8~~ ~~~
f- '-"::':::~Q)<D"::':::~Q)c.on:Jll1Q)G.lQ)"".(o
CE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~5
~:r:Gl~B~UOBou~00220001!~~
'- Q)--_o-ro~~~ I~~u
00 c:'O~5c:11-1~:r:5~ 8oo~
~a~~t ~ z~ ~~w
~ i~~.~ g i~
00., :r: ~ (3
::s
m
Q)
u '"
'~ ~
Q)<(
(/)
Or-me
~O~'l'
tt)MN(I')
oi ~~<<i
.......NO)('\I
....... "'l:t~ __ C\I
OI.()OWOOC')C\lNmOa
,....lO(OlJ)OOaJC\lvv.......~
U'lO)I'vCOOOQt.nlOt"')N.......
air-:C'ioo-cit6C"irDNw"":
atvOtOCO(Cr-CX)COCQVO
,-vll),-_ COON
..,..: "'.....:
M~~~~~~W~~~W~~W~
~
~
o
~
"#.*-?f!.;J!.::e*-"*-<f!.?fl.';J!.***"$.**
~~~~~~gmggg~~~~~
tONMCOOlOCJ)__OOMCON"""lOCO
,.....COf"'-COCO____NOOGOO.......Nt--N
(t)(W)...-CCN(J)lt)CX)COCOOCOCO"'Ctv..-
M~~~O~~~OO~ulO~~~
Ol........-,....ct)CDOCOCOCC.........-('l')NO'J.......
Nmo>..-mNOOO').....,- v'l:tlOlO("l')
.....:..,..: MC'Ii~ N q:,..:ui
~~WW~W~W0~W~0WMW
c:
o
U
~
..
Q;
E
.... '- '- ~
o 0 00
tltitiu
.!!~~..!!
01500
UUUO
i.g 0 00
.ca om .S .5
~~~~
~ ~ '- '- '- '- '-
~~~t5 5~J3~~~
~~Jg~mtiU~~~~~
~888,~,~ 3l888~8
goooCl>cn.!ooogo
,_I'iij '", ,5 .5 '", I'iij 'iij ,- ,5
~~~~ ~~~~~
o
'l'~~~'l''l''l'~OOO'l''l'~~~
o
VLnLOOCDCO,.....N .......(1')0)...-(1')
Vr--.MNO)r-N.......ooo..............cowO)
000""":000""": cici~N......:
z:s:: ,5
~~~(3
.- 0 (.) u
~.-JU;::
.c . Q) c
EO~.c
~....J ~
'ci
a::
g~
.c ~
~~~~
1nliiE.9:
~~8~
lDc3C1,l~
uz
~ s:
Gl
Z
"E
~ ii c:
5: Q) ::5
,~<OtOUa::
1~~~""'E
a:::r::r:~lJl
{3(/)cn~l!
~ iDl1-
U
z~~:~~~~
CD ~~ijl-:TI::J:J
~~3.3IG.3~g I
C).oOO..O ~'~
,f;; , , ., ,~~
1--I-I~.JD-11-
~
E
"'0""0(1)-
'- '- c. ct1
.E.E~8
~~alu;
to '" ~
CiiCii$~
E
~
5.c.... ~
a:: u OJ <0 ,-
Ic~E~~
m{)~I:.S
l!~~cn~
11- 11-
. ~ c:
~~ ~& c
romo~c: CD
.0 .0 0 ~ ~ E c c
.... '- .clr.::: co .c C.- ::::J :t::
Q) ~ ~ eX1:::' 3 I ~ '= u a:: ~
"CEE=gO-U>E(tJo"Eo
caooQ)..c--oQ.l~co....J
(30U ~~'~~~.2 ~o
(/)~0_0",~u03 .
:Z I OQj 0{3 ::::J-'a.....J
s:w~ ~~ .c
Gl~ 5.2 U
Zz 00
~.,
NNNC'\INNNNNNNNNNNN
"'Ill'l'
~~'l'
Ill~,,"
~~g
~cn~
OtOm
~...~
... ...
..
:a
~~19
**=
.(.(iii
cricriii
1)
I-
'l>
c:
III
EO
~
Cl
"-
III
Q)
:>,
()
~
s:
.,
~
'l>
~
U
,~
e
Q
0>
c:
'~
Q)
U)
.0
'<:;
'"
<>.
III
U
s:
Q)
~
c:
o
'l>
Q)
..
'"
.Q
'!!!
Q)
:Q
:~
ii:i
'*
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN MAP
.... ...........
.... ..a ...
.. .....
...
. :.......
. .........
................. .. .. -.
....11 :
.
LEGEND
Service Area
Baund,y
Included Roadway
lie
-
B,idge/Culve,t
.
o
Signal wi th
Impr-ovements
Sepe,ote
Intersection
Improvement
.. .... ........C
t
t
t
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
Figure 111-1
06106301 rrmpclfeeldocllll.doc
III-3
......
I:::l
Q)
S >-
0.- C
0
...... ::>
Q)
:> .-
Q) rn
Cl w
0.0
I:::l W
.- LL
......
en .-
.-
>< (.)
~ <(
Q)
t:: c.
Q) :!:
V'J
0 ~
......
en 3:
......
u
Q) C
'5' <(
~ 0
p...
~ ~
CIO Z
p... en ~
Q) en
"d - Q.
~ I W
~
0.0 W C
0- ...J ~
::J ...J CI
~ a..
N :J
I
...... W D::
...... c:(
...... ...J
~ w
...J )0-
.D 0 .
~ 0
c-. (.) ......
w
W
I.L.U)
l-l-
uU)
<(0
o..u
~
bO::wz
zOwo
I.L.I.L.-
l-Wl-t;
Z-luw
w~<(-l
ue>o..-l
0::-:2:0
~uJ-u
l-
U)
o
U '
l-~
UU)
!!:l~
o
0::
a..
c:
,Q
~
l;:::
'in
"'
t'll
C3
UJ
Q)
c:
t'll
-l
L:
CD:=--
c: E
Q) -
-l
(J')L(),......,....,OlC7.lCOMNNO),....,COCO..-O
<'OCCOCO,.....C\lLOCC~LOC'OCON........-'V
...-LO...,...-""ttM..-..q,.....NO\l)NMmO
ll'iNll'i..tMO~Mll'ioir-:-r-:-Moia)ai
.,.-"l::t'Vl{)COCOVCOCOlO,.....,......mCOID..-
100lLOCO..-('I')O)"-VCONfDO)('I')OlN
M~N MN M "-~N
1I7t1tt1tlhlhll7t1tlhll7lht1tIl7t1tll7l17lh
f/!.~~f/!.?f!.'#.?f!.~~~~r/!.'#-?ft.~~
""'''-OLOOOOO<.oOLOO''-NOO
...............-C.DLOl()lt),....CO.....r--COCOCO.,.......-
~~~~mm~~:;~~~re;::~
~....."""MOllOM"""ll)Nll)Ol<ONOlO
N I.Ci .0 ai cD 0 as ri ~ cnR ci a:i a:i .. cO a)
to~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N
tti-r=-.:; ~ <oc:iN' cD"":N
t1tt1tt1tlht1tt1tlhlht1tt1tlhlhll7t1tt1tlh
"iU.9BmgBB.9.9Ciai'iti'iUB,g
.~ 0 O.C 0 U U 0 O.~.~ .C.C 0 0
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!!!
<( 0 0 <( 0 0 0 0 0 <( <( <( <( 8- 8- '"
_()<..)_ut)c..>ou____ "i::
0'- '- 0'- '- '- '- '- 0 0 0 0 '--00
.5 .~ g ,5 ,~ ,~ ,~ g g ,5 ,5 ,5 .5 g g
:2::2:~:2::2::2::2:~~:2::2::E:E~~
""""""N~"""""""""NNNN"""NNNN
C")""tto)N.,....~O..-Ol.OU)mCOV""l:tM
N IOM..-NCO mCO.....N.......Nr--O
o..-ci~ciciooociciciNcicici
o
l-
~
~Q)
U)'C
,$
~Cl
Q)
L:
U
c:
o
t5
Q)
c:
c:
8 e! 15
c ~ ~~ c
ni :!:o c: UCVX..- 0
~g~~~~.gcu~~~~~l
~o..~~~g.a~g~~~~
.E ii:'iijU)'t; ~=ii:U)U)~
~r 'x ~> r
c: W-l
c:
o
.c
Q)
::>
CD
E
o
U:::
--15. ....--
'E I!!! I~ c Q) !!!!!! .:.:.
:..:J1~ro ~x ~~~'(O(ij~
.2:1~ ~ ~ c ~ Q) i= _~ _~ N a.. ~ Q) Q)I!!!
._ U) L: ~ 'C ~ U) U) Q) C 'C 'C I",
o ~ ~ ~ ~ IV .!Q C ~ ~ ~ 9 en ~ ~ ".::
L: Q) Q)U)-,2;Cl"" Q) Q)U) t'll.2;ClClm
'5a>-g mer: .~lt)ClJ 50::
gBc?J r ~BB
C
o
U
Q)
c c
~5 en ~
c:gu E ~
.~ !!!. en ~ 5 ::!: :i:!!: .~"O C Q) .~ =a
l- :,;':0 c~ t'll (lJ~ (; 0 Q) Q) Q)l-$ c
c....u"E::1~~Q)'+-~"C"O"'Cc:.B~
~.~c~~~~~io~~~g8~
Or t'll_ ,--- Ulm t'llClClC9 9:2: <<l
CD U)~€!SO::Qj -, E 0
~:g -g ~
5 ~ ~
.c
Q)
::>
CD
>>
t'll
~
'C
co
o
0::
Q)
U t'll
-~ ~
U)
v~ll)
M(oOl
Ol Ol co
cON"":
v~<O
M(OOl
criocri
NMll)
lhll7t1tlht1tt1tt1tlhlhlhlh~t1tlht1tt1tlht1t t1t1l7t1t
~ll)ll)OM""'MlOOCO<O~ ",,"COlOlOCO
Olll)ll)lONCOlOCOO~MN<O""",,,,"~ll)lO
lOCOOl.....MOl"""NMONMOOlM"""OlOl
~M~MCONriN~NO~~~ciri~ri
~~~~ro~~~~~~~~~~~~~
N ~ ~ ri~N N~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
m~om~~M~N~~~NM~~W~
~~m~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~
ori~~ooNM~o~~~Nm~~~ri
~mmomm~~~Nmw~~~~~~
~NN~NN~~~~~mmm~M~~
N~N ~ ~~N~ ri~~~
~lht1tlht1t~t1tlhlh~lI7lht1tt1tt1tll7lhlh
~BBBBBBgSomooooooo
~ouuououun.~~~un~n~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<(08-0000000<(0000000
~u uuuuuuu~uuuuuuu
goooooooocsgcsoooooo
-li'iiiiEii1i-E.EEEEE
:E:2:~~:2:~~:E:E:E:E:2:~~:E:E:E~
"""v""""""",,",,,,"N,,,,",,,,"NNNNNNNNN
m~OO~N~~~M~~N~~O~~N
mv~NvO~~~~~~~~Nm~~
ci6cicicicicicici~N~OO~~OO
'C
0:: c
.8~ ~~ ~
"Ez"fiQi -g5. ~ai~
o Q) U) E <0 (0 t'll .!.!' lO <0 U 0 .:.:.
.....5= NN,ncoNN,-oO
UI 't: !II E ' ,w, Q) " _ 0
lii.8sor~co::J:rmgj~
~EcuU)U)""L:CI)U)m>Cl
m ,_ 0 U) U> U ->,
l- Cl . 'x 2 ,!.!'-l
uz W m
:2:> L:
a; U
Z
c
Q)
c3Ec3
~~~g~
~~i~;
CDc:~O::~
~-l5~:o~
-,0...:.:.0..
c
i=
~ ~~5 ~5~_ ~Z~~~5
~Q)~u~~-~~~ro~-~~~'-~~
~ ....~~....~oN~5oouo~....S
~"'Couc,='_c~.B U~ UC0
o$-lct'll~!.!t'llUUJIcQ)-l-lct'llc
o '~~mE0 ~ "-D . .._~~
~ ~el =xUlj~~u)~~Cl~~ICD
~ -lo..o.. wo.. o..l--l-lo..o..
.,;'C
a::Cl:: C C
(ij~ eaJ Q) o"E
-o'~~ g~L:~'~5~"E~
Q) (; E E t 'C ,Q ~ ~'U ~ rn 0 :ii
'OU;EE~:i'iij.Et'llUc=u;~
.!l!cooo Q)t)~:2:"'~cm
Cl~uUm1iiO:: '.c:.2~c~-;;;
mU)> Q:O~uo~om~
,~ 0..:.::: :3-'a...O ~
Zw m,S:.c u ~
~~ l- U :E
Q) Q)
Zz
::::
1ii Q)
otidi5
~.3~~
Q) .'- ~
~Cll-U)
..J
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
~ N
"*'''*'ii
<<a
ujujl-
-0
c:
'"
E
Q)
Cl
'-
ctI
~
~
~
~
-0
Q)
t;
.~
cl:
Ol
c:
-~
Q)
U)
.0
'<:;
'"
~
t)
~
Ql
<:
c:
o
-0
Q)
'"
'"
.Q
'!!!
<l>
:Q
0,
LD
o
<:
'*
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301f1lT'1'CtleeJdoclIV doc
IV. Methodology for Determination of Roadway
Impact Fees
Service Areas
The two service areas used in the 1994 Transportation System Impact Fee
Determination are illustrated in Figure III-I. The service areas cover the entire
corporate boundary of Colleyville. They are comprised of an integral number of
traffic survey zones, a planning zone used by the North Central Texas Council of
Governments for travel modeling and demographic estimates and projections.
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that "the service area is
limited to an area within the corporate boundaries ofthe political subdivision and
shall not exceed a distance equal to the average trip length from the new
development, but in no event more than three miles." An inspection of the 1994 zone
structure indicates that these zones are more than three miles in the longest
dimension, but their area is a reasonable approximation of the three mile limit, and no
change is needed.
Equivalent Service Units
The basic "service unit" for the calculation of impact fees in the City of Colleyville
has been established as a single vehicle "trip". Equivalent service units (ESU) are
calculated using the trip generation rates provided in Table IV-I. These rates
correspond to the land uses identified in the Land Use Plan summarized in Table IV-
2. The existing, 10 year projected, and build-out trips calculated for each service area
are presented in Tables IV -3 through IV -5. Table IV -6 presents the projected 10-
year growth in trips for each service area, as well as the projected growth to build-
out. The application of this unit as an estimate of either supply or demand is based
on travel during the average weekday. This time period is commonly used as the
basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new
development.
IV-I
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301limpclfeeldocllVdoc
Table IV-l
Trip Generation Rates for Selected Land Uses
Trips Generated Unit of Trip
Land Use per Unit Generation
Single Family Residential 9.57 DU
Multi-Family Residential 6.63 DU
Office 11.01 1000 sq.ft. GFA
Retail 53.23 1000 sq.ft. GFA
Institutional 1.02 Students
Industrial 51.80 acre
Private Open Space 1.59 acre
Public Open Space 1.59 acre
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation. 6th Edition.
Washington, D.C., 1997.
IV-2
~
';;
>-
~
'0
u
.....
o
.~
U
Q)
-B
....
..8
V)
Q)
V)
;::J
"0
c::
o:l
....l
"0
2
u
Q)
B
....
~
"0
c::
o:l
E
Q)
g
U
?fi ?fi *' *' *' *' *' ?fi *' *' *' *' *'
0
".e r--. N to to <J C') 0 L!) to 0 N q c:i
0 0 <J c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i
<J 0 N to ":t ~ N C') 0
;2 ~
N C') <J 0 L!) r--. C') to
U C') C') C') 0- C') ":t L!) C') 0 0 L!) 0
< <J ~ N r--. C') N co ":t N N N ":t
L!) co
.....
.! *' *' *' *' *' *' *' ?fi ~ ~ *' *' *'
0 0
E ".e C') C') ~ 0: r--. D co ~ ~ ~ c:i
C'\I 0 0: d N c:i ,....: "<i c:i c:i
= ..( <J C') r--. ~ C') 0
5 ~
..., u) 0 0- ":t ":t 0- N
It) ~ r--. C') N L!) C') ":t
C') N ~ 0 N r--. 0 C') C')
C'\I to ~ ~ C') ~ C') ":t ~ ~
0 N ":t
C'\I *'
*' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' 0
~ C') 0 ":t <J L!) <J N 0 ll:! D ":t r--. 8
- "<i c:i N 0: .0 c:i N c:i ~ c:i c:i N
..( <J ~
u) U N Ci r--. r-- ~ ":t ::8
":t D 0 r--. C') N 0 ":t 0 r--. ~
< r--. ~ ":t N N L!) <J ~ ~ N
N ":t
*' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *'
~ 0- D 0- 0
N ~ C') r--. ":t L!) q N ll:! c:i
,....: d ~ Lt:i "<i d c:i d C') c<:i d N 0
0 L!) ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ":t C') <J 0 N to N ~
U r--. C') ~ ~ 0- L!) ;g ":t L!) <J 0
< to ~ ~ C') C') ":t N ~ N N ":t
":t ~ to
*' *' *' ~ *' *' *' *' ~ *' *' *' ~
-ae ~ C') ll:! 0- C') co --: ~ ~ C') c:i
C'\I .0 d ~ "<i N d r--. ~ "<i to d C') D
0 L!) ~
- ..( ~
0
C'\I ,,; L!) N 0 L!) <J ~
U N C') N ~ N ~ 0-
< C') ~ <J to N ~ N -0 L!) C') C')
N ~ ~ C') ~ r-- ~ ":t
*' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' ~ *' ~ *' *'
D
-ae r--. 0 ~ ~ L!) <J N 0 <J ~ c:i
- 0: d ~ ..Q ..Q d N d N 0: d ~ 0
L!) ~
..( ~
,,; U <J :0 -0 to 0- <J
~ D N r--. ":t 0 r--. D r--. L!) <J
< L!) N ;n to ~ r--. N
N N N ":t ":t
*' ?fi ?fi ?fi *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *' *'
0
-ae ~ N ":t 0- co L!) 0 L!) ~ ~ N N d
N d d N "<i d d d c<:i C') d N 0
0 L!) ~ N ~
-
0
.- ~ r--. r--. 0- r--. N r--. ":t to
r--. C') L!) ":t 0- N C') ":t <J ":t 0 to 0
C') ~ C') N C') ":t CO ":t N 0- N ~ ":t
":t ~ to
~ *' *' ?fi ?fi ?fi ?fi ?fi * *' ?f< *' ?f< ?f<
e: ".e ~ L!) 0
C') ":t 0 q ":t r--. --: 0- ~ N d
ii 0 r--. d d N d c<:i c:i c:i c<:i
C'\I ":t C') r--. ~ C') 0
.)( <C ~
w
..., u) N L!) N
0 U ":t 0 D ":t
0 <J C') <J ":t N to N ~ <J <J C') C') ":t
< 0- ~ ~ to ~ N
0 ~ ~ C'? ~ ~ ~ ~
N
?f< ?f< ?f< ?f< ?f< ?f< ?f< *' *' ?fi ?f< ?fi *'
~ <J ~ 0 0
0 ":t to L!) -D 0 ":t ":t ~ 8
- ..Q c:i d C') .0 d N c:i N ..Q d ~
L!) ~ ~
..( ~
u) u L!) C') <J r--. N N ::8
0 0- <J r--. ":t ~ 0 0 co r-... 0-
< ":t ~ ~ N N L!) ~ -D ~ '" N
N ":t
CD Q)
0
0 0
w 0 a.
V) a. V)
:J V)
0 ~ ~ e: e:
'E 0 CD CD
z 'E a.
:S 0 e: ~ >- a. 0
... 0 0 0 0 'E
CD ... CD ~ ~ III .~ CD ....
I :e :J III " Ql 0 a; - <
Q ~ 0 ; :J :e :c 0 0
'3 = 0 - .~ l-
e: CD III " 0 ~ :J 0 0 0
en :E 0 IX e: e: IX :J D.. > 3: Et I-
N
>
......
Q)
:g
E-<
Table IV-3: 2000 Equivalent Service Unit Calculations
LAND USE Trio Generation SA 1 SA 2 L S.A. 1 $ 2
Rate Unit Qty. # Trips Qty. # Trips Qty. # Trips
Single Family 9,57 DU1 4348 41.608 3531 33,789 7879 75,398
Multi-Family 6,63 DU2 0 0 158 1.045 158 1,045
Office 11,01 1000 sq,ft, GFA4 77 844 63 697 140 1,541
Retail 53.23 1000 sq.ft. GFA5 1442 76.744 743 39,550 2185 116,294
Institutional 1.02 Students3 2067 2,108 1979 2,019 4046 4,127
Industrial 51.80 acre 24 1,263 18 9ffi 42 2.172
Private Open Space 1,59 acre 49 79 134 214 184 292
Public Open Space 1,59 acre 102 163 160 254 262 417
122.810
78.476
Table IV -4: 2010 Equivalent Service Unit Calculations
LAND USE Trip Generation SA 1 SA 2 LS.A.l$2
Rate Unit Qty. # Trips Qty. # Trips Qty. # Trips
Single Family 9.57 DU1 4583 43,860 4185 40,050 8768 83,911
Multi-Family 6.63 DU2 0 0 158 1.045 158 1,045
Office 11,01 1000 sq.ft, GFA4 208 2,288 249 2.741 457 5,029
Retail 53.23 1000 sq.ft, GFA5 2304 122,647 1608 85,566 3912 208,213
Institutional 1,02 Students3 2179 2,223 2346 2,393 4525 4,616
Industrial 51,80 acre 24 1.244 0 0 24 1.244
Private Open Space 1.59 acre 75 120 136 217 212 336
Public Open Space 1,59 acre 87 138 171 272 258 410
Delta Trips =
Table IV -5: Ultimate Equivalent Service Unit Calculations
172.520
49.710
132,284
53,808
103,51 8
LAND USE Trip Generation SA 1 SA 2 L S.A. 1 $ 2
Rate Unit Qty. # Trips Qty. # Trips Qty. # Trips
Single Family 9,57 DU' 4936 47,238 5166 49,442 10102 96,680
Multi-Family 6,63 DU2 0 0 158 1. 045 158 1.045
Office 11,01 1000 sq,ft, GFA4 404 4,453 528 5,808 932 10,261
Retail 53,23 1000 sq,ft, GFA5 3598 191,501 2904 154,589 6502 346.091
Institutional 1,02 Students3 2347 2,394 2896 2,954 5243 5.348
Industrial 51,80 acre 23 1.216 0 0 23 1.216
Private Open Space 1.59 acre 114 181 139 222 253 403
Public Open Space 1,59 acre 64 101 173 275 237 376
'1 ESU = 1 Trip
1 S,F, DU = (SF, Acres x 1.8 DU/Acre)
2 assumed 12 DU/acre (multifamily only)
3 based on 1994 enrollments prorated by appropriate increase in DU since 1994
· Assumed 4.0 X 1000 SF. GFA per Acre (1994 Impact Fee Ordinance)
5 Assumed 8.83 X 1000 SF. GFA per Grose Acre (5'" edition Trip Generation Manual) using Land Use 820 equation
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301f1f1'!lCtleeldoclIVdoc
Table IV-6
Projected Growth in Daily Trips per Service Area
Increase in Dailv Trips
Land Use 2010 Ultimate
S.A.l S.A.2 S.A, 1 S.A.2
Single Family 2,252 6,261 5,630 15,653
Multi-Family 0 0 0 0
Office 1,443 2,045 3,608 5,111
Retail 45,903 46,016 114,757 115,040
Institutional 114 374 286 935
Industrial -19 -909 -47 -909
Private Open Space 41 3 103 8
Public Open Space -25 18 -61 21
Total 49,710 53,808 124,274 135,860
Another aspect of the service unit is the service volume that is provided (supplied) by
roadway facility. This number, also referred to as capacity, is a function of the
facility type, facility configuration, number of lanes, and level of service.
Level of service is a term used by traffic engineers to describe the performance of
various components of the transportation system. The service volumes used in the
this study are consistent with a level of service "C". This is the level of service used
in the Thoroughfare Plan Study. Level of service "C" is an appropriate standard for
the City of Colleyville and is recommended that it remain the basis for service
volumes in the 2000 Impact Fee Update. Table IV -7 shows the service volumes as a
function of facility type.
Table IV-7
Level of Use Table
Facility Type
Principal Arterial
Principal Arterial
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Collector
Collector
Local
Median Configuration
Divided
Undivided
Divided
Undivided
Divided
Undivided
Undivided
Hourly Vehicle-Mile
Capacity per Lane
Mile of Roadway Facility
725
675
700
625
550
500
500
IV-5
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301 "rrpcffeeidocllV doc
Cost Per Service Unit
A basic step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In
the case of the transportation impact fee, this is the cost for each trip. This means the
costs to implement the roadways needed to accommodate daily trip demands at the
level of service which corresponds to the City's standards. The cost per service unit
is calculated for each service area because each service area has a specific list of
projects. The combination of the projects in each service area comprises the Capital
Improvement Plan.
The second component of the cost per service unit is the number of service units in
the service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation demand
that is projected to occur in the ten-year period proscribed by law. As noted earlier,
the units of demand daily trips.
. Cost of the CIP
The costs that may be included in the cost per service unit are all the implementation
costs for arterial and collector system elements on the Capital Improvements Plan.
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Gov't Code specifies that the allowable costs are
". . .including and limited to the :
(1) construction contract price;
(2) surveying and engineering fees;
(3) land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs,
attorney's fees, and expert witness fees; and
(4) fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified
engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital
improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision."
The engineer's opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the CIP is based, in
part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per foot
is calculated based on an average price for the various components of roadway
construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of facility
being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The cost for
items which are not included in the unit cost such as bridges, traffic signals, or other
special components are added to each project as appropriate. Table IV -8 shows the
basis for the unit costs used for the Colleyville Capital Improvements Plan. Table
IV -9 is the CIP project list for each service area with the engineer's opinion of the
probable project cost. In addition to construction cost, the table shows the right-of-
way costs assumed for each project. It should be noted that these tables reflect only
planning-level opinions or assumptions regarding the future cost to implement the
CIP. Actual costs of construction and land prices are likely to change with time and
are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be predicted at this
time.
Many of the roadways listed in the CIP project list are not new roadways, but rather
existing roadways that are to be built to the City of Colleyville Standards. Since
these roadways will continue to serve existing trips, the entire cost of such projects
are not eligible to be included in the impact fee calculations. For such projects, the
IV-6
City 01 Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
061 06301f1"",,~.eldocl1V .doc
eligible portion is determined to be the percentage of the new capacity beyond the
existing demand that will serve growth in trips on that roadway over the next 10
years.
. Trips
To determine the cost per service unit it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle-
miles of travel for each service area for the ten-year period beginning in 2000. Since
trips are the basic service unit, the cost of the transportation system needed to
accommodate growth in each service area is computed per single traffic trip caused
by the growth over the ten-year period prescribed by law.
The trips on each roadway caused by growth are computed using the trip generation
rates developed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG).
The trip rates are used in the Trip Generation Sub-model which is a component of the
regional travel models that is used by NCTCOG for regional and sub-regional
transportation planning. The NCTCOG models are based on surveys of travel
behavior in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan Area and are statistically calibrated
to replicate observed traffic count data as well as travel characteristics such as
number of trips and trip length by trip purpose. This tool is a key component of the
transportation planning process which is certified by NCTCOG to meet the
requirements for transportation planning that are necessary to receive Federal funds.
The trip generation model is a cross-classification model which uses specific rates for
the combination of area type (i.e. suburban for Colleyville), median income range,
and land use activity for each zone. Population and dwelling units describes the land
use activity for residential land use. For non-residential land uses the model uses
estimates or projections of employment which is stratified by basic, service, and
retail categories.
Trips were adjusted to reflect changes in the City of Colleyville Land Use and
Thoroughfare Plan Elements of the Master Plan, as adopted by Council on September
1, 1998.
The total trips caused by growth, for each service area, are computed using the trip
generation rates from the (Jh Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual. These rates
were applied to existing and lO-year projected land use units, as shown in Tables IV-
3 through IV -5. The growth in trips over the next 10 years is equal to the difference
in projected 2010 trips and existing 2000 trips.
IV-7
Table IV-8: Roadway Typical Section Cost Summary
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
ROADWAY CAPITAL PROJECT COSTS
ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION 2-Lane 4-Lane 2-Lane 4-Lane 4-Lane Div.
DIVIDED/UNDIVIDED Minor I Major Major Minor Minor Minor
MATERIAL Collector Collector Arterial Arterial Arterial
WIDTH IN FEET 42' 48' 44' 48' 2X26'
RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH IN FEET 75' 80' Varies 70' 95'
CONSTRUCTION Rural
PAVING:
EXCAVATION:
WIDTH IN FEET 44 50 44 50 56
DEPTH OF EXCAVATION (FT) 1.5 1.5 1,5 1,5 1,5
CUBIC YARDS 2.44 2,78 2.44 2,78 3,11
COST PER CUBIC YARD $13,00 $13.00 $13,00 $13,00 $13,00
COST PER FOOT $31,78 $36,11 $31,78 $36,11 $40.44
STABILIZATION:
WIDTH IN FEET 44 50 44 50 56
SQUARE YDS 4,89 5.56 4,89 5,56 6.22
COST PER SQUARE YARD $2,50 $2,50 $2.50 $2,50 $2.50
COST PER FOOT $12,22 $13.89 $12,22 $13,89 $15.56
LIME:
WIDTH IN FEET 44 50 44 50 56
SQUARE YDS 4.89 5,56 4.89 5,56 6,22
POUNDS PER YARD 36 36 36 36 36
TONS 0,0880 0.1000 0,0880 0,1000 0.1120
COST PER TON $120,00 $120.00 $120,00 $120,00 $120,00
COST PER FOOT $10,56 $12,00 $10,56 $12.00 $13.44
PAVING:
DEPTH (INCHES) 6,0 6.0 6,0 6,0 7,0
WIDTH OF ROAD 42 48 44 48 52
SQUARE YARDS 4,67 5,33 4.89 5,33 5,78
COST PER SQUARE YARD $24,00 $24.00 $24,00 $24,00 $24,00
COST PER FOOT $112.00 $128.00 $117,33 $128.00 $138,67
SUBTOTAL PAVING (COST PER FOOT) $166,56 $190.00 $171,89 $190,00 $208,11
RIGHT -OF-WAY:
PERCENTAGE OF PAVING 10% 10% 10% 10% 10%
COST PER FOOT $16,66 $19,00 $17,19 $19,00 $20,81
DRAINAGE:
PERCENTAGE OF PAVING 35% 35% 10% 35% 35%
COST PER FOOT $58.30 $66,50 $17,19 $66.50 $72,84
PEDESTRIAN:
COST PER FOOT $16,00 $16.00 $16,00 $16,00 $16,00
LIGHTING:
COST PER FOOT $9,00 $9,00 $9,00 $9,00 $9.00
LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION:
COST PER FOOT $10,00 $10,00 $10,00 $10,00 $15.00
UTILITY RELOCATION
COST PER FOOT $33,31 $38,00 $34.38 $38,00 $41,62
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION (COST PER FOOT) $309.82 $348.50 $275.65 $348.50 $383.38
ENGINEERING, TESTING, INSPECTION,
LEGAL, ADMINISTRATION
PERCENTAGE OF CONSTRUCTION 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
COST PER FOOT $61.96 $69.70 $55.13 $69,70 $76.68
FINANCIAL
PERCENTAGE 34% 34% 34% 34% 34%
COST PER FOOT $126.41 $142.19 $112.47 $142.19 $156.42
TOTAL CAPITAL COST PER FOOT $498 $560 $443 $560 $616
TOTAL CAPITAL COST PER LANE MILE $1,316,138 $740,161 $1,171,068 $740,161 $814,187
ell
I::l
o
'<=l
~
"3
U
';j
U
o
o
~
.....
u
~
S'
......
.S
"0
o
"0
;:3
U
I::l
......
ell
U
o
'0'
....
p..
I::l
~
~
ell
t:
S
o
:>
o
....
S'
......
'3
5.
~
u
>-
C
:::)
....
U)
tU
tU
LL
....
()
<(
D..
:E
>-Z
~~
CUI
<(I-
offi
o::~
llO~
<nit
<nil..
'7~
W..J
...J<
...JI-
_ii:
~~
~~
...J>-
o
()~
0-
c:
o
:0
ro
E-<
f-lStlJ5
zu.l.L.j::
WWf-U
U....JOUJ
a::!!1<{...J
W<.9a....J
a.::;~o
w-u
f-
Uf-I-'
~f3~
~u~
a.
W
W
lLOO
f-f-
UOO
<{O
a.U
~
r-...'t"""NO-.:t'~ctICDO't"'"'t"'"Olo)ctlLO""Ot"") 0
OlCO"ltmlDvLOLOOOtOr---NLOCOOOCD 0
N't"""CO......C"')r-........r-...OO,....'r-vC") v~vco N
r--:Ctiui":aiu5,....-,....-cil.ti-il1ici-.iri .10"; M
~ffi::gcc,...,~NN~~~~~~m~U;~ ;b
.... ~ N
6I't1"l "'" tit tit 4h4A> ~~ tit ~ tit...."'" bit ~ 6fltw. 609
"#.rJ!.#.'#"#.#-'#.rJ!.#.'#-rJ!.~rft;f!.rftrf!."#.#. ~
~re~~~~gggg~SSf6~~~g;~ 0
f-";
uoo
~~
Of-
a:: 00
a.0
U
ffi~:t~:;~ffifflgo~::gm~~~~; g
.r--lI).....("')r-...""-I"'-Q)....Mm<DC")lOCJ')tON N
NLO.....,...:a;-mr-:,.:O"OCOcDOfOciaiai. M
ro~~CD.....~NN~~~~~~~~~~ ~
..0 ~ ..,;....~ (D
O......cnOOLOOlOOOMC\lNmOO
NONvr-...LOCDC>>OOCOC'\lvvv"-
LOMt'\IC"lI.l)Ol.....vCDcaOU>Lt)MN.....
ai~"":cO ai"":McicicitDricDN<<I-~
.NO>Ncn.OtOtOUl......COCDCD"It"O
v......N vLO (cON
....:...... N~
Elttllt4hW&tt......,.........w.....,...".EltvtElt
~~!rJ!.rf!.~~~~~~~~~~~
M......Nt-MU')LO.....OO~NN....NN
:e~~~m~~Ngg~~~~~~
(I"J("').....U> NmLOCDCDCDOCDCDv......
MNoiaiOlO":lliciolli"tDO";ctiul
cnr-.......,.....C"'lO'lOCD<<JtO ..-(I')Ncn.
Nmcn.....cnNcocn........... ."""lOU')C")
....:~ MNN N .r-:tti
""'''''''6R-'''~6I't'''''4Il9-!1lIJ4flt.........."",....tA''M- 4Ifo M-Wvtio1lt ......M-..".ut-vt0wg.M..iR-
0>0>."4:;' ......cnO'lml.l)O)Il)I'.'. mooo 0)0)0)0 ~: (J)moU')o
~~~ :ci~6~~~~'~ ~~~~ ~~~~" cici~~~
CD~CJ) .. T'""U)tD(Dvco-.m"\"J..," tOcnalQ'l fDtO(Ocn (DU)m..m
LOU>.." tDIOLOU)..,.Ln....,. 'It)v-'vlO\l)l.l)v "'>>LOvvv
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 1..1.. ... ... ...... ... ... I.. ...... ...
ggg~::mmgog~ ~ 8 m ~gg~ ~;mg
......<DT'""M..................COT'""NN ... C"!. 0 0)<01000 NO......O
g~~~~~~g~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~gg~ ~~g~
T'""~ NNNT'""N ~ T'""T'""...N
N~ ;
a::rn
Wf-
~oo
08
... ... ... ... ...1.. ............ ...1.. i'"
f-
00
o
U
~
o
ci
N....O>
onON
on",,,,
ONu:f
M~~
o lONCJ)CO N......CO
Ot"')...T'""Lt)......C'\ICO
N......C?Nll)Ncn
~:!pj<o~~~~
- '"
...........
WIVl M .,. tit ..
Z
~...J...,.
g~ti:~:5~
a::~ci ..;..;.,;
~<OW ~~g
z~~
o
u
Q)OOOl.l)Oll)N
MLl)ll)ll)U)ll)U)OO
cwia:ia:icrilria::ilriai
~~~~~~~~
"
,g
'"
<>
IE
'"
'"
'"
C3
m5s mS~SmamS
.c:tiu66 .c::u~u'c:.c:.c::u g
~~~'tl'tl0i0i0i0i0i~~=~~~~~ 'tl
<OO~~ c c:c:<ooo<<<o ~
5~~ ~ icncnwC/}CIJ 5~~'2 5 (; o~ ~
~I'~.~ ~ :5 ~ .~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~
~~ ~~~ ~
'"
'"
"
'"
...J
''It.NOOOOOOOe..,.........N''ltNN 0
t~
" E
co-
...J
("')...,.0 N~...,.oU)m<o"'"
N'rcnoooooooM~NtD~N......N 0
o~o ~ciOOOONO
{3.
"
0
~
"
"
"
~ 0
~ g -t:~
'" co co o~~~~ra~~
00"'''' I I I i I I ! o"oII~~I
~aa a...:::~u:i.!! .~~u:i
co ~~ :>et:
.c
U "
"
0
.0
"
::J
iii
]I?I? g:1!: ;:1!:
...J ~ ~
I.~I~I~ I i I I i , I ~.2m~~a..~~
U , , I 0 ~ ~ II ~ ,,~
"""" uj~.~~cri.!!.~C9
5 CO"
::J co " ",a:: = a::
o.c.c I >
ooUU
E
o
U::
>-
'"
~
'"
'"
o
a::
"
g c
Q)~~~Ci> ~ ~ [-t:
~ro~E~ m m5 ~Em
_ "'~oorn~"en"~U ~oa.
~I~~~~~~~~i~~~~mwm~~g
c~B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~555
~~~6~uu6~u~m.~.:::aaa~~w
~ --_o-ro~~~ Emu
m ~~E6c~~I5~ om~
~a~~~ ~ z~ ~~t
m ~~~ ~ ~ ~~
::J
iii
"
.~ ro
? ~
,,<{
en
...
....""io1It w-W'..IVI
...
N~o)CI)OOCl)"""
tD<D........... cnT'""CO.....
......cnT'""CO ~MtOO
COCD~Ocn.tON
.~ l.OCD...,.:t~~t')~
~COl.l)(J)(")
CDCf)<DCDlO
CDM""ltN""lt
co......oi"t-:,..:
--~;;;!:j
..................
.. I......
~~~~~~~~
a:iaimaia::icOcOC>>
~ggg~~~g
OON\t)C'\&
U)L()OOtDCD
..;..;oionoi
.......or---o
C")C?MNM
~.9~~~~~~ 5~~~~~
.s!~!!!!~!!!!!!--""!!!!!!"'!!
oooooc(ooo~~:6ooo~o
~~'2~ '-'2~~.--e~~~L-~
.0 .0 g g g 0.0 g (I) (/) ~ .0 .0 .0 g g
~:!L~~~~~~ -~~~~~
"ltNNN...,.'V"ltNOOO...~NNN
"'ltll)1l)OOlCO.....N ~t"')cn'r""("')
V......t"')NO':l......N~OOO cocoe>>
ocio~ooci....: Oci....:N~
~ ~ n; .~
.sg 8~
~...JU)~
.Q . Q) c:
~:J~~
-ci
a::
g~
.c ~
'E<>co-
o(l)E~
'(n=E.9
~ i 8:<<
<Oc3"i'~
<>z
~~
co
Z
I I I
1::
~ ~ c:
" ",:>
=re~c'3~
~~~m~
n CIJ cnl~ ~
i: iiia.
U
z~~:~~~~
Q)~tjt5I~U::J::J
-g'C.3.3IEi.31313 I i I
Ci ~ . . () '.B.S;
s~~-m~~~
F...J...J~...Ja.a.
" co
~~~~:5
c: ~.1:! . U
mO~J;.!:
';~~OO~
a. a.
'"
o
"O-c1ii-
L.... L.... c: ro
.E.E~8
~~Ill1i)
(!! I!! -..
<O<O~:<::
:c
~
~ c:
~ii ~& ...
ra~o~~(!) i
.~ ~ ,g .c: rn N E.5: 5 3::
IV E E ~ ~ ~ :i ~I.~ ~ ~ ~
-oEE=go..ujEmo'CO
~oo~..c~-U~~lJl....J
<.9UO C:~.(ij~ ...c.2 roo
en~oo_u "'~ U o!!.J
z' mu(5 2-'0..
~~~~~ B
~~ 8~
~-,
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
0>"'....
N_....
on"'....
~~m
NO>-
ciaioi
...~
... ...
co
:ii
-"'..
.:tt=
.e.em
rnu:ica
-0
f-
"
r:::
..
E
Q)
Q
...
'"
~
~
it
'"
<:
b
Q)
1:;
.~
a:
."
r:::
.~
Q)
'"
~
u
..
<L
..
U
it
Q)
<:
r:::
o
b
Q)
'"
..
'"
.~
Q)
~
iU
*'
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
061 06301~mpct1eeldocnV do<
Impact Fee Collected Per Service Unit
This section presents the maximum impact fee rate that is developed for each service
area. The maximum impact fee rate is the allowable cost of the Capital Improvement
Plan for the service area divided by the growth in travel that is attributable to the
level of new development projected to occur in the period covered by the CIP, up to
ten years. All of the components of this calculation have been described and
presented in previous sections of this report. The purpose of this section is to
document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the
limitations provided by state law have been addressed.
Portion of 10 year Improvements Plan Eligible for Inclusion in Impact Fee
Impact Fee CIP (2000-2010)
AREA I
$10,231,529
AREA 2
$8,938,215
Projected Increase in Trips
Equivalent Service Units (2010)
AREA 1
172,520
AREA 2
132,284
Less ESU (2000)
-78.476
-122.810
Growth in ESU (2000 to 2010)
49,710
53,808
Maximum Allowable Impact Fee
The maximum allowable impact fee is the ratio of Cost to AESU, therefore:
Area 1 Impact Fee = $ 10,231,529 = $205
49,710
Area 2 Impact Fee =
$8,938,215 = $ 166
53,808
IV-I0
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
061 06301f1mpctleeldoc/IV .doc
Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development
The assessment of the roadway impact fee is made by multiplying the adopted impact
fee rate times the number of service units projected for the proposed development.
For this purpose the city utilizes the Maximum Calculated Impact Fee per Service
Unit Table presented as Table IV-tO. This table lists predominate land uses that
might occur as growth in the City of Colleyville. For each land use, the development
unit that defines the development's magnitude with respect to transportation demand
is shown. The impact fee rates shown in Table IV-tO represent the maximum that
can be charged. However, the city may adopt in its ordinance a lesser fee or to waive
such fees.
Table IV-tO
Maximum Calculated Impact Fee per Service Unit (Trip)
Maximum Calculated
Trips Impact Fee
Generated Unit of Trip Service Service
Land Use per Unit I Generation Area 1 Area 2
Single Family 9.57 Dwelling Unit $1,962 $1,589
Multi-Family 6.63 Dwelling Unit $1,359 $1,101
Office 11.01 1000 ~ GFA $2,257 $1,828
Retail 53.23 1000 ft2 GFA $10,912 $8,836
Schools 1.02 Students $209 $169
Industrial 51.8 Acre $10,619 $8,599
Private Open Spaces 1.59 Acre $326 $264
Service Area 1 = $205
Service Area 2 = $166
IBased on 1997 Trip Generation Manual
The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the typical weekday by
each land use per development unit. The next column shows that the number of trips
to and from certain land uses are reduced because these trips are already on the
system. This discount for the so-called pass-by phenomenon is applied to land uses
that are convenience rather than destination oriented.
The source of trip generation statistics is the Institute of Transportation Engineers
Trip Generation Manual, Sixth Edition. This is the latest edition (published in 1997)
of the definitive source of trip generation data. The manual utilizes trip generation
studies for a variety of land uses in the United States, and is used by traffic engineers
and transportation planners for traffic impact analysis, site design, transportation
planning, and transportation impact fee determination. The 1994 Ordinance utilized
an earlier version ofthe same source. The change in trip generation rates between
the 1994 and 1997 Manuals is a result of more recent data based on current trip-
making characteristics and provides a stronger relationship between the impact fee
charged and the transportation needs related to growth.
IV-II
City of Colleyville
1999 Roadway CIP
and Impact Fee Update
06106301 r,rrpcHeeldoclV .doc
v. Conclusions
The 1994 Transportation Impact Fee Report for the City of Colleyville established a
process which the city has utilized to collect impact fees to fmance or recoup the
costs of capital improvements for transportation. In the intervening years changes
have occurred which cause the mechanism to require a significant update. Among
these changes are the development of new land use assumptions and a Capital
Improvements Plan which are consistent with the ten-year horizon allowed by state
law. In summary, all parameters that are sensitive to the ten-year horizon need to be
adjusted to reflect a 2000 to 2010 implementation and growth horizon.
In addition to these fundamental components of the process, certain technical
revisions are also in order. These include:
.
calculations of the cost to implement the CIP
computation of the growth in trips from 2000 to 2010
computation of the maximum impact fee that can be collected per service unit
.
.
Another fmding of this technical evaluation is that the methodology and data used in
the application of the impact fee ordinance are appropriate and consistent with the
transportation aspects of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. We also
find and recommend that the list of land uses in the Trip Generation Table is
appropriate for the City of Colleyville and that the trip generation rates and pass-by
trip reduction percentages should be consistent with the Institute of Transportation
Engineers Trip Generation Manual, Sixth Edition.
In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology are appropriate and
consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Gov't Code. Further the Land Use
Assumptions for Impact Fees and the proposed Capital Improvements Plan are
appropriately incorporated into the process. The changes that are incorporated into
this report are our recommendation to the City of Colleyville and the Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee.
V-I
ccecs
CITY COUNCIL Tw; AGENDA BRIEFING
For mta. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
4
Ordinance # :
0-00-1201
Previous Action: 2/1/2000
DEPT. :
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Zoning change requested by Brian Markwood,
from AG to R-30 on 2.210 acres located at 6212
L. D. Lockett Road
Second Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
This request is to rezone a 2.2 acre lot for R-30 zoning. Although there are a few
zoned tracts in the area, most of the zoning remains Agriculture. This tract is one of a
number of long odd-shaped Agricultural tracts along L. D. Lockett Road. Although
there is a house on each of the tracts in the area, only a few of the tracts have been
platted. There is also a house on the subject tract, however, the applicant wishes to
subdivide the property into two parcels to create a second homesite. Before
construction of a second house, the property would have to be platted. At platting, each
lot would far exceed the minimum zoning requirements of the requested R-30 zoning.
At the January 10th hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission, the only speakers
were the applicant Mr. Brian Markwood and Mr. Doug Malcon who has been hired by
the applicant to rebuild the stock pond on the property. No notices were returned in
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-00-1201
Page 2
opposition to this request. After a few questions, the Commission voted 6-1 in favor of
recommending this application for a zoning change to the City Council.
Summary and Conclusion
The request for rezoning is consistent with the Master Plan and the proposed tracts can
be platted to the appropriate zoning standards.
Recommendation
Approval of Ordinance 0-00-1201.
,
, ,
,'/
/1
~,.;
. ...
/",. tal'
I.... .:t.........
'f)')"" ~.
'. 'J t,.)
, 0, If'
i "'lJ
, ",.~
lilt ~~
)
"C..J(
I,
~:
....~....~
J
I\.~' ~,-.....~
~..'
/.'
, ,
/.'
/"'".
,t.
/,'
/.'~
/:
,f,i
/.
'" .
ai /"
~ .
0)0.. ~.
(c) .""\ f',''-
~ ~/..~.
.... lrJo.~,.l
"'.. N ,~.,
... O(f ~.......
,->,~!/4
l~ ,<f J;..~
~V ','#'
/-
Ab
lle~i.e"Ti.(
urr ,
.
<
/
."'---...
/
I
\
\
\
,<c,
,0
.........::
.. '
. .
'j
I ,
, '
,/
, ,
.,
.j'
I,
" J
'-------'
/
0001; :'-~MCI~~ :t: 0 //
.O~_ c.....Q 15 10 ,. ""'. ...~; /
""ll.llUK~IMf&!ll~ ,. /
40' BUILDING -, //
liNt " I ~
//
, ,.
/'.i \.
, .
--:___1_...
, __.1"'. ....
,
/
". ' A'" \fe'
~:~,~ R6it.itlf <
I '. '>.:, ~..'
",' '....,,," ~ i
if'. " , ..........'.!.s
~. - , ~t"-" '{:
;; ':-":'::'<'7'"
~'; . ..... .
J'
/..' . "
,,'
. .;
,1/
,
,I
,
,-.J'
, /
//
,j
At;
IlfS;oE~+i_1
,/
,~ ~
~'t
.;.<Y
"
"'-'
.[
.,
~
'1MJlII'(1fY DlSCM""'DN let I, ~ I, M. .. wt.
.........,...".' N' ...
)/~ I' \(""_
ZONING EXHIBIT
ZONING CHANGE - CASE Z-99-087
...... .. .. '.. .. *-IICI," " ....... ._.....
..... .. . ...... ... ....... _. "- ~ .. ,
Uf'Vt611a 110' '''11
UIIDIII _..., WlSl'[1H J"'ANCIIIU
rlTU CI):Al.AMCI mu
11J#tC&3l..: I.....KWOOD cr, elf DDZlIOIt DC'
DATE- '-29-H
.~
J"ex..
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA BRIEFING
Agenda Date:
January 1 0, 2000
Subject:
Z-99-087 - Public Hearing to consider the request of Brian
Markwood to rezone a 2.210 acre tract at 6212 L. D. Lockett Road
from an AG district to an R-30 district.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
This tract is one of a number of long odd shaped Agricultural tracts along L. D. Lockett.
There is a house on each of the tracts, however only a few have been platted. There is
a house on the subject tract, however, the applicant wishes to subdivide the property into
two parcels to create a second homesite. Before construction of a second house, the
property would have to be platted. At platting, each lot would far exceed the minimum
zoning requirements of R-30 zoning.
1. Master Plan. This proposal is compatible with the Colleyville Master Plan adopted
in 1998 since the plan indicates residential uses for this tract.
2. Surrounding Properties. There are single family homes built on all of the tracts in the
area.
3. Development Trends. The only trend in this area would be for single-family
development.
4. Infrastructure. Apparently sufficient water and sewer utilities have already been
brought to this area, however other subdivision regulations will have to be met when the
property is platted. These regulations include items such as sidewalks and perimeter
street improvements.
5. Current Zoning Suitability. The tract is currently zoned AG, and that zoning is not
suitable for this tract since AG development requires a three acre minimum lot size.
6. Economic Development The addition of a homesite will have a positive impact to the
economy through an increase in ad valorem taxes to the City's tax base.
7. Trail System Plan. The Colleyville Pathways Citywide Trail Plan does not call for
a pathway on this side of L.D. Lockett, however the proposed "Cotton belt Trail" will be
constructed across the street along the D.A.R.T. rail line.
Agenda Item No. 2 - Page 1
Summary:
The request for rezoning is consistent with the Master Plan and the proposed tracts can
be platted to the appropriate zoning standards.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of R-30
ATIACHMENTS
. Location Map
. Zoning Exhibit
. Development Review Committee review memo
. List of Property Owners Receiving Notice of Public Hearing
Prepared by:
~
Tom Niederauer, AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Item No. 2 - Page 2
Richard & Margarita Haenke
1305 Airport Fwy, Ste 302
Bedford, TX 76021
Kenneth & Cheryl Darrow
P.O. Box 1806 Colleyville, TX
76034
Juanita McCain Estate
778 CR 0
Clovis, NM 88101-1154
Willmon Family REV Trust
William & Alpha Willmon TR
RR 3, Box 149
Clovis, NM 88101-9803
Albert Ray
P.O. Box 475
Colleyville, TX 76034
Dallas Area Rapid Transit
601 Pacific Avenue
Dallas, TX 75202
Mary K & Howard Rettig
P.O. Box 17
Colleyville, TX 76034
Leroy Chism
600 Shelton Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Kevin & Kathy Doody
508 Shelton Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Debbie Lykins
6204 L. D. Lockett Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Johnnie Tyler
312 White Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Stacy & Brian Markwood
6212 L. D. Lockett Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Case Z-99-087
According to the Tax Records, individuals who own property that is within the 200' of the
proposed zoning change request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above
have been notified of the proposed zoning change request as required by Section
211 the Local Government Code. (Notices dated: December 30, 1999)
Jan Levy
Planning & Zoning Assistant
.
.:.-ac
,
.
:I
!
I ·
. XlI
".41 ac
.
.
,. .
.~
s
...
I..'. I
.
,
.
.
.XI
...... K
----T---
~~------
IIeIIlIIl'RU. lICIIlICIL _
~Sf" f&
'OO~
t ~ .
1
3... .
.J
,-+. 'WI 'A
I )! R.D AC
'-- r
I
I
I
I
r AVIf1
~ '
~ \~fQ1
-+- ""G
o.C. \J~~ 1
5 1.8
~-
,
I
I
I
I
I
... ..
"
1'." Ie
-
. IA'
I." IlC
.. ..
i.ll AI:
......
~
~,e
1 Uta:. "'-
..01 .t.D At
I
I
III
&...., .
"'.
'.0 ac
3
- 1111
~ 1.D AI:
~h . .....
... M:
() ... X4 ~D S'l1B
111- .11 ..
I. '" AC ~/CE 1
~ 1~
III >DA
.~ u: linn
"'II.
s.o IC
LOCATION MAP
ZONING CHANGE - CASE Z-99-087
.
StiEf
ADVtl
1
~
.
'S.U54 .
,-----
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
.
.
I
...
w
. .
Crrr OF Cou.EYVlu..E
CoMMUNfTY DEvELoPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
FAX TO
FAX NO
FROM
December 21, 1999
Brian Markwood
none
Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT
Z-99-087 AGto R30 - 6212 L.D. Lockett Road
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (ORC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and
zoning change request submitted to this office on December 03, 1999. The following comments
are for your consideration.
ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING
No changes are required to the drawing.
OTHER INFORMATION
Approval of a subdivision plat is required to divide property into additional lots. The following
information is related to the subdivision plat process, and is provided to you for funrre reference.
1. The Subdivision Regulations require sidewalks along LD Lockett Road. The sidewalk must
be constructed when any new residence is built on the property. The sidewalks must be at
least 4-feet wide.
2. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since LD Lockett Road is an
Wlimproved street and the plat contains more than one lot. The developer is required to
construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future
improvement by the City. The Engineering Department will calculate a detailed estimate of
the escrow amount at the time ,of plat submittal. The developer may request a waiver of this
requirement from the City Council, as allowed by the Subdivision Regulations. Please contact
the Community Development Department for further information.
3. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new
residence on the lots. The roadway impact fee is $1,600 per lot. The water and sewer impact
fee depends upon the size of the water meter. The fee for a %- to I-inch meter is $816 for
water and $51 for sewer. The Engineering Department upon the submittal of a building
permit application will provide a formal assessment of impact fees to the Building Inspection
P.O. Box 185 - COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 - 81 7.577.7587
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-99-087 MARKWOOD R30
Department. The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee is in the process of reviewing
the current impact fees, as required by State law. The fees may change in the next 6 months.
4. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for
residential uses is $1,260 per dwelling Wlit. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be
provided upon the review of the final plat. Since only two new lots are being created, the fee
may be paid at the time a building permit is issued for the lots. A formal assessment of
parkland dedication fees will be provided to the Engineering Department.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, January 10,2000 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, February 1 and February 15,2000, 7:30 p.m.
RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS
None
PAGE 2 OF 2
ORDINANCE 0-00-1201
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, H.R. WILSON ADDITION, IN
THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE FROM THE AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO
THE R-30 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION:
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning district change was filed by Brian
Markwood on December 03, 1999, under Case Number Z-99-087;
and
WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission
was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property
herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in
a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 15 days
before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the zoning
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, public hearings to change the zoning and the Master Plan on the
property herein described were held before the Planning and
Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and
Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change herein
effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Zoning
Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of
Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Master Plan, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit A)
are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in
Colleyville, Texas, described as Lot 1, Block 1, HR. Wilson
Addition, by changing the zoning of said property from the AG
district to the R-30 district.
Sec. 2.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance as read together with the Zoning Ordinance of the
Ordinance 0-00-1201
Page 2 of 2
City of Colleyville shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation
continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be
punishable as such.
Sec. 3.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as
an alternate method of publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
a
...
II.UiIe
I
J
. .
. 7' .
.
. 7 111m
lit. I ...... ...
1.10' . t
111
....
- -
- 1~11
'S - .'"
,0oD ~ . .. 11..... AC
. , .'1.
(. 1.1 iIC 1
1.0. -
.J
a
2._ a:
1
.. ..,
J." iIC
...
1.11 III:
-
,
'I.'
&VIto
~
~
1
"'-
4.' AC
1__
1.8 Ie
III
....42 .
,IVA
"''''
I.D iIC
J
~h ·
Q
111_
,._ AC
111..
.l$ AC
"B-
I.' AC
..a4l>
.l$ AC
111- 111m
.50 iIC I.J AI:
,
Exhibit A - Zoning Map
(Q~~
CITY COUNCIL 1m' AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
5
Ordinance # :
0-00-1202
Previous Action: 2/1/2000
DEPT. :
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Zoning change requested by John Grant for Asifali
Mahomed, from AG to R-30 on Lot 1 and from AG
to R-40 on Lot 2, 4.934 acres located at 6208
Pleasant Run Road
Second Reading and Public Hearing
Backoround
This tract is similar to a number of large tracts along Pleasant Run Road that are still
zoned AG for agricultural purposes. There are houses on all the tracts, and since many
of the properties are unplatted, they were apparently built prior to the adoption of the
zoning code. There is a house on the subject tract and at the Planning & Zoning
Commission hearing, the applicant expressed his wish to ultimately subdivide the
property into two parcels to create a second homesite. He stated that he plans to
construct a new dwelling and allow the current dwelling to remain to be used by other
family members. Because of the siting of the existing house, required zoning widths
and setbacks would not permit that lot to be platted for the R-40 zoning. As a result, the
applicant is requesting R-30 on the smaller lot, and R-40 on the larger lot. Since the
single-family zoning in this neighborhood ranges from R-20 to R-40, either district would
be compatible.
(continued)
xOa.- YJJ~ t?vlfft9
CITY MANA ER ":::/
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-00-1202
Page 2
At the January 10th hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission, the only speaker was
the applicant, Mr. John Grant, representing the owners of the property. No notices were
returned in opposition to this request. The Commission voted 6 - 1 in favor of
recommending this application for a zoning change to the City Council. The request for
rezoning is consistent with the Master Plan and the proposed tracts can be platted to
the appropriate zoning standards.
Recommendation
Approval of Ordinance 0-00-1202.
8
o
@i
:&
on
N
o
..
~~
~~
8!"'....
2 ......
o ...,
i ~l
i~~~~
~~:;:8iii
a~
"'....
z
8:~....
2~ ..
~ .J~
2 ::f~
i~~1
~~8S
II-~rl
I \111...,
5\ :~ ~l
-,. Ii ID
61 ;:S!I'l g!.
~,~ .:!.l.....,
i; l~ I ~ j
~; isl ~ 11
0, 1_'1";
~ ~ .l--~-:
~ 19\ -I ~:
._!..-1.__~
~
'-
<
~~ ~
~~~
;,;;\. ... ~
\,~ ?
T),\
'f> <:\
f:: '% 'Ii>
.. a ... ~~
-t;,? ';
t.~
~
:;
- 5!
~ t;~
'" w
:i~n
!i~;!~;;
~~il:~;;
C1C1i!1i<1
~~~X~::::
.... ..
~u~...~
..,0..,
r
~
-'
~ --
~ Do .......
i~ I
011.
:fo ~
~g ~ ~
~; ~ ~
~~ u.at
'"
xo .... '"
....0 .... ~
l!i:; ~ It!
i~ N ~
11.~ 8 ~
ili It l:l
'.
\.,.,
\1\.
~;~
~\
\"
"-
"
.......
0,
tt')'
~~
~ I
0.:4
ffi ~o
J: ~
X W'i
W ~o 0::
o.2~ 0
z J:+'
Z 0
o 0 (,21
N z<!
~E
No
~
-
a
i
00 JS
.8
G) !!
.... -
.8 Ii
~Jf
~ Jj
~J;
I
--0 v 0 ~
.wOK
~_.- ...r-v ,..-,r.3-T a-
-;if n ~ .L ''1 y ,;) y
lit JIt'.L L.DO S
~
..;
...
..
...
".,
~
in
~
<II
/,-""
,/ y-
// /1
/ // k.
/ /;.......
/ ."
\r::.
;II~ ~~
i~ t'~1
,
'"
......"
........,
.'ia~
I
/
I
,
!
.XOIo.
/
,
I
I
I
!
\
\ ~ c::.. ,~
\ ~....,p ~J
~ y:?~ i"- I
~& 0LU' 0 ~ :
o ~ 'Z- !!'~ __
~ ~......~ 1 L-,..._"","
' -'" y: 0
~o-\ ~~ q,. ~
\ ~..t~~
~
~~~
~. 'lli
~g,
/
/
/
/'
.//
./
.-----
/
/
/
.--/
.....
--
,
f
/
i
I
I
,
i
/
/
Ii
~
'\.
....
'i.";).
~ -~~ ~%
~......... ~'"
~....'t.'i. ...;,\
"'",,'~ '<<:>
\.
.6L'~ I 3 ..z;L.9k.DO N
.,.\.
i;, ~:\
'\\'<:~ "t'li>
,;'a~.. ...;;,.
~~?~ ';
"
"
".
.,
,
I
~~
z
...z
~6
0'"
I1.lD
2
~
On
~
r;j
..
y\.
'i....
. ~'\
~~~ ~~
~~; ?
'\:Q,
~
b
o
.
,.,
b>
tD
Z
.~
't'ea..
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA BRIEFING
Agenda Date:
January 10, 2000
Subject:
Z-OO-O01 - Public Hearing to consider the request of John Grant
for Asifali Mahomed to rezone a 4.934 acre tract at 6208 Pleasant
Run Road from an AG district to an R-30 district and an R-40
district (two lots).
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
This tract is similar to a number of large tracts along Pleasant Run that are still zoned AG
for agricultural purposes. There are houses on all of the tracts which indicates that they
were built prior to the adoption of the zoning code since many of the properties are
unplatted. There is a house on the subject tract, however, the applicant wishes to
ultimately subdivide the property into two parcels to create a second homesite. As
indicated by the applicant's exhibit, this would entail demolishing the existing house and
building two new houses.
1. Master Plan. This proposal is compatible with the Colleyville Master Plan adopted
in 1998 since the plan indicates residential uses for this tract.
2. Surrounding Properties. There are single family homes built on all of the tracts in the
area, including the Hardage Estates subdivision across Pleasant Run Road.
3. Development Trends. The only trend in this area would be for single-family
development.
4. Infrastructure. Apparently sufficient water and sewer utilities have already been
brought to this area, however other subdivision regulations will have to be met when the
property is platted. These regulations include items such as sidewalks and perimeter
street improvements.
5. Current Zoning Suitability. The tract is currently zoned AG, and that zoning is
suitable for the existing homesite, however not for subdividing the tract into less than
the three acre minimum lot size.
6. Economic Development The addition of a homesite will have a positive impact to the
economy through an increase in ad valorem taxes to the City's tax base.
7. Trail System Plan. The Colleyville Pathways Citywide Trail Plan calls for a sidewalk
along this side of Pleasant Run Road.
Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 1
Summary:
These tracts will plat to the appropriate zoning standards and are in keeping with the
Master Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of R-30 and R-40
ATTACHMENTS
. Location Map
. Zoning Exhibit
. Development Review Committee review memo
. List of Property Owners Receiving Notice of Public Hearing
Prepared by:
~ "'^ nl~41-..-
Tom Niederauer, AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 2
Glen & Lily Parker
6213 Pleasant Run Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Herschel & Teresa Phillips
900 Hardage lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
Miguel & Regina Erazo
902 Hardage Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
Howard & Suzanne Hughes
1818 Altacrest Drive
Grapevine. TX 76051
John & Jean Hopson
903 Hardage Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
Mrs. G G Cook
6105 Pleasant Run Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Scott & Mary Willis
6114 Pleasant Run Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
P R Yoes & D H Reeder
6113 Hunter Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
Nadine Wilmut
P.O. Box 635
Colleyville, TX 76034
Fred & Mary Rice TR
Rice Revocable Living Trust
6103 Hunter Lane
Colleyville. TX 76034
Ullin & Patricia Davis
The Davis F amilly Trust
6316 Pleasant Run Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Todd & Lisa Pipes
6115 Hunter Lane
Colleyville. TX 76034
John L. Stowe
6212 Pleasant Run Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Asifali & Samia Mahomed
6208 Pleasant Run Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Case Z-00-001
According to the Tax Records, individuals who own property that is within the 200' of the
proposed zoning change request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above
have been notified of the proposed zoning change request as required by Section
211 the Local Government Code. (Notices dated:~ece ber 30. 1999)
Jan Levy
Planning & Z ning Assistant
,
,~
..
,.. .
-
11l~ .
.41 ~
III X'
11Ill 2IMC .K AC
I. '501 ,I:
. II .. "
,.. Ie t.o IC
~.
~
I
I
I
I
.. I IA'
I
I
-- ~ - - - :: -== ::::..=. :: -
I
___L___
M
llltf
1.1 IC
-
M'
AG
.. ~.
: I M'A
\=...1_____
. ",.' . -
\-L.,_,__
1tC I Jel' _
, I
.-
ft.. .c
D
5 E 'f
DValLT. DII
LOCATION MAP
ZONING CHANGE - CASE Z-OO-O01
CITY OF Cou.EYVlUE
CoMMUNrTY DEvELoPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
FAX TO
FAX NO
FROM
December 29, 1999
John Grant for Asifali Mahomed
(817) 923-4141
Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT
Z-OO-OOI AG to R30 and R40 - 6208 Pleasant Run Road
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (ORC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and
zoning change request submitted to this office on December 17, 1999. The following comments
are for your consideration.
ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING
1. The Development Review Committee strongly encourages the applicant to consider rezoning
the entire tract to R40. It appears the only reason for requesting R30 is to allow the 140-foot
lot width of proposed Lot 1. By adding 10 feet to the width of Lot 1, both proposed lots
would conform to the R40 standards.
2. Show the proposed zoning designations on each lot: Lot 1 - R30; Lot 2 - R40.
3. Since two different zoning districts are requested, provide a separate metes and bounds
description for each lot. If approved, the ordinance that changes the zoning will need to
describe each tract separately.
OTHER INFORMATION
Approval of a subdivision plat is required to create a lot or divide the property into two or more
lots. The following information is related to the subdivision plat process, and is provided to you
for future reference.
1. The Subdivision Regulations require sidewalks along Pleasant Run Road. The sidewalk must
be constructed when any new residence is built on the property. The sidewalks must be at
least 4-feet wide.
2. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Pleasant Run Road is an
unimproved street and the plat contains more than one lot. The developer is required to
construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future
improvement by the City. The Engineering Department will calculate a detailed estimate of
P.O. Box 185 - COLLEYVILLE. TEXAS 76034 - 81 7.577.7587
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z.oO.o01 PLEASANT RUN ROAD
the escrow amount at the time of plat submittal. The developer may request a waiver of this
requirement from the City Council, as allowed by the Subdivision Regulations. Please contact
the Community Development Department for further information.
3. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new
residence on the lots. A formal assessment of impact fees will be provided to the Building
Inspection Department by the Engineering Department upon the submittal of a building permit
application. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that
could be assessed. The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee is in the process of
reviewing the current impact fees, as required by State law. The fees may change in the next 6
months.
· Roadway
· Water
· Sewer
$1,600 per lot for single family residential uses
$816 for %- to I-inch meter (fee dependent on water meter size)
$51 for %- to I-inch meter (fee dependent on water meter size)
4. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for
residential uses is $1,260 per dwelling unit. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be
provided upon the review of the final plat. Since only two new lots are being created, the fee
may be paid at the time a building pennit is issued for the lots. A formal assessment of
parkland dedication fees will be provided to the Engineering Department.
5. Right-of-way dedication may be required on the plat for Pleasant Run Road. Pleasant Run
Road is classified as a Minor Arterial (2 lane undivided roadway) on the Master Thoroughfare
Plan. This roadway requires an ultimate right-of-way width of 75 feet. The actual required
dedication will be reviewed as part of the plat submittal.
6. The Subdivision Regulations require utility improvements for this property. According to the
Water Buildout Master Plan, the developer is required to upgrade the 12-inch water line
adjacent to this property to a 16-inch water line. Engineering construction plans for the water
line must be submitted to the Engineering Department for review and approval. Contact Chris
Steubing at (817) 577-7587 for details on these requirements.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, January 10,2000,7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, February 1 and February 15,2000, 7:30 p.m.
RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department
offices. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to
our offices:
PAGE 2 OF 3
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMI1TEE
Z~~1P~ANTRuNRoAD
. 20 folded copies of the revised Zoning Exhibit drawing
· one 8-112" X 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit
. a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering
reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived
The above requested items must be submitted by Tuesday, January 4, 2000 in order to make
the scheduled hearings. Please call me if you have any questions.
C: CHRIS STEUBING, ENGINEERING
RED BAILEY, FIRE DEPARTMENT
RUSSELL WEST, BUILDING INSPECTION
PAGE30F3
ORDINANCE 0-00-1202
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A 4.934 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN
THE JOSEPH WHITE SURVEY, ABSTRACT. 1692, IN THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE FROM THE AG AGRICULTURE DISTRICT TO THE R-30 AND
R-40 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION:
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning district change was filed by John Grant
on December 17, 1999, under Case Number Z-00-001; and
WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission
was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property
herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in
a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 15 days
before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the zoning
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, public hearings to change the zoning and the Master Plan on the
property herein described were held before the Planning and
Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and
Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change herein
effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Zoning
Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of
Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Master Plan, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit A)
are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in
Colleyville, Texas, described by metes and bounds (Exhibit B), by
changing the zoning of said property from the AG district to the R-
30 (proposed Lot 1) and R-40 district (proposed Lot 2).
Sec. 2.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance as read together with the Zoning Ordinance of the
Ordinance 0-00-1202
Page 2 of 2
City of Colleyville shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation
continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be
punishable as such.
Sec. 3.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as
an alternate method of publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
5
J
..
I
I.
"pilE
Slip J
GOOD jDD"
,
c#fJ
,
...- .
.
.
..
'!'B ·
. ....
I.'M M:
. ..
._11<
... ...
,. c ... IC
~.
>>
,
,
I
1
.. I ....
I
,
--~--- ~-==::=.::.-:-
I-
___L___
Ja
...
t.. IC
-
..
AG
..
-
:' M'A
\=-1_____
- ...1 .. _
'rL.,-,--
x I lC11 1a
I ,
.. .""
.. ~
E f
5
.........y. Da
-
Exhibit A - Zoning Map
. . -- ------...-
-
A tract of land out of the JOSEPH A WHITE SURVEY, Abstract No. 1692, in Tarrant County, Texas,
described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a steel rod at the Northeast comer of DUNN SUBDMSION, an Addition to the City
ofColleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 388-120, Page 48 of the
Plat Records ofTmant County, Texas;
THENCE North 89034'00" West along the North line of said Dunn Subdivision, 628.45 feet to a steel
rod at the Northwest comer thereot: said point being in the East line of FRED C. RICE SUBDMSION,
an Addition to the City of Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume
388-193, Page 52 of the Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE North 00036'12" East along the East line of said Fred C. Rice Subdivision, passing the
Northeast corner thereof at 43.52 feet, and continuing along the East line of that tract ofland conveyed
to Philip R Yoes, et al, by deed recorded in Volume 7047, Page 678 of the Deed Records of Tarrant.
County, Texas, in all, 344.19 feet to a steel rod at the Northeast comer of said Yoes tract, said point also
being the Southwest corner of that tract of land conveyed to John L. Stowe by deed recorded in Volume
10707, Page 347 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE South 89015'45" East along the South line of said Stowe tract, 626.63 feet to a steel rod at the
Southeast comer thereof. said point also being in the West right-of-way line of Pleasant Run Road;
THENCE South 00017'48" West along said West right-of-way line of Pleasant Run Road, 340.86 feet to
the Point of Beginning.
Containing 4.934 acres ofland, more or less.
Exhibit B - Metes & Bounds Description
CC~ce
CITY COUNCIL 7m' AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtQ. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
6
Ordinance # :
0-00-1203
Previous Action: 2/1/2000
DEPT. :
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Zoning change requested by Miles Fairris, from
CC-2 to C-PO (Professional Office) on 0.6923
acres located on the south side of Gateway Drive
in the 4100 block
Second Reading and Public Hearing
Backoround
Although zoned for commercial purposes, the tracts along Gateway Drive (four to date)
have developed for non-retail uses probably because of their location away from major
streets. To the east on the corner at Heritage Drive, is a day care facility, and then
three office tracts. The approved preliminary plat for this strip (see following) along the
south side of Gateway Drive indicates a lot arrangement more suitable for office
development rather than retail. Although the adopted Master Plan indicates that this
area should be reserved for retail uses, the location away from major streets makes the
land more suitable for less intense commercial uses. Office development is compatible
with both retail and other commercial uses.
At the January 10th hearing of the Planning & Zoning Commission, the only speaker
was the applicant, Mr. Miles Fairris, representing two dentists that will office in the
(continued)
;a~ ~ ~.
CITY MANf-GER ~
0~
b~
DEPAR. ENT HEAD
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-00-1203
Page 2
building. No notices were returned in opposition to this request. The Commission voted
7 -0 in favor of recommending this application for a zoning change to the City Council.
The request for rezoning is consistent with the Master Plan and the proposed tract can
be platted to the appropriate zoning standard.
Recommendation
Approval of Ordinance 0-00-1203.
.; 'I
C'l I I~I'
.
i~ ~.s ;it :1 ~ tl :1 ~ ~li ...:I '" . ri I'!
\I' I:
~, ';.011 -,I !! ~IJ ~ !~ ~ Iii U 0 Ii ~ ij!~l
if. lIill !. -. · I ~ 'J 15 0 z . . B
. - ,( .i~ r Uj it ~ .."h ~ = t ...~ 15~ I,
i! RIP ir: r!S- i- ul :e
J II i J 1I!1 '- ~ .;. !J e J 1,1 S Nt,,) i: 8u ft.
if' l."&j .. '1 ... j';J Ua UJ ~ p"
1'-1 \~ift iii i- pI j .;I 'ii iii olllil Z 1/1 I I il
'-'C' ". ~l!J 1119=0 ~e '~i
.lJII~Ji; '!" r. ~i :! !' Iii '!~ - .
011.0 III _ ~
II' :.::" ~=! IJ . ! =! 3; PI 1:il!~CXl~t:I~l!;~l--
Jr.1 Ju..:; :V ~ i,~ Ii '- I J! I
i .. r~~~! . m 1 E It. liJ t:1loo 0 .=C ~!::i ~~
.lll." '; 1 ,
ire. !~j:-: b' r. 'i~ .'. ~J .~ ~J 15 lEClrt;I~ ~o I~e ~I
=lEi ~ r~ d r~ ffi ti\ Iii ,I U S~ ~ 8"~i I .M
'"' I I Ie . -. '. I
'jd.r,,~ iU ~ .ii ..~ I~ ~J it' I [-0 0 ~ ~ '2imi
- ~ ~
!ni~:!i: .~ ~j ~i 21 ~J ..1 pi = 101
., ...... ;; =- ~ ra:I ~
I!~; ;~J.Ji 1..1 iti iil jill~! d! 'J. = ~ ,.U i .....f t
.... II
~i 11l1i;; 1m IIJ I!!! IL II! I!i 5iJ 101
~
~~
~
~.
. itt
~.~. .
~:;li'
... II:
.~ t
~
~~
\t
\~
-~ ~
\ ~!
ig I
;~ j~1
Iii =l.
.. d;;
,",
~
~
N
"
"
"
"
,..-.:
~:I!h
f!!~ I ~
i~:~
'~i
i
I
~
'.'0"" ._
I
I I
I II
I I I
! I ! I
I I I
d J I
. I
I ~~I li~'
I a' ,~ -
1111 I~.~!
.J:1 I~:il
l ;; "~t'" ,91 i IiI
I ~ ~ I I &1 I
\.
--- II I
-\;, -'~I il I
I ~ '~..~. ~ 0 0 111 I
o ~.D I I I
~ ~'"
__~__.-J I I
-L_____, I I
I I I I
"' :0'"
~~-
I o:.~ .
~l' = ~:.. :1
- 0 ~'ot R
. .:I ,,,
~
---
ZONING EXHIBIT
ZONING CHANGE - CASE Z-OO-002.
~
.j
~'
.
r
t
I~
I
.
S,
r-
.'
II
i
",. !I
!ll~ !~
Iii: ~!l
li-: :
Iii: "
-:h ;1
U:I~ II
-t' . ;
;!11} j!
1:.1: 'I
I flly' 1
-"~1 a~i
J 11' t 1-'
Ii! , i
"t': a"
[V! I!'
'I" "I
lh · I'.
-"- 1 .r.
tw,l !.j
'. ,I _r.
!I!'I 'I.
, .1, I" I
r Hi .I.
iiih ~H
It ',~ ~';, I = n t : ~ ~, '
I; 11' I ;1. ; ;,- "If I .t , .. · II ,I", 1...', I ;, 'J ' , I "
rJf IIf ~~f ;1) ;1 ;II~ l~ ! i!1 I II ! ji H ~ ~ Ii ! !f ~: ! ! i II
fl.l~ f'Ji ;I'U 'Ii ]~ 3111 I~h' ! ,n i d I ,~ It'~ !~ fI , fi !!: ] ] ] ,~
d I~ of' ".:I~ 'I 'I '.::1 II . I~, II +. It'. r"I" j.i 1". , , , I
u~Ji J!~l i!.~ ;i~ ;~ ;~~ lii~ ; li! i :i : fl. I! ~ J i~ ~i fll~ i!! ~ : U if
11~1'11 Ii. 'I IIIJI, Ijf I! 11',1 IIi: , nil IP. I ,6 If If ) 11ft ',': ''',b III I I .' 11
.~ II' I I ,~I '1,'1i II'. " ';l' r.' ,T (I ;. " ,.,. 'I 'I 'I 'I
Ilk ~. lilt.! 1': I. ..11 Ij;~ 111.III!t' I II! l~ II tIl'" I! I!! III I. I. !I !
)",) lifl ~ltJ~ 1111 I) t!~ 1111 ~! i'llll, ~I! I ~II II t. il'j t ! Ii tit 11:.1 h ~ t. rl'.
'q: ~ I-I: S ,; 'lim 4 SJ!i 'I CII'I'-;'4 iii .Irs lill 'llil; '-ft .. .. Ii. ·
11m iia ~~ijh :ffi n ;!~~ ;inJ ;1 ;~ :i U! {i ;!i nJ ;i; ill; 5! R ~~ nJf ;; ;~ U ;~!
I
I Ii ,I I
l J !
. I
· .f
. ).
- ,f
i u
..)7: 11
.. ---~"::".""""~"." ...-
.. - - .: '~=":..:. \ ...-~;;;;;'; --
....... " : ;,,'\~~\..,
~~'. .~~ , ~.~ \~ L~
..... , '"
, ,
B-a..
~n
l!t
It I
I ..
111
If;
iib
· &l ~'!J
~Ii !!I ~In
..;:a g;:a i &~I
i ~lli ~ uti ! bra
'~I~
Ill!:!
IIIi
-.....-
-....--
~lf .lllfl "0 I'M71IlI lel AW/IH!JIH 3J.lfJS
I !~
" "i.
Ii ui
II ~=I
i Iii:>
I, ~'"
~ ::15
"
I
tl~IJI
'1,IJi
l t!g:
1111~li
jjmif
~
l::
<5
-~
~...It
egll:"
150 ~u i
lI1.to:
ci ~.
~~ I'
........
u
~
Q:
~
I
i
i
~
a
Preliminary Plan for
Heritage High School Addition
Exhibit for Zoning Case #Z-OO-002
- z I .;
= ~ 'I ~ f- -;
e 9 ~ Ie ~ ~ i
I 3 8 '~I- ~ 51!
I' "O~!i :l
I ~ i ~ i ;- ~ ~~
I ~ :z:... 21 0 I I
, I · W ~ ~ ul-,,-l-
115:~~~1~11
::::J ii!:"J zll: ~1-
-.f~!i!~i ull
;;
a
.
-~..
~i
i:!
5
.~
Tex..
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA BRIEFING
Agenda Date:
January 10, 2000
Subject:
Z-OO-002 - Public Hearing to consider the request of Miles Fairris
to rezone a 0.6923 acre tract on the south side of the 4100 block
of Gateway Drive from a CC-2 district to a C-PO district.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Although zoned for commercial purposes, because of their location away from major
streets, the tracts along Gateway Drive have developed for non-retail uses. On the comer,
at Heritage Drive, is a day care facility, and then there are three office tracts. The
preliminary plat for this strip (see following) along the south side of Gateway Drive indicates
a lot arrangement more suitable for office development rather than retail. Although the
adopted Master Plan indicates that this area should be reserved for retail uses, the location
away from major streets makes the land more suitable for less intense commercial uses.
Office development is compatible with both retail and other commercial uses.
1. Master Plan. This proposal is compatible with the Colleyville Master Plan adopted
in 1998. The Master Plan indicates retail uses, however the proposed office use is a
compatible use which is permitted in the retail zoning district
2. Surrounding Properties. There are offices recently built along Gateway Drive on the
south side to the west, undeveloped commercial land to the east and a shopping center
to the south. Two single-family residences and Heritage High School is across the
street to the north.
3. Development Trends. The trend along this street would be a continuation of office
development.
4. Infrastructure. Sufficient water and sewer utilities have already been brought to this
area, and the street is newly constructed.
5. Current Zoning Suitability. The tract is currently zoned CC-2 which permits office
uses however the minimum lot width is larger than the requirement for C-PO zoning.
6. Economic Development. The addition of a new development will have a positive
impact to the economy through an increase in ad valorem taxes to the City's tax base.
7. Trail System Plan. The Colleyville Pathways Citywide Trail Plan calls for a sidewalk
along this side of Gateway Drive which will be constructed as part of the office
development.
Agenda Item No. 5 - Page 1
Summary:
This tract will plat to the appropriate zoning standard and is in keeping with the Master
Plan.
RECOMMENDA liON
Approval of C-PO
A TTACHMENlS
. Preliminary Plan Exhibit
. Location Map
. Zoning Exhibit
. Development Review Committee review memo
. List of Property Owners Receiving Notice of Public Hearing
Prepared by:
~M
Tom Niederauer, AICP, Senior Planner
Agenda Item No. 5 - Page 2
Grapevine-Colleyville ISO
'3501 Ira E. Woods Blvd
Grapevine, TX 76051
Rustin Behl
5101 Old Oak Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
WCJ Glade 94 Ltd.
500 W. 13th St., Ste 100
Fort Worth, TX 76102
Vernon & Diana Rae, Jr.
5208 Normandy Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Partners in Gateway Success
4005 Gateway Drive, #200
Colleyville, TX 76034
Greenway-Glade Partners II LF
2301 Cedar Springs Rd
Ste 400
Dallas, TX 75201-7804
Patricia Calabria & Andre Ellis
211 West Colorado Blvd.
Dallas, TX 75211
Case Z -00-002
According to the Tax Records, individuals who own property that is within the 200' of the
proposed zoning change request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above
have been notified of the proposed zoning change request as required by Section
211 the Local Government Code. (Notices dated: Decem er 0, 1999)
Jan Levy
Planning & Zonin Assistant
CrTY OF Cou.EYVlu.E
CoMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
FAX TO
FAX NO
FROM
December 29; 1999
Miles Fairris, Fairris & Associates, Inc.
(817) 595-2710
Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT
Z-00-002 CC2 to CPO - 4000 block Gateway Drive
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and
zoning change request submitted to this office on December 17, 1999. The following comments
are for your consideration.
ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING
1. Add the uses of the surroW1ding properties. The uses are shown on the marked-up print.
2. The existing zoning designation in the title block should be changed to "CC-2."
3. Additional information is required for this zoning application. All zoning applications for
non-residential districts must include the following information. The information may be
provided in a standard letter format.
· Statement of Planning Objectives - A statement prepared in a narrative format describing
the character and type of the proposed development. This is the applicant's opportunity to
explain what they intend to do with the property.
· Development Schedule - An indication of the approximate dates of construction of the
proposed development.
· Statement of Proposed Ownership - A statement of who will own the property included
in the zoning application.
· Statement of Utilities to be Provided - A statement as to how and when the applicant
proposes to provide public utilities to the site.
4. Provide a copy of the conceptual site plan for this property, if available.
OTHER INFORMATION
Comments regarding the plat are contained in a separate memorandum and will be provided
within the next week.
P.O. Box 185 - COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 - 8 17.577.7587
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-OO-O02 GATEWAY DRIVE
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, January 10,2000, 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, February 1 and February 15,2000, 7:30 p.m.
RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS
A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department
offices. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to
our offices:
. 20 folded copies of the revised Zoning Exhibit drawing
. one 8-1/2" X II" reduced copy of the revised exhibit
. a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering
reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived
The above requested items must be submitted by Tuesday, January 4, 2000 in order to make
the scheduled hearings. Please call me if you have any questions.
C: CHRIS STEUBING, ENGINEERING
RED BAILEY, FIRE DEPARTMENT
RUSSELL WEST, BUILDING INSPECTION
MIKE SOAB, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PAGE 2'OF 2
ORDINANCE 0-00-1203
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A 0.6923 ACRE TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN
THE COX SURVEY, ABSTRACT 352, IN THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE FROM
THE CC-2 COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER DISTRICT TO THE C-PO
COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL OFFICE DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION:
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning district change was filed by Miles Fairris
on December 17, 1999, under Case Number Z-00-002; and
WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission
was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property
herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in
a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 15 days
before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the zoning
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, public hearings to change the zoning and the Master Plan on the
property herein described were held before the Planning and
Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and
Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change herein
effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Zoning
Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of
Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Master Plan, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit A)
are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in
Colleyville, Texas, described by metes and bounds (Exhibit B), by
changing the zoning of said property from the CC-2 district to the C-
PO district.
Sec. 2.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance as read together with the Zoning Ordinance of the
Ordinance 0-00-1203
Page 2 of 2
City of Colleyville shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two
. Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation
continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be
punishable as such.
Sec. 3.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as
an alternate method of publication provided by law.
..-
:
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
#
..
:1
, r
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
i
.
. .
,
.
.
sc~uv-
~lG'"
,
-
~
--
-.
~111 5
. GiJoD\;1~II97'
... ....#1 -,
-.
,
..-.
..
..
'''IE
>>
...
.tlP
UM
..
.,
_c
.-
.-
u.
.a
ua
...
t
EU"L-E s-s._~=-
..
...
Ie
~....-
~~u~~
J.stJ~
,._1-
Exhibit A - Zoning Map
,.1oI1'f
;"~'"
..
12 .... .
,
.
..-
~e.
..sa
~
-
.... .
7
'---
4~
. ~
~
.
-
3
-
.-.
E
I
>>
,no .
I
....
-
...
--------- -----.
-
s
e ..
... ... II:
A
~
~ 1:'
-.
..
BEGINNING lit a 1/2 inch capped steel rod stamped "MOAK SURV INC" found for the northwest comei' of said Calabria and Ellis
1ract, said point being the northeast comer of Lot 5, Block 2, Heritage High School Addition, an Addition to the City of CoUeyville,
Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Cabinet A. Slide 4914, Plat Records, T8IT8Dt County, Texas. said pint being in the southerly
right-of-way line of Gateway Drive and also being in a curve to the left whose radius point bears North 17 degrees 43 minutes 22
seconds West at 615.00 feet;
TIIENCE northeasterly with the northerly boundmy line of said Calabria and Ellis tract and with said southerly right-of-way line and
said curve to the left through a central angle of 08 degrees 45 minutes 24 seconds and an arc length of 93.99 feet to a 1/2 inch capped
steel rod stamped "MOAK SURV INC" found;
1HENCE South 26 degrees IS minutes 10 seconds East with the easterly boundary 1ine of said Calabria and Ellis tract a distance of
130.57 feet to a 1/2 inch capped steel rod stamped "MOAK SURV INC" found;
TIIENCE South 00 degrees 06 minutes 31 seconds East continuing with the easterly boundary line of said Calabria and Ellis tract a
distance of 146.79 feet to a 1/2 inch capped steel rod stamped "MOAK SURV INC" found in the southerly boundary line of said
Calabria and Ellis tract;
1HENCE South 89 degrees S3 minutes 29 seconds West with said southerly boundary line a distance of 130.00 feet to a 1/2 inch
capped steel rod stamped "MOAK SURV INC" found for the southwest corner of said Lot S;
1HENCE North 00 degrees 06 minutes 31 seconds West with the common boundary 1ine of said Calabria and Ellis tract and said Lot 5
a distance of 182.24 feet to a 1/2 inch capped steel rod stamped "MOAK SURV INC" found;
THENCE North 17 degrees 30 minutes 19 seconds West continuing with said common boundary line distance of 48.83 feet to the
PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 0.6923 acre ofland, more or less, as surveyed by David C. Moak Smveyors, Inc.
Exhibit B - Metes & Bounds Description
cce~
CITY COUNCIL Tw; AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item#:
7
Ordinance # :
0-00-1204
Previous Action: 2/01/2000
DEPT. :
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Zoning change requested by David Cunningham
for Faith Christian School from AG, CN, CC1 and
CC2 to PUD-C on 43.891 acres located on the
south side of McDonwell School Road, west of
Remington Parkway
Second Reading and Public Hearing
Update
Staff met with the applicant to discuss the proposed ordinance and issues related to the
zoning case. Staff also met with Colleyville youth sports association representatives to
identify various recreational needs within the community. The two meetings produced
some changes to the proposed ordinance which are described as follows.
Platting - A statement was added to require the submittal of a preliminary plan within
twelve months of zoning approval.
(continued)
xao~~ I 'm~ ~/nf
CITY MANA ER ""-./
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 2
Drive Approaches - The number of allowed drive approaches on McDonwell School
Road was changed from four to six. This increase in drive approaches will allow
for the construction of a parking area adjacent to the practice fields, if necessary.
The property has almost 2,000 feet of frontage on McDonwell School Road.
Outdoor Lighting - The height requirement for parking lot light standards was
increased to a maximum height of 40 feet. Staff researched this requirement
through generally accepted architectural and site planning standards, which
recommend a height for parking lots at 30-50 feet. The light standards would be
a sufficient distance away from any residence on the north side of the road to
alleviate any glare concerns.
Building Design Standards - The proposed ordinance requires all buildings to meet
the architectural requirements of the CC 1 district, which is 30 points. The
ordinance has been modified to apply this requirement to any building exceeding
2,000 square feet in gross floor area. This change is specifically provided to
eliminate any confusion on how this requirement would impact bleachers or
concession stands built at the football field since the requirement was originally
designed for primary structures rather than accessory buildings.
Impact Fees - A brief statement allowing credits and offsets of impact fees for the
construction of off-site and capital facilities was added. This provision is already
allowed by the Subdivision Regulations and is provided for clarity only.
Depth of Commercial Property - Staff has inserted language to require 500 feet of
commercial depth along Precinct Line Road. The site plan has been modified to
reflect this dimension. However, pushing the commercial area to a depth of 500
feet instead of the original 275 feet resulted in the loss of one of the sports
practice fields on the east side of the property. It also pushed the entire campus
closer to the Remington Park subdivision. This 500 foot commercial depth was
determined after staff researched existing developments in the city about size
and depth of property needed to support a shopping center. Attached to this
agenda briefing is an analysis that shows that a "shopping center" similar to
Albertson's or Kroger would require a depth of at least 500 feet. Smaller "strip
center" or single lot users require a depth of 300 feet or less. There appears to
be no significant difference in providing 275 feet or 375 feet of depth. There
does appear to be significant difference if a depth of 500 feet or greater was
provided. The area between Bransford Road and Glade Road on the west side
of Colleyville Boulevard is a good example of single lot development with 300-
foot lot depths. The conceptual plan has been revised to show Area A at a 500-
foot depth rather than 275 feet.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 3
Shared Facility Use - A paragraph was added to require the property owner to enter
into an agreement with the City of Colleyville for shared use of some of the
recreational and fine arts facilities.
Recommendation
Denial of Ordinance 0-00-1204
First Reading and Public Hearing
Backaround
David Cunningham, representing Faith Christian School, has applied for a zoning
district change on a 43.891-acre tract of land located on the south side of McDonwell
School Road, just east of Precinct Line Road. The property also has frontage on
Precinct Line Road. The applicant proposes a zoning district change for this property
from AG, CN, CC1 and CC2 to PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial for a
private school campus.
The proposed private school campus, according to the conceptual plan, includes school
buildings, an auditorium, a gymnasium, and facilities for soccer, baseball and football.
The PUD-C regulations normally require the zoning exhibit to meet the requirements of
a preliminary plan. The exhibit submitted by the applicant does not meet these
requirements. However, staff is acceptable to using the conceptual plan and supporting
documents as the basis for considering the zoning case. This situation will not relieve
the applicant of the requirement to submit a preliminary plan and final plat in the future.
The following are the major issues associated with this zoning case.
Land Use Plan. The request to rezone this property to PUD-C for a private school is
inconsistent with the goals and objectives of the Plan, and the Plan does not support the
rezoning of this property for this type of development. One of the primary issues during
the development of the Colleyville Master Plan was economic development. One of the
goals for commercial development is "Keep property taxes low as possible, while
maximizing the use of commercially zoned areas." An objective to achieve this goal
states "Increase percentage of commercially zoned areas throughout." The area along
Precinct Line Road is designated for retail, office and commercial development. While
the limits are not specifically defined, the policies of the Colleyville Master Plan are clear
regarding the future plans for this property. The applicant has reserved a portion of the
frontage along Precinct Line Road for commercial use. This area is noted as
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 4
Development Area A in the attached ordinance.
Thoroughfare Plan. The Master Thoroughfare Plan identifies an undivided 4-lane
Major Collector street running north-south between McDonwell School Road and L.D.
Lockett Road. The developer will be required to dedicate a 70-foot right-of-way through
this property on the subdivision plat and construct the roadway. The centerline of the
right-of-way should be located 1,OOO:t feet east of Precinct Line Road. The purpose for
this roadway is to provide traffic circulation in and access to the commercial/office areas
in the west part of town, without having a detrimental impact on Precinct Line Road.
The applicant is requesting that the construction of this roadway not be required for this
property, and their reasoning is explained in the attached documents.
Public Improvements. There are considerable amounts of public improvements
required with the development of this parcel. The developer must construct and/or
upgrade both on-site and off-site water and sanitary sewer lines. The developer must
construct the portion of McDonwell School Road adjacent to this property and the
roadway previously described in this briefing.
Zoning Requirements. This property is subject to the regulations of the PUD-C
ordinance and all related sections of the Zoning Regulations. The property must comply
with parking, screening, landscaping, building design and site planning requirements.
Other ordinances that will affect this development include tree preservation, signs, and
drainage. The property will also be subject to the requirements of the actual approving
PUD-C ordinance, which would include any conditions imposed by the Planning &
Zoning Commission or City Council.
Attached Ordinance. A proposed ordinance for this zoning case is attached. The
ordinance includes regulations for land use, lot requirements, open space, landscaping
and screening, and other items. The ordinance specifically includes an amendment to
the Master Thoroughfare Plan to remove a portion of an unnamed north/south collector
street south of McDonwell School Road. The ordinance also includes specific
requirements for lighting of athletic fields and building design requirements. The
Planning & Zoning Commission conducted public hearings, considered this zoning
district change at its January 10 and January 24 meetings, and recommended approval
by a 6-1 vote (Hill opposed). The Commission's discussion included the availability of
commercially developable land in this area, the use and lighting of the athletic and play
fields, open space, the loss of ad valorem tax revenue, and the entry way on Precinct
Line Road.
Recommendation:
Denial of Ordinance 0-00-1204 due to technical non-compliance with the land use plan
.~
Texas
COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
INTERNAL MEMORANDUM
DATE:
MEMO TO:
FROM:
February 8, 2000
Barry LeBaron, AICP, Community Development Manager
Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator
I subject:
Retail Survey
INTRODUCTION
Faith Christian School has proposed to designate the property adjacent to Precinct Line Road
for commercial and retail uses. The zoning request reserves the frontage to a depth of
approximately 275 feet. This depth includes a narrow strip of land located behind several
parcels of land that front Precinct Line Road (see Exhibit A). When the existing parcels (not
included in the applicant's rezoning request) are combined with the school's reserved property,
the resulting parcel of land has approximately 900 feet of frontage on Precinct Line Road, with
a depth of approximately 275 feet, totaling 5.78 acres.
The purpose of this memorandum is to (1) explore how this 5.78-acre tract could develop given
the required setbacks, parking and landscaping and (2) determine the advantages and
disadvantages of reserving only 275 feet of commercial depth verses reserving 500 feet or
more. Included within this memo is a small survey of 14 commercial developments in Colleyville,
ranging from restaurants to retail to office uses. A summary of the existing parcels of land on
Precinct Line Road that are not a part of the Faith Christian School zoning case is also included.
SURVEY OF PROJECTS IN CITY
The table below lists 14 projects in the city of Colleyville. The table summarizes lot sizes,
building sizes, lot dimensions, parking spaces, and property tax information. The purpose for
this survey was to generate the requirements of a typical development to compare with the
reserved property of the Faith Christian School zoning case.
Business Name Property Size Building Size Lot Dimensions Lot Parking Taxable Value Estimated Property
(acres) (sf) Width Depth Coverage TAD 99 Tax Revenue
Albertsons Nlllaae Park) 2205 234,053 1.318 500 24% 1,170 $ 11,678,721 $ 40,572
Applebee's 1.39 4,758 284 180 8% 82 $ 1,090,657 $ 3,789
Atlantic 011 C-Store 1.66 3,580 203 237 5% 29 $ 100.240 $ 348
Bank One 1.22 2,875 276 190 5% 31 $ 937,728 $ 3,258
Colleyvllle Square I 2.92 8,020 201 410 6% 31 $ 623,503 $ 2,166
Colleyvllle Souare II 7.17 25.517 632 900 8% 130 $ 635.003 $ 2.206
Eckerd 1.17 9,700 232 250 19% 50 $ 1,618.340 S 5.622
Glade POints (SH121) 15.40 116,351 1,143 536 17% 582 $ 9.023,032 $ 31,346
Kroger center 17.68 89.935 281 1000 12% 443 $ 7.019,348 $ 24,385
KWlk Lube 065 3,300 84 200 12% 17 $ 554,183 $ 1,925
Pecan Gardens 1.66 11,062 211 289 15% 51 $ 841.750 $ 2,924
Phast Phil's 136 4,330 263 310 7% 20 $ 118,582 $ 412
Railhead 1 93 7,399 150 564 g% 151 $ 1,128.849 $ 3,922
Redenta's 1.22 2,000 274 194 4% 22 $ 299.838 $ 1,042
Averages 5.53 37.349 396.57 411.43 11% 201 S 2. 547. 1U1 S B.B51
Totals 77.4B 522.BBO - - - 2.B09 S 35.669.774 S 123.917
Page 1
As can be assertained from the table above, at least 500 feet of depth is necessary to
accommodate a "large box" facility such as an Albertson's, K-Mart or Kroger. Not only do these
types of facilities have large ad valorem taxable values, but they are major sales tax generators.
No information is available to substantiate the sales tax revenues from these locations. The
TAD appraised value and estimated tax revenue can be somewhat misleading since several of
the valuations are based on vacant property. The Atlantic Oil C-Store and Phast Phil's sites are
both vacant properties under construction. Colleyville Square Phases I and" and Glade Points
shopping center both include some vacant lots in the calculations, though the Glade Points
building size and parking includes a proposed building under review. The number of parking
spaces for Glade Point and Albertson's Village Park are estimates.
The property tax revenue was estimated using the current tax rate of 34.74-cents per $100
valuation. The actual tax revenue from these projects could also include personal property and
sales tax.
TYPICAL AND PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT
Using the information generated from the survey, the parameters for a typical development
project may be assumed. Since a variety of project sizes was used, the average value may be
skewed. The parameters shown below are averages calculated through four combinations of
the sample data, omitting the smallest and the three largest projects. Three combinations were
developed by selecting four properties that provided a total of 5.4 to 5.6 acres in overall size.
The fourth combination was an average of the middle seven projects.
Lot Size
Building Size
Lot Width
Lot Depth
Parking Spaces
Lot Coverage
Typical Development
7.16 acres
27,105 square feet
227 feet
278 feet
235 spaces
9%
Using the above figures, one could project the build-out of the 5.78-acre tract by basing building
size and parking on ratios to the lot size. Lot width and depth are assumed to remain the same
since the width will vary in any case, and the depth roughly matches the lot depth proposed by
Faith Christian School. The lot width results in approximately four lots. Lot coverage is also
assumed to remain the same. This method is not desirable since it does not take into account
the actual dimensions of a specific piece of property.
Lot Size
Building Size
Lot Width
Lot Depth
Parking Spaces
L?t Coverage
Projected Development - Ratio Method
5.78 acres
21,880 square feet
227 feet
278 feet
190 spaces
9%
An alternative way to project the requirements for building on the 5.78 acre tract is to calculate
the land area required for setbacks, parking, landscaping and other requirements to determine
how much land will be used for each requirement. The table below uses this approach. The
lot is estimated at 900 feet wide along Precinct Line Road and 275 feet deep. From the
analysis, it appears the largest building that could be developed is about 64,500 square feet.
This method is somewhat complicated, but the results are more realistic. The land areas for
setbacks and landscaping are fixed since they are a function of lot size, and these requirements
account for 2.82 acres. The only variables are lot coverage and parking. Parking is dependent
upon the size of the building. The retail parking requirement is one space per 200 square feet
Page 2
of building area. For these calculations, parking lots are assumed to occupy 300 square feet
of land area per ~pace, which would allow for including the area of driving aisles.
Only the remaining 2.96 acres could be used for parking and buildings. Since parking is also
allowed within the front setback, an additional 0.82 acres must be considered as available for
parking coverage. The table shows the land required for developing 2.96 acres at 50% building
coverage. with an allowance of 0.82 acres for additional parking. It appears from this exercise
that the largest building that could realistically be developed on this site, given the zoning
requirements. is 64,468 square feet.
,........... ... Projected .D~vli!I.<:)p.'!l.!~~_=L:!I.~c:i_~':!~.f.!'.~.!t.'t<:)c:i..._.........m............._............._.........................._........
ReQuf~ementm m mm..m .. Land Area (sf) . Land Area (acres)
40-foot Front Setback (counted twice- 36,000 sJ. 0.82 acres
see text)
25-foot Rear Setback 22,500 sJ. 0.52 acres
25-foot Side Setback (each side) 13,750 sJ. 0.32 acres
Landscaping (20%) 50,355 sJ. 1.16 acres
Maximum Lot Coverage (50%) 64,468 s.t. 1 .48 acres
Retail Parking Required per Lot 96,702 sJ. 2.22 acres
Coverage (300 sJ. per parkino space)
Total 283,775 sJ. 6.52 acres
Corrected for Parking 247,775 s.f. 5.70 acres
SUMMARY OF EXISTING PARCELS
The table below shows the ownership, TAD appraised value, and estimated property tax
revenue from the existing parcels on Precinct Line Road. Three parcels have building
improvements, and three tracts are vacant.
Owner Name Property Description Property Size Taxable Value Estimated Property
(acres) TAD 99 Tax Revenue
E Wayne Deaton Tr lA9A. A-1154 (vacant) 0.49 $ 17,360 $ 60
Delma Phillips Tr lA, A-1154 (vacant) 0.97 $ 38,800 $ 135
E Wayne Deaton Tr lAl0. A-1154 (improved) 0.47 $ 115,208 $ 400
Bettye Jean Deaton Tr lAll, A-1154 (improved) 0.48 $ 144,767 $ 503
E W Deaton Tr lA12. A-1154 (improved) 0.49 $ 117,752 $ 409
Totals 2.90 $ 433,887 $ 1,507
Two cabinet shops are located on this property. The cabinet shops are housed in two metal
buildings. Future development in this immediate area may necessitate assembling all these
parcels of land with the land reserved through the school's zoning case. The success and
timing of the development will depend largely on the existing property owners' willingness to sell
the property as a "package." The City has no control over the sale of the property.
FUTURE RETAIL POTENTIAL
In September 1998, the City Council adopted a Future Land Use Plan which shows the property
abuting Precinct Line Road as a future retail/office location. The Future Land Use Plan
suggests a depth of 800 to 1,300 feet of retail land use along this route with an additional 800
feet of future office land use. According to the information contained in this analysis, it is
estimated that a "shopping center" similar to Albertson's or Kroger would require a depth of at
least 500 feet. Other "large box" developments, such as a Home Depot or a Wal-Mart would
require a depth of 600 feet, or more. Typically, smaller "strip center" or single lot users require
a depth of 300 feet or less. Oiven the empirical data, reserving a depth of 275 feet along
Precinct Line Road would likely result in strip development or single lot users such as drug
stores or small fast-food type restaurants. In order to attract a larger shopping center, a
minimum depth of 500 feet would be preferable. There appears to be no significant difference
Page 3
in providing 275 feet or 375 feet of depth. Whereas, there does appear to be significant
difference if a depth of 500 feet or greater is provided in terms of ability to support large box
development. However, requiring a- minimum of 500 feet of commercial depth along Precinct
Line Road will have an adverse impact on the proposed campus of the Faith Christian School.
At least one of the practice soccer fields on the east side of the campus would be eliminated and
requiring more than 500 feet of commercial depth along Precinct Line Road would probably
make this location prohibitive for the Faith Christian School or force all of the building up against
the Remington Park subdivision on the east.
Please contact me at extension 214 if you have any questions or need additional information.
Page 4
December 3,1999
..,:.;;"..:."
cJi.~::illers
,~i~.~:I~II'
~ '..\" (:j<~iSr<j:'~::?! ,.
r
.....:i.:;-,:....
f.:< :".'
Mr. Clayton Husband
Development Coordinator
City of Colleyville
5400 Bransford Road
CoUeyville, TIC 76034
DEe 0 3 1999
-.:;.'''......''"''--
CiTY OF COlLEVVllLE
BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RE: Zoning Change Application for Faith Christian School Campus Site
Dear Clayton,
You will please fmd in the body of this letter as well in the attached documents the wning change
request for the Faith Christian School Campus Site. The school has contracted to purchase five (5)
contiguous tracts ofland from four (4) separate landowners. The total combined parcel totals 43.891 acres.
The most easterly and westerly tracts are wned CC1, CN and CC2 and equal 29.916 +/-acres. The two
interior parcels are wned AG and equal 13.974 +/- acres.
The school has plans to purchase this property and currently plans to close the transactions in
February 2000 pending the granting of the new wning and approval of the use of the site as contemplated by
the school. The school is requesting that the City of Colleyville approve the wning of the contiguous tract of
land to include the following specific points:
Zoning for the 43.891 acres is requested to be changed to PUD-C. The school wishes to maintain
the right to utilize the land for any purpose or use which is allowed in the PUD-C category but
requests that the City also recognize the special uses that are Conceptually Planned for the Faith
Christian School Campus (ie: school buildings, auditorium, gymnasium, play fields, football, baseball
and soccer facilities).
The School requests that the exception to height regulation relative to schools, public buildings and
institutions be acknowledged for this site and it's PUD-C wning (ie: 85 feet in lieu of 35 feet).
While the School has authorized me to submit the development schedule attached to this request, the
School requests that the City recognize at the point of PUD-C approval that it's development
schedule will be subject to delay and/or extended planning and study which may prevent the School
from submitting formal plans and platting documents within the first six (6) months as required by
ordinance. Accordingly, the School request that the initial period for submission for this PUD be set
at 12 months before any Section 33- "Amendments: Frequency of Petition" issues or requirements
are needed to be addressed.
· The School requests that the City consider and grant the requested wning designation based upon
the conceptual site plan, statement of intended use and development plan submitted herewith. The
School request that the City recognize that, while in general concept the plan is "not far off', the
School is nnable to accurately depict the actual size, quantity, or capacity of the buildings and the
associated site work and play fields. -
The School recognizes that significant and detailed programming will be required for it to accurately
4141 Blue Lake Circle. Suite 134. Dallas, Texas 75244 · 972/503-5500. Fax 972/503-5788
Page -2-
plan it's campus and that one or more submissions in the form of eventual site plan, landscape plan,
platting and constrUCtion documents will be required before fInal approval is granted to build the
campus. The School wishes the City to understand that the School's final plans and layout are in
their infancy stage and requests the ultimate flexibility to design and construct the campus.
· The School has no plans at this time to subdivide it's acreage however does not wish to be hindered
from doing so at some furore point in time as long as sub-dividing is completed within the guidelines
of the PUD-C zoning category. The Conceprnal Site Plan shall not be used to limit or hinder the
School from it's best development plan which mayor may not resemble the Conceptual Site Plan in
it's current early form.
We are forwarding with this letter the following documents and information:
Zoning Change Application with checklist
Check for $500 for filing fees
Outstanding Liens and Charges Certificate
· Twenty-two 24" x 36" 1" to 100' scale combined survey of property as zoning exhibit. TIlls
drawing identifies the total tract of land in question and the existing zoning of the land as well as
those tracts around the site. Attached to this document is a 8 W' x 11" document which addresses
ckeck list items of section IT.A.
One copy of the survey zoning exhibit on 8 1/2" x 11" format
Twenty-two 11" x 17" colored conceptual site plans of the campus. Attached to this document is a 8
W' x 11" docwnent which addresses ckeck list items of section IT.B.
Twenty-two 11" x 17' colored conceptual arid perspective of the campus
Twenty-two 11" x 17" City of Colleyville Zoning maps with the tract of land hi-lighted
Two 81/2" x 11" arid photo copy of the western section of the City. One has been hi-lighted with
the tract of land in question and one is unmarked in case you need to make additional copies
One copy of the Contract for Sale between the five Sellers and the Buyer
One copy of Landowner consent letters from each of the four sellers
One copy of the metes and bounds description of the property on 8 1/2" x 11" Format
Per Section ill of the Application the following:
- Statement of Planning Objective
- Development Schedule
- Statement of Proposed Ownership
- Statement of Utilities to be Provided
We trust that the aforementioned documents and information is complete for the purposes of this
application. We will furnish any additional information or augmentation of that furnished as may be required
and that is in our power to procure. Thank you in advance for assistance.
\
avid R. Cunningham
President of CrossTimbers Capital, Inc. submitting for
Faith Christian School
Statement of Planning Objectives
The purpose of this Application for the requested zoning of the 43.891 acres in question to a PUD-C
designation is to establish the appropriate zoning classification for the entire tract of land that will enable the
furore owner, Faith Christian School, to properly plan and develop their Campus facilities. It is anticipated
that the development of the Campus will take several years to complete and it will be completed in several
phases or steps. The campus wiJl evolve and final build out will be the result of the maturing of the schools
mission and teachingplaris.
The School will be a Non-denominational Christian based Campus that will offer the complete educational
process in a K thru 12 format. The School is initially targeted to serve a total student body of 1000 students.
Currently it is planned that Phase I of the campus will serve 650 students. The school plans to offer a full
program of educational opporrunities including music and spons. The schools vision for this campus is to be
a comfonable home like environment that will be not only a school but a place for refuge from the busy
world.
The School will be privately owned and managed and the facilities that are contemplated will be private. As
the conceptual plans show, there will be significant open green space area which will be dedicated to play
fields, baseball fields, soccer fields and a football field as well as significant other green space. Since the fmal
design and planning of the school has not yet been completed it is difficult to say what open space will be
available for public use or when it would be available. It is safe to say that the leadership of Faith Christian
School are all residents of the community and We believe they will be good neighbors who will welcome
commtmity use of certain facilities.
Section ll.A. Attachment and Clarifications
1. 1" = 100' exhibit furnished
2. All.Luutareas on the south, north and east boundaries of the subject property are zoned for R-40, R-
20 and AG uses. The SlUTOWlding property is mostly Wldeveloped and/or being used for the
purposes for which it is zoned. The property to the west of the subject property is zoned CCl and is
being used for that purpose.
3. The Applicant, future Proposed owner and sub-divider will be: Faith Christian School
5410 Pleasant RWl
Colleyville, TX
The ClUTeD[ Owners are:
Eva M. Collins, Bobby J. Pace,
A.D. Electric Co., Inc.and
Alvin and Emma Reed
All Sellers are represented by:
J. Andrew Rollins
842 West Mitchell Street
POBox 801
Arlington, TX 76004-0801
The Land Planner and Architect will be:
SHW Group Inc.
5198 Rufe Snow Rd.
Suite 211
N. Richland Hills, TX 76180
The Surveyor and Civil Engineer will be:
Goodwin & Marshall, Inc.
6001 Bridge Str., Suite 100
Ft. Worth, TX 76112
4. Vicinity Map is on exhibit and additional information in the form of arid exhibits and city zoning
maps are furnished as well.
5. Physical features- The land is essentially flat and consist of grassland. There are no water features or
waterways on the site. There are no heavily treed areas on the site. Most of the site is undeveloped
although two older residences exist that will be removed. Part of the property is the site of the old
Nine-Acres facility which is vacant and abandoned. It is anticipated that this facility will be
demolished. An existing small retail facility is in place on the eastern end of the property and is
located on McDonwell School Road. It is anticipated that this facility will be retained in the shon
term and utilized by the school. Long term it is anticipated that this building will also be
demolished.
6. There is no area of the land in a 100 year flood plane.
7. There is no proposed subdivision of the property at this time
8. Legal Descriptions are furnished on the exhibit as well as on a separate 8 W' X 11" exhibit.
Section IT.B. Attachment and Clarifications
10 thru 13.
There are no areas of extensive tree cover on the site at this time. All Tree Cover and new
landscaping will have to be established during ftnal design and planning. The proposed
methods of screening and internal separations of use are not known at this time. The
Conceptuallayours for the building and other site amenities as well as internal site circulation
is purely conceptual at this time. Final planning will be required before these issues can be
adequately addressed
14. As this Site Plan is conceptual and the evenmal build out design of the campus will not be fmalized
for many months or years to come it is not feasible to accurately determine the various areas
requested in this Section. As of this submission the areas are approximately as follows:
- Gross Acreage is 43.891 acres or 1,911,891 sf.
- Gross Area of floor is not known but will probably not be in excess of 250,000 sf at build out. The
exhibit furnished with this application is approximately 178,500 sf.
- The area of streets, side walks, parking areas on the Conceptual Site Plan is approximately
200,000 sf. This amount will likely increase as the Campus Master Plan is fma1ized.
- The area of open or green space ( inclusive of play ftelds ) as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan is
1,461,891 sf or 76.46 % of the land parcel. This amount is highly likely to change as the fmal plan
is determined.
~. ~.:.~
~.' Development.Schedule
Achieve Zoning Classification needed per this Applicatihn
Close Land Purchase
Begin detailed Progranuning and Needs Assessment
Schematic Design
Final Design of Phase I inclusive of site development, platting, etc.
Construction of Phase I campus for initial 650 + /- students
12/3/1999- 2/3/2000
Late February 2000
3/1/2000- 5/1/2000
5/1/2000- 6/1/2000
6/1/2000- 10/1/2000
10/1/2000- 1/1/2002
S~tement of Proposed Ownership
.a .
As stated above, Faith Christian School wilhQc:.~ Privately Owned facility. At this time there are no plans to
sub-divide or sell off any portion of the propenyalthough the school wishes to have the right to do so within
the guidelines of a PUD-C zoning classification.
,
. ;.:
Statement of Utilities to be Provided
Faith Christian School is aware that certain off-site' facilities will be required for the development of their
campus. The fmal and full context of the off-site developtttent is not known but the facilities anticipated are
as follows:
1. 1/2 of McDonwell School which borders the schools north side
2. Approximately 4000 feet of 8" Off-site water main extensions across neighboring property
3. Approximately 2200 feet of 8" Off-site sanitary sewer main extensions
Additionally, it is understood that provisions must be made to store storm water on-site for timed release. It
is anticipated that one or more of the play fields will serve a dual purpose to meet this requirement.
CITY OF Cou.EYVlU-E
CoMMUNrTY DEvELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
FAX TO
FAX NO
FROM
December 21, 1999
David Cunningham or Mike Heath, Cross Timbers Capital
(972) 503-5788
Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT
Z-99-088 AG, CN, CCl and CC2 to PUD-C - McDonwell School Road at
Precinct Line Road
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (ORC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and
zoning change request submitted to this office on December 03, 1999. The following comments
are for your consideration.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future land use of this property as retail, office and
commercial development. The zoning request is inconsistent with the Plan, and a
recommendation for denial will be made to the Planning & Zoning Commission for technical
non-compliance with the Plan. The Plan does not contemplate the location of institutional
uses such as private schools. The applicant should submit a statement as to why the Plan
should be changed to designate this area for institutional development. The statement will be
included in the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council agenda packages when they
consider this request.
2. The Planned Unit Development application process requires the zoning exhibit to meet the
technical requirements of a preliminary plan. The submitted exhibit does not meet those
requirements. However, staff is not opposed to using the submitted exhibit as a conceptual
plan for the property. Upon approval of the zoning case, and before any development of the
property, the owner must submit both a preliminary and final plat for approval by the City.
3. The property would be subject to the general provisions of the PUD-C zoning district and any
conditions imposed by the Planning & Zoning Commission and City COWlcil. Detailed
review for compliance with the regulations will take place during the site plan!landscape plan
phase of the project.
ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING
1. The Master Thoroughfare Plan identifies an undivided 4-lane Major Collector street running
north-south between McDonwell School Road and L.D. Lockett Road. The developer will be
P.O. Box 185 - COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 - 81 7.577.7587'
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-99-488 FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
required to dedicate a 70-foot right-of-way through this property on the subdivision plat and
construct the roadway. The centerline of the right-of-way should be located 1,000:1: feet east
of Precinct Line Road. The purpose for this roadway is to provide traffic circulation in and
access to the commercial/office areas in the west part of town, without having a detrimental
impact on Precinct Line Road.
2. This property has considerable frontage on McDonwell School Road and some frontage on
Precinct Line Road. Access to the school site must be provided from Precinct Line Road,
through either a dedicated street or other access.
3. The developer has indicated to City staff that they have considered reserving the frontage of
this property on Precinct Line Road for commercial development. Provide a statement as to
the extent and type of commercial development.
OTHER INFORMATION
1. Approval of a subdivision plat is required to create lots or divide the property into lots and
blocks. The following information is related to the subdivision plat process, and is provided to
you for future reference.
a. A preliminary drainage analysis must be submitted with the preliminary plat. The
drainage analysis must address off-site drainage areas, and must include runoff
calculations for existing and developed conditions.
b. This development will require the construction of off-site and on-site water and sanitary
sewer utilities. The preliminary plat application must include preliminary utility plans for
water and sanitary sewer construction.
c. The Subdivision Regulations require sidewalks along McDonwell School Road and
Precinct Line Road. The sidewalks must be constructed when any new buildings are
constructed on the property. The sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide.
d. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since McDonwell School
Road is an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one lot. The developer is .
required to construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow
for future improvement by the City. The Engineering Department will calculate a detailed
estimate of the escrow amount at the time of plat submittal, if necessary.
e. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a
new building on the lots. The roadway impact fee for schools is $190 per student. The
water and sewer impact fee depends upon the size of the water meter. The fee for a %- to
I-inch meter is $816 for water and $51 for sewer. A formal assessment of impact fees
will be provided to the Building Inspection Department by the Engineering Department
upon the submittal of a building permit application. The Capital Improvements Advisory
Committee is in the process of reviewing the current impact fees, as required by State law.
The fees may change in the next 6 months.
PAGE 2'OF 3
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-99-088 FAITH CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
f. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for non-
residential uses is $400 per acre. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be
provided upon the review of the final plat.
2. Site plan and landscape plan approval is required before any building permits can be issued for
this property.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, January 10,2000, 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, February 1 and February 15,2000, 7:30 p.m.
RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS
Please submit the following to our offices:
. a written statement addressing the planning issues described in the first two sections of this
memorandum
If there is additional information you would like to submit, please send it to my attention.
Please call me if you have any questions.
C: CHRIS STEUBING, ENGINEERING
CHOYCE MORROW, PE, ENGINEERING
RED BAILEY, FIRE DEPARTMENT
RUSSELL WEST, BUILDING INSPECTION
MIKE SOAB, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
PAGE30F3
December 21, 1999
ECE"IVE
C.,
..
rs
DEe 2 7 1~:I
Mr. Clayton Husband
Development Coordinator
City of Colleyville
5400 Bransford Road
ColJeyville, TX 76034
CJTY OF COllEVVIllE
BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RE: Zoning Change Application for Faith Christian School Campus Site/ Additional Information per
Your Letter of 12/21/99
Dear Clayton,
We are in receipt of your memo of 12/21/99 regarding zoning case Z-99-088 related to Faith
Christian School Campus at Precint Line Road and McDonwell School Road. In general we are aware that
we will have a whole host of details and submittions for approval prior to actual plating and sub-division. We
will attend to these detail planing issues when we close the land purchase and begin the planing process . We
are sending this letter to augment our request with the additional information requested by your memo.
We are aware that the Colleyville Master Plan designated that the land in question be commercial and
that a school campus was not contemplated for this site. You have requested a statement from the
Applicant as to why the plan should be changed.
- The site in question was chosen for the Faith Christian School Campus for various reasons.
First, it is ideally located to serve the student body which largely comes from Colleyville, Keller
and Southlake. The site in open and conducive to development of a campus atmosphere. It is
well situated in that it will have good access from both McDonwell School Road and from
Precinct Line Road. While the land is primarily zoned commercial and/or master planned
commercial we believe that the planed use is appropriate and will actually produce a project
that is more in step with the primarily residential/rural uses and texture of the area. The
school campus will be a significantly less dense usage which will generate much less traffic than
a business or commercial use will, which will be good for the surrounding neighborhood. The
school campus will leave large portions of the site green which will aid in storm water
retention and less run-off. The development of the play fields will be usable by the
neighborhood and will be a recreational asset to the community.
While it is understood that the master plan designates this site as commercial we must
respectfully disagree with that designation. As a commercial developer with significant
experience in retail and office development we can say from experiance that the site in question
has none of the characteristics of a commercial or office site. The site is to far away from major
hi-ways or major traffic bearing roadways. It is to deep and wide for use as a residential
commercial site and to remote for a mall or major strip center. The site is to far removed from
any of the major employment centers to be an office site. In short and in our opinion, this site
4141 Blue Lake Circle · Suite 134 · Dallas, Texas 75244 . 972/503-5500 · Fax 972/503-5788
Crrv OF CoLLEYVlu..E
CoMMUNITY DEvELoPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
FAX TO
FAX NO
FROM
December 28, 1999
David Cunningham or Mike Heath, Cross Timbers Capital
(972) 503-5788
Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT
Z-99-088 AG, CN, CCl and CC2 to PUD-C - McDonwell School Road at
Precinct Line Road
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has received your response letter dated
December 21, 1999. The following comments are for information.
1. If the school constructs improvements to McDonwell School Road along its property frontage,
the cost of the construction may be credited against the roadway impact fees. However, until
the construction of streets, water and sanitary sewer lines are complete, and the Engineering
Department has verified all costs associated with the project, it would be inaccurate for the
City to state that no impact fees would be assessed to the property. The property is still
subject to all impact fees.
2. Your request for a waiver of the parkland dedication fees will be forvvarded to the City
Council when the zoning case is considered. Parkland dedication is typically required at the
time of approval of the final plat.
c: CHRIS STEUBING, ENGINEERING
CHOYCE MORROW, PE, ENGINEERING
RED BAILEY, FIRE DEPARTMENT
RUSSELL WEST, BUILDING INSPECTION
MIKE SOAB, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
P.O. Box I 85 - COLLEYVILLE. TEXAS 76034 - 8 I 7.577.7587
Page -2-
will beg for development far into the future if a retail or office designation remains. Failure to
grant the use as requested will in all likelihood cause this land to sit undeveloped until such
time as it becomes a single family or multi-family residential site.
We understand and intend that the zoning exhibit as submitted. is only a concept plan and that all
furore submssions will be required to be more formal and informative prior to approval by the City.
· Relative to your comment that you have now determined that the Master Thoroughfare Plan will
require a north/south Collector street through the propeny which will be located about 1000' east of
Precinct Line Road we have this comment and request to make. This requirement was not made
aware to us when we reviewed the site with City Staff in the summer of this year. The requirement to
run a 70' wide street through this propeny will result in a road to no where. It will bisect the site and
make it unfit for use as a campus. It is an unfair and unbearable development expense to place on this
site considering that the school will be required pay for a significant piece of McDonwell School Road
as well. Your memo states that the purpose of this roadway is to provide circulation to commercial
development on the west side of town (of which there is none) and to relieve traffic on Precinct Line
Road. We submit that there is no need for this street and suggest that Precinct Line Road is the
proper Place to direct the traffic. We request as a part of this zoning case that the requirement to
have this north south street be eliminated. This is a Major Issue that will destroy the sites use
as a safe and rural area which is what is required for the campus.
The propeny in question has limited frontage on Precinct Line Road. We have correctly stated that
the school may wish to sell off a pan of this frontage for a retail/restaurant use however can not
commit to this until such time as detailed planing is complete. We intend that the school should have
and will have access to the campus from both Precinct Line Road and from McDonwell School Road.
Should the school choose to sell off pan of the frontage we will retain a main entrance as a dedicated
driveway/street into the campus. This detail will be clarified during fmal planing and during
submission of plat materials.
We specificsdl'V asked this Summer if this site would be subiect to an'V road impact fi:es and were told
that since we wen building ~ of McDonwell School Road there would be no other fees. Road impact
fees on a $190 per student basis is a burden that the school can not bear. In that the school
will be building a large portion of off-site water, sewer and a significant portion of McDonwell
School Road we request that this abusive fee be waived as we told it would not apply.
In that the school will be leaving a considerable portion of it's acreage open and green for the
development of play fields which will in all likelihood be used by the residents of Colleyville we
request that the Parkland dedication fee of $400 per acre be waived.
We hoped that we have responded to your memo in the proper fashion and look forward to January
10, 2000 for Planing and Zoning Meeting for the fIrst hearing of this case. Please call should you require
additional information from us.
S'
Da d R. Cunningham
President of CrossTimbers Capital, Inc. submitting for Faith Christian School
January 21,2000
_j~.. . f-. ("'1;: "1'1\1 r=
! ; z...J ~..., .i".",( ......
.~ ~
i JAN 2 4 2000
Cj I Y OF CO!...LEYV1llE
BY COMMUN1TY D~VE~0P~(~r:~JT
Mr. Clayton Husband
Development Coordinator
City of Colleyville
5400 Bransford Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
RE: Zoning Change Application for Faith Christian School Campus Site - Case Z-99-088 - Amendment
to Previous Exhibits
Dear Clayton,
During the hearing of our zoning case on the evening oOanuary 10, 2000 a number of comments
and questions were raised by the Planning and Zoning Commission which required a reasoned and proper
response from the school. On Wednesday evening of the 12th the Board of Directors of Faith Christian
School met so that we might properly respond to the questions that were raised. You will fmd attached
herewith the revised Conceptual Site Plan which the school hopes will adequately address some of the
questions and concerns raised by the Commission. It is our desire that we review and discuss the revised
exhibit on Monday evening of the 24th 00 anuary so that the Faith Christian School may gain the favor of the
Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Commission raised two primary issues that required modifications to the Conceptual Site Plan.
It is Faith Christian School's W1derstanding that these two issues were the primary negative factors of the
zoning change requested by the school. We pray that the Planning and Zoning Commission will consider
the schools modified Conceptual Site Plan as evidence of its desire to cooperate with the City of Colleyville in
the building of what the school believes will be a wonderful asset to the community. In summary we wish to
address in line item form the response to the Commissions questions and wish to further emphasize the
positive aspects of the Faith Christian School Campus.
Issues relating to the Conceptual Site Plan Submission:
Issue: Commercial Land Fronting Precinct Line Road.
Response: The school agrees with the Commission that the frontage along Precinct Line Road has
commercial value however we believe that the commercially valuable land is that land which
immediately fronts Precinct Line Road. It appears that the commercial viability of this land is
reasonably anticipated to be retail pad site development and/or neighborhood office. Typically this
type of use requires a usable site depth of 250 to 300 feet. This usable depth of land area will
suppon neighborhood retail or office buildings which will typically require a usable floor depth of 60
to 70 feet. While the school's intended purchase includes only 1.2 acres of land fronting Precinct Line
Road and the school does not control the remaining frontage in question, the school proposes to do
the following: The school will utilize a 60' wide neck of land along its southern bonndary as the Main
Entrance to the school. The remaining parcel of the school's frontage (approximately one acre) will
Page -2-
not be developed by the school. Funher, a strip ofland that is approximately 100 feet deep which
will adjoin the remainder of the Precinct Line Road frontage will not be developed. The result of
this concession is that a tract of commercially usable land will be created that is 275' deep and 900'
long. This 5-acre tract will suppon a retail or office facility of approximately 70,000 to 100,000 sf.
The school will agree that this area of land will be sold at market rates to any buyer/developer who
might ever purchase the frontage not now controlled by the school so that a feasible development
could take place in the furore. The Conceptual Site Plan has been modified to reflect this adjustment.
In exchange, the City of Colleyville is respectfully requested to abandon the planned north/south
reliever street that would otherwise cut the campus in half.
· Issue: Concern for traffic on McDonwell School Road from the east.
Response: The current school population demographics are as follows: Bedford 11.6%, Hurst
7.8%, Colleyville 20.5%, Southlake 9.3%, Grapevine 20.5%, North RicWand Hills 10.3%, Keller
5.1%, Trophy Club 3.1% and nine other commnnities predominately south and west of the school
site a combined 11.8%. The projections of Faith Christian School based upon the current
development patterns of large residential areas are that the heaviest furore smdent population growth
will come from the North Richland Hills, Keller, Southlake, Roanoke and Trophy Club areas and
that these addresses will make up 50% of the schools furore population. The school respectfully
submits that very little if any traffic will be added to west bound McDonwell School Road due to the
difficulty of this traffic movement and that the bulk of the current population as well as the furore
population will predominantly travel to the school along Davis Blvd. and Precinct Line Road which
will be fed from the major east/west thoroughfares such as Glade Road. In anticipation of this
growth pattern the school will locate its primary entrance on Precinct Line Road as depicted on the
new Conceptual Site Plan.
Other Issues:
Issue: Will the school seek a non-profit non-taxable status?
Response: Faith Christian School is a 501 c 3 entity which is non-profit and non-taxable.
.
Issue: Will the school oppose or fight the sale of alcoholic beverages at a restaurant that might locate
near the school.
Response: No, as long as those uses or sales are within the City of Colleyville guidelines and are
policed accordingly.
Faith Christian School wishes to annotate the positive aspects of the proposed campus:
Low density, low traffic producing use that is most compatible with surrounding single family uses.
Over 65% green space which will aid in lesser storm drain nmoff and a salvaging of usable outdoor
areas.
Sports fields and play areas that will be shared with the residents of Colleyville when not in use by the
Page -3-
school or its member churches. Details of the consrruction, maintenance and use of these facilities
will have to be worked out.
A fIrst class Fine Arts and Meeting Auditorium that will be used for commercial uses and which will
be available for public use when not being used by the school or its member churches.
Consrruction of a destination oriented facility which will actually stimulate commercial development
along Precinct Line Road.
· An addition to the City of Colleyville of a facility that will make a lasting difference by offering high
quality educational alternatives to those families desiring a private non-denominational Christian
based education.
Faith Christian School believes that this site is the best and most proper location for this wonderful
addition to the City of Colleyville. It is ideally suited by being in the hem of the community that it will
serve. It is located near to and has access to a major thoroughfare which will aid in traffic control. It is the
right size for the school. The school must have 40 acres minimum or it cannot reach its build out or perform
its mission. We respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Commission evaluate all of the overlapping
issues and grant the requested zoning to PUD-C for the use as the future campus of Faith Christian School.
Sinwl.,
I I - I ...:
{---II ~
David R. Cunningham
submitting for
Faith Christian School
ORDINANCE 0-00-1204
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 43.891 ACRES OUT OF THE
R.N. MCEWING SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1154, TRACTS 1A8, 1A6, 1A4, 1A2,
1A1, 1A9A1A, 1A9B, 1A9A1, 1A3, 1A5, 1A7, AND 2A; AND LOTS 1 AND 2,
BLOCK B, REED SUBDIVISION FROM THE AG (AGRICULTURE), CN
(NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL), CC1 (VILLAGE RETAIL) AND CC2
(SHOPPING CENTER) TO THE PUD-C (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION:
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by David Cunningham
for Faith Christian School on December 03, 1999, under Case No.
Z-99-088; and
WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission
was sent to real property owners within 200 feet of the property
herein described at least 10 days before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in
a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 15 days
before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the zoning
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, public hearings to change the zoning and the Master Plan on the
property herein described were held before the Planning and
Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the Planning and
Zoning Commission has heretofore made a recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change herein
effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Zoning
Ordinance and is in the best interest of the citizens of the City of
Colleyville;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Master Plan, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit A)
are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in
Colleyville, Texas, described by metes and bounds (Exhibit 8), by
changing the zoning of said property from the AG (Agriculture), CN
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 2 of 7
(Neighborhood Commercial), CC1 (Village Retail) and CC2
(Shopping Center) to the PUD-C (Planned Unit Development-
Commercial) district together with all site plans which are
conceptual in nature, supporting documents, and other conditions
and restrictions imposed and approved by the Council which are
incorporated herein by reference including, but not limited to the
conceptual site plan (Exhibit C); and subject to the following
conditions:
1. GENERAL
a. The purpose of this PUD-C is for the development of a privately
operated kindergarten, elementary and high school campus.
b. This PUD-C shall be divided into two general development
areas: Area A and Area 8. according to the PUD Development
Areas map (Exhibit D). The line separatina Area A from Area
B shall be approximatelv 500 feet east of the east riaht-of-
way line of Precinct Line Road.
c. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the
Colleyville Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations. and
other land development ordinances, except where amended by
this ordinance.
d. Buildinas and sports fields may be constructed in the
aeneral locations shown on the attached Site Plan -
Exhibit C. However. some modification and adiustment of
the locations due to topoaraphv or other site conditions
shall be allowed. provided that the modifications are
determined bv the city permit department as insianificant to
adiacent property owners.
2. PERMITTED USES
a. The following land uses shall be permitted in Development Area
A:
(1) All commercial and office uses allowed in the CC 1 Village
Retail zoning district.
(2) Development Area A shall not be used for school campus
purposes, other than an ingress/egress easement and drive
entrance/exit described in this ordinance.
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 3 of 7
b. The following land uses shall be permitted in Development Area
B:
(1) Privately operated kindergarten, elementary and high
school campus.
(2) Auditorium/Fine Arts Center.
(3) Athletic fields, including but not limited to soccer fields,
baseball/softball fields, and football field.
3. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
a. Minimum Lot Size 7,200 square feet
b. Minimum Lot Width 70 feet
c. Minimum Lot Depth 115 feet
d. Front Building Line 40 feet
e. Side Building Line 25 feet
f. Rear Building Line 25 feet
4. OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
a. This development shall provide a minimum of sixty percent
(60%) open space for the leisure and recreational use of the
school. Athletic fields and storm water detention areas may be
included in the calculation of the open space. . TRe ~re~eRY
eWFlBr eAB tRB City ma~' eFlter iAte eA egreemeFlt fer tRe jeiFlt
~8e sf the athleti€l fielBs.
b. The property shall be landscaped in accordance with the
landscaping standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance at the
time a building permit is requested. A landscape plan shall be
submitted for the entire property with the site plan application for
the first building or building(s). The landscape plan shall show a
phased approach for the installation of the required landscaping
for the overall development period of the project. The
landscaping required by each phase shall be installed prior to
the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building being
constructed on the property.
c. Screening between adjacent residentially zoned properties shall
be provided in accordance with the standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance. The screening shall be installed in three
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 4 of 7
phases, according to the Screening Phasing Plan (Exhibit E).
Phase I shall be installed with the construction of the first
building; Phase II with the second. building, and Phase III with
the third building. The screening shall be installed prior to the
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building being
constructed on the property in any given phase. If live plant
material is used to provide the required screening, the size of
the plant material installed shall be of sufficient size to reach a
height of eight feet (8') within two (2) years of planting.
d. The requirement to provide screening between adjacent
properties shall not be required in the event adjacent property is
rezoned to a non-residential district that would not require
screening to be installed.
5. PLATTING
a. The developer shall submit a preliminary plan and final plat of
the property in accordance with the Colleyville Subdivision
Regulations. A preliminary plan shall be submitted for the
entire property not later than twelve (12) months from the
date of approval of this ordinance. The conceptual site plan
attached as Exhibit C to this ordinance shall not constitute the
preliminary plan.
6. OTHER
a. The school campus shall provide an entrance from Precinct Line
Road to aid in traffic circulation. The final plat of the property
shall include an ingress/egress easement showing the exact
location of the drive entrance. The easement shall be a
minimum of 60 feet in width.
b. F'ewr (4) Six (6) drive approaches shall be allowed on
McDonwell School Road to provide access to parkina areas
and service entrances. The drive approaches shall be spaced
a minimum of one hundred feet (100') apart, centerline to
centerline. The driveway throat width shall not exceed thirty-five
feet (35').
c. The Master Thoroughfare Plan shall be amended to delete a
portion of the unnamed north/south' 4-lane Major Collector
located between McDonwell School Road and L.D. Lockett
Road. The portion of the road between McDonwell School
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 5 of 7
Road and the southern property line of the subject property shall
be deleted from the Plan. The requirement to construct this
section of the roadway is hereby waived.
d. The developer is required to improve one-half of McDonwell
School Road where the roadway abuts this PUD-C, in
accordance with the Colleyville Subdivision Regulations and
Master Thoroughfare Plan, unless an alternative is provided at
the time of platting.
e. Development occurring in Development Area A shall be
required to construct a portion of the hike/bike trail required by
Colleyville Pathways Plan along Precinct Line Road.
f. Outdoor lighting shall comply with the following requirements, as
delineated in the Lighting Restriction Plan (Exhibit F).
(1) Section I: Outdoor lighting of play fields, soccer fields or
similar recreational or athletic areas shall be prohibited.
(2) Section II: Outdoor lighting on the buildings or in the
parking areas shall be directed away from any adjacent
residences. Light standards in the parking areas shall not
exceed tElA (1 g) forty (40) feet in overall height.
(3) Section III: Outdoor lighting of baseball, softball, football
fields or similar recreational athletic areas may be
allowed. Said fields and recreational athletic areas shall
not be illuminated between the hours of 10:30 p.m. and
7:00 a.m.
(4) Section IV: Outdoor lighting on the buildings or in the
parking areas shall be directed away from any adjacent
residences. Light standards in the parking areas shall not
exceed tElA (1 g) forty (40) feet in overall height.
g. All signs constructed on the property shall comply with the
provisions of the Colleyville Sign Regulations.
h. Site plan review and approval shall be required for all buildings
constructed on the property before a building permit will be
issued, as required by the Colleyville Zoning Regulations. The
site plan shall include any athletic field intended for competitive
sports use.
J. All buildings constructed in development areas A and B shall be
designed to meet the minimum architectural design standards of
the CC 1 - Village Retail district, as contained in Section 24.17 of
Sec. 2.
Sec. 3.
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 6 of 7
the Zoning Ordinance. This reQuirement shall apply only to
buildinas that exceed two thousand (2.000) SQuare feet in
gross floor area.
J. Development occurring in development areas A and B shall pay
all applicable water, wastewater, and roadway impact fees and
parkland dedication fees. The roadway impact fee shall be
calculated according to the student enrollment on October 1 of
each year. If in subsequent years the student enrollment
increases, the developer shall pay a roadway impact fee
calculated on the difference between the previous year's
enrollment. Offsets and credits against impact fees for water,
wastewater and roadways shall be provided as allowed by the
Colleyville Subdivision Regulations. Offsets and credits
against impact fees for water. wastewater and roadways
shall be provided as allowed bv the Colleyville Subdivision
Reaulations.
7. Shared Facility Use
a. The property owner will assist the City of Colleyville in
meeting the needs of City co-sponsored youth sports
association recreational activities and City Parks and
Recreational proarams by entering into a ioint use
aareement for use of the facilities. includina all athletic
fields. aymnasium. auditorium. and fine arts center; as well
as the opportunity for the City. or its desianee. to construct
practice facilities.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance as read together with the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Colleyville shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation
continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be
punishable as such.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as
an alternate method of publication provided by law.
Ordinance 0-00-1204
Page 7 of 7
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
,
"
I ~
I
I
I
II r _:,
.::I'
i 1j-,'
.,
II ;~
.1;
3~
o
,....-
I i I'
e!
,
, -
II ;~
""
..
~
..:
,
~8',- ~:
lIIC.\\~\
~')..\v
,,1- d
~I:' ~
'., ;a: ~.i~
L I _, II
.'
. ,t
I'
"=
- -- --
j ~ .-.
" CIiC"~
~
, -r,'"
1"101
..~~~~~..
"
, ~!II
~~
.-
...,
~~:
~~~ .
.
~ ..
'I ;
IV
~ I
: : r'
';i ___~.-:.
! ~ . i:
-----~ ."
r. "
:: L
I
I .'
.!
. -:
D -
.:1
..
,
~
'r It
o .~.
;5
ot
cJ. \~~ I~"
r:f'J "~l..
~d.-~
\ it~
~ .5
Q
Q
;@ _.
~\~
"'-
."
"'-
tl
-
A
:2
G-
I'
I; .
oft
~
.
.. "
r ":
o
't
i'
~ ~~~ I"
~ ~\~ .!.
.:.'"
\ ~
~
.,
"3
I~ 0
.~ N
a:
!'
.:
cO
i":'\ -at. ~
U. 't.~'\
~ ~~~
\ ~
.' ../ - ~ .
. I
. ~~.
..
. .~ .
It
"!
. . I I I
.~.
~
"
/.-.., I
'-.
.
. ..
l,m! I-:I.=T+ I :l~ili,~l...t ~~\~ c 51
-- -
~ - ~!.!.Jt
. - . ojI- . .. - ~ - .t.~ I" III;' ~
_~ - " . \. _: /'.... I '\ L ~
\\ ~ ~: - - :..?- - ~ Q.~~ ~
:: ~- .. ~ .: -. . ~.~. I ~ 'o@. ~
~~':--cP"'t.~ r- IG' ! 1& -';.'0-
.... ~ ;. \"':.. f-- 1--:- r--' _ ~
~:
,--~ -=-. 1---- ~
. ~~~ +1 lit' ... S
I . ~. .;...
~ ~ .~: ~ ~ \-
. -'!' -....
I CllI · . ~ - -d
- .~ . ..~~'L7~}~./
. "Cll . 'f~ ~/(~
~~- ~_.~..~
'oJ . , . .1 '
.. ~ ~i I
Ut ~'
. ~ ,j
r. ~ 7/,
~ ::r CIlI I
0- ~ I
........
I'.:)
. I .
\..
,I
'-:
"5
o
fII.
tit
~ l.t.~
'^ ~ \\":..
t:. 9i ..,...I..~
.;..~.- \~1:-._"
l:"-'-~
~
'"
.;:::
- 'Z.
,~ ~\
I.~ ~
~. ~ .
'I~ '~.,:
I · ~JIV?i ~
, ,~(~"
Q
....
....
.
I ;
I ~L-------
II:: .1 ;!
!'
.~ .
r
~....~
",'=> ...
I ~tJ'ir;.
.,.
II
I~
2 i"
-= "'
..
'I~
o
," ~.
i! QC
I \\\ --;
-",--:z.~
. - \' ~
't(---'.
jj,'_./
a
h .
..
.5
<!)~.
CC':;;<.
. ~!; ~
,..,'e)
~
I'
o
/
.....-.--_-~'-"~--~...-
@
'"
oJ
;:)
..,
I
.
o ~
... G ~~
""1 I
~
~
s:a.
CV
:i
m
e
I-
e
o
N
I
C
..
.-
oa
.-
J:
>C
W
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
BEING a 43.891 acre tract ofland in the R.H. McEwing Survey, Abstract No. 1154 situated
in the City ofColleyville, Tarrant County, Texas and being that tract conveyed to Howard G.
Collins by deed recorded in Volume 6705, Page 947 of the Deed Records of Tarrant County,
Texas (DRTCT), that tract conveyed to Howard G. Collins by deed recorded in Volume 6705,
Page 950 DRTCT , that tract conveyed to Howard G. Collins by deed recorded in Volume 7225,
Page 348 DRTCT , that tract conveyed to H. Collins by deed recorded in Volume 6478, Page
440 DRTCT that tract conveyed to E.M. Collins by deed recorded in Volume 6968, Page 1501
DRTCT, Reed Subdivision, an addition to the City ofColleyville, Tarrant County, Texas as
recorded in Volume 388-145, Page 68 ofthe Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas (PRTCT),
that tract conveyed to A.D. Electric Company, Inc. by deed recorded in Volume 6313, Page 611
DRTCT, that tract conveyed to Bobby Joe Pace by deed recorded in Volume 10257, Page 1779
DRTCT, THAT tract conveyed to Howard G. Collins by deed recorded in Volume 5318, Page
440 DRTCT and that tract conveyed to H.G. Collins by deed recorded in Volume 5479, Page 496
DRTCT and being more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a P.K. nail set in the approximate center of Me Don well School Road (County
Road No. 3105), said P.K. nail being by deed call 388.6 feet east of the northwest comer of said
McEwing Survey~
THENCE S 89048'25" E along the approximate center of said McDonwell School Road, a
distance of 555.53 feet to a P.K. nail set, said P.K. nail also being the original northwest corner
of Reed Subdivision, an addition to the City ofColleyville, Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in
Volume 388-145, Page 68 ofthe Plat Records of Tarrant County, Texas (PRTCT)~
THENCE S 89042'11" E along the approximate center ofMcDonwell School Road, a distance of
1395.21 feet to a P.K. nail set, said nail also being the northeast comer of said H.G. Collins tract
as recorded in Volume 5479, Page 496 DRTCT~
THENCE S 00036'38" E along the east line of said H.G. Collins tract and the west line of a tract
conveyed to Foxcreek Residential Development, Ltd. by deed recorded in Volume 12575, Page
30 DRTCT, a distance of938.24 feet to a 3/8" iron pin found, said iron pin also being on the
north line of a tract conveyed to Charles R. Lewis by deed recorded in Volume 4487, Page 741
DRTCT;
THENCE N 89054'31" W along the south line of said H.G. Collins tract as recorded in Volume
5479, Page 496 DRTCT and the north line of said Lewis tract and the north line of a tract
conveyed to Charles R. Lewis by deed recorded in Volume 4552, Page 839 DRTCT , a distance
of 412.31 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found, said iron pin also being a re-entrant comer of said Lewis
tract as recorded in Volume 4552, Page 839 DRTCT, and on the east line of said Howard G.
Collins tract as recorded in Volume 5318, Page 440 DR TCT~
THENCE S 00036'18" E along the east line of said Howard G. Collins tract as recorded in
Volume 5318, Page 440 DRTCT, a distance of35.08 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found, said iron pin
also being on the north line of said Lewis tract as recorded in Volume 4552, Page 839 DRTCT;
,
\
Exhibit B - Metes & Bounds Description
THENCE S 89025'45" W along the south line of said Howard G. Collins tract as recorded in
Volume 5318, Page 440 DRTCT and the north line of said Lewis tract as recorded in Volume
4552, Page 839 DRTCT, a distance of240.14 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found, said iron pin also
being the northeast comer of a tract conveyed to Doyle McIntosh by deed recorded in V olurne
6742, Page 340 DRTCT;
THENCE N 89051'23" W along the south line of said Howard G. Collins tract as recorded in
Volume 5318, Page 440 DRTCT and the north line of said McIntosh tract, a distance of25.99
feet to a capped 1/2" iron pin set from which a 1/2" iron pin found bears S 89039'57" W, 0.56
feet, said capped iron pin set also being the southeast comer of a tract conveyed to Titan Towers,
L.P. by deed recorded in Volume 13410, Page 307 DRTCT;
THENCE N 00006'30" E along the west line of said Howard G. Collins tract as recorded in
Volume 5318, Page 440 DRTCT and the east line of said Titan Towers tract, a distance of 150.00
feet to a capped 1/2" iron pin set;
THENCE N 89051'23" W along the south line of said Howard G. Collins tract as recorded in
Volume 5318, Page 440 DRTCT and the north line of said Titan Towers tract, a distance of
100.00 feet to a capped 1/2" iron pin set from which a 7/8" iron pin found bears N 12055'59" E,
1.46 feet, said capped iron pin set also being on the east line of said Pace tract;
THENCE S 00006'30" W along the west line of said Titan Towers tract and the east line of said
Pace tract, a distance of 150.00 feet to a capped 1/2" iron pin set from which a 1/2" iron pin
found bears N 00006'30" E, 0.73 feet, said capped iron pin set also being in the north line of said
McIntosh tract;
THENCE N 89051 '23" W along the south line of said Pace tract and the south line of said A.D.
Electric, Inc. Tract and the south line of said Reed Subdivision and the south line of said E.M.
Collins tract as recorded in Volume 6968, Page 1501 DRTCT and the south line of said Howard
G. Collins tract as recorded in Volume 7225, Page 348 DRTCT and the north line of said
McIntosh tract and the north line of a tract conveyed to Buddy Shipman by deed recorded in
Volume 11885, Page 1661 DRTCT a distance of 1335.98 feet to a capped iron pin set, said
capped iron pin also being on the east right-of-way line of Precinct Line Road (F.M. 3029), said
capped iron pin also being the point of curvature of a non-tangent circular curve to the left having
a radius of5789.58 feet and a central angle of 03010'29" and being subtended by a chord which
bears N 02030'22" W 320.75 feet;
THENCE northerly along said curve to the left and east right-of-way line, a distance of 320.79
feet to a capped 112" iron pin set, said iron pin also being on the south line of a tract conveyed to
E. Wayne Deaton by deed recorded in Volume 6724, Page 2195 DRTCT;
THENCE S 89051'23" E departing the said east right-of-way line and along the south line of said
Deaton tract, a distance of 176.84 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found, said iron pin also being on the
west line of said E.M. Collins tract as recorded in Volume 6968, Page 1501 DRTCT;
THENCE N 01005'46" W along the east line of said Deaton tract and the west line of said E.M.
Exhibit B - Metes & Bounds Description
Collins tract as recorded in Volume 6968, Page 1501 DRTCT, a distance of 119.08 feet to a
capped 1/2" iron pin set, said capped iron pin also being on the south line of a tract conveyed to
Bettye Jean Deaton by deed recorded in Volume 6254, Page 521 DRTCT;
THENCE S 89048'25" E along the south line of said Bettye Jean Deaton tract, a distance of7.00
feet to a capped 1/2" iron pin set, said capped iron pin also being on the west line of said Howard
G. Collins tract as recorded in Volume 6705, Page 947 DRICT;
THENCE N 01032'45" W along the west line of said Howard G. Collins tract as recorded in
Volume 6705, Page 947 DRTCT and the east line of said Bettye Jean Deaton tract, the 'east line
ofa tract conveyed to Bettye Jean Deaton by deed recorded in Volume 6485, Page 748 DRTCT,
the east line of a tract conveyed to E. W. Deaton by deed recorded in Volume 7243, Page 2180
DRTCT and the east line of a tract conveyed to Delma Phillips by deed recorded in Volume
4098, Page 235 DRTCT, a distance of527.13 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing
1,911,889 square feet or 43.891 acres ofland, more or less, subject to the rights of the public, if
any, in McDonwell School Road.
Exhibit B - Metes & Bounds Description
/
j
Q.)
~.
a
1.-. -=8\ .
i~r;rlj.,~-... iJ
i'W'~; . -'-41 ;'
l~_-.~f~--G ;;f
'---..J -':--:::- -J1t..-=-_ -( IIi-< -..., '. A .-.
1 '- ~~_t -:J . ".
. . ._ _.1 ~ _ _'. _ __..l____. _' ,.
I. ~.:\
'< '. 1"/
. '''-..---_.__u__ _____ _~_..:~/
--=- r ,
J
IJ
8
~
\)
t:
.
==
.----
.
.
.
.~r .~'~' ~.~ ..:~ : ~ : ~::
,- .
;. ... "-
, .
'. . .
'" .
.~. r'
------------ -------.. _._-_._----..~-;_...
2
~
~'<l. {
u
,:t.
t-
~.(
~\L
.~
{ U 1
"-=-/
.-_iII...,
~
:J
'3 .,
ri ~
~
r
.!)
7-
~
~
~
~
"%
at
-9
'2
~
N
C
ftI
-
A.
CP
.....
1-
m
-
ftI
:I
.....
a.
CP
u
c
o
U
I
U
.....
"-
oa
"-
.c
>C
1&1
/
"8
.
#
a
~
~ .- bJII
~ t t.-
~ t~.
~ : :~ c.n. ~ =
~ 1~1!~~-. -{) .
3 r.~--~(J-~ :;" 1'.
~ :~~_..~=c:~--=={] .
~ ~-~ ~-c-- -F_~r!:",: -"1141> ..,
I ....-,-.-... .::. - :_-~ "c_
, . ~ '
I - " \
-S' '-, " ~
"-~~_-~-r-/ .
...................
.
.
.
cr
IV
f
cr
.........
Q Yo 21 itM'1 .L """7'a}l
~
=>
~ .,
.\.l
~
"'"
"
r
-9
7..
~
~
~
~
-.x
at
~
'2
~
N
en
ra
CD
..
ct
...
c
CD
E
a.
o
-
CD
>-
Co
Q
Q
::)
a.
I
Q
...
.-
.a
.-
.c
>C
w
~
:;
~ ,~
~
:::
UJ -.
i
v
-9
7-
~
~
-s t-
- ~
." -x
at
.!J
a
~ C
N ~
-
D-
en
C
.-
en
~
.c
D-
en
C
.-
C
CI)
CI)
..
J u
en
I
W
...
.-
.a
I .-
.c
H ><
w
W ~
~
~
"2
~
~f
Q.. u
r
t-
+ .~
-, \L.
(~
~
/
f-
Q
-4.
3
a
2
\J
\I)
j
Ul
~
a
~
..-.r----. . .,.-... ~ ~
.
===
.----- .
.
.
.~,~~-?'...~,;'" ;>., .~.....
, ,
i
\ .
\'~'" ,-.,.,~.
-"~"",-__P_~_--.l.---_ __/
--a- . I .
~ . .
.-.---.--.----~-..-------.-- ----. - -_.......... ._5l ,.~.
..........,
/
Vi
u.'
-,
~ '~
~
\l! -,-
~
~
.9
L
~
~
Q
.(
3
a
2
\J
\I)
:i
UJ
~
~
~
~
~
~
i!1
-!J
~
.....Ii...,
ns
CD
..
C
c
ns
-
D-
C
o
.-
...
u
.-
..
...
en
CD
a::
en
c
J .-
~ ~
u.
IJ ~
8 ><
~ W
"2
~
~.~
~ \L.
,~'
I UJ
',--/
. ",
- i . ''-'_.~..' I :-.~~/
..................
.
.
. >
-
-,~ ,;"'~\~.~' { .r'_ >,~ '
'1! " I ~ .
.: l' ... . ~
.'r{. . ' .. _ \
.' .
(Q~~
CITY COUNCIL 7m' AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
8
Ordinance # :
0-00-1205
Previous Action: none
DEPT. :
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Zoning change requested by John Lynch for Bob
Gammon, from R20 to PUD-R (planned unit
development - residential) on 6.810 acres located
at 3650 Pool Road
First Reading and Public Hearing
BackQround
Mr. Robert J. Gammon is the owner of this 6.8-acre tract of land located on the west
side of Pool Road, just north of Highland Drive. The property currently has a single-
family dwelling and an existing metal barn located on the tract. The property is currently
zoned R20 and Mr. Gammon is requesting the property be rezoned to PUD-R.(Planned
Unit Development - Residential). Mr. Gammon's rezoning request includes provisions
for (1) continuation of the existing R20 uses, (2) permitting agricultural uses, and (3)
expansion of the existing barn. Enclosed with this agenda briefing is a copy of the
rezoning statement which describes Mr. Gammon's rezoning request in detail. Staff
used these details as a guide for drafting the enclosed rezoning ordinance.
The following is a brief analysis of the issues associated with this rezoning request:
( continued)
CITY MANAG2
8C2AYl E~
DEPART NT HEAD
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-00-1205
Page 2
1. Master Plan - The future land use map contained in the Colleyville Master Plan
shows this area as a future single family residential area. The applicant's
request includes agricultural uses and it is not clear from the Master Plan
whether or not agricultural uses are consistent with the future single family
residential character shown for this area since future agricultural areas are not a
classification on the Master Plan.
2. Surrounding Properties - The Gammon property and all the surrounding
properties were rezoned to R20 in 1986 to allow the development of the Highland
Meadows subdivision. The Highland Meadow Addition is adjacent to the
Gammon tract on the south and the west sides. Pool Road is located on the east
side of this property. To the north is a five acre tract zoned R20 which contains a
single-family dwelling.
3. Thoroughfare Plan - The Master Thoroughfare Plan designates Pool Road as a
four lane minor collector. The requested zoning change would not have any
significant negative impact on the Master Thoroughfare Plan.
4. Accessory Buildings - Mr. Gammon's site plan shows an existing 6,100 s.f.
metal barn that he proposes to expand by 2,440 s.f. The building will contain
8,540 s.t. when completed. The expanded barn will be 16 ' 2" high at its highest
point. The City Council recently approved new regulations for accessory
buildings which allows a maximum of one accessory buildings allowed on a lot,
but allows a second accessory building with SUP approval. The current
regulations limit the maximum size of an accessory building in an agricultural
zone to 2,000 s.f. and 900 s.f. in the R20 zone. The maximum height of an
accessory building is 15 feet. Since this is a PUD request, any limit on the
height, the maximum number of accessory buildings allowed and the maximum
size limit can be established by the terms of the PUD ordinance. The following is
a copy of the size limit regulation for accessory buildings:
No accessory building shall be erected, nor shall an existing accessory
building be enlarged, to exceed the maximum size shown in the following
table. In addition, the combined square footage of all accessory buildings
shall not exceed the maximum square footage specified in the following table.
DISTRICT
MAX. S.F.
AG
2,000 s.f.
ALL OTHER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
900 s.f.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-00-1205
Page 3
Summary and Conclusion
Staff feels that this area should remain zoned R20. The Master Plan recommends this
area as a future single family residential area. The site plan included with Mr.
Gammon's request includes a very large agricultural building. Staff feels that such a
large accessory building would be a concern to the adjacent neighbors. The property
only contains 6.8 acres and a 8,540 s.f. barn seems too large for supporting the
agricultural activities of such a small site.
A recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission was not available at the
time this agenda briefing was prepared. This item was tabled at the January 10th and
January 24th Planning and Zoning Commission meetings to allow staff to draft an
ordinance for review. The Commission will consider the case at the February 14th
meeting and will make a recommendation at that time. Staff will report the
recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission at the February 15th City
Council meeting.
Recommendation
Denial of Ordinance 0-00-1205.
General Proiect Information Sheet
1. Compliance With Master Plan: The Colleyville Master Plan shows this area to be a
low density single family residential area.
2. Existing Land Use: The property currently has an existing single family dwelling
and a metal barn.
3. Proposed Land Use: The applicant is requesting residential and agricultural
activities and proposes to build a new residential dwelling and an 8,540 s. f. barn.
4. Surrounding Zoning: The Highland Meadows Addition to the south and west is
zoned R20. Pool Road is located on the east side of this property and across Pool
Road is the City of Grapevine. To the north is a five acre tract zoned PUD-R.
5. Density: The overall density will not exceed 1.8 units per acre.
6. Thoroughfare Plan: This development has frontage on Pool Road, a four lane
minor collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The four lane facility currently
exists. No additional roadway improvements are anticipated.
7. Parks Master Plan: This site is not impacted by the Colleyville Parks Master Plan,
adopted in 1996.
8. Open Space Requirement: This development does not require any open space
reserve.
9. Park Land Dedication: The Park Land Dedication Ordinance is not applicable to
this rezoning request but may be applicable in the future if the property is
subdivided.
10. Trail System Plan: There are no trail systems proposed in the Colleyville Pathways
Plan that are impacted by this property.
PUD-R ZONING REQUEST
APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT
STATEMENT OF ZONING REQUEST
A. Land Use
1. The fonowing land uses will permitted within this Plan Unit Development:
a All Agricultural (AG district) uses with the exception of swine-
fanning. Without limiting the type of Agricultural uses permitted, the
Subject Property may be used to keep and maintain, in similar
quantities, the same type of animals which are located on the Subject
Property as of the date of this Ordinance. Animals may be kept with
150 feet of any structure on the Subject Property and other adjoining
lots, provided they are kept on the Subject Property outside the area
enclosed by the existing fence shown on Exhibit "A" (the Site Plan)
b. Single family residence
c. All uses permitted in the R-20 zoning district.
B. Lots requirements and setback
1. The minimum lot size for Agricultural (AG) use of the Subject Property shall
be the entire Subject Property.
2. If and when all or any portion of the Subject Property is subdivided for use as
R-20 single family uses, all rights to use the Subject Property for Agricultural
(AG) uses shall automatically cease.
3. Until the Subject Property is subdivided for use as R-20 single family use, all
building setbacks shall be in accordance with the AG district.
4. If and when the Subject Property is platted and subdivided into R20 lots, all
building setbacks. lot sizes. and other development requirements shall be those
established for the R-20 zoning district.
C. General Requirements.
1. Commercial advertising signs shall be prohibited on the Subject Property.
WIWP60\IfL\9423SUPP.APP Page 1 of 3
2. A barn, vehicle and equipment storage building shall be permitted on the
Property not to exceed the dimensional requirements for the existing building
and the addition as shown on Exhibit "B" which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein for all purposes, provided that such building is located at
its existing location on the Property.
3. All other buildings and structures, fences and other improvements on the
Property located on the Subject Property at the time of this zoning case are
permitted as constructed.
STA TEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES
The zoning of the subject property has been the subject of extensive consideration and
discussion by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council on several occasions recently,
commencing with the most recent master land use plan and its modifications, and more recently with
the public hearings subsequent to the original AG change request for the property submitted on July
28, 1999. The Applicant desires this PUD-R change for the purpose of "grand fathering" the existing
agricultural and agriculture-related uses of the Subject Property (herein so called) which have been
conducted for many years on the Subject Property by the Applicant and the Applicant's predecessors
and title. The agricultural uses requested in this Application are appropriate for the fonowing
reasons:
1. The Subject Property adjoins the 5.67 acre tract of Beth Joseph which was just
rezoned by the City Council to permit agricultural uses in the form of a PUD-R.
2. This Application will permit the continued use of the Subject Property for the types
of uses which have been exercised by the Applicant for many years without problem
or complaint.
3. The zoning request will pennit and encourage the ultimate use of the Subject Property
as R-20, as suggested by the Master Land Use Plan and what Applicant believes to
be the desires stated by a majority of the members of the City Council and Planning
Zoning Commission.
4. The subject zoning request will permit a minor modification of the existing barn on
the Subject Property without the significant alterations and size adjustments which
were originally proposed by Applicant.
The Applicant would propose to use the Subject Property for agricultural purposes similar
to those which have been exercised by the Applicant over the last several years, and at the appropriate
time, develop the Subject Property into an R-20 subdivision as contemplated by the Master Land Use
Plan. Until such time, the Subject Property would act as a temporary buffer between the existing
W:\ WP60\ITL\9423SUPP.APP
Page 2 of3
single family residences which border the Subject Property, buffering those properties from the
commercial activities and agricultural uses of the Beth Joseph tract as approved in her recent PUD-R
zoning. Then, when the Subject Property is developed as R-20, the Subject Property would continue
to act as a buffer from the existence R-20 and residential uses surrounding the Subject Property by
providing residential lots which will be purchased by perspective owners who will take title with full
knowledge of the commercial and agricultural use of the Beth Joseph Tract.
If this Application is approved, the Applicant would expect to continue using the Subject
Property for the proposed agricultural purposes for an indefinite period of time to the future.
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
With the exception of the proposed addition to the bam and accessory building on the Subject
Property, all other improvements relating to the agricultural use of the Subject Property are currently
constructed.
STA TEMENT OF PROPOSED OWNERSHIP
Until such time as the Subject Property is developed into R-20 lots, it is anticipated that the
Applicant will be the owner and will maintain ownership of the Subject Property. Applicant reserves
the right to sell the Subject Property at any time should the personal circumstances of Applicant so
indicate.
STA TEMENT OF UTILITIES TO BE PROVIDED
No additional water, sewer or other utilities are needed for the agricultural uses of the Subject
Property. When and if the Subject Property is developed into R-20 lots, the water, sewer, drainage
and other utilities will be constructed in accordance with the applicable ordinances of the City.
W:\ WP60VTL\9423SUPP.APP
Page 3 of3
Mary B. Joseph
3600 Pool Road
Grapevine, TX 76051
City of Colleyville
Richard & Michelle Smith, Jr.
2600 Highland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Philip Nardecchia
6003 Hillbrook Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
John Deroche
6101 Hillbrook Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Richard & Sarah Lowe, III
2505 Highland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Ross & Karen Graham
2603 Highland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Case Z-99-086
City of Grapevine
P.O. 729
Grapevine, TX 76051
Bobby & Tambra Starnes
2606 Highland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Brad McBride
2604 Highland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
M. L. & Lynn Dellangelo
2602 Highland Drive
Colleyville. TX 76034
Edward & Kathy Hark
2506 Highland Drive
Colleyville. TX 76034
William & Margaret Hopkins
2504 Highland Drive
Colleyville. TX 76034
Thomas & Heidi Saunders
6005 Hillbrook Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Byron & Susan Bauduin
6007 Hillbrook Drive
Colleyville. TX 76034
Phillip & Pamela Gettig
6103 Hillbrook Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Ronald & Mary Ziolkowski
6105 Hillbrook Drive
Colleyville. TX 76034
Russell & Joyce Overby
2507 Highland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
D. R. & Beverly McChesney
2601 Highland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Christopher & Lewina Hui
2605 Highland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Marvin & Kathy McAnderson
6000 Yorkshire Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
According to the Tax Records. individuals who own property that is within the 200' of the
proposed zoning change request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above
have been notified of the proposed zoning change request as required by Section
211 the Local Government Code. (Notices dated: December 29. 1999)
Jan Levy t1I!-
Planning itoning Assistant
ORDINANCE 0-00-1205
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF 6.81 ACRES OF LAND OUT
OF THE ROBERT CHOWNING SURVEY, A-294, AND THE W.R. JOYCE
SURVEY, A-88S, FROM THE R20 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTIAL
(PUD-R) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION:
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Robert J.
Gammon, on November 30, 1999, under Case No. Z-99-
086; and
WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning
Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet
of the property herein described at least 10 days before such
hearing; and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was
published in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville
at least 15 days before such hearing; and
WHEREAS, notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the
zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, public hearings to change the zoning and the Master Plan on
the property herein described were held before the Planning
and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the
Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a
recommendation; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change
herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth
in the Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the
citizens of the City of Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1. THAT the Master Plan, the Zoning Ordinance and the Official
Zoning Map of the City of Colleyville, Texas, are hereby
amended by changing the zoning of the property shown on the
location map .attached as Exhibit "A", and described by metes
and bounds, as contained in the attached Exhibit liB", from R20
Ordinance 0-00-1205
Page 2 of 4
- Single Family Residential District to the Planned Unit
Development - Residential (PUD-R) District.
Sec. 2. A. SITE PLAN
1. Except and excluding the single family residential uses of the
PUD property expressly provided for in Section B.1.b. below,
no new agricultural buildings shall be constructed or any
existing agricultural buildings expanded on this PUD, except
as shown on the Site Plan attached as Exhibit "e" which
shall be used for the placement of all future buildings or
expansions to existing buildings.
2. A barn, vehicle and equipment storage building shall be
permitted on the property not to exceed the dimensions
shown on the Exhibit "0". Except as otherwise expressly
permitted in this PUD, the construction requirements for
such barn, vehicle and equipment storage building shall be
in accordance with the requirements for construction of
accessory buildings in the AG - Agricultural District.
3. All existing buildings, structures, fences and other
improvements on the PUD property shown on the attached
Exhibit "C" are permitted for agricultural uses only.
4. Nothing in this ordinance shall prohibit the replacement or
remodeling of the existing single family dwelling shown on
Exhibit "C", provided such replacement or remodeling
complies with the development regulations of the R-20
Zoning District.
B. LAND USE
1. The following land uses shall be permitted within this
Planned Unit Development:
a. AQricultural Uses - All Agricultural uses permitted for the
AG-Agricultural District, with the exception of swine
farming. The property may also be used to stable, keep,
graze and maintain grazing animals, including lamas,
provided:
i. significant ground accumulations of manure shall be
collected and properly disposed of so as not to create
Ordinance 0-00-1205
Page 3 of 4
offensive odors, fly breeding, or in any way become a
health hazard or nuisance to humans or animals;
ii. fences for pens, corrals, or simIlar enclosures shall be
of sufficient height and strength to properly retain the
grazing animal(s) on the premises;
III. the minimum space area of a lot upon which such
grazing animal(s) may be kept, including pens,
corrals, and stables, shall not be less than fifteen
thousand square feet per each grazing animal over
five hundred pounds and not less than five thousand
square feet for any other grazing animal; and
iv. grazing animals may be kept within one hundred fifty
feet of structures on the property and structures on
adjacent properties.
b. Sinole Family Residential Uses - Except and excluding
the existing single family dwelling shown on Exhibit "Cn,
no portion of this PUD property may be used for single
family residential use unless and until such portion of the
PUD property has been platted in accordance with the
then applicable subdivision ordinances of the City, at
which time the requirements in Section C.2 below shall
be applicable:
C. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
1. Aoricultural Uses - The minimum lot size for any agricultural
use shall be three (3) acres. The building line set-backs and
other building requirements for any agricultural use shall be
the same requirements for the AG-Agricultural District,
except where specifically amended by this ordinance.
2. Sinole Family' Residential Uses - When a future lot(s) is
platted out of this PUD property for single family residential
purposes, the minimum lot size, building line set-backs, and
other building requirements shall be the same requirements
for the R-20 Single Family Residential District.
Sec. 3. THAT, all the regulations of the Zoning Ordinance and the R20
district shall be applicable to this PUD, except where amended
by this ordinance.
Ordinance 0-00-1205
Page 4 of 4
Sec. 4. THAT, any person, firm or corporation violating any of the
provisions of this ordinance as read together with the Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Colleyville shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a
sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each
and every day such violation continues shall constitute a
separate offense and shall be punishable as such.
Sec. 5. THAT, the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to
cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause
hereof as an alternate method of publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
day of , 2000.
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross 1. Foster
City Attorney
.. .. ('fO I
- ..nO ~... .. ,.
~ 'J)~_ I .
- - C:!f-Fu --ur-tj--'-- ---
JIll I . a-... n ,. .. _
~~J
-91..
...... -
~ ~ ~ . I. · I- · · :.'
1iI-.1W I I -t
~- r''''i~~ ~
a I · ~~- .. ~c:I~ "1'.' ~.
: I: If. ,--.-
If - .
~
,
.
-
11;.
..
..
-
..
-
.
II ,
-
-
..
~~
3==---
y
.
..
.
..
I
I
-
-
.
..
..
I
.
..........
-
~ 1 ~.
I
1'-
.
..~. , 3
I ·
-
..
1'l.
~J
.
-
.
----
~I ~ I
~
-------------
- I Iii~;
:'~:." tU:
.. .
,. u J ~IJ.~ ,.
I' IC IC .~ i---
r -.11&
.:. .I.: I
I !.
... ..
I · IC J
1'1
.~
-
,
"
..
'7'
..... ,
,.-
+-----
---------------------
..... ~... .. ~ r:.~~J~. u .~.
.
.
~
GL.-
:~IC 1.:- _ __ .
...: G! · 4R- · r-;.
-
.-
· I.!r......
.
..
-- 26 t I
~ I .Ia.lt'.. .~,
--- --I:
dr'~~~
~~ :.i ~:_. 1lP"~
....- , .
~: A.
. .._~
-
..
':D
--
-
I
. 1 .. I _
Location Map
Exhibit" A"
..
I..te.
I
.1lE
_\ - \
-,~ I I '~)V"l
~-. :II ~.\'r- ·
..
.
N
Q
II
I
I
::ill
~-
..
D':, II
~
.
.
.
..
.
Ii
,
f'
I
--
I
II . '
I
I
-.or ::::::IDa"H'!.~
From R-20
To
PUD-R
.
..........
~,:
'-='" I I I
~.'~ r:f-:-J ~
..
1 . 'W..
-~ B~r'
-, ~... -
.1. :J~I
.
:II
--
1<< u:
--I
.-"'.
"". ....
..
..-
/...
... 'M
....
I
..111
.-.
....
..,.-
...~ ..
,_.
. _ t...<
I
-
I .I"'!
j"~
I
-..
'-II' .
-
,!
-;-lEEEt. · ·
..--- .
'. . -==-
..:...-
: · ,.\a\'J
~ .~.....}
I ...
~~
,
,.-.
'1116t
JB.
,
t
EEltG 6.110 ..... of 1ard cut ,.,f the IUaU'I ODtNlNG SURVEY. Ab!Itnc:t '294. ..s the II. R.
.:JOICE SUIMX. abstract .as.ir; the City of Q)Ueyvllle. T.tent QUlty. Taas. tnI being
tllat ... tdCt _ ClDI.~e4 to. aMrt J. Gwma'a. et \IX. by deeIJ recomet 1n Vol\lfte 1439.
..... 1919. DMd ~. Ta..iAnt County. T"~M. and deeerJb!d bV metee d tIuldII as follOW!
CDt4ENClNG lit e soint In the ell!nterUne of COUnty I'oaIS No.308I. (Poollbed). _i4 point
being by deed call 361 veres tJ")rth and 140. vanm !Bst fran the Southwest com.. of _td
Jojce SUrYeyf '
~ .
.1'iiDcE North 00 44~.-05 ndr-'Ites-Ol ~.r1s Eat, along tbe center of Faollbd. 311.3(,
feet to a feud P. K. Nail for the POINT Of BF.GU.IlNG of thi8 ~t. herein &ecrlbed:
.:, ' ... .. ..
. . I
1'H!J<<S ~h 89 ~~....s-19 ndr~~~es-4' IIeCOfrts WMt. at 25.0 feet peseing . eet 5/1 inch
1Ean pin in" the West; line of f'.,1 ADst. In "U 960.00 feet alcng the North line oE 8lock
13-R. HIM.u1DMBNDIS. PhaSe It. -..<:ordJ~ to plat 11IlICwtde4 In VOl..... 381-209. Pege 98. '0
a fOund ~/2 lnch lam pin a~ t',,, Northlllest ".>>CMr ot t,Dt. 6. .Block 1l-R, MId edLItt.Jon:
.'tHB<<Z ~ GO ~~..-04 mir.'Jt..-44 eecar..... "t. ialcftg the _~ line 'of lote , thN--1ft,
Bloc* 13-1', _J4 adII1tion. 307.15 feft to "~tSl8 Inct\.1ftJft pinr .
," t . - . .
1JIlNCIt tbrtb ,.89 ~1..-Q6 ~r'Jtes-n atM)OI'."" _st. ,t 935.00 ~ a _t ~/. inch t~ 'pin
iRthe tfeet .Ufte of Pool laid.. in all 960.Mfeet. to . .tdnt ia the Cf!ntft..of Pool RDectt....
. .". '. ." " ,:. ...... ., '", ...- .' .
'fttINCB South 00 ~""05 adr.'Jt"es-15 .-.oor.~ raat"." 310.90 feet to, the POttfJ' CF IImINNt~
,In! containing 6.810 ctCI:es of \"m~ of whlC~.,O.178 ~ Ues wit~n ~l ADelS. .
9unete4.. the 4JfO.ftl t~'July_ 1995. ". CXl-m.m. ""l'e rMtked .. atnwn on ~. -ttwtR lu"!
no .enc;E~._.ta or protxust~ eAC;ept - st~. - '-. .
. .. .-z/;'I~..~.
~ l'rt>".;i~l ~ tU26.
.~'. . --.. ('-
,-. ..
. .... ; ~,...
~ ' . .. ~ .... . \
,.
. .... ,. ;
- ;.
...
,.t" i
. . ... . . . '. . 0 _ . o. I' .. . 0 '.. . ;,," I ....: .0. i ' '- , . ... .. - 't..'" ,
..L_. . .-~U ,L~Nt!:,,~,"l.IJ~~r~FJ;,JJ .~-AJ}.::< ~d':'l._'
~4U:.~"': .;,..:... ;:....~~~'Y...:~:::: :. ,:~~' ~--_L-:~::':': _.~:":--:'"' ...~.~ '_',~:.;:'"~=~:A"""C.'~~..'~: ~'=' .~.,~' ..: ~c:..:.:~'\~' ~~: .-l,.~~~~~i:~.:._ ",' ~. '
Metes and Bounds Description
Exhibit "B"
Ql
g:
~
Co
::a
~
;a
[I,l
Co
Cli
-
c.o
....
Co
:I
~
c.o
~,
?t
o
o.
N 00-04"44" " 807.15"
I
~
.
=
I:
!lll =
;a '1
"" Q
Ci Q
a ~
~
fIJ ~
&i
. fIJ
I ~
~ I
tel ~
:-t b:I
.. tel
III :'t
III..
CIII tQ
~
...
,
D:l C) C7:l
. . .
C7:l - Co
c.c ~-
i\:) Co Q
~ ~~
~ ~~
t::t.:I t::t.:I t::t.:I
I fJJ tI) fJJ
":.:' ~""'"
~ ~~
~ Q
-:! ~ fJJ
~fJJ
1:::1'-
'-
.
,
6)me
-
-
~I
!I
"
""
-;..
~
,
"
~
"-
:\
.
-:...
'\
I
)
=~=~=~~----~=~_____t
--.. N 00.05' 15" JY 310.90'
POOL ROAD
.
.
~
Co
c.o
.
<::l
0)
~
~
ta.l F~tllre Bq,." A.l J.. ../.......
e '1',) +':':l & Q" t'\
co
c.c
?'
Q
t:?
E ",." -t ..t ~ 1+. ,,' ~
I
Exhibit "e" Site Plan
~
~
-
I ~-
co I
~ ~
..........
co
--"
-
fTl )>
X 0
(f) 0
-I I -I
Z 0
C') z
~
m
(}1
0
lJ
0
0
r
:;0
0
)>
0
m m
- I
I
CD 0
Exhibit "0" - Proposed BarnNehicle/Equipment Storage Bldg. 1/2..
-
en rrl
~
~ X
0 n
0 -
(f) (f)
0 ---i
" Z
---1 C)
a.
I
N I
- I
~ )> I
~ I
.0 0 I
0 I
(f) --i I
I
0 0 I
" Z I
I
--i I
I
I
'r-------------------------
LJ
en
(J1
o
-0
o
o
r
AJ
o
)>
o
(Xl
U1
~ --i
o 0
(f) --i
o )>
r
'I
--i
Exhibit "0" - Proposed BarnNehicle/Equipment Storage Bldg. 2/ Z.
~~
CITY COUNCIL \ k I AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 2/15/2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
9
Resolution # :
R-OO-1611
DEPT. :
PARKS AND RECREATION
SUBJECT:
Approving the amended Parks and Recreation
Sponsorship and Advertising Policy
Previous Action: none
Reading and Public Hearing
On February 16, 1999, the City Council approved Resolution 99-1465 Parks and
Recreation Sponsorship and Advertising Policy for a one (1) year period. (See
attached). The Sponsorship and Advertising Committee consisting of
representatives of the youth sports associations and the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board met on January 19, 2000. Upon completion of review of this
policy, the committee recommends that Section 8B, be removed, which deletes
this one-year provision.
During 1999, Colleyville Girl's Softball Association sold 24 signs for a total of
$8,520.00 and the City received $2,125.00 Colleyville Baseball Association sold
two signs for a total of $1,324.50 and the City received $441.50. The City will
deposit revenue from the sale of signs into the Voluntary Park Fund. Revenue
from the sale of signs will be used by the youth sports associations to offset
registration fees, purchase league equipment, provide sport clinics and youth
programs.
(continued)
~ m'h~
CITY MANAGER ..
c:l.y
DEPARTMENT HEAD
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-OO-1611
Page 2
Recommendation
Approval of R-OO-1611 amending Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and
Advertising Policy.
City of Colleyville
Parks and Recreation Department
Sponsorship and Advertising Policy
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to provide a consistent basis for 1) ball field signage
at the City of Colleyville ~thletic facilities for the purpose of field improvements
and equipment; 2) to off-set registration fees for the City's cosponsored youth
sports associations; and 3) temporary banners for the purpose of promoting
special park related events.
Procedures
1. Sign Requirements:
A. Signs are to be four (4) feet tall and eight (8) feet long, made of 10 mil
coreplast.
B. Signs will be limited to a maximum of eight (8) signs per field.
C. Sign front will display graphics on a white background. Sign back is to
be dark green.
2. Sign Installation:
A. Signs shall be installed according to City specifications.
B. Signs are to be installed on the outfield fences of the ball fields and/or
athletic fields.
C. Lettering of signs shall face the interior of the ball field.
D. Signs are to be centered on the line posts of the fence.
E. Signs will not be placed within fifty (50) feet of the center of each
outfield fence.
F. Installation of signs must be rendered completely safe to participants
and spectators and will be inspected on a regular basis by the Parks
and Recreation Department and league officials. Damaged or unsafe
signs must be removed or repaired at the expense of the youth sports
association. The City of Colleyville reserves the right to remove signs
at any time if such signs are deemed to pose an imminent danger to
participants and spectators.
G. Installation of signs will take into consideration property owners,
abutting City Park.
3. Sign Approval:
A. All signs are to be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department
subsequent to installation. Approval is purely discretionary and no
organization or individual has any vested rights to erect any signs on
public athletic facilities.
B. The City may, at any time, request subsequent inspection by City
Officials, before installation.
C. Signs must be neat and of an attractive nature (Le., professionally
lettered, etc.) prior to City approval of installation.
4. Sign Guidelines:
A. Signs must reflect only business concerns, individuals, or groups, etc.
that are currently donating funds or other means of direct support for
teams or leagues utilizing City of Colleyville recreational facilities. No
funds or economic support may be received by companies promoting
alcohol, tobacco or sexually oriented business related products or
services.
B. Persons exposed to signs are not overwhelmed by the number of
messages presented.
C. Signs, pictures and/or wording must be of a nature that is not
objectionable to the general park user, as determined by staff.
D. No electrical signs.
E. The City of Colleyville reserves the right to revoke these guidelines at
any time for any reason. The City also reserves the right to impose
additional guidelines that may be necessary for the proper
administration of Parks and Recreation.
5. Sign Maintenance:
A. The youth sports associations shall maintain the signs, during the
season, which shall include inspections, repairs and replacement.
2
6. Sign Sales:
A. The youth sports associations shall solicit sales of signs.
B. Revenue from the sale of signs will be used by the youth sports
associations to offset registration fees, purchase equipment and
provide for City approved park improvements, sports clinics and youth
programs. The youth sports associations shall pay to the City 25% of
the net proceeds for all sign sales to be deposited into the Voluntary
Park Fund. The remaining 75% of the net proceeds for all sign sales
will be retained by the youth sports associations. The associations
shall submit monthly reports to the Parks and Recreation Department
reflecting revenues received and associated expenditures relative to
the sale of signs.
C. The Parks and Recreation Manager or his/her designee will work with
the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to identify and prioritize city
park facility needs. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will
recommend expenditures to the City Council for final approval.
D. The City of Colleyville shall have the right to examine, inspect and
audit all records and files of the youth sports associations related to
the field signage program.
7. Sign Inspections:
A. Signs will be inspected on a regular basis by Parks and Recreation
personnel.
B. Signs that do not meet the requirements set forth may be removed by
the City at any time without notice.
8. Sign Timing:
A. Signs may be installed one (1) week prior to the beginning of the
spring season and must be removed no later than two (2) weeks after
the end of the fall season, inclusive of post-season tournaments.
B. The youth sports associations will enter into an agreement with the
City for a trial period of one (1) year. After this time period, this policy
will be evaluated for future consideration by the City Council.
3
9. Temporary Banners
A. Temporary banners may only be used to advertise a special event
in a City park facility.
B. All temporary banners are to be approved by the Parks and
Recreation Department. Approval is purely discretionary and no
organization or individual has any vested rights to erect any
banners on public athletic or park facilities.
C. Temporary banners must be neat and of an attractive nature (i.e.,
professionally lettered, etc.) prior to City approval for installation.
D. The temporary banners may be installed one (1) to two (2) days
prior to the event and must be removed immediately following the
event.
E. Temporary banners may not be placed on the perimeter fencing of
any City park facility, e.g., City Park or the Pleasant Run Park
Soccer Facility.
F. Temporary banners must be installed according to City
specifications.
Amended 02/03/00
4
RESOLUTION R-OO-1611
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PARKS AND RECREATION SPONSORSHIP AND
ADVERTISING POLICY
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville desires to provide a consistent basis for ball field
signage at the City of Colleyville athletic facilities for the purpose of field
improvements and equipment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville desires to provide a consistent basis for the use of
temporary banners for the purpose of promoting special park related
events; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville desires to offset registration fees for the City's
cosponsored youth sports associations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
! Sec. 1.
THAT the City of Colleyville adopt the Parks and Recreation Sponsorship
and Advertising Policy as amended. (Exhibit "A").
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
PASSED BY A VOTE OF
THIS THE DAY OF
AYES, NAYS, AND
2000.
ABSTENTIONS ON
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
Exhibit "A"
City of Colleyville
Parks and Recreation Department
Sponsorship and Advertising Policy
Statement of Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to provide a consistent basis for 1) ball field signage
at the City of Colleyville a.thletic facilities for the purpose of field improvements
and equipment; 2) to off-set registration fees for the City's cosponsored youth
sports associations; and 3) temporary banners for the purpose of promoting
special park related events.
Procedures
1. Sign Requirements:
A. Signs are to be four (4) feet tall and eight (8) feet long, made of 10 mil
coreplast.
B. Signs will be limited to a maximum of eight (8) signs per field.
C. Sign front will display graphics on a white background. Sign back is to
be dark green.
2. Sign Installation:
A. Signs shall be installed according to City specifications.
B. Signs are to be installed on the outfield fences of the ball fields and/or
athletic fields.
C. Lettering of signs shall face the interior of the ball field.
D. Signs are to be centered on the line posts of the fence.
E. Signs will not be placed within fifty (50) feet of the center of each
outfield fence.
F. Installation of signs must be rendered completely safe to participants
and spectators and will be inspected on a regular basis by the Parks
and Recreation Department and league officials. Damaged or unsafe
signs must be removed or repaired at the expense of the youth sports
association. The City of Colleyville reserves the right to remove signs
at any time if such signs are deemed to pose an imminent danger to
participants and spectators.
G. Installation of signs will take into consideration property owners,
abutting City Park.
3. Sign Approval:
A. All signs are to be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department
subsequent to installation. Approval is purely discretionary and no
organization or individual has any vested rights to erect any signs on
public athletic fa~ilities.
B. The City may, at any time, request subsequent inspection by City
Officials, before installation.
C. Signs must be neat and of an attractive nature (Le., professionally
lettered, etc.) prior to City approval of installation.
4. Sign Guidelines:
A. Signs must reflect only business concerns, individuals, or groups, etc.
that are currently donating funds or other means of direct support for
teams or leagues utilizing City of Colleyville recreational facilities. No
funds or economic support may be received by companies promoting
alcohol, tobacco or sexually oriented business related products or
services.
B. Persons exposed to signs are not overwhelmed by the number of
messages presented.
C. Signs, pictures and/or wording must be of a nature that is not
objectionable to the general park user, as determined by staff.
D. No electrical signs.
E. The City of Colleyville reserves the right to revoke these guidelines at
any time for any reason. The City also reserves the right to impose
additional guidelines that may be necessary for the proper
administration of Parks and Recreation.
5. Sign Maintenance:
A. The youth sports associations shall maintain the signs, during the
season, which shall include inspections, repairs and replacement.
6. Sign Sales:
A. The youth sports associations shall solicit sales of signs.
2
B. Revenue from the sale of signs will be used by the youth sports
associations to offset registration fees, purchase equipment and
provide for city approved park improvements, sports clinics and youth
programs. The youth sports associations shall pay to the City 25% of
the net proceeds for all sign sales to be deposited into the Voluntary
Park Fund. The remaining 75% of the net proceeds for all sign sales
will be retained by the youth sports associations. The associations
shall submit monthly reports to the Parks and Recreation Department
reflecting revenues received and associated expenditures relativ.e to
the sale of signs.
C. The Parks and Recreation Manager or his/her designee will work with
the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to identify and prioritize city
park facility needs. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will
recommend expenditures to the City Council for final approval.
D. The City of Colleyville shall have the right to examine, inspect and
audit all records and files of the youth sports associations related to
the field signage program.
7. Sign Inspections:
A. Signs will be inspected on a regular basis by Parks and Recreation
personnel.
B. Signs that do not meet the requirements set forth may be removed by
the City at any time without notice.
8. Sign Timing:
A. Signs may be installed one (1) week prior to the beginning of the
spring season and must be removed no later than two (2) weeks after
the end of the fall season, inclusive of post-season tournaments.
9. Temporary Banners:
A. Temporary banners may only be used to advertise a special event
in a City park facility.
B. All temporary banners are to be approved by the Parks and
Recreation Department. Approval is purely discretionary and no
organization or individual has any vested rights to erect any
banners on public athletic or park facilities.
3
C. Temporary banners must be neat and of an attractive nature (Le.,
professionally lettered, etc.) prior to City approval for installation.
D. The temporary banners may be installed one (1) to two (2) days
prior to the event and must be removed immediately following the
event.
E. Temporary banners may not be placed on the perimeter fencing of
any City park facility, e.g., City Park or the Pleasant Run Park
Soccer Facility.
F. Temporary banners must be installed according to City
specifications.
Amended 02/07/00
4
. CC~(5
CITY COUNCIL 7w' AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 02/15/00 CMO Approval:
Item#:
10
Resolution # :
R-OO-1612
Previous Action: none
DEPT. :
FINANCE
SUBJECT:
Approval of suspending the effective date of TXU
Electric's proposed tariff revisions
Reading and Public Hearing
On January 25, 2000, TXU Electric Company filed a request to delete, close and modify
the terms of various rate classes provided to their customers (see Attachment 1 /
information from Rick Vaughn, Area Manager for TXU). This action is proposed to
facilitate TXU's movement to a competitive retail market in January 2000 per recent
state legislation. Cities are permitted by law to suspend the request for a period of
ninety days to allow for further examination of the request. Colleyville is a member of
the Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric (the Committee), and this
group studies all rate and tariff requests (see Attachment 2 / information from Jay
Ooegey, City Attorney for the City of Arlington). Attached is Resolution R-00-1612 that
provides for a suspension of the request to allow the Committee time to study the
request.
Recommendation
Approval of Resolution R-QQ-1612.
~ YJ7~u~ a:6~
CITY MANAGER '
( ~~~--I
O"E'PART EAO
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY
A TT ACHMENT 1 .
8rxu
~4~
Rick v.ughn
Area Manager
Community Relations
January 25.2000
Mr. C. Robert Stripling
City Manager
City of Colleyville
5400 Bransford Rd
Colleyville, Texas 76034
r
Re TXU Electric Tariff Revisions
Dear Bob:
Enclosed for filing is TXU Electric Company's Tariff Filing Pursuant to Substantive Rule 25,241,
requesting revisions to 27 of its retail rates/riders. The enclosed Tariff Filing is also berng made
with the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
This Tariff Filing does not propose to either increase or decrease any existing charge or rate, and
TXU Electnc does not anticipate any change 10 revenues as a result of these proposed tariff
reVISions. The primary purpose of this Tariff Filing is to modify, close. or delete certarn eXlstrng
tariffs rn order to facilitate the transition to a competitive retail market as of January 1, 2002,
pursuant to Senate Bill 7 passed in the 1999 Texas Legislature
In order to fully explain the revisions proposed in this Tariff Filing, TXU Electric has included the
testimony of Mr. J. Michael Sherburne. Mr. Sherburne's Exhibit JMS-D-1 summanzes the
proposed tariff revisions. and his subsequent exhibits prOVide the proposed tariff sheets with
changes noted, TXU Electric proposes that these tariff reVISions go rnto effect March 1, 2000.
and requests that the City approve this Tariff Filing effective on that date, By taking no actIon. the
City can allow these tariff revisions to go into effect automatically by OperatIon of Law.
Included In the Tariff Filing, in addition to Mr. Sherburne's testImony. are clean copies of (1) the
revised Table of Contents; (2) the revised Section 2.1 CIties served listing; and (3) the revIsed
tariff pages reflecting the proposed changes.
Please call me at 817-821-5330 should you have any questions concerning this filing,
Very truly yours,
,.........".,.:-
/, ,.
Rick Vaughn
Enclosure
Receipt Acknowledged by:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Q.
r
A
Q&A - 1/25/00 TXU Electric Tariff Filing
Q.
What is the purpose of this filing?
This tiling is being made to facilitate the move to re~i1 competiti.on in Texas.
Since we know that we will not be able to offer certain services In the near future.
we are attempting to be proactive in our efforts to ease concern reg~rdlng .
contractually obligating either the customer or the Company to eXisting tariffs
beyond the start of Competition.
Why are you making this filing?
We are proposing to make these changes to facilitate the transition to a
competitive marketplace and to address the potentially contentious issues
surrounding contract terms with new customers.
A.
Q. Why now? Why don't you wait until retail competition is here?
A Since we already know the date of full retail competition and the date for
competitive energy service transition, we feel that by making these changes now,
the transition to a competitive marketplace will be smoother for all concerned. As
long as these tariffs remain unchanged, we must offer them, which could allow
new customers to game the system to the detriment of the remaining customers.
a. What type of changes are you proposing?
A There are four types of changes proposed:
1) Close certain retail tariffs to new customers for services deemed
competitive energy services which we cannot provide after 9/1/00
2) Close and/or modify optional retail tariffs with contract provisions that
extend beyond the 1/1/02 date of full competition or that are no longer
necessary
3) Modify retail tariffs to limit contract term for basic rates to 12/31/01 and
4) Delete retail tariffs that are no longer being utilized
a. What is a competitive energy service and why will you not be able to
provide it after 09/01/00? .;
A Competitive energy services are customer energy service business activities
which are capable of being provided on a competitive basis in the retail market.
Examples inclu~e: energy efficiency services, energy audits, and guard lights.
The Texas Legislature passed electric industry restructuring in 1999 that states
that an electric utility shall separate from its regulated utility activities from its
custom~r ene~gy s~rvices. The Public Utility Commission initiated an industry
rulemaklng to Identify those competitive energy services. As a result, TXU
1
01/25/00
T'
A
Q.
A
Q.
Electric has identified its competitive energy services and filed a plan with the
PUC on 1/10/00 to describe how we will accomplish this separation.
Q. Is this going to change rates?
A. No. These changes will not impact anyone's rates. Rates were frozen effective
9/1/99 in accordance with the electric industry restructuring law
Q. Do these changes impact current customers on these rates?
A.
No. The changes proposed in the tariff filing are designed to address new
customers on these rates and do not directly impact current customers receiving
service under these rates. However, the issue of how to handle existmg retail
contracts that extend beyond 1/1/02 is currently being discussed by the PUC.
TXU Electric plans to take proactive measures to handle these contracts through
negotiations. Our plan is to review each existing retail contract and renegotiate
the terms with each customer to either:
1) limit the contract term to 12/31/01,
2) allow for contract termination by mutual agreement; or
3) allow both the customer and Company to terminate the contract with 30
days written notice, effective any time after 12/31/01
Q.
Please summarize the affected tariffs?
A
See the attached list.
Q.
You are closing Rate OL - Outdoor Lighting (guard lights) effective 3/1/00,
but the requirement to separate competitive energy services does not
become effective until 9/1/00. Where will new customers go for guard light
service after 3/1/00?
Based upon discussions during the development of the Customer Energy
Services rules at the PUC. there are suppliers of this service currently in
eXistence that are ready to serve these customers. We can provide a list of
suppliers.
What happens to current guard light customers after 9/1/001
TX~ Electric will continue to provide service to existing guard light customers
until 1/1/02. After 1/1/02, these contracts will be transferred to a competitive
affiliate.
Why are you closing Rate OL - Outdoor Lighting but not Rate SL _ Street
Lighting?
2
01/25/00
A. Street lighti.ng was not identified as a competitive energy service in the PUC
rulemaking process. while outdoor lighting was identified as a competitive energy
service which the regulated utility is not allowed to provide to new customers
after 9/1/00.
Q. Where are you filing these tariff changes?
A. We are filing these tariff changes with the PUC and all cities which have retained
their original jurisdiction over TXU's rates.
r
3
01/25/00
"
TXU Electric
Summary of Tariff Revisions
Close Rate/Rider to new customers March 1, 2000
· ED - Economic Development Service
· ET - Environmental Technology Service
· GC - General Service Competitive Pricing
· GC 1 .. General Service
· I - Interruptible Service
· OL - Outdoor Lighting
r'
Close Rate to new customers January 1, 2001
· RLU - Residential Low Use Service
· RTU - Residential Time-at-Use Service
· RTU 1 - Residential Time-ot-Use Service
I RTU 1-M - Residential Time-at-Use Service Municipality
Close Rate to new customers January 1, 2001 & Limit contract term
to December 31,2001
· GTUC - General Service Time-of-Use Voluntary Curtailment
I GTUC-M - General Service Time-ot-Use Voluntary Curtailment
Municipality
Delete Tariff
· RTP - Real Time Pricing
· RTP-I - Real Time Pricing - Interruptible
· RTP-I-1 - Real Time Pricing - Instantaneous Interruptible
Limit contract term to December 31, 2001
· ES - Enterprise Zone
· GP - General Service Primary
· GS - General Service Secondary
· GTU - General Service.Time-ot-Use
· GTU-M - General Service Time-of-Use Municipality
· HV - High Voltage Service
· LPP - Non-Firm Energy Purchases from Qualifying Facilities
· R - Residential Service
· S - Standby Service
· SL - Street Lighting Service
· SPP - Small Power Production
I T - Temporary Service
4
01/25/00
A TT ACHMENT 2
TO:
STEERING COMMITTEE OF TXU ELECTRIC SERVICE AREA
CITIES
FROM:
Jay Doegey, Chair of the
~,.~ -
Steering Committee ~
Modify Certain Tariffs
SUBJECT:
TXU Electric Proposal to
DATE:
January 31, 2000
Please review the attached memo from Geoffrey Gay concerning
TXU Electric's filing on January 25, 2000. It is
recommended that cities pass a suspension resolution such as
shown in the model resolution attached. A suspension
resolution must be adopted prior to March 1, 2000, in order
to effectively suspend the effective date of TXU's request.
JBD/blj
Attachment
.J
01/27/00 THU 15:28 FA!
LLOlll GOSSELINK
@002
'II C:ONOIIE.5 AVeNUE, SUITE laoo
AUSTIN, TEX.... 7.701
TCUE~HONECSla'3.a...OO
TEL.EC:O~'I:II C.,., 471.0.3.
LLOYD. GOSSELINK. BLEVINS. ROCHELLE,
BALOWI N & TOWNSEND. P. c.
ATTOftNEY5 AT LAw
Mr. Gay's DnctLiH: (512) 322-5175
EmaiI: gp.y@lglawfimullD
S07 SOUTM AUSTIN AVENUE"
GCOIIGETOWN, TO.... 7....
TI:L.C~MONE fs'al .30.131'7
"IT _llITNElIT ONU'
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Jay Doegey
FROM:
Geoffrey Gay
DATE:
January 27, 2000
RE:
TXU Electric Proposal To Modify, Oose Or Delete Certain Tariffs
On January 25, 2000 TXTJ Electric made a filing with Cities and the PUC to modify,
close or delete certain rate tariffs. The proposed effective date is March 1,2000. The proposed
changes go into effect on that date unless regulatory authorities suspend the effective date or take
action on the merits of the request prior to March 1, 2000. Cities may suspend the effective date
for up to 90 days.
The proposed changes do not directly increase or decrease rates, but may have an
economic impact on customers who may be forced off a rate and onto a higher cost rate. TXU
Electric's application appears to be part of a general tariff housecleaning prior to the
implementation of retail competition on January 1, 2002. Future transmission and distribution
utiliti es are supposed to get rid of all competitive services and this filing is represented as being
devoted to that effort. The proposal includes closure of time of use rates and deletion of real
time pricing rates. Few, if any, customers are on those rates. The proposal to close the industrial
interruptible rate may draw some debate and Cities may want to intervene at the PUC to monitor
negotiations betWeen the Company and its industrial customers. . Some Cities might be
concerned with closure of the economic development and outdoor lighting tariffs.
I recommend that the Steering Committee intervene at the PUC and monitor proceedings
and that Dr. Andersen be asked to review and comment on the filing. I do not anticipate the need
for expert testimony.
.~
I will prepare a recommendation to the Steering Committee regarding action at the local
level after discussion with Dr. Andersen and parties to the PUC case. Unfonunately, there are
some Cities that may need to meet for their only meeting in February before I can get a memo
prepared on the merits of the application. Therefore, I have attached a model suspension
resolution. Passage of this resolution will move the effective date from March 1, 2000 to May
30, 2000.
cc: Cities' Steering Committee
"M9\OO\mmoO 12700PJ !
RESOLUTION R-oO-1612
A RESOLUTION SUSPENDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF TXU ELECTRIC'S
PROPOSED TARIFF REVISIONS TO PERMIT THE STEERING COMMITTEE OF
CITIES SERVED BY TXU ELECTRIC TIME TO STUDY AND MAKE
RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE PROPOSED CHANGES
WHEREAS, on or about January 25, 2000 TXU Electric filed with the City of Colleyville
its request to close, modify or delete certain retail tariffs effective March 1,
2000; and
WHEREAS, it is reasonable for the City of Colleyville to cooperate with other cities in a
review of TXU's Electric application and to allow sufficient time for the
Steering Committee of Cities Served by TXU Electric to make
recommendations on how to address the Company's filing; and
WHEREAS, PURA 36.1 08(a)(1) grants local regulatory authorities the right to suspend
the effective date of proposed rate changes for up to 90 days.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1
THAT the effective date of the tariff changes submitted by TXU Electric on
or about January 25, 2000 is suspended until May 30, 2000 to permit
adequate time to review the proposed changes.
Sec. 2
THAT a copy of this suspension resolution be sent to the local
representative of TXU Electric.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
Passed by a vote of_ayes and_nays and_abstentions on this the
,2000.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY Of COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
C1ry 01
(Cents
CITY COUNCIL tw. AGENDA BRIEFING
For mtg. : 02-15-00 CMO Approval:
Item # :
11
Report :
Previous Action:
DEPT. :
FINANCE
SUBJECT:
Monthly Financial Report - January 2000
General Fund
As January 31 st is the due date for all property tax payments, the tax office has not
closed the month of January and the collection percentage is unavailable. However,
collections appear to be greater than the prior year. Sales tax revenue received in
January was slightly below ($1,445 /1.42%) the amount received in 1999. Residential
permits are up by seven over January 1999 and are now up by sixteen for the year-to-
date. Municipal Court revenues are up due to greater citations issued during all months
of the fiscal year. The average amount expended by the departments at the end of
January is 27.4%.
Utility Fund
Water sales and usage are higher than the prior year due to the heat and drought
conditions we experienced this fall and the continued lack of rainfall. Building related
installations are up due to greater activity. Penalty revenues are up due to larger bills,
and customers paying later than usual during this fiscal year. Interest income is down
due to timing of maturities and interest earnings from the 1998 Revenue Bonds. The
average amount expended by the Utility Fund at the end of January is 25.48%.
~~ 7'?7~~. r1d~
CITY MANAGER ' ~ I
(~_~h-
DEPART D
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - JANUARY 2000
Current Taxes
Delinquent Taxes
Penalty & Interest
$4,369,195
30,500
28,100
$3,649,109
12,831
3,477
$3,328,310
14,132
4,011
$2,965,358
11,352
2,855
23.06%
13.03o/c
21.79%
..'....-..-..-.....,.....................,...,.............,..'........... .........-............................. ..-.......--. '...--"..,......-.
..n.......H$~~$$?'4~! {...n~~;~-t~;4.~~... ...... ........$g,979,SeS....
TU Electric
Tri.County Electric
Lone Star Gas
Southwestern Bell
General Telephone
Refuse
Cable TV
$665,000 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
27,885 0 0 26,061 100.00%
147,000 0 0 0 0.00%
153,693 38,351 38,423 32,699 17,28%
18,296 5,080 4,574 4,400 1545%
79,206 20,736 6,601 25,087 -17.34%
99,000 56,776 24,750 21,684 161.83%
Sales Tax
Mixed Beverage Tax
$1,901,848
22,000
$439,238
8,276
$466,102
11,000
$407,811
10,503
7.7
.21.2G /0
<$418,314
Building $520,000 $250,139 $170,820 $144,570 7302%
Plumbing 101,000 41,225 32,507 31,712 3000%
Electrical 91,000 33,875 29,288 26,881 2602%
City License 40,000 14,240 12,835 12,565 1333%
Building Plan Review Fee 57,000 39,711 18,345 1,650 2306.73%
New Business 1,000 425 185 330 28 79%
Animal 1,510 140 279 185 '24.32%
Sign Permit '2,900 1,105 933 945 1693%
Fence Permit 3,000 1,326 555 730 81.64%
Fire Permits 225 225 72 50 350.00%
Fines
False Alarms
$424,091
7,320
$149,908
2,550
$141,364
2,440
$129,289
3,400
1595%
'25.00%
.-...........-.........-.......,-...
...... ............"....
.$...1...4......3.....8....).4.....
. -. ... ....
,. '. . --.
:::.::~;.::~;:::.:;:.:,}.::;.;.;:<::.:;:)
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - JANUARY 2000
Re-zoning $10,506 $5,750 $5,800 $5,117 12.37%
Plat Fee/Site Plan 10,000 4,329 4,400 3,745 15,59%
Board of Adjustment 2,500 625 500 250 150,00%
Sale of Material 3,000 1,429 833 417 242.69%
Weed Mowing 7,500 275 350 3,145 -91.26%
Animal Impoundment 3,250 1,813 1,083 1,046 7333%
Ambulance 62,400 21,365 20,800 23,236 -805%
Recreation Program 57,775 8,109 8,000 3,437 135,93%
Non,Resident Fee Parks 16,000 9,720 8,000 6,970 3945%
Field Use Charge 29,430 5,915 6,750 10,012 -40.92%
Engineering & Inspection 75,000 20,476 20,000 37,283 ,45,08%
Chgs & Reimbursements 8,000 6,945 4,500 1,196 480.69%
Commumity Center Rental 151,000 59,482 50,333 41 ,096 44.74%
Lot Drainage Insp Fee 25,000 9,750 4,583 7,500 30.00%
..'.,...........................
.$.................................
......... .f~P~@??).
DARE Officer Reimb $57,750 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
COPS FAST Grant 25,000 0 0 0 000%
.._-----" -... ......-. ........"."............--,...----........
TOTAL.. INTERGoVtRNNlEN TAU........................
Sale of Surplus Property $10,000 $0 $0 $16,328 100.00%
Interest Income 296,500 15,182 18,000 35,339 .57.04%
Miscellaneous 13,260 4,517 4,500 3,548 27,31%
Tower Rental 69,925 19,616 19,514 18,509 5,98%
Transfer from Utility Fd
$382,817
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
. "..-.----.....".".
TOT ALGEj\JERALFQf'{pgS'\lEf'4l.JES<.
........$J.9'1.(}7,3~2..... ...........~4,~94tQ4!>.....)$4;~~,47~........ ..i......$4;Q7s,g$1....y.... ..........................?l;Zg%.
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - JANUARY 2000
TOTAL PERCENT
THROUGH THROUGH INCREASE INCREASE
1/31/00 1/31/99 (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
% OF CURRENT TAX ROLL COLLECTED UNAVAILABLE 93,09% -93.09% -100.00%
RESIDENTIAL BLDG PERMITS 74 58 16 27,59%
COMMERCIAL BLDG PERMITS 6 6 0 0,00%
PLUMBING PERMITS 308 228 80 3509%
ELECTRICAL PERMITS 182 129 53 41.09%
CITATIONS ISSUED 3,203 2,291 912 39.81 %
CITATIONS APPEALED 53 45 8 17.78%
City Council and Secretary
City Manager
Finance
Legal
Economic Development
Engi neeri ng
BUilding Inspection
Community Development
Fire
Police
Parks
Recreation
Commumity Center
Streets & Drainage
Municipal Court
Fleet Maintenance
Merit Pool
Compensation
$200,233
468,341
426,710
100,000
144,470
566,335
270,025
354,281
2,150,173
2,294,165
894,522
151,548
241,890
1,312,167
109,892
118,505
80,000
223,326
$69,323
135,509
153,920
34,365
42,486
186,643
80,093
110,024
646,376
704,375
194,317
30,353
64,142
241,762
36,618
40,181
o
o
..................................
........-...-....................
........$. ..2."7. .7. .0.. .....4.8.. .7......
\U}t...;;:;.:y>[>:;::~J;;;>\)~:/f
$66,477
137,280
159,248
33,200
42,376
188,023
79,204
117,621
670,854
691,002
188,487
30,448
29,027
250,296
35,265
40,543
o
o
..:.:...'...................'..,..-.............-....,...,.,..'..,........
........it;2...~el'ii;l.5..~.
.t:::::i~::~::~~:::..)t:R:~d:g:::;.A/:j
34.6%
28.9%
36.1%
344%
294%
33.0%
29,7%
31.1%
30.1%
30.7%
21.7%
20.0%
26.5%
184%
33,3%
33,9%
0.0%
$130,910
332,832
272,790
65,635
101,984
379,692
189,932
244,257
1,503,797
1,589,790
700,205
121,195
177,748
1,070,405
73,274
78,324
80,000
223,326
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - JANUARY 2000
Water Sales $4,868,869 $1,858,621 $1,134,446 $1,468,949. 26.53%
Sewer Sales 1,606,264 588,213 535,421 486,294 20.96%
Sewer Installation 22,000 8,600 7,333 5,700 50.88%
Water Installation 61,600 20,590 20,533 12,500 64.72%
Sewer Tie.on Charges 45,000 12,760 11,250 10,953 1650%
Engineering Charges 25,000 10,488 6,250 13,684 .23.36%
Penalties 145,690 38,676 36,423 54,316 .28.79%
Miscellaneous 7,500 3,895 1,875 8,146 .52.19%
Interest Income
TOTAL PERCENT
THROUGH THROUGH INCREASE INCREASE
1/31/00 1/31/99 (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
GALLONS OF WATER SOLD 654,689,800 471,489,000 183,200,800 38.86%
NUMBER OF WATER CUSTOMERS 7,114 6,884 230 3.34%
Administration
Billing
Operations
Debt Service
Merit Pool
Compensation Study
Transfer to General Fu nd
$152,529
135,796
4,810,927
1,097,761
22,000
41,628
382,817
$48,032
51,551
866,049
727,239
o
o
o
$50,335
50,245
875,868
727,239
o
o
o
31.49%
37,96%
18.00%
66,25%
000%
000%
0,00%
$104,497
84,245
3,944,878
370,522
22,000
41,628
382,817
....... ......... .......,.. .....
$~;g~p;~~!.
CC@nC5
CITY COUNCIL rw> AGENDA BRIEFING
For mta. : 02-15-2000 CMO Approval:
Item # :
11
Staff Report :
Previous Action: N/A
DEPT. :
FINANCE
SUBJECT:
Quarterly Investment Report
BackQround
During the period October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999, the City of Colleyville
had an average of $30,090,073 invested on a daily basis, which earned $397,067 with
an average yield of 5.23%. The average yield on investments for this quarter is up .22%
from the average yield of 5.01 % for the prior quarter due to higher interest rates. The
City had 98.1 % of idle funds invested daily and the amount held in the depository
account earned interest at an average of 1 %.
As of December 31, 1999, the City had $29,880,765 invested in the LOGIC Investment
Pool and various debt instruments in the following percentages:
LOGIC Investment Pool
FHLB Discount Notes
FNMA Discount Notes
Treasury Notes
32.10%
23.25%
19.09%
14.73%
(continued)
xa~ 1/?uJ~ t2~
CITY MANAGER / , .
CW~
DEPART HEAD
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Agenda Briefing
Quarterly Investment Report
Page 2
FNMA Medium Term Note
FHLB Bond
7.08%
3.75%
These percentages are within the guidelines for portfolio diversification in the City's
investment policy. The market value of the City's investments at December 31, 1999
was $20,626,040 as compared to a purchase price of $20,288,961 (this excludes
LOGIC Investment Pool). There are some investments in the portfolio that now have a
lower market value than at the end of the prior quarter or time of purchase. This occurs
in an environment of rising interest rates. As our investments are relatively short-term in
nature, they will be held until maturity and a loss will not be realized.
The Colleyville Economic Development Corporation currently holds a Treasury bill
($973,217) with a market value of $983,750 and $1,587,990 was invested in the
Corporation's name in the LOGIC investment pool. These funds earned interest of
$17,637 for the quarter.
Attached is the allocation of the LOGIC Investment Pool by fund and investments held
during the quarter and quarterly interest earnings by investment. Also attached is the
quarterly investment information compiled by the LOGIC Investment Pool to meet
investment legislation requirements.
OUTSTANDING INVESTMENTS AT DECEMBER 31,1999
PURCHASE PAR MARKET VAlUE MATURITY YIELD ON
PRICE VAlUE C 12131199 DATE INVESTMENT
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE 51,259,416 51,305,000 51.292,553 O2I1MlO 5.247%
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE 51.190,000 51,250,000 51,241,511 02128100 5.049%
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE 51,179,800 51,226,000 51,213,672 0;W9iOO 5.343%
FHLB BOND 51,120,350 51,120,000 51,106,326 03122100 4.990%
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE 51,191]50 51,250,000 51,234,553 03l23A:l0 4.910%
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE 5973,028 51,020,000 $1.006,000 04I03A:l0 4.918'/0
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE 51.158.417 51,215.000 51,197,430 04/07 iOO 4,920%
TREASURY NOTE 51,012.500 51,000,000 5999,375 04/30/00 4610%
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE 5952.500 51.000,000 5981,333 05/01/00 50080A
FNMA MED TERM NOTE 51,064,438 $1050.000 $1.052.297 05/1 MlO 4.48-4%
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE 51,275,446 51,342,000 $1.316.949 06/30/00 5450%
TREASURY NOTE $1,271.127 51,265.000 $1,265.791 06130/00 5.230%
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE $1.166,581 $1,232,000 51,190,145 07/28100 5.719%
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE 51,124,273 $1,180,000 51,132,803 8/25/00 5.821%
TREASURY NOTE $1,042,451 $1,050,000 $1,037,859 09/30/00 5.003%
TREASURY NOTE $1.076,176 $1,075.000 $1,071,977 10/31/00 5.628%
"NMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE $1,051.388 51.060.000 $1,049.400 11/29/00 5.899%
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE $1179.321 $1.250.000 51.236,066 12/8/00 6.021%
TOT AL OUTSTANDING INVESTMENTS $20.288,961 $20.890.000 $20,626,040
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31.1999
INVESTMENT PURCHASES $20,288.961
LOGIC INVESTMENT POOL 59,591,804
TOTAL CITY INVESTMENTS HELD AT SEPTEMBER 30. 1999
COLLEYVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31. 1999
PURCHASE PAR MARKET VALUE MATURITY YIELD ON
PRICE VALUE C 1213Ml9 DATE INVESTMENT
TREASURY BILL 5973,217 51,000,000 5983:750 02103/00 4.747%
COLLEYVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31. 1999
INVESTMENT PURCHASES
$973,217
LOGIC INVESTMENT POOL
$1,587,990
TOTAL CEDC INVESTMENTS HELD AT DECEMBER 31, 1999
TOTAL INVESTMENTS HELD BY CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
"-ND COLLEYVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORP AT DECEMBER 31, 1999
$30,864,515
INTEREST EARNINGS ON INVESTMENTS OCTOBER 1 - DECEMBER 31,1999
PURCHASE
PRICE
PAR
VALUE
MATURITY
DATE
YIELD ON
INVESTMENT
INTEREST
EARNED
FFCB DISCOUNT NOTE $1,053,051 $1,100,000 10/22/99 4.669% $2,829
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE $1,002,831 $1,050,000 11/08/99 4.754% $4,963
TREASURY NOTE $1,054,758 $1,050,000 11/15/99 4.841% $6,295
FFCB DISCOUNT NOTE $1,124,363 $1,175,000 12/15/99 4.810% $11,113
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE $1,259.416 $1,305,000 02/16/00 5.247% $16,656
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE $1,190,000 $1,250,000 02/28/00 5.049% $15,144
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE $1,179,800 $1,226,000 03/09/00 5.343% $15,889
FHLB BOND $1,120,350 $1,120,000 03/22/00 4,990% $14,091
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE $1,191,750 $1,250,000 03/23/00 4.910% $14,749
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE $973,028 $1,020,000 04/03/00 4.918% $12,062
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE $1,158,417 $1,215,000 04/07/00 4,920% $14,366
TREASURY NOTE $1,012,500 $1,000,000 04/30/00 4.610% $11,765
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE $952,500 $1,000,000 05/01/00 5,008% $12,023
FNMA MED TERM NOTE $1,064,438 $1,050,000 05/16/00 4.484% $12,030
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE $1,275,446 $1,342,000 06/30/00 5,450% $17,521
TREASURY NOTE $1,271,127 $1,265,000 06/30/00 5.230% $16,757
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE $1,166,581 $1,232,000 07/28/00 5.719% $16,816
FNMA DISCOUNT NOTE $1,124,273 $1,180,000 8/25/00 5.821% $16,497
TREASURY NOTE $1,042,451 $1,050,000 09/30/00 5.003% $13,146
TREASURY NOTE $1,076,176 $1,075,000 10/31/00 5.628% $8,961
FNMA MEDIUM TERM NOTE $1,051,388 $1,060,000 11/29/00 5,899% $7,987
FHLB DISCOUNT NOTE $1,179,321 $1,250,000 12/8/00 6.021% $4,669
TOTAL INTEREST EARNED ON CITY INVESTMENTS HELD 10,1,99 THROUGH 12-31,99 $266,328
...
N
.0
~
~
...
'"
'"
o
o
...
..
:..
'"
'"
'"
...
N
o
IZ;
'"
~
o
...
o
~
~
~
'"
'"
o
....
o
....
F!
en
...
:I:
r-
CD
o
Vi
8
c
z
....
z
~
,.,
~
'"
'"
'"
N
~
o
o
...,
.'"
'"
~
:::
t;:
o
o
o
o
z
i;
z
'i;
:::
;0
'"
'"
"
:::
N
'"
.'"
~
z
'i;
z
i;
....
'"
~
c
~
z
o
....
,.,
~
'"
'"
~
~
o
o
:::
8
'"
~
'"
:::
~
o
o
o
z
i;
z
i;
:::
c
C
c
o
~
2
:P
z
'i;
...
z
~
;::
,.,
>2
c
;::
....
,.,
'"
;::
z
o
....
,.,
~
'"
'"
,
N
~
o
o
:::
~
'"
DO
DO
:::
.0
'"
o
o
o
o
"'"
"
z
'i;
5:
'"
DO
DO
o
..
'"
..
o
o
2
'i;
z
i;
...
Z
~
o
Vi
8
c
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
~
N
~
'"
'"
~
~
o
o
:::
N
..
N
~
'"
~
DO
o
o
o
o
"'"
"
"'"
"
:::
~
N
'"
~
'"
N
00
o
'"
z
'i;
z
'i;
....
'"
~
c
;0
-<
z
o
....
,.,
o
!
~
'"
'"
o
~
'"
~
o
o
~
~
~
~
N
'"
'"
o
o
o
~
N
'"
~'"
'"
N
z
i;
z
):;
:::
N
~
:':
z
i;
~
'"
'"
9
."
Z
~
o
~
c
Z
....
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
o
~
'"
'"
~
'"
~
o
o
~
'"
'"
u.
~
~
N
'"
N
o
o
o
~
...,
,'"
'"
...,
z
):;
z
):;
~
'"
.0
t;,
z
i;
1C
.'"
'"
'"
..
...
:I:
r-
CD
o
Vi
8
c
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
N
~
'"
'"
o
~
'"
~
o
o
~
~
'"
~
...
'"
~
w
...
N
o
o
o
~
N
DO
DO
io
~
z
i;
z
):;
~
~
'"
io
...
'"
z
):;
...
;;
u.
o
w
."
Z
~
o
Vi
8
c
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
...,
,
'"
'"
o
~
o
~
o
o
~
...,
'"
-.,
o
o
~
N
'"
'"
o
o
o
~
'"
'"
-.,
..
...
2:
"
z
):;
~
N
w
~
z
):;
...
w
w
~
N
...
z
~
o
Vi
8
c
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
'"
'"
o
~
~
o
o
~
N
'"
'"
~
'"
~
w
o
'"
o
o
o
~
~
...,
N
~
z
i;
z
):;
~
N
'"
'"
jj:
w
z
):;
...
w
.w
~
....
'"
~
c:
;0
-<
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
~
'"
'"
'"
,
'"
'"
~
o
'"
!>
...,
'"
DO
~
o
'"
o
o
o
o
~
51
...
DO
~
o
'"
o
o
o
o
z
):;
z
i;
z
i;
2:
"
."
:I:
r-
CD
o
Vi
8
c
z
....
z
~
,.,
o
~
8
'"
'"
~
8
o
o
...
'"
'"
'"
u.
o
o
~
o
g
o
o
o
...
'"
'"
...,
w
o
'"
z
i;
2:
"
...
'"
~
'"
w
w
z
):;
...
N
DO
-.,
W
W
...
z
~
;::
,.,
>2
c
;::
....
,.,
'"
;::
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
N
'"
'"
~
~
o
o
..
~
...
~
W
DO
~
o
'"
o
o
o
o
~
51
w
'"
W
DO
z
):;
2:
l>
~
5i
N
'"
~
z
i;
~
IV
;;
...
:I:
r-
CD
o
Vi
8
c
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
~
'"
'"
o
...
s
o
o
~
'"
III
~
...,
~
N
'"
o
o
o
~
...,
!"
...,
~
z
):;
z
):;
~
~
~
w
o
z
):;
i
'8
w
...
z
~
o
Vi
8
c
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
~
'"
'"
o
~
o
~
o
o
..
~
w
o
N
III
~
o
'"
o
o
o
o
..
'"
~
'8
'"
z
):;
2:
l>
~
o
o
'"
o
o
o
z
i;
..
w
'"
~
....
'"
~
c:
;0
-<
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
~
,
'"
'"
o
'"
OJ
o
o
o
~
o
...
'"
~
'"
~
o
'"
o
o
o
o
~
o
...
.0
'"
'"
z
):;
2:
l>
~
o
~
Pi:
'"
z
):;
~
!>
'"
~
...
:I:
r-
CD
o
v;
8
c
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
N
~
'"
'"
o
~
N
W
o
o
~
~
-.....
'"
o
~
N
'"
o
"
o
o
~
N
'"
U.
III
o
2:
l>
z
):;
~
'"
w
~...
'"
'"
w
z
i;
..
...
'"
-.,
o
w
...
:I:
r-
CD
CD
o
z
o
o
~
N
...
;0
'"
o
~
'"
~
o
o
'"
o
W
'"
o
~
~
N
o
o
o
o
~
~
'"
~
z
):;
z
):;
~
o
'"
):j
'"
z
):;
~
..
o
N
~
."
:r
r-
CD
o
v;
8
c:
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
o
~
~
'"
'"
o
~
'"
~
o
o
~
~
o
o
o
o
~
'"
'"
o
g
o
~
N
'"
o
W
III
III
2:
l>
2:
l>
~
N
;;
U.
z
):;
...
'"
u.
....
'"
~
c:
~
z
o
....
,.,
s
,
~
'"
'"
o
~
w
o
o
o
~
'8
'"
u.
o
o
~
o
o
o
"
g
~
~
-.....
III
III
z
):;
z
):;
..
'"
'"
'"
~
z
):;
~
!"
2!
."
...
('l
CD
o
v;
8
c
z
....
z
o
....
,.,
s
,
'"
'"
~
'"
"'
'"
~
N
...
w
'"
w
~
...,
'"
g
o
~
2:
io
o
'"
~
...,
'"
o
o
o
z
):;
z
):;
z
):;
2:
l>
...
z
~
o
v;
8
c:
z
....
z
o
....
,..,
:::
~
'"
DO
o
~
'"
'"
o
o
.N
DO
~
~
o
'"
.0
o
o
o
~
"
...
...
o
N
III
~
o
'"
o
"
o
o
z
):;
z
):;
z
):;
2:
l>
."
...
('l
CD
o
v;
8
c
~
z
~
,..,
~
'"
~
'"
DO
~
N
~
'"
'"
~
5i
'"
o
'"
~
o
o
o
o
o
~
o
'"
'"
~:e:
@
'" ~ ~
~ c: ^
;g ~ ~
o
o
"
o
o
~ ~ ,
('l c ,.,
~ ~ ~
lii -<
~
"
."
C ."
'" ,.., ."
('l '" r-
~ 5 ~
,., 0
en
@
z
):;
'" ~ ~
~ ~ ~
....
'"
'"
z
):;
~ ~ '"
;:: ~ ~
: '6 N
o c.n b
~ ~
~
l>
~
~ ~ ~
'" 0 '"
w VI ^
o ~ ~
'"
'"
z
<
,.,
'"
....
;::
,..,
~
'"
~
Q
~
'"
,.,
....
~
c
,..,
'"
o
z
Z
~
'"
~
z
....
'"
:x:
~
o
g
....
o
CD
,..,
;0
."
C
~ ill
,., ~
,..,
~ ~
.... c
,., '"
:i
."
C
." '"
;0 0
n :x:
,.., 0;
,.,
'"
,.,
o
,..,
;::
CD
,.,
;0
w
~ ~
c '"
,..,
'"
'"
'"
LISTING OF INVESTMENTS
BY GENERAL LEDGER
ACCOUNT NUMBER
OUTSTANDING INVESTMENTS AT 12,31.89
ACCOlfoIT AlLOCATION OF INVESTMENT INVESTMENT o3IL TOTAl
001-1172 GENERAL FLND OPERATING $5,497,805.09
002-1188 UTILITY DEBT SERVICE RESERVE 5859.l586.35
002-111l9 98 REVEH..IE BONDS $300,000.00
002-1172 UTILITY FUND OPERATING $4.118,899.88
002-1174 WATER IMPACT FEE $1,118.1l91.28
002.1178 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 52112,300.00
002.1280 "" REVENUE BONDS $209,396.74
003-1121 95 BONDS FIRE STATION $275.417.00
003-1132 94 BONDS STREETS $121,821.28
003-1145 93 BONDS PUBLIC SAFETY $111,154.23
003-1163 B9 BONDS STREETS-INVEST $81,B006
003-1157 CHEEK SPARGER.ESCROW 5354.65640
003-1173 SERVICE AREA I . IMP FEES $1,491.&41.00
003-1179 GLADE ROAD ESCROW 5125.825.59
003-11BO BEDFORD BRIDGE ESCROW $26,873.39
003-.,B, HALL ROAD ESCROW $96,558.35
003-11B2 PLEASANT RLN LAUREL OAKS $46.399.B8
003-11B6 HIGHLAND MEADOWS '" ESCROW 527,165.75
00>1191 HILLS OF CENTRAL PK ESCROW 5112,665.33
003-1.92 MCDOtNv'ELL WOODS EST ESCROW $8,009.'.
003-1200 LONGWOOtl-PARKING ESCROW 510,7B3.211
003-1203 SERVICE AREA II - IMP FEES 5221.163.30
003-1204 BEDFORD LAKES/SOMERSET 5163.733.15
003-1206 HALL RDIOAK CREEK ESTATES ESCROW $56.350.02
003-1207 OAK CREEK ESTATES ESCROW 517.471.04
003-1209 PECAN PARK II DRAINAGE ESCROW $2699.59
003-1212 GLADE RDIPLEAS RUN CHURCH ESCROW $25,005.72
003-12'4 E JOHN MC CAIN PEBBLE Hill-Ese $4765019
003-1216 BOGARTIHIDDEN OAKS/SANDLIN 52'6,31252
003-1217 C><JRCH STREET CULVERT ESCROW 511 ,561 25
003-1228 PLEASANT RLl'oI HARDAGE ESTATES/ESC 534.73396
003-1229 GLADE RO SUMMERBROOK $4616302
003-1231 LAKEWOOD ESCROW 51960B 79
003-1236 E GLADE CAANBROOK ESCROW 59493304
003-1237 E GLADE ASHMORE I ESCROW $42.34004
003-1239 GLADE POINTS LANDSCAPE ESCROW 53,66669
003-1247 GLADEM'AYSIDE ESCROW $34.'67,30
003-1257 ASHMORE II A GLADE RD ESCROW 5226443'
003-1263 ARBOR ESTATES III 536064 12
003-1266 MILL CREEK! GLADE ESCROW 524635.72
003-1272 HALL JOHNSON ESCROW 563.77276
003--1276 GLADE RD/ASHMORE liB ESCROW $29,005"'5
003-1279 H JOHNSON HIGHLAND MEADOW $34.673.60
003-1281 H JO~SON H MEADOW CHuRCH 533,7329'
003-1283 KINGSWOOD ESCROW 569,900,9'
003-1287 CAlDWEEL'S CK PH I ESCROW $11:2.426.52
003-1301 LAKEWOOD PH IV 561,494 75
003-1303 OAKBROOK HillS $48..(304,16
003-1307 SPRING GARDEN $158.51321
003-1312 TIMMARON PH 1 $5805373
003-1313 APPLEBEE'S 535.581 47
003-1319 REMINGTON PARK 5130,28346
003-1323 SHALlMAR 558.550.24
003-1325 PECAN GARDENS 524,2B034
003-1326 WALGREENS 531,75000
004-1172 DEBT SERVICE FUND 5627.6707
005-.172 VOLUNTARY PARK FLND $268,932.59
005-1172 SESOUICENTENNlAlIWEB8 HOUSE FUND 520.616'0
011-1172 LIBRARY DONATIONS FUND 5375.659.38
012-1172 PARK LAND DEDICATION FUND 5306,29880
017-1136 95 BONDS-DRAINAGE $626,425.7'
017-11156 DRAINAGE DEBT SERVICE RESERVE $131,88U5
017-1172 DRAINAGE FUND OPERATING 510B,493.50
018-1172 TREE PRESERVATION FLND 532.204.74
025-11152 CEDC 97 BONOS 5973.217.07
INVESTMENT ALLOCATION AT 12-31-99 521.282,177.99
VALUE AT MATURITY 521,B90,ooo.00
INTEREST RECEIVED AT MATURITY $1.065,596.16
OUTSTNONG NlESTMENTS AT 12-31."
INVESTMENT TllEAS","y I'HLIl I'HLIl I'HLIl TIlEASt.Oly ..... ....0
NOn: DISCOUNT OON> DISCOUNT NOn: DISCOUNT DISCOUNT
DATEAC~ 1!t-J~99 D5-IrIW.9! 24-1W.99 ...-... 31........99 14-Apr-99 14-Apr.t9
MATURITY DATE 3o-Apr..oo 2I-F-.oO 22-Mar-OO 2WW.oo 3O-S~O 03-Apf-OD 07~-OO
26 ~K T..eI.L AUCTlON DtSCOUNTINEE.'I< Of' PUftCHASE 4...OS" ..515" 4..20" ..3010-4 ...MCJ4Jl. ..320'1. 4.320"
VElD TO MAT\JFaTY 4.610" 5.04"' 4.tto" .."0"'" 5.003" .,,'n. 4920..
ACCOUNT ALLOCAllON OF INVESTMENT
001-1172 GENERAL fl..N) OPERATNG 1.012.500.00 317.31..301 2<10."1.54 27$.155.47 1.042.451,13 384.741.29
002-1156 UTl.1TY DElT SEJIMCE RESERVE 116.34173
002-1169 " REVENlA!!: BOhDS
002-1172 UTl..ITY Fl..N) OPERATflIG 555.525.10 357.510.45 35.390&.61 119,86794
002-1174 WATER "ACT FEE 146....6.$0 342.474.58 2.,474,09
002-11711 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 28.72'.48
002-1260 9i ~NlE BONDS
OO~1121 95 BONJS FIRE STATtON
OO~1132 94 BONJS STREETS 29.171.51
OO:s.1145 93 BOhDS PUBLIC SAFETY
OO:s.1163 89 BONDS STREET~ST 11804.36
OD~1167 CHEEK SPARGER-ESCROW
00~1173 SERVICE AItEA 1- IMP ~S 510.685.06
00~1179 GLADE ROAD ESCROW 125.B25,59
003-1180 BEDFORD BRIDGE ESCft:OW 26.67339
00~1111 tw.L ROAD ESCROW 96.558.35
003-11.2 PLEASANT RUN LAUREL OAKS
003-1186 H1GHl..AND MEADOWS at ESCROW
003-1191 HILLS OF CENTRAl.. PK ESCROW 112.685.33
003-1192 MCDO/IMIELL WOOOS EST ESCROW
003-1200 LONGWOO~PAAKlNG ESCROW
003-1203 SERVtCE AREA II . IMP FEES
00~1204 BEDFORD LAKESISOMERSET
003-1206 HALL ROIOAK CREEK ESTATES ESCROW
003-1207 OAK CREEK ESlA TES ESCROW
003-1209 PECAN PARK. DRAINAGE ESCROW
003-1212 GlADE ROPLEAS RUN CHl.JACH ESCROW 25.00572
003-1214 E. JOHN UC C...... PEBBLE Hl.l.ESC 47.850.19
003-1216 BOGART.+aoDEN OAKSfSAl\.DllN
003-1217 CHURCH STREET CUlVERT ESCROW
003-1228 PLEASANT RUN HARDAGE ESTATESJESC J.4.733.96
003-1229 GlADE RD SUMMERMOOK 46.183.02
003-1231 LAKEWOOO ESCROW 19.608.79
003-1236 E. GLADE CRANBAOOK ESCROW
003-1237 E. GLADE ASHMORE I ESCROW
00,J.-1239 GlADE POINTS LNoIDSCAPE ESCROW 3.661.89
003-1247 GLADe..wAYSIOE ESCROW
003-1257 ASHMORE I A GlADE AD ESCROW
00~126J ARBOR ESTATES" 31.064,12
003-1268 MU CREEKJ GlADE ESCROW
003-1272 HALL JO....SON ESCROW
003-1278 GLADE ROJASHMORE 118 eSCROW
00~1279 H JOHNSON HIGHLAND MEADOW
003-128' H JOHNSON H MEADOW CHURCH 33.732.91
003-1283 KINGSWOOO ESCROW 89.900,91
00.}.1287 CALDYJEE1.'S CK PH I ESCROW 112.426.52
003-1301 LAKEWOOD PH rv 61,.94.75
003-1303 OAKeROOK .....lS 48.4304,16
003-1307 SPRJo.lG GAlIDEN 158.513.21
003-1312 TIMMAPtON PH 1 51.05.J.7J
003-1313 APPlEBEE"S . 3S,~81.47
00~1319 REMfoIGTON PARK
00~1J23 .-..... 56,550.24
003-1325 PECAN GARDENS
003-1326 WALGREENS
004-1172 DEBT SEFMCE FUND 170.062,1)4
00~1172 VOL.UNTMY PARK FUN) 20"17.62 248,""'.97
OO~1172 SESQUlCENTENNlALNJEBB HOUSE FUND
011-1172 LIBRARY D~ TIONS FUNJ 81,670.75
012.1172 PARK L.ANO DEDICATION FUND '4'.191.26
017.1136 95 BONDs.DRAlNA.GE
017-1166 DfWNAGE DEBT SERVICE RESERVE 97.080.17
017-1172 DRAINAGE Fl..IfoI) OPERATING 13.SI6.16 14.523.61
01.,172 TREE PRESEJItVATION FUN) 32.204.74
025-1162 CEDC 97 80N:tS
INVESTMENT ALlOCATION AT 12-31-99 $1.012.500.00 $1.190.DOG.00 $1.120,3SO.00 $1,1'1.750.00 $1.042.451.13 S973.027.S8 1.158.417,11
VALUE AT MATURITY $1.000.000.00 $1.250.oo0.DO $1.120.000.00 $1.25O.0DO.00 $1.050,ODO.00 $1.020.000.00 1.215.000.00
INTEREST RECEIVED AT MATURITY SiO.065.61 SiO.OOO.oo $55.561.54 $58.250.00 $78.423.87 $46,972.42 S56.58289
OUTSTANlOlGINI/ESTMENTS AT '2-31."
NVESTMENT TREASUlY ,IU P'HUI P'HUI TIlfASURY .- 'IU
NOTE D1SCOlM BOND D1SCOlM NOTE DISCOUNT DISCOUNT
OA TE ACQUIRED 15-J...'9 .........99 24--.....!9 :zs.......9! 31-Mar-9I 14oApf'-'9 14-Apt-99
MATURITY DATE 30-...... ....eo-DO 2'.....-00 2J..Ah1-00 Jo.S.~OO 03-Apr-OD 07-.-00
2' ~ T.BLL AUCTtON DlSCOUNTNlIHK OF PlJRC*SE 4.405" ........ ....20.. 4.340'10 '.340" ".320-10 ..320"
Y1ELO TO MATURITY ".510.. 5.04'" ".110" 4.91n. 5.003" .. 911" .. 920..
ACCOUNT ALLOCATION OF ~SntENT
001.1172 GEN!RAL Fl.IND OPERA~ 1.012.500.00 317 .3'4.304 240,1&1.54 275.15$.47 1.042,451.13 384,14'.29
002.11i1i UTUTY DEBT SE!1lMCE RESERVE "i.U1.73
002.1169 " REVENlJE IIOhOS
002-1172 UTLITY FlJNO OPERATING 555.526.10 351.510.45 35.394,61 1 ".8'7.M
002.,,1.. WATER "'ACT FEE '.4i.416.50 3<12.41.4.58 2....7..,09
002.1178 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 28.728.48
002-1260 9S REVENUE BON:IS
003-1121 95 BONDS FIRE STATION
003-1132 ,.. BONDS STftEETS 29,811.51
003-1'45 93 BONOS PUBLIC SAFETY
003-11U a9 BONDS STREETs-ftNEST 111.1804.36
00J.1167 CHEEK SPARGER.ESCROW
003-1173 SERVICE AREA 1- loP FEES 510,68506
003-1179 GLADE ROAD ESCROW 125.125.59
003-1180 BEDFORD BRIDGE ESCROW 26.673.39
003-1181 HALl ROAD ESCROW 96.551.35
003-1182 PlEASANT RUN LAUREL OAKS
003-1186 HGH..AND MEADOWS. ESCROW
003-1191 HlLS OF CENTRAL PK eSCROW 112.615.33
003-1192 MCOONWELL WOODS EST esCROW
003-1200 LONGWOOo-PARKING ESCftOW
003-1203 SERVICE AREA I - IMP FEES
003-1204 BEDFORD LAKESJSOMERSET
003-120& HALL ROI'OAK CREEK ESTATES ESCROW
003-1207 OAK CREEK ESTATES ESCROW
003-1209 PECAN PAItK I DRAINAGE ESCROW
003-1212 GL.ADE RD.f'lEAS RUN CHURCH ESCROW 25.005.72
003-1214 E. JOHN MC CAI'II PEBBLE ..-.L..ESC 47.850.19
003-1216 BOGART.tiIOOEN OAKSISAN)lIN
003-1217 CHURCH STREET CULVERT ESCROW
003-1221 PLEASANT RUN HARDAGE eSTATE:S.ESC 34.733.96
003-1229 GlADE RD suw.tERBROOK "6.183.02
003-1231 lAKEWOOD ESCROW 19.601.19
003-1236 E. GLADE CRANBROOK ESCROW
003-1237 E. GLADE AS.....ORE I ESCROW
003-1239 GlADE POINTS LANCSCAPE ESCROW 3.66889
003-12"7 GlADE..wAYSIOE ESCROW
003-1257 ASHMORE I A GlADE AD ESCROW
003-1263 AABOR ESTATES III 31.0,",12
003-1268 MLL CREEKJ GlADE ESCROW
003-1272 HALL JOHNSON ESCROW
003-1278 GLADE RDJASHMORE lIB ESCROW
003-1279 H JOHNSON HIGHLAND MEADOW
003-1211 H JOHNSON H MEADOW CHURCH 3J.73291
003-1283 ~GSWOOD ESCROW 89,900.91
003-1287 C.....OWEEL.S CIC. PH' ESCROW 112.2652
003-1301 LAKEWOOD PH rtI 61,494.75
003-1303 OAKBROOK HLLS 0&8,0416
003-1307 SPRING GNtDEN 1511.513.21
003-1312 TNMAftON PH 1 58.053.73
003-1313 APt'lEBEE'S 35.581.47
003-1319 REw.GTON PARK
003-1323 SHALNM 56.5$0.24
003-1325 PECAN GARDENS
003-1326 WALGREENS
004-1172 DEBT SERVICE FlN) 170,062,04
00So1172 VOLUNT NtY PARK F~ 20.417.62 248,4.44.97
01*1172 SESQUlCENTENNW...NJEBB HOUSE FUND
011-1172 LElRARY DONATtoNS FUND 18.670.75
012-1172 PARK LAND DEDtCATtON FUNC 149.851.26
011.1136 95 BONJS.~GE
017-1166 D~GE DEeT SER\IICE RESERVE 97.080.11
011.1172 Df\MllAGE FUNO OPERA T..,G 13.586.16 '4.523.61
018-1172 TREE PRESERVATION F~ 32.204.74
OZSol162 CEDe 91 BON:>S
INVESTMENT AlLOCATION AT 12.31.99 $1.012.500,00 $1.110.000.00 $1.120.350.00 $1.191.150.00 $1.042."51.13 $913,021,se 1.158.41111
VAlUE AT MATlIRJTY $1.000,000.00 $1.2$4.000.00 $1.120.000.00 $1.250.000,00 $1.050.000.00 $1.020.000.00
1.215.000.00
INTEREST RECEIVED AT MATURITY SiO.065.61 $60,000.00 $55.561.64 $58.25000 $78."2387 546,972.42 $56,582,89
OUTSTANDING IlNES1'lIIENTS AT 12-31-"
INIIESTMENT F.- F_ - FH.ll
DISCOUNT MEa TERM NOTE NOTE DISCOUNT
OATE ACQ'-"'ED n-Qet-!19 De-Hov-99 15-Hov-!9 1~.t-99
YA TURfTY DATE 2S-Auf-OO 29-NoY-OO 31-0et-OO Oe-o.c-oo
26 WEEK T -au AUCTION DtSCOUNT~K OF PURCKQE S.115" 5.120'" 5.21S" !I..'011J.
VELD TO MATUIVTY 5.nl" 5.n9" 5.621'" 6.021'"
ACCOUNT AUOCATtON OF INVESTMENT
001-1172 GEf\ERAL f"lJftrI) OPERATING "'.460.41 124.!l04.23
002-1166 UTLITY DEIT SERVICE pt!SERVE
002-1169 98 RE'\lENUE BONDS
002-1172 UTILITY FUND OPERATING 1.051.387.50 784.493.14 68.597.98
002.1174 WATER IMPACT FEE
002.t118 CUSTOMER DEPOSITS
002.1260 96 REVENUE BONOS
OO~1121 95 BONDS FIRE STATION
003-1132 94 BONOS STREETS 91.749.77
003-1t45 93 BONOS PUBLIC SAFETY
003-1163 89 BONDS STM:ETs-Nv'EST
003-1167 CHEEK SPARGER-ESCROW
003-1173 SERVICE AREA I - IMP FEES 171,496.89 237.362.96
003-1179 GlADE ROAD ESCROW
003-1180 BEDfORD BRIDGE ESCROW
00:>.1181 HALL ROAD ESCROW
00:>.1182 PLEASANT RUN LAUREL OAKS
00:>'1186 HIGHLAND MEADOWS IH ESCROW 27.1!S.7!
003-1191 HillS OF CENTRAL PK ESCROW
003-1192 MCDONWELL WOODS EST ESCROW
003-1200 LONGWOOo-PARKING ESCROW 10.713.28
003-1203 SERVICE A.A.EA II - IMP FEES
003-1204 BEDFORD UY<.ESISOMERSET 183.733.15
003-1206 HALL RDIOAK CREEK ESTATES ESCROW 56.350.02
003-1201 OAK CREEK ESTATES ESCROW 17.471.04
003-1209 PECAN PARK" DRAINAGE ESCROW 2.899.!l9
003-1212 GLADE ROiPLEAS RUN CHURCH ESCROW
aOJ--12'" E. JOHN MC CAIN PEBBLE HLL-ESC
ODJ--1216 BOGART.+tlOOEN OAKSJSANOLN 218.312.52
OCJ--12'7 CHURCH STREET CULVERT ESCROW 11,561.25
oaJ--1228 PLEASANT RUN HARDAGE ESfATES.E:SC
oa~1229 GLADE RD SUMMERBROOK
OOJ..1231 LAKEWOOD ESCROW
00~'236 E. GLADE CRA.l'<4BROOK ESCROW 94.133.04
003-'237 E GLADE ~SHMORE I ESCROW 42.340.04
003.123'3 GLADE POINTS LANDSCAPE ESCROW
00J--12,,7 GL.ADEM'AVSDE ESCROW 34.187.30
aOJ--1257 ASHMORE n A GLADE RD ESCROW 22.644.31
OOJ..1263 ARBOR ESTATES n!
a03-126e MILL CREEK! GLADE ESCROW 24.635.72
OOJ--1272 HALL JOHNSON ESCROW
aOJ-127! GLADE RO/ASHMORE lIB ESCROW 29,OO!l.4~
003-1279 H JOHNSON HlGH...AND MEADOW
oaJ--1281 H JOHNSON H MEADOW CHURCH
00J--128J Kr>IGSWQOD ESCROW
003-1287 CALDVoIEEL'S CK PH I ESCROW
oaJ--D01 LAKEWOOD PH N
OOJ--1JOJ OAKBROOK t-IlLS
00J--1J07 SPRING GARDEN
003-1312 TIMMARON PH 1
00J--131J APPlEBEE'S
OOJ--'J1'3 REMtoIGTON PARK
oOJ--InJ SHAC.....
003-1325 PECAN GARDENS
003-1326 WAlGREENS
004-1172 DEBT SEPWlCE FUND
OO~l172 VOLUNTARV PARK FUND
006-1172 SESQUlCENTENNIALIWEBB HOUSE FUND
011.1172 LIBRARY DONATIONS FUND 48.000.00
012-1172 PARK LAND DEDICATION FUND 71.062.3~ 4~.000.OO
017-1136 9~ BQfIIJS-DRAlNAGE
017,"66 ORANAGE DEBT SERVICE RESERVE
017-1172 ORANAGE FUND OPERATING
018-1172 TREE PRESERVATION FUND
025-1162 ceDe 97 BONOS
NVESTMENT ALLOCATION AT 12-31.99 $1,124.272.53 $1.051,387.50 $1,076.175.78 $1,179.321.811
VALUE AT MATURITY $1,180.000.00 $1.060,000.00 $1,075,000.00 $1.250.000.00
INTEREST R.ECEIVED ~T MATURITY 155.727.47 S57,213.!0 $58.089.50 $70.678.12
LOGIC INVESTMENT POOL ALLOCATION
AND GENERAL INFORMATION
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INVESTMENT
COOPERATIVE / "LOGIC"
ACCOUNT ALLOCATION AT DECEMBER 31,1999
ACCT #
DESCRIPTION
BALANCE
GENERAL FUND
1.1115
GENERAL OPERATING
$29,487.53
UTILITY FUND
2.1115 UTILITY OPNS $849,454,16
2,1116 IMPACT FEES WATER $516.45
2.1130 INTEREST & SINKING FUND $607,015.36
2.1177 94 BONDS $519,653,15
2.1196 98 BONDS $949,439,17
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
3.1113 IMPACT FEES/SA I $116,810.48
3.1144 99 LIBRARY BONDS $491,141.20
DEBT SERVICE FUND
4.1115 DEBT SERVICE OPERATING $14,979.12
CCCPD FUND
27. 1130 INTEREST & SINKING FUND $37,030,61
27.1147 99 POLICE/COURT BLDG FUND $5,976,276.30
TOTAL LOGIC POOL BALANCE
$9,591,803.53
r-
December 1999 .- Financial Newsletter
LOGIC
Allocation Daily Daily LOGIC
Date Factor Rate Interest Balance W.A.M. N.A.V.
01-Dec-99 0.000152482 5.5809% 200,026.84 1,311,802,955.32 43.92 0.9998
02-Dec-99 0.000152467 5.5803% 202.231.33 1,326,393.011.88 47.03 0.9998
03.Dec-99 0.000150669 5.5145% 201,862.65 1,339,778,065.90 44.89 0.9996
04-Dec-99 0.000150669 5.5145% 201,862.65 1.339,778.065.90 44.89 0.9996
05-Dec-99 0.000150669 5.5145% 201,862.65 1,339,778,065.90 44.89 0.9996
06-Dec-99 0.000151365 5.5400% 204,706.60 1,352,400,401.58 45.98 0.9998
07-Dec-99 0.000151467 5.5437% 206,250.54 1,361,681,893.21 46.47 1.0000
08-Dec-99 0.000151869 5.5584% 206,211.14 1,357,825,877.99 46.03 1.0000
09-Dec-99 0.000152831 5.5936% 207,611.16 1.358.437,766.55 46.74 1.0000
10-Dec-99 0.000153322 5.6116% 206,536.68 1,347,077,487.58 45.93 0.9998
11-Dec-99 0.000153322 5.6116% 206.536.68 1,347,077,487.58 45.93 0.9998
12-Dec-99 0.000153322 5.6116% 206,536.68 1,347,077,487.58 45.93 0.9998
13-Dec-99 0.000153996 5.6362% 211,086.34 1,370,729,629.54 46.38 1.0000
14-Dec-99 0.000153942 5.6343% 198,861.26 1.291,790,804.55 48.83 1.0000
15-Dec-99 0.000154123 5.6409% 199,334.05 1,293,344.439.21 49.71 0.9999
16-Dec-99 0.000154336 5.6487% 196,360.64 1.272.293.499.00 51.97 0.9997
17 -Dec-99 0.000154721 5.6628% 196,837.08 1.272.206,224.59 50.71 0.9995
18-Dec-99 0.000154721 5.6628% 196.837.08 1,272,206,224.59 50.71 0.9995
19-Dec-99 0.000154721 5.6628% 196,837.08 1,272,206,224.59 50.71 0.9995
20-Dec-99 0.000155219 5.6810% 198,533.04 1,279,052,070.53 50.06 0.9997
21-Dec-99 0.000155731 5.6998% 200,946.13 1,290,338,490.88 50.06 0.9997
22-Dec-99 0.000155552 5.6932% 199,960.01 1,285,488,045.49 49.59 0.9997
23-Dec-99 0.000155125 5.6776% 200,697.82 1,293,782.392.47 46.97 0.9994
24-Dec-99 0.000155125 5.6776% 200,697.82 1,293,782,392.4 7 46.97 0.9994
25-Dec-99 0.000155125 5.6776% 200.697.82 1,293,782,392.47 46.97 0.9994
26-Dec-99 0.000155125 5.6776% 200,697.82 1,293,782,392.4 7 46.97 0.9994
27-Dec-99 0.000155246 5.6820% 203,809.42 1,312,815,038.06 46.24 0.9996
28-Dec-99 0.000155214 5.6808% 208,558.22 1,343,678,538.37 46.23 0.9996
29-Dec-99 0.000155017 5.6736% 214,836.24 1,385,888,693.53 44.76 0.9999
30-Dec-99 0.000139727 5.1140% 194,610.87 1,392,790,550.48 43.87 0.9999
31-Dec-99 0.000149164 5.4594% 211,552.05 1.418.248.197.31 45.15 0.9999
Totals 0.000153109 5.6038% 6.283,986.36 1,324,429,509.92 47.14 0.9997
Portfolio as of 12/31/1999
Type # of Type Percentage Book Value Market Value Mat. Distribution
T -Notes 0 0.0% 0 0 1 0.00%
T-Bills 0 0.0% 0 0 2to7 36.31%
Agency Sec. 32 17.1% 242,617,554 242,370,130 8 to 30 23.65%
Comm. Paper 45 49.7% 703,608,622 703,758.878 31 to 90 28.20%
Money Mkt. MF 1 8.6% 122.402,646 122.402,646 91 to 180 8.98%
Repos 3 24.6% 347,719.881 347,719,881 180+ 2.86%
Totals 81 100.0'1. 1,416,348,703 1.416.251,535 100.00'1.
Fee.
15-16 bps. var.1
Clients -
287
Type # of Type % of Type % of Dep. # of Accts. % of Accts.
Cities 89 31.01% 25.23% 522 31.9J%
Counties 32 11.15% 16.29% 466 28.50%
Colleges/Univ. 6 2.09% 0.54% 15 0.92%
School Districts 119 41.46% 50.86% 460 28.13%
Other 18 6.27% 1.74% 41 2.51%
Util. I Water Oist. 23 8.01% 5.34% 131 8.01%
T atals 287 100.00.h, 100.00% 1,635 100.001lf~
LOGIC Balance by TypEtof Entity
60%
50%
. 40%
CD
III
-
C
. 30% 25.2".
Co)
...
.
a.
20%
1'.
10%
0%
City
50.9%
0.5%
County
Higher Ed.
School Dist.
Other
Utility
Entity Type
Account Information:
Independent Auditor KPMG LP
Legal Counsel Fulbright & Jaworski LLP
Rating Agency FITCH IBCA Investors Services
General Manager Southwest Securities Group, Inc.
Portfolio Manager Patterson & Associates
Custodian Bank CHASE Bank _ Texas
Participants
Participant Avg. Balance
Participant Accounts
Avg. Accts. per Participant
Avg. Acct. (1635) Balance
287
$4,614,737
1,635
5.7
$810,049
Historical Information as of the last day of the month.
Dec-99 5.6038% 1,416,348,703 1,416,251,535 47.1 0.9997 287
Nov-99 5.4529% 1,258,341,736 1,257,895,047 46.4 0.9996 286
Oct-99 5.2912% 1,259,658,568 1,256.498,689 48.4 0.9997 285
Sep-99 5.2143% 1,183,660,101 1,183,212,384 48.1 0.9996 285
Aug-99 5.0554% 1,164,626,920 1,164,054,026 . 51.3 0.9996 284
Jul-99 4.9251% 1,131.666,612 1,140,540,467 49.0 0.9997 279
Jun-99 4.7828% 1,112,816,998 1,112,429,731 49.7 0.9997 276
May-99 4.7794% 1,203,366.620 1,202,907,562 50.5 0.9999 276
Apr-99 4.7915% 1,196,551,053 1,196,679,762 47.5 0.9999 269
Mar-99 4.7890% 1,245,136,991 1,245,209,819 48.6 1.0000 266
Feb-99 4.7459% 1,519,491,774 1,519,158,885 45.0 0.0000 261
Jan-99 4.8041% 1,337,105,385 1,337,261.030 42.1 1.0001 257
Dee-98 4.8420% 1,146.428,004 1,146,590,818 48.5 1 .0000 256
LOGIC - Local Government Investment Cooperative
1201 Elm Street, Suite 3500 Dallas, Texas 75270
http://www.logic.org
(800) 895-6442 Phone
(214) 859-6775 Fax
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 1 of 9
DRAFT
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman
Hart at 7:20 P.M. on January 24,2000. (The meeting was delayed due to the prior meeting by
the Impact Fee Advisory Committee.)
Roll Call:
Present:
Rob Rutherford, Luann Edwards, William Tyler, Jim
Fletcher, Bryan Hill, Mike Collins, Tom Hart
Barry LeBaron, Tom Niederauer, Clayton Husband, Jan
Levy
Staff:
Invocation:
Commissioner Rutherford
Approval of Minutes:
January 10, 2000
Commissioner Edwards requested that the word "jokingly" be inserted relating to her comments
on item #3, page 9. Commissioner Edwards moved to approve the minutes. Commissioner
Tyler seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
1. Revised Combination Plat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Greer Addition, requested by Paul Millsap,
1.49 acres located at the southwest corner of Glade Road and Jim Mitchell Trail West. Case
P-99-084
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and explained the need for a waiver from
the minimum lot size of 20,000 sq. ft. Chairman Hart moved to approve the plat subject to a
waiver of the lot area requirement. Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The
vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
2. PUBLIC HEARING - A Special Use Permit requested by Paul Kramer, for private horse
stables for domestic use in an R-20 zoning district on 2.46 acres located at 4809 Bill Simmons
Road. Case 5-99-085
Tom Niederauer presented the case to the Commission. He discussed the correspondence
received from area property owners. Chairman Hart opened the public hearing. Those present
wishing to speak were:
Paul Kramer, applicant, said that he purchased the property and there are several barns in the
area. He said that he wanted to use the barn for his daughters' horses and maybe a friend's
horse. Mr. Kramer said that he tried to locate the barn away from neighbors' houses, yet allow
him ample room to locate a large dwelling elsewhere on the property in the future.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 2 of 9
DRAFT
Commissioner Hill asked Mr. Kramer about the size of the barn he is proposing. Mr. Kramer said
that he wanted to build a 3-stall barn with a feed room, a wash room and a tack area for a total
of approximately 1,200 sq. ft. in size.
Mark Lohse, 4900 Patterson said that he had concerns about the placement of the proposed barn
because it would be directly due south of their house and odors during the summer could be a
problem. Mr.Lohse requested that the Commission restrict the property to only allow 2 horses
being permanently housed. He said that Mr. Kramer has cleared approximately 6" of top soil from
the property and it has affected the drainage patterns and would like a retainer wall to be built to
prevent further erosion. Mr. Lohse said that they do not have horses on their property.
Linda Vincent, 4811 Patterson Lane said that she lives directly across from the property and will
view the back side of the lot. The back side of his lot becomes the front of their lot and this is why
she requested restrictions on the special use permit. She said that the other property owners that
have barns and horses have been a part of the neighborhood eighteen years prior to the area
becoming residential. She said that no one is living in the home on the property and it is not Mr.
Kramer's permanent residence, but this is her permanent residence and she wants to protect her
property values. She said that they want the permit void upon sale of the property because
people are requesting to board their horses on the properties that have barns and she is
concerned that this would become a business rather than be used for personal use. She
requested that the Commissioners consider the issues that they have identified in their letter.
Chairman Hart asked Linda Vincent how long she has lived on Patterson Lane and she told hirT.
18-years. He asked he what she had been looking at from the front of their property and she said
that she has never seen a horse across the street from them. She said that Mr. Kramer upgraded
the fence and there have not been any other improvements that they could see. She said that
the grass had been maintained better prior to now because the seeding Mr. Kramer has done did
not grow because of the hot weather. She said that all the improvements on the property have
been done on the Bill Simmons side rather than the Patterson side.
There being no one else present wishing to speak, Chairman Hart closed the public hearing.~
Discussion ensued by the Commission about putting conditions and time limits on special use
permits and the difficulty of tracking sale of property rather than placing a time limit on the special
use permit.
Commissioner Fletc~er stated that having livestock in the neighborhoods is a positive thing and
improves the quality of life. He said that the banner with the logo has a horse and citizen surveys
consistently say that they want the rural atmosphere that livestock provide because of the open
space. He said that he believes this request is positive for the City and they have received
constructive suggestions from the neighbors rather than a negative response.
Commissioner Fletcher recommended to approve the special use permit subject to:
1. Maximum of 3 livestock on the property of any time;
2. Any barn or out-structure is limited to 800 sq. ft.
3. No trailers or livestock equipment stored on the property;
4. There will be an 80 foot minimum setback from Patterson Lane property line and
an 80 foot minimum setback from the northern property line; and
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 3 of 9
DRAFT
5. The special use permit will expire when the property is sub-divided into 2 lots or
more.
Commissioner Collins seconded the motion.
Commissioner Tyler said that the 800 sq. ft. size of the barn is too restrictive since the Accessory
Building Ordinance allows for a 900 sq. ft. structure and is more than adequate to satisfy the
consensus of the neighbors. He said that the applicant stated that he wants to build a larger
structure and 800 sq. ft. would be too limiting.
Clayton Husband said that unless there are limitations or exceptions placed in the special use
permit, the base Accessory Building Ordinance would apply.
Commissioner Hill said that he agreed that 800 sq. ft. is too restrictive.
Commissioner Edwards said that since the neighbors have been provided a forum for discussion,
she was hoping that the Commission would table the case and allow the neighbors to come to a
conclusion. She requested that the Chairman ask the applicant if the restrictions are too severe.
Chairman Hart asked Mr. Kramer to address the Commission. Mr. Kramer said that he
appreciated Commissioner Fletcher trying to find a way for this special use permit to work. He
said that he would have to look at the proposal as it relates to the house that he has designed for
the property. He said that he probably would not build a barn based on those setbacks because
economically the property is so expensive and if he moved the barn over farther, it would prevent
him from building a large estate home. He said that he does not want to withdraw his application,
but he would like time to look at the proposal and talk to his teenagers. He said the way that he
designed the barn, it would be far enough away from the neighbors house and the barn would
open up away from his house and is no where near the street.
Commissioner Fletcher said that he had no compelling reason to make the distance 80' away
from the property lines or 800 sq. ft., but that he was looking for a compromise.
Commissioner Rutherford asked the applicant if he could live with 50' as opposed to the 80'. The'
applicant said that his proposal asks for 60' which is farther away than 50'.
Commissioner Hill said that it makes sense to table the case and allow the applicant and
neighbors time to discuss options.
Commissioner Fletcher asked that the Chairman ask Mrs. Vincent for feedback on the setbacks.
Mrs. Vincent said that she is not as affected as the Lohses. Mr. Lohse came forward as stated
that he does not want a barn due south of his dwelling. The location to the rear of the property
is more critical than the side yard setback. He said that if the barn was located farther away from
Patterson Lane it could be closer to the property line. He said that the original barn on the
property was located further west. He said that the size of the barn was not as critical as the
location of the barn. He said that he is in favor of the horses being on the property as long as it
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 4 of 9
does not negatively affect his property. Commissioner Fletcher Mr. Lohse if he withdrew t
motion, could he get together with Mr. Kramer and come to an agreement on the placement of
the barn. Mr. Lohse said that they have talked quite a bit prior to the public hearing and he was
open to meeting. Barry LeBaron said that if they could meet prior to the next meeting, staff could
draft an ordinance with any special conditions. Commissioner Fletcher said that the reason the
retaining wall issue was excluded was that it was a private issue and not one to be considered by
the Commission.
DRAFT
Mr. Kramer said that moving the barn further back on the problem would be less of a problem than
restricting the size. He said that when he did the calculations for the number of stalls and the tack
room, he roughly estimated up to 14,000 sq. ft., and he will have to rework the plan. He said he
had no problem with tabling the case.
Mary McCuistion, 4905 Bill Simmons Rd., said that she lives directly north of Mr. Kramer's
property on the Bill Simmons side and she has not problem with moving the barn further back.
She said that her biggest concern is the number of horses allowed.
Chairman Hart asked Mr. Kramer if he would be able to move the barn further west. Mr. Kramer
said that he would need to look at the plans.
Commissioner Fletcher said that he wanted to amend the restrictions in #2 to 900 sq. ft.
maximum size for the building and delete #4 in reference to setbacks. Commissioner
Collins seconded the amended motion.
Barry LeBaron said that if the setback limitations were eliminated from the motion, staff would
restrict the setbacks to the site plan provided by the applicant. He said that one part of the motion
included no storage of trailers and he would like the Commission to discuss or consider the
statement that no open storage of trailers because if the trailer was kept inside the barn, it should
not be a problem for the neighbors. If the applicant has horses, they would probably bring trailers
to the property.
Commissioner Fletcher moved to amend his motion by amending the restriction in #3 to
no "open storage" of trailers on the property.
Mr. Kramer said that he has a very nice horse trailer that could be parked anywhere in Colleyville
and he is confused that they don't want him to park a horse trailer and they don't want him to build
a big enough barn to put the horse trailer into. He said that if he is restricted to not having a horse
trailer and is restricted as to where he can put the barn, he would probably withdraw the
application. He said that he has a very nice two horse trailer and is not an open stock trailer. He
said that he has no problem to restrict the property to 3 horses, but not allowing a horse trailer and
not allowing a barn big enough for 3 horses is too restrictive. When he designed a barn with 3
- 12'x12' stalls, a tack room, a feed room, and a wash rack, it was 15,000 sq. ft. and he may be
way off in thinking that this was an appropriate use of the property.
Commissioner Edwards said that she believed that the size of the barn Mr. Kramer was
requesting was not a problem for the neighbors and the setbacks discussed by the Commission
were agreeable, but she felt that they needed time to work out the details.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 5 of 9
Commissioner Fletcher said that he had no problem withdrawing his motion as some of these
issues are best resolved by the neighbors working together. He said that he wanted Mr. Kramer
to know that there are concerns from his neighbors and this is a non-conforming use of the
property and the Commission has to listen to the neighbors and if he can please the neighbors,
he can please the Commission.
DRAFT
Commissioner Fletcher withdrew his motion. Commissioner Collins moved to table the
item until the next meeting. Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The vote
being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
Commissioner Edwards requested that staff meet with Mr. Kramer and advise him of the size
requirements in the Accessory Building Ordinance.
3. TABLED ITEM - A Zoning Change requested by John Lynch for Bob Gammon, from R-20 to
PUD-R (planned unit development-residential) on 6.810 acres located at 3650 Pool Road.
Case Z-99-086.
This item was not removed from the table for discussion.
4. TABLED ITEM - A Zoning Change requested by David Cunningham for Faith Christian
School, from CC-2, CC-1, CN, & AG to PUD-C (planned unit development-commercial) on
43.891 acres located on the south side of McDonwell School Road near Precinct Line Road.
Case Z-99-088
Commissioner Edwards moved to remove the item from the table for discussion.
Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
David Cunningham was present to represent the case. He read the letter that he submitted to
staff on January 24,2000 that was dated January 21,2000 and described amendments to the
previous exhibits. He explained the changes to the newly proposed conceptual site plan.
Commissioner Fletcher moved to reopen the public hearing. Commissioner Edwards
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
Chairman Hart opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were:
Ed Baker, 6106 Highland Hills, said that he was an emeritus member of the Board of Trustees for
Faith Christian School and that the school has a positive impact on neighborhoods. He said that
the Chamber of Commerce site that 75% of people shopping in Colleyville live outside Colleyville.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 6 of 9
DR ft. ~T
~t
He said that 2,500 students represent a potential $600,000 spent in Colleyville per year. He Sa
that this school is for the children and they will be the leadership of the future.
Joseph Noorlag, 5507 Sycamore, said that he is a member of the Parks and Rec. Board. He said
that the City has spent money on game fields and there is a shortage of practice fields in the City.
He said that he hopes Faith Christian School will follow the lead and will provide facilities for use
by the citizens of Colleyville. He said that open space is a wonderful use of the property and a
marvelous entranceway into ~he City.
Butch Ethridge, 404 W. Glade Rd., said that he recently did a study of 150 families and they travel
7.41 miles with 1.655 children, two time per day. He said that the roadways traveled are Precinct
Line Road, Davis Blvd., West Glade Road and L. D. Lockett were used occasionally and
McDonwell School Road was never used. He said that the school will attract future customers
to future commercial development on Precinct Line Road. He said that the school will be a
magnet to commercial uses. He said that Faith Christian School has only one product and that
is the children and they will be developed in a God centered environment. Mr. Ethridge said that
green space is treasured by the citizens and the school needs a space for the children to play and
be educated in a safe environment.
Joe Mcintosh, 4817 Fairway, said that his family owns property south of the proposed driveway
and he is representing his parents. He said that they are disturbed that a new site plan is being
offered by the applicant that has a 300' driveway along their property and they have not beer
given ample opportunity to evaluate the plan and offer comments. He said that the previous case
with a barn had more input from the neighbors than this case is allowing. He said that the
Commissioners should have more input from the surrounding property owners and they would like
more time and the ability to react to the new site plan.
The Commission informed Mr. Mcintosh about the nature of the conceptual site plan and told him
about the opportunities to relay his concerns to the City Council. He said that he would like the
same courtesy as given to the applicant.
Commissioner Hill said that he is very concerned that the Commission is dealing with a
conceptual site plan that is subject to change at anytime in the process rather than an actual site
plan.
Commissioner Tyler said that the Commission did not ask for modifications of the site plan, but
tabled the case to allow the applicant opportunity to better present what it is they wanted to do and
justify their reasons for the use of the property and address the concerns of the Commissioners
as they relate to the Master Plan. He said that they were concerned about the loss of the property
along Precinct Line Road and the loss of commercial retail space and the traffic on McDonwell
School Road and the impact on the citizens in the area, and the applicant addressed these
issues.
Mr. Mcintosh responded that without allowing them any time to react, the issues were addressed
by moving all of the traffic off McDonwell School Road to the back of the property and the only
people affected would be anyone backing up to the driveway. Chairman Hart told Mr. Mcintosh
that the Commission is an advisory board and makes a recommendation to the City Council and
he would have ample opportunity to express his concerns to the Council.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 7 of 9
DRAFT
Sandy Allen, 208 Millwood Ct., said that her daughter is a student at Faith Christian School and
they are thinking about building in Westmont on McDonwell School Road. She said that she
would much rather live next to a school than a commercial site.
Linda Baker, 404 W. McDonwell School Road, said that it is difficult to speak against neighbors
as nice as those associated with the school or if a lightening bolt could strike her if she did. She
said that citizens are both blessed and ham-strung by the number of church properties in the city
that have been taken off the tax rolls. She said that she needed to remind the Commission and
Council that the city does have a lot of things for the children, but the citizens in her area do not
have six figure incomes and they are being run out of town by these Christian things. She said
that it is hypocritical in a way, the good they do and yet they chase older property owners out of
town because of the values in property increasing to overcome the loss of tax revenues. Ms.
Baker said that the City needs to review the mandate of the Master Plan. She said that the
Mormon Church bought property next to hers and paid an obscene amount for it and this caused
her taxes to go up while they won't pay taxes to the City. She said that the Mormon Church told
her that they wanted to capture the Southlake residents. Ms. Baker said that last week Faith
Christian School said that 60% of the students would come from Colleyville, and tonight the figure
was changed to a miniscule amount and she wants to see actual demographics and statistics.
She said that the City cannot afford to lose the whole parcel from potential commercial tax rolls
and she urged the Commission to remember that they are working for the entire city and the
Master Plan is a mandate. She said that they should remember the citizens who have lived in the
area and broadly insulted by the eyesore category. She said that all they've had is things stuck
out there for years like the Doppler tower, the water tower and they've suffered the worst neglect
of any area in the city. She said that now they have a chance with Precinct Line Road to
recapture the use and live their lives out in Colleyville and the Commission should look at it from
another perspective than the children's. She said that her taxes go up and money is sent to the
Keller School District and many can't afford to send their kids to the school that is causing them
to be run out of town in order to pay for it.
Ed Young, 500 Frontier Court, and said that his family was drawn to Colleyville because of the
sense of family the community offered. He said that he is thrilled with the opportunity Faith
Christian has to build in the City because it highlights the vision and values of Colleyville. He said
that it underscores the sense of community because the future rests on the shoulders of the
children and even though it is a non-profit venture, it profits the community.
John Sizemore, 580.7 N. Ballantrae, said that the number of students taken out of public schools
by private schools, will relieve the tax burden.
Robert Heinemann, 5804 Meadowhill, said that everyone moved to Colleyville for the same
reason and the school increases the attractiveness of the community, not just as it relates to
revenues, but as it relates to values.
There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Fletcher said that practice fields would be an attractive addition to the City. He
said the when there are opportunities for practice fields that are not near residential property.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 8 of 9
Commissioner Hill stated concerns about the fluid concept of the site plan, and asked how speci
the PUD ordinance can be to address the concerns he has and the concerns of the neighbors.
Barry LeBaron replied that the PUD needs to provide for thinks that are very unique and different
and cannot be categorized into the all of the existing zoning districts. He said that the PUD is
customized as needed based on input from the public. He said that the conceptual site plan
generally describes what the applicant is trying to accomplish and if distances and setbacks are
an issue, it should be addressed in the ordinance. The applicant would be required to develop
the property somewhat in conformance with the site plan. Commissioner Hill said that he agrees
this is the first time that they have seen the site plan and there is a need to allow area residents
time to review the site plan. He said that he has some concern that the ball fields and practice
field are allowed to be used by the City stipulated in the ordinance rather than later on being
denied the use. He also said that the changes involving the Precinct Line Road property needs
to be tied down in the PUD ordinance.
D~ ~ ~~
r:"'~7 ~n~ i~ !'J
D\iKll "
Commissioner Edwards said that she is please with the changes to the potential commercial
areas on Precinct Line Road and the school would change the look for the entry into Colleyville
in a favorable way. She said that tying down the additional commercial property to the existing
commercial in the area is a good idea. Commissioner Edwards said that the sports field use
needs to be clearly defined and the open space is a plus for the area. She said that with the two
major commercial areas on Hwy. 26 becoming closer to developing, she has lost some of her
concerns about this property and she took Commissioner Tyler's remarks to heart and sees the
potential of this project and would like to work with the applicant.
Commissioner Hill questioned the notification process as the changes relate to neighboring
properties. Barry LeBaron said that the school probably has not done soil tests or drainage
studies and building locations could need to be changed due to topography. Discussion ensued
about the platting and site plan process.
Commissioner Fletcher said that the concept brought before the Commission in good faith. He
has no problem with their commitment to build something similar to what is presented.
Commissioner Edwards questioned potential developer agreements. Commissioner Hill said that
there needs to be something more binding than an agreement to agree and the Commission
needs to fashion someway to tie down the issues other than a good faith commitment. He said
that he would like to allow surrounding property owners more time to digest the plan and comment
and he is in favor of tabling the case. Commissioner Rutherford concurred.
David Cunningham said that tabling the case creates a problem for them because of the timing
involved with the deadline to purchase and close on the land and they would need to amend the
their contract and not sure if they could do that. He said that they are not a development for profit
and cannot contemplate spending the amount of money it would take to design the project until
they own the land, and they can't own the land until they get the zoning change. He said that they
still have two public hearings at City Council, go through platting, and then go through detailed site
plan approval before anything can be built. The zoning change allows the process to start.
William Tyler requested that the Chairman poll the Commission as to what their desire is.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 9 of 9
DRAFT
Commissioner Hill said that he would like another two weeks to allow everyone to look at the
details of the ordinance.
Commissioner Fletcher said that after hearing from the applicant, he would move toward a vote.
Commissioners Collins, Tyler, Edwards, Rutherford and Hart concurred.
Commissioner Edwards moved to recommend approval subject to the newest site plan
being attached to the PUD as a conceptual plan and make a recommendation to City
Council the comments on the practice fields for use by citizens be considered as a part of
the adopting ordinance. Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The vote being"
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hart
Noes: Hill
5. Citizens' comments: There were none.
6. Staff comments, reports and discussion items: Barry LeBaron said that he is working on
scheduling a training session.
7. Commissioners' comments and reports: Commissioner Edwards said that City Council voted
on the impact fee ordinance for sewer and water at a rate of 82% from the Commission's
recommendation of 40%.
ADJOURNMENT:
Commissioner Collins moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:40 p.m. Commissioner Tyler
seconded the motion. The motion passed by an "Aye" voice vote.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jan Levy
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Approved on:
NOTE: As a matter of public record, an audio recording of the above Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting is available upon request. [jh/min/0124pz.min]
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 1 of 2
DRAFT
The regular meeting of the City of Colleyville Impact Fee Advisory Committee was called to order
by Chairman Hart at 6:30 P.M. on January 24, 2000.
Roll Call:
Present:
Rob Rutherford, Luann Edwards, William Tyler, Andrew
Wayne, Jim Fletcher, Bryan Hill, Mike Collins, Tom
Hart
Larry Cole
Barry LeBaron, Tom Niederauer, Clayton Husband, Jan
Levy
Absent:
Staff:
Approval of Minutes of the November 29, 1999 meeting:
Jim Fletcher moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Bryan Hill seconded the motion.
The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Wayne, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
PRESENTATION OF ROADWAY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN:
Barry LeBaron presented the Roadway Capita/Improvements Fee Schedule and gave a history
of the project.
Terry Watson and David Hal/oin, Kimley-Horn Associates, presented the plan to the advisory
committee. David Halloin gave an overview of roadway impact fee legislation. He told how
legislation was enacted in 1987 and it al/ows cities to charge new development for costs of
providing required capacity improvements to the roadway system. He explained that an update
to the fee schedule is mandated every 3-years.
Mr. Halloin spoke about the roadway impact fee process and how it incorporates the thoroughfare
plan, the land use plan, the population growth projection, and the 1 O-year capital improvement
plan. He told the Advisory Committee what their responsibilities would be. Mr. Hal/oin told the
committee that a qualified professional engineer would be required to prepare the CIP, do an
analysis of capacity and usage levels, determine the service units necessitated by new
development, prepare an equivalency table, and project the demand for the next 10-years.
' .
Mr. Halloin spoke about the methodology of the roadway capital improvements plan. He
explained about the service areas, service units, the cost to build each service unit, the impact fee
per service unit, and the service unit demand per development. He told the committee that
construction, surveying and engineering, land acquisition, preparation of the CIP and ordinance,
and the debt service are allowable expenses to build each service unit. Mr. Hal/oin displayed
graphs explaining the portions of roadways that can be financed through roadway impact fees,
the maximum fee calculation, and application of the impact fee. Mr. Halloin then opened the
meeting for questions by the committee.
Impact Fee Advisory Committee
Minutes - January 24, 2000
Page 2 of 2
DRAFT
Discussion ensued by the committee about how the fees recommended for Colleyville compare
with other area cities. The committee directed staff to present them with a comparison study. The
committee reviewed the event schedule and determined that they would make a recommendation
on February 28,2000.
The meeting adjourned at 7:1~ p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jan Levy
Planning & Zoning Assistant
[ jh/min/0124ifac.min]
Sign Board of Appeals
Minutes - February 7, 2000
10f2
DRAFT
The regular meeting of the Sign Board of Appeals was called to order by Ed Moore at
7:00 p.m. on February 7,2000.
Roll Call:
Present: :
Ed Moore, David Pencsak, Elsie Gunter, Jack Martin
Staff: Tom Niederauer, Barry LeBaron
Election of a Chairperson:
In the absence of an official chairman, Jack Martin made a motion to elect Ed Moore
to act as Chairman for the meeting. Motion was seconded by David Pencsak.
The motion was passed by unanimous vote to elect Ed Moore as chairman for the
meeting.
Approval of Minutes of the September 30, 1999 meeting:
Jack Martin moved to approve the minutes with a spelling correction of his name
on the second page. Elsie Gunter seconded the motion. The motion to approve
the minutes with the noted correction was approved by a unanimous vote.
1. Consideration of a request from Les Yates, Church Administrator, Kingdom Harvest
Church, for a variance to the side yard setback requirement of Section G (2)(c)(4) of
the Colleyville Sign Code, for a free standing "General Business" sign to be located
at 1901 Industrial Blvd.
Mr. Les Yates, representing the Kingdom Harvest Church, addressed the Board and
stated that the church that previously occupied the building had a sign at the requested
location. Mr. Yates stated that when their sign permit application was denied because
the proposed sign was too close to the side property line. The regulations require a 30
foot side yard set-back and they proposed only a five foot set-back. Mr. Yates stated
they wanted the sign near the side property line because it would be located in a
grassed area rather than in the middle of their parking lot. Mr. Martin asked if the sign
would be portable as indicated on their drawing. Mr. Yates stated the sign would have a
normal concrete foundation, but would be attached in such a manner that they could
take the sign with them if and when they moved to another location. Mr. Yates stated
the sign would not be lighted or have wheels or be on a trailer. He stated the footings
would come out when the sign is later moved. Mr. Yates stated that this is the end lot
and the vacant lot next door would want a sign at their other end of the property and
visibility would not be blocked by their proposed sign.
Jack Martin moved to approve the side yard set-back of five feet instead of 30 feet
as requested by the applicant. Elise Gunter seconded the motion. Motion carried
unanimously.
Sign Board of Appeals
Minutes - February 7, 2000
20f2
DRAFT
2. Consideration of a request from Glen W. Hahn, P. E., Innovative Developers, Inc.,
acting agent for Rick & Lavonne Bradford, Healthy Approach, for a variance to the
front yard setback requirement of Section G (2)(c)(3) of the Colleyville Sign Code, for
a free standing sign to be located 14 feet from the front property line at 5100 State
Highway 121.
Tom Niederauer, staff member, explained that the owner was building a new retail store
at this location and was requesting a variance from the sign regulations to allow a
Freeway Sign to be 14 feet from the front property line instead of the required 30 feet
set-back. Niederauer stated that there was a large electric power line along the front of
the property and the sign had to stay back at least ten feet behind the power line. Mr.
Moore asked staff to explain how the sign would be situated relative to the Railhead
sign. Staff explained that the Board had approved a front yard set-back variance for the
Railhead sign in September 1999 that allowed their sign to be the same distance (14
feet) from the front property line as the La Hacienda sign.
Jack Martin expressed concern about the proximity of this sign to the Albertson's sign
next door. Mr. Glen Hahn, representing the applicant, stated that he didn't think it would
have any bearing on the Albertson's sign due to the considerable distance. David
Pencsak stated he didn't think the proposed sign location would be a problem to the
Albertson's sign due to the angle involved. He also stated that there should be some
consistency along the frontage of 121. He stated that moving the sign back to the
required 30 foot set-back would block the view of the sign by the existing trees.
Jack Martin suggested that the applicant consider a monument sign because it would
not be blocked by the trees.
Mr. Hahn stated a monument sign would not be appropriate for this type of freeway
location.
Elsie Gunter moved to approve the variance request as presented to allow the
freeway sign to be located at 14 feet from the front property line instead of the
required 30 feet. David Pencsak seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Moore, Pencsak, Gunter
Noes: Martin
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at approximately 8:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Tom Niederauer
Senior Planner
jh/min/sba0207. min
RESOLUTION R-OO-1610
A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION
UNDER BUSINESS AT THE REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING OF
FEBRUARY 15, 2000
WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Business.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Business this
date and not otherwise adopted by Ordinance and/or separate Resolution,
as follows are hereby adopted:
a. THAT
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
AYES, NAYS, AND ABSTENTIONS.
I 2000, BY A VOTE OF
-
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLlEYVlllE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor