Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Minutes-1/14/2013 City of Colleyville City Hall Planning and Zoning 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Commission 817. 503.1000 www.colleyville.com Minutes Monday, January 14, 2013 City Council Chambers Call Meeting to Order The Planning and Zoning Commission of the city of Colleyville was called to order by Chairman Byerly on January 14, 2013 at 7:15 p.m. Roll Call Present: Commissioners Larry Knox, Dave Dudziak, Jim Gotcher, D Phelps, and Jeff Byerly Absent: Commissioner David Wheelwright Staff Present: Ron Ruthven, Darren Cain, Amy Shelley, Rob McKeo Marty Weider,Ky Roby, Jeremy Hutt, and Dale Crown Invocation The invocation was given by Commissioner Byerly. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Phelps moved to approve the December 10, 2012 meeting minutes as corrected. Commissioner Davis seconded. The motion to approve as corrected carried with the following vote: Aye: 6 Knox, Dudziak, Gotcher, Phelps, Davis, and Byerly 2. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA There were no citizen comments/presentations regarding items not 3. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 3a Consideration of a waiver request to the sidewalk requirements o City of Colleyville Page 1 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 Block 1, of the Bransford Pointe Addition located at 5016 Bransford Road, Case GC12-023 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commission. Susan Quinn, the property owner, came forward to present the case and brief the Commission. Jeff Ground, P.E. also came forward to brief the Commission on the lot and the flood plain. Commissioner Dudziak made a motion to approve case GC12-023 with the option to escrow. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve with the escrow option carried with the following vote: Aye: 6 Knox, Dudziak, Gotcher, Davis, Phelps, and Byerly 3b Consideration of a waiver request to the sidewalk requirements o Block 1, of the Renaissance Estates Addition located at 412 Glade Road, Case GC12-024 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commission. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if the applicant was reques waiver, with no option to escrow. Ron Ruthven replied that is c Stan Jordan, the property owner, came forward to present the case and brief the Commission. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Jordan if he was asking to es Jordan replied yes. Commissioner Davis made a motion to approve case GC12-024 with the option to escrow. Commissioner Gotcher seconded the motion. The motion to approve with the escrow option carried with the following vote: Aye: 6 Knox, Dudziak, Gotcher, Davis, Phelps, and Byerly 3c Consideration of a waiver request to the sidewalk requirements o Block 5, of the Chelsea Park Addition located at 1716 Glade Road, Case GC12- City of Colleyville Page 2 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 026 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commission. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if the applicant was reques escrow. Ron Ruthven replied that is correct. Larry Chappell, the property owner, came forward to present the case and brief the Commission. He stated that he would like a full waiver to the sidewalk and the escrow option. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding the ten foot side requirement along Glade Road and the shallow lot sizes and stated that this large of a sidewalk has potential to be disruptive. Ron Ruthven replied that is correct. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff about the location of the sidewalk and the reason it was decided to be placed on this spec the roadway. Ron Ruthven stated that it possibly stemmed from the Colleyville Pathways Plan, which is part of a larger community g effort. Commissioner Phelps stated that he thought there were approximat eight to ten lots where this would be an impractical application. Ron Ruthven stated that if these size lots were to be proposed today they wo approved. He further stated that this was also due to the resid sole frontage on a collector. Commissioner Phelps reiterated his question about having a ten foot sidewalk, the easement, the encroachment property line and asked if this was practical. Ron Ruthven repl practical. He explained that the applicant has stated he intends to install circular driveway as others have on neighboring properties. He further explained that smaller lots, on this road, create the need for circular into a major collector. Commissioner Gotcher questioned staff if the waiver was granted what actions would the City take if the sidewalk was constructed at a Ron Ruthven replied additional right of way would be taken or an could be put in place to allow for construction. Discussion continued between Commissioner Gotcher and staff regarding acquisition of the property, for the sidewalk, if the waiver was Commissioner Knox questioned staff about the lack of an easement on this property. Ron Ruthven replied that there is very little room forg the road or putting in a ten foot trail with the lot sizes in this a Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if the road was realigned, allow for additional square footage on the north side of road. Jeremy Hutt replied this option would be looked at when the time came regarding whether City of Colleyville Page 3 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 or not the road could be widened using the existing center line. Commissioner Dudziak question staff if the ten foot trail was th pedestrian access for this location. Jeremy Hutt stated he did think there were any safety considerations for a sidewalk versus a trail. He further explained that trails are typically used for regional trails, which Glade Road is, or to accommodate multiple bicycles where a five foot sidewalk w Commissioner Dudziak stated that, in his opinion, it was a safety issue. He further stated that he would like to see this sidewalk escrowed. Commissioner Byerly asked staff to clarify that the Supplemental Map was recommended by the Sidewalk Committee and approved by City Council. Ron Ruthven replied that is correct. Commissioner Bye this is what the new construction of sidewalks and escrow requir based on. Ron Ruthven explained that it is used a guiding polic sidewalk construction in the City. Commissioner Byerly made a motion to require escrow on Case GC12-026. Commissioner Dudziak seconded. The motion to require escrow failed with the following vote: Aye: 3 Knox, Dudziak, and Byerly Nay: 3 Gotcher, Davis, and Phelps Commissioner Phelps stated that he is normally for the escrow op to the nature of the redevelopment, he did not want the new owne penalized more than the surrounding neighbors. He further expla did not feel that a ten foot trail was feasible in this location. Commissioner Knox questioned staff if it was noted on the building permit that a ten foot trail would be required. Ron Ruthven replied ye Commissioner Byerly stated that he disagreed with Commissioner Pd he felt that an escrow option was necessary. th Commissioner Byerly made a motion to continue this item on the J agenda. Commissioner Phelps seconded. th The motion to continue this item to the January 28 agenda carried with the following vote: Aye: 6 Knox, Dudziak, Gotcher, Davis, Phelps, and Byerly City of Colleyville Page 4 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 4. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 4a Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural to PUDR on Tract 1A, Abstract 1732 of the S.C.H. Wilton Survey and Tract 4A1, Abstrac the D.R. Teeter Survey located at 2501 Cheek-Sparger Road, Case ZC12-029 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commission. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding lots one through 6 having no windows on the second story. Ron Ruthven replied that is correct. Commissioner Dudziak asked if there would be limits on the first Ruthven replied no. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. Dennis Lang, the applicant, came forward to present the case and Commission along with Gary Panno, Bryan Adams, Jimmy Fechter. Commissioner Dudziak question Mr. Lang if they would be putting detention pond. Mr. Lang replied yes. Commissioner Dudziak ask pond would be permanent. Mr. Lang replied no, it would not have water in it all the time and would only be used for storm water. Commission explained to Mr. Lang what open space was interpreted as in the Colleyville. He further stated an empty pond did not seem to me requirements of the ordinance. Mr. Lang replied that it was not in their concept to have a wet pond with a feature. He further stated th be submitting a preliminary and final plat that would meet the city requiremen. Commissioner Dudziak stated that in the PUD they would need to add the open space requirements and would they be okay with writing this ordinance. Mr. Lang replied it would be up to their developers. Mr. Fechter stated they planned on having a functional and useful open spacer, it would be a small one because this was not a very large developme Discussion continued between Commissioner Dudziak and Mr. Fechter regarding the requirements and the plans for the open space. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Fechter if the open space was required to be in this location because of retention purposes or could it across the street. Mr. Fechter replied that the concept plan was originally set up that way but once survey was done it was determined that the detention would need to be done in the proposed location. He further stated that they have met with the surrounding Homeowner Associations and have ma changes to their layout to accommodate their wishes regarding lo number of stories on specific lots. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Adams if a lower density was consi City of Colleyville Page 5 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 for the development. Mr. Adams replied that they felt this was location for this type of development in comparison to the surro neighborhoods. Commissioner Phelps stated he understood the nature of the Fechter stated that when meeting with staff they were encouraged was a good use for this site. Commissioner Gotcher stated that he agreed that this was an extremely high Commissioner Gotcher questioned the applicants what their respon the traffic on Glade Road, especially during rush hour. Mr. Fec that they were not required to have a traffic impact analysis done because this is a small development. Mr. Fechter would be creating that much more of an issue. Discussion continued between Commissioner Gotcher and Mr. Fechter concerning the volume of traffic and the increase that this new would bring to Glade Road. Jeff Ground, 4108 Dundee Court, came forward and expressed that opposed to this development with regard to high density. Sheri Kimble, 3986 Whitten Drive, came forward and expressed that she and her husband were opposed to this development with regard to drainage and the problems this development would create problems for their ne She stated that they would like for this case to be deferred until more specific information was presented regarding the development. Bill Marrin, 3960 Holiday Drive, came forward and expressed that he was in favor of this development. He stated that he felt this developm value to the surrounding properties. Gary Boeckenstedt, 3964 Holiday Drive, came forward and expressehis concern for this development with regard to the drainage issues this would create for their community. There being no one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:15 p.m. The public hearing was reopened at 8:16 p.m. Michael Wang, 4110 Buckingham Place, came forward and expressed was opposed to this development with regard to traffic and densi Bob Hassett, 2500 Kensington Place, came forward and expressed that he City of Colleyville Page 6 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 was opposed to this development with regard to the density and t to his home. Keith Squires, 3902 St. James Court, came forward and expressed was opposed to this development with regard to his privacy becaue of the elevations of both properties. He further stated he did not fee Ted Smith, 3900 St James Court, came forward and expressed that he was opposed to this development with regard to privacy and noise. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was clos p.m. Mr. Fechter came forward with Mr. Adams and Mr. Lang to address from the citizens. Mr. Fechter stated that originally there wast wood fence proposed, however, after discussions with the two adjacent side and repairs on the other. Mr. Fechter also addresses the comments on drainage of the proposed development and the adjacent properties. Mr. Fechter stated that he felt that the developers have made approp Commissioner Davis questioned Mr. Fechter regarding the comment made on the subdivision to the west getting three hundred percent more water. Mr. Fechter stated that there would be more area to drain in that di would not be a sheet flow, it would be directed to the retention pond and metered out at a slower rate. He further explained why drainage toward Cheek-Sparger Road was not an option. Commissioner Dudziak questioned the applicants on whether or not stated they would be replacing a section of the wall. Mr. Adams between the proposed development and the Spring Garden Addition. Commissioner Phelps questioned the applicants on the omission of in this development. Mr. Fechter stated they were looking at pu sidewalks in and around the development but would possibly seek the one on Cheek-Sparger Road. Commissioner Phelps questioned the applicants on the placement o detention pond and open space. Mr. Fechter stated it was design residence could go behind the three lots and get back out on the system. Discussion continued regarding the location of the retention pond and the City of Colleyville Page 7 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 open space between Commissioner Phelps and Mr. Fechter. Commissioner Knox stated that he felt the density was too high. explained that he did not understand why the size of the detention pond could not be determined, with all the engineering that has already bee that it could be known how much free space there would be. He f stated he could not support this plan. Commissioner Davis stated that the plan was too preliminary. Commissioner Gotcher stated he knew the property would need to b but did not feel that this was the appropriate transition the density was not appropriate. He also stated that he could not support this development. Commissioner Byerly stated that he disagreed and that a transition was ideal for this area, townhomes on one side and R-30 on the other. He further explained that he felt the development needed to be less dense. Commissioner Dudziak stated he wanted to see more detail and would be okay with tabling. Commissioner Phelps stated he would like to see R-20 on the west side of the development and questioned if R-15 was an option. Discussion continued between Commissioners regarding possible op zoning and lot sizes. Commissioner Phelps stated he would like to see more detail on t along Cheek-Sparger Road. Commissioner Phelps asked Mr. Adams if it would be possible to c with more detail and what his thoughts were on the treatment for the property along Cheek-Sparger Road. Mr. Adams replied that they could come back with more details and that the fence would be decorati. Commissioner Phelps made a motion to reopen the public hearing a th continue this item on January 28agenda. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. Commissioner Knox added that this should be brought back with more detail. Commissioner Gotcher concurred. The motion to reopen the public hearing to continue this item on the th January 28 agenda carried with the following vote: City of Colleyville Page 8 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 Aye: 6 Knox, Dudziak, Gotcher, Davis, Phelps, and Byerly 4b Request for a Special Use Permit for a carport on Lot 19, Block Briarwood-Colleyville Addition located at 5804 Quails Path, Case ZC12-032 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commission. The public hearing was opened at 8:52 p.m. Tim Coltart, the property owner, came forward to present the cas the Commission. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Coltart in which direction do lean to. Mr. Coltart replied away from the house toward the str Discussion regarding drainage and elevations continued between Commissioner Phelps and Mr. Coltart. Commissioner Dudziak questioned asked what Mr. Coltart meant by cedar gate. Mr. Coltart replied it would be a six foot sliding gate made of galvanized metal and stained cedar boards. Discussion continued between Commissioner Dudziak and Mr. Coltar location and dimensions of the proposed gate. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Coltart if the idea was to have a lean- to from his house to the edge of the property. Mr. Coltart repl correct. Commissioner Knox questioned Mr. Coltart regarding the construct roof and whether or not it would have steel supports. Mr. Coltart replied yes, it would have steel supports but would not appear to be steel it would appear to be cedar. Commissioner Gotcher questioned Mr. Coltart if he had contacted neighbors to the north about their feelings on the addition being so close to the property line. Mr. Coltart replied they had no problem with plans. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Coltart regarding the distanc structural posts and the property line. Mr. Coltart stated thathave that dimension available. Commissioner Phelps stated he was concerned about taking advantage of considerably more than the ten foot setback any how future property owners might be affected by this encroac Coltart replied the structural posts would be approximately at five foot in the City of Colleyville Page 9 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 ten foot setback and two and half feet overhang. Commissioner P replied his biggest reservation was with the proximity to the pr Mr. Coltart replied he did not think he could go any closer to the home with the structural posts without losing the practicality. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was clos p.m. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff about the location of the whether or not it was required to stay within the build line. Ron Ruthven replied that gates were allowed to encroach up to ten feet into setback. Commissioner Dudziak stated that this was essentially twice the standard that was in our code. Ron Ruthven replied that is correct. Commissioner Dudziak stated that he appreciated the need for sto did not feel that the proposed design was not symmetrical with the house. Commissioner Knox stated he could not support constructing a str this close to the property line. Commissioner Dudziak made a motion to deny Case ZC12-032. Commissioner Knox seconded the motion. The motion to deny carried with the following vote: Aye: 6 Knox, Dudziak, Gotcher, Davis, Phelps, and Byerly 4c Consideration of amendments to Chapter 3 - Land Use, Section 3.24 Schedule of Permitted Principle Uses of the Land Development Cod GC13-001 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commission. The public hearing was opened at 9:13 p.m. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 9:13 p.m. Commissioner Knox made a motion to Case GC13-001. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. The motion to approve carried with the following vote: Aye: 6 Knox, Dudziak, Gotcher, Davis, Phelps, and Byerly City of Colleyville Page 10 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 The Commission recessed at 9:14 p.m. The Commission reconvened at 9:27 p.m. 5. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a Consideration of a request to rezone from R20-Single Family Residential to PUD-R-Planned Unit Development Residential on 12.0 acres on Tracts 3, 3E and 3F, of Abstract 936 of the Joseph M Looney Survey and Lot 1, the Bone Addition, located at 5008 and 5100 Bluebonnet Drive, Ca- 025 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commission on theed information provided by the developers. The public hearing was opened at 9:30 p.m. Paul Spain, the applicant, came forward and briefed the Commissi Curtis Young, 8003 Jefferson Circle, came forward and briefed the Commission on the changes that had been made to the development plans. Commissioner Gotcher stated that the Commission never requested Developer to get the density below four lots per acre. He furth the Commission advised the density be made lower. Commissioner erly stated he believed the idea came from his comment that he could the development if it were above four. It was concurred by all Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Spain regarding windows on the second floor of the homes. Mr. Spain replied that this was a suggestio homeowners in the adjacent subdivision because of their concerns He further stated that the developers came up with the idea to restrict windows on the west facing lots to accommodate this concern as w Discussion continued between the Commission and Mr. Spain regard window restrictions. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Spain about what tree size t be placing on the lots that were up against the neighboring properties. Young replied they would be planting four inch caliper trees. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Young regarding the location of the piping to carry the water off of this property to the creek. Mr. Young replied there are two locations. Commissioner Dudziak asked if the two City of Colleyville Page 11 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 would be used. Mr. Young replied they would use the pipe that was tied into the pond. Commissioner Knox suggested that Mr. Spain share the drawing of drainage analysis that had been done for this development. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Spain regarding traffic at B Road and Glade Road and if they had worked with the City in trying to reduce traffic in at this location. Mr. Spain replied that they had worked with the City. He further explained that a car every two and a half minu that much of an increase in traffic. He also stated that the tr was performed showed a decrease in traffic with the addition of ight hand turn lanes. Discussion continued between Commissioner Dudziak, Mr. Spain, an Young regarding traffic at Bluebonnet Road and Glade Road Commissioner Gotcher questioned Mr. Spain regarding their develo Southlake and the size of it. Mr. Spain replied the three developments that are over one hundred acres. Commissioner Gotcher question Mr. S specifically about the development that was going through Planni Zoning the following night and if it were sixteen acres. Mr. Seplied that development is sixteen acres and has twelve homes. Mr. Spain fu explained the situation with property being re-platted to include more residences which would bring the density to approximately 1.6% d Linda Baker, 4900 Behrens Road, came forward and expressed that she was opposed to the development with regard to traffic and drainage. Jesse Cobb, 1508 Cherry Lane, came forward and expressed that he was opposed to the development with regard to density. Ray Dameron, 1600 Cherry Lane, came forward and expressed that he was opposed to the development with regard to density and drainage. Stan Perry, 1511 Rose Street, came forward and expressed that he was opposed to the development with regard to traffic, density, and drainage. Jackie Gardner, 5013 & 5017 Bluebonnet Drive, came forward and expressed that she was opposed to the development with regard to traffic and density. Dan Winters, 5013 Rose Street, came forward and expressed that he was opposed to the development with regard to density and traffic. Lisa Pomroy, 4712 Behrens Road, came forward and expressed that she was City of Colleyville Page 12 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 opposed to the development with regard to density, drainage, tra and privacy. Matt Quinn, 5020 Stonebridge Drive, came forward and expressed that he was opposed to the development with regard to value of the residences, property values, and drainage. Kelly Miller was called to speak but was not present. Kathleen Hennessey, 5013 Stonebridge Drive , came forward and expressed that she was opposed to the development with regard to drainage, run off on to her property, property maintenance, and traffic. Brian Berry, 5000 Stonebridge Drive, came forward and expressed that he was opposed to the development with regard to traffic, value of the residences, and density. Lola Cobb, 1508 Cherry Lane, came forward on behalf of her neighbor, Beth Williams who resides at 5108 Rose Street, to express that she was opposed to the development with regard to traffic. Sam Hatton, 5024 Stonebridge Drive, came forward and express that he was opposed to the development with regard to drainage and traffic. Commissioner Byerly read names of attendees who wanted to record vote but did not wish to speak: The following were opposed: Ellen and Ramon Lopez Ava Fryer Pam and Troy Marshall Beth Williams Kevin Wi Angela Caylee Debbie Free Lloyd Wensworth Phil Clark Sarah Huggins Pauline Roverson Carol Perry Martha Dameron David Gardner James Callahan Mary Callahan City of Colleyville Page 13 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 Mark Seabeck Paul Pomroy W. S. Huggins Sally Coleman Don Black Nancy Rodgers The following were in support: Connie Fag The following did not indicate support or opposition: Ida Wensworth There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was clos p.m. Mr. Spain came forward to address comments made by the citizens. proposed drainage plan. Jeremy Hutt replied that the drainage p Commissioner Dudziak questioned Jeremy Hutt if this drainage plan would solve the existing issues. Jeremy Hutt replied that the current be address with the proposed plan. Commissioner Byerly question Hutt if he was involved in the drainage study w engineer. Jeremy Hutt replied no he was not involved. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding the status of ch made to Bluebonnet Road and Glade Road. Jeremy Hutt said a study had been done on Glade Road, from city limit to city limit, but the project was only in the preliminary stages. Commissioner Dudziak asked if G was part of the new TIF concept that we could use to finance som roads. Jeremy Hutt replied yes it is. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding the condition of Bluebonnet Road and if it would be able to sustain construction traffic. H there would be an agreement with the developer to make repairs. Hutt replied the developer would pay perimeter street fees and roadway impact fees to cover the impact on the roadway system. He furth if there were direct damage the City would work this out with th that time. Commissioner Dudziak asked if the developer would path the perimeter street fees and roadway impact fees. Jeremy Hutt replied the developer would pay the higher of the two. City of Colleyville Page 14 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if they felt that there wo additional impact downstream due to changing the direction of drainage. Jeremy Hutt replied no there would be no additional impacts down Commissioner Dudziak asked if the Lake of Somerset would be affe additional drainage. Jeremy Hutt replied no. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if the two trees per lot and the window requirements were in the draft ordinance. Ron Ruthven replied twindow requirement was not in the draft ordinance. He further explained that he had not received this requirement in writing from the developer, how Commission so chose to add this as a condition it could be added explained the tree requirements were listed in the draft ordinan Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Spain about the size of drainage pipe and the design of the drainage. Mr. Spain replied they were the eighteen inch an inlet, at the rear of each property, which would then be conn drainage pipe. Commissioner Phelps asked if the inlets would be maintained they would be private and the streets would be public. Discussion continued between Commissioner Phelps and Mr. Spain r the drainage system and the responsibility of maintenance. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Spain regarding the price poi development and was this a desirable price point. Mr. Spain rep a very desirable price point. Commissioner Davis questioned staff regarding the density and why would we allow the density requirement to be doubled. He further questio were any other developments with this density. Ron Ruthven repli there was one, Spring Garden. Discussion continued between the Commission and staff regarding other developments and their densities. Commissioner Dudziak stated density has always been a delicate i Colleyville. He further stated that the City needed Economic De and larger density. He suggested to the developer to talk to City Council about Glade Road improvements. Commissioner Dudziak made a motion to approve with the addition - four inch caliper trees per lot along the western portion and no western facing windows on the second floor. Commissioner Byerly seconded the motion. City of Colleyville Page 15 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 Commissioner Gotcher stated that he felt the justification for 1 acre was there in proximity to Highway 26 but the justification transition to Bluebonnet was not there. Commissioner Byerly stated that he respectfully disagreed with this statement. He further explained that he thought the lot sizes w comparable to those in the surrounding developments, possibly bi Discussion continued between the Commissioners regarding lot siz The motion to approve with the addition of two - four inch caliper trees per lot along the western portion and no western facing windows on the second floor failed with the following vote: Aye: 3 Dudziak, Phelps, and Byerly Nay: 3 Knox, Gotcher, and Davis Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if the super majority had already reached. Ron Ruthven replied yes. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Spain if he wanted to move on Council or would he like to wait until they had a full Commissio replied they had contractual obligations that they were required thought they were running out of time. He further stated they w move on to City Council. Discussion continued between the Commission, staff, and Mr. Spai procedure. Commissioner Gotcher questioned Mr. Spain regarding whether or n would consider a lesser density of twenty-eight or twenty-nine houses. Mr. Spain replied no. He further explained that this was not an opt drainage system that would have to be put in. Commissioner Gotcher asked why Mr. Spain was able to do a lesser density in Southlake but n Mr. Spain replied that it was because of a different market in S Commissioner Knox stated that he felt that, especially in this case, it was Mr. Spain came forward and said they chose to go forward to City Commissioner Gotcher made a motion to deny case ZC12-025. Commissioner Davis seconded the motion. City of Colleyville Page 16 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 2013 Commissioner Byerly stated that he would like to add a friendly amendment that Council be informed that the second motion was made in order to break the three-to-three deadlock. The motion to deny carried with the following vote: Aye: 4 Knox, Gotcher, Davis, and Byerly Nay: 2 Dudziak and Phelps 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:23 p.m. Minutes were written and prepared by: Taci Wrisley Planning and Zoning Assistant The meeting minutes were approved on January 28, 2013 by a vote of 6-0. City of Colleyville Page 17