Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-10/8/2007~~~>=- City of Colleyville ~~~... _~ Meeting Agenda ~~:; Planning and Zoning Commission 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com Monday, October 8, 2007 7:00 PM City Council Chambers LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANNING, ZONING, PLATTING, AND LAND USE REVIEW OF REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS DISCUSSION OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Larry Knox, Dave Dudziak, Scott Redfearn, Mary Taylor, David Phelps, Denis Duffy, Jeff Byerly 3. INVOCATION Commissioner Redfearn 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 24, 2007 6. RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING MEMBERS David Dudziak, Place 5 Mary Taylor, Place 6 Larry Knox, Place 7 7. ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE FOR NEWLY APPOINTED MEMBERS David Dudziak, Place 5 Michael Clardy, Place 6 Larry Knox, Place 7 8. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Chairman Vice Chairman Recording Secretary City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 9/25/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda October 8, 2007 9. CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 10. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 10a Approval of Preliminary Plat for the Villas of Colleyville Addition located at 931-1013 McDonwell School Road and 1100 Lavaca Trail, Case P-07-048 11. TABLED ITEMS 11a Approval of a request for a zoning change from CC1-Village Retail to PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial on Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 of the Thompson Terrace Addition located at 5101-5105 Colleyville Boulevard, Case Z-07-025 12. STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS 13. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS 14. ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Thursday, October 4, 2007 by 5:00 p.m. Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 9/25/2007 City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www. Colleyville. com ~.r1~ i~l .~'-.. _ ~ :~_ ~ ~ t ~ Minutes -Draft Monday, September 24, 2007 7:00 PM City Council Chambers Planning and Zoning Commission ,~f ~ ; City of Colleyville CoI ley ~l a aTexas 76034 $~j ~ (817) 503-1000 °` Minutes -Draft www.colleyville.com ,~~~. Planning and Zoning Commission Monday, September 24, 2007 7:00 PM City Council Chambers LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANNING, ZONING, PLATTING, AND LAND USE REVIEW OF REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS DISCUSSION OF PREVIOUS MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of the City of Colleyville was called to order by Chairman Byerly on September 24, 2007 at 7:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Larry Knox, Dave Dudziak, Scott Redfearn, David Phelps, Denis Duffy, Jeff Byerly Absent: Commissioner Mary Taylor Staff Present: Ron Ruthven, Chris Fuller, Jeremy Hutt, Rob McKeown and Amy Shelley 3. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Commissioner Dudziak. 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Duffy moved to approve the September 10, 2007 meeting minutes as written. Commissioner Phelps seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 -Knox, Dudziak, Redfearn, Phelps, Duffy, Byerly Absent: 1 -Taylor City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None 7. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 7a Approval of a replat for Lot 3R1 - 3R4, Block 2 of the Riverwalk at Colleyville Addition being Lot 3, Block 2 of the Riverwalk at Colleyville Addition located at 1128 Glade Road, Case P-07-047 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. Larry Stewart, the applicant, came forward to present the case and brief the Commissioners. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:16 p.m. Commissioner Dudziak moved to approve case P-07-047. Commissioner Redfearn seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 -Knox, Dudziak, Redfearn, Phelps, Duffy, Byerly Absent: 1 -Taylor 7b Approval of a request for a zoning change from CC1-Village Retail to PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial on Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 of the Thompson Terrace Addition located at 5101-5105 Colleyville Boulevard, Case Z-07-025 Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding what is the use of the concrete wall on the property? Ron Ruthven stated the concrete wall has no current use, a wall with a gate, enough to park a vehicle behind the gate. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding the traffic demands generated for an in house seating facility, what is the estimate of traffic for this facility? Ron Ruthven stated those are estimates for facilities with no in house seating. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Evans and Christy Shaw, the applicants, came forward to present the case and brief the Commissioners. Trip Buchwald, the property owner, City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 came forward as well. Mrs. Shaw stated they do not have any seating area planned at this time and questioned staff regarding the number of parking spaces required? Ron Ruthven replied three would be required. Mrs. Shaw stated she could meet that requirement. Mrs. Shaw questioned staff if they would like her to remove the brick wall? Ron Ruthven replied staff has concerns regarding the setback off of SH26 and the building was closer than 40 feet from the right of way of the street. He stated if the wall were to be removed, the building could be moved further back from the street. Mr. Shaw explained the traffic queuing for the facility and stated there would not be more than three cars stacked at one time on either side of the building. He stated the parking spaces could be re-designed to meet the required parking. Mr. Buchwald stated he has looked for a lot of opportunities for this property but has been unsuccessful, therefore he stated he supports this proposal. Commissioner Duffy stated from a safety point of view, the building needs to be moved further back from SH26 and parallels it to SH26, to be able to get the traffic out of the way. He stated the wall could come down and the facility could be moved back. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Buchwald regarding if TxDot had been contacted regarding the two entrances? Mr. Buchwald stated TxDot would allow a second ingress/egress if he were to pay for it. Commissioner Duffy questioned what are the distances between the two ingress/egress entrances? Mr. Buchwald replied not knowing exactly. He stated there will not be left turn from SH26 in the north entrance because of the turning lane. Commissioner Dudziak questioned the applicant regarding the additional seating to be added? He stated that may require amending the PUD. Mrs. Shaw stated a possible seating area to the back of the property that would not require any additional structures. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mrs. Shaw if the shaded areas represent the brick wall? Mrs. Shaw stated the dotted lines represent the concrete wall. Commissioner Phelps questioned Mrs. Shaw regarding what are the shaded areas on the drawing representing? Mrs. Shaw replied she thought it was three parking spaces, but it appears that it may be the handicap space. Commissioner Phelps stated having concerns for the queuing of traffic with regards to the placement of the building. He stated not being able to support the request with the placement of the building. City of Colleyville Page 3 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 Commissioner Redfearn questioned Mr. Buchwald regarding what options have been considered for this property? Mr. Buchwald stated when he purchased the property; there was a special use permit on the property to allow for car sales, which has now expired. Commissioner Redfearn questioned Mrs. Shaw regarding what are the differences between the existing zoning and the zoning that is being requested. Mrs. Shaw replied the setback, minimum square footage of property and the CC1 current zoning does not allow for a drive through, therefore, staff suggested to come forward and request PUDC zoning. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:31 p.m. Commissioner Duffy stated the site plan is lacking the requirements for the PUD zoning. He stated the setbacks are not proper, parking or open space. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff regarding if it would be possible to put a building on this property given the setbacks that are on the property and allow queuing off of SH26? Ron Ruthven replied by removing the wall, the building could then be moved back further to create more room on the lot for parking and traffic movement. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if the building is moved back, will they meet the 40 foot requirement in the CC1 zoning district? Ron Ruthven concurred. Commissioner Redfearn stated the CC1 zoning district does not allow for a drive through service. Commissioner Dudziak questioned if there is a certain size requirement for the building in this zoning district? Ron Ruthven replied there is no minimum building size requirement in the CC1 zoning district. He stated as long as the building meets the building code requirements. Commissioner Phelps questioned what is the portion of the easement that is jutting into the proposed at the north end, the proposed right of way? Ron Ruthven replied the creek runs through that area, from north to south, but he stated not being able to speak for SH26, but that may be to accommodate drainage for the creek. Commissioner Phelps stated he concurred with Commissioner Duffy and stated this PUDC is not ready. He stated some realignments could be made so that the traffic queuing could be accommodated. He stated this design appears to need a lot of work as presented. City of Colleyville Page 4 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 Commissioner Byerly questioned the applicant if the design could be reconfigured to be able to meet the requirements of the setback and queuing? Mr. Shaw replied they could do some reconfiguring. Mrs. Shaw questioned the Commission if they could have a 35 foot setback instead of the 40 foot setback that is required? Commissioner Byerly stated if a new plan is submitted showing the setback, the Commission can consider that request at that time. Mrs. Shaw questioned staff regarding the queuing of traffic, how many vehicles need to be shown? Ron Ruthven stated the three cars on the south side and the movement of traffic on the site plan needs to be updated to satisfy the Engineering Department as far as queuing off of SH26. Commissioner Redfearn stated instead of having the traffic heading into each other on the property, to have two lanes that are feeding in the same direction as a safer option. He stated if the creek could be placed on the drawing to show how far back the building can be placed would help the Commissioners to decide if the placement of the building has accommodated the alignment of the creek. Commissioner Duffy stated the applicants need to go back and resubmit with the required documents. Commissioner Byerly concurred with Commissioner Duffy. Commissioner Byerly ,moved to continue to the October 8th, 2007 meeting case Z-07-025. Commissioner Knox seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 -Knox, Dudziak, Redfearn, Phelps, Duffy, Byerly Absent: 1 -Taylor 7c Approval of a request for a zoning change from R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential on 1.5 acres on Tract 2F02, Abstract 1692 of the Joseph White Survey located at 6101 Hunter Lane, Case Z-07-032 Commissioner Byerly recused himself from this agenda item and Commissioner Duffy chaired the meeting. Ron Ruthven presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if the letters in opposition have to fall within the 200 feet? Ron Ruthven replied correct, for the City of Colleyville Page 5 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 opposition to count in the opposition calculation. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if all of the signatures on the petition were within 200 feet? Ron Ruthven replied no, not all 36. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding how was the percentage of opposition calculated? Ron Ruthven replied the 54% is the responses from the property owners that were actually notified within 200 feet. The petition has many signatures that do not live within 200 feet of the request. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding if a signature on a petition, the opposition is formally expressed in that position? Ron Ruthven replied if they do live within 200 feet of the notification and they have signed that petition, that is their official opposition to the request and that property is counted toward the opposition with 200 feet. City Attorney Kallas concurred with staff. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding if the 54% is in question for when the request moves forward to City Council for a supermajority vote? Ron Ruthven concurred. Commissioner Duffy opened the public hearing at 7:47 p.m. C.L. Madden, 6112 Hunter Lane, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request and stated every time he has come forward to rezone his property he has always been told to rezone to R40. Dean Decavitte, the applicant, came forward to present the case and brief the Commissioners. Lisa Pipe, 6117 Hunter Lane, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request and stated having concerns for drainage and traffic. Twyla Kerlee, 800 Shelton Drive, stated the R20 zoning on Hunter Lane was an exception made by the Council over 25 years ago. She stated having concerns for drainage. She stated the Commission should consider R30 with an exception. Wade Evans, 800 Shelton Drive, stated there are still drainage and plumbing problems and stated being in favor of a R30 zoning request. Charles Huggins, 700 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request and stated the property should stay R40. Jason Elms, 801 Shelton Drive, stated there are drainage issues on Hunter Lane and spoke in opposition to the rezoning request. Bob McGregor, 6115 Hunter Lane, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request City of Colleyville Page 6 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 Chris Combs, 6106 Hunter Lane, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request and stated the Commission should consider R40. Mohanchand Koduri, 6104 Hunter Lane, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request. Bill Lothrop, 609 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request and stated there are issues concerning drainage on Hunter Lane. Fred Rice, 6103 Hunter Lane, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request and stated there are issues concerning drainage on Hunter Lane. Bill Stephens, 612 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request and stated there are issues concerning drainage on Hunter Lane, as well as the sewer still backs up on Shelton. He stated he would like to keep the R40 zoning. Dinah Stephens, 612 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request. Teri Workman, 6001 Hunter Lane, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:24 p.m. Mr. Decavitte came forward to address the concerns of the neighbors and stated having the utmost concern for neighbors. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding a topo map for the area? Ron Ruthven replied not having one available immediately. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding a larger aerial map? Ron Ruthven replied not having one available immediately. Commissioner Dudziak questioned for clarity, the Commission could not approve anything below R30? Ron Ruthven concurred and stated anything below R20 would have to be a PUD request. Commissioner Dudziak stated if a PUD were to be requested open space would be required as well as other amenities that would make this an extremely financially prohibited. Ron Ruthven concurred and stated flag lots are prohibited. Commissioner Dudziak stated what is being proposed is the only layout that could occur. He stated there are other lots on Hunter Lane that are one acre and could be subdivided if presented to the Commission. He stated overall, these lots are sizeable and would add to the community of Colleyville. He stated the applicant's intentions are to City of Colleyville Page 7 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 build good size homes for the lots. He stated it would be good for Colleyville and good for Hunter Lane. Commissioner Redfearn stated being sensitive to the neighbors and stated he would be willing to lock in a R30 zoning request with a waiver request for the frontage requirement. City Attorney Kallas stated the applicant would have to come back at another meeting and request another zoning change with relief to the lot width requirement. Commissioner Duffy questioned City Attorney Kallas regarding the applicant does not meet the R30 frontage requirements, therefore, the Commission could not grant him R30 unless he were to reapply? City Attorney Kallas replied he can go to a less intense zoning district but because this is a straight zoning request, the Commission is locked into the zoning district requirements. He stated a motion for R30 could be made; however, the frontage would have to comply. Ron Ruthven replied as currently proposed, the R20 zoning district requires a 100 lot width and R30 would be 125 feet. He stated the applicant is requesting R20 because the request meets all of the R20 requirements. Commissioner Knox stated the applicant could put in an east/west street, at his expense, with three lots. Ron Ruthven replied yes he would meet the minimum lot width and depth requirements, however, the street would have to have an approved cul-de-sac for the fire truck to turn around. Commissioner Dudziak stated if the fire truck can not turn around; the applicant will not be able to build the cul-de-sac. Commissioner Phelps stated being opposed to rezoning this property to R20 to split the lot. He stated it establishes a new standard for the area as opposed to an exception. He stated if the R20 were to be approved, then there could be others coming forward to rezone to R20. He stated this is one of those areas of Colleyville that can be preserved. He stated there may be some alternatives, but not R20. Commissioner Redfearn concurred with no to R20. Commissioner Knox moved to deny case Z-07-032. Commissioner Phelps seconded. Commissioner Dudziak stated a 6,000 or 7,000 square foot home could be built on that lot. City of Colleyville Page 8 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 -Knox, Dudziak, Redfearn, Phelps, Duffy Absent: 1 -Taylor Abstain: 1 -Byerly 8. TABLED AGENDA ITEMS ga Approval of a zoning change from AG-Agricultural to PUDR-Planned Unit Development Residential on 108.5 acres out of the Elizabeth Cox Survey, John H. Havens Survey and the Jesse Doss Survey located in the 4900 block of Heritage Avenue, Case Z-07-008 The Planning and Zoning Commission recessed at 8:40 p.m. for a break. The Planning and Zoning Commission reconvened at 8:54 p.m. Commissioner Byerly explained that the two tabled items would be discussed at the same time, however, there would be separate votes made for each item. Commissioner Redfearn made a motion to remove cases Z-07-008 and G-07-016 from the tabled items. Commissioner Knox seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 -Knox, Dudziak, Redfearn, Phelps, Duffy, Byerly Absent: 1 -Taylor Ron Ruthven presented the update and briefed the Commission. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding the southern end of the development, to confirm, the right of way and road planning issues override the PUD language in the ordinances. Ron Ruthven replied the Master Thoroughfare would override the PUD requirements where in conflict. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff if there are two lanes being discussed for Heritage Lane? Ron Ruthven replied the Master Thoroughfare requires four lanes; however, the Commission can amend Heritage Avenue to two lanes. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff if the Commission could recommend Heritage Avenue to be two lanes with 80 feet of right of way? Ron Ruthven concurred. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. Buddy Shephard, the applicant, came forward to present the update and brief the Commission. City of Colleyville Page 9 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Shephard regarding the number of homes on the southern part of the northern section; there are 16 homes on that cul-de-sac which exceeds the Land Development Code requirements. Mr. Shephard replied it does exceed the Development Code, however, he stated there is another portion of the code that states if a bigger turn around is provided at the end of the street then that number can be exceeded. Chris Fuller replied the Land Development Code states that the cul-de-sac length shall be 1600 feet of right of way and 31 feet of pavement, however, if the maximum cul-de-sac length is 1200 feet with 56 feet of right of way and 36 foot pavement section. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff if the number of homes on the cul-de-sac can exceed or just the length of the cul-de-sac? Chris Fuller replied the maximum number of single family residents is 12; therefore the length of the cul-de-sac does not change the maximum number of lots. Mr. Shephard stated he could stick out another street to Heritage Avenue to solve that issue. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Shephard regarding if he would rather do another street or would he rather have a waiver request for the number of lots on the cul-de-sac if fire sprinklers are in the homes on the cul-de-sac? Mr. Shephard replied he would prefer to stick out a street. Commissioner Byerly stated on the south end the number exceeds the requirements as well. Mr. Shephard replied they could put in another street down there as well and meet those requirements. Commissioner Duffy stated everything should be put in the ordinance that the Commission wants to have and not leave what could be done for the City Council to decide. Commissioner Redfearn questioned Mr. Shephard regarding the stub out street on Winewood Place, is it still the intention to stub this street out and use a gate? Mr. Shephard replied that not being his intention. He stated he showed a connection to that street; however, the residents do not want it connected. He stated he told the residents it was the City's decision to connect the street. Commissioner Phelps stated there was a desire for a request for a waiver of the tree survey. He stated the waiver stated instead of replacing existing trees, to put some language in that said, so many trees per lot, etc. He stated the request for the waiver is still there but there is not language that suggests any alternatives. Mr. Shephard stated he felt like that to be a platting issue not a land uses issue and he stated he felt doing it exactly as the tree ordinance reads does not accomplish the goal. He stated he can preserve the elm trees out there but they are going to die soon. He stated the alternative should be to do City of Colleyville Page 10 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 something that works 100% that actually beautifies it other than placing post oak trees that will die 30 minutes after the streets are cut or the house pads are built. He stated if there were some number of caliper inches for interior lots, corner lots, and entry ways and so forth, it would serve the development and the City much better. He stated something different should be considered other than what is written in the book. Commissioner Phelps stated he understood, but he did not see anything from Mr. Shephard regarding a potential number of inches he would prefer. Mr. Shephard stated it would be appropriate to have 12 caliper inches consisting of 3 trees, 4 inches in diameter on the interior lots, and 15 caliper inches on the corner lots and 15 caliper inches on the entrance or entry way lots or 100; just a number that is actually based upon something done by a landscape architect that knows what he is doing instead of him guessing. John Gray, 3300 Pembrooke Parkway South, spoke on behalf of the Woodland Hills Homeowners Association and stated they are in favor of the rezoning request and stated being in support of Heritage Avenue to remain as a two lane roadway. Rick Miller, 3605 Wexford Court, spoke on behalf of the Prestwick Park Homeowners Association and stated they have worked with Mr. Shephard to have a 30 foot setback and he stated that would be an option for Mr. Shephard. Mr. Miller stated there were recommendations made at the workshop regarding reducing the setback. He stated being opposed to reducing the setback. He stated he would support the subdivision with the approval of the 30 foot setback by making an exception to the 80 foot easement. Doug Baron, 3402 Cambridge Court, presented a power point presentation. Robert Bruton, 3303 Middleton Way, spoke in opposition to closing Heritage Avenue and questioned who would maintain it if it were to close? Gary Malone, 4605 & 4609 Winewood Court spoke in favor of the rezoning request and stated they are in favor of the 30 foot setback between the developments. Phil Kelly, 2808 Sherwood Lane, stated some concerns with the closing of Heritage Avenue. Bill Barnard, 3613 Wexford Court, stated having concerns with the 30 foot setback being reduced and the possibility of having a two story home in his back yard. He stated the tree preservation regulations should be met. City of Colleyville Page 11 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 Chris Hall, 4916 Prestwick Drive, stated there should be an easement between the two developments to enhance the new and existing developments. He stated being concerned with what will happen to Heritage Avenue and what will be happening on the Euless side. David Dowdy, 3601 Winewood Place, spoke in favor of the rezoning request but not in favor of closing Heritage Avenue. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 9:49 p.m. Mr. Shephard came forward to address the concerns of the neighbors. Commissioner Byerly stated the Commission should consider the amendment to the Master Thoroughfare first. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding the County easement. Chris Fuller stated the request before the Commission is to consider amending the Master Thoroughfare Plan with regards to the physical classification of what the road way might be. Chris Fuller stated he would have to defer the County issue to the City Attorney. City Attorney Kallas stated the Commission has the ability to take action on these items tonight. As far as the effect of the County easement, that is something to be addressed later. The vote and discussion, after the vote, for case G-07-016 has been attached in the minutes for item 8b. Commissioner Duffy questioned the Fire Marshal regarding the stub out on Winewood Place? Fire Marshal McKeown replied not being in support of gating the stub out, he stated he would prefer that to be a through street. Commissioner Byerly questioned Marshal McKeown if the Commission were to gate that, what kind of recommendation would you have? Marshal McKeown replied if it is an emergency access gate it should meet the Land Development Code regulations with an Opticom that the Fire Department could operate from either direction with a Knox key override and a power failure backup. Commissioner Phelps questioned Marshal McKeown regarding if there is any history regarding servicing the existing neighborhood? Marshal McKeown replied there was a gas in that area about two weeks ago in which the Fire Department had to block off both entrances to Prestwick Park and the residents were not happy about blocking them in. City of Colleyville Page 12 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 Commissioner Phelps stated the rear building line is consistently referred to as 10 feet, but the developer has stated 30 feet therefore the language would need to be amended to address that specific issue on the western lots. Commissioner Phelps questioned staff regarding if the tree preservation regulations are specific to lot or some other area within the development? Chris Fuller replied if the applicant removes trees on one specific lot, he could replace them anywhere on the site that would accommodate them. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding if the applicant removes five 30 inch caliper trees, does he have to replace 150 caliper inches, not just five trees? Chris Fuller replied the applicant has to replace them with a minimum of three inch caliper trees. He stated the applicant may replace them with higher caliper inch trees. Commissioner Duffy stated he could use 50, three inch caliper trees. Chris Fuller concurred and stated 150 inches to be replaced with a minimum of a 3 inch caliper tree. Chris Fuller replied the applicant did not provide staff with a proposal for staff to review so any discussion of a tree waiver, staff will have no insight upon. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if the applicant has requested a waiver from the tree survey but not from tree mitigation? Chris Fuller replied that would need to be specified with the developer. Commissioner Byerly stated that is what he is reading by the draft ordinance. Chris Fuller stated as the applicant has not given a proposal, staff omitted it from the ordinance, there was nothing to include. Commissioner Byerly stated as the draft ordinance is written, a tree survey is required. Chris Fuller stated in accorrdinance with the Land Development Code. He stated the Planning and Zoning Commission is the relief Board for tree mitigation. He stated if it is not addressed with the zoning, the applicant will have to come back to the Planning and Zoning Commission with the waiver request. Commissioner Byerly stated a tree waiver can not be granted without a tree survey at some point. Chris Fuller replied since a tree survey has not been provided, staff can not give any insight to that. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if a tree survey will be done? Chris Fuller replied as of right now, there is no waiver for that. Commissioner Phelps stated to staff that a tree waiver has been requested. Chris Fuller stated he requested a waiver but did not provide a proposal. Commissioner Dudziak stated he did not understand "request" as opposed to "did not supply". Chris Fuller stated the applicant requested City of Col/eyville Page 13 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 a waiver in the Development Review comments but then came forward with no materials supporting that waiver; therefore staff did not include that in the ordinance. Commissioner Duffy moved to approve case Z-07-008 with the following amendments: the fire stub to the Prestwick Park development be constructed during this development and constructed per the Land Development Code with a per code gate on it; the tree preservation survey submitted as per the Land Development Code; the cul-de-sac number of homes as per the Land Development Code. Commissioner Byerly seconded. Commissioner Knox stated a friendly amended with a 30 foot setback on the western boundary of the development, if not that five foot buffer and a 25 foot setback. Commissioner Duffy stated he did not concur with the amendment. He stated if Mr. Shephard wants to give those neighbors adjacent to his development 30 feet, then that is his right to do so, however it is not required. Commissioner Byerly seconded Commissioner Duffy's motion. Commissioner Dudziak stated some language needs to be included that clarifies that the Commission is not waiving parts of the Land Development Code at this time. Commissioner Byerly made a motion for a friendly amendment that the site plan be amended to conform to the Master Thoroughfare Plan and to including access from Heritage Avenue to Glade Road on the southeast corner reflecting the Euless side property. Commissioner Duffy accepted the amendment. Commissioner Byerly stated that any provision that is not expressly waived by the draft ordinance is per the Land Development Code. City Attorney Kallas is waived by the written sections of the ordinance because the site plan is attached to the ordinance. He stated unless written in the text of the ordinance the Code of Ordinances shall apply. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Commissioner Byerly regarding if a wavier is being granted for the number of lots on the cul-de-sac, should there be a street stubbed out to reduce the cul-de-sac. Commissioner Byerly stated a waiver is not being granted by the site plan showing a number of lots on the cul-de-sac exceeding the Land Development Code. Commissioner Phelps stated the word "conceptual" is referring to the site plan might tend to lend a little more weight to its position to the Commission or lack of standing. City of Colleyville Page 14 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 City Attorney Kallas stated to Commissioner Dudziak the requirement is to abide by the cul-de-sac regulations, if a specific street access were to be stubbed, there needs to be an amendment to the motion. Commissioner Phelps stated on the south end of the development where the existing Heritage Avenue curves into Cheek Sparger, there is only one entrance to that portion, with access really close to Heritage Avenue. He stated a second entrance needs to be provided further north on the straight portion of Heritage Avenue so that the entrance is not so close to Cheek Sparger. Chris Fuller replied for the Commission to be as specific as possible on any amendments or conditions to the ordinance. City Attorney Kallas recapped and stated that the southern most portion of the development shall have two entrances along Cheek Sparger and or Heritage Avenue. Commissioner Byerly and Commissioner Duffy both accepted Commissioner Phelps amendment to the motion. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if the parkland will be assumed by the developer? Chris Fuller replied that would be privately owned. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if there would be any potential way for the City to gather or to obtain that land at a future date unless they were to sell it to the City. Chris Fuller concurred. Commissioner Dudziak stated there are legal structures that land can be put into that is easier for the City to obtain that enables Texas Parks and Wildlife grounds to be dedicated to and whether there may need to be something in the ordinance to reflect, should there be some room to allow for this? City Attorney Kallas stated that would be a decision for City Council not for the Planning and Zoning Commission. Commissioner Byerly summarized the motion. Commissioner Duffy moved to approve case Z-07-008 with the following conditions: the fire stub-out on Winewood Place is to be constructed per the Land Development Code regarding emergency access gates; the tree preservation survey per the Land Development Code; adhere to the requirements of the Land Development Code regarding the number of homes allowed on a cul-de-sac; amend the site plan to conform to the Master Thoroughfare Plan including access from Heritage Avenue to Glade Road on the southeast side; there shall be no provision of the Land Development Code granted unless a waiver has been stated in writing in the PUD ordinance for this development; there shall be two entrances to the southern section located either on Cheek Sparger Road or Heritage Avenue. Commissioner Byerly seconded. City of Co/leyville Page 15 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 Commissioner Dudziak questioned if the two southern portions are mentioned is the developer only able to put one in the northern section. Commissioner Byerly stated the northern portion would be per the site plan. He stated this is to clarify the Euless portion. Commissioner Dudziak stated not being comfortable with passing an ordinance with a tremendous amount of wiggle room and not seeing the requirements that have been outlined. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 -Knox, Dudziak, Redfearn, Phelps, Duffy, Byerly Absent: 1 -Taylor gb Consider an amendment to the Master Thoroughfare Plan to remove Heritage Avenue from Glade Road to Cheek Sparger Road, Case G-07-016 See item 8a for the discussion of this item. Commissioner Duffy moved to amend case G-07-016 to show Heritage Avenue as a two lane road with an 80 foot right of way. Commissioner Byerly seconded. Commissioner Redfearn questioned staff regarding in the Master Thoroughfare Plan, roads are either present or not, and they are designated as two lane or four lane or otherwise. He questioned staff if the roadways are designated with right of ways as well? Chris Fuller replied they are designated with the right of way, correct. Commissioner Redfearn questioned staff if the Master Thoroughfare stipulates design? Chris Fuller replied it does, whether it be divided or undivided, two lanes, four lanes. Commissioner Redfearn questioned staff if every roadway has those elements stipulated? Chris Fuller replied correct. Commissioner Redfearn questioned for the two lane roads that are in the Master Thoroughfare Plan, do they have consistent right of way dedications associated with them, or do they vary? Chris Fuller replied they vary. Commissioner Phelps stated the 80 foot right of way creates a great buffer between the two developments. Commissioner Dudziak stated being in favor of the 80 foot right of way to be able to create a four lane road for the future. Commissioner Byerly stated he opposed the four lane road, but does City of Colleyvil/e Page 16 Printed on 9/28/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes -Draft September 24, 2007 support the 80 foot right of way. Commissioner Redfearn stated he supports the 80 foot of right of way. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 -Knox, Dudziak, Redfearn, Phelps, Duffy, Byerly Absent: 1 -Taylor 9. STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS Chris Fuller reminded the Commissioners about the workshop that is scheduled for Wednesday, October 3, 2007 at 6:30 p.m. 10. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS Commissioner Dudziak stated he would like to see the amendments made to motions in the votes. Commissioner Byerly stated those are typically in the minutes. City Attorney Kallas stated the conditions are stated in the ordinance. Commissioner Dudziak stated he would like staff to address those drainages issues that are occuring on Hunter Lane and Shelton Drive. He stated he would like city staff available on public record to address those issues. 11. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 10:29 p.m. I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Friday, September 21, 2007 by 5:00 p.m. Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant City of Colleyville Page 17 Printed on 9/28/2007 ~;~•<„ ~~ City of Colleyville ColleyvilleaTexas76034 (817) 503-1000 '" ~ Agenda Briefing www•colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Commision Action Items Version: 1 Requester: Community Development Department Agenda Date: 10/08/2007 Agenda No.: 10a Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Final Action: File Name: Approval of Preliminary Plat for the Villas of Colleyville Addition located at 931-1013 McDonwell School Road and 1100 Lavaca Trail, Case P-07-048 Attachments: Location and Zoning Map Development Review Committee Memo Applicant's Response • Preliminary Plat History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: 1 10/08/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Approval of Preliminary Plat for the Villas of Colleyville Addition located at 931-1013 McDonwell School Road and 1100 Lavaca Trail, Case P-07-048 Explanation John Fegan is the developer of 19.56 acres of land located just east of Precinct Line Road between McDonwell School Road and Lavaca Trail. The developer has submitted a preliminary plat, which will subdivide the property into 67 residential lots and five (5) open space lots, for the construction of single family residential detached dwelling units. The following is an analysis of the issues associated with this preliminary plat. Zoning. The property is currently zoned PUDR-Planned Unit Development Residential zoning district. A rezoning request for PUDR was approved on August 21, 2007 under ordinance 0-07-1627. The zoning requirements stated in ordinance 0-07-1627 includes single family detached residential as the primary use with a maximum density of 3.2 dwelling units per acre. The minimum lot size allowed is 6,655 square feet, the minimum lot depth is 115 feet and the minimum lot width is 59 feet. A minimum of 21 % of the total development is required to be used as open space, which includes a 35 foot wide greenbelt required along the common property line with the Rosewood Villas Addition on the east side of the development and Liberty Elementary School on the west side. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 10/5/2007 A enda Briefin Continued The preliminary plat meets the zoning requirements of ordinance 0-07-1627. Access. All streets within the proposed development will be private with gates located at each entrance from Lavaca Trail and McDonwell School Road. The gates will be constructed according to the requirements of the Land Development Code. Sidewalks and Trails. Sidewalks, four feet in width, are required to be constructed along all streets within the development at the time the building permit is issued. The sidewalk along Lavaca Trail must be a minimum of four feet in width. No trail is required along McDonwell School Road as an existing ten (10) foot trail already exists. Drainage. The developer has submitted a preliminary drainage analysis of the site, which has been reviewed and accepted by the Engineering Department. According to the drainage analysis, the development will provide on-site detention. Details of the proposed drainage system and storm water detention pond will be submitted as part of the final plat application. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required since McDonwell School Road and Lavaca Trail are considered unimproved streets and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The perimeter street improvement fee is based on the projected roadway impact of the proposed development and the amount of frontage along a public roadway. Tree Preservation. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around the dripline of all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are required in the amount of $1,802 per residential lot for the 67 lots where new homes are proposed. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of final plat. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's office. Summary. The proposed development satisfies the requirements of the PUDR ordinance for the property and the Land Development Code. Since the plat contains more than four lots, the preliminary plat requires additional approval by City Council. Recommendation Approval City of Colleyville Page 2 Pnnrea on wi~tvvi Location and Zoning Map CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE September 18, 2007 TO JOHN FEGAN FAX NO 817.282.1444 FROM Ron Ruthven, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-07-048 Villas of Colleyville Preliminary Plat The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. The following zoning related items require correction: ^ The zoning on the property requires 21 % open space. According to the plat only 20.49% is provided. ^ The zoning on the property requires a minimum lot size of 6,655 square feet. Lot 6, Block 1 is 6,568 square feet. ^ The zoning on the property requires a minimum lot width of 59 feet. Lot 8, Block 1 shows a lot width of 56.28 feet. Change the lot configuration in order to comply with the minimum zoning requirements stated above. 2. A $700.00 private street permit fee must be paid prior to the filing of the final plat. 3. All gates must meet the minimum standards of the Land Development Code. 4. Remove all signature blocks from the plat. 5. With regard to the construction of the "Welcome to Colleyville" sign, aCity/Developer Agreement must be completed prior to the final plat being filed. 6. Provide a sign easement on the plat where the "Welcome to Colleyville" sign will be placed and ensure that access will be granted to the sign to allow for general maintenance. 100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 81 7.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-07-048 VILLAS OF COLLEYVILLE PRELIMINARY PLAT 7. Note the 15 foot front building line across all lots. 8. Verify all connections with existing utilities and placement of new utilities with the Public Works Department. Contact Mike Tekaucic, Utility Supervisor at (817)540-0609 for more information. In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. Perimeter street improvements are required for the newly created lots since McDonwell School Road and Lavaca Trail are considered unimproved streets. The developer's portion of the costs for infrastructure improvements may not exceed the amount that is roughly proportionate to the projected impact of the proposed development, as determined by a professional engineer, licensed in the State of Texas, and who is retained by the City of Colleyville. In making the rough proportionality determination, consideration shall be given to the availability of adequate and minimum levels of public facilities and accessibility to the site for the delivery of emergency services. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. As new vacant lots would be created by the plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. SIDEWALKS/TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on all public streets. The sidewalks internal to the development and along Lavaca Trail must be a minimum of four (4) feet in width and installed when any new structures are built on the property. The sidewalks along McDonwell School Road must be a minimum of five (5) feet in width. TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of--way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of--way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by aCity-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $2,187 for a SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING unit. WATER $2,491 fora 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. SEWER $643 fora 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-07-048 VILLAS OF COLLEYVILLE PRELIMINARY PLAT TENTATIVE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: Monday, October 8, 2007, 7:00 p.m. City Council: Tuesday, November 6, 2007, 7:30 p.m. Please submit the following to our offices: ^ A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived; ^ 10 full size copies of the revised exhibit; ^ 1 reduced copy (8.5x11) of the exhibit. The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Monday, October 1, 2007, in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at ruthvenr~cr~ci.colleyville.tx.us or 817.503.1055 if you have any questions. PAGE 3 OF 3 i ~a D e ~._J 0 ~ En ineerin & Surve ing Balyd, Hampton ~ Brown, Inc. 9 9 Y October 1, 2007 Mr. Ron Ruthven Development Coordinator City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, TX 76034 RE: Response to Preliminary Plat Review Comments -Villas of Colleyville - P-07-048 Mr. Ruthven, Enclosed is the revised preliminary plat for Villas of Colleyville. In response to the review comments dated September 18, 2007, we offer the following: 1 a. The zoning on the property requires 21 % open space. According to the plat only 20.49% is provided. The lot configuration has been revised to meet the minimum lot size criteria. Under the revised lot configuration, the provided open space is 179,675 square feet, or 21.08%. lb. The zoning on the property requires a minimum lot size of 6,6SS square feet. Lot 6, Block 1 is 6,568 square feet. The lot configuration has been revised to meet the minimum lot size criteria. lc. The zoning on the property requires a minimum lot width of 59 feet. Lot 8, Block 1 shows a lot width of 56.28 feet. The width of Lot 8, Block 1 has been verified. Please note the angle point in the rear lot line. The total width of the lot is 59 feet. 2. A $700.00 private street permit fee must be paid prior to the filing of the final plat. We acknowledge that a private street fee must be paid prior to filing the fmal plat. 3. All gates must meet the minimum standards of the Land Development Code. We acknowledge that all gates must meet the standards in the City of Colleyville Land Development Code. 4. Remove all signature blocks from the plat. All signature blocks have been removed from the preliminary plat as requested. S. With regard to the construction of the "Welcome to Colleyville" sign, a Ciry/Developer Agreement must be completed prior to the final plat being filed. We acknowledge that aCity/Developer Agreement regarding the "Welcome to Colleyville" sign must be completed prior to filing of the final plat. ~~ IVED 920 South Main Street, Old Main Place Suite 190, Grapevine, Texas 76051, www.bhbinc.com Main: 817-338-1277, Office: 817-251-8550, Fax: 817-251-8810, Email: mail@bhbinc.com Per ............. r 6. Provide a sign easement on the plat where the "Welcome to Colleyville "sign will be placed and ensure that access will be granted to the sign to allow for general maintenance. A sign easement has been provided at the northwest comer of the site, as shown on the plat. Note the 1 S foot front building line across all lots. The IS' building line has been labeled across all lots. 8. Yer~ all connections with existing utilities and placement of new utilities with the Public Works Department. Contact Mike Tekaucic, Utility Supervisor at (817)540-0609 for more information. Mike Tekaucic indicated that a note should be added to the utility plan that calls for the location of existing water valves to be field verified. This note will be included in the final construction documents. In addition, we acknowledge the informational comments regarding perimeter street improvements, parkland dedication fees, sidewalk/trails, tree preservation and impact fees listed in the review comments. Please contact us with any further questions. Thank you, Baird, Hampton and Brown, Inc. Joanna Kepler, E.I.T. Graduate Engineer Enclosures: Preliminary Plat - 10 copies Preliminary Plat (reduced 8.5"x11") - 1 copy CC: John Fegan - Villas of Colleyville, LLC File 920 South Main Street, Ste 190, Grapevine, Texas 76051, Tel 817-251-8550, Fax 817-251-8810, mailQbhbinc.com ~1 I ~1110H E ~ y 95 !'~ [,i 1 HIB PE1DH[, P 9~' rr ,m / 1~lOX ~q1 MYL • 0%1 ON• Ap (~? • TL0 P vm w vm a va] e reeF~l[lON ~Q1 FAL~'V~9 9•l.0~• vor „ p,f. V0~ VOI. R'xT'V B • P ~y. , FIVi y0~. P N [ G. f~ r0. ee~0.e es~7M +wr r OI.T GI. r] .~r o,. ler ~,. ~ x u•se~9s• T x u•se•m• T X ee~ vor u ' ~ _ ~, 4 + c = 1 . l ~fer ~~~~~ ~ 1~{l I w 1 im i „~~ .. II e - e I13 t ~ 1 ~m> a I ' ' e !o~ !~ rn 1 DoT. 1~ .. f I • .e oM. .A.~ ~ ' RP ; . . . ~. ,. , 'I r.•~ . I ~ .1F. 1 ~ I . ~R 'J':5. I i • "~~~ # ~ e , I .er. . , p 09 D i i ~ ' " mPrp ~ , Op i8 a~; { l:<, I i ~ .tl . I ~ .Y:•. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _. v ~ 1' 1 ...~. 1 o, rn°l~o•oo I ..f.e . 1 K l.s~ 810. I ~ r] e i '~ • I I re] e GxB•P pI.G?' I -• e ~ e ~.w 1 ~,•~ ~ ^ 6 .~R •I 1 I p5 i l' ~ ~ , t •f ~~ ' fr ru-. II lore ixe [Oer al . , ~, _ .q .:.: ~ ,er ,e xesal i^ e ; a~.:~1~' a ~ i ssr. , . ~ , ~ ~ , .Ter. I ,~.. ~ ~ eS'r.. i e l . ~ f eel ,m „ ' - -- - i a-- - - I - - I , i i ..T.. T .wer I ~ 1 rt I e-ru ~mm e ••~:. 1 1' TA/IIDT ANL ,~'• • a.,.a .ra:l lw le ' .+.'- ~I r_al~_~ Ir .. ......w,~. .. ~ m . n I I l 155.00 ~ p • ~~ I a j I. R ~ I .IYL'.. e~'n JILS,. JP:'R ex • I IS ""'~.,.,.. I ~ ~ ~e ~ ~ .er,e :~~~~ ,= p 1 ~. • • MeC[ A f Aely • 4 . ~ ~'~ Ai M I . O.eT; - 0. e.. , R ur ,.eew. a •e°55•x0• • f - ~:u. an,..TMtn 50.19' ~ , I ~oeT~xTef•eerrr '4°IrEt ' 1~a I . ~itw .y • i I tm e 1 ~ •R ,:,.~. ,. .ef ~ e4 I y : , 1 ' ~ ~ ; ~ T. , ,01 a SITE '! .N:r. ' I 7t .m a ~ / l~ e + ~ 1 PNw ~~is ~~y~l.~ nx~vr ~~e i ~ 555 ~ ~ vm s ,, .~:.~~, 1., _ .~:. ,, :. ~ ~ ,, .me ,~ ~„~, ~ ~, 1 .TV ... ,, r.~.~..,,,r_. ~~ l~l lfe ~Y•~eE I ~'r`d .Ae ~I~j•• OIEx LreLE;neiSRe 7~W !1Y mlawr.m.s.w. ar M.l R ele v -._. LAMIG 7RAL ~1-____-_-._ e]..e "~'-7~-. eT,.. wo.v,owoo.. ero J~~~Y~~~~.~ + R, per , '°"lm° ~p~M~E~LIMIMM~//M~A~.TO~F/~~ ~ ( ~ + • + _y YYiLi/ IIiLi III,MI ~ x,11. ~1 l~ ~ [~ 100 v~y xvw~ ~r' vrU • .., ^ ~ .. • N. ~ ~. ~ ~ . m tlE1Ntl 11.66 ACNE IN THE . vm , Gp• P~ . , p, VO~• ~ I ~ FI Y McEWIMtrWtltlETA-T1S1 TMMtlT COtlNTT ~/ ....~.....~ .,x.~.M...~ srea, frnome a erorrn, ice. R E C E 1 Y E ~ ~~~ .~' Cln of IwuEnrn~E, TELI: c ~ Q [:~ enox«xxassx.T.T;~ tEriEM1E11.2007 ow0wor r.o>w1 nmee..m nmm.,T,. aw.m v.. e,a. e•0 p05evw WMSOr . . Tel:et]an.ww sv'. HTSe1.Mq 6nf.n.eMiYr..oem , < h i" •ei w~i n~,wT w ~ a.r..e~l~~ eartaew ' - ` ~~ SHEET 1 OF 2 ei~v.~ .c_ ~ 100 Main Street ~ City of Colleyville Coll (8 i~) 03X1000 034 t~j ~~~•~~ Agenda Briefing w~~colleyville.com File Number: Version: 1 Requester: Community Development Department File Type: Case Agenda Date: 10/08/2007 Agenda No.: 11 a Status: Commission Tabled Items Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Final Action: File Name: Approval of a request for a zoning change from CC1-Village Retail to PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial on Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 of the Thompson Terrace Addition located at 5101-5105 Colleyville Boulevard, Case Z-07-025 Attachments: Location and Zoning Map Notification List Statement of Planning Objectives Development Review Committee Memo Applicant's Response Letter for Shared Access • Site Plan Draft Ordinance History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 1 09/24/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission 1 10/08/2007 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Approval of a request for a zoning change from CC1-Village Retail to PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial on Lots 5 and 6, Block 1 of the Thompson Terrace Addition located at 5101-5105 Colleyville Boulevard, Case Z-07-025 Explanation Update The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this item at the September 24, 2007 meeting. The applicant has since submitted a revised site plan. The briefing has been updated based on the changes to the site plan. Christy Shaw submitted a request to change the zoning of 0.3 acres located at 5101 and 5105 Colleyville Boulevard from the CC1-Village Retail zoning district to the PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial zoning district for adrive-thru coffee shop. Statement of Planning Objectives. The developer has provided a written Statement of Planning Objectives, which has been used for drafting the proposed PUDC ordinance for the subject property. The Statement of Planning Objectives describes the nature of the City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 10/5/2007 Agenda Briefing Continued proposed development, includes a development schedule and a statement of development goals. A copy of the Statement of Planning Objectives is attached to this agenda briefing. Platting. The subject property will be required to be replatted upon approval of the rezoning request. The applicant agrees with this requirement. Lot Sizes. The PUDC standards require a minimum lot size of 7,000 square feet with no maximum lot size. Upon a replat of the properties, the property will meet the minimum lot size requirement. Site Plan. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan for consideration by Planning and Zoning Commission. The conceptual site plan shows a 260 square foot building with drive-up service on both sides from two proposed driveway approaches from SH26. The site plan shows the building set back 40 feet from the front property line with the existing 6 foot wall removed to accommodate four (4) parking spaces. Additionally, the property owner has submitted a shared parking agreement allowing parking for the proposed business to park on the adjacent property to the south. The proposed parking meets the minimum requirements of the Land Development Code. The site plan shows that the drive-thru window on the east side of the building will be able to queue as many as 4 vehicles within the property, while the opposite drive-through window can queue as many as 8 or more vehicles. The applicant states that the existing monument sign shown on the site plan, which advertises the insurance office adjacent to the subject property, will be removed upon construction and there are no plans to add a monument sign for the proposed business. Access. One of the two (2) driveways serving the property from SH26 is a proposed shared driveway with the adjacent property to the south, which will require the approval of a mutual-access easement. Driveway approach and spacing requirements along SH26 are enforced by the Texas Department of Transportation and will require their approval. The site plan may require alterations to internal circulation and stacking of traffic if the Texas Department of Transportation does not approve the northernmost driveway. Staff recommends that if a permit for the northernmost driveway on the property cannot be obtained by the Texas Department of Transportation, then an alternate site plan, meeting all the requirements of this ordinance and the Land Development Code, showing the changes to internal traffic circulation and vehicular queuing to the drive-thru windows, be submitted for administrative approval prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Traffic Generation. The developer is not required to provide a Traffic Impact Analysis, since the development is not projected to generate in excess of 1,000 vehicle trips per day. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Drive-through restaurants with no indoor seating are expected to generate 154 trips per day, on average. Additionally, a study performed by the City of Portland, Oregon found that drive-through coffee shops, on average, generate 166 trips per day with the peak traffic generating hour City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 10/5/2007 Agenda eriefing Continued being between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. Open Space. The PUDC regulations require a minimum of 20% open space. According to the revised site plan, this development proposes an open space area equal to 47% of the total development, exceeding the PUDC development requirement by 27%. Additionally, the revised site plan shows a 20 foot landscaped buffer along the front of the property. The applicant states that the area along the rear portion of the property may be used in the future as a garden area with a fountain that will include a seating area for up to eight (8) people. Fences, Walls and Screening. Given that the surrounding properties are commercial, no screening is required according to the Land Development Code. The Land Development Code requires the planting of a minimum of one, three inch caliper tree for every 40 feet of street frontage. Exterior Building Elevations. The applicant has submitted exterior building elevation plans. These plans have been included within the draft PUDC ordinance. Sidewalks. The sidewalk along SH26 must be five (5) feet wide. The sidewalk must be installed when any new structures are built on the property. Drainage. The developer has submitted a preliminary drainage analysis of the site, which has been reviewed and accepted by the Colleyville Engineering Department. Construction plans for drainage improvements will be submitted as part of the platting process. Master Plan. The Colleyville Plan designates this property for future retail use. The proposed zoning designation would be in compliance with the future land use plan. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are a mixture of office and retail uses. The property to the north is zoned CC1-Village Retail and is developed as a multi-tenant office retail building. The property to the west is zoned CC1-Village Retail and is developed as a restaurant. The property to the south is zoned CC1-Village Retail and is developed as an office. Properties to the east are zoned CC1-Village Retail and CN-Neighborhood Commercial and include a vacant lot and an office building. Public Notification. Staff notified 19 property owners within 200 feet of the subject property regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff has received no correspondence regarding this request. Summary. The revised site plan submitted by the applicant has addressed many of the concerns expressed by staff and the Commission. Recommendation Approval, with the conditions stated in the draft ordinance. City of Colleyville Page 3 Printed on 10/5/2007 Location and Zoning Map Notification List OWNE R OWNE NAME OWNER OWNER_ADDR OWNER CITY STATE R ZIP SITUS_ADDR _ Applebee's Of Texas Inc 4551 W 107Th St Ste 100 Shawnee Mission KS 66207 005150 Colleyville Blvd Buchwald, Rudolph W III 1309 Ashford Ct Colleyville TX 76034 005105 Colleyville Blvd Buchwald, Rudolph W III 1309 Ashford Ct Colleyville TX 76034 005101 Colleyville Blvd Buchwald, Rudolph W III 1309 Ashford Ct Colleyville TX 76034 005025 Colleyville Blvd Colleyville, City Of 100 Main St Colleyville TX 76034 005100 Colleyville Blvd Corvette Property Leasing Lp 1908 Stratton Ct Colleyville TX 76034 005017 Colleyville Blvd Freed, Mickey PO Box 130 Colleyville TX 76034 005013 Colleyville Blvd Gibson, Norman C Etux Doris A 113 Timberline St S Colleyville TX 76034 005117 Colleyville Bfvd Mitcham, Carl D & Brian C PO Box 983 Colleyville TX 76034 005121 Thompson Terr Pleasant Run Creek Jv 6301 Colleyville Blvd Colleyville TX 76034 005115 Colleyville Blvd Russell, Betty Ruth 5025 Thompson Ter Colleyville TX 76034 005025 Thompson Terr Sides, Joseph D 2911 Compton Rd Nashville TN 37215 005113 Thompson Terr Sides, Joseph D 2911 Compton Rd Nashville TN 37215 000000 Thompson Terr Sides, Joseph D 2911 Compton Rd Nashville TN 37215 005109 Thompson Terr Tanner, Jon Donovan 1908 Stratton Ct Colleyville TX 76034 005016 Thompson Terr Thompson Terrace Investment Lp 5017 Colleyville Blvd Colleyville TX 76034 005104 Thompson Terr Thompson Terrace Investment Lp 5017 Colleyville Blvd Colleyville TX 76034 005100 Thompson Terr Village Monticello Prtns Ltd 99 Main St Ste 200 Colleyville TX 76034 000013 Main St Christy Shaw, applicant 2722 Hidden Lake Grapevine TX 76051 Request Zoning Change Cl to PUDC Java Joz's Coffee and More Statement Of Objectives We are requesting a zoning change; Java Jo'z Coffee And More wishes to be able to create a new experience to the surrounding city of Colleyville residents for a drive through specialty coffee and wholesome smoothie drinks. A double drive through will provide quick service and high quality drinks for the early morning commuter. The objective of our facility is to create a one of a kind specialty drink service in one minute or less. We use only the finest European coffees and have created a healthy line of all natural specialty-blended drinks for the person on the go. We will also be providing free wyfi Internet service to ow customers who choose to use the outdoor seating area. This fast and convenient setting is critical to our customer's and the success of the business. We have chosen this particulaz location for the demographics of the surrounding area and pass by traffic flow and the potential of creating additional charm. This location is currently under utilized, it is an old black top pazking area that is not serving any Purpose at this time. The HWY 26 improvement project proposed by 'TXDOT has further made it difficult to utilize the remaining parcel due to further reducing its configuration and s' lation such as a Java Joz utilizes a very small footprint. The building itself is o 260 sq. ft. There are very few options for the cwrent owner to advance the property in a m way. We have signed along-term lease and intend to stay and improve the current property. We believe the visual appeal and charm of the location is very important to ow customers, and the success of ow business. We intend to trim all the current growth around the subject property, retop and stripe the paved area, and create a small cozy outdoor seating area with potted trees, hanging flower planters and awnings/umbrellas. In a future second phase we hope to add a garden area located behind the currently built brick wall and shrubbery with a fountain encroached by flowering potted vines and herbs. We will design a small cozy seating area to accommodate approximately 8 people. Community Involvement Java Jo'z supports and invests in the community by sponsoring various events such as fundraisers for schools. We intend to support a chosen local charity through a consensus of ow employees on a yearly basis by providing people support and monetary support. We will use ow business for co-creating awareness of local needs through a newsletter that we will be creating for the advancement of our chosen charity and Java Jo'z. We are very excited about the potential of having this educated group of customers passing through our business. This opportunity will be utilized to its maximum potential. Hoare of Operation will be the following: Monday- Saturday 5:45 A.M - 5:45 P.M Sunday Closed Development Schedale Upon approval of proposed change and replanting, the anticipated construction start date would be within 45 days with construction being completed in approximately 1 month. F..a.nnmie Develnpment ....~..~..~-- - - - --- r otal Square 260 Estimated sales per year $234,750.OOAnnually Estimated sales per sq ft $97$.13Annual Estimated sales per sq ft $81.51 Monthly EST. Ad Valorem Taxes rear TAX roes an3a of the property proposed for zoning: Building An=a 260 sq ft 1.s °~° Paved Area 9,540 sq ft 57.8% pen /Landscape area 6,700 sq ft 40.6°~ otal Area $$4~ ft 100°~ I 3i ;; = I ;t I `~ ~~ 'jQ. Z W F~O~ ~M W K ..~ N J W ~ N Z W m W ~ Q 3~ W t D~ • '~ N W ~ m n vF~- =sic cv d 00~~ a W OC a Y Q' O Z Z_ r a Y r V1 pad O r N X PpA W U_ 4' W N 1 W J l7 Z H J J a Z g a 0 0 u.. to 0 N Z 1!'J' ~tseiow« ~arwa 11160 9Y OI!lERS 0 ALL YANSARO ARfJI PAIELS- BEYOND n-t a ~aFmeMwiw+nrw~ ~Twt .~i4ls SiIlOCO fNSN ttwt ~r - ~_ taoFe~ow~u tors ~ b ~ ~ ~_ - ~~~ 1~~.K SRIEVlAU.0ED0RAINE _ ~, OO1111~6 lflnltl RUIT ~ COIB1Ei1 Pus-TIMW SERVICE SLIOEIt NRR)0~ ~ ~ Oc®IOR MUUOMr tllNf 06CORAINE PERREIER b FOIW RAIR1RRi C'ON'L ~ ~ tors ~ ~ ~ - oEtoRA11VE PORCEIAN MAtI AE 1IIIN 6R08f toga" HI. f1ODR 1RE r r~r iRR91Ee ftoolt aeavE GRADE SIR~Pec ~ ~~ : 3'-D' OEEP IBN. ( L ~ ~~~ ~ Li.t.r~~~ ~lA F1R5li GRADE. eruct t/~ f--0I' ~mo~~.~/a-~ ~ ~ ~ocEttr oEr~as ~~ tceo er an~- ,oroFao~ru.w~wo -`P ~ co~t,Ex snx:o0 troy ws~. sea sEa~cE oooe iui0 FRAYE ears ~ ~ e~m auEO coax EXIEDIOR wNioow var- oooowuME Ea ~/,y ~ tnw ewoe~c t~'r. oECO~unrE PowcEUw ~rui taE wmi caour ~~~ ' aa~E ~- t^~t~ war I -tioN srsini FYr9iE0 Ftflat z 3'-0' DEEP 1~l. - IEIGNT eEUar ~ ~ J ,~ ,~ L-..~..._---- ~(uc. REAR END ELEVATION ~,~.~ ,.~ ~~~ ..~ ~~ ~t Z 8 i Q W ...~~ I I I I ~~ i ~~~ I ~ x ~ I I l I 1 I I I ~~ ~ i ~~ I i I I - - --~ z 0 a W W ~§ c~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ . t4 tTi ~ ~ ~ _~ I ~o ~~ I '~ I ~~ I I I ~I ~~ ` I ~ ~ ~ ( o I ~ ~ IW I '." b I ... 1 o ~~ ~~`~~ CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE August 29, 2007 TO CHRISTY SHAW EMAIL christyshaw@verizon.net FROM Ron Ruthven, Development Coordinator SUBJECT Z-07-025 CCl to PUDC 5101-5105 Colleyville Blvd. The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Provide exterior building elevations of the proposed structure. If not available, staff may recommend the proposed structure satisfy the commercial building design score criteria for the CC1-Village Retail zoning district. 2. Show all proposed landscaping on the site plan, including trees, shrubbery, grass, etc. as well as a list of amenities provided within the proposed open space area. Differentiate paved areas from unpaved areas. 3. Will the proposed development utilize the existing concrete wall and gate along the back portion of the property? Staff may recommend improvements to the entire property. 4. Based upon the meeting with staff, change the proposed drive-through alignment to allow for more cars to queue without affecting traffic on SH 26. 5. Across-access easement or shared driveway is required between the subject property and the property to the south. In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: 1. The proposed structure shall comply with current building codes, including but not limited to the following requirements, before a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued for the proposed use: 1. The proposed building will be required to provide a public restroom 2. The sign will require a separate permit. 100 Main Street - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 81 7.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-07-025 CC1 ro PUDC 3. 'The proposed use must comply with Tarrant County Public Health Department requirements. 4. The proposed use must comply with state and local handicap accessibility codes. 2. A replat of the subject properties will be required upon approval of the rezoning request. 3. Driveway approaches onto State Highway 26 will require approval from the Texas Department of Transportation. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by aCity-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $7,858 for a FAST FOOD RESTAURANT WITH DRNE-THRU unit. WATER $2,491 fora 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. SEWER $643 fora 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of--way must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of--way. The fencing must be located at the drip line of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. SIDEWALKS. The Colleyville Pathways Plan requires a sidewalk to be constructed along State Highway 26 where none exist. The sidewalk along Colleyville Boulevard must be at least 5-feet wide. The sidewalks must be installed when any new structures are built on the property. TENTATIVE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: Monday, September 24, 2007, 7:OOp.m. City Council: Tuesday, October 16 and November 6, 2007, 7:30 p.m. RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please submit the following to our offices: ^ A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived; PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-07-025 CC1 To PUDC ^ 10 full size copies of the revised exhibit; ^ 1 reduced copy (8.5x11) ofthe exhibit. The above requested items must be submitted no later than Friday, September 14, 2007 in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at ruthvenr(c~ci.colle~ville.tx.us or 817.503.1055 if you have any questions. C: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 3 OF 3 Ron Ruthven, Development Coordinator Subject: Z-07-025 CC1 to PUDC 5101-S10S Colleyville Blvd. Resubmittals per your request dated August 29, 2007. E&C Holdings of Grapevine, LLC 2722 Hidden Lake Grapevine, 7'X 76051 E&C Holduigs of Grapevine, LL.C September 14, 2007 City of Colleyville -Community Development Department Subject: Z-07-025 CC1 to PUDC 5101 - 5105 Colleyville Blvd. Ron, in response to DRC letter dated August 29, 2007. DRC comment 1. Proposed building elevations and floor plan are attached. DRC comment 2. See revised site plan. P&Z Exhibit -Rev. 3 DRC comment 3. We plan on leaving the existing sections of masonry wall, gate, and shrubs along the back portion of the property. This open space will be cleaned of debris, underbrush cleared out, and existing trees trimmed. DRC comment 4. See revised site plan. P&Z Exhibit -Rev. 3. DRC Comment 5. We plan on using a shared drive with the property to the south, same owner on both properties. Site Plan with curb opening information will be sent to TXDOT for inclusion in Hwy. 26 improvement project. Acknowledgement 1. Proposed building shall comply with current building codes. Acknowledgement l .1. Access to a public restroom will be provided. Key from staff member will be required. Acknowledgement 1.2. Proposed building includes signage on the building only. A remote sign is not proposed. Existing sign on the property is within the area being taken by the Hwy. 26 improvement project and will be removed. Owner and tenant understand a separate permit will be required if sign is desired in the future. Acknowledgement 1.3. We understand business plans must comply with Tarrant County Public Health Department requirements. Aclmowledgement 1.4. Proposed building will comply with all handicap accessibility codes. Acknowledgement 2. When zoning change is approved, a replat of the property will be submitted as required by City of Colleyville. Acknowledgement 3. Site Plan with driveway approaches and curb opening information will be sent to TXDOT for approval. ............................ September 14, 2007 Page 2 Sincerely, Christy Shaw 817-798-0805 christyshaw~verizon.net Trip Buchwald, Agent STATE FARM K19 YEAR HONOR AGENT" 5025 Colleyville Blvd. INSURANCE ColleyVille, Texas 76034 Office (817) 581-8563 Fax (817) 581-1809 EMAIL: trip,, r tripbuchwald.com October 3, 2007 E&C Holdings of Crrapevine Java Joz 2722 Hidden Lake Dr. Grapevine, TX 76051 Dear Christi, As owner of said property being located at 5025 Colleyville Blvd., I do herby agree to a shared parking arrangement with E&C holdings of Grapevine. Sincerely, i Trip Buchwald RECEIVED Per ............. Z g o S r yy ~ ~37 Y~~~~ & ~9~K~ a F 1^ N O ~ YxS ~ ~ N a m o S p~~~ ~~ 8~ ~g~" F ~ g ~~8 ~ O Q rn n ~ Q W~ ~ .il ~ a ~neV ~ 6 ~g~ ~ ~ a ~V " '1 Z ~ ' ~ ~`^ N ~ 5 aggs 1~~ W `"° o ~ ~ gtl ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~,~ - _, B~YOIN9.1. NOSdWOHl _ _~ ' _ ~- - - ~- - - - __------ '~I '' - _ ~ __ 1 -------'--------------r--- i 1 ~ t ~ i ' / +i ~ ~~/ ~~ 11 ~ I ~~ / o i o I ~ i ~ f9rb ~ ~ ~~ `. M \ `~ 'L11y~ ~jy • .off, ` \ ~ ~{ ~\ ~\ ~\ ~\ ~\ ~\ .\ ~\ ~~ r~ ~ ~ °"~ ~ /~\~ /`\ ° a .~ \ ~' \ ~\ de ~~ ~~g~~ ~ Z~ !!! ~W~ ~ a~ ~~~~ ~ +_. r a o. ORDINANCE 0-07-xxxx AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF LOTS 5 AND 6, BLOCK 1, THOMPSON TERRACE ADDITION, FROM THE CC1-VILLAGE RETAIL ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PUDC- PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00) FOR EACH OFFENSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has received an application for a rezoning under Case No. Z-07-025; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, to the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in Ordinance 0-07-XXXX Page 2 of 5 the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. Sec. 2. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning on Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Thompson Terrace Addition, from the CC1-Village Retail zoning district to the PUDC-Planned Unit Development Commercial zoning district, as depicted on the attached Zoning and Location Map, labeled as Exhibit "A". Sec. 3. THAT the Official Zoning Map of the City of Colleyville be amended to incorporate the zoning change approved herein. Sec. 4. THAT the above described tract of land shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. GENERAL a. The purpose of this PUDC is for adrive-thru coffee shop. b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the Land Development Code, except where amended by this Ordinance. 2. CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND PLATTING a. The development shall be generally consistent with Exhibit "B" labeled at Conceptual Site Plan, which shall not be considered the preliminary plat. b. The development shall be generally consistent with Exhibit "6", however the lot layout may differ from that shown on Exhibit "B" to accommodate topographic, drainage or other conditions. c. The developer shall submit and receive approval from the City of Colleyville a Replat in accordance with the requirements of the Land Development Code prior to development of this PUDC. 3. OPEN SPACE a. This development shall provide a minimum of 47% common open space, as shown on Exhibit "B". All open space areas shall be landscaped and maintained by the property owner. b. The distribution of landscaping on the property shall be in accordance with Chapter 4-Landscaping and Buffering in the Land Ordinance 0-07-XXXX Page 3 of 5 Development Code, except where amended herein. c. A twenty (20) foot landscaped buffer shall be maintained along SH 26, except where adequate paved queuing space is necessary to maintain the safe circulation of vehicular traffic on the property. Such queuing space shall not exceed more than 15% of the required landscape buffer area. d. At least 25% of the total required landscaped area shall be located within the front setback. 4. SIDEWALKS AND PATHWAYS a. The sidewalk along SH26 must be at least five (5) feet wide. The sidewalk must be installed when any new structures are built on the property. 5. PARKING a. This development shall be required to have a minimum of four (4) parking spaces. 6. OTHER a. The exterior building design shall be in accordance with Exhibit "C" labeled as Building Elevation 1, 2, 3, 4. b. A cross-access easement, constructed to the specifications described in the Land Development Code, shall be maintained between this property and the adjacent property on the south side of this property situated along SH26. c. If a permit for the northernmost driveway on the property cannot be obtained by the Texas Department of Transportation, then an alternate site plan, meeting all the requirements of this ordinance and the Land Development Code, shall be submitted to the City Manager's designee for approval prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. d. All signs shall meet the minimum requirements of the Land Development Code. e. All driveway approaches shall require approval by the Texas Department of Transportation prior to construction. Sec. 5. THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. Sec. 6. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Ordinance 0-07-XXXX Page 4 of 5 Sec. 7. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. Sec. 8. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. Sec. 9. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the day of 2007. The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the day of 2007. ATTEST: Cynthia Singleton, TRMC, CMC City Secretary CITY OF COLLEYVILLE David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney Exhibit A -Zoning and Location Map NORTH Exhibit B -Conceptual Site Plan ~; ~ ~~ ~'~~ CCY~g 1e tx H ~ .. ~~a °~., *~!, M~~ F it l~o~ a ~ ~ ~ is ~ ~ ~S § ~~r ! ~ ~~ ..~ _~..... . ~p w~ ~ i e... - = ~w.. __~. T` ._ .. . _ _._ _w_ -- .~ ' i _ _ __ ._ _---f. _ . ... -.- ~ ' __ _ t E ~ ~ _~ \ fry/, fill ,r' i -`~"*- ~ ~~ j r r '~ r. $q ~, ,~ ~ .`.. ' ~ ., ~ .,~ -~_.~ ~' -,.. _~ '4. '~. Exhibit C -Building Elevation 1 Exhibit C -Building Elevation 2 Exhibit C -Building Elevation 3 vwe.'•wrA~ ~' v 1 ~ r T '~' j, O ~W~it 5MIItlCq FINISH siwwi7t fi i(rYKtM[ +~ Otllt plV~D ODD EYRcl10R MRMD11 V1R~ ~/f OODOAt1RK l11tl11EtER f11Yt itdCYri LOMT. ODOR AJR1 RtY[ 1~P ~- '.~ ~ !'ORCEl11R! MALL ~E rl~ CROUP fas4 ~` lCf. RADII U1~ >JONCNME~ fAtlIMiUOtt S'l5301 ' ' ~.- fEIA VflIRY RMEI[A ROOK 1M. • r-O OED OFYSM R1~f1 CtAOL NBCHi iESER Alq ENa ~ra~nora 7CA& t/f~ Y-0' st7fllQ adGN Exhibit C -Building Elevation 4 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ -- ~~ .. ~~ - ~. ~, ,, ~ ~~ ~ ,d ~ _ Inc L_____~.__J~' . r-r e~ ~ ~ROlVT O~tD ELEVA`RON nor aw~c. u+'= r.a