Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Ordinances (O-22-2210)-08/02/2022
Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 1 of 22 Rev. 08/02/2022 The purpose of this Chapter is to establish regulations for the collection of impact fees to pay for the costs for new development. The regulations contained in this Chapter are adopted under the authorization of Chapter 395 – Local Government Code and Article VI of the Charter of the City of Colleyville. An applicant requesting a waiver of a requirement contained in this Chapter may seek relief from the City Council by using the procedure described in Section 190 of this Chapter this Land Development Code. The definitions unique to this Chapter are found in Chapter 2 – Definitions of this Land Development Code. A. Master Plan – The City of Colleyville, 2015 Comprehensive Plan, “Destination Colleyville,” approved by Ordinance O-17-2005 on February 21, 2017, be and the same is hereby adopted and designated as the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Colleyville for impact fees. B. Land Use Assumptions – The land use assumptions used in the development of the impact fees are contained in the document titled Water, Wastewater, and Roadway Impact Fee Update, dated June 2022, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, are adopted for the purpose of compliance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code regarding impact fees and referenced in Exhibit - 13.A – Table of Land Use Assumptions. C. Water and Wastewater Capital Improvements Plans – The document titled Water, Wastewater, and Roadway Impact Fee Update, dated June 2022, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, is adopted as the Water and Wastewater Capital Improvements Plan for the City of Colleyville for the purpose of compliance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code regarding impact fees. D. Roadway Capital Improvements Plan – The document titled Water, Wastewater, and Roadway Impact Fee Update, dated June 2022, and prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates is adopted as the Roadway Capital Improvements Plan for the City of Colleyville for the purpose of compliance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code regarding impact fees. A. This Chapter shall be uniformly applicable to new development which occurs within the water, wastewater and roadway service areas. Chapter 13 Impact Fees Section 13 – 100 Purpose of this Chapter Section 13 – 105 Authorization for Adoption of this Chapter Section 13 – 110 Waivers and Appeals Section 13 – 115 Definitions Section 13 – 120 Master Plan and Capital Improvements Plan Adopted Section 13 – 125 Applicability of Impact Fees Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 2 of 22 B. No new development shall be exempt from the assessment of impact fees as defined in this Chapter. No final plat for new development shall be approved within the service area without assessment of impact fees pursuant to this Chapter, and no water and wastewater tap shall be issued and no building permit shall be issued unless the applicant has paid the impact fees imposed by and calculated as provided herein. A. The water, wastewater and roadway service areas are established as shown on the Service Area Map, attached as Exhibit -13-B – Service Area Map. The service areas shall be established consistent with any facility service area established in the CIP for each utility. B. The boundaries of the water, wastewater and roadway service areas may be amended from time to time, and new service areas may be delineated, pursuant to the procedures in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. A. Service units are established in accordance with generally accepted engineering and planning standards. B. For water and wastewater impact fees, service units shall be calculated in accordance with the attached Exhibit -13-C – Table of Water and Wastewater Service Unit Equivalencies, as determined by the size of the water meter(s) for the development, or alternatively, as approved the City Engineer as a result of an engineering report prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in the State of Texas, which demonstrates that the number of service unit equivalents (SUE’s) for the new development will be different than those indicated by the size of the water meter. C. If the Director of Public Works determines that the water pressure in the City's transmission main is significantly higher or lower than standard pressure such that the size of the water meter is not indicative of actual service demand, the Director may adjust the number of (SUE’s) based on a smaller or larger sized meter which more accurately reflects the flow rate and the system pressure conditions. D. If a fire demand meter (tap) is purchased for a property, the meter size utilized to calculate the number of (SUE’s) shall be the dimension of the portion of the fire demand meter which reflects the meter size which would provide only domestic service to the property. Said reduced meter size shall then be utilized to calculate the number of (SUE’s). 1. The meter types used to calculate the number of (SUE’s) shall be either simple or compound meters. 2. If the fire protection capacity of the fire demand meter is routinely utilized for domestic purposes as evidenced by the registration of consumption recorded on the City's meter-reading and billing systems, the then-owner of the property shall be assessed the then current fee for the fire protection capacity which has been converted to domestic capacity by its routine usage as domestic capacity. 3. To avoid the use of fire flow volumes for domestic usage, the owner of any property for which a fire demand meter is purchased shall be required to execute a restrictive covenant on a form approved by the City Attorney, which covenant shall acknowledge the right of the City to assess such fees to subsequent owners of the property. Said covenant shall be executed prior to the purchase of the fire demand meter and shall be filed in the deed records of the County. 4. No fees shall be collected for the purchase of taps which shall be utilized to provide only fire protection capacity. E. Upon wastewater tap purchase for lots for which no water meter has been purchased, service units shall Section 13 – 130 Impact Fees as Conditions of Development Approval Section 13 – 135 Establishment of Service Areas Section 13 – 140 Service Units Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 3 of 22 be established by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Texas, shall be reviewed by the Engineer and shall be presented to Council, which shall designate the appropriate number of service units. F. For roadways, service units shall be calculated in accordance with Exhibit - 13.D – Table of Vehicle-Mile Equivalencies. G. The City Council may revise the service unit equivalency tables according to the procedure set forth in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code and its successors. A. Calculation Method – The maximum assessable impact fee per service unit for each service area shall be computed by dividing the growth-related capital construction cost of service in the service area identified in the capital improvements plan for that category of capital improvements, by the total number of projected service units anticipated within the service area which are necessitated by and attributable to new development, based on the land use assumptions for that service area. B. Utility or Ad Valorem Tax Credits – The maximum assessable impact fee is determined by applying a credit back to the development community based on the utility revenues or ad valorem taxes that are allocated for paying a portion for future capital improvements. The maximum assessable water impact is 99.3 percent of the Pre-Credit Recoverable Costs. The maximum assessable wastewater impact fee is 99.3 percent of the Pre-Credit Recoverable Costs. The maximum roadway impact fee is 94.3percent for Service Area One and 94.3 percent for Service Area Two of the Pre-Credit Recoverable Costs. C. Maximum Assessable Water and Wastewater Impact Fees – The maximum assessable impact fees per service unit for water and wastewater facilities after applying the utility or ad valorem tax credits is contained in Exhibit -13-E – Table of Maximum Assessable Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. D. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fees – The maximum assessable impact fees per service unit for roadway facilities after applying the utility or ad valorem tax credits is contained in Exhibit -13-F – Table of Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fees. A. The assessment of an impact fee for any new development shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this Section. B. Assessment of the impact fee for any new development shall be made on occurrence of the following events: 1. For new development which is submitted for approval pursuant to the City's subdivision regulations after June 20, 1987, or for which re-platting results in an increase in the number of service units after such date, assessment shall be at the time of final subdivision plat approval, and shall be the amount of the impact fee per service unit, as provided in the Schedule of Impact Fees to be Collected that is in effect at the time of subdivision plat approval. 2. For new development which has received final plat approval prior to June 20, 1987, and for which no re-platting is necessary prior to the issuance of a building permit, assessment shall be upon the issuance of a building permit, and shall be the amount of the impact fee per service unit set forth in the Schedule of Impact Fees to be Collected that is in effect at the time of building permit application. 3. For new development which occurs or is proposed to occur without platting, assessment shall be upon the issuance of a building permit or water or sewer tap purchase (whichever occurs first), and shall be the amount of the impact fee per service unit set forth in the Schedule of Impact Fees to be Collected that is in effect at the time of building permit application. Section 13 – 145 Maximum Assessable Impact Fees Per Service Unit Section 13 – 150 Assessment of Impact Fees Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 4 of 22 4. For water and wastewater facilities, fees shall not be assessed to a development for which taps previously were purchased and which development does not result in an increase in the number of living unit equivalents as determined by the service unit equivalency table. If the exchange of said taps will result in an increase in the number of (SUE’s), impact fees for the increase in the number of (SUE’s) shall be assessed in accordance with the Schedule of Impact Fees to be Collected that is in effect at the time of subdivision plat approval. 5. Because fire protection is of critical concern to the community as a whole, water demand related solely to fire protection is not subject to assessment or collection of a water or wastewater impact fee. However, if the fire protection capacity of the fire demand meter is routinely utilized for domestic purposes as evidenced by the registration of consumption recorded on the City's meter- reading and billing systems, the current owner of the property shall be assessed the impact fees currently in effect at the time such conversion is established by the City for the fire protection capacity which has been converted to domestic capacity by its routine usage as domestic capacity. C. Following assessment of the impact fee above, no additional impact fees or increases thereof shall be assessed against that development unless the number of service units increases. D. Following the lapse or expiration of approval for a plat, a new assessment must be performed at the time a new application for such development is filed. A. Water Impact Fee Schedule – The actual water impact fee collection rate which is to be paid by each new development shall be 50% of the maximum allowed. This rate is incorporated into Exhibit 13-G – Schedule of Actual Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to be Collected, which shall become effective on August 2, 2022. B. Residential Irrigation Meter Exemption – The payment of the water impact fee shall not be required by an existing residential customer for the installation of a meter to serve a separate lawn irrigation system provided all of the following requirements are met: 1. The lawn irrigation meter does not exceed the ¾” x ⅝” standard basic meter size, 2. The lawn irrigation shall be located on the same property as the residential meter, 3. the residential property must be owner-occupied and be in possession of a valid certificate of occupancy, and 4. The lawn irrigation meter only serves the lawn irrigation system. 5. The upgrade of a ¾” x ⅝” lawn irrigation meter to a 1” meter shall require payment of a water impact fee based on the difference between the base meter size and the water impact fee for a 1” meter applicable at the time of upgrade. 6. No exemption or pro-rata credit shall apply for any meter size exceeding 1” for a lawn irrigation meter. C. Wastewater Impact Fee Schedule – The actual wastewater impact fee collection rate which is to paid by each new development shall be 50% of the maximum allowed by this Chapter. This rate is incorporated into Exhibit 13-G – Schedule of Actual Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to be Collected, which shall become effective on August 2, 2022. D. Roadway Impact Fee Schedule – The actual impact fees per service unit equivalent for roadway facilities is shown in Exhibit 13-H – Schedule of Actual Roadway Impact Fees to be Collected, which incorporates the following collection rate percentages 1. Service Area 1: The actual Roadway Impact Fee collection rate shall be 100% of the maximum assessable impact fee allowed for all uses, except retail and office uses, which shall become effective on August 2, 2022. Section 13 – 155 Schedule of Actual Impact Fees Collected Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 5 of 22 2. Service Area 2: The actual Roadway Impact Fee collection rate shall be 100% of the maximum allowed by this Chapter for all uses, except retail and office uses, which shall become effective on August 2, 2022. 3. For land uses not specifically listed, refer to Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. A. Tap or Building Permit – No water or wastewater tap or building permit shall be issued until all impact fees have been paid to the City, except as provided otherwise by contract. B. Payment with Building Permit – Water, wastewater and roadway impact fees shall be paid at the time of the issuance of a building permit, unless a provision in this Chapter provides for another time for collection of impact fee. C. Conversion from Existing Private Facilities – For new development converting to the City water utility from a water well or to the City wastewater utility from a septic tank or individual waste disposal system, the City may allow the fee-payer to pay impact fees in the form of a monthly assessment in the same manner as monthly assessments for related tap fees, if such an extended payment program for tap fees is currently in effect. D. Contract Specifying Time and Method of Payment – The City may, at its sole discretion, enter into a contract with the owner of a tract of land for which the plat has been recorded to establish a different time and method of payment of impact fees than those provided in this Section. E. Notification Due to Increased Service Units – Whenever a property owner proposes to increase the number of service units for a development previously assessed, the additional impact fees to be collected on such service units shall be determined in accordance with the Schedule of Impact Fees to be Collected that is in effect at the time of building permit application . F. Roadway Impact Fees for Exempt Non-Residential Uses – For roadway impact fees, in circumstances where non-residential uses may be exempt from payment of fees based upon prospective generation of sales tax revenues, such fees may be paid as provided in Section 13-173, subject to rebate pursuant to this Chapter, upon demonstration that more than 50% of the floor area of the structure for which a building permit is issued will be utilized by a business generating city sales tax revenues. A. System Related Facilities – The City shall offset the reasonable value of any system-related facilities, pursuant to rules established in this Section, which have been dedicated to and have been received by the City, including the value of rights-of-way or capital improvements constructed pursuant to an agreement with the City, against the amount of the impact fee due for that category of capital improvement, subject to administrative guidelines established by the City. B. Credit for Impact, Pro-Rata, Acreage of Lot Fees – The City shall credit impact, pro rata, acreage or lot fees which have been paid pursuant to the subdivision regulations contained in this Land Development Code prior to the effective date of this amendatory ordinance against the amount of an impact due for that category of capital improvement, subject to administrative guidelines established by the City. C. Limitations for Offsets and Credits – All offsets and credits against impact fees shall be subject to the following limitations and shall be granted based on this Chapter and additional standards promulgated by the City, which may be adopted as administrative guidelines. 1. No offset or credit shall be given for the dedication or construction of site-related facilities, except where credit is provided in this Chapter, or for any capital improvement which is not identified within the applicable capital improvements plan, unless the City agrees that such improvement supplies Section 13 – 160 Payment and Collection of Impact Fees Section 13 – 163 Offsets and Credits Against Impact Fees Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 6 of 22 capacity to new developments other than the development paying the impact fee and provisions for offsets are incorporated into an agreement for capital improvements. 2. Any construction of, contributions to, or dedications of off-site roadway facilities agreed to or required by the City as a condition of development approval shall be credited against roadway impact fees otherwise due from the development. 3. The unit costs used to calculate the offsets shall not exceed those assumed for the capital improvements included in the capital improvements plan for the category of facility within the service area for which the impact fee is imposed. 4. An offset or credit created pursuant to prior impact fee ordinances shall expire no later than ten (10) years after the effective date of this amendatory ordinance, unless a different expiration date has been agreed to by the City by contract or certificate. Offsets or credits created after the effective date of this amendatory ordinance shall expire within ten (10) years from the date the offset or credit was created, unless otherwise prescribed by contract. 5. In no event will the City reimburse the property owner or developer for an offset or credit when no impact fees for the new development can be collected pursuant to this Chapter or for any value exceeding the total impact fees due for the development for that category of capital improvement, unless otherwise agreed to by the City. 6. Offsets or credits created after the effective date of this amendatory ordinance for a development which has received final plat approval prior to the effective date hereof shall be discounted to take into account the number of service units in the development which will utilize the facility for which the offset or credit was given. D. Application for Offset or Credit – An applicant for new development must apply for an offset or credit against impact fees due for the development either at or before the time of plat recordation, unless the City agrees to a different time. The applicant shall file a petition for offsets or credits with the City on a form provided for such purpose. The contents of the petition shall be established by administrative guidelines. The City must provide the applicant, in writing, with a decision on the offset or credit request, including the reasons for the decision. The decision shall specify the maximum value of the offset or credit which may be applied against an impact fee, which value and the date of the determination shall be associated with the plat for the new development. E. Manner of Offset or Credit Application – The available offset or credit associated with the plat shall be applied against an impact fee in the following manner: 1. Such offset or credit shall be prorated proportionally among all service units, or for roadway facilities, among all units of trip generation, as calculated from the applicable service unit equivalency table, and shall remain applicable to such service units, to be applied at time of filing and acceptance of an application for a building permit, against impact fees due. 2. If the total number of service units used by the City in the original offset or credit calculation described in subsection (1) is eventually exceeded by the number of total service units realized by the actual development, the City may, at its sole discretion, collect the full impact fee exclusive of any associated offset or credits for the excess service units. 3. At its sole discretion, the City may authorize alternative credit or offset agreements upon petition by the owner in accordance with guidelines promulgated by the City. A. The City shall establish separate interest-bearing accounts, in a bank authorized to receive deposits of City funds, for each major category of capital facility for which an impact fee is imposed pursuant to this Chapter. B. Interest earned by each account shall be credited to that account and shall be used solely for the Section 13 – 165 Establishment of Accounts and Records Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 7 of 22 purposes specified for funds authorized in the Capital Improvements Plan. C. The City shall establish adequate financial and accounting controls to ensure that impact fees disbursed from the account are utilized solely for the purposes authorized in the CIP. Disbursement of funds shall be authorized by the City at such times as are reasonably necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of this Chapter; provided, however, that any fee paid shall be expended within a reasonable period of time, but not to exceed ten (10) years from the date the fee is deposited into the account. D. The City shall maintain and keep adequate financial records for each such account, which shall show the source and disbursement of all revenues, which shall account for all monies received, and which shall ensure that the disbursement of funds from each account shall be used solely and exclusively for the provision of uses specified in the capital improvements program as system-related capital projects. The City Finance Department shall also maintain such records as are necessary to ensure that refunds are appropriately made under the provisions of this Chapter, and such other information as may be necessary for the proper implementation of this Chapter. A. Permitted Uses of Fees – The impact fees collected pursuant to this Chapter may be used to finance or to recoup capital construction costs of service. Impact fees may also be used to pay the principal sum and interest and other finance costs on bonds, notes or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the City to finance such capital improvements or facilities expansions. B. Prohibited Uses of Fees – Impact fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall not be used to pay for any of the following expenses: 1. Construction, acquisition or expansion of capital improvements or assets other than those identified in the associated capital improvements plans; 2. Repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements or facilities expansions; 3. Upgrading, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental or regulatory standards; 4. Upgrading, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements to provide better service to existing development; provided however, that impact fees may be used to pay the costs of upgrading, expanding or replacing existing capital improvements in order to meet the need for new capital improvements generated by new development: or 5. Administrative and operating costs of the City. A. The property owner or applicant for new development may appeal the following decisions to the City Manager or designee: 1. The applicability of an impact fee to the development; 2. The value of the impact fee due; 3. The availability or the value of an offset or credit; 4. The application of an offset or credit against an impact fee due, 5. The amount of the refund due, if any; or 6. The alternative determination by the City Engineer concerning the size of the water meter which is to Section 13 – 168 Use of Proceeds of Impact Fee Accounts Section 13 – 170 Appeals Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 8 of 22 be converted to service units. B. The burden of proof shall be on the appellant to demonstrate that the value of the fee or the value of the offset or credit was not calculated according to the applicable impact fee schedule or the ordinance provisions and guidelines established for determining offsets and credits. C. The appellant may appeal the decision of the City Manager to the City Council. A notice of appeal to the Council must be filed by the applicant with the City Secretary within thirty (30) days following the City Manager's decision. If the notice of appeal is accompanied by a bond or other sufficient surety satisfactory to the City Attorney in an amount equal to the original determination of the impact fee due, the development application or tap purchase or building permit issuance may be processed while the appeal is pending. A. Time Limit Prior to Refund – Any impact fee or portion thereof collected pursuant to this Chapter which has not been expended within ten (10) years from the date of payment, shall be refunded, upon application, to the record owner of the property at the time the refund is paid, or, if the impact fee was paid by another governmental entity, to such governmental entity, together with interest calculated from the date of collection to the date of refund at the statutory rate as set forth in Article 1.03, Title 79, Revised Statutes (Article 5069-1.03, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes), or any successor statute. B. Pro-Rated Refund – If a refund is due, the City shall pro-rate the same by dividing the difference between the amount of expenditures and the amount of the fees collected by the total number of service units assumed within the service area for the period to determine the refund due per service unit. The refund to the record owner or governmental entity shall be calculated by multiplying the refund due per service unit by the number of service units for the development for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated upon that amount. C. Determination of Excess Fees Upon Completion of Improvements – Upon completion of all the capital improvements or facilities expansions identified in the capital improvements plan upon which the fee was based, the City shall recalculate the maximum impact fee per service unit using the actual costs for the improvements or expansions. If the maximum impact fee per service unit based on actual cost is less than the impact fee per service unit paid, the City shall refund the difference, if such difference exceeds the impact fee paid by more than ten percent (10%). The refund to the record owner or governmental entity shall be calculated by multiplying such difference by the number of service units for the development for which the fee was paid, and interest due shall be calculated upon that amount. D. Request of Refund Fees - Upon the request of an owner of the property on which an impact fee has been paid, the City shall refund such fees if: 1. Existing service is available and service is denied; or 2. Service was not available when the fee was collected and the City has failed to commence construction of facilities to provide service within two years of fee payment; or 3. Service was not available when the fee was collected and has not subsequently been made available within a reasonable period of time considering the type of capital improvement or facility expansion to be constructed, but in any event later than five years from the date of fee payment. E. Proportional Refund Due to Downsizing Meter – The City shall refund an appropriate proportion of impact fee payments in the event that a previously purchased unused water meter is replaced with a smaller meter, based on the SUE differential of the two meter sizes and the per-SUE fee at the time of the original fee payment, less an administrative charge of $50. F. Procedure for Petitioning of Refund – Petition for refunds shall be submitted to the Director of Public Services on a form provided by the City for such purpose. Within one month of the date of receipt of a petition for refund, the Director must provide the petitioner, in writing, with a decision on the refund request, including the reasons for the decision. If a refund is due to the petitioner, the Director shall notify Section 13 – 173 Refunds Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 9 of 22 the Finance Director and request that a refund payment be made to the petitioner. The petitioner may appeal the determination to the City Manager and Council, as set forth in this Land Development Code. G. Rebate of Roadway Impact Fees for Expired Permit – The City shall rebate the roadway impact fees to the owner on which a building permit has been issued, for which such permit has expired without construction. The City shall review the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan for water, wastewater and roadway facilities at least every five years, the first five year period which shall commence from the date of adoption of the capital improvements plan referenced herein. The City Council shall accordingly then make a determination of whether changes to the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan or impact fees are needed and shall, in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, or any successor statute, either update the fees or make a determination that no update is necessary. A. The functions of the Advisory Committee are those set forth in Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, or any successor statute, and shall include the following: 1. Advise and assist the City in adopting land use assumptions; 2. Review the capital improvements plan regarding water, wastewater and roadway capital improvements and file written comments thereon; 3. Monitor and evaluate implementation of the capital improvements program; 4 Advise the City of the need to update or revise the land use assumptions, capital improvements program and impact fees; and 5. File a semiannual report evaluating the progress of the City in achieving the capital improvements plans and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the impact fees. B. The City shall make available to the Advisory Committee any professional reports prepared in the development or implementation of the capital improvements plan. C. The City Council shall adopt procedural rules for the committee to follow in carrying out its duties. A. The City Council may approve the owner of a new development to construct or finance some of the public improvements identified in the CIP. In the case of such approval, the property owner must enter into an agreement with the City prior to fee collection. The agreement shall be on a form approved by the City, and shall establish the estimated cost of improvement, the schedule for initiation and completion of the improvement, a requirement that the improvement shall be completed to City standards, and any other terms and conditions the City deems necessary. The Engineer shall review the improvement plan, verify costs and time schedules, determine if the improvement is contained in the CIP, and determine the amount of the applicable credit for such improvement to be applied to the otherwise applicable impact fee before submitting the proposed agreement to the Council for approval. B. The City and such owner either may agree that the costs incurred or funds advanced will be credited against the impact fees otherwise due from the new development, or they may agree that the City shall reimburse the owner for such costs from impact fees paid from other new developments which will use such capital improvements or facility expansions. Section 13 – 175 Updates to Plan and Revision of Fees Section 13 – 178 Functions of Advisory Committee Section 13 – 180 Agreement for Capital Improvements Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 10 of 22 A. The City may finance water, wastewater and roadway capital improvements or facilities expansions designated in the capital improvements plan through the issuance of bonds, through the formation of public improvement districts or other assessment districts, or through any other authorized mechanism, in such manner and subject to such limitations as may be provided by law, in addition to the use of impact fees. B. Except as herein otherwise provided, the assessment and collection of an impact fee shall be additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any other tax, fee, charge or assessment which is lawfully imposed on and due against the property. A. Impact fees established by this Chapter are additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any other requirements imposed by the City on the development of land or the issuance of building permits or the sale of water or wastewater taps. Such fees are intended to be consistent with and to further the policies of City's Comprehensive Plan, capital improvements plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and other City policies, ordinances and resolutions by which the City seeks to ensure the provision of adequate public facilities in conjunction with the development of land. B. This Chapter shall not affect, in any manner, the permissible use of property, density of development, design, and improvement standards and requirements, or any other aspect of the development of land or provision of public improvements subject to the zoning and subdivision regulations or other regulations of the City, which shall be operative and remain in full force and effect without limitation with respect to all such development. A. Any person who has paid an impact fee or an owner of land upon which an impact fee has been paid may petition the Council to determine whether any duty required by this ordinance has not been performed within the time so prescribed. The petition shall be in writing and shall state the nature of the unperformed duty and request that the act be performed within sixty (60) days of the request. If the Council determines that the duty is required pursuant to the ordinance and is late in being performed, it shall cause the duty to commence within sixty (60) days of the date of the request and to continue until completion. B. The Council may grant a variance or waiver from any requirement of this ordinance, upon written request by a developer or owner of property subject to the ordinance, following a public hearing, upon finding that a strict application of such requirement would, when regarded as a whole, result in confiscation of the property. Section 13 – 183 Use of Other Financing Mechanisms Section 13 – 188 Impact Fees as Additional and Supplemental Regulation Section 13 – 190 Relief Procedures Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 11 of 22 Reserved for listing of amendments to this Chapter. Ord. Number Date Subject O-00-1218 06/20/00 Established 35% collection rate on church, office and retail uses O-00-1261 12/19/00 Expanded roadway impact fee schedule O-02-1367 10/01/02 Revised impact fee schedules per S.B 243 O-04-1453 04/16/04 Residential irrigation meter exemption O-06-1581 08/02/06 Comprehensive revision and adoption of new fee schedules O-09-1711 03/03/09 Impact Fee Update – Roadway Capital Improvements Plan O-12-1846 08/21/12 Five year update and adoption of new fee schedules O-13-1901 11/15/13 Remove automatic rebate provisions for sales tax generating businesses O-22-2210 08/02/22 Five Year Update and adoption of new fee schedules Section 13.29 Amendments to This Chapter Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 12 of 22 Exhibit – 13-A Table of Land Use Assumptions Residential and Employment Land Use Assumptions Growth Projections (2020‐2030) Service Area Residential Square Feet Single Family Basic Service Retail Total 1 379 23,000 123,000 97,000 243,000 2 274 40,000 337,000 250,000 627,000 City Total 653 63,000 460,000 347,000 870,000 Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 13 of 22 Exhibit – 13-B Service Area Map Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 14 of 22 Exhibit 13 – C Table of Water and Wastewater Service Unit Equivalencies Meter Size* Maximum Continuous Operating Capacity (GPM) Service Unit Equivalent 5/8” x ¾” PD 10 0.67 ¾” PD 15 1.00 1” PD 25 1.67 1 ½” PD 50 3.33 2” PD 80 5.33 2” Compound 80 5.33 2” Turbine 100 6.67 3” Compound 175 11.67 3” Turbine 220 14.67 4” Compound 300 20.00 4” Turbine 420 28.00 6” Compound 675 45.00 6” Turbine 865 57.67 8” Compound 900 60.00 8” Turbine 2.400 160.00 10” Turbine 3,500 233.33 *PD = Positive Displacement Meter (Typical residential meter) Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 15 of 22 Exhibit 13-D - Table of Vehicle Mile Equivalencies Land Use Category ITE Land Use Code Development Unit Vehicle- Mile Per Dev Unit PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal 030 1,000 SF GFA 7.48 INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 110 1,000 SF GFA 2.52 Industrial Park 130 1,000 SF GFA 1.60 Warehousing 150 1,000 SF GFA 0.76 Mini-Warehouse 151 1,000 SF GFA 0.68 RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housing 210 Dwelling Unit 3.96 Apartment/Multi-family 220 Dwelling Unit 2.24 Residential Condominium/Townhome 230 Dwelling Unit 2.24 Senior Adult Housing-Detached 251 Dwelling Unit 1.20 Senior Adult Housing-Attached 252 Dwelling Unit 1.04 Assisted Living 254 Beds 1.04 LODGING Hotel 310 Room 1.93 Motel / Other Lodging Facilities 320 Room 1.22 RECREATIONAL Golf Course 430 Acre 110 Miniature Golf Course 431 Hole 1.30 Golf Driving Range 432 Tee 4.91 Multiplex Movie Theater 445 Screens 54.92 Ice Skating Rink 465 1,000 SF GFA 5.23 Racquet / Tennis Club 491 Court 15.01 Recreational Community Center 495 1,000 SF GFA 9.08 INSTITUTIONAL Church 560 1,000 SF GFA 1.96 Day Care Center 565 1,000 SF GFA 10.87 Primary/Middle School (1-8) 522 Students 0.30 High School 530 Students 0.24 Junior / Community College 540 Students 0.44 University / College 550 Students 0.60 (Continued on next page) Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 16 of 22 Exhibit 13-D - Table of Vehicle Mile Equivalencies - Continued Land Use Category ITE Land Use Code Development Unit Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit MEDICAL Clinic 630 1,000 SF GFA 13.12 Hospital 610 Beds 3.88 Nursing Home 620 Beds 0.88 Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 640 1,000 SF GFA 9.88 OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building 714 1,000 SF GFA 2.40 General Office Building 710 1,000 SF GFA 4.60 Medical-Dental Office Building 720 1,000 SF GFA 13.84 Single Tenant Office Building 715 1,000 SF GFA 6.84 Office Park 750 1,000 SF GFA 4.28 COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center 942 1,000 SF Occ. GLA 2.40 Automobile Parts Sales 843 1,000 SF GFA 4.60 Gasoline/Service Station 944 Vehicle Fueling Position 13.84 Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market 945 Vehicle Fueling Position 6.84 New Car Sales 840 1,000 SF GFA 4.28 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop 941 Servicing Positions 2.40 Self-Service Car Wash 947 Stall 4.60 Tire Store 848 1,000 SF GFA 13.84 Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 934 1,000 SF GFA 46.06 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 933 1,000 SF GFA 39.96 High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 932 1,000 SF GFA 15.70 Quality Restaurant 931 1,000 SF GFA 12.32 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 937 1,000 SF GFA 36.70 Other Retail Free-Standing Discount Store 815 1,000 SF GFA 9.47 Nursery (Garden Center) 817 1,000 SF GFA 13.60 Home Improvement Superstore 862 1,000 SF GFA 3.78 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window 880 1,000 SF GFA 11.20 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window 881 1,000 SF GFA 14.69 Shopping Center 820 1,000 SF GLA 7.04 Supermarket 850 1,000 SF GFA 16.56 Toy/Children's Superstore 864 1,000 SF GFA 9.80 Department Store 875 1,000 SF GFA 3.82 SERVICES Walk-In Bank 911 1,000 SF GFA 16.19 Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-in Lanes 39.27 Hair Salon 918 1,000 SF GLA 3.25 Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 17 of 22 Exhibit 13 – E Table of Maximum Assessable Water and Wastewater Impact Fees Meter Size Maximum Continuous Operating Capacity (GPM)* Service Unit Equivalent Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fee Maximum Assessable Wastewater Impact Fee 5/8”x 3/4” PD 10 0.67 $7,288 $1,977 3/4” PD 15 1.00 $10,932 $2,965 1” PD 25 1.67 $18,220 $4,942 1 1/2” PD 50 3.33 $36,440 $9,883 2” PD 80 5.33 $58,304 $15,813 2” Compound 80 5.33 $58,304 $15,813 2” Turbine 100 6.67 $72,880 $19,767 3” Compound 175 11.67 $127,540 $34,592 3” Turbine 220 14.67 $160,336 $43,487 4” Compound 300 20.00 $218,640 $59,300 4” Turbine 420 28.00 $306,096 $83,020 6” Compound 675 45.00 $491,940 $133,425 6” Turbine 865 57.67 $630,412 $170,982 8” Compound 900 60.00 $655,920 $177,900 8” Turbine 2,400 160.00 $1,749,120 $474,400 10” Turbine 3,500 233.33 $2,550,800 $691,833 PD = Positive Displacement Meter (Typical Residential Meter) *Operating capacities obtained from American Water Works Association (AWWA) C‐700‐20, C‐701‐19, C702‐19 Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 18 of 22 Exhibit 13-F Table of Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fees Land Use Description Development Unit Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit Maximum Impact Fee Per Development Unit Service Area 1 Service Area 2 PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal Acre 7.48 $10,517 $16,329 INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 1,000 SF GFA 2.52 $3,543 $5,501 Industrial Park 1,000 SF GFA 1.60 $2,250 $3,493 Warehousing 1,000 SF GFA 0.76 $1,069 $1,659 Mini-Warehouse 1,000 SF GFA 0.68 $956 $1,484 RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housing Dwelling Unit 3.96 $5,568 $8,645 Apartment/Multi-family Dwelling Unit 2.24 $3,149 $4,890 Residential Condominium/Townhome Dwelling Unit 2.24 $3,149 $4,890 Senior Adult Housing-Detached Dwelling Unit 1.2 $1,687 $2,620 Senior Adult Housing-Attached Dwelling Unit 1.04 $1,462 $2,270 Assisted Living Beds 1.04 $1,462 $2,270 LODGING Hotel Room 1.93 $2,714 $4,213 Motel / Other Lodging Facilities Room 1.22 $1,715 $2,663 RECREATIONAL Golf Course Acre 1.10 $154,660 $240,130 Miniature Golf Course Hole 1.30 $1,828 $2,838 Golf Driving Range Tee 4.91 $6,903 $10,719 Multiplex Movie Theater Screens 54.92 $77,218 $119,890 Ice Skating Rink 1,000 SF GFA 5.23 $7,353 $11,417 Racquet / Tennis Club Court 15.01 $21,104 $32,767 Recreational Community Center 1,000 SF GFA 9.08 $12,766 $19,822 INSTITUTIONAL Church 1,000 SF GFA 1.96 $2,756 $4,279 Day Care Center 1,000 SF GFA 10.87 $15,283 $23,729 Primary/Middle School (1-8) Students 0.30 $422 $655 High School Students 0.24 $337 $524 Junior / Community College Students 0.44 $619 $961 University / College Students 0.60 $844 $1,310 MEDICAL Clinic 1,000 SF GFA 13.12 $18,447 $28,641 Hospital Beds 3.88 $5,455 $8,470 Nursing Home Beds 0.88 $1,237 $1,921 Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 1,000 SF GFA 9.88 $13,891 $21,568 (Continued on next page) Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 19 of 22 Exhibit 13-F Table of Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fees – Continued Land Use Description Development Unit Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit Maximum Impact Fee Per Development Unit Service Area 1 Service Area 2 OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 SF GFA 2.40 $3,374 $5,239 General Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 4.60 $6,468 $10,042 Medical-Dental Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 13.84 $19,459 $30,213 Single Tenant Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 6.84 $9,617 $14,932 Office Park 1,000 SF GFA 4.28 $6,018 $9,343 COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center 1,000 SF Occ. GLA 4.15 $5,835 $9,059 Automobile Parts Sales 1,000 SF GFA 6.23 $8,759 $13,600 Gasoline/Service Station Vehicle Fueling Position 4.88 $6,861 $10,653 Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market Vehicle Fueling Position 3.69 $5,188 $8,055 Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market and Car Wash Vehicle Fueling Position 5.44 $7,649 $11,876 New Car Sales 1,000 SF GFA 6.47 $9,097 $14,124 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop Servicing Positions 1.99 $2,798 $4,344 Self-Service Car Wash Stall 6.38 $8,970 $13,928 Tire Store 1,000 SF GFA 4.15 $5,835 $9,059 Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 46.06 $64,760 $100,549 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 39.96 $56,184 $87,233 High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 1,000 SF GFA 15.7 $22,074 $34,273 Quality Restaurant 1,000 SF GFA 12.32 $17,322 $26,895 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 36.7 $51,600 $80,116 Other Retail Free-Standing Discount Store 1,000 SF GFA 9.47 $13,315 $20,673 Nursery (Garden Center) 1,000 SF GFA 13.6 $19,122 $29,689 Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 SF GFA 3.78 $5,315 $8,252 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 11.2 $15,747 $24,450 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 14.69 $20,654 $32,068 Shopping Center 1,000 SF GLA 7.04 $9,898 $15,368 Supermarket 1,000 SF GFA 16.56 $23,283 $36,150 Toy/Children's Superstore 1,000 SF GFA 9.80 $13,779 $21,393 Department Store 1,000 SF GFA 3.82 $5,371 $8,339 SERVICES Walk-In Bank 1,000 SF GFA 16.19 $22,763 $35,343 Drive-In Bank Drive-in Lanes 39.27 $55,214 $85,726 Hair Salon 1,000 SF GLA 3.25 $4,570 $7,095 Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 20 of 22 Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Exhibit 13 – G Schedule of Actual Water and Wastewater Impact Fees to be Collected Meter Size* Service Unit Equivalent Water Impact Fee (50% of Max) Wastewater Impact Fee (50% of Max) 5/8” x ¾” PD 0.67 $3,644 $989 ¾” PD 1.00 $5,466 $1,483 1” PD 1.67 $9,110 $2,471 1 ½” PD 3.33 $18,220 $4,942 2” PD 5.33 $29,152 $7,907 2” Compound 5.33 $29,152 $7,907 2” Turbine 6.67 $36,440 $9,884 3” Compound 11.67 $63,770 $17,296 3” Turbine 14.67 $80,168 $21,744 4” Compound 20.00 $109,320 $29,650 4” Turbine 28.00 $153,048 $41,510 6” Compound 45.00 $245,970 $66,713 6” Turbine 57.67 $315,206 $85,491 8” Compound 60.00 $327,960 $88,950 8” Turbine 160.00 $874,560 $237,200 10” Turbine 233.33 $1,275,400 $345,917 Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 21 of 22 Exhibit 13 – H Schedule of Actual Roadway Impact Fees to be Collected Land Use Description Development Unit Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit Impact Fee Per Development Unit Service Area 1 (100% of MAX) Service Area 2 (100.0% of MAX) PORT AND TERMINAL Truck Terminal Acre 7.48 $10,517 $16,329 INDUSTRIAL General Light Industrial 1,000 SF GFA 2.52 $3,543 $5,501 General Heavy Industrial 1,000 SF GFA 1.6 $2,250 $3,493 Industrial Park 1,000 SF GFA 0.76 $1,069 $1,659 Warehousing 1,000 SF GFA 0.68 $956 $1,484 Mini-Warehouse 1,000 SF GFA 2.52 $3,543 $5,501 RESIDENTIAL Single-Family Detached Housing Dwelling Unit 3.96 $5,568 $8,645 Apartment/Multi-family Dwelling Unit 2.24 $3,149 $4,890 Residential Condominium/Townhome Dwelling Unit 2.24 $3,149 $4,890 Mobile Home Park / Manufactured Housing Dwelling Unit 1.2 $1,687 $2,620 Senior Adult Housing-Detached Dwelling Unit 1.04 $1,462 $2,270 Senior Adult Housing-Attached Dwelling Unit 1.04 $1,462 $2,270 Assisted Living Beds 3.96 $5,568 $8,645 LODGING Hotel Room 1.93 $2,714 $4,213 Motel / Other Lodging Facilities Room 1.22 $1,715 $2,663 RECREATIONAL Golf Course Tee 1.10 $154,660 $240,130 Miniature Golf Course Acre 1.3 $1,828 $2,838 Golf Driving Range 1,000 SF GFA 4.91 $6,903 $10,719 Multiplex Movie Theater 1,000 SF GFA 54.92 $77,218 $119,890 Ice Skating Rink Hole 5.23 $7,353 $11,417 Racquet / Tennis Club Screens 15.01 $21,104 $32,767 Recreational Community Center Court 9.08 $12,766 $19,822 INSTITUTIONAL Church 1,000 SF GFA 1.96 $2,756 $4,279 Day Care Center 1,000 SF GFA 10.87 $15,283 $23,729 Primary/Middle School (1-8) Students 0.30 $422 $655 High School Students 0.24 $337 $524 Junior / Community College Students 0.44 $619 $961 University / College Students 0.60 $844 $1,310 MEDICAL Clinic 1,000 SF GFA 13.12 $18,447 $28,641 Hospital Beds 3.88 $5,455 $8,470 Nursing Home Beds 0.88 $1,237 $1,921 Animal Hospital/Veterinary Clinic 1,000 SF GFA 9.88 $13,891 $21,568 (Continued on next page) Chapter 13 – Impact Fees Page 22 of 22 Colleyville, Texas, Land Development Code Exhibit 13 – H Schedule of Actual Roadway Impact Fees to be Collected - Continued Land Use Description Development Unit Veh-Mi Per Dev- Unit Impact Fee Per Development Unit Service Area 1 (100% of MAX) Service Area 2 (100% of MAX) OFFICE Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 SF GFA 2.40 $3,374 $5,239 General Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 4.60 $6,468 $10,042 Medical-Dental Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 13.84 $19,459 $30,213 Single Tenant Office Building 1,000 SF GFA 6.84 $9,617 $14,932 Office Park 1,000 SF GFA 4.28 $6,018 $9,343 COMMERCIAL Automobile Related Automobile Care Center 1,000 SF Occ. GLA 4.15 $5,835 $9,059 Automobile Parts Sales 1,000 SF GFA 6.23 $8,759 $13,600 Gasoline/Service Station Vehicle Fueling Position 4.88 $6,861 $10,653 Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market Vehicle Fueling Position 3.69 $5,188 $8,055 Gasoline/Service Station w/ Conv Market and Car Wash Vehicle Fueling Position 5.44 $7,649 $11,876 New Car Sales 1,000 SF GFA 6.47 $9,097 $14,124 Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop Servicing Positions 1.99 $2,798 $4,344 Self-Service Car Wash Stall 6.38 $8,970 $13,928 Tire Store 1,000 SF GFA 4.15 $5,835 $9,059 Dining Fast Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 46.06 $64,760 $100,549 Fast Food Restaurant without Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 39.96 $56,184 $87,233 High Turnover (Sit-Down) Restaurant 1,000 SF GFA 15.70 $22,074 $34,273 Quality Restaurant 1,000 SF GFA 12.32 $17,322 $26,895 Coffee/Donut Shop with Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 36.70 $51,600 $80,116 Other Retail Free-Standing Discount Store 1,000 SF GFA 9.47 $13,315 $20,673 Nursery (Garden Center) 1,000 SF GFA 13.6 $19,122 $29,689 Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 SF GFA 3.78 $5,315 $8,252 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/o Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 11.2 $15,747 $24,450 Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-Thru Window 1,000 SF GFA 14.69 $20,654 $32,068 Shopping Center 1,000 SF GLA 7.04 $9,898 $15,368 Supermarket 1,000 SF GFA 16.56 $23,283 $36,150 Toy/Children's Superstore 1,000 SF GFA 9.80 $13,779 $21,393 Department Store 1,000 SF GFA 3.82 $5,371 $8,339 SERVICES Walk-In Bank 1,000 SF GFA 16.19 $22,763 $35,343 Drive-In Bank Drive-in Lanes 39.27 $55,214 $85,726 Hair Salon 1,000 SF GLA 3.25 $4,570 $7,095 PREPARED BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 801 CHERRY STREET, UNIT 11, SUITE 1300 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 PHONE: 817.335.6511 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER: F-928 PROJECT NUMBER: 061063055 PREPARED FOR CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 2022 Roadway, Water, and Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update ADOPTED BY COUNCIL: AUGUST 2, 2022 Executive Summary 2022 Impact Fee Study June 2022 Prepared for the City of Colleyville Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone 817 335 6511 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 061063055 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Executive Summary 1 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Impact Fees are a mechanism for funding the public infrastructure necessitated by new development. Across the country, they are used to fund police and fire facilities, parks, schools, roads, and utilities. In Texas, the legislature has allowed their use for roadway and drainage, water, and wastewater facilities. The Colleyville Impact Fee program was originally developed as a funding tool for infrastructure needs as a result of growth in the City in 1990 for roadway and water, with the addition of wastewater impact fees in 1995. In 2020, the City of Colleyville began exploring an update to the Roadway, Water, and Wastewater Impact Fees that were last updated in 2012. In the most basic terms, impact fees are meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development towards new infrastructure needs. Impact Fees are a mathematical calculation that determine a maximum fee that would be equivalent to growth paying for growth. This study’s purpose is to calculate the maximum impact fee per service unit of new growth. The Maximum Impact Fee is considered an appropriate measure of the impacts generated by a new unit of development on a City's infrastructure system. An impact fee program is anticipated to be designed so that it is predictable for both the development community and City. An impact fee program is transparent.This report describes in detail how the fee is calculated and how the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) monitors the Impact Fee program. An impact fee program is flexible in that funds can be used on priority projects and not just on projects adjacent to a specific development. An impact fee program is both equitable and proportional in that every new development pays an equal fee that is directly related to its systemwide impact. IMPACT FEE BASICS Service Areas A Service Area is a geographic area within which a unique maximum impact fee is determined. All fees collected within the Service Area must be spent on eligible improvements within the same Service Area. For Roadway Impact Fees, the Service Area may not exceed a 6-mile diameter trip length. In Colleyville, this results in the creation of two (2) separate Roadway Service Areas. For Water and Wastewater Impact Fees, a Service Area can be defined for both water and wastewater facilities that consists of the Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) boundary. Therefore, this study utilizes a singular Service Area for the Water and Wastewater components respectively. Executive Summary 2 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Land Use Assumptions The Impact Fee determination is required to be based on the projected growth and corresponding capacity needs in a 10-year window. This study considers the years 2020-2030. The 10-year increase in residential units is projected to be 653 units within the City Limits. The 2030 projections show an increase of 870,000 square feet of non-residential land uses over the 10-year window. These projections set the basis for determining loadings and demands to serve new growth. The distribution of residential and non-residential growth utilized information from undeveloped land area, future land use data from the 2015 Comprehensive Plan, “Destination Colleyville”, and input from City Staff on known future development locations. Service Units The “service unit” is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used to quantify the supply and demand for roads and utilities in the City. Service units are attributable to an individual unit of development and utilized to calculate the maximum impact fee of a development. For roadway purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle-mile. A “vehicle-mile” refers to the capacity consumed in a single lane by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length during the PM peak hour. The PM peak hour is the one-hour period during the afternoon/evening when the highest vehicular volumes are observed. In accordance with the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, the PM peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. The service unit for water and wastewater impact fees is based on the size of the individual water meters used to serve growth related development. The base water service unit is the water demand associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new residential unit. The base wastewater service unit is the wastewater flow associated with the smallest water meter issued for a new residential unit. The smallest water meter issued for a new residential unit in the City of Colleyville is a 3/4-inch meter. Capital Improvement Plans The City and project staff have identified the Roadway, Water, and Wastewater projects needed to accommodate the projected growth over the next ten (10) years within the City of Colleyville. These projects include existing, proposed, and recently completed projects that were determined based on their current or anticipated impact on each defined Service Area and the City as a whole. Executive Summary 3 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan The City of Colleyville Thoroughfare Plan is the ultimate plan for the roadway infrastructure within the City Limits. The projects on the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan were selected from the Thoroughfare Plan and cover existing, proposed, and completed roadway improvements, as well as intersection improvements with 10-year growth potential. The project team and City staff identified roadway and intersection projects with a projected total project cost (not impact fee eligible cost) of $98,304,382 over two (2) Roadway Service Areas. Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan The Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan was developed for the City of Colleyville based on recommended capital improvements outlines in the Water Master Plan, input from City Staff, and the population growth projections shown in the Land Use Assumptions. The recommended improvements will provide the required capacity and reliability to meet projected water demand through 2030. Elements of the water system, including storage facilities, pumping facilities, and the distribution network were evaluated against industry standards as outlined in the Design Criteria section of Water Impact Fee Chapter of this report. A total of seven (7) existing and five (5) proposed projects were identified to develop the Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. The total project cost (not impact fee eligible cost) to be evaluated is $11,627,893. Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Similar to the Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan, the Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan was developed to address system improvements driven by growth. Elements of the wastewater system, including gravity pipes, force mains, and lift stations were evaluated against industry standards as outlined in the Design Criteria section of the Wastewater Impact Fee Chapter of this Report. A total of four (4) existing and three (3) proposed projects were identified to develop the Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan. The total project cost (not impact fee eligible cost) to be evaluated is $1,926,073. Recoverable Project Costs Impact Fees are a one-time fee meant to recover the incremental cost of the impact of each new unit of development creating new infrastructure needs within a ten-year window. With this consideration, the maximum assessable impact fee does not specifically cover the entire cost of a roadway, water, or wastewater project. The calculations that determine the percentage of a project’s cost that is impact fee eligible are defined as the project’s recoverable cost. Executive Summary 4 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Roadway Recoverable Project Costs The recoverable costs for roadway projects are calculated by first determining the net capacity of vehicle- miles supplied to support future growth within a 10-year window. This net capacity is then multiplied by the percentage of roadway capacity added attributable to this 10-year growth. This growth percentage is obtained through the derivation of a transportation demand factor (TDF), which computes the total vehicle- miles associated to a single land use development unit. The TDF is applied to both the net vehicle-miles supplied and the vehicle-mile growth projections to calculate the growth percentage needed to determine the total recoverable project costs, which total $14,590,852 over two (2) Roadway Service Areas. Per state law this recoverable cost is reduced by $824,881 to account for future ad valorem tax revenues from the new development. Water Recoverable Project Costs The recoverable costs for water projects are calculated by determining the increase in water demand due to growth over the 10-year window. The City’s current and future populations were utilized to calculate the percent utilization of each identified impact fee eligible project. The change in utilization of each project is multiplied by the total project cost to determine total recoverable project cost. The total recoverable cost is then divided by the growth in additional service units to determine the maximum fee per service unit. The total recoverable project costs for the water distribution system is $5,404,564 and is reduced by $36,943 to account for future monthly utility capital project fees. Wastewater Recoverable Project Costs The process for calculating the recoverable wastewater costs is similar to the water financial analysis. The recoverable costs for wastewater projects are calculated by determining the increase in wastewater flows due to growth over the 10-year window. The City’s current and future populations were utilized to calculate the percent utilization of each identified impact fee eligible project. The change in utilization of each project is multiplied by the total project cost to determine total recoverable project cost. The total recoverable cost is then divided by the growth in additional service unites to determine the maximum fee per service unit. The total recoverable project costs for the wastewater collection system is $1,495,858 and is reduced by $10,581 to account for future monthly utility capital project fees. Executive Summary 5 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Calculation In simplest terms, the maximum impact fee allowable by law is calculated by dividing the recoverable cost of the Capital Improvement Plans by the number of new service units of development. In accordance with state law, both the cost of the Capital Improvement Plan and the number of new service units of development used in the equation are based on the growth and corresponding capacity needs projected to occur within a 10-year window. This calculation is performed for each service area individually; each service area has a stand-alone Capital Improvement Plan and 10-year growth projection. In practice, there are many factors that complicate this calculation. The 2022 maximum impact fee allowable by law for each service area is shown in the following table: Roadway Service Area Roadway Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) Water Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (3/4-inch Meter) Wastewater Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (3/4-inch Meter) 1 $1,406 $10,932 $2,965 2 $2,183 Adoption Process Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of impact fees. A Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee’s findings for consideration by the City Council. This CIAC also reviews the calculation and resulting maximum fees and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the CIAC is required to have adequate representation of the building and development communities. In Colleyville this is the Planning & Zoning Commission with an ETJ representative. The City Council then conducts a public hearing on the Land Use Assumptions, Capacity Plan, and Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the CIAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the CIAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires a minimum of one (1) public hearing before Council to amend an existing impact fee program. The public hearing to discuss the land use assumptions, capital improvements plan, and present a proposal for impact fee calculations will be held on July 19, 2022. The first reading to amend the existing impact fee ordinance will also occur on July 19, 2022 and the second reading will be on August 2, 2022. Executive Summary 6 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Maximum Assessable and Adopted Impact Fee Comparison to Previous 2006 and 2012 Updates Updates to the Roadway, Water, and Wastewater Impact Fees were previously completed in 2006 and 2012. A maximum assessable impact fee allowable by law was calculated, reviewed, and amendments were made to the previous impact fee ordinances in place as shown in the following table: Impact Fee 2006 2012 2022 Maximum Assessable Adopted (% of Max.) Maximum Assessable Adopted (% of Max.) Maximum Assessable Adopted (% of Max.) Roadway Service Area 1 $1,843 $542 (29.4%)$2,360 $1,222 (51.8%)$1,406 $1,406 (100%) Roadway Service Area 2 $2,165 $541 (25%)$2,446 $1,223 (50%)$2,183 $2,183 (100%) Water $9,963 $2,491 (25%)$6,100 $2,491 (40.8%)$10,932 $5,466 (50%) Wastewater $2,570 $643 (25%)$2,521 $643 (25.5%)$2,965 $1,483 (50%) Chapter 1 Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study June 2022 Prepared for the City of Colleyville Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone 817 335 6511 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 061063055 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Land Use Assumptions i June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 Purpose ...................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Components of the Land Use Assumptions Chapter................................................................... 8 Land Use Assumptions Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 8 Impact Fee Study Service Areas................................................................................................................................. 8 10-Year Growth Assumptions ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Land Use Assumptions Summary ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Land Use Assumptions Methodology ......................................................................................... 9 1.4 Impact Fee Service Areas ......................................................................................................... 11 Service Area Definition ............................................................................................................................................. 11 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas ...................................................................................................................... 11 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Service Areas ........................................................................................... 11 1.5 Data Format ............................................................................................................................. 15 Impact Fee Service Areas: ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Retail: ....................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Service: .................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Basic:......................................................................................................................................................................... 15 1.6 10-Year Growth Summary ....................................................................................................... 16 1.7 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 17 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1.1 Roadway Service Area ......................................................................................................................... 12 Exhibit 1.2 Water Service Area............................................................................................................................... 13 Exhibit 1.3 Wastewater Service Area .................................................................................................................... 14 LIST OF TABLES Future Land Use Assumptions of Currently Undeveloped Land .................................................... 10 Residential and Employment Land Use Assumptions Growth Projections (2020 – 2030) ...... 16 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Historic Single-Family Building Permits .................................................................................................. 9 Figure 1.2 Historic Commercial Building Permits .................................................................................................. 10 Land Use Assumptions 7 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 1.1 PURPOSE Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure Texas political subdivisions must follow in order to assess impact fees for new development. The first step required in updating impact fees is the development of Land Use Assumptions. These Land Use Assumptions, which include both residential and employment estimates, form the basis for the development of impact fee Capital Improvement Plans (CIP) for roadway, water, and wastewater facilities. Reasonable future growth estimates are necessary in order to aid the City of Colleyville in establishing the need for capital improvements required to serve future development. In accordance with Chapter 395, Kimley-Horn has compiled the information required to complete the Land Use Assumptions using the following sources: •City of Colleyville 2035 Comprehensive Plan, Destination Colleyville (2015); •City of Colleyville Thoroughfare Plan (2015); •City of Colleyville Future Land Use; •Building permit data; and •City of Colleyville Staff. Land Use Assumptions 8 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 1.2 COMPONENTS OF THE LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS CHAPTER The Land Use Assumptions include the following components: LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS METHODOLOGY An overview of the general methodology used to generate the land use assumptions. IMPACT FEE STUDY SERVICE AREAS Explanation of the divisions of Colleyville into service areas for roadway, water, and wastewater facilities. 10-YEAR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS Walk through of the growth projections for 2020-2030. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS SUMMARY A synopsis of the land use assumptions. Land Use Assumptions 9 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 1.3 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS METHODOLOGY The residential and employment growth projections formulated in this chapter were calculated using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles. The following factors were considered in developing these projections: •Character, type, density, location and quantity of existing development; •Building permit data; •Probable future developments; •Location of vacant land; •Future Land Use; and •Physical holding capacity of Colleyville. The City of Colleyville is nearing full build-out. As available greenfield developable land is becoming scarcer, new building permits are not expected to follow the same pattern of past years. For this reason, future land use assumptions in Colleyville are based on availability of land rather than building permit data history. Building permit data was analyzed and is presented as reference in Figures 1.1-1.2. Figure 1.1 Historic Single-Family Building Permits Land Use Assumptions 10 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Figure 1.2 Historic Commercial Building Permits Growth projections from 2020 – 2030 for the entire City of Colleyville were established using information from the 2035 Comprehensive Plan, available vacant land, probable future developments, and generally accepted planning principles. These City-wide growth projections were broken out into Service Area growth projections based the location of the probable future developments and an aerial overview determining the location of vacant land and the future land use. Table 1.1 shows the amount of acreage identified as potential development over the next ten years. The land use was assumed based on either current zoning or the future land use plan. Future Land Use Assumptions of Currently Undeveloped Land Undeveloped Land Acres Residential (R-20)35 Residential (R-40)204 Commercial 26 Colleyville Boulevard Corridor 46 Total 311 Residential (R-20)29 Residential (R-40)60 Commercial 2 Colleyville Boulevard Corridor 26 Total 117 Residential (R-20)64 Residential (R-40)264 Commercial 28 Colleyville Boulevard Corridor 72 Total 428 TOTAL SERVICE AREA 2 (WEST OF SH26) SERVICE AREA 1 (EAST OF SH26) Land Use Assumptions 11 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 1.4 IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREAS SERVICE AREA DEFINITION According to Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code, a Service Area refers to the area within the corporate boundaries or extraterritorial jurisdiction of the political subdivision to be served by the capital improvement or facilities specified in the Capital Improvement Plan. Funds collected in the specific service areas must be spent in the service area collected. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREAS The geographic boundaries of the two (2) impact fee service areas for roadway facilities are shown in Exhibit 1.1. The roadway service areas cover the entire corporate boundary of the City of Colleyville. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that “the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles.” Service Area 1 is located east of SH 26/Colleyville Blvd. Service Area 2 is located west of SH 26/Colleyville Blvd. WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREAS The geographic boundaries of the impact fee service area for water and wastewater facilities are shown in Exhibit 1.2 and 1.3, respectively. The water and wastewater impact fee service areas include the area in the City’s water and wastewater Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN). Grapevine Bedford EulessHurst Keller Southlake 1 2 January 2021 ´0 0.6 1.2 Miles Exhibit 1.1Roadway Service Areas Legend City Limits Roadway Service Area 1 Roadway Service Area 2 ST121 ¬«26 vu3029 vu1938 ST183 ST360 June 2022 Grapevine Bedford EulessHurst Keller Southlake November 2020 ´0 0.6 1.2 Miles Exhibit 1.2Water Service Area Legend City Limits Water ServiceArea ST121 ¬«26 vu3029 vu1938 ST183 ST360 January 2021November 2021November 2021June 2022 Grapevine Bedford EulessHurst Keller Southlake November 2020 ´0 0.6 1.2 Miles Exhibit 1.3Wastewater Service Area Legend City Limits WastewaterService Area ST121 ¬«26 vu3029 vu1938 ST183 ST360 January 2021June 2022 Land Use Assumptions 15 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 1.5 DATA FORMAT The population and employment estimates were all compiled in accordance with the following categories and format: IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREAS: Larger zones, which correspond to the proposed roadway, water, and wastewater facilities service areas (as described in the previous section). UNITS: Number of dwelling units, both single and multifamily. POPULATION: Number of people based on person per dwelling unit factors. EMPLOYMENT: Square feet of building area based on three (3) different classifications: Retail: Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector (i.e. grocery stores and restaurants). Service: Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as government and other professional offices. Basic: Land use activities that produce goods and services, including those that are exported outside the local economy (i.e. manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale, trade, warehousing, and other industrial uses). Land Use Assumptions 16 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 1.6 10-YEAR GROWTH SUMMARY Table 1.2 summarizes the residential and employment 10-year growth projections within the City Limits. These projections were found using the undeveloped acreage and future land use assumptions, as shown in Table 1.1. Different land use densities were used based on the Comprehensive Plan. For residential land use R-20, a density of 2 units per acre was assumed, while for R-40, 1 unit per acre was assumed. A 0.2 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) was applied to all acreage assumed to be a non-residential land use. Residential and Employment Land Use Assumptions Growth Projections (2020 – 2030) Service Area Residential Employment Units Single Family Basic Sq Ft Service Sq Ft Retail Sq Ft 1 379 23,000 123,000 97,000 2 274 40,000 337,000 250,000 City Total 653 63,000 460,000 347,000 Land Use Assumptions 17 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 1.7 SUMMARY The following is a land use assumptions summary for the City limits. This City limit summary is equivalent to the roadway land use assumptions. •The ten year (2020 - 2030) residential growth projection is approximately: •City Total = 653 Dwelling Units •The ten-year (2020 - 2030) employment growth projection is approximately: •City Total = 870,000 ft2 Chapter 2 Roadway Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study June 2022 Prepared for the City of Colleyville Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone 817 335 6511 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 061063055 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Roadway Impact Fee Study i June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 18 2.2 Land Use Assumptions ............................................................................................................. 19 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... 19 Roadway Impact Fee Service Areas ...................................................................................................................... 19 2.3 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan.................................................................... 21 2.4 Methodology For Roadway Impact Fees .................................................................................. 24 Service Areas .............................................................................................................................................................. 24 Service Units ................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Cost Per Service Unit.................................................................................................................................................. 26 Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Methodology ................................................................................................. 26 Overview of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Worksheets ....................................................................... 27 Project Information ................................................................................................................................................ 28 Roadway Construction Costs................................................................................................................................ 28 Construction Component Allowances .................................................................................................................. 29 CIP Allowances ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 Impact Fee Project Cost ........................................................................................................................................ 29 Summary of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costs ........................................................................................................ 29 Service Unit Calculation............................................................................................................................................. 31 2.5 Roadway Impact Fee Calculation ............................................................................................. 36 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit .............................................................................................. 36 Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit.............................................................................................................. 38 Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development .................................................................................................... 40 2.6 Sample Calculations ................................................................................................................. 46 2.7 Adoption and Administration of Roadway Impact Fees .......................................................... 47 Adoption Process ........................................................................................................................................................ 47 Collection and Use of Roadway Impact Fees ....................................................................................................... 47 2.8 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 48 Roadway Impact Fee Study ii June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 2.1 Roadway Impact Fee Service Area .................................................................................................... 20 Exhibit 2.2 Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan ........................................................................... 23 LIST OF TABLES Residential and Employment Land Use Assumptions Growth Projections (2020 – 2030) .............. 19 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area 1 ................................ 21 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area 2 ................................ 22 Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities .................................................................................................. 25 Service Volumes for Existing Facilities ...................................................................................................... 25 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area 1 .... 30 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area 2 .... 30 Transportation Demand Factor Calculations ........................................................................................... 34 10-Year Growth Projections ....................................................................................................................... 35 Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation................................................................. 36 Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee ......................................................................................... 40 Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) ...................................................................... 42 Land Use Descriptions ................................................................................................................................ 44 Roadway Impact Fee Study 18 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2.1 INTRODUCTION Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code describes the procedure political subdivisions must follow to create and implement impact fees. Chapter 395 defines an Impact Fee as “a charge or assessment imposed by a political subdivision against new development to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development.” The City has retained Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide professional transportation engineering services for the 2022 Rodway Impact Fee Update. This chapter includes details of the Roadway Impact Fee calculation methodology in accordance with Chapter 395, the applicable Land Use Assumptions, development of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP, and the Land Use Equivalency Table. This report references two of the basic inputs to the Roadway Impact Fee: 1.Land Use Assumptions (LUA) 2.Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (RIF CIP) Information from these LUA and RIF CIP are used extensively throughout the remainder of the report. There is a detailed discussion of the methodology for the computation of impact fees. This discussion is broken into three components: 1.Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees 2.Roadway Impact Fee Calculation 3.Plan for the Roadway Impact Fee Credit The components of the Methodology for Roadway Impact Fees include development of: • Service Areas •Service Units •Cost Per Service Unit •RIF CIP Costing Methodology •Summary of RIF CIP Costs •Service Unit Calculation The Roadway Impact Fee Calculation includes the calculation of the: •Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit •Service Unit Demand Per Unit of Development The Plan for Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit details the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit that may be applied under Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Roadway Impact Fee Study 19 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2.2 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS SUMMARY The methodology for land use assumptions is presented in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study.Table 2.1 presents the land use assumptions that were utilized in the roadway impact fee development. This table illustrates growth that is projected for the City of Colleyville from 2020 – 2030. These values were derived based on undeveloped land area, future land use data from the 2035 Comprehensive Plan, “Destination Colleyville”, and input from City Staff on known future development locations. Residential and Employment Land Use Assumptions Growth Projections (2020 – 2030) Service Area Residential Units Employment Units Single Family Basic Sq Ft Service Sq Ft Retail Sq Ft 1 379 23,000 123,000 97,000 2 274 40,000 337,000 250,000 City Total 653 63,000 460,000 347,000 ROADWAY IMPACT FEE SERVICE AREAS The geographic boundary of the proposed roadway impact fee service areas is shown in Exhibit 2.1. The City of Colleyville is divided into two (2) service areas. The service areas were based upon input from the City of Colleyville staff. ·Service Area 1 is located east of SH 26/Colleyville Blvd. ·Service Area 2 is located west of SH 26/Colleyville Blvd. All thoroughfare facilities are assumed to be 100% within the City Limits, apart from facilities that are on the boundary of the service areas. In this instance, the proposed boundary is intended to follow the centerline of the roadway. Grapevine Bedford EulessHurst Keller Southlake 1 2 January 2021 ´0 0.6 1.2 Miles Exhibit 2.1Roadway Service Areas Legend City Limits Roadway Service Area 1 Roadway Service Area 2 ST121 ¬«26 vu3029 vu1938 ST183 ST360 June 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study 21 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2.3 ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The City has identified the roadway projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City. The Colleyville Thoroughfare Plan is the ultimate plan for the infrastructure within the City Limits. Only capacity improvements still needed to build out the Thoroughfare Plan to accommodate the expected growth within the next 10-years are included in the RIF CIP. The RIF CIP consists of 3 categories of projects. They are as follows: •Widening – Existing roadways not currently built to the ultimate classification in the Thoroughfare Plan and must be completely reconstructed. •Completed – Completed project with excess capacity available to serve new growth that the City contributed to financially. •Intersections – Major intersection improvements identified by the City and identified as either completed or proposed. All the roadway facilities identified are part of the currently adopted Thoroughfare Plan. The proposed RIF CIP is listed in Tables 2.2 – 2.3 and mapped in Exhibit 2.2. The tables show the length of each project as well as the facility’s Thoroughfare Plan classification. The RIF CIP was developed in conjunction with input from City of Colleyville staff and represents projects that will be needed to accommodate the growth projected in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area 1 Roadway Impact Fee Study 22 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan – Service Area 2 !(8 !(1 !(3 !(5 !(9 !(6 !(7 !(4 !(2 Glade RdColleyvilleBlvd Cheek-Sparger Rd John McCain RdPleasantRunRd Heritage AveJackson RdMartin PkwyL.D.Loc k e t t R dPrecinctLine RdPool RdBransford RdWestcoat DrLavaca Trl Ban d i t T rlRiverwalkDrBr o w n T r l BedfordRdTinker Rd McDonw ell S c h o o l Rd W Shelton Dr Centerpark RobertsRdWhite D r Bogart Dr Main St C hu rchSt Hall-Johnson Rd 1-I 1-D1-B/2-S2-F 2-C 2-L2-Q 2-J2-H1-J2-M1-F2-G1-A/2-R1-E1-G 2-I 1-K2-O 1-H 2-B 2-D 2-K2-E 2-A 1-C2-N 2-P 1-L 1 2 Grapevine Bedford EulessHurst Keller Southlake September 2021 ´0 0.6 1.2 Miles Exhibit 2.2Roadway CIP ST121 ST360 CIP Projects CompletedPreviously Completed 2020 Funded 2021 Impact FeeEligible Intersections CompletedProject Proposed Project Cost Included inRoadway Project City Limits Roadway ServiceArea 1 Roadway ServiceArea 2¬«26 vu3029 vu1938 ST183 June 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study 24 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2.4 METHODOLOGY FOR ROADWAY IMPACT FEES SERVICE AREAS The two (2) service areas used in the 202 Roadway Impact Fee Study are shown in the previously referenced Exhibit 2.1. These service areas cover the entire corporate boundary of the City of Colleyville. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that “the service area is limited to an area within the corporate boundaries of the political subdivision and shall not exceed six (6) miles.” The service areas in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are consistent with the specification of Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Service Area 1 is located east of SH 26/Colleyville Boulevard and Service Area 2 is located west of SH 26/Colleyville Boulevard. Both service areas are approximately four (4) miles in diameter. SERVICE UNITS The “service unit” is a measure of consumption or use of the capital facilities by new development. In other words, it is the unit of measure used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study to quantify the supply and demand for roads in the City. For transportation purposes, the service unit is defined as a vehicle-mile. Below is the definition for vehicle-mile. Vehicle-Mile: The capacity consumed in a single lane in the PM peak hour by a vehicle making a trip one mile in length. The PM Peak is used as the basis for transportation planning and the estimation of trips caused by new development. Total Vehicle-Miles of Supply: Based on the total length (miles), number of lanes, and capacity (vehicles per hour) provided by the Thoroughfare Plan (see Appendix B). Total Vehicle-Miles of Demand: Based on the 10-year growth projections. The demand is equal to PM Trip Rate (trips) * Trip Length (miles). The capacity values used in the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study are based upon generally accepted thoroughfare capacity criteria.Tables 2.4 and 2.5 show the service volumes as a function of the City of Colleyville’s Thoroughfare Plan classifications. Roadway Impact Fee Study 25 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Service Volumes for Proposed Facilities Thoroughfare Plan Classification Median Configuration Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane-Mile of Roadway Facility P6D - Principal Arterial Divided 900 M4D - Minor Arterial 725 M2D - Minor Arterial 725 M4U - Minor Arterial Undivided 650 M2U - Minor Arterial 650 C3U - Major Collector 575 C2U - Major Collector 525 C2U - Minor Collector 525 *Note: Used in Appendix B –CIP Units of Supply Service Volumes for Existing Facilities Existing Section Description Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane- Mile of Roadway Facility C2U Minor Collector - Two-lane undivided 425 C2U Major Collector - Two-lane undivided 425 C3U Major Collector -Three-lane undivided (W/ TWLTL)575 M2U Minor Arterial - Two-lane undivided 650 M2D Minor Arterial - Two-lane divided 700 M4U Minor Arterial - Four-lane undivided 650 M4D Minor Arterial - Four-lane divided 700 M5U Minor Arterial -Five-lane undivided (W/ TWLTL)725 P6U Principal Arterial - Six-lane undivided 750 P6D Principal Arterial - Six-lane divided 900 Roadway Impact Fee Study 26 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas COST PER SERVICE UNIT A fundamental step in the impact fee process is to establish the cost for each service unit. In the case of the Roadway Impact Fee, this is the cost for each vehicle-mile of travel. Thus, it is the cost to construct a roadway (lane-mile) needed to accommodate a vehicle-mile of travel. The cost per service unit is calculated for each service area based on the roadway projects within that service area. The second component of the cost per service unit is the determination of the number of service units in each service area. This number is the measure of the growth in transportation demand that is projected to occur in the ten-year period. Chapter 395 requires that Impact Fees be assessed only to pay for growth projected to occur in the city limits within the next ten-years. As noted earlier, the units of demand are vehicle-miles of travel. ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP COSTING METHODOLOGY All of the project costs for a facility which serves the overall transportation system are eligible to be included in the RIF CIP. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code specifies that the allowable costs are “…including and limited to the: 1.Construction contract price; 2.Surveying and engineering fees; 3.Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney’s fees, and expert witness fees; and 4.Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the CIP who is not an employee of the political subdivision.” The engineer’s opinion of the probable costs of the projects in the RIF CIP are based, in part, on the calculation of a unit cost of construction. This means that a cost per linear foot of roadway is calculated based on an average price for the various components of roadway construction. This allows the probable cost to be determined by the type of facility being constructed, the number of lanes, and the length of the project. The costs for location-specific items such as bridges, highway ramps, drainage structures, or any other special components are added to each project, as appropriate. In addition, future Colleyville Boulevard from Brown Trail to Cheek Sparger Road has been included in the CIP as a 20% portion of the total cost where the City anticipates contributing a portion of the total project costs. This cost assumption is based on the typical cost that the City is responsible for in a state project such as utility adjustments, street lighting, landscaping, and engineering and survey. Based upon discussions with City of Colleyville staff, Roadway Impact Fee Study 27 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas State, County, and developer-driven projects in which the City has contributed a portion of the total project cost have been included in the RIF CIP as lump sum costs. The following is a detailed description of the costing worksheet/methodology for the RIF CIP. Overview of Roadway Impact Fee CIP Costing Worksheets For each project a specific costing worksheet has been developed (see Appendix A). Each worksheet contains project information, construction pay items, construction component allowances, and a summary of costs and allowances. An example costing sheet can be seen below. Project Information Roadway Construction Costs Construction Component Allowances Impact Fee Project Costs CIP Allowances Roadway Impact Fee Study 28 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Project Information In order to correctly estimate the cost of a roadway project, several attributes are first identified: •Project Number – Identifies which Service Area the project is in with a corresponding number. The corresponding number does not represent any prioritizations and is used only to identify projects. •Name – A unique identifier for each project. •Limits – Represents the beginning and ending location for each project. •Impact Fee Class – The costing class to be used in the analysis. The impact fee class provides the width for the various elements in the roadway. The construction costs are variable, based on the proposed Thoroughfare Plan classification of the roadway. For example, M4U indicates an undivided Major Arterial with 4 lanes. An M4U Impact Fee Class means the entire roadway is to be constructed. Additional classifications are utilized in cases where a portion of the facility currently exists and the road is only to be widened. The following notations are used for these projects: o “(1/2)” for facilities where half the facility still needs to be constructed •Ultimate Class – The functional classification on the City of Colleyville’s Thoroughfare Plan. •Length (ft) – The distance measured in feet that is used to cost out the project. •Service Area(s) – Represents the service area where the project is located. Multiple service areas will be listed if the project lies along a service area boundary. •Description – Used to describe the project type assumed in the costing such as a widening or completed. Roadway Construction Costs A typical roadway project consists of a number of costs, including the following: construction, design engineering, survey, and right-of-way acquisition. While the construction cost component of a project may actually consist of approximately 100 various pay items, a simplified approach was used for developing the conceptual level project costs. The pay items are listed below: •Street Excavation •Lime Stabilization •Concrete Pavement •Earthwork/Topsoil •Sidewalk/Trail •Concrete Driveway Approach Roadway Impact Fee Study 29 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Construction Component Allowances A percentage of the roadway construction cost is allotted for various major construction component allowances, as appropriate. These allowances include preparation of ROW, traffic control, signage and pavement markings, drainage, street lighting, minor utility adjustments, turf/erosion control, and basic landscaping. If the project type is “New,” traffic control was set to 0%. If the project type is “Widening”, traffic control was set to 5%. CIP Allowances To determine the total Impact Fee project cost, 15% of the Roadway Construction Costs and Construction Component Allowances subtotal is added for contingency and 6% for mobilization. Impact Fee Project Costs The Impact Fee Project Cost Total is then the Roadway Construction Costs, Construction Component Allowances, and CIP Allowances. In addition, 18% of the Construction Cost total is added for engineering, surveying, and testing. If the project type is “New”, an additional 30% was added for ROW/easement acquisition; if the project type is “Widening”, a ROW/easement acquisition was set to 15%. State highway projects were included with a projected contribution of 20% of the total project. Project cost total for some projects were based on cost estimates from the City, rather than the above methodology. SUMMARY OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP COSTS Tables 2.6 – 2.7 are the 10-Year RIF CIP project lists for each service area with planning level project costs. Individual project cost worksheets can be seen in Appendix A, Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections. It should be noted that these tables reflect only conceptual-level opinions or assumptions regarding the portions of future project costs that are potentially recoverable through impact fees. Actual project costs are likely to change with time and are dependent on market and economic conditions that cannot be predicted. The RIF CIP establishes the list of projects for which Impact Fees may be utilized. Projects not included in the RIF CIP are not eligible to receive impact fee funding. The cost projections utilized in this study should not be utilized for the City’s construction CIP. Roadway Impact Fee Study 30 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area 1 a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Colleyville b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 10-Year Roadway Impact Fee CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Projections – Service Area 2 a.These planning level cost projections have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Projects within the City of Colleyville. b.These planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. Roadway Impact Fee Study 31 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas SERVICE UNIT CALCULATION The basic service unit for the computation of Colleyville’s Roadway Impact Fee is the vehicle-mile of travel during the afternoon peak-hour. To determine the cost per service unit, it is necessary to project the growth in vehicle-miles of travel for the service areas for the ten-year period. The growth in vehicle-miles from 2020 to 2030 is based upon projected changes in residential units and employment for the period. These growth projections are discussed in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study. For the purposes of impact fees, all developed and developable land is categorized as either residential or non-residential. For residential land uses, the existing and projected number of dwelling units are estimated. The number of dwelling units in each service area is multiplied by a transportation demand factor (discussed in more detail below) to compute the vehicle-miles of travel that occur during the afternoon peak hour. This factor indicates the average amount of demand created by the residential land uses in the service area. For non-residential land uses, the process is similar. Existing and projected number of building square footages for three (3) categories of employment – basic, service, and retail – are provided. These categories correspond to an aggregation of other specific land use categories based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). Building square footage is the most common independent variable for the estimation of non- residential trips in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. This characteristic is more appropriate than the number of employees, because building square footage is tied more closely to trip generation and is known at the time of application for any development that would require the assessment of an impact fee. The existing and projected land use assumptions for the dwelling units and the square footage of basic, service, and retail land uses provide the basis for the projected increase in vehicle-miles of travel. As noted earlier, a transportation demand factor is applied to these values and then summed to calculate the total peak hour vehicle-miles of demand for each service area. The transportation demand factors are aggregate rates derived from two sources – the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition and information from the National Household Travel Survey (NHTS). The ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition provides the number of trips that are produced or attracted to the land use for each dwelling unit, square foot of building, or other corresponding unit. For the retail category of land uses, the rate is adjusted to account for the fact that a percentage of retail trips are made by people who would otherwise be traveling past that Roadway Impact Fee Study 32 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas particular establishment anyway, such as a trip between work and home. For example, a stop at a nearby supermarket on the way home from work does not create a new trip onto the roadway network. These trips are called pass-by trips, and since the travel demand is accounted for in the land use calculations relative to the primary trip, it is necessary to discount the retail trip generation rates to avoid double counting trips. The next component of the transportation demand factor accounts for the length of each trip. The average trip length for each category is based on the region-wide travel characteristics survey conducted by NHTS, requirements in Chapter 395, and other generally accepted planning principles. Roadway Impact Fee Study 33 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas The computation of the transportation demand factor is based on the following equation: TDF = T * (1 – Pb) * LMax Where…LMaxIndustrial = min (L * OD or 6) OR LMax = min (L * OD or 3) Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor, T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips / unit), Pb = Pass-By Discount (% of trips), L = Average Trip Length (miles), LMax = Maximum Trip Length (miles), and OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%) The maximum trip length was limited to four (4) miles for all land uses based on the maximum trip length within each service area. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code allows for a service area of six (6) miles; however, the service area within the City of Colleyville is approximated to be a four (4) mile distance. The adjustment made to the average trip length statistic in the computation of the maximum trip length is the origin-destination reduction. This adjustment is made because the RIF is charged to both the origin and destination end of the trip. For example, impact fee methodology will account for a trip from home to work within Colleyville to both residential and non-residential land uses. To avoid counting these trips twice as both residential and non-residential trips, a 50% origin- destination (OD) reduction factor is applied. Therefore, only half of the trip length is assessed to each land use, and the total trip is only counted once. This methodology is consistent with that used in the National Household Travel Survey. Table 2.8 shows the derivation of the Transportation Demand Factor for the residential land use and the three (3) non-residential land use categories. The values utilized for all variables shown in the transportation demand factor equation are also shown in the table. Roadway Impact Fee Study 34 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Transportation Demand Factor Calculations Variable Residential Basic Service RetailSingle Family T 0.99 0.63 1.15 3.81 Pb 0%0%0%34% LMax*4.0 4.0 4.0 2.8 TDF 3.96 2.52 4.60 7.04 *LMax is 4 miles for all land uses apart from Retail;therefore,this lower trip length is used for calculating the TDF for the se land uses. Variables: TDF = Transportation Demand Factor,L = Average Trip Length (miles), T = Trip Rate (peak hour trips /unit),LMax = Maximum Trip Length (miles), and Pb = Pass-By Discount (% of trips),OD = Origin-Destination Reduction (50%) The application of the demographic projections and the transportation demand factors are presented in the 10-Year Growth Projections in Table 2.9. This table shows the total growth in total vehicle-miles by service area between the years 2020 and 2030. These estimates and projections lead to the Vehicle-Miles of Travel for the 10-year period. Roadway Impact Fee Study 35 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2020-2030 Growth Projections1TOTALTrip RateTDF2VEHICLEMILES3BASIC SERVICE RETAILBASIC6SERVICE7RETAIL8BASIC SERVICE RETAIL TOTALVEHICLEMILES100.990.631.152.5111,501 23,000 123,000 97,00058 566 683 1,307 2,80821,085 40,000 337,000 250,000101 1,550 1,760 3,411 4,496Totals2,586 63,000 460,000 347,000159 2,116 2,443 4,718 7,304VEHICLE-MILES OF INCREASE11(2020 - 2030)Notes:12,8081From Land Use Assumptions (included in 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Report)24,4962Transportation Demand Factor for each Service Area (from LUVMET) using Single Family Detached Housing land use andtrip generation rate3Calculated by multiplying TDF by the number of dwelling units4From Land Use Assumptions included in 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Report5Trip generation rateand Transportation Demand Factors from LUVMET for each land use6'Basic' corresponds to General Light Industrial land use andtrip generation rate7'Service' corresponds to General Office land use andtrip generation rate8'Retail' corresponds to Shopping Center land use andtrip generation rate9Calculated by multiplying Transportation Demand Factor by the number of thousand square feet for each land use10Residential plus non-residential vehicle-mile totals for each Service Area11Total Vehicle-Miles represent the increase in vehicle-miles over 10-yearsSERVICEAREAVEH-MILES653SERVICEAREARESIDENTIAL VEHICLE-MILESSQUARE FEET4TRANS. DEMAND FACTOR5NON-RESIDENTIAL VEHICLE-MILES9DWELLINGUNITS3792743.962.52 4.60 7.04Table 2.9 10-Year Growth Projections Roadway Impact Fee Study 36 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2.5 ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CALCULATION MAXIMUM ASSESSABLE IMPACT FEE PER SERVICE UNIT This section presents the maximum assessable impact fee rate calculated for each service area. The maximum assessable impact fee is the sum of the eligible RIF CIP costs for the service area divided by the growth in travel attributable to new development projected to occur within the 10- year period. A majority of the components of this calculation have been described and presented in previous sections of this report. The purpose of this section is to document the computation for each service area and to demonstrate that the guidelines provided by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code have been addressed. Table 2.10 illustrates the computation of the maximum assessable impact fee computed for each service area. Each row in the table is numbered to simplify explanation of the calculation. The calculation of the maximum assessable impact fee is shown in Table 2.11. Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation Line Title Description 1 Total Vehicle-Miles of Capacity Added by the RIF CIP The total number of vehicle-miles added to the service area based on the capacity, length, and number of lanes in each project (from Appendix B – RIF CIP Units of Supply) Each project identified in the CIP will add a certain amount of capacity to the City’s roadway network based on its length and classification. This line displays the total amount added within each service area. 2 Total Vehicle-Miles of Existing Demand A measure of the amount of traffic currently using the roadway facilities upon which capacity is being added. (from Appendix B – RIF CIP Units of Supply) A number of facilities identified in the CIP have traffic currently utilizing a portion of their existing capacity. This line displays the total amount of capacity along these facilities currently being used by existing traffic. 3 Total Vehicle-Miles of Existing Deficiencies Number of vehicle-miles of travel that are not accommodated by the existing roadway system (from Appendix C – Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory) A number of facilities identified in the CIP have traffic currently utilizing a portion of their existing capacity. This line displays the total amount of capacity along these facilities currently being used by existing traffic. Roadway Impact Fee Study 37 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 4 Net Amount of Vehicle- Miles of Capacity Added A measurement of the number of vehicle-miles added by the RIF CIP that will not be utilized by existing demand (Line 1 – Line 2 – Line 3) This calculation identifies the portion of the RIF CIP (in vehicle-miles) that may be recoverable through the collection of impact fees. 5 Total Cost of the RIF CIP within the Service Area The total cost of the roadway projects within each service area (from Table 2.6 – 2.7: 10-Year RIF CIP with Conceptual Level Cost Opinions) This line simply identifies the total cost of all Roadway projects identified in each service area. 6 Cost of Net Capacity Supplied The total RIF CIP cost (Line 5) prorated by the ratio of Net Capacity Added (Line 4) to Total Capacity Added (Line 1).[(Line 4 / Line 1) * (Line 5)] Using the ratio of vehicle-miles added by the RIF CIP available to serve future growth to the total vehicle-miles added, the total cost of the RIF CIP is reduced to the amount available for future growth (i.e. excluding existing usage and deficiencies). 7 Cost to Meet Existing Needs and Usage The difference between the Total Cost of the Roadway Impact Fee CIP (Line 5) and the Cost of the Net Capacity supplied (Line 6) (Line 5 – Line 6) This line is provided for information purposes only – it is to present the portion of the total cost of the RIF CIP that is required to meet existing demand. 8 Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand over Ten Years Based upon the growth projection provided in Chapter 1: Land Use Assumptions for the 2022 Impact Fee Study, an estimate of the number of new vehicle-miles within the service area over the next ten years (from Table 2.9) This line presents the amount of growth (in vehicle-miles) projected to occur within each service area over the next ten years. 9 Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth The result of dividing Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand (Line 8) by the Net Amount of Capacity Added (Line 4), limited to 100%. This calculation is required by Chapter 395 to ensure capacity added is attributable to new growth.10 Chapter 395 Check Roadway Impact Fee Study 38 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas In order to ensure that the vehicle-miles added by the RIF CIP do not exceed the amount needed to accommodate growth beyond the ten-year window, a comparison of the two values is performed. If the number of vehicle-miles added by the RIF CIP exceeds the growth projected to occur in the next ten years, the RIF CIP cost is reduced accordingly. This does not occur in either service area. 11 Cost of RIF CIP Attributable to New Growth The result of multiplying the Cost of Net Capacity Added (Line 6) by the Percent of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, limited to 100% (Line 10) This value is the total RIF CIP project costs (excluding financial costs) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering the limitations to impact fees required by the Texas legislature. 12 Pre-Credit Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (without financing) Found by dividing the Cost of the CIP by the Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 11 /Line 8) This value is the total pre-credit maximum fee per service unit (without financing) that may be recovered through impact fees. This line is determined considering limitations to impact fee required by Texas Legislature. PLAN FOR THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CREDIT Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code requires the RIF CIP to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014 of the Code requires: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan…” The plan is summarized, as prepared by NewGen Strategies & Solutions in Appendix D, Plan for Awarding the RIF Credit. The plan for awarding the RIF Credit was determined for the service areas to account for the current existing fund balance. The continuation of Table 2.10 summarizes the portions of Table 2.11 that utilize this credit calculation. The continuation of Table 2.10 summarizes the additional computations carried out to provide the maximum assessable impact fee. Roadway Impact Fee Study 39 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Table 2.10 Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Computation (Continued) Line Title Description 13 Existing Impact Fee Fund Balance The available non-allocated roadway impact fees in each Service Area as of October 2020. 14 Cost of the CIP and Financing Attributable to New Growth The sum of the Cost of Capacity Added Attributable to New Growth, Financing Costs, Interest Earnings, and the Existing Impact Fee Fund Balance (Line -Line 13) 15 Pre-Credit Maximum Fee Per Service Unit Found by dividing the Cost of the CIP and Financing Attributable to New Growth (Line 14) by the Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 8) (Line 14 /Line 8) 16 Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes A credit for the portion of ad valorem taxes projected to be generated by the new service units, as per Section 395.014 of the Local Government Code (from Appendix D – Plan for Awarding the Roadway Impact Fee Credit) 17 Recoverable Cost of CIP and Financing The difference between the Cost of the CIP and Financing Attributable to New Growth (Line 14) and the Credit for Ad Valorem Taxes (Line 16) (Line 14 +Line 16) 18 Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit Found by dividing the Recoverable Cost of the CIP and Financing (Line 17) by the Total Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Over Ten Years (Line 8) (Line 17 /Line 8) Table 2.11 summarizes the calculations walked through in Table 2.10 and provides the maximum assessable impact fee for each service area. Roadway Impact Fee Study 40 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee LINE TITLE:1 (E. of SH 26) 2 (W. of SH 26) 1 TOTAL VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED BY THE CIP (FROM CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY,APPENDIX B)23,486 25,137 2 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEMAND (FROM CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY,APPENDIX B )11,840 14,364 3 TOTAL VEH-MI OF EXISTING DEFICIENCIES (FROM EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES INVENTORY,APPENDIX C) 521 459 4 NET AMOUNT OF VEH-MI OF CAPACITY ADDED (LINE 1 - LINE 2 - LINE 3)11,125 10,314 5 TOTAL COST OF THE CIP WITHIN SERVICE AREA (FROM TABLE 2.6/TABLE 2.7) $ 36,715,922 $ 61,588,460 6 COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED (LINE 4 / LINE 1) * (LINE 5) $ 17,391,835 $ 25,270,453 7 COST TO MEET EXISTING NEEDS AND USAGE (LINE 5 - LINE 6) $ 19,324,087 $ 36,318,007 8 TOTAL VEH-MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TEN YEARS (FROM TABLE 2.9 and Land Use Assumptions )2,808 4,496 9 PERCENT OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 8 / LINE 4)25.2%43.5% 10 IF LINE 8 > LINE 4, REDUCE LINE 9 TO 100%, OTHERWISE NO CHANGE 25.2%43.5% 11 COST OF CAPACITY ADDED ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 6 * LINE 10) $ 4,382,742 $ 10,992,647 12 PRE-CREDIT MAX FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH-MI) (LINE 11 / LINE 8) $ 1,561 $ 2,445 13 EXISTING FUND BALANCE $ 197,182 $ 587,355 14 COST OF CIP AND FINANCING ATTRIBUTABLE TO GROWTH (LINE 11 - LINE 13) $ 4,185,560 $ 10,405,292 15 PRE-CREDIT MAX FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH-MI) (LINE 14 / LINE 8) $ 1,491 $ 2,314 16 CREDIT FOR AD VALOREM TAXES (FROM APPENDIX D) $ (236,602) $ (588,279) 17 RECOVERABLE COST OF CIP AND AD VALOREM CREDIT (LINE 14 + LINE 16) $ 3,948,958 $ 9,817,013 18 MAX ASSESSABLE FEE PER SERVICE UNIT ($ PER VEH-MI) (LINE 17 / LINE 8) $ 1,406 $ 2,183 SERVICE AREA Roadway Impact Fee Study 41 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas SERVICE UNIT DEMAND PER UNIT OF DEVELOPMENT The Roadway Impact Fee is determined by multiplying the impact fee rate by the number of service units projected for the proposed development. For this purpose, the City will utilize the Land Use/Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET), presented in Table 2.12. This table lists the predominant land uses that may occur within the City of Colleyville. For each land use, the development unit that defines the development’s magnitude with respect to transportation demand is shown. Although every possible use cannot be anticipated, the majority of local uses are found in this table. The descriptions for each land use are presented in Table 2.13. If the exact use is not listed, one similar in trip-making characteristics can serve as a reasonable proxy. The individual land uses are grouped into categories, such as residential, office, commercial, industrial, and institutional. The trip rates presented for each land use is a fundamental component of the LUVMET. The trip rate is the average number of trips generated during the evening peak hour by each land use per development unit. The next column in Table 2.12, if applicable to the land use, presents the number of trips to and from certain land uses reduced by pass-by trips, as previously discussed. The definitive source of the trip generation and pass-by statistics is the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, the latest edition. This manual utilizes trip generation studies for a variety of land uses throughout the United States, and is the standard used by traffic engineers and transportation planners for traffic impact analysis, site design, and transportation planning. However, for land uses not contained within the 10th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual, an alternative service unit demand could be calculated by completing a trip generation study based on the procedure identified in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. To convert vehicle trips to vehicle-miles, it is necessary to multiply trips by trip length. The trip length values are based on land use, as explained in Section 2.4 - Service Unit Calculation. The remaining column in the LUVMET shows the vehicle-miles per development unit. This number is the product of the trip rate and the maximum trip length. This number, previously referred to as the Transportation Demand Factor, is used in the impact fee to compute the number of service units attributed to each land use category. The number of service units is multiplied by the impact fee rate (established by City ordinance) in order to determine the impact fee for a development. Roadway Impact Fee Study 42 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) Roadway Impact Fee Study 43 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Table 2.12 Land Use / Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table (LUVMET) (Continued) Roadway Impact Fee Study 44 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Land Use Descriptions Roadway Impact Fee Study 45 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Table 2.13 Land Use Descriptions (Continued) Roadway Impact Fee Study 46 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2.6 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS The following section details two (2) examples of maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee calculations. Example 1: Development Type - One (1) Unit of Single Family Housing in Service Area 1 Step 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle-Miles Per Development Unit From Table 2.12 [Land Use – Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 1 Dwelling Unit of Single-Family Detached Housing Development Units: 1 Dwelling Unit Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3.96 Step 2 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) From Table 2.11, Line 20 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area 1: $1,406 Step 3 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Impact Fee = 1 * 3.96 * $1,406 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $5,567 Example 2: Development Type - 150,000 Square Foot Home Improvement Store in Service Area 2 Step 1 Determine Development Unit and Vehicle-Miles Per Development Unit From Table 2.12 [Land Use – Vehicle-Mile Equivalency Table] Development Type: 150,000 square feet of Home Improvement Store Development Units: 1,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area Veh-Mi Per Development Unit: 3.78 Step 2 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile) From Table 2.11, Line 20 [Maximum Assessable Fee Per Service Unit] Service Area 2: $2,183 Step 3 Determine Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Impact Fee = # of Development Units * Veh-Mi Per Dev Unit * Max. Fee Per Service Unit Impact Fee = 150 * 3.78 * $2,183 Maximum Assessable Impact Fee = $1,237,761 Roadway Impact Fee Study 47 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2.7 ADOPTION AND ADMINISTRATION OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES ADOPTION PROCESS Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code stipulates a specific process for the adoption of Roadway Impact Fees. A Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) is required to review the Land Use Assumptions and Roadway Impact Fees CIP used in calculating the maximum fee, and to provide the Committee’s findings for consideration by the City Council. This CIAC also reviews the calculation and resulting maximum fees and provides its findings to the City Council. The composition of the CIAC is required to adequately represent the building and development communities. The City Council then conducts a public hearing on the Roadway Impact Fee Assumptions (Land Use and Capital Improvements Plan) and a second public hearing on the Roadway Impact Fee Calculation and Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance. Following policy adoption, the CIAC is tasked with advising the City Council of the need to update the Land Use Assumptions or the Roadway Impact Fees CIP at any time within five years of adoption. Finally, the CIAC oversees the proper administration of the Impact Fee, once in place, and advises the Council as necessary. COLLECTION AND USE OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES Roadway Impact Fees are assessed when a final plat is recorded. The assessment defines the impact of each unit at the time of platting, according to land use, and may not exceed the maximum impact fee allowed by law. Roadway Impact Fees are collected when a building permit is issued. Therefore, funds are not collected until development-impacts are introduced to the transportation system. Funds collected within a service area can be used only within the same service area. Finally, fees must be utilized within 10 years of collection, or must be refunded with interest. Roadway Impact Fee Study 48 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 2.8 CONCLUSIONS The City of Colleyville has established a process to implement the assessment and collection of Roadway Impact Fees through the adoption of an impact fee ordinance that is consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. This report establishes the maximum allowable Roadway Impact Fee that could be assessed by the City of Colleyville, as shown in the previously referenced Table 2.11. This document serves as a guide to the assessment of Roadway Impact Fees pertaining to future development, and the City’s need for transportation improvements to accommodate that growth. Following the public hearing process, the City Council may establish an impact fee amount to be collected, up to the calculated maximum and establish the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance accordingly. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the data and methodology used in this analysis are appropriate and consistent with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code. Furthermore, the Land Use Assumptions and the proposed Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan are appropriately incorporated into the development of the maximum assessable Roadway Impact Fee. Below is the listing of the 2022 Roadway Impact Fee Study’s Maximum Assessable Impact Fee Per Service Unit (Vehicle-Mile): Service Area Maximum Fee Per Service Unit (per Vehicle-Mile) 1 $1,406 2 $2,183 In the 2012 Roadway Impact Fee Study, the Maximum Fee Per Service Unit was $2,360 for Service Area 1 and $2,446 for Service Area 2. This comparison shows that over the 8-year period between the 2012 Study and this Update, the Maximum Fee Per Service Unit has decreased $954 for Service Area 1 but only a $263 decrease for Service Area 2. As the City reaches build out and greenfield development slows, it should be expected that the Maximum Fee will continually decrease. Chapter 3 Water Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study June 2022 Prepared for the City of Colleyville Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone 817 335 6511 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 061063055 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Water Impact Fee Study i June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 49 Land Use Assumptions ...................................................................................................................................... 50 Evaluation of the Water System Master Plan ............................................................................................. 50 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan ......................................................................................................... 50 Impact Fee Analysis and Report .................................................................................................................... 51 3.2 Design Criteria .......................................................................................................................... 52 Water Lines........................................................................................................................................................ 52 Storage Tanks.................................................................................................................................................... 52 Pump Stations .................................................................................................................................................... 53 3.3 Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan .................................................................................... 54 3.4 Water Impact Fee Calculation ................................................................................................... 60 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 3.1 Water System Map................................................................................................................................ 56 LIST OF TABLES Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost .............. 55 Service Unit Consumption Calculation ....................................................................................................... 60 10-year Additional Service Units Calculation......................................................................................... 61 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown ................................................................................................... 61 Service Unit Equivalency Table for Commonly Used Meters ............................................................... 62 Water Impact Fee Study 49 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 3.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Colleyville retained the services of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the purpose of developing the impact fees for water system improvements required to serve new development. The Colleyville Impact Fee program was originally developed as a funding tool for infrastructure needs as a result of growth in the City in 1990 for roadway and water, with the addition of wastewater impact fees in 1995. These fees were last updated in 2012 in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code (impact fees). The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the law and provide the City with an impact fee capital improvements plan and associated impact fees. For convenience and reference, the following is excerpted from Chapter 395 of the code: (a)The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the following items: (1)a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (2)an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (3)a description of all or the parts of the capital improvements or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (4)a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of a service unit for each category of capital improvements or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including but not limited to residential, commercial, and industrial; (5)the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria; Water Impact Fee Study 50 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas (6)the projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years; and (7)plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) in the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total project cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. The impact fee study includes information from the Water and Wastewater Master Plan completed by Garver in December 2014. The impact fees are based on recommended capital improvements outlined in the Water and Wastewater Master Plan, input from City Staff, and the service area growth projections shown in the Land Use Assumptions Report. The study process was comprised of four tasks: LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS The development of land use assumptions included the following: •Establishing impact fee service areas (SA) for water and wastewater; •Collection/determination of population and employment data by SA; and •Projection of the ten-year population and employment by SA. A detailed discussion is outlined in the current Land Use Assumptions Chapter of this report. EVALUATION OF THE WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN This task involved reviewing the Water and Wastewater System Master Plan and its growth projection compatibility with the Land Use Assumptions Report. The water demand projections were then used to determine the additional service units. IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN This task involved reviewing the City’s capital projects shown in the 2012 impact fee report and the water capital improvement plan outlined in the master plan with public works staff and interviews with the Trinity River Authority capital projects managers. Both parties provided information allowing us to develop the impact fee capital improvements plan that will be built in the 10-year planning window. Water Impact Fee Study 51 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS AND REPORT This task included calculating the growth of service units and credit reduction. These values were then used to determine the impact fee per service unit and the maximum assessable impact fee by meter size. Water Impact Fee Study 52 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 3.2 DESIGN CRITERIA In accordance with the Chapter 290 of the Texas Administrative Code (Public Drinking Water) and the American Water Works Associations (AWWA) requirements for the design and operation of potable water systems the following design criteria is followed when planning for future water infrastructure. WATER LINES Water Transmission Lines (12-inch and Larger) Water transmission lines shall be sized to maintain the following pressure requirements: ·Peak hour demand with a minimum pressure of 35 pounds per square inch (psi); ·Night-time tank filling with a maximum pressure of 100 psi; and ·Peak day demand plus fire flow with a minimum pressure of 20 psi. STORAGE TANKS The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and the State Board of Insurance (SBI) have established criteria for ground and elevated storage. These criteria address volume and height requirements only. The layout of the distribution system, location of the storage facilities, and the interaction with the high service and booster pumps affect the amount of storage necessary for the most efficient and reliable operation of the system. (a)Ground Storage Ground storage serves two functions: • Equalization for differing feed rates between the water supply and pumping to the system; and • Emergency capacity in the event of temporary loss of water supply. Generally, ground storage facilities are located at water supply points or at each pump station within the water distribution system. Suggested storage capacities are established based on several criteria. There are specific requirements of the TCEQ. These criteria are detailed later in this section. Although ground and elevated storage facilities perform separate functions within the system, both are aimed at decreasing the impact of demand fluctuations. Their capacities are established based on knowledge of how demand varies seasonally and daily. Water Impact Fee Study 53 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas (b)Elevated Storage Elevated storage serves three purposes: • Functionally, elevated storage equalizes the pumping rate to compensate for daily variations in demand and to maintain a fairly constant pumping rate (usually referred to as operational storage), or a pumping rate that conforms to the requirements of the electrical rate structure. • Provides pressure maintenance and protection against surges created by instantaneous demand, such as fire flow and main breaks, and instantaneous change in supply, such as pumps turning on and off. • Maintains a reserve capacity for fire protection and pressure maintenance in case of power failure to one or more pump stations. Sufficient storage should be maintained to provide four hours of fire flow demand during a loss of power to the pump station. Suggested storage capacities are established by the TCEQ. Adequate operational storage is established by determining the required volume to equalize the daily fluctuations in flow during the maximum day demand, plus the reserve volume required for fire protection. The minimum requirements for storage, according to Chapter 290 of the Texas Administrative Code, are as follows: • Total Storage - Equal to 200 gallons per connection. • Elevated Storage - Equal to 100 gallons per connection; or • Elevated Storage – Equal to 200 gallons per connection for a firm pumping capacity reduction from 2.0 gallons per connection to 0.6 gallons per connection. PUMP STATIONS Pumping capacities must provide the maximum demand, or the peak hour demand required by the water system or the suggested capacities established by the TCEQ. Pumping capacity should supply the maximum demand with sufficient redundancy to allow for the largest pump at the pump station to be out of service. This is known as firm pumping capacity. Each pump station or pressure plane must have two or more pumps that have a total capacity of 2.0 gallons per minute per connection, or have a total capacity of at least 1,000 gallons per minute and the ability to meet peak hour demand with the largest pump out of service, whichever is less. If the system provides elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection, two service pumps with a minimum combined capacity of 0.6 gpm per connection are required. Water Impact Fee Study 54 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 3.3 IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The City Council commissioned Garver to develop a Water and Wastewater System Master Plan. The purpose of the plan is to provide the City with a logical strategy for upgrading and expanding its water distribution system to accommodate future growth and for addressing existing system deficiencies. Garver completed the Water and Wastewater System Master Plan and recommended system improvements to accommodate growth through the City’s build-out. State law only allows cost recovery associated with eligible projects in a ten (10) year planning window from the time of the impact fee study. The following details the projects and the eligible recoverable cost. Seven (7) existing projects and five (5) proposed projects are determined eligible for recoverable cost through impact fee over the next 10 years. The City of Colleyville’s total cost of these projects is $11,627,893. The projected total recoverable through impact fees is $5,404,564. After financing costs are added and the credit reduction calculation is complete, $5,367,621 is recoverable through impact fees serving the 10-year system needs. These impact fee capital improvements are shown in Table 3.1 and illustrated in Exhibit 3.1. Water Impact Fee Study 55 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Water Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost Project #Description 2020 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2030 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2020-2030 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2030 Projected Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost EXISTING 1 Heritage Ave 12" Water Line 92%97%5% $ 31,200 $ 624,000 2 SH 26 South 12" Water Line 92%97%5% $ 19,350 $ 387,000 3 SH 26 Central 12" Water Line 92%97%5% $ 14,950 $ 299,000 4 SH 26 North 12" Water Line 92%97%5% $ 2,250 $ 45,000 5 Pleasant Run Rd 12" Water Line 92%97%5% $ 22,500 $ 450,000 6**Existing TRA - Raw Water Line Improvements 92%97%5% $ 229,075 $ 4,581,500 7 Water Impact Fee Study Update --100% $ 36,250 $ 36,250 Existing Subtotal $ 355,575 $ 6,422,750 PROPOSED 8*Pleasant Run Rd 12" Water Line Extension 0%97%97% $ 551,962 $ 569,033 9*John McCain 12" Water Line 0%97%97% $ 350,079 $ 360,907 10*Cotton Belt Trail to Pleasant Run 16" Water Line 0%97%97% $ 1,342,480 $ 1,384,000 11*Tinker Road 12" Water Line 0%97%97% $ 1,007,057 $ 1,038,203 12 Glade Road 12" Water Line 0%97%97% $ 1,797,410 $ 1,853,000 Proposed Subtotal $ 5,048,989 $ 5,205,143 Total $ 5,404,564 $ 11,627,893 *Water project costs are prorated for upsize capacity only. ** “Total Project Cost” for the TRA facility (item 6) reflects Colleyville’s prorated portion (approx. 17%) of the TRA project cost according to relative demand capacities among member cities. Colleyville’s impact fee can be used to pay the portion of the TRA water rate that is identified for projects accommodating future growth. ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Grapevine Euless Hurst Bedford Southlake Keller !(11 !(8 !(10 !(9 !(12 !(1 !(5 !(2 !(3 !(4 GLADE POOLCOLLEYVILLECHEEK SPARGERPLEASANT RUNHERITAGEJOHN MCCAIN L D LOCKETT BROWNBRANSFORDWESTCOATBEDFORDMARTINTINKER JACKSONHALL JOHNSON PRECINCT LINEMEADELAFITEDAVIDLAVACA MURPHY MONTCLAIRCONNIEBANDIT FELPSFRYRIVERWALKHARDAGE SAN BARHWY 121MONTICELLOCHU R C H HIGHLANDBETTINGERMCDONWELL SCHOOL ELMLAKESIDESHELTON TENNISONOVERLAND ARBORKAYS RUSTICMILL VALLEY OAKBRIARBOGART MIRAMARLETA GREENBRIAR MANNINGFIELD BILLSBEVERLY TYLERQUAILSWHITEHOLLYMAINNORMANDYJO WILLTIMBERLINE BLACK STAFFORDMELANIEPETERS ROBERTSTHAMES CURTISCEDARTRIANONFEGANS BALLANTRAE BLUEBONNETSHERWOOD CENTERPAR K RENFROWHITTIER WAYNETARRANT ALLENDALECHESTNUTPR O V I D E N C E ATLANTAPETRUSJIM MITCHELLPEMBROOKEYORKPONDEROSAAMADORROSEWESTMONTOAK VALLEY REMBRANDT WYATTDOUGLAS POLO CHESHIREBILL SIMMONSEUDALY LATOURCRESTJEFFERSONHERBERT HIGHLAND MEADOW HIGHLAND HILLSO A K K N O L LBEHRENSLANSFORD INWOOD ROYAL REMI N G T O N M E A N D E R I N GLOWRIEHILLSIDEKENNEDYOAK TOPVALLEY VIEWTEXASVILLAGEHUNTERSYCAMOREGREEN OAKSMILL WOOD QUAIL RUN EMERALDREAGANFOX GLEN CHERRY JANETHICKORY HILLSHALIMAR SADDLEB R O O KCIMMARON EDGEWOOD OVERLO O K AVALON LLOYD MAPLEWHITEHAVEN WOODSTOCK QUEENSBURYKENSHIREBELDONQUAIL CRESTEMMAS CARRIAGEMILTONSHADYCREEKBROADOAKARTHUR CARLISLEWINDSWEPTHANDELBROUGHTON RODEOLEESBURG EATONDA VINCIAC U F F KINGSTONSOMERSE T MONTREUX WINNIEBRAEMARMOZARTLOMBARDYWILKES COOKSSCHUBERT MILL CREEKSOUTHMEADOWHILLBACHMONETMONTFORDGLENDALEWINDINGTARAVAN OAKS CRESCENTPLANTA T I O N CLIFFWOODOAK HILLSOAK POINTE MUIR THOMPSONMEADOWVIEW OLD GROVE COVENTRYBENJAMINTWELVE OAKS CHELSEAL O N GW O O D PATTERSONSAVOY SCARBORO U G HHERON PRESTWICKOLD OAKDANBURY NORWALK BRENTWOODOVERHILLTALBOTHIXREATTAWILLOWSTERLINGTUSCANY CAMELOTPEBBLE HILLHILLIERWOODCRESTDANIELLE LEXINGTONBUGLEHARDY DEEPWOODSHEPHERDSINDUSTRIAL EVANS LYNDSEY SOPHIE RED OAK FORDDARTMOORECENTRAL CASA SPRING HOLLOWGATEWAYBOWMANPARKWALDONBALMORALBRIARWICK HAWTHORNE AVONDALE DEVONOAKLEIGHCARMELCALDWELL C R E E K HIGHGROVE BRAHMS BRIDLEWOOD WARWICKST ANDREWSALPINEOAKLAWN WOODBRIAR MOCKINGBIRDTHOMAS DORSET CRANBROOKSUMMERTREE MILL CROSSING CASPIAN CHRISMACCRESTHAVENWESTBURYREGIMENTCHARLOTTESVILLE STONEHAVE N FRONTI E R KINGSWOOD GROSVENOR JO CAROL MILL BROOKVINESFRANCES SHADOWOODGARRY LYNNE TAMBLEWOODBOWDEN HILLVANGUARDBURNHAMALEXANDRABELMONTCOLTS NECKREYNOLDS HAVERHILL MUSTANGDURHAM TREEMONTBUR OAKSAPPHIREFOREST MEADOW PAULSASHLEYWINDSOR HAWKS RIDGE KYLE EDINBURGHSHADOW RIDGEINDEPENDENCEBEDDO PRESERVATIONREGINA WINDERMEREBRAZOSCHARLESTONEVENTIDE WATERFALL B Y R O N N E L S O N WINEWOODFOX TRAILRAVEN AUBURNDALESHERSTONLEGACY ST MORITZGREEN HILLMIDDLETONINDIA ROTHSCHILDSAN GABRIELCUTTER RIDGEBUCKINGHAMSTILLWATER STONINGTON DOGWOOD CAMBRIDGEAVERYSTONEBRIDGESPRINGSGLENHOPE WELSH ADAMS MCCAIN COVINGTON GREEN MEA D O W POST OAKBRIAR RIDGEBRIDGESTRAUSS CONNER COUNTRYPAR K V I E WCHALFORD WATERFORD PRIMROSESTILL POINT ROSEBROOKCALDWELL HUGHESSTILTON MISSIONHIDDEN OAKS DEL MAR LI N D E N MID-CITIES SUELLE N WITTENEQUESTRIANARRINGTONELMWOODMARANATHARONNAVIRGINIA MAGNOLIACOLEARCADY REIMS MULBERRY O P A L SILVERWOODCHALET GUTHRIE HORSESHOEWAGONWHEEL APPLE VALLEYHUNTINGTONCOLDEN BENT TREEBEHRENSSHADOWOODHUNTERCOLLEYVILLE POLO BANDIT MAIN 0 0.5 1 Miles Legend City Limits Water Service Area !!Existing Water Line or Water Line UnderConstruction !!Proposed 2020-2030 Water Line ST121 ¬«26 vu3029 vu1938 ST360 Water Impact Fee CIP ´ Exhibit 3.1 November 2020 !(X Existing Facility Project Label !(X Proposed Facility Project Label Note: TRA projects listed in the CIP are not shown on this exhibit. Project Number Project Description1 Heritage Ave 12" Water Line2 SH 26 South 12" Water Line3 SH 26 Central 12" Water Line 4 SH 26 North 12" Water Line5 Pleasant Run Rd 12" Water Line6 Existing TRA - Raw Water Line Improvements7 Water Impact Fee Study (Not Shown on Map) Project Number Project Description8 Pleasant Run Rd 12" Water Line Extension9 John McCain 12" Water Line10 Cotton Belt Trail to Pleasant Run 16" Water Line11 Tinker Road 12" Water Line12 Glade Road 12" Water Line Existing Facility or Facility Under Construction Proposed 2020-2030 Facilities January 2021June 2022 Water Impact Fee Study 57 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Existing Facilities or Facilities under Construction (1)Heritage Ave 12” Water Line Existing 12” water line along Heritage Avenue from Glade Road to Cheek-Sparger Road. Total Project Cost $624,000 Recoverable Cost $31,200 (2)SH 26 South 12” Water Line Existing 12” water line along SH 26 from Greenbriar Ln to Brown Trail. Total Project Cost $387,000 Recoverable Cost $19,350 (3)SH 26 Central 12" Water Line Existing 12” water line along SH 26 from Bogart Street to Tinker Road. Total Project Cost $299,000 Recoverable Cost $14,950 (4)SH 26 North 12" Water Line Existing 12” water line along SH 26 from Tennison Parkway to 474 feet south of Tennison Parkway. Total Project Cost $45,000 Recoverable Cost $2,250 (5)Pleasant Run Rd 12" Water Line Existing 12” water line along Pleasant Run from Tinker Road to John McCain Road. Total Project Cost $450,000 Recoverable Cost $22,500 (6)Existing TRA - Raw Water Line Improvements Colleyville’s Prorated Portion of TRA Project Cost (17%)$4,581,500 Recoverable Cost $229,075 Water Impact Fee Study 58 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas (7)Water Impact Fee Study Update Update of the impact fees for water system improvements required to serve new development. Total Project Cost $36,250 Recoverable Cost $36,250 Note: Project Descriptions are not provided for the TRA project listed in Table 3.1. Proposed Facilities, Improvements, and Water Lines (8)Pleasant Run Rd 12" Water Line Extension Replace existing 6” water line along Pleasant Run Road from John McCain Road north toward Colleyville City Limits. This proposed water line is an extension of the existing (5) Pleasant Run Rd 12” Water Line impact fee project. Total Project Cost $849,000 Total Upsize Project Cost $569,033 Recoverable Cost $551,962 (9)John McCain 12" Water Line Replace existing 8” water line along John McCain Road from Pebble Hill Drive to Maranatha Court. Total Project Cost $650,000 Total Upsize Project Cost $360,907 Recoverable Cost $350,079 (10)Cotton Belt Trail to Pleasant Run 16" Water Line Construct 16” water line along Cotton Belt Trail from Bransford Road to Pleasant Run Road. Total Project Cost $1,384,000 Recoverable Cost $1,342,480 Water Impact Fee Study 59 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas (11)Tinker Road 12" Water Line Replace existing 10” water line along Tinker Road from Pleasant Run Road to SH 26. This proposed water line is a continuation of the existing (5) Pleasant Run Rd 12" Water Line and (3) SH 26 Central 12" Water Line impact fee projects. Total Project Cost $3,406,000 Total Upsize Project Cost $1,038,203 Recoverable Cost $1,007,057 (12)Glade Road 12" Water Line Construct existing 12” water line along Glad Road from Old Oak Road to Martin Road. Project Cost $1,853,000 Recoverable Cost $1,797,410 Water Impact Fee Study 60 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 3.4 WATER IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code defines a service unit as follows, “Service Unit means a standardized measure of consumption attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years.” Therefore, the City of Colleyville defines a service unit based on historical water usage over the past 10 years as compared to the estimated residential units. The residential unit is the development type that predominately uses a 3/4” meter. The measure of consumption per service unit is based on a 3/4” meter and the data shown in Table 3.2. Service Unit Consumption Calculation Year Population1 Service Units (2.96 person/unit) Water Average Day Demand (MGD)1 Demand per Service Unit (GPD) 2010 22,807 7,705 6.7 870 2011 22,949 7,753 8.11 1046 2012 23,090 7,801 7.93 1017 2013 23,270 7,861 6.52 829 2014 23,740 8,020 6.85 854 2015 23,760 8,027 6.2 772 2016 24230 8,186 6.07 742 2017 24,623 8,319 5.91 710 2018 25,015 8,451 6.42 760 2019 25,408 8,584 6.44 750 Average Historical Demand per Service Unit 835 (1) Data Sources: City of Colleyville Water Impact Fee Study 61 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Based on the City’s 10-year growth projections and the resulting water demand projections, water service will be required for an additional 491 service units. The calculation is as follows: ·A service unit, which is a unit of development that consumes approximately 835 gallons per day (GPD), is a typical residential connection that uses a 3/4” meter.Table 3.3 outlines the future water demand projections and its relationship to the additional service units projected for the next 10-years. 10-year Additional Service Units Calculation Year Average Day Demand (MGD)1 Service Unit Demand (GPD) Projected Service Units 2020 7.28 835 8,719 2030 7.69 835 9,210 10-year Additional Service Units 491 (1) Data Sources:City of Colleyville; Water Master Plan by Garver Impact fee law allows for a credit calculation to credit back the development community based on the utility revenues or ad valorem taxes that are allocated for paying a portion of future capital improvements. The intent of this credit is to prevent the City from double charging development for future capital improvements via impact fees and utility rates. If the city chooses not the do a financial analysis to determine the credit value they are required by law to reduce the recoverable cost by 50 percent. The city has chosen to calculate the credit value. Therefore, the maximum recoverable cost for impact fee shown below is 99.3 percent of the Pre Credit Recoverable Cost. A detailed credit calculation has been provided by Edward B. Peacock in the appendix. A breakdown of the 10-year recoverable costs and the associated impact fee per service unit is as follows: 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs $ 5,404,564 Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 5,404,564 Credit for Utility Revenues $ (36,943) Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 5,367,621 (1) Per Edward B. Peacock, CPA financial analysis, see the Appendix – Plan for Awarding the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Credit Water Impact Fee Study 62 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Impact fee per service units = 10-year recoverable costs 10-year additional service units 10-year recoverable cost = $5,367,621 Impact fee per service units = $5,367,621 491 Impact fee per service units = $10,932 Therefore, the maximum assessable water impact fee per service unit is $10,932. For a development that requires a different size meter, a service unit equivalent is established at a multiplier based on its capacity with respect to the 3/4” meter. The maximum impact fee that could be assessed for other meter sizes is based on the value shown on Table 3.5, Service Unit Equivalency Table for Commonly Used Meters. Service Unit Equivalency Table for Commonly Used Meters Meter Size Maximum Continuous Operating Capacity (GPM)* Service Unit Equivalent Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fee 5/8”x 3/4” PD 10 0.67 $7,288 3/4” PD 15 1.00 $10,932 1” PD 25 1.67 $18,220 1 1/2” PD 50 3.33 $36,440 2” PD 80 5.33 $58,304 2” Compound 80 5.33 $58,304 2” Turbine 100 6.67 $72,880 3” Compound 175 11.67 $127,540 3” Turbine 220 14.67 $160,336 4” Compound 300 20.00 $218,640 4” Turbine 420 28.00 $306,096 6” Compound 675 45.00 $491,940 6” Turbine 865 57.67 $630,412 8” Compound 900 60.00 $655,920 8” Turbine 2,400 160.00 $1,749,120 10” Turbine 3,500 233.33 $2,550,800 PD = Positive Displacement Meter (Typical Residential Meter) *Operating capacities obtained from American Water Works Association (AWWA) C-700-20, C-701-19, C702-19 Chapter 4 Wastewater Impact Fee Study for the 2022 Impact Fee Study June 2022 Prepared for the City of Colleyville Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 801 Cherry Street, Unit 11, Suite 1300 Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone 817 335 6511 TBPE Firm Registration Number: F-928 Project Number: 061063055 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Wastewater Impact Fee Study i June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 63 Land Use Assumptions ...................................................................................................................................... 64 Evaluation of the Wastewater System Master Plan .................................................................................. 64 Impact Fee Capital Improvement Plan ......................................................................................................... 64 Impact Fee Analysis and Report .................................................................................................................... 65 4.2 Design Criteria .......................................................................................................................... 66 Sewer Trunk Lines (Interceptors) .................................................................................................................... 66 Lift Station Pumping Capacity........................................................................................................................ 66 Lift Station Wet Well Capacity ..................................................................................................................... 66 Force Mains ........................................................................................................................................................ 66 4.3 Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan .................................................................................... 67 4.4 Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation.......................................................................................... 72 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 4.1 Wastewater System Map ..................................................................................................................... 69 LIST OF TABLES Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost.... 68 Service Unit Consumption Calculation ....................................................................................................... 72 10-year Additional Service Units Calculation......................................................................................... 73 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown ................................................................................................... 73 Service Unit Equivalency Table for Commonly Used Meters ............................................................... 74 Wastewater Impact Fee Study 63 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 4.1 INTRODUCTION The City of Colleyville retained the services of Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for the purpose of developing the impact fees for wastewater system improvements required to serve new development. The Colleyville Impact Fee program was originally developed as a funding tool for infrastructure needs as a result of growth in the City in 1990 for roadway and water, with the addition of wastewater impact fees in 1995. These fees were last updated in 2012 in accordance with Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code (impact fees). The purpose of this report is to satisfy the requirements of the law and provide the City with an impact fee capital improvements plan and associated impact fees. For convenience and reference, the following is excerpted from Chapter 395 of the code: (a)The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the following items: (1)a description of the existing capital improvements within the service area and the costs to upgrade, update, improve, expand, or replace the improvements to meet existing needs and usage and stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (2)an analysis of the total capacity, the level of current usage, and commitments for usage of capacity of the existing capital improvements, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (3)a description of all or the parts of the capital improvements or facility expansions and their costs necessitated by and attributable to new development in the service area based on the approved land use assumptions, which shall be prepared by a qualified professional engineer licensed to perform such professional engineering services in this state; (4)a definitive table establishing the specific level or quantity of use, consumption, generation, or discharge of a service unit for each category of capital improvements or facility expansions and an equivalency or conversion table establishing the ratio of a service unit to various types of land uses, including but not limited to residential, commercial, and industrial; (5)the total number of projected service units necessitated by and attributable to new 20development within the service area based on the approved land use assumptions and calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning criteria; Wastewater Impact Fee Study 64 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas (6)the projected demand for capital improvements or facility expansions required by new service units projected over a reasonable period of time, not to exceed 10 years; and (7)plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) in the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total project cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. The impact fee study includes information from the Water and Wastewater Master Plan completed by Garver in December 2014. The impact fees are based on recommended capital improvements outlined in the Water and Wastewater Master Plan, input from City Staff, and the service area growth projections shown in the Land Use Assumptions Report. The study process was comprised of four tasks: LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS The development of land use assumptions included the following: •Establishing impact fee service areas (SA) for water and wastewater; •Collection/determination of population and employment data by SA; and •Projection of the ten-year population and employment by SA. A detailed discussion is outlined in the current Land Use Assumptions Chapter of this report. EVALUATION OF THE WASTEWATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN This task involved reviewing the Water and Wastewater System Master Plan and its growth projection compatibility with the Land Use Assumptions Report. The wastewater flow projections were then used to determine the additional service units. IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN This task involved reviewing the City’s capital projects shown in the 2012 impact fee report and the wastewater capital improvement plan outlined in the master plan with public works staff and interviews with the Trinity River Authority capital projects managers. Both parties provided information allowing us to develop the impact fee capital improvements plan that will be built in the 10-year planning window. Wastewater Impact Fee Study 65 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS AND REPORT This task included calculating the growth of service units and credit reduction. These values were then used to determine the impact fee per service unit and the maximum assessable impact fee by meter size. Wastewater Impact Fee Study 66 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 4.2 DESIGN CRITERIA In accordance with the Chapter 217 of the Texas Administrative Code (Design Criteria for Domestic Wastewater Systems) the following design criteria is followed when planning for future wastewater infrastructure. SEWER TRUNK LINES (INTERCEPTORS) The design criteria for sewer trunk lines or interceptors is based on the TCEQ requirements that meet peak wet weather design flows with no overflows while maintaining a minimum of 2 ft/sec cleaning velocity and a maximum of 8 ft/sec velocity. LIFT STATION PUMPING CAPACITY The design criteria for lift station pumping shall be to provide firm pumping capacity to meet 125% of the peak wet weather design flows. The firm pumping capacity is defined as the available total pumping capacity with the largest pump out of service. LIFT STATION WET WELL CAPACITY The design criteria for lift station wet wells are to provide adequate volumes to limit pump cycling to once every 10 minutes. Based on this criterion, the required operating volume for each pump can be calculated as V = tQ/4 where, t = Maximum pump cycling time = 10 minutes Q = Lead pump discharge rate in gallons per minute (gpm) V = Required wet well volume between pump start and stop elevation FORCE MAINS The design criteria recommended for force mains is to meet the required pumping capacity of the lift station at a velocity less than 8 feet per second and a maximum discharge pressure of 100 psi and to allow a minimum of 2 feet per second scouring velocity during a single pump operation. Wastewater Impact Fee Study 67 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 4.3 IMPACT FEE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The City Council commissioned Garver to develop a Water and Wastewater System Master Plan. The purpose of the plan is to provide the City with a logical strategy for upgrading and expanding its wastewater collection system to accommodate future growth and for addressing existing system deficiencies. Garver completed the Water and Wastewater System Master Plan and recommended system improvements to accommodate growth through the City’s build-out. State law only allows cost recovery associated with eligible projects in a ten (10) year planning window from the time of the impact fee study. The following details the projects and the eligible recoverable cost. Four (4) existing projects and three (3) proposed projects are determined eligible for recoverable cost through impact fee over the next 10 years. The City of Colleyville’s total cost of these projects is $1,926,073. The projected total recoverable through impact fees is $1,495,858. After the credit reduction calculation is complete, $1,485,277 is recoverable through impact fees serving the 10-year system needs. These impact fee capital improvements are shown in Table 4.1 and illustrated in Exhibit 4.1. Wastewater Impact Fee Study 68 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Wastewater Impact Fee Capital Improvements Project Cost and 10-Year Recoverable Cost Project #Description 2020 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2030 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2020-2030 Required Capacity (Percent Utilization) 2030 Projected Recoverable Cost Total Project Cost EXISTING 1 V1a 8" Sewer Line 92%97%5% $ 3,350 $ 67,000 2 V1b 8" Sewer Line 92%97%5% $ 6,700 $ 134,000 3 I1 8" Sewer Line 92%97%5% $ 10,250 $ 205,000 4 Wastewater Impact Fee Study -100%100% $ 36,250 $ 36,250 Existing Subtotal $ 56,550 $ 442,250 PROPOSED 5*Pool Road 10" Sewer Line 0%97%97% $ 1,295,338 $ 1,335,400 6**TRA - Bear Creek Interceptor Relief, Phase 1 0%97%97% $ 78,328 $ 80,750 7**TRA - Bear Creek Interceptor Relief, Phase 2 0%97%97% $ 65,643 $ 67,673 Proposed Subtotal $ 1,439,308 $ 1,483,823 Total $ 1,495,858 $ 1,926,073 *Wastewater project costs are prorated for upsize capacity only. ** “Total Project Cost” for the TRA facilities (item 6-7) reflects Colleyville’s prorated portion (approx. 1.7%) of the TRA project cost according to relative demand capacities among member cities. Colleyville’s impact fee can be used to pay the portion of the TRA wastewater rate that is identified for projects accommodating future growth. !!!!!!!!Grapevine Euless Hurst Bedford Southlake Keller !(5 !(3 !(2 GLADE POOLCOLLEYVILLECHEEK SPARGERPLEASANT RUNHERITAGEJOHN MCCAIN L D LOCKETT BROWNBRANSFORDWESTCOATBEDFORDMARTINTINKER JACKSONHALL JOHNSON PRECINCT LINEMEADELAFITEDAVIDLAVACA MURPHY MONTCLAIRCONNIEBANDIT FELPSFRYRIVERWALKHARDAGE SAN BARHWY 121MONTICELLOCHU R C H HIGHLANDBETTINGERMCDONWELL SCHOOL ELMLAKESIDESHELTON TENNISONOVERLAND ARBORKAYS RUSTICMILL VALLEY OAKBRIARBOGART MIRAMARLETA GREENBRIAR MANNINGFIELD BILLSBEVERLY TYLERQUAILSWHITEHOLLYMAINNORMANDYJO WILLTIMBERLINE BLACK STAFFORDMELANIEPETERS ROBERTSTHAMES CURTISCEDARTRIANONFEGANS BALLANTRAE BLUEBONNETSHERWOOD CENTERPAR K RENFROWHITTIER WAYNETARRANT ALLENDALECHESTNUTPR O V I D E N C E ATLANTAPETRUSJIM MITCHELLPEMBROOKEYORKPONDEROSAAMADORROSEWESTMONTOAK VALLEY REMBRANDT WYATTDOUGLAS POLO CHESHIREBILL SIMMONSEUDALY LATOURCRESTJEFFERSONHERBERT HIGHLAND MEADOW HIGHLAND HILLSO A K K N O L LBEHRENSLANSFORD INWOOD ROYAL REMI N G T O N M E A N D E R I N GLOWRIEHILLSIDEKENNEDYOAK TOPVALLEY VIEWTEXASVILLAGEHUNTERSYCAMOREGREEN OAKSMILL WOOD QUAIL RUN EMERALDREAGANFOX GLEN CHERRY JANETHICKORY HILLSHALIMAR SADDLEB R O O KCIMMARON EDGEWOOD OVERLO O K AVALON LLOYD MAPLEWHITEHAVEN WOODSTOCK QUEENSBURYKENSHIREBELDONQUAIL CRESTEMMAS CARRIAGEMILTONSHADYCREEKBROADOAKARTHUR CARLISLEWINDSWEPTHANDELBROUGHTON RODEOLEESBURG EATONDA VINCIAC U F F KINGSTONSOMERSE T MONTREUX WINNIEBRAEMARMOZARTLOMBARDYWILKES COOKSSCHUBERT MILL CREEKSOUTHMEADOWHILLBACHMONETMONTFORDGLENDALEWINDINGTARAVAN OAKS CRESCENTPLANTA T I O N CLIFFWOODOAK HILLSOAK POINTE MUIR THOMPSONMEADOWVIEW OLD GROVE COVENTRYTHERESABENJAMINTWELVE OAKS CHELSEAL O N GW O O D PATTERSONSAVOY SCARBORO U G HHERON PRESTWICKOLD OAKDANBURY NORWALK BRENTWOODOVERHILLTALBOTHIXREATTAWILLOWSTERLINGTUSCANY CAMELOTPEBBLE HILLHILLIERWOODCRESTDANIELLE LEXINGTONBUGLEHARDY DEEPWOODSHEPHERDSINDUSTRIALMAJESTICEVANS LYNDSEY SOPHIE RED OAK FORDDARTMOORECENTRAL CASA SPRING HOLLOWGATEWAYBOWMANPARKWALDONBALMORALBRIARWICK HAWTHORNE AVONDALE DEVONOAKLEIGHCARMELCALDWELL C R E E K HIGHGROVE BRAHMS BRIDLEWOOD WARWICKST ANDREWSALPINEOAKLAWN WOODBRIAR MOCKINGBIRDTHOMAS DORSET CRANBROOKSUMMERTREE MILL CROSSING CASPIAN CHRISMACCRESTHAVENWESTBURYREGIMENTCHARLOTTESVILLE STONEHAVE N FRONTI E R KINGSWOOD GROSVENOR JO CAROL MILL BROOKVINESFRANCES SHADOWOODGARRY LYNNE TAMBLEWOODBOWDEN HILLVANGUARDBURNHAMALEXANDRABELMONTCOLTS NECKREYNOLDS HAVERHILL MUSTANGDURHAM ST ALBANSTREEMONTBUR OAKSAPPHIREFOREST MEADOW PAULSASHLEYWINDSOR HAWKS RIDGE KYLE EDINBURGHSHADOW RIDGEINDEPENDENCEBEDDO PRESERVATIONREGINA WINDERMEREBRAZOSCHARLESTONEVENTIDE WATERFALL B Y R O N N E L S O N ROSS DOWNSWINEWOODFOX TRAILRAVEN AUBURNDALESHERSTONLEGACY ST MORITZGREEN HILLMIDDLETONINDIA ROTHSCHILDSAN GABRIELCUTTER RIDGEBUCKINGHAMSTILLWATER STONINGTON DOGWOOD CAMBRIDGEAVERYSTONEBRIDGESPRINGSGLENHOPESTRATHMOREWELSH ADAMS MCCAIN COVINGTON GREEN MEA D O W POST OAKBRIAR RIDGEBRIDGESTRAUSS CONNER COUNTRYPAR K V I E WCHALFORD WATERFORD PRIMROSEHIGHLAND PARK STILL POINT ROSEBROOKCALDWELL HUGHESSTILTON MISSIONHIDDEN OAKS DEL MAR LI N D E N MID-CITIES SUELLE N WITTENEQUESTRIANARRINGTONELMWOODMARANATHARONNAVIRGINIA MAGNOLIACOLEARCADY REIMS MULBERRY O P A L SILVERWOODCHALET GUTHRIE HORSESHOEWAGONWHEEL APPLE VALLEYCOLDEN BENT TREEBEHRENSSHADOWOODHUNTERCOLLEYVILLE POLO BANDIT MAIN 0 0.5 1 Miles Legend City Limits Wastewater Service Area !!Existing Sewer Line or Sewer Line UnderConstruction !!Proposed 2020-2030 Sewer Line ST121 ¬«26 vu3029 vu1938 !(1 ST360 Wastewater Impact Fee CIP ´ Exhibit 4.1 November 2020 !(X Existing Facility Project Label !(X Proposed Facility Project Label Note: TRA projects listed in the CIP are not shown on this exhibit. Project Number Project Description1 V1a 8" Sewer Line2 V1b 8" Sewer Line3 I1 8" Sewer Line4 Wastewater Impact Fee Study (Not Shown on Map) Project Number Project Description5 Pool Road 10" Sewer Line6 TRA - Bear Creek Interceptor Relief, Phase 17 TRA - Bear Creek Interceptor Relief, Phase 2 Existing Facility or Facility Under Construction Proposed 2020-2030 Facilities January 2021March 2022 Wastewater Impact Fee Study 70 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Existing (1)V1a 8” Sewer Line Existing 8” sanitary sewer line along SH 26 from John McCain Road to just north of Tennison Parkway. Total Project Cost $67,000 Recoverable Cost $3,350 (2)V1b 8” Sewer Line Existing 8” sanitary sewer line along the Cotton Belt Rail Road Line from John McCain Road south to near Caldwell Creek Drive. Total Project Cost $134,000 Recoverable Cost $6,700 (3)I1 8” Sewer Line Existing 8” sanitary sewer line along the Cotton Belt Rail Road Line from John McCain Road south to near Caldwell Creek Drive. Total Project Cost $205,000 Recoverable Cost $10,250 (4)Wastewater Impact Fee Study Update Update of the impact fees for wastewater system improvements required to serve new development. Total Project Cost $36,250 Recoverable Cost $36,250 Wastewater Impact Fee Study 71 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Proposed (5)Pool Road 10” Sewer Line Replace existing 6” sewer line along Pool Road from Whitehaven Street to Summertree Lane. Total Project Cost $1,585,000 Total Upsize Project Cost $1,335,400 Recoverable Cost $1,295,338 (6)TRA – Bear Creek Interceptor Relief, Phase 1 Total Project Cost $24,700,000 Total Upsize Project Cost $4,750,000 Colleyville Proportional Upsize Cost (1.7%)$80,750 Recoverable Cost $78,328 (7)TRA – Bear Creek Interceptor Relief, Phase 2 Total Project Cost $20,700,000 Total Upsize Project Cost $3,980,769 Colleyville Proportional Upsize Cost (1.7%)$67,673 Recoverable Cost $65,643 Note: Project Descriptions are not provided for the TRA projects listed in Table 4.1. Wastewater Impact Fee Study 72 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas 4.4 WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code defines a service unit as follows, “Service Unit means a standardized measure of consumption attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years.” Therefore, the City of Colleyville defines a service unit based on historical wastewater discharge or flow over the past 10 years as compared to the estimated residential units. The residential unit is the development type that predominately uses a 3/4” meter. The measure of discharge per service unit is based on a 3/4” meter and the data shown in Table 4.2. Service Unit Consumption Calculation Year Population1 Service Units (2.96 person/unit) Wastewater Average Day Flow (MGD)1 Flow per Service Unit (GPD) 2010 22,807 7,705 2.16 280 2011 22,949 7,753 2.20 284 2012 23,090 7,801 2.25 288 2013 23,270 7,861 2.30 293 2014 23,740 8,020 2.52 314 2015 23,760 8,027 2.93 365 2016 24230 8,186 3.00 366 2017 24,623 8,319 2.93 352 2018 25,015 8,451 2.73 323 2019 25,408 8,584 2.78 324 Average Historical Flow per Service Unit 319 (1) Data Sources: City of Colleyville Wastewater Impact Fee Study 73 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Based on the City’s 10-year growth projections and the resulting wastewater flow projections, wastewater service will be required for an additional 501 service units. The calculation is as follows: ·A service unit, which is a unit of development that discharges approximately 319 gallons per day (GPD), is a typical residential connection that uses a 3/4” meter.Table 4.3 outlines the future wastewater discharge projections and its relationship to the additional service units projected for the next 10-years. 10-year Additional Service Units Calculation Year Average Day Flow (MGD)1 Service Unit Demand (GPD) Projected Service Units 2020 2.78 319 8,715 2030 2.94 319 9,216 10-year Additional Service Units 501 (1) Data Sources:City of Colleyville; Wastewater Master Plan by Garver Impact fee law allows for a credit calculation to credit back the development community based on the utility revenues or ad valorem taxes that are allocated for paying a portion of future capital improvements. The intent of this credit is to prevent the City from double charging development for future capital improvements via impact fees and utility rates. If the city chooses not the do a financial analysis to determine the credit value they are required by law to reduce the recoverable cost by 50 percent. The city has chosen to calculate the credit value. Therefore, the maximum recoverable cost for impact fee shown below is 99.3 percent of the Pre Credit Recoverable Cost. A detailed credit calculation has been provided by Edward B. Peacock, CPA in the appendix. A breakdown of the 10-year recoverable costs and the associated impact fee per service unit is as follows: 10-Year Recoverable Cost Breakdown Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs $ 1,495,858 Pre Credit Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 1,495,858 Credit for Utility Revenues $ (10,581) Maximum Recoverable Cost for Impact Fee $ 1,485,277 (1) Per Edward B. Peacock, CPA financial analysis, see the Appendix – Plan for Awarding the Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Credit Wastewater Impact Fee Study 74 June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas Impact fee per service units = 10-year recoverable costs 10-year additional service units 10-year recoverable cost = $1,485,277 Impact fee per service units = $1,485,277 501 Impact fee per service units = $2,965 Therefore, the maximum assessable wastewater impact fee per service unit is $2,965. For a development that requires a different size meter, a service unit equivalent is established at a multiplier based on its capacity with respect to the 3/4” meter. The maximum impact fee that could be assessed for other meter sizes is based on the value shown on Table 4.5, Service Unit Equivalency Table for Commonly Used Meters. Service Unit Equivalency Table for Commonly Used Meters Meter Size Maximum Continuous Operating Capacity (GPM)* Service Unit Equivalent Maximum Assessable Wastewater Impact Fee 5/8”x 3/4” PD 10 0.67 $1,977 3/4” PD 15 1.00 $2,965 1” PD 25 1.67 $4,942 1 1/2” PD 50 3.33 $9,883 2” PD 80 5.33 $15,813 2” Compound 80 5.33 $15,813 2” Turbine 100 6.67 $19,767 3” Compound 175 11.67 $34,592 3” Turbine 220 14.67 $43,487 4” Compound 300 20.00 $59,300 4” Turbine 420 28.00 $83,020 6” Compound 675 45.00 $133,425 6” Turbine 865 57.67 $170,982 8” Compound 900 60.00 $177,900 8” Turbine 2,400 160.00 $474,400 10” Turbine 3,500 233.33 $691,833 PD = Positive Displacement Meter (Typical Residential Meter) *Operating capacities obtained from American Water Works Association (AWWA) C-700-20, C-701-19, C702-19 Appendix June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas APPENDIX CONCEPTUAL LEVEL PROJECT COST PROJECTIONS ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES INVENTORY PLAN FOR AWARDING THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CREDIT PLAN FOR AWARDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CREDIT Appendix June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas CONCEPTUAL LEVEL PROJECT COST PROJECTIONS Roadway Improvements - Service Area 1 #Class Project Limits Status Project Cost % in Service Area Cost in Service Area1-A/2-R P6D Colleyville Blvd 475' S of Brown Trl (City Limits) to 600' S of Cheek Sparger Rd Widening 1,893,200$ 50%946,600$ 1-B/2-S P6D Colleyville Blvd 2,030' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to 475' S of Brown Trl Completed 5,070,000$ 50%2,535,000$ 1-C C2U Thompson Terr Colleyville Blvd to Old Glade Rd Widening 1,024,000$ 100%1,024,000$ 1-D M2D Glade Rd Bedford Rd to Pool Rd Completed 11,655,011$ 100%11,655,011$ 1-E C2U-S Roberts Rd 2,140' N of Glade Rd (City Limits) to Glade Rd Widening 1,653,000$ 100%1,653,000$ 1-F C2U Bedford Rd 115' S of Glade Rd to Little Bear Creek Widening 2,583,000$ 100%2,583,000$ 1-G M4U (1/2)Cheek-Sparger Rd San Bar Ln to Del Mar Ct Widening 1,589,000$ 100%1,589,000$ 1-H M4U (1/2)Cheek-Sparger Rd Bedford Rd to 1,270' E of Bedford Rd Widening 947,000$ 100%947,000$ 1-I M4U (1/2)Cheek-Sparger Rd 1,270' E of Bedford Rd to Heritage Ave (City Limits)Widening 8,940,000$ 50%4,470,000$ 1-J M4U (1/2)Jackson Rd 2,540' S of Glade Rd to Cheek Sparger Rd Widening 2,824,000$ 100%2,824,000$ 1-K M4U (1/2)Brown Trl 350' S of Autumn Oaks to 145' S of Quail Crest Dr Widening 1,107,000$ 100%1,107,000$ 1-L M4U (1/2)Glade Rd Pool Rd to Strathmore Terr Widening 2,264,000$ 100%2,264,000$ I-1 Intersection Hall Johnson Rd & Riverwalk Dr Intersection Improvements Proposed 1,000,000$ 100%1,000,000$ I-2 Intersection Bedford Rd & Cheek-Sparger Rd Intersection Improvements Proposed 1,000,000$ 100%1,000,000$ I-3 Intersection Jackson Rd & Cheek-Sparger Rd Intersection Improvements Completed 1,931,523$ 50%965,761$ I-4 Intersection Heritage Ave & Cheek-Sparger Rd Intersection Improvements Completed 250,000$ 50%125,000$ TOTAL 45,730,734$ 36,688,372$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. City of Colleyville - 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Capital Improvements Plan for Roadway Impact FeesSummary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville. Intersection Improvements 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-A/2-R Name:Colleyville Blvd Limits: Impact Fee Class:P6D Ultimate Class:P6D Length (lf):3,881 Service Area(s):1, 2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost108Unclassified Street Excavation 16,819 CY 27.00$ 454,104$ 208 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 36#/sy)33,637 SY 4.25$ 142,959$ 308 8" Concrete Pavement 31,481 SY 73.00$ 2,298,122$ 408 4" Topsoil 12,937 SY 10.00$ 129,374$ 608 8' Paved Trail 62,100 SF 8.00$ 496,798$ 508 Concrete Driveway Approach 4 EA 4,000.00$ 16,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,537,358$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%212,241$ Traffic Control None Anticipated 0%-$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%106,121$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%884,339$ √Illumination 6%212,241$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%212,241$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%141,494$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%106,121$ √Basic Landscaping 3%106,121$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,980,920$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:5,518,278$ Construction Contingency:15%827,742$ Mobilization:6%49,664$ Construction Cost TOTAL:6,396,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 6,396,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%1,151,280$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:New Roadway Alignment 30%1,918,800$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% City Contribution)1,893,200$ 475' S of Brown Trl (City Limits) to 600' S of Cheek Sparger Rd This project consists of the widening of a five-lane undivided facility to a six-lane divided principal arterial. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-B/2-S Name:Colleyville Blvd Limits: Impact Fee Class:P6D Ultimate Class:P6D Length (lf):18,283 Service Area(s):1, 2 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost City Contribution to Construction Cost:- 5,070,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:No ROW Acquisition Costs included Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,070,000$ 2,030' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to 475' S of Brown Trl This completed project consisted of the reconstruction of an existing five-lane undivided facility to a six-lane divided prinicipal arterial. This represents only the City of Colleyville's contribution to SH 26. NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-C Name:Thompson Terr Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U Length (lf):1,061 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 1,946 CY 27.00$ 52,536$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)3,892 SY 3.50$ 13,620$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 3,656 SY 60.00$ 219,341$ 401 4" Topsoil 3,774 SY 10.00$ 37,736$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 10,613 SF 8.00$ 84,906$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 1 EA 4,000.00$ 4,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:412,140$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%24,728$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%20,607$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%12,364$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%103,035$ √Illumination 6%24,728$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%24,728$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%16,486$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%12,364$ √Basic Landscaping 3%12,364$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:251,405$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:663,545$ Construction Contingency:15%99,532$ Mobilization:6%5,972$ Construction Cost TOTAL:770,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 770,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%138,600$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%115,500$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,024,000$ This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two-lane undivided collector facility. Colleyville Blvd to Old Glade Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-D Name:Glade Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:M2D Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):8,235 Service Area(s):1 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost City Contribution to Construction Cost:- 10,764,961$ Engineering/Survey/Testing Other Roundabout at Riverwalk and Bluebonnet lowering 890,050$ ROW/Easement Acquisition:No ROW Acquisition Costs included Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:11,655,011$ This project consisted of the widening of an existing two- lane undivided facility to a four-lane undivided minor arterial. Bedford Rd to Pool Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-E Name:Roberts Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U-S Ultimate Class:C2U-S Length (lf):2,166 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost110Unclassified Street Excavation 3,489 CY 27.00$ 94,213$ 202 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 36#/sy)6,979 SY 4.25$ 29,660$ 310 8" Concrete Pavement 6,497 SY 60.00$ 389,847$ 410 4" Topsoil 5,776 SY 10.00$ 57,755$ 610 4' Concrete Sidewalk 10,829 SF 8.00$ 86,633$ 510 Concrete Driveway Approach 2 EA 4,000.00$ 8,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:666,108$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%39,966$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%33,305$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%19,983$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%166,527$ √Illumination 6%39,966$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%39,966$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%26,644$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%19,983$ √Basic Landscaping 3%19,983$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:406,326$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,072,434$ Construction Contingency:15%160,865$ Mobilization:6%9,652$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,243,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 1,243,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%223,740$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%186,450$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,653,000$ This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two-lane undivided collector facility. 2,140' N of Glade Rd (City Limits) to Glade Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-F Name:Bedford Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U Length (lf):2,674 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 4,902 CY 27.00$ 132,358$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)9,804 SY 3.50$ 34,315$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 9,210 SY 60.00$ 552,605$ 401 4" Topsoil 9,507 SY 10.00$ 95,072$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 26,739 SF 8.00$ 213,912$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 3 EA 4,000.00$ 12,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,040,261$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%62,416$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%52,013$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%31,208$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%260,065$ √Illumination 6%62,416$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%62,416$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%41,610$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%31,208$ √Basic Landscaping 3%31,208$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:634,559$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,674,820$ Construction Contingency:15%251,223$ Mobilization:6%15,073$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,942,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 1,942,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%349,560$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%291,300$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,583,000$ This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two-lane undivided collector facility. 115' S of Glade Rd to Little Bear Creek NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-G Name:Cheek-Sparger Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:M4U (1/2) Ultimate Class:M4U Length (lf):2,132 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost104Unclassified Street Excavation 2,961 CY 27.00$ 79,949$ 204 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)5,922 SY 3.50$ 20,728$ 304 8" Concrete Pavement 5,448 SY 73.00$ 397,733$ 404 4" Topsoil 4,856 SY 10.00$ 48,562$ 604 5' Concrete Sidewalk 10,660 SF 8.00$ 85,279$ 504 Concrete Driveway Approach 2 EA 4,000.00$ 8,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:640,251$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%38,415$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%32,013$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%19,208$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%160,063$ √Illumination 6%38,415$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%38,415$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%25,610$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%19,208$ √Basic Landscaping 3%19,208$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:390,553$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,030,804$ Construction Contingency:15%154,621$ Mobilization:6%9,277$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,195,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 1,195,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%215,100$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%179,250$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,589,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane undivided minor arterial. San Bar Ln to Del Mar Ct NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-H Name:Cheek-Sparger Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:M4U (1/2) Ultimate Class:M4U Length (lf):1,273 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost104Unclassified Street Excavation 1,768 CY 27.00$ 47,739$ 204 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)3,536 SY 3.50$ 12,377$ 304 8" Concrete Pavement 3,253 SY 73.00$ 237,493$ 404 4" Topsoil 2,900 SY 10.00$ 28,997$ 604 5' Concrete Sidewalk 6,365 SF 8.00$ 50,922$ 504 Concrete Driveway Approach 1 EA 4,000.00$ 4,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:381,528$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%22,892$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%19,076$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%11,446$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%95,382$ √Illumination 6%22,892$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%22,892$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%15,261$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%11,446$ √Basic Landscaping 3%11,446$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:232,732$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:614,260$ Construction Contingency:15%92,139$ Mobilization:6%5,528$ Construction Cost TOTAL:712,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 712,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%128,160$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%106,800$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:947,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane undivided minor arterial. Bedford Rd to 1,270' E of Bedford Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-I Name:Cheek-Sparger Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:M4U (1/2) Ultimate Class:M4U Length (lf):11,984 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost104Unclassified Street Excavation 16,644 CY 27.00$ 449,395$ 204 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)33,288 SY 3.50$ 116,510$ 304 8" Concrete Pavement 30,625 SY 73.00$ 2,235,655$ 404 4" Topsoil 27,297 SY 10.00$ 272,966$ 604 5' Concrete Sidewalk 59,919 SF 8.00$ 479,354$ 504 Concrete Driveway Approach 12 EA 4,000.00$ 48,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,601,880$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%216,113$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%180,094$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%108,056$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%900,470$ √Illumination 6%216,113$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%216,113$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%144,075$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%108,056$ √Basic Landscaping 3%108,056$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,197,147$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:5,799,026$ Construction Contingency:15%869,854$ Mobilization:6%52,191$ Construction Cost TOTAL:6,722,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 6,722,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%1,209,960$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%1,008,300$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:8,940,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane undivided minor arterial. 1,270' E of Bedford Rd to Heritage Ave (City Limits) NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-J Name:Jackson Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:M4U (1/2) Ultimate Class:M4U Length (lf):3,782 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost104Unclassified Street Excavation 5,253 CY 27.00$ 141,838$ 204 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)10,507 SY 3.50$ 36,773$ 304 8" Concrete Pavement 9,666 SY 73.00$ 705,620$ 404 4" Topsoil 8,615 SY 10.00$ 86,154$ 604 5' Concrete Sidewalk 18,912 SF 8.00$ 151,294$ 504 Concrete Driveway Approach 4 EA 4,000.00$ 16,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,137,679$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%68,261$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%56,884$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%34,130$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%284,420$ √Illumination 6%68,261$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%68,261$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%45,507$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%34,130$ √Basic Landscaping 3%34,130$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:693,984$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,831,663$ Construction Contingency:15%274,749$ Mobilization:6%16,485$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,123,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 2,123,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%382,140$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%318,450$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,824,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane undivided minor arterial. 2,540' S of Glade Rd to Cheek Sparger Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-K Name:Brown Trl Limits: Impact Fee Class:M4U (1/2) Ultimate Class:M4U Length (lf):1,490 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost104Unclassified Street Excavation 2,069 CY 27.00$ 55,867$ 204 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)4,138 SY 3.50$ 14,484$ 304 8" Concrete Pavement 3,807 SY 73.00$ 277,928$ 404 4" Topsoil 3,393 SY 10.00$ 33,934$ 604 5' Concrete Sidewalk 7,449 SF 8.00$ 59,592$ 504 Concrete Driveway Approach 1 EA 4,000.00$ 4,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:445,805$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%26,748$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%22,290$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%13,374$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%111,451$ √Illumination 6%26,748$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%26,748$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%17,832$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%13,374$ √Basic Landscaping 3%13,374$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:271,941$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:717,746$ Construction Contingency:15%107,662$ Mobilization:6%6,460$ Construction Cost TOTAL:832,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 832,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%149,760$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%124,800$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,107,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane undivided minor arterial. 350' S of Autumn Oaks to 145' S of Quail Crest Dr NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-L Name:Glade Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:M4U (1/2) Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):3,034 Service Area(s):1 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost104Unclassified Street Excavation 4,214 CY 27.00$ 113,769$ 204 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)8,427 SY 3.50$ 29,496$ 304 8" Concrete Pavement 7,753 SY 73.00$ 565,980$ 404 4" Topsoil 6,910 SY 10.00$ 69,104$ 604 5' Concrete Sidewalk 15,169 SF 8.00$ 121,354$ 504 Concrete Driveway Approach 3 EA 4,000.00$ 12,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:911,703$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%54,702$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%45,585$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%27,351$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%227,926$ √Illumination 6%54,702$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%54,702$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%36,468$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%27,351$ √Basic Landscaping 3%27,351$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:556,139$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,467,842$ Construction Contingency:15%220,176$ Mobilization:6%13,211$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,702,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 1,702,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%306,360$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%255,300$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,264,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane undivided minor arterial.Pool Rd to Strathmore Terr NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Roadway Improvements - Service Area 2 #Class Project Limits Status Project Cost % in Service Area Cost in Service Area2-A C2U John McCain Rd Bandit Tr to Westcoat Dr Widening 2,316,000$ 100%2,316,000$ 2-B C2U John McCain Rd 150' E of Westcoat Dr to 430' W of Pleasant Run Rd Widening 1,091,000$ 100%1,091,000$ 2-C C2U John McCain Rd 315' E of Pleasant Run Rd to Maranatha Ct Widening 5,789,000$ 100%5,789,000$ 2-D C2U McDonwell School Rd W Herbert Rd to Westcoat Dr Widening 5,025,000$ 100%5,025,000$ 2-E C2U Lavaca Trl Precinct Line Rd (City Limits) to Mustang Tr Widening 2,837,000$ 100%2,837,000$ 2-F C2U L. D. Lockett Rd Precinct Line Rd (City Limits) to Pleasant Run Rd Widening 9,803,000$ 100%9,803,000$ 2-G C2U Westcoat Dr 300' S of John McCain Rd to McDonwell School Rd Widening 2,343,000$ 100%2,343,000$ 2-H C2U Westcoat Dr McDonwell School Rd to L D Lockett Rd Widening 3,454,000$ 100%3,454,000$ 2-I C2U White Dr Westcoat Dr to L D Lockett Rd Widening 1,781,000$ 100%1,781,000$ 2-J C2U Bransford Rd Shelton Dr to 220' N of Glade Rd Widening 5,244,000$ 100%5,244,000$ 2-K C2U Pleasant Run Rd 3,080' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to John McCain Rd Completed 3,328,000$ 100%3,328,000$ 2-L C2U Pleasant Run Rd John McCain Rd to 200' S of Shelton Dr Completed 4,769,000$ 100%4,769,000$ 2-M C2U Pleasant Run Rd Bogart Dr to Colleyville Blvd Completed 231,000$ 100%231,000$ 2-N C2U Tinker Rd Pleasant Run Rd to 645' E of Pleasant Run Rd Widening 626,000$ 100%626,000$ 2-O C2U Tinker Rd Caldwell Hughes Rd to Colleyville Blvd Widening 2,092,000$ 100%2,092,000$ 2-P C2U Bogart Dr Hall Johnson Rd to Colleyville Blvd Widening 599,000$ 100%599,000$ 2-Q M4U (1/2)Glade Rd 5,100' W of Bransford Rd (City Limits) to 265' W of Bransford Rd Widening 3,586,000$ 100%3,586,000$ 1-A/2-R P6D Colleyville Blvd 475' S of Brown Trl (City Limits) to 600' S of Cheek Sparger Rd Widening 1,219,200$ 50%609,600$ 1-B/2-S P6D Colleyville Blvd 2,030' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to 475' S of Brown Trl Completed 5,070,000$ 50%2,535,000$ I-5 Intersection John McCain Rd & Westcoat Dr Intersection Improvements Completed 1,142,907$ 100%1,142,907$ I-6 Intersection John McCain Rd & Pleasant Run Rd Intersection Improvements Completed 753,196$ 50%376,598$ I-7 Intersection McDonwell School Rd & Westcoat Dr Intersection Improvements Completed 1,452,805$ 100%1,452,805$ I-8 Intersection Precinct Line Rd & Lavaca Trl Intersection Improvements Proposed 750,000$ 50%375,000$ I-9 Intersection L.D. Lockett Rd & Precinct Line Rd Intersection Improvements Completed 310,000$ 50%155,000$ TOTAL 65,612,108$ 61,560,910$ The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. City of Colleyville - 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Capital Improvements Plan for Roadway Impact FeesSummary of Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Intersection Improvements NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-A Name:John McCain Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U Length (lf):2,405 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 4,410 CY 27.00$ 119,068$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)8,820 SY 3.50$ 30,869$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 8,285 SY 60.00$ 497,118$ 401 4" Topsoil 8,553 SY 10.00$ 85,526$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 24,054 SF 8.00$ 192,433$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 2 EA 4,000.00$ 8,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:933,014$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%55,981$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%46,651$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%27,990$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%233,254$ √Illumination 6%55,981$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%55,981$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%37,321$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%27,990$ √Basic Landscaping 3%27,990$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:569,139$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,502,153$ Construction Contingency:15%225,323$ Mobilization:6%13,519$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,741,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 1,741,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%313,380$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%261,150$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,316,000$ This project consists of the reconstruction of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two-lane undivided collector facility. Bandit Tr to Westcoat Dr NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-B Name:John McCain Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):1,132 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 2,075 CY 27.00$ 56,025$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)4,150 SY 3.50$ 14,525$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 3,899 SY 60.00$ 233,911$ 401 4" Topsoil 4,024 SY 10.00$ 40,243$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 11,318 SF 8.00$ 90,546$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 1 EA 4,000.00$ 4,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:439,250$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%26,355$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%21,962$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%13,177$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%109,812$ √Illumination 6%26,355$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%26,355$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%17,570$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%13,177$ √Basic Landscaping 3%13,177$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:267,942$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:707,192$ Construction Contingency:15%106,079$ Mobilization:6%6,365$ Construction Cost TOTAL:820,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 820,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%147,600$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%123,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,091,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. 150' E of Westcoat Dr to 430' W of Pleasant Run Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-C Name:John McCain Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):6,003 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 11,006 CY 27.00$ 297,170$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)22,013 SY 3.50$ 77,044$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 20,678 SY 60.00$ 1,240,708$ 401 4" Topsoil 21,346 SY 10.00$ 213,455$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 60,034 SF 8.00$ 480,274$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 6 EA 4,000.00$ 24,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,332,651$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%139,959$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%116,633$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%69,980$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%583,163$ √Illumination 6%139,959$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%139,959$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%93,306$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%69,980$ √Basic Landscaping 3%69,980$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,422,917$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,755,568$ Construction Contingency:15%563,335$ Mobilization:6%33,800$ Construction Cost TOTAL:4,353,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 4,353,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%783,540$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%652,950$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,789,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. 315' E of Pleasant Run Rd to Maranatha Ct NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-D Name:McDonwell School Rd W Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):5,213 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 9,556 CY 27.00$ 258,022$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)19,113 SY 3.50$ 66,894$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 17,954 SY 60.00$ 1,077,262$ 401 4" Topsoil 18,534 SY 10.00$ 185,335$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 52,126 SF 8.00$ 417,005$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 5 EA 4,000.00$ 20,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,024,518$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%121,471$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%101,226$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%60,736$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%506,129$ √Illumination 6%121,471$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%121,471$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%80,981$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%60,736$ √Basic Landscaping 3%60,736$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,234,956$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,259,474$ Construction Contingency:15%488,921$ Mobilization:6%29,335$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,778,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 3,778,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%680,040$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%566,700$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,025,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. Herbert Rd to Westcoat Dr NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-E Name:Lavaca Trl Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U Length (lf):2,940 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 5,390 CY 27.00$ 145,531$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)10,780 SY 3.50$ 37,730$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 10,127 SY 60.00$ 607,603$ 401 4" Topsoil 10,453 SY 10.00$ 104,534$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 29,400 SF 8.00$ 235,201$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 3 EA 4,000.00$ 12,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,142,599$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%68,556$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%57,130$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%34,278$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%285,650$ √Illumination 6%68,556$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%68,556$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%45,704$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%34,278$ √Basic Landscaping 3%34,278$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:696,985$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,839,584$ Construction Contingency:15%275,938$ Mobilization:6%16,556$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,133,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 2,133,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%383,940$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%319,950$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,837,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two-lane undivided collector facility. Precinct Line Rd (City Limits) to Mustang Tr NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-F Name:L. D. Lockett Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):10,167 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 18,639 CY 27.00$ 503,256$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)37,278 SY 3.50$ 130,474$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 35,019 SY 60.00$ 2,101,136$ 401 4" Topsoil 36,149 SY 10.00$ 361,486$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 101,668 SF 8.00$ 813,343$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 10 EA 4,000.00$ 40,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,949,694$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%236,982$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%197,485$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%118,491$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%987,423$ √Illumination 6%236,982$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%236,982$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%157,988$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%118,491$ √Basic Landscaping 3%118,491$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:2,409,313$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:6,359,007$ Construction Contingency:15%953,851$ Mobilization:6%57,231$ Construction Cost TOTAL:7,371,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 7,371,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%1,326,780$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%1,105,650$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:9,803,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. Precinct Line Rd (City Limits) to Pleasant Run Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-G Name:Westcoat Dr Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):2,433 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 4,461 CY 27.00$ 120,455$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)8,923 SY 3.50$ 31,229$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 8,382 SY 60.00$ 502,911$ 401 4" Topsoil 8,652 SY 10.00$ 86,522$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 24,334 SF 8.00$ 194,675$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 2 EA 4,000.00$ 8,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:943,792$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%56,628$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%47,190$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%28,314$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%235,948$ √Illumination 6%56,628$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%56,628$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%37,752$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%28,314$ √Basic Landscaping 3%28,314$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:575,713$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,519,505$ Construction Contingency:15%227,926$ Mobilization:6%13,676$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,762,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 1,762,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%317,160$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%264,300$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,343,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. 300' S of John McCain Rd to McDonwell School Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-H Name:Westcoat Dr Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):3,577 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 6,558 CY 27.00$ 177,063$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)13,116 SY 3.50$ 45,905$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 12,321 SY 60.00$ 739,252$ 401 4" Topsoil 12,718 SY 10.00$ 127,183$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 35,770 SF 8.00$ 286,162$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 4 EA 4,000.00$ 16,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,391,565$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%83,494$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%69,578$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%41,747$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%347,891$ √Illumination 6%83,494$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%83,494$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%55,663$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%41,747$ √Basic Landscaping 3%41,747$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:848,855$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,240,420$ Construction Contingency:15%336,063$ Mobilization:6%20,164$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,597,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 2,597,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%467,460$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%389,550$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,454,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. McDonwell School Rd to L D Lockett Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-I Name:White Dr Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U Length (lf):1,845 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 3,382 CY 27.00$ 91,322$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)6,765 SY 3.50$ 23,676$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 6,355 SY 60.00$ 381,277$ 401 4" Topsoil 6,560 SY 10.00$ 65,596$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 18,449 SF 8.00$ 147,591$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 2 EA 4,000.00$ 8,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:717,463$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%43,048$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%35,873$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%21,524$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%179,366$ √Illumination 6%43,048$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%43,048$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%28,699$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%21,524$ √Basic Landscaping 3%21,524$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:437,652$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,155,115$ Construction Contingency:15%173,267$ Mobilization:6%10,396$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,339,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 1,339,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%241,020$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%200,850$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:1,781,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two-lane undivided collector facility. Westcoat Dr to L D Lockett Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-J Name:Bransford Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):5,442 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 9,978 CY 27.00$ 269,398$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)19,955 SY 3.50$ 69,844$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 18,746 SY 60.00$ 1,124,758$ 401 4" Topsoil 19,351 SY 10.00$ 193,507$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 54,424 SF 8.00$ 435,390$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 5 EA 4,000.00$ 20,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:2,112,896$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%126,774$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%105,645$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%63,387$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%528,224$ √Illumination 6%126,774$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%126,774$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%84,516$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%63,387$ √Basic Landscaping 3%63,387$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:1,288,867$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:3,401,763$ Construction Contingency:15%510,264$ Mobilization:6%30,616$ Construction Cost TOTAL:3,943,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 3,943,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%709,740$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%591,450$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,244,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. Shelton Dr to 220' N of Glade Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-K Name:Pleasant Run Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):3,051 Service Area(s):2 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost City Contribution to Construction Cost:- 3,328,304$ Engineering/Survey/Testing Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:No ROW Acquisition Costs included Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,328,000$ This completed project consisted of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. 3,080' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to John McCain Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-L Name:Pleasant Run Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):6,175 Service Area(s):2 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost City Contribution to Construction Cost:- 4,769,138$ Engineering/Survey/Testing Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:No ROW Acquisition Costs included Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:4,769,000$ This completed project consisted of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. John McCain Rd to 200' S of Shelton Dr NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-M Name:Pleasant Run Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):3,702 Service Area(s):2 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost City Contribution to Construction Cost:- 231,070$ Engineering/Survey/Testing Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:No ROW Acquisition Costs included Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:231,000$ This completed project consisted of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. Bogart Dr to Colleyville Blvd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-N Name:Tinker Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):646 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 1,184 CY 27.00$ 31,966$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)2,368 SY 3.50$ 8,287$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 2,224 SY 60.00$ 133,460$ 401 4" Topsoil 2,296 SY 10.00$ 22,961$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 6,458 SF 8.00$ 51,662$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 1 EA 4,000.00$ 4,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:252,336$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%15,140$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%12,617$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%7,570$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%63,084$ √Illumination 6%15,140$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%15,140$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%10,093$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%7,570$ √Basic Landscaping 3%7,570$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:153,925$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:406,261$ Construction Contingency:15%60,939$ Mobilization:6%3,656$ Construction Cost TOTAL:471,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 471,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%84,780$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%70,650$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:626,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. Pleasant Run Rd to 645' E of Pleasant Run Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-O Name:Tinker Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):2,171 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 3,980 CY 27.00$ 107,449$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)7,959 SY 3.50$ 27,857$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 7,477 SY 60.00$ 448,610$ 401 4" Topsoil 7,718 SY 10.00$ 77,180$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 21,707 SF 8.00$ 173,655$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 2 EA 4,000.00$ 8,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:842,752$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%50,565$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%42,138$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%25,283$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%210,688$ √Illumination 6%50,565$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%50,565$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%33,710$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%25,283$ √Basic Landscaping 3%25,283$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:514,079$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:1,356,830$ Construction Contingency:15%203,525$ Mobilization:6%12,211$ Construction Cost TOTAL:1,573,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 1,573,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%283,140$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%235,950$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:2,092,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. Caldwell Hughes Rd to Colleyville Blvd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-P Name:Bogart Dr Limits: Impact Fee Class:C2U Ultimate Class:C2U/C3U Length (lf):616 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost101Unclassified Street Excavation 1,129 CY 27.00$ 30,486$ 201 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)2,258 SY 3.50$ 7,904$ 301 7" Concrete Pavement 2,121 SY 60.00$ 127,282$ 401 4" Topsoil 2,190 SY 10.00$ 21,898$ 601 5' Concrete Sidewalk 6,159 SF 8.00$ 49,270$ 501 Concrete Driveway Approach 1 EA 4,000.00$ 4,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:240,840$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%14,450$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%12,042$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%7,225$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%60,210$ √Illumination 6%14,450$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%14,450$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%9,634$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%7,225$ √Basic Landscaping 3%7,225$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:146,912$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:387,752$ Construction Contingency:15%58,163$ Mobilization:6%3,490$ Construction Cost TOTAL:450,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 450,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%81,000$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%67,500$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:599,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a two/three-lane undivided collector facility. Hall Johnson Rd to Colleyville Blvd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.2-Q Name:Glade Rd Limits: Impact Fee Class:M4U (1/2) Ultimate Class:M4U Length (lf):4,803 Service Area(s):2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost104Unclassified Street Excavation 6,671 CY 27.00$ 180,115$ 204 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 30#/sy)13,342 SY 3.50$ 46,697$ 304 8" Concrete Pavement 12,275 SY 73.00$ 896,040$ 404 4" Topsoil 10,940 SY 10.00$ 109,403$ 604 5' Concrete Sidewalk 24,015 SF 8.00$ 192,123$ 504 Concrete Driveway Approach 5 EA 4,000.00$ 20,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:1,444,378$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%86,663$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%72,219$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%43,331$ √Roadway Drainage Standard Internal System 25%361,094$ √Illumination 6%86,663$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ √Water Minor Adjustments 6%86,663$ √Sewer Minor Adjustments 4%57,775$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%43,331$ √Basic Landscaping 3%43,331$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:881,070$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:2,325,448$ Construction Contingency:15%348,817$ Mobilization:6%20,929$ Construction Cost TOTAL:2,696,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 2,696,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%485,280$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:Existing Alignment 15%404,400$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:3,586,000$ This project consists of the widening of an existing two-lane undivided facility to a four-lane undivided minor arterial. 5,100' W of Bransford Rd (City Limits) to 265' W of Bransford Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-A/2-R Name:Colleyville Blvd Limits: Impact Fee Class:P6D Ultimate Class:P6D Length (lf):3,881 Service Area(s):1, 2 Roadway Construction Cost Projection No.Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Item Cost108Unclassified Street Excavation 16,819 CY 27.00$ 454,104$ 208 6" Lime Stabilization (with Lime @ 36#/sy)33,637 SY 4.25$ 142,959$ 308 8" Concrete Pavement 31,481 SY 73.00$ 2,298,122$ 408 4" Topsoil 12,937 SY 10.00$ 129,374$ 608 8' Paved Trail 62,100 SF 8.00$ 496,798$ 508 Concrete Driveway Approach 4 EA 4,000.00$ 16,000$ Paving Construction Cost Subtotal:3,537,358$ Major Construction Component Allowances**: Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost √Prep ROW 6%212,241$ √Traffic Control Construction Phase Traffic Control 5%176,868$ √Pavement Markings/Markers 3%106,121$ Roadway Drainage None Anticipated 0%-$ √Illumination 6%212,241$ Special Drainage Structures None Anticipated 0%-$ Water None Anticipated 0%-$ Sewer None Anticipated 0%-$ √Establish Turf / Erosion Control 3%106,121$ √Basic Landscaping 3%106,121$ Other:$0 -$ **Allowances based on % of Paving Construction Cost Subtotal Allowance Subtotal:919,713$ Paving and Allowance Subtotal:4,457,070$ Construction Contingency:15%668,561$ Mobilization:6%40,114$ Construction Cost TOTAL:5,166,000$ Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost Construction:- 5,166,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing:18%929,880$ Previous Town contribution Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:No ROW Acquisition Costs included 0%-$ Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL (20% Town Contribution)1,219,200$ This project consists of the widening of a five-lane undivided facility to a six-lane divided principal arterial. 475' S of Brown Trl (City Limits) to 600' S of Cheek Sparger Rd NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City's design standards contained or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections City of Colleyville Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update updated:9/21/2021 Conceptual Level Project Cost Projection Project Information:Description:Project No.1-B/2-S Name:Colleyville Blvd Limits: Impact Fee Class:P6D Ultimate Class:P6D Length (lf):18,283 Service Area(s):1, 2 Impact Fee Project Cost Summary Item Description Notes:Allowance Item Cost City Contribution to Construction Cost:- 5,070,000$ Engineering/Survey/Testing Other ROW/Easement Acquisition:No ROW Acquisition Costs included Impact Fee Project Cost TOTAL:5,070,000$ This completed project consisted of the reconstruction of an existing five-lane undivided facility to a six-lane divided prinicipal arterial. This represents only the City of Colleyville's contribution to SH 26. 2,030' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to 475' S of Brown Trl NOTE: The planning level cost projections listed in this appendix have been developed for Impact Fee calculations only and should not be used for any future Capital Improvement Planning within the City of Colleyville.The planning level cost projections shall not supersede the City’s design standards contained within the Subdivision Ordinance or the determination of the City Engineer for a specific project. 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix A - Conceptual Level Project Cost Projections Appendix June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CIP SERVICE UNITS OF SUPPLY Service Area 1 9/21/2021 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTHCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HRPER LN TOTAL PK-HR VEH-MI1-A/2-R Colleyville Blvd 475' S of Brown Trl (City Limits) to 600' S of Cheek Sparger Rd 0.74 6 P6D 2,652 50%900 1,985 975 1,010 1,893,200$ 946,600$ 1-B/2-S Colleyville Blvd 2,030' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to 475' S of Brown Trl 3.46 6 P6D 3,134 50%900 9,349 5,426 3,923 5,070,000$ 2,535,000$ 1-C Thompson Terr Colleyville Blvd to Old Glade Rd 0.20 2 C2U 81 100%525 211 16 195 1,024,000$ 1,024,000$ 1-D Glade Rd Bedford Rd to Pool Rd 1.56 2 M2D 1,338 100%725 2,262 2,087 175 11,655,011$ 11,655,011$ 1-E Roberts Rd 2,140' N of Glade Rd (City Limits) to Glade Rd 0.41 2 C2U 173 100%525 431 71 360 1,653,000$ 1,653,000$ 1-F Bedford Rd 115' S of Glade Rd to Little Bear Creek 0.51 2 C2U 571 100%525 532 289 243 2,583,000$ 2,583,000$ 1-G Cheek-Sparger Rd San Bar Ln to Del Mar Ct 0.40 4 M4U (1/2)878 100%650 1,050 355 695 1,589,000$ 1,589,000$ 1-H Cheek-Sparger Rd Bedford Rd to 1,270' E of Bedford Rd 0.24 4 M4U (1/2)1,194 100%650 627 288 339 947,000$ 947,000$ 1-I Cheek-Sparger Rd 1,270' E of Bedford Rd to Heritage Ave (City Limits)2.27 4 M4U (1/2)1,394 50%650 2,951 1,582 1,369 8,940,000$ 4,470,000$ 1-J Jackson Rd 2,540' S of Glade Rd to Cheek Sparger Rd 0.72 4 M4U (1/2)724 100%650 1,863 519 1,344 2,824,000$ 2,824,000$ 1-K Brown Trl 350' S of Autumn Oaks to 145' S of Quail Crest Dr 0.28 4 M4U (1/2)823 100%650 734 232 502 1,107,000$ 1,107,000$ 1-L Glade Rd Pool Rd to Strathmore Terr 0.57 4 M4U (1/2)1,338 100%650 1,494 769 725 2,264,000$ 2,264,000$ I-1 Hall Johnson Rd & Riverwalk Dr Intersection Improvements 100%1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ I-2 Bedford Rd & Cheek-Sparger Rd Intersection Improvements 100%1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ I-3 Jackson Rd & Cheek-Sparger Rd Intersection Improvements 50%1,931,523$ 965,761$ I-4 Heritage Ave & Cheek-Sparger Rd Intersection Improvements 50%250,000$ 125,000$ 23,486 11,840 10,152 45,730,734$ 36,688,372$ 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Cost Per Service Area 27,550$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA 1 36,715,922$ ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION SUBTOTAL PEAK HOUR VOLUME City of Colleyville - 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update CIP Service Units of Supply % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA Project ID #LIMITS LANES 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix B - CIP Service Units of Supply Service Area 2 9/21/2021 VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESSLENGTHCAPACITYSUPPLYTOTALCAPACITY(MI)PK-HR PK-HR DEMAND PK-HRPER LN TOTAL PK-HR VEH-MI2-A John McCain Rd Bandit Tr to Westcoat Dr 0.46 2 C2U 167 100%525 478 76 402 2,316,000$ 2,316,000$ 2-B John McCain Rd 150' E of Westcoat Dr to 430' W of Pleasant Run Rd 0.21 2 C2U 167 100%525 225 36 189 1,091,000$ 1,091,000$ 2-C John McCain Rd 315' E of Pleasant Run Rd to Maranatha Ct 1.14 2 C2U 1,053 100%525 1,194 1,197 -3 5,789,000$ 5,789,000$ 2-D McDonwell School Rd W Herbert Rd to Westcoat Dr 0.99 2 C2U 863 100%525 1,037 852 185 5,025,000$ 5,025,000$ 2-E Lavaca Trl Precinct Line Rd (City Limits) to Mustang Tr 0.56 2 C2U 79 100%525 585 44 541 2,837,000$ 2,837,000$ 2-F L. D. Lockett Rd Precinct Line Rd (City Limits) to Pleasant Run Rd 1.93 2 C2U 696 100%525 2,022 1,340 682 9,803,000$ 9,803,000$ 2-G Westcoat Dr 300' S of John McCain Rd to McDonwell School Rd 0.46 2 C2U 1,141 100%525 484 526 -42 2,343,000$ 2,343,000$ 2-H Westcoat Dr McDonwell School Rd to L D Lockett Rd 0.68 2 C2U 321 100%525 711 217 494 3,454,000$ 3,454,000$ 2-I White Dr Westcoat Dr to L D Lockett Rd 0.35 2 C2U 331 100%525 367 116 251 1,781,000$ 1,781,000$ 2-J Bransford Rd Shelton Dr to 220' N of Glade Rd 1.03 2 C2U 605 100%525 1,082 624 458 5,244,000$ 5,244,000$ 2-K Pleasant Run Rd 3,080' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to John McCain Rd 0.58 2 C2U 893 100%525 607 516 91 3,328,000$ 3,328,000$ 2-L Pleasant Run Rd John McCain Rd to 200' S of Shelton Dr 1.17 2 C2U 800 100%525 1,228 936 292 4,769,000$ 4,769,000$ 2-M Pleasant Run Rd Bogart Dr to Colleyville Blvd 0.70 2 C2U 509 100%525 736 357 379 231,000$ 231,000$ 2-N Tinker Rd Pleasant Run Rd to 645' E of Pleasant Run Rd 0.12 2 C2U 457 100%525 128 56 72 626,000$ 626,000$ 2-O Tinker Rd Caldwell Hughes Rd to Colleyville Blvd 0.41 2 C2U 457 100%525 432 188 244 2,092,000$ 2,092,000$ 2-P Bogart Dr Hall Johnson Rd to Colleyville Blvd 0.12 2 C2U N/A 100%525 122 0 122 599,000$ 599,000$ 2-Q Glade Rd 5,100' W of Bransford Rd (City Limits) to 265' W of Bransford Rd 0.91 4 M4U (1/2)970 100%650 2,365 882 1,483 3,586,000$ 3,586,000$ 1-A/2-R Colleyville Blvd 475' S of Brown Trl (City Limits) to 600' S of Cheek Sparger Rd 0.74 6 P6D 2,652 50%900 1,985 975 1,010 1,219,200$ 609,600$ 1-B/2-S Colleyville Blvd 2,030' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits) to 475' S of Brown Trl 3.46 6 P6D 3,134 50%900 9,349 5,426 3,923 5,070,000$ 2,535,000$ I-5 John McCain Rd & Westcoat Dr Intersection Improvements 100%1,142,907$ 1,142,907$ I-6 John McCain Rd & Pleasant Run Rd Intersection Improvements 50%753,196$ 376,598$ I-7 McDonwell School Rd & Westcoat Dr Intersection Improvements 100%1,452,805$ 1,452,805$ I-8 Precinct Line Rd & Lavaca Trl Intersection Improvements 50%750,000$ 375,000$ I-9 L.D. Lockett Rd & Precinct Line Rd Intersection Improvements 50%310,000$ 155,000$ 25,137 14,364 10,773 65,302,108$ 61,560,910$ 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Cost Per Service Area 27,550$ TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA 2 61,588,460$ TOTAL PROJECT COST IN SERVICE AREA SUBTOTAL City of Colleyville - 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update CIP Service Units of Supply Project ID #ROADWAY LIMITS LANES IMPACT FEE CLASSIFICATION PEAK HOUR VOLUME % IN SERVICE AREA TOTAL PROJECT COST 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix B - CIP Service Units of Supply Appendix June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas EXISTING ROADWAY FACILITIES INVENTORY Service Area 1 9/21/2021 PM % IN VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS EXISTING ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST TYPE PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY SUPPLY DEMAND CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES (ft)(mi)SECT HOUR AREA PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR VOL PER LN TOTAL TOTAL VEH-MI VEH-MIColleyville Blvd 475' S of Brown Trl (City Limits)600' S of Cheek Sparger Rd 3,881 0.74 M5U P6D 2,652 50%725 1,066 975 91 Colleyville Blvd 2,030' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits)475' S of Brown Trl 18,283 3.46 P6D P6D 3,134 50%900 9,349 5,426 3,923 Hall-Johnson Rd Colleyville Blvd Broughton Rd 2,805 0.53 M4D M4D 2,451 100%700 1,487 1,302 185 Hall-Johnson Rd Broughton Dr Sycamore Dr 1,962 0.37 M4U M4U 2,451 100%650 966 911 55 Hall-Johnson Rd Sycamore Dr Pool Rd (City Limits)2,215 0.42 M4D M4D 2,451 100%700 1,175 1,028 146 Riverwalk Dr Hall Johnson Rd Bluebonnet Dr 1,244 0.24 M4D M4D N/A 100%700 660 0 660 Riverwalk Dr Bluebonnet Dr Glade Rd 2,988 0.57 M4U M4U N/A 100%650 1,472 0 1,472 Church St Colleyville Blvd Riverwalk Dr 1,145 0.22 M4D M4D 266 100%700 607 58 550 Thompson Terr Colleyville Blvd 290' S of Colleyville Blvd 289 0.05 C2U C2U 81 100%425 47 4 42 Thompson Terr Colleyville Blvd Old Glade Rd 1,061 0.20 C2U C2U 81 100%425 171 16 155 Glade Rd Colleyville Blvd Bedford Rd 1,400 0.27 M2U M2U 1,189 100%650 345 315 29 Glade Rd Bedford Rd Pool Rd 8,235 1.56 C3U C2U/C3U 1,338 100%575 1,794 2,087 -293 293Glade Rd Pool Rd Strathmore Terr 3,034 0.57 C3U C2U/C3U 1,338 100%575 661 769 -108 108 Glade Rd Strathmore Terr Roberts Rd 1,551 0.29 M2D M2D 1,378 100%700 411 405 6 Glade Rd Roberts Rd Heritage Ave 1,396 0.26 M2D M2D 1,451 100%700 370 384 -13 13Glade Rd Heritage Ave Hwy 121 (City Limits)1,803 0.34 M4U M4U 1,430 50%650 444 244 200 Roberts Rd 2,140' N of Glade Rd (City Limits)Glade Rd 2,166 0.41 C2U-S C2U-S 173 100%425 349 71 278 Bedford Rd Glade Rd 115' S of Glade Rd 113 0.02 C2U C2U 571 100%425 18 12 6 Bedford Rd 115' S of Glade Rd Little Bear Creek 2,674 0.51 C2U C2U 571 100%425 430 289 141 Bedford Rd Little Bear Creek Cheek Sparger Rd 1,981 0.38 C2U C2U 571 100%425 319 214 105 Centerpark Colleyville Blvd Bedford Rd 2,353 0.45 C2U C2U N/A 100%425 379 0 379 Cheek-Sparger Rd Colleyville Blvd San Bar Ln 858 0.16 M4U M4U 878 100%650 422 143 280 Cheek-Sparger Rd San Bar Ln Del Mar Ct 2,132 0.40 M2U M4U 878 100%650 525 355 170 Cheek-Sparger Rd Del Mar Ct 430' E of Brown Tr 1,095 0.21 M4U M4U 1,194 100%650 539 248 292 Cheek-Sparger Rd 430' E of Brown Tr Bedford Rd 2,052 0.39 M2U M2U 1,194 100%650 505 464 41 Cheek-Sparger Rd Bedford Rd 1,270' E of Bedford Rd 1,273 0.24 M2U M4U 1,194 100%650 313 288 26 Cheek-Sparger Rd 1,270' E of Bedford Rd Heritage Ave (City Limits)11,984 2.27 M2U M4U 1,394 50%650 1,475 1,582 -107 107 Pool Rd 900' N of Twelve Oaks Ln 1,040' S of Hall Johnson Rd 6,874 1.30 M4U M4U 665 50%650 1,693 433 1,260 Pool Rd 1,040' S of Hall Johnson Rd Glade Rd 2,881 0.55 M4U M4U 665 100%650 1,418 363 1,056 Jackson Rd Glade Rd 2,540' S of Glade Rd 2,538 0.48 M4U M4U 724 100%650 1,250 348 902 Jackson Rd 2,540' S of Glade Rd Cheek Sparger Rd 3,782 0.72 M2U M4U 724 100%650 931 519 413 Martin Pkwy Glade Rd Cheek Sparger Rd 5,798 1.10 M4U M4U 108 100%650 2,855 119 2,736 Heritage Ave 2,140' N of Glade Rd (City Limits)Glade Rd 2,141 0.41 M4U M4U 934 100%650 1,054 379 675 Heritage Ave Glade Dr 1,330' N of Cheek Sparger Rd 4,353 0.82 M2U M2U 945 50%650 536 390 146 Brown Trl Colleyville Blvd Cheek Sparger Rd 2,880 0.55 M4U M4U 571 100%650 1,418 311 1,107 Brown Trl Cheek Sparger Rd Autumn Oaks 933 0.18 M4U M4U 823 100%650 460 146 314 Brown Trl Autumn Oaks 350' S of Autumn Oaks 349 0.07 M4U M4U 823 100%650 172 54 117 Brown Trl 350' S of Autumn Oaks 145' S of Quail Crest Dr 1,490 0.28 M2U M4U 823 100%650 367 232 135 SUBTOTAL 115,994 22 38,453 20,882 17,571 521 City of Colleyville - 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix C - Existing Facilities Inventory Service Area 2 9/21/2021 PM % IN VEH-MI VEH-MI VEH-MI EXCESS EXISTING ROADWAY FROM TO LENGTH LENGTH EXIST TYPE PEAK SERVICE CAPACITY SUPPLY DEMAND CAPACITY DEFICIENCIES (ft)(mi)SECT HOUR AREA PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR PK-HR VOL PER LN TOTAL TOTAL VEH-MI VEH-MIBandit Trl 255' W of Overland Tr (City Limits)Overland Tr 256 0.05 C2U C2U N/A 100%425 41 0 41 Overland Tr Bandit Tr Bandit Tr 545 0.10 C2U C2U N/A 100%425 88 0 88 Bandit Trl Overland Tr John McCain Rd 2,425 0.46 C2U C2U 207 100%425 390 95 295 John McCain Rd Bandit Tr Westcoat Dr 2,405 0.46 C2U C2U 167 100%425 387 76 311 John McCain Rd Westcoat Dr 150' E of Westcoat Dr 150 0.03 C2U C2U/C3U 167 100%425 24 5 19 John McCain Rd 150' E of Westcoat Dr 430' W of Pleasant Run Rd 1,132 0.21 C2U C2U/C3U 167 100%425 182 36 146 John McCain Rd 430' W of Pleasant Run Rd 315' E of Pleasant Run Rd 746 0.14 C2U C2U/C3U 167 100%425 120 24 96 John McCain Rd 315' E of Pleasant Run Rd Maranatha Ct 6,003 1.14 C2U C2U/C3U 1,053 100%425 966 1,197 -231 231John McCain Rd Maranatha Ct Colleyville Blvd 994 0.19 C2U C2U/C3U 1,053 100%425 160 198 -38 38Precinct Line Rd 1,770' N of McDonwell School Rd 1,220' S of L D Lockett Rd 7,109 1.35 P6U P6D 2,786 50%750 3,029 1,875 1,154 McDonwell School Rd W Precinct Line (City Limits)Herbert Rd 735 0.14 C2U C2U/C3U 863 100%425 118 120 -2 2McDonwell School Rd W Herbert Rd Westcoat Dr 5,213 0.99 C2U C2U/C3U 863 100%425 839 852 -13 13Lavaca Trl Precinct Line Rd (City Limits)Mustang Tr 2,940 0.56 C2U C2U 79 100%425 473 44 429 L. D. Lockett Rd Precinct Line Rd (City Limits)Pleasant Run Rd 10,167 1.93 C2U C2U/C3U 696 100%425 1,637 1,340 297 Westcoat Dr John McCain Rd 300' S of John McCain Rd 301 0.06 C2U C2U/C3U 1,141 100%425 48 65 -17 17Westcoat Dr 300' S of John McCain Rd McDonwell School Rd 2,433 0.46 C2U C2U/C3U 1,141 100%425 392 526 -134 134Westcoat Dr McDonwell School Rd L D Lockett Rd 3,577 0.68 C2U C2U/C3U 321 100%425 576 217 358 White Dr Westcoat Dr L D Lockett Rd 1,845 0.35 C2U C2U 331 100%425 297 116 181 Bransford Rd L D Lockett Rd Shelton Dr 614 0.12 C2U C2U/C3U 605 100%425 99 70 28 Bransford Rd Shelton Dr 220' N of Glade Rd 5,442 1.03 C2U C2U/C3U 605 100%425 876 624 253 Bransford Rd 220' N of Glade Rd Glade Rd 250 0.05 C2U C2U/C3U 605 100%425 40 29 12 Bransford Rd Glade Rd 355' S of Glade Rd 355 0.07 C2U C2U/C3U N/A 100%425 57 0 57 Bransford Rd 355' S of Glade Rd Bransford Rd 362 0.07 C3U C2U/C3U N/A 100%575 79 0 79 Bransford Rd Bransford Rd Colleyville Blvd 547 0.10 C2U C2U/C3U N/A 100%425 88 0 88 Shelton Dr Bransford Rd Pleasant Run Rd 2,170 0.41 C2U C2U 191 100%425 349 79 271 Pleasant Run Rd 3,080' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits)John McCain Rd 3,051 0.58 C2U C2U/C3U 893 100%425 491 516 -25 25Pleasant Run Rd John McCain Rd 200' S of Shelton Dr 6,175 1.17 C2U C2U/C3U 800 100%425 994 936 58 Pleasant Run Rd 200' S of Shelton Dr Bogart Dr 884 0.17 C2U C2U/C3U 509 100%425 142 85 57 Pleasant Run Rd Bogart Dr Colleyville Blvd 3,702 0.70 C2U C2U/C3U 509 100%425 596 357 239 Main St Cottage Ln Colleyville Blvd 1,143 0.22 C2U C2U N/A 100%425 184 0 184 Tinker Rd Pleasant Run Rd 645' E of Pleasant Run Rd 646 0.12 C2U C2U/C3U 457 100%425 104 56 48 Tinker Rd 645' E of Pleasant Run Rd Caldwell Hughes Rd 863 0.16 C2U C2U/C3U 457 100%425 139 75 64 Tinker Rd Caldwell Hughes Rd Colleyville Blvd 2,171 0.41 C2U C2U/C3U 457 100%425 349 188 162 Bogart Dr Pleasant Run Rd Hall Johnson Rd 1,613 0.31 C2U C2U/C3U 664 100%425 260 203 57 Bogart Dr Hall Johnson Rd Colleyville Blvd 616 0.12 C2U C2U/C3U N/A 100%425 99 0 99 Hall Johnson Rd Bogart Dr Colleyville Blvd 636 0.12 M4D M4D N/A 100%700 337 0 337 Church St Pleasant Run Rd Colleyville Blvd 1,433 0.27 M4U M4U N/A 100%650 706 0 706 Glade Rd Bedford Rd Pool Rd 8,235 1.56 C3U C2U/C3U 970 100%575 1,794 1,513 281 Glade Rd 265' W of Bransford Rd Bransford Rd 267 0.05 M4U M4U 970 100%650 132 49 82 Glade Rd Bransford Rd Colleyville Blvd 1,597 0.30 M4U M4U 970 100%650 786 293 493 Colleyville Blvd 475' S of Brown Trl (City Limits)600' S of Cheek Sparger Rd 3,881 0.74 M5U P6D 2,652 50%725 1,066 975 91 Colleyville Blvd 2,030' N of John McCain Rd (City Limits)475' S of Brown Trl 18,283 3.46 P6D P6D 3,134 50%900 9,349 5,426 3,923 SUBTOTAL 113,910 22 28,886 18,259 10,627 459 City of Colleyville - 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Existing Roadway Facilities Inventory 2020 Roadway Impact Fee UpdateCity of Colleyville, Texas Appendix C - Existing Facilities Inventory Appendix June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas PLAN FOR AWARDING THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEE CREDIT SUPPORTING EXHIBITS City of Colleyville 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Plan for Awarding the Impact Fee Credit Prepared by Eddie Peacock, PLLC Page 1 Introduction Texas Local Government Code Section 395 “Financing Capital Improvements Required by New Development in Municipalities, Counties, and Certain Other Local Governments” requires the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014, Texas Local Government Code states: “… (a) The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the following items: (7) A plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan….” Ad Valorem Tax Generated by New Development The plan for awarding the credit assumes the future growth-related street CIP projects are funded from an annual budgeted transfer of $150,000 from the General Operating Fund of the City. It is anticipated that the growth in General Fund ad valorem tax revenue generated from the new service units will be available to fund the annual interfund transfer to the growth-related CIP fund. The annual $150,000 transfer is allocated between Area 1 and Area 2 proportionally as follows: Area Cost Attributable to Growth % Allocation Annual Transfer 1 $4,185,560 28.6862%$43,029 2 10,405,292 71.3138%106,971 TOTAL $14,590,852 100.0000%$150,000 City of Colleyville 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Plan for Awarding the Impact Fee Credit Prepared by Eddie Peacock, PLLC Page 2 Impact Fee Credit per Vehicle Mile The maximum impact fee is expressed in dollars per vehicle-mile. The annual per vehicle-mile credit is calculated by dividing the annual portion of the annual transfer by the current total vehicle miles of demand: Growth in Service Units (Vehicle Miles) The cumulative totals of 15,444 vehicle-miles in Service Area 1, and 24,728 vehicle-miles in Service Area 2, are derived from the 2,808 projected ten-year demand in Service Area 1, and 4,496 projected ten-year demand in Service Area 2. The growth in vehicle miles is applied equally over the ten-year period: Annual Transfer Veh-Mile of Demand $ per Veh-Mile $43,029 2,808 $15.32 $106,971 4,496 $23.79 YR ANNUAL CUMULATIVE1 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 2812 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 5623 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 8424 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 1,1235 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 1,4046 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 1,6857 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 1,9668 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 2,2469 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 2,52710NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 280.8 2,808TOTAL2,808 15,444 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES IMPACT FEE PERIOD AREA 1 YR ANNUAL CUMULATIVE1 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 4502 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 8993 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 1,3494 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 1,7985 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 2,2486 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 2,6987 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 3,1478 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 3,5979 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 4,04610NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES 449.6 4,496TOTAL4,496 24,728 NEW ROADWAY VEH-MILES IMPACT FEE PERIOD AREA 2 City of Colleyville 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Plan for Awarding the Impact Fee Credit Prepared by Eddie Peacock, PLLC Page 3 CIP Credit by Service Area The credit per vehicle mile is multiplied times the ten-year cumulative total of vehicle miles of demand by service area to equal the CIP credit by service area. Maximum Impact Fee Per Vehicle-Mile After the Credit Calculation of the maximum impact fee per vehicle mile after the credit by service area (column H) is illustrated in the following table: The CIP credit by service area (column E) is subtracted from the cost attributable to growth by service area (column F) to result in the cost attributable to growth less credit by service area (column G). The maximum impact fee per vehicle-mile after the credit per service area (column H) is calculated by dividing the cost attributable to growth less credit (column G) the projected 10 year demand (Column A). Projected 10yr Annual 10 YR Cumulative $ PER CIP Credit Service Demand Demand Demand VEH-MI by Area (veh-miles) (veh-miles)Total CREDIT Service Area 1 2,808 281 15,444 $15.32 $236,602 2 4,496 450 24,728 $23.79 $588,279 Colleyville 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Study Update New Roadway Vehicle-Miles and Credit per Service Area - 10 Year Impact Fee Period (A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F)(G)(H) (C) X (D)(F) - (E)(G) / (A) Projected 10yr Annual 10 YR Cumulative $ PER CIP Credit Cost Cost Attributable Maximum Service Demand Demand Demand VEH-MI by Attributable to Growth Impact Fee Area (veh-miles) (veh-miles)Total CREDIT Service Area to Growth Less Credit after Credit 1 2,808 281 15,444 $15.32 $236,602 4,185,560 $3,948,958 $1,406 2 4,496 450 24,728 $23.79 $588,279 10,405,292 $9,817,013 $2,183 City of Colleyville 2020 Impact Fee Study Update Calculation of the Maximum Impact Fee After the Credit City of Colleyville 2020 Roadway Impact Fee Update Plan for Awarding the Impact Fee Credit Prepared by Eddie Peacock, PLLC Page 4 Impact Fee per Single Family Unit Comparisons of the Base Impact Fee, 50% Alternative, and the Maximum Impact Fee After the Credit A comparison to the base maximum impact fee and 50% reduction follows: (A)(B)(C)(D)(E)(F) Base 50% Alternative Maximum After the Credit Maximum Fee per Maximum Fee Impact Fee after % of Base Maximum Fee Service Impact Fee Veh-Mile per Single Family the credit Maximum per Single Family Area per Veh-Mile @ 50% Discount Dwelling Unit per Veh-Mile Impact Fee Dwelling Unit 1 $1,491 $745 $2,951 $1,406 94.35%$5,569 2 $2,314 $1,157 $4,582 $2,183 94.35%$8,647 City of Colleyville 2020 Impact Fee Study Update Comparison of the Base Maximum Impact Fee to the 50% Maximum Impact Fee and Maximum Impact Fee after the Credit by Service Area Appendix June 2022 City of Colleyville, Texas PLAN FOR AWARDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CREDIT 2020 PLAN FOR AWARDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CREDIT Prepared by Eddie Peacock, PLLC 1 Texas Local Government Code Section 395 “Financing Capital Improvements Required by New Development in Municipalities, Counties, and Certain Other Local Governments” requires the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) to contain specific enumeration of a plan for awarding the impact fee credit. Section 395.014, Texas Local Government Code states: “… (a) The political subdivision shall use qualified professionals to prepare the capital improvements plan and to calculate the impact fee. The capital improvements plan must contain specific enumeration of the following items: (7) a plan for awarding: (A) a credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan; or (B) In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan.” The plan for awarding the credit assumes the future growth-related water and wastewater projects are funded from growth in the utility customer base because of new development. The portion of capital related utility revenue generated by the new development during the 10-year program period is estimated to equal the portion of the monthly utility capital project fee attributable to growth. The monthly capital project fee for a 1” meter is $5.83. A 25% portion of the fee is applied to growth related projects. Monthly Utility Capital Projects Fee $5.83 % Atributable to Growth 25% Monthly Utility Capital Projects Fee Attributable to Growth $1.46 The Monthly Utility Capital Projects Fee Attributable to Growth is applied proportionally to the water and wastewater impact fee capital improvements plans as follows: Impact Fee Recoverable Cost % Allocation Fee Allocation Water $5,404,564 78.3222%$1.14 Wastewater $1,495,858 21.6778%0.32 $6,900,422 100.0000%$1.46 Allocation of Recoverable Impact Fee CIP Costs 2020 PLAN FOR AWARDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CREDIT Prepared by Eddie Peacock, PLLC 2 The cumulative growth total of 2,701 water monthly service units and 2,756 sewer monthly service units is derived from the 491 water service units of new demand and 501 sewer service units of new demand (per Kimley-Horn W&S Impact Fee Update, 2020) applied equally over the ten-year period. WATER SERVICE UNITS WASTEWATER SERVICE UNITS YEAR 491 501 1 49 49 50 50 2 49 98 50 100 3 49 147 50 150 4 49 196 50 200 5 49 246 50 251 6 49 295 50 301 7 49 344 50 351 8 49 393 50 401 9 49 442 50 451 10 49 491 50 501 TOTAL 491 2,701 501 2,756 MONTHS 12 12 BILLS 32,406 33,066 NEW SERVICE UNITS - IMPACT FEE PERIOD The monthly credit per service units is multiplied times the ten-year cumulative total of monthly service units times 12 months to equal the total CIP credit. 10-Year Cumulative Total Monthly Bills Credit per Monthly Bill Impact Fee CIP Credit Water Projects 32,406 $1.14 $36,943 Wastewater Projects 33,066 $0.32 $10,581 The total CIP credit is subtracted from the CIP allocated to ten year growth (per Kimley-Horn W&S Impact Fee Update, 2020 report) to result in the amount to be paid from water and sewer impact fees: Total CIP Credit Water Projects Sewer Projects Total Growth-Related CIP $5,404,564 $1,495,858 Less: CIP Credit (36,943) (10,581) Maximum Impact Fee Recoverable Cost $5,367,621 $1,485,277 2020 PLAN FOR AWARDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CREDIT Prepared by Eddie Peacock, PLLC 3 The maximum impact fee after the credit is calculated by dividing the total amount to be paid from impact fees by the service units of new demand: Total CIP Credit Water Projects Sewer Projects Total Growth-Related CIP $5,404,564 $1,495,858 Less: CIP Credit (36,943) (10,581) Maximum Impact Fee Recoverable Cost $5,367,621 $1,485,277 Service Units of New Demand 491 501 Maximum Impact Fee After the Credit $10,932 $2,965 The result is an adjusted maximum water impact fee per service unit after the credit of $10,932 or 99.32% of the base maximum impact fee of $11,007, and an adjusted maximum sewer impact fee per service unit after the credit of $2,965 or 99.29% of the base maximum sewer impact fee per service unit of $2,986. Maximum Impact Fee Before the Credit 11,007 2,986 Maximum Impact Fee After the Credit 10,932 2,965 % 99.32% 99.29% % of the Maximum Impact Fee Before the Credit This credit is less than the 50% alternative which results in an adjusted water impact fee per service unit after the 50% credit of $5,504, and an adjusted sewer impact fee per service unit after the 50% credit of $1,493. Maximum Impact Fee Before the Credit 11,007 2,986 50% Maximum Impact Fee Before the Credit 5,504 1,493 % 50.00% 50.00% 50% o the Maximum Impact Fee Before the Credit 2020 PLAN FOR AWARDING THE WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CREDIT Prepared by Eddie Peacock, PLLC 4 The following is a conversion of service units to maximum assessable water impact fees for various meter types and sizes: Meter Size Service Unit Equivalent Base Maximum Water Impact Fee Maximum Assessable Water Impact Fee 50% of Base Maximum Fee 11,007$ 10,932$ 5,504$ 5/8" X 3/4" PD 0.67 7,338 7,288 3,669 3/4" PD 1.00 11,007 10,932 5,504 1" PD 1.67 18,345 18,220 9,173 1 1/2" PD 3.33 36,690 36,440 18,345 2" PD 5.33 58,704 58,304 29,352 2" Turbine 6.67 73,380 72,880 36,690 3" Compound 11.67 128,415 127,540 64,208 3" Turbine 14.67 161,436 160,336 80,718 4" Compound 20.00 220,140 218,640 110,070 4" Turbine 28.00 308,196 306,096 154,098 6" Compound 45.00 495,315 491,940 247,658 6" Turbine 57.67 634,737 630,412 317,369 8" Compound 60.00 660,420 655,920 330,210 8" Turbine 160.00 1,761,120 1,749,120 880,560 10" Turbine 233.33 2,568,300 2,550,800 1,284,150 The following is a conversion of service units to maximum assessable sewer impact fees for various meter types and sizes: Meter Size Service Unit Equivalent Base Maximum Sewer Impact Fee Maximum Assessable Sewer Impact Fee 50% of Base Maximum Fee 2,986$ 2,965$ 1,493$ 5/8" X 3/4" PD 0.67 1,991 1,977 996 3/4" PD 1.00 2,986 2,965 1,493 1" PD 1.67 4,977 4,942 2,489 1 1/2" PD 3.33 9,953 9,883 4,976 2" PD 5.33 15,925 15,813 7,962 2" Turbine 6.67 19,907 19,767 9,954 3" Compound 11.67 34,837 34,592 17,419 3" Turbine 14.67 43,795 43,487 21,898 4" Compound 20.00 59,720 59,300 29,860 4" Turbine 28.00 83,608 83,020 41,804 6" Compound 45.00 134,370 133,425 67,185 6" Turbine 57.67 172,193 170,982 86,097 8" Compound 60.00 179,160 177,900 89,580 8" Turbine 160.00 477,760 474,400 238,880 10" Turbine 233.33 696,733 691,833 348,366