HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-7/22/2002
City of
Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda - July 22,2002
Page 1 of 2
Texas
AGENDA
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
City Hall - 5400 Bransford Road
Monday July 22, 2002
REGULAR MEETING:
7:00 P.M.
Invocation:
Chairman Gasper
Commissioners Jeffrey Wall, Bob Culley, Earl Swift, Mark Jones,
Bud Sellers, Mark Hollis, Jo Ann Gasper
Commissioner Swift
Call to Order:
Roll Call:
Pledge of Allegiance
Approval of Minutes:
July 8, 2002
1. PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from R40 to R20 Single Family Residential on 1.99
acres located at the southeast corner of Hall Johnson Road and Montclair Drive, Case Z-02-
020
2. PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG to R20 Single Family Residential on 0.9623
acres located at 2309 Hall Johnson Road, Case Z-02-021
3. Final Plat of Westgate Villas, 14.761 acres located on the south side of McDonwell School
Road, west of Remington Park, Case P-02-023
4. TABLED ITEM - Zoning Change from R40 to PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential
on 19.405 acres located on the south side of L.D. Lockett Road in the 900 block, Case 2-02-
018 .
5. Citizens' comments regarding items not on the agenda.
6. Staff comments, reports and discussion items.
The following items were received on the last case submittal cycle and may be placed on a
future agenda:
· A Final Plat of Westcliff Addition, Phase I, 57.112 acres located on the north side of
McDonwell School Road east of Remington Parkway, Case P-02-025
P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE. TEXAS 76034 (817) 577-7575
Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda - July 22, 2002
Page 2 of 2
7. Commissioners' comments and reports.
ADJOURNMENT
I certify that this agenda was posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall on Friday July 19. 2002 at 4:30 p.m.
t{- Jan Levy, Planning and Zoning Assislanl
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes - July 8, 2002
Chairman Gasper called the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to order at
7:00 P.M. on July 8, 2002.
Roll Call:
Present:
Bob Culley, Earl Swift, Mark Jones, Bud Sellers, Mark
Hollis, Jo Ann Gasper
Absent:
Jeffrey Wall
Staff:
Barry LeBaron, Jeff Jones, Chris Steubing, Jan Levy
Invocation:
Commissioner Culley
Pledge of Allegiance
Approval of Minutes:
June 24, 2002
Chairman Gasper moved to approve the minutes of the June 10, 2002 meeting as written.
Commissioner Culley seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Culley, Swift, Jones, Sellers, Hollis, Gasper
Noes: None
1. PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG to R20 Single Family Residential on 1.5517
acres located at the northwest corner of Glade Road and Pool Road, Case Z-02-019
Barry LeBaron presented the case to the Commission and reviewed the staff briefing.
Chairman Gasper opened the public hearing. There being no one present wishing to speak, the
public hearing was closed. The commissioners did not have questions for the applicant.
Chairman Gasper moved to recommend approval of the zoning change from AG to R20.
Commissioner Jones seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Culley, Swift, Jones, Sellers, Hollis, Gasper
Noes: None
2. PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from R40 to PUD-R Planned Unit Development-
Residential on 19.405 acres located on the south side of L.D. Lockett Road in the 900
block, Case Z-02-018
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 1 of 9 - D R AFT CO,. Y
Barry LeBaron presented the case to the Commission and reviewed the staff briefing. He told
them the applicant is not asking for a preliminary platting at this time and the applicant will need to
come back before the commissioners with a preliminary plat if the zoning change is approved. He
said the detention pond is shown as open space. Mr. LeBaron said the applicant is asking for a
waiver from the 20% open space requirements as they are proposing 19% open space. He told
the commissioners that the City owns property to the east and the City has not designated the
property for parkland, but will build a water storage tank and possibly baseball practice fields. Mr.
LeBaron told the commissioners that staff is recommending denial of the case because it is in
non-compliance with the Master Plan, and does not meet the open space and lot size
requirements for the PUD regulations.
Chairman Gasper opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were:
Joseph Reue, Washington & Associates, 3950 Fossil Creek Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137. Mr.
Reue was representing the applicant, Mr. Dick Blackard, who was unable to attend the meeting.
He said they are aware of the 1998 Master Plan's designation of the property as
office/commercial. He said they felt the PUD would be a more appropriate use of the property and
they planned on leaving the corridor on L.D. Lockett as commercial then transition lot sizes to
buffer the commercial uses and transition into Hurst. Mr. Reue said they took into consideration
the practical and comparable use of the property and have an average lot size close to 16,000
square feet. He said they are within the limits of the density requirements for the PUD zoning
district. Mr. Reue said the homes would be approximately 3,000 square feet in size and list for
$330,000 and up, and the developer is projecting a three year build out time. He said the addition
of homes in the area would ignite commercial development in the area.
There was no one else present to speak at the public hearing, so Chairman Gasper closed the
public hearing.
Commissioner Swift asked Fire Marshal Jones to comment on the one street access and any
effect it has on fire response time for the fire department. Fire Marshal Jones responded that they
do not oppose the layout of the subdivision and would use the Hurst side of the development for
additional access.
Chairman Gasper said she has serious reservations about taking scarce commercially designated
land and changing it to residential. The commissioners entered into discussion about buffers and
the consequences of changing the Master Planned commercial property to residential. They
discussed how other properties in the area may also want to rezone to residential rather than
commercial if this change is approved. Chairman Gasper said this portion of property is situated
between others that are designated for commercial on the Master Plan and if it becomes
residential the new residents will want a buffer and more potential commercial property may
become residential.
Commissioner Culley asked Joseph Reue if there is latitude for the developer to meet the open
space requirements. Mr. Reue responded that there may be some flexibility and they may have to
lose one residential lot for them to meet the PUD-R requirements.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 2 of 9 - D R AFT CO,. Y
___." ~~....___,_"_ .___,.,_,____..,~.._...,.,__._,__...._._,_._..~__~._,..'""__~_..._____.,_..._~__..~.._.._.____,___..~_....._........,_~__,___<...~.___~__...___'__.__~_'_..~._~_.~____.M.._~___~
The commissioners discussed the length of the street to the channel and what the channel will
look like. There was discussion about the detention/retention pond, the culvert, the plans for the
open space area and the drainage plans. They discussed possible screening on the western side
of the property from the potential commercial development.
Commissioner Jones commented on this development providing more residents who pay taxes
and will attract commercial business even though some future commercial property is
cannibalized.
Chairman Gasper moved to deny the zoning change request. Commissioner Swift
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Culley, Swift, , Gasper
Noes: Jones, Sellers, Hollis
The motion did not pass because it takes four affirmative votes to pass an item.
Chairman Gasper moved to table the case until a full compliment of the Commission is
available to vote.
The motion died for a lack of a second.
The commissioners entered into discussion about the reasoning for tabling the case.
Commissioner Hollis said he would like to see fewer homes with more open space and he does
not think that commercial use of that property is the best use for the property. Commissioner
Jones spoke about maintaining the rural atmosphere that most citizens want in Colleyville.
Commissioner Culley said the proposed plan in not indicative of current residential needs and is
not the right residential plan.
Joseph Reue requested the commission table the case so that the developer can address the
commissioners concerns.
Commissioner Hollis moved to table the case. Commissioner Jones seconded the motion.
Commissioner Cully provided reasons for the case to be tabled and said the developer has not
crossed the threshold for reaching technical compliance. Commissioner Sellers recommended
that the developer come back with 20% open space, larger lots, and the reason residential is
better economically for the City than commercial development on the property. Commissioner
Swift said he sees the Master Plan issue as the only outstanding issue. Staff entered into the
discussion and suggested that the developer provide better economic information including
taxable values of the property if it were developed residential as proposed versus the values if the
property developed according to the Master Plan over the next five years.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 3 of 9 - D R AFT COP Y
The vote being:
Ayes: Jones, Sellers, Hollis, Gasper
Noes: Culley, Swift,
3. TABLED ITEM - Final Plat of Whittier Heights, 58.003 acres located on the north side of
McDonwell School Road, east of Remington Parkway, Case P-02-021
Commissioner Sellers recused himself for this item. He stepped down, but remained in the
Council Chambers to listen to discussion.
Commissioner Culley moved to remove the case from the table for discussion.
Commissioner Swift seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Culley, Swift, Jones, Hollis, Gasper
Noes: None
Barry LeBaron presented the case to the commissioners. He told them staff cannot support the
proposed trail clipping the City of Colleyville property because of implications it has for future grant
requests to develop the park property. He told the commissioner that the developer has
withdrawn his proposed donation of a 1.5 acre space are to the City. He said that the proposed
traffic calming devices had not been considered by any approving body in prior plat approval and
the Fire Department cannot support the developers proposed designs.
Fire Marshal Jeff Jones addressed the Commission. He said he tried to get an agreement and
meet with the developer and he planned on getting the largest apparatus that would respond to a
fire and test it on the proposed street widths where the traffic calming devices are located. He
said he was unable to get the fire truck from the City of Grapevine, so he used the City of
Colleyville's largest truck and went to Remington Park and used the developers figures and set up
cones to represent lane width. He said he drove the truck at 8 mph and the truck could not make
the turning radius.
David Bagwell addressed the Commission and said that it has gotten more difficult to develop in
Colleyville and he would be happy to surrender, but in doing so the City is wrong. He said on
March 29th the subject of traffic calming devices was brought up. He said he will renounce any
innovative ideas he has proposed and adhere to the City's design standards of forcing a square
peg into a square hole. He said that 40' rights-of-way were allowed in all of his other subdivisions.
He said the commissioners are getting a red herring by listening to the City's commentary on the
design standards.
The commissioners discussed with staff the reason the trail should not be considered as shown.
They discussed the possibility of jeopardizing future grant funds if the trail was constructed
through City property.
Commissioner Culley addressed David Bagwell and made the following statement: "I thought the
problem was just the fact that you did not want to move the trail because you just didn't want to
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 4 of 9 - D R AFT COP Y
move it and it had been approved that way before and you wanted to stick to that point. What I
now understand is that we made a mistake or someone made a mistake in approving this
preliminarily even though we may not have intended to do it that way. I tend to remember it
exactly like Barry said that the trail was in flux and it would be finalized later. We even had
discussions about if the trail was going to be at the rear of McPherson and there was going to be a
total trail there, and that is my recollection."
Commissioner Culley said if it is true that they did give Mr. Bagwell the approval to do the trail in
that fashion, he didn't see how they could go back on that point with him. He said he can only see
that they get Mr. Bagwell to agree with them to leave it on the City property as approved, right,
wrong or indifferent and it would be a disservice to go back and try to change the rules. He said if
Mr. Bagwell will work with them on moving the trail, then it should be moved. Mr. Bagwell said he
would be accept moving the trail location on the north side of the park to be moved as far west as
possible and there is room to do that to get it back into alignment as it leaves the northern portion
of the park property.
Commissioner Culley said he did not think the intent was to align the trail that way, but since it's
already been done, they owe that to Mr. Bagwell to try to work with him at this point.
Mr. Bagwell said it is not as if the realignment of the trail will not have a financial consequence to
him, but it is not enough to worry over. He said he is anxious to see the trail built, and he thought
his company was trying to do the right thing and if it accomplishes that by moving the portion that
they pick up north of the park then that is fine.
Chairman Gasper recapped the case and said that the commissioners feel the location of the trail
is no longer an issue and the developer has withdrawn his request to change the entrance rights-
of-ways on streets from the City's standards so there are no outstanding issues.
Commissioner Culley asked the Fire Marshal if there is a way the rollover curbs could be modified
or if they could accommodate the current designs and not impede a fire truck from getting into the
subdivision. Chairman Gasper said before the Fire Marshal answers, she wanted to tell the
commissioners that she did some research into a product called Grass Pave where the substrata
is prepared and then it looks like grass and will carry the weight of a fire truck. She asked if the
Fire Marshal is aware of the product. Fire Marshal Jeff Jones said that his outside radius is a
mandate and he has to have 50'. He said if he can clip the corner and make that a solid base he
would not oppose that. Commissioner Culley said how they get fire trucks into and around the
subdivision is between the developer's engineer, the fire marshal and the City. He asked the
developers engineer to address the Commission.
Chairman Gasper asked the developer's engineer, Eddie Eckert, to address the commissioners.
Mr. Eckert said his findings are based on Engineering and AASHTO guidelines (American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials - a policy on geometric design of
highways and streets). He said based on those guidelines, the inside and outside radiuses are
not concentric, and they do not run parallel. He said he drew up something that he believes works
and the fire marshal disagrees with his design and he is disappointed with that. Mr. Eckert said he
is a Colleyville resident and he was willing to come up with a solution and he thinks the solution
can be a 24' inside radius rather than a 20' inside radius. He said they are not dealing with a
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 5 of 9 - D R AFT COP Y
parallel circle. Mr. Eckert said he believes he and the fire marshal can come up with something
that Mr. Bagwell and the City can live with that does not compromise the safety.
Chairman Gasper asked Mr. Bagwell to show them a copy of the preliminary plan that was
approved. She said the preliminary plat clearly does not show the provisions for the narrower
entryways into the streets. David Bagwell said that was an idea they came up with later and he
said he didn't want to spend anymore time on it and he would like to renounce the concept and he
said they'll go back to the standard Colleyville street intersections. He said they will forget the
throat, the traffic calming, and the aesthetic benefits. He said the misinformation the Commission
has received will prevail today. He said the wonderful design idea that he is proposing is going to
die as a result of a bureaucratic claim that is incorrect.
Commissioner Culley said he is not prepared to give up and denounce everybody that is working
on the project. He asked the fire marshal if there is a way to work the street entrance designs out
as it is proposed by the developer and explain how that might work. Jeff Jones said he believed
the radius of the intersection is a platting issue and the street design review process will come
when the street engineering plans are approved by City staff, and if it is not worked out, the street
designs will not be approved by the Engineering Department. Fire Marshal Jones said he thinks it
could be worked out with a modified inside turning radius, but that could not be done tonight or
before City Council next week. He said he believes they could reach a resolution when the
construction plans are submitted and reviewed. He said the designs would be determined only if
they would be approved by the fire department. He said he believes the developer's engineer has
the same intention he does to see the development continue.
Commissioner Culley moved to approve the final plat with the following amendments:
· That the approval be subject to the developer constructing the 10' wide trail along a
path, in a location, that is mutually agreeable to both the developer and the City
without going against what was originally passed; and
· That Fire Marshal Jones and the developer's engineer meet before the City Council
meeting and make recommendations how the street designs will work.
Mr. Bagwell said he is not willing to work out the issues with staff. Mr. Culley said he is not
interested in Mr. Bagwell's opinion and he is talking about Mr. Bagwell's engineer and it should be
worked out between the engineer and the fire department and not be an emotional issue because
a lot of time and money has been spent to trying to put this project together and it is a good
project. Commissioner Culley said the outbursts and accusations they've had are not
commensurate with what they came together to do tonight.
Commissioner Swift seconded the motion.
Commissioner Hollis said that as far as a mutual agreement, he has not heard that there is one
and they cannot pass something that says they will mutually agree. He said the plat will go to City
Council with or without the Commission's approval and he does not see a mutual agreement
happening. Commissioner Hollis said he would recommend tabling the case and direct the
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 6 of 9 - D R AFT COP Y
applicant and staff to work out the issues. He said he would only be for a motion that nails down
what they want to see and leave it up to Mr. Bagwell to accept or reject it.
Chairman Gasper said she thinks Mr. Bagwell has no problem with the trail issue, but the problem
is with the traffic calming provision. She said she believes the motion offers the developer and the
fire marshal an adequate opportunity to see if a resolution to the issue can be made that
maintains the aesthetics of the development. Commissioner Hollis said he would love to see
some optimism on the part of the developer and then he would be on board with her and
Commissioner Culley, but with what he has heard tonight, he is not. Chairman Gasper said that if
this motion is approved and the developer tells his engineer he will not pay for his time, the intent
of the motion dies. Commissioner Culley said that would be the developer's choice and he feels it
would be a travesty to continue to table the item because they've heard all of the arguments and it
is time to send it on to Council. Commissioner Hollis said if the city staff and developer cannot
work out issues on a time table, the Commission should not be at fault or considered a part of the
problem. He said the commissioners are not there to make a project economically viable, but to
approve good plans. He said they are not there to rush plans, but to approve good plans and the
way he sees it, this is not a good plan.
Chairman Gasper said that if there are substantive changes between the preliminary plan and the
final plat that is presented to the Commission, then they have the flexibility to deny the plat. She
said she does not see where there are significant, substantial differences between the preliminary
plat that was approved and the final plat they are considering that is before them. Commissioner
Hollis said he can see that point and can appreciate that, but the preliminary plats come before
them for a reason which is to bring forth areas that may be weak that may need changes. He said
that is why there is a two step process and they consider a plat twice; once at preliminary plat and
again at final plat. He said in this case were there optimism and clear channels of communication
between the City and the developer, he would be completely on board with Chairman Gasper. He
said given what he has seen and heard in the meeting, the Commission should give the developer
and City black and white instructions because they are not working out the gray areas. Chairman
Gasper said it behooves them to not make decisions based upon personalities or behaviors, but
they need to look at the facts and make their determinations on the facts.
Commissioner Culley said that speaking for the staff and the fire marshal who he supports equally
as much as the developer in this situation, they can all have their opinions as how things should
be and are, but that is why they are here. He said they try to determine what is best and move on
and that is what his motion is for. Commissioner Culley said he does not support tabling simply
because they are putting more in the hands of the developer who is upset with the way they are
handling the final plat already. He said they've heard the developer say, "Just turn it down," but
Commissioner Culley said he doesn't believe the developer means that, but that puts more bullets
into the developer's gun to come back and say that he has not been treated fairly. He said after
the harsh discussion, he believes the developer is right about the path and Commissioner Culley
agreed the developer should move it so the park can be used. He said he does not agree that
they should leave the final plat with the street the way it is on the plat, because he respects Mr.
Eckert's learning and degree, but he also respects the fire marshal's opinion. Commissioner
Culley said the developer's engineer and the fire marshal said they could work on a plan for the
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 7 of 9 - D R AFT CO,. Y
streets and make it work, so the Commission should at least give them an opportunity to do that
without delaying the plat and keeping the developer in a situation in which he has to wait again.
Chairman Gasper said that time is money and the more they delay in making a decision the more
it costs the developer money. She said that whatever they decide on the plat, the plat will go to
City Council and the Council will hold two public hearings at that point. She said she agrees with
Commissioner Culley and wants to give the City and the applicant an opportunity to attempt to
work this out now that they have a clear understanding as to what the issues are. She said she
believes the Commission's roll is to try and fix the problem.
Commissioner Hollis said he agrees and is not trying to affix any blame, but he does not believe
the plat should go forward until the trail issue is worked out.
Chairman Gasper called the question. The vote being:
Ayes: Culley, Swift, Jones, Gasper
Noes: Hollis
Commissioner Sellers rejoined the Commission.
4. Citizens' comments regarding items not on the agenda: There were none
5. Staff comments, reports and discussion items:
Staff told the commissioners about the Midwest Section, TX APA Elected and Appointed Officials
Planning Workshop on Monday, July 29, 2002 at the Brookside Convention Center, in Hurst,
Texas.
6. Commissioners' comments and reports:
Chairman Gasper presented a draft letter written to the City Council regarding the Council's future
work on the Master Plan. She asked the commissioners if they had any changes or suggestions.
Commissioner Jones said that the he would like to see the portion of the letter that states
encouraging economic development while protecting the quality of the community to say
something about protecting the sanctity and safety of the residential neighborhoods and add
something about property values. He said it should say as it pertains to any economic or personal
venture that would adversely affect an existing residential property. Mr. LeBaron and
Commissioner Jones talked about the areas that are affected most are residential areas that
clearly are abutting commercially designated properties.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 8 of 9 - D R AFT COP Y
ADJOURNMENT:
The Commission moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:00 p.m. The motion was seconded and
passed by acclamation.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jan Levy
Planning & Zoning Assistant
levvi@ci.collevville.tx.us
Approved on:
NOTE: As a matter of public record, an audio recording of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is available
upon request.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - July 8, 2002
Page 9 of 9 - D R AFT COP Y
.~
TexaS
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA BlUEFING
Agenda Date:
Subject:
July 22, 2002
Z-02-020 - Public Hearing - Zoning Change from R40 to R20
Single Family Residential on 1.99 acres located at the southeast
corner of Hall Johnson Road and Montclair Drive
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Robert and Nancy Jackson are the owners of 0.87 acres located at the southeast corner of
Hall Johnson Road and Montclair Drive. The owner has submitted a request to change the
zoning on the property from R40 Single Family Residential to R20 Single Family
Residential. The owner is seeking a zoning change in order to possibly divide the property
into single-family lots in the future.
The R20 district requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet, a minimum lot depth of 125 feet,
and a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet. The property proposed for rezoning has
142-feet of frontage on Hall Johnson Road, and 478 feet of frontage on Montclair Drive.
There are residences on both parcels of land. The property appears large enough to
divide the property into no more than 4 lots.
The surrounding property is single-family residential in nature. Property to the north is
zoned R20 Single Family Residential and is developed as single-family residences
(Highland Meadows). Property to the west is zoned AG and R20; to the east is zoned R40
and R20; and to the south is zoned R40. All surrounding development is single family
residences.
IMPACT ISSUES
1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan,
adopted in 1998, which designates this area as a future single-family residential area.
The surrounding properties are also designated as single-family residential areas.
2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are developed as single-family
residential areas. Highland Meadows, a 360-lot subdivision, is located across Hall
Johnson Road from this property. Arbor Estates, a 111-lot subdivision, abuts this
property on the east. The remaining properties contain existing residences.
3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is single-family development.
Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development.
4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights-
of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sewer service lines
to the individual lots.
Agenda Item No. 1 - Page 1
5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District,
the 1.99-acre tract and house is appraised at $132,645. The estimated annual City
property tax revenue generated by this property is $460.
6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip
Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data
has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960s, primarily in
suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per
day, on average. The following table shows the recent traffic counts for Hall Johnson
Road during a 24-hour period.
Location 24-Hour Total Date
Bluebonnet Road intersection 9,574 vehicles 2002
Amador Trail 9,982 vehicles Sept 2001
Windina Trail 9,095 vehicles Seot 2001
Staff mailed 19 notices to adjacent property owners regarding this request. As of the time
of the agenda preparation, no correspondence has been received regarding this request.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning
Commission: July 22, 2002
City Council: August 7 and August 20,2002
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
ATTACHMENTS:
· Location and Zoning Map
· Zoning Exhibit
· List of Property Owners Notified
Prepared by:
sS
Agenda Item No. 1 - Page 2
7
': T~ I
~2 ~'ci.NJ.
. I
i I
i \~\ iTR 184
l~' 1
:~ 11.12 @
, !
. .
: i
I tR 187,
! .\228 ~ .7 A~
._.~...-S~.._.....-
i-'-- "\ O~~1ddt}a~_
~.,.......-._~.................~..._~. ..~
I 'r \1\... \.. ~1
,_ \.1 \ c;:g02" 0 \aJ
" ,..........mm-rl-.................__........ml...
I
!
~ 11
I r~~r'\~ .831 0
~Q-V..~...........----.--
i S)\)\ 9>~ 2
,.,1 ~ 1~ ~~33~___C
Imm--_md ~ 1
i~~ 1
--~..~ ~.... __..mm__._.....
. .... ....-
........ -------..--......
:~ 1~~
I
/1
/ !-.
TR 188
.65 AC
T~g8C \
1
2
3
14
6R
1R
2
3
5
2
4 i
I
I
HALL - jemt'
TR 1J2A
L:;"
I ~....O
I 26
CT
19
r----- m
I
18
L___m..........
1
\"\t.~
t \ S,,, 9 ~ <:> L_1~____ 15
~ ~ ~S~ L_______.___
-~- -\-::-2r1
S - S\)\';'1:\ 9 I---~~--
0:::
o
rv'
Location Map
CASE # Z-02-020 - Zoning Change - from R40 to R20
11
10
8
7
6
19~
5
4
m.........__
3
1
PlAT SHOWING
- THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1- 'Oct
Bf:IJ<<H:M Btoel
THE Cln' Of C.O\...LEYV ILLE
RECORDED IN '10 LVf<\~ ~.'15 '"'
TtXAS.
HAl-LJQtW5ON
9P'-
TEXAS, AND
MHBBmt>N-tO
-rA cuaNr COUNTY. TEXAS. AOCOROJNG. TO mE . n I!.r: 1'l
OF THE n~~ I') RECORDS or ..,ARsV'Ni' . COUNTY.
IN THE CITY OF COU.I't\lt~Ui
AT PAbE 'fisc)
f,..." ~~N4E cOR..
IS,.O" . AI",. ttJl"I~.I..r
P.sAf\8 WI ~( J:hl(.(
F~ ~. tllQ\l ?IN
10:
Rn
~
I
I
.~
~
~
...~
"
~
S;
tti
.tJ
:tJ
b ."'
i I ~
-\
~.\l
~
~
e
~
v
en
+
r~
I/"'V\).
' ." 1
- -1- -{
i ~~...\.!
I
tfM'
.....
:t
~
I..Q. 1.5 0'1: l 01: - -
Jt7RbfV'\ P!....,c.~ ~
, " l\i
S,~I1.
t
S'r~U.r 'su..""
C\
'"
I at
\. oM~
.__..~_._---_.~..._._...:.
He
--.-..-....--1: HALL JOl--\NsO N R<:lA\)-------
I if). 58 -S 89 005 ~J't!
1. DONAlD srE'fART PEEBLES. DO HEREBY DECLARE THAT mE PlAT SHOIN HEREON ACCURATELY
REPRESENTS AN ON THE GROUND SURVEY WIlE UNDER YY DI.RECTlON !liD SUPERVISION. AND THAT
JIJ mPIWp<lIHVP 11,:'>'11 <:~ nP lnrn'rn A<: <:Ilnw~ Ilrpl'n}l ATc:n '1'IlrN' IP;o IIn i'lo1rpnlMnTrN'l'<l
~
-
~<:.
~~
""~
{;~6' '6d '~.'PG' II loA
d//T.(;<:Y;/JI..L2Itfd OJ? ..L1Y~Ud07//ffO I/:JCI' ~b? lb'O
(~"o/y ,;J"~/5'':)"(;Ij;'/,..9"~O,,PE'~O~
~
~
.~
~
~
II)
\() g
ft\ ;
~ ~.
l( l\i
.~
~ ~..
G) "
'f\ $J
~ !)
~ ~
~ 0
~
~ ~..
~
~
~
~
\()
--
c.~
...~
-.:.
c.~
'~.,-
z
~
"
\.9
"
~
Ii)
~
'i\
>--
~
~
(!)
~
.~
"-
"
~
::t
\j
Ii)
//
'"
/
/
.../
Q/
~
b
~
~(
"
';/1 I t!::I Cl
1
I
I
1
I
"I.
""
'-
"
~ ~ Q.
~ ~ !>l
..$..~. ij/t:
~~ ~U::
j:- .- ~
~i~?
~.~ ~ ~
l\i ~'Il -.
-.: ~i~t?
\'11
~Jl
..,.
'"
"ll
~
~
.\
S
-0
~.. <;:.
....--
"'~
--
"
~
~,
"-
~
~
If)
!Q
x
.~
\i
.~
~
.if" ~
"
~
.
~
.9)
~
C>~
~
"'IS>
~
~~
s~
~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
~
t::
t./")
3: +-'
0 "'0 ~"
Z -I (1) to
OW-I u~
~__ (!) 0 t::
(YI~e:(LL (1) 0
~o:::o.. ~o
~o Vl (1)
~ 0.. ~e:( 4- (1)'
..... (1)~
. e:( en Vl . ~+-'
0 NO
Z L,) o::! z: (1)4-
C\J Z' :::J > 0,
.......WO 0
h-. Vl W :E:. ~ LJ ~
CD 0:; :::J to ~
\) e:( -10
" COZ. OJ+-'
>-Z::>~ ~ 0
~ We:( +-' -I
::> Z Vl
<:J 0::: ~__W 4- 4-
...... :::JVl ~ 0 0
~ ene:(OW
Xo::::E:. ~ ~
~ ~ ZWO (1) (1)
...... W~U>- t:: C
C) "t) ~ W CD ~ ~
~ ~ ~O::: 0 0
~ ...... >- 0 U U
3:~LLW
\r) ZOO:> +-' +-'
~. . :::> -- Vl Vl
'\1. (!) :X::OClO::: (1) C1J
~ , Z .UWU ::: 3:
~ ...... U WVl .s;; .s;;
~ 3; .~ O'UJ +-' +-'
0 Vl Z Cl ~ ~
tt :r e:( e:( 0 0
~ '-I en W 0::: >- en z
~ :x::crZ-I
~ ~ <( ...... .0::: (1) (1)
e:( ~ e:( .s;; ~
-I Z C -I +-' +-'
\) 0.. -- ~ W :::J
"i \.J.J a::. U +-' C
~-I--""" to t::
"- U-lO::~
e:( _ U 0::: -0 lL
~ 0:: ::> Vl e:( C.J::.
~>-Wo.. ~
\.J.J 0 O+'
e:( -I W 4- t:
-I~O::: ....
o:::OUO C C
OUe:(~ 0 t:
l.L. 0::: ~
l.L.~C:> or- "t:
VlO z:
\.J.J l.LJ .... = It
~>-O:::W CO lJ
O~UCD ........
Z-e:( L!)
U z: +
Cl L!) 0 10 <.
-.I W """ ...... n
\.J.J :r . ~ +-' t
.....~NO::: tt:l+
l.L. 0
ZOo..
0...... UJ
Z -lCl (,.!:l
e:(O-l- Z
W<(e:( ......
>-~UVl Z
We:( Z
::>:::J<( ~ ......
0:: ~ (,.!:l
=:> ........, ~ -.; l.LJ
Vl Vl 0 l.C CD
'- ---,
10' --"-."
~ ,,;/ I ,D,;)'r'S
;,./
~
Is. ~!\'"
~ ~~ ~
~~
,ii'I'
'\:)
t
"
",
\ 0
~~
t ,,--,
~( '.
~ ,)
!
I
.J
<l
\a
,
~
~
I:)
11).
<:l
IS
.?
O~ '8cG/ ~_8;~S;/~OfY
B/~7.:2..L/VO~ .FO'~
~
____,.__,~,__.____._..._._____~._."_._...~....__M.._..__._~,_,__,,_,_"'_'_"_"__'____'___""__~___'__'_" ~.,,_._.__.,._._.,--_.... --~---"'-'_.'-----~' _._.,,-_._~,
Raymond & K J Philbaum
2101 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Katherine Schiffer
2103 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Warren Elrod
2105 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Mark & Barbara Maness
2107 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Nathan & Elaine N echamkin
2109 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Kyle & Michelle Appling
5801 Highland Hills Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
Tommy & Sherry Bums
2113 Hall Johnson Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
S Craig & Dierdre Lemmon
2305 Mulberry Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
Richard & J Schwalenberg
2301 Mulberry Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
Gary & Kathy Friedman
2300 Mulberry Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
Estin & James Isakson
2304 Mulberry Court
Colleyville, TX 76034
Gordon Hodges
5601 Montclair Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Dba Fisher
5513 Montclair Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Walter Fisher
5513 Montclair Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Scott & Cathy Williamson
5600 Montclair Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Kirk & Brenda Rush
5604 Montclair Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Kenneth & Shirley Haney
2101 Hall Johnson Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Norwest Bank of Minnesota
5450 NW Central Drive, Ste 307
Houston, TX 77092
Hubert & Terri Garner
3205 Damascus Way
Dallas, TX 75234
Kerry Bowman
2201 Hall Johnson Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Edith Burton
5603 Montclair Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Robert & Nancy Jackson
4305 Eaton Circle
Colleyville, TX 76034
Case Z-02-020 (Notices dated: July 12, 2002)
According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200'
of the proposed special use permitland-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that
the parties listed above have been notified ofthe proposed change request as required by
the Texas local Government Code and the Colleyville land Development Code.
Jan Levy ~
Planning & Zoning Assistant
___"..u._.~_".____. .___.______"."..____"_."_'_._H_.._..___,.".*__,.._..."~___ ,__'__'.'~_ -._,,__..___.__,.._.'0 ,,_ _ ,. ___~._.___..._" "" __._.,,_ _"'_~_._~__..,,~,__... ..M.....'.._.._..~~...._~_._,. .-
.~
Texas
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA BRIEFING
Agenda Date:
Subject:
July 22, 2002
Z-02-021 - Public Hearing - Zoning Change from AG to R20
Single Family Residential on 0.9623 acres located at 2309 Hall
Johnson Road
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
John Mikolaitis is the owner of a 0.9623-acre tract located on the south side of Hall
Johnson Road, between Sycamore Drive and Amador Trail. The owner has submitted a
request to change the zoning on the property from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family
Residential. The owner is seeking a zoning change in order to plat the property.
The R20 district requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet, a minimum lot depth of 125 feet,
and a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet. The property proposed for rezoning has
1 04-feet offrontage on Hall Johnson Road, and exceeds all other requirements ofthe R20
district. There is an existing residence on both the site.
The purpose of the zoning change is to allow the owner to plat the property. The property
does not meet the requirements of the AG Agricultural. Further, the AG district requires
side yard setbacks of 25-feet on each side, leaving a narrow building pad site. The
proposed zoning of R20 is more appropriate for the width and size of the property.
The surrounding property is single-family residential in nature. Property to the north and
west is zoned R20 Single Family Residential, and is developed as single-family residences
(Highland Meadows and Arbor Estates). Property to the east and south is zoned AG and
developed as single-family residences.
IMPACT ISSUES
1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan,
adopted in 1998, which designates this area as a future single-family residential area.
The surrounding properties are also designated as single-family residential areas.
2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are developed as single-family
residential areas. Highland Meadows, a 360-lot subdivision, is located across Hall
Johnson Road from this property. Arbor Estates, a 111-lot subdivision, abuts this
property on the west. The remaining properties contain existing residences.
3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is single-family development.
Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development.
4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights-
of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sewer service lines
to the individual lots.
Agenda Item No. 2 - Page 1
5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District,
the 0.9623-acre tract and house is appraised at $74,000. The estimated annual City
property tax revenue generated by this property is $257.
6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip
Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data
has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960s, primarily in
suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per
day, on average. The following table shows the recent traffic counts for Hall Johnson
Road during a 24-hour period.
Location 24-Hour Total Date
Bluebonnet Road intersection 9,574 vehicles 2002
Amador Trail 9,982 vehicles Sept 2001
WindinQ Trail 9,095 vehicles Sept 2001
Staff mailed 15 notices to adjacent property owners regarding this request. As of the time
of the agenda preparation, no correspondence has been received regarding this request.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning
Commission: . July 22,2002
City Council: August 7 and August 20,2002
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval
ATTACHMENTS:
. Location and Zoning Map
. Zoning Exhibit
. List of Property Oyvners Notified
Prepared by:
-G
Agenda Item No. 2 - Page 2
JI
~K
OK
I I-
22
I ~I
35R
BA,U ANTRAE DR
~
-
! I
I
2 i i
1R 2 3 4 I 5 i 6 I 7R 8R
I R
I '--0
!
- - "A:' - -+O"t~cQi-:o~- RD
H ,-L v H~ ,':' l'l ,
27
L_.__.__.___._..._~--""-'
11
I
I 1 1(.(.1
Acr L__J '\-
TR I t, G G t, ~ ~
, ~G) '...\'" "\. ~ ~ \J
, \ '1 C ~
1.0 ~'C '" '{ \.., 0
AC : . \... ~
I ~ . 90
~:;11 2
r----~------m
,~
r...--.--Z----m-
--_____m~ 25 ~
!---------~-- S \ \
23 i 24"\
t,S"\~
2A
AC
~?-O
91
8
3ERRY CT
I
-------1
!
!
I
i
A G;- s '\j \ ~t.i ",IlSl
\-\ ~ \... \... (\ ~ 1
~\)V 1
20
19
7
i
I
.--.-..-.-.----......--.---1
3.071 @
18
6
i
------...---\1
19~ I
5 i.-------.--.--....-..-...-........~.......-.....-.
! .
I
...--................---....................
\ 6161
17
0:::::
o ...____.._____._._.
/\
0',
~'- , 16
LJ
CL
o
5
4 ///~
//
~/
./-,"""/'/;"
i-"-~,....._.....
4
................".........
i
.---.
Location Map
CASE # Z-02-021 - Zoning Change - from AG to R20
1R
o
2R
,
'"
1\t-.. :
8 AC ~~;-\~
TR 'TR :
1R51 ~
TR
1R6
TR 1R7
0:::::
r--
TI
1..
DC
o
o
'<t
''''="
2
<1'-
'-l..
1
SPRUCE
,
~ci II 0
z ~ ~~lll J
u! t.
Or.. . ~ : 5INI"
E:f !ll~ . ""
, >-li1 ... (,:)1
- Qt~ ~~a -.:I:l:: I A .1 J
' .
!: g ~I<l~ ~ ~ ~G
III :c~ 0 . ~~
~ S fo ~ --:~ ~~
"~~...~~ 'fi;! ~~
t-.;lt-.;l
t:l a, ;1:li1 gj~~ ....l::l
~ a:- o~ '" ~~
~~... E..l ~~' ~.... ~n 'I
I:l::trJ
N 0 i=lO '" .. I:l::~ ~~h~ i I
,...10~U~ :::,:::' Il~!ii'
",0-
~~ ~ ~
I:l:: ~ Miig I, r
'. i:11
j .o'~'ihi:1
"
;:
3
0
"
i ~
'" "
" ="0
z ~~~~
.
0 o r
'" :~ g
~ ~~(ooo~
... ~~,,~
z rJ::~
..
u IIlll')~ct:
::l ;:,,~
.. 3;:
~I ~ "
Si
z
'"
i;
U
l;J
" l~~t
I~
~ IS}l
jI~
~~U ~ll
!i~.. - tk
~I
~ ~hi
u
.=~.:: ~ ......... 0 "'11 P:,: "',];, ~~t ,~:
w ~~~~~:... ~o t~
:~:g ......~ foQ.lI ~:,,~~ 2::~~"
:t.D~0> 2:~~~~ :!;c; D_;_"
~~:~~ . 'c. ~..
=: ~- ..~i.;~~ :~:; :~o
\~! l!I;\ll\l! 11 j~ II
~;~~: i~:~g ji:: ~g H~ Co,!,
i- 0.... EI 0 0_ g'::~ g:: .w
j! l\m 111m !~I m~! jj
II Ii! !!l\l ji!iJ!!( ill
;~ ..gv5: -~.~c:~: ~"'1J~~ ~~'I:I wc~.. ~~~
~2 ~~~~i ~2;~S:~ ~H~: .-:e ;:~_ 0-__
.':J:J.alRJ6
T ~~"~I"''':'=~
T ZXJ1lI' 'C'.l.O'l
i
.JI
~
D:
~
~
...
~
I!-
1111 :
a Ii
II
It
"
.
.
.~ 1;;
"0 '
~. l"
iP
n.:'lrd'_ ~=llO/'I...~ ],:::~:JHIW3ll)
,~.6C!ir
tu ga"~
It. I ~ ~
o 'f ~~
<( Q . ~~
"ldwzu
1'l'lShe
~ ~III
~
e
e~i
I:D~
'GO' ""
',j '1
I
I [~)
.<<-fI. .""'.
:l~n~~-=,,=-~:J
T """"
{g';
{E~
;,
z
o
l1l
:t" 1 ill
.. , ~..
~
"
I g I I
+
Denneth & Mary Ann Cannon
2207 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Alfred & Christi Marucci
2301 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
James & Jill Van Over
2303 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
David Stiles, Jr.
2305 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
A J & Elizabeth Phelan
2307 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Keith & Carole Butterfield
2309 Ballantrae Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Chandler Cantrell Properties
P.O. Box 611
Colleyville, TX 76034
Charlie & Helen Fay Hall
4200 Glade Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Larry Brown
5603 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Kevin & Heather Preola
5605 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
John & Lynn Terry
5609 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Roger & Teresa Isbell
5701 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Guy & Shelley Willingham
5705 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
Jeffrey Seifers
5709 Sycamore Drive
Colleyville, TX 76034
John & Deborah Mikolaitis
2433 Brittany Lane
Grapevine, TX 76051
Case Z-02-021 (Notices dated: July 12, 2002)
According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200'
of the proposed special use permitland-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that
the parties listed above have been notified of the proposed change request as required by
the Texas local Government Code and the Colleyville land Development Code.
Jan Levy d/
Planning & Z;~ing Assistant
.____~~.__,__."__.___~"., .,.__,_._._""__'M._______,___..__.~.__"'_"..___.__~""____",M_"~__'_~_'__ -,._~"". ...-...-~.~-~.-"_..,.".....~,--.,...~. ~_._,-,-_._'-"---
.~
Texas
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA BRIEFING
Agenda Date:
Subject:
July 22, 2002
P-02-023 - Final Plat of Westgate Villas, 14.761 acres located on
the south side of McDonwell School Road, west of Remington
Park.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Raman Chander Properties has submitted a Final Plat on a 14.761-acre parcel of land
located on the south side of McDonwell School Road, immediately west of the
Remington Park subdivision. The plat will create 53 single-family residential lots and
several open space lots for this development.
The following is a summary of the major items associated with this Final Plat.
Zoning. This property is zoned PUD-R, approved by Ordinance 0-01-1286 on August
8, 2001. The overall density of the development is 3.59 dwelling units per acre. The
specific requirements of Ordinance 0-01-1286 require a minimum lot size of 6,490
square feet. The average lot size is 6,753 square feet.
Open Space. The PUD-R ordinance for this property requires that 20% of the total
development be dedicated as open space. The open space areas consist of a 32.5-foot
wide greenbelt adjacent to McDonwell School Road, a 30-foot wide greenbelt along the
east and west sides of the property, a large greenbelt on the south side of the property,
and the medians located in the streets. The open space areas comprise 3.16 acres, or
21 .41 % of the development. The homeowners association is responsible for the
maintenance of the private open space areas and the associated detention ponds.
Medians. This project is a gated community with private streets. The travel lanes of
the streets are 24 feet wide, with a 21-foot wide median separating the northbound and
southbound travel lanes. There is an opening between the medians to provide an area
for vehicles to turn around and travel the opposite direction. The Fire Department has
reviewed the design of the medians and stated that the turning radius is not sufficient to
allow an emergency vehicle to make a U-turn between the medians. The minimum
outside turning radius required is 50 feet; the approximate radius provided is 39 feet.
Screening Walls. The PUD-R ordinance for this property requires the construction of
an 8-foot tall screening wall between this development and the Remington Park
subdivision, and between this development and the adjacent commercial property. The
developer will be submitting a PUD amendment request to change the height of the wall
adjacent to Remington Park to 6 feet in height.
Agenda Item No. 3 - Page 1
Drainage. Storm water runoff will be directed to a detention pond located in the open
space area on the south side of the subdivision. Off-site easements have been
prepared to convey this water to a temporary detention pond on the commercial
property to the west. The water from this pond will then be conveyed to the south,
where it will be dispersed onto the property and drain into an existing stock pond.
Sidewalks. The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along McDonwell
School Road. This project does not require the construction of hike and bike trails as
part of the development.
Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are
required for this property since McDonwell School Road is considered an unimproved
street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The developer is required to
construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for
future improvement by the City.
Gated Community. The PUD-R ordinance for this property allows this development to
be constructed as a gated community with private streets. A detailed layout of the entry
gates is attached.
RECOMMENDATION
Denial, due to technical non-compliance with the Colleyville Fire Code
ATTACHMENTS
· Location map
· Plat
· DRC Review Memo
· Applicant Response Letter
· Entry Gate Exhibit
Prepared by:
--~
Agenda Item No. 3 - Page 2
~-) \,--_I___I__~
1
- --1-2-- --1--7-7--7-- ---
/''-
/11
,
,
'\ _ _ _L _ _ L _.-----J ! L _ _ -L _ _ 1- _
10
9
8 1
7
6
5
<:l
3
7<:l
- - - - __ __ - - - - - - -- -- "--'-'._"~' - -' -- - --- ._n-- _ -.--- _ -. _ --- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - ----- - - -1- - --
TR
1A7A
.3<:l @
5
1
4
3
TR 1 A5
<:l.0 AC
TR 1A7
1.519
AC
5
6
7
8
12
TR 184
5.8 AC
I
+
TR 1 B1 A
5.519 @
2
TR 1 B2
5.<:l82 AC
LOT C
TR 1 B3
3.0 AC
I
. I
I
Location Map
CASE # P-02-023 - Final Plat - WESTGATE VILLAGE ADDITION
Na.DtltWW'J'D SlKWlf&J.Y'M'JtINIl
J-'-
Ii ijrtl i ~ t j,iu~J! i !: ,ii I~ II ~i~ 11t~ldt
I: 'Iill I Pr a ,1!~II't t I) ,~ I.~I I l~f'll;llt.lrtI e
l I~ I. J.iJi' : h · I n. ~~: ll~
n UJI~ ! ~ II :i~~:!:i ~ :U hi C~ U iHf~.I~l~1 II~I~
I' !I It I "I'! hl!lfi!i: il 19 ~i ~III fliji'llftHi ri~1
! U ~~I !~ UPI'I ~~I'im; ill ~, Whlllll~ ~! !!ltf!li;bgj t:._
1'1 l!tljl.1 d, I ..1. ifIll. I."~ eO u .11 g!lll'l .
illU~ tll ~ Ufl'~I; ~I ;1 ~u;ij ~~I'~I ~ ~(r-I' 't'~fl !illl
.15 .lrlU. ~11.If.lm h ,. .1 . . .It .1... till. .
~l
I
11.r~. <i I
!I~~ oS
! ~ a..= i f ~ I
!i 6irl~ ~ i
I lj ~ ~I
l
.
.
~:III ~Il li. l'i::1 I. ni If 1 m m
mItt
II' . J · " I, 1 1 1 I l' f' !It ml
111!)lJi ji ~. i I Pi : ~~ j: lI:f It
1m, iif I~ ~i I i I ~I : :1 IIi IIUI 11& I~
"1 ':11 I 'f ~ "Sa . .f J' :r.iJ ~ iii,
t;; I Iii, I, il . I::! i itt III
I sf III' I: 51 III! I. ~ I f I ~j I. I ~ i I !Ii
~;~j1,!'II.! =i !i i !!I 'I hi .! I
I "i~ ' ~ 'I f~
I If.;1 ~!II I!l II II I Il!r to III !!~ I .~ f
i I r' "'I 'II ',1 .. , "J ~ '.111" Tlil · 9 rn' ~
,I f'll' I' 1 , 'II . I.- I 'II J · ii~" I I IIi
~I!ir :I!I.i! :11 :! ! : !i: ~ !!I !~I I . U' I
~;!Ji lilt I!; Iii I; t 1111 ~ II! t~1 I '~I i ~ii !~
'i'tl it i
I~d I. II III I I I . III II I... I I I ~I
I _
1
~
m
ji! .
I~ I
.u
~I '
.. .
eil
III I
'i
~I!
~ t
II J I
~ I
I ~
1'0 ~
Illil
I-
,ii; ! il~d!i
~;! II-HI1
1,1 . 111.1:.:a
II ! ~;!;I:G
!i! ! Ilf ijj
6h. ~ liIi'llI
~_ili iI
..
.d
(&1 ~ 1'1
I'!I' 'Ift
.!I:t i. IS
HI
,. ': !iI
I. III
III ftl
! h!
..
.188~1~
5~!IM
i188al~
5~!nd
ii~ ,Da
~S88d!
aJfhA~
~~
&~
~~
~~
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
FAX TO
FAX NO
FROM
June 28, 2002
Raman Chandler ~ Tony Krauska, P.E.
817-283-9186 ~ 972-240-4466
Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT P-02-023 Final Plat- Westgate Villas
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your Final Plat request
submitted to this office on June 14,2001. The following comments are for your consideration.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. The review of this plat and related engineering plans was based on Ordinance No. 0-01-1286,
adopted by the City Council on August 8, 2001; on the PUD-R regulations contained in the
Land Development Code; and on the Preliminary Plat approved by Resolution R -02-1894.
PLAT DRAWING
1. Revise the last part of the dedication statement to read as follows:
That We, (names), Owners, do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinbefore
described property as (subdivision name), an addition to the City of Colleyville, Tarrant
County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate fee simple to the public use forever all streets,
rights-of-way, and alleys shown thereon, and do hereby reserve the easements shown on
this plat for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities desiring to use or
using same. This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations and
resolutions of the City of Colleyville, Texas.
2. The PUD-R ordinance for this property requires a minimum lot size of 6,490 square feet. Lot
14 does not meet this requirement. The size must be revised to meet the 6,490 square foot
requirement.
3. Add all medians as separate lots to the drawing. The City must plan for the possibility that the
street may become a public street at some future date. Since the medians are included as
private open space for the development, the City will not assume maintenance of the medians.
4. Remove the parkways from the open space calculation. The PUD-R ordinance does not
authorize the inclusion of the parkways as open space. See the marked-up print for the revised
numbers.
P.O. Box 185-Colleyville, Texas 76034-817.577.7587
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-02-o23 WESTGATE VILLAS
5. Since the development is proposed to be a gated community, the street must be dedicated as a
separate lot that is owned by the homeowner's association. The marked-up print shows the
required lot line separating the public right-of-way from the private lot. Show this property
line on the plat.
6. Renumber the street and open spaces as shown on the marked-up print.
7. The 30-foot wide greenbelt easement adjacent to the Remington Park subdivision must be
overlaid with a 30-foot wide drainage and utility easement. Show the easement on the plat.
8. Resolution R-02-1894 approved the Preliminary Plat subject to the granting and filing of an
easement on the adjacent property to the west, for the purpose of accommodating proposed
drainage plans. A copy of this recorded easement must be included with the next submittal.
9. The property owner's name for the property across McDonwell School Road needs to be
verified. The tax records indicate that leI Development purchased the property from Parvis
Yazhari. Verify and revise the plat accordingly.
10. The PUD-R ordinance for this property requires an 8-foot tall masonry screening wall along
the eastern boundary of the property, adjacent to the Remington Park Addition. This wall
must be constructed with the public improvements to the property. A copy of the ordinance is
attached for reference.
11. The PUD-R ordinance requires the developer to construct sidewalks along McDonwell School
Road as part of the public improvements to the property. The sidewalk must be a minimum of
5-feet in width and constructed in the area between the curb line and the adjacent property
line.
12. The following note must be added to the plat, per the requirements of the PUD-R ordinance:
A north-south 4-lane Major Collector street is proposed on the Master Thoroughfare Plan west of the
residential subdivision. The street would be located approximately 1,000 feet east of Precinct Line
Road, and be located between McDonwell School Road and L.D. Lockett Road.
13. A detailed drawing, to scale, of the gates and entry area must be submitted so the relevant
requirements for gated communities may be evaluated. An Opticom entry system with Knox
Box backup is required for all gates.
14. Other comments may be noted on the marked-up print.
TREE PRESERVATION
1. Trees not located within the right-of-way must be preserved during the construction of the
subdivision. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed
around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the
drip line of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl
PAGE20F4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-02-023 WESTGATE VILLAS
construction fencing, chain link fence or other similar fencing with a four-foot (4')
approximate height. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period.
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PLANS
1. The engineering construction plans are being reviewed by the Engineering Department, Fire
Department and Public Works Department. Comments on the paving, drainage and utility
plans will be available early next week. Questions concerning the engineering construction
plans should be directed to Chris Steubing or Keith Fisher, at 817-577-7587.
OTHER INFORMATION
1. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all interior streets. The
sidewalks must be constructed at the same time any new structures are built on the lots. The
sidewalk must be at least 4-feet wide and be located within the right-of-way, per Chapter 15 of
the Land Development Code.
2. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is
issued for a new structure on a lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general
information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different
depending upon the specific plans for construction or previously approved City-Developer
Agreements.
SEWER
$794 per 1,000 square feet GFA for SINGLE FAMn..V uses. Actual fee depends on
specific use of the property. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land
Development Code.
$1,790 for a I-inch water mellT. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or ifa new
meter is installed.
$128 for a I-inch water meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new
meter is installed.
ROADWAY
WATER
3. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are
required for this property since McDonwell School Road is considered an unimproved street
and the plat contains more than one residenti~lllot. The owner is required to construct one-half
of the street adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for
future improvement by the City. An estin1~llC of the cash escrow amount can be provided by
the Engineering Department upon request. A general estimate of the escrow amount is $139
per linear foot, for 676.54 feet, for a total of $94,039. The response letter should indicate the
developer's intention of construction or escrow regarding this roadway.
4. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland ('dication fees are assessed at the time of approval
of the fmal plat. Since new residential k.s are being created by this plat, the payment of
parkland dedication fees is req .Iired for this ucvelopment. The fee for single-family residential
development is $1,802 per dwelling unit. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded
with the County Clerks Office. A formal assessment of parkland dedication fees will be
PAGE30F4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-02..o23 WESTGATE VILLAS
provided upon approval of the plat. The estimated fee for this plat, based on 53 lots, is
$95,506.
5. INFORMATIONAL ONLY. The Colleyvilk Land Development Code is available on-line at
www.collevville.com. The Land Development Code is in Adobe Acrobat format.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, July 8,2002, 7:00 p.m. (tentative)
Tues '~,y, August 6,2002, 7:30 p.m. (tentative)
RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS
A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices.
Once you have completed the changes to the dL IVing, please submit the following to our offices:
· 12 folded copies of the revised Final Plat d;.~lWing
· one 8W' xlI" reduced copy of the revised exhibit
· drawings of the entrance gates
. a written letter addressing each comment st'\ting the comment has been addressed or offering
reasons why the requirement should be mat . lied or waived
The above requested items must be submitted ~.) later than noon on Wednesday, July 3,2001 in
order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning & Zoning
Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Please contact me at 817-577-7587 or
husbandc@;ci.colleyville.tx.us if you have any questions.
C: ENGINEERING DEPT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
BUILDING INSPECTlON
PUBLIC WORKS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
PAGE40F4
^ ...._--"_._-_._---~~--"-"_._--._..__._-,,...__._._-~'".,-....-.,-..--------...-.. ~_..-._._.,_.._-,.~~--_._. ---"
/K//B/iA/ Partners. Inc.
Consulting Engineers - Surveyors
July 17, 2002
Mr. Clayton Husband, AICP
Development Coordinator
City of Colleyville
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Re: Westgate Villas
Colleyville, Texas
Dear Mr. Husband:
Tony Krauska. P.E.
Jay Bedford. RP LS
Terry Whitaker
Dale Cryer
- Owner
- Owner
- Survey Operations
- Field Operations
Enclosed are the plat resubmittal package for the Westgate Villas. Listed below is oour response
to each plat comment item.
1. Dedication statement has been revised as requested.
2. Lot 14 has been revised to reflect 6,490 sfminimum.
3. Medians have been included as lots
4. Parkways have been removed from the open space calculations
5. The street has been inc1ude.d as a separate lot
6. Streets and open spaces have been renumbered as requested
7. 30' drainage and utili~y easement has been added as requested
8. Raman Chandler is providing the requested easement
9. Property owner name has been revised
10. We will request a zoning amendment at a later date
11. Sidewalks will be constructed on McDonwell School Road as requested
4222 Rosehil/ Road, Suite 2 - Garland, Texas 75043 - Ph. 972-240-5999 - Fax 972-240-4466
Mr. Clayton Husband
Westgate Villas Plat
Page 2
July 17, 2002
12. Thoroughfare note has been added
13. Attached detail drawing of the gates is included
14. Other comments have been revised as requested.
KBA Partners, Inc.
Sincerely,
/II.,{ U~u~
Tony Krauska, P.E.
"---"~....__._---,"..."._.-~~-_._~._-~.,_...-....~-'~'-',.'... ^' ~'- -,-"",--,-,-,,~----"--,--"---"--~'--'-"""'~""'--'-.~.'---,-_.."_. ~-,-'~"-,"_._"",,,,,"~--~,,,,-,-,,,'_.'-'~''''''''--'--'--~-
~
".,
!
l:':
t3
<:
~
~
V)
L..J
----2-----
ll.
(f')
lIt'l
!
~ I'
t;\ :':',
~ I, , '
J I i>:>>i
! :',',',,, 'I
I I ~ ~ I, " '
. ',' " , , "
f I 1,::
IH""
1~ j::::>:::j
I " ' " ' "
:' : " """ ~ " " " ~
I : ,,',' ,,',:
; "':',' I
~',' ~" ,'~ ,-: " :
:: ,'~, ,,','" '- ., '
. , ,
" '
: '
.'
I
ll')
oj
~
~
C)
~
ll.
>-
~
ICj
I V)',,;
12 '~:
s: :
L..J
::x::
R
I
I
V)
l:':
t3
------LC
ij
- -..J
! ~
~
In
lIt'l
:3
t-
a
'<i
C\j
~t ~~
(\j ~.
Q..-
~-
I
C\j
gs
V)
Cj Lu ~
V) Q:] ~
~ j ~
g ~<:U)
ll. U) "'C )... X
o )... g: ~
~Q:]<:
f-.,:: luX
~Q ()
C5~<:<:Q
>-~()~::J
Q:::O::::U ~
f-.:Lui=::2::U
<:QQ:::;;:~
Lu()()::s;~
~~j
~ E=: Q.. C\j
~ '< :;l~
~ 0 p~'
< > 5:>-
~ ~ E}~
rI)~Z
~ 8
~
~ ~
~ ~
.~
TexaS
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA BRIEFING
Agenda Date:
Subject:
July 22, 2002
Z-02-018 - Tabled - Zoning Change from R40 to PU D-R Planned
Unit Development-Residential on 19.405 acres located on the
south side of L.D. Lockett Road in the 900 block
UPDATE
The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled action on this request at the July 8, 2002
meeting. The Commission requested the developer to provide economic information and
to revise the conceptual site plan to conform to the PUD-R requirements.
The applicant advised staff that he would provide the economic information at the
Commission meeting. A revised conceptual site plan has been submitted, and the
following changes were made:
1. The number of lots was decreased from 32 lots to 31 lots. This change decreased
the density of the development from 1.78 dwelling units per acre to 1.60 dwelling
units per acre.
2. The average lot size has been increased from 15,769 square feet to 16,050 square
feet.
3. The open space area has been increased from 3.42 acres to 3.59 acres, and the
open space represents 20% of the residential development area. A common open
space area has been added adjacent to L.D. Lockett Road, and the area provides a
landscape buffer between the street and the first residential lot.
Staff discussed this proposed zoning change with the Planning Department at the City of
Hurst. Their staff does not have any problems or issues with the connection of this phase
of the subdivision with the existing phases in Hurst.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS - Julv 8.2002
Stinson Development and Mid-Cities Church are the owners of 19.405 acres located on the
south side of L.D. Lockett Road, just east of Precinct Line Road. The owner has submitted
a request to change the zoning on the property from R40 Single Family Residential to
PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential. The owner proposes to divide the property
into 32 single-family lots, 1 open space lot, and 1 neighborhood commercial lot.
The subject property is 19.405 acres in size, and is accessed from L.D. Lockett Road on
the north and Texas Trail on the south. Texas Trail is part of the Lonesome Dove Estates
subdivision located in Hurst. The open space area contains an existing detention pond.
The developer proposes to construct 32 single-family lots, with a minimum lot size of
15,000 square feet and an average lot size of 15,769 square feet.
Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 1
The surrounding property is generally single-family residential in nature, though there is
some commercial development in the area. Property to the north, east and west is zoned
R40 Single Family Residential, and is developed as low-density single family residential.
Property to the south is zoned residential and located in the city of Hurst.
The following is an analysis of the major issues associated with this rezoning request.
Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan shows this area as a future office and
commercial area. During the development of the Master Plan, the Master Plan Committee
spent considerable time evaluating the location of additional future commercial lands.
Since the amount of commercial land in Colleyville is extremely low as a percentage of the
overall development, one of the goals of the Master Plan is to increase the percentage of
commercial land in the future. The Precinct Line Road corridor was identified as a non-
residential area, partly due to its relatively undeveloped status. Approval of this PUD-R
rezoning request as proposed by the applicant will eliminate about 17.9 acres of future
commercial/office land from possible development in the future. However, the applicant is
proposing a 1.4-acre neighborhood commercial lot along LD Lockett Road.
Density and Lot Sizes. The proposed density of this rezoning request is within the
recommended maximum residential density called for in the Colleyvi/le Master Plan. The
Master Plan calls for a maximum density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed
density of this project is 1.78 dwelling units per acre. The developer proposes a minimum
lot size of 15,000 square feet, which is greater than the minimum PUD-R requirement of
13,000 square feet. The developer is requesting that the average lot size be 15,769
square feet, which is less than the PUD-R requirement of 16,000 square feet.
Open Space. The PUD-R regulations allow for lots as small as 13,000 square feet
provided this is balanced with at least 20% of the property being dedicated as common
open space. This project provides 3.42 acres of open space, which is 19% of the
residential project area. The developer is requesting that the Planning and Zoning
Commission accept the 19% open space for this development since this subdivision will
also have access to a future public park on the east side of the development. The PUD-R
regulations allow the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council to reduce the
required amount of open space when a lesser amount may be appropriate due to
availability of adjacent public open space.
Preliminary Plat. The zoning exhibit for this request is not considered a preliminary plat.
The exhibit is a conceptual layout only, and the developer will be required to submit a
preliminary plat if the zoning change is approved. The preliminary plat review will give the
Commission one additional opportunity to review specific plans for streets, water, sewer
and drainage.
Number of Subdivision Entrances. The Land Development Code requires a subdivision
containing more than 12 lots to provide a second entrance or emergency access drive.
While this proposed layout has only one entrance on LD Lockett Road, the subdivision is
accessible from an existing development in Hurst. The proposed layout meets the
requirements for subdivision entrances.
Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along LD Lockett
Road and along all interior streets. A 5-foot wide sidewalk is required along LD Lockett
Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 2
Road, and the developer has indicated his initial intention to escrow funds for the future
construction of this sidewalk. All internal sidewalks must be 4-feet wide and will be built
with the construction of the houses on the lots. The construction of hike and bike trails is
not required for this property.
IMPACT ISSUES
1. Master Plan. The rezoning request is not consistent with the Colleyvi/le Master Plan,
adopted in 1998, which designates this area as a future office and commercial area.
The surrounding properties are also designated as non-residential areas, with retail to
the west and office to the east.
2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are generally undeveloped,
though there are some single-family residences located on large acreage tracts in the
area. There is a convenience store and gas station located at the southeast corner of
LD Lockett and Precinct Line Road, and a church located just south of the store.
3. Development Trends. There are no development trends established in this area, as
most of the property is undeveloped. The most recent development is the convenience
store and church, both located on Precinct Line Road.
4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights-
of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sewer service lines
to the individual lots.
5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District,
the three tracts that make up the 19.405-acre tract are valued at $985,544. The
estimated City property tax revenue for the land is $3,423 annually. The future property
tax revenue would depend upon the value of each individual lot and the value of the
house built on the lot.
6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip
Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data
has been collected in the US and Canada since the 1960s, primarily in suburban
locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on
average. Based on this average, the 32 proposed residences would add 306 vehicle
trips per day to the surrounding roadways. The 2001-2002 traffic counts indicate that
1,146 vehicles traveled LD Lockett Road during a 24-hour period, though a date for this
count is not known. During that same period, 15,280 vehicles traveled Precinct Line
Road at the LD Lockett Road intersection.
Staff mailed 13 notices to adjacent property owners regarding this request. As of the time
of the agenda preparation, no correspondence has been received regarding this request.
SUMMARY
The proposed development contains 32 single-family lots, 1 open space lot, and 1
neighborhood commercial lot. The developer is requesting waivers from two PUD-R
requirements: the average lot size and the required open space. The request is not
consistent with the adopted Master Plan, and only the Planning and Zoning Commission
Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 3
and City Council may approve residential lots in these areas.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning
Commission: July 8, 2002 - tabled to July 22, 2002
City Council: August 7 and August 20, 2002
RECOMMENDATION:
Denial, due to non-compliance with the Master Plan
ATTACHMENTS:
.
DRC Review Memorandum
Developer Response Letter
Draft Ordinance
.
Location and Zoning Map
Zoning Exhibit
Information from Applicant
List of Property Owners Notified
.
.
.
.
.
Prepared by:
~
Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 4
ii 'e:
II
II
"
-\1
Ii
"
it
j!.::
TR IE
13.883 AC
o
1
TR 1 A5
4. 35 AC
TR , A4
2.4 AC
TR , A3
4.8 AC
t
i
I
l
i:
l'
"
~" /" ).. 1"
t'- /7
u
\" 1-' c, 01:)
,-,'
TR 1A I C
.214 AC
~ '~
i i .~
....--,
cl~;0..?)
'! : W
TR lC
1.18 AC
TR 28
.770 @
I R~'
"n-..---..----..----. --' .QA.iEi4--------
- .----TR-nl2------.::t.::.='.::.===
i : fL~ --=~==:.:.=:==::.:::~~0--,.---..-------------------.. -----
.I, :: '. _.__.J- . f:). L lO c.. \<. Err R~.~ /
~Il. I i'13flEE'f!iir:.; )
'I i i i 1.~27 @i'BfLA}<.!
"if, t'l'l1D !N1C~~S cs'fA'f f----J
,I! i po. l\... . DDt'l i p.C i P 1 YJI! /'")
i ! i . i 0" c::, po. ~ ! TRACT 28 i. ..----::-' ! I' 18
4101 Gl"'''' ......< '; 2.00":--::--J /:: 1\ 5.0@
I,. !,v' I'" 1. 93:@(\7.;;-j I ,~1 S ?.../ \,J..-:. \ (lji 0 W
I~, '-.------ I\:--~/~ i c"
'ii i 3 I -~ 1 / ~~ E
I ~I .658 @ ~ I / l-J1'"'
!,~.; I. T .~ \... \...B1u' <l'c'\l""In---@i:.s,
',: i ~ \: ~ cB i
i '&-' 13 B po. T \1' 1 < .- - I 1
, ' ' ~ 1} N DN ,r<,.~_.,\-:_.J
-' ~I CO}.Ii}.I~ L 'p.. D I ~____;.----- 3.'t4
,!~I l'
'\i 10.086 @
-,I, i
'~,
1~1
-Ii! ~---"
I ~~ '
\~.~ -.------ .-.---------.
\-F! .
.1 i! f TRACT B2A
01 i ! .-
~:I: ;,- .. -po.~
Iii I: oEA . J__
i i i ',~ 1" T~~bT TRACT .--;:RACT TRACT A28
::Ii i :1............ .1~'. A2Al A2A
;1 :IC~;;;i~:A-CT
I i I A1 A
: II TRACT Al
I 1 .927 @
: ,I
, .--.............
,
I
TR 1 w
92 AC
I "1
TR IJ i F
, c
.98 AC ~ ~ ......
2 (~~
\2;
TR IN
.99 AC
IB1
11'
lEE
5 41 l!
TR lCC
1. 03 AC
TR 1
25 A
[-SA
I
I.'
TR 1
1. 67
TR lAA1C
TR 2
31.12 AC
128.12 l'i113.QO CJ)
I (
I \
B 2\ \
L.....----lo,
Location Map
CASE # Z-02-018 - Zoning Change - from R40 to PUD-R
__,_~'__M_'"_~__'__.'__"___"____'_____'''__>>__"___''_,...---------..-~-,_.,~~.-...----.--..---"..,-.,..".~-.-~..~...,.---.~----
I-l ....; ~; ",,:
;. Te-
l .. I.
rr~ '~",~ ~ I
.Jli ~L:_ '; ~.
~~"J: f
..>_.:]1.:__.
._ i.. I
.
(~.
. II
t
l
It r
. ..
Iq
s
lu
5~ .:.
I~t I
. t 2
" -
~
fl. T
...... I
!Il!
. )..
I
I
I
s
rOo
I!~
lu.
1I1n
I.n
...
Iii
, II ~ ~ ~s I . II ~ ~ ~
~II JI J~ J J ~; ~~ i J~~I J J !I
11 ; I il i~ ~;~ I;; if
III l~ ~. J J JI JI - JII I - - J!
e ;'d~ ti 1. 1 1~ 11 1 11, d 1 111
i ij1lb I~ i! i! ih it i iU ! i if i!1
1.'1 III ~!IIlJ .J l;1~ hi I hili- U II1I
II s, r;. JIll In II~ I Ilu 11 11 I,
!I~ ;.J IIi ~~ ~~ ~~1 ~!J ~ ~!II i ~ =~ ~I!
III IU III J~ J~ J!~ In h JI~I J J! J~ J!l
.......-
"tftft.l': &.......
--..,.. ...
~I~!I
~! ; !I
~
I.
II
~:II
I I!
~I
C'?
~
I: :'II:
~ ~ I
~ e ~ l
a ~ t ~ &; Ii
IIli I :s,~ ~
~1:i:e.;I' .
Iln!~ jl!J
~ b :g I~ I t:l
I B ; 2 iiI
~ ~ I
I ~
... fcI
~
~
--
.-
I
I
I
s
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
s
I !
I It~
1.1 ,"13
III ~
~I
I
I
. ~
~ I
I_Ii
Illlq
I I f'
II Iii II
lilt! Illd~
I.I~ It ii.
II~'
j!~
1!ll~
I..
.
I
Ofo-Ir a:INOJ
d
In
r.i
51
illl,
!1;~I'i
,I" I
Illir
~
j
I
II
II
!IIII
nlll i
IItllilt..
nm~I~~~~
I
,III
diU
:hlli II~~
...11. 1111
I ..
~I · !iil
!I i !II;
!! I ~ il
II . !I I
il · !UI
il i. 91!1
11 It II IIIi
t. 9 II ..:
I; 'I;: II!
~iI ~ ~I ~II
~
.
Iii
!sl
..i
II
I~
1'1
iii
.-
._.__"_.".___.__,~..._....,._.___ ~._..,____...".__,._..___._.~..__ ,____.._~,___,_.._.._."...... . _'-_________._. M"__ __' ...,..._._..".._."....."__
"REVISED"
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR LONESOME DOVE ESTATES PHASE 3
A "PUD-R" Planned Unit Development - Residential
In tbe City of Colleyville, Texas
INTRODUCTION
Stinson Development Corporation, Inc., being the applicant, hereby requests the property described herein to be
rezoned from R-40 to PUD-R. The proposed subdivision will be platted as Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3. The
overall site area to be included within the Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 planned unit development is 19.405
acres with 17.927 acres of PUD-R (single family residential) and 1.478 acres of CN (neighborhood commercial).
Lonesome Dove Estates Pbase 3 will be developed as a thirty-one (31) lot single-family residential subdivision
with two (2) common open space lots with an overall density of 1.60 lots/acre and an average lot size of 16,050
square feet. The total common open space within the subdivision will be 3.59 acres (20.0% of the residential site
area). The residents within Lonesome Dove Estates Pbase 3 will have access to the City ofColleyville public park
area located immediately east of this proposed development. An 8-foot sidewalk will be constructed within the 15-
foot pedestrian access, drainage and utility easement located on the common lot lines oflots 6 and 7, Block 3. The
remaining 1.478 acres located along the frontage of L.D. Lockett Road will be developed as neighborhood
commercial use. The proposed planned unit development submitted herein does meet all technical standards for the
City ofColleyville's PUR-D zoning district.
OWNERSHIP
The proposed PUD-R planned unit development is comprised of two (2) tracts of land currently owned by two
separate property owners. The Stinson Development Corporation, Inc. currently owns the western tract of land
(approximately 11.6 acres) bounded by Lot 1, Block I Meadowlake subdivision to the west, the Lonesome Dove
Estates Phase 2 subdivision to the south, the Mid-Cities Church, Inc. tract to the east and L.D. Lockett Road to the
north. The Mid-Cities Church, Inc. currently owns the eastern tract of land (approximately 7.8 acres) bounded by
the forementioned Stinson tract to the west and south, the City of Colleyville tract to the east and L.D. Lockett
Road to the north. Once the PUD-R zoning change has been completed, the Stinson Development Corporation, Inc.
REVISEDDevelopment PIan.doc
will purchase the Mid-Cities Church, Inc. tract and develop the entire Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 residential
subdivision.
PUD-R DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
The following development conditions shall be applicable within the Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 planned
unit development:
1. All residential lots (lots 1-3 and 5-13, Block 1; lots 1-6, Block 2 and lots 2-14, Block 3) shall meet the
zoning district standards for the PUD-R single family residential district.
2. The commercial lot (lot 14, Block 1) shall meet the zoning district for the CN-neighborhood commercial
district.
3. The common open space lots (lot 4, Block 1 and lot 1, Block 3) shall be owned and maintained by the
property owners association for Lonesome Dove Estates Pbase 3.
4. All screening and landscaping requirements for this PUD-R development shall be in conformance with
the provisions for "Fences, Free Standing Walls, and Screening Materials" set forth by the City of
Colleyville.
PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION
A property owners association will be established for the Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 planned unit
development. The property owners association will be responsible for maintenance of all landscaped and irrigated
areas, common open space areas, entry areas and fencing, and enforcement of the deed restrictions in order to
maintain the quality and character of Lonesome Dove Estates Pbase 3.
DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
The proposed 17.927 acre residential portion of the PUD-R Planned Unit Development (i.e. thirty-one (31)
residential lots and two (2) common open space lots) will be developed by Stinson Development Corporation, Inc.
in a single phase as shown on the "Revised" Zoning Exhibit. Construction of the residential portion of this
development will begin as soon as the rezoning and platting process is completed through the City of Colleyville.
REVISEDDevelopment PlllJl.doc
At this time, a specific user for the neighborhood commercial lot (1.478 acre lot) has not be determined, therefore
we can not state a definite time of final platting or start date of construction for this lot.
SUMMARY
This PUD-R planned unit development will consist of thirty-one (31) residential lots, two (2) common open space
lots and one (1) neighborhood commercial lot. This proposed development also meets all technical standards for
the City ofColleyville's PUD-R zoning district. The overall site area to be included in the Lonesome Dove Estates
Phase 3 planned unit development is 19.405 acres with 17.927 acres of PUD-R (single family residential) and
1.478 acres of CN (neighborhood commercial). The overall density within the residential portion of Lonesome
Dove Estates Phase 3 will be 1.60 lots/acre and the average lot size will be 16,050 square feet. The total common
open space within the residential portion of Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will be 3.59 acres (20.0% of
residential site area). It is also important to note that the residents within the Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will
also have access to the City of Colleyville public park area (i.e. future youth baseball fields) located immediately
east of this proposed development. A summary of the PUD-R Development Conditions for Lonesome Dove
Estates Phase 3 are clearly defined on the "Revised" Zoning Exhibit.
The average home size within Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will be approximately 3,000 square feet. The
average home value within Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 will be in the $330,000 range or higher (i.e.
$110/square foot @ 3,000 square feet). The anticipated build-out of all residential lots within Lonesome Dove
Estates Phase 3 once all improvements are completed and accepted by the city is estimated at two years. At this
time, we do not have a definite build-out time for the neighborhood commercial lot located along the frontage of
L.D. Lockett Road. The 1.478 acre neighborhood commercial lot will not be final platted until a specific user is
determined for this lot.
We do understand and recognize that the current Colleyville Master Plan adopted in 1998 designates the future
land use of this property as office and lor commercial use. We feel that the PUD-R planned unit development
described herein is a more compatible and practical use of the property based on the current development
REVlSEDDevelopment Plan.doc
----_._---~----_._._-,._-~-_. -,--_.__.._._"....__..~---"~_._~_...-....~--,._--_._-'---------._~->'",....~.._.,'~_..,_._._"._'
surrounding this property. The proposed planned unit development offers a mix of neighborhood commercial (CN)
zoning and single family residential with common open space areas. The neighborhood commercial is planned
along the frontage corridor of L.D. Lockett Road. The single family residential zoning (with common open space
areas) is planned south of the neighborhood commercial and north of the existing Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 2
subdivision in Hurst. The single family zoning (with average lot size of 16,050 square feet) offers a compatible
transitional zoning change between the neighborhood commercial and the +/-8,500 square foot lots in the existing
Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 2 subdivision.
It is also important to note that this property is located approximately 1,600 feet east of the intersection of Precinct
Line Road and L.D. Lockett Road and is not really visible from Precinct Line Road. Due to its location and lack
exposure and marketing visibility from any major corridors within Colleyville, we feel that this property will more
than likely never be developed as office and/or commercial uses. There is also an existing creek with a mature
stand of trees located approximately 700 feet west of this proposed development. This existing creek would be the
most practical location for a future zoning buffer between any future retail/commercial uses located along Precinct
Line Road (i.e. west ofthe creek) and any future single family residential developments located east of the creek.
With sincerity and respect, Stinson Development Corporation, Inc., requests consideration and approval of this
PUD-R Planned Unit Development of Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3 by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and the City Council ofColleyville, Texas pursuant to the criteria presented and discussed herein.
REVISEDDevelopmenl PIan.doc
Mid Cities Church Inc.
Attn: Denis Faulkner
4905 Eversham Court
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Stinson Development Corp.
7510 Davis Blvd., Ste D
Fort Worth, Texas 76180
USA
Attn: David Houser
2601 Meacham Blvd.
Fort Worth, TX 76137
William Hale Sneed
P.O. Box 101
Joshua, TX 76058
Roy & Susan Hill
805 W. L.D. Lockett Rd.
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Peter & Linda Kuhlmann
6000 Quality Hill St.
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Wallace Craig
P.O. Box 308
Hurst, TX 76053
Norma Jones
2509 Huneysuckle Ave.
Fort Worth, TX 76111
Garry & Sharon Tennyson
1507 Johnson Road
Keller, TX 76248
Bevsco LP
P.O. Box 670903
Dallas, TX 75367
Craig Gandy
1117 W. L.D. Lockett Road
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Bear Valley Community Church
7900 Precinct Line Road
Colleyville, Texas 76034
City of Hurst
1505 Precinct Line Road
Hurst, Texas 76054
Case Z-02-018 (Notices dated: June 28, 2002)
According to the last published Tax Record, individuals who own property that is within the 200'
of the proposed special use permitland-or/zoning change request are listed above. I certify that
the parties listed above have been notified of the proposed change request as required by
the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code.
~ Jan Levy
v~ Planning & Zoning Assistant
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE June 12,2002
FAX TO Dick Blackard ~ Joseph Reue, PE
FAX NO 817-488-5802 ~ 817-306-1555
FROM Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT Z-02-018 R40 to PUDR - Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and
zoning change request submitted to this office on May 31, 2002. The following comments are for
your consideration.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. The zoning exhibit submitted does not meet the requirements of a Preliminary Plat. While a
conceptual plan is acceptable for the zoning process, a preliminary plat and final plat will be
required prior to development of the property. This application may include review of a
preliminary plat if all required information for the preliminary plat is submitted.
2. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future land use of this property as office
development. The zoning request is inconsistent with the Plan, and a recommendation for
denial will be made to the Planning & Zoning Commission for technical non-compliance with
the Plan. Only the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council have the discretion to
approve residential components in this area.
ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING
1. The residential lots in the proposed development do not meet the average lot size requirement
of the PUD-R zoning district, which is 16,000 square feet. The lot sizes need to be adjusted to
meet this requirement.
2. A 7.5-foot drainage and utility easement is required adjacent to the rear property line of each
residential lot. Add the easement to the drawing.
3. The proposed open space area primarily consists of a detention pond. Will the developer
make any landscaping or other site improvements to this area?
4. The open space area provided does not meet the minimum 20% requirement of the PUD-R
district. The open space needs to be increased to meet this requirement.
P.O. Box 185 - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.577.7587
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-02-018 LONESOME DOVE PUD-R
5. The open space requirements in the PUD- R district suggest that the open space areas be
readily accessible to the residents in the development. The proposed layout shows a 20- foot
wide access area to the open space. It is the opinion of the DRC that this access is too narrow,
and does not meet the intent of the regulations for "readily accessible." The DRC suggests
that a more prominent and/or wider access area be provided for this open space so that it is
more visible from the street. A wider access area will also help the open space meet the 20%
requirement for this development.
6. The proposed subdivision includes the construction of two masonry screening walls. The
proposed 6-foot wall on Lot 1, Block 3, may not extend past the front building line of that lot.
The proposed 8-foot wall will be recommended to be constructed as part of the public
improvements to this property.
7. The right-of-way for L.D. Lockett Road needs to be verified when the plat is submitted. Tie
down the existing right-of-way with monuments on the opposite side of the street. The
required right-of-way established for this roadway by Master Thoroughfare Plan is 75 feet.
The required right-of-way dedication along the frontage of the property is 37.5- feet from the
centerline ofthe existing right-of-way.
8. Remove Note 6 from the PUD-R Development Conditions. This condition is not enforceable
through a zoning ordinance. The requirement may be added to the deed restrictions and
covenants for this project.
OTHER INFORMATION
1. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is
issued for a new structure on the lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general
information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different
depending upon the specific plans for construction.
SEWER
$794 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMD...Y uses. Actual fee depends on specific use of
the property. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code.
$1,790 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new
meter is installed.
$128 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter
is installed.
ROADWAY
WATER
2. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are
required for this property since L.D. Lockett Road is considered an unimproved street and the
plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the
streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future
improvement by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the
Engineering Department upon request. A general estimate of the escrow amount is
approximately $139 per linear foot, for 598.53 feet, for a total of$83,196. The response letter
to these comments should indicate the developer's initial intention of construction or escrow
regarding these streets.
PAGE 2 OF 3
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-02-018 LONESOME DOVE PUD-R
3. PARKLAND DEDICATION. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the
subdivision plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per dwelling unit. An assessment of
parkland dedication fees will be provided upon the review of the final plat.
4. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along L.D.
Lockett Road and all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be installed when any new
residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide.
The sidewalks along L.D. Lockett Road are required to be 5-feet wide, and the developer is
required to construct the L.D. Lockett Road sidewalk as part of the public improvements for
this property.
5. INFORMATIONAL ONLY. The Colleyville Land Development Code is available on-line at
http://www.colleyville.comldevelopment/code.asp. The Land Development Code is in Adobe
Acrobat format.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, June 24, 2002, 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, July 16 and August 6,2002, 7:30 p.m.
RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS
A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices.
Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices:
. a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering
reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived
· 22 folded copies of the revised Zoning Exhibit drawing
· one 8W' xII" reduced copy of the revised exhibit
The revised drawings must be submitted no later than Wednesday, June 19, 2002 in order to make
the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at husbandc@ci.colleyville.tx.us or 817-577-7587 if
you have any questions.
C: ENGINEERING DEPT
FIRE DEPARTMENT
BUILDING INSPECTION
PUBUC WORKS
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
PAGE 3 OF 3
WASHINGTON & ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERS · PLANNERS
3950 Fossil Creek Boulevard, Suite 210 · FortWortb, Texas 76137
817/306-1444 · Fax 817/306-1555
MEMORANDUM
TO: MR. CLAYTON HUSBAND, ACIP, DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR FOR THE CIIT OF
COLLEYVILLE
FROM: JOSEPH T. REUE, P.E.
SUBJECT: LONESOME DOVE ESTATES PHASE 3 - PUD-R ZONING CHANGE REQUEST
DATE: 7/1/2002
CC: MR. DICK BLACKARD
Mr. Husband:
This memo is intended to respond to the written comments received from the City of Colleyville
Development Review Committee letter dated June 12,2002.
The following responses to the city written comments are addressed in the order received:
General Information
1. We understand that this zoning exhibit does not meet the requirements of a Preliminary Plat.
At this time, we are submitting only the conceptual plan for the zoning change. We do
understand that the developer will need to submit a preliminary plat and a fmal plat prior to
development of the property.
2. We understand and recognize that the current Colleyville Master Plan designates the future
land use of this property as office development. From our meetings with city staff, we feel
that the PUD-R planned unit development submitted herein is a more compatible and
practical use of the property based on the current development surrounding this property.
The proposed planned unit development offers a mix of neighborhood commercial (CN)
zoning and single family residential with common open space. The neighborhood
commercial zoning is planned along the frontage corridor of L.D. Lockett Road. The R 15
single family zoning (with common open space) is planned south of the neighborhood
commercial and north of the existing Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 2 subdivision in Hurst.
This RlS zoning offers a compatible transitional zoning change between the neighborhood
commercial and the 8,500 square foot lots in the existing Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 2
subdivision.
ZoniQg Exhibit DrawiQg
1. The average lot size within the proposed PUD-R planned unit development is 15,769 square
feet. All residential lots within this planned development shall meet the zoning district
standards for the R15-single family residential district. Under the standard PUD-R zoning it
is allowed for lots sizes to be as small as 13,000 square feet with the average lot size being
16,000 square feet. At this time, we are proposing that all residential lots within the planned
development to be at least 15,000 square feet (no 13,000 square feet lots-will be allowed).
2. A 7.5-foot drainage and utility easement has been added adjacent to the rear property line of
each residential lot.
3. The existing detention/retention pond in the proposed common open space is to remain.
The common open space will have minimal landscaping and will be used for recreational
fishing and as a relaxation area for the residents within Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3.
No other improvements are planned at this time within this common open space area.
4. The total common open space within the residential portion of Lonesome Dove Estates
Phase 3 will be 3.42 acres ~.e. + / -19.1 % of residential site area). It is importantto note that
the residents within this subdivision will also have access to the City of Colleyville public
park area located immediately east of this proposed development. The developer is thus
requesting a minor variance from the minimum 20% open space requirement due to the
availability and nature of adjacent public open space/park area (as described in Section
3.23.F "Open Space Requirements" of the City of Colleyville Land Development Code).
5. We feel that the 20-foot wide access to the common open space is appropriate and is readily
accessible for its intended use. We feel widening the access to the common open space
would encourage more "non-residents" to used this "private" common open space area.
We also feel that the location of the "private" common open space area and the access to
the City of Colleyville "public" park area enhance the planned development quite nicely (i.e.
offers a balanced use of open space for the west and east residents within Lonesome Dove
Estates Phase 3).
6. The proposed 6-foot screening wall along Lot 1, Block 3 and the proposed 8-foot screening
wall along the rear of Lot 14, Block 1 have been removed from the zoning exhibit drawing.
7. We understand and acknowledge this comment.
8. Note 6 has been removed from the PUD-R Development Conditions.
Other Information
1. (Impact Fees) We understand and acknowledge this comment.
2. (Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements) The developer's initial intention for this
development is to escrow the funds for the perimeter street improvements required for L.D.
Lockett Road at time of fmal platting of the property. The estimated amount of escrow
funds due at time of fmal platting of residential portion of development is $24,316.66 (i.e.
174.941.f. of frontage @ $139 per linear foot). The estimated amount of escrow funds due at
time of fmal platting of neighborhood commercial portion of development is $58,879.01 (i.e.
423.59 l.f. of frontage @ $139 per linear foot).
3. (Parkland Dedication) We understand and acknowledge this comment.
4. (Sidewalk and Trails) We understand and acknowledge this comment. We note that the
developer would like to escrow the funds for the 5-foot sidewalk along L.D. Lockett Road
since the southern half of L.D. Lockett Road is not proposed to be built at this time (i.e.
only escrowing funds for perimeter street improvements).
5. (Informational Only) We understand and acknowledge this comment.
Re-submittal Requirements
Attached with this memo are twenty two (22) copies of the revised zoning exhibit, one (1) 8 1f2" x
11" reduced copy of the re~ised zoning exhibit and one (1) copy of the revised Development Plan
Summary for Lonesome Dove Estates Phase 3.
Please do not hesitate to contact our office at (817) 306-1444 if you have any additional comments or
questions.
2
~
(c3J
ORDINANCE 0-02-xxxx
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF A 19.405 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE
CARADINE SURVEY, ABSTRACT 356, FROM THE R40 SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE PUD-R PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-
RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENAL TV FOR VIOLATIONS
AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION.
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Stinson
Development Corporation and Mid-Cities Church on June 3, 2002,
under Case No. Z-02-018; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification
requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the
Colleyville Land Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and
made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning
amendment is in the best interests of the City of Colleyville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, and the Official Zoning Map are hereby amended
insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas, as
shown on the Zoning Map attached as Exhibit "An, and described by
metes and bounds description attached as Exhibit "B", by changing
the zoning of said property from the R40 Single Family Residential
district to the PUD-R Planned Unit Development-Residential district,
including any other conditions and restrictions imposed and
approved by the City Council, which are incorporated herein.
Sec. 2.
THAT this PUD-R shall be subject to the following conditions:
1. GENERAL
a. The purpose of this PUD-R is for single-family residential
development, constructed at an approximate density of 1.6
dwelling units per acre.
~
(c~
Ordinance 0-02-xxxx
Page 2 of 4
b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the
Colleyville Land Development Code, except where amended by
this Ordinance.
2. PERMITTED USES
a. Single family residences, detached
b. Open space
c. Commercial uses as defined elsewhere in this ordinance
3. NON-RESIDENTIAL USES. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
a. Non-residential lots shall conform to the minimum standards
of the CN Neighborhood Commercial zoning district.
b. The uses allowed in the non-residential portion of this PUD-R
shall conform to the requirements of the CN Neighborhood
Commercial zoning district.
4. RESIDENTIAL LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
Residential lot requirements and setbacks shall comply with the
following provisions, as shown in the Conceptual Site Plan attached
as Exhibit C.
a. Minimum Lot Size
b. Average Lot Size
c. Minimum Lot Width
d. Minimum Lot Depth
e. Front Building Line
f. Side Building Line
g. Rear Building Line
15,000 square feet
16,050 square feet
1 00 feet
125 feet
30 feet
1 0 feet
25 feet
5. OPEN SPACE
a. This development shall provide a minimum of twenty percent
(20%) of the residential project area as common open space for
the leisure and recreational use of the development's residents.
The open space shall comply with the provisions contained in
the Land Development Code.
b. The common open space may be utilized for storm water
detention purposes.
c. Development on the non-residential lot shall conform to the
landscaping requirements contained in the Land Development
Code.
~
Sec. 3.
Sec. 4.
Ordinance 0-02-xxxx
Page 3 of 4
6. CONCEPTUAL SITE PLANS AND PLATTING
a. The subdivision shall be generally consistent with the
conceptual site plan attached as Exhibit "C" I which shall not be
considered the preliminary plat. The actual street and lot
arrangement may differ from that shown on Exhibit "C" to
accommodate topographic, drainage or other conditions.
b. Prior to the issuance of any development permits within this
PUD-R and as a condition to the development of the subject
property, the developer shall obtain approval of a preliminary
plat and a final plat of the property in accordance with the
procedures and requirements of the Colleyville Land
Development Code.
7. SIDEWALKS
a. The developer shall construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along L.D.
Lockett Road at the same time as other public improvements
are constructed in the subdivision, unless funds are escrowed
with the City for future construction of the sidewalk.
b. Sidewalks along lot frontages shall be constructed by each
homebuilder. All sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance
with the requirements of the Colleyville Land Development
Code.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
of this ordinance as read together with any zoning regulation
contained in the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be
fined in a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00).
Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a
separate offense and shall be punishable as such.
THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an
alternate method of publication provided by law.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
day of
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2002.
~_.__._,.~_._"..._--->-_.__.__._._--._."------_.~--
Ordinance 0-02-xxxx
Page 4 of 4
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the day of
2002.
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE:
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney