HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council-Agenda Packets-12/3/2002
City of
Texas
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
5400 BRANSFORD ROAD
DECEMBER 3, 2002
5:15 P.M. - 6:30 P.M. - PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA
6:30 P.M. - METROPORT TEEN COURT ADVISORY BOARD INTERVIEWS
PC.-1 Discussion of the proposed Ethics Ordinance
PC.- 2 Discussion of December 3, 2002, City Council regular agenda items
REGULAR AGENDA
6:45 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter
551, Subchapter D
Sec. 551.071 -
Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public
Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda
7:30 P.M. - RESUME REGULAR MEETING
INVOCATION: Reverend Lloyd McCutchen, Pleasant Glade Assembly of God Church
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Ross Foster, City Attorney
P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 577-7575
2. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS
ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS, AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS, OR PRESENTATIONS
CONSENT:
3. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2065 - Consent Items:
a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of November 19,
2002
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
4. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1374 -
Amending 0-01-1284 approving the Village Monticello Partners, Ltd., Village
Management Ltd., Village Owner's Association (VOA) and Realty Capital
Corporation City/Developer Agreement
5. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1376 -
Approval of the Zoning Change from AG to R20 Single Family Residential on
0.443-acres located at 612 Shelton Road, Case Z-02-027
6. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1377 - Approval
of the Zoning Change from R40 Single Family Residential to R20 Single Family
Residential on 1.00 acres located at 304 W. Van Oaks Drive, Case Z-02-030
7. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1378 - Approval
of the Special Use Permit for an accessory building on Lot 1, Block 1, Mikolaitis
Addition located at 2309 Hall Johnson Road, Case Z-02-032
8. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1379 - Approval
of the Zoning Change from CPO Professional Office to PUD-C Planned Unit
Development Commercial on Tract A2, Block 2, Highland Acres located at 5314
Bransford Road, Case Z-02-033
9. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1380 - Adopting
TXU Gas Distribution general service rates including rate adjustment provisions
and miscellaneous service charges for sales and transportation of natural gas to
residential, commercial and industrial customers
10. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2066 - Approval of a
Settlement Agreement with TXU Electric and TXU Gas relating to claims arising
out of electric and gas franchise fee calculations prior to January 1 , 2002
11. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2067 - Consideration of
appointment to the Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board
12. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2068 - Approval of
funding allocation for the design, construction and installation of the Colleyville
City Hall and Public Library sculpture, in the amount of $51 ,800
13. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2069 - Approval of the
construction contract with Carter Construction Company for the Grapevine-
Colleyville Independent School District (GCISD) ballfield improvements, in the
amount of $65,000
14. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2070 - Approval of the
Final Plat of Westcliff Addition, 57.112 acres located on the north side of
McDonwell School Road, west of Fire Station No.3, Case P-02-042
15. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2071 - Approval of
purchasing a truck-mounted high-pressure sewer cleaner through the Texas
Local Government Statewide Purchasing Cooperative (BuyBoard), in the amount
of $81,000
16. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2072 - Approval of the
submittal of the application for trail construction and related improvements for the
Texas Department of Transportation's "Safe Routes to School" program
TABLED ITEMS:
17. CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE 0-02-1337.4 - Approval to amend
Ordinance 0-99-1131 PUD-C (Planed Unit Development-Commercial),
requested by Richard Myers, Realty Capital Corporation for the Village at
Colleyville, Case Z-02-01 0
18. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION R-02-2056 - Approval of an Agreement
between Broadland Limited Partnership, the David Bagwell Company and David
Bagwell and the City of Colleyville relating to the Colleyville trail system
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
19. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
ACTION/RESOLUTION:
20. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING
COUNCIL AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 2002 -
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-02-2073
ADJOURNMENT:
21. ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin board at City Hall on Tuesday, November
26,2002, at 4:30 p~. L L ')
Y-4~ r v,,-/
~ Singleton, TR C
City Secretary
If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special
accommodations, please advise the City Secretary at least 48 hours in advance at
817.577.7575, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you.
PRE-COUNCIL
Cd)" Of
\1]\ .'~ilce AGENDA BRIEFING
~\EI
TL~-"~~
MEETING DATE:
ITEM # :
12/03/02
PC-1
CITY MANAGER
DEPARTMENT HEAD
FINANCE REVIEW
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Discussion of the proposed Ethics Ordinance
As a follow-up to the October 15, 2002, Pre-CC meeting related to the proposed Ethics
Ordinance, Councilman Newton prepared the attached comments for consideration. A
copy of the proposed Ethics Ordinance is also attached. This item provides the
opportunity for the City Council to discuss the proposed Ethics Ordinance.
ATTACHMENTS
· Ethics Ordinance Comments, as prepared by Councilman Newton
· Proposed Ethics Ordinance
Memo
To: Colleyville Ethics Committee
From: Richard Newton, City Council Place 4
Subject: Proposed Ethics Ordinance
I really appreciate the many hours that you have devoted to this effort individually and as
a group. Volunteer activities take a tremendous amount of personal time and I cannot
overstate how indebted the elected officials and citizens are to you for your commitment
to the city's well being.
As I reviewed the proposed Ethics Ordinance, I made a conscious effort to consider it
from all vantagepoints based on my experience in seven political campaigns and as a
seven term elected official. I considered the positive aspects that we hope to achieve by
defining guidelines for ethical behavior, as well as the possible unintended results that
may not be so positive.
I verbally shared my thoughts with the city council in the pre-council work session the
meeting before last. The consensus of the council was for all individual council members
to share any comments and suggestions that they had on the proposed ordinance with the
Ethics Committee for consideration prior to the city council taking action on the
ordinance. I have attempted to document my thoughts and suggestions in as straight
forward a way as possible. I will be happy to talk to any of you at any time to clarify or
elaborate on any of these points.
I read the ordinance from two perspectives. One was considering how it may be applied
as a political weapon in a politically divisive climate like we often have in Colleyville.
And the other from a perspective of it's effectiveness in challenging everyone to behave
in an ethical manner. We all want to accomplish the latter, but if it becomes a political
weapon the entire purpose of the ordinance can be defeated.
I have arranged my comments by section of the ordinance.
Statement of Policy and Construction
1. Last sentence - The provisions of the Code of Ethics shall be construed liberally
to promote the foregoing policies.
Comment: It is not clear what he phrase "shall be construed liberally" means.
Suggestion: Rewrite the phrase to put the meaning in plain language.
R. Newton Memo to Ethics Committee
Standards of Conduct
3.2 No city official shall grant in the discharge of his or her official duties an
improper favor, service or thing of value to any person or entity.
Comment: "Improper" is not defined and is left to subjective interpretation. Different
people would consider the same action or situation by different standards. What could be
improper to one is not improper to another, especially in a politically charged situation.
Suggestion: Provide some level of definition or guidelines for the interpretation of
improper.
3.4 No city official or their immediate family members shall accept or solicit any
eift. favor. service or thine of value from any person or entity that is seeking a
decision. . . . . . . . .
Comment: What about the solicitation of monetary contributions or contributions in
kind for the benefit of the city by an elected official or any official in a position of
discretionary authority? Even though a solicitation may be for the city, the motivation
could be for political reasons if the thing solicited would benefit the individual
personally, such as political capital for a coming election. Even though the thing solicited
was for the benefit of the city, this could be considered coercion depending on how it was
done and the influence that was brought to bear.
Suggestion: Request the city council to establish policy guidelines for the proper
solicitation of things of value from any person or entity that the city councilor any
appointed position would likely make discretionary decisions about. I would suggest that
this policy could be as simple as having the city council agree as a body what city
solicitations could be for, prioritize them, agree on who the solicitor would be and when
they would be approached. There is currently no policy like this and there is confusion on
what is being solicited, why, and who authorized it on the city's behalf. In addition
businesses and individuals that do business with Colleyville get multiple uncoordinated
solicitations on the city's behalf. This is difficult for the businesses and individuals that
do business within Colleyville and could lead them to feel coerced.
3.5 No city official shall disclose any confidential information gained by reason of
their position with the city concernine property. operations. policies or affairs
of the city, ..... This paragraph shall not preclude the disclosure of
confidential information in connection with any investigation......
Comment: There is no definition of confidential information and no policy in the city
regulates who has the authority to define what is confidential information. Therefore this
is completely subjective and has a high likelihood of being misused for political reasons.
It could be used to keep information about city operations, policies, or affairs that citizens
have every right to know hidden from public view for political reasons. I believe this a
dangerous item to put in the ordinance. There are state laws that govern information that
2
R. Newton Memo to Ethics Committee
can and can't be released. I believe this requirement provides a political weapon in city
politics that if used as such could create havoc for the city if challenged by the Freedom
of Information Act and other state and federal laws designed to protect the public's right
to know.
If state law precludes confidential information from being disclosed, city law doesn't
have the authority to circumvent the state law.
Suggestion: Eliminate section 3.5 and rely on state law OR recommend that the city
council define a policy by ordinance on what can be defined as confidential and the
process for doing so OR define what is considered to be confidential based on state or
federal law . The Flower Mound Ethics ordinance refers to information deemed
"confidential by law".
If section 3.5 remains, modify the statement that allows confidential information to be
disclosed in order to comply with state law
3.7 No city official shall grant special consideration, treatment or advantage to any
citizen beyond that which is available to every other citizen.
Comment: Applying this just to citizens is too limiting. Special considerations,
treatment, etc. could wrongfully be granted to any person or entity that does business
with the city in order to benefit a city official that has discretionary authority over that
person or entity.
Suggestion: Expand this to any person or entity that does business with or in the city of
Colleyville.
3.9 No city official. . ... shall aCQuire an interest in any contract, transaction, zoning
decision, or other matter or property at a time when such official knew or had
reason to believe that the interest would be effected by an official act or action of
the city.
Comment: It's not clear to me that this applies to the situation where a city official has
a business relationship with another person or entity that encompasses property or
business activity outside of the city, county or state, and the other person or entity has
separate property or business activity within the city that the city official has
discretionary authority over. In this situation the city official could make decisions in the
normal course of city activity that could be beneficial to the other person or entity and
therefore indirectly benefit because of the good will equity created with the entity or
person that the city official has a business relationship with.
Suggestion: Add language that insures even indirect relationships that could result in
benefit to the city official even if those benefits are realized through property or business
activity anywhere outside of Colleyville.
3
R. Newton Memo to Ethics Committee
3.11 City Officials shall not use their Dosition to solicit or accept employment. . ..
with a person or entity that is seeking a decision.....
Comment: Why should this be qualified by "shall not use their position". I don't think
officials should seek employment with a person or entity that is seeking a decision on the
exercise of discretionary authority from that official.
Suggestion: Remove the phrase "shall not use their position".
3.12 City officials shall disclose.........in accordance with this code. state law or
other city code or charter Drovisions.
Comment: This seems totally redundant. By their very nature if this code, state law or
other city code or charter provisions requires disclosure then it must be done according to
those instruments. Why is this restated here?
Suggestion: Drop section 3.12 for brevity and clarity.
3.13 City officials shall disclose any interest in an affected entity or in affected real
DroDerty held by them or their immediate family... ....if the official participates
in discussion with or gives an official opinion or recommendation to...........
Comment: This is a good requirement, but it doesn't go far enough. It doesn't handle
the indirect relationships described in the section 3.9 comment. In other words, it doesn't
require that the official disclose a business relationship with persons or entities that the
official may participate in discussions, official opinions, or decisions concerning separate
business activity that those persons or entities have with the city.
Suggestion: Add language that would require the official to disclose these indirect
relationships.
Establishment of Ethics Commission
5.1 The Commission shall consist of six (6) members.
Comment: The ordinance is mute on the voting procedures the Commission is to use. A
six member Commission can have a tie vote.
The ordinance is mute on criteria for qualification to be a Commissioner. This means that
a non-citizen, a person that does business with the city, a business associate of an official,
etc. could be appointed to the Commission.
Suggestion: Expand the Filings and Disposition of Complaints section to add specific
procedures for due process and require that decisions are only reached on an affirmative
vote of five Commissioners. (Reference page 10 section F of the City of Arlington, a
4
R. Newton Memo to Ethics Committee
violation requires the affirmative vote of at least seven (7) members of the commission,
which only has eight (8) members.)
Add requirements for members. For instance the Arlington ordinance requires that they
be residents, can't hold an office or be an elected official, can't be a candidate for any
such office or hold any other city appointed position. The Keller ordinance selects
commissioners from a pool of former and retired municipal, county and district judges
but not Keller citizens that are put in place to hear specific complaints and then dissolved.
5.2 After nomination each member must be confirmed by the city council.
Comment: Why must the entire council confirm the nominations. That would allow the
majority council members to control the appointments of the minority council members
similar to what the democrats have done with President Bush's judge appointments.
Suggestion: Add criteria for membership and allow each council member to appoint a
Commissioner without confirmation by he full councilOR go to a system like Keller.
5.4 Any member of the Ethics Commission can be removed with or without
cause by majority vote of the city council.
Comment: This gives the council majority complete control of the Ethics Commission.
The minority members should have protection against their nominations being removed
for no cause.
Suggestion: Remove section 5.4.
5.6 Four members.... .. ..shall constitute a quorum.
Comment: At least five members should constitute a quorum, and an affirmative vote
supporting a violation should require five votes. (See section 5.1 above.)
Suggestion: Increase the quorum to five.
Legal Opinions
Comment: If I understand this process correctly, it could be used by an official to
circumvent the Ethics Commission process by requesting a legal opinion prior to a
complaint being filed. This could lead to a race to get the request for legal opinion filed
and the filing of a complaint by someone else. Also, if a legal opinion is filed, it is
binding on the city if a complaint is subsequently filed, thereby avoiding Commission
review because the city attorney opinion would hold. This is important because the
ordinance has several subjective requirements that aren't based on fact of law, but
personal opinion of the individuals handling the complaint. The ordinance should insure
that all complaints are handled by the same process.
5
R. Newton Memo to Ethics Committee
Suggestion: Modify the process to clarify when a legal opinion can be requested. Since
speculative or advisory opinions can't be requested, it is not clear to me under what
conditions a legal opinion can be requested. For office holders advisory opinions would
be useful even if they were non binding. In addition, to be fair to all, there should not be a
way to circumvent the process if a complaint is filed.
Filing and Disposition of Complaints
7.1 A person may file a complaint. . ... A complaint must be filed within one year
of the date of occurrence of the incident, or within 90 days of the discovery of
the incident, whichever is sooner.
Comment: Any person can file a complaint. This allows a person that is not a citizen to
file a complaint. This has pros and cons. On the positive side, a non-citizen could have
been a victim of unethical influence and would have personal knowledge in which case
that person would be doing a service to the citizens of Colleyville to file a complaint. On
the other hand, since there are subjective interpretations in the ordinance, anyone could
file a complaint at any time, citizen or non-citizen, claiming an interpretation that suits
their political agenda in order to damage an official politically. A non-citizen would have
absolutely no equity stake in the city and could do this without repercussions of any kind.
In addition, a non-citizen that desired to do business in Colleyville, but was turned down
could do the same thing.
I don't understand why the time limits of one year from the date of occurrence or within
90 days of the discovery of the occurrence are imposed. I don't know how the date of the
discovery of the occurrence can be established. If an occurrence did occur and a
complainer didn't learn about it until well after 90 days of the actual occurrence, then the
official that committed the occurrence may mount a defense that the complainant didn't
report it until after 90 days and therefore the complaint is invalid.
I don't think a fixed time frame is appropriate.
Suggestion: Replace the time limits as they are written with as long as the official holds
an official position.
7 .3 Upon receipt of a complaint. . . ..
Comment: No rules of decision making and process are defined. This can lead to
confusion and inconsistency. Also, there is no provision for confidentiality until the
complaint has been confirmed that it is valid as to form and that it adequately alleges a
violation. This is unfair and allows the ordinance to easily be used as a powerful political
weapon. The Texas Ethics Commission procedure provides a good model for process.
The City of Arlington does as well. They both provide for a period of confidentiality so
frivolous complaints can't be used for political purposes.
6
R. Newton Memo to Ethics Committee
Suggestion: Establish a due process that includes a period of confidentiality until the
complaint is officially accepted. I would suggest the City of Arlington process. It seems
to be very thorough and closely models the Texas Ethics Commission process.
7.5 (b) If the violator is an elected city official, the matter shall be placed on the next
regularly scheduled city council meeting and the city council shall accept,
reject or modify the recommend sanction or penalty.
Comment: The city council is a political body. It is not capable of regulating itself or
fairly applying sanctions to political opponents. This would degenerate into a political
battle and could easily and unfairly take advantage of the minority members of the
political body.
Suggestion: Replace 7.5 (b) with language that would assign a jury of peers through the
city judicial system as the authority to accept, reject, or modify the recommended
sanctions or penalty. This is the tried and true method of getting justice in the USA and it
avoids the political pitfalls. OR, establish a system similar to Keller's that uses outside
former and retired judges to act as the Commission.
Each comment that I've made has a basis in my experience as an elected official.
Individuals that have not held elected office would not necessarily have the same
experiences and would not necessarily relate to some of these comments initially. Again,
I will be happy to discuss these comments and suggestions at your convenience. Thank
you for considering them.
7
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ETHICS CODE, PROVIDING FOR A STATEMENT OF
POLICY AND CONSTRUCTION, ESTABLISHING DEFINITIONS, PROVIDING
STANDARDS OF CONDUCT, REQUIRING DISCLOSURES, ESTABLISHING AN ETHICS
COMMISSION, PROVIDING FOR LEGAL OPINIONS, ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE
OF FILING A DISPOSITION OF COMPLAINTS, AND ESTABLISHING A RANGE OF
SANCTIONS AND PROVIDING FOR RECISSION OF A PRIOR RESOLUTION.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Colleyville deems it is in the best interest of the
citizens of the City of Colleyville to establish an ethics code,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AS FOLLOWS:
Sec. 1:
THAT an ethics code providing as follows is hereby adopted:
"COLLEYVILLE ETHICS CODE
Statement of Policy And Construction
1. Officials of the City of Colleyville have a special responsibility to the citizens of
Colleyville. They should be dedicated to the highest ideals of honor and integrity in all
public and personal relationships. They should demonstrate a commitment to the
preservation of the values and integrity of local government, and a dedication to effective,
efficient government. In order to further these objectives, the Colleyville Code of Ethics is
adopted. The provisions of the Code of Ethics shall be construed liberally to promote the
foregoing policies.
Definitions
2. As used in this Code of Ethics the following identified terms have the stated
meaning:
(a) "Effected" means reasonably likely to be subject to a direct economic
effect or consequence, either positive or negative, as a result of a vote, decision or action
by the City.
(b) "Citv" means the City of Colleyville.
(c) "Citv Official" means the following: Any member of the City Council,
including the Mayor, the City Manger, the City Attorney, the Judge of the City's Municipal
Court and any appointed member of a board, commission, authority or committee set up by
ordinance, the Charter, the State Law or otherwise on a temporary or permanent basis, but
not members of a board, commission, authority or committee which functions only in a
advisory or study capacity and which has no discretionary, government, quasi judicial or
administration authority.
(d) "Decision" means a vote and any deliberations on any ordinance,
resolution, contract, franchise or other matter.
(e) "Discretionary Authoritv" means the power to exercise any discretion in a
decision or action.
(f) "Entitv" means a sole proprietorship, partnership, limited partnership, firm,
corporation, professional corporation, holding company, joint stock company, joint venture,
receivership, trust, or any other entity recognized by law through which business may be
conducted.
(g) "Immediate Familv Member" means the spouse, parent, parent-in-law,
brother, brother-in-law, sister, sister-in-law, child, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, or other
person living in the same residential dwelling unit of the person.
(h) "Person" means an individual, proprietorship, partnership, corporation,
association, or other legal entity.
U) "Substantial Interest" means:
A person has a substantial interest in an entity if they have a 10% or more
ownership interest in the entity, the value of the person's interest in the entity exceeds
$15,000.00 or the person has received from the entity 10% or more of the person's gross
income for the preceding year. A person has a substantial interest in real property if the
person's interest exceeds a value of $2,500.00.
Standards of Conduct
3.1 No city official shall make a decision or exercise their discretionary authority
with regard to an entity or property in which he or she has a substantial interest.
3.2 No city official shall grant in the discharge of his or her official duties any
improper favor, service or thing of value to any person or entity.
3.3 No city official shall make or permit the unauthorized use of city owned vehicles,
equipment, materials or property.
3.4 No city official or their immediate family members shall accept or solicit any gift,
favor, service or thing of value from any person or entity that is seeking a decision or the
exercise of discretionary authority from such official or from the city council, commission or
agency of which such official is a member. This prohibition shall not apply to:
(a) a non-pecuniary gift, the value of which is $25.00 or less; or
(b) an award publicly presented in recognition of public service; or
(c) gifts from family members.
3.5 No city official shall disclose any confidential information gained by reason of
their position with the city concerning the property, operations, policies or affairs of the city,
or use such confidential information to advance any personal interest, financial or
otherwise, this paragraph shall not preclude disclosure of such confidential information in
connection with any investigation or proceeding regarding whether there has been a
violation of the standards of conduct set forth in this code.
3.6 No city official shall hold himself/herself out as representing the city in any
capacity other than that for which he/she was appointed or elected.
3.7 No city official shall grant any special consideration, treatment or advantage to
any citizen beyond that which is available to every other citizen.
3.8 No city official shall use his or her position or city facilities, personnel,
equipment or supplies to secure special privileges or exemptions for himself/herself or
others or for the private gain of the city official.
3.9 No city official or their immediate family members shall acquire an interest in
any contract, transaction, zoning decision, or other matter or property at a time when such
official knew or had reason to believe that the interest would be effected by an official act
or action of the city.
3.10 No city official shall ask or direct another official to take action or to fail to take
action that violates this code.
3.11 City officials shall not use their position to solicit or accept employment for
themselves or their immediate family members with a person or business entity that is
seeking a decision on the exercise of discretionary authority from such official, or the
board, commission or agency of which such official is a member.
3.12 City officials shall disclose any interest in an entity or in real property in
accordance with this code, state law or other City code or charter provisions.
3.13 City officials shall disclose any interest in an effected entity or in effected real
property held by them or their immediate family members if the official participates in
discussion with or gives an official opinion or recommendation to the city councilor any city
board, commission or agency concerning the effected entity or effected real property.
3.14 It shall not be a violation of this code for a city official or their immediate family
members to contract with the city if the contract is awarded through a process of public
notice and competitive bidding, if such notice and competitive bidding are required by state
law; and the contract is with a division or agency over which the official has no functions
requiring the exercise of discretion.
Disclosures
4. Any city official, who becomes aware that a decision or exercise of discretionary
authority by the person would constitute a violation of the ethical standards of conduct
adopted in this code or by whom this code requires disclosure, shall promptly file with the
City Secretary a written statement of the conflict or make the disclosure by completing the
form established by the City Manager from time to time for reporting such conflicts or
disclosures.
Establishment of Ethics Commission
5.1 The Colleyville Ethics Commission is hereby established. The Commission
shall consist of six (6) members.
5.2 Members to the Colleyville Ethics Commission shall be appointed by nomination
and confirmation. Each member of the City Council, including the Mayor, shall nominate
an individual as a member of the Colleyville Ethics Commission. After nomination each
member must be confirmed by the City Council.
5.3 The term of office of the members of the Ethics Commission shall run
concurrently with the elective term of office of the member of the City Council which
nominated them. All members of the Ethics Commission shall be residents of the City of
Colleyville.
5.4 Any member of the Ethics Commission may be removed with or without cause
by majority vote of the City Council. Upon removal the replacement of the removed
member shall be based upon the nomination by the council place which originally
nominated the removed member and by confirmation by the City Council.
5.5 The Colleyville Ethics Commission will meet annually to review the City Ethics
Policy. The City Manager shall call additional meetings of the Ethics Commission as
required.
5.6 Four members of the Colleyville Ethics Commission shall constitute a quorum.
Legal Opinions
6.1 Any individual whose conduct is governed by this code shall have the right to
request from the City Attorney a legal opinion as to the application or effect of this code
upon any actual situation involving the requestor; provided said opinion must be requested
prior to the filing of any complaint arising out of the situation. Speculative or advisory
opinions shall not be requested. A request for a legal opinion shall be filed with the City
Secretary .
6.2 Upon filing of a request for a legal opinion with the City Secretary the matter
shall be referred to the City Attorney. The City Attorney shall render a legal opinion within
15 working days of the date of the request. In preparing the legal opinion, the requestor
shall respond to request for information from the City Attorney's office concerning the
matter. In the event the requestor fails to respond the City Attorney may refrain fromnissuing a legal opinion.
6.3 A legal opinion shall be binding upon the individual requesting same until
amended or revoked. In the event a complaint is filed concerning the matter in which the
legal opinion was rendered, the opinion shall be binding upon the City except to the extent
the opinion was issued in bad faith or based upon material misrepresentations or
omissions by the requestor.
Filing and Disposition of Complaints
7.1 A person may file a complaint with the City Secretary alleging a violation of this
code by any city official. A complaint must state (1) the specific section(s) of the code
alleged to have been violated; (2) the specific act(s) which violated the section(s); and (3)
that the complaining party has personal knowledge of the acts. In addition, the complaint
must be given under oath. The complaint shall be made on such a form as the City
Manager may from time to time designate. A complaint must be filed within one year of the
date of the occurrence of the incident, or within 90 days of the discovery of the incident,
whichever is sooner.
7.2 Upon filing of a complaint in the form required by the code, the City Secretary
shall forward a copy of the complaint to the person who is alleged to have violated the code
and the City Manager within three (3) working days.
7.3 Upon receipt of a complaint, the City Manager shall convene a meeting of the
Ethics Commission as promptly as possible. At the initial meeting, the Commission may
summarily dismiss the complaint if it determines that the complaint is defective, untimely or
the allegations in the complaint fail to state a violation of the code. If the Commission
determines that the complaint is in proper form, timely and adequately alleges a violation of
the code, then the Commission shall set a time for the complaint to be heard. The
complaint shall be heard within 45 days of the date the complaint is filed. The Commission
may continue a hearing date if necessary to promote justice.
7.4 At the hearing, the Commission shall receive evidence from the complainant
and the respondent. The Commission may request information from the City Manager or
the City staff.
7.5 After the hearing the Ethics Commission shall file a written finding as to whether
or not the code has been violated and shall recommend a sanction or penalty in the event
a violation is found, as follows:
(a) If the violator is the City Manager or an appointee of the Council, the
recommendation shall be directed to the City Council, and the City Council shall have
authority to determine the propriety and extent of the sanction or penalty.
(b) In the event the violator is an elected city official, the matter shall be
placed on the agenda for the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting, and the City
Council shall either accept, reject or modify the recommended sanction or penalty.
Range of Sanctions and Penalties
8. Upon the finding of a violation of the code, the following sanctions and penalties
shall be recommended:
(a) When the violation is clearly minor and unintentional a letter of
notification shall be issued describing the violation and informing the party of appropriate
actions to be taken to avoid future violations.
(b) When a violation is minor and mayor may not have been intentional, and
the violation calls for a more substantial response than a letter of notification, then a letter
of admonition shall be issued.
(c) When the Ethics Commission finds a violation has been committed either
intentionally or through disregard of the code or a legal opinion issued by the City Attorney
a letter of reprimand shall be issued.
(d) If the Ethics Commission finds that a serious or repeated violation of the
code has been committed by the City Manager or an appointee of the Council, either
intentionally or through reckless disregard of the code, a recommendation of removal or
suspension shall be made. Recommendations of suspension shall include a suggested
length of suspension.
(e) If the Ethics Commission finds a serious or repeated violation of the code
has been committed by an elected official, either intentionally or through reckless disregard
of the code, a recommendation to call for the resignation of the elected official shall be
made."
Sec. 2:
THAT upon the adoption of this Ordinance, Resolution Number R-01-1789 is
repealed.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
_, 2002.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,2002.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Cynthia Singleton, City Secretary
Donna Arp, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster, City Attorney
PRE-COUNCIL
cce", AGENDA BRIEFING
rL'.""~
MEETING DATE: I
ITEM #: !
12/03/02
PC-2
CITY MANAGER I
DEPARTMENT HEAD !
FINANCE REVIEW I N/ A
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Discussion of December 3, 2002 City Council
regular agenda items
This item provides the opportunity for the City Council to discuss the regular agenda items.
CITY COUNCIL
c\ty Qf
cae", AGENDA BRIEFING
71.'.'I:;l$
MEETING DATE: I
ITEM #: I
RESOLUTION #: I
12/03/02
1
N/A
CITY MANAGER I
DEPARTMENT HEAD i
FINANCE REVIEW i
N/A
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Executive Session - In accordance with Texas
Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D
EXECUTIVE SESSION -In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551,
Subchapter D
Sec. 551.071 -
Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public
Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda
RESOLUTION R-02-2065
A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION
UNDER CONSENT ITEMS AT THE REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 2002
WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Consent
Items.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Consent
Items as follows are hereby adopted:
a.
THAT the minutes of the regular City Council meeting of November 19,
2002, are hereby approved.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
APPROVED THIS
AYES,
DAY OF
NAYS AND
2002 BY A VOTE OF
ABSTENTIONS.
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
MINUTES OF THE
COLLEYVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
The Pre-Council meeting of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor
Arp on November 19, 2002, at 5:20 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Councilpersons Brad Rice, Rich Hendler, Richard Newton and
Mayor Pro Tem Ginny Tigue were present. Mayor Donna Arp,
Deputy City Manager Dianne McWethy, Interim Community
Development Manager Clayton Husband, Public Services Director
Keith Fisher, Engineer Chris Steubing, Human Resources Manager
Kelly Cooper, Financial Analyst Collin Boothe, Parks and
Recreation Manager Monica Walsh, Records Manager Matt
Denton, Administrative Assistant Cindy Martin, and City Secretary
Cynthia Singleton were also present.
Councilman Joe Hocutt was absent.
PC.-1 Discussion of the work plan and City Web based information for the Update of
the City of Colleyville Master Plan
Community Development Manager Clayton Husband provided an overview of the work
plan and City web based information for the update of the City of Colleyville Master
Plan.
There was general discussion regarding the process and timing of providing citizens
with updates of the Masterplan.
PC.- 2 Discussion of Sanitary Sewer Repair Ordinance
Ms. Martha Walker, 7109 Jo Will Street, spoke regarding sanitary sewer repairs at her
residence.
Discussion ensued regarding the responsibility of the City and homeowners related to
making repairs in the sanitary sewer system.
Council requested that staff place an item on a future agenda regarding the
responsibility of the City related to making repairs in the sanitary sewer system.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
PC.- 3 Discussion of November 19, 2002, City Council regular agenda items
There was general discussion regarding City Council regular agenda items.
Mayor Arp declared the meeting adjourned at 6:45p.m.
The regular meeting of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor Donna
Arp on November 19, 2002, at 6:48 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Councilpersons Brad Rice, Rich Hendler, Richard Newton, and
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue were present. Mayor Donna Arp, City
Manager Bill Lindley, Deputy City Manager Dianne McWethy,
Finance Director Terry Leake, Interim Community Development
Manager Clayton Husband, Public Services Director Keith Fisher,
Engineer Chris Steubing, Human Resources Manager Kelly
Cooper, Community Center Manager Lin Przybyl, Parks and
Recreation Manager Monica Walsh, Financial Analyst Collin
Boothe, Record Manager Matt Denton, Administrative Assistant
Cindy Martin, City Attorney Ross Foster and City Secretary Cynthia
Singleton were also present.
Councilman Joe Hocutt was absent.
1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter
551 , Subchapter D
Sec. 551.071 -
Sec. 551.071 -
Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public
Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda
Legal - Contemplative Litigation - Justice Center
Legal - Pending Litigation - Windview Homeowners
Association
Sec. 551.071 -
Mayor Arp explained that the Executive Session had been called in accordance with the
Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D, Section 551.071 - Legal, Section
551.072 - Property Acquisition, and Section 551.074 - Personnel. She further
explained that there would be no decisions made or action taken during this time. The
meeting was recessed at 6:50 p.m. and reconvened at 7:40 p.m.
The invocation was given by Associate Pastor Jan Baldwin of the First United Methodist
Church, after which Ross Foster led the Pledge of Allegiance.
2
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
2. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS
ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS, AND
ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS, OR PRESENTATIONS
Councilman Richard Newton reported that he and Councilman Hendler attended the
dedication and renaming of Fire Station Number One for Mr. Robert Bufe, who served
as a volunteer fireman for the City. Councilman Newton commended Fire Chief Mike
Johnston and Fire Marshall Jeff Jones for providing an official ceremony honoring Mr.
Bufe. Mayor Arp expressed gratitude to the City of Grapevine firefighters for attending
the ceremony.
CONSENT:
3. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2054 - Consent Items:
a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of November 6,
2002
b. Approval of award for Alt Benefit Consultants to provide Flexible Spending
Accounts
c. Approval of renewal for health and dental insurance to Blue Cross Blue
Shield of Texas
d. Approval of a donation of a framed oil painting to the Colleyville
Community Center
e. Approval of donation of a framed print to the Colleyville Community Center
f. Approval of Amendment to Employment Agreement between the City of
Colleyville and City Manager
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2054 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue expressed gratitude to Ann Hardy for the donation of the framed
oil painting.
City Attorney Ross Foster stated the Section 3.01 of the City Manager's contract should
include after $110,160, the words "in installments" ...
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue moved to approve Resolution R-02-2054 with the amendment as
so noted by the City Attorney.
3
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
Councilman Rice seconded the motion.
Councilman Hendler reported that the Lion's Club donated the framed print to the
Colleyville Community Center.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
4. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1371 -
Approval of the Special Use Permit for a Carport on Lot 25R, Block 1, Rustic
Oaks Addition located at 209 Valley View Drive South, Case Z-02-026
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-02-1371.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Newton moved to approve Ordinance 0-02-1371 .
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
5. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1372 -
Amending Ordinance 0-02-1339 relative to fees and reservations for the use of
park athletic and recreation facilities
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-02-1372.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Rice requested that staff review the athletic field use fee structures with the
sports associations.
Councilman Newton thanked staff for providing information related to the agreement
between the City and youth associations and the resident and non-resident fees.
4
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue moved to approve Ordinance 0-02-1372.
Councilman Newton seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
6. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1373 -
Amending Ordinance 0-02-1362 setting fees and charges for city services and
facilities
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-02-1373.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue moved to approve Ordinance 0-02-1373.
Councilman Hendler seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
7. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1374 - Amending
0-01-1284 approving the Village Monticello Partners, Ltd., Village Management
Ltd., Village Owner's Association (VOA) and Realty Capital Corporation
City/Developer Agreement
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-02-1374.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Rice proposed the following amendment: Add a number 25 stating: To the
extent that anything contained in the City Developer Agreement requires prior approval
of TxDOT, neither the City nor the Developer shall be liable for any provision herein until
appropriate approval of that specific TxDOT provision has been obtained.
5
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
Mr. Richard Myers, 300 Lloyd Circle, applicant, was present to answer questions of the
Council.
Discussion ensued regarding the use of the developer's name versus the Village
Owner's Association, funding and timeline for the completion of the realignment of the
intersection at Thompson Terrace, ownership of parking lots, reimbursement of utility
costs, author of agreement, funding of a wrought iron fence separating City Park and
City Hall and designated parking and enforcement.
8. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1375 - Authorizing the
issuance of Waterworks and Sewer Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002
This item was considered in the Item 18 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-02-1375.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Mr. Jim Sabonis, Financial Advisor, First Southwest Company, was present to answer
questions of the Council, provided a summary of the Bond Sale and reported that the
City's bond rating has been upgraded by Standard & Poor's to AA- and by Fitch, AA+
rating.
Mayor Arp commended staff for sound management of the City's finances.
Mayor Pro T em Tigue moved to approve Ordinance 0-02-1375.
Councilman Hendler seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
9. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-02-1376 - Approval
of the Zoning Change from AG to R20 Single Family Residential on 0.443-acres
located at 612 Shelton Road, Case Z-02-027
This item was considered in Item 8 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-02-1376.
6
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Discussion ensued regarding definition of lot of record.
Ms. Dinah Stephens, 612 Shelton Road, applicant was present to answer questions of
the Council.
10. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2055 - Approval of
authorizing one reading of an ordinance for the issuance of debt for which the
only purpose is to refund prior debt issues
This item was considered in Item 17 position.
Mayor recessed the meeting at 9:15 and reconvened at 9:25 p.m.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2055 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Newton moved to approve Resolution R-02-2055 with the following
amendments: Add a phrase to the end of Section 1: "only when necessary to take
advantage of advantageous market conditions". Change Section 2 to become Section
3. Add a new Section 2: "The City Council will not issue new debt without two readings
of the funding ordinance as required by the City Charter".
Councilman Hendler seconded the motion.
Mr. Jim Sabonis, First Southwest Company, was present to answer questions of the
Council.
Mayor Arp reported that reissuing the bonds will provide a net savings to the City of
approximately $92,000 over a twelve year period.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
7
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
11. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2056 - Approval of an
Agreement between Broadland Limited Partnership, the David Bagwell Company
and David Bagwell and the City of Colleyville relating to the Colleyville trail
system
This item was considered in Item 9 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2056 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Mr. Jason Weaver of Goodwin and Marshall, Inc., representing the applicant, was
present to answer questions of the Council.
City Attorney Ross Foster recommended that Council table the item until Mr. Bagwell
provides information, which verifies that Broadland Limited Partnership is the entity that
owns Westcliff I.
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue moved to table Resolution R-02-2056.
Councilman Rice seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
12. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2057 - Approval of the
Final Plat of Westcliff Addition, 57.112 acres located on the north side of
McDonwel1 School Road, west of Fire Station No.3, Case P-02-042
This item was considered in Item 10 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2057 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue moved to deny without prejudice Resolution R-02-2057.
Councilman Rice seconded the motion.
Mr. Jason Weaver of Goodwin and Marshall, Inc., representing the applicant, spoke
regarding the denial of the request.
8
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
Ayes: Council persons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
13. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2058 - Approval of
permanent name change for Colleyville Community Center to Colleyville Center
This item was considered in Item 11 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2058 in its entirety.
Mr. Jim Moore, 1416 Glade Road, spoke in favor of the proposed Resolution.
There were no others present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp
closed the public hearing.
Councilman Hendler moved to approve Resolution R-02-2058.
Councilman Newton seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
14. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2059 - Approval of the
construction contract with American Civil Constructors, for the Cottonbelt Trail -
Phase I, in an amount not to exceed $752,777.65
This item was considered in Item 12 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2059 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Mayor Arp expressed gratitude to Deputy City Manager Dianne McWethy and staff for
obtaining federal funds, in the amount of $713,887, to build the trail.
Discussion ensued regarding the length and location of the trail and funding sources.
Councilman Rice moved to approve Resolution R-02-2059.
9
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
Councilman Hendler seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
15. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2060 - Approval of
directing the City Manager to proceed with Old Glade Road bridge improvements
This item was considered in Item 13 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2060 in its entirety.
Dr. Rich Driscoll, 5005 Colleyville Boulevard, spoke in favor of the proposed Resolution.
Mr. Ross McCready, 306 Lloyd Circle, spoke in favor of the proposed Resolution.
Ms. Karen Luchessi, 800 Glade Road, spoke in opposition to the proposed Resolution
and regarding future development of the area.
Mr. Richard Myers, 300 Lloyd Circle, spoke in favor of the proposed Resolution and
regarding access to Colleyville Plaza.
There were no others present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp
closed the public hearing.
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue reported that Ms. Jan Henning of J & H Interiors could not attend
the meeting and requested that it become a matter of record that she is in favor of the
proposed Resolution.
Councilman Newton moved to approve Resolution R-02-2060.
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue seconded the motion.
Discussion ensued regarding the rear entrance to the Colleyville Plaza, reason for
staff's recommendation for denial of the Resolution, design of box culverts and funding
sources.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
10
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
16. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2061 - Approval of an
Interlocal Participation Agreement with the Texas Local Government Purchasing
Cooperative
This item was considered in the Item 14 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2061 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Newton moved to approve Resolution R-02-2055.
Councilman Rice seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
17. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2062 - Amending R-92-
737 related to non-resident sports association fees
This item was considered in Item 15 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2062 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Discussion ensued regarding non-resident fees charged by peer cities and costs
associated with use of athletic fields by non-residents.
Mayor Pro Tem Tigue moved to approve Resolution R-02-2062.
Councilman Newton seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
18. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-02-2063 - Consideration of
appointment to the Colleyville Tree Board
11
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
This item was considered in Item 16 position.
Mayor Arp opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-02-2063 in its entirety.
There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Arp closed
the public hearing.
Councilman Newton moved to approve Resolution R-02-2063.
Councilman Hendler seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Hendler, Newton and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the motion carried.
ST AFF REPORTS:
19. MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT
QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT
There was no action taken on this item.
REPORTS:
20. COLLEYVILLE TREE BOARD MINUTES - November 5, 2001
COMMUNITY CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES - August 12, 2002
COMMUNITY CENTER ANNIVERSARY SUBCOMMITTEE - August 21, 2002
COMMUNITY CENTER ANNIVERSARY SUBCOMMITTEE - September 26,
2002
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES - October 7,2002
LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES - October 14, 2002
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 28, 2002
There was no action taken on this item.
CITIZEN COMMENTS:
21. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE
AGENDA
Mr. Rocky Hudson, 7011 Colleyville Boulevard, spoke regarding the City code
enforcement practices and the maintenance of property located at 7013 Colleyville
Boulevard.
12
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
NOVEMBER 19, 2002
Mr. Glen Carlson, 106 Colonial Square, spoke regarding road conditions and
construction traffic in northwest Colleyville and safety issues at railroad crossings.
ACTION/RESOLUTION:
22. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING
COUNCIL AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 19, 2002 -
Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-02-2064
This resolution was not needed.
ADJOURNMENT:
23. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business before the City Council, Councilman Hendler
moved to adjourn.
Councilman Newton seconded the motion.
Ayes: Councilpersons Rice, Newton, and Mayor Pro Tem Tigue
Nays: None
Mayor Arp declared the meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
APPROVED THIS DAY OF 2002 BY A VOTE OF
AYES, NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS.
Minutes taken and prepared by:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
13
CITY COUNCIL
cdyor
~
CC~Dce AGENDA BRIEFING
'rex.,::;
MEETING DATE: 12/03/02 CITY MANAGER
ITEM # : ! 4 DEPARTMENT HEAD
ORDINANCE # : 0-02-1374 FINANCE REVIEW N.A.
Previous Action: 11/19/02
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: Amending 0-01-1284 approving the Village
Monticello Partners, Ltd., Village Management Ltd.,
Village Owner's Association (VOA), and Realty
Capital Corporation City/Developer Agreement
Second Reading and Public Hearing
Update
The Council proposed several changes to the City/Developer Agreement at the November 19,
2002, meeting. A summary of the changes to the Agreement follows:
General Change. There was discussion regarding the use of the term "developer" throughout
the document, as there are several items in which the Village Owner's Association is
specifically mentioned. The term "developer" is used when an item is required to be
constructed. The term "VOA" is used when an item is required to be maintained, operated or
repaired.
Items 9, 10 and 12. Language referring to TxDOT approval was removed. A new section 25
was added related to TxDOT approval.
Item 18. Language was updated to state that the Village Owner's Association is responsible
for maintenance and operation of street signs and streetlights.
Item 22. Language was updated to state that the Village Owner's Association is responsible
for maintenance and repair to public drainage easement improvements.
Item 25. A blanket statement was added regarding items that may require TXDOT approval
before construction begins.
First Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
Over the past several months, staff and representatives of the Village at Colleyville have met
to discuss amendments to the City/Developer Agreement (CDA) for the Village at Colleyville.
The amendments are needed to clarify several provisions of the CDA and to make the CDA
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1374
Page 2 of 4
consistent with the proposed Village zoning ordinance changes (Ordinance 0-02-1337.4) and
the existing Tax Increment Financing District Agreement. On advice from the City Attorney,
several provisions were deleted, as the items are already required under the Village zoning
ordinance or the Land Development Code.
The original agreement was approved by the City Council on June 20, 2000 (Ordinance 0-00-
1219). The agreement has been modified three times to specify the City's participation in
construction costs for public improvements related to water, sewer and roadways (Ordinances
0-00-1234,0-00-1251, and 0-001-1284). The most current agreement was approved by the
City Council and signed by the Mayor on July 17, 2001 (Ordinance 0-01-1284).
Attached is the revised City/Developer Agreement as agreed to by staff and the developer,
with underline and strike-through text detailing the changes. The following is a detailed list of
the changes between the two documents.
Opening paragraphs. Realty Capital Corporation and the Village Owner's Association have
been added as parties to the agreement.
Item 9. The timing for the design and construction of the intersection of Thompson Terrace
with Main Street has been changed from January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2005.
Item 10. The timing for the acquisition of right-of-way for the realignment of Thompson
Terrace with Main Street has been changed from January 1, 2004 to January 1, 2005.
Item 12. The timing for the design and installation of the permanent traffic signal at Thompson
Terrace and Main Street has been changed to coincide with the widening of State Highway 26
by TXDOT. The existing agreement set a deadline of January 1, 2004.
Item 13. Language was added to require the developer to install the landscaping and irrigation
improvements in all public areas, as approved by the City in all public parks. The Village
Owner's Association has been named the responsible party for keeping plant material healthy
and growing. The VOA would not be responsible for maintenance or repairs to landscaping or
irrigation systems on the City Hall and Library property.
Item 14. The type of gate to be built at the west end of Central Drive has been clarified to be a
4-foot wide pedestrian gate. The Village Owner's Association will maintain and repair the gate
after installation; the current agreement requires the City to maintain the gate. Language has
also been added to require a Knox Box system to be installed for Fire Department and
emergency personnel access.
Item 15. The requirements for the construction of masonry screening fences have been
deleted, as these requirements are already part of the adopted Village at Colleyville zoning
ordinance. The language has also been modified to require the developer to make a
contribution of $15,000 to the City Hall-Library Construction Fund in lieu of building the 8-foot
tall wrought iron fence along the City Park and Village at Colleyville property line.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1374
Page 3 of 4
Item 16. The date for the City and developer to further define and agree upon specific parking
regulations for the Village has been extended from September 1, 2000 to September 1, 2003.
As more buildings are constructed in the project, parking issues can be better addressed as
those issues are identified.
Item 17. This item has been clarified to require the Village Owner's Association to pay for the
surface cleaning of the public parking lots and provide for clearing of litter and other debris.
The City will be responsible for repairing and maintaining the concrete structure of the public
parking lots, and for surface cleaning of public streets and public alleys.
Item 18. This item has been clarified to require the developer to install, maintain and operate
all streetlights. The City will pay for the costs of electricity for street lights, as is in other areas
of the city.
Item 19. This item requires the City to install certain sidewalks along Thompson Terrace and
Glade Road, and along Pleasant Run Road from Bogart Drive to the Village. The sidewalks
are required to be constructed within 12 months after the completion of infrastructure in Phase
1 of the Village. Staff has identified the costs for the construction of the sidewalks as follows:
Thompson Terrace/Glade Road
Bogart Drive to Village at Colleyville
$116,796
$ 172,692
Detailed sidewalk construction cost estimates are attached. Staff is examining grant
opportunities and other funding sources for the construction of these sidewalks.
Item 20. The language has been clarified to require the developer to construct, repair and
maintain drainage improvements on Lots 52 and 77, which generally covers the creek area
adjacent to Colleyville Boulevard. The City agrees to remove debris in the easement if the City
determines that a potential flood hazard exists.
Building and Sign Permits. Language has been deleted that required the City to withhold
building and sign permits until the Architectural Control Committee provided written
authorization. This language is already in the approved Village at Colleyville zoning ordinance.
Public Improvements. Language has been deleted that required the developer to provide 2-
year maintenance bonds, as this is already required by the Land Development Code.
Perimeter Street Improvements. Language has been deleted that required the developer to
rebuild Pleasant Run Road, as this is already required by the Land Development Code.
Impact Fees. Language has been deleted that required the developer to pay applicable
impact fees, as this is already required by the Land Development Code.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1374
Page 4 of 4
The revision to the Village at Colleyville PUD-C zoning ordinance, Ordinance 0-02-1337.4, is
currently tabled. The ordinance will be placed on the first December City Council meeting
agenda so it may be considered at the same meeting action is taken on the City/Developer
Agreement.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· City/Developer Agreement with revisions
· Ordinance 0-01-1284
· Sidewalk Construction Cost Estimates
· Ordinance 0-02-1374
City of Colleyville
City-Developer Agreement
for
The Village at Colleyville
That Village Monticello Partners, Ltd., Village Management, kkG Ltd., Villaqe
Owner's Association (VOA) and Realty Capital Corporation, collectively called
"Developer" and the City of Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas hereinafter called
"City", enter into the following agreement.
In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and for The Village at
Colleyville ("The Village"), which is shown on the attached Exhibit "A" and which
shall be an addition to the City of Colleyville, Texas as filed of record in the Plat
Records of Tarrant County, Texas, the parties hereto agree:
1. Developer and City agree to exchange the City's undeveloped strip of land
(59' by 944') on Pleasant Run Road for all of Lot 42 in The Village owned
by the Developer. Lot 42 contains five building sites and a total of 15
units. Appraisals showed the City land to be worth $160,000 and the five
sites on Lot 42 to be worth $419,000.
2. Developer agrees to construct the main parking lot on Lot 4R, Block 1,
including parking lot lighting and landscaping. Construction costs of the
parking lot, including lighting and landscaping, are estimated by Baird,
Hampton and Brown to cost approximately $475,000.
3. City agrees to contribute $210,000 towards the construction costs of the
parking lot on Lot 4R, Block 1. This contribution shall be delivered to The
Village during the construction of this parking lot, upon delivery of invoices
to the City.
4. The Village Owner's Association ("VOA") will clean the parking lot on Lot
4R, Block 1 and maintain the landscaping in and around the parking lot.
The City will pay the cost of electricity for the parking lot light poles and
the water costs for the landscaping.
5. City agrees to pay Developer for the oversizing cost between an 8-inch
water line and a 12-inch water line installed between Pleasant Run Road
and the City Park as shown on the City-approved construction plans titled
"Water Plan" prepared by Baird, Hampton, and Brown. (estimated cost to
City = $15,250) Actual cost of construction is $18,052.50.
6. City agrees to pay Developer the cost for utility improvements performed
along the Chase Bank property for m 1@€lGtiA~ relocation of an 8-inch
water line and an 8-inch sanitary sewer line out of the proposed future
Highway 26 right-of-way, as shown on the City approved construction
plans titled "Water Plan" prepared by Baird, Hampton, and Brown.
(estimated cost to City = $30,500) Actual cost of construction is
$35,667.00.
7. City agrees to pay Developer the cost for the 12-inch water line installed
from ~ Hiqhwav 26 along Pleasant Run Road to the realigned portion
of Pleasant Run Road a not to exceed amount of $16,225.00.
8. City agrees to coordinate and implement the design and construction of
realigning Thompson Terrace with Main Street at Highway 26 at the time
of the Highway 26 widening by TxDOT. This includes installing a ten-inch
water pipe under Thompson Terrace outside of the proposed future
Highway 26 right-of-way.
9. City and Developer agree to equally share the costs of re-constructing that
portion of Thompson Terrace~ which has to be re-aligned with Main Street
which is not paid for by tHe TxDOT. If the Thompson Terrace / Highway
26 intersection is not re-built by January 1, 2005 ~, then the Developer
may pay for the design and construction of any or all of these
improvements, provided however, that the City will still share in the cost of
the Thompson Terrace re-alignment described above.
10. City agrees to acquire the right-of-way necessary to allow for the
construction of the road and utility improvements outlined in paragraph 4= ~
above. It is agreed that this condemnation will be done in conjunction with
the Highway 26 widening. If the City has not acquired the necessary right-
of-way by January 1, 2005 ~, then the Developer may attempt to
acquire on the City's behalf, provided however, that the City will assist the
Developer (at the Developer's expense) with the condemnation process, if
reasonably necessary.
11. City agrees to recommend approval to the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) of the Highway 26 median improvements as
shown on the attached Exhibit "B" titled "Proposed Median Treatment
Colleyville Boulevard (SH 26) Glade Road to Thompson Terrace"
prepared by Parsons Transportation Group.
12. City agrees to pay the design and installation costs for a temporary traffic
signal at the Main Street/Highway 26/Thompson Terrace intersection. It is
understood and agreed that the Citv will desiqn the permanent traffic
signals will be dosignm:l BY tho City and will be constructed by TxDOT in
conjunction with the Highway 26 widening. If the permanent signal is not
installed BY J6IAI;.I6lrY 1, 2004 as part of the planned Hiqhwav 26
improvement proiect, the Developer may elect to pay for the design of the
permanent traffic signal, and the City shall construct it.
13. Developer agrees that The Village Owner's Association (the "VOA") will
pay the total cost of continued maintenance and repairs of any
landscaping and irrigation systems installed in all public areas (streets,
parks, etc.) in the Village, except for the City Hall and Library property.
City shall pay for the landscape watering costs in the public areas.
Developer shall install the landscapinq and irriqation improvements as
approved by the City in all public parks in The Villaqe. Tho Dovel€llger The
Villaqe Owner's Association agrees that tho City P6Ifks Dopartment will
havo rem:snablo control of the irrig6ltion in 61 mGlnnor that to keeps plant
material healthy and growing.
14. Developer agrees to pay the total cost of installation of a four (4) foot wide
pedestrian gate at the west end of Central Drive with key access. Gity
agre08 to The Villaqe Owner's Association shall maintain and repair the
gate after installation. A Knox Box system shall be provided for Fire
Department and emerqency personnel access.
15. Developer agrees to make a contribution of $15.000 to the City Hall-
Library Construction Fund in lieu of construction of an eiqht-foot tall
wrought iron fence alonq the City Park and Villaqe at Colleyville property
line. Said contribution shall be made to the City bv Auqust 31. 2003.
€Jon8tr::\;lGt 61n oight foot ma8snry sereoning '<\'6111 along tho threw Gammon
j9rDl90rty linos with Tr6lBt 21'.2, B.B.S. R C.R.R. Co. S\;lP:sy, ^BStr6lct 2Qij
61S 19art of PhClSO I of thG I9f€ljoCt. Dovoloper agreos to imltClII a sb( foot
masonp/ sgr8€lning wall along ths entire longth of th€l northorn BO\;lm~ary of
Tho '/iIlClgo from City Park to PloClsant Run Road and an oight foot,
'/.TG\;lght iron fango with elgenings for gatos along tho ontire '/J08tom
proli>orty lino whoro ThG VillGl!'ilo is adjClgont te the City Park at ths timo tho
lots that aB\;lt thoso proporty linss ha':o gomplots€l StroOt8 Clnd \;ltilitios
which h6lvs boon agcoptad by ths City.
16. City agrees to enforce the parking regulations within The Village as
referenced in Section 10 of Zoning Ordinance 0-99-1141, provided
however, that the Developer shall pay the cost of the administration and
the City's enforcement of such parking regulations until building permits
have been issued for eighty building sites in The Village. Thereafter, the
City shall pay the enforcement costs of parking regulations. By
September 1, ~ 2003, City and Developer shall attempt to further
define and agree upon specific parking regulations for The Village.
17. Developer shall desiqn and construct all public parkinq lots and parks.
agroos that tIhe VOA shall pay for the surface cleaning of public parking
lots and provide for c1earinq of litter and other debris. The City shall be
responsible for the surface cleaninq of public streets and public alleys.
The City shall repair and maintain the concrete structure such public
parking lots.
18. Developer shall install all streetlights and street signs as approved by the
City in the Village. The VOA shall maintain and operate all streetliqhts
and street siqns in the Villaqe. Theroaftor, tlhe City shall maiAtaiA and
oporate them pay the costs of electricity for the streetliqhts.
19. DB'.'Bloper shall install the lan€lse@l9iA~ G1A€l irril!:!ation improvomonts as
approved by City irl all pWBli€i parks in The 'Iillal!:!o.
20. City agrom: to withhold bwilding and sign pormits in Tho Villal!:!o wntil tho
oppli€iant dolivor3 writt€lA awth€lrizution fmm tho VOI'.'s f.mhit€letwral
COAtml Committoo that tho I9larls am u€i€ioptublo to tho '/O^.
21. 19. Within twelve months after completion of infrastructure in the first
phase of The Village, City agrees to install: (a) at least six-foot wide
sidewalks on Thompson Terrace and Glade Road from Highway 26 to the
east to connect to the recently installed sidewalk on Glade Road; (b) a six-
foot wide sidewalk on Pleasant Run Road from Bogart Road connecting to
the sidewalk constructed by The Village on Pleasant Run Road. (This will
allow citizens to ride their bikes from Hall-Johnson and Glade all the way
to the City Park and The Village.)
22. ~ Developer agrees to construct all public drainage easement
improvements in The Village on the followinq lots: Lot 52 and Lot 77, as
noted on the Villaqe at Colleyville subdivision plat recorded in Cabinet A.
Slide 6292. Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. The VOA shall maintain
and repair said public drainaqe easement improvements. City agrees to
mpoir uAlij muintoin Sld€ih impmvomoAts uttar a66optiA~ thorn remove
debris alonq the public drainaqe easement on said Lot 52 and Lot 77 if the
City determines that a potential flood hazard exists.
23. Do'/olopor agroos to provide tho City with a 2 your maiAt€lnonGo bond on
all public improvomonts.
24. 21. Developer agrees to pay all overtime construction inspection fees
incurred by the City during the infrastructure construction in The Village.
25. City al!:!mos to '1:ai'.'e all pGrimotor streot faGs for PloasaAt RWA R€la€! sin€io
the Developor is r€l bwildiAl!:! the roa€! al€lA~ its property ff(;mta~€l.
26. 22. Developer agrees that the City is not responsible for maintenance of
the sewer lines from the sewer mains to the buildings. Maintenance of
this section of the sewer lines will be the responsibility of the building unit
owners.
27. Devoloper ogroo~ that 011 applicaBle il'llpa€lt foo~ 'I:ill 130 ~aig by each
bl::lil€ling €lWl'lor prim to iS8b161r;lEW of 0 sl::lilding ~orl'llit f€lr that bl::lil€ling.
28. 23. Developer agrees to reimburse the City for the drainage
improvements constructed along Pleasant Run Road as part of ~!he
Village at Colleyville~ Phase II~ construction so as to complete the
Pleasant Run Road concrete section to the Main Street Intersection
Improvements. The Developer will reimburse the City in an amount not to
exceed $23,279.25 at the time of construction for the Village at Colleyville
Phase ,,~ or three .Q} years from July 17, 2001. tho dato of this
ogrsol'llont.
24. Accordinq to Resolution R-02-1981. approved on Julv 18. 2002,
Realtv Capital Corporation will reimburse approximatelv $105.000 for
utilitv improvements within thirtv (30) days from the date the Citv notified
Realtv Capital Corpmation, of the City's payment of the utilitv
improvements. Anv amount not paid bv that date shall bear interest at the
of 9 /"2 percent simple interest compounded annuallv until paid. In any
event. the amount to be paid bv Realtv Capital Corporation shall be paid
on m before the issuance of any buildinq permits for Phase liar
December 31.2004.
25. To the extent anvthinq contained in the Citv/Developer Agreement
requires prior approval of TxDOT, neither the City nor the Developer shall
be liable for anv provision contained herein until appropriate approval of
that specific TxDOT provision has been obtained.
Developer (Village Monticello Partners, Ltd. and Village Management, Ltd. kbG,
Villaqe Owner's Association, and Realty Capital Corporation)
Date:
Name: Richard A. Myers
Title: President of the General Partner
City (City of Colleyville)
Date:
Name: Donna Arp
Title: Mayor
ORDINANCE 0-01-1284
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION IN CONTRACT
FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN VILLAGE MONTICELLO PARTNERS,
LTD., VILLAGE MANAGEMENT, LLC. AND THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS
WHEREAS, Village Monticello Partners, Ltd., Village Management, LLC. (Developer)
shall construct public improvements and the City of Colleyville, Texas
shall participate in the cost as determined by municipal ordinance under
Subchapter C. Developers Participation in Contract for Public
Improvements, Local Government Code, State of Texas; and
WHEREAS, The City of Colleyville and Developer have entered into a City-Developer
Agreement for The Village at Colleyville, which specifies certain
construction costs that the City has agreed to participate in with the
Developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
Sec. 2.
Sec. 3.
Sec. 4.
Sec. 5.
Sec. 6.
THAT the Developer shall construct the improvements and the City shall
participate in their cost.
THAT the City's total cost participation ($311,193.25) does not exceed
thirty percent (30%) of the total contract price.
THAT the City's participation in the oversizing of public improvements
required by the City does not exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the
total costs of the oversizing so required.
THAT the Developer must execute a performance bond for the
construction of the improvements to ensure completion of the project, said
bond must be executed by a corporate surety in accordance with Chapter
2253, Government Code.
THAT the City shall be reimbursed by the Developer the total cost
participation by the City if City finds there was any undue loading of cost,
collusion, or fraud.
THAT all of the Developer's books and other records related to the project
shall be available for inspection by the City.
Ordinance 0-01-1284
Page 2 of 2
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the /9 ~day of
~ ,2001.
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the ~ day of
1~ ,2001.
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
0~~
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
i:~~
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
{?1{ir
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
Sidewalk Construction Estimate
Thompson Terrace
SH26 to Glade to City Garage
Prepared October 29, 2002
I
. .
Sidewalks & ramps
6' Concrete sidewalk 1570 If $24.00 $37,680.00
Handicap Ramos 2 each $750.00 $1,500.00
Demo existinq 4' sidewalks 210 If $10.00 $2,100.00
Drainage
18" rcp 150 If $40.00 $6,000.00
Misc Gradework 1 Is $1,200.00 $1,200.00
Culvert modifications 1 Is $1,000.00 $1,000.00
small pedestrian bridQe 1 ea $3,000.00 $3,000.00
Misc construction items
Concrete sawcut 1 Is $200.00 $200.00
Tree removal 1 Is $3,100.00 $3,100.00
Remove & replace brick mailbox 1 ea $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Remove & reolace conc 12' driveway 1 ea $2,500.00 $2,500.00
Remove & reolace conc 20' driveway 2 ea $5,000.00 $10,000.00
Remove & replace conc 27' driveway 1 ea $6,000.00 $6,000.00
Manhole adiustment 1 ea $250.00 $250.00
Fire hydrant relocation 1 ea $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Utilitv adiustments 1 Is $500.00 $500.00
Tree trimminQI brush removal 1 Is $300.00 $300.00
Plant removal & reolacement 1 Is $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Other
Surveyina 1 Is $5,000.00 $5,000.00
ROW purchase 6500 sf $2.00 $13,000.00
Subtotal $97,330.00
EnQineerinQ fees ~ 10% $9,733.00
Const. continaencv 10% $9,733.00
Sidewalk Construction Estimate
Pleasant Run Road
Bogart Drive to the Villages of Colleyville
Prepared October 29,2002
I
Sidewalks & ramps
6' Concrete sidewalk 2420 If $24.00 $58,080.00
Handicap Ramps 8 each $750.00 $6,000.00
Demo existing 4' sidewalks 820 If $10.00 $8,200.00
Drainage
48" rcp 12 r If $100.00 $1,200.00
24" rcp 36 If $50.00 $1,800.00
18" rcp 12 If $40.00 $480.00
Misc Gradework 1 Is $1,200.00 $1,200.00
Misc construction items
Concrete sawcut 1 Is $200.00 $200.00
Tree removal 1 Is $4,000.00 $4,000.00
Remove brick monument 1 Is $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Fence removal 1 Is $600.00 $600.00
Fence removal & replacement 710 If $15.00 $10,650.00
Tree trimming I brush removal 1 Is $1,500.00 $1,500.00
Plant removal & replacement 1 Is $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Crosswalk buttons @ Bogart Dr 1 Is $1,000.00 $1,000.00
Other
SurveyinQ 1 Is $15,000.00 $15,000.00
ROW purchase 16000 sf $2.00 $32,000.00
Subtotal $143,910.00
EngineerinQ fees @ 10% $14,391.00
Canst. contingency 10% $14,391.00
: t ,'I~.I~Uat1
",.... " ." ....
ORDINANCE 0-02-1374
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE DEVELOPER PARTICIPATION IN CONTRACT
FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BETWEEN VILLAGE MONTICELLO PARTNERS,
LTD., VILLAGE MANAGEMENT, LTD., VILLAGE OWNER'S ASSOCIATION,
REALTY CAPITAL CORPORATION AND THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE.
WHEREAS, Village Monticello Partners, Ltd., Village Management, Ltd., Village
Owner's Association, and Realty Capital Corporation (Developer) shall
construct public improvements and the City of Colleyville, Texas, shall
participate in the cost as determined by municipal ordinance under
Subchapter C. Developers Participation in Contract for Public
Improvements, Local Government Code, State of Texas; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville and Developer have entered into a City/Developer
Agreement for the Village at Colleyville, which specifies certain
construction costs that the City has agreed to participate in with the
Developer.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the City/Developer Agreement, as attached, with Village Monticello
Partners, Ltd., Village Management, Ltd., Village Owner's Association, and
Realty Capital Corporation (Developer) is hereby approved.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
City of Colleyville
City/Developer Agreement
for the Village at Colleyville
The Village Monticello Partners, Ltd., Village Management Ltd., Village Owner's
Association (VOA), and Realty Capital Corporation, collectively called
"Developer" and the City of Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, hereinafter called
"City", enter into the following agreement.
In consideration of mutual covenants herein contained and for the Village at
Colleyville ("the Village"), which is shown on the attached Exhibit "A" and which
shall be an addition to the City of Colleyville, Texas as filed of record in the Plat
Records of Tarrant County, Texas, the parties hereto agree:
1. Developer and City agree to exchange the City's undeveloped strip of
land (59' by 944') on Pleasant Run Road for all of Lot 42 in the Village
owned by the Developer. Lot 42 contains five building sites and a total
of 15 units. Appraisals showed the City land to be worth $160,000 and
the five sites on Lot 42 to be worth $419,000.
2. Developer agrees to construct the main parking lot on Lot 4R, Block 1,
including parking lot lighting and landscaping. Construction costs of
the parking lot, including lighting and landscaping, are estimated by
Baird, Hampton and Brown to cost approximately $475,000.
3. City agrees to contribute $210,000 towards the construction costs of
the parking lot on Lot 4R, Block 1. This contribution shall be delivered
to the Village during the construction of this parking lot, upon delivery
of invoices to the City.
4. The Village Owner's Association ("VOA") will clean the parking lot on
Lot 4R, Block 1 and maintain the landscaping in and around the
parking lot. The City will pay the cost of electricity for the parking lot
light poles and the water costs for landscaping.
5. City agrees to pay Developer for the oversizing cost between an 8-inch
water line and a 12-inch water line installed between Pleasant Run
Road and City Park as shown on the City-approved construction plans
titled "Water Plan" prepared by Baird, Hampton, and Brown.
(Estimated cost to City = $15,250) Actual cost of construction is
$18,052.50.
6. City agrees to pay Developer the cost for utility improvements
performed along the Chase Bank property for relocation of an 8-inch
water line and an 8-inch sanitary sewer line out of the proposed future
CitylDeveloper Agreement for the Village at Colleyville
Page 1
Highway 26 right-of-way, as shown on the City approved construction
plans titled, "Water Plan" prepared by Baird, Hampton and Brown.
(Estimated cost to City = $30,500) Actual cost of construction is
$35,667.00.
7. City agrees to pay Developer the cost for the 12-inch water line
installed from Highway 26 along Pleasant Run Road to the realigned
portion of Pleasant Run Road in an amount not to exceed $16,225.00.
8. City agrees to coordinate and implement the design and construction
of realigning Thompson Terrace with Main Street at Highway 26 at the
time of the Highway 26 widening by TXDOT. This includes installing a
ten-inch water pipe under Thompson Terrace outside of the proposed
future Highway 26 right-of-way.
9. City and Developer agree to equally share the costs of re-constructing
that portion of Thompson Terrace, which has to be realigned with Main
Street, which is not paid for by TXDOT. If the Thompson Terrace /
Highway 26 intersection is not re-built by January 1, 2005, then the
Developer may pay for the design and construction of any or all of
these improvements, provided however, that the City will still share in
the cost of the Thompson Terrace re-alignment described above.
10. Subject to TxDOT approval, the City agrees to acquire right-of-way
necessary to allow for the construction of the road and utility
improvements outlined in paragraph 8 above. It is agreed that this
condemnation will be done in conjunction with the Highway 26
widening. If the City has not acquired the necessary right-of-way by
January 1, 2005, then the Developer may attempt to acquire on the
City's behalf, provided however, that the City will assist the Developer
(at the Developer's expense) with the condemnation process, if
reasonably necessary.
11. City agrees to recommend approval to the Texas Department of
Transportation (TXDOT) of the Highway 26 median improvements as
shown on the attached Exhibit "B" titled "Proposed Median Treatment
Colleyville Boulevard (SH26) Glade Road to Thompson Terrace"
prepared by Parsons Transportation Group.
12. Subject to TxDOT approval, the City agrees to pay the design and
installation costs for a temporary traffic signal at the Main
Street/Highway 26/Thompson Terrace intersection. It is understood
and agreed that the City will design the permanent traffic signals and
will be constructed by TXDOT in conjunction with the Highway 26
widening. If the permanent signal is not installed as part of the
planned Highway 26 improvement project, the Developer may elect to
City/Developer Agreement for the Village at Colleyville
Page 2
pay for the design of the permanent traffic signal and the City shall
construct it.
13. Developer agrees that the Village Owners' Association (the "VOA") will
pay the total cost of continued maintenance and repairs of any
landscaping and irrigation systems installed in all public areas (streets,
parks, etc.) in the Village, except for the City Hall and Library property.
City shall pay for the landscape watering costs in public areas.
Developer shall install the landscaping and irrigation improvements as
approved by the City in all public parks in the Village. The Village
Owner's Association agrees to keep plant material healthy and
growing.
14. Developer agrees to pay the total cost of installation of a four (4) foot
wide pedestrian gate at the west end of Central Drive with key access.
The Village Owner's Association shall maintain and repair the gate
after installation. A Knox Box system shall be provided for Fire
Department and emergency personnel access.
15. Developer agrees to make a contribution of $15,000 to the City Hall-
Library Construction Fund in lieu of construction of an eight-foot tall
wrought iron fence along the City Park and Village at Colleyville
property line. Said contribution shall be made to the City by August 31,
2003.
16. City agrees to enforce the parking regulations within the Village as
referenced in Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance 0-99-1141, provided
however, that the Developer shall pay the cost of the administration
and the City's enforcement of such parking regulations until building
permits have been issued for eighty building sites in the Village.
Thereafter, the City shall pay the enforcement of parking regulations.
By September 1, 2003, City and the Developer shall attempt to further
define and agree upon specific parking regulations for the Village.
17. Developer shall design and construct all public parking lots and parks.
The VOA shall pay for the surface cleaning of public parking lots and
provide for clearing of litter and other debris. The City shall be
responsible for the surface cleaning of public streets and public alleys.
The City shall repair and maintain the concrete structure of such public
parking lots.
18. Developer shall install all streetlights and street signs as approved by
the City in the Village. The VOA shall maintain and operate all
streetlights and street signs in the Village. The City shall pay the costs
of electricity for the streetlights.
City/Developer Agreement for the Village at Colleyville
Page 3
19. Within twelve months after completion of infrastructure in the first
phase of the Village, City agrees to install: (a) at least six-foot wide
sidewalks on Thompson Terrace and Glade Road from Highway 26 to
the east to connect to the recently installed sidewalk on Glade Road;
(b) a six-foot wide sidewalk on Pleasant Run Road from Bogart Road
connecting to the sidewalk constructed by the Village on Pleasant Run
Road. (This will allow citizens to ride their bikes from Hall-Johnson
Road and Glade Road all the way to City Park and the Village).
20. Developer agrees to construct all public drainage easement
improvements in the Village on the following lots: Lot 52 and Lot 77, as
noted on the Village at Colleyville subdivision plat recorded in Cabinet
A, Slide 6292, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. The VOA shall
maintain and repair said public drainage easement improvements.
City agrees to remove debris along the public drainage easement on
said Lot 52 and Lot 77 if the City determines that a potential flood
hazard exists.
21. Developer agrees to pay all overtime construction inspection fees
incurred by the City during the infrastructure construction in the Village.
22. Developer agrees that the City is not responsible for maintenance of
sewer lines from the sewer mains to the buildings. Maintenance of this
section of the sewer lines will be the responsibility of the building unit
owners.
23. Developer agrees to reimburse the City for the drainage improvements
constructed along Pleasant Run Road as part of the Village at
Colleyville, Phase II, construction so as to complete the Pleasant Run
Road concrete section to the Main Street Intersection Improvements.
The Developer will reimburse the City in an amount not to exceed
$23,279.25 at the time of construction for the Village at Colleyville,
Phase II, or three (3) years from July 17, 2001.
24. According to Resolution R-02-1981, approved on July 18, 2002, Realty
Capital Corporation will reimburse approximately $105,000 for utility
improvements within thirty (30) days from the date the City notified
Realty Capital Corporation, of the City's payment of the utility
improvements. Any amount not paid by that date shall bear interest at
the rate of 9 ~ percent simple interest compounded annually until paid.
In any event, the amount to be paid by Realty Capital Corporation shall
be paid on or before the issuance of any building permits for Phase II
or December 31,2004.
CitylDeveloper Agreement for the Village at Colleyville
Page 4
25. To the extent anything contained in the City/Developer Agreement
requires prior approval of TxDOT, neither the City nor the Developer
shall be liable for any provision contained herein until appropriate
approval of that specific TxDOT provision has been obtained.
Developer (Village Monticello Partners, Ltd., Village Management Ltd., Village
Owner's Association, and Realty Capital Corporation)
Date:
Name: Richard A. Myers
Title: President of the General Partner
City (City of Colleyville)
Date:
Name: Donna Arp
Title: Mayor
City/Developer Agreement for the Village at Colleyville
Page 5
CITY COUNCIL
city or
CC~'" AGENDA BRIEFING
le....,s
MEETING DATE:
ITEM # :
ORDINANCE # :
12/03/02
5
0-02-1376
CITY MANAGER
DEPARTMENT HEAD ~
FINANCE REVIEW N.A.
Previous Action: 11/19/02
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: Approval of the Zoning Change from AG to R20
Single Family Residential on 0.443 acres located at
612 Shelton Road, Case Z-02-027
Second Reading and Public Hearing
First Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
Billy and Dinah Stephens are the owners of 0.443 acres located at the northwest corner of
Shelton Road and Hunter Lane. The owners have submitted a request to change the zoning
on the property from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential. The owner is seeking a
zoning change in order to provide an appropriate building site for a new residence.
The property is considered a lot of record and is allowed to be platted in its current
configuration under the AG zoning district, even though the property does not meet the
requirements of the AG district. However, due to the narrow width of the property and the 25-
foot side building lines required by the AG district, the owner has applied to change the zoning
to R20.
The R20 district requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet, a minimum lot depth of 125 feet, and
a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet. The existing property is 80 feet wide along its
frontage on Shelton Road, 218 feet deep along Hunter Lane, and approximately 17,440 square
feet in area. The zoning change would primarily provide narrower side yards, 10 feet on each
side, and provide a more appropriate building site for the new residence given the existing
property dimensions. Since this is a corner lot, the Commission may establish the street side
building lines at the time the subdivision plat is considered.
The surrounding property is single-family residential in nature. Property to the south, across
Shelton Road, is zoned R40 Single Family Residential and is developed as single-family
residences. Properties to the north along Hunter Lane are zoned R40 and R30 and are
developed as single-family residences. Property to the west is zoned AG Agricultural and is
developed as single-family residences. Property to the east, across Hunter Lane, is zoned
R30 and is presently vacant.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1376
Page 2 of 2
Impact Issues
1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan, adopted
in 1998, which designates this area as a future single-family residential area. The
surrounding properties are also designated as single-family residential areas.
2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are developed as single-family
residences.
3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is single-family development.
Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development.
4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights-of-
way.
5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the
land and house is appraised at $52,800. The estimated annual City property tax revenue
generated by this property is $183.
6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation
provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been
collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban
locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on
average. There are no recent traffic counts available for Shelton Road.
Staff mailed notices to 14 adjacent property owners regarding this request. No
correspondence has been received regarding this request.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered this request
at the October 28,2002, meeting and recommended approval by a unanimous vote.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· Location Map
· Area Zoning Map
· Zoning Exhibit
· List of Property Owners Notified
· Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
· Ordinance 0-02-1376
TR eC2
.74 At
TA 8F
1~. AC
TR e
1.32 AC
1 · I}.,
ctC S
O^1<
(#J
1
~
TA Ie
.'161'lC
TR IAI
4.5 AC
TR IOIA
2.9 AC
~c l\ 1
\)U ,&,
TR 1A5
1.851 AC
lR JA .63 At
TR I AJA
1.?21lC
lR lAJ9 .482.
6
o^
13 " IS 16
28 11 I. 11
,''/2 1R 2'2 1.5. 1 v~#" i
I .r~.' c.. '1 ~~) ~~ ~Gp.'rl~~~DDt'\ !~,
i TR 1N ll'V'a,\L t4 ) \..J ';J ~ ~~llE:rtlr O~GR lS{t, 1 i
l~_~~::~:_~~~~'~!~~~; :~;-~~~~~~~;~J
I ?\,~~<; ~l\:S '~C~'~ ~~AFS 18!
! 'AR O~ ~'\ J:>, 5A2lI ul" i
I ZRI ~'5,.. r- ~0 JIll ~. I r- Sr' C .A .A1 i
I 2.56. \... 1.& 2....1 .8 ('\.\3cUliVar' 7A2 i
! A 1.26.0-2~ i
L ____n_____._h__.__ _______.______._h n_n_._________._ n_n_n_. _n_n_n n__._____ _n____._ h____.._. ___n_n n____n_.__.__..___ .i
i
1
I
!
!
i
i
j
I
I
I
J
7AI
1
It
...
..
70
18
~L 702
7t \ 7t'I7t2
7DIA
2A
]A
..1
10
~S'f
1l^1<S
..
....c~
p}.,toJ
~~
1
&1\0 (.
'% D2
AIG ~AI~J\ ~ AIOIR
AIF
'" f (~1f-
~ p. .l~ 'JEf"
::>
'" p-I (;<.
2
BEVERLY.
[)R
...
AlE
A'.
.q7q .
AIN
AI
AIRI
"-182
AIB3
A 102ft
AIR
'-.... .9! II L_ :~S 1:S;~ _
,)ir~~;-;,-
-+;fr" 12 1 ~
.... () 't~&6 .>:
.J e n I!I ,- 211
'~(. ,,1 w/~ -~ I! .. -~ 21
· .,.~~ :'r:' ':r
~ AlT
AI'"
AIS
A..
AIR
AIU
RIMI
~
~
:r;
ti
f,
I
t
LET.
LN ...
...
OIR
AIV
AID
A'L
1 l.-
I ' l ~ , , , , r' r . .
3 1:1" . 6 7 . 18 II 12 13 I"~ 15 I. 11 re I' "" 21 22 23 2. 25 Z6 27
COLLEYV1LLE n:f1R -
IIIR
IIA
I
~
]2R
OR
TJlOr-1AS
-
'"
. ~T ~O~
R.... -~
}\J..R 1 s:0\~1
TR "A
IJR5El1E~
\ ~. "'13 104 1 1&.~
'-J
n ---fl- .--'-. . c-
o
B 0
Location Map & Area of Notification
CASE" Z-02-027 - Zoning Change to R20
.]A
~~-
1N I
3.lqAl;
TA IKI
.43 AC
. Tit .j;:.'
1.111 M:
TR IK
.44 ftC
COOKS
Tn lH
TR IS
1.9 IlC
;:.~--:;-.:~
.,
i
.
TA 10
1.90t
fR -IE
1~.4 I
1R IE
1.8 AC
fR JAil
1.58 IV:.
!
~.
i
i
j;
I
I
~
! ~
i .
I:
\.
f;
{'i
~
I
!
!
i
i
i
i
I
'f tJ~I2~\J~
fIWoVIS'f
t'f c#J
4~qq~
.-
1 ~i~ ADD J.
: G ~ It V lO' 2 :
I t\ 3.&11 .
: 1
lOT I
,Q92 II
~ r----il-
- ...""" T
I ~
f= -
~r-
==~
--'I),
re,
0-
~
('I
I
L.I:;;
~ ~
to ~
1 ..
17'" ~
...~
a.I1
~ ~
r'
~V~
Q:
Q
~
a::
't"-
O
o
I~~ ~./f ~
~~~~r -
cr: 111- - - - - ~ .............. ~~ JtI ~
o ~~~ or-
~ ~K \ _____________ ~ nj!l..) ~
~ ? '1~ 0
g~ rb- ~ /~Ov~
= ~ ~ ~~ 0"
~"i;= 'n ~i'~
11- ~ :b ~ '///~ ~
II \ 4~___ 0 ~ I ,..
· ./ I a ~ 0 ,~
~ i\ P: I ~ 0 llI:,
L t
C)
q:
,-------
.' ,. ,. "
w=
~ I~~_-
~~, ~-
y T ~fi -- ~
1 ..;
bKAI J1~ ~
c T--
~ l
~I\;'s ~ __
I lC::~ -'
ct: I;;: F . ~ - - ~I--- -
/,-: - - -
~ . '-- - 1--->--_
-
-
C)
q:
@:
....
r'"
I C'
--Q:
I--- ~
'-------
~
"E
.i:.
~
~
~
o
..... -
5~
~ct:
~
a::
-
r.
------'-
, e--
- r:
.
f---
f-
.--
-
-
iii- --
--.r:= ...
- --
~ t- --
= ct:
,- Q
Ii l~
~ :a I ~ lr:
Ut:r:~ ~
~ ;:-
~~-
c.>o
2
~ f--
,s f--
I----
,.~ ~
-0 ~iW
-('I ;~
I __ --,y
-
1---1---
u
~~
.~ ~
~
b
~
;;:;
~
....
P- 1\
\..
o~
Oc;Y
~~ ~
~~ I
'?s- ~ '0<t> /
</- ~
,~,_ '1
-Yo. ) .
0) <IS' ~
/ ;--
I
,~
~
:3
I,
Ii
Cl
q:
)~f--
J>.
~
~~
~
....
I
I r
'-AI
_~V
C~
~t
\T
r- r------
,~
'---
VII
c.> ~
!lI!
5
~. - I 1
wrrv
1::-
1< / ~~_
t 1-= ~=
,~ IL-
'"
I--
c:: ~~
~;r-I "~
\ \ \ \ ~~i'
I 1.\ I '\ '\ -.:t
-
1
t
~
~
II(
c(
r-
N
o
..
a
.
N
II!'
:~;: :-"': ;or; 1
!H:
~nt j
~.i j Po (?
f:;( c,,:
IL:
__..,1,---,
"'J~!~ ~~ t
-~
?J:D.?'
~~. .0.0
, WOOD fa-ICe
Fll.~Me-
-1<\
Sio~. -..i
e:,L. t:lG1. ('..I
I
18.0
~
[B-FIZ.~""E-
G,<:)' f)fD S.10~. e:k-1)G,.
. a \.) ~ \'-.\ 1)--
-cJ ~
'l..t\.o'
-0
g
t
\ ": '2.0
M ~ "::O~ '~"( \O.~
~. N\ E:-T~ L ~'
f~ loI\~' ! -0
G."~,p-.. ~~\09..i<l
fj.rd Tf.r:,1
t
I
-\9
%
r
WooO'
Decll-/
'PCl~. i
r. \A=1~
<:.I
r.
q:
('J
14.'S -S- \~.Cjl
-+\9
! .
~
1
~TO R.,.
f t2..~ M E=-
~
o
"2
.j
c:
~
18.0'
-0
19
n.r<!
,
,,, P , .3
r' f
'0!1! f!.
~2V)~
<> cO" l
<cO' ~.
? ~.)-
j \) ,. .
crill ;;,I\!;f
~~ ~<<?
~<";CJ::C'('
r~ ir?,.
,"0 5\r~
(.l r;G;~
'~L.E:.b~IE-L~.
LI "-IE:- ES\o(\T. I!oJ
'JOL. 1~4C)1 p. 'C'Ji?,
,X Po\\.le~~
L \C...\-\ T Does
1--.\0, ('.:.. pPL'(.
C:' L E c.. 'i\.,. ELE'";
L\ ,,"I e- e':>l'w'YT. \ N
VDL. 1?4=l. P. 41:J1J
D. \2. :I.c.;\. TO
11< ~\J €\2--~
L\C,I1T {X)-€5
\--.leY'f ~PPL"(.
<fi
~
~
I
-~
u:I
~
....J
~
u:I
t-<
Z
~
::I:
P.L . \\1 E'S'{" BO- 0
\.f'
(V
cJ
612 SHBL TON RpAD
\r
~
\
'\J ~'2T 150
se E- ; ~ E:- "2. <::) f '2 l,= O?-,.
LE-G(~L DE-SC.~\ V'\IO.......' ~
~u \l.\I,E-"< OP... ':> C E-\Zf \ f \ C~ ,\\ ON.
~E- i o~'2-
_-6000..Hllrl~"""-l.aJ.t..e- _
T.cri.Workman- --
_ f1OO1HmlfP.T T .ane
Colleyville, TX 76034
-- James Pine
==----S91& ~
Colleyville, TX 76034
-~~vin=&-M3I'garet=-b<wC
Colleyville, TX 76034
Jerry Allen
5917 Hunter Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
Leroy Chism
6150 Genview Drive, Apt. 139
North Richland Hills, TX 76180
J ames Henslee
P.O. Box 863
Colleyville, TX 76034
Cecil & Rebecca Allen
307 Main Road, #A
Ruidoso, NM 88345
Nadine Wilmut
6101 Hunter Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
C. L. Allen
704 Shelton Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Mary Watson
P.O. Box 1211
Grapevine, TX 76099
Jeffrey & T. Vanderpool
601 Shelton Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
William & Beverly Lathorp
609 Shelton Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Madelyn Gardner
701 Shelton Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Billy & Dinah Stephens
612 Shelton Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Case Z-02-027 (Notices dated: October 11 , 2002)
According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200'
of the proposed special use permitland-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that
the parties listed above have been notified ofthe proposed change request as required by
the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code.
Jan Levy d--
Planning & Z~nag Assistant
Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
October 28, 2002
Case Z-02-027 PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG to R20 Single Family Residential
on 0.443 acres located at 612 Shelton Road
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and reviewed the staff briefing. He also said there are
no future plans for commercial development of property in the area and this zoning change was to make the
property more buildable. He told the commissioners that the Master Plan indicates that the area is to be
developed for residential uses and the infrastructure is already in place to service the lot.
Commissioner Swift asked Clayton to display the slide for the zoning of surrounding properties.
Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were:
Bill & Dinah Stevens were present to represent the case. Commissioner Swift asked the applicants what they
envision for their property. They told the commissioners that they plan on building a new home facing Shelton.
Commissioner Culley asked the applicants about the position of the home across the street on Hunter. They
responded that the property was vacant. Commissioner Culley asked them if they plan on leaving the other
accessory buildings. Bill Stevens said they plan on repainting and repairing the one accessory building for a work
shop and the one building in the very back of the property has already been removed.
Mary & Mark Watson, owners of the property on the northeast corner of Shelton and Hunter, living at 4200 Briar
Ridge, said they have put off building on their lot. The asked about the plans to widen Hunter and said they were
concerned about the right-of-way not being equally divided between the properties to the east and to the west.
Chairman Wall told Mr. and Mrs. Watson that he would direct their question to staff at the close of the public
hearing.
There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Chairman Wall asked staff about future improvements to Hunter. Clayton Husband responded that there are no
current plans to widen Hunter nor are their any CIP plans for that street. He said sufficient right-of-way will be
acquired when the property is platted. He said the right-of-way for a local street is a minimum of 50', and the
measurement will be tied down by a surveyor during platted and taken evenly from the center line.
Commissioner Jones asked staff to restate the issues and differences between zoning and platting. Staff
responded to his request.
Commissioner Culley commented on the work on the Master Plan. He said they have talked about preserving
types of zoning for certain areas of the City. He asked the other commissioners for their comments about
whether or not this is an area they would be encroaching into a particular zoning category by rezoning this
property to R20.
Commissioner Jones said they have not received any feedback or opposition for the surrounding property
owners. Commissioner Kelly responded that erosion of density may be an issue in some areas, but not with this
particular case. Chairman Wall said when there has been strong citizen concerns they have taken that into
consideration for denying a zoning change request. He said there is a general mix of zoning in the area, no
definite solid block of zoning, and no citizen concerns so there would be less problems with approving the R20
zoning for this lot.
Commissioner Jones moved to recommend approval of the zoning change to R20. Commissioner Culley
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall
Noes: None
ORDINANCE 0-02-1376
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF 0.443 ACRES OUT OF THE JOESPH WHITE SURVEY,
ABSTRACT 1692, FROM THE AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO THE R20 SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS
ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Billy and Dinah Stephens
on October 15, 2002, under Case No. Z-02-027; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of
the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made
a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is
in the best interests of the City of Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
Sec. 2.
Sec. 3.
Sec. 4.
Sec. 5.
THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the Official Zoning Map are hereby amended
insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas, as
shown on the Zoning Map attached as Exhibit "A", and described by metes
and bounds attached as Exhibit "B", by changing the zoning of said
property from the AG Agricultural district to the R20 Single Family
Residential district.
THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof
shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00).
Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate
offense and shall be punishable as such.
THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, shall
remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternative method of publication provided by law.
THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication.
Ordinance 0-02-1376
Page 2 of 2
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
I
J
, ///
)/
/'
/
R20
/
,/
//
/ /'
Exhibit A
Zoning Map
~
// ~ /
/ ^
/ //~~
/ ""
A9 / '" .
/// '~
/ \.
R20
R40
.TTR
R40
mL
.-.'" (
i
Exhibit B
Metes and Bounds Description
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Joseph White Survey,
Abstract No. 1692, Tarrant County, Texas, and being Tract NO.1 as described in
deed from Myrtle L. Bass et al to J.C. Fry, recorded in Voume 3512, Page 581,
Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more particularly described as
follows:
BEGINNING at a stake in the south line of the said Joseph White Survey, said
stake being 1064.9 feet east of the southwest corner of the said survey, also
being 156.5 feet east of the southwest corner of a 5.92 acre tract conveyed to
George F. Bass and wife, Myrtle Bass by deed recorded in Volume 1510, Page
83, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE North, at 22.5 feet an iron pin in the north line of Felps and Shelton
Road, in all 242.2 feet to an iron pin for corner;
THENCE South 88 degrees 37 minutes East, 80 feet to iron pin for corner;
THENCE South, at 217.8 feet an iron pin in the north line of said road, in all
240.3 feet;
THENCE West 80 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING, containing 0.443 acres of
land, more or less.
CITY COUNCIL
ell)' or
cc~n", AGENDA BRIEFING
1e.x;:1.S
MEETING DATE: J
ITEM # :
ORDINANCE # :
12103/02
6
0-02-1377
CITY MANAGER J
DEPARTMENT HEAD
FINANCE REVIEW
N.A.
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: ' Approval of the Zoning Change from R40 Single
Family Residential to R20 Single Family Residential
on 1.00 acres located at 304 W. Van Oaks Drive,
Case Z-02-030
First Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
David Debrecht is the owner of approximately one acre of land located on the north side of
Van Oaks Drive, west of Bettinger Road. The owner has submitted a request to change the
zoning on the property from R40 Single Family Residential to R20 Single Family Residential.
The owner is seeking a zoning change in order to divide the property into two lots.
The R20 district requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet, a minimum lot depth of 125 feet, and
a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet. The existing property is 217 feet wide along Van
Oaks Drive and 200 feet deep. The zoning change may allow the owner to subdivide the
property into two lots. Depending on right-of-way dedication requirements, the owner may
need to request a variance related to the lot size from the Planning and Zoning Commission
when the subdivision plat is considered.
The surrounding property is single-family residential in nature. Property to the east and west is
zoned R20 Single Family Residential. Property across Van Oaks Drive is zoned R40 Single
Family Residential. This property abuts the Remington Park subdivision at the rear. Most of
the lots contain single family residences. The lot sizes on Van Oaks Drive range from 19,000
square feet to over one acre. The lots in Remington Park that abut this property average
17,000 square feet in size.
Impact Issues
1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan, adopted
in 1998, which designates this area as a future single-family residential area.
2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are developed as single-family
residences.
3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is single-family development.
Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1377
Page 2 of 2
4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights-of-
way.
5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the
land and house is appraised at $112,090. The estimated annual City property tax revenue
generated by this property is $389.
6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation
provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been
collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban
locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on
average. There are no recent traffic counts available for Van Oaks Drive.
Staff mailed notices to 14 adjacent property owners regarding this request. No
correspondence has been received regarding this request.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered this request
at the November 11, 2002, meeting and recommended approval by a unanimous vote. There
were no speakers at the public hearing.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· Location Map
· Property Map
· List of Property Owners Notified
· Ordinance 0-02-1377
fR 2.
12.2 At
To 28
4.05 IIC
'8
_ cz, cz,
1\. j'; 11 UO
~ 0 J ~~~J';'{
. ~. tJ ,,:)2
,..p
fA U1
1.111 At
TA ZF'
11.212 At
20
& ~ n "
'"
:3
~
To 2 :;: l4 II
6.50.
BARTRAM LN
'" '0
.-,
..,
.'
Cl .
_"3
._1
IIU1R l.N
~(
"'
63
~ ~\
r
"' r}
1. .v~~t(
. I
5 ~_61 I OJ
I",
----, ~ ..
. ,.;: I 1
--1~1 .,
, I i: I
:il
8"i 70
Tt
_/ "
J
74
tlFCB\..L
P ~
1
~vv
Tn lA1
.80.
TA l81
,.],.. .
.A
~ :l.lfs(D,C
":
~
~
," IE
1.2'12 At
'."5jji-..
u-..----..-,,!:*u~!i1fft'l.;J'J~t,~.-ttfr..-..-..-..-.--..-..-..-..-..-....-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-...----..-.-,-
1~
~IS1~ ~
1
,.,
t." .
,.,
'.21 .
6E:~~
VLJ\~
fJ\l~
1'1
'1' l,LlAO
J\O
,
'"
r:
...
z
o
".
.1
L-'
In
~
1
B.
<Q
1 f;FS
I\. -- VII \,11 ~f,'l
~ J,t:.. ~~1148
~
1
...
,t~
"
'2.
2] II 21 20 19
l' n
~
I
-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TA 'El
.45 At
I
<U
[lRl
EJ..
.!lot, . -.211
13.l' .
o,.tc
lA ",
.n At
u
\..1301'
1'~
1
.,t
Location Map & Area of Notification
CASE" Z-02.030 - Zoning Change from AG to H2O
I I 11-1 '
I ~I :,
.~ -f
~~ I~'
.-......., . :tFT
a::
" ,~~
hl./ '" 'I Ii ,...
~ ~ ~ ~ cb d;
I "v Tt: - ~ 0> I--
I ~ ..... ~ C'I 0
~I~: ti ~
~'-J .' J
~ .......... "'= ~ _;00 -----I
I~ ~ ~ ~ ~_
~ ~ "1 ~ t-~-
I":~ Ie ..... ll~ ~ I '-
~.r .. r--
'11JJl k -]~ ~
~ I -. ..>
~ - ~ ...{ L ... "-'
:0.>> .... ~ ") ~ ..... 8
~.~. \:) 'G I~ . =:..J . ::
~. ~ .... ~ a.. Q ch
. ~ 1~ ~ """ ;;;: Kf ::) 6
I~ /\ ~(V
~\ I~~ (~~noo!1
I ~ ~>~ _'._ L~.~7
'\ ~~~ . .- r0~ - _..~
w ~
o I-
<> ~
~
-"
\
~;? ~
~ ~.
~
~~
~
~
~
--{A M '"~
/'r-'
Nl ~3 ))....
ll.
A _
IJ" ~, ~ )
I - ,...
I:: ~ '7 D
I( == ~
.... t I
.. 0
Ie ~ ... ~ -:1l
. . _IV.........
1ft
~
q:
~ ~
~ID~
;:
>
~
i~ ~
" ~
L .. {
~O:::
}
I'" ~
{II
--- /"
-
-
r
~
J:::~d
Jl
.....r N' ~
-
~
~t: I---
"
~
d
b<
-
r ~ .. -
z
:;;;
~p \
\ ./ l I
y
IN'
~
I ~~ iE
I~
(LO~
,r------......I
I
LIJ
LI;
.....
~
. "
..
~
P
I r
10
~r
L.J
u
;~
F J
~~
)~~U .,_.
a: CO
. ex:>
~ ~
~ 0
0-10 !
,..,-
-
u
l~
G:
Q
~
~
..... -
g
Id
II
CIF
BLOCK 6. REMINGTON PARK ADD'N
N 69053'OO"E 217 0'
5/6" IF
. '.
________'===_'!..______~__.__________.-,--------..--.-----n----nn_n
e-:
t::lc3
ra:l~
~a~
l1. .
::0::: .~
u:z;.
got.!!
~5!~
. ~
'~~o
E-<' N
o I
. ..J Oce
~~
>.J
o
>
i~
li: -
.~
::II'N
~
l'f.I~
~,~
.,>
10' UTILlTY EASEWENT
I
i
l'
\
o
o
o
" ~
,,' S
~'"
-"'-
, !ii'll ~
~ ,G -,
~ 0
~l i
~~ 0
);; ~ l'f.I
I;)
o
o
o
o
N
!11m
CJ
:at
-~-
-- II
~' ..... ~ .
~ e!l
. .....
-
- --
/ :: ;;---- - J~r<9p~/ .":-
/", , Ill. -', )
(:~ '.
I
?s.,. ~e. 1"..,1. &"':5.~ ,;7.&) 0
304 W. VAN "OAKS DRIVE ~
S 69053'OO!'Y 217.60'
DANiEL LAPIER etux JENNIFER
VOL. .11340, PG. 1709
, PLAT SHOWING
E"'l
o
~
;,.
o
,0
(;)
o
:z;
!10 ~
1/2" IF
8748
.A. t+ v..cJ,... __ cl-~ \
'@
SCALE: 1"= 60'
I
I
OCT O' 4 2002
.--'.\---.........--'-'-"-~ ~_.
SURVEY AND FIELD NOTES FOR A TRACT IN THE JANE S.NEWTON SURVEY, ABSTRACT
NO. 1177, SITUATED IN THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS, AND
BEING A PORTION DF THE E. A. SMITH SUBDIVISION AS SHOWN ON A PLAT RECORDED
IN VOLUME 388-60, PAGE 31, PLAT RECORDS, TARRANT COONTY, TEXAS, SAID
PORTION BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLL~WS:
at a ~.. iron .found 'at the Northeast corner of the above
referenced Smith Subdivision, in the South line of Remington
Park Addition to. the City of Colleyville, as shown on a plat of
record in Cabinet A, Slide 3670, Plat Records, Tarrant County,
Texa~;
S. 0 -04'-30"W. along the West line of Lot 1, Block 1, of Van
Oaks Addition~ Phase II, as shown on a plat of record in Volume
388-203, Page 1, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, at 175.00
feet. passing a ~" iron found in the North line of a road easement
and continuing in all, 200.00 feet to a point for corner in e
cent8r of said easement;
S.89 -53'-OO"W. 217.80 feet along the center of said ement to
a point in same for corner;
N.Oo- 04'-30"E. at 25.00 feet passin1l a ~" iron found and
continuing in all 200.00 feet to a ~ iron found in the South line
of Remin?ton Park Addition, above referenced;
N.89o-53 -OO"E. 217.80 feet along said South line to the POINT OF
BEGINNING and ~ontaining 1.00 acres of which 0.125 acres are in
use in said road easement.
BEGINNING
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
THENCE
I, Walter W. Ward, Rf' tered Professional Land
Surveyor bereby cllrti to Sellers, Lenders, Purcbasers,
~//t::~".r/7Ce 7/n , ~o and its underwriter ..
tbat this survey was made on the ground under my supervision
and correctly showl the corners, boundary lines, dimensions
and area orrand indicated hereon, and correctly shows the
location of aU permanent buildings, structures, and otber
improvement and visible items on the subject property, and
correctly shows the location of all alleys, streets, roads,
rights-ot-way, easements and otber matters of record, of
wbicb I bave knowledge, whlcb affect the subject property
according to the legal description in such matters. Tbe
undersigned further certifies that except as sbown bereon,
tbere are no visible descrepancies, sbortages in area,
boundary line confticts, encrol!cbments, overlapping of.
improvements, casements or nghts-of.way, and the subject
pro~~ss ~~;7d roadway.
Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 2014
Date '7 -/ t? -cJ Z
,;f"'"-R......-...
~~;f~}.;;J;/:;~f;,<\
. ..::'" :.~.:.: .,-....,.: ,.:\
\fl~.c ; ~,k, '1~ V',.",hu J
, ,. .. .. . ... .. , ., . ~ ' . ~. \ ~ '.;.
V:,"" ,'Oj4. ,".";.,-!
\':~;:;'~:: f r." J; ':~f.~~':~{) '" l
'.:~ sW.;'J'r'"
'-......",.~>~,..
WARD
According to the FIRM published by FEMA Community
Panel No. 4~o.5!J/J ~ L/, this lot is not affected
by the 100 year flood plain, Zone X .
P,O. BOX 820253
FORT WORTH[ TEXAS 76112.0253
(817/251-6411
SURVEYING
COMPANY, INC.
Donald & Carla Hannah
P.O. Box 501
Colleyville, TX 76034
Daniel & Jennifer Lapier
305 W. Van Oaks
Colleyville, TX 76034
Eric Hansen
304 W. Van Oaks Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
--
--- -- ~--
---------- -
- --- - ------------
--~_.
Foxcreek Residential Dev. Ltd.
Mr. Larry Cole
6420 Remington Pkwy
Colleyville, TX 76034
James & Elizabeth Worrell
600 Shetland Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Ronald Kirchenbauer
317 Oaklawn Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
A L & Maria Hathcock, III
313 Oaklawn Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Peter & Cherie Lopez
309 Oaklawn Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Danny & Karen Coleman
305 Oaklawn Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Gene & Jennifer Orr
301 Oaklawn Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Larry & Patricia Lewis
209 Oaklawn Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Guy & Laura Church
205 W. Van Oaks Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
William Virag
201 W. Van Oaks Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Gregory Simpson
209 W. Van Oaks Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Case Z-02-Q3& (Notices dated: November 1,2002)
According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200'
of the proposed special use permitland-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that
the parties listed above have been notified of the proposed change request as required by
the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code.
Jan Levy ;;I----
Planning &~Uning Assistant
ORDINANCE 0-02-1377
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF 1.00 ACRES OUT OF THE JANE S. NEWTON
SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1177, FROM THE R40 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT TO THE R20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by David Debrecht on
October 18, 2002, under Case No. Z-02-030; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of
the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made
a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is
in the best interests of the City of Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
Sec. 2.
Sec. 3.
Sec. 4.
Sec. 5.
THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the Official Zoning Map are hereby amended
insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas, as
shown on the Zoning Map attached as Exhibit "A", and described by metes
and bounds attached as Exhibit "B", by changing the zoning of said
property from the R40 Single Family Residential district to the R20 Single
Family Residential district.
THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof
shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00).
Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate
offense and shall be punishable as such.
THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, shall
remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternative method of publication provided by law.
THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication.
Ordinance 0-02-1377
Page 2 of 2
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Don na Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
Exhibit A
Zoning Map
~ l'" ~... ~ e~"" " E (
a" 1.\\(1 ~3-3-~
".C
..' 13
~ ,C: . ( :::
~ ) ,..p
'.
v ., / -
6-.V - 't
~ '""'- -
)
[ 1("\1 ("\ "rc ,... . .......
IE .. J
-_..
... -
>> \y ~ R . '(1
'om nn..~~
C7S - \ - ~ ~l ~I
n, ..co · "''' r1 a.::: ~
r\" YPl . I
!-I- ~I~..t -
II ~
I~ -~ ~~~ .....,..~- - LJ ...
b
PUD-R \,KMT"^"~ ~ MI R-29- :::-J:I f
0-9~1100 ~ Ivn::,
~ l.---
Q-99-1194V'
( E
I
Exhibit B
Metes and Bounds Description
All that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the Jane S. Newton Survey,
Abstract No. 1177, in the city of Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a
portion of the E.A. Smith Subdivision as shown on a plat recorded in Volume
388-60, Page 31, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being more
particularly described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a ~-inch iron found at the Northeast corner of the above
referenced Smith Subdivision, in the South line of Remington Park Addition to the
city of Colleyville, as shown on a plat of record in Cabinet A Slide 3670, Plat
Records, Tarrant County, Texas;
THENCE South 0 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds West along the West line of
Lot 1, Block 1, Van Oaks Addition, Phase II, as shown on a plat of record in
Volume 388-203, Page 1, Plat Record, Tarrant County, Texas, at 175.00 feet
passing a ~-inch iron found in the North line of a road easement and continuing
in all, 200.00 feet to a point for corner in the center of said easement;
THENCE South 89 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds West 217.80 feet along the
center of said easement to a point in same for corner;
THENCE North 00 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds East at 25.00 feet passing a
~-inch iron found and continuing in all 200.00 feet to a ~-inch iron found in the
South line of Remington Park Addition, above referenced;
THENCE North 89 degrees 53 minutes 00 seconds East 217.80 feet along said
South line to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1.00 acres of which
0.125 acres are in use in said road easement.
CITY COUNCIL
cilyor
~ AGENDA BRIEFING
CC~~~n<~
le.\ ;:\:'-
MEETING DATE: 12/03/02 CITY MANAGER i ~
ITEM # : 7 DEPARTMENT HEAD ~
ORDINANCE # : 0-02-1378 FINANCE REVIEW N.A.
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: Approval of the Special Use Permit for an accessory
building on Lot 1, Block 1, Mikolaitis Addition located
at 2309 Hall Johnson Road, Case Z-02-032
First Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
John and Deborah Mikolaitis are the owners of a house located at 2309 Hall Johnson Road.
The owner has submitted a Special Use Permit (SUP) application to construct an accessory
building on the property. The owner proposes to construct a 1,500 square toot, single-story
building on the property.
The accessory building regulations include size and location standards. All requests to exceed
the base standards must be authorized by a Special Use Permit approved by the City Council.
A comparison of the regulations and the proposed building is shown below. The proposed
building meets all the requirements of the regulations except for the building size. The
applicant has requested a waiver from this requirement, as allowed by the Code.
ACCESSORY BUILDING ZONING COMPARISON
Category Zoning Requirement Applicant Proposal
1 . Maximum Size 1,000 sf for 0.5-0.99-acre lots 1,500 sf
,
2. Max. Number of Buildings 3 1
3. Side Setbacks 5 feet 20+ feet both sides
4. Rear Setback 5 feet 20+ feet
5. Max. Height Not to exceed height of main building complies
The allowed size of an accessory building is based on the size ot the lot. For lots between 0.5-
acres and 0.99-acres, the size is limited to 1,000 square teet. The applicant's lot is 0.9623-
acres in size, or 41,918 square feet. If the lot were 1,642 square feet larger, the proposed
accessory building could be constructed without obtaining a special use permit. The applicant
has requested a waiver of this requirement to allow the 1,500 square foot building.
A letter from the applicant is attached that further explains this request. The building, as
proposed, would be constructed with a pitched roof, skylight panels, cupola, and shuttered
windows. The applicant has indicated that the exterior construction material would be painted
metal, the walls being light color off-white with green trim, and a gray roof.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1378
Page 2 of 3
Impact Issues
1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan, adopted
in 1998, which designates this area as a future single-family residential area.
2. Surrounding Properties. Most of the surrounding properties are developed as single-
family residences. Properties to the north and west are developed as single family
residences (Highland Meadows and Arbor Estates). Properties to the east and south are
zoned AG Agriculture and contain single family residences. There is an office building
located approximately 200 feet to the east.
3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is single-family development.
Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development.
4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights-of-
way.
5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the
land and house is appraised at $74,000. The estimated annual City property tax revenue
generated by this property is $257. The addition of the accessory building could have a
positive impact on the appraised value of the property. The owner has stated his intent to
construct a new residence on the property in 2003.
6. Traffic Generation. The addition of the accessory building will not have an impact on the
traffic generation in the neighborhood or local area, as the building is a private garage for
use by the residents on the premises.
Staff mailed 17 notices to adjacent property owners regarding this request. Staff received
letters in opposition to the request. Copies of the letters are attached.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered this request
at the November 11, 2002, meeting and recommended approval by a unanimous vote.
Speakers at the public hearing voiced concerns about the metal exterior of the building and
were less concerned about the use of the building.
Staff's recommendation of denial is based on the proposed building not complying with the
Land Development Code. Since the SUP for this particular use has little impact on land use
decisions or requirements, but may be important to those living nearby, staff believes the
opinions of the area property owners should be the most important factor in whether to grant
the Special Use Permit. Since the request is an SUP, conditions may be imposed that are
different than or in addition to the normal requirements of the Land Development Code,
provided the conditions are intended to reduce the negative impacts on the adjacent property.
Recommendation
Denial, due to technical non-compliance with the Land Development Code
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1378
Page 3 of 3
Attachments
· Location and Zoning Map
· Information from Applicant
· List of Property Owners Notified
· Correspondence
· Ordinance 0-02-1378
i
TA 2851
.69 .,
I
i .~.~
.-..-~~-~.~: ____00__._.1____.._.. i ..-..--.----..---.-----..----..-..-.
~93 !i81 Z : 1A \'
.35 'IA? ~
/IoC 38 ". ...
:; '/tC ! At
rJ i I TA
: --- -- 1 IAt
: :------ 5!1':
I , - , .
I I 17A " 't
I I \ ...
~a:~ IBR \ \;
:0 Hif' \ \ &
1 ~ I !~
: ~ : iL---- -' '
I ~ 15 28R I I VERSA1LLES I
JIf :71,..----- ---~~ -
~ 14 : ,~-;:
: I~"": 12
I I~: I
, 2' 1<1."
1 13 1~1
I 1"1":t
I 111
I I I,
t 12 22 I II 13 14
\ ~~~t__m."
~ Al\V : ! U.I--_l1t1?Nl I 16
\ r p. I i .---- "... f_ T "
" Z3 : i ~ --
\ I II 1",
\ ' 'I
" -::o"'~i'
" ~:!:
", " , ! :
" "', , I' 2.
......., ,. \
~18R -'- :::~\ \t<~:
, \ I
, "
1& 17 \ \ l
I I!
,.. ,'-____J :!
,Si f/"lILlOI'J r.T I i
~r~'-i \1
I d
12 I Ii
13 I f 1
I "
I I:
/' ...._____' :1
tI
,.
:!
I I3UHl3i'Nr' ( C f
'-.---/-I'--~
\I
II
..- 0- ...
. 3 1 . . OR IR ~ 3 V . Ie ~h-. K CIIEI
J ..... -,
.-II. fl__.!!I
-~-.._.._.-----.- ..-..----.-'?tIIr------..--.----------- --. ___h_.._ -.- ._-- -.-----.------ -.-
oJollA'l ~~o~ 11 ~ .::1-_ .iAh
6~~ II 1
fA I J2 5> lR IJ2A lA ,e1- PI ,'.:'. i!
.Iet N:. ;t t-'tt.';> r/ fy&.G tlp.~
1.53 At 10. I< TO TA
lR I J2D y; .. ,. I..) Gl<T 'l LO( f. tRn lRI2
.,.\" 0.'.1'':. 'R6
f7 ilL IB~
., 1 lOt -G; t---- .~7:J5 "173'
2 . AI: AC
tf 1 . .. '0
TA 1J2C Z' ') 1"7
..I . . >2 , M'lL HLRRY .
I CT 9 0-
TA IRe
'f~ .. .. .. ~ ,s'l I.' AI:
'tit. lt~'bl>!4 1
o. . ),- 3. "
I'J. RurH no 10 a: ~
fl~ Cl I 2 3 .
1 w .
I 17 !r.
a
1.~25 . :>: 7~PR\JCE .J:,l ,
cJ~ E
~ ~1 ~
16 f 5:J 1'~~
i ~ 'DUN I ~c;1' ^ 1'f s. " 3
,. t, . oHOll 7 8
.0 ASSl p.. ~ ",IIV' .
J\RijUl'l ~ 7 " ~
J U -' -,
n.
"..... 0 u: . I. II
i\ \r? " I ,-
- ~_\E, I I ... I l1.J:-I
j~~
"'!.~Of;tl ~ .- POPLAR LN ( 10. PUPLAR CTE
III t'rc",,1 I'
l Tltc --- ,--
ilaOtl,. S. tUt.-Jf6' I ~
II~ ... ,.. IIA I> 16 .. ..
.1]524 A a:
u
r- 2 ~ 0
u <r
ZA w ~ .
<r
_ r\ r'O'. " I. IT
a 3 17 18 ..
:>: - ,. .. 13
HILl>~ ~- <r I.
. 'J t: I
~ .Ii
.<s""..... m . -
\'3 .",. r~HEtlm IA -- -
1 8 I . 17
J
IR
TA I J1A ].09 . 18 .. .1 21 Z~ 23 2'
."6 PC 7 .
~ll~ftg~ , ',1' o\1€ liRe
. , · 1'bt-l ~ 1
.5'87 . 5 to, lQl,l . ! '0
1,.'322. E'i
-.
~ ~~~~P.1~~,1.,: ~ H^ WTIlfJll!H: AVE ~ )
. r-; I 2 ,I 3 I . I 5 I . I 1 I . I . L~
,.
II
5A ~~) 16R
HIGHLAI/O UR
1SA ~L~ 'lR
....
IR ... 3R ..R OR ""
,... I'A V
~
11 13R ''''
''lR ~
...
~'A .
~ 6
~~ I
BALLANlRAI D!l
Location Map & Area of Notification
CASE # Z-02-032 - SUP for an Accessory Building
2
~ ~\l-i.t
~.
1.11.7.
22
23R
"'--",
,
...
- ------,
I
,
I
I
,
2
/
1
I
,
I
,
,
I Z I
7R : ~:
I" ,
. ,
: ~.:- -
6R I ~,
I 1
_.~ I
,
,
50 :
I
.
1
I.
OR
...
..
31A
311A
.
'20
41
..
u: 3't
0
()
u: 38
0
~
z
0
:>:
37
36
I """
6
I ,... 'R
15 2
14 3
,
13 .
,
I~ .
!
II 6
II 7
, ... ...
5
3
II
II
lR
OR
J
...
1
I
TR 195
.65 At
TR '88
.&5/lC
lnlQq
.5'3 .
!r.
C
!"
TR lOll
.59 ..
f:'
z
a
>:
..
2~
2&
~7
'0
..
"'R
= I ~r--~
~ ~ 1iP ~~~_---', ~~
tj'l ~ --i:tfj!>--I l~ L__
' t --'-------'; "' __
n=--=r ~ ~~ ~! ~
II ~ ',_ -.TIXJ:lOR-C'1 \_1 I I ~?!
-j II - "';' , r~ -, ... 1 r.:::
1 lJ I M_ _"'v= 'C <!I -Ll" 11 I Q ...lcL1....
utn ril~'- ....1 r '--- lCtl ~ ~ ~ I Q
D I T 1 · "- I!P' L<L \i!l ~, 0;lL- ,~.
,l"~ I -'- 11 -J ,,1m \ ~L
f Il' -~ i1 I Il~ FrI ~~ =" l-=r I I
"1 l~ - ~I ---+- U. J - .K> ~ 1 ~ ~~, r_ _
.' T I I- "" T <!II I. '-- I _
I. I"i'"" I, "J- ~I--_ U 8
~ I~ <( ffC~ ~~
Tf~ 1 I I I I r ~"' J' ~ ~i=
- IT-l7 ~ .- I~
- J"'fiWi 1"- " -'-'J:::
r..,. ~ LH ~i I "'; l:l
...... 1 ~>-I ~ ~ R"4 \ :L ~
'-'1 \ 1 K1 _~
~/ ~\? '" Q,. ~ ---" '-.J~
~.--- , 'i .e ~tf r.! --.:~ ,;) ~
L-L- - rT..~ 'I
v- -I I \, I L J _
.~ \' ", ~~-
Ii <!I \\. -0 au I \ II
~ ~ ~ c:r: 11-J '!?$>;-:~, l=J~d __
.) Q U ~ '/ l '\
.) :!1 .. '/ "'/h ~ ~ '----' ~ _
... t r.; 'W///.- ;: ~ 10~
Q Q '/ '// d, I-- _ .;::; _
ll:i ~ 6 I-- fjj .....
/,~ I j-", ~ I ~'~
~ ~/'; ~~
' ~,:.--
: 5 " -- r .. \' J ~
~ P:Jr~ (.) ~
~~~1
J I (2)~
0: 0010
I N
g ~
Q.
1-
.......-l
:r 2ic (.)
;U=r
r L-~(';=
- t"nl f--
'I~r-....
""""
=J
Mikolaitis Addition
Lot 1, Block 1
Special Use Permit Application
10/18/02
Background
We agreed to purchase this lot in October 2001. It was reported to be 1.008
acres. We were specifically looking for a lot of 1 acre or greater in the Colleyville
area in order to initially build a personal workshop, and then build our primary
residence. We knew we needed at least an acre to build the size shop (30' x 50')
we wanted per the Land Development Code (Section 3.27.A).
The lot in question is located at 2309 Hall Johnson Road. It was originally 1.008
acres prior to the city acquiring 15' of road frontage to improve Hall Johnson. We
discovered this during the survey and platting work.
Application Details
We elected to move ahead with our purchase and petition for a Special Use
Permit based upon the following considerations:
. The lot was originally 1.008 acres. We invested earnest money and survey
expenses based upon this assumption. Zoning records reflectthe lot being
1.0 acre in size. (Attachment A is typical.)
. The lot was formerly used to support a landscaping service. We have made
the property much more visually presentable to the neighbors. (Attachment B
is a photo showing the previous storage on site of miscellaneous landscaping
tools, equipment, and products. And Attachment C is a current photo of the
lot.)
. The lot is very narrow and deep. We plan to place the shop at the very back
of the property, nearly 400' from Hall Johnson Road. (See Attachment D.)
. The property to the rear of this lot already has a large metal shop just across
our fence line. (See Attachment D for location and Attachment E for photo.)
. The lot to the east also has a large metal building (See Attachment D for
location and Attachments F & G for photos of that shop and rock pile areas.)
. Just to the west of our proposed building there is a fenced drainage area
providing separation from the existing homes. (See Attachment H for photo.)
. Our proposed building will be complementary to our planned home. It will be
"garage" like, with a 4 in 12 pitched roof, skylight panels, cupola, additional
personnel door and shuttered windows. The intended manufacturer is
Mueller, Inc. (See Attachment I.)
. The increased building size (1 ,500-sq. ft. as opposed to 1 ,OOO-sq. ft.) will
provide for increased interior storage of our property, minimizing the outside
storage "clutter" to our neighbors and us.
Timing
We plan on construction beginning as soon as this permit is acted upon. We
further expect to begin construction of our home on this site during 2003, and
understand that the small existing home will be required to be removed.
Contacts
John & Deborah Mikolaitis
2433 Brittany Lane
Grapevine, TX 76051
Home: 817-488-3393
Work: 817-640-6936
Cell: 817-307-8124
E-Mail: mikoman@iuno.comoriohn.i.mikolaitis@cummins.com
I
I
I
I; /'
-r 0.9823 ~E
I nucr~
/DIIN~
1'OtVll8 Da$ ~ :cr
I~ I c,~'W
I ~ '? /
~/ CD
'j /
I t ~ / BLOCK 1
i l'J~/
!O'S.1.,_
...,
(11)
....-
...,
ao)
....-
fO' DTWNACE ~ U.I.
AnncHlV16:"J~
D
..-
~
..
~~
=
,..:
~ea
"~lU
~,la ~
G~
~G G U
SUAVEY ptA~OA~EO
'UOY AND PLAN ~0It
'TINO AT THE TI~ 1\(.-11_, ...n
r IMPAOVEMENT$ ON N --v~~
:tl BY ,It. THOROUCH
: ORA I N,lt.OE REv I EW .J-~I\lC('~
ISIONS AAE ON ANO ~
11$ TAACT WILL ~[ OAA"'A&{;"
OV I !II ONS ~ST lit 11 /I L- h
EXTENSIONS. rlR[ rr~~
~ "'ROVISIONS ~y
"'LANS ANO/O~ TMt
'OANCE WiT.... C' Ty
1....9'
\ \
...._1
/
/
_-./
!!to' !II1lDl.... LIHI!. _
..
...
ot<<-STOIl'f
\lIOClO FRAAlE
7.5' DIt4INACE ~ U.8.
\
"--
--~
)
/
(
'"
I
I
I
I Prt~h 0
r'lTE
L_
r tt r.:'
,//
...
x
S 60'46 '42 or 10$.
ntAO'm
otANtUt CAMbU. I'iia
mlrIJI.I .... I'AGI ... .
'JiT. ~
.T.C.T.
s 69'4!'09'~ 1~
re:;., STEEL IlOD
Vo~ STEEL ROO
~ ')( l c; "t,tIi'c.
(th~_I""JI L
I 'ldcp
20' DJ
L I, BLOCK J.
1'fEYARD ADDlnOl'
CABINET A. SLIDE 4029, P.R. T.
Mueller, Inc
Steel Building Systems & Components
Salesperson:
Philip_~mith ______ __
Submittals
Erection Drawings Qty 0
Anchor Bolt Plan Qty 0
Design Certification
Next Business Day Mail (where available)
Customer Data
Building Arr-A:~H (v\&\)y
Quotation
I
Date: 10/15/2002
Job#:
UL-90
Design Calculations
WPI-2D (Texas Windstorm Certification)
See Additional Architectural Drawings
Customer:
Ship to:
Mail Address:
City, State, Zip:
Contact:
Day Phone:
Home Phone:
Cell Phone:
Fax:
Email:
John Mikolaitis
2433 Brittany Ln.
Grapevine, Tx. 76051
--
Ship Via:
Mueller Truck
Building Details
Building Type:
Width: 30.000'
Length: 50.000'
Sidewall Bay Spacin
RF SS L T
Peak Offset: 15.000'
_ 1 @ 28.0000', 1 @ 22.0000'
Frame ID
1
Frame Type
Rigid _Fram
Load Width
31.250'
Col Type"
ide-Flang
. May change due to engineering requirements
Building Code (Provided by customer): Building Loads:
Design Code:
Closed/Open:
Exposure:
Importance - Wind:
Seismic Zone:
Importance -Seismic:
Seismic Coefficient:
Importance - Snow:
MBMA '96
---
P
Dead Load:
Live Load:
Load Reduction:
Roof Snow Load
Collateral
Wind Load:
1.00
1.00
~-_._-----
0.05
--~--
1.00
Stepped elevations or structures within 20 feet
Special Serviceability requirements?
Ye
Ye
MBMA Intended Use:
Building Use Classifiation:
Description of building use:
5G (Residential)
Standard Building
MBS File: JM
End User:
Name:
Jobsite Address:
City, State, Zip:
County:
General Contr:
Address:
City, State, Zip:
Customer Type: Retail
Weight:
10,592 Ibs
Eave Ht
Front Side: 10.000'
-----
Back Side: 10.000'
Roof Slope
4.000 in 12
4.000 in 12
irt Typ
ByPass
ByPass
Rafter Type
ide-Flang__
Frame Line
2
# Int Col's
_~"-50_ps~_ _
20.00 pst
No
~.OO psL____
3.00 pst
85.00 mph
-----
Other Loads:
Extension Dead Load: ~~J>~!_
Extension Live Load (SW 20.00 pst
Extension Live Load (EW 20.00 pst
Ye
Ye
Ye
Crane Load?
Floor Load?-:
Parapet I Mansard?
No
No
No
't
..
No
No
Page 1 of 3
30 X 50 X 10 /10
Frame Coating
Main Columns & Rafters
Red oxide
Galvanized
Purlins, Girts, Eave Struts
Red oxide
Galvanized
Door Framing
Red oxide
Galvanized
Base Angle
Red oxide
Galvanized
End Frames
Base Condition
Wall Bracing:
Expandable
Other
Angle
Trim
Channel
Girt
Roof:
Left Endwall:
Front Sidewall:
Right Endwall:
Back Sidewall:
Bracing Details
Diagonal Bracing
Panel Shear
Diagonal Bracing
Panel Shear
Diagonal Bracing
Left
Right
Framed Openings
Wall
Front Sidewall
Front Sidewall
Bay
1
--
2
Open Widt
10.000'
16.000'
Header Ht
8.000'
8.000'
Sill Ht
0.000'
0.000'
Offset
16.000'
2.000'
'Note on framed openings: Mueller, Inc will supply the necessary reinforcement to brace framed openings against necessary loadings. If
the size of the framed openings are specified by the customer, Mueller, Inc will not be responsible for adaptability of fit-up of items installed
in these framed openings other than stock overhead doors supplied by Mueller,lnc
Purlin Extensions
Length
Soffit
Wall
None
Surface
Eave Extensions and Canopies
Bay St
Height
Width
Slope
Soffit
Wall
None
ay En
Open walls:
'Note: All open walls will contain necessary columns unless otherwise noted.
Left Endwall:
Front Sidewall:
Yes
Yes
No
No
Right Endwall:
Back Sidewall:
Yes
Yes
No
No
Partial Walls:
Wall
None
pen Heigh
Base
Full Load
Bay Start
Bay End
MBS File: JM
Page 2 of 3
30 x 50 x 10/10
Roof
Color:
Panel:
Gauge:
Quality:
Sheets & trim
LI6.jfT
iSM)
White
PBR
26
-----
25 Year
Walls
Color:
Panel:
Gauge:
Quality:
Fasteners
Roof
Panel:
Lap:
Type:
TEK1.25
LAPTEK
Long Life
Walls
Panel:
Lap:
Type:
Ll6t4f
~14'i(:':"
-1=eA-
--~--~--
R
26
25 Year
TEK1.25
LAPTEK
---'~--
Std
Ridge Covering
Peak Sheets
Ridge Row
Eave Condition
Front Sidewall
Gutter & 3 Downspouts
Eave Trim
Insulation
Roof:
Walls
Accessories
Quan
4
1
1
---
1
-~--
1
---'.--
1
---
1
--
1
------
5
------
2
3 Inch
3 Inch
Vinyl Back
Vinyl Back
Special Requirements:
-~_._._------_.-._._--_._-----_.._---_.~
Trim
Gable:
Eave:
Corner:
Jamb:
Soffit
Panel:
Lap:
Type:
. Reinforced Vinyl Back
II Reinforced Vinyl Back
,"-<
(; ftt: -f/V
RHe ReEl
Soffit
Color:
Panel:
Gauge:
Quality:
RuG Red
litye Red
AH~~
Back Sidewall
Gutters &
Eave Trim
E-Foil Radiant
E-Foil Radiant
Hex Wire
Hex Wire
~~.---_._,.._~~-_._._.__.__.._--_._._--_._----_._------------_._----,.------~---
Description
Roof Light Panels - SW x 12.0000'
DBCI RUD - 10 X 8 Mod. 2000
- ~._~
DBCI RUD -11 J[ 11 Mod. 3100 Iby.8
3x7 Door Wht WIlks Cutout White
!Y4 in X ~x7 Wht Frame Kit White (WI Hinges & Thresho!~ ____
Premium Heavy Duty Lockset _ JB9160a32~d)
3070 Trim Packages
Weather Strip Kit 3x7 Door
----------- ,,-
9" Continuous Ridge Vent (Die-form Base) : White, W/damper
Hor.Slide 3030 Ins M~._L! .~~__--==--=-~~_ ~~~~=-
Estimated Building Price:
$11,857.15
Estimated Shipping Weight
MBS File: JM
(Includes.fihipping, 8.~5!o Sale~....a)( inclu~ed) ._
10,592 Ibs
Page 3 of 3
30 x 50 x 10/10
'"'
~,:.r
~::::~
, I ~ '"''i''"'
w I ~ I
I ---l Cr-.!a-.
'j
'"
<1
f-
0::.' ....o..:r...o
~ xxx
~ (\J C\J(\J
W W...............-
'" :>: 333
I/)
'"
W w........(\J\":
,~ U I I I
~ ~ L:L:::L:
~ 0..... lYQ::::lY
, '" > Q'
. ..
~ ~
z " ..
a
",;:: ~ ..
~ ..
~ ..
~~ ..
~ ..
'" ..
~~
~8
"'''' "
~a ~
az '"
"'-a ~ CD
"'- "'~
::>f- U~ "- '
"'- <[ ~
u "-
->- Z~ x~
<1'" ! ~
z'" f-"" ~
a<[ f----<~ ,0
;::"- ~- g
..CD "-
<['" ",'
;o:a " c"' ~
"'"- ciE .:=-.D
a d""
.0-,01 I "-'" CD~
zw W::; "' ~
- '" ~ - ~ w
.l>-,L "'<[ ~~ ;, ~
OW ~ ~~
"--> .
W -.J~ ~ .
vo'" .- .
-z Wd <[ w ~ ;; >-0. N
"- " ]
..,w ~ . "
ZW ~~ ~~ Q' . ~ ;1 ~
_CD s:1' ~ ~ ~
f- U"- C ~
0 ....'" :3 , {i
"'z L l"' " g ~ >
-, "'-
",'" ~g ~
E-U~ -<[
~:I: ~~ ~
a::luo..,mal:J S' ~ ~ ~
.91/EI 6-,8 0 ~ ~ t; ~ ,
z a
-> c
W
W 0
f-
'" +'
"- U
.. a ClJ W
~ ~ f- Vl Z
Co " ::> ::;
~ ~ 0 I
'" a:)u'O.;'Oa1J , " , V1 W
;" .. a ;0:
.9l/1l 2-,E[ ruu f- V1 <[
I 0 '"
f- "-
::> L
0 '"
U 0
0 "-
, QJ
0
"" E
d
"-
i..L-
~ ruCu
+' ~~
ill COO
+' Cl; Ullf)
0-1 ruru
i:L 00
4- .q If) \Il
oP f':r"-:
00
5Q.tnl!1
+' >. rv ru
.pI-- ('1M
I~ <[<(
-r
<5 VV
COD
'" Vl Vl
II/) ~~I~~
~ n:~I~~
III 4- 00
o
06 o...UllrJ
1~IJf~!~~1
f- +' Vl
:3 ~~Vi~
; '" _N I'w~
_ u-'"
-.J .:..:: l.- I I Vi
0.... o.d o...a.<!
1/1 (/'I5'" C/) C/l 00
Curu
.s: "
+' --
OJ
Q./cCJO
N Q.I I I
t/j....J ::......::-.
,,-'"
~.~ ruru
o:~ ~::::
~ ~ .
:3 '"' '"'
~_~ M
I I
~~ ~~
'\t<:!
6
I: ...':r
'"
~
"
~~
::ia
~ "
II\~
~~
(,..) ,..:
c
.s:C
.,.,.s:
a""
",Ol
c
no
v;~
w"
ux0J
<rXx
D::' r-.;
rn~x
~(1J
I,...,J <l --.J
0,
Z X I
"''''
--!lc<1
lc
[)
a.:Juu...foaD
.9l/EI 6 ,8
l-U~
.l> ,L
.0 ,01
'"
"
<[
Co
:1
! c+I~.
*~ 'W#fg.lj -,I~a (ok-fx ) tJJ
A \D I 61. _ E~ ~a +j HI %00' U5r* } .../Lt:; . NCle(5 I! s(5:k<< I 8Pt9
Chandler Cantrell Properties
P.O. Box 611
Colleyville, TX 76034
Larry Brown
5603 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Charlie & Helen Fay Hall
4200 Glade Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
John & Lynn Terry
5609 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Roger & Teresa Isbell
5701 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Kevin & Heather Preola
5605 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Jeffrey Seifers
5709 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
David Stiles, Jr.
2305 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Guy & Shelley Willingham
5705 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Keith & Carole Butterfield
2309 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Kenneth & Mary Ann Cannon
2207 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
A. J. & Elizabeth Phelan
2307 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
James & Jill Van Over
2303 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
John & Deborah Mikolaitis
2433 Brittany Lane
Grapevine, TX 76051
Alfred & Christi Marucci
2301 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Case Z-02-032 (Notices dated: November 1,2002)
According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200'
of the pr?po~ed special use permit/and-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that
the parties listed above have been notified ofthe proposed change request as required by
ct;the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code.
an Levy
lanning & Zoning Assistant
\I\A 15-M,.'L..
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Colleyville
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville, TX 76034
;'~"t"{):,~ :"_~t~;Li.t.\'\ ~ .
':_, (~1V~ ~\'; i;.} C.!! " ._'~ [) r-v' E L () r'~'f\/ ~:-- (.,;
Regarding Case # Z-02-032 Special Use Permit for an Accessory Building. Lot 1, Block 1, Mikolaitis Addition
Dear Sirs,
I am one of the owners of the property directly adjacent to the case subject property described above (Lot 11 , Block
1, Arbor Estates III) and wish to submit my concerns for consideration of the Commission. My concerns involve the
improvement to this property where:
1 Property values of Arbor Estates III in particular are concerned: I am confident the use of the
proposed accessory building will be discussed at the hearing. I can not help but think, however, that
a facility described as "accessory" will do anything to help surrounding property values and will
most likely do damage There was recently such a structure on this same property that was
dismantled and destroyed. The pest harborage alone (rodents, etc.) was enough to discourage the
reconstruction of a similar facility but the impact to "sellability" of the surrounding properties was
definitely felt as was shared by potential homebuyers during the sales cycle of one of homes
adjacent and in the area.
2. The impact to traffic patterns of Hall Johnson Road: The current tenants of 2308 Hall Johnson
have indicated that it is the desire of the owner of this property to erect a structure similar to the
one described above for the purpose of opening some type of auto service center. If this is the
intent or something similar there should be consideration given to the traffic implications of allowing
this type of business in this area of Hall Johnson. You may be aware that this particular section of
Hall Johnson has no protected turn lane or traffic control.
3 The potential increase in "neighborhood noise": If the business described above is allowed, the
noise of an auto shop including air compressors, engine noise and general traffic would most
certainly follow. The residents of Arbor Estates III have already endured some most un-neighborly
behavior on the part of the current tenants, as Colleyville Police records will no doubt bear out.
Specifically, weekend "celebrations" by the current tenants have been anything but discreet
4. The potential use of the property for commercial or industrial purposes: Commercial or
industrial neighbors of a residential area such as Arbor Estates or Highland Meadows rarely make
good bedfellows. Would parking, lights, generators, etc be required?
5. The evolution of this particular area of town: Colleyville seems to be a town in transition.
Transitioning from a rural community existing of agricultural commerce and lifestyle to one of
executives and entrepreneurs. An "adhoc" building erected as described above would most
certainly fit here in the Colleyville of the past, however, it seems very out of place given the location
and condition of the current City of Colleyville.
I just had the pleasure of receiving my tax bill for the year 2002 where, for my % acre of the city, I was billed over
$8,000. On a property with the potential appreciation that 1 believe mine has, I am happy to invest this money in my
community for the common good. As you can imagine, however, I am not very anxious to make this same
investment if there is little control over permitted construction and business at my back door.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey S. Scifers
5709 Sycamore Dr.
Colleyville, Texas 76034
f\C 'J 0 8 iDOl
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Colleyville
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville, TX 76034
~ '
Regarding Case # Z-02-032 Special Use Pennit for an Accessory Building. Lot 1, Block 1,
Mikolaitis Addition
Dear Sirs,
. ,. \ ~ ;; ,
,
I am one of the owners of the property directly adjacent to the case subject property
described above (Lot 10, Block 1, Arbor Estates III) and wish to submit my concerns for
consideration of the Commission. My concerns involve the improvement to this property
where:
1 Property values of Arbor Estates III in particular are concerned: I am
confident the use of the proposed accessory building will be discussed
at the hearing. I can not help but think, however, that a facility described
as "accessorY' will do anything to help surrounding property values and
will most likely do damage There was recently such a structure on this
same property that was dismantled and destroyed' The pest harborage
alone (rodents, etc.) was enough to discourage the reconstruction of a
similar facility but the impact to "sell ability" of the surrounding properties
was definitely felt as was shared by potential homebuyers during the
sales cycle of one of homes adjacent and in the area.
2. The impact to traffic patterns of Hall Johnson Road: The current
tenants of 2308 Hall Johnson have indicated that. it is the desire of the
owner of this property to erect a structure similar to the one described
above for the purpose of opening some type of auto serVice center. If
this is, the intent or something' similar there should be consideration
given to the traffic implications of allowing this type of business in this
area of Hall Johnson. You may be aware that this particular section of
Hall Johnson has no protected turn lane or traffic control.
3 The potential increase in "neighborhood noise": If the business
described above is allowed, the noise of an auto shop including air
compressors, engine noise, and general traffic would most certainly
follow. The residents of Arbor Estates III have already endured some
most unneighboriy behavior on the part of the current tenants, as the
Colleyville Police records will no doubt bear out. Specifically, weekend
"celebrations" by the current tenants have been anything but discreet
4. The potential use of the property for commercial or industrial
purposes: Commercial or industrial neighbors of a residential area such
as Arbor Estates or Highland Meadows rarely make good bedfellows.
Would parking, lights, generators, etc be required?
5. The evolution of this particular area of town: Colleyville seems to be
a town in transition. Transition from rural community existing of
agricultural commerce and lifestyle to one of executives and
entrepreneurs. An "adhoc" building erected as described above would
most certainly fit here in the Colleyville of the past; however, it seems
very out of place given the location and condition of the current City of
Colleyville.
I just had the pleasure of receiving my tax bill for the year 2002 where for my 1/2 acre of
the city, I was billed over $8,000. On a property with the potential appreciation that I
believe mine has, I am happy to invest this money in my community for the common
good. As you can imagine, however, I am not very anxious to make this same
investment if there is little control over permitted construction and business at my back
door.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
since::, II ~+,,_ /.
A. '1l.llingharn
5705 S~more Dr.
Colleyville, Texas 76034
'~iA
U
, ,
t I t'iU ,) 0 6 2002
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Colleyville
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville, TX 76034
Regarding Case # Z-02-032 Special Use Permit for an Accessory Building. Lot 1, Block 1,
Mikolaitis Addition
Dear Sirs,
I am one of the owners of the property directly adjacent to the case subject property
described above (Lot 11, Block 1, Arbor Estates III) and wish to submit my concerns for
consideration of the Commission.
This facility will undoubtly cause great harm to our community. Noise levels, traffic
patterns and the unsightly presence of this addition are just some of the negative factors
that will impact all of Mr. Mikolaitis neighbors. Property Values will tumble. The house
next to mine was recently on the market and already experienced difficulty in selling and
the comments where all based on the exsisting sights and noise level already
associated with this property. A quick review of Police records and complaints on this
property will bear this out.
We take great pride in our homes and our community. Please help us protect our
property from harm. It is, I believe, the very reason you exist.
Thank you for this 0 portunity to express my family's concerns.
John Terry
5609 Sycamore Dr. ,
Colleyville, TX. 76031l
,
~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON PETITION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT
DATE OF NOTICE: FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2002
CASE NUMBER: Z-02-032
Planning and Zoning Commission
City of Colleyville
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville, TX 76034
Regarding Case # Z-02-032 Special Use Permit for an Accessory Building. Lot 1, Block 1, Mikolaitis Addition
Dear Sirs,
I am one of the owners of the property directly adjacent to the case subject property described above (Lot 11 , Block
1, Arbor Estates III) and wish to submit my concerns for consideration of the Commission. My concerns involve the
improvement to this property where:
1 Property values of Arbor Estates III in particular are concerned: I am confident the use of the
proposed accessory building will be discussed at the hearing. I can not help but think, however, that
a facility described as "accessory" will do anything to help surrounding property values and will
most likely do damage There was recently such a structure on this same property that was
dismantled and destroyed. The pest harborage alone (rodents, etc.) was enough to discourage the
reconstruction of a similar facility but the impact to "sellability" of the surrounding properties was
definitely felt as was shared by potential homebuyers during the sales cycle of one of homes
adjacent and in the area.
2. The impact to traffic patterns of Hall Johnson Road: The current tenants of 2308 Hall Johnson
have indicated that it is the desire of the owner of this property to erect a structure similar to the
one described above for the purpose of opening some type of auto service center. If this is the
intent or something similar there should be consideration given to the traffic implications of allowing
this type of business in this area of Hall Johnson. You may be aware that this particular section of
Hall Johnson has no protected turn lane or traffic control.
3 The potential increase in "neighborhood noise": If the business described above is allowed, the
noise of an auto shop including air compressors, engine noise and general traffic would most
certainly follow. The residents of Arbor Estates III have already endured some most un-neighborly
behavior on the part of the current tenants, as Colleyville Police records will no doubt bear out.
Specifically, weekend "celebrations" by the current tenants have been anything but discreet
4. The potential use of the property for commercial or industrial purposes: Commercial or
industrial neighbors of a residential area such as Arbor Estates or Highland Meadows rarely make
good bedfellows. Would parking, lights, generators, etc be required?
5. The evolution of this particular area of town: Colleyville seems to be a town in transition.
Transitioning from a rural community existing of agricultural commerce and lifestyle to one of
executives and entrepreneurs. An "ad hoc" building erected as described above would most
certainly fit here in the Colleyville of the past, however, it seems very out of place given the location
and condition of the current City of Colleyville.
I just had the pleasure of receiving my tax bill for the year 2002 where, for my ~ acre of the city, I was billed over
$8,000. On a property with the potential appreciation that I believe mine has, I am happy to invest this money in my
community for the common good. As you can imagine, however, I am not very anxious to make this same
investment if there is little control over permitted construction and business at my back door.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
~~
Jeffrey S. Scifers
5709 Sycamore Dr.
Colleyville, Texas 76034
"""';~~I..;..:._.....,....n... .."."...1......... 'I.ffl. ..........0.: ......._-'
. 'C>~" ......0.'.. <,," _ .'J I
'"', ,"'-" \' ,', tit.: _'<'" --."
. ',,... ...',. ,.. ";J . .,,,\ I
....-.......:. ."~'" .',' -.' .-,',
-~-_.- ""',
\ j "
I NfJyt' I" ~ 1 .
.: '. 1"
1'<~: . .'. . . . . I
" ,\:Qitllil.t~lihi~~Kti)ft.lrl~~tJI
ORDINANCE 0-02-1378
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR AN
ACCESSORY BUILDING ON LOT 1, BLOCK 1, MIKOLAITIS ADDITION;
PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A
SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application for a Special Use Permit was filed by John Mikolaitis on
October 18, 2002, under Case No. Z-02-032; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of
the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land
Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and
made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is
in the best interests of the City of Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
Sec. 2.
Sec. 3.
THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit "A")
are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in
Colleyville, Texas, described as Lot 1, Block 1, Mikolaitis Addition
(2309 Hall Johnson Road), by authorizing a Special Use Permit for
an Accessory Building, subject to the following conditions:
a. The maximum size of the building footprint shall not exceed one
thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet.
b. The building location shall be consistent with the drawings
attached as Exhibit "B".
THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand
Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues
shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such.
THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas,
shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this
ordinance.
Ordinance 0-02-1378
Page 2 of 2
Sec. 4.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternative method of publication provided by law.
Sec. 5.
THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
publication.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
I-------J
-
-
-
Ip~-
- -
I-- f---
r- ~
~
I---
-
>------
r- c-
-
I-- r---
"" ~ -:;:---
.......
-L.\ -'
-
-
t; I- ,l
~
~ CT
~rH_7
v
~AG
h-
Exhibit A
Zoning Map
~
IrT_- ... 11
l--
p:
~ t---
Me Ufr-...I:lti:S
r---
\
~\ I
~i;~FE
-I-
w
~ u
"
..",; (I" If .-1
;r-
--
r.,-:"" A G - -~
I
-
-
y
l
~U'C-= v
]~ ;f'
R-4D
\
--"-. /:::::1
_ I-- --...e v
_ e--_
I---- I--
I--- L_ L-..- '-0:;)
~ .. wI -I I I j-""
I
I I '-~ I
1 I [ ;:
I I ~'m
I; .//
'0' tJIWNAr;E.. v.,.t ( D.9S23 fE:
'10' I J
\,j I ~ I ;'
I i I /
I I !/ CD
" /
Ie; ; BLOCK 1
,~ y/ "
I' \~
I 7.&' DlUlNAr;! It V.!.
I \"
I --~
i )
I ('"
I f'N;~H 0 rlft~
L_ r',Tf, ~
to' DlUlNACE 1tlr. ~
L. 971lt. PG. 4/'. .r.c.r.
589'45'0
~ST[EL ItOO
Exhibit B
Building Location
_ !Or lUlu".,.. i.... ._
(iD
'-
(~9~\
~,.-I
( -8~\
\ I
,-
/
-~
roe;.,"m ROO
S69'46'4
I
CITY COUNCIL
Cil~' or
r"~
((V;~~'. ~ljn=
'" /j.-J_~ "':'d
---=:..--\ J
~~
IC.\0'3o
AGENDA BRIEFING
MEETING DATE:
ITEM# :
ORDINANCE # :
12/03/02
8
0-02-1379
CITY MANAGER
DEPARTMENT HEAD I J",*,
FINANCE REVIEW N.A.
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: Approval of the Zoning Change from CPO
Professional Offi ce to PUD-C Planned Unit
Development Commercial on Tract A2, Block 2,
Highland Acres located at 5314 Bransford Road,
Case Z-02-033
First Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
Hughes Capital Management is the owner of an existing building located at 5314 Bransford
Road. Victorious Living Church has applied for a zoning change on the property from CPO
Professional Office to PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial. The owner is seeking a
zoning change in order to use the facility as an assisted living center.
The property is located at the southwest corner of Bransford Road and Timberline North, just
south of city hall. The existing single-story building is 9,783 square feet in size. Access to the
property is from Timberline North. There are 15 parking spaces on the lot.
The building was constructed in 1986, and was initially used as a retirement home. In 1993,
the building was used as a Class A large personal care home, similar to the type of use
proposed by the applicant, and maintained a license for the facility through the Texas
Department of Health. The facility ceased operation for unknown reasons in May 1998.
Changes to the zoning regulations in 1995 resulted in this type of facility not being an allowed
use in the CPO zoning district. Thus, the owner has applied for a zoning change to allow the
use as proposed.
The applicant proposes to use the building as a Type A Assisted Living Center. According to
the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS), a Type A facility is one that "cares for
residents who do not require routine attendance during sleeping hours and are capable of
following directions in an emergency." Assisted Living Centers typically provide food and
shelter, and personal care services such as assistance with meals, dressing, bathing and the
supervision of medication. The Texas DHS licenses, inspects, and investigates complaints
related to these facilities. A State license is required for any facility that houses four or more
people; the applicant proposes a capacity of 32 residents. The applicant intends to sign a 36-
month lease upon approval of the Special Use Permit.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1379
Page 2 of 2
A Type A Assisted Living Center license does not authorize the owner to operate a nursing
facility/home, an adult day care center, a mental health/mental retardation hospital, or a drug
or alcohol treatment center.
Impact Issues
1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan, adopted
in 1998, which designates this area as a future institutional area.
2. Surrounding Properties. The properties to the west are developed as single-family
residences. The Latter-Day Saints church is located to the south. A mixed-use office and
residential building and a day care center are located to the north. City Park is located to
the east across Bransford Road.
3. Development Trends. The area IS not experiencing significant development as most
tracts are already built upon.
4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights-of-
way.
5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the
land and house is appraised at $600,000. The estimated annual City property tax revenue
generated by this property is $2,084.
6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation
provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. There is little data
available for assisted living facility or congregate care facility uses. The most recent data
available are from 1981, which estimates 2.12 to 2.15 trips per occupied dwelling unit.
There are no traffic counts available for Bransford Road.
Staff mailed notices to 10 adjacent property owners regarding this request. No
correspondence has been received regarding this request.
The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and considered this request
at the November 11, 2002, meeting and recommended approval by a unanimous vote. There
were no speakers at the public hearing other than the applicant.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· Location and Zoning Map
· Information from Applicant
· List of Property Owners Notified
· Ordinance 0-02-1379
4
~
V
'"
<
o
I II ,
"J 32~31+t+n ~t+~
2.
.. " 1).J
"" 25 24 23 22 21 2. I' 18 11 4:0~.L ~
I.... 2~ {;I 5 ~ ;... 7
=
~ V g\.t/l \Jr~
32 31 38 2q 2fJ ,>>
11.. J;::l
.c'l' 11
,I L ~ -QiA\0J_
01\''> ~
2 I
!
II
,
i
",
21
21
-'
j 2.
. .
II
..
'"
fA tM
,.~ AI:
IA1
. AC
TA. IA
7.3 At
3
TR IA'
\.4 AC
!
B i
i
~':
~ tI I .., I' I 14du._ ~
OAK
VAl.!.F.Y
DR..
-
35....
A3
"
)
'"
""
"
'"
o
to.
U,
~:;,
.-~
'"
'"
~
fA 28
1.8 At
TA 2C
I.' AI:
34 "':~.f.-32 31
Ie-" .. j
I,i! -
i I 2 3
!
i- ____.._.._..__._.._.._u_____.._._.__
!
6
1 ~ 8
.
4 \5
6
rJ\FI<
Cl'l'~
~I
I rf\'
crr)' 6f
.
~ '
2
TR 20
18.8 AI:
Jl~~
.__~.__.__.____.__..__.____.._____.__.________u_n_.._
-
..____..__.____.._______.______._60______.__..____.._____.-..----.--..
0::
foI
....
...
,~ ~,.tlS
~~6tAE~
(
Location Map & Area of Notification
CASE # z..o2-033 - Zoning Change from CPO to PUD.C
18
12
1311
,<,>
A,l'O"-
111l.i P \'O0~
11 15 f'3 \, "
11 ~i-fi '~ ·
21 l\. :. '\ \ ('Ill 011 ~
L:I\. - J. I ,if'"
_~ d ~~ \'16
K "'-'4
I,~ TIMBERLINE DR S _
-._"-00-" 00-._..._-00-' _'C~s? -..00----.
, NV!\\
,uLto. 4
1l1Gl' 5
lR SO
5.8 AC \ \ co-
~ ~ (-.~~E-~p..
-~-~:~-~~~_::.~:_- 1--,-00,,- ~~,Sit:: . 1
~~~/l5A1: ~S"\. 2.4'" 1
0...
..... 2
::t::
rJ:l
~:c::;
klQ
l:<~
~""l;
~
.......:J
[:Q
II
1
J\cre9
2 V-
I
AI
-,
I
A2
5
TIMBEJlLINf:
OR N
5
TRACT AI 1
q,,"~.
.835.
12
5 CR~~ I
JD f \
,rll jt ~ ~
~l~ 8G~ 4 ':
2.!5 .
~Oo'l
i
i
i
!
!
I
..-.--..-- ---_..__0- -..-.---.-..-..---1
TRAtT A
2
~
TR IG
LI N:.
'" ...-S
TR aC1A TR
lei
1. qn AC TR ie
.154 1.1 laC
AC
TR
TGT
TR IB .41' AI:
1R ISZ 1.17 fC
ot'- 4
/I.)' J 5 I'~
'1' C.t e ~o9)
to. I 2 (~;..-- 3
.G8. .68 At .'-&2.
?.601O
..t --""
t.I' 'Ilt.t."jf ~
IGp t.DD 1
R 1
-
Ll.OYIJ C]R _
TR IA
2.12 AI:
1A lEI
3.7QI At
AI
1\LtF
to. DV~
~
1 I
Z.2104
TA "A
TA 48 I.EI;? AC
4."'32 .
lR 4ft
1.3.t
TR 4E
1.3 At
TR 4F
3.153 PC..
@ftJ
'" 2DO
2.1 At
1A 20
1.3 AC
fA 1.X
2.8 At
fA 2U TR 21'-11 1Ft 2N
1 AC 1.2 AC 1.2 AC
TR ...
lAC
<>6.
Od-
~ta. ~
~ '
~~~ q.)>
~~> ~1y~ ~
/r
" .'
I--f""IlI."fI.
Cl?
It
\
I IrM~J(~
f--
-ll: :
--~
,'\),
~
0-
~
C'I
,
L.I;
~
....
110
I ~ f :'7
'It: ~ i!
P
])
01'1
~Vc--
Q:
'I">
~
c.i
o
C)
~
a:::
CJ
q:
IF
~
-
~
~
~
1=
o
... -
e~
!ia:::
~
a::
I
I---
J~~~ ry
I g~~ ~
~ I~ ,. \___ ~~/ ~~ ~
c( ~I ~ ~
~ 1ft ~ 0
g ~ ~ ~ 'l"/- 0.:7,
=t - ""'" 88 r-- ~
'/ ~ ...///.......
.~ - ~ ~ ~ d; //J
~-r-- ~ ~ 6 ",'(1
11'~ ~ -'l
c-- I: \ ./ 0 ~ ";' .
~ \ ' f ~ g ~~
L t~
\
I~.-- ~
'<H
TI~ _
1 I ~t] I----
"- A'K ~ - I----
r crY ~
C)I~ ,~
~ ~~
Q: ~I~
/x _ '-
'---
--I
I
-::
-
>--
BE rrr
-
-
~
-~
I---
II
-
I- I--- f-- f - f--- f--
L- f--t--- f-- f-- f---
I--- -
- f--I---_
-
CJ
q:
@:
f--
1--11
-
-
-
I--
1'=
-
f---
~
I
1--1---- I--
L-r= ill
I--- -I-- f--- a:::
I--- -C f- I---~ -f-- f--- Q
~. ,-~ -~ ~ Ii ~
1 ~ I~ 6=a1~ ~I
~ iii';! ::t: ''''' ~
~ ~ ~~-
~ ~~-
~ l/:Jo_
~ :s
I) ~-
~ -
B ,sa
-
l~ ..
~~ I'!l
~. ~
"'"
-- \
l
Cl
q:
t,lo$l!-
~)..
~ r\1">
~~.L
~
"f
~ n "---
"--
~~ ).'
~~-N
\ ~\ ~
~ ~
~
~
1-
III
.1.
I
I:>
1< / I--
~ ~c-= ==
-
,
DJ
"r"""
"r"""
~
uI
t::
'"
STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES:
Our church, The Victorious Living Church, organized and approved by the
Internal Revenue Service as tax exempt organization in 1995, would like to
open an Assisted Living Facility in the formerly known Townleigh Retirement
Center located at 5314 Bransford Road in Colleyville. The building was, at
one time, operated as a State approved type A, Assisted Living facility. We
will leave floor plan as is. This current facility would have a licensed capacity
of 32 residents,
In a Type A facility, a resident :
(A) must be physically and mentally capable of evacuating the facility
unassisted. This may include the mobile non ambulatory persons such as
those who are in wheelchairs or electric carts and have the capacity to
transfer and evacuate themselves in an emergency.
(B) does not require routine attendance during nighttime sleeping hours; and
.. \
.
(C) must be capable of following directions under emergency conditions.
Upon approval from the City of Colleyville, our organization would sign a
36 month lease agreement as the responsible party and began operations.
Thank you,
Patsy Ray,
Administrator
".l
""!;;~""""
~,,~
.~
"-_'''H_'~_''.'''''.''''''''~_JN'.'''_
N
<')D
:z::i.
(:J
-:~,
..".----.,.....-.............
.. " .'.... '.'- <..\,.ii.i.~,'.'.~~.,~:....'.',~~W'~~~._':. .
,
~
ti
,II
.N
':,::8
'l.:"'~
:, _ t11
....'
. -".' -- .
. . $:QO!fO~27.i, ~e:
.'.,~-
,..._-......._...,..,...._-_.,~--......._....,"-~_.,~:..........~....~l
---;~..~........".~:.~.----
" ,
8A:ANSFORO '" RO:~<[)-{A'$PHAL Tl
---.-.... "--. -....._..~~ ....---
... ....-......-----.-----.~~-~...-- --... ~_.'w___..........
':'.,..._,..-..-"'_...._...-.---~--..__...,""................,_.,..
-"- ---~.., -.,--.-
',-4
3:
m
tt:1I
::0
r
Z
m
z
o
,:;:e
-1
J:
j;
<Ii
1
1>
r
-t
1
i
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
f
,
t
!
j
(
cd W~7:p0 c00c 80 '+00
--() -.....-.-
t
13da 110)5 : WOd~
: 'ON 3No-ld
PI-GE NO. :
I
]!jr.:~r.=,i;'.';'~"'::'''''~~~'.1 Oct, 08 2002
~1~1 J'::~;:--'< US IL~:::'~*=~\1~-~-,' 04:44PM P4
." <<... CJ 'lnh
__ _~j ::. \ _ Iv ~ 11 <oj..
- ___'------ ' "" I' .... . , ' I'
~.d~~~~;;&~;~~I~-r.ll .;.~t~11 ~ J~' ,::.. Ii; \ r'i
~_ < ~g~1 , I~ ''''1 ' ~ I I ~. 0. .iJ
.:c .<7,'-- -1' I 7 .,;,. I t.., J '~'.? . i
;.;'. Tn- ,--:No ",' vv - 'I
.. ..0', I~'_'''~ I.r.gi'" ~'] .i-~'l l) -I .~
~ ' :", . ) ,~II~: < Q :. l'" 0 ..
_^ " .,~ ..~..J:f' , ," " .r--~-
:7; /) :~J6~{f0~t\L t, ~ :" -I r ~I \1 ~~l ~,. ;'~, ~: )\ I -I:>> ~ . -, ~'I
.:::~ w,;,. -~l~/ 6"~1 ,.. "i rl~~ :pl ~I~ ;; .-' '~I" L. '! 9 ~ · !,
_::.----....~I ' _ ~- _==:,_.._l__....:::::bf 0\,~ 1,/'\."1 II! \. "'+-:,J AIL: ~I) ~ ~ t.
__ ~ I.;...~_-c:"' .-'~ ~ !"i;.:..-. 'L lli. /: ~ 1~-=,K;;,,---1~ ~ i
'.~ ,;' (:q:\U'lP~~fPiT-O&~;..;:..,l ::.. It~ /:.\__;:~ ..-~ ~ ._I~ ,:- ~,c
Ill., . ~ ., ,f... D :;,r'l:1 ..~ (1'~ I ' ,.--'/ - ...' .... -- I
. '.' ..J, .,~. I I~-T'" ,"~' " . ."-
\r'o=:.~-..;,j,:,fir.., Je>Jt,;;<o'1 '.1.. it).",,b'. ~~C",',:oj'''~;\ , . ~ ~!" , ,1
\. '-.d 10 ,"'_'-.L'j'<lfo!."Il-.f(OJ.[ ~",_"i?t? (S t' ~.I r .r;:r\!ri? ~.... ~-1. I,
, 'rd ~ I "i1-r~'" ,., ~ " .
e" l"-' c. ;: 0 -,.,,~ ". ~ . ""'1',;,1 I I
~ ~ ~II . ~'f '""1 ' ~~~ ....:.."'-1' r .. - .. ~ ,V , . i
;. ...:: !~i ~ C :. I "'r ,..'~-"' 11 .' . S" I, I "I
'-; , I'i ! < ;, _ \. -.. ~" " ; r LV: · "I ;
~~-r-~ ~ \ . 0 ~ ~... ~ \ " - :; I -[ I I
....-'~.>!...".J...il9 1;~ll ~ (jl ~ o\'~1 > ..' . .... .~,; · I I'
~ ..,. . _~-,~_'" . _ ~ .__ .' ' '. · t . I
__" ~. j""'.'~ L' 11
.. ,7.< ...., ..N" - " -- '
, _-,-.--.".----h ,- '
.. '_ .hst ..... I 0 ~
1r ._' '\~;~"7 . .-'
l,~, ".= '.". ""; ~-:;r':'<:;;'-=;:f~:::t~;~tr~'r. x--:::--==-l'
. .._.. -. ,.,p." 1
" '" /. " ......., ~".. . I
"\ .,...~,r-:.. 1! l ..~~ ':-'"'''~'::-''' I'
1~::-_...1U.'_' -:,1."' \ J '''' "'i' ~: rnnr4: '" / - I
~"E ,.- . ; ,~vj.. \-~ J
j.~ ::: ~ ,,'" ~ '''';;': "-- ~. . u.,--'L't .IL '..J l1
,,-,.... ..." ' ~- -- " .......,... --.
li'.~! .. I. [i7il, -' .u 'H: ']' '\ Ii r.=:~:;T.:.::-];.-:,~
~ I j I .' \ . ~~...., \ J' 1
\... ""..,~' 1 I' ' .. ';.~:.:'" .) ~ ',j ... ~ ..' .. I'
I ,I . I . l,lf ....." !
~ ~"I I ,""" - j;! ~. ·
. ""'.....--oY.--'-. [ ". .. "l,.,mk,..
-'---~"-l~LU r" ,,--.- . ,.' ,,,,J
_ ".. i" " 13InJP(I(IM 7- iiii~~~; T
......... . '
· "--.::1 -.J1 .Y'
FROM
SCOTT BREI
',t:
,. '
~ ~
....Il'"
_.~
,~::'?~U*4
.. .-1"''''I''I1II
David & Denise Hall
407 Timberline Street N
Colleyville, TX 76034
Van Tee!
P.O. Box 242
Colleyville, TX 76034
John Slater
404 Timberline Street S
Colleyville, TX 76034
Wilmer & Alinda Dale
408 Timberline Street N
Colleyville, TX 76034
Billy & Janice McClure
404 Timberline Street N
Colleyville, TX 76034
Wheatland Medical Inc.
1301 Capital ofTX HWY A-306
Austin, TX 78746
Church of Jesus Christ LDS
50 East North Temple
Salt Lake City, UT 84150
Shirley Roberts
101 Timberline Street N
Colleyville, TX 76034
Ritz Properties Inc.
P.O. Box 1530
Colleyville, TX 76034
Anthony & Frances Hernandez
3125 Oakdale Drive
Hurst, TX 76054
City of Colleyville
Case Z-02-033 (Notices dated: November 1 , 2002)
According to the last published T~x Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200'
of the pr?po~ed special use permltJand-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that
the parties listed above have been notified ofthe proposed change request as required by
~e Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code.
an Levy
lanning & Zoning Assistant
ORDINANCE 0-02-1379
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3, LAND USE OF THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF TRACT A1,
BLOCK 2, HIGHLAND ACRES, FROM THE CPO PROFESSIONAL OFFICE
DISTRICT TO THE PUD-C PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING
A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Pat Ray, Victorious
Living Church for Hughes Capital Management, Inc. on October 18,
2002, under Case No. Z-02-033; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of
the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land
Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and
made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is
in the best interests of the City of Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the Official Zoning Map are hereby amended
insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas, as
shown on the Zoning Map attached as Exhibit "A", and described as
Tract A 1, Block 2, Highland Acres, by changing the zoning of said
property from the CPO Professional Office district to the PUD-C
Planned Unit Development Commercial district, as shown on the
attached Zoning Exhibit attached as Exhibit "B", including any other
conditions and restrictions imposed and approved by the City
Council, which are incorporated herein.
Sec. 2.
THAT the PUD-C area shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. GENERAL
a. The purpose of this PUD-C is for an assisted living center and
general office land uses.
Ordinance 0-02-1379
Page 2 of 3
b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the
Colleyville Land Development Code, except where amended by
this Ordinance.
2. PERMITTED USES
The following land uses shall be permitted within this Planned
Unit Development.
a. Assisted Living Center
b. Uses allowed in the CPO Professional Office zoning district
3. GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR ASSISTED LIVING CENTER
a. For the purposes of this ordinance, an assisted living center
shall mean an establishment that furnishes, in one or more
facilities, food and shelter to four or more persons who are
unrelated to the proprietor of the establishment; and provides
personal care services.
b. For the purposes of this ordinance, personal care services shall
mean assistance with meals, dressing, movement, bathing, or
other personal needs or maintenance; the administration of
medication by a person licensed to administer medication or the
assistance with or supervision of medication; or general
supervision or oversight of the physical and mental well-being of
a person who needs assistance to maintain a private and
independent residence in an assisted living facility or who needs
assistance to manage the person's personal life, regardless of
whether a guardian has been appointed for the person.
c. This facility shall be licensed as a Type A Assisted Living Center
by the Texas Department of Human Services as required by the
Assisted Living Facility Licensing Act. Proof of such licensing
shall be required prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy for this property.
d. The number of residents in the assisted living center shall not
exceed thirty-two (32) people.
e. At least eighty (80) percent of the residents of the facility shall
be fifty-five (55) years of age or older.
f. This facility shall not accommodate individuals who are bed-
ridden, chronically disabled, invalid or pose a direct threat to the
Sec. 4.
Sec. 5.
Sec. 6.
Sec. 7.
Ordinance 0-02-1379
Page 3 of 3
health, safety or welfare of themselves or others. This facility
shall not constitute a halfway house, rehabilitation facility, or any
other type of facility whereby individuals receive guidance or
assistance in the transition from institutional care to normal
social activities and treatment, counseling, or other services
related to such rehabilitative services.
THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon
conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand
Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues
shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such.
THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas,
shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this
ordinance.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternative method of publication provided by law.
THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon
publication.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
EXHIBIT A - ZO
NING MAP
-SlTE.S
AG
EXHIBIT B - ZONING EXHIBIT
TIM8ERl.lNE NORTH
"
r".,",..,'_.,.,.,.,~".,' ."",., ~7,r:;""..1 (, .. ,C$MS! ..:.. ;A
~- ~~ ~,'. ~:~.~,:.;~.... ....~'I~;J
N
tn
<>
~
t
It:
'\~
--
,.-
,.
,I&"
.,";rA)M
I
: I
~~
~I"
J
f
CITY COUNCIL
cc6$ AGENDA BRIEFING
,...:-;:\$
MEETING DATE:
ITEM # :
ORDINANCE # :
12/03/02
9
0-02-1380
CITY MANAGER i
DEPARTMENT HEAD
FINANCE REVIEW I
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
SUBJECT: Adopting TXU Gas Distribution general service rates
including rate adjustment provisions and
miscellaneous service charges for sales and
transportation of natu ral gas to residential,
commercial and industrial customers
First Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
TXU Gas Distribution Company filed a Statement of Intent on March 1, 2002 with 109 North
Texas cities to increase rates charged for natural gas service. The proposed change would
increase current rates by $33,9 million in the North Texas Metroplex Distribution System. On
March 18, 2002, Council authorized the City to participate jointly with other cities in the
distribution system (TXU Steering Committee) to independently analyze the reasonableness of
the gas rate filing,
The TXU Steering Committee retained Diversified Utility Consultants, Inc., (DUCI) to report to
cities regarding TXU Gas Distribution's proposed consolidation of systems and increase in
revenue requirements for the Metroplex. DUCI recommended a reduction to TXU's proposed
rate increase based on a review and analysis of the individual components of the request that
tested whether a reasonable level of costs and expenses had been requested.
A settlement committee and TXU participated in various settlement scenarios and counter-
offers in June. Negotiations ended in an offer that would hold the Fort Worth System's rates at
the current level and increase the rates of the remaining 86 cities by $12.7 million. The impact
of that settlement offer can be seen in the tables below described as the "June Settlement
Offer." On July 18, the City of Colleyville along with fifty-one other Metroplex cities denied TXU
Gas Distribution's initial request and subsequent offer to increase natural gas rates. Upon
denial by the cities, the rate request was appealed to the Texas Railroad Commission as Gas
Utilities Docket (GUD) 9313.
Current Settlement Aqreement
Before the Steering Committee filed testimony for the docket, committee legal counsel and
TXU reached a preliminary settlement agreement. The settlement offer was delivered to city
representatives on October 29. A spreadsheet listing each city and the revenue changes by
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1380
Page 2
customer class can be seen attached, The impact of the settlement offer on Colleyville,
compared with the June settlement offer, is outlined below:
March June October
Proposed Settlement Settlement
Offer
All Cities $33,853,710 $12,673,084 $7,500,000
Colleyville $359,187 $191,816 $106,798
The October settlement decreased the revenue requirement proposed by TXU in June by 44%
for Colleyville and 41 % for all cities. The impact on the revenue requirement for each
customer class in the City of Colleyville is outlined below:
Customer Class Revenue Increase % Increase
Residential $ 106,243 3.0%
Commercial $ 555 0.2%
Industrial $ 0 0.0%
Service Charges $ 0 0.0%
Total Revenue Change $ 106,798 2.7%
The settlement increases current rates charged to residential and commercial customers, An
analysis of the proposed rates is outlined below:
Residential Current
March
Proposed
June
Settlement
Offer
October
Settlement
(Final)
Customer $7.0000 Customer $9.4000 Customer $8,0000 Customer $8,0000
CharQe CharQe CharQe CharQe
All $0.8335 First 3 $1,1500 All $1.0171 All $0.8848
consumption Met consumption consumption
Next 12 $1.0822
Met
Over 15 $0.9990
Met
Commercial
Customer $12.0000 Customer $14.7500 Customer $14.7500 Customer $14.0000
Charge Charge CharQe CharQe
First 20 Met $1.1371 First 30 $1.1300 First 75 Met $0.9169 First 30 Met $0.9978
Met
Next 30 Met $0.8371 Next 320 $1.0110 Next 275 $0.8203 Next 320 $0.8928
Met Met Met
Over 50 Met $0.6871 Over 350 $0.9302 Over 350 $0.7548 Over 350 $0.8214
Met Met Met
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1380
Page 3
The typical residential customer using 6Mcf per month will realize an increase of approximately
$1.37 per month. The typical commercial customer using 30Mcf per month will realize an
increase of approximately $0.87 per month. The City of Colleyville has no industrial
customers,
Current Settlement Increase % Change
Residential @ $39.19 $40.56 $1.37 3.50%
5 Met Mo,
Commercial @ $209,81 $210,68 $0.87 0.41%
30 Mcf Mo.
Rate case expenses occurring before June 1, 2002, will be surcharged to all 107 North Texas
metroplex cities. Costs incurred after June 1, 2002, will be surcharged to the 51 cities whose
ordinances were appealed, Spread over a twelve-month period, recovery of these costs will
result in a per Mcf surcharge of 1,5 to 2 cents. Since monthly usage averages about 6 Mcfs
over the year, this amounts to a monthly surcharge of approximately 9 to 12 cents for the
typical residential customer.
Additionally, as a part of the settlement, TXU will refund the amounts owed to consumers
pursuant to the Order approved in GUD 9173 during the months of January through March
2003.
The new rates will be effective for bills rendered on or after February 1, 2003. The attached
ordinance approves the rates presented in the final settlement agreement.
Financial Impact
None
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· North Texas Metroplex Distribution System - Revenue Increase/(Decrease) by City
· Ordinance 0-02-1380
~~~~~~~~#~~~#~~~~~~~~#~~~~~#~~~#~~~#~~#~~~#~~#~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2MNMMOMO~NMN~MMNMM~~MM~NNMMMMMN~MM~~MNN~M~ONNNNN~MN~N
_41 I I " I ~ I
~o..
~ ~M~~m~rooro~~V~NN~~O~a~~vMv~OVroMV~V~~rovroNoomNMM~~V~OOmo
~ ~~~~~~~~~ffi~re~~~~~g~~~~~~~~g~ffig~~~~~;~~~~~g~~~~~~~~~g
~c~~~~~g~~gg;~~~~g~g~g~~~~~g~~g~~~~~~g~~~~~~~g~~~~~g~g
G:I~~~ ~_~ m~~~ ~v~ ~~ NN~~~N ~~~~~~M ~~N~ ~m-M~~~~*~ ~~
~l~~ ~ ~ ~~~ *~ ~~ ~~ ~-* * ~ ~* ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~~#~~~~#~~#~~~~~~~##~~~~~~~~~~~~#~~~##~~~~~#~~~##
c8888888g888~8g8gg8gggggggggg~ggggggggggggg8gggggg
~oaaoaaaaaOaIDOOaaOaaaoaooaaoa~aooaoooooooooooooooo
. ~
fa.
U
~_~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
c ~ N N
~ ~ ~
~
<{
#"#.t!.
oo~
000
000
#~##"#.#~"#.##~~#~~####~~#~~##~#~"#.~####~~~~#~~#~~~~~~#~~
~g8~~~g~gg2gg~8gg~g~~~~g~gg~~~g~ggg~8g~~~g~~g~~ggg~~
c~IDOM~OOOOOOIDOO~NO~~OOm~~aroOOM~MOroIDOa~NamMNOMNOIDOaaaO~
~~ ~ I V IIJ'1 M~ "";~ I ~U')~ ~ vM..- '?
"-
J
M..-aoo~mo~aa~oa~ooovomm~..-o~aOOM~OMNa00IJ'10"-lJ'1momvovroooom~
N...-~m...-~~~~~~~~V~~~N~NroVM~O~~MNN~M...-~*...-~~NMV~N~~ro~~~~m~
N...- mmN N M Nm MO ~~mo ro ...-~M ~o ro~ ONa ~ID ~~ NW
c~~ MO~ ~ ~ ~o o~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ om ~~~ roo ri ~O
~~~ MN IJ'1 ~ ~N"'-"'- MM N *N~~"- ...-~ ~ ...- IJ'1N N ...-N
E ~~ ~ ~* ~~ ~* ~ ~~ * * ~ ~~ ~ ~~
<{
~##~#~#~~~~~#~~~~####~~~~####~~~####~#~#~#~~#~~~~~~~
~~~roM~~rolJ'1~1J'10Nooo~...-..-mMM..-m~roro..-IJ'1...-...-ro~Nm~U')v~...-..-...-m~IJ'1~~lJ'1mM~W
Mm~~aMNM..-~OaIJ'1IDmoro~vMOOOlJ'1mIJ'1MOO~IJ'1",-~",-olJ'1...-~vomrowro..-~ro~OIJ'1VVW
~MMNM~M~~OMNOM~~O~M9MN9N~MNNM~~~NM~~MN~~NO~O~~MNONO~N
!!! ~
~~
III
"
.~ ~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~8~~g~~~ffi8~~~~~~~~~g;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
E ~N~~W~NNU')~W IJ'1lJ'1m NN~...-N..-~IJ'1~..-NVVIJ'1~a~...-mmm~*IJ'1~M~oo~m..-aMro~
E_om~ID~~~ro~NN Nmm MM-~~~ro~~*NN~oro~m~~~ri~-~N~oM~m~~~~ooo
8~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ *~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~N
E ~ ~ ~- - * ~ ~ N
<{ ~
~~~~~~~~~#~~#~~##~#~~#~~~~~~~~~#~~~~#~~~~~~~~~~~##~~
MV~Nva~~a~rolJ'1roMrowroIJ'10mOv~N"'-N~...-~m~ro~~~..-~~~~IJ'1~NNmVNIJ'1VIJ'1~W
VN~~o..-~mo~..-...-mNmoo~Mm~...-ovro~vMwo~m"'-~M..-...-vvmroIJ'1NMlJ'1m~~IJ'1Vow
cMNM~M~~MMMNroN~NM~~~MMNNNMMM~O~~M~~M~NNMM~~NNNNNNMMMN
~ I I I I I '? I ,
"-
i
.~
a:
m~vro~~~~M~N~~amIJ'1NMaoro~o~M~"-IJ'1~IJ'1M~oo~Nroro~NM"-~V~NNro~..-~V~
~om~~...-M~vU')mvNomro~~~wro"-MlJ'1m~aM...-..-~rorororovm~MvooM~mmoMIDmw~
aMOIJ'1~wrooN~IDNmID~NVMIDNmv~...-owaMN~wa~N~m~m~M~NroM~~N~NMro~
c~~~N~~~M~~~~roM~MoNN~~oroN~rooM~m~N~*~NMM-m~M~wMM~~~Moo~
~NN~...-M~ 1J'10vM ~~M~Mro~...-IJ'1"-~,,,-V*~N*~*MO ~~IJ'1~ ~M~M...-M..-NN...-~N~
0*..- m~~ M"-"'-~ N"'-"-~ ..-N..-M~"- ~...- V...-N ~..-~ IJ'1-N"'-~~"-~~ ~~
~ ~ *- ~~* ~~ ~ ~~~~-~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~
E
..
1ii
,.,
(f)
c
~
"
'ci!;<
Eo
en >-
.- .c
o.
>< ~
.!! ~
Cot;
o ~
~e
..-
::;: ~
en rn
'" e
>< u
.. E
I- ~
.c ~
t:: ii
o >
z~
CfJ
Z
W
o
0::
<(
(:J W
CfJ ~ Go CfJ ~~
(:J I- ~z I- W...J ~
o Z Zw r~ ~~ ~~ I w~ ~ Z r~
z- WO~ ~z ~~ mO Qw~> w~ 0 w zO ~WZ~
O~o(:J~~ u~ 05 >CfJ~ owzuo CfJ ...J~3...J~ ~O OCfJI- ~~ou~
Oz w~CfJo::o::go~~j~~00::ZOW~CfJ~O::wO::ozI5~Z ~ o::->~~w~~~I~(:J ~~wl-w5~0...J~<(
...J~IO wWz- OI-~-CfJ-W <(ZW :)I-I(:JZ -w~z IwO <( CfJOI I~ ~
~~r~o~wO::~~_0::~1-0rnuw>~~o~Z~~ICfJUZ~~~0~CfJ-~I-I-Z~I5I(:JI-U~~~<(
o~(:J~~o~o::~~O::O::...JZCfJ~z~o::o::oCfJO::w<( O::I--CfJ~~UI-Z~O::O::z<( >u<(~wo ~I-
o~o::o::<(w...J<(oooo<(wwo~~~<(...J~<(~o::~~~~>o::~ww~~<(o~O<(~~~O<(WOIO::~CO
<(<(<(<(rnrnrnouuouooooow~~~~(:J(:J(:JIIII_~~~...J~~~~z~~~O::O::CfJCfJCfJI-I->~1-
~
z
~ ~ N M ~ ~ w ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o ~
"''''
ORDINANCE 0-02-1380
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS FINDING, AFTER
REASONABLE NOTICE AND HEARING, THAT TXU GAS DISTRIBUTION'S RATES
AND CHARGES WITHIN THE CITY SHOULD BE CHANGED; DETERMINING JUST AND
REASONABLE RATES; ADOPTING GENERAL SERVICE RATES INCLUDING RATE
ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS AND MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES TO BE
CHARGED FOR SALES AND TRANSPORTATION OF NATURAL GAS TO
RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMERS; PROVIDING FOR
RECOVERY OF RATE CASE EXPENSES; PRESERVING REGULATORY RIGHTS OF
THE CITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; PROVIDING
FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville ("City") acting as a regulatory authority, has previously
suspended the effective date of TXU Gas Distribution's ("Company")
application to increase rates in the City in order to study the reasonableness
of that application; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville, in a reasonably noticed public hearing considered the
Company's application, a report from the City's consultants who were
retained to evaluate the merits of the Company's application and a
settlement agreement negotiated with TXU Gas Distribution by a Steering
Committee of Cities; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that the Company's rates within the City should be
changed and that the Company's application should be granted, in part, and
denied, in part.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec, 1.
THAT On March 1, 2002, TXU Gas Distribution, a division of TXU Gas
Company ("Company") filed with the Governing Body of this municipality a
Statement of Intent to Change Residential, Commercial and Industrial Rates
charged to consumers within this municipality. Also filed was the Tariff for
Gas Service in the North Texas Metroplex Distribution System ("Tariff for
Gas Service") and the supporting Cost of Service Schedules ("Schedules").
Sec. 2.
THAT the existing rates and charges of TXU Gas Distribution are hereby
found, after reasonable notice and hearing, to be unreasonable and shall be
changed as hereinafter ordered, The changed rates resulting from this
Ordinance are hereby determined to be just and reasonable rates to be
observed and in force within the City.
Sec. 3,
Sec. 4,
Sec. 5.
Sec. 6.
Sec. 7,
Sec. 8.
Sec, 9.
Sec, 10.
Ordinance 0-02-1380
Page 2 of 5
THAT the Company has agreed to modify the rates proposed in its
Statement of Intent and the modified rates are reflected in the revised Tariff
for Gas Service attached hereto as Exhibit "A",
THAT the maximum general service rates for sales and transportation of
natural gas rendered to residential, commercial and industrial consumers
within the city limits of Colleyville, Texas by TXU Gas Distribution, a division
of TXU Gas Company, a Texas corporation, its successors and assigns, are
hereby fixed and approved as set forth in the revised Tariff for Gas Service
attached hereto as Exhibit "A". The rates reflected in the attached Rate
Schedules entitled Residential Service, Commercial Service, Industrial Sales,
Industrial Transportation and Industrial Sales & Transportation are found to
be reasonable. Nothing contained herein shall limit the right of industrial and
transportation customers with competitive options to negotiate rates with the
Company that differ from approved tariffs.
THAT all electric generation customers are included as Industrial
Transportation customers under the applicable transportation rate schedule.
THAT the Rate Adjustment and Surcharge Provisions set forth in the revised
Tariff for Gas Service attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and entitled Gas Cost
Adjustment, and Tax Adjustment, are approved.
THAT the Company shall have the right to collect such reasonable charges
as are necessary to conduct its business and to carry out its reasonable
rules and regulations. Such miscellaneous service charges are identified in
Rate Schedules 9001 through 9008 of the attached revised Tariff for Gas
Service.
THAT Cities' rate case expenses are found to be reasonable and shall be
reimbursed by the Company. The Company is authorized to recover the rate
case expenses reimbursed to Cities and the Company's rate case expenses,
up to the amount agreed to, through a per Mcf surcharge as set forth in the
Rider entitled Surcharges in the attached revised Tariff for Gas Service.
THAT the aforesaid rate schedules and riders herein approved shall be
effective for bills rendered on or after February 1 , 2003.
THAT the rates set forth in this Ordinance may be changed and amended by
either the City or Company in any other manner provided by law. Service
hereunder is subject to the orders of regulatory bodies having jurisdiction,
and to the Company's Rules and Regulations currently on file with the City.
Sec, 11.
Sec. 12.
Sec. 13.
Sec. 14.
Sec, 15,
Sec. 16.
Ordinance 0-02-1380
Page 3 of 5
THAT unless otherwise noted herein, other than TXU Gas Distribution (a
named party), no person or entity has been admitted as a party to this rate
proceeding.
THAT it is hereby found and determined that said meeting at which this
ordinance was passed was open to the public, as required by Texas law, and
that advance public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting
was given.
THAT this Ordinance shall be served on TXU Gas Distribution by U.S. Mail to
the Company's authorized representative, Autry Warren, Rates Manager,
TXU Business Services, 1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-3411.
THAT nothing contained in this Ordinance shall be construed now or
hereafter in limiting or modifying, in any manner, the right and power of the
City under law to regulate the rates and charges of TXU Gas Distribution.
THAT all ordinances, resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
Ordinance are repealed to the extent of such conflict. Examples of such
ordinances or resolutions that are deemed repealed are all ordinances or
resolutions concerning Military Rates-N, Cost of Service Adjustments, Plant
Investment Cost Adjustments, and Weather Normalization Adjustments. To
the extent Public Authority Rates, Commercial Contract Rates or Military
Rates-N are in effect in the city those rates are specifically repealed as they
are now a part of the Commercial rates and are calculated in accordance
with the revenue requirement for Commercial customers.
THAT the rate schedules included in the Tariff for Gas Service supercede
and replace all other tariffed services provided by TXU Gas Distribution
except as expressly contained within the Tariff for Gas Service.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002,
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
ATTEST:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
Ordinance 0-02-1380
Page 4 of 5
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Donna Arp
Mayor
TARIFF FOR GAS SERVICE
IN THE
NORTH TEXAS METROPLEX
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
TXU GAS DISTRIBUTION
EXHIBIT A TO ORDINANCE NO. 0 - 02 - , 3 8 D
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Index of Rates No. 4630
APPLICABLE TO: See List of Applicable Cities Below REVISION: 0
DATE:
PAGE: 1 of 2
INDEX OF RATES & LIST OF APPLICABLE CITIES
RATES:
4631
Residential Service
4632
Commercial Service
4641 - 4643
Industrial Sales
4644
Industrial Transportation
4651
Industrial Sales and Transportation
RATE ADJUSTMENT PROVISIONS:
8041
Gas Cost Adjustment
8042
Tax & Franchise Fee Adjustment
8043
Surcharges
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES:
9001 Connection Charge
9002 Read for Change Charge
9003 Returned Check Charges
9004 Delinquent Notification Charge
9005 Main Line Extension Rate
9006 Excess Flow Valve Charge
9007 Certain Stand-by Gas Generators
9008 Temporary Discontinuance of Service
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Index of Rates No. 4630
APPLICABLE TO: See List of Applicable Cities Below REVISION: 0
DATE:
PAGE: 2 of 2
LIST OF APPLICABLE CITIES:
North Texas Metroplex Distribution System (NT Metro System) Appeal Cities
Addison
Allen
Argyle
Arlington
Balch Springs
Bedford
Blue Ridge
Carrollton
Colleyville
Coppell
Corinth
Corral City
Dalworthington Gardens
Denton
DeSoto
Double Oak
Duncanville
Euless
Fairview
Farmers Branch
Flower Mound
Frisco
Garland
Glenn Heights
Grapevine
Hickory Creek
Highland Village
Hurst
Hutchins
Irving
Justin
Keller
Lewisville
Lincoln Park
Little Elm
Mansfield
McKinney
Murphy
Northlake
Pantego
Piano
Princeton
Richardson
Rowlett
Sachse
Seagoville
South lake
The Colony
Trophy Club
Westlake
Wylie
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Residential Service No. 4631
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 1 OF 1
RESIDENTIAL SERVICE
Monthly Rate:
Subject to applicable adjustments, the following rates are the maximum applicable to residential
consumers per meter per month or for any part of a month for which gas service is available at the SamE!
location.
Customer Charge (Minimum Bill)
All Consumption
$
@
8.0000
0.8848 Per Mef
If the service period is less than 28 days in a month the customer charge is $.2857 times the number 01'
days service, If the consumption contains a portion of an Met, a prorata portion of the per Met charge will
be made.
Bills are due and payable when rendered and must be paid within fifteen days from monthly billing date.
OTHER APPLICABLE RATE SCHEDULES
Rate Adjustment Provisions:
8041 Gas Cost Adjustment
8042 Tax & Franchise Fee Adjustment
8043 Surcharges
Miscellaneous/Service Charges:
9001 Connection Charge
9002 Read for Change Charge
9003 Returned Check Charges
9004 Delinquent Notification Charge
9005 Main Line Extension Rate
9006 Excess Flow Valve Charge
9007 Certain Stand-By Gas Generators
9008 Temporary Discontinuance of Service Charge
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Commercial Service No, 4632
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 1 OF 1
COMMERCIAL SERVICE
Monthly Rate:
Customer Charge (Minimum Bill) $
14.0000
First 30 Met @
Next 320 Mcf @
Over 350 Mcf @
0.9978 Per Met
0.8928 Per Mcf
0.8214 Per Met
If the service period is less than 28 days in a month the customer charge is $.5000 times the number 01'
days service. If the consumption contains a portion of an Met, a prorata portion of the per Met charge will
be made.
Bills are due and payable when rendered and must be paid within fifteen days from monthly billing date.
OTHER APPLICABLE RATE SCHEDULES
Rate Adjustment Provisions:
8041 Gas Cost Adjustment
8042 Tax & Franchise Fee Adjustment
8043 Surcharges
Miscellaneous/Service Charges:
9001 Connection Charge
9002 Read tor Change Charge
9003 Returned Check Charges
9004 Delinquent Notification Charge
9005 Main Line Extension Rate
9006 Excess Flow Valve Charge
9007 Certain Stand-By Gas Generators
9008 Temporary Discontinuance ot Service Charge
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distributiorl
RATE SCHEDULE: Industrial Sales Nos. 4641 thru 4643
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 1 OF 2
INDUSTRIAL SALES
Monthly Rates:
The following rate schedules are hereby amended or superseded as follows:
Rate Schedule Nos,
48-N Industrial Rates-N -Texas (Amended)
3291 Industrial Rates-NNEMETRO - Northeast Metro (Amended)
4111-4113 Industrial Sales - Corinth / Lincoln Park (Superseded)
4121-4123 Industrial Sales - Northwest Metro / Mid Cities Distribution System (Superseded)
4211-4213 Industrial Sales - East Region Distribution System (Superseded)
Subject to Company's limitations on the availability of each rate, Customer shall receive service under its
choice of one of the following rates in accordance with the rate selected by Customer as provided in thEl
contract:
RATE 4641
First 125 Mcf or less $ 325.00
All over 125 Met @ $ 1.940 per Met
RATE 4642
First 600 Mcf or less $ 800.00
All over 600 Mcf @ $ 1.769 per Mcf
RATE 4643
First 1,250 Mcf or less $ 1,450.00
All over 1 ,250 Mcf @ $ 1.592 per Mef
In all other respects, the above listed amended rate schedules remain in effect as filed with the Cities
listed in Rate Schedule No. 4630. 100% of the increase in industrial margin is to accrue to the benefit of
TXU Gas Distribution.
The above listed rates are closed to new customers as of the effective date of this rate schedule. Current
customers taking service pursuant to this rate schedule will no longer be eligible for this seNice upon
contract termination. Current customers may convert their existing contract to new Rate Schedule No.
4651. When the final contract subject to this rate expires or is terminated, this rate schedule will bEi
cancelled.
Tariff for Gas Service. NT Metro System. Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Industrial Sales Nos. 4641 thru 4643
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 2 OF 2
APPLICABLE RATE SCHEDULES:
Rate Adjustment Provisions:
8042 Tax & Franchise Fee Adjustment
8043 Surcharges
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Industrial Transportation No. 4644
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 1 OF 1
INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION
Monthly Rates:
The fee for industrial transportation service is $ 0.915 per MMSTU delivered plus applicable taxes
exclusive of the backup fee.
The above transportation fees include both the fees incurred to move the gas from the receipt point on
the transmission system to the city gate and the fee incurred to move the gas from the city gate to the
customer's facility.
If the fees for transportation service on the transmission system change, the above fee will be adjusted
to reflect the overall transportation rate charged to customers.
For Industrial Transportation customers, the quantity of transportation gas received into the Company's
distribution system for the customer's account will be reduced by the Company's current lost and
unaccounted-for-gas percentage as reflected in the volume factor on Rate Schedule No. 8041.
100% of the increase in transportation fees incurred to move the gas from the city gate to the customer's
facility is to accrue to the benefit of TXU Gas Distribution.
This rate schedule is closed to new customers as of the effective date of this rate schedule, Current
customers taking service pursuant to this rate schedule will no longer be eligible for this service upon
contract termination. Current customers may convert their existing contract to new Rate Schedule No.
4651. When the final contract subject to this rate schedule expires or is terminated, Rate Schedule No.
4644 will be cancelled.
APPLICABLE RATE SCHEDULES:
Rate Adjustment Provisions:
8042 Tax & Franchise Fee Adjustment
8043 Surcharges
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Industrial Sales & Transportation No. 4651
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 1 OF 2
INDUSTRIAL SALES AND TRANSPORTATION
Monthly Rates:
RATE 4651- S (SALES)
Customer Charge (Minimum Bill) $200.00 per meter
Btu transported per month Rate/MMBtu
First 1 ,500 MMBtu $0.5043
Next 3,500 MMBtu $0.4617 I
Next 45,000 MMBtu $0,3667
Over 50,000 MMBtu $0.1404
RATE 4651-T (TRANSPORTATION)
Customer Charge (Minimum Bill) $200.00 per meter
Btu transported per month Rate/MMBtu
First 1,500 MMBtu $0.5043
Next 3,500 MMBtu $0.4617
Next 45,000 MMBtu $0,3667
Over 50,000 MMBtu $0.1404
Availabi Iity:
Availability is subject to Texas Utilities Code (TUC) Section 104.003(b). In the absence of TUC Section
104.003(b) rates, the rates shown in this rate schedule are available to industrial customers. Rate 4651-5;
(Sales) is not available to electric generation customers.
Adjustment for Gas Cost:
Each industrial customer receiving sales service under this rate schedule shall pay the Company's cost
of gas plus applicable transportation, storage, and other costs incurred to acquire the gas and move it to the!
city gate on a per MMBtu basis.
The above gas cost will be adjusted by multiplying it by the volume factor referenced in Rate Schedule
No, 8041.
Retention:
For Industrial Transportation customers, the quantity of transportation gas received into the Company's
distribution system for the customer's account will be reduced by the Company's current lost and
unaccounted-for-gas percentage as reflected in the volume factor on Rate Schedule No. 8041.
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Industrial Sales & Transportation No. 4651
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 2 OF 2
APPLICABLE RATE SCHEDULES:
Rate Adjustment Provisions:
8042 Tax & Franchise Fee Adjustment
8043 Surcharges
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System. Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Gas Cost Adjustment No. 8041
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 1 OF 1
GAS COST ADJUSTMENT
Each monthly bill shall be adjusted for gas cost as follows:
(1) The city gate rate applicable to current billing month sales shall be calculated to the nearest $0.0001
per Mcf based upon:
(a) A volume factor of 1,0273 determined in establishing the above rate for the distribution system
as the ratio of adjusted purchased volumes divided by adjusted sales volumes. Said factor shall
be adjusted annually following determination of the actual lost and unaccounted for gas
percentage based upon year ended June 30.
(b) The city gate rate applicable to volumes purchased during the current calendar month, expressed
to the nearest $0,0001 per Mcf (shown below as "CGRn)
In summary, the gas cost adjustment (GCA) shall be determined to the nearest $0.0001 per Met as
follows:
GCA = 1,0273 x CGR
Tariff for Gas Service - NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Tax & Franchise Fee Adlustment No. 8042
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 1 OF 1
TAX & FRANCHISE FEE ADJUSTMENT
For customers inside the city limits of an incorporated city, each monthly billing, as adjusted. shall
be adjusted for municipal franchise fees (street and alley rental assessments) and the state gross
receipts taxes imposed by Sections 182.021 - 182.025 of the Texas Tax Code. Municipal
franchise fees are determined by each city's franchise ordinance, Each city's franchise ordinance
will specify the percentage and applicability of franchise fees.
Each monthly bill. as adjusted, shall also be adjusted by an amount equivalent to the
proportionate part of any new tax, or any tax increase or decrease, or any increase or decrease of
any other governmental imposition, rental fee, or charge (except state, county, city and special
district ad valorem taxes and taxes on net income) levied, assessed or imposed subsequent to
September 30,2001, upon or allocated to the Company's distribution operations, by any new or
amended law, ordinance or contract.
Municipal franchise fees (street and alley rental assessments) and the state gross receipts taxes
imposed by Sections 182.021 - 182.025 of the Texas Tax Code shall continue to be collected
pursuant to individual industrial contracts,
Tariff for Gas Service. NT Metro System. Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RIDER: Surcharaes No. 8043
APPLICABLE TO: REVISION: 0
DATE:
EFFECTIVE DATE: PAGE: 1 OF 1
SURCHARGES
Rate Case Expense Surcharge:
Rate case expenses will be recovered through a surcharge designed for a twelve-month nominal
recovery period. The surcharge per Mcf will be calculated by dividing the rate case expense to be
recovered by the adjusted annual sales volume to residential, commercial, Industrial Sales, and
Industrial Transportation customers.
Other Surcharges:
TXU Gas Distribution will recover other surcharges as authorized by the relevant municipality, the
Railroad Commission of Texas or the Texas Utilities Code.
Tariff for Gas Service-NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Miscellaneous Service Charges Nos. 9001 thru 9008
APPLICABLE TO: As Referenced REVISION: 0
EFFECTIVE DATE: As Referenced PAGE: 1 OF 2
MISCELLANEOUS SERVICE CHARGES:
9001 Connection Charge
(Residential & Commercial)
The following connection charges apply:
Schedule
Charae
Business Hours
After Hours
$
35.00
52.50
For each reconnection of gas service where service has been discontinued at the same premises
for any reason, for the initial inauguration of service, and for each inauguration of service when
the billable party has changed, with the following exceptions:
(a) For a builder who uses gas temporarily during construction or for display purposes.
(b) Whenever gas service has been temporarily interrupted because of system outage or
service work done by Company; or
(c) For any reason deemed necessary for company operations.
9002 Read For Change Charge
(Residential & Commercial)
A read for change charge of $12,00 is made when it is necessary for a company employee to readi
the meter at a currently served location because of a change in the billable party.
9003 Returned Check Charges
(Residential & Commercial)
A returned check handling charge of $16.25 is made for each check returned to the Company for
any reason.
9004 Delinquent Notification Charge
(Residential & Commercial)
A charge of $4.75 shall be made for each trip by a Company employee to a customer's residence
or place of business when there is an amount owed to the Company that is past due. This charge
shall not be made when the trip is required for safety investigations or when gas service has been
temporarily interrupted because of system outage or service work done by Company.
9005 Main Line Extension Rate
(Residential & Commercial)
The charge for extending mains beyond the limit established by Franchise for residential, and
commercial customers shall be based on the actual cost per foot of the extension.
Tariff for Gas Service-NT Metro System - Appeal Cities
TXU Gas Distribution
RATE SCHEDULE: Miscellaneous Service Charaes Nos. 9001 thru 9008
APPLICABLE TO: As Referenced REVISION: 0
EFFECTIVE DATE: As Referenced PAGE: 2 OF 2
9006 Charge for Installing and Maintaining
an Excess Flow Valve
(Residential)
A customer may request the installation of an excess flow valve on a new service line or on a
service line being replaced provided that the service line will serve a single residence and operate
continuously throughout the year at a pressure of not less than 10 psig, The customer will pay the
actual cost incurred to install the excess flow valve. That cost will include the cost of the excess
flow valve, the labor cost required to install the excess flow valve, and other associated costs. The
estimated total cost to install an excess flow valve is $50.00. This cost is based on installing the
excess flow valve at the same time a service line is installed or replaced. The excess flow valve
will be installed on the service line upstream of the customer's meter and as near as practical to
the main.
A customer requiring maintenance, repair, or replacement of an excess flow valve will be required
to pay the actual cost of locating and repairing or replacing the excess flow valve. The cost to
perform this service will normally range from $200,00 to $2,000,00, depending on the amount of
work required. This cost will be determined on an individual project basis,
This tariff is being filed in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation rule requiring
the installation of an excess flow valve, if requested by a customer, on new or replaced service
lines that operate continuously throughout the year at a pressure of not less than 10 psig and that
serve a single residence, The rule further states that the customer will bear all costs of installing
and maintaining the excess flow valve.
9007 Recovery of Connection Costs Associated
with Certain Stand-By Gas Generators
(Commercial)
Commercial customers installing stand.by gas generators to provide service in the event of an
interruption in electric service in facilities where gas service is not otherwise provided will
reimburse TXU Gas Distribution for the actual cost of acquiring and installing the regulator,
service line, and meter required to provide gas service for the stand. by generators. Gas service
provided for the stand-by generators will be billed at the applicable commercial rate.
9008 Charge for Temporary Discontinuance of Service
(Residential & Commercial)
Whenever service under this rate schedule has been temporarily disconnected at the request of
the customer, a charge of $47.00 for residential and $73.75 for commercial plus the appropriate
Connection Charge will be made to reestablish such service for that customer at the same
address.
CITY COUNCIL
ccenC6 AGENDA BRIEFING
tL'X~:$
MEETING DATE:
ITEM#:
RESOLUTION # :
12/03/02
10
R-02-2066
CITY MANAGER [
DEPARTMENT HEAD I
FINANCE REVIEW I
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
SUBJECT: Approval of a Settlement Agreement with TXU
Electric and TXU Gas relating to claims arising out
of electric and gas franchise fee calculations prior to
January 1, 2002
Reading and Public Hearing
On August 7, 2002, TXU delivered the terms of a settlement agreement to the City of
Colleyville as well as all cities served by TXU Electric and Gas. The agreement is based on a
lawsuit filed by the City of Denton and thirty-six (36) other cities against TXU, which involved
claims arising out of electric and gas franchise fee payments.
BACKGROUND
In June 2000, the City of Denton filed suit against TXU relating to the payment of delinquent
electric and gas franchise fees. The City of Denton alleged that TXU Electric and TXU Gas
excluded certain classes of revenues from calculations used to derive the franchise fees owed
to cities for the rental and use of their public streets, easements, and public properties
(franchise fees). Denton contacted cities in Texas served by TXU and inquired about
participating in the case. In all, thirty-six (36) cities joined; however, the City of Colleyville did
not join the litigation,
ANAL YSIS
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Generally, the terms of the settlement agreement (Exhibit A) include a total cash payment of
$66,142,95 in exchange for a release of claims related to any franchise fee calculations prior to
January 1, 2002. Upon acceptance of the settlement, the City may approve ordinances that
amend the electric and gas franchise agreements in the future to include additional categories
of revenue in the franchise fee calculation from and after January 1, 2002. Staff anticipates
Council review of amendments to the electric and gas franchise agreements at the December
17 Council meeting.
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-02-2066
Page 2
ELECTRIC
The terms of the electric portion of the settlement agreement include a payment of $15,919.44.
The settlement provides that the City may amend the current franchise fee ordinance in the
future to add the 4% franchise fee to discretionary services charges. As a part of the
settlement, the City agrees that Oncor has the right to collect the fee from the customer and
the customer will bear 100% of the franchise fee (pass-through cost). Finally, the City agrees
that in the event the City intervenes in any regulatory proceeding or subsequent appeal, the
City must take an affirmative position in support of the 100% recovery of the franchise fee from
the ratepayer.
In summary, the City can approve the settlement agreement to receive the $15,919.44, and, at
the discretion of the City, amend the current franchise ordinance to have items DD1 through
DD24 subject to the franchise fee base in the future, The impact of approving the electric
portion of the settlement agreement is as follows.
Table 1: Impact to a Typical Colleyville Electric Bill
Impact to electric bill
Approval of settlement portion None
NOTE
NATURAL GAS
The terms of the gas section of the settlement agreement include a payment of $50,223.51.
The settlement provides that the City may amend the current franchise fee ordinance in the
future to add the 4% franchise fee to governmental users, miscellaneous fees, contributions in
aid of construction, bad debt expense, transportation revenues, and third-party gas sales.
In addition, the City agrees that TXU Gas has the right to collect the fee from the customer and
the customer will bear 100% of the franchise fee (pass-through cost). Finally, the City agrees
that in the event the City intervenes in any regulatory proceeding or subsequent appeal, the
City must take an affirmative position in support of the 100% recovery of the franchise fee from
the ratepayer. The impact of approving the gas portion of the settlement agreement is
illustrated in Table 2.
Table 2: Impact to a Typical Colleyville Gas Bill
Impact to typical gas bill
Residential (6 Mef) Commercial (30 Mef)
I Approval of settlement portion $0.17 $0,76
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-02-2066
Page 3
The surcharge will be applied to residential, commercial, and industrial customer classes;
however, the City does not have any industrial users. The surcharge will be amortized to
customers' bills over a three-year period.
In exchange for the payments, the City agrees that it will release all claims related to the
payment or calculation of franchise fees to the City on or before December 31, 2001. The
release is not intended to discharge any other claims that may accrue in the future.
Clarence A. West, a public utilities attorney from Austin, has reviewed the proposed agreement
and did not suggest any changes or modifications.
Financial Impact
The City will receive a payment from TXU Electric and TXU Gas in the amount of $66,142,95,
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· Correspondence - Oncor Distribution Division
· Resolution R-02-2066
~R
Rick Vauohn
Area Manage'
August 7, 2002
Oncor
Distribution Division
200 N, Ector
Euless, TX 76039
Mr. Bill Lindley
City Manager
City of Colleyville
5400 Bransford Rd.
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Tel 8173557001
Fax 817 355 7090
rvaughn 1@oncorgroup.com
Dear Bill:
As you may be aware, in JWle 2000, the City of Denton fIled a lawsuit against TXU Electric which included claims
arising out of electric and gas franchise agreements. Specifically, the suit involved a dispute regarding the calculation
and amoWlt of franchise fees paid by TXU Electric and TXU Gas. Thirty-six cities joined the City of Denton in this
lawsuit. This lawsuit has recently been settled by agreement.
It is the intent of Oncor (successor to TXU Electric) and TXU Gas to offer the terms of the settlement agreement to all
cities served by the companies. The purpose of this communication is to convey information and docwnents needed to
execute the settlement agreement if you choose to accept the offer. The enclosed "Compromise, Settlement and
Release Agreement" describes the terms of the settlement agreement.
Generally, the terms include a cash payment in exchange for a release from any claims related to any franchise fee
calculations prior to January 1, 2002, as well as ordinances which amend the electric and gas franchise agreements to
include additional categories of revenue in the franchise fee calculation from and after January 1, 2002.
The additional categories of revenue referenced in the electric franchise amendment are Discretionary Service Charges,
which can be fOWld in Oncor's Tarifffor Retail Delivery Service.
The gas franchise amendment provides that, at the election of the City, the franchise fee will increase to a maximwn of
4.00% of the applicable franchise fee payment base and, also at the election of the City, the franchise fee payment base
be amended to include certain categories of revenue which are not currently subject to a franchise fee Wlder most of
TXU Gas' existing franchises. TXU Gas requests that the City review the proposed franchise amendment carefully to
ensure that it reflects the wishes of the City in this matter since, in the past, many cities have made a specific decision
to exclude certain customer classes from local franchise fees.
Oncor and TXU Gas respectfully requests approval of the agreement.
Sincerely,
ILL-
Rick Vaughn
Area Manager
Enclosures
RESOLUTION R-02-2066
APPROVAL OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH TXU ELECTRIC AND TXU
GAS RELATING TO CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF ELECTRIC AND GAS FRANCHISE
FEE CALCULATIONS PRIOR TO JANUARY 1, 2002
WHEREAS, thirty-seven cities filed a suit in the 134th Judicial District Court of Dallas
County, Texas styled City of Denton, Texas et al. vs. TXU Electric
Company et al. which included claims arising out of the calculation and
amount of franchise fees paid by TXU Electric and TXU Gas; and
WHEREAS, the Litigation was resolved by agreement and TXU Electric and TXU Gas
have agreed to offer the City of Colleyville, Texas, as well as all cities
served by the company, the same benefits offered to the Plaintiffs in the
Litigation; and
WHEREAS, TXU Electric (Oncor) will pay the City a sum of money in the amount of
$15,919.44; and
WHEREAS, TXU Gas will pay the City a sum of money in the amount of $50,223,51;
and
WHEREAS, the City acknowledges that TXU Gas has the right to and shall recover the
sum of $50,223.51 from its ratepayers through a surcharge to the monthly
bills rendered to its ratepayers; and
WHEREAS, the City has agreed to accept the offer by TXU Electric and TXU Gas in
order to fully and finally resolve all disputes and claims arising out of the
calculation and payment of franchise fees to the City prior to and through
December 31 , 2001.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1,
THAT the City Council of the City of Colleyville, Texas, approves the
Compromise, Settlement, and Release Agreement, hereby attached as
Exhibit "A".
AS IT IS SO RESOLVED.
PASSED BY A VOTE OF AYES,
THIS THE DAY OF
NAYS AND
2002.
ATTEST:
Resolution R-02-2066
Page 2 of 2
ABSTENTIONS ON
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
"Exhibit A"
COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
This Compromise, Settlement, and Release Agreement (the "Agreement") is made and
entered into as of the date set forth below by and between the City of Colleyville (the "City") and
TXU Electric Company nlk/a TXU US Holdings Company ("TXU Electric") and TXU Gas
Company ("TXU Gas"):
WHEREAS, thirty seven cities filed a suit in the 134th Judicial District Court of Dallas
County, Texas, in Cause No. 00-9383, styled City of Denton. Texas et ai, VS. TXU Electric Company,
et at. (the "Litigation") which included claims arising out of the electric and gas franchise ordinances
similar in some respects to the franchise ordinances entered into by and between the City and
TXU Electric and TXU Gas and, specifically, the Litigation involved a dispute with regard to the
calculation and amount of franchise fees paid by TXU Electric and TXU Gas;
WHEREAS, the Litigation was resolved by agreement and TXU Electric and TXU Gas have
agreed to offer the City the same benefits offered to the Plaintiffs in the Litigation and the City has
agreed to accept the offer by TXU Electric and TXU Gas and to release any claims related to the
payment of franchise fees prior to and through December 31,2001 ;
NOW, THEREFORE, in order to fully and finally resolve all disputes and claims arising
out of the calculation and payment of franchise fees to the City by TXU Electric and TXU Gas prior
to and through December 31, 2001, for the mutual promises and covenants set forth in this
Agreement, the adequacy and sufficiency of which consideration is acknowledged the City and
TXU Electric and TXU Gas agree as follows:
1. AMENDMENTS TO THE ELECTRIC FRANCHISE ORDINANCE
As the result of electric industry restructuring, the electric franchise formerly held by
TXU Electric has been assigned to Oncor Electric Delivery Company ("Oncor"), accordingly,
COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Pal!:e I
effective January 1,2002, the City agrees to enter into and TXU Electric agrees to cause On cor to
accept an amendment to the current electric franchise ordinance substantially in the form of the
amendment attached as Exhibit A which amendment shall, at the election of the City, provide that
the Discretionary Services Charges identified in Section 6.1.2 of the Tariff for Retail Delivery
applicable to Oncor which are directly paid by the customer and which are those charges identified
as items DOl through and inclusive of 0024 in said tariff, shall be subject to an additional franchise
fee based on 4% of such charges which additional franchise fee shall be paid to the City pursuant
to the terms of the amendment attached as Exhibit A. The City acknowledges that Oncor may file
with the Texas Public Utility Commission and/or the City a tariff amendment in compliance with
the terms of this agreement, which will provide that Oncor shall have the right to collect from the
customer the franchise fee on such Discretionary Service Charges such that the customer shall bear
100% of the franchise fee on such Discretionary Service Charges. The City acknowledges that
Oncor is an intended third-party beneficiary of this agreement and agrees to cooperate with Oncor
in order for Oncor to pass through to customers the entire franchise fee on such Discretionary
Service Charges by taking the following actions: (i) to the extent the City acts as regulatory
authority, by adopting and approving that portion of any tariff in compliance with the terms of this
Agreement which provides for 100% recovery of such franchise fees; (ii) in the event the City
intervenes in any regulatory proceeding before a federal or state agency in which the recovery of the
franchise fees on such Discretionary Service Charges is an issue, the City will take an affirmative
position supporting the 100% recovery of such franchise fees by Oncor and; (iii) in the event of an
appeal of any such regulatory proceeding in which the City has intervened, the City will take an
affirmative position in any such appeals in support of the 100% recovery of such franchise fees by
Oncor. The City further agrees not to take any action to prevent the recovery of the franchise fees
COMPROMISE, SElTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Pa2e 2
on such Discretionary Service Charges by Oncor and to take other action which may be reasonably
requested by Oncor to provide for the 100% recovery of such franchise fees by Oncor.
2. AMENDMENTS TO THE GAS FRANCHISE ORDINANCE
Effective January 1, 2002, the City agrees to enact and TXU Gas agrees to accept an
amendment to the current gas franchise ordinance substantially in the form of the amendment
attached as Exhibit B to provide that, at the election ofthe City, the franchise fee will increase to a
maximum of 4.00% of the applicable franchise fee payment base and, at the election of the City, the
franchise fee payment base shall be amended to include miscellaneous fees, contributions in aid of
construction, bad debt expense, transportation revenues and third-party gas sales and gross receipts
fees as well as a favored nations clause with respect to franchise fee payments and franchise fee
calculations, substantially in the form of the provisions in Exhibit B. The City acknowledges that
TXU Gas has the right to recover from its ratepayers such additional franchise fee payments to the
City and the City agrees to cooperate with TXU Gas in order for TXU Gas to pass through to its
ratepayers the entire franchise fee payment, as amended, by taking the following actions: (i) as
regulatory authority, by adopting and approving the ordinance, rates or tariff which provide for
100% recovery of such franchise fees as part of TXU Gas' rates; (ii) in the event the City intervenes
in any regulatory proceeding before a federal or state agency in which the recovery of TXU Gas'
franchise fees is an issue, the City will take an affirmative position supporting 100% recovery of
such franchise fees by TXU Gas and; (iii) in the event of an appeal of any such regulatory
proceeding in which a City has intervened, the City will take an affirmative position in any such
appeals in support of the 100% recovery of such franchise fees by TXU Gas. The City further agrees
not to take any action to prevent the recovery of such franchise fees by TXU Gas and to take other
COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Paee 3
action which may be reasonably requested by TXU Gas to provide for the 100% recovery of such
franchise fees from TXU Gas' ratepayers.
3. PAYMENTS TO THE CITY
Upon execution and delivery of a fully executed and notarized original of this Agreement:
A. TXU Gas agrees to pay to the City the sum of $50,223.51. The City acknowledges
that TXU Gas has the right to and shall recover this amount from its ratepayers
pursuant to the tax adjustment clause applicable to TXU Gas, by applying a
surcharge to the monthly bills rendered to its ratepayers, provided that the recovery
of such surcharge shall be limited as follows: (1) the surcharge shall be amortized
over a period not less than three years, and (2) the accrual balance will not be subject
to interest. TXU Gas agrees that the franchise fee paid to the City and recovered
from ratepayers under this Agreement will not include any amounts collected in the
past from ratepayers.
B. TXU Electric agrees to pay, or cause Oncor to pay the City, the sum of$15,919.44.
4. RELEASE OF TXU ELECTRIC, TXU GAS AND THEIR AFFILIATES BY THE
CITY
Except for claims arising out of a breach of this Agreement, the City of Colleyville, on behalf
of itself and its successors and assigns and any and all persons, entities or municipalities claiming
by, through or under them, hereby RELEASES, DISCHARGES AND ACQUITS, forever and for
all purposes, TXU Electric Company (now known as TXU US Holdings Company), its successor
Oncor Electric Delivery Company, TXU Gas Company, including its division TXU Gas
Distribution, TXU Corp, and each of their respective agents, employees, officers, directors,
shareholders, partners, insurers, attorneys, legal representatives, successors and assigns as well as
COMPROMISE. SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Paee 4
their affiliated corporations, including TXU Business Services Company and TXU Energy Company
LLC and its subsidiaries, from and against any and all liability which they now have, have had or
may have, and all past, present and future actions, causes of action, claims, demands, damages, costs,
expenses, compensation, losses and attorneys' fees of any kind or nature whatsoever, or however
described, whether known or unknown, fixed or contingent, in law or in equity, whether asserted or
unasserted, whether in tort or contract, whether now existing or accruing in the future arising out of
or related to the payment, calculation or rendition of franchise fees to the City on or before
December 31, 2001 and all claims which could be asserted against TXU Electric and/or TXU Gas
in litigation in any way related to the payment, calculation or rendition of franchise fees by
TXU Electric and/or TXU Gas on or before December 31,2001. This release is intended to only
release claims related to the payment, calculation or rendition of franchise fees by TXU Electric and
TXU Gas on or before December 31, 2001 and is not intended to release any other claim or cause
of action that any party to this Agreement has, known or unknown, or which accrues in the future.
5. WARRANTY AS TO OWNERSHIP OF CLAIMS AND AUTHORITY
A. The City warrants and represents that it is the owner of the claims being
compromised, settled, discharged and released pursuant to this Agreement and each
further warrants and represents that it has not previously assigned all or any part of
such claims to another entity or person. The City warrants and represents that there
are no liens of any nature, assignments or subrogation interests in or to the money
paid to the City under the terms of this Agreement. The City warrants that it will take
all action necessary to properly execute and' deliver this agreement.
COMPROMISE. SElTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Pal!e 5
B. TXU Electric and TXU Gas warrant that the person(s) executing this Agreement on
their behalf has authority to bind the entity for whom such person signs this
Agreement.
6. NO ADMISSION OF LIABILITY
This Agreement is made to compromise, terminate and to constitute an accord and
satisfaction of all of the claims released by this Agreement and TXU Electric and TXU Gas admit
no liability, fault or wrongdoing of any nature or kind whatsoever and expressly deny and disclaim
any liability, fault or wrongdoing alleged or which could have been alleged with regard to the claims
asserted in the Litigation if the City had become a party to the Litigation or any similar claims which
might be asserted by the City against TXU Electric and/or TXU Gas.
7. RECOVERY OF DAMAGES DUE TO BREACH
In the event of breach by any party of the terms and conditions ofthis Agreement, a non-
breaching party shall be entitled to recover all expenses as a result of such breach, including, but not
limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
8. It is understood and agreed that all agreements and understandings by and between the parties
to this Agreement with respect to the payment of franchise fees and the settlement of any claims
related to the payment of franchise fees are expressly embodied in this Agreement and that this
Agreement supersedes any and all prior agreements, arrangements or understandings between the
parties relating to the claims released pursuant to this Agreement or any matters related thereto
executed by the parties.
9. The parties acknowledge and agree that the terms of this Agreement are all contractual and
not mere recitals.
COMPROMISE, SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Paee 6
10. The parties acknowledge that they have read this Agreement, understand its terms, and that
this Agreement is entered into voluntarily, without duress, and with full knowledge of its legal
significance.
11. This Agreement may not be modified in any manner, nor may any rights provided for herein
be waived, except by an instrument in writing signed by each party.
12. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their
respective successors and assigns.
13. Should any term or any provision of this Agreement be declared invalid by a court of
competent jurisdiction, the parties agree that all other terms of this Agreement are binding and have
full force and effect as if the invalid portion had not been included.
14. The parties represent and warrant that no party has been induced to enter this Agreement by
a statement, action or representation of any kind or character made by the persons or entities released
under this Agreement or any person or persons representing them, other than those expressly made
in this Agreement.
15. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement may be executed in a number of identical
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original for all purposes.
16. The headings contained herein are for convenience and reference only and are agreed, in no
way, to define, describe, extend or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or its provisions.
17. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the date
set forth,
COMPROMISE. SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Pal!e 7
THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS
By:
Its:
Date:
TXU ELECTRIC COMPANY nlkla TXU
US HOLDINGS COMPANY
By:
Its:
Date:
TXU GAS COMPANY
By:
Its:
Date:
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF
by
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _ day of
, as on behalf of the City of
2002,
Notary Public, State of Texas
COMPROMISE. SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Paee 8
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _ day of _ 2002,
by , ofTXU Electric Company nlk/a TXU US Holdings Company, on behalf
of said corporation,
Notary Public, State of Texas
STATE OF TEXAS
COUNTY OF DALLAS
This instrument was acknowledged before me on the _ day of _ 2002,
by , ofTXU Gas Company, on behalf of said corporation.
Notary Public, State of Texas
COMPROMISE. SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT - Pal!e 9
CITY COUNCIL
<n@rn", AGENDA BRIEFING
1(....."$
MEETING DATE: 12/03/02
ITEM #: j 11
RESOLUTION #: R-02-2067
CITY MANAGER i
DEPARTMENT HEAD [
FINANCE REVIEW !
N/A
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: Consideration of appointment to the Metroport Teen
Court Advisory Board
Reading and Public Hearing
On October 1, 1996, the Cities of Colleyville, Southlake and Grapevine; Town of Trophy Club;
the Carroll Independent School District; and the Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School
District entered into an Interlocal Agreement for the purpose of supporting a volunteer program
which allows juvenile misdemeanor offenders an alternative to the criminal justice center, The
Agreement provides for a Teen Court Advisory Board, appointed by the respective governing
body, and comprised of two (2) members from ~a~ participating entity. The Board oversees
and evaluates teen court, solicits communit~;:)ervice avenues and participates in the
committee fundraising efforts.
Two positions on the Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board, whose terms expired September
2002, were advertised. One application was received and on October 15, 2002, the City
Council appointed Ms. Linda Eilenfeldt to the Board. One position remained open and was
advertised and applications accepted through November 15, 2002. There are two (2)
applicants, whose names are listed below and their applications are attached.
· Frank Whitmire
· Deanne Ayers
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board roster
· Applications for Appointment
· Resolution R-02-2067
2002-2003 ADVISORY BOARD
Members
City I Entitv
Linda Eilenfeldt
2801 Cottonwood
Colleyville, TX 76034
Work Phone: 817-416-5112
Home Phone: 817-571-3682
Cell Phone: 817-909-1052
Colleyville
Debbie Armstrong
3006 Doublecreek Drive
Grapevine, TX 76051
Kim Early
3046 Creekbend Circle
Grapevine, TX 76051
Keith Shankland
1704 Pecos Drive
South lake, TX 76092
HOME: 817-481-3606
CELL: 817-366-6648
Grapevine
HOME: 817-251-2337
EMAIL: EARLY@COOLLlNK.NET
CELL: 817-475-6510
HOME: 817-421-6756
Grapevine
South lake
Denise Burkhart
2705 North Quail Run
Southlake, TX 76092
HOME: 817-481-2732
CELL: 817-247-3852
PAGER: 214-963-1832
South lake
Sandy Sobocinski
903 Wentwood Drive
Southlake, TX 76092
HOME: 817-410-8014
WORK: 817-949-5800
EMAIL: GSOBOCINSK@AOL.COM
Carroll ISD
Committee Members
FundraisinQ (Scholarships and Volunteer Incentives)
Kim Early
Debbie Armstrong
Darlene Freed
Public Relations (School Contacts) Public Relations (Media Attention)
Proiects/Events (Day)
Sandy Sobocinski Darlene Freed
Debbie Armstrong Keith Shankland
Sandy Sobocinski
Kim Early
Denise Burkhart
MUNICIPAL JUDGES
Jim Ames
460 W. Harwood Rd.
Hurst, TX 76054
WORK: 817-280-0811 Co II eyville
COURT: 817-577-7575
EMAIL: J.AMES@LEACHAMESMNDHM.COM
Terry Leach
460 W. Harwood Rd.
Hurst, TX 76054
WORK: 817-280-0811 Co II eyville
COURT: 817-577-7575
EMAIL: TLEACH@LEACHAMESMNDHM.COM
David A. Florence
P.O. Box 2413
Grapevine, TX 76099
COURT: 817-410-3282 Grapevine
Carol Montgomery
1903 Cobbs
Grapevine, TX 76051
HOME: 817-266-5291 Southlake
COURT: 817-481-5746
EMAIL: CMONTGOMERY@CITYOFSOUTHLAKE.COM
Andrew Wambsgnass
801 Chase TX Towers
FT. Worth, TX 76102
COUNCIL MEMBER L1ASONS
Darlene Freed
3417 Lookout Ct.
Grapevine, TX 76051
Joe Hocutt
7703 Tillman Hill Rd.
Colleyville, TX 76034
COURT PERSONNEL
Amber Cartwright, Metroport Teen Court
1400 Main St., Suite 440
Southlake, TX 76092
WORK: 817-338-4888 South lake
EMAIL: AWAMBSGNASS@CITYOFSOUTHLAKE.COM
WORK: 817-481-9977
FAX: 817-488-2988
PAGER: 817-651-6604
CELL: 817-480-6434
EMAIL: DFREED@CI.GRAPEVINE.TX.US
HOME: 817-577-2151
EMAIL: JHOCUTT@ALATEX.COM
WORK: 817-481-1897
FAX: 817-481-1945
EMAIL: acartwright@ci.southlake.tx.us
Grapevine
Colleyville
oMs.
o Mrs.
~ Mr. Name:
.
CitY or
RETARY'S
OFFICE
1v'/lrf(Jlr,,(E FblA.lK
(Last) (First)
Address: 230 0 tJ4~ I<.lVoLL (!l!iu;< /
Home Telephone: g 17 - 2 g :? - 80.5 8
L.
(MI)
Work Telephone: ~c,=-/7 ~c:---D
Email Address: DWFlA..ljJ/lWS- f?)PI?-J!I-/V&'TFax: &(7-54S--4f64
Board, Commission or Committee Appointment Desired:
/!:?=~ CcfJu;:2i 4D(/(J&,~ &/l~
Qualifications: (list educational background or experience that would assist you in
carrying out the duties of this appointment)
815-4 ):)C-?(/C-~ t/Tr;. tiS /f/;e! Fd~('F f/t!7C'/1r1N
I
3' 0 VEYJr2-S nc---r2-Vt-- /PLfLF 0 AQ-rt. - COLLc-rrt//LLE >~72Y~
A J ct?{/~-r-- ;~1-L-./Fr- /if,~ 4cLt:--r-f//L /E
pUI?L /74-Yb.< - C(JLLEYI//LLF., ?;/t? Clfl-r~-ntJtL) 2t:~
/ ;
TL:ifriC ~/tFc-ff CtP/lr;J7 y /I? EY7le'c-;t' tJr tfJ ~I 6'( tf/A-c (1/ Tf' t7t1-14-erL Q9/lf .
Reasons for Serving: (state briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment
and your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee)
R/J/JR) .3 CI'fILiJ&,u I" tJ/{1// 7?/ I!t:-Z,P ~46R~{'* M/71
(i/7'/ t1tJ{,/;VCIL t:::7fd/aULE;_ (1641/17r ~ :I' /2J"1~L) n;:h6E711C"c
:j L1-tJ E71/RLt!6-/nallT f (}tft/Lr .J?:(J?~(c;tJCF 61t/~ /lle-
/l~J ;d/c7lJ5/{~ b~K r;r&u,up H-L 71/1) d/41IlJlY11 "
Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee?
-X yes ? _no
Date: / / -- 2 - <0 Z--
Signature:
Once the City Council has filJed a position, your application will be removed from the file
and you must reapply for future openings.
This infonnation will become a Public Record.
City Secretary P.O. Box 185, Colleyville, Texas 76034, Phone: 817.577.7575 Fax: 817.577.7555
llCfJ
f5)~ ~ [E ~ \W ~fn\
ln1 NOV 1 1 2002 lW
city Of
Texas
CITY SECRETARY'S
OFFICE
Application for Appointment
Name: Ayers
(Last)
Deanne C.
(First) (MI)
4808 Meanderina Way. Collevville. Texas 76034
Address:
Home Telephone:
(817) 267-1630
(817) 267-9009
Work Telephone:
Email Address: dayers@ayersfirm.com Fax:
(817) 318-0663
Board, Commission or Committee Appointment Desired: Metrooort Teen Court
Advisory Board.
Qualifications: (list educational background or experience that would assist you in
carrying out the duties of this appointment)
Ouachita Baptist University. B.A. in Political SCience with focus on criminal
iustice. Baylor University School of Law. J.D. Practicing attorney since 1988
with emphasis on civil litigation. Extensive experience in mediation. arbitration
and other forms of dispute resolution. I have also acted as attorney ad litem and
guardian ad litem for minors involved in legal actions as well as prosecuting
attorney.
Reasons for Serving: (state briefly the contributions you can make to this
appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission,
or Committee)
My experience in dispute resolution as well as the legal system aenerally offers a
perspective for this Board which I believe can be of assistance. I also have
business experience in operating small businesses and management which will
assist in the operations aspect of the teen court program.
Do you underst
appointee?
that attendance and active support is required for each
yes no
Signature:
Date:
II~I/-O 7-
RESOLUTION R-02-2067
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING A MEMBER TO THE METROPORT TEEN COURT
ADVISORY BOARD
WHEREAS, the Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board has one vacancy,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec, 1.
THAT the City Council hereby appoints the following person to the
Metroport Teen Court Advisory Board to serve until September 2003:
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
_ AYES, NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS,
2002, BY A VOTE OF
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL
Cd Y r)f
/?\) ~
~~~D'13 AGENDA BRIEFING
"'l'X~~
MEETING DATE: 12/03/02
ITEM # : 12
RESOLUTION # :' R-02-2068
CITY MANAGER
DEPARTMENT HEAD
FINANCE REVIEW ,
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: Approval of funding allocation for the design,
construction and installation of the Colleyville City
Hall and Public Library sculpture, in the amount of
$51,800
Reading and Public Hearing
On September 3, 2002, the City Council approved Change Order 2 for the City Hall and
Library, in the amount of $170,959. Change Order 2 provided for modifications for
walkway pavers, emergency lighting, tree grates, ADA compliance, library stairway,
technical services, area window shades, light fixture selections, library intrusion
detection system, plumbing and elevator revisions, library roof revisions, stone window
headers, fountain finish-out and thermoplastic parking lot striping.
On September 3, 2002, the City Council also approved Change Order 3 for the City Hall
and Library, in the amount of $425,213. This Change Order included additional monies
for the finish-out of the library, including carpet, mechanical and duct work, HV AC boxes
and diffusers, ceiling, paint lights and toilets, the addition of a library drive-through
structure, addition of CCTV cameras and security mirrors for the library. Change Order
3 also included additional days and general conditions related to the changes in the
scope of the project.
Although Change Order 2 included fountain finish-out, it did not include the design and
construction of the City Hall and Public Library sculpture for the loggia. Since
September 2002, the City has received donations and pledges toward the design and
construction of the Colleyville City Hall and Public Library Art sculpture. The estimated
total cost for the design, construction and installation of this sculpture is $140,000. As
per discussions with Brinkley Sargent Architects and Mike Kendall Landscaping, the
City Hall and Library sculpture will need to be authorized for design and construction in
January 2003, to ensure delivery by the projected opening date of October 2003,
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-02-2068
Page 2 of 2
As per the attached, the City has received a total of $56,100, as of November 24, 2002,
and anticipates receipt of an additional $32,100 committed for payment by December
31, 2002, for a total of $88,200. On the basis that the City Hall and Library sculpture will
need to be authorized by January 2003, additional monies in the amount of $51,800 will
need to be allocated to provide for the sculpture. The attached payment schedule
reflects the anticipated receipt of the $51,800,
The monies pledged, to date, in the amount of $144,200, exceed the cost of the design
and construction of the City Hall and Public Library sculpture. The remaining funds of
$4,200 will be used for the purchase of a contributor's plaque for individuals and
businesses donating $3,000 or more, Any funds remaining after the purchase of the
contributor's plaque will be donated to the Colleyville Public Library for additional
enhancements.
Financial Impact
The remaining construction fund balance is $233,649. The funding sources for the
design and construction of the City Hall and Public Library sculpture, in the amount of
$51,800, are the construction fund balance or the general fund balance. The balance of
the remaining construction fund, including the City Hall and Public Library sculpture is
$181,849. Upon receipt, donation monies may be allocated to the construction fund.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
. City Hall and Library Sculpture Donations
. Resolution R-02-2068
~
::J
.9-
::J
U
(j)
>.
~
..0
:.:J
""0
e
co
cu
I
.q
U
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0
e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 C\I 0 0 0 0 II) 0 0 0 0 <0 II)C') C\!.
.2 0 to (") to 0 (") (") Y7 .,f (") (") (") - to to to .,f (") (") Y7 Y7 Y7
Cij C\I C') II) II) ~ C') C') C') '<t
- C\I Y7 Y7 ~ C') Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 '<t
- t1I Y7 Y7 Y7 ~
0 c: Y7
.... 0
c
0 0 0 0 0
II) 0 0 0 II)
<OC\I 0 ~ 0 C\I
>'0 '<t (") ~ ~ OJ
cOO
OJ~ Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7
::JO
DC')
--
OJ
0 0 0 0 0
II) 0 0 0 II)
II)C\I 0 O. ~ C\I
>'0 '<t C') ~ ~ cri'
cOO
OJ~ Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7
::JO
DC')
--
OJ
0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0
II) 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 II)
'<tC\l O. 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0_ O. t--
>'0 (") r--:
coo '<t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 ~
OJ~ Y7
::JO
O~
OJ
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
II) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II)
C') C\I 0 0 0 0 o. ~ ~ ~ o. II). o. ~ t--
>'0 . (")
coo '<t C\I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ
OJ~ Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 ~
Y7
::JO
DC')
--
OJ
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C\I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>.0 0 0 0 0 0 C\I 0 0 0 0 II) 0 0 0 0 <0 II) C') ~
. . (") . . . . to to . (") . . (") Y7 Y7 Y7 N
COO C\I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
C\I Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 C')
OJ-- Y7
::JO
O~
C\I
~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
B 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 ~
>. ""0 (") C') . (") 0 (") C\I . . Y7 '<t II) cD
~ ~
OJ OJ OJ Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 C') Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 Y7 II)
e >-
o .- CO Y7 Y7
~~O
OJ
((
Cfl
CO
X
OJ
....
..c ~
t:: ::J
0 tl
z .~
'0 Cfl ..c
~ .ex u
e OJ ~
~ e Cfl 0 e CO .~
tl .... ~
Cfl e .Qi 0 U .ex ""0
E e OJ CO 2 .ex E ~ ~ .... e - e
0 ~ e E :.c e Qi .EO ~ CO :J CO
u co 0 Cfl U CO cu ~ co a co u g
W 0 U5 co Cfl e
.~ Cfl OJ ..c Ul ~ a.. ::J 0 co .~ Z- 0
0 I f- a... 0 Ul e e e- I .9- iD'
0 OJ Cfl OJ OJ Qi 0 .ex OJ CJ
~ ..c U; e ...J ""0 ""0 OJ ~ ~ c Ul e 0 U tl .... e ...., .c OJ ell
Ul :;::: .~ 0 C e 0 u ell ~ Ul 0 U; 2 ..c ell Z- E <( u =0
e u (5 'C OJ ~ ::J 0
Z .~ ell c: ::J ..c .... OJ cu Q) co E Ul e
-~ E co 0 cu ~ ell e co U ...J Q) Q) ~ U; ""0 Q) Q) ell ...., ""0
cu ""0 ..c g OJ cu u: .!!l ~ Qi E .~ e e Q) co .... e E c: e :.:J
(j) ell e Q) (( ~ 0 ""0 e ""0 ~ ~ ~ ..c 0 ell 1ii 0 e ell ell
OJ 0 <( z U ""0 e (j) ~ e :J ell U ...J en ""0 0: 0 0 E ...J I
'0 I ~ 0 Ul ""0 ell ~ ell Q) ~ U 0 U
U Q) e ...., ~ 0 e
OJ Q) e 0 ~ .2:- - :J .0 CU E
OJ .... ell Ul Ul u Q. 6 Ul ell ell .... Qi (j) - Ul ell .... ~ ""0
0 OJ OJ 32 ~ 0 u E ell ~ ~ e ""0 .!!l Cij
E ~ OJ .C E ell E u cu e
u Q) ro (j) 0 co E .0 t:: e ro x Ul 1ii Qi x ..c ::J e - -
ell ell 0 u: w OJ OJ ell 0 0 ell .C a.. ::J ~ 0 co Q) Q) 0 ell co e 0 OJ .- 0
z co U I a... f- ...., f- co U co ...., (( ...J f- (j) (( (( I f- ...., ~ ~ ::> u ~ ~ ....
~
a..
<0
C')
t--
C\I
o
o
C\I
lO
C\I
--
~
~
RESOLUTION R-02-2068
A RESOLUTION APPROVING OF FUNDING ALLOCATION FOR THE DESIGN,
CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF THE COLLEYVILLE CITY HALL AND
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCULPTURE
WHEREAS, funding for the design, construction and installation of the City Hall and
Public Library sculpture is being provided by private donations and
pledges; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to proceed with the design, construction and
installation of the City Hall and Public Library sculpture; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1,
THAT the funding allocation for the design, construction and installation of
the Colleyville City Hall and Library sculpture, in the amount of $51,800
from the construction fund contingency, is hereby approved.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
PASSED BY A VOTE OF AYES,
THIS THE DAY OF
NAYS, AND
2002.
ABSTENTIONS ON
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL
cc6@ AGENDA BRIEFING
Tc:e;:'l$
,
FINANCE REVIEW I
MEETING DATE:
ITEM # :
RESOLUTION # :
12/03/02
13
R-02-2069
CITY MANAGER :
DEPARTMENT HEAD I
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT : ENGINEERING
SUBJECT: Approval of the construction contract with Carter
Construction Company for the Grapevine-Colleyville
Independent School District (GCISD) ballfield
improvements, in the amount of $65,000
Reading and Public Hearing
City staff has been working with the Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District
(GCISD) and the Colleyville Baseball Association (CBA) and Girl's Softball Associations
(CGSA) for the past several months in an effort to upgrade several practice fields within the
City. The four fields currently designated for upgrading are located at Colleyville Elementary
School (1), Colleyville Middle School (1), and a.c. Taylor Elementary School (2). Each field
improvement will consist of the removal and replacement of the existing infield grasses. Some
miscellaneous gradework and hydro mulching will also occur in the disturbed areas.
City staff has met with both the Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District (GCISD) and
the associations to review the design and specifications.
Sealed bids were received on November 13, 2002, for the construction of the ballfield
improvements. Two bids were submitted, with Carter Construction Company, Inc., submitting
the low bid, in the amount of $48,948.95. City staff will include bid alternates one and two
(sodding in lieu of hydro mulch) and also a 15% construction contingency fund, for a total
construction amount of $65,000.
The City Attorney has reviewed and approved this contract.
Financial Impact
Funding is available from the Voluntary Park Fund in the amount of $40,000, Colleyville Girl's
Softball Association in the amount of $10,000 and Colleyville Baseball Association in the
amount of $15,000.
Recommendation
Approval
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-02-2069
Page 2
Attachments
. Bid Tab
. Financial Status of Voluntary Park Fund
. Resolution R-02-2069
2002 BALLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS
Bid Tab
- November 13, 2002 -
'){)Watauru:: :':',:::):':':::::,:::::ii':::::::::::::::)):::::':i """""""""",,,",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"""""""""""""", """"""""""""""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"""""""""""
I~ijf.t.. 1@$lgl\1".llll'~11.! Ill'.I.I~I'I:..
1 Carter Construction Com an
2 Sprinkle 'N Sprout
y
y
$48,948.95 $
$49,556.00 $
2,524.50
2,618.00
$5,049.00
$5,236.00
FINANCIAL STATUS OF VOLUNTARY PARK FUND AT 10-31-2002
FUND BALANCE AT 9-30-2003:
FY 2003 REVENUE
Donations: PROJECTED ACTUAL
October $10,326 $10,326
November $9,850 $0
December $9,875 $0
January $9,875 $0
February $9,900 $0
March $9,900 $0
April $9,925 $0
May $9,925 $0
June $9,950 $0
July $9,950 $0
August $10,000 $0
September $10,000 $0
City Park Sign Revenue $350 $0
Total Donations $119,826 $10,326
Interest income Received $7,000 $0
TOTAL $126,826 $10,326
$432,891
FY 2002 EXPENDITURES
UNENCUMBERED FUND BALANCE AT 10-31-2002 (COUNCIL APPROVED)
RECOMMENDED APPROVED EXPENDED
(BOARD) (COUNCIL)
------- ------- -------
------- ------- -------
$41,236 $41,236 $0
$19,123 $19,123 $0
$46,325 $46,325 $0
$50,000 $50,000 $0
------- ------- -------
------- ------- -------
$156,684 $156,684 $0
$286,533
COTTON BEL T PHASE II LOCAL MATCH &&
SPARGER PARK TRAIL GRANT LOCAL MATCH@@
COTTON BEL T TRAIL PHASE III --
GCISD PRACTICE AREA IMPROVEMENTS##
TOTAL
PROJECTED FUND BALANCE AT 9-30-2003
$403,033
EXPENDITURE KEY:
&& FY 2002 PROJECT/APPROVED OCT 99
@@ FY 2002 PROJECT/APPROVED MAY 2000
-- FY 2002 PROJECT/APPROVED JUNE 2001
## FY 2002 PROJECT/APPROVED JULY 2002
RESOLUTION R-02-2069
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH CARTER
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., FOR THE GRAPEVINE-COLLEYVILLE
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT (GCISD) BALLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has been working with the Colleyville Baseball
Association (CBA) and Colleyville Girl's Softball Association (CGSA) and
GCISD to make improvements to four ballfield practice sites at Colleyville
Middle School, Colleyville Elementary and O.C. Taylor Elementary School;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville desires to approve the contract for the improvements
to these ballfield practice sites.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the construction contract with Carter Construction Company, Inc.,
for the GCISD ballfield improvements, in the amount of $65,000, is hereby
approved.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
PASSED BY A VOTE OF
THIS THE DAY OF
AYES,
NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS ON
2002.
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL
ell)" Of
cc~n", AGENDA BRIEFING
-'-('.>;;:1 S
MEETING DATE:
ITEM # :
RESOLUTION # :
12103/02
14
R-02-2070
CITY MANAGER
DEPARTMENT HEAD ':\~
FINANCE REVIEW' N.A.
Previous Action: 11/19/02
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: Approval of the Final Plat of Westcliff Addition,
57.112 acres located on the north of side of
McDonwell School Road, west of Fire Station No.3,
Case P-02-042
Update
The City Council denied the final plat without prejudice at the November 19, 2002, meeting.
Additional information was requested on the ownership of Broadland Limited Partnership as it
relates to the trail agreement for this project, which is a separate tabled item on this agenda.
Reading and Public Hearing
The David Bagwell Company has submitted a Final Plat on a 57-acre parcel of land located on
the north side of McDonwell School Road, east of Remington Parkway. The plat will create
103 single-family residential lots and 11 open space lots and will be the first phase of this
single family development.
The following is a summary of the major items associated with this Final Plat.
Zoning. This property is zoned PUD-R, approved by Ordinance 0-99-1153 on April 20, 1999.
The overall density of the development is 1.77 dwelling units per acre. The smallest lot is
13,500 square feet in area, with an average lot size of 15,302 square feet. While the average
lot size for this phase is less than the required 16,000 square feet, the PUD-R ordinance for
this property requires that the average lot size be taken over both phases of the development.
When the second phase of the development, Old Grove, is included, the lot sizes are sufficient
to bring the average to the required 16,000 square feet.
Open Space. The PUD-R ordinance for this property requires that 20% of the total
development be designated as open space. The 11 open space lots comprise 12.03 acres, or
21.1 % of the development. The homeowners association is responsible for the maintenance
of the private open space areas and the associated detention ponds.
Emergency Access. There is one primary entrance to the subdivision from McDonwel1
School Road on Newkirk Lane. A secondary emergency access is proposed at the south end
of Wildbriar Lane. This secondary access enables this subdivision to meet the requirement to
provide two entrances to this phase of the development.
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-02-2070
Page 2 of 2
Colleyville Pathways Plan. This property is subject to the provIsIons of the Colleyville
Pathways Plan, which requires a 10-foot wide hike and bike trail to be constructed through this
property. The developer will construct the trail on the east side of Newkirk Lane from the north
boundary of the church property to approximately the mid-point of the west property line of
McPherson Park with this phase of the subdivision.
The developer's engineer and surveyor have addressed all Development Review Committee
comments related to this final plat. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved the final
plat at the October 28,2002, meeting by a unanimous vote.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· Plat
· DRC Review Memo
· Applicant Correspondence
· Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes
· Resolution R-02-2070
S
3+M
N
~ l-r;;..p.. z<1l
~~~~ : ~<J.~ ",: ~~~
i I ~~"u '%.~I ~~"
o I ::lj..... -= ~:~... ... 3~.r t
I' ~1'. lj . t- lj ~ / I' ~
r~'"\ ", - " > ~
: ~ u , ~ 1"\ 'US""
Jc"~'~SOlC"ONOQAINXi:) -~'..:~~ _ _ _L _ _ _ _i~!~"~~
n
. .
. i n
~. ;0"
r I ~I Ii
~ I~~:~~:j i
h. .ili-=. -~.
..~,hi!..,et
c.
~~~
t. ~ o.i u
.::~:~e.
l":)"l-tj"c1
~6 9.:t 'Oli:HJU 1M
HOIJ.ICIQ\111J'J~
I )I:1019 'I 101
~~ ,
~~3
~~.
't-do
,p
~....
....~%.
~~~
....p
"""
o O~
5 ;~
=~~~f~
~","~D,. .u
~~IW~:
-!:it ...J 0
~ ig
......
......~
P~! ..~~
8:i" >+
;~il=
~i';-
;~i
;
.
J.-':l-C~'cI
02 "<)eI '69~a13r -101\
l'iO NOH:)JS 'Sll"lH I'jtlJ1S)M
\
~ ~ ~
Z ~~ i
o Z~ '"
tiO
~ ~ e ~ ~ ~~ 0
~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~
~~!!;~b8>~~g;> I
~ d~ ~~~~ ~r~ ~.
~ 8 a 2~ I
~ fila ~
III 0
. ~
a~ ~
~ ~
u ~
i!
~ -~!II
.
.
f u ~ I i~
~
~ ; ~ III
~
"i ~o t
I h
g ~
I
Sl ft
r i-j!
i ~ - ii
~~~~
Q-;5
~ DI;~
~ ..
23
~-
~~
~~
I
-
I
f
!~
.!
'.
..~
:ii
! !
f "
; :,
~ ~
~ Ii
~ ~
f P
i
~.h
l!~ :,
; .II! i
" ~i'~ ~ j
n i~h !
I
Ii
8 EU
J~!~~
.i..!
2gl'i
~I~il
I j!!i:
!U~~
IIi!
f ~ I
~d
. .
. .
! ~
~ &
i '
iP
~ '!
~ .
~ i
p,
i I II e
~ I
H~
. ,
! f
n ! .
i. l
Ie ~~
l!~ lis
2"'8 Ill..
ll~ ..
ij; ~ !~
'll i is
!,il II ~
,.' ~.!~
~=~ ~~ i:
i~~ ;i;i
.r; i~!1
H~ ;i!E
.~. !i~ 'j' ~i
! I i'~ II iI
ill ~: !' i~ !.
~J A -!,f- "
ff~ I~I~ ~~ Iii ~:~ij~
:)11 Jm ~: Jd :!i~.;
!",Bi
! II s j ~.~ i.. i
.! ~ ~ i! ji, ~:1 i: Ii. I ~ ~I i ;!I
.!d i~'~ ii'i.~i 'j., .J !;I. h !i l! - .~l
j;:: !~~~ ;!!I~ h U ;; !I~~~il il ~~ ~ ~U
H" ~'.' l'!'i~ 'j" r; sE'~ ~ I. i i".
;iil :!~~ ~im: t ~ii!! ~~i&!!J i~~! ~ ;~i
iH' j~U I~~';" ~; ~;: s! f;~~lk'l ~; II I! Ii!
~,i! f!~i I.J~! .l :i!. ~l !I,~I! i! Ii !i.
".. .'f .-~OI!, I < h ..- j- 'l I 'l~
tl;~ )!~ ~;IIil II Ii 'Ii i~;' . ;.
'I! s~h !!!i !~;~ ~h !! !I~I !tf !i~: !; rl~
!.S I ,t. '-j t. . I' ."! I!".
· ~.~g ~li, -i!~ -. " I: f~ . f.'
ri'~rJ :m :1 m !~~ ~!I! ~ ~s !~ M
Us J-" II -... !l 'I -N -8
i Ih i.i! !~ ili il! i j I i., i: i"I. .
;!f~- 'fi ;i~: ~~ ~eE ~iI - ~! ;!!; ;~ ~:;
~.. E- ~!" ~" i'~_ ~I- e.~! ~- ~!l,
8-. .Ii 8 E O! 8-. 8.. 8" 8_ .. ;_!!<I
0" . e'I=1 Z!ii' Z z:" 'e~ zef~'. "I o' olo.t~
~h;;: i!~ ~Jhh ~ h ~ t;,~ ~; ~if ~si n~~xll~ ~l ~n ~: ~b~ ~ho
.
.
.
1
! I
I:~e
"U'
... ~ d .G
,~, _ itoJ$E
ii.e'l .,.,.
il~i~ dJi!i
Jlf.!
~!
ii ..
~'tt II
i~;~ Ie
~ !~ iii;ji
H ia B~C!;
,! I~ pl~)l
!. I "x....
;1 p..~i ;1!!li
tl . · l..e: ~
C.I ." IOule
~!i iJ~ !iiJ)~
i!S -Ii
5-i ;g
~- f
~ ;ii ~n :m:i
~
.
a
e
I~
i
I
~ 15 0
N 2
N
~. i
~ ~~.,
~ 8 ~~~~
~ ~~ J~~~ ~~~
~l!i!!l~I~~~...~~.:
~ ~ll. aG~~ ~~~
~ 8~!1!-
~ ~8
8@)
~ ,oJ
!f .~l' i: '!i ~
:3; :i!1 aj i~..j
it; ;!~l !~ ill i~ ii
'I~ -Iii Ii h!;! 'i
Iii I~~ I~ ;ii Ii Ii
Hi I~!! "IS! !I~ II Ii
}~~ I";x ~ '!' j! }!
!l";" ':h Ii l;.~ ⁢ !II
Iii' i~1 " !ii Ii d
a~~ ~i~t ~! il! ~I ~!
~l~~ i~:.:i a.li i~ i~
!S"i< !M" ~ ~s~ IS !"
i;i~ I~i:"1 r. is: i; i;
~l"i ;!; ~~ ~!~ ~!a ~il
~m i"i~l ~ii =~, ~=, ;;,
"~;~ .!E-I"jl ~;; 8;; il~~
Z r .~., Oi!. I Ogt 0 i
~I,i hm ~d ~I, ~.~ ~ia
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
FAX TO
October 16, 2002
David Bagwell ~ Eddie Eckart ~ Justin Stratton
214-368-7740 ~ 817-446-3116 ~ 817-545-8989
Clayton Husband, AICP, Community Development Manager
, FAX NO
FROM
SUBJECT P-02-042 Final Plat - Westcliff
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your Final Plat request
submitted to this office on September 25, 2002, The following comments are for your
consideration.
GENERAL INFORMATION
The review of this plat and related engineering plans was based on Ordinance No. 0-99-1153,
adopted by the City Council on April 20, 1999, on the PUD-R regulations contained in the Land
Development Code, and on the Preliminary Plat approved by Resolution R-02-1903.
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PLANS
The engineering construction plans are under review by the Engineering Department, Fire
Department and Public Works Department. Comments on the paving, drainage and utility plans
are being coordinated with the developer's engineer. Questions concerning the engineering
construction plans should be directed to Chris Steubing, P.E" at 817-577-7587.
OTHER INFORMATION
1. HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL. A separate letter was sent to the developer on October 15, 2002,
regarding the issues surrounding the hike and bike trails for this property. The letter contains
specific information and proposals regarding portions of the trail within Westcliff Phase I,
Westcliff Phase II, and Old Grove. It is requested that the developer respond in writing to the
letter as the response will be included in the briefings to the Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council for the WestcliffPhase I and Phase II plats.
2. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all streets. All sidewalks
must be a minimum of 4-feet in width and constructed in the area between the curb line and
the adjacent property line. The sidewalks must be constructed when new structures are built
on the lot.
P.O. Box 185-Colleyville, Texas 76034-817.577.7587
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P"()2"()42 WESTCLIFF
3. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is
issued for a new structure on the lot. The Engineering Department will provide a formal
assessment of impact fees to the Building Inspection Department upon submittal for a building
pennit. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that
could be assessed.
ROADWAY
$1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMn.Y RESIDENTIAL uses. The actual fee depends on
specific use of the property. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code.
$2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
$200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
WATER
SEWER
4. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are
required for this property since McDonwell School Road is considered an unimproved street
and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The developer is required to construct one-
half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by
the City. The response letter should indicate the developer's intention of construction or
escrow regarding this roadway.
5. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval
of the final plat. The fee for single-family residential uses is $1,802 per lot. An assessment of
parkland dedication fees will be provided to the Engineering Department, and all fees must be
paid at the time of final acceptance of the subdivision.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, October 28,2002, 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, November 19, 2002, 7:30 p.m.
RESUBMITIAL REQUIREMENTS
A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices.
Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices:
· 15 folded copies ofthe revised Final Plat drawing
· one 81'2" xlI" reduced copy of the revised exhibit
· a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering
reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived
The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, August 7,2002
in order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning &
Zoning Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Please contact me at 817-577-7587 or
husbandc@ci.colleyville.tx.us if you have any questions.
PAGE20F3
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-D2-D42 WESTCLlFF
C: ENGINEERING DEPT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
BUILDING INSPECTION
PUBUC WORKS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
PAGE30F3
GOODWIN~
M ARSHALL~
CIVIL ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS
October 21,2002
Mr. Clayton Husband, AICP
Development Coordinator
City of Colleyville
5400 Bransford Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
RE: Westcliff Addition - Final Plat P-02-042
Dear Mr. Husband:
In response to the City of Colleyville's review comments concerning the above referenced
project, we offer the following changes and explanations for the Final Plat. For ease of reference,
the following are organized in the same order as your letter dated October 16th, 2002.
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PLANS
1. The engineering comments have been received and revised construction plans have
been re-submitted to the City. A revised trail section will be provided according to
the pending resolution between the City and the Developer.
OTHER INFORMATION
1. Please refer to the Developer's letter for this comment.
2. We are aware of the sidewalk policy and will follow the guidelines established in
Ordinance No. 0-99-1153 as to the construction of sidewalks.
3, We are aware that impact fees are due at the time of the building permit and the
Westcliffhomebuilders or ourselves will be paying the appropriate amounts.
4, Weare aware of the perimeter street improvements and would like to construct the
required improvements on McDonwell School Road that our development would be
required to build. Based on the previously escrowed monies that should have been
(or soon will be) obtained by the City of Colleyville for the surrounding
developments (i.e, Clairemont, Westmont, Remington Park, The Latter Day Saints
Church, and Raman Chandler's development, etc.), we would like to use that money
in conjunction with our required monies to construct improvements beyond the limits
of our boundary. If the City does not consider this a desirable solution, we would be
willing to escrow the monies required by this development for the McDonwell School
Road improvements.
600 I BRIDGE STREET. SUITE 100 I FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76112 I 817-429-4373 (METRO) I 817-446-3116 (FAX)
Mr, Clayton Husband
October 21,2002
Page 2 of2
5. We are aware of the parkland dedication fee and will be paying the appropriate fees
prior to acceptance of the subdivision.
Clayton, I appreciate the staff's time and consideration of this project, and if you have any
questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call me. Along with this letter, I
have included the required 15 copies of the revised final plat and an 8 !Iz x 11 copy of the plat.
Sincerely,
GO~rs~
Edward W. Eckart, ~~
EWE/jc
cc: David Bagwell
DA V[]D BAGWELL
CO~[PANY
October 23, 2002
Clayton Husband, AICP
Development Coordinator
City of Colleyville
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville,1)( 76034
Dear Clayton,
I am providing information in response to your October 16 Westcliff Final Plat
DRC comments letter that were not addressed by Eddie Eckart, P.E. in sepa-
rate correspondence. The following paragraph titles and sub-paragraph num-
bers track yours.
OTHER INFORMATION
1. HIKE AND BIKE TRAIL. The October 17, 2002 letter of the City Manager
to me, amended in 112. to provide that the developer of Westcliff Phase I
will build Segment B, is acceptable.
4. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. We propose to build the portion
of McDonwell School Road that we are obligated to build and also build addi-
tional sections of the road using funds escrowed by Clairmont, Remington
Park, the LOS Church, Westcliff Phase II, and Raman Chandler's new devel-
opment, plus road impact fees paid by builders in those developments and in
Westmont. If this is not possible, we will escrow with the City a reasonable
sum to satisfy the obligation imposed by the Land Development Code on
Westcliff for perimeter road construction.
If there is anything further that we need to address so that our zoning applica-
tion may ~e considered Monday night, please let me and Eddie know.
~m!)
~t.~~1I
cc: Eddie Eckart, P.E.
COMMU:.IIlY DEVELOPMENT
8222 DOUGlAS A VI'
SUITE 605
DALLAS, TEXA,S 75225
214 368-7711
METRO 817 ')40-5500
FAX 214 368-7740
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES
October 28, 2002
Case P-02-042 - final Plat of Westcliff Addition, 57.112 acres located on the
north side of McDonwell School Road, west of fire Station NO.3
Clayton Husband presented the case to the Commission and reviewed the staff briefing. He
displayed a slide of the aerial view of the property. He told the commissioners that the
developer, David Bagwell, has reached an agreement with the City and has agreed to
construct the hike and bike trail.
Commissioner Jones said this is the third time they have considered a final plat for this
property and he asked staff if they are in support of this plat.
Barry LeBaron recapped the previous action taken by the Commission and said that the denial
was due to the applicant's unwillingness to construct the trail. He said Mr. Bagwell has
entered into an agreement with the City and the Developer Agreement will go to City Council at
the same meeting that City Council considers this final plat. He said staff is comfortable with
the recommendation of approval.
Eddie Eckert, Goodwin & Marshall, Inc., was present to represent the case.
Commissioner Culley commented and thanked Mr. Eckert for his demeanor and willingness to
work with the commissioners throughout this process.
Commissioner Culley moved to approve the final plat of the Westcliff Addition.
Commissioner Swift seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Jones, Wall
Noes: None
Commissioner Sellers told the commissioners that he was recused from considering the case.
RESOLUTION R-02-2070
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
FINAL PLAT OF WESTCLlFF ADDITION
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the final plat of Westcliff Addition is hereby approved.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
NAYS AND
2002.
ABSTENTIONS ON
PASSED BY A VOTE OF
THIS THE DAY OF
AYES,
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Don na Arp
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL
Cd)" Of
~
CQ~~lil'13
T(...'\:~~
AGENDA BRIEFING
FINANCE REVIEW
MEETING DATE: I
ITEM # :
RESOLUTION # :
12/03/02
15
R-02-2071
CITY MANAGER .
DEPARTMENT HEAD
Previous Action: None
DEP ARTM ENT : PUBLIC WORKS
SUBJECT: Approval of purchasing a truck-mounted high-
pressure sewer cleaner through the Texas Local
Government Statewide Purchasing Cooperative
(BuyBoard), in the amount of $81,000
Reading and Public Hearing
The FY2002-03 Utility Fund Budget provides funding, in the amount of $85,000, for
replacement of one (1) 1973 truck-mounted sewer cleaner and one (1) 1989 trailer-mounted
sewer cleaner. This equipment purchase will assist the department to increase the footage of
sewer lines cleaned on an annual basis. This equipment will be purchased from STM
Equipment through the Texas Local Government Statewide Purchasing Cooperative.
(BuyBoard). (See attached).
Financial Impact
Funds are available in the Utility Fund, Operating Equipment, line item account 002-61-6645.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
. STM Equipment Quote
. Resolution R-02-2071
STM EQUIPMENT, INC.
P.o. Box 5626 · Arlington, Texas 76005 · Tel 817/649-5900 · Fax 817/633-7239
Purchase of Sewer Cleaning Unit via the Texas Local Government
Statewide Purchasing Cooperative
1. Purchase Order for Chassis would be made out to:
Lawrence Marshall Dealerships/via buyboard
Attn: John Hudgins
PO Box 11541
Austin, TX 78711
512-236-1395 (Voice)
512-236-8663 (Fax)
1
Ford F550 Diesel
$ 29,752.00
2. Purchase Order for Sewer Cleaning Body would be made out to:
STM Equipment, Inc.lvia buyboard
Attn: Gary Renfro
PO Box 5626
Arlington, TX 76005
817-649-5900 (Voice)
817-633-7239 (Fax)
1
Harben Sewer Cleaning Unit
$ 50,648.00
3. The Texas Local Government Statewide Purchasing Cooperative known
known as the buyboard will bill you for the following:
Annual Membership Fee
Chassis Flat Fee
$ 200.00
$ 400.00
---
-----
Grand Total for Sewer Cleaning Machine
$ 81,000.00
You would send the original Purchase Order to the buyboard and fax a copy to Lawrence Marshall
Dealerships and to STM Equipment. We will then build the Chassis, Build and Mount the Sewer
Cleaning Body, Deliver to the City ofColleyville, Train, and Invoice the City.
If you have any questions please call me at 817-649-5900.
"Setting the industry standard in equipment, parts and service. "
RESOLUTION R-02-2071
APPROVAL TO PURCHASE A TRUCK-MOUNTED HIGH-PRESSURE SEWER
CLEANER THROUGH THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT PURCHASING
COOPERATIVE
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville desires to purchase a truck-mounted sewer cleaner
from STM Equipment Inc., through the Texas Local Government
Purchasing Cooperative (BuyBoard); and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville, has elected to be a Cooperative Member in the
Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative (hereinafter
"Cooperative"), a program created by local governments in accordance
with and pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas
Government Code; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that the purchase of a truck-
mounted sewer cleaner will improve the efficiency and level of customer
service provided to the residents of Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the City of Colleyville City Council does hereby authorize the
purchase of a truck-mounted sewer cleaner from STM Equipment Inc"
through the Texas Local Government Purchasing Cooperative
(BuyBoard), in the amount of $81,000.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
PASSED BY A VOTE OF AYES,
ON THIS THE DAY OF
NAYS, AND
2002.
ABSTENTIONS
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL
cilr or
cce~
7L~....,,$
AGENDA BRIEFING
MEETING DATE:
ITEM#:
RESOLUTION # :
12/03/02
16
R-02-2072
CITY MANAGER
DEPARTMENT HEAD
FINANCE REVIEW
Previous Action: None
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT : Approval of the submittal of the grant application for
trail construction and related improvements for the
Texas Department of Transportation's "Safe Routes
to School" program
Reading and Public Hearing
"Safe Routes to School" (SRS) is a construction program administered by the Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to increase the safety of the routes for children
to walk or ride to school. The focus is on the typical routes that students use within two
miles of the school and may include traffic calming, law enforcement, crossing guards,
bike lanes, pedestrian overpasses, sidewalks and many other solutions. Modeled after
successful programs in other United States cities and even European cities, this is the
first year that the program has been funded in Texas with a funding allocation of
$3,000,000 for this year,
In recent weeks, staff has been working with the Colleyville Sidewalk Task Force to
prepare a grant application for submittal to the Texas Department of Transportation's
(TxDOT) "Safe Routes to School" Program. The Sidewalk Task Force has assisted in
the involvement of local citizens and/or parents of local school children by working with
staff to prepare a survey of the walking, hiking or biking habits of local students and
their parents, to secure their input related to improvements needed to provide better,
safer routes to school. The Task Force has undertaken this task, and in working with
GCISD, has surveyed over 3,000 middle and elementary school students in Colleyville
to secure their input related to this program. (See attached.)
On November 8, 2002, 850 surveys were distributed to students at Colleyville Middle
School, with a return request by November 15, 2002. As of November 18, 2002, a total
of 135 surveys had been returned to the office. The Sidewalk Task Force will compile
all of the survey responses for all of the participating campuses, which will be included
in the grant submittal to the "Safe Routes to School" program.
Agenda Briefing
Resolution R-02-2072
Page 2 of 2
The preliminary projects identified are:
PROJECT NAME
Pleasant Run Road
West Glade Drive
Black Drive
Centerpark Drive
Colleyville Boulevard
DESCRIPTION
Connect soccer fields to schools and The Village
Connect Bransford Elementary to Mill Creek
Connect Bransford Elementary to Mill Creek
Connect Colleyville Blvd, to Lakewood Drive
Connect Hardage Lane to Colleyville Elementary
COST
$ 300,000
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
$ 25,000
$ 75,000
$500,000
TOTAL =
The total fund request is $500,000. A twenty percent (20%) local share match is
required. Funding sources for the local share match ($100,000) will be provided by the
Engineering Department's annual budget allocation for sidewalks and related
expenditures.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· Sample Survey
· Resolution R-02-2072
"1J
(f
Q)
fI)
CD
tP
(I)
(I)
sa.
:::T
(I)
..,
fI)
0:
(I)
z
o
r+
CD
~
=s-
CD
o
o
c
3
:]
3
m
..,
"
CD
a.
~
~
CD
C;
(J)
=s-
o
~
a.
5'
o
C-
o.
CD
0-
~.
o
CD
(J)
(J)
8
o
r+
CD
..,
(J)
..,
o
CD
..,
0-
m
a.
CD
(J)
(J)
7\
m
r-+
CD
0-
o
m
..,
a.
(J)
CD
r+
~
-n-
... :;,
c.:~
I>> ...
'< C
, ~
I>> 0
< :;,
ID !'!
""'0
'j'-
ID ID
I>>
~'"
C ID
c..'"
ID C
:;, <
"ID
"',<
!.~
'" C
IDc..
../I)
'::T:::I
ID ..
-.'"
... .
'j'''
I>> ID
:::I ~
c.. 'j'
'" ID
e: ~
'< I>>
o :::I
cc..
n ~
I>> I>>
=4:
O-to
S.o
...
"-to
=r -,
/I) <
o ID
-oc..
..I>>
-.,<
o '"
:::I'
'" -I
==-<
~..
ID 0
c.. _.
. :;,
:E~
'::T'"
ID ID
:;, ..
..=r
=rl>>
ID ..
",'<
C 0
< C
ID n
'< 0
<
-. /I)
III ...
8 I>>
3c..
-0 I>>
ID'<
..'"
ID 0
... -to
/l)r+
"=r
~ ID
:::I ~
;:+ID
...ID
0'1'
'< -.
o'
cf
...
"'~
n 0
'::T:::I
Oc..
2.1>>
0'<
4:S:
-....
n 0
!II c
Ie
':T
0 0 0 0 0
I>> I>> I>> I>> ~
... ... .. ..
!~ 1:": :-: I~ :-:
:e
.
i
Do
..
;:
.
Do
0
~
<'
It
~
..
Ii
~
r
II
a
(J)
8-
o
o
.....
~
~
~
r1l
~
o en
~ r-t"
~S-
(1)(1)
~a
~--
~~
(1) ~
""'-n
~~
r-t"~
0--
en~
n ~
~~
o en
o s=
.....-~
~(1)
8..---<
~
=l:t::
o
.......
CI>
t+
C
~
r1l
::s
t+
en
~
(ll
$I)
(')
::r
(ll
>-t
- Safe Routes Texas -
Giving school children the right of way in Texas
Parent Survey
School :
Your Child's Grade
This survey will be used as a tool to assist the City of Colleyville in applying for federal
funds through the Texas Dept of Transportation for improving the routes your children
walk or ride to schoo\. The information you provide will help assess the needs in our
community. Feedback that pertains to other cities will be forwarded to them. We
appreciate your time and interest in ensuring safe routes for the children.
Instructions: Please complete one of these forms for each of your school children.
When complete return this form to your child's teacher by November 15th. If
possible, please use the "Walkability" or "Bikeability" checklists from the
www.saferoutestexas.org web site to survey the routes your children would walk or
ride to school.
1. What is the approximate distance from your home to the school?
l:I 1f.a mile or less l:I between 1 and 2 mile
l:I 1f.a to Y2 mile l:I greater than 2 miles
l:I Y2 to 1 mile
2. How does your child usually travel to and from school?
(Note: include scooters, skateboards, rollerblades, etc. in the bicycle column),
T h l' h
F
h 1. h ft
osc 00 In t e morning: rom sc 00 Int ea emoon:
Every 2-3 Once a Occasion Every 2-3 Once a Occasion-
day days week -allv day days week ally
Walk
Bike
Driven
Bus
3. In which neighborhood do you live? List subdivision name or street name if not in a
subdivision.
4. If you drive your child, why do you make that choice? Check all that apply,
l:I Safety l:I Backpacks too heavy
l:I Convenience l:I Carrying projects or musical instruments
l:I Drop off on way to work l:I Tardiness
l:I Too far to walk l:I Safe place to cross the street
l:I Sidewalks (lack or incomplete) l:I Scary people
l:I High speed vehicles l:I Lack of safe place to store bikes
l:I Child is too young l:I No biking or walking route maps
l:I Bad Weather l:I Paths incomplete or not wide enough
l:I Child would not obey safety rules l:I Unfriendly dogs
l:I Other
PLEASE COMPLETE OTHER SIDE OF SURVEY!
RESOLUTION R-02-2072
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF THE APPLICATION FOR TRAIL
CONSTRUCTION AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE TEXAS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION'S "SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
PROGRAM"
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Colleyville concurs with efforts to make
America's neighborhoods safe places in which to grow, live and work; and
WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation offers a "Safe Routes to School"
Program, in which a certain amount of state funding is earmarked for trail,
signal crossing and other pedestrian-related improvements specifically
designed to improve non-motorized travel to and from school.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec, 1.
THAT the City Council hereby approves the submittal of the application for
trail construction and related improvements for the Texas Department of
Transportation's "Safe Routes to School" program.
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
PASSED BY A VOTE OF AYES,
THIS THE DAY OF
NAYS AND
2002.
ABSTENTIONS ON
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
CITY COUNCIL
Cd)' Of
(Q~n", AGENDA BRIEFING
Tl,....:1 ~
MEETING DATE: 12/03/02 CITY MANAGER --"]20_
ITEM # : 17 DEPARTMENT HEAD :r~
ORDINANCE # : 0-02-1337.4 FINANCE REVIEW, N.A.
Previous Action: Tabled
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: i Approval to amend Ordinance 0-99-1131 PUD-C
(Planned Unit Development-Commercial), requested
by Richard Myers, Realty Capital Corporation for the
Village at Colleyville, Case Z-02-01 0
Tabled 08/20/02
Update
The City Council has approved several amendments to the Village at Colleyville ordinance, but
tabled action on other portions of the ordinance (0-02-1337.3). Ordinance 0-02-1337.4, which
is attached, contains underlined text, which reflects new language to be inserted into the
regulations, while strikethrough text is proposed for deletion from the ordinance.
The following is a detailed list of the items still outstanding in this ordinance. As some of the
proposed changes in the ordinance were grammatical and difficult to notice in the ordinance,
the following list includes all sections that have proposed changes. The section numbers
noted below correspond with the section numbers in the attached ordinance.
Section E. Development Standards
1. Permitted Uses
A new section is proposed under Section E (page 4 of the ordinance) that would allow a
parking lot or underground parking garage with 14 or fewer spaces as an allowed use.
2. Permitted Uses with a Special Use Permit
Sub-section "e." has been revised to require a Special Use Permit for any above ground
parking garage containing 15 or more parking spaces. This sub-section further requires that
any above ground parking garage, regardless of the number of parking spaces, that fronts on a
street in the Neighborhood Central zone will require approval of a Special Use Permit. This
language is on Page 5 of the ordinance.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 2 of 16
4. General Lot Criteria
The maximum lot coverage currently allowed in the approved PUD-C zoning ordinance is 90%
of the lot. The developer is requesting an amendment to increase the lot coverage to 95%, but
only within the Neighborhood Center (NC) zone. The NC zone is the major commercial area of
the development along each side of Main Street and Village Lane. The Southlake Town
Center and the area in downtown Fort Worth are two similar areas that allow as much as 100%
lot coverage.
The developer is also requesting that the rear building setback line be changed from five (5)
feet to four (4) feet in order to coincide with the four-foot wide utility easements shown on the
subdivision plat. These two changes are included on Page 6 in the proposed ordinance.
7. Roofinq
The changes proposed to this section are grammatical only, This section is on Page 6 of the
ordinance.
16. Limitation on Late Niqht Hours of Operation
This section of the ordinance is proposed for deletion. This section states "Businesses located
within this PUD-C shall close not later than 10:30 p.m. on weekdays and Sundays, and 12:30
a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays." This general restriction does not exist in other portions of the
City Code of Ordinances, though there are specific hours of operation for pool halls and the
sales of alcoholic beverages. The developer has requested this section be deleted. This
section is on Page 6 of the ordinance.
18. Dumpster Screeninq
This new section states that all dumpsters located in a perimeter alley must be screened from
view with an opaque enclosure or within a building niche. The screening enclosure must be at
least 6-feet in height. This section is on Page 8 of the ordinance.
Section G. Supplementary Requirements
5. Garaqes/Accessory Buildinqs
The changes proposed to this section are grammatical only. This section is on Page 9 of the
ordinance.
9. Security Fencinq and Walls
The words "as follows" have been struck in the title section as a grammatical change. This
language is on Pages 11 and 12 of the ordinance.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 3 of 16
Sub-section "c." includes language to remove the requirement for an 8-foot tall wrought iron
fence adjacent to the city hall and library site as this issue is being addressed in the proposed
City/Developer Agreement. When this requirement was placed in the zoning ordinance for the
Village, there was concern over unrestricted pedestrian traffic between City Park and the
Village properties. However, with the future development of the city hall and library adjacent to
City Park, a four-foot high wrought iron fence may present a more desirable screening
separation than the eight-foot fence. Staff contacted a local fence contractor who specializes
in wrought iron fence construction to obtain the differences in construction costs between the
two fence heights. The contractor recommended a fence constructed with powder coated
galvanized metal instead of wrought iron due to the severe rusting and rotting characteristics of
real wrought iron, and offered cost estimates based on the galvanized metal. The two fence
cost estimates are as follows:
Metal Fence Cost Estimate
Fence Type Total Cost Cost/Linear Foot Linear Feet
Four-foot Height $ 8,750 $25 350 linear feet
Eight-foot Height $ 14,000 $40 350 linear feet
Section H. Amenities
5. Street Siqns
The changes proposed to this section are grammatical only. This section is on Page 12 of the
ordinance.
Section I. Parking Requirements
2d. Public Parkinq
The two-hour time limit for parallel parking spaces has been deleted. The proposed
City/Developer Agreement states that the City and Developer will further refine this portion of
the ordinance by September 1, 2003. This section is on Pages 13 and 14 of the ordinance.
The text of the previous briefings has been removed from the main portion of the briefing and
has been added as an attachment to this briefing.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
· Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 4 of 16
TEXT FROM PREVIOUS BRIEFINGS - ORDINANCE 0-02-1337
Tabled 06/04/02
Update
The City Council took action on portions of the proposed amendments to the ordinance that
established the zoning regulations on the Village at Colleyville, but tabled action on other
portions of the ordinance (0-02-1337.2). The attached Ordinance 0-02-1337.3 includes text
that is underlined which reflects new language to be inserted into the regulations, while
strikethrough text is proposed for deletion from the ordinance.
The following is a detailed list of the items still outstanding in this ordinance. As some of the
proposed changes in the ordinance were grammatical and difficult to notice in the ordinance,
the following list includes all sections that have proposed changes. The section numbers
noted below correspond with the section numbers in the attached ordinance.
Section E. Development Standards
1. Permitted Uses
The original Village at Colleyville ordinance included beer and wine sales as an allowed use
under this section. New language is added under d. Food and Lodging to clarify that beer and
wine sales are only allowed for off-premise consumption and may only be sold in a grocery
store, specialty wine shop or gourmet food store.
Three new sections are proposed under Section E (page 4 of the ordinance). One will allow
outdoor seating areas for food, lodging and entertainment uses. The second section will clarify
that the Special Use Permit originally authorized in another section for alcoholic beverage
sales for on-premise consumption is limited only to restaurant uses. The third section would
allow a parking lot or underground parking garage with 14 or fewer spaces as an allowed use.
2. Permitted Uses with a Special Use Permit
Sub-section "e." has been revised to require a Special Use Permit for any above ground
parking garage containing 15 or more parking spaces. This sub-section further requires that
any above ground parking garage, regardless of the number of parking spaces, that fronts on a
street in the Neighborhood Central zone will require approval of a Special Use Permit. This
language is on Page 5 of the ordinance.
Sub-section "f." has been struck as the alcoholic beverage issues have been clarified
elsewhere in the new ordinance. This language is on Page 5 of the ordinance.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 5 of 16
4. General Lot Criteria
The maximum lot coverage currently allowed in the approved PUD-C zoning ordinance is 90%
of the lot. The developer is requesting an amendment to increase the lot coverage to 95%, but
only within the Neighborhood Center (NC) zone. The NC zone is the major commercial area of
the development along each side of Main Street and Village Lane. The Southlake Town
Center and the area in downtown Fort Worth are two similar areas that allow as much as 100%
lot coverage.
The developer is also requesting that the rear building setback line be changed from five (5)
feet to four (4) feet in order to coincide with the four-foot wide utility easements shown on the
subdivision plat. These two changes are included on Page 6 in the proposed ordinance.
7. Roofinq
The changes proposed to this section are grammatical only. This section is on Page 6 of the
ordinance.
17. Special Use Permit Time Limits
This new section states that the Special Use Permits for alcoholic beverage sales, authorized
elsewhere in the ordinance, are not subject to the one-year time limit requirements provided in
the Land Development Code. This section is on Page 7 of the ordinance.
18. Dumpster Screeninq
This new section states that all dumpsters located in a perimeter alley must be screened from
view with an opaque enclosure or within a building niche. The screening enclosure must be at
least 6-feet in height. This section is on Page 8 of the ordinance,
Section E1. Encroachments and Use of Public Right-of-Way
The remaining item in this section deals with the allowable encroachment of signs. The
language would allow a sign encroach to 66% of the width of the adjacent sidewalk. On a 10-
foot wide sidewalk, the allowed encroachment would be 6-feet, 7 -inches. All signs would have
to provide overhead clearance of 8 feet over a pedestrian area and 14 feet over a vehicular
area. This language is on Page 8 of the ordinance.
Section G. Supplementary Requirements
5. Garaqes/Accessorv Buildings
The changes proposed to this section are grammatical only. This section is on Page 9 of the
ordinance.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 6 of 16
6. Advertisinq Siqns
Sub-section "g." is a provision to allow Sandwich Board Signs within the limits of the PUD-C.
These types signs are generally common along sidewalk areas, provided they are only
displayed during hours that the adjacent business is open. The proposed language would
allow one sign per business, and limit the size of the sign to 4 feet tall by 3 feet wide. The sign
would have to be located not more than 50 feet from the business entrance. This language is
on Page 10 of the ordinance.
9. Security Fencinq and Walls
The words "as follows" have been struck in the title section as a grammatical change. This
language is on Page 11 of the ordinance.
Sub-section "c." includes language to not require an 8-foot tall wrought iron fence adjacent to
the city hall and library site. When this requirement was placed in the zoning ordinance for the
Village, there was concern over unrestricted pedestrian traffic between City Park and the
Village properties. However, with the future development of the city hall and library adjacent to
City Park, a four-foot high wrought iron fence may present a more desirable screening
separation than the eight-foot fence. Staff contacted a local fence contractor who specializes
in wrought iron fence construction to obtain the differences in construction costs between the
two fence heights. The contractor recommended a fence constructed with powder coated
galvanized metal instead of wrought iron due to the severe rusting and rotting characteristics of
real wrought iron, and offered cost estimates based on the galvanized metal. The two fence
cost estimates are as follows:
Metal Fence Cost Estimate
Fence Type Total Cost Cost/Linear Foot Linear Feet
Four-foot Height $ 8,750 $25 350 linear feet
Eight-foot Height $ 14,000 $40 350 linear feet
Section H. Amenities
5. Street Siqns
The changes proposed to this section are grammatical only, This section is on Page 12 of the
ordinance.
The text of the previous briefings has been removed from the main portion of the briefing and
has been added as an attachment to this briefing.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 7 of 16
Tabled OS/21/02
Update
The City Council took action on portions of the proposed amendments to the ordinance that
established the zoning regulations on the Village at Colleyville, but tabled action on other
portions of the ordinance (0-02-1337.1). The attached Ordinance 0-02-1337.2 includes text
that is underlined, which reflects new language to be inserted into the regulations, while
strikethrough text is proposed for deletion from the ordinance.
The following is a summary of the items still outstanding in this ordinance,
1. Alcoholic Beverages - The original ordinance that established the zoning for The Village
at Colleyville allowed the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption, but
required approval of a Special Use Permit, as referenced in the Colleyville Code of
Ordinances. One of the proposed amendments to the original zoning ordinance will insert a
provision to authorize a Special Use Permit within the limits of the PUD-C development for the
sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption, such as for a grocery store,
specialty wine shop or gourmet food store.
One of the concerns discussed at the April 16, 2002, meeting related to the potential for a
person to purchase beer or wine at a store that operates under a Texas Alcoholic Beverage
Commission license for off-premises consumption, and walk down the sidewalk consuming the
beer or wine. The City's alcohol regulations and the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code do not
prohibit this activity. Once a person leaves the premises (the physical property of the license
holder), an individual is free to consume alcoholic beverages anywhere in the City except in a
public park or while driving a motor vehicle.
Another amendment to the original zoning ordinance includes a provision for a Special Use
Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption when in conjunction
with a restaurant use, There are two other areas in the city that have similar SUP provisions.
The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code prohibits individuals from purchasing alcoholic beverages
for on-premises consumption and leaving the premises with an open container.
2. Outdoor Uses - The intention of the original zoning ordinance was not very clear regarding
outdoor seating areas for food service, even though the Village at Colleyville was initially
designed to have a strong restaurant component and pedestrian oriented environment.
Language has been added to the ordinance to allow outdoor food service areas as a part of a
restaurant use. As a related item, language has been added to the ordinance to allow up to
four tables with chairs, to be placed on the public sidewalk, provided four feet of clearance is
maintained for pedestrian circulation and handicapped accessibility.
3. Parking - One of the parking concerns for the Village involved the potential for
consumption of valuable retail space with above ground parking garages. Additionally, there
was concern over potentially unsightly visibility problems of parking garages that may front on
Main Street or Village Lane, the two major commercial streets in the development.
Agenda Briefing
Ord inance 0-02-1337.4
Page 8 of 16
Language has been added in the proposed zoning ordinance amendments to require a Special
Use Permit for above ground parking garages containing fifteen or more parking spaces on a
platted lot.
Additional language in the ordinance stipulates that any above ground parking garage that
fronts a street in the Neighborhood Central (NC) zone shall only be allowed with the approval
of a Special Use Permit.
4. Lot Coverage and Building Lines - The maximum lot coverage currently allowed in the
approved PUD-C zoning ordinance is 90% of the lot. The developer is requesting an
amendment to the original zoning ordinance to increase the lot coverage to 95%, but only
within the Neighborhood Center (NC) zone. The NC zone is the major commercial area of the
development along each side of Main Street and Village Lane, The Southlake Town Center
project and the area in downtown Fort Worth are two similar areas that allow as much as 100%
lot coverage.
The developer is also requesting that the rear building setback line be changed from five (5)
feet to four (4) feet in order to coincide with the four-foot wide utility easements shown on the
subdivision plat. These two changes are included in the proposed ordinance being
considered.
5. Dumpster Screening - Concerns have been raised regarding screening requirements for
garbage dumpsters within The Village. There is no provision in The Village PUD-C zoning
ordinance that establishes any special dumpster screening requirements. Therefore, it is
necessary to rely on the Colleyville Land Development Code, which states the following
regarding the screening of garbage dumpsters:
"Garbage, refuse and trash collection/storage areas shall be fully enclosed by a
suitable screening element of not less than six (6) feet in height."
There is currently only one commercial dumpster in the Village and it is located in the large
public parking lot. It serves as the central dumpster for the current tenants in the Village. It is
screened on three sides by a solid masonry wall and wooden gates across the front. As the
Village builds out, strict application of the dumpster screening requirement may cause some
operational problems for the trucks that empty the dumpsters due to the limited amount of
space in the alleys. The Village is the only place in Colleyville that has alleys platted through
the middle of the blocks.
The only location where garbage dumpsters may be visible is when looking down the length of
an alley or on the perimeter of the project. The site plans that have been approved for the two
buildings currently under construction show dumpster niches set into each of the building
footprints to accommodate garbage dumpsters,
The following language has been added to the ordinance being considered.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 9 of 16
18. Dumpster Screening - A dumpster located in an alley on the perimeter of the project shall be
screened from view on three sides with an opaque enclosure measuring at least six (6) feet in
height. The enclosure or building niche shall be constructed of material that matches the building.
6. Encroachments - The original zoning ordinance did not include provisions to
accommodate building overhangs, such as porch lighting, awnings, signs, balconies, cornices,
roof eaves and bay windows, when they encroach a right-of-way, alley or easement.
While these types of architectural features are common on nearly every building, it was never
anticipated that a variance or special use permit would be required for every awning, roof eave
or other minor encroachment.
After contacting several neighboring communities to determine how similar issues are handled,
a provision has been included to amend the original zoning ordinance to establish a set of
standards for these types of encroachments. The following table shows the two outstanding
items related to encroachments. The City Council approved standards for bay windows,
awnings, canopies, eaves, cornices and balconies at the May 21, 2002 meeting.
RiQht-of-wav Encroachment Standards
Tvpe of Maximum Allowable Encroachment
Encroachment
Siqns 66% of sidewalk width 8 feet clearance over pedestrian
area & 14 feet clearance over vehicle area
Liqhts If the liqht encroaches 12 inches or less. it may be mounted
at any heiqht on the buildinq facade. Encroachments over
12 inches require 8 feet clearance over pedestrian area and
14 feet clearance over vehicle area and shall not encroach
bevond 48 inches
7. Signs - A provision has been included in the ordinance amendments to allow Sandwich
Board Signs within the limits of the PUD-C. These types signs are generally common along
sidewalk areas, provided they are only displayed during hours that the adjacent business is
open.
8. Wrought Iron Fence - This stipulation in the original zoning ordinance requires the
construction of a wrought iron fence along the western boundary line where the PUD-C is
adjacent to City owned park property. When this requirement was placed in the zoning
ordinance for The Village, there was concern over unrestricted pedestrian traffic between City
Park and The Village properties. However, with the construction of the City Hall and Library
facilities adjacent to City Park, a landscape screening device would seem more appropriate.
Language has been added to the proposed amendments to exclude the wrought iron fencing
requirement where the city hall and library are adjacent to City Park.
9. Miscellaneous Language - There are also minor grammatical changes to several
sections. These sections include Section E.7. Roofing, Section G,5 Garages/Accessory
Buildings, and Section H.5 Street Signs.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 10 of 16
Tabled 05/07/02
The City Council took action on portions of the proposed amendments to the ordinance that
established the zoning regulations on the Village at Colleyville, but tabled action on other
portions of the ordinance (0-02-1337), The attached Ordinance 0-02-1337.1 includes text that
is underlined which reflects new language to be inserted into the regulations, while
strikethrough text is proposed for deletion from the ordinance.
Staff has provided copy of the articles of incorporation of the Village Owners Association, Inc.
to the City Council as requested at the May 7,2002 meeting.
There were questions at the May 7, 2002 meeting regarding the stipulation in the original
zoning ordinance to require an eight-foot wrought iron fence between the Village at Colleyville
PUD-C boundary and City Park. However, with the future development of the city hall and
library adjacent to City Park a four-foot high wrought iron fence may present a more desirable
screening separation than the eight-foot fence. Staff contacted a local fence contractor who
specializes in wrought iron fence construction to obtain the differences in construction costs
between the two fence heights. The contractor staff talked with recommended a fence
constructed with powder coated galvanized metal instead of wrought iron due to the severe
rusting and rotting characteristics of real wrought iron and offered cost estimates based on the
galvanized metal. An eight-foot metal fence costs approximately $40 per linear foot, while a
four-foot metal fence costs approximately $25 a foot. The distance of the common line
between the City Park and the city hall site is approximately 350 feet. The two fence cost
estimates are as follows:
Second Reading and Public Hearing
At the April 16, 2002 meeting, the City Council asked staff to group the proposed revisions to
the original PUD-C zoning ordinance for the Village into major categories and to provide
information regarding each of the various issues associated with the developer's request.
1. Alcoholic Beverages - The original ordinance that established the zoning for The Village
at Colleyville allowed the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption, but
required approval of a Special Use Permit, as referenced in the Colleyville Code of
Ordinances. One of the proposed amendments to the original zoning ordinance will insert
a provision to authorize a Special Use Permit within the limits of the PUD-C development
for the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption, such as for a grocery
store, specialty wine shop or gourmet food store.
One of the concerns discussed at the April 16, 2002, meeting related to the potential for a
person to purchase beer or wine at a store that operates under a Texas Alcoholic Beverage
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 11 of 16
Commission license for off-premises consumption, and walk down the sidewalk consuming
the beer or wine. The City's alcohol regulations and the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code
do not prohibit this activity. Once a person leaves the premises (the physical property of
the license holder), an individual is free to consume alcoholic beverages anywhere in the
City except in a public park or while driving a motor vehicle. However, Colleyville does
enforce the public intoxication laws.
Another amendment to the original zoning ordinance includes a provision for a Special Use
Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption when in
conjunction with a restaurant use. Two other areas in the city have similar SUP provisions.
The Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code prohibits individuals from purchasing alcoholic
beverages for on-premises consumption and leaving the premises with an open container.
2. Open Space Areas - The City Council requested staff to compare the open space areas at
the Southlake Town Square project with those open space areas within the Village at
Colleyville. The City of Southlake reported that open space in the Town Square is 13
acres, the project is 130 acres in size and open space comprises 10% of the project.
Southlake staff also reported that information pertaining to sidewalk areas is unavailable.
The Village at Colleyville contains 23.97 acres of which 3.53 acres is in open areas
constituting 14.7% of the development.
3. Signs - Until a customer base is established in the Village, new retail stores within the
development will suffer from the lack of visibility along State Highway 26 and from not
having any routine traffic circulation through the development. With no signage presence
along Highway 26, customers are not generally aware of new stores opening. Therefore,
the developer has expressed an interest in allowing new stores to have special signage
provisions during the critically important first few weeks after a new store is opened.
One of the proposed amendments to the original zoning ordinance will allow a new store to
have grand opening signs consisting of banners, pennants or a temporary free-standing
sign that does not exceed 90 square feet (the same size as currently allowed for a new
development sign). A Grand Opening Sign permit would be valid for 60 days. It would only
be issued to a new store within the first 180 days after receiving a certificate of occupancy.
An additional provision would allow the temporary free-standing sign to be constructed off-
premises, but within the limits of the PUD-C, with the permission of the property owner.
This would allow the business in the development to place signs on the common areas with
the permission of the Village Owners Association.
An additional provision has been included in the ordinance amendments to allow Sandwich
Board Signs within the limits of the PUD-C. These types signs are generally common
along sidewalk areas, provided they are only displayed during hours that the adjacent
business is open.
4. Lot Coverage & Building Lines - The maximum lot coverage currently allowed in the
approved PUD-C zoning ordinance is 90% of the lot. The developer is requesting an
amendment to the original zoning ordinance to increase the lot coverage to 95%, but only
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 12 of 16
within the Neighborhood Center (NC) zone. The NC zone is the major commercial area of
the development along each side of Main Street and Village Lane. The South lake Town
Center project and the area in downtown Fort Worth are two similar areas that allow as
much as 100% lot coverage.
The developer is also requesting that the rear building setback line be changed from five
feet to four feet in order to coincide with the four-foot wide utility easements shown on the
subdivision plat. These two changes are included in the proposed ordinance being
considered.
5. Encroachments - It was an apparent oversight in the drafting of the original zoning
ordinance that omitted any provisions to accommodate building overhangs, such as porch
lighting, awnings, signs, balconies, cornices, roof eaves and bay windows, when they
encroach a right-of-way, alley or easement.
While these types of architectural features are common on nearly every building, it was
never anticipated that a variance or special use permit would be required for every awning,
roof eave or other minor encroachment.
After contacting several neighboring communities to determine how similar issues are
handled, a provision has been included to amend the original zoning ordinance to establish
a set of standards for these types of encroachments. The following is a copy of the table of
encroachment standards that is included in the proposed ordinance amendments. Within
the limits of the established standards, any encroachments below grade will require
approval by the Director of Public Works. Encroachments above grade require approval by
the Building Inspection Department.
Riaht-of-way Encroachment Standards
Type of Maximum Allowable Encroachment
Encroachment
Bay Windows 18 inches with max. 7 footlenqth. 3 foot min. spacinq & one bay
window ner 15 feet of site frontane
Awninqs & canopies 80% of sidewalk width. 8 feet clearance over pedestrian area &
14 feet clearance over vehicle area, support columns not less
than 2 feet from back of curb
Siqns 66% of sidewalk width. 8 feet clearance over pedestrian area &
14 feet clearance over vehicle area
Liqhts If the Iiqht encroaches 12 inches or less, it mav be mounted at
any heiqht on the buildinq facade. Encroachments over 12
inches require 8 feet clearance over pedestrian area & 14 feet
clearance over vehicle area and shall not encroach beyond 48
inches
Eaves, cornices and From 8 feet to 15 feet above made one inch of encroachment for
balconies each inch of clearance above 8 feet not to exceed 48 inches of
encroachment. Encroachments 15 feet or more above qrade
shall have 8 feet of clearance over pedestrian area & 14 feet
clearance over vehicle area and shall not encroach beyond 6 feet
6. Dumpster Screening - Concerns have been raised regarding screening requirements for
garbage dumpsters within The Village. There is no provision in The Village PUD-C zoning
ordinance that establishes any special dumpster screening requirements. Therefore, it is
Agenda Briefing
Ord inance 0-02-1337.4
Page 13 of 16
necessary to rely on the Colleyville Land Development Code, which states the following
regarding the screening of garbage dumpsters:
"Garbage, refuse and trash collection/storage areas shall be fully enclosed by a
suitable screening element of not less than six (6) feet in height."
There is currently only one commercial dumpster in The Village and it is located in the large
public parking lot. It serves as the central dumpster for the current tenants in The Village.
It is screened on three sides by a solid masonry wall and wooden gates across the front.
As The Village builds out, strict application of the dumpster screening requirement may
cause some operational problems for the trucks that empty the dumpsters due to the
limited amount of space in the alleys. The Village is the only place in Colleyville that has
alleys platted through the middle of the blocks.
The only location where garbage dumpsters may be visible is when looking down the
lengtb of an alley or on the perimeter of the project. The site plans that have been
approved for the two buildings currently under construction show dumpster niches set into
each of the building footprints to accommodate garbage dumpsters.
The following language has been added to the ordinance being considered.
18. Dumpster Screening - A dumpster located in an alley on the perimeter of the project shall
be screened from view on three sides with an opaque enclosure measuring at least six (6) feet
in height. The enclosure or building niche shall be constructed of material that matches the
building.
7. Street Right-of-Way Widths - On January 23, 2002, staff measured the street widths of
the currently constructed streets in The Village at Colleyville. The street widths were
measured at 12 different locations. The table below summarizes the findings. The location
number corresponds to the attached drawing, showing the general location of each
measurement. Staff found no deficiencies in the street widths.
Total Pavement Driving Lane Parking Stall
Location Street Width Width Width
1 Main Street 22 feet, each side 1 5 feet - south 7 feet - south
of median 22 feet - north n.a. - north
2 Mission Lane 18.5 feet 18.5 feet n.a.
3 Main Street 22 feet 1 5 feet 7 feet
4 Village Lane 38 feet 12 feet 7 feet
5 Main Street 22 feet, each side 12 feet 7 feet
of median
6 Cottaqe Lane 38 feet 12 feet 7 feet
7 Piazza Lane 38 feet 12 feet 7 feet
8 Villaqe Lane 38 feet 12 feet 7 feet
9 Terra Cotta Way 38 feet 12 feet 7 feet
10 Villaqe Lane 38 feet 12 feet 7 feet
11 Village Lane 38 feet 12 feet 7 feet
12 Villaqe Lane 38 feet 12 feet 7 feet
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 14 of 16
8. Outdoor Uses - The intention of the original zoning ordinance was not very clear
regarding outdoor seating areas for food service, even though The Village at Colleyville
was initially designed to have a strong restaurant component and pedestrian oriented
environment. Language has been added to the ordinance to allow outdoor food service
areas as a part of a restaurant use. As a related item, language has been added to the
ordinance to allow up to four tables with chairs, to be placed on the public sidewalk,
provided four feet of clearance is maintained for pedestrian circulation and handicapped
accessibility.
9. Parking - One of the parking concerns for The Village involved the potential for
consumption of valuable retail space with above ground parking garages. Additionally,
there was concern over potentially unsightly visibility problems of parking garages that may
front on Main Street or Village Lane, the two major commercial streets in the development.
Language has been added in the proposed zoning ordinance amendments to require a
Special Use Permit for above ground parking garages containing fifteen or more parking
spaces on a platted lot.
Additional language in the ordinance stipulates that any above ground parking garage that
fronts a street in the Neighborhood Central (NC) zone shall only be allowed with the
approval of a Special Use Permit.
Another parking related question was raised regarding the overall amount of parking that
will be ultimately provided in the development. The parking requirements for The Village
are divided into two categories: residential and non-residential.
Residential parking requirements for a residence located on the ground floor are two
parking spaces built on the same building site. When a residence is located on an upper
floor, two parking spaces are required either on the same building site or in a parking
garage or parking lot located within 400 feet of the residence. At the present time, no
residential building permits have been issued in The Village.
Non-residential parking spaces are required at the ratio of one parking space per 400
square feet of floor area. Parking spaces may be located either on the building site, in a
parking lot, or in a parking garage. The off-site parking shall be located within 400 feet of
the building requiring the parking.
According to the original development projection provided by the developer of The Village,
there will be approximately 940,000 square feet of building space when the project is fully
developed. The following parking table shows an estimate of the number of parking spaces
that will eventually be required in The Village using the parking requirement criteria
contained in the PUD-C ordinance.
Agenda Briefing
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 1 5 of 16
Village at Colleyville
Estimated Parking Requirements
Type of Use Square Required
Footage Parking
Spaces
Retail Shoos and Stores 220,000 550
Restaurants 40,000 100
Offices 210,000 525
Hotel/Bed & Breakfasts 70,000 175
Residences (100) 400,000 200
Totals 940,000 1,550
According to the above table, The Village at Colleyville will ultimately contain 1,550 parking
spaces. Currently, there are 496 public parking spaces. However, this does not include
those private parking spaces included in the one completed building and the two buildings
under construction (approximately 50 spaces total).
The PUD-C ordinance states that 30% of the parking requirements will be provided on the
streets as they are constructed and the remaining 70% provided as building permits are
issued. Staff maintains a spreadsheet to monitor the number of parking spaces built in The
Village. The PUD-C ordinance also stipulates that the parking ratio will be re-evaluated
when 50% of the development is completed within the Neighborhood General (NG) zone.
10. Wrought Iron Fence - This stipulation in the original zoning ordinance requires the
construction of a wrought iron fence along the western boundary line where the PUD-C is
adjacent to City owned park property. When this requirement was placed in the zoning
ordinance for The Village, there was concern over unrestricted pedestrian traffic between
City Park and The Village properties. However, with the construction of the City Hall and
Library facilities adjacent to City Park, a landscape screening device would seem more
appropriate. Language has been added to the proposed amendments to exclude the
wrought iron fencing requirement where the city hall and library are adjacent to City Park.
First Reading and Public Hearing
Backqround
On January 19, 1999, the City Council approved Ordinance 0-99-1131, which established the
Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning for The Village at Colleyville development located
west of Colleyville Boulevard at the intersection with Main Street. Realty Capital Corporation is
the owner and developer of this project that contains approximately 24 acres. The owner is
requesting certain amendments to the PUD ordinance to address a number of issues not
anticipated when the original ordinance was adopted by the City Council. Attached is a copy
of the comments from the Colleyville Development Review Committee.
Staff met with the developer on several occasions to coordinate the developer's proposed
changes and to resolve the concerns of the various municipal departments. Also attached is a
Agenda Briefing
Ord inance 0-02-1337.4
Page 16 of 16
copy of the ordinance showing the proposed changes with deleted text as strikethrough and
added text as underlined. The following is a summary of the changes being proposed.
1. Added the words "Special Use Permit" to the regulation that authorizes the sale of
alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption. The provision for off-premises
consumption was originally included in the approved ordinance, but it did not include the
words "Special Use Permit" as prescribed by the Colleyville Code of ordinances.
2. Added language to permit outdoor seating areas for food, lodging or entertainment
uses.
3. Added a provision for a Special Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-
premises consumption in conjunction with a restaurant use.
4. Added a provision to allow by right parking lots, underground parking garages,
basements, cellars, and aboveground parking garages containing less than 15 spaces.
5. Increased from six to fifteen, the number of parking spaces in an aboveground parking
garage that is required to obtain special use permit approval.
6. Increased the percent of lot coverage in the Neighborhood Center Zone from 90% to
95%.
7. Reduced the rear building setback line from five feet to four feet to coincide with the
four-foot wide utility easements shown on the subdivision plat.
8. Added a new Section E 1 to handle the encroachments and overhangs of bay windows,
balconies, cornices, roof eaves, and signs. A provision is added to allow certain
temporary structures, such as planter boxes, benches, sandwich board signs,
merchandise and up to four tables with chairs, to be placed on the sidewalk (attached
are several photos and drawings depicting similar situations in a neighboring
community).
9. Added a provision to require a Special Use Permit if more than four tables are used as
an outdoor eating area on a public sidewalk.
10. Added a provision for special signage in conjunction with the grand opening of a new
business.
11. Added a provision for the use of "Sandwich Board Signs" on the sidewalks.
12. Added a phrase to delete the wrought iron fence requirement where the city hall and
library site abuts the City Park.
MAP OF STREET WIDTHS
!;
5&
61)
1
~
f
~€-
o4R
4!
pOON
OGEJ~
K~
1]
~
AOOf'J
1
1
ORDINANCE 0-02-1337.4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, AS AMENDED, BY
AMENDING ORDINANCE 0-99-1141 IN ITS ENTIRETY; PROVIDING A SAVINGS
CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION.
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning district change was filed by Richard Myers on
February 28,2002, under Case Number Z-02-01 0; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the
Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development
Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made
a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in
the best interests of the City of Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT Ordinance 0-99-1141 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as
follows:
A. PURPOSE
The purpose of this planned unit development is to encourage mixed-
use, compact development that is sensitive to the environmental
characteristics of the land and facilitates the efficient use of services.
This planned unit development diversifies and integrates residential and
commercial land uses within close proximity to each other and promotes
long-term economic sustainability for the City.
B. PUD BOUNDARIES
The property shown on the attached Zoning Exhibit "A" and described by
metes and bounds as indicated on the attached Exhibit "B" shall be
rezoned from the AG Agricultural district to the PUD-C Planned Unit
Development-Commercial district and the Official Zoning Map and Land
Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas are hereby amended
by the terms of this ordinance.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 2 of 1 5
C. NEIGHBORHOOD AREAS
This Planned Unit Development is hereby divided into two neighborhood
areas. The boundaries of the neighborhood areas are shown on the
attached Exhibit "C". The neighborhood areas and their symbol
designations are described as follows:
Neiqhborhood Center - The Neighborhood Center area shall serve as
the commercial and business focal point of the development with a
limited amount of area used for residential purposes. The
Neighborhood Center area shall be designated with the letters "NC".
Neiqhborhood General. The Neighborhood General area shall serve as
a secondary area for commercial and business activities of the
development and may have a higher percentage of residential dwellings
than the Neighborhood Center area. The Neighborhood General area
shall be designated with the letters "NG".
D. STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES AND DEVELOPMENT
SCHEDULE
The Statement of Planning Objectives and Development Schedule are
attached as Exhibit "D".
E. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Buildings or structures containing any combination of single-family
residences and business use listed herein shall be allowed in
accordance with the following Development Standards:
1. Permitted Uses - the following permitted uses shall be allowed
within this planned unit development:
a. Single-family Residences: Residential units may be either
detached or attached, but not more than one residence shall be
located per building site. A building site may have one ancillary
residential structure. The habitable area of the ancillary structure
shall not exceed 600 sq. ft. Within each neighborhood area, the
maximum number of residential units on the ground floor of a
building shall not exceed the following maximum residential
densities:
(1) NC Area: A maximum of 20% of the building sites in the
Neighborhood Center area may contain a single-family residence
use on the first floor of its building.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 3 of 15
(2) NG Area: A maximum of 40% of the building sites in the
Neighborhood General area may contain a single-family
residence use on the first floor of its building.
(3) A maximum of 30% of the building sites within the boundaries
of this PUD-C may contain a single-family residence use on the
first floor of its building.
(4) Not more than 45% of the total cumulative square footage of
all floor areas within this PUD-C may be residential use.
b. Retail: Retail specialty shops including, but not limited to, the sale
of clothing, gifts, antiques, flowers and plants, books, jewelry, music,
electronic equipment, computers and software, tobacco and related
supplies, crafts, toys, cameras, souvenirs, greeting cards, artwork,
furniture, hardware, sporting goods, house and garden supplies,
office supplies, leather goods and periodicals.
c. Service: Personal service shops including, but not limited to,
travel agency, banks, airline ticket office, tailor, barber, beauty salon,
spa, health club, shoe repair, food catering, dry cleaners, studios for
dance, art, music, photography, radio, and television, or similar
service uses.
d. Food and Lodging: Small hotels, bed and breakfast inns,
restaurants, cafes, coffee shops, bakeries, butchers, fish markets,
delicatessens, ice cream parlors, cookie stores, grocery stores, drug
stores, bagel or doughnut shops, and soda fountain shops.
e. Enterlainment: Entertainment venues including movie theatres,
provided the total number of all movie screens does not exceed four;
playhouses, comedy clubs, and jazz/music clubs.
f. Office: Business offices including, but not limited to, software
design firms, business consulting, security and commodity
brokerage, general business offices, real estate sales, insurance
sales, advertising, mailing and stenographic services, professional
offices for lawyers, engineers, architects, doctors, dentists,
psychiatrists, accountants, investment advisors, orthodontists, or
other office related businesses.
g. Educational: Private schools, and day-care centers.
h. Mixed-use: buildings or structures containing any combination of
single-family residences and other uses listed herein.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 4 of 1 5
i. Public/Semi-public: Buildings or structures owned or operated by
the City of Colleyville or The Village Owner's Association. Semi-
public uses such as a neighborhood center, pool and related
recreational facilities.
j. Parking lots.
k. Accessory buildings or uses as defined herein.
I. Any use of a nature similar to the above when granted a Special
Use Permit by the Colleyville City Council.
m. Outside sales on the sidewalk of art, antiques, fruit, vegetables,
flowers, plants, gifts and souvenirs.
n. Outdoor seating areas for food, lodging or entertainment uses.
o. A Special Use Permit for alcoholic beverage sales for on-premise
consumption in conjunction with a restaurant use.
p. A Special Use Permit for alcoholic beverage sales for off-premise
consumption for a grocery store, specialty wine shop or gourmet
food store)
q. Parkinq lots. underqround parking 9arages. basements. cellars.
and aboveground parking garages containing fourteen (14) orfewer
parking spaces.
2. Permitted Uses with a Special Use Permit - The following uses may
be permitted upon approval of a Special Use Permit by the City
Council as provided in the Land Development Code of the City of
Colleyville:
a. Outside sales of cooked food and other items not listed in Section
E.1 Permitted Uses.
b. Automobile Sales (Business may store no more than two new
vehicles outside in a public parking lot.).
c. Television and appliance repair service shop.
d. Club, lodge or other fraternal organizations.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 5 of 1 5
e. Above qround parking garages containing F-Flom thQn gj)( fifteen
(15) or more parking spaces. Any above ground parking garage that
fronts a street within the Neighborhood Central (NC) zone shall be
allowed only with the approval of a Special Use Permit.
3. Prohibited Uses - The following uses shall be prohibited within this
planned unit development:
a. Drive-through commercial uses where patrons remain In
automobiles.
b. Vending machines, except within buildings.
c. Retail uses containing more than 30,000 square feet of floor area
per certificate of occupancy.
d. Industrial and manufacturing businesses that create nOise,
vibration or obnoxious odors.
e. Kennels.
f. Terminals or depots for large-scale storage or distribution of
good s.
g. Scrap yards for the processing or storage of waste materials.
h. Automotive repair businesses.
I. Telemarketing office with over 20 employees.
j. Uses not listed herein shall be considered by following the
procedures outlined in the Colleyville Land Development Code for
new and unlisted uses.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 6 of 15
4. General Lot Criteria - See Table 1 below:
Table 1
General Lot Criteria
Neighborhood Neighborhood
General Zone (NG) Center Zone (NC)
Lot Min. Area 2,600 s.f. Min. Area 2,600 s.f.
Dimensions Max. Area 5 acres Max. Area 5 acres
Min. Lot 30% Min. Lot 45%
Coveraae Coveraqe
Max. Lot 90% Max. Lot ~95'1'0
Coveraqe Coveraoe
Setbacks Front 0' min - 15' max. Front 0' min - 15' max.
Side 0' min - 15' max. Side 0' min - 15' max.
Rear - Main e' 1: min. Rear - Main &:!.'min.
Bldo. Bldo.
Rear - Accy. &1: Rear - Accy. e'1:
Blda. Blda.
Height Max. Heiaht 48 ft. or 3.5 stories Max. Heiaht 48 ft. or 3.5 stories
Notes:
1. the one-half story above third floor shall not exceed 400 s.f.
2. see Exhibit "F" for additional heiqht and use restrictions for certain areas
5. Special Use and Heiqht Conditions - The areas indicated on Exhibit
"F" shall be limited to a maximum height of two and one-half stories
and the areas indicated with an "R" on Exhibit "F" shall be
additionally limited to residential use only.
6. Buildinq Exteriors - The exposed exterior walls of each building must
contain 100% masonry. For purpose of this ordinance, masonry
shall consist of any combination of brick, stone, faux-stone, stucco or
faux-stucco.
7. Roofinq - If a flat roof is constructed, all sides of the building shall
have a mansard or built-up parapet wall roof at least four feet (4') in
height, which shall simulate the look of a pitched roof from street
level. tffl~e$!La roof terrace is constructed, then railings may be
used which comply with Paragraph ~ ~, Balconies.
8. Balconies - Balcony railings must be constructed with wrought iron or
masonry balustrades.
9. Buildinq Desiqn Requirements - Articulation of walls shall not be
mandatory. Buildings within this planned unit development shall be
exempt from Chapter 6 Building Design of the Colleyville Land
Development Code.
10. Exterior Buildinq Liqhtinq - Buildings may be lit with wall washer type
lights, natural gas lamps, or low wattage decorative electric lamps.
Lights shall be placed on buildings in a manner so as to not be a
nuisance.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 7 of 1 5
11. HV AC Systems - All air-conditioning condenser units must be hidden
from street view or placed on the roof.
12. Backvard Walls - These shall be constructed 100% masonry
materials or wrought-iron fencing. Any gates must be constructed of
wrought iron.
13. Landscapinq - Lots within this planned unit development shall be
exempt from Chapter 4 Landscaping and Buffering of the Colleyville
Land Development Code. The landscaping within this Planned Unit
Development shall be consistent with the landscaping shown on
Exhibit" E." The owners of the first floor shall plant and maintain the
storefront planting area (if applicable) along its street frontage. All
sidewalks (six feet or wider) in the project will have tree planter
islands spaced every thirty to thirty-five feet. Approved trees shall
include Shumard Red Oaks, Sweet Gums, Burr Oaks, Live Oaks,
Bald Cypress, Loblolly Pines, Cedar Elms and Chinese Pistachio. A
minimum of 25% of the building sites shall be required to install and
maintain a 24" wide planting area (at least 8 feet long) in the setback
between their building and the sidewalk. The owners of the ground
floor levels of these buildings shall be required to plant, irrigate and
maintain flowers, vines or shrubs in those areas. In addition, any
roof terraces shall contain at least two irrigated, potted shrubs or
trees. Building site owners shall plant and maintain one approved
tree in their backyard.
14. Awninqs - Buildings with commercial uses on the ground level shall
install awnings over all windows on the ground level that front public
sidewalks, if those buildings contain a residential use above the
ground level.
15. Architectural Control Committee - The Property Owner's Association
must create an Architectural Control Committee, which shall be
funded by the Property Owner's Association. All building exterior
specifications, site plans, lighting, signage and landscaping plans
must be approved by the Architectural Control Committee prior to
approval of a building permit.
18. LimitatioR €IR Lat€l ~Ji€1ht ~€I\:;lfG €If Oporation Businos808 IO€latod
within this PUD C €)hall €llo€)o not lator than 1 Q:20 f).m. on wook€lays
aRe ~\:;lndays, aRe 12:30 a.m. en Fridays aRe ~atk:lrdays.
17. Special Use Permit Time Limits - The special use permit required for
alcoholic beverage sales for on-premise or off-premise consumption
shall become null and void five (5) years from the date of approval of
this ordinance for undeveloped sites.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 8 of 15
18. Dumpster Screeninq - A dumpster located in an alley on the
perimeter of the project shall be screened from view on all sides with
an opaque enclosure or buildinq niche measurinq at least six (6) feet
in heiqht. The enclosure or buildinq niche shall be constructed of
material that matches the buildinq.
E.1 ENCROACHMENTS AND USE OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
Due to the unique nature of this planned unit development, the
encroachments of buildings and architectural features into the public
right-of-way and certain uses within the public right-of-way, stated herein
in Section E.1, shall be allowed within this planned unit development
and shall be exceptions to the requirements of the Land Development
Code. All encroachments, including temporary structures, must
maintain a forty-eight (48") inch pedestrian right-of-way and comply with
all other ADA regulations. In addition, any encroachments shall ensure
a twenty-four (24") inch sight line.
1. Encroachments below grade - Approval by the Director of Public
Services of a Right-of-way Permit is required for any building
encroachments below grade. All encroachments shall not exceed
eighteen (18") inches.
2. Encroachments of architectural features above grade - Approval by
the Building Inspection Department is required for any encroachment
of architectural features above grade, provided such encroachments
comply with the standards contained in the following table and local
building and fire codes:
Riaht-of-way Encroachment Standards
Type of Maximum Allowable Encroachment
Encroachment
Bay Windows 18 inches with max. 7 foot length, 3 feet min. spacing & one bay
window oer 15 feet of site frontaoe
Awnings & canopies 80% of sidewalk width, 8 feet clearance over pedestrian area & 14
feet clearance over vehicle area
Signs 66% of sidewalk width, 8 feet clearance over pedestrian area & 14
feet clearance over vehicle area
Lights If the light encroaches 12 inches or less, it may be mounted at any
height on the building fatyade. From 8 feet to 11 feet above grade,
one additional inch of encroachment shall be required for each inch
of clearance above 8 feet, not to exceed 48 inches of encroachment.
Encroachments over 12 inches require 8 feet clearance over
pedestrian areas & 14 feet clearance over vehicle areas, and shall
not encroach bevond 48 inches
Eaves, cornices and From 8 feet to 15 feet above grade, one inch of encroachment for
balconies each inch of clearance above 8 feet not to exceed 48 inches of
encroachment. Encroachments 15 feet or more above grade shall
have 8 feet of clearance over pedestrian area & 14 feet clearance
over vehicle area and shall not encroach bevond 6 feet
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 9 of 15
3. Temporary structures in public right-of-way - The temporary use of
sidewalk areas located within a public right-of-way shall be allowed
for the following types of temporary structures: planter boxes,
benches, sandwich board signs, retail merchandise, and four (4)
tables with chairs. Use of the public right-of-way for retail
merchandise shall be limited to business hours.
4. Outdoor Eating Areas on public sidewalks - The use of a public
sidewalk as an outdoor eating area containing more than four tables
shall be permitted only with approval of a Special Use Permit by the
City Council.
F. SUBDIVISION PLAT
Upon zoning approval, the developer shall submit a Preliminary Plan
and a Final Plat, which shall generally be consistent with the attached
site plan. The proposed deed restrictions shall be approved by the City
Council.
G. SUPPLEMENTARY REQUIREMENTS
This planned unit development shall comply with the following
supplementary requirements:
1. Open Space Requirements - This development shall provide open
space areas as shown on the attached Exhibit "E" in lieu of any other
open space requirements of the Colleyville Land Development Code.
2. Park Land Dedication Fees - Payment of Park Land Dedication
Fees at the rate applicable at the time of building permit shall be due
and payable when a building permit is issued for each non-
residential structure or primary single-family dwelling unit.
3. Street Riqht-of-Wav Widths - These shall be established upon
approval of the Final Plat using the street and alley design standards
contained in Paragraph 7 below.
4. Sidewalks - Sidewalks shall be required for all lots In this
development.
5. Garaqes/Accessorv Buildinqs - The walls of these buildings shall be
100% masonry, constructed of similar materials as the building on
the same building site and shall cover no more than 20% of the
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 10 of 15
building site area, and they may be connected to the main building
by an enclosed walkway. These buildings shall comply with all other
requirements in this ordinance.
6. Advertisinq Siqns - Buildings may contain the following types of
signs:
a. Wall Signs - The size of a wall sign shall be limited to the size of
the building wall it is attached to: either 10 percent of the wall area or
1.5 square feet for each linear foot of the building's wall, whichever is
less.
b. Projecting Signs - These may not exceed 20 square feet in size,
with a clearance of at least eight feet above ground level.
c. Awning Signs -Individual letters on awning signs shall not exceed
12 inches in height.
d. None of the above signs shall be internally lit. These signs may
be front-lit with lights that do not create an unreasonable glare on
adjacent buildings.
e. Window Signs - Food and Lodging and Entertainment uses may
use internally lit window signs (made of decorative neon) inside of
their businesses. Any business shall be limited to a maximum of two
window signs. I nternally lit box signs shall not be permitted.
f. Grand Opening Signs - When a certificate of occupancy has been
issued for a new business and within one (1) year thereafter, one (1)
Grand Opening Sign permit shall be allowed to advertise the new
business. On-site signs may include either a banner or pennant,
which may be in addition to any other legal sign allowed by the Land
Development Code. Height and area of such signs shall be limited
to the applicable regulations for the sign classification. In addition to
the on-site Grand Opening Sign, a temporary sign may be placed off-
premises with the permission of the property owner. The permit
holder shall be the responsible party for compliance with the Grand
Opening Sign Permit regulations. A Grand Opening Sign permit
shall not be valid for more than sixty (60) days. No permit fee shall
be required for a Grand Opening Sign permit. After the expiration of
the initial sixty (60) day period, a business may request sixty (60) day
extensions during the one (1) year period, subjectto approval of the
City Council.
g. Sandwich Board Signs - One (1) temporary Sandwich Board sign
shall be allowed per business, provided such sign does not exceed
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 11 of 1 5
forty-eight inches (48") high and thirty-six inches (36") wide and is
located in front of the business site. Sandwich Board Signs may be
placed in front of another business site with the approval of that
business owner. Forthe purpose of this regulation, Sandwich Board
signs shall include easels and podiums.
7. Street and Alley Desiqn
a. Two-way Street - The cross-section of the typical village street
shall be comprised of twenty-four feet of drive lanes (two, twelve-foot
lanes); two, seven-foot parallel parking spaces; and a ten-foot
sidewalk on each side of the street. The total public right-of-way
shall not be less than fifty-six (56) feet wide.
b. One-way Street - A cross-section of a typical one-way street shall
contain an eighteen-foot drive lane, one seven-foot parallel parking
space and sidewalks ranging in width from three feet to six feet. The
public right-of-way for a one-way street shall not be less than thirty-
five (35) feet.
c. Alley - The cross section of the typical alley shall contain twelve
feet of pavement with green space on each side. The alley right-of-
way width shall not be less than twenty (20) feet.
8. Public Area Landscaping - Public parks in the project shall be
landscaped and irrigated according to plans approved by the City of
Colleyville.
9. Security Fencing and Walls os follows:
a. a six foot masonry screening wall shall be constructed along the
entire length of the northern boundary from the City Park to Pleasant
Run Road, and
b. an eight foot masonry screening wall shall be constructed along
the three common property lines with Tract 2A2, B.B.B. & C.R.R. Co.
Survey, Abstract 206, and
c. an eight foot wrought iron fence with openings for gates shall be
constructed along the western property line where this planned unit
development is adjacent to the City owned park property, except
where adiacent to the City Hall and Library site, and
d. a gate shall be constructed at the west end of Central Drive with
card-key access for the residents of Central Drive.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 12 of 1 5
H. AMENITIES
1. Parks and Playqrounds - All or portions of certain lots identified on
the project site plan must be set aside for public parks, meeting
areas and playgrounds.
2. Sidewalk Amenities - Besides the trees and other landscaping,
sidewalks shall be constructed to contain the following amenities:
bicycle racks, benches, bulletin boards, drinking fountains,
underground electric outlets for sidewalk vendors, chess and
checkers tables, and water fountains.
3. Street Liqhts - The street lights may be either gas or electric and
shall be installed on the sidewalks and be of a style which
compliments that architectural style of the project's buildings.
4. Walkinq Paths - Certain paths in front of some lots and building sites
will be for pedestrian and bicycle use only. These paths shall range
from eight to twenty feet in width and shall be constructed of brick,
stone and/or concrete.
5. Street Siqns - Street signs sRaU may be attached on the appropriate
buildings at each intersection. The signs, if attached, shall be placed
fifteen (15} feet above street level and shall be front lit with a
decorative lighting fixture. The signs shall contain eight-inch letters.
I. PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The parking requirements for this planned unit development shall be as
follows and subject to review when the project is 50% complete:
1. The parking shall be provided according to the parking requirements
of this section, provided that when 50% of the development is
completed within the NC-Neighborhood Center area, the City shall
have the authority to review the parking demands and reassess the
parking ratio by the development. The developer shall reserve
spaces throughout the development to provide extra parking at the
50% reduced development stage. The City shall additionally have
the authority to review the parking supply and may reassess the
parking ratio when 50% of the development is completed within the
NG-Neighborhood General area.
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 13 of 1 5
2. Parking spaces shall consist of a combination of parking spaces
provided on the street, on each building site, within a parking garage
or in an open parking lot. Approximately thirty (30) percent of the
parking requirements will be provided on the streets as streets are
constructed within the development. The remaining seventy (70)
percent of the parking requirements shall be provided as building
permits are issued for each structure in accordance with the
following requirements:
a. Residential Uses - The parking requirements for residential units
shall be as follows:
(1) Ground floor - when a primary residence is located on the
ground floor, two (2) parking spaces shall be provided on the
same building site as the dwelling unit and one additional on-
site parking space if the building site contains an ancillary
residential unit.
(2) Upper floor - when a primary residence is located on an
upper floor, two (2) parking spaces shall be provided either on
the same building site as the residence or in a parking lot or
parking garage located within 400 feet of the residence. Said
parking spaces shall not have been used in calculating parking
needs for any other residence or use within the planned unit
development.
b. Non-Residential Uses - The parking requirements for non-
residential uses shall be at a ratio of one (1) parking space per 400
square feet of floor area. Parking spaces shall either be located on
the building site, in a parking lot, or in a parking garage. Said
parking lot or parking garage shall be located within 400 feet of the
use requiring the parking space. Said parking spaces shall not have
been used in calculating the parking needs for any other use within
the planned unit development.
c. Parkinq Space Records Retention - When off-site parking spaces
are provided to satisfy the parking requirements of this ordinance,
the City of Colleyville Community DevelopmentDepartment shall
maintain records of the number of parking spaces used in calculating
parking needs for each building site and no building permit shall be
issued for a structure for which adequate parking is not included with
the building permit application.
d. Public Parkinq - Public parking lots and parallel parking spaces
shall be located as shown on the attached Exhibit "E". All public
parking shall be free of charge. Parking time limits shall bB-twe
Ord inance 0-02-1337.4
Page 14 of 15
hour~ for por:::lllol p:::lrking ~p:::lCO~ from 9:00 :::I.m. to 8:00 p.m. No
overnight parking shall be permitted in the parking lots.
J. PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
Each property owner in the project shall be a member of the owners'
association which shall collect quarterly fees from each property owner
for payment for the following common services: landscaping, Village
promotions and events, cleaning, security, marketing, architectural
control and project administration. If a Village property owner fails to
timely pay its association fees, the owners association's declaration of
covenants shall enable it to file a lien against that owner's property.
Sec. 2.
THAT Ordinance 0-99-1141 shall remain in effect except where amended
by this ordinance.
Sec. 3.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this
ordinance as read together with the Land Development Code of the City of
Colleyville shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof
shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00).
Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate
offense and shall be punishable as such.
Sec. 4.
THAT, the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternate method of publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
Ordinance 0-02-1337.4
Page 15 of 15
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
Ci I Y r){
,/~
CITY COUNCIL CQ~~~nC1> AGENDA BRIEFING
Tl"X~::;
MEETING DATE: : 12/03/02
ITEM # : 18
RESOLUTION # : R-02-2056
CITY MANAGER :
DEPARTMENT HEAD
FINANCE REVIEW
Previous Action: TABLED
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
SUBJECT: Approval of an Agreement between Broadland
Limited Partnership, the David Bagwell Company
and David Bagwell and the City of Colleyville
relating to the Colleyville trail system
Update
As requested, the City Attorney is working with David Bagwell to identify the parties defined as
the "Developer" related to this Agreement.
Reading and Public Hearing
In recent months, staff has been working with David Bagwell, President, David Bagwell
Company, regarding construction of a concrete trail in Westcliff I. As a follow-up to these
discussions, the City Attorney has prepared the attached Agreement between the developer
and the City related to the city's trail system. Trail segments for Westcliff II, Old Grove and
McPherson Park will be addressed as future development occurs within this area.
Recommendation
Approval
Attachments
. Resolution R-02-2056
RESOLUTION R-02-2056
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN BROADLAND LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, THE DAVID BAGWELL COMPANY AND DAVID BAGWELL AND
THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE RELATED TO THE COLLEYVILLE TRAIL SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has adopted the "Colleyville Pathways: a Citywide
Trail System Plan" that, when complete, will serve to connect the strategic
points throughout the City; and
WHEREAS, the Colleyville City Council desires to continue to develop the City of
Colleyville's trail system throughout the City to enhance mobility.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the City Council hereby approves an Agreement between
Broadland Limited Partnership, the David Bagwell Company and David
Bagwell and the City of Colleyville related to the Colleyville Trail System,
hereby attached as Exhibit "A".
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
PASSED BY A VOTE OF
THIS THE DAY OF
AYES,
NAYS, AND
2002.
ABSTENTIONS ON
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
Exhibit "A"
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 3rd day of December 2002, by and between
BROADLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, DAVID BAGWELL, AND DAVID
BAGWELL COMPANY, hereinafter referred to as "Developer" and the CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, hereinafter referred to as "City".
WHEREAS, the Developer is in the process of developing the subdivisions
known as Westcliff, Phase I (hereinafter referred to as "Subdivision"), within the
City of Colleyville; and
WHEREAS, a dispute has arisen between the Developer and the City relating
to the dedication of property for the Colleyville trail system and the construction
of the trail with regard to the Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement desire to settle their dispute in order
to promote the interest of both the Developer and the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, upon the mutual covenants, conditions and promises
contained herein, the parties hereby agree as follows:
Developer's Obligations With Regard to the Trail System
1 . The Developer and the City hereby agree that the following criteria
shall govern the obligations of the Developer to dedicate property to
the City and to construct the Colleyville trail system (as identified in
Exhibit "A" hereto) with regard to the Subdivision.
Segment B - This section of the trail is located on the east
side of Newkirk Lane and extends from the northern
boundary of the LDS Church property in a northeasterly
direction to a point where the trail crosses into the
McPherson Park property, a distance of approximately 410
linear feet. The Developer shall construct this portion of the
trail as part of the development of Westcliff I Addition.
1.2 The sections of the trail the Developer is required to install shall be
constructed in accordance with Section 15.5.A, detail number P-8A
of the Colleyville Land Development Code.
Developer-City Agreement
Page 2
Release
2.1 Except for the obligations imposed on the parties by this
agreement, the City, on its own behalf and on behalf of its
respective agents, employees, servants, representatives, attorneys,
insurers, reinsurers, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, and any
entity claiming by, through or under it, does hereby release, acquit,
and forever discharge Developer, their agents, employees,
servants, representatives, attorneys, insurers, reinsurers,
subsidiaries, successors, and assigns, from and against any and all
claims, demands, causes of action, liabilities and damages
(including but not limited to actual damages, exemplary and
punitive damages, statutory damages, penalties, attorney's fees,
prejudgment and post judgment interest and expenses), or any and
every character, kind and nature whatsoever, at law or in equity,
whether known or unknown, past, present or future, accrued or
unaccrued, contingent or fixed, whether based on the law of
contract, tort or otherwise, whether under statutory law or the
common law, arising out of, resulting from, based upon or related in
any way to the actions of the parties with regard to the dedication or
construction of the Colleyville trail system reflected on Exhibit "A",
or in the negotiation and execution of this agreement.
2.2 Except for the obligations imposed on the parties by this
agreement, Developer on its own behalf and on behalf of its
respective owners, shareholders, agents, representatives,
subsidiaries, successors and assigns, and any entity claiming by,
through or under him, do hereby release, acquit and forever
discharge the City, its agents, employees, servants,
representatives, attorneys, insurers, reinsurers, subsidiaries,
successors, and assigns, from and against any and all claims,
demands, causes of action, liabilities and damages (including but
not limited to actual damages, exemplary and punitive damages,
statutory damages, penalties, attorney's fees, prejudgment and
post judgment interest and expenses), of any and every character,
kind and nature whatsoever, at law or in equity, whether known or
unknown, past, present or future, accrued on unaccrued, contingent
or fixed, whether based on the law of contract, tort, or otherwise,
whether under statutory law or the common law, arising out of,
resulting from, based upon or related in any way to the actions of
the parties with regard to the dedication of construction of the
Colleyville trail system reflected on Exhibit "A", or in the negotiation
and execution of this agreement.
2
Developer-City Agreement
Page 3
Other Development Regulations
3. This agreement is intended only to govern the obligations of the
Developer concerning the dedication of property for and the
construction of the Colleyville trail system as reflected on Exhibit
"A". This agreement is not intended to and shall not be construed
to vary or alter any other development regulations which are
applicable to the Subdivisions.
Miscellaneous Provisions
4.1 This agreement shall be binding upon and for the sole benefit of
both parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors and
assigns and not for the benefit of any third-party and may not be
assigned in whole or part without the written consent on the other
party.
4.2 This agreement may not be changed orally, but only by an
agreement in writing signed by the parties. No act, delay, omission,
course of dealing between the parties will be a waiver of any rights
or remedies under this agreement. Any waiver of any right, remedy
or requirement under the terms hereof on any occasion will not be a
bar or constitute a waiver of the exercise of the same or other right
or remedy on subsequent occasions.
4.3 This agreement shall be governed by and be in accordance with
the laws of the State of Texas.
4.4 If any provision of this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be
invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not
affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement shall be
construed as if such invalid or unenforceable provision have never
been contained herein.
4.5 This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts
and each such counterpart shall be deemed an original.
3
Developer-City Agreement
Page 4
EXECUTED on the date first above written.
DEVELOPER
BROADLAND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By:
Its General Partner
DAVID BAGWELL COMPANY
By:
David Bagwell, President
DA VI D Bagwell
By:
David Bagwell
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
By:
Donna Arp, Mayor
4
..
,
I '
r<
: I
I
i
~-=
~
~......... ...::,. ~. .~..
..,' .~
. .
,.
"PAlIK
0+<: /,' ft
T Y't(,' I
S87/tt e ",.J
.""
.6
.-
I
I
RESOLUTION R-02-2073
A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION
UNDER BUSINESS AT THE REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING OF
DECEMBER 3, 2002
WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Business.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Business
this date and not otherwise adopted by Ordinance and/or separate
Resolution as follows are hereby adopted:
a.
THAT
AND IT IS SO RESOLVED.
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
_ AYES, NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS.
2002 BY A VOTE OF
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor