Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-12/2/2002 City of Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda - December 2.2002 F'~ge 1 ur 2 ([] Texas AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION City Hall - 5400 Bransford Road Monday December 2, 2002 REGULAR MEETING: 7:00 P.M. Invocation: Chairman Wall Commissioners Bruce Kelly, Bob Culley, Earl Swift, Jeff Byerly, Bud Sellers, Mark Jones, Jeff Wall Commissioner Swift Call to Order: Roll Call: Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Minutes: November 11, 2002 Citizen Comments: Regarding items not on the following agenda 1. Case P-02-045 - Minor Plat of Lot 3R, Block 2, Thompson Terraces, 0.4841 acres located at 5009-5013 Thompson Terrace 2. Case P-02-046 - Amended Plat of Lots 40-R-1 and 41-R-1, Village at Colleyville located at 85 and 97 Piazza Lane 3. Case Z-02-034 PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG to PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial on 4.268 acres located on the east side of Colleyville Boulevard, north of Tarrant Lane 4. Case Z-02-035 PUBLIC HEARING - Amendment to the PUD-R (0-02-1364) for Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3. 19.405 acres located on the south side of L.D. Lockett Road near Precinct Line Road 5. Case Z-02-029 TABLED ITEM - Special Use Permit for an accessory building on Lot 1, Block 3, Sunrise Terrace Addition located at 1205 Glade Road 6. Staff comments, reports and discussion items. P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 577-7575 Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda - December 2,2002 Page 2 of 2 The following items were received on the last case submittal cycle and may be placed on a future agenda: . Case Z-02-028 - Zoning Change from AG to PUD-R on 3.561 acres located at 404 W. McDonwell School Road - Westcliff Addition Phase II . Case Z-02-036 - Special Use Permit for an Accessory Building located at 305 Timberline N. . Case SP-02-013 - A Site Plan for an office building at 4113 Gateway Drive . Case SP-02-014 - A Site Plan for Centurion American Group Office Building at 1905 Industrial Blvd. 7. Commissioners' comments and reports. ADJOURNMENT I certify that this agenda was posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall on Wednesday Nov. 27, 2002 at 4:30 p.m. cfJan Levy, Planning and Zoning Assistant PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Meeting Minutes - November 11, 2002 Chairman Jeffrey Wall called the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to order at 7:00 P.M. on November 11. 2002. Roll Call: Present: Bruce Kelly. Earl Swift, Jeff Byerly, Bud Sellers, Mark Jones, Jeff Wall Absent: Bob Culley Staff: Barry LeBaron, Clayton Husband, Jeff Jones, Jan Levy Invocation: Chairman Wall Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Minutes: October 28,2002 Commissioner Swift moved to approve the minutes of the October 28, 2002 meeting as written. Commissioner Sellers seconded the motion. The motion passed by unanimous acclamation. Chairman Wall announced at the beginning of the meeting that legal papers had been served by Windview Homeowners Association and the Planning and Zoning Commission would not be discussing item #2. Citizen Comments: There were none. 1. Case P-02-043 - Minor Plat of Tivoli Office Park, 2.189 acres located at the southwest corner of Hall Johnson Road and Bogart Drive Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and discussed the staff briefing. The Commission raised questions about an entrance onto Bogart across from Colleyville Middle School. There was discussion by staff and the commissioners regarding providing two points of access for emergency vehicles and the entrance onto Bogart may only be used as an emergency access and have gates. Chairman Wall said he is concerned about safety. Commissioner Jones said there is a bottleneck with the traffic now and there is no need to add more traffic to the area. Staff responded that they will take the Commission's comments under advisement when building plans are submitted. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 11, 2002 Page 1 of 7 - Draft Copy (11/25/02) Commissioner Jones moved to approve the minor plat of Tivoli Office Park. Commissioner Sellers seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 2. Case P-02-044 - PUBLIC HEARING - Replat of Lot 4, Block 7, Windview Addition, 1.269 acres located at 4005 Tamblewood Drive This item was not discussed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. Case Z-02-029 PUBLIC HEARING - Special Use Permit for an accessory building on Lot 1. Block 3, Sunrise Terrace Addition located at 1205 Glade Road Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and discussed the staff briefing. He also gave the history of how the Special Use Permit requirements came about for accessory buildings. He told the commissioners that staff received two letters of opposition since the packet was distributed and those letters were given to the commissioners Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Terry Grisso, applicant, told the commissioners that he has cars on the property and wants to garage the cars. He said the addition of the garage will beautify the property. Chairman Wall asked the applicant if he plans on moving all of the cars that are currently parked on his property into the garage. Mr. Grisso said he would move all of the cars into the garage. There was discussion by the commissioners with the applicant and staff about the tree ordinance; the condition of the automobiles located on the property; architectural plans; building construction materials; and the removal of the current carport. Ed Van Eck. 513 King Richard, Irving. said he was representing his son and daughter-in-law who live at 1116 Jo Carroll. He spoke about the current condition of Mr. Grisso's property. He requested that the commissioners ask questions about building size, roof composition, and siding materials. He told the commissioners that some vehicles have been undercover for some time. He wanted to know if Mr. Grisso will add to the number of vehicles he has once the garage is built. Garland Edgill, 1112 Garry Lynne Drive, presented photos to the commissioners and told them about the current condition of the property. He said he has lived in the area for twelve years and there would be an improvement to the property if the garage were built, but if past performance is an indication of future performance, he is concerned that won't happen. There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. The commissioners discussed the possibility of limiting the number of vehicles allowed on the property. There was discussion about requirements for paving. Staff told the commissioners that Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 11, 2002 Page 2 of 7 - Dl'llft Copy (11/25/02) the requirements need to be reasonable and enforceable. Barry LeBaron explained how the regulations for large accessory came about and how the commissioners could establish conditions with the Special Use Permit. The commissioners entered into discussion about taking property rights away and tried to come up with regulations that would ensure there wouldn't be six cars in the garage and another six cars stored outside the garage on the property. There was discussion about how the applicant did not present specifics as far as building size and description of building materials to be used. Mr. Grisso told the Commission that he only intends to have six vehicles on the property. He said he does not do welding and there are other metal buildings in the neighborhood. He said he put up a new fence and has taken down two buildings. He said he is just trying to improve the appearance of his property. He said he is planning on constructing a ranch style garage with a metal ribbed roof. He said the exterior would be a baked enamel prefabricated building and he would concrete or asphalt the driveway to enter off of Garry Lynne Drive. He said that one part of the fence nearest the house will come down. There was discussion between the applicant and the Commission about having a paved surface from Garry Lynne Drive to all six bays; the need to house the cars cu rrently in use in the garage; how the materials should match the exterior of the house; and no parking should be allowed off the paved surface. There was discussion that the neighbors would want specifics and they asked the applicant to bring back a proposal with those specifics. Commissioner Kelley moved to table the case until the applicant can present something specific to the Commission. Commissioner Sellers seconded the motion. The Commission told the applicant to present a drawing of the proposed building with specifics regarding size; location and details about the parking surface; roof and siding materials; and a request that the building is to serve for storage of vehicles and not for business. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 4. Case Z-02-030 PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from R40 to R20 Single Family Residential on Tract A 1 F, EA Smith Tracts Addition located at 304 W Van Oaks Drive Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and discussed the staff briefing. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. There being no one present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Jones moved to recommend approval of the zoning change from R40 to R20. Commissioner Swift seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 11, 2002 Page 3 of 7 - Draft Copy (11/25/02) 5. Case Z-02-031 PUBLIC HEARING - Special Use Permit for a cellular tower on Lot 1, Block 2, Leggett, McKithan and Baylock Addition located at 2319 Hall Johnson Road Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and discussed the staff briefing. Chairman Wall asked staff what the distance is from the existing tower to the nearest house and what impact an additional 15' of antenna would have on the area. Staff presented an area map that showed where the existing houses were located. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Peter Kavanagh. Zone Systems, Inc., was present to represent the case. He told the commissioners that there are upgrades planned for the existing area and they will be located in the same fenced area. He told the commissioners that his company sent letters with the plans to the surrounding neighbors. Roger Isbell. 5701 Sycamore, indicated on the map where his lot was located in relationship to the tower. He said that the tower is in full view from his front door and fifteen additional feet will make a difference to him. The Commission asked if the tower was there when he designed and built his house. He responded that it was. Sue Harry. 5606 Poplar Court, said she sees the tower from her kitchen sink and a second set of antenna will become an eyesore. She also responded to the Commission's question that the tower was present when she moved into the neighborhood. John Mikolaitis. said he bought the lot at 2309 Hall Johnson Road to build his house and he is concerned about the value of the property in the area. Jeff Sifers, 5709 Sycamore. asked questions about the design of the structure and the tolerance of the tower when it is increased in height. The applicant responded to the questions and told the commissioners and audience that the base of the pole will support the additional height without impairing the structural safety. Guy Willingham. 5705 Sycamore, said that fifteen more feet of tower creates a distraction. He said it will impact the next two lots behind him on Sycamore and he is opposed to the addition. He said the tower was already in place when he moved into the area. Chairman Wall closed the public hearing when there was no one else present wishing to speak. Commissioner Swift asked the applicant what the incidence is of towers falling. Mr. Kavanagh responded that towers are built to withstand winds and a failure may include a bending of the tower but not falling. There was discussion by the applicant and the commissioners about how many towers there are locally and the need to enhance present service and provide for future service. Mr. Kavanagh said that cell sites have maximum capacity and carriers have to split-up existing service. Chairman Wall asked the applicant what the options are if the request was not approved. The applicant said he didn't know what Verizon would do. Staff talked about co-locating existing locations rather than constructing additional towers. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 11, 2002 Page 4 of 7 - Draft Copy (11/25/02) Commissioner Jones moved to recommend approval of the Special Use Permit. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 6. Case Z-02-032 PUBLIC HEARING - Special Use Permit for an accessory building on Lot 1, Block 1, Mikolaitis Addition located at 2309 Hall Johnson Road Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and reviewed the staff briefing. There was discussion about the City purchasing right-of-way from the property owner in order to widen Hall Johnson Road. It was said that it was possible the applicant thought he had a full one-acre of property when he purchased the lot and if that were the case, he would not be required to obtain a special use permit. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: John Mikolaitis. applicant. was present to represent the case. He told the commissioners that he likes to tinker with cars and he intends to build a home on the site. He said he looked at several properties in the areas and chose this property because he thought it was one-acre is size and he would be allowed to build the kind of accessory building he wants on a one-acre parcel, but when he had the property platted. it measured to slightly less than one-acre. He said he plans on storing everything inside the building rather than littering his property with items. He explained the type of construction, size, materials. and color scheme to the commissioners. He said he does plan to build a shop in the building, but only for his personal use. Jeff Seifers, 5709 Sycamore, said many of the neighbors met Mr. Mikolaitis for the firsttime atthe meeting. He said Mr. Mikolaitis overcame most of their concerns because they anticipated a commercial shop to be built on the property. He said the main concerns are that the types of material be required so to not negatively impact the property values. Roger Isbell. said the applicant allayed some of their concerns, but they would like to hear about the building materials and the value of the metal building. Sue Harry, 5606 Poplar Court, said that first there is a proposed tower and now a metal roof that will glare and it is not attractive. Guy Willingham, 5705 Sycamore Drive, said he would like to see the commissioners require something to blend in with the neighborhood and require a composition roof and the building be built with brick. Craig Lemon. 2305 Mulberry Court, said he already looks at an ugly green building, so he would like to see the proposed building built next to the ugly green building to block his view of it. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 11, 2002 Page 5 of 7 - D,."ft Copy (11/25102) Kelly Tuki, 5601 Poplar Court, said they do not want anything that would decrease the property values of the neighborhood that is well kept and they did not want to hear the noise of motors being tested. Chairman Wall closed the public hearing. The applicant, John Mikolaitis, told the commissioners more about his planned building and said he is proposing to build a 2,800 square foot house on the lot and will pave the driveway back to the shop. Commissioner Kelly moved to recommend approval of the special use permit. Commissioner Sellers seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 7. Case Z-02-033 PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from CPO to PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial on Tract A 1, Block 2, Highland Acres located at 5314 Bransford Road Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and discussed the staff briefing. There was discussion about how the building is currently vacant and for sale, and how the regulations have changed and CPO is no longer the appropriate zoning district for the use. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Patsy Ray, 1812 Glade Road. Colleyville. said they have operated a day care associated with their church and have experience and want to increase their ministry by offering an assisted living center. Richard Ray. pastor of Victorious Living Church, Patsy Ray's husband, was also present to speak. He said they desire to provide a quality facility mainly for senior occupants. They said the type of license they have. Type A through the State, limits the type of care they can offer. They explained how they would have a licensed nurse on staff and they could fulfill that position with someone other than a church member. Commissioner Kelly asked the Rays if the ballparks across the street from the building would create problems for their future residents. The Rays responded that the activities in the area would be positive and they want to be in an active zone. There was no one else present wishing to speak and Chairman Wall closed the public hearing. Following discussion by the commissioners, Commissioner Byerly moved to recommend approval of the zoning change from CPO to PUD-C. Commissioner Sellers seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 11, 2002 Page 6 of 7 - Dl1Jft Copy (11125/02) 8. Case G-02-029 - Consideration and discussion of the work plan for the Master Plan update. Barry LeBaron presented the work plan to the commissioners. He gave them the timeline for the Master Plan update and requested that they give their comments to staff with the information they want added. He said that the Planning and Zoning Commission has been charged by the Council to oversee the Master Plan process. There was discussion about surveys, availability of information on the web site, issues and concerns. There was discussion about the possibility of asking for input on the positives in the community rather than framing questions that dwell on negative aspects of the community. Chairman Wall asked the commissioners to keep their calendars open so they can attend upcoming meetings. 9. Staff comments, reports and discussion items. There were none. 10. Commissioners' comments and reports: There was discussion about the possibility of not having a quorum at the next meeting because of the Thanksgiving holiday. The commissioners also discussed the need to reschedule the December meeting to adjust for the holidays. ADJOURNMENT: The Commission moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:35 p.m. The motion was seconded and passed by acclamation. Respectfully Submitted. Jan Levy Planning & Zoning Assistant Approved on: NOTE: As a matter of public record, an audio recording of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is available upon request. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 11, 2002 Page 7 of 7 - Draft Copy (11125102) Cily O{ coe~ Tt! X <JSo , , Ii I' i' I, Ii December 2. 2002 I P-02-045 - Minor Plat of Lot 3R, Block 2, Thompson Terraces, : 0.4841 acres located at 5009-5013 Thompson Terrace PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS: Mary Richard is the owner of a 0.4814-acre parcel of land located on the east side of Thompson Terrace, between Glade Road and Colleyville Boulevard. The owner has submitted an Amended Plat of the property for review and consideration by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The plat will create one non-residential lot for the construction of a medical clinic. The following is a summary of the major items associated with this plat. Zoning. The property is zoned CN Neighborhood Commercial. A zoning change from R20 to CN was approved by the City Council in February 2001. Right-of-Way Dedication. The owner is dedicating additional right-of-way for Thompson Terrace adjacent to this property. The total right-of-way requirement for this street is 75 feet. The owner is dedicating approximately 7.5 feet of right-of-way along the frontage of this property. Perimeter Street Improvements. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Thompson Terrace is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains a non-residential lot. The developer/owner is required to construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement of the street by the City. The estimated amount of escrow for this property is $25.020. The owner may request a waiver of this requirement from the City Council. Board of Adjustment Action. The applicant applied for and received a variance from several zoning requirements from the Board of Adjustment. The Board approved variances from the rear and side yard setbacks and required the construction of a masonry fence adjacent to the single family area to the east. These variances do not affect the plat. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDATION: Approval Agenda Item No. 1 - Page 1 ATTACHMENTS: · Location map · Plat · DRC Review Memorandum · Surveyor Response Letter Prepared by: and, AICP elopment Manager Agenda Item No. 1 - Page 2 ,. .. ~6~.~~ ~ - '2'\; ~ 1\. \2" vr.1 1-i': \3. ~. S~p 206 . . TR ."1 : .J N: : , TA "'A 1.15 ac TR 3C .61 At ~O~j~O\' ) ser- f I ..!Ill. . j) I !\?J .; SOI~ pOL." ~IIPV~4B .. - - It t P ~'" flJ\~1< 1'EF Ct:!'l pVt'l_ p. ~"f) ... 1.99f1l11 . 1~ ...- ~ c.ll('\14 _ ,nl , ". .,J '" 11: :_: 'J ",n IIn O\) , -_ : :~ -,.. I ,~O S (p."p,p~-..t~r.. -Cl i' /:\j:' ~~S~Gm-:: : :-1 l_~l .. "'''J~~ _ __ I 4Z ~ 1 _ _ ' (~ .. , 13" 27 H 15 24 i 12 .J~... " 1\;" "''-- ___ ._-' " II E!f; --~t1JJ. .::?r ~~fl"~~~tc_:_.. -- -~'s I ~ 34 33 '1:1 ~ I: 32 :61 I I ~ ^ ---1 ~ .-.1-...- 31 :; I , = .___4~__,r ; ~ " ,_......... ........._:.~ I 1 ~. ----(;.Ir.":~~c~_nr;---j {-~l)l-"\~. \ · Z3 --~.. td ! /-.......... ...... .. \. :' ' :' ';',~/ I~ ~ i ! ;--/- _~ ------ -~__ :.... >-r::.'-':!..;,' ':!".-~- f\_ ..-......L Z ., r...-....,..___ I. 15 .. " I\. \. e a: '" >- e l!l '" ..> '" ~, I. UJ Location Map CASE # P-D2-045 - Amended Pial - Thompson Terraces U . III I. U Il J~~ "JI ,.gtll II I' , l' A ~I J III MI d I)l,,)~ Ii ) 11 J"I 3. '". flf ' JU! i~t! Ufm!!;!,~,d 'l~l IhB IWU!'till I I hIi JUj IHfJmmfil1 HJI~ 'Jil{ !lil1 hiJill!ll~1 p, I,~ .1'hll,c1~ ) 21 !iJt ImlfHnhd~mil )111 ,I'liJJJ'b)'j.l,b'=1 i~f1 UHnil'iI1'~IIH'fl-1 ill! I Ulill' lid lW, ~ !Iff nli! bhfh~!hn~ "" , · f IUirU1h IUtHliif{ jHtH!)' I 'fJ~nf!t! · ! f'l!ltl'JIJlt I "j,t " d ~ fflbtUfil ; l'fJJtU!f't! I l 1'11.,'1' ,. i 1!1 JJf1rl I I iltM~t,11 , 111 III -, NI 111 J.(. II, . ~'i I iI, 11]11 I == Id i ~ I ~nHn I. ~~ f'Jp I 1 ~B I' , Iff I , I I il , I ill L \ I ~I fa I 13 I . ~ . ~ I I. . I. I I I !t I' ,t 11 !r h I Ii I II III Ii I- II . Hit J Rm I I I I .. I .. - - _.-J _ _ _ __ + _ _!!!!!!!!.. _ __ _ __ _ _ ---P____ _ _ _ _ __ _J----. + n_ _ _ _ _ __ ------------l~! r-------~=:=~-r-----------------fl-------- ! I ! ~ I I I I I b I i I .~t. ~ I i I, H~~ gJ '1 II: I I I I . I ---------~iL-------------~______________~----~~L--- ! : i . ~ nn_n_n ~ :i--=f'":::'=::"'::-;,--;"'--- n:-_-_. n____nn ------ ---J......---------------- ------- I 30VlIlI31 NOSdt'lOHl I ----tj---- ---------,---------1------- I I I , I I ~I R. gi -It II!: Ji. II~ --r------ to , I I I I o o ~ o I I rn'" ~" U9 <Ill 0::. "'0::'lI t::r::I ..,'" 3~ Eo-< ~~ o..m go: ~~ Z l5~ 2.... 0 ~t 9 rn iilO 0..5 :::s~ 0'" ::r:~ E-<ijl ~Ii "II ~ * -: ;~ 1 s I I . ~ ~ J dl IP uJ I; ft I, ,I I Ii . I -tin! ~Iltt~ shil,! Ii 1=1 il~ IIII! :1;1 I :nJ CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE November 20, 2002 FAX TO FAX NO FROM Shaun Spooner ~ Jonathan Richard 817-282--7184 ~ 817-410-4221 l-J3'i!'f Clayton Husband, AICP, Community Development Manager SUBJECT P-02-045 Amended Plat - Thompson Terraces Addition, Block 3, Lot 3R The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted'to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. PLAT DRAWING 1. Remove the staff approval block. This plat requires approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission since right-of-way dedication is required. The correct approval block is below: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVAL WHEREAS The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville , Texas voted affirmatively on this _ day of .20_, to approve this Plat. Chair, Planning and Zoning Commission Attest: Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission 2. Increase the size of the easement adjacent to the rear property line to 7.5 feet. Label the easement as DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT. 3. The right-of-way for Thompson Terrace needs to be verified. Tie down the existing right-of- way with monuments on the opposite side of the street. The required right-of-way established for Thompson Terrace by the Master Thoroughfare Plan is 75 feet. The required right-of-way dedication along the frontage of the property is 37.5-feet from the centerline of the existing right-of-way. Show the right-of-way dedication on the plat. 4. Change "Village Park Drive" to "Glade Road" in the location map. This street name was changed earlier this year. P.O. Box 185 - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.577.7587 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-02-045 THOMPSON TERRACES ADDITION OTHER INFORMATION 1. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are not required for this property, as this property is already platted. The fees are only applicable to property for which a final plat has not been formally submitted to the City for approval. 2. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Thompson Terrace is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains a non-residential lot. The developer/owner is required to construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement of the street by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the Engineering Department upon request. A general estimate of the escrow amount is $139 per linear foot, for 180.0 feet of street frontage, for a total of $25,020. The owner may request a waiver of this requirement from the City Council by providing a letter requesting the waiver and the reasons why this requirement should be waived for this property. 3. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $2,582 per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for 'IEDICAL A:'oiJ} DE:'oiT AL OFFICE Bl'IU)I:'oiG uses. Actual fee depends on specific use of the property. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 4. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all public streets. The sidewalk must be constructed at the same time any new structures are built on the lots. The sidewalk on Thompson Terrace must be 5-feet wide since Thompson Terrace is designated as a Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. 5. SITE PLAN. A site plan and landscape plan application must be submitted and approved before the issuance of any building permits on this property. Please contact the Community Development offices at 817-577-7587 for information on this process. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, December 2,2002, 7:00 p.m. not required PAGE20F3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-02-045 THOMPSON TERRACES ADDITION RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices: · 15 folded copies of the revised Minor Plat drawing · one 81'/' x 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit · a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived The revised drawings must be submitted no later than Friday, November 22, 2002 in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at husbandc@ci.collevville.tx.us or 817-577- 7587 if you have any questions. C: ENGINEERING DEPT FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTION PUBLIC WORKS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE PAGE30F3 SPOONER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 7417 Continental Tr. North Richland Hills, TEXAS 76180-1700 (817) 281-2355 November 22,2002 Clayton Husband City of Colleyville P.O. Box 185 Colleyville, TX 76034 Re: P-02-045 Minor Plat - Thompson Terraces Addition , Bloc~Lot 3R This is a letter addressing the Comments dated 11-20-02 on the above proposed plat. The title of the plat was revised to be a "MINOR PLAT" instead of "AMENDED PLA T"'. 1) The approval block was changed from staff approval to Planning & Zoning approval. 2) The easement along the rear was changed to a 7.5' drainage & utility easement. 3) The new right-of-way dedication was shown 37.5' from street centerline. 4) Village Park Drive was changed to Glade Road in the location map. Enclosed are 15 folded prints and a reduced 8 'l2" x 11" copy of the proposed plat. 1\ I ,/ ~ 2 ZUOL 1 eCilYOr ,I~ r ~\ cg Tt"X;d!'O PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: December 2, 2002 P-02-046 - Amended Plat of Lots 40-R-1 and 41-R-1, Village at Colleyville located at 85 and 97 Piazza Lane STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS: At the November 11, 2002, meeting, the City Council approved a replat of two lots in the Village at Colleyville across from the city hall and library site. The replat affected an open space lot by reducing it in size by 702 square feet. The replat was approved subject to the developer submitting a new plat of a different lot to provide the 702 square feet of open space that was removed by replat. The attached amended plat is a replat of Lots 40-R-1 and 41-R-1, located on the south side of Piazza Lane. The amended plat increases the size of Lot 41-R-1 by 702 square feet. This lot is also an open space lot in the Village at Colleyville. RECOMMENDATION: Approval ATTACHMENTS: · Location map · Plat Prepared by: J. CI ton usband. AICP Comm y Development Manager Agenda Item No. 2 - Page 1 -l I \ ~ _.6Z ,6Z-, I , .IlS I 1 M ~ ~ Z ~ <t: ;j; .....:l <~ uc..; -"'" 1.,; ........ '" a: N ~o NI~ <t: q >--4 a: ~ ~ -L" .6Z r T:JT)\'Q '/t,O')\,S' S 'V I~Ulq.:> - _ ~6' ~~ ~ \11.'11A aN\11. a'8 ~\ 504028' 17"E f-.. r- "'l ~ N ", .~~ t.1.l -~~ I~U ~<< 0;:):= ~O'~ .....tIlO ONe:::: ~~O 00. r- ~ ~ :::J oq-"", '\, ~ o t.1.l \0 "'l \0 "'l o 0\ 00 Z .8,',6 !\'\.. ffi. tooOON \ '" $ f- t.1.l ,., J::: - ti: 02~_ I t.1.l U _ ~e::::< "T~, ~<oo ~::J:! c ..... 0'6 -1 o tile:::: ~~O ~. '-0 / ~ 8~ '/ 68/ ( -0 o o Z .OO'SZ MllvO,€OoOON El6, 30ns 'V 'BY:> . J..311V '<Xl on M '-N ~~ ;:;1\1.1 w9 CIl..J <'" ;.t; <- i:':i;j"; ::::;zt..l j::-f- ;:l~czi ..;,;0 \ \ .06'1€ "I MllvO.tOoOON "'! 00 I;..;G '" I~ ~ r.... N a- N &, 00 ;Z .; j I E....; Ul a:: I w . o ~ . I ~~ o'd:' Il't:l 0':'= .~~ I 0< COI - c N .- ~81 :1:0 UO ~a:: NZ ,-0 ~!!: o Z ~ o L.. :.. I I 1- 9 i , I I I I I I I I I ~I I <t: 1M ~ ~ I I I < i~ ~ <~ r:....... U U l:"""'" " ' O :lit-: <GO!: U ~ci ~ <t: ~ 0::: I b 0::: on ~ ~ I L_ ..- ~ o 0:::- >- < - ~ o l.O< --~ ~ ~O ZU j~ p:: ~~ <i:z;:l Op:: ") o +z- Gr 11 I ! ~ ao~ NO~I H::lNI Z/L MAIN 28 Zl ......l W 5 "'- <! 1 34 --l ---l 2 - > 3 PIAZZA LN 42 40R TERRA CarT A site Location Map - P-02-046 85 & 97 Piazza Lane ~n c~~ Texas , I I: December 2. 2002 I Z-02-034 - Public Hearing - Zoning Change from AG to PUD-C I Planned Unit Development Commercial on 4.268 acres located on :1 the east side of Colle ille Boulevard. north of Tarrant Lane I PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Schwab Construction Corporation is the owner of 4.268 acres located near the northeast corner of Colleyville Boulevard and an abandoned road known as Ross Downs Road. John Altman has the property under contract to purchase and develop. The applicant has submitted a request to change the zoning on the property from AG Agricultural to PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial. The owner proposes to develop the property for office. retail/commercial and office-warehouse uses. The property is generally triangular in shape. There is an existing auto repair facility and several smaller buildings on the property. The property abuts a single-family residential area to the east. and industrial property on the other sides. The property is landlocked and does not have direct access to a public street. The following is an analysis of the major issues associated with this rezoning request. Land Uses. The applicant proposes that the uses allowed in the CC1 and ML zoning districts be allowed by right. Any use requiring a Special Use Permit in either district would still require the Special Use Permit. The applicant also proposes an automotive repair and service facility as a use by right. Access. The property is accessed from Ross Downs Road, which was abandoned by the Commissioners Court in 1936. Access to the property is the most significant issue related to the development of this property, as this property does not have frontage on a public right-of-way. On the advice of their attorney, a quitclaim deed will be recorded and the old roadway be divided between the adjacent property owners on both sides of the abandoned street. When a plat is submitted forthis property, half cfthe road will be incorporated in to the lot, giving the property enough frontage on Colleyville Boulevard to provide a drive approach for the project. A copy of the attorney's letter is attached. Road/Access Improvements. Some improvements to the abandoned roadway may be required upon development of the property. If the road were not constructed as a public street, the pavement would need to be improved to at least a fire lane construction standard. A fire lane must be at least 24-feet wide and provide a concrete or asphalt paved surface. An access easement and drainage and utility easement must also be dedicated to provide vehicle and utility access to the property. Agenda Item No. 3 - Page 1 Landscaping and Buffers. At least 20% of the land area must be maintained as a landscaped area, as required by the Land Development Code. The zoning exhibit appears to satisfy this standard. However, detailed review for compliance with this requirement would take place during the site plan and landscape plan review stage. The development is also required to provide a 20-foot wide landscaped buffer adjacent to all single-family areas. The buffer area must include evergreen plan materials planted on 6-foot centers for the entire length of the buffer area. Fencing. The applicant proposes to construct an 8-foot tall cedar fence with cap along the common property line with the single family residential area. Subdivision Plat. The zoning exhibit for this request is not considered a subdivision plat. The exhibit is a conceptual layout only, and the developer will be required to submit a plat if the zoning change is approved. The subdivision plat review will give the City the opportunity to review specific plans for streets, water, sewer and drainage. IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan, adopted in 1998, which designates this area as a future retail and commercial area. 2. Surrounding Properties. The properties to the north and west are developed as commercial uses and are zoned ML Light Manufacturing. Property to the south is also zoned ML Light Manufacturing. and one lot is developed as a self-storage facility. Property to the east is zoned PUD-R and is developed as single-family residences (Ross Downs Estates). 3. Development Trends. The area is experiencing some new development northwest of this site along Colleyville Boulevard. A new dentist office has opened at the corner of Tennison Parkway. and a photo studio and interior design studio are under construction. It is possible that the area could experience redevelopment in the future when improvements to Colleyville Boulevard are complete. 4. Infrastructure. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sanitary sewer services to the project. Some utilities are available in the area. 5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the land and house is appraised at $254,130. The estimated annual City property tax revenue generated by this property is $883. 6. Sales Taxes. Office and warehouse operations typically do not generate sales tax revenue. It is possible that some uses will generate sales tax depending upon the specific type of business. 7. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Business parks typically consist of buildings occupied by offices. commercial uses, industrial uses and warehouses. During the 1980's and 1990's, ITE studied business parks around the country, mostly in the San Diego area. On average, a business park generated 12.76 trips per 1,000 square feet Gross Floor Area and 149.79 trips per Agenda Item No. 3 - Page 2 acre. Based on these averages and the size of the buildings and lot, this development could generate 639 to 664 trips per day. The following table shows the recent traffic counts for Colleyville Boulevard during a 24-hour period. Location 24-Hour Total Date Tinker Road intersection 30,366 vehicles 2001 /2002 John McCain intersection 43,625 vehicles 2001 /2002 8. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 33 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star- Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: December 2,2002 City Council: December 17, 2002 and January 7,2003 RECOMMENDATION: Approval ATTACHMENTS: · Location and Zoning Map · I nformation from Applicant · DRC Review Memorandum · Applicant Response to DRC · List of Property Owners Notified · Draft Ordinance Prepared by: Aa,~ Agenda Item No. 3 - Page 3 T" 3 8.5'" At lA2M 2... IlC '" 2 t .", AC '" 2" '2E 3.82 AC SAC [,N .._.._.._n_ T' 2K 3..2 AC 13 11 II II l,] --' .-l q ~..~ --' --' 0 t.! 7. S i.) " 7. '" ~ 15 3 TA 2BJ .ql At TA 2.1 T' 2K ., At I.. At SMHJF.RS LN ,. >HI '" ,. m ?y 2'12 .4q At 'fl' " . II 12 5 9 z .0 ,. . 13 ...J 0, ,., n ~ II ,. 14 " .. t.' 12 .. " ... 12 11 12 II .. N ".yu~ CT J : 1 ,. ,... 15 16 q... , (j7J9 1 A-14-1 \l~~;) \\1>- Y t'-W- '\~S ~;=;~ t'- 1 3.d"3~ ~ " 11 COLl,EVVII.U: Tlr lA 2N ,.". . Tn 21. I.. IlC n. lOt UNI"PS I 22 -lQ T" 20 .'l81lC ."'" I: :16fI · i '" "'" .35 OC 21 ~ r~ Location Map & Area of Notification CASE" Z-02-G34 - Zoning Change - AG to PUD-C r~--- iw ).L.....~ ftl T~' _" ...\~ I @-j-71 I" - c--- -, -- (:Y /' ~o~ 'j i Ii'" I'll; I h-'~ ,--Too- , I,r-;-'T'~ ii' i ,," r~ A <._ ~~ 1,1 'I I ~1C;h I " I z?r"~~=~~~ ~" I ~ ~ ff/' mi.~ ~J:! I I"~::" ~~ ::) '~ I -r" ~I/, I I 1: I ! f~-,~lr"1 '-~ l,i.11~' \!1\lfL"\"'~F'- ~J I thi,. >-J, ! 'j-11 i, ~~ .- I ~' iH I 1 if\{ 111,1 I 11@11, f- ~:til ' b ~ Wv~' , · I rHl---I~:i ' ie(;3 / LJJJI:fl HCP ~ II , I ~ f=1~ ~~ I' ...... ttttHtE~ c j I I I - "" '1' ....1 ~ I ~ ' I1t- : ~"LLt ; '=IJ/LN~ i I : c\ ~' C;, L- i : ... '-, i..' I -k ~''I '- I" I'''' I ... " .. ~: T...(., R~' t II ~~I:~ TT=FT .J, ' I. ,........ ," I" ti I /~ 11 ~ ~ ~~~ ~ i ~ ~--'l: II;! ~V '- '- I ~ ~~' fT"""j" ~~' - ~ ,~~~c-1~ ~ ~ L 1111 ~ I i 0 Il'-j=::~ iiI 1-;:, Jf'f' ~ I S I ~~~~ l,l?S...~ I I!f- 1c;~ _ ~L..r-~ 0..' J!! J~t,.b I~~I'E -~ - ~ I ~7: ~ I ~ -..J...:~c\ '<<r ~ ;;;;: --- - ~i 9 J' ..,J I' i7i I j-~ er- ~ ~ J =e ~ .Jll---JOQ~11:!'l ' ~ _1 1 -, ""' Ai :: ~ 1 ~ ~I 1 f-- ~ !::t N ))~ t !t-L.rr~~ C'I I :---\ ~ -------,' ~ r_ I II i'\" I ~ I ;!J)i.... ' I I ) V I ' Q ,,! - ~ - 0,,0:: 0 ~ <\ ~ I: T ! II I I I T -II .. .....1 0 '\ ! \ ( 1;(1 '" l >-- I! T t r-.. I 9' +I~ R' 1 i' 11I::' - I '-1 \~lJ'(P~hJ~1 I II'! ,/,! H il~1 ... ~ 'I t:'~ ~.I~ \'\.. i I i\ I ~ I LL II;;: ..: 11,y J~\ - ..... _~L-ij '\ dTSri ~ ~~o i ~ ~ -T- ,~ 1 ,\ LJ' '" ~ ~g ,~ i I I~ ~~ 'U _,- In-l~ ,- ~ fl-- I ii"~ X-- j , ) 'i Q ilL -,,, "'1: ;,:.' LU. ;;Ii ~ ~\ \ ;r - ~ j- 'T l ~' - D;S~ .1 B, I I Ii .... H/T11 \L! i 1 ~ \ ' I, 1 ~ 1 i I I / I k I - ii ii iii ~~ ~~ ~~~ II II III M' M MMM M,,! .... .. D ..... :li~ ~ . It It t:1t t:t: t~ Ii Ki iit iit II ~~ i~ .~ .. . .! ;~ _e Ii eu ow ~~ ~~ I~ ~E ~~ ~~ ~lli Ii ii ii il Ij II II II IIl:JajI.I~~1 li~ ;'~I 'I,! l'illl!i~1 ~II ;;Ii! -, ~11,ii!fii,r ~!ji ~~ iii I 111~I~i~IJ! il~ I lal~~ i 'IKI~I:il !~ !II~I lil:1 I~ !.~I!!=: !;I'i !111i ~ ;!III~! "Iii II.J~ I~'~ 1;1 ~llfl ~lf,li! ~dg A~IIJ ~i ~ 21DII r!IIR!II!;11 11~liir:~ !r~lt~1!iBI:B:111 oll;u~I!1 jl:. iUlli:ill J Irl!llic~ iiJl!sd~1; l~~~i 1 ~J;L-~:~' ~. ~ ; /f, .. ~ t..;'" / . ~ - I. ,." ~ '\.. I I , L__~- ---;~ -- --.... -- ".", ~.......~,., .,..,.".".,..,""",.~.:,:.: = Ir",.:....,""""',..,....,..,.. . , ., ,',', ,',.,','.. ' , , , "'." . . , . , . , , . , , '::,:::::: ':::",:::,. " .\ Lit '.' I ':':G'It" ..... "Ph I IIlFJ ~":::~ .....:. .:: " -:'. .'\ :::' '. ~ ~ i ! i ~! :a 1- lilt~ " ~w ~ 51~o :I:U::;l~ (j~8~ S!-a: jEZ 2 ~2 ~ N s::. ....... ~ o Q.)Z > ~ Q.) ~c o Q.) uU ~ Ul o Ul '+-Q) C C'- o U) _:J o...m Q.)l:J ~c (1)0 - o :J 0 +-' - o Q) C Us::. c u o Q) U~ Hki,! J ! J &1 ] :dBI ...... :; I if I ~:i~~1 . . . ~. ~~~.. ~ ~ COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE October 30, 2002 Dear Neighbors, My name is William Ingle, a commercial real estate agent actively working in the Colleyville Market. I represent John Altman, a real estate investor who owns "Colleyville Tech and Business Center" at 1900 and 1904 Industrial Blvd in Colleyville. CUlTently, Mr. Altman has a 4.268-acre tract at the intersection of the abandoned Ross Downs Road and Colleyville Blvd., which backs up to McMakin Ct. and Baker Ct. in the Ross Downs Estates II subdivision, under contract with plans for a mixed-use development - "Colleyville Tech and Business Center North". Mr. Altman plans to submit to the City of Colleyville for a Planned Unit Development with C-l uses and some ML uses. This development will have approximately 43,000-sq. ft. of total lease space available and will target retail, showroom, and professional office type tenants. Lease spaces will start at a rate $12.50 per sq. ft. and they will be triple net leases, which includes taxes, insurance, and common maintenance area. In addition, "Colleyville Tech and Business Center North" will meet all design and landscape standards of the City of Colleyville. We have already spoken to Hodges Automotive about the possibility of being a tenant in the new development. Mr. Hodge, who has been on the property for almost 20 years, indicated that he would like to remain at this location and be a part of the new development. Mr. Hodge would be in a new lease space of approximately 4,000-sq. ft., with a screened in yard and retail look and would be the only automotive business in the development. Please know that Mr. Altman has the best interests of everyone around this development in mind. He believes that this development will clean up the property and make it an asset to the City of Colleyville, in addition to creating more affordable lease space for professional office, retail, showroom and other tenants that would like to be a part ofthe City of Colleyville. We have scheduled a meeting for 7:00 p.m., November 12, 2002 at Able Electronics located at 6607 Colleyville Blvd. in order to show the site plan and discuss any concerns. you might have regarding this development. Should you have any questions prior to this meeting, please feel free to contact me at 817- 427-9545. I look forward to working with you in regards to this matter. SincOfely, {J~ ~~ .Y-pl-- William S. Ingle Phifer and Associates, Inc 817.427.9545 . Fax 817.281.2442 . 7510 Davis Blvd., Suite E . North Richland Hills, TX 76180 info@LandDeaIs.com . www.LandDeaIs.com CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE November 13,2002 FAX TO Dwayne Young ~ Bill Ingle ~ Schwob Construction Corp FAX NO 817-442-9007 ~ 817-281-2442 ~ 970-259-6510 FROM Clayton Husband, AICP, Community Development Manager SUBJECT Z-02-035 PUDR amendment - Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and zoning change request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Access to the property is the most significant issue related to this zoning change request. It appears that the Commissioners Court abandoned Ross Downs Road in 1936. The ownership of the abandoned road is unclear. Documentation must be submitted to the City indicating the ownership of the property and/or how the applicant proposes to provide legal access to the site, i.e. an access easement granted by the owner. This issue must be adequately addressed before this case is presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission. ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING 1. Depending upon the status of the abandoned roadway, some improvements will be required upon development of the property. At a minimum, the pavement would need to be improved to at least a fire lane standard and an access easement dedicated. A fire lane must be at least 24- feet wide with a concrete or asphalt paved surface. 2. The zoning exhibit does not indicate if the development will be subdivided into individual lots. If separate lots will be sold, each lot must have frontage on a public street. The dedication of right-of-way and construction of a public street may be required depending upon the number of lots proposed in this development. The PUD-C zoning district requires a minimum lot size of7,200 square feet, with a minimum lot width of70 feet. 3. The Land Development Code requires a 20-foot wide landscaped buffer between commercial and residential properties. The landscape buffer shown in the exhibit must be extended to include the proposed automotive repair area in the northeast corner of the property. The landscaped buffer must contain evergreen plant material planted on 6-foot centers. P.O. Box 185-Colleyville, Texas 76034-817.577.7587 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-02-034 BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER NORTH 4. The zoning exhibit indicates a proposed 8-foot tall screening fence on the common property line with the residential properties. Indicate on the plan what type of fence is proposed. 5. The Land Development Code requires that commercial lots provide at least 20% of the lot area as a landscaped area. This requirement will be evaluated upon submittal and review of site plan applications for the property. 6. A secondary entrance from the access road is required between the automotive repair building and the Great American Pastimes building. Show the driveway on the exhibit. 7. The ordinance submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission will include as allowed land uses those uses in the CCl and ML zoning districts, and automotive repair and service with outside storage. Please advise if additional uses that may not be allowed in the proposed zoning districts are intended to be included for consideration. 8. It is recommended that the applicant review the location and availability of water and sanitary sewer lines in the area. The construction of additional utility lines may be required for this development. OTHER INFORMATION 1. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on the lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be differen1 depending upon the specific use ofthe property, proposed utility construction, or conditions in an existing City-Developer Agreement. Details are contained in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. ROADWAY $790 per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for GENERAL OFFICE uses. $773 per 1.000 square feet gross floor area for SPECIALTY RETAIL CENTER uses. $1,157 per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for GENERAL LIGHT INDlJSTRIAL uses. Actual fee depends on specific use of the property. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 2. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are not required for this property since the property does not have frontage on an existing public street or right-of-way. Right-of-way dedication and street construction may be required depending upon specific development plans for the property relative to the abandoned roadway. 3. PARKLAND DEDICATION. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the subdivision plat. The fee for non-residential uses is $800 per acre. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon the review ofthe final plat. PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z.Q2.Q34 BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER NORTH 4. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all public streets. The sidewalks must be installed when any new structures are built on the property. The sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, December 2,2002, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, December 17, 2002 and January 7. 2003, 7:30 p.m. RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices: · a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived · 22 folded copies of the revised Zoning Exhibit drawing · one 8W' x 11/1 reduced copy of the revised exhibit The revised drawings must be submitted no later than Friday, November 22, 2002 in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at husbandc@!ci.col]eyville.tx.lIs or 817-577- 7587 if you have any questions. C: ENGINEERING DEPT FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTION PUBLIC WORKS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE PAGE30F3 D. Young Co., Inc. D. Young Co., Inc. 1904 Industrial Suite # 105 Colleyville, TX 76034 I Telephone 817-442-9007 Fax 817-481-9664 November 21,2002 City of Colleyville Clayton Husband P.O. Box 185 Colleyville, TX 76034 Re:Z-02-035 PUDC Amendment Mr. Husband, This letter is in response to the Development Review Committee comments on the aforementioned Zoning case. Due to legalities discovered about the abandoned roadway and in response to our meeting with the surrounding homeowners the entire drawing has been redone. Please bear in mind that this is intended to be a preliminary conceptual design as needed for Rezoning. The guidelines established during this process will guide us through the actual final design of the project. General Information: 1. Please find attached a copy of the letter stating the legal opinion of Richard D. Worsham. It is our intention to follow Mr. Worshams advice. He has been retained to begin the legal paperwork for all of the quitclaims access easements etc. Zoning Exhibit Drawing 1. As the revised drawing shows we intend to totally redo the entrance in concrete and provide proper fire lane access throughout the property. 2. The development will not be subdivided. 3. The 20' landscape buffer is shown in the revised drawing. 4. An 8' cedar fence is now noted on the plans. The surrounding homeowners seemed to be pleased with this. 5. According to the drawings 27% 0 the property is landscaped. 6. Due to revisions after meeting with the surrounding homeowners the secondary entrance was placed further from the residential areas. We trust that this will be satisfactory. 7. These land uses area acceptable. 8. Water, sewer, electricity and phones have been located. Other Information: Fees and dedications have been noted and discussed with the developer. Nov-21-02 03:4~P Wor~nam ~ uanm4n OJ.I ~"'t-O O(;3~'" t-'."-IL RICHAROD. WORSHAM ^TrOlL"I~Y "NT> COUNSaUli...T TAW MEiKA'lnli'. RANX: B!...IX:. If>Oll Airport F~~\OoIlY. !\uitt 404 Redt'"..], lcx.'~ ''',022 F..~.i'n.;k: . <I. ph...... 1:'!;.tlM.~..(:\1 ~rU;45 u8[\oj Novcmher 21. 2002 Via Fac:simile - HI"7-281-2442 Bill Ingle 7510 North Davis Blvd., Suite E NOl1h Richland Hills. Tx 76180 Re: Colleyville Tech Business Center North (4.3 Acres in Colleyville) Dear Bill: This lener is to cunHrm our prior conversations regarding this property.. I have reviewed The prdiminary sur/cy of the proposed !Oite ofthe Colleyville Tech Business Center North. ThIs surve~ shows an abandoned road and thoroughfare between the pmp<lSed bUilding ~ite and the lots bordering Highway 26. The survey reflect!' the road and rhoroughfarc were abandoned in 1936. However, 1 believe it to have b~en in use to access Ross Downs for many years after that. It is my understanding that this roadway was cutolT from the adjoining Rnss Downs development over ten years ago, bur has been in continuous use tll access !hc rear of the properties bordering Highway 26 since the road was abandoned in 1936. This road dues not appear to have been incorporated into the legal descriptions of any of the surrounding tracts. The question raised by the City nfCulleyville, as I understand it, is how will you access the proposed site of the Colleyville Tech Business Center North unless title to this property is cleared? First, regardless or ownership of the roadway easement, the property owners using the road\\'8Y have a prescriptive easement to use the roadway. An easement by prescriptim, is similar to squatters rights; if you ll'\e it long enough, it becomes a property right. It is I~Y legal opinion that the property o\vners abutting the roadway rboroughfare do not have a legal right to block acceSS to the roadway, and that your right of access is enforceable in a court onaw. The property owners in Ross Downs. however, have abandoned their right to ,Kcess through lack of use There remains a question:'\s to title to the roadway and thoroughfare. The only way to flnally clear title is t<J me a suit to qUiet litl~ As that is a time consuming and COl;tly process, tbe alternative is to reach an agreement with all of the parties who would have standing to assert ownership of the roadway thoroughfare It is my legal opinilm that the only parties with standing te make a claim to the properlY or a right to access the roadway are those ahutling the roadway rhoroughfare and th~se property owners who have been using November 11, 11"12 . PMl/:C 1 of 2 r"'U\I-LJ.-UL U.,:):.....,r- wWr-'::'I'Cln, Ol U'=!r'Hk':1I' Ci' 0,,+::, 000'-+ ,...- .. \o,J.....;) the roadway to access their property for the past decade This is limited to the owners of the tive tracts lying between the roadway thoroughfare A..'ld Highway 26, and the owners of the propused site for the Co!leyvillc Tech Bllsine.'is Center l'orth I wCould propo~e that this be docurnenteJ by surveying the roadway thoroughfare, brt:aking it into portions abutting the surrounding tracts (5 tracts). and having each ofthc parties execute a quitclaim deed of each s'Jrveyed section to the respective adjoining tract owner. To establish a clear right to acceS!i or the rcad~'ay, we would simultaneously creatc a cross access agreement providing an ea:~ement for all 6 property traclS (including the one that docs not adjoin the roadway, hut has used it for access) to use the roadway. As I1Cl ot:l~r party would have standin~ to assert a clair.-t, this would effectively qUIet tit(~ in the nam~s of the surrounding property owners and eluablish access and use of the roadway thoruug.luare Mair.tt:lliillce of the thoroughfare would be resolved in the cross access agreement. I believe that this lite will be sufficient for a title iMuran.ce company to is!o;ue title insurance on the added property. However, it is up to the underwriters of the individual title insurance companieii to make that decision, and 1 C81lnot guarantee that decision. A1; there is a 3-year statute of limitations for advers~ possesSion under "color of title" (meaning, a deed), I believe any possible objections to title would expire ailer that time period. , would recommend a review ol'thc deeds to the surrounding tracts and the d~ tu Ross Downs prier to ltS conversioll to adevelopmeIlt would be warranted to assure that the road thoroughfare hilS not previously been incorporated into another property description. Please feel fr~~ to use this letter as a reference in your discussions with the City or your investors. Sincerely, .--J '. ~--'/) /~/ / ).z~/' /V/--t'/J..,-- Richard D. Worsham rw Nonmbcr 21, 21)02. Paltc 1 of2 Schwob & Sage Building Corp. 2349 Glenda Lane Dallas, TX 75229 J ames Bowden 6516 Colleyville Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 Harold & Kathy Wilson 211 Meadow Lark Duncanville, TX 75137 Arroyo Norte Ltd. 6600 Colleyville Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 Neil & Sherrie Hart 6703 Colleyville Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 America's Storage 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Ste 700 Dallas, TX 75219 Mary & Michael Moan P.O. Box 801 Colleyville, TX 76034 G S & Deann Preston 6604 Baker Court Colleyville, TX 76034 David & Clara Green 6610 Baker Court Colleyville, TX 76034 J as W & Angela Graham, III 6616 McMakin Court Colleyville, TX 76034 Schwob Construction Group 190 Spruce Drive Durango, CO 81301 Tres Rosa Ltd. 6516 Colleyville Boulevard Colleyville, TX 76034 Neil & Sherrie Hart 1600 Glade Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Conbined Enterprises, Inc. 5601 Normandy Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 Sun Valley Properties 5301 Sun Valley Drive Fort Worth, TX 76119 Antionetta Mooney 404 Oak Valley Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 Kenneth Green 6620 Colleyville Blvd., #A Colleyville, TX 76034 Richard & Sharon Rucker Attn: Richard Rucker 6705 Colleyville Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 James Eklund 3005 Columbine Drive Grapevine, TX 76051 James & Marilyn Helzer 8110 Russell Curry Road Arlington, TX 76001 C. W. Davidson 405 Shenandoa Drive Burleson, TX 76028 Kevin Kim 2000 Tarrant Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Michael & Gayle Biggers 2004 Tarrant Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Efren & Maria Pabon 6602 Baker Court Colleyville, TX 76034 Patrick & Ramona O'Hanlon 6606 Baker Court Colleyville, TX 76034 Kenneth & Judy McEntire 6608 Baker Court Colleyville, TX 76034 Donald & Sally Pryor 6612 McMakin Court Colleyville, TX 76034 Thomas & Terri Ginavan 6614 McMakin Court Colleyville, TX 76034 Gary & Becky Anderson 6618 McMakin Court Colleyville, TX 76034 Donald & Susan Cook 6620 McMakin Court Colleyville, TX 76034 W Clyde & Lavonne Sheker 6700 Kennedy Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 James & Bemes Eklund 3005 Columbine Drive Grapevine, TX 76051 Complementary Copy to: Ross Downs HOA Dave Dudziak 2301 Wilkes Ct. Colleyville, TX 76034 Case Z-02-03 (Notices dated: November 20,2002) According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200' of the proposed special use permiUand-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that the (33) parties listed above have been notified of the proposed change request as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code. .'hI- Jan Levy - (f Planning & Zoning Assistant ORDINANCE 0-02-xxxx AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3, LAND USE OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF 4.268 ACRES OUT OF THE A.J. LOTT SURVEY, ABSTRACT 963, FROM THE AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO THE PUD-C PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by the D. Young Company on November 4,2002, under Case No. Z-02-034; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in the best interests of the City of Colleyville. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, and the Official Zoning Map are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville. Texas, as shown on the Zoning Map attached as Exhibit "A", and described by metes and bounds as shown on attached Exhibit "B", by changing the zoning of said property from the AG Agricultural district to the PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial district, including any other conditions and restrictions imposed and approved by the City Council, which are incorporated herein. Sec. 2. THAT the PUD-C area shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. GENERAL a. The purpose of this PUD-C is for general office, retail, oftice- warehouse land uses. b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the Colleyville Land Development Code, except where amended by this Ordinance. Ordinance 0-02-xxxx Page 2 of 4 2. PERMITTED USES The following land uses shall be permitted within this Planned Unit Development. a. Uses allowed in the CC1 Village Retail zoning district b. Uses allowed in the ML Light Manufacturing zoning district c. One (1) automotive repair and service facility with outside storage 3. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANS AND PLATTING a. The locations of land uses shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan attached as Exhibit "C", which shall not be considered the preliminary plat. The actual street and lot arrangement may differ from that shown on Exhibit "C" to accommodate topographic. drainage or other conditions. b. The arrangement, location and footprint of buildings within the PUD-C may differ from that shown on the attached Exhibit "C" and will be determined at time of site plan approval. However, the combined total square footage of all buildings within each sub-area shall not exceed fifty two thousand fifty square feet (52.050). which may be in one or more buildings, provided that any large commercial building shall comply with any additional requirements of the Land Development Code. c. Prior to the issuance of any development permits within this PUD-C and as a condition to the development of the subject property, the developer shall obtain approval of a final plat of the property in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the Colleyville Land Development Code. 4. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS The lot requirements and setbacks shall the following minimum standards: a. Minimum Lot Size b. Front Building Line c. Side Building Line d. Rear Building Line e. Maximum Building Height none 40 feet none (25' abutting residential) none (25' abutting residential) 35 feet Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. Sec. 7. Ordinance 0-02-xxxx Page 3 of 4 5. OPEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING a. Each building site shall comply with the minimum landscaping requirements of the Land Development Code, which shall satisfy the open space requirements for the PUD-C area. b. The common open space may be utilized for storm water detention purposes. 6. FENCING a. The developer shall construct an eight (8) foot tall cedar fence where the lot abuts a residential lot. The fence shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on any building on the lot. 7. OTHER a. The architectural design score for all commercial buildings shall be a minimum of 30 points, as described in Chapter 6 of the Land Development Code. THAT any person. firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville. Texas, shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternative method of publication provided by law. THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2002. day of CUy Of CDece Texa~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: December 2. 2002 Z-02-035 - Public Hearing - Amendment to the PUD-R (0-02- 1364) for Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3. 19.405 acres located on the south side of L.D. Lockett Road near Precinct Line Road STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Stinson Development Corporation and Mid-Cities Church are the owners of 19.405 acres of land located on the south side of L.D. Lockett Road, just east of Precinct Line Road. The property is currently zoned PUD-R, and the owners have applied for an amendment to the zoning regulations for the property. The PUD-R zoning for this property was approved by the City Council on September 17. 2002, by Ordinance 0-02-1364. The approved PUD-R ordinance for this property allows the development of 31 single family residential lots. and allows the development of office uses along L.D. Lockett Road. The owners propose to amend the existing PUD-R by removing the office uses and making the entire project a single family residential development. The proposed change would remove the 1.4-acre non-residential lot and redesign the subdivision for single family residential development. The number of lots increases from 31 lots to 34 lots, averaging 16,004 square feet in area. The standards proposed by the developer would require the construction of a 6-foot tall ornamental iron fence along the rear of the lots adjacent to L.D. Lockett Road. The following is an analysis of the major issues associated with this rezoning request. Master Plan. Upon the adoption of the zoning forthis property, the Colleyville MasterPlan was amended to designate office and residential development for this area. During the development of the Plan in 1998. considerable time was spent evaluating the location of future commercial areas. Since the amount of commercial land in Colleyville is extremely low as a percentage of the overall development, one of the goals of the Master Plan is to increase the percentage of commercial land available for development in the future. The Precinct Line Road corridor was identified as a non-residential area, partly due to its relatively undeveloped status. Approval of the PUD-R rezoning request in September eliminated about 17.9 acres of future commercial/office land from possible development in the future. Approval of this request would remove the remaining 1.4 acres available for office development on L.D. Lockett Road. Density and Lot Sizes. The proposed density of this rezoning request complies with the recommended maximum residential density called for in the Colleyville Master Plan, which calls for a maximum density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density of this project is 1.75 dwelling units per acre. The developer proposes a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet. which is greater than the minimum PUD-R requirement of 13,000 square feet. The average lot size is 16,000 square feet. Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 1 Open Space. The PUD-R regulations allow for lots as small as 13,000 square feet provided this is balanced with at least 20% of the property being dedicated as common open space. This project provides 3.88 acres of open space. which is 20% of the project area. A future city park area and water storage tank is proposed immediately to the east of this subdivision. The exhibit contains a note advising that the proposed baseball and softball fields in this park may be lighted in the future. Preliminary Plat. The zoning exhibit for this request is considered a preliminary plat. The developer's engineer submitted preliminary construction plans for streets, water, sewer and drainage. Number of Subdivision Entrances. The Land Development Code requires a subdivision containing more than 12 lots to provide a second entrance or emergency access drive. While this proposed layout has only one entrance on LD Lockett Road, the subdivision is accessible from an existing development in Hurst. The proposed layout meets the requirements for subdivision entrances. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along LD Lockett Road and along all interior streets. A 5-foot wide sidewalk is required along LD Lockett Road, and the developer has indicated his initial intention to escrow funds for the future construction of this sidewalk. All internal sidewalks must be 4-feet wide and will be built with the construction of the houses on the lots. The construction of hike and bike trails is not required for this property. IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. The PUD-R ordinance for this project amended the Colleyville Master Plan to designate the future land use of this property as single family residential and office development. Since the request proposes to remove the office area, it is inconsistent with the adopted Plan. 2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are generally undeveloped, though there are some single-family residences located on large acreage tracts in the area. There is a convenience store and gas station located at the southeast corner of LD Lockett and Precinct Line Road, and a church located just south of the store. 3. Development Trends. There are no development trends established in this area, as most of the property is undeveloped. The most recent development is the convenience store and church, both located on Precinct Line Road. A zoning change for single family residential and office/retail uses was recently approved on the northeast corner of L.D. Lockett Road and Precinct Line Road. 4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights- of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sewer service lines to the individual lots. 5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District. the three tracts that make up the 19.405-acre tract are valued at $985,544. The estimated City property tax revenue for the land is $3,423 annually. The future Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 2 property tax revenue would depend upon the value of each individual lot and the value of the house built on the lot. 6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the US and Canada since the 1960s, primarily in suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on average. Based on this average, the 34 proposed residences would add 325 vehicle trips per day to the surrounding roadways. The 2001-2002 traffic counts indicate that 1.146 vehicles traveled LD Lockett Road during a 24-hour period, though a date for this count is not known. During that same period. 15,280 vehicles traveled Precinct Line Road at the LD Lockett Road intersection. 7. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 14 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. SUMMARY The proposed development contains 34 single-family lots and 3 open space lots. The request is not consistent with the adopted Master Plan. and only the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council may approve residential lots in these areas. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: December 2, 2002 City Council: December 17, 2002 and January 7,2003 RECOMMENDATION: Denial. due to technical non-compliance with the Colleyville Master Plan ATTACHMENTS: · Location and Zoning Map · Zoning Exhibit · Information from Applicant · List of Property Owners Notified · DRC Review Memorandum · Developer Response Letter · Draft Ordinance Prepared by: Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 3 I. I~ I~ I I~ I' I I !~I . '''''00 I! ji ~ ! ! I ~ If Ii ii Iii 1iiO J' l~ I ij 3 1 A E ! ~ .658" L ~ ') 1~ ,n~ pi 'Y P.L~~~RCrll-n_--n-:-- ------ ! If-I BE A R 1'i 'I 1 ~~I O}A1At.l1'4AIDD~ & !~IC l' I :!O 10.086" I 11~L i \ j! ~j I ~'i-'-'-'-' f' ~1.1! TRACT 8U . !: " I! . ~ ir I' . . . . J. > ~ 0 , i: : 1Z~A (,')1 I!'~ ~~DT TRACT ~ 'i.ll . ",. A,2 A 1 I ",'I I T "'~T : 'r .....01\. I, -j______ ___ I! i i-rRACT Al II ,01] . i i : T~~;T TRACT AI8 I. , TRACT Al I!: . '27 . II ...Jii .. . , _Ii .1. , :lq C! Ii ~Ii i ~ li: I\-----.\-1 J o \'1 J..' C. tJ r; >-' ~-'l ~'.G~ I....... ,\ 1..':' TR UIC .21' AC TR IE 13.883 AC 1 i I I I I .R. TR U5 ..35 AC TR IU 2.. AC TR I A3 ..8 AC 4- i I l TR lC 1.78 AC .QA''lb''''-oo_" i 81 C i RE . T:8 'AJC I C I ... 2 ~ \.,::.-- TR IN B1 ." AC 1 ' TR tCC TR I 1, 03 AC 25 A 5A REAG ~r;: -..?.= 2 I.- TR I I. 67 TR 12 1, 02 AC fl ( , 2.17 . TR IX .5' AC TRACT A TR 28 .770 " TR 2 31, 12 AC 128.12 (1)(3.00 (I) Location Map & Area of Notification CASE # Z-02-G35 - An Amendment to the PUD (0-02-13&4) - > , S' ...!; I . II ... :-' '. ; -. :,;" jf Jlj II" : : :J" ~~ j =~i J: : ~! ,- ;'--'- < II' I' . ~ ! ~I ~j : ~j, I ~ ~ ~fJ .: i - "Y:.r ~. f :,,'~ ~ I I I~ II I II, ~ 1 I J1i ,$~ ~~~- -:' i~ i iJ'lllfl..J~ ,.! ,.,",-; ,'; " ,';1 !,I ,If ,'It ~,I'R.. ~ - s:: '1'1 I 11 J ' .f t ,1 , .1 lp.--, t~ i I Itfll. a ,J ;;1, ..,- ioU I. >1 'h ",' . lolfB I ~, .:. l' I' .n II, I 'lti 1. l' ijl - - '.:1 !_-.. ~I: ..J IIi =hh~' ~ II! ~ IIJ 'f! =:!fJ - " IU m m J~ J~ J~ JH h J;;I ! J! J~ J!i I I~II d!: ~Inl aiJ :i! W' '!n · H ,. :~. thll L~ i ii~: i ~ dllli!~ DiU ~, e I'i~: nIl r~!~m r~ ! UJWH~~~ ~Sl ~~i,_ o !h ii 1I11~ i ~ i" E ~: n I i I !J~I:Li!lf I i If:n: ii. :1 I 1 ,Hi. I ~.!1 f i D~:ikU.!i I ",11,1 ~IJI m III '!J!J~ iHmm i rln IIIU ,III,,'n .1 Illn .. iIIld"l t< L :i!! ~T It , ~ f'". 'I'" ' ! ~ g f~~! I!~ ;r ~I mB I Iii Ji~ :~ m iii' ~ im! HU HI fl I '!m e~ r9!;.f ~~ I ~~. ~{. ~e. , ~~. ,:.... .... - ""10'1'.-- ----- I~ % "I III II!! II % . '1 I ., I . I. i .... - ~y..-- '_'1'- IJ % !~I . . I n.% iiil . ---T- ! I~ 'I I. " I ~ E I!.I~ Ii' I i~s I 11r.;~IB:~ I frJ ~ tI · ~ ~I. I,ssl Illii I ~ i. ,iIIE~~ !I! III ! I I !:t! I i II ;111 ~,I I I I .. 8 9'J . PI.. I ~Ia I i:i I I~ lil:;i r.. I,D r I ~~~~ -- "PUD-R ZONING AMENDMENT" LONESOME DOVE EST A TES PHASE 3 A "PUD-R" Planned Unit Development - Residential In the City of Colleyville, Texas INTRODUCTION Stinson Development Corporation, Inc., being the applicant, hereby requests an amendment to the existing PUD-R zoning (i.e. Ordinance 0-02-1364) for Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3. This amendment is specifically to convert the approved CN (neighborhood commercial) zoning located along the frontage of L.D. Lockett Road to PUD-R (single family residential) zoning. Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will then be developed as a thirty-four (34) lot single-family residential subdivision with three (3) common open space lots with an overall density of 1.75 lots/acre and an average lot size of 16,004 square feet. The total common open space within the subdivision will be 3.88 acres (20.0% of the residential site area). The residents within Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will have access to the City ofColleyville public park area located immediately east of this proposed development. An 8-foot sidewalk will be constructed within the 15-foot pedestrian access, drainage and utility easement located on the common lot lines of lots 6 and 7, Block 3. The proposed planned unit development submitted herein does meet all technical standards for the City ofColleyville's PUR-D zoning district. OWNERSHIP The proposed PUD-R planned unit development is comprised of two (2) tracts of land currently owned by two separate property owners. The Stinson Development Corporation, Inc. currently owns the western tract of land (approximately 11.6 acres) bounded by Lot 1, Block 1 Meadowlake subdivision to the west, the Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 2 subdivision to the south, the Mid-Cities Church, Inc. tract to the east and L.D. Lockett Road to the north. The Mid-Cities Church, Inc. currently owns the eastern tract of land (approximately 7.8 acres) bounded by the forementioned Stinson tract to the west and south, the City of Colleyville tract to the east and L.D. Lockett Road to the north. Once the PUD-R zoning amendment process has been completed, the Stinson Development Corporation, Inc. will purchase the Mid-Cities Church, Inc. tract and develop the entire Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 residential subdivision. amendmentDevdopment Plan .doc PROPOSED PUD-R DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS The following development conditions shall be applicable within the Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 planned unit development: 1. General a. The purpose of this PUD-R is for single-family residential development, constructed at a density not to exceed a maximum of].8 dwelling units per acre. b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the Colleyville Land Development Code, except where amended by this Ordinance. 2. Pl'rmittl'd 1J!ll'!I a. Single family residences, detached. b. Open space. 3. Non-re!lidentiallJ!ll'!I, Lot Rl'qllirl'ml'nt!land Sethack!l a. None. 4. Rl'!lidentiall,ot Rl'qllirl'ml'nt!land Sethal"k!l Residential lot requirements and setbacks shall comply with the following provisions: a. Minimum Lot Size 15,000 square feet b. A verage Lot Size ] 6,004 square feet c. Minimum Lot Width 95 feet d. Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet e. Front Building Line 30 feet f. Side Building Line ] 0 feet g. Rear Building Line 25 feet 5. Opl'n SpaN' a. This development shall provide a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the residential project area as common open space for the leisure and recreational use of the development's residents. The open space shall comply with the provisions contained in the Land Development Code. amendmentDevdopment Plan.doc b. The common open space lot (i.e. Lot 4, Block I) may be utilized for storm water detention purposes. c. The common open space lot (i.e. Lot 4, Block I) shall contain two picnic tables with shade covers, eight three-inch caliper trees, a fishing pier and two park benches. d. The common open space lots shall be owned and maintained by the property owners association for Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3. 6. C:onl'eptIlSlI Site PllIn", SInd PllItting a. The subdivision shall be generally consistent with the Zoning ExhibitlPreliminary Plat. The actual street and lot arrangement may differ from that shown on the Zoning Exhibit/Preliminary Plat to accommodate topographic, drainage or other conditions. b. Prior to the issuance of any development permits within this PUD-R and as a condition to the development of the subject property, the developer shall obtain approval of a Final Plat of the property in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the Colleyville Land Development Code. 7. SidewlIlh a. The developer shall construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along L.D. Lockett Road at the same time as other public improvements are constructed in the subdivision, unless funds are escrowed with the . City for future construction of the sidewalk. b. Sidewalks along lot frontages shall be constructed by each homebuilder. All sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements ofthe Colleyville Land Development Code. 8. Fenl'ing a. A six (6) foot wrought iron fence similar in type, color and design shall be required along the rear of Lots 12-]4, Block I and Lot 2, B]ock 3. The wrought iron fence shall be built by the homebuilder at the time of home construction. Each individual lot owner shall be responsible for maintenance and upkeep of the wrought iron fence located on their lot. amendmentDevelopmenl PIIJl.doc PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION A property owners association will be established for the Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 planned unit development. The property owners association will be responsible for maintenance of all landscaped and irrigated areas, common open space areas, entry areas and fencing, and enforcement of the deed restrictions in order to maintain the quality and character of Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE The proposed 19.405 acre PUD-R Planned Unit Development (i.e. thirty-four (34) residential lots and three (3) common open space lots) will be developed by Stinson Development Corporation, Inc. in a single phase as shown on the Zoning Exhibit/Preliminary Plat. Construction of this development will begin as soon as the zoning amendment and platting process are completed through the City ofColleyville. SUMMARY This PUD-R planned unit development will consist of thirty-four (34) residential lots, three (3) common open space lots if the requested PUD-R zoning amendment is approved by City Council. This proposed development also meets all technical standards for the City of Colleyville's PUD-R zoning district. The overall density within Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will be 1.75 lots/acre and the average lot size will be 16,004 square feet. The total common open space within the residential portion of Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will be 3.88 acres (20.0% of residential site area). It is also important to note that the residents within the Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will also have access to the City of Colleyville public park area (i.e. future youth baseball fields) located immediately east of this proposed development. A summary of the proposed PUD-R Development Conditions for Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 are clearly defined on the Zoning Exhibit/Preliminary Plat. The average home size within Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will be approximately 3,000 square feet. The average home value within Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will be in the S330,000 range or higher (i.e. SIlO/square foot @ 3,000 square feet). The anticipated build-out of all residential lots within Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 once all improvements are completed and accepted by the city is estimated at two years. ameudmentDevelopmalt Plan .doc We feel that the PUD-R planned unit development described herein is a more compatible and practical use of the property based on the current development surrounding this property. It is also important to note that this property is located approximately 1,600 feet east of the intersection of Precinct Line Road and L.D. Lockett Road and is not really visible from Precinct Line Road. Due to its location and lack exposure and marketing visibility from any major corridors within Colleyville, we feel that this property will more than likely never be developed as neighborhood commercial. There is also an existing creek with a mature stand of trees located approximately 700 feet west of this proposed development. This existing creek would be the most practical location for a future zoning buffer between any future retail/commercial uses located along Precinct Line Road (i.e. west of the creek) and any future single family residential developments located east of the creek. With sincerity and respect, Stinson Development Corporation, Inc., requests consideration and approval of this PUD-R Zoning Amendment of Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council ofColleyville, Texas pursuant to the criteria presented and discussed herein. amendmentOevelopment Plan.doc Mid Cities Church Inc. Attn: Denis Faulkner 4905 Eversham Court Colleyville, Texas 76034 Stinson Development Corp. 7510 Davis Blvd., Ste D Fort Worth, Texas 76180 USA Attn: David Houser 2601 Meacham Blvd. Fort Worth, TX 76137 City of Colleyville Martin & Lisa Stajduhar 101 Williamsburg Court Colleyville, TX 76034 Ashraf, Ishak 2928 Oak Ridge Drive Hurst, TX 76054 Wallace Craig P.O. Box 308 Hurst, TX 76053 Norma Jones 2509 Huneysuckle Ave. Fort Worth, TX 76111 Garry & Sharon Tennyson 1507 Johnson Road Keller, TX 76248 Bevsco LP P.O. Box 670903 Dallas, TX 75367 Craig Gandy 111 7 W. L.D. Lockett Road Colleyville, Texas 76034 Bear Valley Community Church 7900 Precinct Line Road Colleyville, Texas 76034 City of Hurst 1505 Precinct Line Road Hurst, Texas 76054 Peter & Linda Kuhlmann 6000 Quality Hill Street Colleyville, TX 76034 Case Z-02-035 (Notices dated: November 21 , 2002) According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200' of the proposed special use permitland-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above have been notified ofthe proposed change request as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code. Jan Levy i Y-- Planning & ~Oning Assistant CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE FAX TO FAX NO November 13, 2002 Dick Blackard 0 Joseph Reue, PE 817-488-5802 0 817-306-1555 FROM Clayton Husband, AICP, Community Development Manager SUBJECT Z-02-035 PUDR amendment - Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRe) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and zoning change request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. The current PUD-R zoning for this property was approved by Ordinance 0-02-1364, adopted by the City Council on September 17, 2002. This ordinance also amended the Colleyville Master Plan to designate the future land use of this property as single family residential and office development. The zoning request is inconsistent with the Plan, and a recommendation for denial will be made to the Planning & Zoning Commission for technical non-compliance with the Plan. Only the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council have the discretion to approve residential components in this area. ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING 1. A 15-foot wide drainage and utility easement needs to be added adjacent to the common lot line of Lots 5 and 6, Block 3. The purpose for this easement is to provide a location for a sanitary sewer stub to the park property to the east. 2. Increase the size of the drainage and utility easement adjacent to the south lot line of Lot 14, Block 3, to 15 feet in width. The purpose for this increased width is to provide for the looping of water lines in the area. 3. The City-owned tract to the east is planned for baseball/softball practice fields. These fields may be lighted when the fields are constructed. The DRC suggests that a note be added to the exhibit/plat indicating that the park may contain lights in the future. P.O. Box 185 - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.577.7587 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-02-035 LONESOME DOVE PUD-R ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PLANS 1. The Fire Department and Engineering Department have significant concerns about the dead- end water line proposed in the plans. The water line would need to be looped either to the east or west. 2. The engineering construction plans have been reviewed by the Engineering Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department. Comments on the paving, drainage and utility plans noted on a set of marked-up prints, which are ready to be picked up. Questions concerning the engineering construction plans should be directed to Chad Bartee at 81 7-577- 7587. OTHER INFORMATION 1. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building pennit is issued for a new structure on the lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general infonnation on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY uses. Actual fee depends on specific use of the property. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 2. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since L.D. Lockett Road is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the Engineering Department upon request. A general estimate of the escrow amount is approximately $139 per linear foot, for 598.53 feet, for a total of$83,196. The response letter to these comments should indicate the developer's initial intention of construction or escrow regarding these streets. 3. PARKLAND DEDICATION. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the subdivision plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per dwelling unit. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon the review ofthe final plat. 4. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along L.D. Lockett Road and all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. The sidewalks along L.D. Lockett Road are required to be 5-feet wide, and the developer is required to construct the L.D. Lockett Road sidewalk as part of the public improvements for this property. PAGE20F3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-02-035 LONESOME DOVE PUDeR PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, December 2,2002, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, December 17, 2002 and January 7, 2003, 7:30 p.m. RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices: · a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived · 22 folded copies of the revised Zoning Exhibit drawing · one 81'2" X 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit The revised drawings must be submitted no later than Friday, November 22, 2002 in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at husbandc@:ci.collewille.tx.us or 817-577- 7587 if you have any questions. C: ENGINEERING DEPT FIRE DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTION PUBLIC WORKS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE PAGE30F3 WASHINGTON & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS · PLANNERS 3950 Fossil Creek Boulevard, Suite 210 · Fort Worth, Texas 76137 817/306-1444 · Fax 817/306-1555 MEMORANDUM TO: MR. CU YTON HUSBAND, ACIP, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR FOR THE CITY OF COLLEYVIllE FROM: EARL R. SMITH III SUBJECT: LONESOME DOVE ESTATES PHASE 3 - PUD-R ZONING CHANGE REQUEST DATE: 11/22/2002 CC: MR. DICK BUCKARD Mr. Husband: This memo is intended to respond to the written comments received from the City of Colleyville Development Review Committee letter dated November 13, 2002. The following responses to the city written comments are addressed in the order received: General Information Comment: The cumnt PUD-R zoningfor this properry was approved I?J ordinance 0-02-1364, adopted I?J the Ci!Y Council on September 17, 2002. This ordinance also amended the Collryville Master Plan to designate the future land use tif this properry as single famijy residential and office development. The zoning request is inconsistent with the plan, and a recommendation for denial will be made to the Planning & Zoning Commission for the technical non-compliance wit the plan. OnlY the Planning & Zoning Commission and Ci!] Council have the discretion to approve residential components in this area. Response: Meetings with he Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council have been scheduled to review the project as required. Zoning Exhibit Drawing Comment: ,. A 15 foot wide drainage and utili!] easement needs to be added acjjacent to the common lot line tif Lots 5 and 6, Block 3. The purpose for this easement is to provide a location for a sanitary sewer stub to the park properry to the east. Response: A ten-foot drainage and utility easement has been added to adjacent to Lot 5, Block 3 for the placement of a proposed sanitary sewer stub to the park property. Comment: 2. Increase the size if the drainage and utility easement atjjacent to the south lot line if Lot 14, Block 3, to 15 feet in width. The purpose Jor thzs increased width is to provide Jor the looping if water lines in the area. Response: The proposed water will be looped to an existing eight-inch water line to the east of the property. (See Sheet 4, Preliminary Plan Set) Comment: 3. The City-owned tract to the east is planned Jor baseball/softball fields. These fields mqy be lighted when the fields are constructed The DRC suggests that a note be added to the exhibit/plat indicating that the park mqy contain lights in the future. Response: A note has been added to the exhibit/plat stating, "Future baseball/softball fields may contain lights in the event of future improvements." Engineering Construction Plans Comment: ,. The Fire Department and Engineering Department have significant concerns about the dead-end water line proposed in the plans. The water line would need to be looped either to the east or west Response: The proposed water line will be looped to an existing eight-inch water line to the east of the site. (See Sheet 4, Preliminary Plan Set) Comment: ,. The engineering construction plans have been reviewed I?Y the Engineen'ng Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department. Comments on paving, drainage and utility plans and noted on a set if marked-up prints, which are reacfy Jor pick up. Response: All marked-up comments and suggestions have been addressed. 2 Other Information: Other Information 1. (Impact Fees) We understand and acknowledge this comment. 2. (Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements) The developer's initial intention for this development is to escrow the funds for the perimeter street improvements required for L.D. Lockett Road at time of final platting of the property. The estimated amount of escrow funds due at time of final platting of residential portion of development is $24,316.66 (i.e. 174.941.f. of frontage @ $139 per linear foot). The estimated amount of escrow funds due at time of fInal platting of neighborhood commercial portion of development is $58,879.01 (i.e. 423.59 I.f. of frontage @ $139 per linear foot). 3. (Parkland Dedication) We understand and acknowledge this comment. 4. (Sidewalk and Trails) We understand and acknowledge this comment. We note that the developer would like to escrow the funds for the 5-foot sidewalk along L.D. Lockett Road since the southern half ofL.D. Lockett Road is not proposed to be built at this time (i.e. only escrowing funds for perimeter street improvements). Re-submittal Requirements Attached with this memo are twenty two (22) copies of the revised zoning exhibit, one (1) 8 112" x 11" reduced copy of the revised zoning exhibit and one (3) copies of the revised Preliminary Plan Set for Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3. Please do not hesitate to contact our offIce at (817) 306-1444 if you have any additional comments or questions. 3 ORDINANCE 0-02-xxxx AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, AS AMENDED, BY AMENDING ORDINANCE 0-02-1364 IN ITS ENTIRETY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Stinson Development Corporation and Mid-Cities Church on November 4, 2002, under Case No. Z-02-035; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in the best interests of the City of Colleyville. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT Ordinance 0-02-1364 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 1. GENERAL a. The purpose of this PUD-R is for single-family residential development, constructed at a density not to exceed a maximum of 1.8 dwelling units per acre. b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the Colleyville Land Development Code, except where amended by this Ordinance. 2. PERMITTED USES a. Single family residences, detached b. Open space 3. RESIDENTIAL LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS Residential lot requirements and setbacks shall comply with the following provisions, as shown in the Conceptual Site Plan attached as Exhibit C. Ordinance 0-02-xxxx Page 2 of 4 a. Minimum Lot Size b. Average Lot Size c. Minimum Lot Width d. Minimum Lot Depth e. Front Building Line f. Side Building Line g. Rear Building Line 15,000 square feet 16,050 square feet 1 00 feet 125 feet 30 feet 1 0 feet 25 feet 4. OPEN SPACE a. This development shall provide a minimum of twenty percent (20%) of the residential project area as common open space for the leisure and recreational use of the development's residents. The open space shall comply with the provisions contained in the Land Development Code. b. The common open space may be utilized for storm water detention purposes. c. Development on the non-residential lot shall conform to the landscaping requirements contained in the Land Development Code. d. The open space lot shall contain two picnic tables with shade covers, eight three-inch caliper trees, a fishing pier and two park benches. 5. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANS AND PLATTING a. The subdivision shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan attached as Exhibit "C". The conceptual site plan shall be considered the preliminary plat. The actual street and lot arrangement may differ from that shown on Exhibit "C" to accommodate topographic, drainage or other conditions. b. Prior to the issuance of any development permits within this PUD-R and as a condition to the development of the subject property. the developer shall obtain approval of a preliminary plat and a final plat of the property in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the Colleyville Land Development Code. 6. SIDEWALKS a. The developer shall construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along L.D. Lockett Road at the same time as other public improvements are constructed in the subdivision, unless funds are escrowed with the City for future construction of the sidewalk. Ordinance 0-02-xxxx Page 3 of 4 b. Sidewalks along lot frontages shall be constructed by each homebuilder. All sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Colleyville Land Development Code. 7. FENCING a. A six (6) foot tall ornamental iron fence shall be constructed along the rear lot line of Lots 12-14, Block 1, and Lot 2, Block 3. The fence shall be similar in type, color and design on each lot. The fence shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the house on the lot. The property owner shall maintain the fence. Sec. 2. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance as read together with any zoning regulation contained in the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. Sec. 3. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternate method of publication provided by law. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2002. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2003. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE: Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary Donna Arp Mayor cce$ Tt"xa~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: December 2, 2002 I Z-02-029 - Tabled Item - Special Use Permit for an accessory i building on Lot 1, Block 3, Sunrise Terrace, located at 1205 Glade Road UPDATE The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this item at its November 11, 2002, meeting and directed the applicant to provide detailed information about the proposed building. The applicant submitted a letter detailing the request, and a copy of the letter is attached. The owner proposes a six-car garage with dimensions of 70 feet in length, 25 feet in width, and 10 feet in height. The roofline would be a ranch-style roof similar to the existing house. The exterior walls would be constructed of painted 29 gauge ribbed steel panels or hardboard siding. The roof would be constructed of similar metal panels or fiberglass shingles. The foundation of the structure would include a brick ledge in order to allow the structure to be bricked in the future. The applicant proposes a gravel driveway to the garage and an extension of the fence to screen the building. The applicant proposes two different sets of standards in the letter. one for a metal building and one for a non-metal structure. A 1,750 square foot metal building may not be an appropriate structure for the area as this type of building usually has a commercial look. A building with hardboard exterior and shingle roof would provide a building with a residential look and may be more compatible with the development in the neighborhood. The location proposed by the applicant is the rear of the lot. The lot is almost 105 feet wide at the rear property line. Taking into account to the 25-foot building line adjacent to Garry Lynn Drive and the 5-foot easement on the east side of the property. the buildable width at the rear is 75 feet. If the structure were built as proposed, the building would take up almost the entire rear width of the property. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS 11-11-02 Terry Grisso is the owner of a house located at 1205 Glade Road, at the southeast corner of Garry Lynn Drive. The owner has submitted a Special Use Permit (SUP) application to construct an accessory building on the property. The owner proposes to construct a 1,750 square foot, 6-car garage on the property. The accessory building regulations include size and location standards. All requests to exceed the base standards must be authorized by a Special Use Permit approved by the City Council. A comparison of the regulations and the proposed building is shown below. Based on the applicant's information, the proposed building meets all the requirements of the regulations except forthe building size. The applicant has requested a waiver from this requirement, as allowed by the Code. Agenda Item No. 5 - Page 1 ACCESSORY BUILDING ZONING COMPARISON Category Zoning Requirement Applicant Proposal 1. Maximum Size 1,000 sf for 0.5-0.99-acre lots 2,158 sf 2. Max. Number of Buildings 3 2 3. Side Setbacks 5 feet 18 feet; 25+ feet 4. Rear Setback 5 feet 14 feet 5. Max. Height Not to exceed height of main building complies The allowed size of an accessory building is based on the size of the lot. In addition. the total square footage of all accessory buildings cannot exceed the maximum allowed size unless approved by SUP. For lots between 0.5-acres and 0.99-acres, the size of all accessory buildings is limited to 1,000 square feet. The applicant's lot is 0.8-acres in size, or 34.848 square feet. There is an existing building on site that counts towards the total square footage. With the existing building and the proposed building, the total square footage of accessory buildings proposed is 2,158 square feet. The applicant has requested a waiver of the size requirement to allow both buildings with a total size of 2,158 square feet. A letter from the applicant is attached that further explains this request. The building, as proposed, is a 6-car garage with three double doors. The garage doors would face north towards the existing house. The purpose for the building is to provide a place to park the owner's cars. The applicant has not indicated the exterior construction material. IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan. adopted in 1998. which designates this area as a future single-family residential area. 2. Surrounding Properties. Most of the surrounding properties are developed as single- family residences. Properties to the east, west and south are developed as single family residences. Properties to the north are zoned PUD-R. but the lots on Glade Road are zoned for commercial and office use. There is a new salon located approximately 500 feet to the west. 3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is single-family development. Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development. 4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights- of-way. 5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the land and house is appraised at $106,722. The estimated annual City property tax revenue generated by this property is $371. The addition of the accessory building could have a positive impact on the appraised value of the property. 6. Traffic Generation. The addition of the accessory building will not have an impact on the traffic generation in the neighborhood or local area. Agenda Item No. 5 - Page 2 Staff mailed 10 notices to adjacent property owners regarding this request. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. The request is consistent with the Master Plan. Since the SUP for this particular use has little impact on land use decisions or requirements, but may be important to those living nearby, staff believes the opinions of the area property owners should be the most important factor in whether to grant the Special Use Permit. Since the request is an SUP, conditions may be imposed that are different than or in addition to the normal requirements of the Land Development Code. provided the conditions are intended to reduce the negative impacts on the adjacent property. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: November 11, 2002 City Council: December 3 and December 17, 2002 RECOMMENDATION: Denial. due to technical non-compliance with the Land Development Code ATTACHMENTS: · Location Map · Zoning Exhibit and Information from Applicant · List of Property Owners Notified · Correspondence · Draft Ordinance Prepared by: ~ Agenda Item No. 5 - Page 3 ,. 55 5 il .:__. .._-' I I ! ,~)~10f'l'" LS i ':1SI~'~;~r m J05'fb~/~- P~~:'O .0 I' lr:R1"l:,h, ~r !\~/ I 1 ... At; , ttE~a .~~M1~. ' ! Cf!7' ;,.<;,;:-' K. ~ ~~~~I:':~' ~ I UillR I _~(, (071 K KNOLL- - WE "'or 3." i tlnfJ I. : ~ 1 ,. : '0 ., <Z U 23 Ae _ ;-1: "1 .- 14 f ~ ,--- .1,i~I' ~~ " , '0 ( .. : NUf:CES C1 ~ I - · 51 "T 13 :,.. 4A1A7 ~R 4Al11lq; :'~ ./ ~ " fl. ~"'~lj r--- :. 7&'~ '--::& It; , ' JI 31 3& 35 H '-Il 41 : ~ · ;..... 'J '. J .' f .... r-- 1 N 1: E1IE'.'5 .~. --;-- . ~' ~ .1 1 f' APPL 6 IlR .,...... ....... ". 30" 32 33 _ O 1]1 ~: ......... : ., ~-: L....... ,]"...... .t1 I I 'p 1 1 '\. - lR "AIAI8 ;;.78' ,; I > r---- f 1.608. !~ :.7..el {L.10\,.AJ :21 GU^UAJ.UPE CT g; SO 2.~0' 'R ...! · . II : t..(;;::~'.,L r.. -0 V~ ' ..-/ 2.5.,I.'T tV' ;;, I~ ..e. .e ! M ,=rr . ~' 2T I 2a.. ~1'111 23 t t-'-'- i & ~ . : or p' ~ .r'Z,'6?\ 0 L-.' "j;J !i:...=..ii,.. 52 i · 'U;'.'R8 lJ) , 20ni\.l1J"~~ i 5 I11l! I .'He ~ 1 2 : II '9. F.-'{ IV 22 M~ i R I \~ "'1 [".: ~ .7.. ~' 1r,...1 I 2' i ""' '.1'\ '~" K'n RIVF.RWALK t:T i ~iit~ Il~G""-;O' 7 . :.-/ : 2'-J1 1 0\ 9 ~ ;T. ",RS ~ TR ,,'",,' 15 14 13 3...- ! , fY I n _ . ..e RC 0 .73 RC . 1& ., ....... :-"'~. ! I 12 ga r--z;- : I ~ :;:...--- I, "'-.- . -' n' T -: ' 10 " i ~'3 ~~ 5 ;IR ",., .:.'103: SHllNE CT .~! 1 -': .77 It; .7'l It; : & . <V' AVV~ ~ -.~ : 5 ~ 3 2 , "'f 15 3, I .,J' :,' ,I CO ~ . _ ~ I, A. ~..... D ~3: TR '" fi.\~"'" IR 16 rr 2 ".1"12 4111. ! ~ 1--~-:.58 .58 2 ! ~ 17 f""1 1 : At At 1'0'1" f;'l\'I"- 2 CO~\, ?~10 ~ 2 C._17 . (; .. ~ -' _,f 1~17. . ...]GJ . 6~ ..J '. tEIJu ~ 1tT ~,' ~~g3 1l:Q2 I r+} lOO' '2 I,~ J\..'S\~~\ ~ 5 -1'-j, al~~Y;l ~~ oc F. \ ~',\i, '0 ~. : 31 tzl~ ~ ~ '" L-2.... JI: ,C') 6 0:: --;- t.J ~ ~ - ~-;~ 02 ~;..:~ ~~~ ~~~ 't,;~ ) T. ] '0..." At '-- 5' ssr - 5& r-- 51 ~O~. o-g 1 58 1.59! . \fI>s I 1 TR U ~R TR 38 . 'TR J8"- 2 1.15 AC .. At .15 AC .UIi At ~ nl ()O' _ '11 ....lL~~..,.."_,,..=-....:4 ____ ___ _ __.._...~':!h~~'._.,,_:. ~"~E>-:~:';:-~"-~'- ~-:,~,:-~~;T~---:-'~'c ~5 ~~~\R3' /' ;.)' It /loOD ,'.,uJ.: \ \ · r \~.\'- "',' "plr ! .- I 1 ' ' 3 . i . 7 3. \ I.~ · _ ,," .!504e · .~. .: ,.. IR @~ ,,// .. I 1 LN ,~. -/- .. I 11" JO C^,.RBL 'tl'- ~ '. ...' -i.... ';'iR/t i "SI' I'llll; : "., i', · If lSS 7lI III J J. 3 /,.! 5 tl ~ 3 ....-:l\) --3- L-- tr~>\;@~',~;:,,_"-~_;:./;;-I " ,"" .... -B'-\J_"~ L0" '" ,. GWi~ 15 15', u~m- i J t"~ . ,__." b. . I.S11 At \..._ ' 11ft 'r--~ I_,~ ! ~ GA.RRY L')'NN UR 7 & ,\Qt: I" , I 16 Ii, I. 7 ' ,) 1" J1 I : --1'1 . ..'J 12" 1tR (.." \) _ ':---0- II .. ' 3.S0 , <~~.0'-~~~t;*~'(:":;l':.~ ~ t . ,~ ~) ~ :~;;. .. " ".. " '" " b.~ , .).,~ 27 .. 25 2.: :.. i t~ I. SJ11 :,4 \ 1 ~ --~(";" 1~ I I.--. i "'-}- e:J " I ;... "',- J I . (~H^TSWOrlTH ......OR'rH OR , r' ,\ - --- .-- '" ! _"I' ~ .l1. r HATSWOHrlf CT. r. -.-;-r ;'}, :M A \~.1~~1I' ~~k:_~~ /-- ! ~l.... IIJ 11 -~~-{ f 1-'"- Z8 2' 3B (.;i ,. i. IZ S ,,~' ,," " 7::'- '" '" ", S" ..~ ~~_.._..:17.._ .-..-..-.. ..-.... ._.._..c,,_,,_O'_"'-j , 1. l( ~c'1' ~ " 1 t It. }{ I S~., .... . \--- 34 33 'i". I 1 ft~ ,. _ ~-~0 ;7 /...,'~~ _:32 ,-~'J~L!' . i}l~O}A~;] .. \0 -:- '1'~~, :01fo\: 50 '. 7\,' '.-- '. "1 EII--J. -- : : I I "r' ) i., 1 " · ;;;;$ ~5 -: I. 2T f \ ~ 'I I' H\l\ -.. 2 '"\ .c.. 6 7 14 _ rnn.~ t'I , fA 4AI : .7 M: : I ;...:U,L_.._.._.._ / ] 1.4! ,ft I.' ].Il At l-- '" ]8 '.0 At . 2.00 155 . . ."" At 7 6.5ft . ~ ,. ?n8 . ..Z~ &.1 Location Map & Area of Notification CASE." Z.02-G29 - SUP for an Accessory Building =:"'01 . ~ !?i''1'J1...~~'~-_/ f/~ f/imes 1.96'3 Praf~ .~'-- . iF. LEGAL DESCRIPTION:Lot 1,B1ock 3, SUNRISE TERRACE SECTION ONE, an Addition to thl City of COlleyville, Tarrant County, Tex , according to the plat recorded in 'Volu.'Ile 388-31, Page 66, Plat Record!::, Tar nt County., Texas. NOTE: The."following eilsernents."do' not.. . affect .this"lot..' ,.'.: Vol 1349 Pg 61 DRTCT Vol 1349 Pg 213 DRTCT Vol 1539 Pg 476 DRTCT 3.0' INSDE 25' BLDG. LINE 1 IRO ~ \OA~ IRON ROD . -:"--,-,.-- --:.- .. ~~" .,"::.. - - -'-.~-;;." \ NOTE: FENCES OFF AS SHOWN. ..." -". ... :r1N SHED ~ 24.0 2 -?f'" '. ..~. . ~: o o o U) ~l .\!' ~;' ~~. 'f WOOD DECK . POOL ~.. :"." SPA 600 z z >- -1 25' BLDG. LINE Q. II) )- C:: 0: <[ (!) IRON ROD ~O' Utility Easement *NOTE: HOUSE OVER _ BLDG. LINE . AS SHOWN. 160.00' IRON ROD 1205 GLADE ROAD NOTE: According to FEMA Map 480590 0010 B this property :_~ is not in the 100 year Aood Zone "Au I DECEMBER I, 1982 Revised November 12,2002 at the Request of the Zoning and Planning Committee Ladies and Gentlemen, The following is my proposal for 6-car garage with a maximum of 1750 Square Feet on my .8 acre lot at 1205 Glade Road in Colleyville. Attached is a photocopy of a six-car garage similar to what I would like to put up. I have not determined the builder that I will be using at this point in time. The maximum dimensions in feet will be (Length x Width x Height): 70 x 25x 10 using a ranch style roofline similar to my house. The exterior four sides of the structure will be made out of a minimum of29 gauge ribbed painted steel panels or hardboard siding in a complimentary color to my house. The roof will also be of the same metal material or fiberglass shingles that match the house. The inside flooring in the garage will be concrete with an extension on all four sides of the outside wall (called a brick ledge) to allow brick or stone to be placed on the structure on at least one exterior wall in the future. My new fence will continue to surround it on three sides so that only the front will be totally visable. My lot is on the South side of Glade Road on the east corner. The garage would be built on the South side of the lot with the garage doors facing the North towards the back of my house. I will initially have a gravel driveway to the garage. There were actually 7 accessory buildings (shed type) on the property when I purchased it over 12 years ago which were not shown on the plot plan. Three have been torn down within the last year with two more to go after the garage is built. The plot plan only shows a house and two tin outbuildings. This is incorrect, as the larger tin building is actually a one-car garage. The second "tin" shed building I plan to tear down after building the new garage. The 6-car garage would be in addition to my present 12xlO gazebo by the pool and one car garage (17x24)(shown in the plot plan) will be used to store my lawn tractor, boat and canoes so that they are not visible either. I am requesting a Special Use Permit (variance) because my lot isn't one acre as indicated by the city code that allows a 1750 square foot garage to be built on it. The purpose of the 6-car garage is to improve the appearance of our block by having room for our 6 family cars that are presently visible when driving by on the street. I respectfully request your approval of my proposal and plan, so that I can help in the efforts to beautify Colleyville and to improve my property. Thank you. Terry Grisso, 817-581-6682 1205 Glade Road, Colleyville, Texas 76034 Carwhis Riverwalk Colleyville 3838 Oak Lawn Ave, Ste 1416 Dallas, IX 75219 Dale & Katherine Lockwood 3305 Ashmore Lane Grapevine, IX 76051 Keith & Amy Edgell P.O. Box 748 Fort Worth, IX 76101 Max & Joan Wolfe, II 1112 Jo Carol Lane Colleyville, IX 76034 Mary Alice Leake 1117 Jo Carol Street Colleyville, IX 76034 Ierance & Candice Grisso 1205 Glade Road Colleyville, IX 76034 Aby & Rosamma George 1209 Glade Road Colleyville, IX 76034 Conrad & Jackie Rodgers 1213 Garry Lynne Drive Colleyville, IX 76034 Harold & Linda Whitten 1209 Garry Lynne Drive Colleyville, IX 76034 Clifton Duke 1301 Glade Road Colleyville, IX 76034 Ihe Bridges at Riverwalk Ltd. 3401 Amherst Circle, Apt. 127 Bedford, IX 76021 Case Z-02-029 (Notices dated: November 1, 2002) According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200' of the proposed special use permit/and-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above have been notified of the proposed change request as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code. Jan Levy ~ Planning & Zoning Assistant Page 1 of 1 Jan Levy From: BOBBIE FOWLER [bobbiefowler@msn.com] Sent: Sunday, November 10,20023:37 PM To: Jan Levy; Richard Newton Subject: PUBLIC HEARING-11-11-02 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION My name is Bobbie Fowler. My husband and I have lived on 30 Carol Lane for over 34 years. We are very proud of our neighborhood. It is an older neighborhood, of course, but we have great pride in the appearance of our street and Garry Lynne Street. Mr. Grisso who is asking for a zone change request of his property on the comer of Garry Lynne and Glade Road is at the ENTRANCE INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. Several neighbors have complained to the City of Colleyville in the past several years about the cars he has parked on his property. The cars are covered with tarps that are held on with bricks and rocks. The complaints did no good! It's not a pretty sight. Some of these cars are not even registered in the state of Texas. If he is allowed to build a 1750 square feet building for the cars he now has, wonder how many more he will bring in? I believe this building would be larger than the house he lives in! Please drive by and look at his property before making a decision. Please, just have the junk cars removed and ask him to clean up that comer, THE ENTRANCE INTO OUR NEIGHBORHOOD! Thank you for your help. Bobbie Fowler : rt::~ E (" i~.,~ t> . -., \,,;V: [J t: r,:"j ItUlJL ': -J ~'. I ...;.t.;..... 'c'. ;,;:~ '--'~-, ~ I:, '.." 1_ I ": J; i Ii . ,;, r.~ r f' 11/11/2002 Date November 8, 2002 To, Planning & Zoning Commission, City Of Colleyville, P.O. Box 185, Colleyville, Tx-76034 Sub: Case Number Z-02-029 Attn: - ] an Levy I received the Notice of Pubic hearing on Novll, 2002. I have an objection on building 6 car garages at 1205 Glade Road, Lot 1, Block 3, Sunrise Terrace. As it is not appropriate business for the neighborhood. I have no objection have additional two-car garages for the residence use. Thanks _\ ~.. ~\ - Aby George 1209 Glade Road, Colleyville, Tx-76034 0_\,- t-J 0" 1 1 tuut. Page 1 of 1 Jan Levy From: Jan Levy Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:42 AM To: 'John Salazar' Subject: RE: case number: Z-02-029 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Salazar, The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted the public hearing at the meeting last night. After receiving public testimony, the Commission tabled the case and requested that the applicant better define his request and provide them with construction details on the building. They wanted to know specifics regarding the size, the kinds of construction materials to be used and colors of the roof and siding, type of parking surface, location of driveway and approach with dimensions, etc. The Planning and Zoning Commission polled the membership regarding attendance at the November 25th meeting and it appears there will not be a quorum. If you want to attend the next meeting when the case will be considered, contact me near the end of November and I will know the Commission's schedule for December. Sincerely, Jan Levy -----Original Message----- From: John Salazar [mailto:johnr@johnrsalazar.com] Sent: Monday, November 11,20027:06 PM To: Jan Levy Subject: case number: 2-02-029 Our concern for this special use permit would be that a 6 car garage on this property would have more than 6 cars on the lot. There are currently several cars that are on this lot, approximately 5. I would be concerned that the owners would have 6 cars in their garage in addition to the other vehicles that are currently parked on their lot. John and Eva Salazar 1201 Garry Lynne Drive Colleyville, Tx. 817 -498-8074 P.S. please e-mail me with whatever decision is made. Thank you. 11/12/2002 ORDINANCE 0-02-xxxx AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR AN ACCESSORY BUILDING ON LOT 1, BLOCK 3, SUNRISE TERRACE ADDITION; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application for a Special Use Permit was filed by Terry Grisso on October 18, 2002. under Case No. Z-02-029; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in the best interests of the City of Colleyville. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit "A") are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas. described as Lot 1, Block 3, Sunrise Terrace Addition (1205 Glade Road). by authorizing a Special Use Permit for an Accessory Building, subject to the following conditions: a. The maximum size of the accessory building shall not exceed one-thousand seven hundred fifty (1,750) square feet. b. The building location shall be consistent with the drawings attached as Exhibit "B". c. The exterior walls of the building shall be constructed of d. Sec. 2. THAT any person, firm. or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2.000.00). Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. Ordinance 0-02-xxxx Page 2 of 2 Sec. 3. THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. Sec. 4. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Sec. 5. THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2002. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2002. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE: Cynthia Singleton City Secretary Donna Arp Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Ross T. Foster City Attorney