HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-1/10/2008s~~
~~o
~o~
Jgmm
1-
\; /~~ ~ ~~
/' \\ \\
~ ~ ~
x e3'pp* .
__ ~ _. f ,.\__\ ~ ~ s oGO ...
~ sEx
I ~ g~
~ i2A u m'
` ` /ST
/
I
\
~
9 F
`~~
~
~` v, ~ ~
,yy O
22 y
1 - ~ \ ~~~ €330 9~
\ ~
I `. ~, ~ ~~. ~ga
•
° ~ ~~
~ ~
~~ •
, ~ ~ ~
, o
_. _. _ ~ _.
i
1
iI
~._ II
m~Q~o I ~
t~~~RA
~gk:~~
gxv~a~
~~;~
BUU~"~
RyN
_oN~
Via
C
~ K
i
i
i
i
I
~ ~, r >. ~ ~
~ ` _ '~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ use
~ ~
\ _ \ €@~,
rl _ ~ ~ ~ ~ /
~~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~
~ i / ~~. /
I `y ~ ~
/ i I~ _ _ -
I
I
I
m ~ -- --
li
\ I~
~I
/ I
~'.~:
1 I :'
I
I
I
I I
t I
I I ;_
iu
Im 1
z
I I I
I ~. .
~o
~~ 1
~~
~A
I
I ~...I.
I _~.
a`.._ __. __~
2 OA Vm 4V C O 0 2 D
nD ~ s ~
2 H AOZ 00 ~aa bo ~ ~
n ~ aA xx ~ ~ a n
~~ xx ~~~ A ~' n
~ ~C n(n(nn N>D II ~=~ 4 v
y~ L~ ill <l N~
II ti N ^~ y ~ nt m a 'o N
G 0 II A NN ~N`n ~ OaN ~A
O O < m~ TEA ~ rvl
~ xs ~A =gs e A~~ ti~
03 ~s s~o ~ s`N -,
r^ A O 2
m0 00 ~ m
D
"
1 m
~ ~
~ 4
~ .°~
4 r f
~
a
Il BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
"°
°'rz "exvarv n~sc"iruw~
8 a a ~ TM~ OAFID~Nf AT CCLL~YVILL~ ~~~~~~
COLLEYVH.LE BOULEVABD '~'
~ ~
I (STATE HIGHWAY 26)
~~~ w~m.~~~>.
u
o ~ ~ § ~ I~ COLGEYVILLE. TERAS ~
`~-
;~~
City of Colleyville
Meeting Agenda
Sign Board of Appeals
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
Wvivr.colleyville.com
Thursday, January 10, 2008
7:00 PM
City Council Chambers
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
Board members Lisa Kenney, Skip Reynolds, Ed Moore, Rich Munson,
Dee McNosky, Kevin Sams (Alternate 1) and Uton Dellosso (Alternate 2)
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
December 11, 2007
5. AGENDA ITEM
5a Case A-08-001 -Request for a variance from the regulations of the
Colleyville Land Development Code regarding monument sign
requirements on Lot 2A, Block 1 of the Docs Addition located at 4400
Colleyville Boulevard
6. TABLED AGENDA ITEM
6a Case A-07-022 - Request for a variance from the regulations of the
Colleyville Land Development Code regarding monument sign
requirements on Tracts 3D and 3E, Abstract 963 of the A.J. Lott Survey
located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Boulevard
7. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
8. ApJOURNMENT
I here certify th above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall
on Friday, January 4, 2008 by 5:00 p.m.
Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant
City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 1/3/2008
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www. colle yville. com
:_
r `.i
h~~ ~ i~J~~`-`Y'
i~
Minutes -Draft
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
7:15 PM
City Council Chambers
Sign Board of Appeals
~~~i
City of Colleyville
Minutes -Draft
Sign Board of Appeals
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
1. CALL TO ORDER
7:15 PM
City Council Chambers
The Zoning Board of Adjustments meeting of the City of Colleyville was
called to order by Chairman McNosky on December 11, 2007 at 8:25
p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Board members Lisa Kenney, Skip Reynolds, Ed Moore, Rich
Munson, Dee McNosky, Kevin Sams (Alternate 1) and Uton Dellosso
(Alternate 2)
Staff Present: Ron Ruthven and Amy Shelley
3.
4.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Board member Moore moved to approve the November 13, 2007
meeting mintues as written. Board member Kenney seconded.
5.
AGENDA ITEMS
5a Case A-07-024 - Request for a variance from the regulations of the
Colleyville Land Development Code regarding monument sign
requirements on Lot 11 R, Block 2 of the Thompson Terrace Addition
located at 5121 Thompson Terrace
Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Board members.
Chairman McNosky opened the public hearing at 8:29 p.m.
Carl Mitcham, the applicant, came forward to present the case and brief
the Board members. He stated he denied allowing shared access to the
adjacent lot. He stated it being inappropriate for staff to recommend it.
Ron Ruthven used the exhibits showing TxDot's right of way. He stated
the reason staff is recommending denial is because if the sign is allowed
to go through, it will increase the cost of the right of way acquisition.
Board member Munson questioned staff regarding why TxDot would be
acquiring right of way 50 or 75 feet from the proposed right of way of
City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 12/31/2007
Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft December 11, 2007
SH26? Chairman McNosky stated TxDot will only do so if they realign
that road.
Mr. Mitcham stated surely they will not be coming across his parking lot
to the adjacent lot.
Discussion occurred between Board member Reynolds and Ron
Ruthven regarding the denial recommendation and the payment for the
acquisition of right of way.
Chairman McNosky stated the current sign request does not meet what
the code requires. Ron Ruthven concurred and stated the proposed
construction does not meet code requirements as submitted. He stated
the Board is allowed to grant construction waivers.
Chairman McNosky and Ron Ruthven discussed what would be correct
under code for the monument sign.
Board member Reynolds questioned staff if there are any public safety
issues? Ron Ruthven relied there do not appear to be any. He stated
the planter box is out of the visibility triangle.
Board member Munson questioned staff regarding the visibility triangle is
for intersections? Ron Ruthven replied the visibility triangle is for street
intersections and commercial driveway approaches.
Mr. Mitcham stated the base of the sign is already in place and he stated
he would construct the sign according to City code. He stated he wants
to help his tenants so that they will not move out and leave spots vacant.
Lynn Bural, 5104 Chelsea, stated because of the sign regulations, a
parking space would be lost if the sign were to be moved to the 30 foot
mark.
Board member Munson questioned staff that the new sign will have to
comply with the current sign regulations, having a concrete base and
brick or masonry columns. Ron Ruthven concurred.
Board member Munson questioned Mr. Mitcham regarding if he would
comply with those regulations? Mr. Mitcham replied he would do
whatever is required. He stated the only thing that is being discussed is
the location of the sign.
Board member Munson questioned Mr. Mitcham regarding if the brick
columns were added and the sign were to be put up, would the square
footage of the sign be in compliance with the ordinance? Mr. Mitcham
stated he does not know that. Ron Ruthven replied staff has looked at
City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 12/31/2007
Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft December 11, 2007
the square footage and it would be in compliance.
Board member Reynolds stated the applicant has a hardship regarding
the shape of the lot because of the way the streets are coming together.
He stated the businesses have an economic hardship because they
need the sign. He stated there is no better place for the sign.
Board member Reynolds stated he supports this citizen and his tenants
and stated he hoped the variance would be approved.
There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at
8:40 p.m.
Board member Reynolds moved to approve case A-07-024. Board
member Munson seconded.
Ron Ruthven questioned the Board regarding if the variance is being
approved to the construction standards and the placement of the sign?
Chairman McNosky asked the Board for clarification.
Board member Reynolds stated approving both. Board member Kenney
stated the applicant is only asking for a variance regarding the location of
the sign.
Board member Reynolds stated this being an interesting situation
because of the street. He stated this is in an older part of the town.
Board member Reynolds questioned Mr. Mitcham regarding what he
wants? Mr. Mitcham replied the exhibits are a rough sketch, however,
he wants to place the sign in the location that it was before. He stated
he would construct the sign to code. Board member Reynolds stated
that is what he approves.
Chairman McNosky restated the motion: Board member Reynolds
moved to approve case A-07-024 with the construction of the sign to
meet City standards at the location that the applicant is requesting.
Board member Munson seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 -Kenney, Reynolds, Moore, Munson, McNosky
5b Case A-07-025 - Request for a variance from the regulations of the
Colleyville Land Development Code regarding monument sign
requirements on Lot 2RB, Block 1 of the Village Park Addition located at
710 Centerpark Drive
City of Colleyville Page 3 Printed on 12/31/2007
Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft December 11, 2007
Chairman McNosky opened the public hearing at 8:44 p.m.
Lynn Bural, the applicant, came forward to present the case and brief the
Board members.
Jerry Pederson, the builder and owner of the property, came forward to
present the case and brief the Board members.
Board member Reynolds questioned staff regarding the information on
the exhibits presented for the placement of the signs.
Board member Moore questioned staff regarding if some trees have
been planted? Ron Ruthven replied the applicant has removed some
trees and they have planted trees according to the Land Development
Code.
Board member Moore questioned staff regarding if the sign will be
placed far enough away from the street? Ron Ruthven replied yes.
Chairman McNosky questioned staff regarding if the location would
cause any type of visibility issues? Ron Ruthven replied given the
setback of 10 feet from the street and given that there are no driveway
approaches or street intersections, there are no visibility issues here.
There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at
8:49 p.m.
Chairman McNosky stated the land itself has created an issue for the
applicant. She stated he has tried to place the sign in several locations.
She stated between the retention pond and the trees that are currently
there, this is the best spot for the sign.
Board member Kenney concurred with Chairman McNosky.
Board member Kenney moved to approve case A-07-025. Board
member Reynolds seconded.
Board member Reynolds stated that none of the persons notified object
to the sign.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 -Kenney, Reynolds, Moore, Munson, McNosky
6. TABLED AGENDA ITEMS
City of Colleyville Page 4 Printed on 12/31/2007
Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft December 11, 2007
Linda Seim, 3951 Brown Trail, stated she has an electronic scroll
message sign for her business and can only have time and temperature
on it. She provided a presentation showing her sign with a scrolling
message. She stated the presentation shows that the message does
not impose a problem with traffic. She stated not knowing how the
Board would measure the rate of time a scrolling message would
appear. She presented other signs that are not in compliance with code.
Lynn Bural, 5104 Chelsea, stated being in favor of a rate of scroll should
be something addressed. He stated the time change, the 30 second
time change is pretty slow. He stated 15 seconds seems slow as well.
Board member Moore stated it being the fault of City staff that the signs
are not in compliance with the sign regulations. He stated Code
Enforcement should be ticketing those businesses. He stated Code
Enforcement fails all over the City.
Board member Kenney stated electronic signs should not be allowed in
Colleyville and stated they are not going to attract business. She stated
an attractive monument sign will attract people to the business. She
stated flashing messages are distracting. She stated illuminated,
scrolling signs in five or ten years, are not going to be attractive. She
stated there should be a greater opinion of the community.
Board member Moore concurred with Board member Kenney and stated
Code Enforcement should be fixing those issues.
Board member Sams concurred with Board member Kenney and stated
having lived in Southlake, the signs in Southlake, are very attractive and
tranquil. He stated it is irrelevant to have time and temperature because
most cars come equipped with time and temperature features.
Board member Dellosso stated being against electronic signs and stated
technology has evolved regarding getting information to customers. He
stated there are other ways to get the message across to customers. He
stated being glad that Southlake does not have them.
Chairman McNosky stated wanting to send this back to City Council.
She stated it not being the Board's job to suggest or create ordinances.
She stated the City Council should go to the citizens for suggestions as
opposed to coming to the Board.
Ron Ruthven stated the Board can make any recommendations it would
like to City Council. He stated if the Board wishes to not have electronic
signs at all, City Council would like to see that coming from this Board.
He stated staff mailed notices to all of the Homeowners Associations
Cify of Colleyville Page 6 Printed on 12/31/2007
Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft December 11, 2007
6a Case A-07-022 - Request for a variance from the regulations of the
Colleyville Land Development Code regarding monument sign
requirements on Tracts 3D and 3E, Abstract 963 of the A.J. Lott Survey
located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Boulevard
Board member Moore moved to remove case A-07-022 from the tabled
items. Board member Kenney seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 -Kenney, Reynolds, Moore, Munson, McNosky
Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Board members.
Chairman McNosky opened the public hearing at 8:51 p.m.
Kip Whitman, the applicant, came forward to present the case and brief
the Board members. He apologized to the Board regarding not having
the drawings to show what the signs will look like. He stated he would
approve if the Board would like to table this item until the drawings are
provided.
Board member Kenney stated she agreed with what the applicant is
asking for, however, she stated she would like to see what the proposed
signs are going to look like before voting on the request.
There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at
8:57 p.m.
Board member Kenney moved to table case A-07-022. Board member
Munson seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 -Kenney, Reynolds, Moore, Munson, McNosky
6b Case A-07-023 -Discuss and review Chapter 7-Sign Regulations of the
Colleyville Land Development Code regarding electronic, flashing and
scrolling reader board sign requirements
Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Board members.
Chairman McNosky questioned staff regarding if the Board will need to
make a motion on the suggestions, a second and a vote. Ron Ruthven
replied that the Board should make a motion, second and a vote on the
recommendations.
Chairman McNosky opened the public hearing at 9:00 p.m.
City of Colleyville Page 5 Printed on 12/31/2007
Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft December 11, 2007
regarding the recommendations.
Board member Dellosso stated the Board is most in agreement with the
suggestions.
There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at
9:14.
Board member Kenney moved that the Board make a recommendation
to the City Council that the City not allow electronic signs. She stated
the ordinance should stay as is. Board member Moore seconded.
Board member Dellosso stated he would like to further restrict the use of
any signs.
Chairman McNosky stated there is a motion and a second. She
suggested making an amendment to the motion.
Board member Dellosso stated again he would like to further restrict the
use of any signs.
Board member Kenney concurred and stated or the ordinance should be
enforced.
Ron Ruthven stated the minutes would be forwarded to City Council.
Chairman McNosky restated the motion: Board member Kenney moved
that the Board make a recommendation to the City Council that the City
not allow electronic signs. She stated the ordinance should stay as is.
Board member Moore seconded.
Board member Sams stated the City Council is requesting this Board to
make recommendations. He stated there have been many times where
the Board would have liked for City Council to know what the Board's
recommendations are to particular items. He stated this is the perfect
time for the Board to send recommendations to City Council.
Board member Munson questioned staff regarding what happens to
existing signs that have time and temp? Board member Kenney stated
that being where the enforcement would come into play.
Board member Dellosso stated he does not know where the Board
stands if he were to make recommendations. He stated not knowing if it
has to be a motion, just a recommendation. He stated if the Board is
going to recommend something, the Board will have to agree. He went
through the worksheet given to the Board and stated what he suggested:
City of Colleyville Page 7 Printed on 12/31/2007
Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft December 11, 2007
Current Regulations include:
Electronic Message Sign Allowed =yes
Sign Type Allowed =Monument and Freeway Pole Signs
Flashing or Blinking OK = No
Scrolling OK = No
Message Change Frequency = 5 Minute Minimum
Time/Temp Frequency = No interval requirements
Specific Illumination Standards =Illuminated signs cannot project across
property lines
Other Provisions of Note = Signs are allowed for business and
institutional uses
Suggestions from the Board include:
Electronic Message Sign Allowed =yes
Sign Type Allowed =Monument and Freeway Pole Signs
Flashing or Blinking OK = No
Scrolling OK = No
Message Change Frequency = 24 hour Minimum
Time/Temp Frequency = 3 seconds to prohibited
Specific Illumination Standards =Illuminated signs cannot project across
property lines
Other Provisions of Note = Signs are allowed for business and
institutional uses
Ron Ruthven stated the recommendations could vote on separately and
all members can vote.
Board member Kenney revised her motion to not allow any additional or
any changes to the electronic messages to allow more electronic signs,
not relax the current regulations.
Board member Moore stated there are no scrolling signs allowed, only
electronic signs were the message can only change every five minutes.
Chairman McNosky stated Board member Dellosso stated his
suggestions to further restrict. Board member Kenney agreed with
Board member Dellosso's suggestions.
Ron Ruthven asked the Board to be specific on those restrictions. Board
member Dellosso replied not being qualified to do some of them. He
stated his suggestions to be:
Suggestions from the Board include:
Electronic Message Sign Allowed =yes
Sign Type Allowed =Monument and Freeway Pole Signs
Flashing or Blinking OK = No
City of Colleyville Page 8 Printed on 12/31/2007
Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft December 11, 2007
Scrolling OK = No
Message Change Frequency = 24 hour Minimum
Time/Temp Frequency = 3 seconds to prohibited
Specific Illumination Standards =Illuminated signs cannot project across
property lines
Other Provisions of Note = Signs are allowed for business and
institutional uses
Board member Sams stated not seeing the need for time and
temperature.
Chairman McNosky stated not seeing the need for a sign other than to
draw attention to the business.
Board member Dellosso stated enforcement needs to be addressed for
the signs that are not in compliance.
Board member Sams suggested doing what Southlake does.
Board member Reynolds abstained from any recommendations.
Board member Kenney recommended more code enforcement on signs.
7. REPORTS AND COMMENTS
8. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall
on Thursday, December 6, 2007 by 5:00 p.m.
Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant
City of Colleyville Page 9 Printed on 12/31/2007
100 Main Street
~ , Cit of Colle vi lle Colleyville, Texas 76034
Y"~~~~ ---' (817) 503-1000
~~'~~~ Agenda Briefing www•colleyville.com
File Number:
Version: 1
Requester: Community
Development
Department
File Type: Case
Agenda Date: 01/10/2008
Agenda No.: 5a
Status: Board Public
Hearing
Controlling Body: Sign Board of
Appeals
Final Action:
File Name: Case A-08-001 -Request for a variance from the regulations of the Colleyville Land
Development Code regarding monument sign requirements on Lot 2A, Block 1 of the Docs
Addition located at 4400 Colleyville Boulevard
Attachments: Location and Zoning Map Application Exhibits Site Plan
History of Legislative File
Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text:
01 /10/2008 Sign Board of Appeals
Title
Case A-08-001 -Request for a variance from the regulations of the Colleyville Land
Development Code regarding monument sign requirements on Lot 2A, Block 1 of the Docs
Addition located at 4400 Colleyville Boulevard
Explanation
The applicant has submitted a request for a variance regarding the construction of a
monument sign located at 4400 Colleyville Boulevard. The applicant is requesting a
variance from the side yard setback requirement, sign height requirement, sign area
requirement and maximum number of signs.
The Land Development Code requires a minimum 30-foot side yard setback for monument
signs. The applicant is proposing to construct the sign eight (8) feet from the side property
line. There is an existing ten (10) foot utility easement along the side of the property where
the applicant is proposing to construct the sign. Therefore, as proposed, the sign would
encroach two (2) feet into the easement.
The Land Development Code requires a maximum height of eight (8) feet for monument
signs. The applicant is proposing to construct the sign to a height of 12 feet.
The applicant is proposing a total sign area of 132 square feet. The Land Development
Code requires a maximum area of 112 square feet for monument signs.
Lastly, four monument signs currently exist on the property. The applicant states that three
of the four existing monument signs on the property would be removed prior to construction
City of Colleyville Page 1 Prinfed on 1/3/2008
A enda Briefin Continued
of the proposed sign. The sign that is proposed to remain is located on the eastern most
portion of the property. The Land Development Code states that one general business sign
shall be allowed for each 250 feet of street frontage. However, given that there is only 300
feet of road frontage on the subject property, only one sign is allowed for the entire property.
The applicant is requesting the variance because of recent right-of-way acquisitions along
the front of the property for the future expansion of SH26, and so that the sign will be visible
above the cars parked in front of the building.
Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 9 property owners within 200 feet of the site.
As of this writing, staff has received no written response in acknowledgement of the
variance request.
Summary. The applicant explains that the variance is needed because of recent
right-of-way acquisitions along the front of the property for the future expansion of SH26
and for visibility purposes. Staff does not identify any hardship associated with the request.
Recommendation
Denial
City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 1/3/2008
Location and Zoning Map
7o zo 70 ~ ~`~
60 700 703.202 0 D 0 10 4703 305 405 "
0 701 4701 509 ;~~
700 701
4609
02 604600 605 604' 605 00 07 606 4607 4604
04 03 2p5 604 605 r.;. .,>„ 4t3
06 001.10112 OO 0 6Q2 603 ~ f = ~ '~.
0 0 0 1 12 4600 ~` ~ ~ _' < =' .
4601 ,- ~ ~` E~~~ f
~~ .
_ ~ '" '
1.01 PUD-R '~~1' '471
~`
1 1 1 2 2 3 0 0 .~~. ~. r~ ~~ ~~ '`~ `"
~ ~ st~~ ~a~l~~'
0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 3fi 0 1 1
219 ~ ~.», ..,,~`` ~`~ ~ ~
4 L.r~~ ;' ~ ~~~ ;ate ,",
Subject . ~. ~ ~.~ ;°: ~~ ~ o ~
Property a~r,r, ,~ ~ ~~~~~ , ,, .w
~1~30~ ~..~~ ~.~~~- 50D p 0
yC f i
S
C'!ty _ _ % ~ `~ ~` ~ 3102 ~~ o
Iturst r~ '~:~: ~~ ~J
u
., ~ 3 ~~:;Y : 30b
4 J ~ 7 `'t. ' -t f.
~`~.. ~ 0 ~ "~ Z 14 4
~ l .
•~} 21
/~ ~~ "
,'`4 `` " 1 ,~ ~ ~ 1
~ l(y'yy
/ ~ ~. L1
/ , ~~` ` ~ 4205 _
~~?~~ 11 p 4 ~~ ~ D ~ 1 0 0 1.. 1 0' t2 ~ _ '~
,/~ ~ 4201. 1 1. 1 i 1 1_ ~{ ~ 1 1- 1 1 1 1 ~, ~1~,
~ x ~42~?T 1 1~ 11. 11 11~ 1 ~1 11._ 11 31" ~1
,.
~~420 411 ~ 1 12 1 1 11 1 1 11 11 1 i 'k 11 1 1 tL
i '~4 11D .c 13 10'
~ •~ _
r
~~~ o.
(~
Texas
0
1 I
3
c
M
•
a
0
w`
•~
q
v
m
4
O
,y
•
c
0
v
4
b
c
is
C
.~
4.
s
W
V
W
V
Q
~l
O
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyvilie, TX 76034
817.503.1050
Community Development Services Application
^ Zoning Change ^ Preliminary Plat Zoning Variance (ZBA)
^ Special Use Permit ^ Final Plat Sign Variance (SBA)
^ Planned Unit Development ^ Minor Plat Special Exception
^ Site 8~ Landscape Plan ^ Amended Plat ^ Interpretation Appeal
Project Name: ~ ~ o ns 0 n -tL~rQ
Project Address (Location):
pu~'eiV4v~
Legal Description: LO'~ ~ A..,, J(OC,.IL_ ( ~ ~~ '~~'^
Proposed Number of Lots: Gross Acres:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Existing Use: Proposed Use:
ApaliCatiOn ReaUirementS: The applicant is required to submit sufficient information that describes and justifies the proposal.
See appropriote checklist and fee schedule for minlmum requirements. Incomplete applications will not be processed.
~-~--- , ~
Applicant: lr4~ompany: '~
Address: ~ cr. Tel: ~ ~l Fax: " ~ ~ `_ ,.1~ ~ `
City: Stat ZIP: Email: .~~
Applicant's Status: (check one) O Owner ^ Representative D Tenant ^ Prospective Buyer
Property Owner: ~i G~./l~lr ~Cudel Company:~n~ts o» -~e ~~d•
Address: ~ ~~~~• Tel: ~it `~56" ` t~Fax:
~,
City: •~r St~ ZIP: Email: ~_
Ownership Status: (check one) ^ Individual ^ Trust ^ Partnership ^ Corporation
For Deparfinenfct Use Only
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT (SIGN AND PRINT OR TYPE N ME) ~ ,Og`,~~
/~ Case #: ,
SIGNATURE! ' Date: Total Fee(s): I ~~
(,I.YQ q I ,,
~h ~ t~l!D
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER (SIGN AND PRINT OR TYPE NAME] Receipt #:
SIGNATURE? ` `~G ~ Date Submitted: (~"' (~
(Letter of auth ~ ~ r~qu' if ~g~ture is other than property owner) ,~j
The property owner must sign t e application or submit a notarized letter or aathori7stion. Accepted By: ~t~
PubBc Hearing Date: 1 O O
Rev: 02107
cur or City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
® VARIANCE OR APPEAL APPLICATION Colleyville TX 76034
CHECKLIST 817.503.1050
Tei~•
• ~ • ~ ~
Please answer the following questions as completely as possible. Failure to outline fully the situation by
answering these questions could cause unnecessary delay in evaluating your appeal. Additional pages may be
attached if necessary.
Have you applied for a building permit? ^ Yes ~ No
Have you filed an appeal or petition on this property before? ~ No ^ Yes --
1. Completely describe the variance you are requesting. C~ ---
- - -s _"
2. Do similar conditions exist in the area? Explain. 7'~~/L --------___...----
3. Describe how the unique conditions or circumstances do not result from your actions. __, . _ _
--~~
_--~ -~~-
4. Is there any way to do what you want without this request? _~~/-(~-- ---
Acknowledgments
I certify that the above information is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge and ability and that I am now or
will be fully prepared to present the above proposal at the Zoning Board of Adjustment hearing.
I understand that in the event that I am not present or represented at the public hearing, the Board shall have the power
to dismiss this proposal either at the call of the case or after the hearing, and that such dismissal shall constitute a
denial.
I reserve the right to withdraw this proposal at any time upon written request filed with the Community Development
Department, and such withdrawal shall immediately stop all proceedings. I understand the filing fee is not refundable
upon withdrawal of the proposal after public notice.
I understand that if the request is approved, I must obtain a building permit from the City before any work is started on
the property, and that the Board's action does not constitute the approval of a building permit.
Applicant's Initials Date ~ ~ ~ < ~ ~U/
r1gY-9-'005 1T: ]5 FRQr1:JfarEY BRYfiNT ~TIK 8174169448 f0: B: 73291536 p ~
.t~Ai'•.!A"stf ~` 1/mod{~~~ /a .o
-. ~c .- /
1
O. '
4 s
~ ~
J
\ ~~ ~ `
~_ ~
' ~.
w ~ .r
°.a c,. J
,~l
,~~~ . ~y~i3rT ~
~_ f ,~
\, P~~y~•'~~
~p
,5ovn,~2y KuPa~2s
-~~° ~~ ~y
`~ ~~~, Ildn o~~ ~~ ~
~ ~ PLAT SHOWING
URVEY OF PREMISES LOCATED ON LOT 2, BLOCK I, CC'S ADDITION TO THE
CTTY OF COLLEYYILLE. TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS. AC:•~RDINC TO THE PL1-T
YECORDED IN YO.LUME 388-130, PAGE 4, PLAT RECORC.3, TARRANT COUNTY.
TEXAS.
The easement to the City of Colleyvtlle in voi.r,ne 8997, Page
2367 does not a[tect this lot.
. ,,~~rt~
wY~r~r Rt wtid. um~ Ml...fna L+.+ 7 ~l~
1- ~.rn. a SNlers. lwNas: AMu.,,,,
/^1/b~^IMw+kfr r
tW f r N w^ sa ^1 11^tM • rf~sevd l~/
.ds•rr•Wi~•wsrAtrw~ra.~.fi•NMMq„ltwnlo^ ~ ~+.
•N •w• drw INW/•0 Aeren, sN aw..cay.b.. rt.
w+MN•lw8ffuafuw{NNO,ilrechrw.ielleWr ~'i~i ~~.. T,c>,
' lel/re+awrfw M ~YIIit leer •a 1 f.y.a Lrrgenf. •a!
M~~Nsw Nt 1•~11ia e1 •fl dlr. unetr. fwdf,
~ ~kw.~s,f ~...t~^o i^s N>tec .wn~n KrK..~..f
w • ! a... `sprM~ w~fea ^A.a rsc f^1/ur /rMtrq
.ewr( r. u1. kpJ Stl.rl,.•• 1• gc...pf-~. ik
^MaMpM h17Mr etMlea Iu1 efteN ^. s~wnr ~eneN,
dM 117 N r1d11f ~MiR~NtIM. N•rtsyr. ~^ MM^,
~ 6.•NMrYNwMeM,.•se~tf~oa^4...~r1^ rf.~.r
Iwrr+w+Nw, werwu •. rlalr+8w,rr •^J,4.^-~sfr
~.~ . r.~. • , A.«e,.,r.
R.~...fs rr.4.d...i [a^A Svwyr H. 7111
nw. ~/-/2-».
A ro le.>'ozM ~atm.e er I<EMA c...~1y
~ r.nM ~ ~.,ei. to a as .fla.e
w rlr rm...r wri. ^,~. x
WAt:"EH :N._ WARO.
~• ~~14 ~.;:Q
•~~r~~eea~o~y~
~.~.s ~arss~s -
r... +..,.. sa+sarasa
Subject Property Site Plan
Mill Valley
._
J
city
of
Hursf
,~.
,
~
~
'~ i
~f
,~'~ SU~(ECT ; ,
,~ ~~ ;; ,
~~, ~ ,
/~ ~' ~
~~ ~'~ ,
~~ ~ ~~~ O DER T ~~
~~, ,
a
~~ ,
~~ ,
%F /~Qi
..,
a~i I / ~~~
,~
~~,
~ ~~
W ~~ i , ~a
j , o~~J
i
~- ~~~~ , ~
i
o ~(
~~~ / %0
o~~ i ,
~- ,
II\
,
8' , ~ _~
~~ 1
, ~~
,
Proposed Sign
100 Main Street
~ . ~ City of Colleyville Colleyville, Texas 76034
~ rr~,•+~V (817) 503-1000
~~~~~ Agetlda BI'leflllg www.colleyville.com
File Number:
File Type: Case
Status: Board Tabled
Items
Version: 1
Requester: Community
Development
Department
Agenda Date: 01/10/2008
Agenda No.: 6a
Controlling Body: Sign Board of
Appeals
Final Action:
File Name: Case A-07-022 -Request for a variance from the regulations of the Colleyville Land
Development Code regarding monument sign requirements on Tracts 3D and 3E, Abstract 963
of the A.J. Lott Survey located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Boulevard
Attachments: Application Notification List Exhibit
History of Legislative File
Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text:
1 11/13/2007 Sign Board of Appeals
1 12/11/2007 Sign Board of Appeals
1 01/10/2008 Sign Board of Appeals
Title
Case A-07-022 - Request for a variance from the regulations of the Colleyville Land
Development Code regarding monument sign requirements on Tracts 3D and 3E, Abstract
963 of the A.J. Lott Survey located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Boulevard
Explanation
Update
This item was tabled by the Zoning Board of Adjustment at the meeting held on November
13, 2007 and December 11, 2007. The applicant requested that the item be tabled at the
December 11, 2007 meeting in order to allow time for him to submit design renderings of
the proposed signs.
The applicant has submitted a request for a variance regarding the construction of three
proposed general business monument signs that are part of a new development, not yet
approved by the City, located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Blvd. The applicant is requesting
a variance from the front yard setback requirement and the requirement that only one
monument sign be allowed for every 250 feet of street frontage.
The Land Development Code requires a minimum 8-foot front yard setback for monument
signs. According to supporting documents submitted with the variance application, the
City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 1/3/2008
A ends Briefin Continued
applicant proposes that the signs be installed along the front property line adjacent to SH26
right-of-way. The Land Development Code requires a maximum of one monument sign per
every 250 feet of street frontage. The applicant is proposing three monument signs, spaced
evenly apart, along the front of the subject property. The subject property has a total of
367 feet of frontage along SH26. The minimum frontage required by the Land Development
Code for 3 monument signs on a single piece of property is 750 feet.
The applicant states that the signs will be smaller than the maximum size and area allowed
in the Land Development Code. However, no details of the proposed sign dimensions were
provided. The applicant asserts that the variance is needed because the development will
be architecturally unique and the proposed signs will fit the character of the development.
Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 11 property owners within 200 feet of the site.
As of this writing, staff has received no written response in acknowledgement of the
variance request.
Summary. The applicant asserts that the variance is needed because a unique condition is
being created based on the character and architecture of the development. Staff does not
identify any hardship associated with the request.
Recommendation
Denial
City of Colleyville Page 2 rrinrea on usiwvo
0
a
d
3
h
O
ti
0
h
n
'~
4
m`
v
v
.>;
°o
ti
+.,
>;
0
O
>;
c
~c
C
0.
•
W
V
~1
W
V
4
V
O
V
Wt of
Tex~~
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
817.503.1050
Community Development Services Application
^ Zoning Change ^ Preliminary Plat ^ Zoning Variance (ZBA)
^ Special Use Permit ^ Fnat Plat Sign Variance (SBA)
^ Planned Unit Development ^ Minor Plat ^ Special Exception
^ Site & Landscape Plan ^ Amended Plat ^ Interpretation Appeal
Project Name: ~ ~~'/'/7~)~/US
Project Address (Location): ~~ / 7 ~d1/~U.TJ_/ ` ~~~/
Legal Description: ~_~'~ //'Q .~~~ .3E
Proposed Number of Lots: ~ Gross Acres: D ~~_
Existing Zoning: C C" ~ Proposed Zoning: ~~
Existing Use: ~~a/~¢r-O~rf" Proposed Use: /YI%„~G~ /~.f~°_ ~Dl'!I/Y/P/'L~1~~
ADDI1CntlOn RecUlremenh: The applicant is required to submit sufficient information that describes and justifies the proposal.
See appropriate cMcldlst and tee schedule for minimum requMements. Incomplete applications wRl not be processed.
Applicant: ~„~ 0 r/. %[~1)/7~7~fQ' ~~ Company: ~°La~ic/ ~ur4/~~ys L.l~
Address: ~.39. ~D C~~QdP ~(°~/ Tel/ ~'S7f-9~I0 Fax: ~~)-S~fD-~f~/S j
City: ~ ~ StaterZlP: ~~ 03 ~ Email: ~ lAt~ ~u/1lrlQ/~ D/,1/~lo/~L~S,('O~C
Applicant's Status: (check one) Owner O Representative ^ Tenant ^ Prospective Buyer
Property Owner: .SCll~yl Ct .5 ulodU Company:
Address:
Tel: Fax:
City: State: ZIP: Email:
Ownership Status: (check one) ^ Individual ^ Trust 0 Partnership ^ Corporation
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
SIGNATURE: Y G
Nr ~'` '`
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY
SIGNATURE:
(letter of authoriz tion~
The prope~wnelr must sige
OR TYPE NAME)
" 7
/o-as-o~
PRINT OR TYPE NAME)
is other than property owner)
or submit ~ notarized letter of authortzatlon.
Rev: 02/07
For Departm/~enta}l~U-she Doty
Case#: /'T"U 1~~2Z'
Total Feels): ~~~00
Receipt #: `~ ` ,
Date Submitted: ~~ ~3
Accepted 8y:
Public Hearing Date:
.. City of Colleyville
ZONING 80ARD OF ADJUSTMENT 10D~°S°"``
Colleyv~7la TX 76034
,~,,, APPLICA710N CHECKLIST 817303.1050
Please answer the following questions as complsbely es possible. Failure in outline fully the situation by
answering these questions could cause unnecessary delay in evaluating your appeal. Additional pages may be
attached if necessary.
Have you applied for a building permit? O Yes ~9(No
Nave you fled an appeal ar petition on this property before? ~ j No t1 Yea
1. Completely describe the variance you are requesting _~~~ w'tTao~~+e.-
2. Do similar Conditbns exist in the area? Explain Srt «~~Sa ~r~ _ _.-..
3. Describe how the unique conditbns or circumstances do not result from your actions. _~~ e,?~~_.,,_ ... ~..
4. Is there any way to do what you want without this request? ~_____„__~.,~_,____...~ _. ~...._..~.
Acknowledgments
I certify that the above information b correct and. complete to the best of my knowledge and abHity and that I am Hove or
wIA be fully prepared to prosent the above proposal at the Zoning Board of Adjustment hearing.
I understand that in the event that I am not present ar represented at the public hearing, the Board shall have the power
to dismiss this proposal either at the call of the case or after the hearing, end that such dismissal shave corratitute a
denial
I reserve the right to withdraw this propose! at an tkne upon written request filed with the Commurr$y- Devekrpment
Department, and such withdrawal shad immed[ atop eA proceedings. I understand the filing fee is not refundable
upon withdrawal of the proposal after pubtb notice
i understand that K the request is approved, I must obtain a butid~tg pemtlit from the City before any work la started on
the property, and that the Zoning Board of Adjustment actbn does not constitute the approvd of a building perm
ApplignYs Initials ~1~.~ Date D Z
DUNAWA~/
DA No 2006257
October 24, 2007
Board of Adjustment
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
RE: Zoning Board of Adjustment Responses
1.. We are requesting three variances, one for the sign and one for the front landscape setback
and one for the rear landscape setback.
a. The sign request is that we would prefer three short monument signs as opposed to
having a single monument sign in the center of the property along SH26 which could
stand and obstruct the view of the site and landscape and other traffic along the
curve„ We are proposing three short monument signs spaced evenly along the front
of the property in which the total square footage of signage allowed would be the
same or slightly less than normally allowed, but placed on the front property line.
b, The front landscape variance request is to make use of the TXDOT Right of Way
{non-paved area) as part of our 20' required landscape buffer.. This is common in
other Cities along a major thoroughfare such as Bedford along SH 121, Bedford and
TXDOT will allow a reduction in the required landscape setback internal to the site
provided that the equivalent area fronting the property be landscaped and irrigated in
the right of way., This is limited to a minimum of 5 feet of the landscape must be
inside the development and the remaining area (provided it is available outside the
paving and shoulder ditch) is available for use, We are in the process of acquiring
this permit from TXDOT and anticipate receiving due to other considerations, We are
requesting that Colleyville allow the reduction in front yard landscape setback equal
to the area TXDOT will allow us to landscape in their right of way per the proposed
agreement. Whle this does not meet the getter' of the landscape ordinance, we feel
that it does meet the 'intent' of the ordinance,
c. The rear landscape setback is requested to get the required amount of parking The
rear neighbor has stated that he would prefer not to see a tall wall as he would be
fenced in on two sides and we are more than willing to work with him on any kind of
fencing he would prefer if he will support our reduced setback,
2 To our knowledge, neither of these conditions exist in any other locations and we are asking
for something special, We are asking because we believe we have something special to offer
with our development that is not the ordinary run of the mill look along SH 26 The rear
landscape setback we are just trying to work with our neighbor to come to a mutually
agreeable solution for the City to Support..
2006257_BoardofAdjustment_07-1024_IN 1
rwmm
Board of Adjustment
City of Colleyville
October 24, 2007
3 We are creating a unique condition with our signage and landscape variance requests
a. The sign is unique in that it is not a standard sign, and we are not requesting more
signage than is allowed, we are just trying to spread it out and keep it lower to the
ground. This variance will allow for signage that better fits with the character and
archi#ectural and landscape aspects of the proposed building,
b. We are requesting something unique for Colleyville, but not without precedent in the
surrounding cities, By design we do not want something that is standard `cookie
cutterfrom a catalog'. Just like the downtown is special in that is urban design and
was not standard for any where, we want to do accomplish the same kind of
deveiopmen#,
c.. This would not create a unique condition as we hope to have the support of our rear
neighbor in its resolution,.
4. In short, no, To do what is allowed by code would be to do the same as everyone and
everywhere else and we are choosing to be different and interesting if you will let us.
2006257_Boardo€Adjustment_07-1024_1 N
iam ~n.,..~...,... ~;...i,. a~a., inn a [...e ~u...~~, r......,. Haim a s.i~ oiro ~~c i ini a nn,.~.,.. o~~ nnn nivc ~ r~_.. ei o ooc ronn-. ....... ~.., ......~..~_-.. _~_i__ _-.--
Notification List
Notifications were mailed on Friday,
October 26, 2007 by Amy Shelley
Signature
~ma
~~o
~~o
~
~o
gym
n
)
1
~
\
~ ~ ~
/~~ ~~ A
~ ~~ ~
~ -~~ ~
.
°~~
{.
~
I.... o
~ to
4~ r`'F~
om~~oi~
~~gs~
ao n:"e
g"
gk'^~Ro~
:om~A~
.04~eN
84N~"~
~. ~M
~~
i ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~~~
z
~~-~ ~\ ~A ~sr~i
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~, ~ ~~~~~~ ~~~G~~
I_ ~ l
~.
~ ;A
~ ~~ ~.
.~ ,s`
j
d ~ a3a ~
~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~~ ~°o
~~ ~ ~ / ~ ~ '~ ~ a;2
I:
~ ~ i~
"~~
i ~
r _
_ ~ ~ a
~ ~ /~ /
~: ~~>
~ _ ~~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~mm
~ ~ ,,
' ~ I-~~ ~ ~
1 ` V ~ ,~ /
1 i
r'~ i
i~ /
~a~
B
~.
s u ~ ~ i
~;
i i "y.
e i, ~
i ~ --
y~e'a ~'
~ ~~
~~ ~ ~~
,__~
I
~ i
;.. i ~
9
F
oR
i.,
/ i.J
\/ ~~
J /i. i
% r
~~
~ i oa ~m N~ ° ° g n
na -•aa ° 'O s n
~ 02 z o 0
n ~ °~ a'a iii ° ~ s ' a
n >2 ~x n°° A
O ~° nn Naa ' m ^I4
II n CC Li O II nbN Nv
m mp TNN a OmN
H~ ~~ a bA
S ~o N
m0 00 ~
A
D
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
7AiiDtNt AT COLLtYVRLt I 1t~Y yn+.»,~111.~nr..w.u,
COLLEYVILLE BOULEVAED 1t~.,.NAWA~/
(STATE HIGHWAY 26) ,»