The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSign Board of Appeals-Agenda Packets-11/13/2007c,n_~., -_ _ \ (~ ,:,. City of Colleyville Meeting Agenda Sign Board of Appeals 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com Tuesday, November 13, 2007 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 7:15 PM City Council Chambers Board members Lisa Kenney, Skip Reynolds, Ed Moore, Rich Munson, Dee McNosky, Kevin Sams (Alternate 1) and Uton Dellosso (Alternate 2) 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 11, 2007 5. AGENDA ITEMS 5a Case A-07-022 - Request for a variance from the regulations of the Colleyville Land Development Code regarding monument sign requirements on Tracts 3D and 3E, Abstract 963 of the A.J. Lott Survey located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Boulevard 5b Case A-07-023 -Discuss and review Chapter 7-Sign Regulations of the Colleyville Land Development Code regarding electronic, flashing and scrolling reader board sign requirements 6. REPORTS AND COMMENTS 7. ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Friday, November 9, 2007 by 5:00 p.m. Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 11/6/2007 City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www. Colleyville. com ~_.~~~~~ ~m,~ ~f ~~ ~~_ T~.~~4 Minutes -Draft Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:15 PM City Council Chambers Sign Board of Appeals ~, 100 Main Street City of Colleyville Colleyville, Texas 76034 @) (817) 503-1000 Minutes -Draft www.colleyville.com ~z.,, Sign Board of Appeals Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:15 PM City Council Chambers 1. CALL TO ORDER The Sign Board of Appeals meeting of the City of Colleyville was called to order by Chairman Munson on September 11, 2007 at 7:52 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Board members Lisa Kenney, Ed Moore, Rich Munson and Uton Detlosso (Alternate 2) Absent: Board members Skip Reynolds, Dee McNosky and Kevin Sams (Alternate 1) Staff Present: Ron Ruthven, Amy Shelley and City Attorney Michael Kallas 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Board member Moore moved to approve the July 12, 2007 meeting minutes as written. Board member Kenney seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 -Kenney, Moore, Munson, Detlosso, Alt. 2 Absent: 3 -Reynolds, McNosky, Sams, Alt. 1 4. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 4a Request for a variance from the regulations of the Colleyville Land Development Code regarding sign requirements on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Southwest Colleyville Office Park Addition located at 3951 Brown Trail, Case A-07-016 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Board members. Chairman Munson opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. Dr. Linda Seim, the applicant, came forward to present the case and brief the Board members. Board member Munson questioned Dr. Seim regarding how long does the message scroll on the sign for Colleyville Heritage High School? Dr. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 11/2/2007 Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft September 11, 2007 Seim replied she had not timed it, but the code states it has to stay up five minutes. She stated a message can not scroll for five minutes. Board member Munson questioned staff regarding how is a scrolling message defined, as one thought or a different thought? Ron Ruthven stated the code reads time and temperature is exempt from the five minute rule. He stated eveything else has to meet the five minute requirement. Board member Moore stated the Heritage High School sign is bound to the same rules as the other signs. Ron Ruthven replied he would check into that issue. He stated frontage along SH121 has different regulations. Board member Kenney questioned Dr. Seim if there is a way to make the sign comply, to scroll the time and temperature but leave the message, such as Happy Thanksgiving? Dr. Seim stated she only has 10 characters so the message would read Happy Than. She stated there is only room for one line. Board member Munson questioned staff if a scrolling sign is one that passes the message and that is the message. He stated if the subject is changed, then that is a different message. He questioned if for instance could Happy Thanksgiving be repeated. Ron Ruthven stated the code is very specific that the message is not to change but every five minutes. Board member Kenney disagreed and stated the message should be completed before the time and temperature begins to run again. Board member Munson stated the message would be Happy Thanksgiving for five mintues. Board member Moore questioned staff regarding when did the regulations change, because all sign requests for scrolling messages in the past have been denied. He stated the only thing that was allowed was time and temperature. Ron Ruthven stated the last update was done in 2006, prior to that 2000 and 2001 which did not address the scrolling portion. Board member Moore stated all requests for scrolling messages have been denied. Board member Munson questioned Dr. Seim regarding if the lights could be reduced to allow for more letters? Dr. Seim replied no, there are only ten characters. Board member Dellosso questioned Dr. Seim if the lights are all one color? Dr. Seim replied yes, all red. City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 11/2/2007 Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft September 11, 2007 Board member Kenney questioned Dr. Seim if the hypens could be eliminated in the phone number? Dr. Seim replied yes, then no one would know what the numbers were for. Board member Kenney stated this applicant has gone through an incredible amount of hardship and has attempted to the best of her ability to comply with the code, however the City missed something as well as the sign builder. She stated it is difficult to permit a variance to something that the City has been so strict on the scrolling requirement. Board member Munson concurred and stated this Board is between a rock and a hard place. Board member Kenney stated the applicant does have the ability to appeal the request to City Council if the request is denied. Board member Munson stated this issue will need to rest with the City Council because the regulations are very specific. Board member Kenney stated she would like to grant this variance but there are too many conflicting issues. . Board member Moore stated he would deny this request because previous requests have been denied. Board member Munson questioned Dr. Seim if another set of lights could be installed to be able to create the messages that she wants? Dr. Seim replied yes, but it would cost additional money and she stated she has already invested about $30,000 into the sign and the sign company has gone bankrupt. James Polk, 3913 Treemont Circle, spoke in opposition to the sign request and stated the lights from the sign shine through the second floor of his home. Dr. Seim came forward to address Mr. Polk's concerns and stated she is allowed to have the red lights. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:19 p.m. Board member Dellosso moved to deny case A-07-016. Board member Kenney seconded. City of Colleyville Page 3 _ Printed on 11/2/2007 Sign Board of Appeals Minutes -Draft September 11, 2007 The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 -Kenney, Moore, Munson, Dellosso, Alt 2 Absent: 3 -Reynolds, McNosky, Sams, Alt. 1 5. REPORTS AND COMMENTS Board member Moore questioned staff regarding the banners at the Village entrance, he stated those banners are advertising and should not be there. Ron Ruthven stated he would have Code Enforcement check the banners. 6. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m. I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Thursday, September 6, 2007 by 5:00 p.m. Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant City of Colleyville _ Page 4 Printed on 11/2/2007 ~:i~~ ~ r ~_~ ~r ,.:; City of Colleyville Agenda Briefing 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Board Public Hearing Version: 1 Requester: Community Development Department Agenda Date: 11/13/2007 Agenda No.: 5a Controlling Body: Sign Board of Appeals Final Action: File Name: Case A-07-022 -Request for a variance from the regulations of the Colleyville Land Development Code regarding monument sign requirements on Tracts 3D and 3E, Abstract 963 of the A.J. Lott Survey located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Boulevard Attachments: Application Notification List Exhibit History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 11 /13/2007 Sign Board of Appeals Title Case A-07-022 - Request for a variance from the regulations of the Colleyville Land Development Code regarding monument sign requirements on Tracts 3D and 3E, Abstract 963 of the A.J. Lott Survey located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Boulevard Explanation The applicant has submitted a request for a variance regarding the construction of three proposed general business monument signs that are part of a new development located at 7015 and 7017 Colleyville Blvd. The applicant is requesting a variance from the front yard setback requirement and the requirement that only one monument sign be allowed for every 250 feet of street frontage. The Land Development Code requires a minimum 8-foot front yard setback for monument signs. The applicant proposes the signs be installed on the property line where they are adjacent to SH26 right-of--way. The Land Development Code also requires a maximum of one monument sign per every 250 feet of street frontage. The applicant is proposing three monument signs, spaced evenly apart, along the front of the subject property. The subject property has a total of 367 feet of frontage along SH26. The minimum frontage required by the Land Development Code for 3 monument signs on a single piece of property is 750 feet. The applicant states that the signs will be smaller than the maximum size and area allowed in the Land Development Code. However, no details of the proposed sign dimensions were provided. The applicant asserts that the variance is needed because the development will be architecturally unique and the proposed signs will fit the character of the development. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 11/6/2007 Agenda Briefing Continued Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 11 property owners within 200 feet of the site. As of this writing, staff has received no written response in acknowledgement of the variance request. Summary. The applicant asserts that the variance is needed because a unique condition is being created based on the character and architecture of the development. Staff does not identify any hardship associated with the request. Recommendation Denial City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 11/6/2007 8 1 3 3 0 Q ti 0 h a 0 n a` 1 U ... vii b ,C o° ti • c 0 4 c C C C 4 • V W V O V 0 V Glt o/ re:~~ City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, TX 76034 817.503.1050 Community Development Services Application ^ Zoning Change ^ Preliminary Plat ^ Zoning Variance (ZBA~ ^ Special Use Permit ^ Final Plat Sign Variance (SBA} ^ Planned Unit Development ^ Minor Plat ^ Special Exception ^ Site & Landscape Plan ^ Amended Plat ^ Interpretation Appeal Project Name: ~ ~° i~~'/"/r77' 1~/L/S / Project Address (Location}: ~~ 1 ~ C: ~l f~l/ 1 / t ~ .R~UZ~ Legal Description: ~,~ ~ .~-- ~ 3Lc Proposed Number of lots: ~ Gross Acres: . 3L~,~ .~ Existing Zoning: CC ~ Proposed Zoning: ~C'-~ Existing Use: t~a~o~ Proposed Use: ~'Ii/.~' C~ //. jE /rBl~1/Yl~/'L~1lP~ ADDIiCatlon ReaulrementS: The applicant is required to submit sufficient information that describes and justfies the proposal. See appropriate checklllst and fee schedule for minimum requiremeMS. Incomplete opppcaflons wlq not be processed. Applicant: ~, ~,l~I/)~/7"~1~1Q'i{,~/ Company: ~~~IC/G i~/"~PNS ~-CS..: Address: ~9 ~D (.~ IQdP ~ Tel ~ I~'S 7~ ~~~ Fax: $~~' D- ~~/$~ City: /~ tlr~~ I/.~ state:7~ ZIP: `7 6 d ~ ~ Email:~~~oi~ cis ,~~ Applicant's Status: (check ore) ~1 Owner O Representative ^ Tenant O Prospective Buyer Property Owner: .Sll~'i Cr S C~lod(/C Company: Address: Tel: Fax: City: State: ZIP: Email: Ownership Status: (check one) ^ Individual 0 Trust ^ Partnership O Corporation SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 'Y OR TYPE NAME) For Deporfinenfat use ony case#: R'~-02Z SIGNATURE: // /, _ 1! SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWQ SIGNATURE: (Letter of aut oriz Non The prope~iva" eh• mnsi sign io -a5- 0 7 ~ Total Fee,s,: PRIM OR TYPE NAME) 3nature is other than property owner) ardo~ submit a notarfttd letter of t<utboriution. Rev: 02/07 ~~504 Receipt #• ~~~ Dote Submitted: ~ ~ '~'~ Accepted By: ~u Publ'~c Hearing Date: City of CotleyvUk ZONING 80ARD OF ADJUSTMENT 100"''"'°S°zCt Collryn7la TX 76034 ... APPLICATION CHECKLIST 817503.1050 Please answer the tbllowing quostlons as completely ss possibto. Failure do outitns fully the sttnation by answering these questions could cause unnecessary delay In svaluatJng your app~i. Additional pages may be attached ff necessary. Have you applied for s building permit? O Yea ~No Have you tied ~ appeal or petftion on this property before? ~i f No 0 Yee 1. Completely describe the variance you are requeathrg Sic ~+'tTae~~e.~ 2. Do similar conditbns exist in the arr3a? F~lain ~~r .. .~ ~.tr~ _ ~. 3. Deacn'be how the unique condttbns or cinxrmatancea do not result from your atdions. _~~ ~,_ _ ..._ ... 4. Is them enY way to do what you want without this request? _~~~_~__..._.. ___r..____ .. _..w..~. AclmowlodQmerrts 1 oerti(y that the above inforrrtatlon b correct and complete to the hest of my knowledge and ability and that 1 am now or vViB be fully prepared to prosent the above proposal at the Zoning Boats of Adjustrnent hearing. I understand that in the event that ! am riot present or represented at the publk hearing, the Board shah have the power to dismiss this proposal eitl~er at the call of the case or after the hearing, and that such dismissal shat constitute e denlat I recerv~e the right to withdraw this proposal at s time upon written request flied with the Community Development Depafinerrt, and such vv>thdrslwal shat itr~n~rsdia atop aq proceedings. I understand tha fling fee is not refundable upon wRhdrawpl of the proposal after pubik notice I understand that K tha request is approved, l must obtain a budding pem>h from the City before any wotfc to started on the property, and that the Zoning Board of Adjustment acdon does not oonatttute the approval d a buitdirrg permit AppicanYs initials ~~ Date 0 Z ouNawA~/ DA No 2006257 October 24, 2007 Board of Adjustment City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 RE: Zoning Board of Adjustment Responses 1.. We are requesting three variances, one for the sign and one for the front landscape setback and one for the rear landscape setback. a. The sign request is that we would prefer three short monument signs as opposed to having a single monument sign in the center of the property along SH26 which could stand and obstruct the view of the site and landscape and other traffic along the curve.. We are proposing three short monument signs spaced evenly along the front of the property in which the total square footage of signage allowed would be the same or slightly less than normally allowed, but placed on the front property line. b. The front landscape variance request is to make use of the TXDOT Right of Way (non-paved area) as part of our 20' required landscape buffer.. This is common in other Cities along a major thoroughfare such as Bedford along SH 121, Bedford and TXDOT will allow a reduction in the required landscape setback internal to the site provided that the equivalent area fronting the property be landscaped and irrigated in the right of way.. This is limited to a minimum of 5 feet of the landscape must be inside the development and the remaining area (provided it is available outside the paving and shoulder ditch) is available for use. We are in the process of acquiring this permit from TXDOT and anticipate receiving due to other considerations. We are requesting that Colleyville allow the reduction in front yard landscape setback equal to the area TXDOT will allow us to landscape in their right of way per the proposed agreement.. While this does not meet the 'letter' of the landscape ordinance, we feel that if does meet the 'intent' of the ordinance. c. The rear landscape setback is requested to get the required amount of parking The rear neighbor has stated that he would prefer not to see a tall wallas he would be fenced in on two sides and we are more than willing to work with him on any kind of fencing he would prefer if he will support our reduced setback. 2 To our knowledge, neither of these conditions exist in any other locations and we are asking for something special. We are asking because we believe we have something special to offer with our development that is not the ordinary run of the mill look along SH 26 The rear landscape setback we are just trying to work with our neighbor to come to a mutually agreeable solution for the City to Support.. 2006257_BoardofAdjustment_07-1024_IN Board of Adjustment City of Colleyville October 24, 2007 3 We are creating a unique condition with our signage and landscape variance requests a. The sign is unique in that it is not a standard sign, and we are not requesting more signage than is allowed, we are just trying to spread it out and keep it Tower to the ground. This variance will allow for signage that better fits with the character and architectural and landscape aspects of the proposed building. b. We are requesting something unique for Colleyvifle, but not without precedent in the surrounding cities. By design we do not want something that is standard `cookie cutter from a catalog'. Just like the downtown is special in that is urban design and was not standard for any where, we want to do accomplish the same kind of development. c.. This would not create a unique condition as we hope to have the supporf of our rear neighbor in its resolution.. 4. In short, no. To do what is allowed by code would be to do the same as everyone and everywhere else and we are choosing to be different and interesting if you will tet us. 2006257_BoardofAdiustment 07-1024_IN Notification List ACCOUNT OWNER NAME OWNER ADDR OWNER CITY OWNER STATE OWNER ZIP SITUS ADDR 40474135 Hasting Cove Ltd PO Box 5287 Culver City CA 90231 Colleyville Blvd 40474127 Pecan Creek Village Cntr Prtn 5613 Dtc Pkwy Ste 800 Greenwood Village CO 80111 Colleyville Blvd 07401906 Pecan Creek Village Ctr Ptr 5613 Dtc Pkwy Ste 800 Greenwood Village CO 80111 7101 Colleyville Blvd 07401957 Gardens Commercial Partners 3930 Glade Rd Ste 108 Colle ville TX 76034 Colleyville Blvd 04010213 Gardens Comm Partners Ltd 3930 Glade Rd Ste 108 Colleyville TX 76034 7013 Colleyville Blvd 04010191 Gardens Comm Partners Ltd 3930 Glade Rd Ste 108 Colleyville TX 76034 Colleyville BIvd,Subject Property 04010221 Gardens Comm Partners Ltd 3930 Glade Rd Ste 108 Colleyville TX 76034 7013 Colleyville Blvd 04010248 Gardens Comm Partners Ltd 3930 Glade Rd Ste 108 Colleyville TX 76034 Colleyville BIvd,Subject Property 04010310 Dietrich, Charlotte W 7001 Colleyville Blvd Colleyville TX 76034 7001 Colleyville Blvd 04010272 West, Cheryl Ann & Diane M ers 7009 Colle ville Blvd Colle ille TX 76034 7009 Colleyville Blvd Ian Norfolk, applicant 1501 Merrimac Cr. Ft. Worth TX 76137 Notifications were mailed on Friday, October 26, 2007 by Amy Shelley Signature ~s ~~s ~o~ l~md ,1 ,\ ~ ~~ ~ ~ , r'' \~ \~ ' ~ ~ ~ g$s~ 1 ~~ \ ~ ~~ \\ / n~y ' ~ ~, ~r r ~ ~~ ~~ CO ~ ~- `'` R 2 ~~~/,., ' i 1 ~~ ~ ; ~, r ~ ~' ~ y ~'/ ~~~~, ~ .~ ~ a~a ~ ~~ ~ ~~ - a _. I i ,I __ i i__. I ;i ', Ro^~^'~ ~~"~~~ ~y~eg t~~~~ ~8~ro~ g~ ~;~goF ~~~~ 'z~~~^~ ~~=o~~ R: .,~ ., .fir . 8~ k ax ~~ ~ ~o~ ~ y r ~ , .~,- , r~ ' ,, ~,. __~ r ~_ ~ it ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ $.~ ii -.ea o ~ o g 3 n z ~ i '.$ o A ~~ ii ~xx ° ~i i n 5^J ~ ~ ynN~ n A „ 1 5 2 O ~^ lZl c~j ~YL ~ ~ ~ V m ~~ N~ ~N~n oma nn oDe ~ °'~„ -b N O~ GS ^OG N M o ~ ~:. ~o 00 R~ a ~ ; _ ~ ~ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ~ °` °' `~'~~"~ ~ TNO OAAOWO AT COLLJYVM.LO _ ~ $ coLLEYVILLE BOULEVARD +puNp~/py g ~ ~ ~ (STATE HIGHWAY 26) w ,~ .4 ~~ COLLEYVII.LE, TEAS ~ r7 O. c?« <r -_ ~~~ ~~ Co~~e ~~~~~ 100 Main Street ( ~~~ .1i~ Y J Colleyville, Texas 76034 ~d (817) 503-1000 ~~~^~- Agenda Briefing www•colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Board Public Hearing Version: 1 Requester: Community Development Department Agenda Date: 11/13/2007 Agenda No.: 5b Controlling Body: Sign Board of Appeals Final Action: File Name: Case A-07-023 -Discuss and review Chapter 7-Sign Regulations of the Colleyville Land Development Code regarding electronic, flashing and scrolling reader board sign requirements Attachments: Area City Sign Regulations History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 11/13/2007 Sign Board of Appeals Title Case A-07-023 -Discuss and review Chapter 7-Sign Regulations of the Colleyville Land Development Code regarding electronic, flashing and scrolling reader board sign requirements Explanation At the October 2, 2007 City Council meeting, the Council directed the Sign Board of Appeals to examine the portions of Chapter 7, Sign Regulations in the Land Development Code that address electronic reader, message board signs. The sections of the code that address these types of signs are as follows: 7-150(A)5. Changeable Reader Board: A general business sign may include a changeable reader board area, provided the combined gross surface area does not exceed the maximum allowable message area and provided that no more than fifty (50%) percent of the maximum allowable message area may be used as a changeable reader board area. A permit is not required to change the message on a changeable reader board. For purpose of this regulation, a changeable reader board may include an electronic message area. 7-150(B)1c. Changeable Reader Board: An on-premises institutional sign may include a changeable reader board area, provided the combined gross surface area does not exceed the maximum allowable sign area and provided that no more than fifty (50%) percent of the maximum allowable sign area may be used as a changeable reader board area. A permit is not required to change the message on a changeable reader board. For purpose of this regulation, a changeable reader board may include an electronic message area. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 11/6/2007 Agenda Briefing Continued - 7-155(A)1d. Changeable Reader Board: A freeway pole sign may include a changeable reader board area, provided the combined gross surface area does not exceed the maximum allowable sign area and provided that no more than fifty (50%) percent of the maximum allowable sign area may be used as a changeable reader board area. A permit is not required to change the message on a changeable reader board. A changeable reader board may include an electronic message area. PROH161TED S/GNS: 7-215(H). Moving and Flashing Signs - No person shall erect or allow to be displayed upon premises owned or controlled by him any illuminated, animated, moving or flashing sign. Exception: Only a sign, which has illumination, that is turned on and off, changes in light intensity, color or copy, at a rate equivalent to, or no more often than once every five (5) minutes, is permitted. It is further provided that a sign, which uses illumination to provide time of day and/or temperature, only shall not constitute a flashing sign. Permanent institutional and business free-standing signs as well as freeway pole signs are allowed to have a changeable electronic message area. However, per the requirements of Section 7-215(H) listed above, these electronic signs cannot move, flash, scroll or be animated. Further, they can only change in light intensity and/or their message once every five minutes. The only exceptions are signs that display time and temperature only. As part of the directive by the City Council, staff has conducted a survey of ten area cities with regard to their electronic sign regulations. The findings of the survey are attached to this briefing. The cities surveyed were Coppell, Flower Mound, Frisco, Grapevine, Hurst, Keller, Mansfield, North Richland Hills, Plano and Southlake. Colleyville businesses, including sign companies, the Chamber of Commerce as well as homeowners associations were notified of this agenda item. Staff recommends the Sign Board of Appeals receive input and provide a recommendation to the City Council. The scope of the discussion may require that the item be tabled to the next Sign Board of Appeals meeting in December. City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 11/6/2007 Area City Electronic Message Sign Survey -October, 2007 .Electronic Message Specific Other Message Sign Type. -Flashing or Scrolling. Change Time/Temp Ilumination Provi$ions of Sign Allowed Blinking OK OK Frequency Frequency Standards Note Allowed? Coppell NO N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Allowed only in Non-residential Fl wer Mound YES Monument NO YES 15 Seconds 15 Seconds NO districts and on o Signs Minimum Minimum high school - sites. Allowed in Monument 15 Seconds Multifamily, Frisco YES and Wall NO NO Minimum; 24 3 Seconds NO Religious and Signs hours for Wall Minimum Business Signs districts Monument, 15 Seconds 15 Seconds NO No district Grapevine YES Pole and NO YES Minimum Minimum provisions Wall Signs Monument, Messages not 6 Seconds Time and Temp Hurst YES Pole and NO YES allowed Minimum NO is only allowed Wall Signs in a PD district *Signs are approved on a case by case Keller YES' - _ _ _ _ _ basis through a zoning site plan process Allowed in Monument 10 Seconds 10 Seconds Lamps cannot Commercial Mansfield YES and Wall NO YES Minimum Minimum exceed 50 watts Districts and for Signs all institutional uses Signs within 100 Unless a school feet of single Monument, 5 Seconds 5 Seconds family must be use, signs are North Richland Hills YES Pole and NO NO Minimum Minimum shielded so as only allowed in a Wall Signs to not shine onto Freeway Overlay Zone. homes Signs within 150 feet of single family must not Plano YES All Sign NO NO 30 Minute No interval shine onto - Types Minimum requirements homes and cannot exceed 40 watts Minimum 6 Signs only inches of sign allowed for Institutional structure must institutional Southlake YES and Gasoline NO NO 24 Hour Prohibited surround sign uses or to show Monument Minimum face in order to gas prices. Signs only direct Otherwise they illumination are prohibited. Signs are Monument Illuminated signs allowed for Colleyville YES and Freeway NO NO 5 Minute No interval cannot project business and Pole Signs Minimum requirements across property institutional lines uses