HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council-Agenda Packets-1/18/2000
city Of
TIcs
Texas
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
5400 BRANSFORD ROAD
JANUARY 18, 2000
6:45 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551,
Subchapter D
Sec. 551.071-
Sec. 551.072 -
Sec. 551.072 -
Sec. 551.072 -
Sec. 551.074 -
Legal - Murray Construction lawsuit
Property Acquisition - John McCain Road
Property Acquisition - Colleyville Boulevard
Property Acquisition - Hall-Johnson Road
Personnel - The City Council may consider the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline or
dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City
Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City board and
commission members. A complete list of the City boards and
commissions is on file in the City Secretary's Office
7:30 P.M. - RESUME REGULAR MEETING
INVOCATION: Reverend David Rose, First Assembly of God Church, Colleyville
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Ross Foster, City Attorney
P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 577-7575
2. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED
BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS, AND ANNOUNCEMENTS,
PROCLAMATIONS, OR PRESENTATIONS
CONSENT:
3. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1595- Consent Items:
a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of January 4, 2000
b. Approval of minutes of a City Council worksession held January 8,2000
c. Approval of a bid award to Philpott Motor Company in the amount of
$69,771.77, for Parks and Recreation Department vehicles
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
4. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-OO- 1597 - Approval of a waiver
of perimeter street improvement requirements requested by Amita and Sarinder
Chhabra for Lots 1 B 1 and 1 B2, Block 2, Pleasant Oaks Estates, 801 Beverly Drive
5. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1598 - Consideration of
appointments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
6. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1599 - Consideration of
appointments to the Colleyville Tree Board
7. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1600 - Consideration of
appointments to the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee
8. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1601 - Consideration of
appointments to the Community Center Advisory Committee
9. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1602 - Approving a
combination plat for the Sapphire Enclave requested by John Hawkins, 20.565
acres located to the east of Jewell Estates, north of Tinker Road
TABLED ITEMS:
10. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-99-1148 -A zoning change from AG to R-20
and R-30 Single Family Residential on approximately 20 acres located north of
Tinker Road and east of Jewell Estates, at the end of Emerald Drive
11. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-99-1191 -A zoning change request by Tom
Pritchett for Mark Gottfredson, from AG to PUD-R (planned unit development-
residential) on 21.63 acres located at the end of Pebble Hill Drive, extending to John
McCain Road
12. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-99-1192 - A zoning change request by
David Hannah, from PUD-R for a nursing home/assisted living center use to PUD-R
for single family residential use on 11.958 acres located on the north side of Glade
Road in the 1300 block
13. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-99-1199 - Amending the water and
wastewater system capital improvements plan and the imposition of impact fees
14. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-99-1200 - Authorizing the removal or
trimming of trees, tree limbs or shrubs in or over street rights-of-way
STAFF REPORTS:
15. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
REPORTS:
16. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES -1/10/00
COLLEYVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION MINUTES - 1/4100
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
17. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
ACTION/RESOLUTION:
18. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING COUNCIL
AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 2000 - Reading and
Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1596
ADJOURNMENT:
19. ADJOURNMENT
I certify that the above agenda was posted on the bulletin board at City Hall on January 14,
2000, at 4:30 p.m.
Jean~~IJ~
City Secretary
If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special
accommodations, please advise the City Secretary at least 48 hours in advance at 577-
7575, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you.
CITY COUNCIL CO,
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
TexaS
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
MEETING / AGENDA #
01/18/00 /--1--
Executive Session
/
/
Januarv 18. 2000
Sec. 551.071 -
Sec. 551.072 -
Sec. 551.072 -
Sec. 551.072 -
Sec. 551.074 -
Legal - Murray Construction lawsuit
Property Acquisition - John McCain Road
Property Acquisition - Colleyville Boulevard
Property Acquisition - Hall-Johnson Road
Personnel - The City Council may consider the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline or dismissal
of public officers or employees, including the City Manager, City
Secretary, City Attorney, and City board and commission members.
A complete list of the City boards and commissions is on file in the
City Secretary's office.
('-~~~~
CITY MANAGER
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
N'" ,*",2E.k'l
'\1 1 ~ ,
RESOLUTION R-00-1595
A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION
UNDER CONSENT ITEMS AT THE REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 18, 2000
WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Consent
Items.
I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1:
THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Consent Items
as follows are hereby adopted:
a.
THAT the minutes of the regular City Council meeting of January 4, 2000,
are hereby approved.
b.
THAT the minutes of a City Council worksession held January 8,2000, are
hereby approved.
c.
THAT the bid award to Philpott Motor Company in the amount of $69,771.77,
for Parks and Recreation Department vehicles, is hereby approved.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
Passed by a vote of ayes,
of ,2000.
nays, and
abstentions on the
day
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
MINUTES OF THE
COLLEYVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 4, 2000
The regular meeting of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor Donna
Arp on January 4, 2000, at 6:48 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Councilpersons Jody Short, Mike Taylor, Frank Carroll, Ginny Tigue,
and Mayor Pro T em Nelson Thibodeaux were present. Mayor Donna
Arp, City Manager Bob Stripling, Assistant City Manager Dianne
McWethy, Director of Public Services Bob Whitehead, Community
Development Manager Barry LeBaron, Fire Chief Mike Johnston,
Parks and Recreation Manager Monica Sue Walsh, Financial Analyst
Ken Kolsti, City Attorney Ross Foster, and City Secretary Jean Harris
were also present.
1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551,
Subchapter D
Sec. 551.071-
Sec. 551.072-
Sec. 551.072 -
Sec. 551.072-
Sec. 551.074 -
Legal - Murray Construction lawsuit
Property Acquisition - John McCain Road
Property Acquisition - Colleyville Boulevard
Property Acquisition - Hall-Johnson Road
Personnel - The City Council may consider the appointment,
employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline or
dismissal of public officers or employees, including the City
Manager, City Secretary, City Attorney, and City board and
commission members. A complete list of the City boards and
commissions is on fire in the City Secretary's Office
Mayor Arp explained that the Executive Session had been called in accordance with Texas
Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D, Section 551.071 - Legal, Section 551.072
- Property Acquisition, and Section 551.074 - Personnel. She further explained that there
would be no decisions made or action taken during this time. The meeting was recessed
at 6:49 p.m., and reconvened at 7:30 p.m.
The invocation was given by Bishopric Member Mike Beck, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter
Day Saints, after which Ross Foster led the Pledge of Allegiance.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4, 2000
2. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED
BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS, AND ANNOUNCEMENTS,
PROCLAMATIONS, OR PRESENTATIONS
Presentation - Janet Houk, Retiree - Janet Houk was unable to attend.
There were no reports given.
CONSENT:
3. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1591- Consent Items:
a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of December 21,
1999
b. Approval of minutes of a City Council worksession held December 14, 1999
c. Approval of a bid award for a pickup truck to Philpott Motor Company in the
amount of $19,999.96, to be used by the Engineering Department
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-00-1591 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Tigue moved to approve Resolution R-00-1591.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
4. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-99-1199 - Amending
the water and wastewater system capital improvements plan and the imposition of
impact fees
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-99-1199.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4,2000
Discussion ensued regarding the breakdown of water and wastewater, level of fees,
maximum fees for wastewater, neighboring cities' fees, benefits of raising water fees,
effective date, additional information regarding fees, density, and the impact on retail as
well as residential.
Mr. Jeff James, Kimley Horn and Associates, was present to answer questions of the
Council.
Councilman Taylor moved to table Ordinance 0-99-1199.
Councilman Carroll seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
5. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-99-1200 - Authorizing
the removal or trimming of trees, tree limbs or shrubs in or over street rights-of-way
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-99-1200.
Mr. Dennis Marlin, 7101 Pleasant Run Road, spoke regarding the proposed ordinance
giving the City "carte blanche" to remove trees.
There were no others wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
Discussion ensued regarding heights of trees on different roadways, rewriting section 1 A
to consider the beauty of canopied streets, emergency equipment clearance, public safety
issues, implementation by whom in the city, committee decision prior to removing trees,
complaint driven ordinance, and the notification process to adjacent property owners.
Councilman Tigue moved to table Ordinance 0-99-1200.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Tigue, Short, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: Councilpersons Carroll and Taylor
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4,2000
6. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1593 - Approval of
authorizing the City Manager to proceed with condemnation of parcel number 17 on
the Hall-Johnson Road project
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-00-1593 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux moved to approve Resolution R-00-1593.
Councilman Taylor seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: Councilman Tigue
Mayor Arp declar.ed the motion carried.
7. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-00-1594 - Approval of
authorizing the City Manager to proceed with condemnation of parcel number 11 on
the Hall-Johnson Road project
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-00-1594 in its entirety.
Mr. Rich Munson, 1905 Hall-Johnson Road, spoke in opposition, requested to enter into
an agreement with the city to be exempted from the building setback requirements, and
requested a wrought iron and brick fence across the front of the property.
There were no others wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
Discussion ensued regarding zoning conformity of the proposed property, and
compromise/negot3tions with Mr. Munson.
It was the consensus of the Council that with a counter-offer from Mr. Munson, the City
Manager would enter into negotiations regarding Mr. Munson's requests.
Councilman Carroll moved to approve Resolution R-00-1594.
Councilman Short seconded the motion.
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4, 2000
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: Councilman Tigue
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
TABLED ITEMS: .
8. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-99-1191 - A zoning change request by Tom
Pritchett for Mark Gottfredson, from AG to PUD-R (planned unit development-
residential) on 21.63 acres located at the end of Pebble Hill Drive, extending to John
McCain Road
Councilman Carroll moved to remove this item from the table.
Councilman Tigue seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
Councilman Tigue moved to suspend the rules to allow the citizens to speak.
Councilman Short seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
Mr. Keith Staudt, 7208 Belle Meade, spoke regarding the citizens of Pebble Hill being
opposed to a road through Pebble Hill, an engineering study regarding emergency
equipment crossing the levy, park property not being included in the zoning request, and
legal impediments to putting a roadway across the park.
Mr. Lance Brown, 7302 Pebble Hill Drive, spoke regarding the proposed 7' wall and asked
that the wording be changed to say "at least 6' and up to as much as 8', and he requested
the zoning case be approved as drawn including the setback.
There were no others wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed the
public hearing.
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4,2000
Discussion ensued regarding the safety issues, configuration differences, inclusions in the
ordinance regarding the fire resistant roofing materials, hand-laid brick fencing, sprinkler
system in all homes, and all brick veneer on all homes. The Council further discussed
tabling the ordinance until the ordinance could be revised to include the wording as
proposed, including the specific location of the proposed fence, fire hydrant locations, and
gating the community.
Fire Chief Mike Johnston was present to answer questions of the Council.
Councilman Taylor moved to approve Ordinance 0-99-1191, with the proposed changes.
Councilman Taylor withdrew his motion.
Councilman Carroll moved to table Ordinance 0-99-1191.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
9. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-99-1192 - A zoning change request by
David Hannah, from PUD-R for a nursing home/assisted living center use to PUD-R
for single family residential use on 11.958 acres located on the north side of Glade
Road in the 1300 block
There was no motion to remove this item from the table.
1 o. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-99-1193 - A zoning change request by
David Bagwell, from R20 to PUD-R (planned unit development-residential) on
50.424 acres located in the 800-1000 block of McDonwell School Road, north side
of the street; and to consider amending Ordinance 0-99-1153 by including this
property into the Glenwood PUD-R .
Discussion ensued regarding the last action taken on this item, the developer withdrawing
the request, the Smith/Mormon property not being platted, and the letter the citizens
received prior to this meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux moved to remove this item from the table.
Councilman Tigue seconded the motion.
6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4,2000
Discussion ensued regarding the legality of removing this item from the table for the
purpose of amending 0-99-1153.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux withdrew his motion and Councilman Tigue withdrew her
second to the motion.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux moved to suspend the rules to allow the citizens to speak.
It was the consensus of the Council to allow the citizens to speak.
Mr. Joe Hocutt, 7703 Tillman Hill, spoke regarding the next step in the process if no action
is taken by the Council on this item.
Mr. Dennis Marlin, 7101 Pleasant Run Road, spoke regarding the need for city meetings
and input from the citizens and developers to insure proper development of Colleyville.
Mr. Brent Neff, 204 John McCain, spoke regarding "the rules" that the developer needs so
he will know how to proceed.
Mr. Grady Walker, 7309 John McCain, spoke regarding better ways to communicate with
the citizens, and the development already beginning on the proposed property.
Discussion ensued regarding the Council's agenda being placed on the City's Web Page
and improvements to the Web Page.
11. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION R-99-1583 - Resolution R-99-1583 -
Adopting the City of Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Master Plan
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux, moved to remove this item from the table.
Councilman Tigue seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
Mayor Pro T em Thibodeaux moved to allow the citizens to speak.
It was the consensus of the Council to allow the citizens to speak.
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4, 2000
Mr. Jim Moore, 1416 Glade Road, spoke regarding the approval of these expenditures for
the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan rather than using
these expenditures for a library.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux moved to approve Resolution R-99-1583.
Councilman Tigue seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
REPORTS:
12. IMPACT FEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES -11/29/99
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES -12/16/99
There was no action taken on this item.
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
13. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
There was no one present wishing to speak.
ACTION/RESOLUTION:
14. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING COUNCIL
AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF JANUARY 4, 2000 - Reading and
Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1592
This Resolution was not needed.
8
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 4, 2000
ADJOURNMENT:
15. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Councilman Carroll moved to
adjourn.
Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Short, Taylor, Carroll, Tigue, and Mayor Pro Tem Thibodeaux
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
AYES, NAYS, AND ABSTENTIONS.
,2000, BY A VOTE OF
Minutes taken and prepared by:
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
9
MINUTES OF THE
COLLEYVILLE CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION
JANUARY 8, 2000
The worksession of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor Donna Arp
on January 8, 2000, at 8:38 a.m.
ROLL CALL:
Councilpersons Jody Short, Mike Taylor, Frank Carroll, Ginny Tigue,
and Mayor Pro Tem Nelson Thibodeaux were present. Mayor Donna
Arp, City Manager Bob Stripling, Assistant City Manager Dianne
McWethy, Director of Public Services Bob Whitehead, Community
Development Manager Barry LeBaron, Project Manager Keith Fisher,
Economic Development Manager Mike'Soab, Financial Analyst Ken
Kolsti, City Secretary Jean Harris, Patsy Smith, Rob Farrell, Charles
Hodges, Mark Howe, Richard Kelly, Sam Atkins, Hal Sargent, Denny
Boles, Michael Kendall, and Madeline Ivey were also present.
1. REVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF THE PROPOSED COLLEYVILLE CITY HALL
DESIGN
Discussion ensued regarding the proposed retail development, public plaza, parking and
traffic considerations, water features, interior/exterior building design, Council chambers
dias configuration, executive session area, audience seating, audio-visual elements,
Council chambers location, and lobby and reception area.
There being no further business before the City Council, the worksession was adjourned
at 12:40 p.m.
APPROVED THIS
AYES, NAYS, AND
DAY OF
ABSTENTIONS.
, 2000, BY A VOTE OF
Minutes taken and prepared by:
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
city or
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
Texas
DEPARTMENT:
SUBJECT:
PARKS AND RECREATION
Resolution R-00-1595 - Approval of bid award
to Philpott Motor Company in the amount of
$69,771.77 for Parks and Recreation Depart-
ment vehicles - by Consent
MEETING I AGENDA #
01/18/00 /--3.C--
/
/
January 18. 2000
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1595 - by Consent
Background
This bid includes three vehicles for the Parks and Recreation Department. One
vehicle is to replace a 1989 Chevrolet pickup with 166,351 miles and the other
replacement vehicle is for a F350 dump truck with 95,369 miles. The third vehicle is
a new pickup to service eight full-time employees and one part- time employee that
currently share three trucks. According to state law, staff is proposing to use the
Houston-Galveston Area Consortium (H-GAC) bid prices for this purchase. The
vehicles recommended are two 2000 Ford F250 pickups and a 2000 F350 dump
truck for a total cost of $69,771.77.
Financiallmoact
Funds in the amount of $71,800 were appropriated in the Supplemental Budget
approved on December 21, 1999.
Recommendation
Approval of Resolution R-00-1595 to authorize the purchase of Parks and Recreation
Department vehicles from Philpott Motor Company for the amount of $69,771.77.
r_Qwx~
CITY MANAGER
fOlio" 08KI2E~
~. \1 1 i
FROM ; PHILPOTT"FLEET
PHONE NO. ; 9564129199
~
;
1/(
L {,vtJ-
^~
Bid Scrid-and Due price in BldIPl'oposal
s I~OJtcJV
B: Pllb~bed 0 lions hemiu: eacb Item below}
CODE
H-CAe Bid PRICE
CODE
OPTIONS
H,CAC Bid PRICE
S
oS
S
S
S
"
,
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
.s
s
Total Published Op.Ioms
8..,.. Bid Price
s
Tl/blB
s
c.
l'npuhllshcd Optj"1\$ [It''mizc c-oIch U..m bel...... ft.,c tl) cxcftd : 2S~
s
s
s
s
D.
Optl"l\$ IIcld..d I.. 8"5" Pdce
Cunlr-"CI Pro Adjustment (I( .tl~.. explain here]
DeliYer! ChrgllS [Ir any. e~pblln hen) Jry A tl f.l
Tubl uf B . C + D + E ,.. J:"
Qu""tlIy Order..d (V"iU:~ .. F) =>
H.CAC "dmlni$lr-~ti"e Fee (Frdm Fu Schedule., T",bl.. ~ "'>
Nnn-El{lllpmenl Ch. '" C
"~C$ rl!dlu CEJl.I. "'our-,uny, Tr..dc-in.<)
TOTAL PIJRCH..\SE PRICE I"'CLUDI~O H-GAC fEE
.....................
s 'f?~.-cv
s
r.
-;. ~(X/
S ~ S7b<OCi
s 4( /.5,(...(2()
s ~65lfI'7:J
E_
s
c.
H.
I:
s
J.
s Iff. 'iIO / y}
/
5 vj'Jlf t<-C t'l0
~
t~o'.'. 04 1999 04: 28Pr., P5
VE
CUSTOMIZED PRODUCT PRICING SUMMAR.Y BASED ON CONTRACT
\ -=--VEr'1-o.:<' I
or fA Iif-/' l(f
(')000 P-:f57J f)~iV /J(':t'.5~t-
BidSules Y'l-551 C6
l
FROM : PHILPOTT"FLEET
PHOHE NO. : 9564129199
\
\
C'~7
PMud DdCriptl",,:
;
End User-
A:
8:
Bid Series and Bas- Price In BidIPrapoSal
PubllshC'd 0 1l.*"5 Itcm1z.e eacb hem belowl
s ;t. ~ odC/;/
.
CODE
OPTIONS
H.GAC Bid PRICE
CODE
OPTIONS
R,CAC Bid PRICE
S
s-
s
s
s
s
s
s
ToUI Puhlished Opliuns
Base Bid Pric..
Tul:iIB
C.
Vnpuhlishtd Opt;'lns (htmiz.e each Ih:m beltm-. P"ll.. eXc:e~ : lS~ S ,.,
~,
s
s
s
s
s - C f':l'f<cv
.
D.
"T ubi C l!npubIL<hl:d Optluns addo:d t., BlUe Price
C"ntr..c\ Pt"ice Adjustment [Ir aDY. expl.in hereJ
OellYcry Ch:.rccs[l(an]. npl;aln hen.1 pt;:r I'l( 7. ~ t/l # $'0 j-J1Zt
T "blur B + C + D + E " r
QUl&nllty Ordered ((Jft,~:L :oc FJ =>
H.G,\C ^dminlstr,,""''' fire [fr..m Fee Schedul.... T"'bl.~_>
N..n.Equipment Ch. .... ". C ->. ("" .
.....es "'" r....lts "'-lit. \\;arr"'nl,.. Tr..dc.in~J
E.
$
S j2$;2 ..0rJ
s J!.19/ ~O(l
s:L1,.s:z t. O{)
s I ~l{()(J~
l
r.
G.
H.
I:
J.
TOT.-\L PURCHASE PRrCE INCLVD1NC H.CAC FEE .....................
s
s r71, 1bt. !t
I
\O,..J
"\J\hV\. P
CUy or
CITY COUNCIL ca.
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
Texas
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: R-00-1597 - Approval of a waiver of perimeter
street improvement requirements requested by
Amita and Sarinder Chhabra for Lots 181 &
1 B2, Block 2, Pleasant Oaks Estates, 801
Beverly Drive. .
~ma}~ / AGENDA #
/ 4
/
/
January 18, 2000
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1597
BackQround
Sarinder & Amita Chhabra are the owners of a 1.9936-acre tract of land located at 801
Beverly Drive, just west of Pleasant Run Road. The owner has submitted a replat of the
property which created two lots, one of which will be for a new house on the property. The
Planning and Zoning Commission approved this plat at its January 10, 2000 meeting.
The owner is seeking a waiver of perimeter street improvement requirements for this
property's frontage on Beverly Drive. The Chhabra's do not own any contiguous property.
A letter from the owner is attached. Also attached is a copy of the worksheet provided by
the Engineering Department to estimate the perimeter street costs. The table below shows
the pertinent data relative to this request.
STREET
Beverly Drive
FRONTAGE
269.29 feet
TOTAL ESTIMATE
$13,969.72
COST PER LINEAR FOOT
$51.88 per linear foot
In previous cases of requests for a waiver of perimeter street improvement requirements,
the Council approved all requests for properties that could not reasonably be divided into
more than two lots. Given the current zoning of R1 0 and required lot widths of 100 feet,
this property could not be divided into more than two lots. Any future plats that may include
this property would require a reevaluation of the perimeter street improvement
requirements.
Recommendation:
Approval of Resolution R-00-1597
IS
DEPARTMEN
C~A~.
CITY MANAGER f2~
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
~... 0&I'i2E.....
~ '',' 1 1 I
May 18. 1998
To:
The City Council
clo City Manager
City of Colleyville
Colleyville, Texas.
Dear Madam/Sirs,
Reauest for re-olattinl!
Recently we purchased a 2 acre property located on 801 Beverly Dr, in the Lot 3 block 2 of Pleasant Oaks
Estates in Colleyville. We would like to have this property re-platted as two 1 acre lots. We would
appreciate a waiver of the perimeter and street fees as we intend to give these two plots to our two
daughters as separate plots.
Thanking you,
Sincerely,
J
Sarinder and Amita Chhabra
801 Beverly Drive
Colleyville, Texas 76034.
ECEIVE
DEe 1 7 ~~
CJTY OF COLLEYVILLE
BY COMMUN'T~ DE~!f_~"'f}~ft~~n
~
CI) c:
.!
as ~
oS 0)
....
~ ~
l
l;
.~ Qi
lii 0
ca
1) -
e
.~ ,g
cf g
~~ 0 g
~
e > .~ 0
CD ca CO
00. .....
.E- - .....
-0
S*
011) .. ..
-
o~ N N
.... ....
e- 00 ~
'C >
~~ co
..... .....
e- ..... .....
.- 0
~*
WN .. ..
-
g ~ CO
CD .- ~
fl~ ,...: ....
eO. ~. 3.
.- -
e 0 - -
c~
0 .. ..
N
.... t;
CIO
en a) a)
.9! ~ .... ....
..- ~
:::0 f:') .
.- N f:')
5
.. ..
00) 0
e o~ II)
0 . ..... cw;
i O)f')
N ~
~ -
..
..
8~ f::
.Ill:. '0 ~
(i ~~
~
CD (If)
't:J
Ci)
.. ..
"- 00) ('I)
CD
= II)C'! N
::r '0 cw;
C) N~ to
't:J
e
ca
€
::r ..
0 ..
.c OClO It)
ca 0"'": It)
en Ni ,...:
c ~
CD
E
CD ..
0 ..
8~ ~
'f') 0)
-co
0 N.... f')
e ....
'S; 0)
CD
Q.
.. ..
>=' G:' ~ ..
en -'... 2 II)
>-"":'&1. "":'E>- ~ ii
~~~~<~- ~
..0 0.. 0
-;;
ii
'0
-
'ii
'0
E
::r
.!!.
~ ~
0) -
S II)
(If)
-
..
U II
m 'ii
~
~ u:
.J
RESOLUTION R-00-1597
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A WAIVER OF
PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
FOR LOTS 1 B1 AND 1 B2, BLOCK 2, PLEASANT OAKS ESTATES
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the perimeter street improvement requirements for Lots 1 B 1 and 182,
Block 2, Pleasant Oaks Estates, are hereby waived.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
Passed by a vote of
day of
ayes,
,2000.
nays and
abstentions on this the
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
city of
CITY COUNCIL
-
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Resolution R-00-1598 - Consideration of
appointments to the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board
MEETING / AGENDA #
01/18/00 / 5
/
/
Januarv 18. 2000
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1598
Backqround
This Resolution provides for the Council to appoint four (4) members to the four (4)
vacancies on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. One incumbent has applied for
reappointment and three new applications were submitted. Mr. Magee is currently serving
on the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Below is a list of applicants. Applications are attached for review.
Incumbent:
Rich Hendler, 2100 Highland Meadows
New applicants:
Steven H. Magee, 6900 Shepherds Glen
Roger H. Nelson, 4509 Dartmoore Lane
Karen Birkes, 1301 Ashford Court
Recommendation
Approval of Resolution R-00-1598
D[#~iJ~
c-~~
CITY MANAGER ~
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
fC.... Q8I(l2E.H
(V',l',
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
PLACE 1
Joe Noorlag - Vice Chair
5507 Sycamore
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:571-0504/0:332-7301 x. 2
F:831-2020
Term: December 98-2000
PLACE 4
Richard Hendler
2100 Highland Meadows
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:421-8164/0:421-8165
F:421-9062
Term: December 97-99
PLACE 7
Dan Witte
2400 Highway 121, Suite 20
Euless, TX 76039
H:318-127 4/F:318-127 4
Term: December 98-2000
update: 12/98
Coordinator: Vacant
Office: 656-7275
CE2
Mike Billings
4900 Eversham Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:283-5864/0:972-718-3398
F:972-719-7836
Term: December 97-99
PLACE 5
Frank "Ken" Crooks
5102 Indian Trail Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:788-8814/0:972-718-70
F:972-718-8662
Term: December 98-2000
LACE 8
William Recker - Chair
2209 Woodstock Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:571-9633/0:972-404-3392
F:972-404-3756
Term: December 97-99
PLACE 3
Vince Rosen
1313 Chatsworth Court E
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:577 -4862
Term: December 98-2000
PLACE 6
Laura Ann Travis
7907 Jefferson Cr.
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:577 -2723
Term: December 97-99
SCHOOL BOARD LIAISON
Alan Linford
3202 Wilton Woods Ct.
Colleyville, Texas 76034
H:685-0951/0:581-4774
NOV-30-99 11:51 AM MAIL.COPY.PLUS.
817 428 8966
P.01
CUy or
~Oll 3~ ,\
V~
~ '!'
t "
.-'
CD
ilC6
Texa. '
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME , I~ t. f\I 4 ( t r DATE ,d>'ilq~ I
R I' ~
ADDRESS ~ \:)0 ~ I .~ L.14PA.. fA, t,J.....; f
I HOME TELEPHONE lf6-\ 81 (,'f WORK LJ.~ I gtc.$" i
I
I E-MAIL ADDRESS ~"3 \\~~b~ ~ t),1.J~"'~ . Co h.. FAX L./ ). J qoCt,).. I
,
,
I APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board. Commission or Comm' e or which you wish to be considered) I
. PPlv-k &~ l S1l~ :--"t ITI J I
! QUALlFICA liONS (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of thisl
I appointment)
; ~~/~ ~ ().~J, 1l.A1~~ ~~~ \
^o (F~r~(j ~~ as BI~I.~ ~ S ~
t'J4'~ T ~~
. REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
I wanting to serve on tne Board, Commission, or Committee)
f
~/rJ;c, ~~ ~.
51
I
Once the City Council has filled a position. your application will be removed from the tile and
: you must reapply for future openings.
---'
P. 0 9~x 185
Cc'!eyvl'!e, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAA 817/577-7555
City Of
~
18--/ /'-1/ c; I
1113"-
I I ( r--:
Lw
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME :5+~Ve." 1-1. VV\"'4."'-t:- I DATE /2-/1 S/4j
: ADDRESS , /' Il l I
I 6tCjeQ She~\....c:..f'"clS G-{c.~ I <"0 ~'t,-,', l e.., TX" 76D3~~
. HOME TELEPHONEg'17 _ '-i "6'8 - 4"'l10 lW~~-770-Z050
E-MAIL ADDRESS s I'Y\~'" e... 4"3 I S @ ",,"0 \ . <:'0""" I FAX &17 Z. - 770 - za 70 _
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered) ,
Pa.. f'"' k s AJ v : ~o,... '"I rs o~c-d .
QUALIFICATIONS (list educationaf background or expenence that would assist you in carrying out the duties of thiSlI
appointment) .1..l. \ 'n. .1-
P'4!.~S~ ~~C- ~,\'Q,.C"-k.e..6 f'"&SV.W\.c..., y~c-\",~ ~~ \~I\.IoU"'L!
D..~ C. ~\""\ ~","~Lt" D f c.~.~ ~-\ C-tc..c.... \<.. I wcL C~~~+-r~..t.e..d. I
5e- U L'^- "'... "" fl....... ..... 0;. ""-. ",-J. . "'" L-( 0 ,~o <::> ~ c:.:=-_ .-...",:. \: 'f Ge..J -c..r: I
:L. ........" c. ".....: '" \ 'I '4t .\-"''''0;. ,VL ~ 'It fC. r , ~L ...... f""'" "- t \............ ""':\ '
d 4!. ~ t- \c:ot V\l'\ Co V'...-\- ~~,! ~ ~e...V\I\.e.. ~ .. I )
REASONS FOR SERVING (Stal~ bnefly the contributions you can make ta thIs appointment and your reasons for I'
wanting to serve on fhe Board, CommIssion, or Commrttee)L L I,
~ H"'\f c.~-\:~ ~\-...~ ~Mf'''''lM.~~\- f.....~1Io,.S ~rc~t'~~~ 4W'\d I
~~or~-\-~"2..L- rc."(''''-\-\o~ o~~or~~",,\~...\ .f~~ r~'S~c::lc..,^"\-~.
~ Prov'IA~ ~-t-~\<- \~J.c...""$"':~~ ~"'- P-..c'~'\ eD"'~J..
3) \'Y\.... ~c. IN c.ll +\-~ I... -\- ........ -t- i"~ ~ t ........~ +'" ~L...-L- I
C ; -t- 'I G:.",,^,', \, I
Do you understand toat aaendance a~t:lti"t suppolj is requirt!d for pach apP9intee? i
aAtc.V\Jul e~ k-l"...L B-_f'J.~ AJ.~","s-t~"'t ~-t~ ^~ Su'\eA.- :
Yes 0 No 'cc....~ ~~i ~-\c.~ +c> ~--t b~rd.. I
J your application wUl be removed from the file and
P. O. Box 185
Co'leyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
=2::2 3S\1~
JlW
0L0Z:0LLU5
~~:~z: 5551/~1!=:
Steven H. Magee, Esq.
4313 Hazy Meado\\.' Lane
GrllpeV1ne. Tens 76051
(817) 488-4910
PROFESSIONAL EXPERlENCE
President, Magee-Leonard Corporation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . September 1997 to pxesent
5420 LBJ Freeway
T'wo Lincoln Center, Suite 626
Dallas, Texas 75240
Supervise and manage site selection, negotiation, teal estate contracting. as well as planning
and zoning apptOV'als for approximately $10 mill10n land de\'t:lopment company.
Sleven H. Magee. . . . . . . . .......................... .May 1998 to present
Attorney at Law, PILe
5420 LBJ Freeway
Two LiIlcoln Center, Suite 626
Dallas, Texas 75240
Solo legal praCllce serving client needs in the areas of real estate, planrung, land use, zoning
subd1vision plamng, corporate and contX'act law.
City Manager .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
City of Coconut Creek, Florida
4800 W. Copans Road
Coconut Creek., Rorida 33063
Managed fast-groWing fuU-semce CIty of 35,000 with 250 employees and $25 million budget.
.... ...... . January 1989 to July 1993
AS6istant City Manager/Community Development.
City of Coconut Creek, Florida
Managed city planrung. engweenng, buildmg. zoning. eCOnont1c development and code
enforcement activities, including superv1S1ng cIty reVIeWS of more than $500 million of
developer consttuction projects.
.. ...... February 1983 to January 1989
EDUCATION
Southern Methodist Uni~r6ity School of Law
Dallas, TelCas
J.D., May 1997
Honors: 1996/97 Hawk:ins Golden Scholar
1996/97 Corporate Counsel Editor, SMu Law Review Assn.
1995196 Board of Edttors, SMO Law Review Assn.
Authored: ProtMing Land ArrJlmd Alports. AliOi~'(g R8.!,NlatOf) Taking Claims By ComJmhms:~'!
Planning, cmd ZOning, published In the Fall 1996 Issue of the SMU Ioumal of Air Law and
Conunerce. '
Eastern Mi,~igan University
Ypsilanti, Michigan
M.S., Land Use Analysis, May 1982
B.S., Education, May 1980
Honors: Recipient of EMU's 1992 "OutStanding Young l\lumnus') Award
MEMBERSHIPS
State Bar of Texas
..~:merican Bar AssociBtlOn (A13.-\)
.i\merican Insotute of Certified Planners (AICP)
International City Management Association (ICIvlA.), Full Member
=2:=2 :=S\'=
Jl~
0L02:0LLU5
2:P:2:3 555,!~1/2:1
city of
n~
Texas
DATE J)U j!J J / QC(9
CtJ j J l. U', / I G
WORK
.8J7.S77 -S~ 3D 8; .S7}.;).3SIo
I E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered)
PMis ~ hcru17L1JJ MU~soe7 J8z:cW
QUALIFICATIONS (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this
appointment) S j) rcL- !1b);'c ~/i);-SfrearfiAJ Ifb/Jlicok .sGl'tJJC~
/YJC.5~ (J UJ../IUCJ2.::/) ~ cr1 tU )6[(J;Y.s)~ /Cj 7,/
)ak 04" ~Cr5LJ ;-/vmGC:)2uJJ~~ /13.s~rf1oJ - Ula IJr~1
. ;qq.s- Iqq 7
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME ;@ 6-~ ;/ Aft-L 5(JJ
ADDRESS 1S()Q !)l}t7/Yl()Of!.G 14AiL
HOME TELEPHONE
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee) :r::. GuY\a..,q-oDd ~ a.ud harYL..
~~1:-t.._ :::c 'ou\..,t....VU:L c.a.J prnv\:~ IJu' b..la. \eLL ~tL~C:..u ~ t1\L
I WlV\(Y\\.A tJ \ ~ tt-.ro~\.; 1'<"\\ (Jc-<C +\0 ~CL~ cx.J ~t... ~r-G.s' ~ ~ <h~ MJ..J~ E::.~
I t:noW.
Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
I
! J8f Yes
I SIGNED I
o No
~\, \ \
uncil has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and
for future 0 enin s.
P. O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
llcg
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME VI I~~ DATE ( )- {O~ 11
ar-~n
ADDRESS I 30 I A sfrfordA 6ur-r CU I/-e .tI~ 110 71otJ3l/
HOME TELEPHONE tjL7 cg. 7 3 3 I WORK -----
E-MAIL ADDRESS ._~ FAX ---.
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or com~ittee for WhiC~OU wish to be considered)
Parks ~ Rec. AAi//5or J50tJ-r/
QUALIFICATIONS (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this
I appointment) p .4. f7 ~ , J3 ofl t' r (j n' ILlaS'!y I f,1LIt ti ~ i .'
;J Is:; ['._di lie Iy /11// 0 /v e/. w ,ii... Co !Ie 7'" /!G. r{c'-!.. de /I /! /,'~ I (! 0 ~t: 7 Vi lie
[JO(h.efls CluD, 1t//c!elf,eS S.0.5. I {lysT;c f/brosls rotJlJda.i7o/l. fJ.6.
le.~ Chftl 13r~IIS{or-.1 g(e/'J. VoltJ/11eerj f..t.&~ d ~m.er:f-r ~At!sco.~ {'ja/',-
I REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to s,erv~ on the B?ard, Commission, or Committee) jJ A~ ~ 7'f' t1U~ ~iJk, ko ~ ~~
;ut;'~ ~ C~{.;J4 St'-U-tA- - ~~.~. CdUlt-d4 ~ tl- ~~ ".n?kt~~
I ~iu~~/(tp ~ ~~ ...,-/lJ..e.. ~ ~ ll;;: p~_ ~, &t: ..0 "k~,r. A<.u/
, 6fi ~ u~ ~ aff'~ ~-zt ~~ ~~~ ~~
Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
~Yes
SIGNED
Once the City ouncil has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and
1 'ou must rea I for future 0 enin s.
P. O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
RESOLUTION R-00-1598
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION
ADVISORY BOARD
WHEREAS, four positions on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board have
expiring terms.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Colleyville City Council hereby appoints Steven H. Magee,
Place 2, Rich Hendler, Place 4, Roger H. Nelson, Place 6, and Karen
Birkes, Place 8 on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to serve
until December 2001.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
Passed by a vote of
day of
ayes,
nays, and
,2000.
abstentions on the
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
. I
, I
CITY COUNCIL
clty of
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Resolution R-00-1599 - Consideration of
appointments to the Colleyville Tree Board
MEETING / AGENDA #
01/18/00 1-1L-
1
/
January 18. 2000
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1599
Backoround
This Resolution provides for the Council to appoint three (3) members to the three (3)
vacancies on the Colleyville Tree Board. Two incumbents have applied for reappointment
and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has recommended the appointment of Dan
Witte to fill the vacancy left by the resignation of Mike Billings.
Below is a list of applicants. Applications are attached for review.
Incumbents:
Joseph Noorlag, 5507 Sycamore Drive
David Bagwell, 8222 Douglas Avenue, Suite 770, Dallas
Recommendation
Approval of Resolution R-00-1599
r~*h, .
CITY MANAGER ~
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
..... 0II'II2E.....
I'; 1;1
COLLEYVILLE TREE BOARD
e Noorlag
5507 Sycamore
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:571-0504/0:332-7301 x. 2
F:831-2020
Term Expires: 12/99
Mike Billings
4900 Eversham Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:283-5864/0:972-718~3398
F:972-719-7836
Term Expires: 1 000
Richard Hendler
2100 Highland Meadows
Colleyville, TX 76034
H:421-8164/0:421-8165
F:421-9062
Term Expires: 12/2001
David Bagwell
8222 Douglas Avenue, Suite 770
Dallas, TX 75225
0: 540-5500
Term Expires: 12/99
Doug Rivers
6100 Elliott Reeder Road
Ft. Worth, TX 76117
H: 283-5273/0:332-7301
Term Expires: 12/2000
Donna Kauffman
210 W. College St., Suite 100
Grapevine, TX 76051-5255
H: 329-4436/0:488-4124
Term Expires: 1212001
Updated: 05/99
or1
li~
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME I
. ~c..t71wi tV Cc> 12 ~ 04
ADDRESS
I SSO'1 S'1(-4J.-..."c.
. HOME TELEPHONE
i" ,,- $7/- t.:J~~ '-I-
E-MAIL ADDRESS
0~,
'WORK
'f? 2,. :t '2, { - ~8 ~I
FAX
S ~; --.-t ~; \ . e... _ Cj'''1l, ~:l {' - cCh K
list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered}
~'4 ~_.J
QUALIFICATIONS (list educahonal background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this II
appointment) I
.3 .., ~'4 7 A-te-~ a--. cl 04 a- d c:..s~ ~.. -h. c.-,....~- C!.o (\4,1/ d l<. i
!
I
n ~_ / t l... - ;..-- b "'-- .=--"' ~ .u. -~ ~ c-~ ~~ -. n ~
~~.. L t~ ~ ., - - q q Y
~ [1\1<:....:
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to serve on tne Board, CommIssion, or Committee)
'B.".'~ 6-~~S ,_ $~ t."', d IS (,.-r \,-c... ~ ~ ~..,...J ~kc."" ~
-:&'4'\ ...._~ S s p,..-.d ~~'.
Do you understand that attendance and active support i6 required for each appointee?
g Yes a No
SIGN~ ~ ~
Once the City Council has filled position, your application will be removed from the file and
")u must reapply for future openings.
P.O.Box185
Colleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
1. d
1t?2'ON
Wd8E:2 6661'52'^ON
il0
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME 6H-Jl~ ~f16lU~LL DATE it It ( 1"
ADDRESS 0-> ~/ [rMu It't::> 1-t-.J \ (,Ir -L4J , -
It Ji . \ ..;;rt . ,~ t-~:..:..;;
.....'--
HOME TELEPHONE..., L~--h .~ "J' .... WORK. _ _ I
l -'. . - ~'1l ....1 4f ,J~ ~ ... +-t-fl
_ ...J__ ~
E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX _ _
:"('tl ~~... "t tf-J
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered)
-. - LJ Itr':. ~
t {' 'l... ~
- '-
QUALIFICATIONS (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this
appointment) I
,
- tf .,,,,.;c. / ir''LL..J f1.1 y'.A1.&Z v1 f ~lvl ...l.vJ\, w yDYv! YV\ t .NlJ ~'l:\ l '6Ifl~c. J'...
r , G- (
r - ~~&,'\, l r ~~c......~ ., -- '\ JJ dvtt
./~L ~ ...Vlv l....\vv'~~ vJVt,lJJ\ t, V (..~.>
\
v'\I'\
~
L., .,'. \I' (
,-. V oII. """)
\
,( 'I
\...~I..t.- TJ~ pi ~vv..v '\. 'tJ ~ .
---'
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to serve on tne Board, Commission, or Committee)
,
" \.-
~\. YJ l ~~.Il&7v'.Iw.' -;: ';"/,/-J, .....~.I\ :-~~--~ Vv'~.'W"yr'a.:t~/,
,. " ,
\..4/'v'~ .1t......,v\'~ t../~" ~vbt "lite( [:;..-v.l vv,.../:-~......~
)
;)0' \...t-<:t'~ tA... f-' (3v'lt~_...~ \ .vL......dt -L;"~~ \...ir-
e. Itlt"t"'1I1 t)
Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
'j {~l'Vl '" "f~vt-r'v'v...t.
-- .......,...",.............,.
-'\... ..) ~ l .J . vlC'"l...
I
_ A... '" Vlv.l\...) -: ~ r l ~-.It.>
Q Yes
SIGNED
o No
t . I" /
.~ _~ 1./../.,/./
Once the City Council has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and
I you must reapply for future openings.
P. O. Box 185
COlleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
RESOLUTION R-00-1599
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE COLLEYVILLE TREE BOARD
WHEREAS, two positions on the Colleyville Tree Board have expired and one
position has become vacant due to the resignation of one of the
members representing the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board; and
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has met and made a
recommendation to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Mr.
Mike BiHings.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
i
THAT the Colleyville City Council hereby appoints incumbents Joseph
Noorlag and David Bagwell to the Colleyville Tree Board to serve until
December 2001.
Sec. 2.
THAT the Colleyville City Council hereby appoints Dan Witte
representing the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to serve until
December 2000.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
Passed by a vote of
day of
ayes,
nays, and
,2000.
abstentions on the
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
city Of
CITY COUNCIL CO,
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
Resolution R-00-1600 - Consideration of
appointments to the Traffic Safety Advisory
Committee
MEETING / AGENDA #
01/18/00 / 7
/
I
Januarv 18, 2000
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1600
Backaround
This Resolution provides for the Council to appoint four (4) members to the four (4)
vacancies on the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee. One incumbent has applied for
reappointment and three new applications were submitted.
Below is a list of applicants. Applications are attached for review.
Incumbent:
Joseph "Skip" McDonnell, 1704 Arthur Drive
New Applicants:
Angela Davis, 5106 Old Oak Lane
Eileen Flanagan, 2105 Maplewood Trail
Richard Fairlamb, 6209 Ponderosa
Recommendation
Approval of Resolution R-00-1600
C ~J:~
CITY MANAGER
D
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
Jio.... ()8Ig2E~
TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Term: October, 1997
Frank Whitmire
2300 Oak Knoll Court
Colleyville, Texas 76034
H: 283-8038
Term: October, 2000
/~-::::
Holly Scott
2803 Edgewood
Colleyville, Texas 76034
H: 318-7737
W: 972-603-1250
Term: October, 1998
Updated: 12/99
Joseph "Skip" McDonnell
1704 Arthur Drive
Colleyville, Texas 76034
H: 283-8352
W: 214-574.:-2150
Term: October, 1997
n~
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME:
ADDRESS:
DATE: ~ y.--
+"C
19-9\'
or would like to be considered):
--T-;..,~,~ ~~~ t7~7~//:fr~
QUALlFICA TIONS (List educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying
out the duties of this appointment):
_.:.'~. S'. ~i>1+>;1t?-S /'/v t-{~'1'F "S"l)-P{/Ir:-r;;'.-1'/1j ~/,.d~cY
~. 'P'/ - . ~ ,4.o/v
/ c..) ,"-".!c~/ .;...../..'7- /} /....:....1.,<- -J.'" /".
") -
// JR.4'--r<5o' C)/' ~.~, '::~~IC' '< c.-'A./ r; V.n.4I/7:l'"-~
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment
and your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Comm;ttee):
rJ,~?'~/-4/!: '7) ~5 f:;)~;;;'':'/Y' /-Y
Do you undE~rstand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
Circle: "ES or NO
SIGNED:
\~'Yv\\'~~~
---
Once the City Co ncil has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and you
must rea I for future 0 enin s.
P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 577-7575
city of
nee
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME
DATE
?r,
I E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX
;J-
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered)
IrOltf/C 5aFI-e'
QUALIFICATIONS (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this
appointment) r< 5 C ' , / T -'-',
IJ rl rr7, Ylt::i --./#..5 71 C e
Cevf,'f/ec9 ro/I'c~ OF,p/cpv -Pcy- {/rrO~,
/0 ?jtr5,
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to serve on file Board, Commission, or Committee)
J C?J/?? /nl-~Y-e5I-ec1 /n -I-/?(!"' et7~-I/Y7I'1'~cP ~rOfr~55
0+ CO//f''ju,'//e, T have a ohU'yh-l-f'r; Cl'rf' G/ and
J ~(/C/'J/?-) h('v ~ ~r??,"d u~ u/;74? r'f"5,r:?t"C-1- f'or
-I r"af'-P I 'c /a W 5 .
Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
if'Yes
SIGNED
o No
.
~/(;rf 0-
. Once the City Council as filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and
ou must rea I for future 0 enin s.
P. O. Box 185
COlleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
city of
ilcg
TexaS
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME /"', I -/
c: / /~ fl /) j-, C1 /711 /1 C, /1
AD~~~~~ ~ /~WOOj) 7;0//
I' HOME TELEPHONE 7
7/7 - S-PI -.!{} ro
Ii E-MAIL ADDRE~
(?/ ~(?f7 r/~nu.c;c./n rOc/ItA, /leT-
I APPOINTMENT DESI (list Board, ommission or Committee for which you wish to be considered)
: '7;a /h'c ~~Iz/ Il-df//s-O/2 /2//?/n/ ffie
QUALlFICA T~S (list educational. ckground o~ experience ~at would assist you in carry~ng put the duties of this
appointment) --L- G< 1'f7 {Iv Y/~/1f Cc CLJtY/CcJ-,-L-dL/('4hi:.J/lJ SpeC)4/JJ1-@.
/-I-IJK/~/ s /J1e#70c/){f- 1/1 /Z f-,aJt!~. -L J:a Ve ci 1+ tj ~~ 0;:'/1/ U/!!.~ /,N'i '
{:)<jJrl/r/7CE- l.//'/-J; ~ y!f?c/{"W~ //7 (}2/hru/'(/1re P- GJJ~f'r;('y /Vt74I/1/i ,
T AC'A u e Ivt-h C0 73 y t/ 9--m;6/V I r7( m C/ y;?ec/ cAP i4. --L S;::eA f- ~ J.
OS U Vt1VmA- /l012.ce. a0/2(lld~6r'" IjV-CAa:lu!fe I We c;:, ~/2 ued ~y
! orJ '/jJe kf?C /()/V ;:. t-/115 Mv/so3 (S/17ml!lee (
I REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanlong to serve on the Board. Commission. or Committee) -T /AJ (j u / cI bn 1t, "'- /Y7,oc/!, it /
-PfrSpfC fuJ2 -nJ '1M- j}.-;oo.yJ. as iT- r-fJ/~;Le 10 o.U/hC{ (lare y
'7r~ Uf!n-hCJ n. L Av. ve. /70 ko( :;:~u-fJra ( OfrorfUfl/77(7J Oi/er<fir~
/~ ) I k fA) j/YlOf/l ftu ~ I fnj./ro ve..- (51; PI' ~ u e y) fuJ II r-t'leA.. Ie C{ ID /rD..ffic
S-~k 9--tuou/d /;/~..e ~ be op?<rl- CJ~#>IS //7/a-hve )/)
! (J /1- t/; II-e..-.
I Do you u derstand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
rtJ Yes 0 No
I SIGNED w0 It. [' W
I Once the City Council has filled position, your application will be removed from the file and
fOU must rea I for future 0 en in s.
DATE
II IS- 77
7; 700.5Y
WORK
J?/7-P7f-56/0
FAX
P. O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
llcg
city Of
Texas
CITY SECRETARY'S
OFFICE
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME:
ADDRESS:
IJI>GAaJ~
TELEPHONE HOME: I
APPOINTMENT DE8!RED
D~.TE: 2
C~ ~ 7l:aM-
WORK:
(List Board, Commission, or Committee for which you are being
or would like to e considered):
fii4FRc. S~
I QUALlFICA TIONS (List ecucational background or experience that would assist you in carrying
I
out the duties of this appointment):
IvlA- Su-a CA- lq 5
~ j:;,.~ - USAl;' ~ jq57- Iq~3
6S ~tJ!;'~-U.5~~~d~-tq61
~A ~""",K UKllI",y~ - jC/g2...
I CV" ,
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the conrnbutions you can make to this appointment
and your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee):
I~erov-e T(Y!l.a.~
I~c 54-A.....: CV,
h..(.{i c' c,U, ~ I.r
Do you un stand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
- --
Circle: YES or NO
SIGNED~
I Once the City Council ha d position, your application will be removed from the file and you
Imustrea I for future 0 enin s.
P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 7603L (817) 577-7575
RESOLUTION R-00-1600
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE TRAFFIC SAFETY
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, four positions on the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee have expired.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Colleyville City Council hereby appoints Joseph "Skip"
McDonnell, Angela Davis, and Eileen Flanagan to serve on the Traffic
Safety Advisory Committee until October 2001.
Sec. 2.
THAT the Colleyville City Council hereby appoints Richard Fairlamb
to serve on the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee until October 2000.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
I Passed by a vote of
day of
ayes,
nays, and
,2000.
abstentions on the
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
I City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
city Of
CITY COUNCIL CO,
AGENDA BRIEFING
nee;
TexaS
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
MEETING / AGENDA #
01/18/00 /--8---
Resolution R-00-1601-- Consideration of
appointments to the Community Center
Advisory Committee
/
/
Januarv 18, 2000
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1601
Backqround
This Resolution provides for the Council to appoint five (5) members to the six (6)
vacancies on the Community Center Advisory Committee and for the City Secretary to
advertise for an applicant to fill one at-large position. Five incumbents have applied for
reappointment. One of the members serving in an at-large position advised the staff that
she would not be applying for reappointment.
Below is a list of applicants. Applications are attached for review.
Bonnie Carroll, 1304 Alexandra Court
Muriel Havran, 303 Oakcrest Hill Drive
Sharon O'Neil, 4012 Windermere Drive
Mary Michaels, 6001 Montford Drive
Ret Stansberger, 3906 Magnolia Court
Recommendation
Approval of Resolution R-00-1601
D~~id~
C~A-t. -.
CITY MANAGER ~
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
w.... O8Ii2E.I"l
11;
COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Barbara Brown
813 John McCain Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
488-0716 (h)
Ex-Officio
Mary Michaels
6001 Montford
Colleyville, TX 76034
481-6248 (h)
Term Expires: 1/2000
Shirley Schollmeyer
2316 Oak Knoll Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
267 -8769 (h) 571-4639 (f)
Term Expires: 1/01
Louis Miller
7800 B Tillman Hill Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
577 -8546 (h) 485-2111 (
Term Expires: 1/01
Bonnie Carroll
1304 Alexandra Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
577 -3002 (h)
Term Ex ires: 1/2000
Linda Ponder
601 Green Meadow St. N
Colleyville, TX 76034
498-6299 (h) 485-2429 (f)
Term Expires: 1/01
Ann Hardy
900 John McCain Rd.
Colleyville, TX 76034
488-9398 (h) 481-4007 (
Term Expires: 1/2000
Sharon O'Neil
4012 Windermere Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
354-1676 (h) 421-6393 (w)
Term Expires: 1/2000
Muriel Havran
303 Oakcrest Hill Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
498-1420 (h)
Term Expires: 1/2000
Lois Mackey
4613 Patterson Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
571-7956 (h)
Term Expires: 1/01
Dianne McWethy
Assistant City Manager
577-7575, ext. 204 (w)
Un Przybyl
Community Center Supervisor
427 -0450 (w)
Updated: 3/12/99
Rob Rutherford
1001 W. Euless
Euless, TX 76040
577-1111 (m)
540-1444 (w)
Term Expires: 1/01
Ret Stansberger
3906 Magnolia Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
498-4055 (h)
488-7148 (w)
Term Expires: 1/2000
Ginny Tigue
4415 Meandering Way
Colleyville, TX 76034
267 -5527 (h)
City Council Liaison
Paul Vigiletti
604 Summertree Ct.
Colleyville, TX 76034
485-7417 (h)
Term Expires: 1/01
city of
nee
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME Q
'-L)()JJ
ADDRESS
() LIZ
HOME TELEPHONE
S?,- ()
E-MAIL ADDRESS
k/...;
DATE
I~-~-
WORK
FAX
dl8-;3 )
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered)
~o/.,~ I T E r, oA
QUALlFIC IONS (list education9l backgr nd or experience that would assist yo in carrying out the duties of this
appointment}(1) ~~rbJ.s"/e, 1/"J...u.JJ~(l; t()olJ,K.. I~ 1tJ.e.- /nlb- t:.J1"d!:JS ~E.A.
~ ~e,E NT 1 .5> r ON cS I 1(. 8t:JA /l.I:) ~ ~ LJ fiLII ere te." UJ 0 uA...J "q /lC/9;
(lJ exr&N..sJcJ~ I7Dm/~)I.5rJ1..RTlvc.. Q.., e.OA,PORArf:, IAllloJ..6rnJ!!!Nr IAJ
B u..s,Al6sS .
@) eJl!3rR/Ne,() A /Y).e'D A#b J/pue... ~ ,-e~cJ.JI/lJ.c; C!.6~1I<<IC$J-reS,
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee)
.:;:;- H~IJ~ ..,seR,vLD DU -r;IJS BD~ ~;'NCE Jrs t'tUvePYJ(J'-/ ~A.J.b.
C!.- L~,~_AeA!i;(J' ,-.4 y cS e ~~ HS C!-r;,Q / Ae./'Yl,q~ . :z; ~t> 1.JJ;5' l3 &'/A,) (j /.N V IJ 4 If CLJ
tV IT II b ul!J ~ rn m tJAJ / r'lj Co tV rE:..JtJ,
Do you ~rstand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
Q Yes 0 No
SIGN
P. O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
city Of
ilcg
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME
/
ut(/Ei-
)-/- A )/ /( A A/
DATE
/J---
ADDRESS
,'''+
I HOME TELEPHONE
I /1 q , ;7- 0
I E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered)
IE
r-
WORK
eel 'e~ \/1' tie- n Cf Ie - r;/ S oK' C T;--'e--
QUALI ICA TIONS (list educational ackground or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this
appointment) ..2 k.v.)L ~~-,.../ ~;t~ ~~Jz& Cer-,.-r--.~"" Cz.--~
'~ . .[' ^ L:/~ - n :t-
!Lt{~ C7YV~T1-<--~G r ~ r-a-t /<./c.v-b' r-e~" ~ ~
/.L,-.~:JL- ~1~, ~~ ffi A A ;( f'.
!l C~J/>O/ f~~ cP-c.L~ '-1$ ~..
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee)
Sl~v~4~~~~~~~
.lfc~~ dvt ~.t ai 4 ~ L&-~1
,t, :Lr -
\ --.>-- ""'?'\....- .
Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
Ita Yes
SIGNED
o No
/'
. / CY/
4'?1 A.k- ~" 14..- ~'-r-a/J/\-/
Once the City Council has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and
ou must rea I for future 0 enin s.
P. O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
city of
llcg
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME DATE
S~-C0 [j' (Je~l \~-~-9.c\
ADDRESS
~6 \. d- ~ \.~..r\'~-re.-
, HOME TELEPH{ONE . l.o WORK
~,1. ~SL1.-\lcl ~ll (~J...I.-Lc~q3
E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX
\.)C)~ {\....)c.> \-) E-
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered)
c.. 0 \N'-. 'N--0 \.-.l ~ -\-..l C:.e ~~-v h.J.. \,j~. x>-J""'-l ~)Cl...-rcl
QUALIFICATIONS (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this
appointment)
~'.~S ) c.~"'S~ucw-t\.'i <2-y- ~~~~\..Xxd -
O~ \~ cu..::,~ O-'N\..... " "-J
\.~ L::Ci- \.. , i--X \.l o...l\. CLS~CTS 0'\ 'N'-Cl\_rut; ~1 (\.. \..:) ~V-~~Q. ~~~
~~D~\eJ..i\~.s -t \..a--\~ t'"'.......~ C)...,{' : ~
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee)
~ ~ , ~~e. .
.:L O~ ~ ~d-.. c:::,~\-Jc.e. ,~ \D.eqo..u o..ud.
E_ 0:l- "-\<2. d. ~G ~ t-:l ~ \ t-J~ \ ue.d L0,~ ~ ~'(II'l\JlJ, \- '{ Vl-.j"~-~\I'"'I ~~
l \'--.O,--'"e. \uE.<2W ~"'~ '~~')'1. ~ "tk c.G~W\...',-\,\<2..(,? \ \i'.o.j.~~~~v .\~ 1\.0...rc:.
I
CL-[ C c..er\- \-= ..r ~~o~\ce... ~A:-"" - ~","""::,. ""--- -\-0 ~C)\.LJ 1--J~", 3- --\: ~'- w \<.. ~'
\. -:::.
",C0>-- ~ ~O-~ "\-\u,,-\ ~e. ~\e... 4
~ ~ <::;0 .
Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
[2( Yes 0 No
SIGNED [))In 1'0
wfi..a IU'lL
Once the City Council has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and
'ou must reapplv for future openinas.
P. O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
city of
n~
Texas
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
NAME Nl ; c h (A e.-I., DATE /~ -/ ~ _ci'j I
IV) c,rL I
ADDRESS,
U-C'l\( IV) Ut I t fVi~J
I HOME TELEPHONE WORK I
I
I
i J..h51 -ll.L/ Ii. - i
I E-MAIL ADDRESS FAX I
IV\; CI\LHd"7 X W @ocl . c..;,,"""\ - I
APPOINTMENT DESIRED (list Board, Commission or Committee for which you wish to be considered)
lid\J 1'<:; . BL~lt r ,,-l - Co 11r:!:J VJ'II t. G.l, niL.{ r1, 13 ~e..r"
QUALIFICATIONS (list educational background or experience that would assist you in canying out the duties of this
appointment) : - "1 , - .
,) /~4-<--.G C~'- -H'-<..Q A:-'-C>-d--t..,L.- ~~ ~~J~u) ~/.J
.-J U (C...-t..'-' ~v~ V ~jJ) J)kA../l~ G.A.,J't.il- ~.J.I...~ AA,--lll.{J .A.A.-n-<-J~ HI.--{.:)
l~~~ . '..
:;) 1'1 '''j'- ....1.kQ : cUrv { .'C; CACvr/" /} L.-<...</v'^-'?r
REASONS FOR SERVING (State briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for
wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee)
,) CA->l vC0v~ ~ ( ...-(A,)-&A.--Iu "'1.',-' ~ I) ~~7 ~+ ~ t,.a-..J-,;--u--,
,J) '-fa./L-L~)~ (L~~ ~ CZxJ 0- C.A+; z~ 1
..
UL0J~
! Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
I
I
I
13 Yes 0 No
i SIGNE~L{u'1:J< 011.A~(,~u...L '\
! Once the City Council has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and
you must rea I for future 0 enin s.
P. O. Box 185
COlleyville, Texas 76034 817/577-7575
FAX 817/577-7555
5 18174987851
12/28/1999 05:5 . ~ TY OF COLLEYVILLE
DEC. -28' 99(TlIEI ]6;29 iii
K5TAN5EERGER
PA3~ 2~
F. 2J2
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT
e+ + r 12 _
O~
I HOIIUIL "H WONK 't 3 f _ I 'f
'AX If I?- ~r.2- I
' A~ItOfNT NT DII'''ID Cll. loera, Comm-..o" or CammfftH fat ""~ ~ ..." to bt CDnlUGlrwd)
I · ~A~ ~
,- .
Al '4' N8 (hI_....,. '1IooIrG11I0. or """".... tftot _lei. .,.,.. In GItl'yino .01 In, duliol .r 1"'1
_Inlm'''j & II ~ : l! e ~<t.,..j, fl." J (?P rIllI\.l.UJ: f-.., ~€..II. f. ~ .,.. :
t.... br <I.. f' '( ~ lle.cS( 1.1 Q.r- ~ o.....s C!: >kt f ~ k( Fo~ ftPt'kflt.'tt .u.~, I'
~ ( lr-y~i ((e ~S ~-lWo r 101. ... +er PI fLllJ ~r'k.,..,.. Il ~ , !
I
i N!A80NlI'O" 'I"VINlfr_ -~ tho -~""Iono "'" _. ...'" .. I"'" ,,,,,,,,-;;;m.nlllllo ~"nl for
,: w.nling to IIN' Dn ''''101,., Camrtllulon, or CDmmiN) . ~
I ~ l!..f "-..4..,; A.. ,. "u."'ff. "nc ~'7.: '-.1;:':: z:'h!..- _
I~~~~~~~/ '-_..,
!ua...-~-<,..t..?~ ~ ft... a.u . .
I .
!
. f Do r.... ~ Ill.. .~. MtIl11l/vt IIIIIPOtt It NqUl..... fer ~ IlPpoIn...,
~.. 0 Ne
IIQN!D
'eno. the City
I au m".t ,..
p, O. Box 116
. - - .,--...,
r .,.pl'Allon WIll IN -"vtd flam Iht III. 'nd I
-oJ
COUevYlue, T.... '7eo~ 11'7/ln-'7578
FAX 817/571.7555
RESOLUTION R-00-1601
I: A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE COMMUNITY CENTER
i i ADVISORY COMMITTEE
I!
, :
WHEREAS, six (6) positions on the Community Center Advisory Committee have
expired; and
WHEREAS, one at-large position remains vacant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
, OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Colleyville City Council hereby appoints Bonnie Carroll,
Muriel Havran, Sharon O'Neil, Mary Michaels, and Ret Stansberger
to serve on the Community Center Advisory Committee until January
2002.
Sec. 2.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby requested to advertise for
applicants to fill the remaining vacant position.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
Passed by a vote of
day of
ayes,
nays, and
,2000.
abstentions on the
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
City of
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
TexaS
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: R-00-1602 - Combination Plat for the
Sapphire Enclave requested by John
Hawkins, 20.565 acres located to the
east of Jewell Estates, north of Tinker
Road.
~rJl!}~cr: ~
/
I
Januarv 18.2000
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-00-1602
Backqround
At its August 17, 1999 meeting, the City Council denied without prejudice the final plat of
the Sapphire Enclave. The plat was also placed on the November 16, 1999 agenda, but
was again denied without prejudice. The Council denied the plat on both occasions
because there is no legal means of access provided to the property from Colleyville
Boulevard. The applicant was advised that the Council would reconsider the final plat
when one of the two events occurred: Q) the Monterra subdivision is completed and
accepted by the City, and the subdivision is released for building permits; or (l) a legal
means of access is granted to Mr. Hawkins by the developer of the Monterra subdivision,
and the City is furnished a copy of such agreement.
This property is currently zoned Agricultural. The zoning application for this property
remains tabled on the Council's agenda. To avoid approving a subdivision plat that is
inconsistent with the zoning classification, the City Council should first consider removing
the zoning request from its "tabled status" and take action on it before considering this final
plat.
The only item to be completed before the Monterra streets will be accepted by the City is
the striping of a tl.!~n lane on S. H. 26. This may be completed before January 18th.
CITY MANAGER
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
~... 081'Q2E..M"t
Agenda Briefing
Sapphire Enclave
Page 2
Mr. Hawkins has also requested that this plat be approved as a private gated community.
All Development Review Committee comments and subdivision regulations requirements
have been met regarding the 'private gated community request.
The Planning & Zoning Commission approved this final plat by a 4-1 vote (Berges voting
no) at its August 9, 1999 meeting, subject to the completion and acceptance by the City
of Colleyville of the Monterra subdivision.
Recommendation:
Approval of Resolution R-00-1602
RESOLUTION R-00-1602
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT OF
SAPPHIRE ENCLAVE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the final plat of Sapphire Enclave is hereby approved.
I
I AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
I
Passed by a vote of
of
ayes,
,2000.
nays and
abstentions on this the
day
ATTEST:
I
I
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL CD'
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
TexaS
10
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
"" /
"
'"
Ordinance 0-99-1148 - Consideration of a
zoning change from Agricultural to R-20 & R-30
Single Family Residential on approximately 20
Acres located north of Tinker Rd. and east of
Jewell Estates, at the end of Emerald Drive
MEETING / AGENDA #
~~ ~~ ~~~~ / ~~~~~~~
10/05/99 6/01/99
Q/? 1/QQ / "/1 ~/QQ
9/07/99 5/04/99
8/17/99 / 4/20/99
./
./
o
r
7/20/99 3/23/99
3/03/99
"
January 18, 2000 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
At this time, approval of the street improvements for the Monterra Addition has delayed
consideration of this rezoning application.
November 16,1999
Update
You will recall that this is a rezoning request of Mr. John Hawkins to rezone approximately
20 acres located at the north end of Emerald Drive from Agricultural to R-20 and R-30
Single Family Residential. The rezoning request has been tabled for a number of months
because Emerald Drive was the only access to the 20 acre tract and the neighbors
objected to the additional traffic generated by this development coming through their
existing neighborhood. The development is able to gain access through the new Monterra
Subdivision to the east, but the streets have been under construction during the past few
months and actual access has not been available.
This item has been placed on the agenda with the expectation that the streets in the
adjacent Monterra Addition will be accepted by the City before November 16th, It will be
necessary for the City Council to remove this item from the table before taking any further
action regarding this rezoning request. Earlier this year, when the applicant submitted the
initial rezoning request, there were a number of adjacent property owners that furnished
written objection. The number of written objections exceeded the minimum "20%
adjacency" threshold to trigger the super majority vote requirement of the City Council to
approve this rezoning request.
13~ ! Eu- ~
DEPARTMENt HEAD
C~~
CITY MANAGER
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
N'" 081$2 EJH .J
I-V 1"i
City Council Agenda Briefing
Page 2 of 4
Recommendation
Approval of Ordinance 0-99-1148 to rezone this 20 acre tract from Agricultural to R-20 and
R-30 Single Family Residential.
October 05, 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The developer provided a copy of a written agreement with the Pulte Corporation which
allows access across the Monterra Addition while under construction. However, staff is not
satisfied that the agreement provides the necessary guarantee required by the City Council
since the Pulte Corporation can revoke the agreement at any time.
September 21, 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
At the August 17,1999 City Council meeting, the subdivision plat was denied because
public access was not available through the Monterra Addition. No further action is
anticipated until the street through the Pulte development has been completed and
accepted by the City.
September 07. 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
At the August 17,1999 City Council meeting, the subdivision plat was denied because
public access was not available through the Monterra Addition. No further action is
anticipated until the street through the Pulte development has been completed and
accepted by the City.
Auaust 17, 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The applicant has submitted the final plat as requested by the City Council in March. The
Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and approved the final plat at its August 9,
1999 meeting with the condition that access be obtained through the adjacent Monterra
Subdivision that is currently under construction.
City Council Agenda Briefing
Page 3 of 4
AUQust 03,1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The applicant has submitted the documents as requested and these are currently under
staff review. It is anticipated that this project will be ready for City Council action
within the next few weeks.
July 20.1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
. The applicant has not submitted a revised plat in response to the Development Review
Comments.
July 06. 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The applicant has not submitted a revised plat in response to the Development Review
Comments.
June 15. 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The applicant has not submitted a revised plat in response to the Development Review
Comments.
June 01. 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The applicant has not submitted a revised plat in response to the Development Review
Comments.
May 18, 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The applicant has not submitted a revised plat in response to the Development Review
Comments.
City Council Agenda Briefing
Page 4 of 4
Mav 04. 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The applicant has not submitted a revised plat in response to the Development Review
Comments.
April 20, 1999 - Tabled 3-23-99
Update
The applicant has submitted a plat as required by the City Council at the 3-23-99 meeting.
The plat has been reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC) and the
applicant has been advised of any additional requirements.
March 23, 1999
Second Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1148
Update
At the March 2nd meeting, the developer requested a change to his original rezoning
request of R-20 to a development plan containing R-30 for a portion of the tract and R-20
for another part of the tract. The developer wants to have R-30 zoned lots along the west
and south parts of the tract in order to mitigate concerns from neighbors in the Jewell
Estates Addition and those living to the south of this tract. The R-30 area contains 7.359
acres. The remaining 13.207 acres will be zoned R-20. According to the zoning exhibit,
the total number of lots has been reduced from 34 to 32 lots. The City Council felt that the
change to the original zoning request was significant enough to warrant further review by
the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold
public hearing on the revised zoning plan at its meeting on March 22nd. Their
recommendation will be presented to the City Council at the March 23rd meeting. Attached
in this agenda briefing is a copy of an additional citizen comment received since the last
agenda packet was prepared. The attached ordinance has been modified from the March
2nd meeting to reflect the two different zoning categories.
The developer has indicated on his zoning exhibit that he plans to develop this property as
a gated subdivision with his primary access coming from the recently platted Monterra
Addition to the east. The access to Emerald Drive will become an emergency access
point. The developer has been advised that the proposed development will not qualify as
a gated subdivision because he does not have the required minimum 80 feet of contiguous
frontage on a public street. However, the issues associated with platting this property are
related to the subdivision regulations and have little bearing on the rezoning request.
ORDINANCE 0-99-1148
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING
THE ZONING OF 7.359 ACRES OUT OF THE HUGHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT 656,
FROM THE AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO R-30 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT AND 13.207 ACRES OUT OF THE HUGHES SURVEY, ABSTRACT 656,
FROM THE AG (AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT TO R-20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT; PROVIDING A PENALTY AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION.
WHEREAS, an application for zoning change was filed by John Hawkins, agent for the
property owner, on December 4, 1998 under Case No. Z-98-040; and,
WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to
real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least
10 days before such hearing; and,
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a
newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 15 days before such
hearing; and,
WHEREAS, notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the zoning ordinance;
and,
WHEREAS, public hearings to change the zoning on the property herein described were
held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council,
and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a
recommendation; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of the
rezoning request as presented; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change herein effectuated
furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and is in
the best interest of the citizens of the City of Colleyville;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1. THAT the Master Plan, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas,
and the accompanying Zoning Map (as indicated on Exhibit A) are hereby
amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas.
Sec. 2. THAT "Tract 1", containing 7.359 acres, and described by metes and bounds on
the attached Exhibit B, is hereby rezoned from Agricultural to R-30 Single Family
Residential, together with all site plans which are conceptual in nature,
City Council Agenda Briefing
Page 6 of 4
34 lots with the nine lots on the west and south sides of the 20 acre tract proposed for R-30
zoning and the remaining 23 lots proposed for R-20 zoning. The revised layout
incorporates a street connection with the recently approved, but not developed, Monterra
Subdivision to the east of the subject tract. There could be a possible timing issue involved
if the Monterra development does not occur until after the subject tract develops. Staff has
made a brief review of the revised submittal and feels that since the revised proposal is
such a "substantial change" from the initial rezoning request, it should be referred back to
the Planning and Zoning Commission for public hearing to seek their recommendation of
the revised plan.
Recommendation
Denial of Ordinance 0-99-1148 because it does not satisfy the traffic and zoning
compatibility issues raised by the residents of Jewell Estates. ( see recommendation dated
11/16/99)
City Council Agenda Briefing
Page 5 of 4
Recommendation
To approve Ordinance 0-99-1148 and rezone this 20 acre tract from Agricultural to part
R-20 and part R-30 as shown on the zoning exhibit.
March 2, 1999
First Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1148
BackQround
Mr. John Hawkins is requesting a zoning change from Agricultural to R-20 Single Family
Residential on 20.059 acres in the Hughes Survey, Abstract 656. The property is situated
at the north end of Emerald Drive. There has been considerable negative input from the
neighbors in the Jewell Estates Addition, which is adjacent to the subject tract to the west.
The residents of the Jewell Estates Addition are concerned about the compatibility of the
requested zoning with their zoning classification (Jewell Estates is zoned R-40) and they
are concerned about increased traffic on Emerald Drive. Emerald Drive was originally
platted for extension into the 20 acre subject tract, but the street surface ends at the
boundary of the Jewell Estates Addition and it is the only route into this area.
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended denial of the rezoning request
because the applicant had failed to address the traffic and zoning in-compatibility issues
raised by the Jewell Estates residents. The applicant appealed the decision to the City
Council and the Council granted his request for public hearing at its February 16th meeting.
Notices have been sent to all property owners having property within 200 feet of this tract
to advise them of the City Council public hearing. Attached are copies of written responses
received from a number of citizens in the vicinity of this rezoning request. The majority of
those responses received were in opposition to the request.
The zoning exhibit considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission shows a regular
street connection to Emerald Drive. An emergency access to the property to the east is
also shown on the zoning exhibit. The attached Ordinance 0-99-1148 is prepared for
consideration to rezone the property from Agricultural to R-20 Single Family Residential.
The Zoning Ordinance requires a three-fourths favorable vote of the City Council to
approve a zoning request, which has been denied by the P & Z.
The applicant, however, has submitted an alternate proposal for consideration. In January,
the applicant met with a group of residents from the Jewell Estates Addition to find a
solution to his rezoning request that addressed their concerns. His revised request (see
attachment #1) consists of a plan to develop the property as a "private gated subdivision"
under the recently enacted subdivision regulations, which provide guidelines for these
types of development. The applicant's revised plan contains 32 lots instead of the original
Ordinance 0-99-1148
Page 2 of 8
Sec. 3.
Ii Sec. 4.
Sec. 5.
supporting documents, and other conditions and restrictions imposed and
approved by the City Council which are incorporated herein by referenc
including, but not limited to the conceptual site plan which is attached as Exhibit
D to this ordinance.
THAT "Tract 2", contajning 13.207 acres and described by metes and bounds
on the attached Exhibit C, is hereby rezoned from Agricultural to R-20 Single
Family Residential, together with all site plans which are conceptual in nature,
supporting documents, and other conditions and restrictions imposed and
approved by the City Council which are incorporated herein by reference
including, but not limited to the conceptual site plan which is attached as Exhibit
D to this ordinance.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance as read together with the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville
and accompanying official Zoning Map thereto shall be guilty of a misdemeanor
and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues
shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication
of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternative method of
publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
1999.
day of
! The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,1999.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
: City Attorney
---r~.:"-.r~J ~_...I.,~.,~;",; .\"\.~ ~
\ I" '1-".'1: ~~\~ ~ ~ ~. .s~,
-- It:. ".. ~a:&p -..-....;- -d. ~
n '-'-:14. I" ... V~
. -.--, " ~ti I ~ ~ .a. :.. L/ ::
'1--1 . "" t u' 4JJ. "0 ,:,. ~1JlI&... · .... ~ .-.;,~./ /<'~~
, , II.' . . d....I[' -!:~;. ~ .I. ~ ---.-:- ~ V ~
., (o-J ~ 6~- 2~~\)?~~~~~:r:\Yr.'1~ /--"'"'
..... c.. ;) II r , ~.Jr~ ~A, ,~. ~~ .( .,
t\.. ,., U .~t4t5 ..~.-/ /." ,-0" - '- ~.. . ''-
~ ... t4uv: ...../. ..~, ~ 1).....-..:
% '. -. =- ' ~...:y .....
~V~ ~ 0 '."., :.< _~~:~;:. tramAGtDR-20 .l. .... V" ~~~.~.
~ ~ -., -~.,,~ ....~ \ " 1" \ \\.... ,. ~. ,
· .. 2! ]l~ ,.:.. -. "'~;:"\~" ..\'. -- ...,..--~~~~ ~.
"" lil ;-;; .. "3 \~~.., ~ ~..~ -- .\......
-- :i\ ~, \ .' I ~ --1 ~ .Ao...Ao :.---:
r \ " \.' ".!.:';.;t:.d?" .......... ..'
.... - - - i..n I -. ~" r::-- ~ .:! ,~
r ~ ~ :so.". -.'"/-,,1 I ..''1.. --f I ,=~. ...;: ~ ... ....L ..J.... ....~' ./"'/ ...
# I ~ "" ... 20 J, , i i -. -' .... ... l ~ L- . r ;...--: ..II.
, . ~ .a _ if! r~::~1 ~,. .l.'. ... - -c ~.--. - . ...
. /;. .\ ~"~,i-1<'? ~ r... ~... A...."...
/' ...~ "~'! 2:J\-~'~.;,?l~;i,,"'"; p.:~~ .r.~' _lIlI_~:
/ III I __ 'to' ---l~ __: - --- -...... _...Ln - _Z".
~ EJ,l~ ~o~ ., _r \...~ . "Tract1"trDmAGtoR-30 " " N ~
--- JF-- ~~,... "' ~ /'. .. IS ..
III I J - ^ 1) L\ M.J I ~~~!.~. 1 . It" =:
': ~I~~ {).\u~~ 1_ ~ I: ~ ~. .. "_of'IlPl ~
.. - r..A . ,.. __ d.. ':\ . It r,..... [I .
{'Or '~ '\ .. " .. I" ,.. 1 ("\0",1[7. ~ ~ !I . '0 .. ('1'1~ .
!" -..;;>~ ..~. "~~')S'p t!: ~~ ~~T.j. I ' ,.. ~l=:.
: - \ ~ ~ ,-, : ,r" f/Io ~ ~ n I "", · " i
I " . .. I." .!!is, i ,."., . -
" - : )c,.. t ~... 1 . . ·
! .. '(" .~_ I.. ... . ~,~o . U ~--:
1 . \ . - tal 'l ' u . t--..:....:: I--
! ~ .. ..:. ~ '. :.';:;-- , >> :I
R "A _ ~ r.. lie.::. .. _ -- --. , D t---;
I II" II I._ . .. llC
I "' ... : '" loA ... I .....--
Ii _ _ _ _. 1-. ' . ' . I '
.___.__. __~-__ __ ~t ___ __ _______ ______________ _.'-:'-'
I - - :..1 _.:. 1\ . . l '! .::-.... ~
~,~ . . ... I ' LIi :. .. , I .. .. ·
. 111& :1 i. ,.... It I.""
J..' K ~ ~ 1----1
_ . . . ......' .. _ . 1 .,. ~ \ ..1 " .:.~~
... D iJo'" - · ........ I-- ~ ::""
J E' "1\ I'" rJo! ~ L .. " '1 II - . ~. ~ L- , · l '
"G _~~ 'G.' ~ ~ [,.....M .~~ .. "'.: _/
'AIlD~al Ul _rr.'i PO' " ':.'is' ;if'J ~ ~r ~.... .... ,Sa A .JI · r
. ~ l . PJI~'" rvr." .-
· iiI, · I · J ~. I d
tit" _I L t 1'1.
I'-OA(. "'tc Exhl.bl't "A" It . ~~~. .1..
i ~.'~~ I." .. Q ~ IA' ~f DOl
... _~h~~~I__.
.----...-."'.... l..::!.-1
-'
Ie n .
I.ut .c
C\
.. III I
..... II
,
,
I
I
,
I
,
,
I
,
i _
_ ....l- _ .
. - ~--
SUB
J pAil s
EVA ·
"Tract 1"
from AG to R-30
FIELD NOTES
The Sapphire Enctave
30,000 Square Foot Lots
All that certain lot, trad or parcel of land in the HARRELL HUGHES SURVEY, Abstract
656, Tarrant County, Texas. oeing a portion of that certain called 20.059 acre trad of
land described in the deed .to Robert and Mary L. Weese, by the deed recorded in
Volume 4047, Page 299. Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas (D.R.. T.Co., Tx.), a
portion of an abandoned county road, and a portion of proposed The Sapphire Enclave
(the subdivision) and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as
follows:
BEGINNING at the Northwest comer of proposed Lot 2 of said subdivision;
THENCE North 65 degrees 48 minutes 14 seconds East 120.53 feet to the most
Northerly comer common to said proposed Lots 2 and 3 of said subdivision;
THENCE South 41 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds East with the line common to said
proposed Lots 2 and 3, 177.26 feet to a point in the curved center of proposed Sapphire
Circle North;
THENCE South and Easter1y around the center of said Sapphire Circle North, proposed
Sapphire Circle South and proposed Opal Court, the following eight (8) courses and
distances:
1. Around said curve to the left having a radius of 60.00 feet and a long chord
that bears South 18 degrees 47 minutes 32 seconds West 59.30 feet, a
distance of 62.02 feet to a point,
2. South 13 degrees 16 minutes 52 seconds East 105.11 feet to the beginning
of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 244.35 feet and a long chord
that bears South 02 degrees 41 minutes 25 seconds East 110.35 feet,
3. Around the arc of said curve to the right, a distance of 111.31 feet to a po~nt,
4. South.~ 0 degrees 21 minutes 35 seconds West 182.29 feet to the beginning
of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 125.00 feet and a long chord
that bears South 10 degrees 23 minutes 11 seconds East 88.56 feet,
5. Southeasterly around the arc of said curve to the left, a distance of 90.52 feet
to the beginning ot a curve to the left having a radius of 154.57 feet and a
Exhibit "8"
long chord that bears South 67 degrees 48 minutes 44 seconds East 184.66
feet.
6. Easterly around the arc of said curve, a distance of 197.91 feet to the
beginning of a curve to the left having a radius of 425.00 feet and a long
chord that bears North 57 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds East 267.74 feet,.
7. Northeasterly around the arc of said curve to the left, a distance of 272.38
feet to the intersection of the center of proposed Sapphire Circle South with
the center of proposed Opal Court, and
8. South 36 degrees 47 minutes 16 seconds East with the center of said
proposed Opal Court, 133.68 feet to the center of said court;
THENCE South 51 degrees 31 minutes 12 seconds East passing at SO.OO feet the
Southwest comer of proposed Lot 13 and Northeast comer of proposed Lot 14 and
continuing with the line common to said proposed Lots 13 and 14, in all 263.50 feet to
the most Easterly comer common to said proposed Lots 13 and 14 and being in the
East line of said 20.059 acre tract;
THENCE South 00 degrees 43 minutes 40 seconds East with the East line of said
proposed Lot 14 and East line of said 20.059 acre tract, 47.69 feet to a concrete
monument found at the Southeast comer of said proposed subdivision and Southeast
comer of said 20.059 acre tract;
THENCE South 89 degrees 25 minutes 02 seconds West with the South line of said
subdivision and South line of said 20.059 aae tract, 888.00 feet to a 5/8 inch iron pin
set at the Southwest comer of said subdivision;
THENCE North 01 degree 02 minutes 50 seconds West with the West line of said
subdivision, 870.63 feet to the place of beginning, containing in all some 7.359 acres of
land or 320,542 square feet.
Prepared from a survey made on
the ground October 1, 1998.
Q~~hJK
J as W. Bartlett
R.P.L.S. No. 1897
"Tract 2"
from AG to R-20
FIELD NOTES
The Sapphire Enclave
20,000 Square Foot Lots
All that certain lot, tract or parcel of land in the HARRELL HUGHES SURVEY, Abstract
656, Tarrant County, Texas, being a portion of that certain called 20.059 acre tract of
land described in the deed to Robert and Mary L. Weese, by the deed recorded in
Volume 4047, Page 299'; Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas (D.R., T.Co., Tx.), a
portion of an abandoned county road, and a portion of proposed The Sapphire Enclave
(the subdivision) and being more particularty described by metes and bounds as
follows:
BEGINNING at a concrete monument found at the Northeast comer of said 20.059 acre
tract, said point being the most Northerly comer of proposed Lot 6 of said subdivision;
THENCE with the East line of said subdivision and East line of said 20.059 acre tract,
the following three (3) courses and distances:
1. South 25 degrees 10 minutes 03 seconds East 364.90 feet to a concrete
monument found, .
2. South 14 degrees 03 minutes 44 seconds East 200.80 feet to a concrete
monument found, and
3. South 00 degrees 43 minutes 40 seconds East 599.56 feet to a concrete
monument found at the most Southerty comer of proposed Lot 13 of said
subdivision and most easterty Northeast comer of proposed Lot 14;
THENCE North 51 degrees 31 minutes 12 seconds West with the line common to said
proposed Lots 13 and 14, passing at 213.50 feet the most Northerly comer common to
said Lots 13 and 14 and continuing in all 263.50 feet to the center of proposed Opal
Court;
THENCE North 36 degrees 47 minutes 16 seconds West with said centerline 133.68
feet to its intersection with the curved centerline of proposed Sapphire Circle South;
THENCE along said centerline Westerly and Northerly, the following seven (7) courses
and distances:
Exh i bit "e"
1. Around the arc of said curve to the right having a radius of 425.00 feet and a
long chord that bears South 57 degrees 08 minutes 51 seconds West 267.74
feet, a distance of 272.38 feet to the beginning of a curve to the right having a
radius of 154.57 feet and a long chord that bears North 67 degrees 48
minutes 44 seconds West 184.66 feet,
2. Around the arc of said curve to the right, a distance of 197.91 feet to the
beginning of a curve to the right having a radius of 125.00 feet and a long
chord that bears North 10 degrees 23 minutes 11 seconds West 88.56 feet;
3. Around the arc of said curve to the right, a distance of 90.52 feet to a point;
4. North 10 degrees 21 minutes 35 seconds East 182.29 feet to the beginning of
a curve to the left having a radius of 244.35 feet and a long chord that bears
North 02 degrees 41 minutes 25 seconds West 110.35 feet;
5. Around the arc of said curve to the left, a distance of 111.31 feet to a point;
6. North 13 degrees 16 minutes 52 seconds West 105.11 feet to the beginning
of a curve to the right having a radius of 60.00 feet and a long chord that
bears North 18 degrees 47 minutes 32 seconds East 59.30 feet;
7. Around the arc of said curve to the right, a distance of 62.02 feet to a point;
. THENCE North 41 degrees 35 minutes 37 seconds West passing at 25 feet the most
Easterly comer of proposed Lots 2 and 3 and continuing with the line common to said
proposed Lots 2 and 3, in all 1 n .26 feet to the most Northerly comer common to said
Lots 2 and 3, said point being in the Southeast R/VV line of the S1. Louis & Southwestern
RR. Co. RIW and being the North line of said subdivision and North line of said 20.059
acre tract;
THENCE North 65 degrees 48 minutes 14 seconds East with said common line 637.76
feet to the place of beginning, containing in all some 13.207 acres or 575,286 square
feet.
Prepared from a survey made on
the ground October 1, 1998.
6~
R.P.L.S. No. 1897
:Jf
0 ih
~ .I~
~ N ...
N I :!!I .
0::
... 0 J,U
(.) ... {I .
ca C) jlp
c( 11 , , I
... allf ~
l- E Ue . ... ,
Jf >
"I , ~ ,
~ 0 !IU CoO III L
~ ... J I~ ::: ,
.... % .
U"',
:)'"
%'"
I...
.r -'c
-' '
N ... J
'"
'"
C
%
o
f'--
I
It..
o
........-
c:
<(
E
c
'-
....
..
~
..,
01
ca
...1
1-'
-
-
'~--
=
iN
.
=
J--
~Ol
,--
.
.......
-
<0
~
s "
'Ok
I'
~
.-'
I,
.......~..
I
I
.
I
I
I ..:
I Ii
~
...
>
'"
:)
,1/1
z.
zO
::::l.
01
C
I')
...-.............,
"'............
.....__a___
--
llj
. !
~ .
-. j !
I
II
Exhibit "0"
N
City of
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
0-99-1191-Azoning change requested by Tom
Pritchett for Mark Gottfredson, from AG to PUD-R
(planned unit development-residential) on 21.63
acres located at the end of Pebble Hill Drive,
extending to John McCain Road
~-17flltbG / ~~;~~A #
/
01 /04/00
/~
12/21/99
/
Januarv 18, 2000 - Tabled 12/21/99
Update
At the January 4th City Council meeting, a number of suggestions were made for inclusion
in the PUD ordinance. These comments have been incorporated into Section 6 of the
attached Ordinance 0-99-1191. In summary these comments are: (1) each house to have
an automatic fire sprinkler system, (2) the exterior surfaces of the homes are to be brick
or stone, and the roofs constructed of a fire resistent material, such as cementeous
material or similar, (3) the developer to build a minimum six foot brick and mortar screening
wall along the eastern common property line with Lots 1-10, Block 1, Pebble Hills
Plantation Estates Addition, (4) the developer to install fire hydrants to provide a maximum
of 500 foot coverage for all building sites, (5) the secondary access to the development is
waived, and (6) a dual entryway to be provided at the entrance to the development.
Staff received additional letters from citizens withdrawing their initial petition against this
rezoning request. The City Attorney has been asked for an opinion as to whether the %
super majority requirement is still applicable.
Januarv 04. 2000 - Tabled 12/21/99
Update
The City Council tabled this item at its December 21, 1999 meeting. This item was tabled
to allow the appll(;ant and neighbors to discuss a solution to the emergency access
problem for the subdivision. Staff has not been advised of any outcome from the
discussions as of the date of the briefing preparation.
B~.-l ~I$---
DEPARTMENT HEAD
CITY MANAGER
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
JO.... 0Ml2E..J1
rv i 11,
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1191
Page 2
December 21. 1999
Second Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1191
Update
At the December 7, 1999 Council meeting, there was considerable discussion regarding
the cui de sac length and secondary entrance requirements for this development. The
briefing includes two memorandums from the fire chief about these two issues, and
another staff paper on cui de sac street lengths. The Council directed staff to meet with
the applicant to discuss their options on these items.
The applicant met with representatives from the Fire Department and Community
Development Department on December 13, 1999, to discuss the cui de sac length and
secondary emergency access issues. Among the options discussed with the applicant
were:
1. Provide a fire lane from Pebble Hill Drive around the north side of the pond to tie into
the new cui de sac. The fire lane would be a minimum 24-feet in width and constructed
of concrete or asphalt. The fire lane would be gated at each end to limit use to fire and
police personnel. This option creates two entrances to the proposed new subdivision
and, as a side benefit, provides an alternative access to the Pebble Hill Plantation
Estates subdivision. This alternative would provide the best access of all solutions
offered. As proposed by the applicant, however, the fire lane would not be built to a
normal street specification as to base material and paving thickness. His offer is to
build the fire lane with a Grasscrete@ paving system that allows the grass to grow up
through the concrete to maintain a park like atmosphere (see attached information).
The staff has consistently opposed emergency accesses that are not built to normal
street specifications due to the excessive weight of the fire equipment.
2. Provide a fire lane in an access easement from the Bear Creek Plantation property to
the west. This solution would require the granting of an easement from Burk Collins.
The developer has pursued this option in the past with little success.
3. Redesign the entry to accommodate two entry points. The developer has slightly
redesigned the entry to include a divided roadway, but the separation between the entry
and exit roads is minimal, less than 35 feet apart. The property has 208 feet of
frontage on John McCain Road. Comparatively, the entrance streets to Shalimar are
130 feet apart. Extension of the dual entryway into the development with sufficient
distance to bring the remaining part of the cui de sac within compliance with the 1,200-
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1191
Page 3
foot limitation would result in the loss of four lots.
4. Provide a fire lane in an alley easement at the rear of Lots 3 and 4. While this
approach would provide a second access to a portion of the cui de sac, an incident at
the entry to the subdivision would still block both accesses. The alley easement would
also include several gates, which would further delay response time to an emergency.
Of the four alternatives discussed, the dual entry roadway, with maximum separation to a
point within 1,200 feet of the end of the cui de sac would meet ordinance requirements.
The first option, a fire lane connected to the Pebble Hill Plantation Estates subdivision,
would provide the best access options if the access met City design standards.
The applicant has not offered an alternative that changes the staff's recommendation for
denial.
The attached ordinance has been amended from the previous meeting to include two
additional items that were inadvertently left out. The requirement for fire sprinkler systems
in each residence, as recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission, has been
added. The option of allowing this development. to be a gated community with private
streets has also been included as originally requested by the applicant. Representatives
of the Pebble Hill HOA stated that an agreement had been worked out with the developer
on several issues, including the use of the lake and the walking path. Lance Brown,
president of the association, stated that all homeowners have withdrawn their opposition
to the zoning change. However, staff has not received any written correspondence
officially withdrawing the opposition. Since a valid petition is still in place, this request will
require a %-majority vote by the Council for approval. This request must receive four
affirmative votes by the Council to be approved.
December 07,1999
First Reading an~ Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1191
Backqround
Mark Gottfredson is the owner and developer of a 25.949-acre tract of land located on the
north side of John McCain Road, just west of Pebble Hill Drive. The property owner has
submitted a zoning district change application for this property from AG to PUD-R.
The proposed Planned Unit Development-Residential is for a 12-lot subdivision with a
density of 0.45 dwelling units per acre. The average lot size is 48,589 square feet with the
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1191
Page 4
smallest lot shown at 30,232 square feet and the largest lot at 162,499 square feet. An
open space lot, which contains a small lake, of 9.03 acres is also included providing almost
35% open space. The attached zoning exhibit is also a preliminary plat, as required by the
Zoning Ordinance.
The property is located between Pebble Hill Plantation Estates and Bear Creek Plantation.
The property is somewhat lip" shaped, being very narrow at the southern end and
expanding in width at the northern end. This property is adjacent to Bear Creek and a
significant portion of the property is located in the 1 OO-year flood plain.
The large lot with the lake is platted as part of the Pebble Hill subdivision. An open
space/common area access easement covers the portion of the lot between the lake and
the lots in Pebble Hill. This area is used by the residents in Pebble Hill as a recreational
area; however, the easement is not a zoning-required open space area as the subdivision
is zoned R20. The easement area was the subject of significant discussion at the
Commission hearings. Since the home owners association and area residents made
challenges about the ownership and use of the lot with the open space easement, staff
advised the developer to have his attorney contact the City Attorney to discuss these
issues. The attorneys discussed the situation, and as a result of the discussions the
applicant has elected to delete from the zoning request the easement portion of the lot in
question.
The applicant submitted a revised zoning exhibit that excludes the easement area of the
large lot from the request. The revised request in effect reduces the area of the request
by 4.32 acres, and would leave the easement area zoned Agricultural. If the Council
approves the zoning case, the final plat of the property will show the easement area as a
separate lot since the existing lot would be split between two different zoning districts.
The following is a summary of the other major items associated with this planned unit
development application.
Emergency Access The development proposes only 12 lots, which meets the
requirement of the Subdivision Regulations limiting the number of lots on a cui de sac.
However, the cui de sac exceeds the maximum length allowed by the regulations. A cui
de sac may not exceed 1,200 feet in length; the street on the plan is about 2,400 feet in
length. A second access point for an emergency access purpose into the development is
required. One of the Development Review Committee's original comments dealt with the
cui de sac length. The DRC considers this a significant issue for this property, especially
since a secondary access point is not proposed. The revised exhibit does not address this
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1191
Page 5
issue, which has led to staff's recommendation of denial in this case. The developer is
requesting a waiver from the street length and secondary access requirements.
Gated Community The submitted planning objectives state the developer's intent to make
this subdivision a gated community. The approval process for a gated community typically
coincides with the final plat, but there is one significant issue with the development as
proposed that will affect a gated community request. The Subdivision Regulations require
a gated community to have 20 or more lots; the proposed development has only 12 lots.
Approval of this zoning case does not authorize this development to be a private gated
community. The applicant is requesting that the Council offer comments on the question
of whether this development should be a gated community or not, and the applicant will
submit the request with the final plat based on the Council's direction.
The applicant also submitted a letter outlining his request, and a copy is attached for the
Council's reference. The letter addresses the meetings with the homeowners, the
discussions between the attorneys, and several development issues. The applicant has
formally requested waivers from the cui de sac length and second access requirements.
The Fire Department has made specific comments about the cui de sac length and
secondary access point issues. A copy of the memo from Chief Johnston is attached. The
developer submitted a revised main entry drawing the day the agenda was prepared, but
the proposal does not significantly address staff's concerns. A copy of this drawing is also
attached.
Staff recommends denial of the zoning request due to the cui de sac length and the
absence of a second access point into the subdivision.
The Planning & Zoning Commission conducted public hearings, considered this zoning
district change at its November 8, 1999 meeting, and recommended approval by a 4-1 vote
(Edwards opposed). The recommendation for approval is subject to the requirement that
fire sprinkler systei71S be installed in all dwellings.
Adjacent property owners submitted a petition in opposition to the zoning change to the
City. The petition meets the criteria to trigger a %-majority vote by the Council to approve
this zoning request. This request must receive four affirmative votes by the Council to be
approved.
Recommendation:
Denial of Ordinance 0-99-1191
ORDINANCE 0-99-1191
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 21.63
ACRES COMPRISING A PORTION OF LOT 17, BLOCK 3, PEBBLE
HILL PLANTATION ESTATES, AND ALL OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BEAR
CREEK PLANTATION ADDITION; FROM THE AG AGRICULTURE
DISTRICT TO THE PUD-R (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL) DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR
VIOLATIONS AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION:
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Mark
Gottfredson, Gottfredson Land Development L.L.C., on
September 17,1999, under Case No. Z-99-071; and
I WHEREAS,
I
II WHEREAS,
I
i WHEREAS,
I
WHEREAS,
i
WHEREAS,
notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning
Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet
of the property herein described at least 10 days before such
hearing; and
notice of a public hearing before the City Council was
published in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville
at least 15 days before such hearing; and
notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the
zoning ordinance; and
public hearings to change the zoning and the Master Plan on
the property herein described were held before the Planning
and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the
Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a
recommendation; and,
the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change
herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth
in the Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the
citizens of the City of Colleyville;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
I THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
I Sec. 1. THAT, . the Master Plan, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyvllle, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit A) are
hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in
Colleyville, Texas, described by metes and bounds (Exhibit B), by
changing the zoning of said property from the AG Agricultural district
Ordinance 0-99-1191
Page 2 of 4
to the PUD-R (Planned Unit Development Residential) district,
together with all site plans which are conceptual in nature, supporting
documents, and other conditions and restrictions imposed and
approved by the Council which are incorporated herein by reference
including, but not limited to the conceptual site plan (Exhibit C) and
the statement of planning objectives (Exhibit D); and subject to the
following conditions:
1.. GENERAL
a. The purpose of this PUD-R is for single-family residential
development, constructed at an approximate density of 0.45
dwelling units per acre.
b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the
Colleyville Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, and
other land development ordinances, except where amended
by this ordinance.
2. PERMITTED USES
a. Single family residences, detached
b. Parks and open space
3. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
a. Minimum Lot Size 30,000 square feet
b. Minimum Lot Width 125 feet
c. Minimum Lot Depth 125 feet
d. Front Building Line 30 feet
e. Side Building Line 15 feet
f. Rear Building Line 25 feet
4 OPEN SPACE
n
a. This development shall provide a minimum of 20% common
open space for the leisure and recreational use of the
development's residents. The open space shall comply with
the provisions contained in the Zoning Ordinance. All open
space areas shall be landscaped.
Ordinance 0-99-1191
Page 3 of 4
5. PLATTING
a. The developer shall submit a final plat of the property in
accordance with Section 2 C of the Colleyville Subdivision
Regulations. The conceptual site plan attached as Exhibit C
to this ordinance shall constitute the preliminary plan.
b. This development may be developed as a gated community
with private streets in accordance with Section 15 of the
Colleyville Subdivision Regulations. The development shall
contain a minimum of twelve (12) residential lots.
6. OTHER
a. Each single family residence shall contain a fire sprinkler
system in accordance with applicable fire and building codes.
b. The exterior wall surface of each dwelling shall be constructed
of brick or stone, except for door and window openings. Roofs
shall be constructed of a highly fire resistant material, such as
cementeous material or other similar non-combustible
material.
c. The developer shall build a minimum six foot (6') high brick
and mortar (hand laid-common brick) wall constructed from
the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block 1, Pebble Hills
Plantation Estates to the northwest corner of Lot 11, Block 1,
Pebble Hills Plantation Estates. Said wall may provide for a
visibility set-back from John McCain Road, if required by the
City Engineer. Said wall shall be eight feet in height if the
adjacent property owners so request. The developer shall
continue the brick and mortar wall at a minimum height of six
feet (6') from the southwest corner of Lot 10, Block 1, Pebble
Hills Plantation Estates to a corner that is approximately forty-
six feet (46') north of the southwest corner of Lot 6, Block 1,
Pebble Hills Plantation Estates. The exact termination point of
the wall may be adjusted to accommodate drainage
easements. The roadway surface or back-of-curb of Trianon
Court shall be no closer than ten (10') feet to the common
property line with Pebble Hill Plantation Estates.
d. Fire hydrants shall be installed by the developer at such
intervals that all building sites shall be within 500 feet of a fire
hydrant.
Ordinance 0-99-1191
Page 3 of 4
5. PLATTING
a. The developer shall submit a final plat of the property in
accordance with Section 2 C of the COlleyville Subdivision
Regulations. The conceptual site plan attached as Exhibit C
to this ordinance shall constitute the preliminary plan.
b. This development may be developed as a gated community
with private streets in accordance with Section 15 of the
Colleyville Subdivision Regulations. The development shall
contain a minimum of twelve (12) residential lots.
6. OTHER
a. Each single family residence shall contain a fire sprinkler
system in accordance with applicable fire and building codes.
b. The exterior wall surface of each dwelling shall be constructed
of brick or stone, except for door and window openings. Roofs
shall be constructed of a highly fire resistant material, such as
cementeous material or other similar non-combustible
material.
c. The developer shall build a minimum six foot (6') high brick
and mortar (hand laid-common brick) wall constructed from
the southwest corner of Lot 13, Block 1, Pebble Hills
Plantation Estates to a comer that is approximately forty-six
feet (46') north of the southwest comer of Lot 6, Block 1,
Pebble Hills Plantation Estates. Said wall may provide for a
visibility set-back from John McCain Road, if required by the
City Engineer. Said wall may be up to eight feet in height if
the adjacent property owners so request. The exact
termination point of the wall may be adjusted to accommodate
drainage easements. The roadway surface or back-of-curb of
Trianon Court shall be no closer than ten (10') feet to the
common property line with Pebble Hill Plantation Estates.
d. Fire hydrants shall be installed by the developer at such
intervals that all building sites shall be within 500 feet of a fire
hydrant.
e. The secondary access to this development is hereby waived.
Ordinance 0-99-1191
Page 4 of 4
e. The secondary access to this development is hereby waived.
f. The entry into this subdivision shall be a dual entryway and be
designed similar to that shown on Exhibit E.
Sec. 2.
THAT, any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance as read together with the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Colleyville shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation
continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable
as such.
Sec. 3.
THAT, the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternate method of publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,1999.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
day of ,2000.
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
~
iw
!
~
.,
..
z
'1'
I
Atf
t.~.
I
----,
I
I
I
I
I
I
-r-..J
I
I
I
I
I
I
A6 ~ PUI:>-2..
,-----
I
I
,
I....
....
....
-
3
I 1ft
C8IU 1L
O}{ J\pDl'I
1'l)1!:~OUl\S~
GO~ '
n
:n._ .
.,~.
I.
ZL442 .
I\
.. --
(
\
\..
=
~';
,~
UI2 II:
TA .
11.20 .
DESC~IPTloN O~ PR~tR~'{ SURvtYEO
Destt"ptlOh Mo. 21.i30 tJCrp hod ~i~ual.d lri \hd Hall ....d1in. SUt'\le~.
Ab~trod No: 'O~7 dhd the- H.R. WoII Sury~~. Abstrdct No. '913, C't~ of
totlt!}NlIl,e, Tprront Cbunt V. Tthas:. !idit.i troct bein<l t~":,pri"fr.t bf P~r"\ of Lot
BR. Block t P'Dble Hi"" PIOr'\tO(lon E*totes. Oh bddl"on to th~ city 'if
Cc.lI~yvllle. T~rt'or'tt County. Tdxas. occo~dit\g \() th~ Arlu~nded Plot ter.::orded Ir'I .
Cabinei B. Sli\ie 1894 o( th" Plot Retord~ vf Torrant, Couhly..Te)td9 arid L6l 2.
alO~k 1, Bedr Creek PlorHdtlorl. dn odd'Uon t6 the City of Colleyvilffl
Tarfont c,,~My. ,Tex.ds o~c.,..ding .\0 th. plot 'retotd~d .ir1 Volume j~8-1t9.Pbg~
j6 of \h.t "Idt ~ec4)tds bf torrdr1t County. Tex.Qs; ~oid 21.63d dcr~ tt4t\: be\n~
tnofEt pc\rh,ulorly d.'c,"ib~d <is 1ohows: .
bEGINNING. at a 1/1-inCih itbr"l r~d with "Pochecd I(adh" ~~ set 6t tHI!
to\Jlhett~t cttrhef of sbid Lot 2. a'bck 1. Seor trtl8 Plontotior'; sold poirit
behiq tl1~ southwest corhet ~f Ldt 1 j. BlOc\< " P~bblef Hills Plor1talion
[slo\I!~. on addition to \ht! City of Colle Y."'i11 e. tor~onl Col.lhty. T~lCCh. . .
octbrd1rt1 td th~ ~Id.\ retdrdtd I" Cabl....el A, Slide '4S~ of the Plot ~etord' of
Torfdt'lt CbuMy. T.xd!i: !oid pOir1t t11~b being lJ'\ t"e nbt\" riqht-oi--woy tin~
of Mc:(din~(10d (0r1 SO-Mot wid~ ri<)ht-6f-way); .
THENCE. "'ort~ ~9 d~~re~s. OS trlii1ut.~9, ~1 stcontJ! Wet\. deSiortir\q the tf.st
line (1f taid Pebblt> Hi~ Pldntb'ior\ [litotes ond bldh~ th~ sold horth Iiri~ of
McOoln Rodd. d dlslbnct! d-f ~08.3e fp.l!!t \0 d 1 /2-inChirbn t6d fbund for
tornet: . s"llj point bein<j \t1Ct solJthe6S\ eotr1~r -of lot 1. ~'bck 1. ~dr Creek
F:'ldl'tttJtibh;
'HENt~. NQl'\h 00 .d~grte5, ~6 n1i"ut~S. 42 I5~C?l1dS Eot~. de~o(tirlq t~e sdid
hotth 11M ot McCoIn Podd ofJd dlonq lht t!ost hne of stud Lot i. b dt.t(JJ'\Ce
t)f i0161i r~l!\ lo d , /2-in~h itan red with "Poche('~ ~.oCh" eap ~ltt at oh
tJntjle point: 'Old "ofl1l being the r\o(U,we9t corn!!'," of sl'Jid lot 2: toe1rj poiF\t
0190 belhli t....t 90UU'W~S\ coi'ner of ~':Jitl Lot 13R. Sloell 3. Pt!bble ",,":;
PIOt\tbti6n Estottrs:
THENtE. Notth 01 dtg__ee, 01 minu\~. 1,.1 ~p.~-:-nds to~t, ~6,..tittlJihg dlor\q th~
told e"~\ 11t1l! 01 lot i. b diitonct o. 838.21 f.,et \0 d 5/B-lhCh iron rod
found at oti onc:jlt ~oihll
THtNtE.. NQf\h ()1 dtgrl!t, 18 mlnutf!tl. 5t $ec:ond~ tot\, eontinuin~ DI~r19 \t1e
sold e~~t 1I11e e.' Lot \. b dit\or\cte 01 423.59 fte\ \0 0 2'" inch iron plpt
tout'\d for cOrn~r: cjcJid t>oint belhQ th~ r\ortl1eost corher bf said Lo\ ~; said
pol'tH dlto beihQ the northwest torn~t or $bid Lot 13~; ,oid point \]I~o tJei"Q
in th~ ~outH line of 0 troct of 'or"ld tt'nveYE'd to Joe Whgh\ dt retord~d if"
VolUMe 8007, Ptlqe 1084 bf \he O~ea Records of Tottont CQuhty. lelldsi
THENCE. $olJ\h 83 de9re.~~. ~O "'iir'lutes. 26 geGI:-I'd~ Eastl derior\il1~ tt,t stJid
el)s~ 'in~ of Lc-t , and dlohg the soLlth "h~ ,jf sd1d ~tlQht trCJt\. rJ rji!J\Cln~
of 299 ~\ '~e\ \0 lj 1/2-irH:h rod wilh "~c~r.eco "oc~.. ~Op S~\ r:Jt on ljnqlt
poInt:
THENCL S\~lJ\h~4 d~qrl:!e!l. ~8 h'lirhJte!. ~6 !teco,.,ds Ea~t. co"til1ulnQ <llonq \h~
s.oU\h lin~ of sdld W"i~ht 'rote d distonc~ of ~2a 83 feet to a point In \l1e
north lille tit ,;o]ld LO~ 1 ~l
. Ey'lllblt B - Metes and Bounds Description
tHEHct. Sou\h 01 de~ree. i 5 minl.l\esl 01 s~Gondt We!tt. depot\ing the S()uU,
line bf s~id Wright trdc\. 0 di~\bn~~ or 269.89 fe~\ to 0 pbint fOr torrier;
tHEN ct. SOlllh 01de~r~el ~O minutes, '9 sect:>nds Eo!tt, 0 d'9tbr\c~ of 1\ 9.30
flfet to Ii pOlh\ for c~rhe~;
tHEHct. south 11 de~redl, 02 mih\Jtd. 3& ~econdt W~9t. 0 ditttor\ce of 11~.00
leet to <3 po hl for r;orl"let"; .. . ,
tHENct. ,90 iteqi"8es. 3~ rtIip.u\es., 15 seco;1ds West. 0 di~tdhGe of 107.11 feet lo
o pD,,,,\for ct)rn~t;
tHENct.' 58 ~e~rtes. 03 rnihu\e'i. :29 ~l!cOf\ds. 0 dhltcr'tce of 1i6.80 fe~\ \0 a
1)0'" t for eorner;
'tHENCt. SOLllt'l 6~ d~gret!s, 2fS mlhllt'*t;. otistftond9 Wtst. d dtt;tol"lce df 111.11
f6et to 0 poInt fQr ci)r....er;
tI"4E~ct. South ,. d~gret!t,
teet to 0 pO(hl for c~rne~;
tHENct. sout' h 36 degre~t.
feet \c) 0 po ht for COrtler;
tHEHct. SOLl\h .7 rnih\ihis.
~eet to d PI> hl for tOrnt~;
tHENG[. 30u lh 2 ~ d~~reet.
tl!et to d pofhl fOf c~rhtt;
tHENct. 90llth 22 df!~ree~.
ie~t to " ~o hl fbr cornet;
tHENCt. S()L1~b 12 I'je~rlr!e~. 11 mlf1~\~t~ sl teeond!l 'f,ipst,b d'~tdnce <1. 28.51
f,ee\ \0 0 poInt felr c6rn~~; soid J>6int b!ihljJ in lh~ n,;rth litle of sbid Lo\
2; ~oid pbirlt ol!o b.inq il1 th~ !outt\ II"~ of 90id lot 1 3P~
"tHENCE.' Soulh 89 detyeet. 1 j tniflute.. 32 seeondl3 E4Ist. C11tl11U tht! hort" line
of sdid loot 1 bl1d 'hit SOU \1': line bf ,_ld Lo'. t~R. 0 6lstoMt;4! df 21.1:! feet \0
o pdl,,\ tor r;\')rneit; Sdid poi,.,' b61ng tftt' norlheast t~~t ot said Lot 2; ,
"tHENct. Stlulh 00 d~9reet. 5t) mlhlltds. 42 setands W..t. along the eOst II"e of
sold L(.\ 2; l1t CI dlstOnct! of 47 25 feet po!tslnq the ,buU..~rnrr\o~t carl'ler df
~o\d Lot 13R and beir\g ir\ \he!' we~t line of P!bble Hilloj Plontotlon Es\o'es;
~orl\lhuin~ ali}nq the edst line (If tClid Lot. 2 ond the \fe~t lir1e of Pet-ble
HUls PlorUdllon Estbt~s. in 011 0 dI9\Ot..ce of 1016..10 f~et to the POINT OF
BEGINNINC: '
59 rnlh\Jt~t. 54 seconds Wttlt. d dlttonte df 111.58
11 tT1inutefii. 1~ s~tond, W~gt, 0 ditttOr1ce' of iO~.65
I
!
3i "..,lh\Jt~S. 29 s~tonds Wtst. 0 dtstbnc:e ~f 111.40
06 rn'h\Jt~ti, 33 s~ton.j9 ~!I\, d dlttohc.e of 112.70
.\., """h\Jt~~. 0' seeond W~t. d distance of 88.10
CONtAINING 942, '91. ~q\Jor~ fee\ or zUno ottes of IOhd. h1or~ Or le'S!
Exhibit B - Matas and Bounds Descrintion
~~g.J
!nl
,s" a
~!I,;&!l~
i ~
1/
~ ~
~Ol~ ~t
'1 %.
= =..;.
W. .if
=~1 !- ~
~" J...
hi iF
i!j I
I
I
"
~
!
i
i
o
~
z
$l
:=
~
;
l
i
~
~
Ii ,Usi ~
....~~nil! j
5P,.,.. ~Sh' r-
-~"',.~~ l:l
:i>>:i!J1 ::
...tg~ ...... ~
...~ ."";;1"
.,iii6i't!"' ;;I
~~-OI::'" :
..tiiii""~ ~
i':.-ilt~ ..
a...... it!"
;~gQCJn;
..~,..;:~C
~:lt;;J:gt~
~a>au.. ...
,hg:;:.....
I!.::~~:-i
~l. 'i!f
,.<S~! ...
">'21 . _w
~~;;:J..
~~. ;tae!
",::I aw-..
oR. ......
..~ ....D
0_ ~..
:::D'" ~
i~
~:
n.
J:Q
~:
~::
5
~
~~J ".,-.
III ,",
If at
l;-t l:t
I Ii ~i
hi .ll
1"t111!
'l !(~~
~
,.
.
x~ ...
...~ ~ <
J:,\ ... f"T1
-" a;:o ~
~~~l~: ~ ,,2 ;
~ ~_O~ ....
3~ ~n:= t~
n~'!~f"Tl"'" ,.
~.hQ,LIl,.,.( Q
z I: ~~ )It.." f"I'\
~~5~~ ~ g~ ~
~~~~1;; =<~ 5
,3€ - ~ :;
2
.~t
I
~~..
~~A9AI>-- -
___.s~____
fi
...
I
"
Ir
General
Brick Wall
Location
. .
.~
I
~~~'~Is 'I!!i'.!.~ t.
ii! l,f~:!f Ii I~ rmn; ~ -. 1I
~. ~-lr irri3. ij - "'t~~ J 1-1
~ l!l;' lOr. .lI~.t ~fIf;lJ.J
~ rlf ~ L ~ it! I'~ ~'l~.t
j J!f. 5, ~ . l!ilJ~ ft:-~ L
.r &&CiIs :1 I '.... ~. .~p
:} hll~ll:ll ~t - eft ~~ ali
l ..:~ ri!:.iE rr hl:~ :r'":,u. I ! tiJiil
r '''' Hf~. I a~ Lit I . ,- He-
~ tli- slI r It tah: P-t '. 1 Ii:t;.
I m~I iiJ;a 9 !Iff!!!i!l!l if !!.~ 3
; ;t";J. '!J..liJ. ~ if. iJ..iJ. if. ~ I:- ~ ~ it- !t
i ~nt~ ~;;. ;f." : ;; ; :; :; :; 3~ ~ :I. Ii i
I · so. V Jl J.J JJ J.~ JJ J.J U. f } u.. .'
[ dt!a lr; rti ~ a So :0. &. .. ; _ Il w-._
F n~ft J;f nI t t r I t t · ~ t l!l
; ~~& ~ ~ · · · :. ~ a f I .. -. ,.
! g~t l!l-lil l t t t 1 l t ! I- I n
t ~~ft~!if ~ f ! ! ! ! ! ; f ! ~ ~
! i L~!~~; if I i f J t t ~ ! l l:!
,if!i ..il ~ ~ ~ : i ; : ~ i ~ ~ Ii
t.r II # i : ~ :: ; . ~ t .
Exhibit C - Conceptual Site Plan
T. H. PRITCHErr / Associates
I..andscape Atr:hilecturBI Design and Sie Planning
3017 mtstrninsIw Drtve
F.",.,. SIenI:h, TUBS 75ZU-7IlfiO
omce, 972-4H-7373, Fex, 172-4tU-1230
September 17, 1999
City of CoIIeyviIIe
Re: Versailles Estates
Tract an John McCain west d Pebble Hill PIEw1tation
STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTNES
The zoning .. requested will provide 12101s far estaI8 f88identiaI uses within a Residential PUD.
The lots win be min. 30,000 sq." eech and the sita win provide eMIr ~ Cammon area.
The open space will be used... maiI__ by a Homeowners Ai'~
The development will h8ve. gIIIed -*y and be fenced per.,.... AcceBe to the Convnon area
wiD be provided to all Pebble .. r8IIidenIs .. per deed resIrictioIlS.
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDUlE
The pial. led deveIcJpInd is scheduled to begin consIruction within 6 mal"" d zoning change.
The entire str8et and lot dIMIIopmBIll will be ~l......liIB 1:1.. one phase d CD1Sbuction wiIhn 12-
16 mo.dha. TAle pntS8MIIion is in~ for the pmjec:t owners and great an will be provided
to save and mitigate the removal d 8I'tf 1reeS on siIB cwer 6" caliper.
STATEMENT OF PROPOSED OVVNERSHIP
The development will be said to ~ for single famity construction pwpasss.
STATEMENT OF UTILITIES TO BE PROVIDED.
The engineering and desiCJl of the subdivision win Bilow for all sewer, water and storm drainage.
All the City utilities In available with in close proximity.
Sincerely,
ECEIVE
ee, Mark Gottfredson
SEP 1 7 1999
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
BY COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT
Exhibit D - Statement of Planning Objectives
...
-I
II"
--i~
. plt
,~
I , -
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ,
~~
q
\ ~ : ~
~\ I P
\\ \ I ~ I
I
40' ~U~IN~ UNE -1 , I
388-191, PG'JC6> I I
at I I
· l
I
..3a:..
- -
208.38'
n
2
McCAIN RbAD~
(80' R.O. W.) > ~
8!
1- _
--
148.40'
c...
c...
-"
:r:~
~>
fq~
I
,
,
r;;o\
, 1\ 1\ ,
-....JI\)
'001 \
'0
.~ 0 \
-0
- \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
-A
r
o
-i
N
"":.
LI
"'!
N
"":.
nao~-a-a::!lN-a ~
OC""I >~;;u"'C::::::""
E:> SOr<! aJ)>
E:~!Zl~zS~d~
~:r:il>C)~ZO -
g-<5~or<!-I~ Z
~cn ;;u~Oe;E>
r<!r<! -a ;;u~o
>> zo~z ... rrl
rZ "'~""'l>~g
00 o:Us Z
.;-IE: ~n8ogz~
ZM :;! -IzQr<!--f
o !2 en!;! ;;u 0 CD -I -n
~~ en ~o~~ /V
z_ ~ CZ:I:r<!-<
U1Z rt1 lII-a(/l-a
il 0 OCoz
M aJ c~r<!-I"
r<! 0 ulOUlO u
; i! olll~;g r
. en l'I'lil 0)>
p 0 OI'l'lE:-a
;IE r'1 ~M8!il Z
en z::~~
~>
Os;
~Z
C)
N
o
z
z
(;J
:;:0
I
I'V
o
'"'
~I
.)>-
'z
.....,j(J)
o
U1(J)
~~
"'1]-i
pI
_L
01;0
~.
.......
Exhibit "E" - Typical Entryway
CITY COUNCIL CO-
AGENDA BRIEFING
n~
Texas
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
0-99-1192 - A Zoning change requested by Davi
Hannah, from PUD-R for a nursing home/assisted
living center use to PUD-R for single family
residential use on 11.958 acres located on the
north side of Glade Road in the 1300 block.
MEETING / AGENDA #
01/18/00 /---12--
01/04/00
/
12/21/99
12/07/99 /
January 18. 2000 - Tabled 01/04/00 .
Update
The City Council did not remove this item from the table at its January 4, 2000 meeting.
January 04. 2000 - Tabled 12/21/99
Update
The City Council tabled this item at its December 21, 1999 meeting. The Council
discussed the timing of this development relative to the city hall/justice center complex
projects.
December 21. 1999
Second Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1192
December 07, 1999
First Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1192
BackQround
David Hannah, with Riverwalk Development, is the owner of an 11.958-acre tract of land
located on the north side of Glade Road, just west of Bluebonnet Drive. The property is
also located at the northeast corner of the future Riverwalk Drive. The property owner has
submitted a zoning district change application for this property from PUD-R for a Nursing
Home/Assisted Living Center to a PUD-R for Single Family Residential.
(CONTINUED)
"'\5'~ijf,\/ t3~----
DEPAR ENT HEAD
~ ~~~.
CITY MANAG ~
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
"1ioV O&/Q2E..JH
, "i 1 ~ t ,
Agenda Briefing
0-99-11 92
Page 2
The request includes 32 single family lots, ranging in size from 6,001 to 7,845 square feet,
and 1.533 acres of office uses at the southem end of the property, adjacent to Glade
Road. The office area would allow for up to 16,000 square feet of office space, with
associated parking and landscaping. The calculated density is 3.01 dwelling units per
acre.
The following table shows the differences between the PUD-R requirements and the
applicant's revised proposal. The deficient areas are shown in bold/italics.
THE BRIDGES AT RIVERWALK ZONING COMPARISON
Category PUD-R Applicant Proposal
1. Minimum Lot Size 13,000 sq. ft. 6,001 sq. ft.
2. Average Lot Size 16,000 sq. ft. 6,479 sq. ft.
3. Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 56 feet
4. Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet 106 feet
5. Total Open Space Required 20% (2.12 acres) 30.9% (3.280 acres)
6. Residential Open Space Required 20% (1.82 acres) 24.58% (2.233 acres)
7. Commercial Open Space Required 20% (13,356 sq.ft.) 68% (45,600 sq.ft.)
8. No. of Lots on Cul-de-sac 12 lots n.a.
9. Front building line 30 feet 15 feet
10. Side building line 1 0 feet 2 feet / 8 feet
11. Rear building line 25 feet 10 feet
12. Maximum allowable non-residential uses 10 acres 1.553 acres
In order to make the office area compatible with the residential area, the developer
proposes to construct 7 -foot and 8-foot tall masonry wall sections between the areas, on
either side of the street. The developer also proposes to add a security gate across the
proposed street to prevent the traffic leaving the office area from traveling through the
residential area. The gates would be operational in that residential traffic could travel
through the gates, and an Opticom system would be installed to allow emergency vehicles
to use the gates. Alter:1atively, the applicant could provide a fire lane access through the
office lot to provide a gated secondary emergency entrance into the residential area. A
similar design exists in the new Monterra subdivision, just south of John McCain Road on
Colleyville Boulevard. The subdivision is not proposed to be a gated community.
The Development Review Committee discussed the proposed zoning change and
forwarded comments to the applicant requesting that the exhibit be redrawn to conform to
the PUD-R requirements. The applicant requested that the proposal be forwarded to the
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1192
Page 3
City Council for consideration as presented. Both the DRC review letter and the applicant's
response letter are attached for the Council's reference since the applicant is requesting
many waivers from the PUD-R requirements.
The developer would be responsible for all public improvements to the property, such as
water, sewer, street and drainage improvements. The developer would also construct a
portion of Riverwalk Drive and his share of the hike and bike trail system that affects this
property.
The developer is also requesting special consideration for the interior sidewalks in the
development. The Statement of Planning Objectives states the developer's desire to
construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk on one side of the interior street. The Subdivision
Regulations require sidewalks on both sides of the street.
MASTER PLAN ISSUES
Below are excerpts from the Colleyville Master Plan that relate to the issue of housing and
the Town Center area. The Plan establishes criteria for "alternative housing" such as town
homes and garden homes with smaller lots (Issues 1 and 2). The Plan also states an
objective to include residential areas within the Town Center area (Issue 13), though no
specific location is designated on the land use maps.
One of the issues before the Council is whether this zoning proposal substantially complies
with the goals and objectives of the Master Plan. Since the Plan does not create specific
criteria for the location of residences in the Town Center, staff evaluated the proposal with
the assumption that the entire parcel should develop as non-residential uses.
ISSUE I: HOUSING QUALITY AND LAND USE
Goal: Maintain current level of housing quality and density.
Objective: Overall density for residential development should be compatible with existing neighborhoods. A guideline
of no more than 1.8 units per acre should be adhered to in most situations. Town homes and garden homes that exceed
1.8 units per acres may be acceptable in areas that meet one or more of the following criteria: a transition area between
commercial uses and less dense residential, near major street intersections, smaller parcels that make less dense
development economically difficult and sites with unique topographical features.
ISSUE 2: ALTERNATIVE HOUSING
Agenda Briefing
0-99-11 92
Page 4
There is a desire for a limited number of upscale town homes and garden homes on small lots designed for easier living.
The quality of construction needs to be compatible with the existing and proposed single-family housing standards.
Goal: Allow the development of upscale town homes and garden homes within the city limits of Colleyville.
Objective: Establish PUD-R guidelines for town homes and garden homes development.
Objective: Ensure that such developments are only located in areas that meet the criteria in the objective under Issue
1.
ISSUE 13: TOWN CENTER
Colleyville has a beautiful, new community center on a nine-acre parcel of land initially designed to also include a library
and city hall. This is the ideal area for the center of Town to inc;;ide a library, city hall, restaurant and distinctive
shopping area.
I Goal: Develop a center of town at the southeast corner of Hall-Johnson Road and Colleyville Blvd. that will serve
as the catalyst to accelerate the development of the city's commercial center.
Objective -
Encourage a residential area of single family residences.
The Planning &. Zoning C .:mmission conducted public hearings, considered this zoning
district change at its November 29, 1999 meeting, and recommended approval by a 5-2
vote (Edwards and Tyler opposed). The Commissioners comments included the following:
the proposed use is better than the use allowed under the current zoning; the Master Plan
recommends residential development in the Town Center as transition areas; there is a
need for this type of housmg in Colleyville; and the project does not fall within the City's
residential development and density goals.
Recommendation:
Denial of Ordinan(,~ 0-99-1192
ORDINANCE 0-99-1192
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 11.958
ACRES~OUT OF THE J.M. LOONEY SURVEY, A-936, FROM THE PUD-
R DISTRICT (NURSING HOME/ASSISTED LIVING CENTER USE) TO
THE PUD-R DISTRICT (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE);
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS AND AUTHORIZING
PUBLICATION:
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by David
Hannah, Riverwalk Development L.L.C., on October 14,
1999, under Case No. Z-99-074; and
WHEREAS, notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning
Commission was sent to real property owners within 200 feet
of the property herein described at least 10 days before such
hearing; and
I.
II
I:
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was
published in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville
at least 15 days before such hearing; and
, WHEREAS,
I
I
: WHEREAS,
I
r
I
notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the
zoning ordinance; and
public hearings to change the zoning and the Master Plan on
the property herein described were held before the Planning
and Zoning Commission and the City Council, and the
Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a
recommendation; and,
WHEREAS,
the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change
herein effectuated furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth
in the Zoning Ordinance and is in the best interest of the
citizens of the City of Colleyville;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT, the Master Plan, the Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit A) are
hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in
Colleyville, Texas, described by metes and bounds (Exhibit B), by
changing the zoning of said property from the PUD-R (Nursing
Home/Assisted Living Center use) district to the PUD-R (Single
II
Ordinance 0-99-1192
Page 2 of 4
Family Residential use) district, together with all site plans which are
conceptual in nature, supporting documents, and other conditions
and restrictions imposed and approved by the Council which are
incorporated herein by reference including, but not limited to the
conceptual site plan (Exhibit C) and the statement of planning
objectives (Exhibit D); and subject to the following conditions:
1. GENERAL
a. The purpose of this PUD-R is for single-family residential
development, constructed at an approximate density of 3.01
dwelling units per acre, and office development comprising
1.53:f: acres
b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the
Colleyville Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations and other
land development ordinances, except where amended by this
ordinance.
2. PERMITTED USES
a. Single family residences, detached
b. Parks and open space
c. General office uses and uses allowed in the eN district
3. RESIDENTIAL LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
a. Minimum Lot Size 6,001 square feet
b. Average Lot Size 6,479 square feet
c. Minimum Lot Width 56 feet
d. Minimum Lot Depth 1 06 feet
e. Front Building Line 1 5 feet
f. Side Building Line 2 feet / 8 feet
g. Rear Building Line 1 0 feet
4. NON-RESIDENTIAL LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
All non-residential lots shall conform to the minimum standards of the
CN Neighborhood Commercial zoning district.
Ordinance 0-99-1192
Page 3 of 4
5. OPEN SPACE
a. This development shall provide a minimum of 24% common
open space for the leisure and recreational use of the
development's residents. The open space shall comply with the
provisions contained in the Zoning Ordinance. All open space
areas shall be landscaped.
b. The office development landscaping shall conform to the
landscaping requirements contained in the Zoning Ordinance.
6. SCREENING
a. A screening wall shall be required between the office and
residential areas. The screening wall shall be a minimum of
seven (7) feet in height, and shall be constructed of brick or
stone. The wall shall be constructed along the south property
line of the southern most residential lots.
b. A screening fence shall be constructed along the property's
frontage on Glade Road and Riverwalk Drive. The screening
fence shall be a minimum of six (6) feet in height, and shall be
constructed of a combination of brick, stone, and/or wrought
iron.
7. SECURITY GATE
a. A security gate may be constructed across the proposed street
in the subdivision. The fence shall be located near the south
property lines of the southern most residential lots. The gate
shall be constructed to allow vehicles to travel through the
gates. An Opticom system shall be installed on the gates.
8. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS
a. Sidewalks on the interior street shall only be required on the
east side of the street. The sidewalk shall be at least five (5)
feet in width.
b. The developer shall construct the portion of the City trail system
adjacent to this property. The trail shall be constructed along
this property's frontage on Glade Road and Riverwalk Drive.
The trail shall be constructed according to City trail standards
and specifications.
Ordinance 0-99-1192
Page 4 of 4
9. PLATTING
a. The developer shall submit a final plat of the property in
accordance with Section 2 C of the Colleyville Subdivision
Regulations. The conceptual site plan attached as Exhibit C
to this ordinance shall constitute the preliminary plan.
Sec. 2.
THAT, any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance as read together with the Zoning Ordinance of the
City of Colleyville shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation
continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable
as such.
Sec. 3.
THAT, the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternate method of publication provided by Jaw.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,1999.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
day of , 1999.
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
L -
'~/. ~ """
: _t~./ l~efj. - ~.';-. ~
J ~---. UIC IC
~ .:... ; ~ ~,oJIAl' .. ..
- t ~"",,\ 4 _ -'!!.
,oIZJ>> ~ ~
1 · ,~~ '
~~~ IC
~ r...... _;~ ._~
( 4 -_(
& "u .. -:,i .~-:I ~\
. \ ~
,. - - C 't
,: .. ~::-. I 9?:J\. f' ~)
~ f1IJ.tlL."1 '....,,-'
· r-- . r t 'J. \!~.c-t l,'
...... I · ....,..... ..., .... IC s\t"ii&
~~ 3a.IC.I"I~..:::. :.~
~~.-'I-.---IC ·
.-. -
,. ',. 1-; _ _
....... U - ._ _ I ...:. .
· .n1C~ o.Ja_
)11 ~ 7 ~ J _
1S 4 f---:;a r-. - -
. ..
~ ' 10."- ..... ._
) - t--r -- I ja-- 011C
~iI-' .. --,;::.-- -
~ :;;!~ 1,'1',
- - I ·
.
.
-
L -
,
.x
UIC
~I
~
-
::.~ I
-
- - -
...... -- ---
i,'A'f
, 111 rp;."
>>
.. r;~j(I'" ·
· .. rSI> .
· srJ1I ;I' a --B-
, ...... ~ ..t:}t. : ..+- ft. ~ . .
r~.. ~ I .. .'. ..11 ~
or ~ " ,
. ,. .. -.' - '.... I,
r-. jr"' I ~ I - aAIIii LDft . 1 ,
'.p,. ", .1: ~.
~:;::-~:., + -
a f~' .. >>. ---- If
' · t-:- ., a ; ""W~ · II 17..
;, ~~. .alj" ~ I .. .-.1,1.,-.. . _ I
d-'_..a.. !I-, ".~_ _
~ I" · l f:fral - - - _
. ..~ 1"'-!JIr' .. II " I
, I I · · In
- · l.r---I of · r. ;&~r.~ _
~ : -11: ~ :, : I rll~so) ~~:;
- ---...j L I
tl :.",,~" : ,
'.J · ,.
... 'I I
· B I
. I
'-.t..,. ~ ~ :
'':Ej T~~~~~ J .7~ I
1'3 .. -.:~-L~ :
11 Z:-"b. : II..
-
111 ,...
u.
,-
,
I
.
· . i
I!
3 .! .
~ . ~ :
1 1'.
.
- ~ .
a2
lUll _
..a
--
a." A
~DDlI 1
cfllS~ '
..
,.._ I
.
.
......... ~:
'"" ~f i
1 :
I:c,.~ eN 'f!
- . ~
..f6 11. ~...'.
rs, I '.DC . I
~w '. I,
W/~~o ;i I
~ ."-
~ L! . .~t t
("\
~~-~~
_. ..tI~
" SUI';' 3
,.~.
.
.
.
l.rIf'\"
_.-.a .... ..il1 ". _
c::~
..
&SIC
rrJfdI.&]( t -. -.
-- ~iJO .
, .
,
· A
r-;- rJ~5
Lli~,
'~---.ri
· - li.
~
-
sE!llfn
.~
, ,
.- ---
--.., -- ---.
a-
u .c
- - - -
I .
4 111
r--
...
1UC "= .
I ..
..
... .
.
>>
I >>
,;&ftQ
-
-
fa Iii
.. 1-
-
-
..
--=
Ie
=:
-
" Ii
u__--.J
I !JlJ
,
I <:
-'
.
r
. . ...L
r=
.
I
.
I ";1" l-
4"115> ,
. l-
t~
....:, ,
. -
.
. J1
410' :
Il". · . IS
.' ~ A,~
~ .- \"t. ,; >>,,47ca
- Go !:S'I cUD 1_..-"" ..
- ;....~... ,.~,..... I
.-
,-..
CI
Wi~ i
, , ,.
.
.
.
It II .II..~D
r-I- .'~
~ ~.
., ~ IS ~ ~ u-
. Q Q _ '.r, f{E~~~~ ::,,~
.. It 7.:1 f!1. 'sO~~. -
- . 0$ .
. ,~n~ r-- D . . >> .
.. ~'1"}J:.fP/,1 IS
b ~. ~~. ;. r;:1~~cr.> .
'I . I. J. I - - ..
o 11 n 1'. 10 I
"'~ . ....
i I I · . - '1~'l.f/:I.
"I. .-. - ~..o
If t · I lto - - - . L':L -. ;)
: .. :. .~ . '~I"lt' rlIng Mats
.
I
,.
1.
.
-
1
.~~
...
t-
IS
.
~
.
:-
IJ
I.
'j
;.
!
,. i
!
u
Legal description
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the J. M. Looney Survey, Abstract
No. 936 and being described in the deed to Donald D. Huffmaster and wife, Janet L.
Huffmaster as recorded in volume 6911, page 1894 of the Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as
follows;
Beginning at nail found in asphalt for the southwest comer of said Huffmaster tract
and being by deed call west at 829 feet from the southeast corner of said J .M.
Looney Survey;
Thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 46 seconds West with the westerly boundary
line of said Huffmaster tract, passing a 1/2 inch steel rod found at 17.20 feet
for the southeast comer of the tract described in the deed to Herman J. Smith
as recorded in Volume 8189, Page 1114 of the Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas and being in the right of way line of Glade Road (County
Road 3036);
Thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 46 seconds West a distance of 1334.13 feet to a
3/4 inch steel rod found at the northwest comer of said Herman J. Smith tract;
Thence South 89 degrees 29 minutes 02 seconds East with the northerly boundary
line of said Huffmaster tract and generally along a fence line, 389.97 feet to a
1/2 inch steel rod found for the northeast comer of same;
Thence South 00 degrees 04 minutes 26 seconds East with the easterly boundary line .
of same and generally along a fence line passing a 1/2 inch steel rod found at
1315.21 feet in said northerly right-of-way line, continuing a total distance of
1332.51 feet to a nail found in asphalt;
Thence North 891egrees 43 minutes 23 seconds West, 391.38 feet to the Place Of
Beginning and containing 11.958 acres of land, more or less.
Exhibit B - Metes and Bounds Description
~
I 1'1 II
Ii II
.111 ~ ~ 'i
i !
IS' , i I .1, I
IIII i 111&t:IFii ',.
il
1~lllglf r;l
iil~1fi I
I
i! 11!1
I
II IliI IiI !: liill P. i11i !IIII~~ III
!! ~'i'I' IJrj 'I ~I
il .1 II _I ..1 !. '._ I -Ii- II
I al. I "I. !i- II .111 Ilil .--.---
ii Iii .11 I! I!;! k I!ii I \
!j iii 1f1!1 9,1 P .' I f ..,
I, II' ~. ,! !!!~ II ~ \ . I
"
!! .1' .1 II lib I" C. 1:1:1:1:1 I I T
"III I.. I II ". I
! II lhj ,,' 'I lid i B. I I
i ~I iP! !Ii! h 'I I I I
i j!1i II; I.". I.. I
..i ," Ii I ,
"I ~ ~ I . ~
,Iii I1111 Jli It.II~~l It .
ilh I -Itfn f ~'~!
i. ~ [ "I .
II ;11 I=I~ i I
. .
!,I
dl
,j-
II":
. '-'-.- ._-,!..!...,-~
-I !..-I~-I! -'~-I~-'!..-J~ -I'
~II!..II !..1t4~"'i"=jI~"'i'!.."i'~i
i!....fi~~Z:2:~!...J"i!.;
"!..-l__!..-"
I-II-I'-r-I'- '-"-11-
:;1 _,1_11_11_,1:'.1_.1_11
,_, l-rl':~-"iJ-:1'~-II_II-:
:i!,,-;j !..-:"'i~ ~I!..~I !...'"':I !..-;-!..~~~~
I :"11~11;=a.:"11 :"11_11~~"f!..~
-~~~-c~-~ ~~!...~-~~~=~~-~~~-~~~
_11_11_.1_.1 _,' _ ,1_.1_,1
1_,1_..-___,1--
1-~\I~~7~f~ l!...~il~r~~I-~~
_"_II_I~~~ .1_,1_11_,"
1_11_"'jI.~I_""':,l _-,1_.1_-,'_-:
-, -. -, -. -. -, -:-:1_-1
...,1-
:"j'
The Bridges at Riverwalk
Proposed PUD-R Single Family Development
11.958 Acres (11.803 ac net of existing Glade Road ROW)
Glade Road at Riverwalk Drive
Colleyville, Texas
Statement of Plannine: Obiectives
.
To focus on a demand in Colleyville for an upscale, single family environment
emphasizing small, low maintenance yards, a central location, elegant amenities
and homes in the 2,100 to 3,000 square foot range. The identified market niche is
expected to be primarily empty nesters and dual and single income. professionals
who want smaller square footage residences but who at the same time want
uncompromising quality. Many presently live in Colleyville in larger homes.
Others would like to move here but the desired product does not currently exist.
The attendance impact on the school district is expected to be negligible.
.
To provide a small lot, low maintenance residence while retaining the single family,
detached environment. The Homeowner's Association will maintain all Common
Areas as well as the right-of-way and front yard of each residence which will give a
quality, coordinated look to the street winding through the subdivision.
Homeowners may have very low maintenance yards by the type plantings selected
for the small remaining portions of the lots. It is expected many homeowners will
contract with the Common Area landscape maintenance company to maintain
their entire lot thereby providing a zero maintenance option.
.
To utilize the drainage that traverses the length of the property as an amenity and
to develop it in a natural and aesthetically pleasing manner. It is the intent of the
development plan to give a feeling of openness to the subdivision and to promote an
active lifestyle. Pedestrian activity and flow is encouraged by providing one five
foot wide sidewalk along The Bridges Drive which will tie into six foot wide
sidewalks in the public ROW along Riverwalk Drive and Glade Road.
.
To contribute to the "Riverwalk" concept and provide a residential, upscale
southern entrance to the Town Center property to the north. The perimeter fence
along Riverwalk Drive will be primarily wrought iron with brick or stone columns
which will provide enhanced views of the Waterway from the landscaped walkway
winding along the public ROW.
.
To add upper-income households to the immediate Town Center area. Proximity
to the planned Town and Civic Center and to the Village of Colleyville is viewed as
a marketing plus for the community.
10/14/99
Exhibit 0 - Statement of Planning Objectives
The Bridges at Riverwalk
Statement of Planning Objectives
Page 2
· To provide a residential development that addresses the Issues and the Goals and
Objectives of the Colleyville Master Plan adopted September 15, 1998:
Issue 13: Town Cenier. . The third Objective is to "encourage a residential area of
single family residences".
Issue 2: Alternative Housing. "There is a desire for a limited number of upscale
town homes and garden homes on small lots designed for easier living. The quality
of construction needs to be compatible with the existing and proposed single-family
housing standards".
Issue 1: Housing Quality and Land Use. Objective: "Town homes and garden
homes that exceed 1.8 units per acre may be acceptable in areas that meet one or
more of the following criteria: a transition area between commercial uses and less
dense residential, near major intersections, smaller parcels that make less dense
development economically difficult and sites with unique topographical features".
The Bridges at Riverwalk site meets all of these criteria.
. To comply with objectives outlined in the Colleyville PUD Ordinance to "permit
flexibility to encourage a more creative, efficient, environmentally pleasing and
aesthetic design", and "considerations of special site and topographic features".
The applicant notes this zoning request, if approved, would amend PUD-R zoning for
a nursing, assisted living and retirement community of up to 272 units.
Development Schedule
The developer expects to commence land development as soon as the approval process
has been completed. It is expected land development and the construction of homes
should be completed within 36 months of approvals.
Proposed Ownership
Lots to be sold to individual builders/buyers. All Common Areas will be owned and
maintained by the Bridges at Riverwalk Homeowner's Association.
Utilities
Water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, electricity, gas and cable will be provided to each
lot. All utilities will be underground. Necessary easements to be provided on the plat.
10/14/99
Exhibit 0 - Statement of Planning Objectives
Addendum
The Bridges at Riverwalk
Development Plan Details
1. Street ROW. Developer agrees to dedicate 35 ft of ROWand to build to City standards
one-half of the proposed Riverwalk Drive. Developer also agrees to work with City staff
on improvements to and ROW for Glade Road as it abuts the proposed development.
2. Sidewalks. Developer proposes to build 6 ft wide, winding sidewalks along both Glade
Road and Riverwalk Drive which will then become part of the City's proposed Trail
System and which will provide pedestrians enhanced views of the. series of small lakes set
in the development's landscaped Common Areas.
3. Pedestrian Traffic. Bridges Drive is proposed as a 31 ft street in a 50 ft ROW. The
development plan proposes to move the street slightly to the west within the ROWand
build one 5 ft sidewalk along the east side of Bridges Drive. The Planning Objective is to
promote and channel pedestrian activity with the wider sidewalk and to increase
landscaped open space. The Bridges Drive sidewalk will tie in nicely with the 6 ft wide
walkway along Riverwalk Drive. Residents of the development will have a one-half mile
circle they can walk with excellent views of the Waterway without having foot traffic
immediately behind any of the homes.
4. Setbacks. The development proposes a .5 ft front setback for homes with a "side-swing"
garage entry and an 18 fi front setback for homes with a front facing garage entry. A mix
of side-swing and front entry garages is desirable aesthetically and will be encouraged.
Enhanced trim will be required on all garage doors. A 10 ft rear setback is proposed and
homes will be a minimum of 10ft apart on the sides. A few lots have 5 ft setbacks and
the majority have 2 ft setbacks on one side and 8 ft on the other. This encourages a
"courtyard" design for the homes. Windows are not permitted on the side of the home
with the 2 ft setback which then serves as the privacy wall for the courtyard of the
adjacent home. The advantage of a 2 ft setback over a "zero lot line" is it allows for roof
and gutter overhang and provides room for underground piping of roof runoff where
needed. Maintenance easements are granted for each home. These setbacks are typical of
low maintenance, small lot plans and are very attractive with appropriate landscape plans.
5. Minimum square footaee requirements. Single-story homes - 2,100 ft; Two-story homes
- 2,000 feet on the ground floor. It is expected most homes will be in the 2,300 to 3,000
square foot range.
6. Open Space. The development plan has 26% Open Space which does not count any of
the 50 ft ROW for Bridges Drive or the ROW dedication for Riverwalk Drive. The
drainage chcumel will be a series of small lakes typically expected to be 25 to 50 ft wide
and created by appropriately spaced weirs or small dams. The 5 year flood will be
contained within the " lake walls " and the 100 year flood within landscaped berms. Box
culverts at both Bridges Drive crossings will be faced with stone and, from many viewing
angles, be reflected picturesquely by the Waterway. The development plan provides
significant open space interspersed throughout the development and the plan encourages
pedestrian traffic and provides dramatic views without putting pedestrians immediately
behind any of the homes. 20 ft landscaped buffer zones have been placed at the north end
of the development and along Glade Road. A 15 ft landscaped buffer has been provided
to shield the two lots with sideyards adjacent to Riverwalk Drive.
10/14/99
Exhibit 0 - Statement of Planning Objectives
CITY COUNCIL
city Of
n~
AGENDA BRIEFING
Texas
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
Ordinance 0-99-1199 - Amending the Water
and Wastewater System Capital Improvements
Plan and imposition of impact fees.
MEETING / AGENDA #
01/18/00/--1.3..-
01/04/00 /
12/21/99 /
Januarv 18. 2000 - Tabled 1/04/00
This item was tabled at the January 4th meeting to allow staff time to collect additional
information from the cities of Keller and South lake for comparison with other development
related fees. Attached to this agenda briefing are five worksheets described as follows:
o Table r - This table compares the various fees with a total amount charged to a typical
new single-family house.
o Table 2 - This table is similar to Table 1 except that the fees are based on a typical
6, 100 s. f commercial restaurant.
o Table 3 - This table compares only water and sewer impact fees with various scenarios
ranging from a position of being lower than either Keller or Southlake to the maximum
allowed under impact fee laws.
o Table 4 - This table compares different water and sewer impact fees with other
development related fees from a position of being lower than either Keller or Southlake
to the maximum allowed by law.
o Table 5 - This is a brief explanation of the various fees charged to new development.
Also included with this agenda briefing is a copy of a memo from Bob Whitehead, Director
of Public Services, to Bob Stripling, City Manager, which explains in detail some of the
future water and sewer improvements that are needed to meet the future demands of the
city.
C~~~
CITY MANAGER
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
....~ 0IIi2 E.JH
(\I 1 iI,
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1199
Page 2 of 6
The following table has been revised since the last City Council meeting to provide a
clearer comparison of impact fees from area cities. The table shows the current Colleyville
impact fee and the proposed impact fee (based on 40% collection rate for water and 100%
rate charged for sewer.) The table reflects the impact fees based on a 1" water meter
rather than the %" water meter. The revised table is shown below.
Comparison of Impact fees of Selected Area Cities
Water Sewer Total Date
City Impact Impact Impact Of
I................ Fee Fee Fees m~dopti()rl
.... ................ . ...~.... .................................................
Colleyville ( current actual) (1 ") $ 816.00 $ 51.00 $ 867.00 9/95
Colleyville ( proposed) (1 ") $ 1 ,432.00 $ 256.00 $ 1 ,688.00
Bedford $ o (1) $ 0(1) $ 0
Euless (1 ") $ 3,342.42 $ 191.42 $ 3,533.84 4/99
Hurst (1 ") $1,702.82 (2) $ 1,168.76 (3) $ 3,187.50 1 0/99
Keller (1") $ 1 ,875.00 $ 1 ,312.50 $ 2,063.00 5/94
Southlake (1 ") $ 1 ,450.00 $ 900.00 $ 2,350.00 6/96
(1) Bedford is 95% built out and does not collect impact fees
(2) Hurst $ 1 ,081.5 + FW $ 621.32 = $ 1,702.82
(3) Hurst $ 411.25 + FW $ 757.51 = $ 1,168.76
The table below shows the proposed water and sewer impact fees that will actually be
collected based on the following formula recommended by the Capital Improvements
Advisory Committee:
A. The actual Water Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be 40% of the maximum
allowed.
B. The actual Wastewater Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be 100% of the
maximum allowed.
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1199
Page 3 of 6
Actual Water And Sewer Impact Fees
(Recommended by the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee)
Proposed Sclhedule of 'Nater and V\'astewater Impact Fees
(Actual Collections)
I Actual Actual ! Total
i Water WastewatE!r I Impact Fees
1
Meter Type Meter Size I Impact Fee Impact Fe,~ I To Be Collectl~d
Collected Collected
Simple I 3/4" I $ 1,003 I $ 179 $ 1,182
i I
Simple I 1" $ 1 ,432 i $ 256 , $ 1,688
Simple i 1-1/2" $ 2,865 i $ 512 $ 3,377
,
Simple, Compound j 2" , $ 4,584 . $ 819 $ 5,403
Turbine I 2" 1 $ 5,730 ! $ 1,024 $ 6,754
I
Compound ! 3" $ 8,596 I $ 1,536 I $ 10,132
Turbine i 3" $ 10,028 I $ 1,792 , $ 11,820
Compound ! 4" $ 14,326 I $ 2,560 ! $ 16,886
Turbine 4" I $ 17,191 I $ 3,072 $ 20,263
i
Compound I 6" $ 28,652 $ 5,120 I $ 33,772
Turbine I 6" $ 35,814 I $ 6,400 $ 42,214
I
Turbine 8" $ 51,573 I $ 9,216 , $ 60,789
i I
Turbine 10" $ 83,090 i $ 14,848 $ 97,938
Turbine 12" $ 123,202 ! $ 22,016 $ 145,218
i
January 04. 2000
Second Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1199
December 21. 1999
First Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1199
Cities adopt impact fee ordinances to collect fees from new developments to help pay for
the expansion of their water and sewer systems to meet the demands the additional
development places on their utility systems. Impact fees in Colleyville are assessed and
collected against new development whenever a building permit is issued for a new
structure that has an "impact" on the water or sewer system by requiring a new or larger
water or sewer service.
State impact fee regulations require municipalities that impose impact fees to update their
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1199
Page 4 of 6
Capital Improvements Plans (CIP) every three years. The purpose of the periodic update
is to provide for regular reviews of the criteria used to calculate impact fees so that the
impact fee charges accurately reflect the estimated costs of making the capital
improvements outlined in the CIP. Earlier in November, the City Council was provided with
a copy of the Collevville Water and Wastewater System Capital Improvements Plan
prepared by the firm of Kimley-Horn and Associates located in Fort Worth. The Capital
Improvements Plan identifies all of the system improvements required to meet the water
and sewer needs associated with new development that is anticipated over the next ten
year period and provides cost estimates for making those improvements. The costs for
making the required ten-year water system improvements are estimated to be $8,159,000.
When this cost estimate is factored into the calculation based on the future land use
assumptions and future population estimates, the maximum impact fee that could be
assessed for a 1-inch water meter is $3,581 (the normal minimum size used in Colleyville).
The costs for making the improvements to the sewage collection system required by new
development over the next ten years are estimated at $583,734. Since wastewater impact
fees are based on the size of the water meter and not the size of the sewer tap, the
maximum wastewater impact fee that could be assessed for a customer using a 1-inch
water meter could be $256.
The City Council may elect to set the "actual collection percentage rate" at 100% of the
maximum allowed or choose a lower percentage rate that is more in line with the impact
fees charged by our neighboring communities. Listed in the table below is a comparison
of impact fees actually charged by a few of the neighboring cities surveyed. The City of
Fort Worth provides Hurst and North Richland Hills with water and sewer services and their
impact fee charges include Fort Worth's impact fees.
Comparison of Impact fees of Selected Area Cities
( based on Typical W' residential water meter)
Total Date
Impact Of
...._.......... .'=.~~~...m......._..~~_<<?p!i.<<?~_..
$ 867.00 9/95
$ 2,686.00
$ 3,837.00
$ 0
$ 1,429.00
$ 1,626.00
$ 1,679.00
$ 2,063.00
$ 1,431.00
$ 2,350.00
Water Sewer
City Impact Impact
........_..............................._..___...._._...____.__._._.._______E~~_..___._........ .._.._....F~~ _
Colleyville (current actual) $ 816.00 . $ 51.66-
Colleyville ( new max. 'Y." meter) $ 2,507.00 $ 179.00
Colleyville (nt:..v max. 1" meter) $ 3,581.00 $ 256.00
Bedford $ 0 (1) $ 0 (1)
Euless $ 1,337.00 $ 92.00
Grapevine $ 1,148.00 $ 478.00
Hurst $ 990.00 (2) $ 689.00 (3)
Keller $ 1,125.00
N. Richland Hills $ 700.07 (4)
Southlake $ 1,450.00
(Footnotes to table are on the next page)
$ 938.00
$ 731.10 (5)
$ 900.00
4/99
4/98
1 0/99
5/94
1 0/99
6/96
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1199
Page 5 of 6
(1) Bedford is 95% built out and does not collect impact fees
(2) Hurst $ 618 + FW $ 372 = $ 990
(3) Hurst $ 235 + FW $ 454 = $ 689
(4) NRH $ 488 + FW $ 212.07 = $ 700.07
(5) NRH $ 277.50 + FW $ 453.60 = $ 731.10
According to State law, written comments must be forwarded to the City Council from the
Capital Improvements Advisory Committee regarding the CIP and the proposed impact
fees no later than five business days before the City Council public hearing. Attached is
a copy of a letter signed by the chairman of the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee
which summarizes the actions taken by the committee at its November 29, 1999 meeting.
The committee is recommending an actual collection rate of 40% for water impact fees and
100% for wastewater impact fees. It was the committee's opinion that the 40% level for
the City of Colleyville water impact fees would be more in line with the surrounding cities.
The 100% rate was recommended because the actual dollar amount was not so great as
to hinder future development. The following is the recommendation of the Capital
Improvements Advisory Committee which has been incorporated into the proposed
Ordinance 0-99-1199.
A. The actual Water Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be 40% of the maximum
allowed by this ordinance.
B. The actual Wastewater Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be 100% of the
maximum allowed by this ordinance.
C. The actual assessed Water and Wastewater Impact Fees Collected shall be in
accordance with the following table.
Actual Impact Fees to be Collected
Actual Actual Total
Water WastewatE,r Impact Fees,
Meter Type Meter Size Impact Fee Impact Fel~ To Be Collectl~d
Collected Collected
Simple 3/4" $ 1,003 I $ 179 $ 1,182
Simple i 1 " $ 1 ,432 : $ 256 $ 1,688
I
Simple 1-1/2" $ 2,865 I $ 512 $ 3,377
Simple, Compound 2" j $ 4,584 $ 819 $ 5.403
Turbine 2" $ 5,730 $ 1,024 $ 6,754
-=--
Compound 3" $ 8,596 $ 1,536 $ 10,132
Turbine 3" $ 10,028 $ 1,792 $ 11,820
Compound 4" $ 14,326 $ 2,560 $ 16,886
Turbine 4" I $ 17,191 $ 3,072 $ 20,263
Compound I 6" $ 28,652 I $ 5,120 $ 33,772
Turbine I 6" $ 35,814 $ 6,400 $ 42,214
Turbine i 8" $ 51,573 $ 9,216 $ 60,789
Turbine i 10" , $ 83,090 $ 14,848 $ 97,938
Turbine I 12" , $ 123,202 $ 22,016 $ 145,218
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1199
Page 6 of 6
Attached is a proposed schedule of events required by the Local Government Code for
cities revising their Capital Impro.vements Plans and adopting new Impact Fees.
Recommendation
Approval of Ordinance 0-99-1199 to amend the Water and Wastewater CIP and impose
Impact Fees.
s::
o
t/)
'':
C'Cl
C.
E
o
u
Q)
Q)
u..
-
C'Cl
+:i
s::
Q)
"'C
t/)
Q)
a::
(fJ
Q)
:-e
(fJ ro
o '(3
o C.E
I!) ..... 0
C") 5 (fJ Qj
-- Q) :J:
0) - (fJ Q)
c (fJ ::l (fJ
_Eo'O
Q)O..cc
:J: e Q) ro
'O'O..c.....
>, Q) I- Q)
-.0 ro
E ..... ....: :J:
.E152Q)
Q)-Q)Qj
c;,c:E..c
c Q) .... :J:
.- ..c Q) c
~.Broo
(fJ ~:J:'Cij
o Q) ..c :~
oCU'O
o .!f .0
- Q) ::l
'<:I'~c(fJ
ro::lO'O
curoQ)
oE(fJ~
-g(fJ~:O
(fJ ~::l ro
ro 0 0-00
.oOO~Q)
.!Q I Q) c
C ~ (fJ ro
o ~ ::l C
.~ ro ,g ~
~.!Q Q) .~
E .!Q t== Q)
o ..c Q)
ul-aj.::.
.!Q . 0) (fJ
..cQ)ro'O
I- g> Iii Q)
I ..... 0) >0 .
.....m........_
CO)roo.Q)
Q)....:uE~
E (fJ 0'--(fJ
a. ~ Q)
.Qg~ffi
~coroc.s
Q)'O'OOc
occ_-o
ro ro Q)
roro(fJ....::O
~Q)Eui~
Q)liigo~
~g>-Egro
~ :~ ~ g ~
....:
CI)-
_'0
CI)
> VI
:>.0
CI) Q,
= 0
o ..
o~
.!!:-
.- c:
> (I)
:>...
CI) ..
= ::l
o U
u-
CI)
..:.:
.!!!
.c
...
:=
o
CJ)
..
~
a:i
~
c:
o
:;;
CI) Q,
CI) .~
LL C.l
VI
CI)
C
o 0.0 I!) co M
COI!)OI!)C"')N
I!) I!)C"') lit
N
~'~~I~ ~ .,.
o 0 OII!)ICO M
!CO l!)'Oil!)iC") N
II!) ,I!) 'C") "t
~ N
~ ~.~ ~ ~.,.
o 1!)'010 I!) 0
CO~~NiC"')CD
I!) C"') 'N 'C"'), 'Olt
~, IN:
,~ ~i~'~ ~,.,.
O'l 0 0 OIl!) 'Olt
O'l co N N IC") ,II)
co co N iN ICO~
~ IN
I~I~i~I~,~I.,.i
Q)
Q)
LL.
VlIQ)
CI)!Q)
CI) ILL. Q)
LL_Q)
... '-.LL.
c: E :>
CI) .... :>
E icf. .~
Q,>
o ' 0), Q)
a:i .~ c::
> '0, C
CI) '51J!1
C COle..
"I
<[
I
Q)
Q) -
LL. E
c Qj
o :e..
~ Q) c
.- Q) .Q
"a., LL. ro
a. 0)
<(' ro 'C
0)' a:: .....
'~ro ~
O;.~, rol
NiLL. ....J
"-
CI)
~
CI)
II)
~
:u Q
~ ~ ~
CD~II)ClI5
:z: CD "-
't:l -g .9> ~
3:ctl-ctl
o "- t :t
g.~a~
,,-~~Q
Cl~.=:~
'0 010
''<:I' 0''Olt
C")'Olt
o
CO
IN
:0 N CO CO
o MIt)CO
CO '<:I'.Ni~
...... ....
Q)
.s
:{,E
Q)
:0
J!1
'm
U >
ro ro
o.(fJ
E .-
Q)
~Qj2
ro:J:'O
:E Q) Q)
-:: (fJ (fJ
~ '0 0
o c a.
C/) ro e
OQjo.
~ro g
U:J:aj
Q)2E
t== .~;;::;
C-
Q) ._ c
Oro~
zR~
::l a.
>,(fJ
- Q)
c2
Q)
.....
....
::l
u
.!Q
c
o
(fJ
'C
ro
a.
E
o
u
,~
'~I~I'"
:~ !~ ~I'"
....
.....
II) ,
,..:
.,.
o
en
~
CD
.,.
01
:81
cO!
.,.
,..
....
<<"!.
en
.,.1
VI
(I)
'CD
...
ftj
IV
...
o
I-
Table 1
I~
1010101
'<:1'10 ''Olt'
M'~ 'Olt
!O
I~
10 !CO~''''
'0 ~ It) CD
co. 'co co
~,~:.,.,
,~
,~ ~ ~..,.
iL()
't-
'<:I'
o
01
L() I
~-I
I
18i ig g:~1
iN I 1'<:I'.10'l 1C"'t~
I~I ......' NI
I
I
'~I~'''''
:~,
I~ ;~ ~,.,.
:U")iOiU)'
IN II.{) I"""
C"')IC") CD
10
o
L()
o
10
10
L() C"')ICO'
t-~CO
CO. M .....
~I~ M'
,~
Ill:
...
o
...
.Q
:=,
o
I , I
!~i~i.,.1
ftjl
, ...
o
...
i.Q
1:=
,0
,
..-. i ..-. i
Q)I... i Q) i
:J:
Q) Q)
E (fJ
;-~or-
en --.,...1--.,...
CI) Q)iQ)
CI) Q)'Q)
LLILL. ILL. ,
t):U t)
III ro ro,
c.o.o.
.E'E E
, i
i~1
'-
I
I~I
: I ,
i~~I'"
III
Q3 <VIe
--...
Q)' (]) .Q'
E E :=
o
o
CI)
(I)
LLI
c: i
o
:;;
III
C.l
:c
CI)
C
"C
c:
III
..J
..:.:
..
III
a..
cJ
Qj Qj
roro
:J: :J:
I 0
'(I)
:CI)
'LL I
...
C.l
III
Q,
.s
:;..i;..
en r "'-"-i
CI) Q)iQ)1
CI) Q)IQ)I
LL LL.ILL.:
Q, 0.1 c.,
III i ro " ro,
1-11- 1-'
:>.:.... ....
... i Q) Q)
--1- :J:
~iro Q)
:)l~ C/)
c
o
(/)
'i:
n:s
Co
E
o
u
CD
CD
LL
n:s
,-
CJ
"-
CD
E
E
o
u
.c
0)
::l 0)
e c: .
~~q
0) lIJ III
> 0.10
".:: ~ N
'0 CO.....
g~~
lIJO
EO)o
.~ ~ 10
O)N
'E.c:CO
lIJf-r--
::; Y+
,S~ro
lIl.....,o
~ ~$
.,..;lIlllJO
III Q; .~ ~
O~iiiN
oC:O)CO
~ 'c U) ........
cD 0..- Y+
lIlO)_
lIJ ~ .2 0
c: .- lIJ c:
0- > 0
'0 .5:2 .-
0) ro g> ro
~E'O.2
.oo:S~
.!Q :; .0 0)
c: lIJ 0) .~
.~ ~ ~ ~
lIJ ~ III
a.E~~O)
O)uE
o c: lIJ c:
U .- 0
lIl'OlO
:c:sr--'O
f-.olllO)
c: III
~._ lIJ
'EO,S.o
O)iii5~
E cb u lIJ
O'c:.....lIl
o 0 U 0)
Q3l1J~~
aJ .!Q 0) .....
CllllEE
m:C'OQ;
.~ f- ffi D.
0)' 0)
~~~:g
o .~ ~ :s
()~lIlOJ
CIl-
_"0
: CIl
> Ul
>-0
CIl Q.
= 0
o ...
()~
~;-
,- C
> CIl
>-...
CIl ...
= :::I
o (,)
()-
c
o
;;
CIl Q.
CIl 'i:
U, (,)
Ul
CIl
C
1:'
;
CIl
II)
~
10" Q
CIl Q
~ ~ ~
~~II)~
....._CIlIo"
'tIi::af~
~ III _ ;
~ ~ ~.....
0' - Q,.......
lo;;.~~Q
Q..~.::~
0 0 0 10 0 .0 ,CO M ,0 010 .0
to ..... 0 10 0 0 :('1') CO ' (j) o'en 0
~ (j) 10 ('I') ,10 cct '('I') .....,~ ('I')
~ N : CO
I i
Y+'Y+IY+.Y+,Y+iY+iY+t4 Y+,Y+lt4 iY+ i69-1
, ' i
10010 :1010 'OICO'M 0 lolo! loi I
:co .....'0 10'0 :01('1') CO (j) o:en' 10
~ (j) 10 ('I') ,10 '..... , CO ('I') .....,~ !('I')
~ N I CO
Y+.Y+'Y+Y+,Y+iY+iY+:t4
CIl
~
.!!!
.s::.
-
:::I
o
en
10 ('1')'0 IO!O
00........... .....
O,CO N,('I') ('I') I
~IN
: 10 CO
,('I') ,...
~
,..:
...
~
Q;
~
'Y+Y+Y+Y+IY+IY+!Y+!t4.
'('I') 10 0 OIOIIO:lOlco
to ..... N N I..... 1('1')1('1') '....,
~ (j)'N NI('I')I N
~ N =;
,y+y+,Y+Y+Y+'Y+'Y+t4
,-
10)
, 0)
I~ i~
0) III)
'S: ,0) :g!
O)'O)u,
~ IC::::U.._
'u. O)'~ E
:c:g c: ~EQ;
CIl u. 0) .2 U 0) D.
~~~ro ~D.,c:
5iE~~:gffi~g
EI~I.~ 8:~ :::: ~ ~I
Q. 0) aJ i <( ~ ffi .;::: E
.S! I c: c::: I 0)1 a. . - 0., - ,
CIlI'ij ,s:-,D.CJ),c:i
>:= ffi -c:I~, 0) O)~!
CIl ::J._ 0 ._I~.!::: lIJ'
CIOJ!D. N u. CJ) U. ...Ji
<
Table 2
Y+'Y+lt4 ,y+ ,y+
IOllOiO 10 !O
.....'1'--.0) 10 0
0 CI !co r-- '
N ,N'I I C"il
I I
IY+I i
1
~1~lt4! I~'
I
IOblll)! I 110
NIIO ,..., 'N
101('1') co' I I 'co
N'
y+.y+!.,..:
III
.-
10
1-
iSI!
i.s
I,Q
':::I
I_I (1),
'-'1 L- I
Q;IO):
....., ~:
0)'0)'
E:lIl
NCo
en --:_!
CIl 0) 0) I
'CIl 0) 0)'
1U,u. u.i
! Q., c.. 0.
! III I lIJ lIJ
1f-IHf-
i~Q;IQ;
::Iroi ~
::;:~Ic1.l
ai
'Y+'
i i
. I
CIl
CIl
U,
c
1.2
.-
III
.~
"0
CIl
C
"0
c
III
-'
~
...
III
~
()
i~
I
(1):
CIl'
CIl'
'u, 1
.-
CJ
i III
I Q.i
IE
_i
>-i
III I
~I
iO!
1 c:: i
.1
IC:
I '
! I
I I
I I !
l~i~t4i
I !
1.....1('1') ~!
......CO ,...,
:COj..... ,...,
iN' N'!
1~Y+lt4
'0:010
'~:COiN
CO ,co III)
! v"j N-I"':!
I i I
, I '
I '
, .
!~i~it4'
10;1(111)1
1011'--1,... :
10 ('I') 1M
:CO C"iia)'
'~Iy+.t4l
, I . '
I 1-:
ii~I!1
E,E!:::I:
~I'-ICI)I
0)' I
!JBi....' I
: lIJ , lIJ I
~'~i I
. - I = I I
IUl,~i~, '
t! 0), 0)1
iu,'~j~1
It);t):t)'
11llIllJIlIJ
I Q.I c.. 0.,.
EIEIE:
I. ;" :: I':: I
1_10) 0)
:1......, ;:1
:;;i~' 0)1
:;:)1> CJ)!
.i I I
IW'
0>
c:.....
:; c:
lIJ 0)
'0 III
0.0)
::J ~
>,0..
:;::; 0)
c:.c:
0).....
t::::(
::l
U <Ii
.!Q 0)
O)~
~
~
.c:
:;
o
CJ)
-
o
~
U
0)
.c:
f-
a;
(5
Z
~
.E
0)
:0
~
'm
>
U lIJ
~ .!Q
E 0)
.- 0)
~ -
0)'0
~ 0)
0) III
III 0
'0 0.
c: 0
lIJ a.
.... 0
0) c:
ro _
~ 0)
~~
~
II)
,...~
(Q
,...
N
"It
(Q
....
I
1414
! I
! t-- I
'~;
N'I
....1
,
1414
ico
I co
1C"'t
,....,
INI
I
,
,
1414:
IMI
len
'C'!,
'....
iN
I"'!
,
I!I
I III I
'Si
I~,
I I
>.
c
o
'"
Q)
Q)
LL.
~
~ ~
'C >-
ro ..c
aiai"C
U Q) Q)
1Il ~ ~
1IlQ)=
5 ..c ro
.- >- Q)
roro2
> ~ E
Q) 32 :::J
f3.EE
. .!a 'x
....._ro
2~E
Q)-Q)
EQ).c
.....Q)-
Q) ...... OJ
ro al .~
~ c E
...-ii~
ro E 1Il
1Il8~
E ro ~
:::JC;;-"C
lIl_C
1Il _ ro
ro Q)
~~~
-g:c~
-"5;S
Q) 0 :::J
.cC/)O
I-.....C/)
o .....
ai ..... 0
""Q).....
l!!'(i)~
.c~Q)
"5.....~
o Q) .....
C/).cQ)
"C .1j3 :E
C C Q)
ro ro C
~;:;~
Q)Ci>::
~ ~ Q)
~.2-g,
'5 .!a :.c
iD' ro .!a
=0=16
OQ);:;
..... 2 Q)
.2"C2
1IlQ)"C
Q) .~ Q)
Q) ..c C
::::Eii
~ 8 E
o.roO
E_U
.- N ro
~~~
>1Il-
Q)Q)"C
1Il 2 C
"C_ro
C C en
ro !!:l Q)
Cv:J~
ro U 1Il
~ _1Il -Q)
1Il~""
Q)=ro
Co ~ E
o.Q):::J
E = 0
o8C/)
U "C
Q);:-C:
:c-ro
ro Q) _1Il
-"C.....
1Il:::J~
:.cUm
I- .C ~
....
(.)
C'tl
Co
E
L.
Q)
~
Q)
en
~
L.
Q)
....
C'tl
3:
'to-
o
c
o
.~
L.
C'tl
Co
E
o
()
.!!
>
>0
.!!
(5
u
.:c'
>< CI)
~ ~
E 0
--
ftj
~o;~';'
'>.s;~~
>O_~CI):C
CI)~CI)-...
=::I.c-::I
oc:rcn~o
o .!.:c C/)
CI) -
.-r;~~~
> ~ CI) ~ ~
~:2.!~=
- E CI) CI) ::I
8-.Q~~
.!!;.....';'
-.c_~
> ... ~ ~
~;.!!:C
=~Qj'$
o 0 ~ 0
u d. C/)
.!!-
>c
>oCl)
CI) l:
= ::I
o C.)
u-
CI)
~
~
.c
...
::I
o
en
~
~
CI)
~
c
o
;:
CI) Co
CI) ';:
u. C.)
III
CI)
C
"'-'(0
CO 11.0
I.O'N
M
t/7!t/7 ~
MJ(O
MI.O
m'N
NI
I
t/7 I t/7
MI(O
...- 1.0
I.ON
N
t/7 ! t/7
M(O
ml.O
ON
N
t/7 ! t/7
(0...-
...- '1.0
co
t/7 ; t/7 ~
00
1.00
'V,m
...-
t/7:t/7 ~
1.0 ,('t')
1'--...-
COM
...- ...-
t/71t/7 ~
-,
.....'1.."
Q) Q)
Q;!Q;
EIE
..........
Q):Q)
ro;ro
~;~
I:
~1~i
_i_
Q) Q)
Q) Q)
L.L.L.L.
13u
ro ro
0.0.
.s.s
..... .....
Q) Q)
ro ~
:> Q),
:> C/) I
,...
M
co
M
>< ><
IV IV
E E
Q) I
co'
.,..1
M:
....
o
';f!.
o
o
--
...
Q
&n '
M
N,
co'
co
.,..
M
><
>< IV
IV E
E ....
.... 0
o
';f!.
1IO
It)
~
~
...
o
I-
Table 3
tn
Q)
Q)
LL
-
r::
CI)
E
c.
o
-
CI)
>
CI)
C
L.
CI)
.r::
-
o
o
-
-c
CI)
-c
-c
~
tn
Q)
Q)
LL
-
(.)
ca
c.
E
~ai
.o~iO
JB~-
Q)J::'O
J::.....c
I-gro
enai
. ~
l3 (; ro
~....;s
.....~::l
U - 0
ro Q) '^
0. ~ .."
E .... ....
._ Q) 0
.... J:: ....
~=ai~
Q)ai~
~:503
c....:5
~ ~ 'Qj
,*.2ai
:i= .!a :5
~ 16 10-
..E:5~
.Ql
J::
.!a
L.
Q)
~
Q)
en
~
:g Q)
.~ ~
ro
c
Q)
U
I/)
I/)
::l
o
.;::
ro
>
J::
.....
.~
Q)
~
~c:
J::
'5 ~
o ~
en U
'0 I/)
C ~ I/)
ro = ~
Q) ~--
= Q) I/)
Q) = -Q)
~O~
- U ro
~-E
~ ~:;
>-Q)o
~'Oen
0.2'0
u g ai
C .;;; I/)
I/) 0 -....
Q) .- Q)
Q)ro=
-- c Q)
'OQ)~
Q) U c s:
ml/)Q)ro
-I/)Q)-
~ ::l ~ >-
c: .Q Q) .0
Q)ro.o~
K~iU~
OJ:::i=-
(j)1-:!2ro
> ....: E Q)
.g Q) .!a ~
W E
roEm::l
I/) .... :5 E
~ 2 Q) 'x
roro~ro
Q.:i='O E
E = Q) Q)
8';:.6:5
Q)I/)EO>
:0 Q) 0 .~
JBEuE
.!a ~ ~ ~
~l{lel{l
'0
~m
:0:5
E Q)
o~
U'O
ro Q)
- c
N .-
_.0
viE
Q) 8
~ ro
-
~
'0
c
ro
L.
Q)
-
ca
~
.....
o
r::
o
U)
.~
ca
c.
E
o
u
~
'S:
>.
.!!
'0
o
.:C
>< Q)
ftl ~
E 0
-=
ftl
.!!s;~Qj'
=OJ:O~
>---~.!!
~ftl~!;
-::IJ:Q)::I
Oc:rC)~o
o Q)'- (/)
_J:
= >. C
.- ftl Q)
> ~ Q)
~:s2.!
- E Q)
0_.0
o
Qj'
05~
~.!!
.!!J:
Gi-
~ g
(/)
.!! ;
=J:05
> - ~
~~.!!
=~Gi
oo~
O..J
-
Qj'
~
ftl
:c
-
::I
o
(/)
.!!-
- -
> C
>.Q)
Q) ~
= ::I
o (,)
0-
Q)
~
.!!
J:
-
::I
o
(/)
...
.!!
Gi
~
C
o
;
Q) Q.
Q) .t:
LL (,)
tIl
Q)
o
010101ll') CX) C"'II
CX)1ll')'Oill') M N'
ll') ,ll') : M II)
..... N
I &') I&') &')' &') I &') I"
10:0 0
ICX)Ill') 0
ll')i ll')
C"'I
NI
lI)i
Nt
I
I
I
! I 1
i&')i&')i&') ,&') i&')l..
ll')1CX)
ll')iM
M,
I
.....
010 OIL() CX)IC"'I
'CX) ll')!0,ll') M!N
Ill') Ill') i M , II)
..... N
&')i&')l&')i&'):&')i..:
!010 o Ill') ICX) C"'I,
lCX)iL() Oill')iMIN'
Ill') iL() 'M i III).
'..... IN
i &') I&') &')' &'), &')."
OIO,O,ll')iCX)IM'
CX)ill')iOIL()'MIN
ll') ll') : M III)
I~ N
I.....
&') i &')' &') i&'). &') 1414,
10> OiO,O L()'''''it
IO>ICX)'NIN Mill)
,(O'(OIN N, =
,-, 'N
'&').&')&'):&').&').414
I
I
I Q)
I Q) I
Q) LL,
Q) .....
Q) Iu.. E
tLfQ)5 ~
~ELf~Q)c
C....:i==Q)Q
Q) Q)IQ) Q.u..'1i;:
E i a. .- 0...... 0>,
Q., 0>1 iU <{ ~ 'E i
o C Ie:: 0>1a. - :
Gi :2. C .~ (;;1 ' ~ I
> '-,ro C'C ;>,
Q) ::1_ 0:._. ro !
o COia. N,u..I...J;
<.
ia
-
o
1-
:.0:
I ::I'
i till
,
,
Table 4
101010
'''''it10!''''it
l('f')t~l"
&') &'), 414
:010 0
'viO ""it
1M'..... ""it
! I
1&')&'),414
:000
'V,O ""it
("f')1~1'"
1&'):&')'"
o 0:0
V Ol""it
M .....'''''it
&') '&') i 414
iO'OIO
IV'O ""it
1M'..... ""it
&') &') 414
lLOil.() Q
I/'-./'-. II)
V ill)
1&,)'&,),414
,ll') 0 II)
N ll')1,...
C'?C'?CD
&') &')' 414
i
i'i::":~
I Q) Q)'
..... :i=
Q) Q)
E I/)
..... .....
--
l3 Q) Q)
Q) Q) u..Q)
LLu..
...., 0..0.
-I ro : ro
~IHI-
~I 031' 03
=I:~ro.. ~
- len
~:
ai
ia
-
o
-
,.0
::I
tIl
.....
&')
,0
1(0
IN
I~
&')
10
:(0
!N
.....
i&') : &')
:0 0'
(0 0
N (0_
..... .....
i&')
'0
O.
! ll')_i
I~!
&')
iO
o
o
&')
tIl
Q)
i Q)
ILL
'c
o
;
ftl
,.!:?
"
Q)
0,
:" ,
.C
, ftl
!..J
I~
, ...
ftl
1l:L
o
'.....,<O'~
'CO ll') C"'I
,ll') N cct
M M
.....
&')
&') &'), 414
o
o
~
.....
0>.(0:11)
1M L() en
.....,N M,
1M! 1M;
'&')
'&')1&')1"
o
o
'(0
O.(o:CD
(Oll')I....
ll')_'N :cct
N 'N
i &') &') I 414
!O co!CD
:CX) L() 1M
:O>iN'N
..,..: 'N
1&')1&,),414
Icol.....'~
I"'" Ill') CD
,co =
'.....
&')
&') &') ..
!010101
1ll'):011l)
IViO>jM,
1.....-1 IN:
j
!gl
N
I "f""""_r
&')
1&')'&')14I4i
01
O!
,L()
Ill') ! M 1 = i
'/'-. I..... 1=,
CX)iMI....,
... ... "I
........... C"'II
, I , !
&')
&') I &') I 414
tIl
Q)
Q)
LL
-
(,)
C'll
Q.
.5
>.,
ftl
~!
"1
~i
0:::
ia
, !-
~; 03 lal
,..... ..... .0 I
I Q) Q) ::I i
i E E II)
!.... ....
122
,ro ro
I:i= :i=
'''f'''''''' "f"""";
--'
tIl Q) Q)
Q) Q) Q)
Lf u..,u..
...1:)13
(,) ro ro
ftll Q.i 0.,
Q.j E E:
E,-,_'
i!21~1
Sl~i.~'
~ : I
W
o
CD
CD
a;
414
=
....
N'
(,ji
en
C"'I
~
=
414
0'
en!
CDI
uii
><
>< C'lI
C'lI E
E ....
_ 0
o
~
.-
.....
...
CII
-
C'lI
~
I
4141
01
CD!
C!,'
=
414
~'
....1
N'
a;!
I
!
414:
11)'
I tl
I~I
ftl
ii
-
o
t-
><
C'lI
E
City of Colleyville
Derivation of Development Fees for Commercial Development Projects
TYPE OF FEE OR HOW DETERMINED WHEN COLLECTED
PERMIT
A. DEVELOPMENT FEES
1. Building permit Fee is based on a valuation formula Fee for permit is collected after
provided by the '97 Uniform Administrative plans are reviewed and approved.
Code, and is set by City Council by annual
ordinance.
2. Building plan review Fee is 65% of building permit fee and is set Same as Building Permit.
fee bv City Council bv annual ordinance.
3. Zoning change fee Fees determined by area city review and Upon zoning application, prior to
estimation of personnel hours involved in platting, site plan and/or building
review, and set by City Council by annual permits
ordinance.
4. Final Plat fee Same as zoning fee Upon application, usually after
zoning, prior to site plan and
buildina oermit.
5. Site / Landscape Same as zoning fee Collected upon application for site
Plan review fee and landscape plan approval - prior
to buildina oermit submission.
6. Fire Sprinkler permit Amount determined by review of nearby Collected when plans are reviewed
cities and set by City Council by annual and approved.
ordinance.
7. Irrigation permit Fees based on field review time and is set Can be issued anytime after review
by City Council by annual ordinance. and approval of irrigation plans.
Same day.
B. UTILITY TAP FEES
1. Water tap fee Part of fee pays for actual water meter and Collected when Building Permit fee
remainder for review of hook-up. Fees set is collected as permits are issued.
by City Council by ordinance
2. Sewer tap fee Fee pays for review of installation, and is Collected when Building Permit fee
set by City Council by ordinance. is collected as oermits are issued.
C. IMPACT FEES
1. Water Impact fee Fee set by City Council by impact fee Collected at time Building Permit is
ordinance. Determined by anticipated costs issued.
of buildinq water lines over oeriod of time.
2. Sewer Impact fee Fee set by City Council by impact fee Collected at time Building Permit is
ordinance. Determined by anticipated issued.
costs of buildinQ sewer over period of time.
3. Roadway Impact fee Fee set by City Council by impact fee Collected at time Building Permit is
ordinance. Determined by anticipated costs issued. .
of buildinQ streets over period of time.
D. PARK LAND DEDICATION FEE
1. Parkland Dedication Fees set by City Council by impact fee Collected by Engineering Dept.
fee ordinance. Determined by anticipated costs before acceptance of all public
of providing parks over period of time. capital projects are approved, or by
Bldg. Inspection when Building
Permit is issued.
(dev fee dertv)( 1/13/00)
Table 5
Memorandum
From:
Bob Stripling, City Manager
Bob Whitehead, Director of Public services~
January 12, 2000
To:
Date:
Subject:
Attachment to City Council Agenda Briefing number 13 -
Consideration of Ordinance 0-99-1199 - Amending the water and
wastewater impact fees.
Backoround
"Impact Fees" must be developed in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Local
Government Code (Impact Fees), which requires a city imposing impact fees to
update the land-use assumptions and capital improvements plan upon which the
fees are calculated, at least every three years. Colleyville first developed impact
fees in 1992 and updated them in 1995. Attached as Exhibit A are portions of
Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code as copied from Section VI of the
March 1999 Water and Wastewater System Capital Improvements Plan and
Impact Fee Update for the City of Collevville as prepared by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. The key points in Chapter 395 are:
1. An approved land Use Plan,
2. A defined Service Area. (the entire City),
3. A plan of Capital Improvements or Facility Expansion and their costs
necessitated by and attributable to new development. (Note: capital
improvements for existing development are not recoverable through
impact fees.)
4. Service Units necessitated by and attributable to new development,
5. Projected demand required by the new service units over a reasonable period
of time, not to exceed 10 years, and
6. Appointment of a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee, which for
Colleyville 1$ the Planning and Zoning Committee plus additional members of
the development community.
Land Use Assumptions
The land use plan approved by the City in September 1998, Resolution R-98-
1408, reflected a reduction in developable area available for growth and a larger
commercial/retail component. This reflection resulted in a reduced growth rate
Impact Fee Briefing
Page 2
from the 1995 Impact Fee Update, The September 1998 Land Use Plan projects
a 2025 or build-out population of 25,540, see attached Exhibit B.
Service Unit
To be consistent with the previous impact fee studies, for the purpose of
computing impact fees, a" service unit in Colleyville has been defined as a unit of
development that would consume 1,000 gallons of water per day. The attached
Exhibit C shows: the 1998 acres and the projected ten year (2008) acres of
various land use based on the Land Use Plan; the increase in the acreage, which
totals 812 acres; the service units per acre; and the increase in service units over
the ten year period, which totals to be 1,458. Based upon the historical
consumption of water a Colleyville single family residential unit uses 640 gallons
per day.
Capital Improvement Plan
The Capital Improvement Plan and the Land Use Plan are the key documents in
calculating the impact fee. The Land Use Plan determines the number of new
service units over the ten years and the Capital Improvement Plan determines
the required improvements and the cost of those improvements. The Capital
Improvement Plan develops:
. the required capacities to meet the 1998 population demands;
. the required capacities to meet the build-out demands; and
. the required capacities to meet the ten-year demand.
The costs of the capital improvements that are attributable to new
development are the only costs that can be eligible for impact fees.
Therefore, capital such as Colleyville's share of TRA'S wastewater and water
treatment plants, pump stations, ground and elevated water storage tanks, along
with transmission/distribution lines are included in the impact fee calculations.
The 1998 Impact Fee study section VI and the accompanying map detail the
Capital Improvement Plan.
. Water sysu~m:
The water system capital improvement plan is summarized in Exhibit D. The
projected cost of the system improvements recommended to satisfy the
water system build-out conditions is $37,090,000. Of that total $11,613,000
is proposed to meet existing demands and not eligible for impact fee cost
recovery. Of the total, $7,432,000 is recoverable through impact fees for
serving new development in the ten-year period. In addition, $718,000 is
Impact Fee Briefing
Page 3
recoverable from existing oversized facilities and $9,000 is recoverable for
the impact fee study. Therefore, the total maximum amount that is
recoverable for new development is $8,159,000. Exhibit E presents an
explanation of the development of water system impact fees and the Table of
Eauivalencies and Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fees.
. Wastewater System:
The wastewater system consists of the TRA Wastewater Treatment Facility,
various interceptor, collector, and lateral sewers. Because developers install
at their costs the collector and lateral sewers they are not eligible for impact
fee recovery. See Exhibit F for definition of the various sewer lines.
Therefore, the wastewater system impact fee recoverable costs include the
existing oversized TRA treatment plant, existing oversized interceptor sewers,
and proposed interceptor sewers. The attached Build-out Wastewater
Collection Svstem Map visually shows via the yellow highlighted lines the
sewer system eligible for impact fee cost recovery and the red-dashed lines
show the capital improvements to be built that are not impact fee eligible.
The red-dashed lines are not impact fee recoverable because they
service existing development or will be built by new development with
no reimbursement. Exhibit G is a summary showing the projected cost of
Colleyville's system improvements that are recommended to satisfy the
wastewater system build-out conditions. The total project cost is $1,389,000
with $205,213 being recoverable through impact fees serving new
development in the ten-year period. In addition, $283,911 is recoverable from
oversized TRA treatment facilities, $85,610 is recoverable from existing
oversized interceptor sewers, and $9,000 for the impact fee study for a total
of $583,734 eligible for impact fee recovery. Exhibit H is an explanation of
the development of wastewater system impact fee calculation and the Table
of Eauivalencies and Maximum Assessable Wastewater Impact Fee.
In 1993 City Council passed Resolution R-93-897 A Resolution APprovina
Water and Sewer Line Extension Proiects and Authorizina the City Manaaer .
to Proceec.: With a Financina Plan. A plan was developed to provide "for the
extension of sewer and water lines to those residences and businesses not
now served by public facilities." In 1993 the number of residential and
business units not on sewer were 736. Two sewer projects have been
completed. They are:
. Project A: Total cost of $ 1,147,000 and
. Project B: Total cost of $ 650,000
Staff is finalizing plans for Project C that will complete the 1993 program.
Project C is estimated to cost $ 570,000. Upon the completion of Project C
I mpact Fee Briefing
Page 4
there will be an estimated 269 residential or business units not being served
by sanitary sewer. A sewer connection fee of $1,500 is charged to offset part
of the construction costs.
The wastewater system capital improvement plan details the need to
construct $1,389,000 worth of new interceptor sewer lines for build-out.
Exhibit I, Table VI-9, shows the five proposed interceptor sewers needed for
build-out. Of those five, developers are constructing three of the sewers. The
V1c is in Monterra Addition. The S1 is in Westmont. And the T1 is in
Williamsburg Estates. Because these interceptors are being built by the
developers and are in the impact fee study, the City, in the developer
agreement either: reimburses the developer the sewer impact fee per lot
times the number of lots in the development with the total not to exceed the
actual cost to the developer of the construction of said interceptor sewer and
then collects the impact fee; or waives the impact fee for the lots. In either
case the City acquires the interceptor sewer at a cost usually less than the
actual cost of construction.
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:061 063.0 I/doclreport
EXHIBIT "A"
VII.
Impact Fee Calculation
Introduction
Elements of the water and wastewater system were evaluated against industry
standards and design criteria. Planning information concerning the future growth of
the City was determined during the land use planning phase of this project.
Improvements necessary to serve the 100ycar (year 2008) and build~ut (year 2025)
system needs were formulated and evaluated against the same criteria. While 10-year
system improvements would not nonnally be constructed, it was necessary to
hypothetically size facilities to serve the 10-year system needs since Section 395 only
allows recovery of costs to serve a 10-year planning horizon.
The development and imposition of impact fees is controlled by State Law. Chapter
395 of the Local Government Code contains the requirements that must be met in
order to impose impact fees.
Chapter 395 indicates:
Unless otherwise specifically authorized by state law or this Act, no
governmental entity or political subdivision shall enact or impose an
impact fee. Political subdivisions are authorized to enact or impose
impact fees on land within their corporate boundaries or extraterritorial
jurisdictions only by complying with this Act.
An impact fee may be imposed only to pay the costs of constructing
capital improvements or facility expansions, including and limited to the
construction contract price, surveying and engineering fees, land
acquisition costs (including land purchases, court awards and costs,
attorney's fees, and expert witness fees), and the fees actua1ly paid or
contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial
consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is
not an employee of the political subdivision.
Impact fees shall not be adopted or used to pay for any of the following:
(1) construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or
assets other than capital improvements or facility expansions identified
in the capital improvements plan;
(2) repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital
improvements or facility expansions~
VII -1
City of Colleyvil1e
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:06\ 063.0 I/cIocIrq>oct
EXHIBIT "A"
(3) upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital
improvements to serve existing development in order to meet stricter
safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards
(4) upgrading, updating. expanding or replacing existing capital
improvements to provide better service to existing development
(5) administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision,
except the Edwards Underground Water District or a river authority,
which is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees which function
as impact fees as defmed in this Act, may expend impact fees to pay its
administrative and operating costs .
The following improvements plan shall contain specific enumeration of
the following items:
(A) a description of the existing capital improvements within the service
area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, or replace such
improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety,
efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be
prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such
professional engineering services in the State of Texas
(B) an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and
commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements,
which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to
perform such professional engineering services in the State of Texas
(C) a description of all or the portions of the capital improvements or
facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new
development in the service area based on the approved land use
assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional
engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in
the State of Texas
(D) a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use,
consumption, generation, or discharge of a service unit for each category
of capital improvements or facility expansions and an equivalency or
conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types
of land uses, including but not limited to residential, commercial, and
industrial
(E) the total number of projected service units necessitated by and
attributable to new development within the service area based on the
approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with
generally accepted engineering or planning criteria
(F) the projected demand for capital improvements or facility
expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable
period of time, not to exceed 10 years.
VII-2
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Waste'Mlter CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:061 063.0 I/doclreporl
EXHmIT "B"
o
('t')
o
N
'"
;::
_!2
~ 0
'e- N
0.. 0
00 N
0\
0\
-
.!!
~
!'
'0
u 0
~ -
0
N
o
o
O~
o
~
."
c:l
o
'y
'0'
..
0..
-.:to
0'1
0'1
U I
=
->
!'
'0
u
t
c;;
U
'C=
o
.~
::r::
.
.
.
"'0
Q)
.....
Q) U
- Q)
:-:= . 0
~ ~tt
~~~
=O-a
.....UU
.""" <+.. . t::
:S 0 0
-= .0 't:i
~ .-."""
~U::r:
o
o
o
N
o
o
O~
\r)
('f')
III-2'
EXHIBIT "e"
Table VD-l
Service Units by Land Use
Increase in
Service Units
Increue ill Acres from
I Emtin&Year IO-Year Fnm Emtmc Yeal Service Units · Per Emting Year
i [Land Use TYDe (1998) Acres . (2008) Acres to IO-Year Acre to IO-Year
Sinlde Familv' 4,278 4,772 494 ~,.~ 569
~ulti-Familv 13 13 0 5.0 0
)fficc 19 110 91 3.5 318
etail 208 404 196 2.9 567
ostitutional 400 390 0 1.4 0
ndustrial 43 24 0 1.4 0
oadwav 837 840 3 0.0 0
Jtilitics 44 44 0 0.0 0
>ublic ()pco. SJ)8.CC 264 261 0 0.2 0
Jacant 2,103 1,324 0 0.0 0
"ater 21 20 0 0.0 0
IPJivate ()Pen SJ)8.ce 178 206 28 0.2 4
Ffota1s: 811 1.458
KHA No. 061063 01
AuumptionsJProjeetions:
· Service Unit derIDed as the equivalent to a unit of development that would
consume 1,000 gallons per day (average day demand). .
. For single family land use: Number of service units = (increase in single family acres · dwelling units/acre) · (640 gpdIdu /1000 gpd)
For other land use types: Number of service units = (mcrease in acres ofland use type) · (demand/acre /1000 gpd)
For demand/acre calculations for other land use types, reference Technical Appendix Table A-2.
Dwelling unit! per single family land use acre:
(1998 dwelling units per single family residential acre
based on actual residential connections as of Sept '98)
... 1998 2008 Build-Out
1.5 1.8 1.8
dwelling units/single family residential acre
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:061063.0 lldoe/rcport
VII-4
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
bnpact Fee Update
P:06106J.OJ/docIreport
EXHIBIT "D"
VI. Capital Improvements Plan
Water
The projected cost of the system improvements recommended to satisfy the water
system build-out conditions is $37,090,000 with $7.432,000 being recoverable
through impact fees serving the 10-year system needs. These capital improvement
projects are shown in Table VI-t. The majority of the remaining costs will be
recoverable in subsequent impact fee assessment periods. The recoverable cost
associated with existing oversized facilities is summarized in Table VI-2.
Proposed water mains to meet existing demands, as identified in Table VI-3. result in
$11.613,000 of distribution and transmission improvements. Proposed water mains
to meet build-out demands are shown in Table VI-4.
Cost opinions were derived from current prices for competitively bid public works
projects. A 20% factor for soft costs, including administration, engineering, legal.
testing and inspection, was added along with a 34% financing cost factor to obtain
the Total Project Cost.
It is anticipated that the City will issue bonds to fund improvements because
improvements exceed requirements for the la-year cycle. Therefore impact fees
alone will not fund the total cost for the improvements. The 34% cost factor was
used because it is anticipated that the City will use impact fees for payment on
principle and interest on bonds. notes or other obligations issued by the City for the
development and construction of capital improvements or facility expansion
identified in the CIP. Based on the way Cities typically pay interest aild principle on
bonds. net interest costs for debt issuance is approximately 34%.
VI-I
e!
fI)
o
u
au
iiI
~a
G;:::s;
~o
mli ~
:;: JI) :s a:
:::i>~l.U
.!! CI) 0 l.U
.Q Q: Q: U;;
~l!:!a;: ~
-:lu
~::;~
:!~
iL-
ti~
q;
~
u
a
~
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater Cll' and
hnpact Fee Update
P:061 063.0 I/docIreport
! ~=
a.t:)i
Ea..
-au
",; ~.
iill..
~ ftJ
-
. ..
_=0
J! ~ U
0.!!1
toO'
u"
Q.
c
o
15_
i! ·
1;0
cU
o
U
1.
1::_
0'...
.. · 0
Q.~u
.u
8.!
"
!"t
o ~..
~c!S"
~~
&!~
.a.
CD ..
mU
-
'0:.-
--
..-
&.~
o a.
.. ..
Q.u
!:C088
cs800
0";"':(')
~s~.
... -...
.
8888
0"':160
fa!i:G:
.reiN
... ... .
0000
8888
r:::::f cr~" t')
10(')0.
~.... ~
... ... ...
o
o
::i
CIl!
~
....
o
o
::i
It>
,,;
~
o
o
::i
....
00
N
..
:r
li
-
ftJ
""''''''<<]<<1)
l!!l!!l!!l!!
,....,.... t'--,....
g g g ~
-ii "ii ". 1i
c c c c
.ll .S!' .2l
1i.1l1l
'C'C'C'C
e ~ Ii .
-':'-':'''''0
C c:: c:: C
:1 :I =' :J
N
.,
...
tit
88
00
llilti
....0
"'CD
(')-
tit
00
88
~8-
.......
lION'
tit
000
88'"
N"W)"
....eD
...~
...
olSo
0::i0
::i",::i
~ci(Q
o
000
::i00
....::i::i
NOCO
~
000
OoC)
::i::i::i
C!N~
~~::
IIll
l!!
....
8
c:
'ii
c:
at
Z
'C
t
'C
c:
:>
N ...
ft ...
.
tit
8
10
(')
10
...
...
8
8
eD
....
...
8
o
o
(')
10
...
C)
::i
'"
CIl!
Cl
:::IE
~
~
o
::i
o
,,;
....
.
:'i
o
o
o
...
o
10
N
...
888
000
~;li;-
to. eD_1ft
~ ...
~ ~
... ...
8
8
....
~
...
888
N'1Ill-5ij-
~~...
...:......
... ...
o
8
....
~
'"
...
00
... 0
o
~
10
....
iii
...
C)
::i
...
~
o
Cl
:::IE
o
Cl
::i
It>
C?,.
55
Il II
1;1;
~~
Il II
II II
UlUl
l5
c ~ i
o g a ~ ~Ui
0. !! ~ 4D .ai~
::ic Ul &5 l!! -liiEll.
~~11l ~ .s JE15l;
c .0 I :> E Ul ~"'15:5i
il:ic. ~ ~.5&~I.~q~
'C5E~E i ~Cll~~".i5.~E
~ ~~!.~~.ri5 ~iO...~s~dlW
., 1::.~:j~Q,.~~m~.~:u;.!!1im~
Q ~ . - - 'Il S .!: . II ~c: 1D '" "C Q ~ ~ _
~8C:Ul w~_c: -~..~~~o
i:i a:m~ c..iQ,E~~~Ul~~..2~E,g
~::i1l_5ll. ~E~0E~~:m~~
...CI).Ein.&; m:li... :I w~.~m=
Q. cE...- >ll.rl ll. 'C....::il!l
-_~:I: >'Cw 'C 1I!!::i ~
!!:'o'-~ ~~I) ~ &.1i~6
~.=>-. .~o::? 0:: c:'::1ii~~
>Oi~= fll.. II "~::::E
~1ii30 o~= ~ 0:: ~j::'
~~::iP P.9~ .9 ~ mrlB
<.<<< <.< :8 &.~1l
ffiffiffiffi ffi~~ ~ ~ ~~~
'$.
'"
...
'$.
o
EXHIBIT "D"
o
I
it
o
...
..-
.
:
E
u
I
o
~
a
j
E
.
E
DI
c:
o
E
.
J
1
8
i
E
Il
'C
j
.
e
S t:
ato
c;:: .-
;0 'E~ -g
j D~ ~
1ii .8 'C
ii .'5 2'
II 8 #,. ~.
-;; S;~ 1
I ~: 1
0' t-. E
Q. .!8 s
i ~i ~
: ~! !
j lr ~
- It: ~
.2 -s ..
~ j. 1
l5 !'a. i
~ i~ 8.
· -: 0
...l!l~ ~ ~ is.
-g ~.... a. ~ ..e
!!..~..e.!!.
t:Q..-c"-
"8'C;=~E8~
"0 c vcO
ii:g~= ..2~
~~~81!1~
:>:i\1~m~
E>n..'C.€lS
l~ii!!CDatc:
E.eP'-O>~o
'CQ.l?~'i~
i~CD=c:s-g
Ii! ! i t ~
D.!I;Ucit-8
61P>-g6i:5
:'~'B""9
'i 'Cc: ~ < ::..1. 3!
=.OlllliiE;;
.oE~lDC:'i.o
J15:g'8~1
~-<::'<i"E
C.6:;:'<'g6E
~;gi~gti~
i.ililj~l
0::1'C1l'ii8~
oB~iE:.!1
~:e-1i~~i
.Co.l<-.... ..
'0''' <,:1.8.
Q:~i~~~[
c.!!......... ..... ....
~~I~~~;
'ii,:"~~8~
t::~:gOll80
~ g.~ 1i lllii 1i
8: Q: B 'e- .~ ~ 'e-
~'5~~~'2~
~~ ~~..~
r N'<r ~ .t' .t'
I
N
~
....
tit
~
~
t-
I 0 010
0111
....-..
.,........
~t; "':.
.t; :
C?'
5
II
:0
~
:
!!!.
.
~
.0
.
l<-
i
.!:I
.. l!
~~
Eat
II c:
J.~
~ d'i >.
:oE'C
~,g~
8~::
1101<-
0::111)
CI)::Cca
oeo.
o..E
N6-
"~8l
~o::~
=
c:
.::1
.. .
c u
::J-
Ii
cZ ·
~=
'<rIG
IG
~.
vr.2
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:06106l.0Ildoclreport
EXHIBIT "E"
Chapter 395 stipulates the followinl procedure for calculating impact fees:
The impact fee per service unit shall not exceed the amount detennined
by dividing the costs of the capital improvements described in
Paragraph (C) of this subsection by the total number of projected
service units described in Paragraph (E) of this subsection. If the
number of new service units projected over a reasonable period of time
is less than the total number of new service units shown by the
approved land use assumptions at full development of the service area,
the maximum impact fee per service unit shall be calculated by
dividing' the costs of the portion of the capital improvements
necessitated by and attributable to projected new service units
described in Paragraph (F) of this subsection by the projected new
service units described in that paragraph. The analysis required by
Paragraph (C) of this subsection may be prepared on a system-wide
basis within the service area for each major category of capital
improvement or facility expansion for the designated service area.
Paragraph (F), as referenced above, is that portion of the impact fee law which limits
a municipality to charging for improvements to serve no more than the 10-year
system needs. This total cost includes those recoverable from facility oversizing and
the cost of preparing the impact fee study. These costs are summarized in Table
VII-2, for water and Table VII-5 for wastewater.
Water
An explanation of the development of water system impact fees follows.
Table Vll-2
TotallO-Year Water System Cost
Total 2008 Recoverable System Cost
Recoverable Cost from Oversizing
1998 Impact Fee Study
$7,432,000
$ 718,000
$ 9.000
TotallO-year System Cost Recoverable Through Impact Fees
$8,159,000
Based on the land-use assumptions, historical water usage rates, and analysis of the
water distribution system, a single-fiunily residence, typically equipped with a 3/4-
inch or I-inch meter, is projected to consume on the average, 640 gallons of water
per day, or 0.640 service units per day.
The impact fee per service unit is calculated as the 10-year recoverable cost divided
by the number of new service units projected over the next 10 years or:
VII-5
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
bnpact Fee Update
P:061063.0Jldochq>ort
EXHmIT "E"
Impact Fee per Service Unit = 10-year Recoverable CostllO-year Service Units
= $8.159.000
1,458 Service Units
= $5,596 per Service Unit
The maximum impact fee which could be assessed for a I-inch meter is computed by
multiplying the number of service units consumed by a I-inch meter times the impact
fee per service unit, or:
Impact Fee for I-inch Meter
= $5.596
Service Unit
x 0.640 Service Units
I-inch Meter
= $3,581 per I-inch Meter
The maximum impact fee which could be assessed for other meter sizes and types is
based on the equivalent capacity of a I-inch meter. A table of equivalencies based on
meter size and type is provided in Table VII-3. For example, the water impact fee
for a 4-inch compound meter is computed as follows.
Impact Fee per 4-inch Compound Meter =
(4-inch Compound Meter)
(I-inch Compound Meter)
10.0 x
1.0
$3.581
I-inch Meter
= $35,814 per 4-inch Compound Meter
Table VII-3 presents maximum assessable water impact fees for various meter types
and sizes. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an
amount to be assessed up to this maximum.
VII-6
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:06106l01/docirc:polt
EXHIBIT "E"
Table VU..3
Table of Equivalencies
And Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fee
For Selected Water Meter Sizes and Types
Meter Type
Simple
Simple
Simple
Simple, Compound
Turbine
Compound
Turbine
Compound
Turbine
Compound
Turbine
Turbine
Turbine
Turbine
Meter Size
5/8" x 3/4"
3/4" or I"
I-In"
2"
2"
3"
3"
4"
4"
6"
6"
8"
10"
12"
Ratio to }" Meter
0.7
1.0
2.0
3.2
4.0
6.0
7.0
10.0
12.0
20.0
25.0
36.0
58.0
86.0
Maximum Assessable
Water Impact Fee ($)
S 2,507
S 3,581
S 7,163
S 11,461
S 14,326
$ 21,489
S 25,070
S 35,814
S 42~77
S 71,629
$ 89,536
S 128~32
S 207,724
$ 308,004
Table VII-4 provides a comparison ofColleyville water impact fees with other DFW
Metroplex communities.
VII-7
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:061 063.0 I/docIreport
EXHIBIT "F"
~ WASTEWATER
Introduction
The wastewater system study and Capital Improvement Plan (CIF) updating
Colleyville's 1995 elP includes the following tasks:
. Data Collection
. Historical and Projected Wastewater Flows
· Evaluation Of Wastewater Collection System and CIP
. Impact Fee Analysis
Def'mitions
Collector Sewer
Sewer pipe which carries sewage flow from one or more laterals as well as house
sewers.
Lateral Sewer
Sewers with no tributary flow except from house sewers.
Interceptor Sewer
Sewers which receive flow from several collectors, laterals and house -services and
carry flow to the TRA outfall sewers.
Force Mains
Pressurized sewer lines which convey sewage from a lift station to another gravity
sewer or to a point of treatment.
Lift Station
A sewage pumping station within the collection system.
Sewer Service Area
The area within drainage divide boundaries (as determined by vertical topographic
requirements) served by each interceptor sewer.
Sewage
Liquid waste conveyed by a sewer which may include domestic and industrial
discharges as well as infiltration and inflow.
Infiltration
Water entering the sewer system and services from the ground through defective pipe
joints, broken pipes, cracks in manhole walls, and bad pipe-to-manhole connections.
V-I
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:061 063. Ol/doclreport
EXHIBIT "G"
Wastewater
The projected cost of Colleyville's system improvements recommended to satisfy
the wastewater system build-out conditions is $1,389,000 withO;161, 75~being (!l ~(J 5) ~J-'}
recoverable through impact fees serving the lo-year system needs. These capital
improvement projects, along with recoverable costs for existing oversized treatment
and interceptor sewers, are summarized in Table VI-S. The recoverable cost
associated with existing oversized treatment facilities and interceptor sewers are
shown in Table VI-6 and Table VI-7 respectively. Impact fee recoveIable costs for
proposed interceptor sewers are presented in Table VI-8.
The City of Colleyville 1998 Wastewater Capitol Improvements Plan, which
identifies interceptor sewers capable of meeting build-out demands, is presented in
Table VI-9.
Cost opinions were derived from current prices for competitively bid public works
projects. A 20% factor for soft costs, including administration, engineering, legal,
testing and inspection, was added along with a 34% financing cost factor to obtain
the Total Project Cost.
It is anticipated that the City will issue bonds to fund improvements because
improvements exceed requirements for the 10-year cycle. Therefore impact fees
alone will not fund the total cost for the improvements. The 34% cost factor was
used because it is anticipated that the City will use impact fees for payment on
principle and interest on bonds, notes or other obligations issued by the City for the
development and construction of capital improvements or facility expansion
identified in the CIP. Based on the way Cities typically pay interest and principle on
bonds, net interest costs for debt issuance is approximately 34%.
VI-lO
~
U)
o
o
au
.....
CQ
~
;e~
e!o
~o
II) CI) au
Seta:
.!!~w
.Q ~ u.:
~ ~ ....
~o
CI)~
~~
....
~
q:
....
o
~
o
If
City ofColleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:061063.0lfdoc/report
EXHIBIT "G"
~ ~
CI>> u
llC LL. ~ ~
-
. U ~ c
:E .fnj
a...
E CI>>
-a.
CI>>
-
-=1:$..
J! ~ CI>> .
0~0"0
1-=..0
.. oIL
0
~
-,:,-
~J:l
GO 'Sf -
c .
c ~ ~ 0
N 0"00
.. u
IL&
~>.
a"_
~-
a:g
GO a.
o .
00
N
GO -,:,~
- U
G) a".
G) &!~
-
0
C
0
;;
a.
.C
u
.
CD
Q
-
u
CI>>
0'
..
IL
II)
Q)
.....
.
Q)
m
co
oti
,...
N
N
W
...
...
m
C')-
co
N
W
<0
I
5
Q)
:0
lU
~
I)
Q)
en
i
s
C\I
~
o
~
'0
l'lI
LL
-
c:
Gl
E
-
lU
Q)
~
~
<(
0::
~
'0
Gl
N
.!
Q)
>
o
a
c:
~
;n
~
o
-
o
-
o
o
U
Gl
:0
l!
Q)
>
o
o
Q)
0::
Q)
Q)
.....
.
NO
NO
~o
fliai
C') co
COM
W .
...
W
OM
... ...
<0 N
U'iU'i
COO
WN
W
m
I
,...5
...!..~
>co
I)...!..
:0>
lU CD
~-
1).0
Q) lU
oo~
Q)
Q)
en
I!!
~
CD
II)
~
.e
t
e
~
oS
o
~
Q)
~
Q)
en
~
o lD
aGi
Q) ~
e Q)
1)00
:ECi
-
'0 0.
Q) Q)
N 0
- ~
f!! CD
Gl-
>.5
0'0
aGl
c: 0
._ 0
1i)o.
.- 0
.no:
~ ~
o 0
--
o 0
--
U) 0
o 0
UU
Gl Q)
:0:0
lU lU
~ ~
Q) Q)
> >
o 0
o 0
Q) Q)
0:::0::
o
o
o
i
.
~
M
...
.
....
II)
.
~ o~~
..,0..,
....0....
.mC"i
In-IS
. ..
..J
:!
o
~
1;;
o
u
E
Q)
1i)
>-
en
~>-
.0 '0
lU ::l
~ -
GlOO
> Gl
o Gl
~LL
0::-
o
en l'lI
00.
o E
N-
- co
.sm
om
~...
-
'E
.!!!;:)
'2 8
:J,>
Gl ..
o CD
~~
Q) CD
en
coo
~ij!
... w
itj
-
'2
:J
Q)
u
.~ ..
Gl S
en lU
~ ~
g: S
>- 0
o I'CI
...3:
'0 E
S ::J
~ .g
'0' ><
... I'CI
r&-:E
...
-
o
...
#.
o
N
-
lU
.;
o
o
c:
o
=fi
Q)
a.
lD
c:
::::::
Cl
c:
:;;
Gl ,,;
!;;1;)
lU 0
ClUaj
~c:c:
o.Q ~
.E u lU
Gi8.~
CDU)-
.E c: rJ
Cl ::::::
c:aQ)
I) c: Q)
~~1i
E ~ lU
i Ri ~
Cl ._
cD~ E
~-:
lUClQ)
~~U;
'O-:~
co c: ~
m'E S~
...'0
lU
.5'OS
lD c: U)
~ ~ ~
UO'O
c: =fi c:
.Q ::l lU
1:) .t: CD
2~ni
1i) 0 ~
c:o.c;
o Q) _ .
o .c; 0
'0-.0
QJ - ~
'Oo.g
~#.I)
g ~ E
'm ni ~
'- U) Q)
:!:1i).c
00-
lU 0 ~
LL Q) lU
<( 0 U)
,.,..c:-
j::~~
C: ;;::: Q)
0'0,2
: fii ~
o - Gl
';500
~ =fi Iii
U.5~
1)00
Q)C:'"
'0' 8 '0
~ - Q)
a.. 01)
Q)
'0'
a:
'"
Ri
-
o
r
13
i::
-
:::!
o
~
.....
Gi
~
~
I:
fil
~~
J...;;CI)
~ffi
~U):s
SQ:O
.! t!! ~
.Q~;C:
~~i::
~CI)
U)x
~LLi
a::
~
~
CI)
o
o
III
....
EO
q:
ffi
:s
o
o
~
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:06\ 063.01Idoclreport
EXHIBIT "G"
CD
-c-
CDoC
-l!-
U CD en
CD > 0
0'00
... U
IL CD
a::
CD 00
Iliac
8~~C)
~!:~!.
c::c....
..
.e aJ_
-c~c
- enC)
CT_:e
CD>C_
a::w
N
~
- --
ca-c
_ u ,,,
oca""
t- Q.:e
N ca_
o
c
o
;
u_
= UJ
.:: 0
UJO
C
o
o
-
c
o
;
Q.
'C
U
UJ
CD
C
-
u
CD
'0'
..
D..
00.....
.... .....
o
~
co
N
..
OOCO
00..,.
00(0)
000
ClOu)o)
..,.00
"lI:~CC!
.....00
ClOCO&l)
..,.0&1)
..,.NO)
"':00
(0)0)1'-0
ClOClON
1'-0"" co
<<i N (0)-
0) en ClO
ClO&I)I'-o
.. .. ..
CD
'C
t!
~
::)
.w
c:
CD
E
-
C'lI
e
~
N
-
c:
CD
E
-
as
~
f-eIl
..,.c:
0).2
en ell
.....c:
DlS[
__><
enNW
ClOen_
O)enc:
..... ..... as
-;-;n:
Q)CD-
:e:eai
1313E
as as-
LLLL~
- -....
C:C:t-
Q)CD..,.
EEen
CiiCiien
Q)CD.....
~~DlS
<{<(N
u:~g
r-f-.....
-
-
en.
..,
to
N
-
.
~
o
f')
.
N
~
>-
G)
-
as
E
)(
e
c..
c..
as
o
-
II)
Q)
-
as
::I
r::r
Q)
~ II)
o~
&I)
en _
en .r::.
..... e
Q) as
5~
.s: g
ic
-0
i~
ell
Q)&I)
a""':
eIlN
as II
1i~
00)
(.).....
U ....
Q).E
.0' ~
500
_10:
o CD
~ 2'
~ CD
II) >
II) as
~~
.- 'C
O.
CDO
.r::.(O)
-;; E
u ::I
Q) E
10: 'x
CD as
o:::~
iii vi
O'E
o 0
c: (.)
o ~
~~
iiit-
c: ....
o CD
00..
~ ...
eft
o
CD
~
en
eft
to
.
.....
~
N
-
-J
c(
t-
o
f-
,
~
,
c:
o
f!
CD
c..
-
'B.
D
&I)
N
.....
iO
N
C
N
_0 (0)
...'011'&1)0)
::I&I)N.....
q vi..... .
N C")
:2
'S
m
o
101'-0&1)0)
2ClO_N~
-0..... .
NN N
ClOg C")
eft.....~U)
eft -'''' N
ClO..... .
.......... N
c:-c
.Q.~ C>
Cii$~
:; .C: c:
c..o .-
o >- ~
0..=0
ou::
~c:
:: Cl
> .-
>-(1)
> CD
~o
otU
0'0
&l)f-
en
en
.....
E
e
-
....,
"8
Q.
OJ
c:
~
o
u:
c:
OJ
"in
CD
C
CI)
m
3:
~
a::
e
fh
o
lti
.-;;
~
fa
~ ~
~ CI)
~ lti
...... CI) ::so
Sit 0
.!! ~ (!)
.Q~ a:
.!! s .-:
~ 1!!
CI) ~
~ a::
f2
~
CI)
o
o
UJ
.....
en
m
::so
o
o
~
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
WastewaterCIP and
hnpact Fee Update
P:06106J.Dl/doclrcport
EXHIBIT "G"
...
Gl ~~fil C').,110 ~~i;l~ .~ !i ~ N !C')t;~
,........1 .,
CDi~ C') C') ..... ." NC') ;; CD !..; ....
..: N .-- ** **..:** .....-* ti1i ..;
.. *** * * * **
o GI Gl ..
o > 0
Nero U
~ u
D- GI
IX:
;~ ~~
.~CDC32 ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill ill
-:b Q.- · CD., .,., _co~~
~- itc:a.CIO ~CD"" .....NC') NC').,.,." ..... ..... .......... ..... llO
i -=
5a: 0....
-
0 a-
~ ~ lu ill ill ill ill ill ill tlillillillill ill ill ill ill ill #. tlillilltl
O'1:J_ca ~~~ ~~~ ~~~[;;~ ~Pi ." C') Ul Cl ~~:g!:J
N - D- a. ,... ,... C')
.. i ca
a:: U
- -
:lI 0 a-
q ~ lu ill ill ill tlillill ill ill ill ill ill G~ ill ill ill tl iIlillilltl
:!2'1:J-1 ,...0..... N~~ ~~~~Q! 8"" ,... M :!.~~
'5 -f D- ca ."."., .....CD ."
~IX: U
-
ClO a-
=~ lU ill ill ill ill ill ill tlilltlilltl tlill ill ill ill #. tl#.tltl
.. '1:J _ !. ~~~ ~PH~ ~fil:;lR~ CD~ Uim Ul 0 NCD.".,
~ -i D- ca M -....C')N
.. a:: U
c iii~~ ~Cii8 ~_i.~"l~. ~~ CD 0 8 Ul M8f::lC
0 ..... ." .....
llO.....C") N,........ ." I") ." 0 SllOca.....
; Nr-:ai cri":o; ca- N" .uf cr) ~ liu;uf.....
u llO.....!UlO
.. _N..... .....N..... ... .-.- ** NN N ...........
:lI .. * ... ... **... ... * * ... ... * *
.tr 0
III U
C
0
U
N
~
'0
Ii
W E
III
C ;( (3 0
0 .. .r. 'ii
~ II::
; ~ 't: ~
a. .... i a::
1: m ~ ..
u 1i ~
III
.. ~ .s .r. a
CP ~ c( 0
Q - ii
II:: 0
- .... Z 'ii
U ~ ... ~
Gl 0 ~ c
0- S z ~
~ N c(
D- E b .s 'ii
."
N ~ 0
'i::i III
0
a:: II:: '0
.. .. 'ii
~ ~ E
as III
~ ~ III
e.
lJ ..Q III lJ ..Q III ..~lJ..Q1lI lJ III ..Q ftI ftI ~ ~(')..Q1lI
;c;c;c mmm 00000 00 lULU N a: a: a: a:
-' 0
ftI as ftI III III III III ftI III III as ftI as ftI ftI III ftI III as ftI ftI
.. II QI .. II QI !!!!!! ! ! ! ! ! e ! ! ! e
.... .... .... .... ... ....
c(c(c( c(c(c( c(c(c(c(c( c(c( c(c( c( c( c(c(c(c(
;tU; !Hi;; iUn;Uw n~i;i;in5
_ss sss ssscc cc cc c c cccc
~ I!! I!! l!!~ l!! I!! I!!~ l!! I! l!!!! !!~!'e ! '! 'ee'e!!
~ooo ooo~ooooo oo~oo o~o 0000
N
'0
U)
ffi
~
U)
a:
e
fb
(.)
f5
.-
3:
fa
m~
~ U)
~ f5
..... en :>
::; a:: 0
..! ~ (!J
..Q~ ~
t!!::=;;; .-
~S!!
CI) ?3
~ a:
~
~
U)
o
(.)
LU
aI
~
~
o
(.)
~
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:061 063. Olldoclrq>ort
lD
~:s
CIOSe-
OUlD-
001>0
NO"OU
~ U
a..lD
a:::
s"O .. ell)
.. ~O
.~.'i:i2
-bSo...!.
~ -ra: to;
5a:: U~
"-
o l:'
::gcatlDU
O'U~-
N- a.. Q.
· i ca
a:: U
'S'O l:'
qcatCllU
~~3:ca
= -_ Co.. C.
= Cii ca
P a:: U
"-
010 l:'
~~ [-
· ~-l
";( -i a.. ca
~ a:: U
c
o
:;:;
U_
= ..
~ 0
';JU
c
o
U
N
...
EXHIBIT "G"
CD
-
N
tit
ON_(f)
II)!I-....
ti~;.~
- tit
tit
CD
~
a
i
tit
~
lItllt~lIt
CDCD_CD
lit
-
-
lit
~
lit lit lit lit lit
~~18&; ~
lit
Q
lit lit lit lit lit
~{;;~~ ~
lit
CD
(f)
lit lit lit lit lit
CD~~18 {;;
~
~
II)N2- 0
r;;m~~ ;;
a~g~ g
lit-lit
lit
..;
o
1;
o
o
iii
e
~
c
o
:;:;
Q.
0:
U
.
Gl
C
i
0'
~
a..
~
III
tic ~
c: .s -c
Ii i ~
~~ -i
::E1:
c- 0
-a~ ~
.....t- C
.s~ -a
1.- ~
00 .s
~- e
_10 ..J
Ii ~
CI)~ li
=0 t-
; '" lii
Cb cu
16 ~~ ~
c ~,g N
~ -. I
~ ~g ~
.D ~E: ca
il "'. ~ :;
d.. ~uE;- (') "C
~ (iiCiiC;;Cii ~ :;
.. ......I!! .. ..
! !!!Z! ! !
~h nH~lgi
~o!:oooo9o~o
:i'
i
~
;::
..
.I:
o
lit
(f)
-
lit
01
(f)
11-
~
tl-
ll)
N
~
2-
N
....
o
III
.c:
1:
l!
III
::E
~
~
::
N
'0
0:
C3
i
G
5
~
.
~
01
iii
<<
.
Q.
..
o
III
III
...
.,;
'"
==
8-
Ci.
8 (;
~ 1
1i Q.
is" 'a
Q. !
o :i
li. r
8 'S
~.!i . f?
e .6 -a 'a
~'i~'3
i~ ii
We If) ftI
c.b!OJ
=-'0..,.-.6
-,-.e;;
1:,2>')(
.-".,
Q.= C e
"O.tIIt:
fiCij<<?,!
= ~> cu
.2o,!!.c
....... .c e
'i~~:8
"g'ie.!!
.2:20&.
I>C'"
~el!~
OQ.._
~=Ilfi,
eiif:E5
2i80~
J!! 8. 5
~1i~!
....0".-
.6a.9-e
"O_D.G
.0--.
1:Go"O
lliillt.!!
!iiil~
Q..~o
l!~&8.
00 G tII
15..cu~o
~=ii)!.
B.!!~a:
.5~!::!..'O
i';;'StI-
i~q"O
Cfii:2!
1i8~1
~~"g~
'21).11)
.t12~8
!li..N
cue.!!!.
>OX.I:
OOwt-
... N PI ...
~
o
....
II)
~
~
It:
e
Bl
(J
15
.-
~a;
t!!Q
~LI.i
C1QfI)lI)
~ 15 ~
.!! .-; 0
~~ ~
.-;It:
fl)p
~-
~
II)
o
(J
iU
....
~
~
:::i
o
(J
~
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
hnpact Fee Update
P:0611l63.0 lIdocheport
G)
1:Q
oo-k!-
OUCDI/)
oCD>O
Ne'SU
~ CD
Q:
~ 'C; " CIQ
:~.:5'2
e ~t I:
u. ClICIt
~a: CJ,..
- .
CD~CD~
o. U
o'tJ&CI
N - ~ c-
.. i CI
Q: U
'SO >.
q ~ CD ~.
~ ." ,S- ClI
~ -Z' a.. t
9Ja:. U
-
at 0 ~
~ ~ CD 'u
.!! ." & !!
.:i -cr a.. ;-
... ~ U
~
l-
.....
-
u_
CD lIS
.~ 0
eu
~
EXHIBIT "G"
c
o
;:
c-
't:
U
III
CD
Q
t;
CD
e-
~
..
r!
;
CD
en
..
o
~
G)
~
!
s
III
lD
..(
....1&
-tv
W.5
z~
:io
III
l)!j
,...-
...
...
"I-
CD
"l-
N
....
"I-
CD
N
"I-
M
co
(I)
o
~
...
'C'
o
Q.
lD
~
III
E
04:
0.:
l-
N
"<t
.s
11
o
a:
CD
"0
III
a
'0
.c
:i
o
(J)
is
M
E
o
~
!:
:2
Ii
.2
c
o
~
'0
3:__
- "0
8 a::
Ne
e :l
'ii a::
Uc
o lZ
~III
-;.!!
00..
-:=.9
0"0
1ija::
o e
li~
~1:
>.
e=
"O.!!
0.:0..
0'0
~3:
cab
~l5
E E
o 0
~~
"0111
... ...
(J)(J)
I'll 1II
~~
;:iPliP
~.;.;
:100
(I) ....
"<tM
N,...
OaD
"<tN
... -
"1-"1-
~~
"1-"1-
~~.
"1-"1-
18~
"1-"1-
~o
<ON
,..."<t
....,...
O~
""(1)
N_
...
'C'
o
Q.
CD
o
Iii
E
04:
a::
l-
f...
....
.s
"0
a::
e
iii
U
o
~
e
.c
o
..,
E
e
!:!::..
~
.
~
CD
~liP
w.5
z~
:10
"<t
(J)
....
N
M
-
"l-
II)
....
"I-
....
II)
"I-
~
"I-
~
10
,....
....
....
N
...
--
o
III
.c
1ij
e
!!
.
~
'0
U)
8
"<t
.s
...
o
~
!
o
1
Ii
U
-
o
w
is
N
E
E
!:!::..
~
>
III
!!!
.004:
...."
>:iP
W.5
ZI!
:10
~
If)
~
...
iPJ
en,...
m~
...."<t
... ...
"I-
...
....
"1-"1-
~~
"I-
....
N
"1-"1-
010
"<tll)
"I-
10
...
"1-"1-
l58l
"I-
,...
"1-"1-
~~
M
8
~
....
...
~~
,...,...
l8f8
.... ....
... ...
'C'
"20
....I"
.5J
~a.
~'O
'Ow
zis
8~
....-
....CD
.&i
0::....1
a:: .5
3:t'3
U)O
CIlI~
.'0
'Sz
0_
~8
(J)....
Ee
e 0
~~
N....
o 0
>>
III III
II II
u.(.(
....> &&
III I'll
w.5.5
Z!!~
:100
..,
~
o
::
'0
g
o
~
eo
~
:;
tD
II
:e
o
III
Do
III
o
!.
'Q.
'0
c
II
o
~
Do
"0
!!!
'S
C'
!!!
:i
. 9
'::-"0
11=
> ::J
:.=..c
0"0
!.e
II) III
!!! 01
_ e
.,.~
> 'x
"0 II
C C
III GI
<?~
> GI
lDJ:l
:a e
. 0
1-=
I! E ~
I 0 Do
I-t=a
· ! C
~ CD --
%:~
" .- :l
e 1i e
GI 1II .c
- Q.-
.5 1II]
"OUe
lD CD .-
~ .9- E
Q. 0.. GI
~ '0 i
5 "I- .!!
"""0>-
..,,,~
1ii .: 0
o :l 1II
U a Do
CD III
t)o.:o
II -- lD
'0' l(3 .9-
Q:oa..
1iC!o
o'5;fl.
I-O't:l
.... ' II
o J2 ...
;;:; 'S'S
. m IT
5"OlD
co.:
.!!IlI(1)
.g g'8
I- .- N
GI .!i lD
GI )( ..c:
(J)WI-
-- ~ ...,
....I
::
o
I-
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
PD61 063. D I/doclreport
EXHIBIT "H"
Wastewater
An explanation of the development of wastewater system impact fees follows.
Table Vll-5
TotallO-Year Wastewater System Cost
Total 2008 Recoverable System Cost
1998 Impact Fee Study
$ 574,734
$ 9.000
TotallO-year System Cost Recoverable Through Impact Fees
$ 583,734
Following the same assumptions used for the water system impact fees, a single-
family residence, typically equipped with a 3/4-inch or I-inch water meter, is
equivalent to 0.640 service units per day.
The wastewater impact fee per service unit is calculated as the IO-year recoverable
cost divided by the number of new service units projected over the next 10 years or:
Wastewater impact Fee per Service Unit = lO-year Recoverable Cost/lO-year
Service Units
= $ 583.734
1,458 Service Units
= $400 per Service Unit
The maximum wastewater impact fee which could be assessed for a I-inch meter is
computed by multiplying the number of service units consumed by a I-inch meter
times the impact fee per service unit, or:
Wastewater Impact Fee
for I-inch Meter
= $400
Service Unit
x 0.640 Service Units
I-inch Meter
=
$256 per I-inch Meter
The maximum wastewater impact fee which could be assessed for other meter sizes
and types is based on the equivalent capacity of a I-inch meter. A table of
quivalencies based on meter size and type is provided in Table VII-6. For example,
the wastewater impact fee for a 4-inch compound meter is computed as follows.
Wastewater Impact Fee per 4-inch Compound Meter =
(4-inch Compound Meter)
(I-inch Compound Meter)
10.0 x
1.0
$256
I-inch Meter
= $2,560 per 4-inch Compound Meter
VII-9
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
P:061 Q63.01/doc:/report
EXHIBIT "H"
Table VII-6 presents maximum assessable wastewater impact fees for various water
meter types and sizes. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may
establish an amount to be assessed up to this maximum.
Table Vll-6
Table of Equivalencies
And Maximum Assessable Wastewater Impact Fee
For Selected Water Meter Sizes and Types
Meter Type
Simple
Simple
Simple
Simple, Compound
Turbine
Compound
Turbine
Compound
Turbine
Compound
Turbine
Turbine
Turbine
Turbine
Meter Size
5/8" x 3/4"
3/4" or 1"
1-112"
2"
2"
3"
3"
4"
4"
6"
6"
8"
10"
12"
Ratio to 1" Meter
0.7
1.0
2.0
3.2
4.0
6.0
7.0
10.0
12.0
20.0
25.0
36.0
58.0
86.0
Maximum Assessable
Wastewater
Impact Fee ($)
$ 179
$ 256
$ 512
$ 819
S 1,024
$ 1,536
$ 1,792
S 2,560
$ 3,072
S 5,120
$ 6,400
S 9,216
$ 14,848
S 22,016
VII-IO
City of Colleyville
1998 Water and
Wastewater CIP and
Impact Fee Update
PD61063.Dlldoc/n:port
~
o
i::
-
~
o
(J
~
o
C!:it
~....
e!5
2:.
wQ
!:&:::!
~:::i
~OCXl
s! ct: ....
~ Q.; Lu
QWll ~
S........III::
.!5~ P
.Q U a.: .-
~~~ ~
~~ ~
U~ UJ
~~
Cl)e
~Q.
Q)~
Q
~ffi
'"
~
fil
CI)
o
a.
o
8:
..
'i ~ ~~ In ~ flj~
"'"
-"'" - r::."'"
0' 0) ~! - ~ !~
..u ~ -
D..o N .-
-(.) .... .... .... ....
~
10 NN N "'" "'0)
. i jg~ 18 ~ -"'"
5u ION
~ l8N ~ ! ~i
c 0 ........
it(.)
I
I=lu ~ ~I ~ I I:!
! .
"'u a 8 .., fi~
~ c 0 ~
11:'(.)
.
~ ~8 ~ a ,.....,
13 (f)N
0"'" CD"'"
il co l8~ tf) N 21
CD
;; -.... ;; ;;
gu .... ....
u
..
.
a.- i NN "'" ~ "'" "'"
u g COli) In ~~
01&. ........ .... ....
u
..
..
Ig CD CD 10 lI) lI) lI)lI)
is
g ~ ~~ ~ Ii -N
"'(f)
"'" CD CD "'"
.c N N - --
en
c
.
...
III
!
c( N_
. . 'U. .a
",0 :::: Uiiii I- ;; U U
.z ;;;;
c
'ii
..
Q
.S!
G
U
~
:E
'0 0
0 ~ .. c ..
15 III -'>
... 0 -c
'P. 8'U I'P. = c 'U
01 II III 'ii
e NO:: e c 0 .!!
QI C e QI I!! U .~
:E - ~ :E III :E
(30:: :E '0 a
c( Uc c( '0 '0
0:: ~. 0:: %
I- .211 l- (/) B w
~ o- N ~ ... ~
-,Q.. -
..
a
'Ii
0
~ 0::
QI 0::
~'O ... E
El~ a 41)
E 'U ..lO: 1ii
0:: 'U~ I) ~ e
0 !!
.. QI 0::0::
II. '0 0 ~...J
III gc 'U 1 ~.j
a .elll
u In 0:: (/)0
'0 (/)J! c 'UU
~ =n. 'ii G c::e
~'O 0 0 111_
15 u '0 In 0
0 a~ ~ '3%
(/) W .98
c
b ~'8 ~ '8
0 0 ..-
M ~co -, N (/)...
QI ..- .a u
c :::: ~ :;: ;;
::::i (/)
I
,,;
..
.,
.:
...
o
o
o
~.
.,
..
i
-g
u
.e
'0
c
;
I
I
~
....
...
....
~
e
~
III
~
e
.
...,
'0
III
III
'i
u
2
..
e
o
U
c..
18
.ao
~a
~1$
~2
.2.
ja
Q..o
--
00
!i~
...N
cii
ji
:iili
!~
Q1n.
l.i!f
III III
15 8 .
c.c.
80ii
..;;0
4I)Jiiu
s.!!~
-c;
a:el
o~~
1I'l'U.9
OICIll
~III~
a"-~
2'--
'i...J!
." ....
ftIC_
.aoe
III l$'E
cc'O
II Q. III
EIII'U
...ec
"5ci~
l:r.E 0
~1'tS
15.....5
o -Ill
I ~e
'U-co
'5::~
ale.!!
a; aB
Q1e-
E w 0
oQl~
_'U~
III.2M
~u_
~.e III
QI_'U
,ft III ..
VI 0-
.. u U
a.7b~
eptUQ.
e~ III
~ Qii
e .- 0
-t/)u
'UQlI)
01 a u
en c c
o .- III
Gi g. ~ .5
oa:ct
z. . .
o
g
~
(D
00
..
EXHIBIT "I"
'r
ORDINANCE 0-99-1199
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING
ORDINANCE 0-95-1004, THE WATER, WASTEWATER AND ROADWAY
IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE, BY APPROVING AND ADOPTING A NEW
CAPITAL. IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER
IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR AND IMPOSING NEW WATER AND
WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE;
AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION.
WHEREAS, Chapter 395, as amended, of the Texas Local Government Code
provides procedures for municipalities to enact and amend impact
fees; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville Capital Improvements Advisory Committee
has reviewed the Water and Wastewater System Capital
Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Update study, dated March,
1999, prepared for the City of Colleyville by the engineering
consulting firm of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. of Fort Worth,
Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Water and Wastewater System
Capital rmprovements Plan and adopted an order setting a public
hearing date to discuss adoption of said document and imposition
of impact fees as required by the Texas Local Government Code;
and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published
three times in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville in
accordance with the publication requirements of Chapter 395,
Texas Local Government Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec 1.
THAT Exhibit A, Service Area Map, of Ordinance 0-95-1004 remains
unchanged.
Sec 2.
THAT Exhibit B, Land Use Assumptions, of Ordinance 0-95-1004 is
hereby amended to incorporate the Land Use Assumptions
contained in Resolution R-98-1408.
Sec 3.
THAT Exhibit C, Schedule of Maximum Impact Fees, of Ordinance
0-95-1004 is hereby amended as it relates to Water and Wastewater
Impact Fees by incorporating the table of Maximum Allowable Water
Ord.0-99-1199
Page 2 of 4
Sec4.
Sec 5.
Sec 6.
Sec 7.
Sec 8.
Sec 9.
and Wastewater Impact Fees shown on the attached Exhibit "1" of
this ordinance.
THAT Exhibit 0, Schedule of Maximum Impact Fees to be Collected,
of Ordinance 0-95-1004 is hereby amended as it relates to Water
and Wastewater Impact Fees by establishing the actual assessment
rate as follows:
A. The actual Water Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be 40% of the
maximum allowed by this ordinance.
B. The actual Wastewater Impact Fee Collection Rate shall be 100%
of the maximum allowed by this ordinance.
THAT Exhibit 0, Schedule of Maximum Impact Fees to be Collected,
of Ordinance 0-95-1004 is hereby amended as it relates to Water
and Wastewater Impact Fees by incorporating the table of Actual
Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to be Collected shown on the
attached Exhibit "1" of this ordinance.
THAT Exhibit E, Water Improvements Plan, of Ordinance 0-95-1004,
is hereby amended and the document "Water and Wastewater
System Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Update" dated
March, 1999, is hereby adopted as the official study required by
Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code for adoption of
water impact fees.
THAT Exhibit E, Wastewater Improvements Plan, of Ordinance 0-
95-1004, is hereby amended and the document "Water and
Wastewater System Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee
Update" dated March, 1999, is hereby adopted as the official study
required by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code for .
adoption of wastewater impact fees.
THAT Ordinance 0-95-1004 as it relates to Roadway Impact Fees
shall remain in place, except where amended by this ordinance.
THAT it is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that
that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of
this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section of this ordinance shall be declared
unconstitutional by the valid judgement or decree of any court of
competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of
the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections
of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the
City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such
unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section.
2
Ord. 0-99-1199
Page 3 of 4
Sec 10.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two
Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation
continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable
as such.
Sec 11.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternate method of publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,1999.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
3
Ord. 0-99-1199
Page 4 of4
- - .
Maximum Water.. 'Na$tewder Impatrt fees Allowable
Maximum Maximum Total
Meter'Type Meter Size Water Wastewater lmpa~Fees
Impact P_ I$pactFM Allowable
Simple 3/4" $ 2,507 $ 179 $ 2,686
Simple 1" $ 3,581 $ 256 $ 3,837
Simple 1-112" $ 7,163 $ 512 $ 7,675
Simple, Compound 2" $ 11,461 $ 819 $ 12,280
Turbine 2" $ 14,326 $ 1,024 $ 15,350
Compound 3" $ 21.489 $ 1,536 $ 23,025
urbine 3" $ 25,070 $ 1,792 $ 26,862
Compound 4" $ 35.814 $ 2.560 $ 38,374
Turbine 4" $ 42,977 $ 3,072 $ 46,049
Compound 6" $ 71,629 $ 5.120 $ 76,749
Turbine 6" $ 89,536 $ 6,400 $ 95,936
Turbine 8" $ 128,932 $ 9.216 $138,148
Turbine 10" $ 207.724 $ 14,848 $ 222,572
Turbine 12" $ 308.004 $ 22,016 $ 330,020
. ..
..
Actual water.and Wa$l:~ter Im~ac:t P~~~<l,;..;<<tl'~;.J ;.. u.....
.. - .>.. .:..;. '
. A~ :'ACfuaJ .
'Nitar . W~te~
M!!ltet1y)1fi fle~s~ . J"~P" ~~l~~~t .
COllectecf .~,..~;.~. ;r~e6Cot ~.
... .. ~ ... .
Simple 3/4" $ 1,003 $ 179 $ 1,182
Simple 1" $ 1,432 $ 256 $ 1,688
Simple 1-112" $ 2,865 $ 512 $ 3,377
Simple, Compound 2" $ 4,584 $ 819 $ 5,403
Turbine 2" $ 5,730 $ 1,024 $ 6,754
Compound 3" $ 8,596 $ 1,536 $ 10,132
Turbine 3" $ 10,028 $ 1,792 $ 11,820
Compound 4" $ 14,326 $ 2,560 $ 16,886
~ urbine 4" $ 17,191 $ 3.072 $ 20,263
Compound 6" $ 28,652 $ 5.120 $ 33,772
Turbine 6" $ 35,814 $ 6,400 $ 42,214
Turbine 8" $ 51.573 $ 9,216 $ 60,789
Turbine 10" $ 83,090 $ 14,848 $ 97,938
Turbine 12" $ 123.202 $ 22,016 $ 145,218
Exhibit "1"
4
Water and Wastewater Event Schedule
City of Colleyville
(Final)
I
Step I
Number Event TiminQ Purpose of Event Event Date
I 1 At a regular meeting of the City City Council adopts order setting a public hearing date to discuss Completed I
Council I adoption of the land use assumptions.
Not more than 60 days and not less Publish first notice of public hearing on land use assumptions. i
2 than 31 days prior to date of public Notices published once a week for three consecutive weeks. Completed
hearing.
I On or before the first notice of public land use assumptions must be made available to the public on this
I 3 hearing on land use assumptions. date. Completed
! I Before the 30th day before the public I Send notice of public hearing on land use assumptions at least 31 Completed
4 ! hearing on land use assumptions. days prior to the hearing to any person who has requested notice In
i writing within last two years.
I I ,
5 lOne week after step 2. Publish second notice of public hearing on land use assumptions Completed
6 One week after step 5. Publish third notice of public hearing on land use assumptions. Completed
,
I On the public hearing date that has City Council conducts publiC hearing on land use assumptions and
I 7 been advertised and at a regular City Completed
i within 30 days of the public hearing adopts land use assumptions.
I Council meeting.
i
8 Develop the capital improvements plan City Council authorizes for a capital improvements plan to be Completed
i if not already completed. developed by a qualified professional.
j
i IOn completion of the capital ,City Council adopts order setting a public hearing date to discuss
I 9 adoption of the capital improvements plan and imposition of the 11/16/1999
I improvements plan. impact fee.
10 ! Not more than 60 days prior to date of Publish first notice of City Council public hearing on capital 11/17/1999
public hearing. improvements plan and impact fees.
I On or before the first notice of public
11 hearing on the capital improvements Capital improvements plan made available to the public. 11/17/1999
I plan
I Before the 30th day before the public Send notice of City Council public hearing at least 31 days prior to
, 12 ! hearing on the capital Improvements the hearing to any person who has requested notice in writing within 11/17/1999
!
! Iplan and impact fee. last two years.
I 13 lOne week after publishing first notice Publish second notice of City Council public hearing on capital 11/24/1999
I of public hearing. improvements plan and impact fees.
At least 6 business days prior to the CIAC reviews capital improvements plan and proposed impact fee
i 14 City Council public hearing on the and submits written comments to City Council before the fifth 11/29/1999
capital improvements plan business day before the date of the public hearing.
15 lone week after publishing second Publish third notice of City Council public hearing on capital 12/01/1999
notice of public hearing. improvements plan and impact fees.
iOn the public hearing date that has City Council conducts first public hearing to discuss the capital
16 Ibeen advertised and at a regular City 12/21/1999
Council meeting. improvements plan and proposed impact fees.
IOn the public hearing date that has City Council conducts second public hearing and within 30 days of
17 Ibeen advertised and at a regular City the first public hearing adopts capital improvements plan and 01/04/2000
!Council meeting. i imposes impact fees.
01/13/2000
c Uy of
AGENDA BRIEFING
TI~
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT:
0-99-1200 - An Ordinance to authorize the.
removal or the trimming of trees, tree limbs
or shrubs in or over the street rights-of-way.
MEETING I AGENDA #
1/18/00 I 14
1/04/00
I
12/21/99
I
January 18. 2000
Update
At the January 4th meeting, the City Council suggested several language changes to the
proposed ordinance. The language changes are intended to make the ordinance sensitive
to the preservation of the unique rural character along collector streets in the City. The
attached ordinance has been modified to include the revised language. One comment
suggested that the minimum clearance height of tree limbs over the right-of-way be
reduced to 12.5 feet instead of the proposed 14 feet. However, staff is recommending that
the 14' minimum clearance be retained because our current fire fighting apparatus would
not have any clearance at 12.5 feet. A second comment referenced the $2000 penalty
clause contained in the ordinance. It is not the intent of staff to issue citations to require
compliance to this ordinance since the City has the authority under the ordinance to trim
any tree determined to be in violation. However, the City Attorney has advised staff to
include the $2000 penalty clause just in case it is ever needed.
January 4. 2000
Second Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1200
December 21. 1999
First Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1200
Backaround
The Public Works Department frequently receives complaints from citizens regarding low
hanging tree limbs over public streets. Currently there is no ordinance that establishes
specific criteria for trimming or removing trees, which cause a public nuisance within the
public right-of-way. Earlier this year, during the normal process of trimming and removing
several problem trees, staff was confronted by citizens regarding the authority to perform
this function.
c~&>~
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
....... 08Ii2e.....
Agenda Briefing
0-99-1200
Page 2.
In response to this concern, staff has drafted the attached ordinance, which clarifies the
authority for trimming trees within the public right-of-way, and establishes minimum criteria
for visibility and clearance over public street surfaces. The importance of having minimum
clearances over a street is also a concern of the Fire Department. From a public safety
perspective, fire department equipment and ambulance vehicles have difficulty negotiating
areas where tree limbs hang within 14' of a street surface. The ordinance includes a
process for notifying an adjacent property owner when a tree is in violation. The ordinance
establishes the following criteria:
1) a tree, whether located on private property or not, which has limbs within 14'
of the street surface is declared a violation of the ordinance.
2) certain trees located within the parkway which block the visibility of drivers
located at a street intersection are also a violation of the ordinance.
The notification process established by this ordinance would require written notification of
the adjacent property owner advising them to trim the violating tree within ten (10) days.
If the property owner fails to comply with this requirement the Public Warks Department
would be authorized by the ordinance to trim the tree accordingly. There is no penalty for
non-compliance. The ordinance also contains a provision for the removal of a tree located
within the parkway (the space between the pavement and the property line) when it blocks
the visibility at a street intersection. A tree over three inChes (3") in diameter which creates
a visibility problem would only be removed upon the recommendation of a staff committee
composed of the Fire Chief, Police Chief and the Public Services Director. The ordinance
includes language giving some discretion when dealing with young trees that may
ultimately grow into compliance with the ordinance.
Summary and Conclusion
Attached is a copy of the proposed Ordinance 0-99-1200, which was reviewed by the
City's Tree Board Ei.ld Parks & Recreation Advisory Board on November 1, 1999. Both
bodies concurred with the ordinance, however a concern regarding how to trim young,
newly planted trees that might be interfering with the right-of-way without destroying them
was raised. As a result, Staff amended the ordinance to require the review by several
knowledgeable people before such trees are trimmed or removed.
Recommendation
Approval of Ordinance 0-99-1200
ORDINANCE 0-99-1200
AN ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE THE REMOVAL OR TRIMMING OF TREE LIMBS
OVER STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY; DECLARING A PUBLIC NUISANCE; PROVIDING
NOTICE AND ABATEMENT PROCEDURES; PROVIDING FOR A PENAL TV FOR
VIOLATION; AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION:
WHEREAS, trees or tree limbs, when allowed to grow over or onto the parkway or
pavement of a street right-of-way, may create a public nuisance and can
cause a hazard to passing motorists or pedestrians; and
WHEREAS, in some cases such overhanging limbs have become obstacles to viewing I
potential oncoming traffic for motorists at street intersections; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds the need to establish minimum clearance
requirements over street pavement surfaces, and provide a method for
notice to owners of adjacent properties to maintain trees, tree limbs, and
shrubs in a safe manner; and
.1 WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a
newspaper of general circulation in Colleyvilleat least 15 days before
such hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the proposed ordinance herein
effectuated furthers the purpose of achieving public safety and is in the
best interest of the citizens of the City of Colleyville;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1. Trees overhanging street and sidewalk pavement.
A. THAT any tree, shrub or tree limbs, which are growing at a height less
than required by this ordinance, may be declared a public nuisance.
B.
THAT it shall be unlawful for any person owning or having supervision
or control of any real property within the corporate limits of the City, to
permit or allow a tree, shrub or tree limb to grow upon any such real
property, or along the sidewalk or street adjacent to the same between
the property line and the curb, or if there is no curb, between the
property line and the edge of the street, if any portion of the tree, shrub
or tree limb is growing at a height less than fourteen feet (14') above
the pavement of the roadway, or seven feet (7') above the pavement
of the sidewalk.
II
I
C. THAT a tree, shrub or tree limb shall be deemed to interfere with or
cause an obstruction to motorists or pedestrians if it obscures the
II
Ordinance 0-99-1200
Page 2 of 3
motorists' or pedestrians' view of any street intersection, sign or traffic
control device or if it otherwise causes or creates a hazard that could
reasonably cause property damage or personal injury.
D. THAT in the event that any person fails or refuses to comply with the
provisions of this ordinance, the City shall give ten (10) days written
notice of the violation to the property owner prior to abating the
violation. For purposes of this ordinance, the property owner shall be
the name according to the most recent official tax rolls.
E.
THAT if such person fails or refuses to comply with the provisions of
this ordinance within ten (10) days after the date of notification as
provided above, the City may go upon such property, or authorize
another to go upon such property, and do or cause to be done the
work necessary to obtain compliance with this ordinance. The
specifications in this ordinance shall allow the City to remove a shrub,
branch or tree if, after careful determination by the City, it is deemed to
be an eminent threat to public safety. Taking into consideration the
desire of our citizens to maintain the beauty of our tree canopied
streets, limb trimming will be kept to the minimum required in order to
preserve safety of vehicular travel.
i
!
i
I
I
I
Ii
Sec. 2. Trees obscuring view in parkway visibility triangle.
A. THAT trees, shrubs or tree limbs which interfere with, or cause an
obstruction to motorists or pedestrians by obscuring the view within the
parkway visibility triangle as illustrated on the attached Exhibit 'A', or
the view of a traffic control device shall be hereby declared a public
nuisance. For purposes of this ordinance, the viewing area shall be
the area between thirty inches (30") and seven feet (7') above the
ground.
B. THAT in the event that a tree, shrub or tree limb is determined to be in
violation of this ordinance, the City shall give ten (10) days written
notice to the abutting property owner prior to abating the violation.
The specifications in this ordinance shall allow the City to remove a
shrub, branch or tree if after careful determination by the City (or its
designated committee) it is deemed to be an eminent threat to public
safety.
C.
THAT if such person fails or refuses to comply with the provisions of
this ordinance within ten (10) days after the date of notification as
provided above, the City may go upon such property, or authorize
another to go upon such property, and do or cause to be done the
work necessary to obtain compliance with this ordinance.
II
Ordinance 0-99-1200
Page 3 of 3
D. THAT no live tree, which exceeds three inches (3") in diameter,
measured at 48" above the ground, shall be removed unless
authorized, after review, by a committee composed of the Public
Services Director, the Chief of Police and the Fire Chief, and their
decision shall be final.
Sec. 3. THAT in the enforcement and administration of this ordinance, City Staff will
use discretion when evaluating whether or not a young tree should be
trimmed or allowed to grow in such a manner that it will eventually become in
conformance with this ordinance.
Sec. 4. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall
be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and
every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and
shall be punishable as such.
Sec. 5. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternate method of publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,1999.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2000.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVE[, AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
I
I Ross 1. Foster
City Attorney
Street
Sidewalk
STREET CROSS SECTION - MINIMUM TREE CLEARANCES
,.
300'
-I
-- -~~----~'~-~-'S;'-'-~:'~;~;~i;i..~:'~::.~&,., ~:~ 1"
- - Property Li~ -./ .
-
CD
!
-
en
Street
Edge of Pavement
t---
, The visibility triangle shown
on this drawing is typical
and is applicable on both
'sides of the intersection.
NON - TREE OBSTRUCTION - VISIBILITY TRIANGLE
EXHIBIT 'A'
0-99-1200
Clty of
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA BRIEFING
neE;
Texas
DEPARTMENT: FINANCE
SUBJECT:
Monthly Financial Report
December 1999
MEETING / AGENDA #
01/18/00/ ~ 5
/
/
January 18. 2000
Analvsis
General Fund
Current tax collection percentage is up over the December 1998 collection percentage by
over 8%. Monthly sales tax revenue was up significantly ($33,621 I 33.2%) over the
amount received in December 1998. Residential permits are up by eight over December
1998 and now exceed FY1999 by eight for the year -to-date. Municipal Court revenues are
rebounding due to greater citations issued from October through December. The average
amount expended by the departments at the end of December is 19.9%.
Utility Fund
Water sales and usage are higher than the prior year due to the summer-like heat and
drought conditions we experienced this fall and the continued lack of rainfall. Building
related installations are up because of increased building related activity. Penalty
revenues are up due to larger bills, and customers paying later than usual during this fiscal
year. Interest income is down due to timing of maturities and interest earnings from the
1998 Revenue Bonds. The average amount expended by the Utility Fund at the end of
December is 20.75%.
~c/~~ ,
DEPART AD
C~~l~
CITY MANAGE ~
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
"'.... 08IQ2E.H
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - DECEMBER 1999
GENERAL FUND RECEIVED PROJECTED RECEIVED
fY 2000 AS OF AS OF AS OF PERCENT
REVENUE SOURCE BUDGET 12/31/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/1998 CHANGE
Current Taxes $4,369,195 $1,287,686 $1,375,652 $1,225,637 5.06%
Delinquent Taxes 30,500 10,654 11,574 9,297 14.60%
Penalty &. Interest 28,100 2,929 3,268 2,326 25.92%
TOTALAD VALOREM TAXES $4,427,795 $1,301,269 $1,390,493 $1,237,260 5.170/0
TU Electric $665,000 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
Tri-County Electric 27,885 0 0 0 0.00%
Lone Star Gas 147,000 0 0 0 0.00%
Southwestern Bell 153,693 38,351 38,423 32,699 17.28%
General Telephone 18,296 5,080 4,574 4,400 15.45%
Refuse 79,206 13,884 13,201 21,302 - 34 .82%
Cable 1V 99,000 27,161 24,750 21,684 25.26%
TOTAL FRANCHISE TAXES $1,190,080 $84,476 $80,948 $80,085 5.48%
Sales Tax
Mixed Beverage Tax
$1,901,848
22,000
$339,267
4,671
$350,190
5,500
$306,395
5,428
10.73%
-13.950/
TOTAL SALES TAX
$1,923,848
$343,938
$355,690
$311,823
10.30%
Building $520,000 $158,966 $117,000 $93,000 70.93%
Plumbing 101,000 27,534 22,725 20,558 33.93%
Electrical 91,000 22,831 20,475 17,744 28.67%
City License 40,000 7,610 7,532 6,149 23.76%
Building Plan Review Fee 10,000 21,898 2,585 1,125 1846.49%
New Business 1,000 350 225 250 40.00%
Animal 1,510 92 279 113 -18.58%
Sign Permit 2,900 755 653 840 -10.12%
Fence Permit 3,000 1,051 675 525 100.19%
Fire Permits 225 175 51 50 250.00%
TOTAL UCENSES &. PERMITS $770,635 $241,262 $172,199 $140,354 71.90%
Fines $424,091 $105,787 $106,023 $94,156 12.35%
False Alarms 7,320 1,800 1,830 2,700 -33.33%
TOTAL ANES $431,411 $107,587 $107,853 $96,856 11.08%
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - DECEMBER 1999
RECEIVED PROJECTED RECEIVED
REVENUE SOURCE FY 2000 AS OF AS OF AS OF PERCENT
BUDGET 12/31/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/1998 CHANGE
Re-zoning $38,506 $4,250 $4,500 $3,000 41.67%
Plat Fee/Site Plan 29,000 4,285 4,500 3,205 33.70%
Board of Adjustment 2,500 375 625 12.5 200.00%
Sale of Material 3,000 689 625 158 336.08%
Weed Mowing 7,500 275 833 2,291 -88.00%
Animal Impoundment 3,250 1,340 813 926 44.71 %
Ambulance 62,400 12,626 15,600 16,618 -24.02%
Recreation Program 57,775 7,772 7,700 542 1333.95%
Non-Resident Fee Parks 16,000 9,720 8,000 6,970 39.45%
Field Use Charge 29,430 5,915 6,750 10,012 -40.92%
Engineering & Inspection 75,000 20,476 18,750 37,283 -45.08%
:hgs & Reimbursements 8,000 6,945 2,500 1,196 480.69%
':ommumity Center Rental 151,000 44,378 37,750 33,772 31.40%
Lot Drainage Insp Fee 25,000 6,375 6,875 5,125 24.39%
TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICE $508,361 $125,421 $115,821 $121,223 3.46%
DARE Officer Reimb
':nPS FAST Grant
$57,750
25,000
$0
o
$0
o
$0
o
0.00%
0.00%
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL
$82,750
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
Sale of Surplus Property $10,000 $0 $0 $16,331 100.00%
nterest Income 296,500 10,500 10,000 35,339 -70.29%
~iscellaneous 13,260 2,392 3,315 2,473 -3.28%
Tower Rental 69,925 16,521 16,000 6,141 169.03%
:OTAL MISCELLANEOUS $389,685 $29,413 $29,315 $60,284 -51.21%
,'ransfer from Utility Fd
$382,817
$0
$0
$0
o.oo%"
'OTAL TRANSFERS
$382,817
$0
$0
$0
0.00%
OTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUES
$10,107,382
$2,233,366
$2,252,320
$2,047,885
9.06%
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - DECEMBER 1999
TOTAL PERCENT
THROUGH THROUGH INCREASE INCREASE
12/31/1999 12/31/1998 (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
% OF CURRENT TAX ROLL COLLECTED 58.80% 50.60% 8.20% 16.21%
RESIDENTIAL BLOG PERMITS 48 40 8 20.00%
COMMERCIAL BLDG PERMITS 5 4 1 25.00%
PLUMBING PERMITS 228 158 70 44.30%
ELECTRICAL PERMITS 132 79 53 67.09%
CITATIONS ISSUED 2,395 1,817 578 31.81 %
CITATIONS APPEALED 47 43 4 9.30%
GENERAL FUND EXPENSES
EXPENDED YEAR- TO-DATE % EXPENDED
FY 2000 THROUGH PROJECTED 25% OF THE BUDGET
BUDGET 12/31/1999 EXPENDITURES YEAR COMPLETED REMAINING
City Council and Secretary $200,233 $41,805 $46,054 20.9% $158,428
City Manager 468,341 104,206 $112,402 22.3% 364,135
Finance 426,710 107,557 $106,678 25.2% 319,153
Legal 100,000 7,090 $8,550 7.1% 92,910
Economic Development 144,470 34,109 $34,673 23.6% 110,361
Engineering 566,335 142,704 $141,584 25.2% 423,631
Building Inspection 270,025 53,384 $54,005 19.8% 216,641
Community Development 354,281 82,057 $85,027 23.2% 272,224
Fire 2,150,173 482,813 $473,038 22.5% 1,667,360
Police 2,294,165 529,015 $550,600 23.1% 1,765,150
Parks 894,522 118,681 $116,925 13.3% 775,841
Recreation 151,548 24,805 $25,777 16.4% 126,743
Commumity Center 241,890 46,891 $48,378 19.4% 194,999
Streets & Drainage 1,312,167 178,062 $183,703 13.6% 1,134,105
Municipal Court 109,892 30,272 $30,870 27.5% 79,620
Fleet Maintenance 118,505 31,144 $33,181 26.3% 87,361
Merit Pool 80,000 0 0 0.0% 80,000
Compensation Study 223,326 0 0 0.0% 223,326
TOTAL EXPENSES $10,106,583 $2,014,595 $2,051,444 19.9% $8,091,988
MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - DECEMBER 1999
UTILITY FUND
RECEIVED PROJECTED RECEIVED
FY 2000 AS OF AS OF AS OF PERCENT
REVENUE SOURCE BUDGET 12/31/1999 12/31/1999 12/31/1998 CHANGE
Water Sales $4,868,869 $1,563,418 $1,217,217 $1,233,047 26.79%
Sewer Sales 1,606,264 441,745 401,566 364,381 21.23%
Sewer Installation 22,000 6,400 5,500 3,900 64.10%
Water Installation 61,.600 12,970 15,400 8,540 51.87%
Sewer Tie-on Charges 45,000 6,332 7,500 7,273 -12.94%
Engineering Charges 25,000 10,488 6,250 13,684 -23.36%
Penalties 145,690 52,980 36,423 44,384 19.37%
Miscellaneous 7,500 2,806 1,875 8,146 -65.55%
rOTALOPERATINGINCOME $6,781,923 $2,097,139 $1,691,731 $1,683,355 24.58%
Interest Income $245,000 $13,519 $13,000 $58,830 -77.02%
TOTAL NON-OPERATING INCOME $245,000 $13,519 $13,000 $58,830 -77 .02%
roTAL INCOME $7,026,9231 $2,110,6581 $1,704,731 1 $1,742,185 21.15%
TOTAL PERCENT
II THROUGH THROUGH INCREASE INCREASE
12/31/1999 12/31/1998 (DECREASE) (DECREASE)
IIGALLONS OF WATER SOLD 563,763,700 402,637,100 161,126,600 40.02%
~UMBER OF WATER CUSTOMERS 7,101 6,851 250 3.65%
JTILITY FUND EXPENSES
EXPENDED YEAR-TO-DATE % EXPENDED
FY 2000 THROUGH PROJECTED 25% OF THE BUDGET
BUDGET 12/31/1999 EXPENSES YEAR COMPLETED REMAINING
~dministration $152,529 $37,193 $38,132 24.38% $115,336
tiilling 135,796 39,898 39,381 29.38% 95,898
0perations 4,810,927 620,052 663,908 12.89% 4,190,875
)ebt Service 1,097,761 681,334 681,334 62.07% 416,427
Merit Pool 22,000 0 0 0.00% 22,000
":ompensation Study 41,628 0 0 0.00% 41,628
-ransfer to General Fund 382,817 0 0 0.00% 382,817
'- . r\L EXPENSES $6,643,458 $1,378,477 $1,422..755 20.75% $5,264,981
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 1 of 13
DRArr
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman
Hart at 7:00 P.M. on January 10, 2000.
Roll Call:
Present:
Rob Rutherford, Luann Edwards, William Tyler, Jim
Fletcher, Bryan Hill, Mike Collins (was absent during roll
call & arrived at 7:06 p.m.), Tom Hart
Tom Niederauer, Clayton Husband, Jan Levy
Staff:
Invocation:
Chairman Hart
Approval of Minutes:
December 13, 1999
Commissioner Hill moved to approve the minutes of December 13th as submitted.
Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
Abstained: Tyler
1. PUBLIC HEARING - A Zoning Change requested by John Lynch for Bob Gammon, from R-20
to PUD-R (planned unit development-residential) on 6.810 acres located at 3650 Pool Road.
Case Z-99-086.
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and explained the differences from the
previous rezoning case considered by the Commission. He said that the staff is recommending
denial because staff has consistently felt that the area should remain R20 as indicated on the
Master Plan and agricultural activities are not addressed in the Master Plan and consequently the
denial is recommended by default. Chairman Hart opened the public hearing. Those present
wishing to speak were:
John Lynch, applicant, representing the owner Bob Gammon, said that the use of the property is
consistent with the AG zoning district as the Gammons have had animals on the property as long
as they have lived there. He said that the best long term use of the property upon a sale or
subdivision would be R20. Mr. Lynch said that the current proposal includes the renovation of the
barn which will be smaller and not as high as the previous request and is a much more modest
expansion. The materials will be regular side sheets and a tin roof. Commissioner Collins asked
staff to explain the newly adopted amendment to accessory building regulations as it relates to
this case.
Bob Gammon, owner, told about his proposal and the plans for the addition to the barn. He said
that the neighbors were not in opposition to the first request and are in favor of this request.
John Lynch said that this is an extension of the original case and the owner was asked by Council
to withdraw his original case and apply for a PUD-R zoning change.
Commissioner Hill asked staff to extract the language from the proposal from John Lynch and
prepare a zoning change ordinance that better defines the PUD for the Commission to consider.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes -January 10, 2000
Page 2 of 13
DRA~1i
. rr- :J
Commissioner Fletcher said that neighborhoods benefit from pockets of open space and by
having this property open as proposed by the applicant, the community benefits, and with the
restrictions imposed by the PUD rather than straight AG zoning, he would be in favor of the
request.
Commissioner Hill said that he would not want to restrict Mr. Gammon from conducting the
activities that he has historically done on his property. He said that generally the neighbors have
been in favor of the use of the property and Mr. Gammon has been a good neighbor and leaving
the property R20 prevents him from using the property as he currently uses it.
Commissioner Fletcher said that he would like to restrict the property from being used as a future
commercial venture and there should be restrictions on the minimum square footage of lots if the
property were subdivided and also the maximum square footage and height of the barn.
Commissioner Edwards said that staff should use the limitations that are being asked for by the
applicant of 8500 s.f. for the barn and include the drawings with the ordinance. Mr. Lynch said
that they are requesting that the drawing be attached to the ordinance 'as stated in item # 2. c. of
their application. Also, under "land use" the only things that would be permitted are listed under
A.1.a. & c. Commissioner Edwards asked staff to draft an ordinance for their review. Staff said
that a draft could be prepared for their review at the next meeting and the applicant's case could
stay on track and be considered at the originally scheduled City Council meeting on February 1st
Commissioner Rutherford questioned the application about the proposed height of the barn.
Chairman Hart said that he personally does not have a problem with the proposed size of the barn
because of the lack of objection by the neighbors when the original request was for a 13,000 sq.
ft. barn. He also sited that the barn will be in the center of the property and not close to any
neighbors.
John Lynch asked if the Commission could grant a tentative approval subject to the language of
the ordinance being worked out to satisfy the Commission so that they can have some direction
as to the general concepts that are involved.
Chairman Hart polled the Commission how they would vote as requested. The general.
consensus was for approval. Mr. Lynch said that it was their original intent to include language
that did not permit any commercial use of the property.
Commissioner Fletcher moved to table the case. Commissioner Collins seconded the
motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
2. PUBLIC HEARING - A Zoning Change requested by Brian Marched, from AG to R-30 (single
family res., min. lot size 30,000 sq. ft.) on 2.210 acres located at 6212 L. D. Lockett Road.
Case Z-99-087
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 3 of 13
DRAFT
Tom Niederauer presented the case to the Commission.
Commissioner Edwards questioned staff about the reason the larger lot will be R30 rather than
a category that is more fitting for the amount of acreage.
Chairman Hart opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Brian Marched,
owner. He said that his family has outgrown the current house on the property and they want to
stay in Colleyville, so they propose subdividing the property in order to build a larger dwelling on
the lot. He said that they will continue to own the dwelling smaller lot at the front of the property.
He said that his neighbors do not have any concerns.
Doug Malcon, 2355 Glen Ridge Road, said that he proposes to redo the stock pond and build a
well that will have water in it all of the time. He said that the pond was used for detention of water
and the work proposed will enhance the pond and make it better. There being no one else
present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Edwards questioned staff about the availability of 'utilities and regulatioons
regarding fire hydrants for adequate coverage for the dwelling at the rear of the lot. Staff said that
those requirements will be reviewed at time of platting and building permit.
Commissioner Collins moved to approve the plat. Commissioner Rutherford seconded the
motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: Edwards
3. PUBLIC HEARING - A Zoning Change requested by David Cunningham for Faith Christian
School, from CC-2, CC-1, CN, & AG to PUD-C (planned unit development-commercial) on
43.891 acres located on the south side of McDonwell School Road near Precinct Line Road.
Case Z-99-088
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission. He told about the surrounding zonings
and uses of property. He explained why the site plan submitted by the applicant was conceptual
in nature and said that the detailed plan would be submitted at time of plat submittal. Mr.
Husband discussed the currently adopted Land Use Plan and the Thoroughfare Plan and pointed
out that the application does not conform to either one. He said that notice of public hearing was
sent to surrounding property owners and no correspondence has been received in response to
the notice.
Commissioner Hill asked questions about the Master Plan, and Commissioner Fletcher
questioned setbacks and rights-of-way on Precinct Line Road and McDonwell School Road.
Commissioner Edwards asked if the private school would be paying taxes on the property. She
asked if staff had a problem with the 85' height variance proposed by the applicant and staff said
that there were provisions in the ordinance to allow the height for institutional uses pending that
increased setback requirements are met. There being no further discussion, Chairman Hart
opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were:
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 4 of 13
DRf1~T
David Cunningham, 2172 Winding Creek, Grapevine, said that he was requested to assist the
school on a pro-bono basis. He said that he attends Memorial Baptist Church and is involved with
a number of leaders of the school. He stated the mission of the school and said that the proposed
school is a K through 12 school with a non-denominational Christian based education program.
He said that the ultimate buildout of the school will be approximately 1,000 students with the initial
phase being 650 students. They currently have an enrollment in excess of 400 students and the
student body is from Colleyville, South Lake, Trophy Club, Grapevine, with the majority being from
Colleyville. Mr. Cunningham said that this location was chosen because it is at the epicenter of
the student body that it will be serving. The site was chosen specifically because of its location,
depth, and size and because of the access from Precinct Line Road. He said that the overall feel
of this area is residential and not commercial. He said that the site is not a candidate for office
or retail development because it is too deep and too far removed from major thoroughfares and
is not near any major employment center.
The school plans to build a low density development with over 50 - 75% of the site being green
space with play yards, baseball diamonds, soccer fields, yards and private circulation. He said
that at maximum buildout the school will be 250,000 s.f. with 180,000 s.f. conceived currently.
The only field that would be lighted would be the football field and that is located close to Precinct
Line Road. He said that they are aware that they will need to do a significant amount of planning
to comply with all regulations and Precinct Line Road will be the primary access.
Mr. Cunningham said that the north/south connector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan would
bisect the site and it absolutely cannot be done. They believe that the .road should be eliminated
from the Master Plan as it is a road to nowhere and will serve no purpose. He said that Phase
One has not been determined yet as they will not be able to do detailed planning until the site is
zoned due to the cost involve with the document preparations. He said that he had another site
in another city under consideration, but chose to look at this site due to the prompting of certain
City staff members.
Chairman Hart questioned Mr. Cunningham about his statement about the project being an
epicenter for the student body and asked him if the Colleyville students would travel down Precinct
Line Road to go to a commercial business if it were located in the area. Mr. Cunningham said that
Precinct Line Road is too far away from too many major thoroughfares and most commercial
development is taking place on Davis Blvd. He said the site is too large for smaller commercial
development to develop. Chairman Hart asked if restaurants that sell beer and wine wanted to
locate in the area, how would the school feel about that. Mr. Cunningham said that he was not
in a position to comment about that. He said that there was a request in the application to allow
the school to subdivide the parcel that projects up to Precinct Line Road for a restaurant use.
Commissioner Fletcher questioned the projections for the student body and the impact of the
amount of trips being made by the majority of Colleyville students on the local roads that access
Precinct Line Road. Mr. Cunningham said that it would have little impact on McDonwell School
Road and it is sufficient enough to handle the increased traffic because the road will be greatly
overburdened with a school use rather than a commercial use.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 5 of 13
DR,AF~
Commissioner Rutherford questioned the applicant about deeper setbacks and he responded that
green space around the perimeter adds safety to the campus and deeper setbacks are not a
major issue.
Commissioner Hart mentioned the lack of property taxes and the need for everyone to think about
the importance of the subject.
Michael Simons, 6601 Curtis Road, had questions about the roadway design for McDonwell
School Road and the affect this project will have on the taxes for his property. He wanted to know
if the entryways for the school have been designed.
Linda Baker, 404 W. McDonwell School Road, said that she was on the Master Plan Task Force
and this area was known as the Western Gateway and retail is very important to the city. She
said that Precinct Line Road is a new highway and the future use of the area should not be
dismissed. She said that the city should not continue to bleed of future retail land even if it was
residential at one time or the citizens will no longer enjoy the low tax rates they currently have.
She said that even if the property were to be developed as residential, the city would receive more
taxes than if it were to be developed as a school. She said that the school should be required to
furnish the details of the development prior to rezoning and not at platting, as it is a waste of the
citizens time to attend meetings when the developers contracts fall through and they have to start
over again. She said that if they have a plan they should spend the money to draw plans, as a
concept plan does not mean anything to anybody. She said that a lot of work was put into the
Western Gateway Plan and it the committee was made up of citizens with many from the western
part of Colleyville. Ms. Baker said that it is insulting when the plan is ignored as Precinct Line
Road is the last hope for commercial development to locate in Colleyville.
Marilyn Nordling, LaVaca Trail, said that the object of the goal of the Commission is to preserve
open space for the benefit of the citizens as stated in an earlier case with cleaner air, quiet
neighbors; tree preservation; no more trashy environment; and she is in favor of all of that. She
said that she believes that this application offers all of those aspects as opposed to a commercial
development or a housing development. She said that she has never heard of a Western
Gateway Plan and would like to obtain more information about it.
Ronnie Nordling, 715 W. LaVaca Trail, had questions about the location of the lighted fields and
would like to assure that they be required close to Precinct Line Road as shown on the conceptual
site plan because if it were place to the east it would be closer to residential. He said that he is
not in favor of a proposed north/south roadway if it would end on LaVaca Trail.
Doyle Macintosh, 8333 Precinct Line Road, N. Richland Hills, on the southeast corner of LaVaca
Trail where the water tank is. He is opposed because they propose to take the corner portion of
the property away for road improvements and it is now used for drainage. He said that the
applicant could not have picked a worse piece of property to develop because of the height of
North Tarrant Property and the impact it has on drainage. He said that water flows over this
property. Mr. Macintosh said when they sell off a piece of this property it will create another
structure to stop the flow of water and create more problems.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 6 of 13
~~~
: t., _ C;
DR ;~:'.'\.' :1
David Cunningham, applicant, said that the area that they might sell of is limited to a small area
on Precinct Line Road and they are aware of the drainage issues. He said that the low density,
high green space campus is the smart thing to do because they won't be adding to the drainage
problems as a shopping center with parking lots or an office faciHty would. They will be retaining
water on site by using one of the play fields or football fields as a retention area for water to
elevate downstream water. The school is aware that they will be responsible for building half of
the improvements along McDonwell School Road, and off-site storm and sanitary sewer facilities.
Commissioner Fletcher asked the applicant if he could see a left turn being included for the traffic
patterns on t'AcDonwell School Road heading west bound. He responded that they will deed
property for tne widening of the two lane road and it will remain a two lane improved roadway with
a wider section for turning and the details will be addressed at the time of traffic planning.
Doyal Macintosh, 8333 Precinct Line, said that he has never heard of dumping water on a football
field. He asked if the field was already wet from the sprinklers, why would anyone want to dump
another six inches onto the field. He said that Remington Park is planned to exit onto LaVaca
Trail and all of the cars will be going west to Precinct Line Road. He is opposed to the loss of
taxes in the City as he still owns property in the City. He said that the problem with Colleyville has
been that they wanted five acre lots and horses and drive ten miles to a store. He said .that he
is concerned about flooding in the area because of all of the drainage pattern changes.
Edgar Butch Ethridge, fifty year resident of Colleyville, said Dr. Colley delivered his mother in an
area near this site when it was known as "near Smithfield". He said that he has been in the
Christian school community for over fourteen years as his children have been educated in
Christian schools. He said that he speaks from experience when he says that Christian schools
are very adept at handling traffic through car-pooling as there are 2.6 children per car on trips to
and from the schools and the traffic is absorbed onto the property. The location would be fed off
of Davis onto Precinct Line, off West Glade onto Precinct Line, Hwy. 26 onto Precinct, off
McDonwell School Road onto Precinct Line. He said that a large majority of Colleyville students
would be coming off West Glade. He is concerned about fresh air and green space in the City
and the school will have very little adverse impact and will make a special effort to be a good
neighbor in the community. Butch said that the students leave at night, they come when most
residents are gone, they're gone when residents come home, they're gone over the weekends,
most of the summer, and on holidays. He said that the impact of traffic on the environment is a
lot less than people foresee it as being.
Chairman Hart asked Butch about future commercial development on Precinct Line Road, and
if Colleyville would be fortunate enough to bring in a restaurant that wanted to serve mixed drinks,
would the school be adverse to the business. He responded that he is not in a position to speak
for the school and give a definite yes or no answer. He said that he can only look at business that
are situated around area churches and at this point in time that it is a harmonious atmosphere and
if certain guidelines were in place, there should be no problem.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 7 of 13
.~
DR~'~';
Commissioner Hill asked Butch about his involvement with the school. He said that he is very
involved. In October of last year there was no school and that demonstrates the need for this kind
of school in the community. The original estimate for enrollments was 150 students and space
was needed to accommodate the enrollment of 476 students today. They are currently using
portable buildings at First Baptist Colleyville and they want to be out of the portables as badly as
everybody would like them out of them. He said that this is why it is imperative that they begin
construction as soon as possible. He said that they are turning down 20 applications a day and
this demonstrates the need and because it is non-denominational, it draws from area churches
and because it is not associated with a specific church, they have to raise all of the funding
themselves.
Mr. Macintosh said that he wanted people to know that he is not opposed to Christian schools as
he drove his granddaughter to a private Christian school everyday and it was a very good thing
in their lives.
Chairman Hart closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Edwards said that the school is a great idea, and she has looked at all areas of
Colleyville for an alternate site. She said that with Precinct Line being completed, she has great
expectations for commercial development and she has reservations about the school taking up
so much open space. She said that she is impressed with the amount of growth at the school and
hopes that they find another site and remain in Colleyville as it would be a great asset.
Commissioner Fletcher said that he has a conflict as well as he sees the potential of the property
and the commercial use may be in the distant future. He said that 40 acre parcels become
scarcer as the area grows and an office park or new car dealership or commercial venture could
be located there as traffic increases on Precinct Line Road. He said that he agrees with the
statement that tax revenue is not the only thing the community needs to look at that they need to
also look at quality of life. He said that there seems to be a conflict there and the way the school
has grown so quickly, the maximum buildout will be achieved in a very short time and it will be
difficult to handle the increase in traffic on city streets. He said that the roads that lead to the
school are two lane roads currently. He said that the school is an attractive addition and there is
a need, but he does not know if this location is the right one.
Chairman Hart said that this is a very difficult decision as the Commission only has one shot at
commercial development and this is a major chunk of land. He said that he believes that Precinct
Line Road traffic and development will increase eventually and the city needs sales tax. The
Master Plan showed that not enough space was set aside for sales tax revenues to handle the
current infrastructure. He said that he personally knows Mr. Ethridge and it makes the decision
more difficult, but it goes back to "is it the right spot at the right time". He said that he is looking
for help from the other Commissioners.
Commissioner Hill said that Precinct Line may not currently be the best location for commercial,
but it is the only one the city has and he echoes the concerns stated by the other Commissioners.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 8 of 13
DRAFT
Commissioner Rutherford said that he also has the same concerns about tax impact, street
impact, loss of potential commercial property. He said that is why he asked the question about
relocating the school farther east away from Precinct Line Road to maximize commercial along
the roadway.
Commissioner Tyler said that he regretfully disagrees with the Commission as they should give
the application more consideration and they need to make concessions and sacrifices to allow the
school to locate in Colleyville. He said that he has seen other Christian schools come before the
Commission and seen hesitancy to show any partiality and sometimes the bottom line is not the
only thing to be considered. He said that he understands that the goal of the Commission is to
look out for the best interest of the city and citizens, but the school mentioned that 60% of the
students are Colleyville residents. He said that his children were in private schools when they
lived in California, but are currently in public schools and he would like the opportunity if finances
were available to put his children in a Christian school. Mr. Tyler said that if they are not willing
to show consideration for these organizations, the city will not get any private schools in the future
and with the majority of families having the need and means to use the schools, that is important.
The city is attracting families with children by building City Park, baseball fields and things that
attract families and sometimes pocket sense does not need to be ap:Jlied to the project, but the
decision needs to be made from the heart. He said that the consideration needs to be what is
best for the children of citizens and the opportunities for the future. He said that the school is only
going to use a minimum amount of frontage on Precinct Line Road to allow access to the site, and
he doesn't foresee commercial development locating deep off of the roadway and this could be
a good development for the land at that location.
Commissioner Fletcher said that he would like to consider tabling the case until the next meeting
so that he could digest all of the information presented at the public hearing and would like to poll
the other Commissioners on their thoughts.
Commissioner Hill said that he would not be in favor of tabling with no changes recommended to
the developer.
Commissioner Collins said that he would hate to defer making a decision, and he would prefer
to make a decision tonight. He said that he would take a look at a possible plan that would leave
some of the space closest to Precinct Line available for commercial development and still be able
to build the school, because he is in favor of the proposed use, He acknowledges the limited
availability for commercial properties.
Commissioner Tyler said that he cannot see what the Commission could recommend to the
applicant to bring back an alternate plan for their review. He does not believe that with the current
attitude of the Commission that tabling the case would change anything. He does not think that
there is another location for the school to locate and address concerns about using roads to
access the site without going through the city. He said it seems to him that the citizens do not
want to develop any roads in the city. He said that he wishes there were some kind of
compromise for the applicant to develop the property and obtain approval by the Commission.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 9 of 13
DRAFT
Commissioner Edwards said that if she votes to table, she might be able to get her car door locks
fixed before she has to vote. She said that there are fifty acres available on McDonwell School
Road that David Bagwell is no longer going to develop. She said that she has no objections to
tabling the case, however, she does not want to mislead the developer because it is unlikely that
she is going to change her mind.
Commissioner Rutherford said that he feels the same way, that he would not be adverse to tabling
the case if the applicant came back with a plan that might meet some of the concerns of the
Commission. He said that if he had to vote tonight he would be against it.
Commissioner Hill asked the applicant if it were possible to purchase additional property and
move the project farther east. David Cunningham said that the minimum acreage that is needed
is 40 acres, and the preferred is 50 acres and they could not find or afford that. By eliminating
property on the west side, it defeats the possibility of locating in that area. He said that he is
hearing from the Commission that they want the school, they don't want traffic, and they want
commercial. If the school is not put on a major thoroughfare, they are defeating the traffic piece
of the puzzle, if it is put on a major thoroughfare, they have a commercial problem. He said that
there is not another possibility of relocating the school to another parcel and remain in Colleyville.
He said that they are taking up very little frontage on Precinct Line Road and if forces to nibble
off a piece, it defeats the purpose of locating the school on this site. He said that based upon
every planning aspect by the planners, they must have a minimum of 40 acres and they preferred
50 acres and the 50 acres Commissioner Edwards speaks of is in a residential area that creates
impacts the traffic problem. He said that their studies show that this is the best site for the school
and the best use of the property. He said that Commissioner Tyler is right and this is a time for
the Commission to open their hearts and not their pocket books.
Butch Ethridge, said that he has spoken to Joe Turk and the property was not large enough; the
Allgood family on West Glade and the property was too small; the Atkins family at Precinct Line
and West Glade and the wetlands reduced the size; the McCain family and the property was too
difficult to access and too large. That left the current Nine Acres piece of property. He said that
he personally knows all of the families and has looked for over a year and is aware of the
shrinking base of commercial properties. All of the residents have to send children to school and
we owe it to them to give them a good viable choice.
Commissioner Edwards said that she is willing to table the case in order to allow her time to think
about it as it is a big decision. Commissioner Edwards moved to table the case.
Commissioner Fletcher seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hart
Noes: Hill
[NOTE: THE COMMISSION TOOK A TEN MINUTE BREAK.]
4. PUBLIC HEARING - A Zoning Change requested by John Grant for As if a Ii Mahomed, from
AG to R-30 (single family residential, min. lot size 30,000 sq. ft.)on Lot 1 and from AG to R-40
(single family residential, min. lot size 40,000 sq. ft.) on Lot 2, 4.934 acres located at 6208
Pleasant Run Road. Case Z-00-001
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 10 of 13
DRAFT
Tom Niederauer presented the case to the Commission. Chairman Hart opened the public.;
hearing. Those present wishing to speak were:
John Grant, applicant, said that the lot is a large lot with one dwelling and the family wants to
construct a new dwelling and allow the current dwelling to remain to be used by other family
members. There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Hart moved to recommend approval of the zoning change from AG to R-30
and R-40. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: Edwards
5. PUBLIC HEARING - A Zoning Change requested by Miles Fairris, from CC-2 to C-PO
(Commercial-Professional Office) on .6923 acres located on the south side of Gateway Drive
in the in the 4100 block. Case Z-00-002
Tom Niederauer presented the case to the Commission. Chairman Hart opened the public
hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Miles Fairris, applicant, saying that he was
representing two dentists who wanted to open an office in Colleyville. There being no one else
present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Edwards moved to recommend approval of the zoning change from CC-2
to cpo. Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
6. PUBLIC HEARING - A Combination Plat of Lots 1 B1 & 1 B2, Block 2, Pleasant Oaks Estates
requested by Amita Chhambra, being a replat of a portion of Block 2, located at 801 Beverly
Drive. Case P-00-003
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission. Chairman Hart opened the public
hearing. There being no one present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Fletcher moved to approve the combination plat. Commissioner Edwards
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
7. A Combination Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Mikulik Addition requested by Danny Woods for Walter
Mikulik, 1.89 acres located in the 5000 block of Pool Road. Case P-OQ-Q05
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission. The Commission questioned the
location of the lot and the current structures and the location of the fence on the property.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 11 of 13
Do 10 ~?
. i.-~AJF tj
Commissioner Hill moved to approve the combination plat. Commissioner Rutherford
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
8. A Combination Plat of Lot 13, Block 2, Heritage High School Addition requested by Robert F.
Kohsmann, 0.4602 acres located on the south side of Gateway Drive in the 4200 block. Case
P-99-006
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and displayed the configuration of the
preliminary plan.
Commissioner Edwards moved to approve the combination plat. Commissioner Collins
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
9. PUBLIC HEARING - A Final Plat of The Village at Colleyville requested by Richard A Myers,
21.99 acres and 3.70 acres, a portion being a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, City Nat'1 Bank of
Colleyville Addition, located on Pleasant Run Road and Colleyville Blvd. Case P-00-007
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission. Chairman Hart opened the public
hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Richard Myers, applicant. Discussion by the
Commission ensued about the street name "Main Street" associated with the project. Richard
Myers said that he has had conversations with several City Council members and that there is a
consensus that Main Street can be associated with The Village project.
Commissioner Edwards said that other street names could be more imaginative for a
Mediterranean village project. She questioned the construction materials for a "wrought iron"
fence along City Park. She requested that the applicant identify the open spaces within the
project. She also asked the applicant to identify the proposed phases of the project. He said that
the initial phase would be mostly the commercial areas with the residential being constructed next.
Commissioner Fletcher asked about future alignment of Pleasant Run Road. Staff pointed out
the location of the future alignment. Richard Myers said that TXDOT has indicated that a traffic
signal will be located at Main Street, Thompson Terrace, and Colleyville Blvd. He said that he
disagrees with the concept of widening east/west roads to access Hwy. 26. Pleasant Run Road
has a long way to go to be as busy as Mockingbird Lane in Dallas and multiple lanes do not
necessarily encourage commercial development. Mr. Myers said that one of the reasons people
move to Colleyville is because of the effect of the beauty, quality of life, and 2 lane roads. The
way to solve the traffic problems is to improve the intersections.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 12 of 13
D..,.."
~ 'c {.;>, /'::lll::::-~,:'
t~:;,' f: ~.. ,,,..,. "'.
. II ~ Il'-\. ir' ~;
Commissioner Fletcher asked about sidewalks associated with the project. Mr. Myers said that
they are proposing that the City build the sidewalks along Pleasant Run Road and use some of
the TIF money. He said that within the project they will build sidewalks on every street and
access. He said that pedestrian and bicycle traffic isa very important aspect of this project and
the Hwy. 26 corridor for east/west circulation. Sidewalk construction will be proposed in the
developer agreement. He said that the potential TIF reimbursement could be up to five million
dollars with part being funded by sales tax and part by property tax. He said that their project will
need to generate approximately 20 million dollars in increased property tax and they will be
reimbursed 25 cents on every dollar that they generate.
Staff said that all departments in the city have worked continually on the project. Richard Myers
complimented staff and said that because of their work, the project has been speeded up due to
their meetings every two weeks to work step by step through the process.
Chairman Hart closed the public hearing.
Chairman Hart asked Richard Myers what he thought about commercial opportunities along
Precinct Line Road. He said that his company builds a lot of office buildings and currently have
about 25 suburban office projects around Dallas/Fort Worth area and he lives is Colleyville and
offices in Grapevine and knows every major piece of available property. He say that they have
nothing on Precinct Line Road and in the near future, he is interested in hearing the discussio""
by the Commission. He said that as much of the frontage along Precinct Line needs to b,
protected for future tax base, but once you get deeper off Precinct Line there will be little need for
commercial property. He said that the supermarkets have already decided that Davis Blvd. is the
place to locate. Colleyville may get some overflow with interest by doctors or light office uses and
possibly a restaurant. He said that fast food business will congregate near the supermarkets.
Commissioner Rutherford moved to approve the final plat. Commissioner Collins
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
10.A Combination Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Noorvilla Addition requested by Greg Black, 0.89 acres
located on the northeast corner of Glade Rd. & Pool Rd. Case P-99-077
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission.
Chairman Hart moved to approve the combination plat. Commissioner Rutherford
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Edwards, Tyler, Collins, Fletcher, Hill, Hart
Noes: None
11. Citizens' comments: There were none.
A. Staff comments, reports and discussion items: There were none.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - January 10, 2000
Page 13 of 13
D i"';" Ii'" ~"T
'.\ (..~. x
. . ~'Hlr ..
12. Commissioners' comments and reports: There were none.
ADJOURNMENT:
Commissioner Fletcher moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:58 p.m. Commissioner Collins
seconded the motion. The motion passed by an "Aye" voice vote.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jan Levy
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Approved on:
NOTE: As a matter of public record, an audio recording of the above Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting is available upon request. [jh/min/0110pz.min]
MINUTES OF THE
COLLEYVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
JANUARY 4, 2000
The meeting of the Colleyville Economic Development Corporation Board of Directors was
called to order by President Nelson Thibodeaux on January 4,2000, at 6:01 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Directors Ginny Tigue, Mike Taylor, Frank Carroll, Ron Adams, Gary
Cantrell, and Dennis Johnson were present. President Nelson Thibodeaux, General
Manager Bob Stripling, Financial Advisor Jim Sabonis, and Secretary Jean Harris were
also present.
CONSENT:
1. CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT RESOLUTION R-00-31- CONSENT ITEMS:
a. Approval of minutes of the Colleyville Economic Development Corporation
Board of Directors meeting held September 14, 1999
President Thibodeaux opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-00-31 in its
entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and President
Thibodeaux closed the public hearing.
Director Carroll moved to approve Resolution R-00-31.
Director Tigue seconded the motion.
Ayes: Directors Tigue, Taylor, Carroll, Adams, Cantrell, and President Thibodeaux
Nays: Director Johnson
President Thibodeaux declared the motion carried.
CEDC MINUTES
JANUARY 4, 2000
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION R-OO-32 - A Resolution setting
a public hearing on the Colleyville Economic Development Corporation undertaking
a project; and approving and authorizing publication of notice of such public hearing
President Thibodeaux opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-00-32 in its
entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and President
Thibodeaux closed the public hearing.
Director Taylor moved to approve Resolution R-00-32.
Director Carroll seconded the motion.
Discussion ensued regarding changing the date of the scheduled public hearing to March
28, proposed funding sources for the project, TIF financing, ownership of the property,
commitment for selling additional bonds, citizen survey results, Highway 26 improvements,
the CEDC budget, debt service and repayment schedule for the proposed bonds, a
possible need to raise ad valorem taxes, the responsibility of the CEDC regarding the
building of a City Hall, and completed project.
It was the consensus of the Board to hold the public hearing as scheduled on March 21,
2000.
The vote on the motion to approve Resolution R-00-32 was as follows:
Ayes: Directors Taylor, Carroll, Adams, and President Thibodeaux
Nays: Directors Tigue, Cantrell, and Johnson
President Thibodeaux declared the motion carried.
3. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the Board, Director Carroll moved to adjourn.
Director Taylor seconded the motion.
CEDe MINUTES
JANUARY 4, 2000
Ayes: Directors Tigue, Taylor, Carroll, Adams, Cantrell, Johnson, and President
Thibodeaux
Nays: None
President Thibodeaux declared the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
AYES, NAYS, AND ABSTENTIONS.
, 2000, BY A VOTE OF
Minutes taken and prepared by:
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
Secretary
RESOLUTION R-00-1596
A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION
UNDER BUSINESS AT THE REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING OF
JANUARY 18, 2000
WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Business.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Business this
date and not otherwise adopted by Ordinance and/or separate Resolution,
as follows are hereby adopted:
a. THAT
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
AYES, NAYS, AND ABSTENTIONS.
, 2000, BY A VOTE OF _
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor