Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-11/14/2011City of Colleyville city Hall 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 817. 503.1000 www. Colleyville. com ~`-11)' iip {'1..';~, ._~. _ _ ``f~ ~ Meeting Agenda Monday, November 14, 2011 6:15 PM City Council Chambers Planning and Zoning Commission ~- City of Colleyville City Hall 100 Main Street ~~ ~ ~' I~,~ Colleyville, Texas 76034 d,~_ Meeting Agenda 817.503.1000 ~~,r,.. www.colleyville.com Planning and Zoning Commission Monday, November 14, 2011 6:15 PM City Council Chambers LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANNING, ZONING, PLATTING, AND LAND USE REVIEW OF REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND DISCUSSION OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES DISCUSSION OF ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON FUTURE AGENDAS AND UPDATES ON DEVELOPMENT TRENDS, PROGRESS AND CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS ON PAST AGENDA ITEMS EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D, Section 551.071 -Legal -Consultation with attorney on legal issues raised by public hearing or action items on the agenda 7:00 P.M. -REGULAR MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. INVOCATION Commissioner Rotthaus 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 24, 2011 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7a Approval of a request for a minor plat on 5.0 acres on Tract 1 B, Abstract 1154 of the RH McEwing Survey located at 8100 Precinct Line Road, Case PC 11-013 City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 11/10/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda November 14, 2011 8. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 8a Approval of a request for an amendment to the PUD-C-Planned Unit Development Commercial zoning and development requirements for the Village Front Door Addition located at 5204 and 5232 Colleyville Boulevard, Case ZC11-021 8b Approval of a request for a Special Use Permit for a convenience store with gasoline sales and alcoholic beverage sales - off-premise consumption on Lot 1 R, Block 1 of the Davidson Addition located at 3900 Colleyville Boulevard, Case ZC11-022 9. ADJOURNMENT Ihere certify th~above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Fri y, November 11, 2011 by 5:00 p.m. Amy Shelley, Community Development Coordinator City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 11/10/2011 City of Colleyville City Hall 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 817. 503.1000 www. Colleyville. com .~ :~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. ,~ ! <;.'.~ Minutes -Draft Monday, October 24, 2011 6:15 PM City Council Chambers Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville City Hall . ~-~-""'~. 100 Main Street m ~~~ +~ ~:- a Colleyville, Texas 76034 Minutes -Draft 817.503.1000 "' '" www.colleyville.com Planning and Zoning Commission Monday, October 24, 2011 6:15 PM City Council Chambers LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANNING, ZONING, PLATTING, AND LAND USE REVIEW OF REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS AND DISCUSSION OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES DISCUSSION OF ITEMS TO BE PLACED ON FUTURE AGENDAS AND UPDATES ON DEVELOPMENT TRENDS, PROGRESS AND CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS ON PAST AGENDA ITEMS EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D, Section 551.071 -Legal -Consultation with attorney on legal issues raised by public hearing or action items on the agenda 7:00 P.M. -REGULAR MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of the City of Colleyville was called to order by Chairman Byerly on October 24, 2011 at 7:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Larry Knox, Dave Dudziak, David Wheelwright, Don Davis, Ron Rotthaus, David Phelps and Jeff Byerly Staff Present: Ron Ruthven, Marty Wieder, Rob McKeown, Jeremy Hutt and Amy Shelley 3. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Commissioner Phelps. 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Knox moved to approve the October 10, 2011 meeting minutes as written. Commissioner Davis seconded. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 10/26/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft October 24, 2011 The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 - Knox, Dudziak, Wheelwright, Davis, Rotthaus, Phelps, Byerly 6. SWEARING IN OF NEWLY APPOINTED MEMBERS Recording Secretary Amy Shelley administered the Oath of Office to the new members. 7. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Commissioner Dudziak moved to approve Commissioner Byerly as the Chairman. Commissioner Knox seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 -Knox, Dudziak, Wheelwright, Davis, Rotthaus, Phelps, Byerly Commissioner Rotthaus moved to approve Commissioner Dudziak as the Vice Chairman. Commissioner Phelps seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 -Knox, Dudziak, Wheelwright, Davis, Rotthaus, Phelps, Byerly Commissioner Byerly moved to approve Amy Shelley as the Recording Secretary. Commissioner Phelps seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 -Knox, Dudziak, Wheelwright, Davis, Rotthaus, Phelps, Byerly 8. APPOINTMENTS TO THE PARKLAND DEDICATION COMMITTEE Commissioner Byerly moved to approve Commissioners Dudziak and Rotthaus to the Parkland Dedication Committee. Commissioner Davis seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 7 -Knox, Dudziak, Wheelwright, Davis, Rotthaus, Phelps, Byerly 9. CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None 10. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 10a Approval of a request to rezone 0.8 acres from CN-Neighborhood City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 10/26/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft October 24, 2011 Commercial to PUD-C-Planned Unit Development Commercial on Lot A1, Block 1, Highland Acres Addition located at 412 Timberline Drive North, Case ZC11-020 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding the waiver request adjacent to the residentially zoned property, if the building were to be moved, would the end parking space be removed? Ron Ruthven replied yes and that all parking would have to be behind the 20 foot landscaped buffer. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. David Keener, the applicant, came forward to present the case and brief the Commissioners. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Keener regarding if this is a Type B facility. Mr. Keener replied yes. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Keener if other patients, other than Type B, can be accepted at this facility? Mr. Keener replied that they are not limiting themselves to just Alzheimer patients. He stated it would be their desire to make this a full time Alzheimer facility, however, he stated the market will dictate the use. He stated their current facility has 15 Alzheimer patients and 15 assisted living patients. Mr. Keener stated that currently they have no patients that drive. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Keener regarding if there will be about 10 cars using the parking for the proposed facility. Mr. Keener replied that a maximum of five staff members and a maximum of four people for the cottages. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Keener regarding if this is just an assisted living facility, would not the parking increase? Mr. Keener replied that currently in the assisted living facility, there are zero drivers. He stated that an increase in parking has been allowed by providing the 20 parking spaces in the proposed facility. Commissioner Rotthaus questioned Mr. Keener regarding the carting of food from the current facility to the new facility. Mr. Keener replied they currently use a carting system between the two existing facilities and they are proposing to use a golf cart that will be fitted for the carting of food with hot boxes. Commissioner Wheelwright questioned Mr. Keener regarding if there will be residents carted across the street. Mr. Keener replied that City of Colleyville Page 3 Printed on 10/26/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft October 24, 2011 occasionally there may be, especially for an activity, but not for housing. Mr. Keener stated that they have no issue with the any parking requirements on the street. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Keener regarding staffing and cottage numbers. Mr. Keener replied that there will be five additional staff members per shift with the possibility of four drivers for the cottages. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Keener if overflow parking from the current facility will be using the proposed facility. Mr. Keener replied that they currently need an additional four or five parking space. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Keener if staff members currently park in front of the neighbors. Mr. Keener replied no, it is not allowed. Further discussion occurred about the current parking situation on the road. Mr. Keener clarified that the showers are in the middle of the floor plan to meet the regulations of this facility. He stated that if the showers are tucked away in back corners, the nursing staff cannot keep a watchful eye on the patients using them. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Keener regarding the drainage waiver request, has the drainage for this property been considered? Mr. Keener stated that the property is a flat, platted parcel and stated not being in favor of drainage detention areas for the safety of the patients. He stated not seeing the benefit of detention. He stated he would rather have a flat grass area. He stated they want to have more of a residential function with less commercial type areas like detention on the property. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:34 p.m. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Fire Marshal Rob McKeown regarding if this assisted living type use have more of an impact on the emergency service system even though, in the past, it has been stated that services can handle the impact because of the number of these facilities? Marshal McKeown stated since January 1st, there have been 21 calls, two being fire alarm calls, to the assisted living facility on Bransford. He further stated that the call volume has gone up and will continue to rise because of the city's growth. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Marshal McKeown regarding if the multi use building will require a different type of fire system? Marshal McKeown stated they have required a sprinkler system in the multi City of Colleyville Page 4 Printed on 10/26/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft October 24, 2011 occupant dwellings such as townhomes. He stated the multi use building will require a fire sprinkler system. Commissioner Phelps questioned Marshal McKeown regarding if this facility will be self sufficient because of the nursing staff on hand? Marshal McKeown replied that having the nursing staff on site does help the emergency crew especially since they work together. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Marshal McKeown regarding if the extra turn around in the front of the building had to be eliminated, would he be ok with that? Marshal McKeown replied that the hammer head in the fire lane does meet the code. However, he further stated that they like to prevent having to back up the vehicles because of accidents. He stated he requested the front entrance driveway to help with that situation. Commissioner Rotthaus questioned Marshal McKeown regarding if he has any concerns about the foot traffic crossing traffic on Timberline Drive North. Marshal McKeown replied that anybody needs to be aware of crossing any street regardless of the street or intersection. He further stated that they need to be careful. Commissioner Byerly questioned City Engineer Jeremy Hutt regarding if the driveway separation is a concern for the subject property as well as the property located 5316 Bransford? City Engineer Hutt replied yes and that the separation requirement is centerline to centerline regardless on the subject property or on the adjacent property. Commissioner Byerly questioned City Engineer Hutt regarding which two driveways are too close. City Engineer Hutt replied both driveways proposed and the one on the east are too close. Commissioner Byerly questioned City Engineer Hutt regarding how this was worked out with the Fire Marshal's requirements. City Engineer Hutt replied that his request can be taken into consideration however there are still two relatively close with the adjacent property owner. He further stated that there are engineering judgment calls that can be made that may be technically non-compliant but safe. Commissioner Byerly questioned City Engineer Hutt regarding if the requirement can be alleviated by one driveway being an entrance only. City Engineer Hutt replied it could if the non-fire lane is a one-way section. Commissioner Phelps questioned City Engineer Hutt regarding if the distance requirement is independent rather the property is residential versus commercial. City Engineer Hutt Jeremy replied that the code City of Colleyville Page 5 Printed on 10/26/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft October 24, 2011 does not go into details with regards to the uses; it basically considers the street type and the use on a local street. City Engineer Hutt further stated that the driveway spacing for a residential use is 22 feet on a local street. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding if the retention requirement is met for the subject property. City Engineer Hutt replied that there is a retention requirement for pre-developed conditions and it does not necessarily require a pond. He further stated that there could be parking lot detention and underground detention that could be met. Commissioner Dudziak stated that 25 to 30% will be covered by buildings and concrete. He further questioned City Engineer Hutt regarding if some type of detention will be required. City Engineer Hutt stated they will require compliance with the Land Development Code which will require some type of detention or a drainage analysis showing why detention would not be the best case scenario for this property. He further stated that the analysis will determine a viable solution. Commissioner Dudziak questioned City Engineer Hutt regarding if the pre-determination is received before the request is presented to City Council. City Engineer Hutt stated it is a requirement during the time of building permit unless a waiver, of some sort, is granted. Commissioner Dudziak stated at this time we really do not know if one is needed however the Commission is being asked to grant a waiver. City Engineer Hutt replied that the Land Development Code has specific requirements and if those requirements are not specifically waived, then they will still have to be met during the building permit process. Discussion occurred between Commissioner Dudziak and staff regarding percentages of building coverings with regards to open space or green space. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding if the drainage will all run to the street and is the street a curb and gutter street? City Engineer Hutt replied yes, it is a curb and gutter street. He stated the applicant is showing the drainage direction however a drainage analysis has not been completed to show the increase in run off. Commissioner Rotthaus questioned staff regarding if the parking on Timberline/Bransford can be anon-parking area with regards to the subject property. Ron Ruthven replied yes, it will ultimately be at the decision of City Council. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if that recommendation should be outside of this PUD? Ron Ruthven stated it could be a condition of this City of Colleyville Page 6 Printed on 10/26/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft October 24, 2011 PUD. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mr. Keener regarding if the waiver for the building line is not granted, is there an alternative to this plan? Mr. Keener replied that they can move the site to the east however it would not be the best solution. He stated he would rather continue the hedges that are currently in place. He stated the neighbor does not want a parking to cross especially since there is already a curb in place. Ron Ruthven explained the State requirements for bedroom sizes, kitchen, fire alarm/sprinkler systems and bathroom facilities. Commissioner Wheelwright questioned Mr. Keener regarding if he would like to have wrought iron fencing to the north. Mr. Keener replied yes, in order to keep it open. He further stated that the cedar wood fencing would be used for the west property line since it is already in place. Commissioner Wheelwright questioned Mr. Keener regarding if there would be any fencing along the eastern property line. Mr. Keener replied no, that they would like to install hedges similar to match the existing. He further explained that the wrought iron fencing would go along the north property line behind the proposed cottage. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff regarding what the Master Plan calls for on the old city hall property. Ron Ruthven replied residential uses. Commissioner Dudziak stated he likes the use however stated having some issues with this particular plan. He stated a full masonry fence should be along the north. He stated the rear building is not cottages; it is a multi use building. He further stated that the landscaping barriers, as drawn, are not to code. Commissioner Phelps stated that he would be opposed to granting the buffer waiver on the residential side, however less inclined to be concerned about the commercial side. He further said that some parking may be lost. He stated it is a good balance in the rest of the development. Commissioner Byerly concurred and stated he can approve the two less parking spaces however cannot approve the other waiver requests. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Keener regarding if the other issues can be addressed. Mr. Keener replied he would like to address these concerns tonight. He further stated that he is not asking for a drainage waiver, it must have been something staff stated. He stated that they are asking for help to fit a building on a lot that is not wider than City of Colleyville Page 7 Printed on 10/26/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft October 24, 2011 it is. He stated the building is designed to fit the function that they need. He stated the rooms cannot be reduced to meet the market demand. He stated they spent a lot of time trying to design the building so that it fits in the neighborhood. He stated the parking was situated on the east side of the building so that traffic would not impact the resident to the west. He stated the driveway is a one way drive with arrows. He said there will be minimal usage of that driveway. He stated not having an issue for a masonry fence to the north, however stated that it would not be very appealing in this area. Commissioner Rotthaus questioned Mr. Keener regarding the angled parking on the east side, how will they exit the site? Mr. Keener replied that there is enough room to do a three point turn especially since there is a 24 foot fire lane. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Keener regarding if the rear building is required to be fire sprinkled, will that impact whether or not the building will be built? Mr. Keener replied that they were told that they did not have to sprinkle that building but stated if they have to sprinkle it, then they will do so. Commissioner Phelps moved to reopen the public hearing. Commissioner Davis seconded. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:12 p.m. Karen Wilson, 100 Timberline Drive, stated being in support of the request and stated the developer has been a great neighbor to this area and stated the waivers should be granted as requested. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:14 p.m. Commissioner Byerly moved to approve case ZC11-020 subject to the following conditions: 1. Denial of all setback screening and buffering waivers 2. No drainage or detention waivers 3. No waiver on the fencing requirements. Commissioner Rotthaus questioned the mover about making Timberline Drive North a no parking area. Commissioner Byerly concurred and added no parking up to the subject property line on Timberline Drive North. Commissioner Davis seconded. Commissioner Dudziak questioned the mover regarding if the request by the applicant to be able to use the rear building for residents from the 5314 Bransford location, if needed, and no residents younger than 55? Commissioner Byerly stated not being comfortable with having residents living there that are affiliated with the other property since this will be a standalone PUD development. City of Colleyville Page 8 Printed on 10/26/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft October 24, 2011 Commissioner Dudziak stated he would like to add a residential sprinkling system be required in the cottage unit. Commissioner Byerly stated it is currently required therefore it would not have to be stated in this ordinance. Commissioner Byerly restated the motion: 1. Denial of all setbacks, screening, landscaping and buffering waivers 2. No drainage or detention waivers 3. No waiver on the fencing requirements 4. No parking along Timberline Drive North from Bransford to the western property line of the subject property. Commissioner Davis seconded. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding what changes will the applicant need to make to this submittal before this moves forward to City Council. Ron Ruthven stated that it will ultimately be up to the applicant to provide any new types of plans or descriptions; however he stated he would recommend an amended site plan. He also stated that this can be submitted to the City Council as proposed with the existing site plan and existing waivers. He further stated that City Council may approve with the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations along with their own recommendations. Commissioner Byerly reminded the Commissioners that the driveway and parking space waivers have been granted. Commissioner Rotthaus stated that if the setbacks are not granted then additional parking spaces will be lost. Commissioner Byerly stated that the applicant can resituate some of the open space to accommodate for additional parking spaces. Commissioner Dudziak stated not being comfortable with voting on a submittal when the Commissioners need to see the revisions on the site. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 -Knox, Wheelwright, Davis, Rotthaus, Byerly Nay: 2 -Dudziak, Phelps 11. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:24 p.m. I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Friday, October 21, 2011 by 5:00 p.m. Amy Shelley, Community Development Coordinator City of Colleyville Page 9 Printed on 10/26/2011 Cit of Colle V~~~e 100 Main Street :~.~~ra~~~.~ Y Y Colleyville, Texas 76034 ,~., Agenda Briefing 817.503.1000 www.colleyville.com File Number: Version: 1 Requester: Community Development Department File Type: Case Agenda Date: 11/14/2011 Agenda No.: 7a Final Action: File Name: Approval of a request for a minor plat on 5.0 acres on Tract 1 B, Abstract 1154 of the RH McEwing Survey located at 8100 Precinct Line Road, Case PC11-013 Attachments: Location and Zoning Map Plat Exhibit Lot Description History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 1 11/14/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Approval of a request for a minor plat on 5.0 acres on Tract 1 B, Abstract 1154 of the RH McEwing Survey located at 8100 Precinct Line Road, Case PC11-013 Explanation Jeffrey Jones is the applicant of a 5.0 acre tract of land located at 8100 Precinct Line Road. The applicant submitted a request for approval of a minor plat which will consist of one commercial lot. The lots meet the requirements of the Land Development Code. Zoning. The property was approved for a rezoning request from the CC2-Shopping Center to the PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial zoning district on August 3, 2010. The lot meets the minimum requirements of PUDC Ordinance 0-10-1761 and the Land Development Code in general. Preliminary Plat. A preliminary plat was approved for the subject property by the City Council on June 7, 2005 under Resolution R-05-2549. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat for new structures on newly platted lots. The fee for non-residential uses is $800 per acre. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's Office. Sidewalks and Trails. The Colleyville Pathways Plan requires a five (5) foot wide sidewalk to be constructed along Lavaca Trail. The sidewalk will be located in the dedicated right-of-way and the applicant will be responsible for construction prior to a Certificate of Status: Commision Action Items Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 11/10/2011 Agenda Briefing Continued Occupancy being issued for the property. Tree Preservation. Trees not located within the building footprint must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside of the building footprint. Summary. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. The proposed development satisfies all requirements of the Land Development Code. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Recommendation Approval City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 11/10/2011 Location and Zoning Map ~ ~. 't"°~ ~ t ~ _ - = sago - ~ ~ ~.~ n~ 6416 6'417 6416 ~• ,, 0417 ~~: . 6412 f.413 6412 6413 '` G408 6409 6409 6404 6405 6404 6405 6400 Precinct 6304 ~ a ~ ~ $ ~~ Line Road '~ ~ T PUDR 6300 6304 +300 6301 PUDC r ~ 6233 6301 c II1~0 ft130 ~ 6229 0212 0225 6213 6220 G221 Site - 6208 621 6217 R20 6209 0212 6213 810Q ~ 0209 6~ ~~~ "'''"'''""''' 6205 6204 6205 111111 ~~~ R ~ ~~~~ - i P U C R40 6216 6213 aaso 6212 02'09 1201 6zoa s205 aoso ~~ ~ ~ ~p ~ 8~~~ ~i ~~ca h --•.._~ § R 0 Plat Exhibit ~g$g~gg~jj g • $$ ~~ WW' $ggS$gg E I ~~ ! - ~~ Y8 $'$ E: r ~g~ - •- ~§gg $~55g8g -: ~$ •W g$g'gsy~ rr- ~$$$gsg Bt B R $ tY l698 ?~ TS 7Y8 cpc se RCe eR =: c"c "c 2 :-.°.cz~& nB c~~ N,BEI Ag ~ ~~~b~ c F~ I~~~ 8~~ ~~~ ~~1~~ 1 P Z ~~~~ -Ilvai Noadwwlo E 9 ~~a;, y ~ 3 9 _.._._._ -- I ~~~~ 9 s g ae~~ ' ---- ---•----- __ ---- -- ,dtyy~~~ 'Tw r-i it :.nx wr`.'u ~-- __ S I,7r .i~3r ~~~. -, - i ~§ r ~ J °~ E= --'-~ § _ s I 0~ p ~ E I I I ~ °t . r _ __ ~- a~~- ~ ~ t ~ 'a' f i .! L~ I ~ ~I Y f Eal I Y ~ ~ ~ ~w ~... ~'F ` i ~~ JJ NY i ~ ~~ .. S b ~ I I ~ I w g 4Y ~' ~a ~m ~ ~~ ~ ` I ~ ... ~ _.. ~ L_~~i_ I- -- G7t ;y , ~ ~ _ ~ ...i .~'.• ~_. i Y : 1 ~ ~..~..1 ~ "~ ~ am,,/ N ---___...-~.ww-iw.-'--'- yT'9 / .. - ,w f Re' ~ J ! ~,,,-e, ~„ NIL. . _ ._ - -L~ }- - ~ i ~,'~ ~„s+:•x.. N O.i'ff'Si' W ~ I!l.~~' .'rs' +~~ l I ~! I ~ •wc ~* y~wa ,, _ r ~- ^~ °0` ri~T; ~ -o;-- _~ ICI _ ~- _ i' ~ i ~ ----- 4 sj ~y'' ~- ....__ ___._____ ..... ~.. I -_ - v _- .. _~ ~ - _. . " ' -il .. _._. ._.______ ___... ..__ r" 1 i ~~~ ~~ ~I I. 6 I a ~ ~~qi~ py ~ ~ ~ ~' 'I ~L~ ~ I jQ~ I ~~~ R . pp ~l. ! ~ ~ §~E~z .... .._ ~ f l I ~ a I A`~Y~ . y ~~~a I ; ~ ~i 'I t 4 ~t~' ~E; I ~ ', ~ __-.~-~__T.= ~ ....._~.~ I ~ I B~ ~_ N ~ ~~ g 4 ~~ ti~ vo U ~ yH~~ s o~q~~ R a CQ ti 4 ~ ~~ ~~ ~ .~y ~ ~ g C U ..i ~ O ~ Y N 4u :~~~ '~~ V i ~~Si gi4 ~i M1 ~jy Ii ~g a a~ ~~ J 3 ~~~ i~A ~~ u-.-.o-wool Iwo. n-nuW p IaVOa 3N1'1 l~Nl~3ad1 8Z4E 'oN AdMHJIH 'W'~ Lot Description LOT 2, BLOCK 1, MEADOWS CREEK PLAZA North: 3935.0946 East: 3536.5740 Course: N 89-55-00 E Distance: 264.60 North: 3935.4795 East: 3801.1737 Course: N 03-47-13 E Distance: 603.20 North: 4537.3625 East: 3841.0116 Course: S 89-55-00 W Distance: 427.37 North: 4536.7409 East: 3413.6420 Course: S 02-45-04 E Distance: 103.90 North: 4432.9606 East: 3418.6290 Course: S 03-17-55 E Distance: 134,23 North: 4298.9530 East: 3426.3525 Course: S 00-05-00 E Distance: 72.82 North: 4226.1283 East: 3426.4585 Course: S 23-49-36 E Distance: 272.43 North: 3976.9146 East: 3536.5132 Course: S 00-05-00 E Distance: 41.82 North: 3935.0946 East: 3536.5740 Perimeter: 1920.38 Area: 220781.59 5.07 acres Mathematical Closure - (Uses Survey Units} Error of Closure: 0.000 Course: S 90-00-00 E Precision 1:1920377354.78 '-'/ ~> City of Colleyville city Hal' t\{~~(~~~„~~~ 100 Main Street ~~~' Colleyville, Texas 76034 ~~'~" Agenda Briefing 817.503.1000 www.col leyville.com File Number: Version: 1 Requester: Community Development Department File Type: Case Agenda Date: 11/14/2011 Agenda No.: 8a Status: Commission Public Hearings Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Final Action: File Name: Approval of a request for an amendment to the PUD-C-Planned Unit Development Commercial zoning and development requirements for the Village Front Door Addition located at 5204 and 5232 Colleyville Boulevard, Case ZC11-021 Attachments: Location and Zoning Map Site Plan Floor Plan Ordinance History of Legislative File • Notification List Buffer Map Aerial Applicant's Request Ordinance 0-07-1630 Ordinance 0-10-1784 Proposed Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 1 11/14/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Approval of a request for an amendment to the PUD-C-Planned Unit Development Commercial zoning and development requirements for the Village Front Door Addition located at 5204 and 5232 Colleyville Boulevard, Case ZC11-021 Explanation Jimmy Archie, of Realty Capital Corporation submitted a request to amend Ordinance 0-10-1784, Section 4(1 )b under the permitted uses section. This clause states "not less than 100 percent of the air-conditioned area of Building (C) depicted on Exhibit "B" shall contain uses that are eligible for State of Texas retail sales tax as defined by the State of Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts" on approximately 0.8 acres, located at 5204 Colleyville Boulevard. The applicant is requesting to allow office as a permitted use. The applicant did not specify a specific percentage of office use allowance. Rather, they prefer to leave the option open for an open percentage of office or retail uses. Existing Zoning. The original Ordinance 0-07-1630 was approved by City Council on September 18, 2007. This ordinance rezoned 2.8 acres of land from CC1-Village Retail to PUD-C-Planned Unit Development Commercial and allowed for two buildings. The northernmost Building (D) is completed and is three stories. Ordinance 0-07-1630 allowed this building to contain a maximum of 30 residential units on the upper two floors and allows office uses on the ground floor. The other Building (C) is permitted for construction as a 6,735 square foot retail building. Ordinance 0-07-1630 allowed this building to contain any City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 11/10/2011 Agenda Briefing Continued use allowed in the CC1-Village Retail zoning district including office uses. However, in December, 2010, City Council approved Ordinance 0-10-1784 with the condition that Building (C) be 100 percent retail uses as condition for allowing Building (D) to have 100% office uses on the ground floor. The entire ground floor of Building (D) is now occupied by Baylor Family Medicine with a gross floor area of 11,625 square feet. Proposed Ordinance Amendment. The applicant is seeking to amend the existing ordinance by removing the 100% retail cap in its entirety. The applicant states that they have received interest to lease a portion of the building as office, specifically 2,100 square feet for Prudential Texas Properties. Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the subject property for retail uses. Additionally, in March 2002, the City Council passed a resolution accepting the recommendations of the State Highway 26/Colleyville Boulevard Corridor Design Study as a guide for the preparation of ordinances and the establishment of policies for the future redevelopment of SH26. Goal 7 of the study states: "Where appropriate, developments should include a mix of uses, such as first level retail with second and third level residential, retail and office, and other similar mixes. Residential mixed-use developments should only be vertically mixed. " Surrounding Properties. The property to the north is developed as a church and is zoned CC1-Village Retail. The properties to the west are developed as single family residential and the eastern boundary of the Village at Colleyville and are zoned PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial. The property to the east includes office uses and the Central Fire Station and are zoned CPO-Professional Office. The property to the south is developed as amulti-tenant retail building and zoned CC1-Village Retail. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 16 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff has received no correspondence regarding the request. Summary. The request by the applicant is not necessarily consistent with the Colleyville Master Plan or the recommendations of the State Highway 26/Colleyville Boulevard Corridor Design Study given the allowance of 100% office uses on Building (D). If the applicant's request is granted as proposed, there is a potential that there would be no retail uses located on the subject property upon full leasing of the Buildings (C) and (D). Therefore, given that the applicant was able to use the entire ground floor of Building (D) for office space, staff recommends denial of the addition of office uses to the subject property. Recommendation Denial City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 11/10/2011 Location and Zoning Map Notification List OWNER NAME OWNER ADDR OWNER CITY OWNER STATE OWNER ZIP SITUS ADDR First Baptist Ch Colleyville 5405 Pleasant Run Rd Colleyville TX 76034 005300 Colleyville Blvd First Baptist Ch Colleyville 5405 Pleasant Run Rd Colleyville TX 76034 005312 Colleyville Blvd Hart, Kay L nn Foster 5301 Pleasant Run Rd Colle ille TX 76034 005301 Pleasant Run Rd Miller, Louis C Etux Elizabeth 7802 Tillman Hill Ct Unit B Colle ville TX 76034 005303 Colleyville Blvd Hart, Kay Lynn Foster 5301 Pleasant Run Rd Colleyville TX 76034 005301 Pleasant Run Rd Colleyville, City Of 100 Main St Colleyville TX 76034 005209 Colleyville Blvd Colleyville Terrace Salon & Da 5201 Collyville Blvd Colleyville TX 76034 005201 Colleyville Blvd Allgood, Leslie A 16525 Preston Trail Dr Dallas TX 75248 005307 Colleyville Blvd Rcc Village Properties Ltd, a licant 8333 Dou las Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 005232 Colle ville Blvd Rcc Village Properties Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 005204 Colleyville Blvd Villa a Management Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000023 Mission Ln Village Management Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000023 Mission Ln Village Managment Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000016 Main St Village Monticello Prtns Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000014 Main St Villa a Mana ement Ltd 8333 Dou las Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000026 Main St Village Management Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000026 Main St Village Management Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000018 Main St Village Management Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000020 Main St Village Management Ltd 8333 Douglas Ave Ste 110 Dallas TX 75225 000012 Main St Beam Real Estate Llc 14455 Webb Chapel Rd Farmers Branch TX 75234 005200 Colleyville Blvd Barnard Partners Xiii Ltd PO Box 37197 Fort Worth TX 76117 005301 Colle ille Blvd Libert Bank 860 Air ort Fwy Ste 100 Hurst TX 76054 005217 Pleasant Run Rd Liberty Bank 860 Airport Fwy Ste 100 Hurst TX 76054 005201 Pleasant Run Rd Public hearing notices were remailed on Friday, Oct. 21, 2011 by Amy Shellley. Buffer Map eoe ~ac~ 5e ~ ~~u~ ~~as -' .~ 110E ~i90 5505 a 5501 8U3 806 5503 X912 5bth~ J""",t Sid Sit CSB &04 £~ 5405 5408 ,"V t~w~7 5413 3 5=1C~~+ ~ ..,~ ~~ 9221 37 13 ~ S05 1 5312 ~~ 54 C 1 B'99 C! )..~y t3,3 A ~~ G.,/'! 5311 ~~'`~ 53U9 ~'~`'~ 53ffS S 17 5:i 10 5341 ('~+ s 15 L,,,J 1 1 F3~~.. 5300' ~ e n'~..~ '.GA .. 1 `~~` •~ 5~2t3 F" ~.... t ~~ F L IVI i ~7 ~;~ ~ F~.c, -~ 7 0 53 ~ 1 '_~~i _:,, , ~ 520+ r l r" ~~~ •~ g~{i 5112 190*4 1?C3 1191 11th 112G' c~ f~ "~.::, L_[._l~! ' ~~ "urn 5tb 91 ~t0 `.' _ ,,; `201 , 91i)u5 5f0~ 511' ~~ ;90g ~' 1'13 1117 112 ' ry12a F1^ ~~a129 1104 9D8 922 t18 120 59~a ~ ~`~,' ; qy ~ 51:3 511 b904 5 ~I'~ - \..l F"1 f"'~ 5 i ._ F~. LJ ci•C F"i 1~ -' Yrr • F~ Aerial Applicant's Request The applicant is seeking a zoning change to Ordinance 0-07-1630, as amended by Ordinance 0-10-1784, in order to allow office use on Lot 2, Block 1, Village Front Door Addition (also depicted as Building C on the attached site plan). The original ordinance on this property (0-07-1630) allowed for office use, however, this use was removed from the property at the request of the City Council upon adoption of Ordinance 0-10-1784. The applicant is requesting to add office back in the ordinance as an allowed use. While retail and restaurant is still an acceptable and welcomed use for the property, the developer is requesting that the City allow the market to dictate the use of the building over time. Currently, the market demand is not for retail use at this location. At this time, the developer has entered into an agreement to lease a portion of the building to an office user. REGElV~;C~ SEP 2 2 2011 Per ............. Site Plan ~r~. „",~,,, .... ou~.q.~n'S ~ Duu~~u~~u3 ~ ' ' fl CD aaax '~v ~ a~ ~ m r :uw anouu ~rwa mw ~a StlX31 3111M31'10~ NOIlIOOtl ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~w~ uwo~ ~ uo~dwoH p„~e o nb S„~d„„ ~„ aooa 1NOad av+niln 3N1 i 0 1 ' ' ~s~~p 666 ~ ~ r V ~ ti ~ 0o - IN sl ~ H~ ~9 L ~ lOl ~ ~~e ~ N I [r~ ,l [r S % ~ C ~ ~ ~ aoc wws'x ~ww se Ntl7d 3115 AIitlNIWl~3tld e 6 ~ ~ a ~~ Y bbb ~~~ pbb ~ ~ ~~~ : b x ~ b ~ M $ a ~~~ bbb eR~ eat ~~~ bbb 5~~ ~ I ~ : d a ~ ~ S ~E 11. ~ I a L ~~ i~t I ~ ~ ~ e ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~~ ~~ ° ~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ef$°~ ~~ ~~ gi!~ 3 oga g~~qq iy~ ~g~ §~~ ~yFi ~~~ ~~! ~~y3 ~~~~ ~9~ Q~~s~ ' ~ 3 12 y li)p ~~ # ~~ i ~"1 `;}i f~~~ jji~ ~~~~ ~3° ~? ~ !ut: ,yf: y: a y 11 { I I I a a~ ~ 9 ~~s~~~~i~9~ ~~~~~~~I~~~ ~ ~ o a~ ~~ I " _ .:~ _- 1 ~ i .~ ~~ I I ~ a~~'I ~ } I -~.. ~ ~I ~4~ ~I I \ ~ ~. ` ~ ~ a; ~ ~ ~,~- - ` - ~` 1^ MA/N S ~ L _ ~~--- ~` w•~.~wo.~ rs.n ~ •M~+v~mo~ I, i, +,, 8 ~~~ ~1 ~ ~ ~\ ~~;~ ' ~~~ ~e3 ~x>< /~ o. ~ -: ~~~~ ~, i ~'~~ ', , Z~Z~ ~ +e Fe M1 Q yR V Q.i 1 I ' If I ;, ° ~ ~( e 'i I Wo~ ~; ,r~i ~~~ ~~ ~ 3 ~ W ae,~== wW= s o~-~ ~~ i I is I` ~~! ~3 I ;~~ ~~I;_ i i ~e: ` I .. ~~' I l:e ~ Y y ;. +e ;, ~. ; ~. , Glnnr Dl~n V Q Z a O O u ORDINANCE 0-07-1630 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF LOT AR AND BR, OF THE E.M. THOMPSON SUBDIVISION, AND LOT 2, BLOCK 1, FOSTER ADDITION, FROM THE CC1- VILLAGE RETAIL ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PUDC-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has received an application for a rezoning under Case No. Z-07-026; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and !,,WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, to the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the Ordinance 0-07-1630 Page 2 of 6 property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. 'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: 'Sec. 1. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Sec. 2. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning on Lot AR and BR, E.M. Thompson Subdivision, and Lot 2, Block 1, Foster Addition, from the CC1-Village Retail zoning district to the PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial zoning district, as depicted on the attached Zoning and Location Map, labeled as Exhibit "A". Sec. 3. THAT the Official Zoning Map of the City of Colleyville be amended to incorporate the zoning change approved herein. Sec. 4. THAT the above described tract of land shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. GENERAL a. The purpose of this PUDC is for office, retail and residential uses. b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the Colleyville Land Development Code, except where amended by this Ordinance. 2. CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND PLATTING a. The development shall be generally consistent with the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit "B", which shall not be considered the preliminary plat. b. The development shall be generally consistent with the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit "B"; however the lot layout may differ from that shown on Exhibit "B" to accommodate topographic, drainage or other conditions. c. The developer shall submit and receive approval from the City of Colleyville a Final Plat in accordance with the requirements of the Land Development Code prior to development of this PUDC. 3. PERMITTED USES a. A maximum of 30 residential units allowed on the second and third floor of Building D, as shown on Exhibit "B". Ordinance 0-07-1630 Page 3 of 6 b. All uses allowed in the CC1-Village Retail zoning district. c. All uses shall be in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan on Exhibit "B". d. Not less than 50%, or 6,150 square feet, of the air-conditioned area of the first floor of Building D shall contain uses that are eligible for State of Texas retail sales tax as defined by the State of Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. e. Any floor of Building D may be used as retail and office uses. No residential uses are permitted on the first floor of Building C or D. 4. LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS a. Lot requirements and building line setbacks established by the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit "B", shall control where such building line setback is different from the Land Development Code. 5. OPEN SPACE a. This development shall provide a minimum of 22.9% common open space, as shown on Exhibit "B". All open space areas shall be landscaped and maintained by the property owner. b. The amount of landscaping on the property shall be in accordance with Chapter 4 Landscaping and Buffering in the Land Development Code. 6. BUILDING ELVEATIONS b. All exterior building elevations shall be in accordance with the Building Elevations, labeled as Exhibit "C". 7. SIDEWALKS AND PATHWAYS a. The sidewalk along Colleyville Boulevard shall be at least 5-feet wide. The sidewalk shall be installed when any new structures are built on the property. 8. SCREENING a. A six foot high wall shall be constructed along the northern property line and shall consist of a combination of stucco and wrought iron accents. 9. PARKING a. Parking for residential units shall be calculated at 2 reserved parking spaces per dwelling unit. b. Parking for non-residential uses shall be in accordance with the parking requirements of the Land Development Code. c. This development shall contain not less than 175 parking spaces. Ordinance 0-07-1630 Page 4 of 6 'I ~. OTHER a. Any modification to the creek on the west side of the development shall be approved by the City of Colleyville Engineering Department. b. Residential units shall contain not less than 750 square feet of living area per dwelling unit. A maximum of 5 residential units are permitted to be 850 square feet or smaller. All other units will be a minimum of 851 square feet. c. The average square footage of residential units shall total 1,000 square feet. d. All residential units allowed by this ordinance shall be subject to the rules and regulations of a single condominium regime. A copy of the condominium regime by-laws, approved and filed by the Tarrant County Clerk, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit on any residential unit. e. All buildings shall have fire sprinkler and monitoring systems. f. The maximum building height shall be 3 stories with a maximum height measurement of 56 feet. g. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any building, the property shall accomplish the following: 1. Complete construction of a bridge across Pleasant Run Creek connecting the subject property to The Village at Colleyville property. Such bridge shall connect the subject property to Mission Lane, which is an existing public street in The Village. The drive connection and bridge shall be dedicated as a public right-of- way. The drive connection and bridge width shall be the same width as shown on the Site Plan. The bridge will be located where the driveway currently dead ends into Pleasant Run Creek on the Site Plan. The bridge shall be constructed with similar materials and design as the existing bridge located at Main Street. A five foot wide sidewalk shall be provided on both sides of the bridge. 2. The property owner shall make improvements to Pleasant Run Creek from the north property line of The Village PUD south to Main Street consisting of the following: removal of debris and dead trees, construction of new water retention areas, fountains, and new landscaping. 3. Complete the construction of an 8 foot wide sidewalk, that may be a minimum 6 foot wide at the discretion of the City Engineer, within Pleasant Run Creek connecting Lot 1, Block 1 Village Court Addition to the proposed bridge. 4. The project sign featured on the building will read "The Village at Colleyville". h. This zoning ordinance shall be automatically repealed if a preliminary plat or preliminary drainage analysis is not approved within eight (8) months from the date of approval of this zoning request. Ordinance 0-07-1630 Page 5 of 6 . 5. THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. Sec. 6. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Sec. 7. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. Sec. 8. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other pena{ties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. Sec. 9. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. IAND IT IS SO ORDERED. r first reading and public hearing being conducted on the o2/ S'-day of 2007. ~~ day of ~sT~ ~"-~ n CITY OF COLLEYVILLE second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 007. ~rnthia Singleton, TRMC, CMC City Secretary ~~ David Kelly Mayor Ordinance 0-07-1630 Page6of6 ED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ~' ~' Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney Exhibit A -Zoning and Location Map NORTH Exhibit B -Conceptual Site Plan \~ l M l~ Q f }b ~~ O r~ f ~ !, ~ i .r. i ~.~~~' i s~s~~i Y / I ~~ I `` /~ ,% 'ti ~r --, / G+ r4 t ?"~`~ t s"1'~ ' r ~~ ~i~' +~ ~ 'm ~ .eft i LLW~y~ I /~ ~"~ " ~ •t' a •t L f ' 7S ~~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ I i I f I TH6 SHOPS AT (JOLLBYVIII~ ^ _.-,~~;,~.~'" •:. ~ $~ C~Assoct~rati l ~l ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ f j~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~9 1 i Exhibit C-Building Elevations ~ Z ~ ~ m ~ .~ o ~ o jm~ ~ ~ ~~ {~~• . ~~~ ~~ ® ~~ • ® ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ® ~ ® ~~ ~ ~p ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~ ~~ ® ~~ ~ { ~~• ~~ S ...I I ~ ~ ~ THE SHOPS AT COLLEYVIII.B "' '""' oouBxvau, maces Ire. ORDINANCE 0-10-1784 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 0-07-1630 WHICH ESTABLISHED THEE ZONING OF LOT AR AND BR, OF THE E.M. THOMPSON SUBDIVISION CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 0-07-1630 on September 4, 2007, to establish the zoning of Lot AR and BR, of the E.M. Thompson Subdivision, and Lot 2, Block 1, Foster Addition; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has requested an amendment to Ordinance 0-07- 1630, under Case Z-10-028; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote; health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the' overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; toi facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration to, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of'. buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout!. the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning , classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the Ordinance 0-10-1784 Page 2 of 3 property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Sec. 2. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville,: Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by amending Ordinance 0-07- 1630 which established the zoning of Lot AR and BR, of the E.M. Thompson Subdivision conditions. Sec. 3. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville,! Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning of the Village Front Door Addition, depicted on Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B". Sec. 4. THAT the above described tract of land shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. GENERAL a. Ordinance 0-07-1630, Section 4(3)d is hereby removed and deleted. b. Not less than 100 percent of the air-conditioned area of Building (C} depicted on Exhibit "B" shall contain uses that are eligible for State of Texas retail sales tax as defined by the State of Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Sec. 5. THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended and as amended herein. Sec. 6. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Sec. 7. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance 0-10-1784 Page 3 of 3 Sec. 8. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. Sec. 9. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. Sec. 10. THAT Ordinance 0-07-1630 shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. rin ein conducted on the ~ da of The fi`rstre~ding and pubic hea g b g ~_ Y `~ ~-~1/.p~3'Y~ G:~•Fi~J 2010. and public hearing being conducted on the ~~ day of~ ~/~ ~ 2010. L.--- ATTES ~~ Cynthia Singleton, TRMC, CMC City Secretary CITY OF COLLEYVILLE David Kelly Mayor APPROVED A'S TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ^~~ " .. . Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney Exhibit "A" -Location and Zoning Map Exhibit "B" -Site Plan __ .y_ ~4 ; .. :. 4r~ a, •~ ~ tes ~ '~ I ! •~ .. ~' u V .. i ~: w. R ~ r.: yt - p' r - - " p .. wrM. I 6 a n. W w~ j ~v ~~ _ . t ! _ U ~~ id h . _ ._ 2 ~ ¢~ ~j ~ F ~N ~~ ~ ~!a ~' i ,. ~ ~ .. I . ..- m .. ~.. _...._.. 7' ~'~ ~~~k ~ ~~ ~~; r' xx~' ' - i; ~ py !e ~ ~~ 2Y t~ 4{ S~ yjf tat [I i ~~3 ~;5 f ,~ ... fJ f ~ i I 7 , ., ~ a ~~ ~~ ~ 1 ~` ~~ .. fs ,, -- , .~ _ _.. ~~a l{ ~ `? ~ n 4 , ; ~ I ~ .N ~ F. - ~~ isp h ~ ~ z ~ ~ E~ ~. ~..5 ~~ 9 ~~ ~ ~ ~~iN y s ~ ~ J a ; . ! ~\ k ~~ ~y~. ki3 ~~r ~xa,E v ~~ .ri ~\ ,. Qa L _ ,. ~. p ,,. a° 7 -y 5 - , _- + \~`i.- _ __ fi r ,• ., o • ;~ r ,~ ~ ,\ 1 ~. s ~; ~. - i I __ '~.. ' II ~ ,f 1~' I R • .: •.; ~ \ •, ~. 1 „: q k i• ~ `ter `, _._.__. ~ ~s` # as i,v s rAe'E r ~, ~ ------- ORDINANCE 0-11-xxxx AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 0-10-1784 CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 0-07-1630 on September 4, 2007, to establish the zoning of Lot AR and BR, of the E.M. Thompson Subdivision, and Lot 2, Block 1, Foster Addition; and WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 0-10-1784 December 7, 2010, amending Ordinance 0-07-1630 by changing the percentage requirements for office uses versus retail uses in the development; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has received a request for an amendment to Ordinance 0-10-1784, under Case ZC11-021; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration to, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning Ordinance 0-11-XXXX Page 2 of 3 classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Sec. 2. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by amending Ordinance 0-10- 1784 conditions for the Village Front Door Addition. Sec. 3. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning of the Village Front Door Addition, depicted on Exhibit "A". Sec. 4. THAT the above described tract of land shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. GENERAL a. Ordinance 0-10-1784, Section 4(1)b is hereby removed and deleted. Sec. 5. THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended and as amended herein. Sec. 6. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Sec. 7. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance 0-11-XXXX Page 3 of 3 Sec. 8. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. Sec. 9. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. Sec. 10. THAT Ordinances 0-10-1784 and 0-07-1630 shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the day of 2011. The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the day of 2011. ATTEST: Cynthia Singleton, TRMC, CMC City Secretary CITY OF COLLEYVILLE David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney Exhibit "A" -Location and Zoning Map ,. , . ~'' Cit of Colle Vl~~e 100 Main Street ~ - ~;~ Y Y Colleyville, Texas 76034 -,~.,°~~ Agenda Briefing 817.503.1000 www.colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Commission Public Hearings Version: 1 Requester: Community Development Department Agenda Date: 11/14/2011 Agenda No.: 8b Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Final Action: File Name: Approval of a request for a Special Use Permit for a convenience store with gasoline sales and alcoholic beverage sales -off-premise consumption on Lot 1 R, Block 1 of the Davidson Addition located at 3900 Colleyville Boulevard, Case ZC11-022 Attachments: Location and Zoning Map Notification List Buffer Map Aerial Statement of Planning Objectives Site Plan Front Elevation Perspective Building Elevations Floor Plan Landscape Plan Pump Stations Sign Details Monument Sign Placement Trash Enclosure Elevations Traffic Impact Analysis Proposed Ordinance History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 1 11/14/2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Approval of a request for a Special Use Permit for a convenience store with gasoline sales and alcoholic beverage sales -off-premise consumption on Lot 1 R, Block 1 of the Davidson Addition located at 3900 Colleyville Boulevard, Case ZC11-022 Explanation 7-Eleven has submitted a special use permit application to allow a convenience store with gasoline sales and beer and wine sales for off premise consumption on property at 3900 Colleyville Boulevard. The property is located at the southwest corner of Colleyville Boulevard (SH26) and Mid-Cities Boulevard. 7-Eleven is represented by Michael Montgomery, with Verdad Real Estate. The applicant proposes to construct a convenience store with gasoline sales, known as 7-Eleven. In general, the applicant proposes a 2,940 square foot convenience store with four gasoline pump islands, and a Special Use Permit to allow alcoholic beverage sales for off-premises consumption. The information submitted by the applicant includes a conceptual site plan, a landscape plan, building elevation drawings and sign exhibits. Existing Zoning and Development Conditions. The property is zoned CC3-Highway Commercial, vacant and platted. A Texaco convenience store was previously located on the subject property however, the building was demolished in 2006. Convenience stores City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 11/10/2011 Agenda Briefing Continued with gasoline sales as well as alcoholic beverage sales for off-premises consumption are allowed in the CC3-Highway Commercial zoning district with the approval of an SUP. Site Plan, Landscaping, Building Design and Signage Site Plan. The property is 35,403 square feet in area, with frontage on both SH26 and Mid-Cities Boulevard. The site plan submitted by the applicant shows the proposed convenience store to be 2,940 square feet with four gasoline pump islands, including diesel, allowing service for eight (8) vehicles at a time, and also indicates the proposed parking and landscaping. Landscaping. Chapter 4-Landscaping and Buffering in the Land Development Code requires a minimum of one (1) three inch caliper tree to be planted for every 40 feet of frontage along collector and arterial roadways. The subject property contains approximately 674 square feet of street frontage along SH26 and Mid-Cities Boulevard. Therefore, 17 total trees are required to be planted along on the subject property. The landscape plan submitted by the applicant shows eight (8) trees along SH26 and four (4) trees along Mid-Cities Boulevard, additionally three (3) are shown off of Mid-Cities Boulevard but in the required street yard, for a total of 15 trees. Additionally, a minimum of one (1) five gallon shrub is required to be planted for every five (5) feet of frontage along any roadway frontage. The landscape plan meets the minimum shrub planting requirements. Staff recommends that all landscaping meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 4-Landscaping and Buffering prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. This condition has been added to the proposed ordinance. Dumpster Locations. The site plan indicates an enclosed dumpster location at the north corner of the subject property. The dumpster enclosure proposed is 7 feet, 5 inches in height and will be constructed of masonry with real brick veneer like the proposed primary structure. The applicant has provided details of the trash enclosure area. Hours of Operation. The applicant states that the convenience store will be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The sale of off-premise alcoholic beverage sales will be restricted and limited to the available hours per the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code (TABC) which outlines Monday -Friday: lam -midnight; Saturday: lam - 1 am and Sunday: noon to midnight. Building Design and Construction. According to Chapter 6-Building Design in the Land Development Code, commercial buildings located in the CC3-Highway Commercial zoning district requires a minimum design score of 20. The subject building, as it is proposed, contains a design score of 28 and will be constructed of masonry. The applicant also proposes to construct the support columns, of the canopy structure, with masonry as well. signage. The applicant is proposing two (2) monument signs, one (1) to be located along Mid-Cities Boulevard and one (1) to be located along SH26. The applicant is also proposing wall signage along the left side building elevation and the front building elevations. Additionally, the applicant is proposing signage along all four (4) sides of the gasoline canopy area. Staff recommends that all signage, at a minimum, shall meet the minimum City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 11/10/2011 Agenda Briet-ng Continued requirements of Chapter 7-Sign Regulations in the Land Development Code. The detail of all proposed signs is included in the briefing attachments. The sign provisions noted above have been added to the proposed ordinance. Store Layout and Crime Prevention. The applicant has submitted a floor plan detailing the proposed location of all items to be sold, check-out points and security cameras. In terms of crime prevention, staff recommends that all convenience stores be required to comply with the Crime Prevention Recommendations for Convenience Stores and Package Stores. This document has been added to the proposed ordinance as an exhibit. Access. Parkina and Traffic Generation Access. The proposed site plan shows three (3) driveway approaches. One (1) approach connects to SH26 and two (2) approaches connect to Mid-Cities Boulevard. The applicant is currently working with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) for the required driveway permits. The Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA), submitted by the applicant, recommends that the Colleyville Boulevard driveway should not be restricted (right in and right out). Parking. The Land Development Code requires one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area for general retail uses such as convenience stores. Based on this requirement, the applicant is required to provide a minimum of 15 parking spaces. The site plan provided by the applicant indicates 16 parking spaces, excluding parking at the gasoline pumps. The Land Development Code neither restricts or allows parking at a gasoline pump to be counted toward required parking totals. Traffic Generation. The applicant has provided a detailed TIA and based on the calculation of a convenience store with gasoline sales, 2,940 square feet of gross floor area is expected to generate 2,486 trips per day, on average. The TIA states that the proposed driveway locations will accommodate such trips. Proximity Information. The following measurements detail the proximity of the proposed convenience store to the uses listed below. All measurements are calculated based on a straight line drawn from the closest point of the subject property line to the closest point of the property line of the closest use in Colleyville only: Distance to closest residence: 500 feet Distance to closest school: 2,704 feet Distance to closest church: 2,704 feet Distance to closest day care: 257 feet School Distance Measurements and Findings. Section Six-Alcoholic Beverage Regulations of the Code of Ordinances requires a minimum distance of 300 feet from any establishment that sells alcoholic beverages and a church, school or hospital. The measurement distance must be calculated from closest front door to closest front door for churches and hospitals and from closest property line to closest property line for schools. City of Colleyville Page 3 Printed on 11/10/2011 Agenda Briefing Continued Public Safety Assessment. The police department has not identified any potential public safety concerns with this application. Surrounding Properties. The adjacent properties to the north, south and west are all in the City of Hurst and are developed as retail or office uses. The adjacent property to the east is zoned CC3-Highway Commercial and is developed as a retail shopping center. Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates this property for future retail uses. The use of the property as a convenience store with gasoline sales complies with the plan with the approval of a Special Use Permit. Public Notification. Staff notified 14 property owners within 500 feet of the subject property regarding this request Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff also mailed a notice to the City of Hurst. Staff has not received any correspondence to this request. Staff Analysis and Summary of Recommendations. Staff has written the proposed ordinance such that it contains all recommendations specified in the briefing. The following is a summary of staff recommendations: - All landscaping shall meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 4-Landscaping and Buffering in the Land Development Code - All signs shall meet the following conditions: (1) all signage, at a minimum, shall meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 7-Sign Regulations in the Land Development Code - All convenience stores shall be required to comply with the attached Crime Prevention Recommendations for Package Stores and Convenience Stores. This document has been added to the proposed ordinance as an exhibit. The following is an analysis of the request, as submitted by the applicant, in terms of compliance with current Land Development Code and Code of Ordinance requirements as specified below: Complies with parking regulations? Yes Complies with landscaping regulations? Yes Complies with sign regulations? Yes Complies with minimum building design score? Yes Complies with outdoor storage restrictions? Yes Traffic Impact Analysis required? No Recommendation Approval City of Colleyville Page 4 Printed on 11/10/2011 Agenda Briefing Continued City of Colleyville Page 5 Printed on 11/10/2011 Location and Zoning Map 4007 Site City of Hurst -Sparger Rd. PUDC 10~ 100 1 CN ~~ 21d .210 206 202 118 114 110 ~'~'. ~~ 3712 3713 3714 3708 3709 3708 3704 370` 3704 21 S ' 2117 ~ 203 111:0 ~ f 15 ~ 411 3721 ~~ 371fi' 3r 17 20$ 204 200 3713 212 3708 3708 3709 3708 3705 ~ 3704 ~ ~ 3705 ~ 3704 Notification List OWNER NAME OWNER ADDR OWNER CITY OWNER STATE OWNER ZIP SITUS ADDR Hibernia National Bank 275 Broadhollow Rd Melville NY 11747 003907 Colleyville Blvd Davidson, Charles W Etux Velma 300 Meanderin Ln Burleson TX 76028 003900 Colle ille Blvd 99 Cents Only Stores Tx Inc 4000 Union Pacific Ave Los Angeles CA 90023 003901 Colleyville Blvd Blue Star Land L 1 Cowbo s Pkwy Irvin TX 75063 003901 Colle ville Blvd Lerer, Jane S & Harry Saginaw 9746 Rockbrook Dr Dallas TX 75220 003811 Colleyville Blvd 4 Hms Llc 300 W Greenbriar Ln Colleyville TX 76034 000300 W Greenbriar Ln Oakmont Plaza Lp 2930 Bledsoe St Ste 100 Fort Worth TX 76107 003809 Colleyville Blvd Parsons, Steve Jr Etux Erica 210 W Greenbriar Ln Colleyville TX 76034 000210 W Greenbriar Ln Clarke, Candi Lynne 214 W Greenbriar Ln Colleyville TX 76034 000214 W Greenbriar Ln Colle ille, Cit Of 100 Main St Colleyville TX 76034 000000 W Greenbriar Ln Foreman Enterprises, Llc PO Box 308 Colleyville TX 76034 003801 Colleyville Blvd Foreman Enter rises, Llc PO Box 308 Colleyville TX 76034 003801 Colleyville Blvd Hardin, Lana Michelle 3726 Woodcrest Dr Colleyville TX 76034 003726 Woodcrest Dr Michael Mont ornery, applicant 502 North Carroll Ave. Ste. 120 Southlake TX 76092 a licant Public hearing notices were mailed on Friday, Oct. 28, 2011 by Amy Shelley. Buffer Map 4007 4001 39i'9 / 3~ 108 142 ((^''~ ~['~ ~ J ?,3p7 104 ~~ ~ l,J ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ..,r. 1 tk7 .. 401 xarv~ ~C 1 1Cb~ 1811 yap h214 ,~'<~u ~Y16 202 448 ltd 110 1 3C'3 ,/.. ~ , . 1 y ~~ ~~G ~~ .~P 372a ~,~,wrr'' ~ 3722 3717 3715 3716 371? 3713 3714 3703 3703 3708 j~p4 3705 3704 3725 214 207 203 1'.13 115 111 3721 3720 3721 371 b 3717 371f~ 3717 20E 2fld 2(~ 3713 3712 3713. 3703 212 3708 ~ 3705r - 3708 7p9 3705 3705 ~~ 3700 3705 3?"d 3705 3704 3701 3616 ~~ --~ n 3701 3700 ' ~ Aerial h~ } ~r.~ a ~- ~., ~- - , -~-_ '... ~-. ~-. Y ®. r~ • Cheeie-Sparger Rd. }. _: _- - - r ~ .~~ ~. . ~~~- ~ . ~ , ~..~ Statement of Planning Objectives Wh-y Does Colleyville Need a 7-Eleven? • This store will generate jobs for 10-15 people. • 7-Eleven projects total store and fuel sales in excess of $1.5MM, which equates to an estimated $100,000+ in sales tax revenue in the first year alone. This doesn't include property tax revenue. • This store will sell diesel. Currently the Colleyville Fire Department vehicles are all fueled by diesel and must travel to another jurisdiction for their gas. • Colleyville has not had a new gas station developed in 15 years. • This 7-Eleven will not only meet Colleyville's architectural requirements, but will exceed them improving the overall look of the intersection. • The sale of beer and wine will be restricted and limited to the available hours per TABC requirements. • This location will be convenient for both the citizens of Colleyville and Hurst. • 7-Eleven builds a very "Green" building with many LEED certified design elements. This greatly increases energy efficiency and decreases power consumption through the use of SIPS panels (R- value of 32), LED lighting, increased insulation, and skylights. • All of the lighting for the interior and exterior of the store will be LED lighting. This, clean, white light significantly reduces energy consumption and light pollution, and aids in security by allowing the site to be better lit. • This 7-Eleven store will be open 24-hours a day. Due to few late night options in the city, this store will provide Colleyville citizens a convenient late night option for gas and food. • 24-hour security monitoring keeps neighborhoods safer. • Due to the TXDOT Right-of-Way taking, there will be limited developable area for any other use, making it ideal for a convenience store and fuel. • The two access points on Colleyville Boulevard will be consolidated into one and moved away from the intersection, improving safety and optimizing access for this type of use. • 7-Eleven's purchasing power allows them to sell high quality gasoline at a lower price than its competitors, offering the people of Colleyville another fueling option. • Community outreach is an important part of 7-Eleven's business model. • Food made fresh daily, selling higher quality products than their competitors. • Convenience, food, grocery services for the neighborhood -the neighborhood store. II ~° eooee-~i-z~ -aaennx roaa ~Q • z+ +~ ~ `C oee svxaa ~a~mnxmoa ' I B ~°~ ~ - ~~~ ~ OU ^ ~ _~ W c an~e ~musnao e ~ ~ "'(~ ,',_,~ ~ y 0~o H ZZ 4 _. g , ~ oez 3 ~ ~ ~a. F~ a C "RFE ~ W N~n~z~--~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ff LLB ~ ~ ~ t~ ~~~~1. ~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ E ~~~~ ~1 ~~ ~ ~ eee®oie;®eo-:a~~y'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y~ ~ y~~ i t" ~ ~ ° Y B ~. daa a n ~> gggg ? i r~g~~ ~3 k 4g g ° a ~~a ~ ~qk ~"~~ a< i~ 9~~ I ~ ~ ~ k 3 ~ ~ ~ Q; ~ e~ ek ~~ ~ 4 eq ~- ~~~~~ ~~ 3~ ~ €~~~~ 9 a ~ ~ fag •. ^ ~: ~~~~~~5~r~? ~ vial ~ I i; ~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~~ ~Y ~` ~ ~~ ~e~~m~~k ~! g ~ ~i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ° ~ ~ ~° u9E ~7~~:~: ~~ ~ ~ i gg #4 @ra 3 ~ ~ a ~ ygy @e k g 3 ~ g~3 q S$ 3 W a ~.a.wleep.az®e® I $ i m ~ d ~ ~~ ~D 8 E ~~ ~ ~~~5 g ~3~~3~~~~~~~~~~~~9~C ~ ~~~a~~~x~~ V] ~ e~4 £ e ~ a ~ a e ~ e g~2 ~ " =sa 9R 0 f O sake ~aa::€'axcas~:: ^ V - 4 a e a w ~_ \ °m ~~o~ . ~ v, - •, 1 W ~ ~ ~; ~ a ~- ~ ~~~'i~, '° Y ~ ~4 __\` ~~ s - r iV~' -....n .~ 111 aI h^ '~ ~ ~/~ ~ I Ly i Q ~ 'I ~ Q bl I ~~1 ~1 ~'A _ "r~. 1 i c~ ~ 1 u ~ ~ l 1 / ~ ~ \ ~ ~ R R a ~- z ~ $~''j.. ~.~ ~ ~~ ~ I o O ~ ~ - ° o ~ ,-g vy i ~ . /Ox o i ~~ ~ e o~ V~,~ ~ R ~,~ \nv S2 ~h` ~.,Y,$ ~rSl\~~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ooh ~~ ti .' ~ '\~ ~~ii `~ ~ 4 ~ ~~ ~ ~\ 1T1T1T \~ ~! ~~ ~ ~ n ~` SS < \~ ~ ~P \ < ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ \. e w', i . ~ ~ ~I ~~ 11 ~ _: i J ~ / ~ ~. 9<LS2 3 fi 0.00 _. : .~ ~ - _ - ._. 8C'LZL 3 LZ na onl ~ ~~ n ., , \~ _.-,. -.. ~ A r .8 W ~~' ~ . `~ n~kap~ph €z ~~~~d`sb~ $~E€ ~g~~&ie ~ l:~~~ ~~~,~ ~5 ~~ ~~a a a~oa° ~ss_,~ ,~,~_~=_so~ ~_ as„a.a ~,~,,~.>,wa ,,,,~ oe , ~,._ .. , _„,a,~°., ~ ai, ..~.R o ~ _ wa~0._„oi=a,~ Front Elevation Perspective ~~ ~" ~y w `~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~= W F= V W d. W w E-+m w~° M a N O az o~ U v~ ~e ~~~ W Building Elevations .,5-.4 .n 'v ..£-.t m 'v ,~ l a \ N In Z ~ O e F., `'Q io J o, W L Z .n ~ LL b N W ~ ~ ~ I / ( H LL X W F I ~ ~ tb Va- W O Z d W ~UW Z _ ~~ (7 ~a~ = ~ > O ~ w F F 5 7 0 ~ a U Sp OC70 U U mpQ U~ Z Z WQ U fn Q=Q K (n IT1 O rUN Z Z~ O ~ ~ 2H QaH W Z p WQZ ( /7 =~ W ~ ~a ooaa a Q ~ 3pau~i W Z ~ ~w ~ 1 k~ Z O tV ~ J w W J ~I S~1 0 _~, w+ p ~, H ,~ a yy•~~ N WWI ~ W .., O w. Z H J QW W ~/~ Q' V Z `O r W J W N O ~ ~ ~ ~ Z M ~ O o O ~ o Q W '-' o ~o m ~ii w F- = aM z ~,.a NO r t~.~~z r 0 0 J '' rTIO ~ µ~Uj Z ° , ~ r., W o w a lr Jy ~ + O ~. N K. U C!j ~ o ~~~ Yi Floor Plan ~p ~" ~" w `~ ~< n~ ~~ ~~ .~ .~ -x s ~~'°` Z g ~. ~c 0 0 J LL a 0 z U ? W 2m ~a 0 z 0 F U a~ F O V M ~ O ~. ~ ~ M °z N O ~ ~ ~ ~ °zM~ - w W~~ N a O ~ O ro a i a 0 Q U Z W BOOBS-II-ZI -tlatlMN ! _ ~~ - o a ¢ a • ~ E~ ~ C . ooc BNxaa 'anuuanw ~y ' ~ ~ OU ~ U Z °o ~j y ; E e, , W O a'le in'IUx3'noO ooec _- 1 9 d ~ ~ to a > ~ 1 5 F~ _ ~ tS 3 g [ ~ Q~ 0 a W V ;: ~~ ~ W 9 ~. Bm sYZ1 W ~ Z ~ r r C { ~ .~~ Q I J I F Ga c €~' VE ` sc ~ E~~~~ E1_ €ce~ VIII-~~~-. b ? t 3 T T a b $ ~'-, '~ ~ ~ i s s ~ ~ ~_.__..._._ s" ` ~ x € ~ s ~ ~ ! ~~~ ~ :i~TU ~i ` ~ ~ ~w ~, g ~ I~ ~~ bl a 61: I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ a ~ ~ ; ~ "p e g 4 ~g ~" a 2 8 - s `g~ CIO ~k # ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ x a a § y ~ ~ sa ~~ ~ a ' $ ~~ ~ ~ t 3 ~ Y Y B3 8 Ytl tlY :, h ~ ~ ~ ~ s vs ~4a a s as a qe ~ ~. ~ ~ r a ~ ~ ~ e ~~~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ~~6aa xN ~.3 a n a~ i x E ,~ ~~ fi n. ~ Z ~ ~ ff a s~ ~ ~'~ ~ 82 ~ ~ 6 9 0 ~ 9 m g 5 5 33 g 3 ~ ~ 3 ~ °~ '+ t ~ a 3 ~~ E E a e ~2 8 ~ ~~ ~ x e ~ a 88 ~ X 5 5 ~e :~ g a o z ^; 5 ~ c 6 S b b ~ ,; Y a, ~ ~~'^o „2aa y a [~ a a ~ .. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~;., 3 ~ x "~ •s ~ < i a"~ ~~ e~ 5 S 3~ e ys ax ~ a a Ya ~ e 3 3 aY 6~° ri 4~ E~~ ~~ s Cz;~ <~ mk ~^~~ Ba ICI I. „4 ~, ~~ ~~ ?~;,~~ ~~ 11111= Ck' iY I ~g ~~ ~ m=ii.n_.ii: ~= g -~~I-~~~-~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ { 5 S~~S~ ~ g~88~ Z ~ s ~ ~ss~ 5 ~~<e ~ ~'i~iv-I ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ Q~QLL ~~§'~ ~3 Bo~IY CE a s W , ~ o~ of ~~ ~ ~ -~y 4~`4' ~$ 3 ~ w F. , ~ W ~ R '~ a~ ~~ ~ ~ . u ~~ ~ IIII.~~I~ ~o ~~ ?~ ~8 ~~~ _; ~ I'~~III~~~~ 1 I~ ~ ~~~ _ _ • 1 - ~~ ~ Z Z inm WIII If ~~ g a ~ g ~ i m ~ ° ~~~ <._ s, rn ~ ~ s ~/ - - 4 r.~ e } ~ 3 ~ Y' g k - ~ "~ k n ~t ~~ _ 6 '[ 'G _ "~3 d ~ ~ ~~~ ~x -aS 7 55 ~So ~ j z a m# ;~c ~ 's. < ~a fi% _~, ~~ zp _~ :~ °,~ , :~ ~ „_ :~ . ~' \ \ ~~ "a '" J ~ ~ ':~~ ~ . ~~ >~ ~ \~ ~j' ~~_ \_ B-.aos, ooBBB-~i ~(ii-ie-BO) oo-..a~.B.B x~n\eno\we ..N,a nn w ~xs ., ~.Bw.~wa KxKxrrv BBOBB-in.~,..,, iioe~r m J W } F W ~ <a Z ! ~ ~ (~ ~ <V 1 (n p FWF-- j r " '. J ~ ~a i ~_ 0 o ~ ~ b (V (V O Pump Stati s 'k--- 0 iv m} J W F Q W a. U` za ~~ ~~ Zk w w~ J ~ W ~a <h Z 0 a - a N J nrn ° W 8'dlS AdONVO dO1NIOd 1S3H`JIH ~ N ,.0 • ~£ Ol dAl 2110 ..9-.4 L Z k 0 m o ¢ m ? (_ J ~ a ~ g O O X ¢~ O ¢ ~ ~ W U Z U W ~ ~ w ~W O o ~ a O Z H ¢ O N a a o ~ ~ ° U LL ~ Z ~ ~ ¢ w O z Wo ~ Z ~ O O ¢ ~ ~ O ~d' W q7 U - Lei U U O <n C7 ~ C7 z Z ~ ~ ~ v W ?~ Z 3 W ~ Z t? W o o d ~o ~ m p Z ~ Z U ~ ~ m Z~ O Z Z ¢ W ~ ]¢ U 2¢' ~ Q Y O F- H O x ~ o¢ w ~ w o a V1 LL H ~ = W D x Q N K W n O N ~ g g ~ ~ z '~ ~ ~ ~ S } Q = ~, " °~ ~ U ¢ Z a Z ~ Z O U Z U, Z Z 7 Z J -~ W d. LL ~ ~ ~ O ~ u i = w z ~ g ¢ a~ O a ~ Z ¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ a 2 ~ ~ Q a Z O W ~ ~ F' U ~ H U z m °a = o O ~ a ¢ o g ~ ~ ¢ U w U ~ LLU HWp O a OZ ¢~ ¢ ~ ~ ui z ~ ~ ~ y U C7 Z p~ ~ w~ LL a U 6. ~ m ~ ~O Z O J~ a ¢ O J O r ¢ ~ O U 7 U ? ~ W OO 0 C7 OU U a W C cn 0 ~ N M V N t0 n OD O] ° Ni o tV O ih o ~ N i -- -~ ~~ ~¢ ~a ~" wW H ~/ ~~ ~I~ r O `g /I~ `i O Z Q rV V Z Z O IL J W F- Z 1 O (~ U z 0 --~ tL ~ O H a ~ O ~NygO ~~~~W++++~y a~ V F~l ; o W 1--1 ~ o µ~jK O ~ N tfyiG (~~ao ~~~ Q~ ~~V - ~t V1 O/~1 tl IJ ~~Y~V L bn Details _ W Z ~ o~ ~~ N 7 m W ,,, JN W ~ ~ N pa ~F N .~ r F ag = r' F 0 0 ~ V Z ~, O W ~ N Z __...~__.... V' 1/1 Z W J to W ~ ~ a Jn V' • 3 4 ~ x 3~ a • l £ Z ti ~ . z ~ L~~ :_~ W E o # m ~ 3 Ri`~ ~ is ~ _. . ~ , ~~ o~ b ~~ ,~ ay ~ z` a " LL~ ~ ~ s . `o ~, ~~~ ~ ~~ o i W ' .-i ~... . ~: i...• J I ... ~ '' O ':) ,~ ,...~ - ti - r ~ ~ ~ A ~ m ~ ._~ L a S \ ~ e ~¢~~ O~ ~ $ H. ^' ... S=u. , .... s i ~; _ 1 ~~~ Y 2 ~. ., v ___...- ~. r . _. ,, ~ _ ' ~ za i ~ a.: a.. .~,: _ ~gg ~R$ i _ ... ~ C . ~ ~ ~. .V,E ~ .6 'Y fu s~~ y3y ~: ~3 pg k.~W~~ i ~cf is ~ma3Ri~~a 4~ i5Y S4 sr ~a H Z ON LL Z O Q W§ w~ r ~~ <e ~ ~~ ~- ¢,~ u w .^: :Wm a=~ ~ g"~ ~ § ~~ gg w , . W Q 2 ' m .. ~., ~ i 0 a W J W O VI ~ W ~~ ~ N .xo ~- ~ N -=it' Z ~ •W^ O 3 ~o V iit W O 4/= _. W N W Q X 3^ r ~ ~_3_.__ =~q ~a oaf ° ~.~ ~~, ~ , z~ G- . ~ `~ . § ~s z !~~ o- ~ ~-, t f n o~ . i . , . ~m9 ~~ ~o S :~ y. y LL~ ~ Y~ u 4 5 ~~~~ ~~~~~ I~ W H 2 ~_ Z 0 ~" `Q W? J W N --, M ~....... ~-- .,65 W Z a 2 ~~ N + ~ u Ni ~ $ m ', ~ ~'~~ 4 r; ZI ' 1,, Q II N W N W p~ = O Oj W ~. U1 Z If1 = ~~ lal G O~ ~ m II t0 O Z O = W 11 ~ ~ W C J3 '' tea: W ()aN1A Y3W Z y~ . fit, W a (p U r In x~jw n a WO O N or N Z: aE~ J~ J N Y m O O mam?a acri° W Z '. O7i u ~O W 2mWU0 '~, ~ d Ji NN O d NNNN r Z CO I 6.~ ',, JZ~ mlri aDmm MOW ~, ''., J O >ri ~ d 11 11 II II ~ ~ xNInwJJn1- W~ u^ZNaaZUI W -~a~ 04' Jai ~ x 11 ~m06yla Ol. jl, U~ J ap~4 W Zp U Y~ W W '. OZ' N a 6' pjaO ~QOWO '~. 3 '~. C1! Yyi r , J y W y0mN om 1-r W-~ owxw~ma '., ' r ~ Zi W XrouNO~Z a U N W Z d' Z p '. O ' ', ' '~ VI x . 4 . - ~ '.. FZ fY4~ '. , . ''. Oj xUZ mNW ~'. ~f W =7 IAf 2 Z Z O ~ f Z W Z O _ _ s• ~_ pU ~f ~j 4~~ \ ~ ~ .. ~ k :~ ~ `~ - ~f ~ \ ~~~ F NF,, ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.~e i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ r ~ s~ ~ ~~ ~ a y `° t ® ars 1 i v p. s ~ '~ ,~, ~\~~, i _~ ~ ® u ~~ ~ i a' ~ 7 ~ / ~ '~ / ~ .,~ \ :Q ° ~ ~~ \ r 4 Q ~ y~ < ~ ~<,y\ ` °!~ .i ~ h / +~. F ~ tA't ~. y ~ n . i' ~ \ _ ~ ~ ~ .,~ y ~ _ _ _ B 2 L i,fE_/h110 $ ~ - _ x[2[2 _, _.C~.ZO.OGk - - b ~m va I '9FUx ._ e oe ~ ~E~ ~. Y Q e ~ W B - ----t Y~ a Y N j a- w~~~ ~ZC~d m = w Z 7~UQ a a w Woo ~~ Z Q W QdQ' W z 0 H J w o N Trash Enclosure Elevations 0 c~ m?~o W~Um Fw-Wp~ ~ ~ U ? ~ ,$ a ~~ ui ~Q~w (~W x~ ~~fV w FwxW ~ ~ N a OJ ~ W W QO~H ~F U ~/J ~~nw w t- oz~ Q~=a W ~ S ~ ..9 -.L r- w OQ~ m w~ a U W ~ U O ~ Z Z ~~~ Q Q _ ~ZU Z U }a Q~ QtwiJ F` Q =5 ~ J .. W FW- z 3 a 0 U z w x ., p y~ F H ~ ~° of ~~ y F+ h H f ~ ~~ ~~ ~_ cs=~- -- Z LO r W W ~W~/ LL ''~^ V• O J V Z W 2 Q~ OC H z o M x .~ o W "' o aN z ~0~~ N {L~ O <r U ~z°~ aW~~ O~ N ~ U~oO Traffic Impact Analysis 7- Eleven Colleyville Texas Prepared by: Walter Ragsdale, P. E. '. Ragsdale Consulting TBE Firm #11082 214.893.3230 Box 941947 Plano, Texas 75094 ~~~~~~%~~~.Ra~s~lal~consi~ltin~r.~t:~~~~~~ ~'1~ztlt~~r.Ra;~sd~tl~~;c~~•~i~sd~~lc~i•s~r~st~ltiix~.i~~~t~~ Traffic h»pact Analysis - 7 Eleven Collcyville Texas Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose Study Procedure ll. EXISTING AND PROPOSED LAND USE Site Location Figure 1 site Location Study Area Land Usc -t 4 ~f 6 6 6 6 6 I11. EXISTING AND PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM 7 Thoroughfare System ~ Existing Traffic Volumes 8 Figure 2 Existing peak Hour Traffic Volumes & Lanes g IV. SITE TRAFFIC CHARACISTICS q Proposed Development 9 Figure 3 Site Plan 9 Trip Generation 9 Table i Trip Generation Data 1 ~ Trip Distribution and Assignment 10 Figure 4 Directions of Approach 1 ~ Figure 5 Projected Site Generated Traffic 1 1 Table 2 Projected Full Development Traffic 12 Projected Background Traffic 12 Table 3 Projected Full Development Intersection Traftc 12 Table 4 Projected Horizon Ycar Traffic I ~ Ragsdale Consulting ~ Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Collcyville Texas ~'. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Level of Service Evaluations hltersection Capacity 13 13 13 Results of the Analysis 13 Table 5 Full Development Intersection LOS 13 Table 6 Horizon Year LOS I ~ ~'l. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 APPENDIX A: TRAFFIC COUNTS 15 APPENDIX B: CAPICITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS lg Kagsdalc Consulting 3 i'raffic hnpact Analysis - 7 ElevenColleyville Texas I. Introduction The Development is located Sff 2.6 (Grapevine >-iighway ~~ Colleyville Boulevard) at Mid-Cities Boulevard %' Cheek Sparger Road in Colleyville Tarrant County Texas. The development is adjacent to the City of llurst. The development has an existing access on SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) at two locations just west of Mid-Cities Boulevard. The proposed development will eliminate these existing Driveways on SH 26 and construct a single drive. It is also proposed to have additional access driveways on Mid-Cities Boulevard. The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) requires that a traffic impact analysis (TIA) be submitted as part of the platting and driveway pcnnitting process. To comply with this requirement the developer has retained the services of Ragsdale Consulting to complete this study. Purpose This report assesses the impacts of anticipated site-generated traffic on the area roadway system and identifies any measures necessary to mitigate any adverse traffic impacts caused by the proposed development. Intersection level-of-service is the standard measure of effectiveness utilized b_y traffic engineering professionals to identify such potential adverse impacts. This report presents background information relative to the site, study methodology, findings, conclusions, and recommendations for the proposed development's traffic as it relates to the area roadway system. Study Procedure To make a thorough analysis of the traffic impacts of the proposed development, the following procedures were followed: • Guidelines for the traffic impact analysis were obtained from TxDOT. • Existing roadway conditions were observed in the field. • Traffic volume counts were made on SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) in the vicinity of the site. • Projected directions of approach to/from the proposed development .were determined based on existing locations of retail and employment centers and schools. • Projected peak hour traffic volumes for the study intersections were determined based on proposed land uses and existing traffic volumes. Ragsdale Consulting 4 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas • Capacity analyses were prepared for the morning and afternoon peak hours for the study intersections. • This report was prepared to document the analysis, findings, and recommendations of the study. Ragsdale Consulting Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas II. Existing and Proposed Land Use Site Location The proposed mixed-use development is located east of Hurst on the southwest corner of SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) and Mid-Cities Boulevard, as shown in Figure 1. :~ ,.~~ 4 a ~zg Figure 1: North .-0,+ ~~ ~+ .~ ;~ " Site ~ ta,»a. ~;„ w ~,:; : ~. ~`~~ \`!~ ~ ~,{ ~' - Locaton btap Stirdv A~~ea Access to/from the Site will be provided by a single proposed driveway on SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) and driveways on Mid-Cities Boulevard. The Study Arca will address the impact of the development at the intersection of SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) at Mid-Cities Boulevard and along SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard). This site is located on SH 26 between Mid-Cities Boulevard and the Hurst/Colleyville city limit. Land U.se The City of Colleyville has identified this property in their Future 2025 Land Use Plan as Retail. It has been used as a service station in the past only the foundation and driveways of this station remain. Ragsdale Consulting 6 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas III. Existing and Proposed Transportation System Thoroughfare System The proposed development will be served directly by SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) and Mid- Cities Boulevard. A brief description of each of the major roadways providing access to the site is provided in the following paragraphs: • SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) is a 4 lane road with a left turn lane. This road is classified as a 120 foot wide Major Arterial by the City of Colleyville posted at 45mph. Typically there is a continuous left turn lane with designated left turn lanes at the signalized intersections. The Roadway is currently constructed to these Standards. • Mid-Cities Boulevard is Major Arterial with a 120 foot right of way. The road is also a five lane divided road in Colleyville. There are two existing Driveways that are to provide access to SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) as shown in the aerial photo below. These drives are proposed to be eliminated and replaced by a single drive. Aer3a~a Photo ~, +~ Ragsdale Consulting ~ Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas Existing Traffic Volumes Daily traffic on SH 26 (COLLEYVILLE BOULEVARD) is about 26,500 (2009) cars. Peak hour and traffic volumes on SH 26 (COLLEYVILLE BOULEVARD) are shown in Figure 2. TxDOT historical data-indicated a 2Q09 count of 5730 cars on Mid-Cities Boulevard. The existing lane configuration can also be seen below. ~~~ 724J5% ~` \ ~l~> 747j1407 *~267/720 A 808/42© 26 . ExisYsrrgAMIPMPeakHOUrTraffi[ vasum~ Figure 2: North Ragsdale Consulting 8 Exist'rrg LarxCantguraz=cn Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas IV. Site Traffic Characteristics Proposed Development The proposed development consists of a commercial tract. The existing driveways and foundations for the service station and carwash remain. The proposed development will be a 7- Eleven with gas pumps. The development assumed to be completed in late 2012. The existing foundations and driveways will be removed. The proposed development is shown in Figure 3. ,.~,. uat utcs MR=MG eto~+~t*v+m R Ste P='an Figure 3: Trip Generation The traffic expected to be generated by a parcel of land is primarily a fimetion of the use of that land. The volume of traffic associated with any development depends on the proposed land uses and their densities of development. To determine the expected trip generation of the proposed development, a nationally recognized and accepted standard published by ITE entitled Trip Generation, 8th Edition was used. This publication states trip generation rates and equations for varied land uses based upon actual surveys of those land uses. Land use and intensity, trip rates, and daily trips for the site are shown below in Table 1. Ragsdale Consulting 9 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas Tri s A.M: Peak P.M. Peak Direction Trips Direction Trips Daily Land Use % % D il T i a y r ps. In Out Rate Total In Out Rate Total Rate Convenience Store /pumps ITE code 853 50 50 45.6 1 ] 0 50 50 60.6 178 845.6 2 486 Tri s er 1000 sf of GFA , Table 1: Trip Generation Data Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment Traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development is based on ITE trip generation rates, as shown in Table 1. Directions of approach for traffic entering and exiting the site during the day were determined based on the location of existing and projected future retail, schools and employment centers. These directions of approach are shown in Figure 4. ~~ 15~'. ~/ .~~~ ~~ Y ~ \\/S North ~` ?59G ~lr z Di rctau of Ap proach Figure 4: Assignment of the a.m. and p.tn. peak hour site-generated traffic to the drive approaches for the site shown in Figure S, respectively. Table 2 represents the a.m. and p.m. peak hour site- generated traffic for the intersection of SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) at Mid-Cities Boulevard. Ragsdale Consulting 10 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas '~',' ~e~ v~3 ~ ~''~~` C, 5 ~ ~` io 2 z~ _26 ~~ AM Peak Hour Dra~~euray Va±urnes North ,,j ~j~_ __ North ~~ 67 ~~ ~~ 2 1C 3 ~~ ~~.& GP11 Peak HcurDrvem~ayVouma Figure 5: Projected Site-Generated Traffic Ragsdale Consulting 11 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas ~ ~ ~ Southbound ~ Westbound Northbound :~ Eastbound Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt AM Peak 0 22 0 23 10 0 0 6 1 8 0 0 PM Peak 0 40 0 35 18 0 0 11 1 27 0 0 Table 2: Projected Full Development Site-Generated Traffic Projected Background Traffic Full build out year traffic is the last phase of the construction. For this Study it is anticipated that it will be less than a year. This traffic is shown in Table 3 the site impact traffic plus the existing traffic counts. i ~ Southbound Westbound Northbound t~ Eastbound Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt AM Peak 29 633 157 122 163 15 10 734 71 314 4l8 5 PM Pcak 41 1046 360 205 520 38 22 787 121 287 327 9 Table 3: Projected Full Development Site plus existing Traffic Background traffic is the existing traffic volume increased for normal growth. For the purpose of this study, background traffic is existing traffic increased by five percent per year the growth rate based on the historical counts. This would yield a twenty five percent increase in traffic described as the Horizon year traffic shown on Table 4. ~ ~ Southbound ~ Westbound Northbound :~ Eastbound Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt AM Peak 36 791 196 152 203 19 12 917 89 393 522 7 PM Peak 51 1307 450 256 650 48 28 984 1-51 359 408 11 Table 4: Horizon Year Traffic Ragsdale Consulting 12 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas V. Traffic Analysis Level-of-Service Evaluations Analyses were performed at the intersection of SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) and Mid-Cities Boulevard to determine the demand, capacity, and level-of service-(LOS). This intersection was analyzed under total traffic conditions for the two development scenarios. Level-of-service is a qualitative measure of identifying how effectively traffic operates at an intersection and is defined by categories A through F. LOS "A" represents very good traffic flow and LOS "F" represents poor traffic flow and a high level of traffic congestion. Intersection Capacity Level-of-service for intersections is determined by average delay in seconds per vehicle that is experienced at the intersection and is a function of the volume, capacity, and amount of green time allocated out of the cycle length (for signalized intersections) for each movement at the intersection. Platoon arrival characteristics are also considered in determining the delay and LOS at an intersection. Capacity is a function of the number of lanes, the type of movement and the make-up of the traffic in that movement. The methodology used in this study for determining capacity, delay, and LOS at an intersection is outlined in the 2010 Hi~hwa~pacity Manual (HCM). Capacity analyses were performed using HCS for stop sign controlled intersections, a computer program developed to emulate the procedures outlined in the HCM. Results of the Analysis The projected traffic volume count information for the development was used with traffic generated by the development in the Synchro software, which uses the Highway Capacity Manual 2010 methodology to analyze the operation of the intersection and Driveway. The results of the analyses are shown in the following Table S and 6. Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Lt Thru Rt Lt Thn~ Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt AM Peak D C C D C C E D D D B B PM Peak D F F D E E D C C D C C fable 5 hull Build out Traffic Ragsdale Consulting ] 3 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas ~ Southbound ~ ~ :~ :~ Westbound Northbound Eastbound Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt Lt Thru Rt AM Peak D C C D D D D D D E C C PM Peak D F F E F F D C C_ E D D Table 6 Horizon Year LOS The intersection of SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) and Mid~ities Boulevard with the full site development yielded an AM LOS of C and PM of E. The Horizon Year traffic was LOS D for the AM peak and LOS F for the PM peak. The analysis indicates that the driveway for the 7- Eleven did not have much of an impact on the Traffic flow on SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) as the LOS remained an A or B with the additional traffic from the development. This development will not have an adverse effect on traffic on SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard). VI. Conclusions and Recommendations The results of the analyses presented in this study indicate that the existing SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) roadway system can accommodate the projected traffic associated with development of a convenience store. The proposed driveway on SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) is adequately designed with adequate site distances and with only 45 right turn vehicles in the PM peak does not require deceleration lane. The two existing Driveways can easily be replaced with a single driveway and still have plenty of capacity. The site generated traffic only has a small effect on the intersection LOS in the Full Build out and Horizon Traffic alternatives. The existing two Driveways onto SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) should be combined into a single Driveway. This will reduce some conflicts and move the drive further downstream from the intersection. Due to the location of the property between the Hurst!Collcyville city limit and the intersection this may require a variance. A mutual drive is not an alternative as to the existing development in the adjacent city. The driveway onto SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) should not be restricted (right in and right out). The all movements can be easily made in the off peak hours and for exiting vehicles in the peak there is ample onsite storage or alternative exits. The assumed growth on SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) will justify the need for additional through lanes on this road. The proposed development is saving future ROW for this purpose. These future lanes will help mitigate the capacity problems in the future. The Traffic analyses indicate that the existing roadway configuration on SH 26 (Colleyville Boulevard) will accommodate full development of the site with the use of a single driveway. Ragsdale Consulting 14 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas Appendix A: Traffic Counts Ragsdale Consulting 15 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas GRAM Traffic North Texas, Inc. 1124 4V. Lovers Lane Arlington, Texas 75013 File Name : SH 26 @ MID CITIES Site Code :00000121 Start Date : 101412011 Page No : 1 Grouns Printed-EARS SH 26 MID C7T1£S SH 26 MID CITIES Southbauttl Westbound Northbound E astbomrd Stag Tinte Left Thr Rg Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App Left Thr Rig Ped App. Lefr Thr Rg Ped App. Int. u ht s Total u ht _ Total u hl s Total u ht s Total That 07:00 2 84 20 0 106 8 32 2 0 42 0 154 11 0 165 96 94 1 0 191 504 D7:15 2 87 25 0 114 20 28 2 0 5D 3 123 6 D 132 55 91 0 0 146 442 07:30 5 134 41 0 180 16 44 i 0 63 0 139 ii 0 150 63 131 0 0 194 587 07:4 9 176 1 0 236 20 32 8 0 2 220 19 0 241 97 12 2 D 22 76 Total 18 481 137 0 fi36 66 136 13 D 215 5 636 47 0 688 311 445 3 0 759 2298 OS:DO 7 142 39 0 188 29 5A c^ 0 81 1 126 14 D 141 60 97 0 0 157 567 08:15 7 t25 40 0 172 24 28 2 6 54 1 139 13 0 153 69 102 1 0 172 551 08:30 6 168 27 D 201 26 43 3 0 72 6 243 2b D 273 80 90 2 0 172 718 OS:dS 16 167 36 0 219 23 29 1 0 53 3 219 17 0 239 fi7 S3 3 0 133 644 Total 36 602 142 D 780 102 150 8 0 260 11 727 68 0 806 276 352 6 0 634 2480 16:00 9 216 61 0 28D 25 59 9 D 93 11 163 35 0 209 44 54 1 0 99 681 16:15 7 180 66 D 273 36 113 8 6 157 6 127 34 0 167 54 71 1 0 126 723 16:30 12 228 69 0 329 38 102 4 D 14d 10 192 27 0 229 52 58 3 D 1'I3 815 16:45 6 166 90 0 262 50 123 2 D 175 8 150 19 D 177 d7 61 1 0 109 723 Tda1 34 784 326 0 1144 149 397 23 D 5b9 35 632 115 0 782 197 244 6 0 447 2942 17:00 10 227 163 D 346 32 114 11 4 157 5 192 21 0 218 65 79 2 0 146 $61 17:15 ti 271 93 6 375 46 1d4 9 6 199 T 198 38 2 245 69 BO 3 0 152 g71 17:30 8 265 87 0 360 56 123 9 0 188 6 261 33 0 240 64 84 2 D 150 938 17:45 12 243 77 0 332 36 121 9 C se'.6 185 2E G 217 62 B4 2 0 '148 863 Total 41 I~ 360 0 1407 17D 502' 38 0 710 22 776 120 2 920 266 327 9 0 596 3633 Grand 129 287 965 0 3967 487 118 82 0 1754 73 277 350 2 3196 104 136 24 0 2436 1135 ) Twat 3 5 ( 1 ( 4 8 1 3 Apprch % 3.3 72A 24.3 0 27.8 67.6 4 7 0 2.3 86.7 11 0.1 42..9 562 1 0 Total % 1.9 25.3 8.5 0 z1 9 4.3 10.4 0] 0 15.4 0 6 24 A 3.1 0 2$ 2 9.2 12 0 2 6 21 5 SH 26 M1D CITIES SH 26 MID CITIES Southbound Westbound Northbound Eas[Dound StaA Tinte Left Thr Rg Ped App. Left Thr Rig Ped App. Lek Th+ Rig Ped App. Left Thr Rg Ped App. u fit s Total a ht s Total u M s Total a ht s Total r roar ru ary~ r rvnr ur.uv ru i .YV- roan r rn i o,...r, u..... ~... e...:.., r .............~.., n,,..:.,..... m.ee Inl Total 07.45 9 t76 51 0 236 20 32 B 0 50 2 220 18 0 241 97 129 2 0 229 765 08:00 T 142 39 0 188 29 50 ~ C B1 1 125 14 0 141 6D 57 0 0 157 567 08:15 7 125 4C 0 172 24 2? 2 0 54 1 134 13 153 6g 102 1 0 172 551 09:30 6 168 27 0 2C1 26 43 3 C 72 6 243 24 0 273 80 90 0 172 713 Total 29 611 t57 0 797 99 153 15 C 267 t0 728 7G D 3D6 306 418 0 729 25fli votume - ~ App. total 3.6 75.7 19.7 0 37.1 57.3 '_~.£, C 1.2 90.1 6.7 0 42 57.3 0.7 0 PHP .906 .968 770 .000 .844 .AE3 .765 .459 90C A94 417 .749 .729 000 X40 X99 910 .625 .000 .799 650 Ragsdale Consulting I6 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas Peak Hour Anaiys'as From 12:00 to 17:45 -Peak 7 of 1 Peak Hour fior Er.U•e nterse[tion Begins of 17:00 tZ00 1D 227 103 0 340 32 tt4 tt 0 757 5 792 2f fl 278 65 79 0 146 861 t 7:75 11 271 93 0 375 46 144 9 0 199 7 79S 38 2 245 69 80 3 0 152 g71 17:30 8 2E5 .g7 0 360 56 t23 9 0 7A8 E 201 33 0 240 64 84 2 0 750 938 17:45 12 243 77 D 332 36 121 9 D 166 4 785 28 0 217 62 84 2 D 148 563 ,.o;~ e~ 47 'D6 3E0 0 1407 770 502 38 D 710 22 776 720 2 920 250 327 ., D _`96 3633 c~ToPtall 29 71.5 25.6 0 123.9 70.7 5.4 0 I 2.4 84.3 73 0.2 I 43ti 54.9 7.5 0 PHF .854 .428 .874 .000 .938 .759 .872 .864 .000 .892 786 465 784 750 4'14 4e7 a7z 7~n nnn oan nac Ragsdale Consulting 17 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas Appendix B: Capacity Analysis Worksheets Ragsdale Consulting 18 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas ojectslPhdllT~rdtSQlDp &i~Fi9li~dfl~a6~+,tld~~'~.~aeltx#'y~lt,~t~131tColleyville7-Eleven FullbuildoutAh.~iF.syn 3: SH 26 & Mid Cities Blvd tD;11i2at1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBt W13R NBL NBT tJBR S8l 58T SBjt Lane Gonfiguratwns ~ ?A ~ TA ~ ?A _ f TA -- - Volutae (vphj- - - 314. .418 5 122. - 163. 15 10 _ Z34_ 7i. 29 ti3~ 157 Movement Number - 5 2 ?2 1 6 16 3 8 8 7 4 14 inifial Queue, veh 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-bike Adj. Factor (A~bT} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1 OD 1.00 1.00 Parking, Bus Adj. Factors 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 i Q0 1 DO 1.00 t 00 1.00 1.00 i D0 1.00 Adj. 5at_ Fknv Rate, vehltJln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 '.863 1$45 1846 -1846 1845 1848 1848 Lanes 1 2 II 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Assignment Capacity, veh/h 396 1341 16 170 826 75 19 929 90 46 846 210 Proportion Amving On Green D.22 0.37 0.37 0.10 0.25 025 QDi 0.28 C.28 0.43 0.30 0.30 Movement Delay, sireh 45.6 17.2 17.2 38-1 21.9 22.0 57.9 36.0 36.3 49.8 31.2 31.8 Movement LOS D B B D C G E D D D C G Approadt Voitxne, vehfi 801 326 886 890 Appro~h Detay, slush 29.3 28.5 36.4 32.2 Approach LOS C C D C <;Tmea - t 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phase t 2 3 4 5 6 7 $ Case Na 20 4 D 2.0 4.0 2 0 4.0 2.0 4 D Phase Duratron (G+Y+Rc}, s t 0.65 29.40 4.75 24.47 1905 21.00 5.82 23-40 Change Period (Y+Rc}, s 4.00 4A0 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.Q0 4.00 4.00 Max. ANovrable Headway(MAH), s 4.19 7.89 4.19 7.19 4-i9 7.89 4.19 7.59 Maximum Green Setting (Gmax), s 12 OG 21.00 6.00 20 GO 16 00 ' 7 f)0 6.00 20.00 Max. Queue Clearance Tkne (g c+li}, s 7.06 820 2.43 17.46 14.92 4.94 3.23 17.81 Green Extension Tkne (g_e}, s 0.15 5.93 0.00 2.37 0.15 5.69 0.01 1.59 Probabi~y ~ Phase tag (p_c) 0:972 1.0()4 0.189 1:000 0.999 1.000 0..455 1-000 Probability of Max (tut (p_x} 0.532 0.665 1-000 1.000 1 A00 0.707 1.000 1.OQ0 Lefk-tum btovetnerrt Bate ~ ~ Assigned Movement 1 3 5 _ 7 _ Mvmf: Sat Flow, vehrh 1774.04 1756.82 1774.04 1756.82 Thrt~e ~Da Assigned Movement 2 4 6 8 havmt. Sat Flow. vehlh 3673.82 2 A31 89 336;4.94 3 315.26 Right~Tutt~nen! Data _ Assigned Mavemen# 12 14 16 18 Mvmt. Sat Flow, vehfi 43.92 709.39 306.46 320.63 Lett Lime Group Data Assigned Movement 1 0 3 0 5 0 7 0 Lane Assignment L (Prot) L (Prot} L ;Prot] L (Prot) Lanes in Group 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Group Volume {vl, vehih 132.6 D 0 '.0.9 0.0 341.3 D.0 31.5 0.0 Group Sal Flow (s}, vetv'hlln 1774.0 0.0 1756.8 0 0 1774.0 0 0 1756.8 0.0 t~ueue Seroe Time (g_s): s 5 1 G-0 0.9 0.0 12.9 D.D 1.2 O D Cyde Queue Clear Time (g_c), s 5.1 0.0 OA 0.0 12.9 D.0 1.2 D.0 Perm LT Sat Flamm Rate is li. vetv'hiln 0.0 G 0 0.0 0.0 G 4 0 0 0.0 0 0 Celieyv~=`°e 7-E?ea~en 5:00 pm 10+Iti201? Base';ne Synchro B L!ght Report 'rVaHer Ragsdale Page 1 Ragsdale Consulting 19 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas ~rolectslPhd~¢lt4QtJ(i 8.I~fiAl~d-d~~r.~dtld2toti~r}aat,~F~1#1!Colleyvilie7-Eleven FullbuildoutAMF.syn 3: SH 26 & (4tid Cities Blvd 1o;t1r2Dt1 Shared LT Sat Flow (s_sh}, vehlhlln 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 QO 0 0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT EK. Green (g_p), s QO 0 0 0.0 0.0 C 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Penn LT Serve Time (g_u), s D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 D 0 09 0.0 Perm LT Cue Serge Time {g__ps), s 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0 D Time fo First Btk-(g_f), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 E}0- - 0 0 - - Serve Time pre Blk (g_fs), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Proportion LT Inside Lane (P L} 1 600 Q.000 1.000 0-000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 Lane Group Capacity {c), vehrh 1703 0.0 ':9.1 O.D 385.5 0.0 d6.1 D.0 Volume-to-Caparafy Ratio (X) 0.779 0.000 0.568 0.000 0.885 0.000 0-683 O.WO Available Capacity (c_a), vehlh 3Q7.3 0.0 1522 0.0 4Q9.1 0.0 152.2 Q.0 Upstream Fitter' Factor (I) 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000. 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.400 Uniform De#ay (dt), slveh 30.6 0.0 3d.i 0.0 26.3 0.0 33.4 0.0 Incremental Delay (d2), slush 7.5 0.0 23.8 0.0 19.4 0-0 16.3 0.0 Inrtial Queue Delay (d3). slush 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Conhd Delay td}, siveh 38. i 0.4 57.9 0.0 45.6 0.0 49.8 0.0 First-Tenn Queue (Ct), vehlln 2.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 4.9 0.0 0.5 0.0 Second-Tenn Queue (Q2), vehArr 0.4 0.0 0.1 , O.Q 2:S flA 6.2 0.0 Third-Tenn Queue (C3}, vehlln 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 Pere~tile bk-of-que factor (f B%) 1.000 Q.D00 1.000 Q.tH~ 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 Percentile Back of Queue iQ%}, vehlln 2.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 6.9 0.0 0.7 09 Percentile Storage Ratio (RQ%) 024 0.00 4.08 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.18 0.00 Inrtial Queue {Cb). veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Final tResidual) Cueue (t7e), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Delay (ds), stveh 0.0 0.0 O.Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Cueue (Qs), veh 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 fl.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Capacity (cs), vehth D 0 O.fl 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Inrtial Cueue Clear Time (tc), h 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mrddlp Lane Group ~ _ . Ass>~red Movement 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 $ Lane Assignment T T T T lanes in Group 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 f Group Volume (v}; veh~h 0.0 230.2 0.0 4dd2 4 0 97.3 0.0 444.2 Group Sat. Flow (s), veh/hM 0.0 1862.7 0.0 1848.2 0.0 18fi2.7 0.0 18462 Queue Serve Time {g_s), s 0.0 6.2 0.0 15.4 0 0 2.9 0.0 15 $ Cyde Queue Clear Time ~ c), s 40 62 0.0 15.4 Q.0 2.9 0.0 15.8 Lane Group Capacity (c), vehih 0.0 683.0 0.0 546.0 Q.0 457. t 0.0 511.1 Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) O D~ 0.337 0.000 0.813 0000 0.213 0.000 0.859 Available Capacity {c_a), vehrh 0.0 683.0 0.0 5x6.0 C.0 457.1 0.0 533.0 Upstream Filter Facto (I) 0.000 f.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 Uniform Delay (dt), slush OA 15.9 D.0 22.6 Q 0 20.8 0.0 23.6 Incremental Delay (d2), sJveh 0.0 1.3 0.0 8.6 0.0 1.1 0.0 12.3 Inrtial Cueue Delay (d3), slush Q.0 0.0 OA OA 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d}; slush 0-0 17.2 0.0 31.2 0.0 21.9 0.0 36.0 First-Term Queue {Q1), vehlln 0 0 2.3 0.0 5.8 0 0 i.i 0.0 6.0 Second-Term Queue (Q2), vehlln 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 1.8 Third-Term Queue f.C3), vehlln 0 0 0 0 OA QO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percentile bk-of-que factor (f_B%) O.D00 1.000 0.000 1.0~ Q.000 1.006 0:000 1.000 Pe~cent~e Park of Cueue (C4e i, vehlln 0.0 2.5 0-0 7.1 0 0 ?-3 QO 7 8 Percentile Storage Ratio (RQ%} 0.00 0.07 0.00 020 O.OD 0.03 0.00 021 In fiat Cueue iCb) veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 QO CelleV'vl'e 7-Eleven 5 C0 pm tOf 1 U20 L Basei ;ne Synchro 8 Light Report 7Valter Raslsdale Page 2 Ragsdale Consulting 20 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas ~rojectsiPht4000 fli~F9li~~i~a~-~dtl~tloQ`e~eH~~•i~ll~Plil~i9lColleyville7-Eleven FullbuildoutAMF.syn 3: SH 26 & Mid Cities Blvd t4n1i2D11 Finai (Residual) Queue (Qe), veh fl.0 O fl O.D 0.0 0.0 4 0 D.0 0.0 Saturated Delay (ds), s,"veh O.U D.D 0.0 D 0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 Sa#urated Queue (Qs), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5atu2ted Capacity {cs), vehlh 0.0 0.4 fl 0 0-0 4.0 4.0 fl.0 0.0 Initial Queue Clear Time (tc}, h OA 0.0 fl 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6 0 - 6.0 RigfB Lane Gtavp D~a - __ - _ Assig~ri Movement 0 12 0 14 0 16 0 18 Lane Assgnment T-R TAR TtR TAR Lanes n Group 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Group Volume {v), vehlh 0.0 229.5 0.0 414.5 0.0 962 0.0 430-8 Group Sat. Flow {s}, vetdhAn 0.0 1855.0 0.0 1723.0 0.0 18(18.7 0.0 17~.T flueue Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 6.2 fl.0 15.5 O.D 2.9 O.D 15.8 Cycle Queue Clear Tune ( c3 s 0 0 6.2 0 0 15.5 0.0 2.9 0.0 15.8. Prot RT Sal Fbw Rate {s_R}, vehTh/ln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.D 0.0 0.0 Prot RT Eff. Green (g_R}, s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 OA' Proportion RT Outside Lane {P R) 0000 D.024 D.D00 0.412 0.000 0.169 0.0(30 O.i79 Lane Group Capacity (c}, vehlh 0.0 660.2 fl.0 509.1 0.0 443:8 0.0 501.2 Volume-to-Capacity Ratio {X) 0.000 4.337 0.000 0.814 0.000 0.217 0.000 4.859 Available Capacity {c_a}, vehih 0.0 660.2 0.0 509.1 0.0 443.8 0.0 516.7 Upstream Filter factor tt} 0.000 1.040 0-DDO 1.000 0.000 1.040 0.000 1.000 Uniform Decay (d1}, stveh 0.0 15.9 0.0 22.6 0-0 20.8 0.0 23.6 Incremental Delay (d2), siveh O.D 1.3 OA 92 0.0 1.1 0.4 12.7 Inifiat Queue Delay {d3}, stveh 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay Id), stveh 0.0 172 0.0 31.8 0.0 22.0 0.0 36.3 First-Term Queue (01). vehM 0.0 2.3 D.0 5.5 0.0 1.1 6.4 5.8 Second-Term flueue ifl2). vehan 0.0 G 3 0.0 I ? D D 0.1 0.0 1 8 Tttird-Term Queue (Q3}, vehlln 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percentile bk-of-que factor (f_B°%) 0.000 1.440 0.000 1.000 0.00D 1.000 0.000 1.040 Percentiles Back of Qr (Q96}, vehlkr OA 2.5 0.0 6.8 09 <' t.3 OA 7-6 Percentile Storage Ratio {RQ°b} 0.00 0.07 O.QO 0.19 0..04 O.D3 0.40 0.21 Initial Queue {Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 F.nal (Residual} flueue (fle}, ash D.0 Qfl 0.0 0.0 C 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Saturated Delay {ds), sfveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Queue {Qs}, veh 0.0 0 0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.C 0 0 Saturated Capacity {cs), vetdh 0.0 0.0 0.6 O.D D.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 Initial Queue Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 fl.0 D.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 Intersection Summary HCM Average ConUol Delay 32.3 HCM Level of Service C Collevti=i'e 7-E'even 5:4D pm t0i11i2D" Baseline ',Nalier Ragsdale ~ynchro 8 Lsght Report Page 3 Ragsdale Consulting 21 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis fullbuildoutPMF 10711,'2011 ~ ~ > s' t '~ t /' ~- 1 d Mov~-t EBL EBT EBR WBt W8T INBR NBt. NBL NBR SBt SBT SBR Lane Confguratmns ~ ?A ~'~ ti+ 4A Vokrme(vph) 267 327 9 205 520 38 22 787 121 41 1046 360 Movement Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 '4 Initial Queue, veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj. Factor (A~bT} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '.p0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking, Bus Adj. Factors 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Sat. Flow Rate, veh/hlln 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 1845 1847 1847 1845 1849 1849 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 Lane Assignment Capacrty, vehlh 363 854 23 275 640 47 51 1228 189 76 1077 363 Proportion Amving On Green 0.20 0.24 0.24 D.15 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.39 0.39 0.04 0.41 0.41 Movert-ent Delay, stveh 53.7 32.8 32.9 54.4 6?.6 63.5 50.7 26.0 26:1 50-4 73.3 84.4 Movement LflS D C C D E E D C C D F F Approach Volume, vetu'h 677 829 1011 1573 Approach Delay, slveh 42.5 607 26.7 7Z9 Approach LOS D E C E T'ntler' _ ---- 1 2 3'- 4 5 6 T 8 -- -- Assigned Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Case No 2.0 4A 2.0 4 D 2 0 4.0 2.0 4.0 Phase Duration (G~Y~Rc), s 18.35 25.94 6.71 41.7fl 22.99 21.30 8.03 40.39 Change Pe^od {Y-Rci. s 4.00 4.00 4 00 ~ 00 4 00 4 Oi) = i?C 4 00 Max. Avowable Headway (MAH }, s 4.19 8.17 4.19 7.22 4.19 8.17 4.19 722 Maximum Green Setting (Gmax}, s 14.40 21.90 5.90 37.70 19.00 17.30 5.90 35.70 Max. Queue Clearazrce Time (g_e+11), s1328 9.75 3.24 39.70 17-73 16.90 4.31 23.20 Green Extension Time (g_e), s 0.09 8..24 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.32 0.01 12.15 Probability of Phase Call (p_c) 0.997 1.000 0.460 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.683 1.000 Rrobab~'ty o1 Max Qut {p_x) 1.OD0 0.858 ;.000 1 C00 1.000 '.000 1 OD+? 0.988 Lest-Tian A4ovenw~tt Data Assigned Mo~aement 1 3 5 Mvmt Sat Flow, vetVh 1774.04 1756.82 1774.04 1756.82 Through Movcynertt Data Assigned Movement 2 4 6 ___ 8 Mvmt Sat Flow, vettTh 3608.86 2647.37 343;.05 3128.28 Rt~t-Toro hrrt Data Assigned Movement 12 14 16 18 Mvmt. Sat Flow, vehlh 99.14 893.47 250.27 480.97 Lefl Lane Grrwp Dafa Assigned Movemen# 1 0 3 0 5 0 7 0 Lane Assignment L (Prot) L (Prot) L (Prot1 L (Prot) Lanes in Group 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Group Volume (vj, vehih 222.8 0 0 23.9 Q.C 312 0 0.0 -,.o G ~ Group Sat. Flow (s), vehihlln 1774.0 09 1756.$ 0.0 1774.0 0 0 1756.8 0.0 Queue Sene lime (g=s). s 11.3 0.0 '.2 0.0 15.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 Cycle Queue Clear Time (g_c), s 11.3 0.0 t 2 0.0 15.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 Perm LT Sat Flow Rate is 11. vehlh;ln 0.0 C 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Colleyv+ile 7-Eleven 5'.00 pm 10111,'201 ? Base!~:ne Synchro 8 L ahl Report 'h'alter Ragsdale Page Ragsdale Consulting 22 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas NCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis fullbuildoutPMF 1Of111201 Snared LT Sat Flow (s_sh), vehrhlln 0 0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 Perm LT Eff Green (g_p), s 0.0 D 6 D.6 6.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Penn LT Serve Time (g_u), s 0 D D 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT Que Serve Time (g_ps}. s 0.0 G.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 Time to First Blk (g_f), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Serve Time pre @Ik (g_fs), s 0.0 6.6 D.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 Proportion LT Inside Lane (P_L} 1.000 0-000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 i.ODO 0.604 Lane Group Capaaty {c), vehth 274.7 O.D 51.4 0.0 363.5 0.0 76.3 0.0 Volume-to-Capaaty Ratio (X) 0.811 0.000 0.465 0.000 0.858 0.000 0.564 0.600 Available Capacity {c_a), aehlh 275.6 0A '?1.$ 0.0 363.6 0.0 ? t t.8 G.0 UpsUeam Filler Factor (1} 1.1100 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000. 0.000 1.000 0.000 Uniform Delay {d1}, slveh 37.9 D.0 44.3 0.0 35.6 0.0 43.5 0 0 Incremental Delay (d2), sJveh 16.5 0.0 6.4 0.0 18.1 0:0 6.9 0.0 In tial Queue Delay (d3), slveh 0.0 D.D OA QO 0 0 0.0 0.0 C.6 Control Delay {d), sNeh 54.4 0.0 50.7 0.0 53.7 0.0 50.4 0.0 first-Tenn Queue {Q1), vehlln 4.6 0.0 0.5 0.0 6.4 0.0 1.0 0.0 Second-Term Queue {Q2), vehlln 1.3 0.0 0. t 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.1 0.0 Third-Term Queue (Q3), vetdln 0.0 D.0 OA 0.0 0.0 fl.0 0.0 0.0 Percentile bk-at-que factor (t_B%) 1.000 0.000 1.000 O.OQO 1.000 0.000: 1.000 0.000 Percentile Back of Queue (Q%}, vehlln 5.9 6.0 0.6 0.0 8.2 D.0 1.1 0.0 Percentile Storage Ratio {RQ%) 0.60 0.00 0.16 G.QO D.21 D.00 0.28 0.00 Initial Queue {Qb), veh 0.0 0.6 6.0 0.0 D 0 0.0 0.0 D 0 Fnal (Residual} Queue (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Delay (ds}, sfven 0.6 D 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 saturated Queue (Qs}, ven o.0 a.D a.o o.o D.6 O.o o.D 6.0 Saturated Capacity {cs), vehth D 0 0 D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Initial Queue Clear Time {tc), h 6 0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 lNidr9e l.eae Group (?uta ~ - _ _ - Assigned Movemer~ 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 Lame Assignment T T T T Cartes in Group 0 i 0 1 0 f 0 1 Group Volume {vl: vehth 6.0 183.? 0.0 787.4 D.0 306.4 6.0 505.? Group Sat. Flow (s), vehthlln 0 0 1862.7 D.0 1849.3 00 1862.7 0.0 1847.1 Queue Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 7.7 0.0 37.7 D.0 14.8 0.0 21.2 Cycle Queue Clear Time (g_c}, s D 0 7.7 0.0 37.7 0.0 14.8 0.0 212 Lame Group Capacity (c), vehln O.D 446.8 0.0 752.0 D 0 347.6 0.6 724.9 Voh~me-to-Gapacity Ratio (X) O.flt}0 0.415 O.t)DO 1.047 0.000 0.881 0.000 0.697 Ava=?abie Capacity ;r_aj, vehlh O G 44D 8 D.6 752.0 G 6 347.6 0.6 724 9 Upstream Filter Factor {!} 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.600 O.Of)fl 1.600 0000 1.000 Uniform Delay (d1}, slveh 0.0 30D 0.0 27.5 0.0 36.7 0.0 23.5 Incremental Delay {d2), sJveh 0 6 2.9 0.0 45.8 0.0 25.9 0.0 2 5 Initial Queue Delay (d3), siveh O.D D A D.0 6.0 D 6 0.0 0 0 D 0 Control Delay (d), slush 0.0 32.8 0.0 73.3 OA 62.6 3.D 26.0 Frst-Term Queue (Q 1), vehlln 0.0 3.3 D.0 14.8 0.0 6.4 0.0 8.4 Second-Term Queue (Q2), vehlln QO Q4 0.0 9 6 0.0 2.5 0.0 D.5 Third-Terns Queue (Q3), vehlln 0.0 G.6 0.6 0.0 C.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 Percentile bk-of-4ce factor (f_B%} 0.0~ 1.000 0.000 1.000 O.D00 1.0~ 0.000 1.600 Percenli'e @ack of Queue jQ%}. vehlln 0.0 3.6 0.0 24.4 D 6 8.9 6.0 8.9 Percentile Storage Ratio {RQ%) 0.00 0.10 0.00 6.67 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.24 Initial Queue (Qb), veh O.G D 6 0.0 0.6 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Colley<,ri['.e 7-Eleven 5:00 pm 10t11i2D1 1 Basel ine Synchro 8 L;ghl Report 'h'alter Ragsdale Page 2 Ragsdale Consulting 23 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas FiCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity analysis 1`ullbuiidoutPMF 10!1112011 Final (Residual) Queue {Qe), veh Saturated Delay (ds), slveh Saturaled~ueue (Qs), veh saturated capacity (~), vehrh Initial Queue Clear Time (Ic}, h R~td t.ane Group Data 0.0 0.0 0.0 o o 0.0 0.0 0-0 00 e o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 8.8 0.0 O.D o.D 0.3 -- 0.0 0.0 09 D.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D o 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA - o.o 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 . o.o 0.0 - -- _ Assigned Movement 0 42 0 14 0 16 0 18 Larre Assignment T+R T+R T+R T-R Lanes in Group 0 i 0 9 0 9 0 f Group Volume (v), vehfi 0.0 182.1 0.0 740.8 0.0 300.1 0.0 481.9 Group Sat. Flow (s), vehiNln 0.0 1845.3 0.0 1691.6 0.0 1818.6 0.0 1762.2 Queue Serve Time (g_s}; s 0.0 7.7 0.6 37.7 0-0 14.9 4.0 21.2 Cycle Queue Clete Time (iLC) s 0.0 7.7 0.0 37.7 0-0 14.9 OA 212 Prot R7 Sat Fbw Rate (s_R), vehlhnn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ProtRTE~i. Green {g_R}, s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Proportion RT Outside Lane {P R) 0.(}00 0.054 0.000 0-528 0.000 0.138 0.000 0.213 Lane Group Capadty (c}, vehRr 0.0 436.7 0.0 687.9 0.0 339.4 0.0 691.6 'volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X} 0.000 ~~ d17 0.000 1.077 0.000 0.884 Q000 0.697 Available Capacity (c_a}, vehlh 0.0 436..7 D.0 687.9 0.0 339.4 0.0 699.6 Upstream Fitter Factor (I} 0.000 1 A00 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.D00 0.000 1.000 Uniform Delay (d9), stveh 0.0 30.0 0.0 27.5 0.0 36.7 OA 23.5 Incremeniat Delay {d2}, stveh 0.0 2.9 0.0 56.9 0.0 26.8 0.0 2.6 lnittat Queue Delay (d3}, slush 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay id1: slush 0.0 32.9 0.0 84.4 0 0 63.5 0.0 2fi.1 First-Terri flueue {QI), vehlln U.0 3.3 0.0 13.6 0.0 6.2 0.0 8.0 Second-Term Queue {Q2), vehlln 0.0 0.4 0.0 10.9 0-0 25 0.0 0.5 Third-Tenn Queue {Q3), vehtkr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percentile bk~vf-que factor (f_B%) 0.0~ 1.000 0.000 1.000 0-000 1.D00 0.000 1.000 Perrentile Back al Queue (Q%), veh/im 0.0 3.6 0.0 24.5 QO 8.8 0.0 8.5 Percent=':e Storage Ratio {RQ°,b} 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.23 Irutiaf Queue (Qb), veh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Final (Residual) Queue (Qe}, veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Delay {ds}, sNeh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Saturated Queue (Qs}, veh 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 Saturated Capacity (cs}, vehRr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA Q.0 In! ial flueue Clear Time (tc? h OA 0.0 0.0 0.3 0 0 D 0 0.0 0 0 lntetsectiart ~ HCM Average Control Delay 55.9 --- _-- HCM Level of Service E Galleyv:".e 7-Seven 5:G0 pm 10.11;20" Base> ne Synchro 8 Lsght Report ~Nalter Raosdale Page 3 Ragsdale Consulting 24 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis HorizonAt~~1F 3: SH 26 & Mid Cities Blvd 10111/2011 Mavetgetrl <; EBL E@T ~BR VItBI WBT W(3fi NBL t~T NBR 59L S13T SBI~ Lane Configurations ~ ?'F- ?T+ ?A ~ ?A VolumeTvph) _ 393 522 7 t52 203 t9- 12 91.7 89 36 791 !96 tAovementNumber 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 '•8 7 d 14 Initial (gueue, veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fl Ped-bike Adj.. Factor tA~bT} 1.00 1.00 '._00 1.00 ' 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking, Bus Adj-Factors 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 Adj. Sat. Flow Rafe, vehlhAn 1863 1863 1863 1863 1863 '863 1845 1846 '846 1845 1848 1848 Lanes t Z 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 lane Assignment Capacity, vehih 443 1108 15 240 631 59 31 1158 112 71 1(?65 264 Proportion Amv~g Qn Green 0.25 0.3fl 0.30 0.14 .0.19 0 ',9 0.02 0.35 G 35 0.04 G.37 0.37 Movement Delay, sTveh 68.1 30.0 30.0 46.0 35.4 35.fi 53.5 39.0 39.3 50.1 32.3 32.8 Movement LOS E C C D D D D D D D C C Approach Yoturne,vehTh 1002 407 1107 1112 Approach Delay, sJveh d6.2 39.7 39.3 33.1 Approach LOS D D D C .Timer ) 2 3` 4' 5, 6 7 8 Assigred Phase 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Case No 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 2.0 d.0 2.4 4 0 Phase Duration (G=Y=Rc); s 16.52 31.98 5.65 38.43 27.10 21.40 7.74 36.34 Change Period (Y•Rc), s 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4 DO d 00 4.00 4.00 Max. Atlowable Headway (MAH), s 4.19 7.89 4.19 7.19 4.19 7.89 4.19 7.19 PAaximum Green Setting (Gmax). s 12.7C 27.80 5.80 35.40 23.10 `-7.10 5.90 31 d0 Max. Queue Clearance Time (g_c=I1), s 1022 13.83 2.68 26.98 24-04 7.34 4.02 27.92 Green Extension Time (g_e), s 0.12 7.72 0.00 7.05 000 6.02 0.01 3.37 Probebildy of Phase Call (p c) 0.986 1.000 0285 1.000. 1.000 1.000 0.634 1.000 Probability of Max Out (p_x) 1.000 0..701 1.000 0.993 1.000 0.881 1.004 1.000 Leff-7uin Movemei>f llata Assigned Movement 1 3 5 7 Mvmt. Sat Flow, vetdh 1774.04 1756.82 1774.Q4 1756.82 Through Movement Data Assigned Movement 2 4 6 8 IAvmt Sat Flow. uehlh 3667 65 2862.4G 3359.04 3314.' 8 Rwfd-Tum Movernertt Dana Assigned Movement 12 14 16 18 Mvmt. Sat Flow, vehfi 49.16 708.94 311.48 321.57 L_eR Lame _Grtrup. Data Assigned Movement 1 0 3 0 5 0 7 0 Lane Assignment L i;P*ot} L (Pros} L {Prod L iProt) Lanes in Group 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 Group Volume (v): vehlh 165.2 0.0 13.0 0.0 427.2 0.0 39.1 O fl Group Sat. Flow (s), veh(hlln 1774.0 0 0 1756.8 0.0 1774.0 0.0 1756.8 0.0 Queue Serve lime (g_s), s 82 0 0 0.7 0.0 22.0 0.0 2.C 0.0 Cycle Queue Clear Time (g_c) s 8-2 0.0 0.7 0.0 22.0 fl-0 2.0 0.0 Pecm LT Sat Flow Rate +s Il. vehlhlln O.C G 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.C 0.0 Colley.++e 7-Eleven 5:C0 pm tOr Y1f20 1' Base ':ne Synchro 8 L:ghl Report 'Halter Ragsdale 'age Ragsdale Consulting 25 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas HCfut 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis HorizonAMF 3: SH 26 & Mid Cities Blvd 1oti1t2011 Shared LT Sat Flow (s_sh), vehlhftn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Penn LT Eff Green {gam}: s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 C 0 0.0 G 0 0 0 Perin LT Serve Time (g_u), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perm LT 4ue Serve Time {gds}, s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time toFirst i31k (g_f~ s OA _ 0:0 OU 0.8 0.0- 8.0 - 8.0 00 - Serve Time pre Blk (g_fs}, s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 Proport~ tT Inside Lane {P L) 1000 0.000 1.00(3 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 Lane Group Capadty {c}, vehth 239.9 0.0 3'1 ~ 0.0 442.6 0.0 71.0 0..0 Voume-to-Capacity Ratio (X} 0.689 0.000 0.416 0.000 0.965 0.000 0.551 0.000 Avadab{e Capacity (c_a), vehTh 243.3 0.0 110-1 0.0 442.6 0.0 1120 0-0 Upstream Fitter fac~ar(I} 1.!300 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.D00 0.000 Uniform Delay {d1), slveh 38.2 0.0 45.0 0.0 34.3 0.0 43.6 0.0 Incremental Delay (d2), stveh 7.8 0.0 8.5 0.0 33.8 0.0 6.5 0.0 Initial Queue Delay (d3}, stveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Contrd Delay {d), stveh 48.0 0.0 53.5 0.0 68.1 0.0- 50:1 0.1) First-Tenn 4ue~ {41j, vehlln 3.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 8.9 0.0 0.8 0.0 Second-Term 4ue~ (Q2), vehl[t- 0.5 0.0 0:1 0.0 4.2 O.t3 01 0a} Third-Tern Queue {Q3), vehAn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percenti~ bk-of-que factor {f B%) 1.000 0.000 1.000 O.t100 1.t)DO 0.000 1.000 0.~0 Fercentie Back of Queue (~!~b}, vehiln 3.9 CA 0.4 0.0 13.0 0.0 I.C 0.0 Percentile Storage Ratio (R4%) 0.40 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.25 0.00 Initial Queue {4b), veh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Final (ResiduaO 4ueue (4e}, veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 Saturated Delay {ds}, slveh 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Queue (Qs}, veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 Saturated [rapacity (cs), veh.+h 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 C.0 0 0 0.0 Initial Queue Clear Time (tc}, h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Mic3ryC Lope Group Dada . Assigned Moverment 0 2 0 4 0 6 0 8 Lane Assignment T T T T Lanes in Group 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 Group Volume {v}, vehrh 0.0 288.1 0.0 555.0 0.0 121.4 0.0 555.1 Group Sat. Flow (s), veidhlln 0.0 1862.7 0.0 1848.2 0.8 1862.7 0.0 1846.2 Queue Serve Time {g_s}, s 0.0 11.8 0.0 25.0 0.0 5.2 0.0 25.9 Cyde 4ueue CtearTime {g_c), s 0.0 11.8 0.0 25A D.0 5.2 0:0 25.9 Lane Group Capaaty {c}, vehlh 0.0 562.9 0.0 687.4 0.0 350.1 0.0 645.0 Volume-to-Capacity Ratio {)O 0.000 0.512 0.000 0.807 0.000 0.347 0.000 4.861 Available Capacity {c a}, vehlh 0.0 562.9 0.0 706.6 0.0 350.1 0.0 645.0 Upstream Filter Factor {I) 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000' Uniforn Delay {dt}, stveh 0.0 26.7 0-0 26.1 0.0 32.7 0.0 28..0 Incremental De!ay (d2), slveh 0.0 3.3 0 0 6 2 0.0 2.7 0.0 10.9 Initial Queue delay {d3}, stveh OA G.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), slveh 0.0 30.0 0.0 32.3 0-0 35.4 0.0 39.0 First-Term Queue {41), veh7ln 0.0 4.9 O.G 10.0 G 0 2 3 O.C 10.5 Second-Tern Queue {42}, vehfln 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.3 0.0 2.0 Third-Term Queue (43}, vehtln 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percentile bk-of-que factor {f_B96} 0.000 1 000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0000 1.000 Percentile Baek of t~ueue (4 •b}, vehlln 0.0 5.4 0.0 112 0.0 2.5 0.0 12.4 Percentile Storage Ratio iR496} 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.3d Initial 4ueue {•Db}, 'veh 0.0 C.0 0.0 0.0 C.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Colleyv=e 7-Seven 5 CG pin 1G111~20". Base`ne Synchro 8 C<ght Report 'N'aHer Ragsdale Page 2 Ragsdale Consulting 26 Traffic lmpact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville i exas HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis HorizonAMF 3: SH 26 8 Mid Cities Blvd 1Df11;2D11 Final (Residual) Queue (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Delay (ds}. siveh 0.0 0 G G.0 0A G 0 D.0 0.0 C.0 Saturated Queue (Qs), veh 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O D Saturated Capacity (cs}, veh;h 0.0 D 0 0.0 0.0 09 0.0 0.0 G 0 Initial Queue Cleat Tune {tc), h 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 QO 0.0 Riga Lire C~~ Oata Assigned Movement 0 12 0 14 0 16 0 18 Lane Assignment TAR TAR T-R TAR Lanes in Group 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Group Voume (v), vehlh 0.0 286.9 0.0 517.8 0.0 1 t9.9 0.0 538..3 Group Sat. Flow {s}, vehthlln 0.0 1854:1 0.0 1723.1 0.0 t807.8 0.0 1789:5 Queue Serve Time (g_s), s 0.0 11.8 0.0 25.0 0.0 5.3 O D 25.9 Hyde Queue Clear Tme (tLd s 0 0 11 8 D 0 25.0 0.0 5-3 0.0 25.9 Prot RT Sat Fbw Rate (s_R), vehihiln 0.0 G 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 Prot RT 1Jf. Green {g_R}, s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Proportion RT Outside Lane (P R) 0000 0 027 0.000 0.411 0.000 0.172 0.000 0.1$0 Lane Grwip Caparaty (c}, vetr/h 0.0 560.3 0.0 640.9 0.0 3397 E).0 625.1 Volume-to-Capacsty Ratio (X} 0.000 0.512 0.000 0.808 O D00 0.353 0.000 0.851 Available Capacity (c_a}, vehlh 0.0 560.3 0.0 658.8 0.0 339.7 0.0 625.1 Upstream FilterFacio=(Ij GJGG 1.000 O.ODD 1.OG0 G-000 '.000 O.G00 1GG0 tlnifonn Delay {dt}, slveh 0 0 26.7 0.0 26.1 0.0 32.7 0.0 28.0 lncrementat Delay (d2), s(veh D.D 3.3 D.0 6.7 D.0 2.9 0.0 11.3 Initial Queue Delay {d3), slveh 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d}, sfveh 0.0 30.0 D.0 32.8 0 0 35.6 0 0 39.3 First-Tenn Queue (Qt), vehtln 0.0 4.9 D.0 9.3 0.0 22 0.0 10..1 Second-Term Queue (fl21, ~+ehiln O.G 0 5 0.0 1 2 G 0 D 3 0.0 2.0 Third-Term Queue (Q3), veh(In 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Perczntile bk-of-que factor (1_8%) 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.0~ 0 (~0 1-000 0.000 1.000 Percentge Rack of Queue {Q9i), vehlM 0.0 5.4 0.0 10..5 0.0 2.5 0.0 12.1 Percentle Storage Ratio 4.R496} 0.00 D.":6 0.00 0.29 O OD 0.06 0.00 0.33 lnifial Queue (Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 Final {Residual] Queue IQe}, veh 0.0 G.0 0.0 0.0 OA D 0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Delay {ds), siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Queue (Qs}, veh 2D G 0 0 0 0.0 QO 0.0 O D 0.0 Saturated Capacity (cs), vehth 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 Initial Queue Clear Time {tc}, h 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay 39A HCM Level of Service D Colley~r~?ie 7-Eleven 5'.00 pm 10111;20 ~' Base~'ne Synchro B Lght Report ',Natter Ragsdale Page 3 Ragsdale Consulting 2~ Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas HClvt 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis HorizonPMF 3: SH 26 & Mid Cities Blvd toJ11r2D11 Movearanf" EBt. E$T E$R WNL W$T WBR NBL 1~tBT NBR SBL SBI S81i Lane Canfigtsations ?A 'i 1•~ 4A "f ?A Vokxne-(vph)-_ _ .- 359_ _ 408 _ _7_ 256 650 48 28 984 151 51 1307 450 MovemerdNumber 5 2 ?2 1 fi ?6 3 8 '8 7 4 `4 lni#iai Queue, veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj. Factor (A~rT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking, Bus Adj. Faders 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00 t-00 1.Q0 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Sal. Fbw Rate, vehthlin 1863 1863 "863 1863 1863 1863 1845 1847 `847 1845 1849 ' 849 Lanes 1 2 4 1 2 0 i 2 0 t 2 0 Lane Assignment Capacity,vehFh 311 753 13 296 677 50 61 1261 i93 86 1114 363 Proportion Amwng On Green 0.18 0.21 021 0.17 0.20 C 20 0.03 0.40 OAO 0.05 0.42 0.42 Movement Delay, stvch 175.3 39.2 392 74.4 95.3 96.2 49.4 33.3 33.9 50.5 146:8 192A Movement LOS F D D E F F D C C D F F Approadt VoWrne, vehA- 841 1037 1284 1985 Approach Delay, snren 102.3 90.0 34.0 165.9 .Approach L013 F F C F THAer t 2 8 4 5' 6 7 g' Assisted p~ 1 Z 3 4 5 6 7 8 Case No 2.0 4 0 2.0 4.0 2.0 4.0 20 4.0 Phase Duration {G+Y+Rc), s 19.20 22.80 7.17 42.00 20.E 22.Q0 8.d5 40.72 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.C0 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Max. Afowaae Headway (MAH), s 4.19 8..17 4.19 722 4.19 8.17 4.19 7.22 Maximum Green Setting {Gmaxl, s 15.20 18 80 5.90 38.00 16.00 18.00 5.90 36.00 Man. Queue Clearance Tine {g_c+11 ), s 16.13 12.01 3.55 40.00 18.00 20.04 4.83 30.35 Green Extension Tine (g_e), s 0.00 5.65 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 5.63 Proba6i9ly o1 Ptt~e CaB (p~c) 0.999 i .t)tb 0.537 t 00f! 1.000 1.000 0.754 i .flOD ProbabikN/ of Max [fit (p x) 1.000 1.000 1 A00 1.000 1-000 1.000 1.000 1.000 LeR-Tt~ii 1Mo~t D~a Assigned Movemer~l 1 3 5 7 Mvm1 Sat Fbw, vehlh 1774.D4 1756.82 1774.04 1756.82 Tbroudi Mareit Da#a Assic~ted Movement 2 4 6 8 Mvmt. Sat Flow, vehRt 3651 64 2673 38 3427.87 313U OR Assigned Movement 12 14 16 i8 Mvmt. Sat flow, vehfi 62,60 871.36 252.98 479.40 Leif Lave Gray Dafa _ Assigned Movement 1 0 3 0 5 0 7 0 Lane Assignment L (Prot) L {Prot) L {Prot] L jPrat) Lanes in Group - 1 0 1 0 i 0 1 0 Group Volume (v); vehJh 278.3 0.0 30.4 OA 390.2 D.0 55.4 CA Group Sat. Flow (s), vehiFJb 1774.0 0.0 1756.8 0.0 1774.0 0.0 1756.8 0.0 Queue Serve Time {g_s). s 14.1 0.0 t6 O.C 16.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 Cyde Queue Clear Time {g c), s 14.1 0.0 i.6 0.0 16.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 , Penn LT Sat Flow Rate fs It vehmJkt - 0 0 0 D 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0_ _ Colleyville 7-Eleven 5:00 pm 10J11?2011 BaseE ne Syn+;hro 8 L'ght Repor( 'A'aller Ragsdale Page Ragsdale Consulting 28 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis HorizonP~1F 3: SFt 26 8~ Mid Cities Blvd 1(7nit201I 6hared LT Sat Flow (s_stt), vehlhlln 0.0 D 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P?gin LT Eff Green ig_P), s 0 0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 Perth LT Serve Time (g_u), s 0.0 D.0 0.0 O.D 0 0 OA 0.0 09 Perm LT Cue Serve Time (gys), s 0.0 0.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 Time to First Blk (g_fa, s 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -Serve Time pre Blk {g_f ), s O.D D:0 0.0 0.17 - - 0 fl fl.D 0-0- O D - Proportion LT Inside Lane tP L) 1.40D 0.000 1.000 0-000 1.000 D.000 1.000 0.~0 Lane Gnwp Capacity {c), vehih 295.8 0.0 fi1.t 0.0 311.3 0-0 85.8 0.0 Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.941 D.000 0.498 0.~0 1.253 0.000 0.648 0-000 Avazabie Capacity (c_a), vehih 295.8 0.0 i 13.7 0.0 311.3 0.0 113.7 0.0 Upstream Filter Facts (I) 1.000 0.000. 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0-000 Uniform Delay {dt}, stveh 37.5 0.0 432 0.0 37.6 0.0 42-6 0.0 Incremental Delay (d2), sfvett 36.6 0.0 6.2 0.0 137.7 0.0 7.9 0.0 Initial Queue Delay (.d3): siveh 0.0 0.D 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 Control Delay {d}, sJveh 74.4 0.0 49.4 0.0 115.3 0.0 50-5 0.0 First-Term Queue (Q1), vehAn 5.8 0.0 0.6 0.0 6.5 0.0 1.2 0.0 Second-Term Queue (Q2}, veFJ1n 3-0 0.0 O;t 0.0 11.9 . 0.0 0.2 0.0 Third-Term Queue (fl3}, vehlln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0-0 0.0 Perc.~tile bk-o(~r~ factor (f_B%} 1.()00 0.000 1.000 0:000 1.000 O.ODO t000 0.000 Percentile Back of (Queue (fl%), vehrln 8.8 0.0 0.8 0.0 18.4 0.0 1.4 0.0 Percentt4e Storage Ratio (RC%) 0.90 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.47 0.00 0.35 0.00 Initial Queue {Cb), veh 0.0 C.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.4 OA Final {Residual) Queue (Qe), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 D.0 0.0 Saturated Delay (ds), slveh 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D OA 0.0 Saturated Queue (Qs), veh 0.0 0A 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Capacity (cs), vehrh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 Initial Queue Clear Time (tc), h 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.3 OA 0.0 AA Midife tane G+uvp. Dad Assigned Movement 0 2 0 4 0 6 d 8 Lane Assignment T T T 7 Lanes in Gmup 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 Group Volume (v), vehih 0.0 226.0 0.0 958.0 0 4 383.7 0.0 630.3 Group Sat. Flow {s), vehlhJin 0.0 1862.7 0.0 1849.3 0.0 1862.7 D.0 1847.0 Queue Serve Time {g_s), s 0.0 10.0 0.0 38.0 0.0 48.0 0.0 28.2 Cycle flueue Clear Tone (g_c), s D.0 10.0 0.0 38.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 28.2 Lane Group Capacity (c), vehlh 0.0 384.1 0.0 770.8 0.0 387.8 0.0 743.9 Volume-to-Capacity Ratio (X) 0.000 0.588 D.000 1243 0-0{l0 1.043 0.000 0.847 Aea iaDie Capacity !c_a7. vehfh O.D 384.1 0.0 770.$ 0 0 387.8 0 0 743.9 Upstream FilterFacta(I) 0.000 1-000 0.000 t.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 1-000 Unitonrr Delay (d1), sJveh 0.0 32.7 0.0 26.6 0.0 36.6 0.0 24.7 Incremental Delay (d2), stveh 0 0 6.5 0.0 120.2 0-0 58.7 0-0 8.6 Initial Queue Delay (d3), s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay (d), s.'veh 0.0 39.2 0-0 146.8 0.0 95.3 D.0 33.3 First-Term Queue {Q11, vehrin 0.0 4:3 0.0 14.8 QO 7.7 D 0 11.1 Second-Term Queue (fl2), veh/in 0.0 0-7 0.0 25J 0.0 6.0 D.0 1.8 Thi~i-Term Queue (t~3), vehlln 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0-8• 0.0 0 0 Perxntile bk-of-que factor {f_B%) O QO(7 1.000 0.000 1 0~ 0.000 1.000 0-000 t_00D Pementi3e Back of Queue (Q%)• veh~ln 0.0 4.9 0.0 40.5 0.0 13.7 0.0 12.8 Percentile Storage Ratio {Rfl%) 0.40 0.14 0.00 1.12 0.00 0.31 0.00 0..35 Initial Queue {Cb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Celleyv!':!e 7-Ewen 5:G0 pm tort ti201 1 Basel ine S}~nchro B _ ght Repcrt 'r4'alter Ragsdale Page 2 Ragsdale Consulting 29 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas HCtti4 2010 Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis HorizonPMF 3: SH 2E & Mid Cities Blvd 14nt.~2D=.t Final (Residua#) Queae f0e),-veh D:8 - OA D:0 46.8-- 0.J1- 4.0 - _ Od- 0.0 - _ _ Saturated Delay (ds}, stveh G.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 G 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Queue (Qs), veh 0.0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Saturated Capacity (cs}, vehlh 0.0 C 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 lnifial Queue Clear Trme {te), h 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 D.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 1 Lat~t Data Assigned. Movemet-t 0 12 0 14 0 i 6 0 18 Lane Assgnment T+R T+R T*R T+R Lanes im Gawp 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 group Volume (u), vehlh 0.0 225.1 0.0 9517 D.0 375.0 0.0 603.4 Group Sat. Flog (s), vehttdln 0.0 1851.7 4.0 1695.5 4.0 1818.1 OA 1782.4 Queue Serve Time (mss), s D.0 10.0 D.0 38.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 28.3 Cycle Queue Clear Time ig_c), s 0.0 10.0 0.0 38.0 0:0 18.0 09 28.3 Prot R7 Sat Flow Rate (s_R), vehlhlln 0.0 0.0 O.D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0.0 0 0 Frot RT Eft. Green {g_R), s O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 D_0 D.0 0.0 0.0 Proportion RT Outside Lane (P_R} Q.000 4.034 O.G40 4.514 0.000 0.139 0.004 0.272 Lane Group Capaaty {c}, vehfi 0.0 381.8 0.0 706.7 0.0 359.0 0.0 749.8 Volume#o-Capacity Ratio (X} 0.000 0.589 0.000 1.347 D.000 1.045 0.000 0.850 Available Capaaty (c_a}, vehfi 0.0 381.8 0.0 706.7 4.0 359.0 0.0 709.8 Upstream Fitter Factor (i} 0.000 1.000 D.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.400 1.000 Uniform Delay (d1), slveh 0.0 32.7 0 0 26.6 0.0 36.6 0.0 24..7 lncrementai Delay (d2), siveh 0.0 6.5 0.0 165.4 0.0 59.6 0.0 9.2 Initial Queue Delay (d3}, sJveh 0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay {d), slveh 0.0 39.2 0.0 192.0 0 0 9fi.2 0.0 33.9 First Term Queue (Q1), vehlln 0.0 4.2 4.0 13.6 0.0 7.5 OA 10.6 Second-Term Queue (Q2), vehlin 0.0 0 7 0.4 32.5 0 0 5.9 0.0 1.8 Third-Term Queue {Q3}, wehlln 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0..0 Percentile bk-of-que factor (f_8%) O.DO(} 1.000 0.000 i.ODO D.000 1.D00 0.000 1.fl40 Percentile Back of Queue (Q96), vehfin 0.0 4.9 0.0 46.0 D.0 t3.4 0.4 12.4 Percentile Storage Ratio (RQ96} 0.00 0.14 0.00 1.27 0.00 0.31 O.DO D.34 Initial Queue {Qb), veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 F=nai (Residual} Queue {Qe), vEh 4 0 C 0 0.4 61.3 G 0 4.0 DA 0.0 Saturated Delay (ds}, s/vdr 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Saturated Queue (Qs}, veh 0.0 O.D 0.0 0 0 0.0 OA 0.0 0 0 saturated capacity (~s}, vehm o.o o.0 4.D a o o.o 0 0 0.o a.o (rt=tial Queue Clear T inie {tcf, h 0.0 C.0 O.G 0.3 G.0 0.3 0.4 C.0 lntersecbon Surrunary HCM Aaerage Control Delay 107.4 HCM Level of Service F Ragsdale Consulting 30 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas Driveway HCM 2010 Fullbui{doutAM 3' SH 26 & Driveway _ lat7,~2o11 ~ ~ ~ t 1 ~ Movement Ems. EBIt NBL NBT SBT 5t}R Lane Configurations ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~' ~ Vdrsne (vehfi) 9 13 12 744 633 26 SgnLonhot_ _ _ __ _ _ Siop. _ _ free Free - _ - - _ Grade 0% - 0% 096 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly tbw rate (vph) 10 14 13 809 688 28 Pedestrsans Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (fUs) Percent Right !um stare (veh} Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream sjgnat (fl) pX, platoon unblocked vG, con0ictirg vdume 1118' 344' 718 vCi, stage t coot vol vC2. stage 2 coot vol vCu. unblocked ~ao 1118 344 716 tC, sings (s) 6.8 6.9 4.1 iC; 2 stage {s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 PO queue free % 95 98 99 CM CapaClty (vehlh) 198 652 880 Direction Lane of EB t EB 2 N8 i IiB 2 NB 3 SB 1 SB 2 SB 3 Votwne Toil 10 t4 t3 404 404 459 239 19 Volume Left 10 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 Vokrme Right 0 14 Q 0 0 D 9 19 cSH 198 652 8~ 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Vohune to Capacity 005 0.02 0.01 0.24 0.24 027 .0.14 0.01 Queue Length 95th S.ft) 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 Conttd Delay (s) 24.1 10.6 92 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C ti A ApproarhDelay(s) 16.2 O.t O.U Approach L05 C Intersectan Sumrn_' -- - Average Delay 0.3 )ntersection Capacity tttilizaCron 30.6% ICU Level of Service A AnaP~sis Period (min} t5 Colleyv~3eOrive-Nay Ana?ysis Baseline 'Halter Ragsdale Synchro 8 Lght Report Page 1 Ragsdale Consulting 31 Traffic Impact Analysis - 7 Eleven Colleyville Texas Driveway HCM 2010 Pt4tFullbuildoutRM 3~ SH 26 & Driveway t0117t2o11 ~ ~ ~ t 1 ~ rtt EBi:-- E9R ' NBf. _ Ni31''_ _SBT _ S6ffi.. , Lana Configurations M ~ ~ ~~ ?7' r Volume {vehlh} 12 24 22 787 1048 45 Sign Corn:rol Stop Free Free Grade - 0% Oqo 0°,i _ _ - __ _ Peak Hour Factor 092 D,92 0,92 0,92 0.92 0:92 Hourly flow rate (vph} 13 26 24 855 1137 49 Pedestrians Lane width (A} ~ 1'YahCing Speed (fUs) Percent Blcdtage Right tum Aare (veh) Median type None None FAedian storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflidb-g volume.. 1612 568 1186 vC1. stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vnl 1612 568 1186 tC, single (s} 6.B 6,9 4,1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF {s) 3,5 3,3 2,2 p0 queue free 9~e 86 94 96 cM capacity (veh~h) 9t 466 58S DirestioiL Lane N E.S t EB 7 NB Y NB 2 NC3 3 ...581 _S8 2 SB 3 Volume Totai 13 26 24 428 428 758 395 33 Volume Left t 3 0 24 0 D 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 26 0 D 0 Q 1B 38 cSH 91 466 585 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.14 O,D6 0,04 0,25 0,25 0,45 0:23 0,02 Queue Length 95th (A} t2 a 3 0 D~ 0 0 0 Control Delay (s) 51,4 13,2 11,4 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 D,0 Lane LOS F B 9 Approach Delay (s) 25.8 0.3 D.0 Approach LOS D {ntersection Summary - Average Dalay 0,6 Intersection Capacity UUlizapon 38,4% ICU Level of Service A Analyses Period (min} 15 ColleyvilleCrv~,vay AnalysisFullbslidoutPM 10f 17t2D i 1 Baseline Synchro 8 gig~t Raport sb'alter RaGsdale Page Ragsdale Consulting 32 ORDINANCE 0-11-xxxx AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, OF THE DAVIDSON ADDITION LOCATED AT 3900 COLLEYVILLE BOULEVARD BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GASOLINE SALES AND BY; AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES FOR OFF-PREMISES CONSUMPTION; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has received an application for rezoning under Case No. ZC11-022; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration to, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in Ordinance 0-11-xxxx Page 2 of 4 the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Sec. 2. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by amending the official zoning map by authorizing a Special Use Permit for a convenience store with gasoline sales and a Special Use Permit for alcoholic beverage sales for off-premises consumption on Lot 1, Block 1, of the Davidson Addition located at 3900 Colleyville Boulevard, as depicted on Exhibit "A". Sec. 3. THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive honing Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. Sec. 4. THAT the above described tract of land shall be subject to the following conditions: 'I l:FNFR~I a. This Special Use Permit shall only apply to the uses of a convenience store with gasoline sales and alcoholic beverage sales for off-premises consumption described in Exhibit "B" and depicted in Exhibit "C". b. The convenience store authorized by this Special Use Permit shall not exceed 2,940 square feet in size. 2. PARKING a. All required parking including the number, location and dimensions of parking shall meet the minimum requirements of the Land Development Code. 3. LANDSCAPING a. All landscaping and buffering shall meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 4-Landscaping and Buffering in the Land Development Code. Ordinance 0-11-xxxx Page 3 of 4 4. SIGNAGE a. All signs advertising the convenience store shall meet the following conditions: (1) all signage, shall, at a minimum, meet the minimum requirements of Chapter 7-Sign Regulations in the Land Development Code 4. DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS a. The building design of the business shall be generally consistent with the attached Exhibit "E". Otherwise the final design shall, at a minimum, have a design score of 28 as described in Chapter 6 of the Land Development Code. b. All dumpsters shall, at a minimum, be screened per the requirements for dumpster screening in the Land Development Code and as shown in Exhibit "F". c. The convenience store authorized by this Special Use Permit shall be required to comply with all provisions of the attached Exhibit "G". d. This Special Use Permit shall automatically expire upon the abandonment of the business, change in the use, a change in ownership or upon the expiration or termination of the Certificate of Occupancy. e. All requirements of the Land Development Code shall be met, except where amended herein. Sec. 5. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Sec. 6. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. Sec. 7. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. Sec. 8. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above Ordinance 0-11-xxxx Page4of4 zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the day of 2011. The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the day of 2011. ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC, CMC City Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: David Kelly Mayor Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney Exhibit "A" -Location and Zoning Map Exhibit "B" -Statement of Planning Objectives This sure vrill generate lobs fdr l d-t 5 people. 7-Eleven projects total stare and fuel sales in excess of ~ 1.5MM, which equates to an estimated $] Q~,~{}+ in sales tax revenue in fibs first year alone_ This doesn't include property tax revenue_ • This stare will sell diesel_ Currently the Colleyville Fire Department vehicles are all fueled by diesel and must travel to another jurisdiction for their gas. Colleyville has not had a new gas station developed in f ~ years. +~ This 7-Eleven will n«t only meet Calfeyville's architectural requirements, but will exceed them improving the overall look of the intersection. The sale of beer and wine will be restricted and limited to the available hours per TABC requirements. This Eocation will. be cwavenient for both the citizens of C~Ileyville and Hurst. ~-Eleven builds a very "Gree:n° building with many EEED certified design elemerrts_ This greatly increases energy efficiency and decreases power consumpfion through the use of SIPS panels ~R- value of 32}, EEG lighting, increased insulation, and skylight;. • All of the lighting for the interior and exteri+~r of the store will be LED lighting_ Thais, clean, white 'light significantly reduces energy corisumpticsn and light pollutic~rt, and aids. ir; security by allowing the site to be better lit. This 7-Eleven store will be open 24-fours a day_ Dine to few late night options in the city, Phis store will provide Colleyville citizens a convenient late night nptir>n for gas and food. • 2d-hr~ur security monitor~g keeps neighborhoods safer. Due to fhe TXD~T Right-of-way taking, there will be limited developable area for any other use, making it ideal for a convenience store and' fuel • The two access paints on Colleyville Boulevard will be consolidated into one and moved away from the intersection, improving safety and optimizing access far this type of use.. • 7-Eleven's purchasing power allows them to se11 high quality gasoline at a lower price Haan its competitors, offering the people of Ccalleyville anatha:r fueling optic~ah. + Community outreach is an important part of 7-Eleven`s business m<>del. • Food made fresh daily, selling higher quality pr~;ducts than their competitors. • Convenience, food, grocery services for the n+eighb4rh+oocl -the neighborhood store. Exhibit "C" -Site Plan Exhibit "D" -Sign Exhibits ELEVATION - RIGHT SlQE t~••Yp k ~..~ ~, -. t -. ,.. a_..Y FRRfx is r ~ C ~ - - r i xif 43 ...; R tl .. ...: w CY ~~. ~ wt `... ~ ~ 3T ~ w L::.:':1ta. . \ .. iRr _~: i ,aa [ ~wu~cx i In Wt A•RC Exhibit "D" -Sign Exhibits continued zs• , a^ i ~ PROP04ED M06EL OZS N6NUMENi SIGN xITN tEb PN1CE PANEL 4'1 a. t- a > t.f !` u tr c~ K ~_ ~, a cn w T S2' - {a` .a. i 't ® i ' ODE ELEVAcTI{}t?d ~-ELE'JEtJ'~Iv'~i~~E TC7 BE F'EF~MITTEC~ SEP?.F,gTEL'z' 1'i, ~ M1P 3 (a ~ Sf, 0 S3'-9° cr ~ ~} v ,`t s v .. S I 1 i r 1 l l.=s _~ FRONT ELLEVATI4N G09"'Ek1ECh LIGHEING Fl%TllRE. CbRhisCE : HPG141MFACT EIFS - PA~lT aAF~Y 4VNIiE DECCyRATP~E t~(Z~ITAL " DETAIL fNC1+IMFACT EIFS - YAd4T SAPdpY WHITE ACME BR~IC - 8k1FHiLNDY --._ WATER TABE€: ALWANCED CFST tTOJ$ - SATA`TONE LEFT ELEVATION Exhibit "E" -Building Elevations FRONT ELEVATION RIGIiT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION I I =1~' 1.3'd"I, t7-2"~3'-0~17-T~-fi t£-T 4'•A"~ r-s~ 'I~-~ x-e- r-s I, is -r a--a, sv-a- <~-s~ ----- L ~-°' 4 Exhibit "F" -Trash Enclosure Elevations STEEL TUBE CEi 5t' DEFT3i Ih"T"`1 CONC. <7 ~ - PNNT: ?~ SIDE ELEVATION O O O b f4"-D' C~ C TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN REAR ELEVATION hiETAt GxJMPSTER GATE 6'ir6" STEEL TUBE GORRilGATELt A#ETAL ~ ~~ 54" pEPTii INTO OVER Z f.2' x Y x ifA" COtJC- FTG. - STEELANGI£FRAME ~ PAINf:BRON~ 17-tY 1R" t~4W dllTY HftJGES f-1,2 PR'GATE MiASP+}fAA3D --f ~ ~ CANE BOLT ':.... LAFChi ~ EA. GATE ANCF+CR SLEEVES S£T IN COh1CRETE ~T`iPlCAL'} GATE ELEVATION Exhibit "G" CRIME PREVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONVENIENCE STORES AND PACKAGE STORES Purpose The purpose of these recommendations are to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Colleyville by reducing the occurrence of crime, preventing the escalation of crime, and increasing the successful prosecution of crime that may occur in a convenience store or package store in the City. To this end, these recommendations address best practices in crime prevention through environmental design including height markers, visibility into and around the business, alarm systems, physical security, drop safes, surveillance camera systems, and minimum staffing requirements. Definitions Unless otherwise expressly stated, the following terms shall, for the purposes of these recommendations, have the meanings indicated in this section: "Convenience Store" means an establishment designed, intended, adapted or used primarily to provide for consumer shopping of a brief duration, characterized by a limited product mix (generally emphasizing prepared and snack foods, beverages, tobacco products or gasoline/motor vehicle fuel), close-in parking, and limited retail space. "Drop Safe" means a cash management device in which money can be deposited without the depositor having access to the contents. "Employee" means any person listed on the payroll of a convenience store or package store as an employee, whether part-time, full-time, permanent, or temporary. The term does not include a person providing only janitorial or security services to the store. "Height Marker" means a measuring strip that is attached on or near the door frame of doors used for ingress and egress to the store to aid in identifying the height of a person suspected of committing a crime. "Package Store" means a retail establishment that sells "liquor", as defined by the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, to the public for the purpose of off-premise consumption. "Manager" means the person designated as the supervisor or person in charge of the operations of the store. "Owner" means the person or persons who hold title to, leases or has a possessory interest in property for the purpose of operating aconvenience/package store. Height strips A convenience/package store shall have height strips posted at all public exits to aid in obtaining a physical description on any suspicious person or suspect in a criminal offense. Visibility A) A convenience/package store shall maintain an unobstructed line of sight allowing a clear view of and from the cash register and sales transaction area through all windows and public access doors. Such windows and doors must be clear of all items that would obstruct a clear view including, but not limited to, tinting, signage, advertisements, shelving, and merchandise. Such unobstructed line of sight must, at a minimum, extend from three feet above the ground to at least six feet above the ground. B) Landscaping shall be maintained in a manner that allows an unobstructed view of all windows and doors in an attempt to prevent blind spots or places of concealment. Alarm system A) A convenience/package store shall have a silent panic or holdup alarm system for which a permit has been issued by the City. This system shall, at a minimum, include a panic button located within reach of the cash register and out of view of the customer. Such panic button will generate an alarm signal indicating a holdup or other life-threatening emergency requiring a police department response. B) A convenience/package store shall have posted at all public exits and entrances signs or decals indicating that a security alarm system is in use. Entrances and Exits A) All doorways shall be secured with a deadbolt lock. Deadbolt locks within 40 inches of a breakable surface must be a double cylinder lock. B) Service or delivery entrances shall be equipped with an exterior, high resolution digital video camera or a "peep hole", which enables employees to visually observe the area immediately outside the door. Drop safe A) A convenience/package store shall have a drop safe on the premises to keep the amount of cash available to employees to a minimum. A drop safe must be bolted to the floor and may have atime-delay mechanism to allow small amounts of change to be removed. B) A convenience/package store shall have a written cash accountability policy mandating the maximum amounts of cash that can be kept in cash registers. C) A convenience/package store shall have posted, at or near the point(s) of sale, decals or signs indicating that employees cannot open the safe and that employees have minimum cash on hand. Surveillance camera system A) A convenience/package store shall have a minimum of two, color digital high- resolution surveillance cameras. One camera must have an overall view of the counter/register area and the other camera a view of the main entrance/exit area and both shall display the correct date and time of the recording. B) The entrance/exit area camera shall be placed to provide a clear and identifiable full frame of the filmed individual's face. C) The cameras shall be operated at all times including hours when the store is not open for business. D) The owner or manager shall provide the police department, upon request, digital color images in connection with any criminal investigation. E) The owner or manager shall maintain a library of the recorded digital images for not less than 30 days. F) A convenience/package store shall have posted, at or near the point(s) of sale, signs or decals indicating that surveillance cameras are in use. Minimum Staffing A) A convenience/package store will maintain a minimum staffing of at least two (2) employees on-site at all times when the business is open.