Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks and Rec Advisory Board-Agenda Packets-2/6/1996 (7) GitY of Texas PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COLLEYVII,LE PARXGS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA NOVEMBER 4, 1996 The Colleyville Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will meet meet at 7:00 pm Monday November 04, 1996 at the Parks and Recreation Office I. Historic Preservation Committee ~° II. Colleyville Boys Baseball Discuss and Consider (Interim baseball fields solution far Bronco Sic Pony age groups) III. Priority List for 1/2 Cexrt Sales Committee Discuss Park Board Priorities) 5205 Bransford Road P.O. Box 185 Colleyville, Texas 76034 fR171 f5F-ti531 COLLEYVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF OCTOBER 7, 1996 Bill Recker called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Monday October 7, 1996. The following members were present: Bill Recker, Mike Billings, Laura Ann Travis, David Huff, Dan Witte, Chuck Walton, Rob Benefield. Chairman Rich Hendler was absent. Staff members present: Skip Keller, Parks and Recreation Coordinator Kathye McCall, Recreation Supervisor; Joy Tailford, Parks and Recreation Secretary. Special Guest: Larry O'Flynn of Carter -Burgess I INTRODUCTION OF KATHYE McCALL, RECREATION SUPERVISOR II. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF THE START UP DATE FOR THE RENOVATION OF CITY PARK Mr. Flynn, of Carter Burgess, presented two plans illustrating advantages and disadvantages of altei native start up dates: I. CONSTRUCTION PROCESS A: Early grading package with main improvements to follow 2. CONSTRUCTION PROCESS B: Entire project under one contract (allowing for a longer growing season for the turf) Chuck Walton moved the Advisory Board approve "B" which allowed for the entire project to be under one contract. Laura Ann Travis seconded the motion, and it was passed. III. UPDATE ON THE GCISD APPROVAL OF FIELD USAGE ON SCHOOL PROPERTY Skip Keller told the Advisory Board that staff was drawing up final plans for the field usage on school property and that there will be a meeting to approve the plans on October 15, 1996. IV. ADJOURNMENT To: All Advisory Board Members From: Skip Keller, Parks and Recreation Coordinator Date: November 24, 1996 Subject: Colleyville Historical Preservation Committee PLEASE READ THE ENCLOSED MATERLAL ON THE COLLEYVILLE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE SO YOU CAN DISCUSS THE INVOLVEMENT THE PARK BOARD WOULD LIKE TO HAVE WITH THIS COMMITTEE I THINK THEY WOULD LIKE A MEMBER OF THE PARK BOARD TO WORK WITH THEM. (THERE WILL BE A GROUP PICTURE TAKE AT THE MEETING, PLEASE R.S.V.P. IF YOU WILL BE UNABLE TO ATTEND) COLLEYVILLE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE END OF YEAR REPORT 3 SEPTEMBER 1996 The first year of the Committee has been one of investigation and research of the sites, structures, objects, and written record which remain of the herit- age of the area now Colleyville. Special consideration has been given the restoration of the Section Foreman's house at Bransford Park, and the reprint- ing of the book "Colleyville, 1855-1956". By providing a solid base of knowl- edge the Committee is better prepared to act to protect the heritage of Col- leyville, and to provide awareness to the citizens of the city. , SURVEY OF COLLEYVILLE Using the Colleyville section of the countywide historical/architectural/cul- tural survey done in the 1980s under the guidance of the Texas Historical Commission, using the criteria of the National Register and the Texas Histori- cal Commission, committee members drove the city to review which, sites re- mained, and which have been destroyed. New sites not noted on the original survey were also recorded. In many cities the Planning Department uses these. surveys to protect the heritage of their city. ORAL HISTORY One member of the Committee expressed an interest in doing oral histories of local citizens. A proper form for release was provided to the members of the committee, to avoid copyright infringement. COLLEYVILLE HISTORY BOOK The Committee has agreed we should publish a second edition of the Colleyville history book, "Colleyville, 1855-1956" which was written by a committee of the Colleyville Sesquicentennial Committee. Various methods of reprinting have been discussed. The problem of not having of the original photographs and/or negatives for reproducing that facet of the book is one which must b'e solved. It has been decided that whatever printing method is used, the book text will be scanned and put onto a disk for permanent storage. TEXAS HISTORICAL MARKER It was agreed that a program to obtain an official Texas Historical Marker for each significant and appropriate site in Colleyville would be an ongoing and long term project. One member was given the guidelines and has agreed to write an application for a Texas Marker for one of the early settlements which later became a part of Colleyville. RAILROAD SECTION FOREMAN'S HOUSE IN BRANSFORD PARK Previous to the formation of this Committee, several appropriate people were asked to evaluate the Section Forman's house, also known locally as the Webb House. The Chairman of the Texas Historical Commission (a Commission with members appointed by the Governor) inspected the house and provided a written report. The Director of the staff of the National Register Department (a U.S. Gov- ernment program) at the Texas Historical Commission, inspected the house and provided a written report. He was accompanied by the Director of the Archi- tecture Department of the Texas Historical Commission, who participated in the evaluation. A former Chairman of the Tarrant County Historical Commission, who is an architect and works on historic buildings, gave a written report. He also called in a contractor to investigate the condition of the sills under the house. A Dallas contractor who restored an identical house made a written report. Copies of all these reports were given to Doug Henderson, City of Colleyville, several years ago. All those who evaluated the house considered it in very good condition and worthy of restoration. The Director of the National Register Department de- clared it to be potentially eligible for the National Register, though desig- nation could be accomplished only after proper restoration by accepted stand- ards. On 28 January 1996, two members of the Historical Preservation Committee at- tended a workshop held at COG explaining details of the ISTEA application process, for funds under the 1991 Act designating Highway Department funds for historical purposes. This is not a grant program as the projects are adminis-• tered by TXDOT. There is a 20% up front fee for administration, mandatory TXDOT planning consultants, along with extensive federal and state regulations and requirements, which would significantly add to the cost of restoration. The Committee Chairman consulted with a city who had received ISTEA approval for funds for a house of identical design, but had turned down the funds after receiving details of federal and state requirements. She also conferred with an EPA representative for the ISTEA program. Both suggested the added costs due to ISTEA requirements were not cost effective in many instances, especial- ly so in small requests. ISTEA workshop personnel stated removal of the asbestos siding would be about a $40,000 expense, and would have to handled through that program if funds were requested. This was investigated by the Committee Chairman. It has been determined that removing the asbestos siding and disposing of that si~ing will not be a problem, and can be done at little or no expense. Bill Dahlin of the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission, who is a TNRCC Inspector for Region 4, has informed me the asbestos shingle siding is not friable and that no special care need be taken in their removal. By federal and state regulation, they do not have to be treated for removal, nor do they have to be treated or encased at the landfill. Disposal is to be treated as regular household trash. It does not have to be declared at the landfill, and by regulation no special charge may be made at the landfill. TNRCC will confirm by phone to City Staff and Laidlaw. At the 23 January 1996 •meeting the Colleyville Historical Preservation Commit- tee voted to recommend to the City, and to the Parks and Recreation Board and the Parks and Recreation Department, that the Section Foreman's house oe re- stored, and that Bransford Park be developed with a railroad theme. This was conveyed to the Park Board and Park Department, as well as City Council and Staff, in an 8 March 1996 report. The railroad theme is appropriate due to the association of the house and the railroad. The house was built with plans and 2 lumber provided by the railroad. The section foreman lived in the house, and tickets were sold from the house to passengers who boarded at the Bransford flag stop. To restore the house the following must be accomplished: 1. Remove the concrete porch. This can be done by County work release people, or by volunteers. No skill needed. 2. Rebuild wooden porch and steps to house. 3. Sills need to be inspected and replaced where necessary. One sill was determined in poor condition by inspection several years ago. 4. Windows and frames need to be repaired. 5. Floor boards need to be replaced where necessary. Some are satisfactory. 6. The Parks Department needs to participate in a discussion regarding the removal of the bathroom, which was not an original feature of the house. The addition affects the exterior of the house by enclosing a porch. Whether returning to t`he original open porches or retaining enclosures with the added bath needs to be more thoroughly discussed depending upon anticipated use of the building and park. _ 7. Repair interior as needed. It should be noted that all consultants agreed all woodwork could be done by local carpenters. 8. Remove kitchen cabinets, and provide kitchen appropriate to 1914. 9. Remove shingle siding, fill holes, replace boards where needed, and paint. 10. The house needs to be reroofed. This should be done with wood shingles appropriate to the original roof. 11. Update electrical wiring and plumbing to code. 12. Install air conditioning and heating units, by restoration standards. A restoration architect was consulted, who recommended separate heat and air units for the first and second floors, making them as inconspicuous as possi- ble. If there should be additional costs by having separate units, that cost would be returned by the ability to heat and cool only the lower floor of the house when the upper floor is not in use. During the summer of 1996 the Committee asked that Mayor Ed Baker, City Engi- neer Jim Foster and Community Development Director Doug Henderson, inspect the house. They determined it to be in excellent condition. ArchiTexas, a firm which specializes in restoration of historic structures, was then asked by the Committee Chairman to evaluate the house. They too determined it to be in excellent condition. The Chair of this Committee asked ArchiTexas to give a cost estimate for the restoration of the house by that firm. Enclosed find the estimate submitted. This cost estimate does not present an incentive for a change from the origi- nal recommendation of the Historical Preservation Committee that restoration be under the guidance of the Preservation Committee, administered by the City, and accomplished by local skilled labor. Evaluating the ArchiTexas proposal by The demolition work can be donE suggested. Utility services to the house will owned house on city owned property. Carpentry can be accomplished by a presented. items: by local volunteers as previously be absorbed by the city as it is a city skilled local carpenter at less cost than Rewiring of the house can be accomplished by a local electrician at less cost than presented. 3 Hardware should be compatible with the age and style of the house, but can be found from demolished houses. The kitchen is a variable cost depending upon a final decision of design. It should be suitable to a 1914 house, but usable for today. Exterior demolition is two fold. Removing the asbestos shingles on the side of the house, and removing the concrete front porch. Both can be done at no cost by volunteers. Restoration of windows and screens can be done by a local carpenter and volunteer aides. A roofers bid estimates roof replacement as $5000 to $6000 rather than $16,000. This will be with shingles at cost and a discount from the roofer. No masonry work is anticipated with the possible exception of additional piers under the house. This is not probable as the house has not shifted at all over the years. It is anticipated the existing piers are adequate. All carpentry can be done by a local carpenter. The house does not have fine woodwork that would require a specialist. Preparation for painting presents a special problem which should be recog- nized. Special precautions must be taken when restoring a structure which has lead paint. Both paint dust and fumes endanger the worker. A lead assessment should be conducted. Paint that must be removed, should be done so with proper procedures such as protective clothing and HEPA (high-efficiency par- ticulate air) filter-equipped vacuum cleaner. Areas that may be covered, rather than removing paint, must be done so with a lead encapsulating paint to prevent leaching through of the old lead paint. ' Protective measures, if paint preparation is done by local labor, and the health of those performing that task, must be considered in evaluating total cost. Preparation for painting is a task which may be more appropriate for one skilled in that area, and with proper equipment, than with volunteers. Considering only the cost of restoration, accomplishment by local skilled labor and volunteers would be a great savings compared to the cost of con- tracting with a professional restoration company. It must be recognized, however, that local restoration must be within accepted restoration'standards. The Historic Preservation Committee has an interest in the restoration of the Section Foreman's house and the design of the city park. The house and park, and future bicycle path, adjacent to the railroad track whereon the Tarantula tourist trains runs, presents the city a rare opportunity for a well developed park attractive to both citizens and those from outside the city. This park is as much a "gateway" to the city as other areas being planned, and will be seen daily by tourists. The Committee is available to the Park Board and the Park Department for cooperation and consultation in developing this house and park in a way appropriate to their past association with the railroad. We ask that the Park Board recognize that the park and house is the one historic site and structure that is owned by the city. It seems appropriate that the Park Board and the Historic Preservation Commit- tee meet to discuss tie Park Board's plans for use of Bransford Park before preservation efforts are further considered by this Committee. Dee Barker, Chairman Colleyville Historic Preservation Committee enclosed: proposal by ArchiTexas 4 , - ~ • 1 ` • • ARC H . ~ .TEXAS ARCHITECTURE , .. ' HISTORIC PRESERVATION 09-04-96 - ,, . Ms: Dee Barker ~ ~ ~ ~ . . 2200 Oak Knoll' ~ _ ' ~ Colleyville, Texas 76034 Re ~ ~ ' Section House Restoration • Colleyville, Texas ~ ` ~ , 1. . Dear ~ , ~ . ' ~ . • ~ Ms. Barker: ~ ~ _ 1 , .. - ~ ~ -~ yPer your request; I nave'prepared the following initial cost estimate for the . ~ ..restoration of~the Section House located in the City Park in Colleyville. When . we toured the house we decided that an accurate restoration would be the • preferred approach.' The restoration should provide fox new electrical, lighting, HVAC and plumbing systems as well as a fire detection security _ system. _We agreed that new bathroom facilities will be needed in the park in~ _ a separate structure and not in the Section House, I have included in this estimate some limited site work and assume that more period landscaping and exterior lighting should be planned for in the future. . The following is a'preliminary cost estimate based upon a single site visit and ' is intended to -establish an initial budget for planning purposes. Interior i ~"~ ` " Interior Selective Demolition/Sitework 3,500 ' Electric, Water, Sewer Service ~ 8,000 Interior Carpentry ---Nall; Flees,-C-eilinb Frariing _ ... _.. ._`__.. ._ . _ • - and Trim Repair/Replacement, • , ~ Stripping and Refuushing, , Floors, Doors, Stairway ` ~ 12,800 ~~ Electrical and Lighting/Fire Detection ~ _ " ~ 28,000 Paint preparation/Painting 1 ~ ~ 21,000 . . Hardware ~ . ' ' , 6,200 HVAC ~ ~ ~' 10,000 . Plumbing/Kitchen ~ 4,800 . TotalInter~or ~ ~ $112,400 .. ~ ,. 1 . ~ , t oAU~ i9o~ r~+wua, 7GM1 IM A17AG_AS/,1 • Ms. Barker ` 09-04-96 ' ~ ~ - . Page Two • , ~, ~ l E ri r • Exterior Selective Demolition . • , 8,200 'Restore WindowslScreens ~ • 10,1(}0 Roofing, Flashing and Masonry 16, 000 - ~ ~ Carpentry including Siding, Porches, ~ Fascia, etc. 23,0(30 • Paint preparation painting ~ ~ 16'000 --- - . -- Total ExteriDr ~ --. ~ ~ $73 300 • ~• Total ~ $18~,7Q0- • This represents the hard costs associated with restoration of the Section House. •~ The project budget should•include approximately fifteen percent (15%) for soft ' costs including architectural services and other expenses. ,Please call if you have any questions. .Sincerely ,Craig de ~ . .~ COLLEYVILLE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE END OF YEAR REPORT 3 SEPTEMBER 1996 The first year of the Committee has been one of investigation and research of the sites, structures, objects, and written record which remain of the herit- age of the area now Colleyville. Special consideration has been given the restoration of the Section Foreman's house at Bransford Park, and the reprint- ing of the book "Colleyville, 1855-1956". By providing a solid base of knowl- edge the Committee is better prepared to act to protect the heritage of Col- leyville, and to provide awareness to the citizens of the city, , SURVEY OF COLLEYVILLE Using the Colleyville section of the countywide historical/architectural/cul- tural survey done in the 1980s under the guidance of the Texas Historical Commission, using the criteria of the National Register and the Texas Histori- cal Commission, committee members drove the city to review which sites re- mained, and which have been destroyed. New sites not noted on the original survey were also recorded. In many cities the Planning Department uses these. surveys to protect the heritage of their city. ORAL HISTORY One member of the Committee expressed an interest in doing oral histories of local citizens. A proper form for release was provided to the members of the committee, to avoid copyright infringement. COLLEYVILLE HISTORY BOOK The Committee has agreed we should publish a second edition of the Colleyville history book, "Colleyville, 1855-1956" which was written by a committee of the Colleyville Sesquicentennial Committee. Various methods of reprinting have been discussed. The problem of not having of the original photographs and/or negatives for reproducing that facet of the book is one which must tie solved, It has been decided that whatever printing method is used, the book text will be scanned and put onto a disk for permanent storage, TEXAS HISTORICAL MARKER It was agreed that a program to obtain an official Texas Historical Marker for each significant and appropriate site in Colleyville would be an ongoing and long term project. One member was given the guidelines and has agreed to write an application for a Texas Marker for one of the early settlements which later ,. became a part of Colleyville. RAILROAD SECTION FOREMAN'S HOUSE IN BRANSFORD PARK Previous to the formation of this Committee, several appropriate people were asked to evaluate the Section Forman's house, also known locally as the Webb House. The Chairman of the Texas Historical Commission (a Commission with members appointed by the Governor) inspected the house and provided a written report. The Director of the staff of the National Register Department (a U,S. Gov- ernment program) at the Texas Historical Commission, inspected the house and provided a written report. He was accompanied by the Director of the Archi- tecture Department of the Texas Historical Commission, who participated in the evaluation. A former Chairman of the Tarrant County Historical Commission, who is an architect and works on historic buildings, gave a written report. He also called in a contractor to investigate the condition of the sills under the house. A Dallas contractor who restored an identical house made a written report. Copies of all these reports were given to Doug Henderson, City of Colleyville, several years ago. All those who evaluated the house considered it in very good condition and worthy of restoration. The Director of the National Register Department de- clared it to be potentially eligible for the National Register, though desig- nation could be accomplished only after proper restoration by accepted stand- ards. On 28 January -1996, two members of the Historical Preservation Committee at- tended a workshop held at COG explaining details of the ISTEA application process, for funds under the 1991 Act designating Highway Department funds for historical purposes. This is not a grant program as the projects are adminis-' tered by TXDOT, There is a 20X up front fee for administration, mandatory TXDOT planning consultants, along with extensive federal and state regulations and requirements, which would significantly add to the cost of restoration. The Committee Chairman consulted with a city who had received ISTEA approval for funds for a house of identical design, but had turned down the funds after receiving details of federal and state requirements. She also conferred with an EPA representative for the ISTEA program. Both suggested the added costs due to ISTEA requirements were not cost effective in many instances, especial- ly so in small requests. ' ISTEA workshop personnel stated removal of the asbestos siding would be about a $40,000 expense, and would have to handled through that program if funds were requested. This was investigated by the Committee Chairman. It has been determined that removing the asbestos siding and disposing of that siding will not be a problem, and can be done at little or no expense. Bill Dahlin of the Texas Natural Resources Conservation Commission, who is a TNRCC Inspector for Region 4, has informed me the asbestos shingle siding is not friable and that no special care need be taken in their removal. By federal and state regulation, they do not have to be treated for removal, nor do they have to be treated or encased at the landfill. Disposal is to be treated as regular household trash. It does not have to be declared at the landfill, and by regulation no special charge may be made at the landfill. TNRCC will confirm by phone to City Staff and Laidlaw. At the 23 January 1996 meeting the Colleyville Historical Preservation Commit- tee voted to recommend to the City, and to the Parks and Recreation Board and the Parks and Recreation Department, that the Section Foreman's house oe re- stored, and that Bransford Park be developed with a railroad theme. This was conveyed to the Park Board and Park Department, as well as City Council and Staff, in an 8 March 1996 report. The railroad theme is appropriate due to the association of the house and the railroad. The house was built with plans. and 2 lumber provided by the railroad. The section foreman lived in the house, and tickets were sold from the house to passengers who boarded at the Bransford flag stop. To restore the house the following must be accomplished: 1. Remove the concrete porch. This can be done by County work release people, or by volunteers. No skill needed, 2. Rebuild wooden porch and steps to house. 3. Sills need to be inspected and replaced where necessary. One sill was determined in poor condition by inspection several years ago. 4. Windows and frames need to be repaired. 5. Floor boards need to be replaced where necessary. Some are satisfactory, 6. The Parks Department needs to participate in a discussion regarding the removal of the bathroom, which was not an original feature of the house. The addition affects the exterior of the house by enclosing a porch. Whether returning to t`he original open porches or retaining enclosures with the added bath needs to be more thoroughly discussed depending upon anticipated use of the building and park. 7. Repair interior as needed. It should be noted that all consultants agreed all woodwork could be done by local carpenters. 8. Remove kitchen cabinets, and provide kitchen appropriate to 1914. 9. Remove shingle siding, fill holes, replace boards where needed, and paint. 10. The house needs to be reroofed. This should be done with wood shingles appropriate to the original roof. 11. Update electrical wiring and plumbing to code. 12. Install air conditioning and heating units, by restoration standards, A restoration architect was consulted, who recommended separate heat and air units for the first and second floors, making them as inconspicuous. as possi- ble. If there should be additional costs by having separate units, that cost would be returned by the ability to heat and cool only the lower floor of the house when the upper floor is not in use. During the summer of 1996 the Committee asked that Mayor Ed Baker, City Engi- neer Jim Foster and Community Development Director Doug Henderson, inspect the house. They determined it to be in excellent condition. ArchiTexas, a firm which specializes in restoration of historic structures, was then asked by the Committee Chairman to evaluate the house. They too determined it to be in excellent condition. r The Chair of this Committee asked ArchiTexas to give a cost estimate for the restoration of the house by that firm. Enclosed find the estimate submitted. This cost estimate does not present an incentive for a change from the origi- nal recommendation of the Historical Preservation Committee that restoration be under the guidance of the Preservation Committee, administered by the City, and accomplished by local skilled labor. Evaluating the ArchiTexas proposal by items: The demolition work can be done by local volunteers as previously `~ suggested. Utility services to the house will be absorbed by the city as it is a city owned house on city owned property. Carpentry can be accomplished by a skilled local carpenter at less cost than presented. Rewiring of the house can be accomplished by a local electrician at less cost than presented. Hardware should be compatible with the age and style of the house, but can be found from demolished houses. The kitchen is a variable cost depending upon a final decision of design. It should be suitable to a 1914 house, but usable for today, Exterior demolition is two fold. Removing the asbestos shingles on the side of the house, and removing the concrete front porch. Both can be done at no cost by volunteers. Restoration of windows and screens can be done by a local carpenter and volunteer aides. A roofers bid estimates roof replacement as $5000 to $6000 rather than $16,000. This will be with shingles at cost and a discount from the roofer, No masonry work is anticipated with the possible exception of additional piers under the house. This is not probable as the house has not shifted at all over the dears. It is anticipated the existing piers are adequate. All carpentry can be done by a local carpenter. The house does not. have fine woodwork that would require a specialist. Preparation for painting presents a special problem which should be recog- nized. Special precautions must be taken when restoring a structure which has lead paint. Both paint dust and fumes endanger the worker. A lead assessment should be conducted. Paint that must be removed, should be done so with proper procedures such as protective clothing and HEPA (high-efficiency par- ticulate air) filter-equipped vacuum cleaner. Areas that may tie covered, rather than removing paint, must be done so with a lead encapsulating paint to prevent leaching through of the old lead paint. ' Protective measures, if paint preparation is done by local labor, and the health of those performing that task, must be considered in evaluating total cost. Preparation for painting is a task which may be more appropriate for one skilled in that area, and with proper equipment, than with volunteers. Considering only the cost of restoration, accomplishment by local skilled labor and volunteers would be a great savings compared to the cost of con- tracting with a professional restoration company. It must be recognized, however, that local restoration must be within accepted restoration'standards. The Historic Preservation Committee has an interest in the restoration of the Section Foreman's house and the design of the city park. The house and park, and future bicycle path, adjacent to the railroad track whereon the Tarantula tourist trains runs, presents the city a rare opportunity for a well developed park attractive to both citizens and those from outside the city. This park is as much a "gateway" to the city as other areas being planned, and will be seen daily by tourists. The Committee is available to the Park Board and the Park Department for cooperation and consultation in developing this house and park in a way appropriate to their past association with the railroad. We ask that the Park Board recognize that the park and house is the one historic site and structure that is owned by the city. It seems appropriate that the Park Board and ~ tee meet to discuss tie Park Board's plans preservation efforts are further considered Dee Barker, Chairman Colleyville Historic Preservation Committee enclosed: proposal by ArchiTexas the Historic Preservation Commit- for use of Bransford Park before by this Committee. • ~. • • . ARC H I .. ~ ~ . . ~ . TEXA'S ARCHITECTURE . ... HISTORIC PRESERVATION 09-04-96 ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ms: Dee Barker ~ ~ ~ • • 2200 Oak Knoll' ~ _ ' ' ~ Colleyville, Texas 76034 ~ . Re • ~ Section House Restoration • • ~ Colleyville, Texas ~ ` - ~ , • ,.: Deaz n r ~ - ~ ~ Ms. Bazker: r' - - ~ ~ , • • , - ~ - -' -Per your request; I 'nave'prepared the following initial cost estimate for the • ~ ..restoration of ~ the Section House located in the City Park in Colleyville. When • we toured the house we decided that an accurate restoration would be the preferred approach.• • The restoration should provide far new electrical, • • - lighting, HVAC and plumbing systems as well as a fire detection security system. _ We agreed that new bathroom facilities will be needed in the park in • a separate structure and not in the Section House. I have included in this ' ~ ~ estimate some limited site work and assume that more period landscaping and exterior lighting should be planned for in the future. . The following is a 'preliminary cost estimate based upon a single site visit and ' is intended to establish an initial budget for planning purposes. • Interior '~" ~ ~ - . ~ '. Interior Selective Demolition/Sitework 3,500 • Electric, Water, Sewer Service 8,000 • Interior Carpentry ~ r . ------~Ve.ll~le~~,--C-eilina F~zting-- - -• . _.. . _, _ __ ..- . _ • • -and Trim Repair/Replacement, ' • . Stripping and Refinishing, _ , Floors, Doors, Stairway 12,800 . ~~ Electrical and Lighting/Fire Detection ~ . " ~ 28,000 Paint preparatiori/Painting ~ ~ ' 21,000 . . Hardware ~ 6,200 HVAC ~ , '~ 10,000 . Plumbing/Kitchen ~ 4,800 . TotalInterfor ~ $112,400 ~ ' - .. . , ~ ~~ • , ~ aaiu~s ~ 90~ n~rniA ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ ~ • Ms. Barker ~ ~ ' ' 09-04-96 ' ~ ~ ~ - . ' Page Two ' - .. ' Exterior Selective Demolition . • . ~ 8,200 . • ~ • 'Restore Windows/Screens ~ • 10,100 • ' Roofing, Flashing and Masonry 16,000 -' • ~ ~ Carpentry including Siding, Porches, ~ Fascia, etc. 23,000 • ~ Paint preparation painting: ~ . 16.4Q0 . ~. ... ~ - Total Exteri,~r .~ ~_ ~ - ~. ~ $73,300 ' ~• . ~ ~ Total ~ $185,704- • This represents the hard costs associated with restoration of the Section House. •' ' The project budget should include approximately fifteen percent (15%) for soft costs including architectural services and other expenses. Please call if you have any questions. . .• , ' Sincerely ~ _ . ,Craig de _ ' ~ ~ 1 ' ~ i . y •~ , i i i From: Ed Duncan To: Skip Keller Date: 10/18196 Time: 15:01:35 CBA Colleyville Baseball Association P.O. Box 103, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - Memorandum - Date: Friday, October 1$, 1996 To: Skip Keller, City of Colleyville, Parks Manager cc: Rich Hendler, City of Colleyville, Parks Board Chairman From: Ed Duncan, CBA, President Subject: Interim baseball fields solution for Bronco & Pony age groups On November 7, 1996, I will be meeting with the parks board to address the situation of interim baseball fields while City Park is under construction from June 1997 till Spring 1999. CBA, which has never shirked responsibilities on donating both financial and working support of city owned ball fields, needs your and the City of Colleyville's help. Paye 1 ul t CBA had hoped to be able to assist the city with the interim fields, by locating a private land owner willing to lease (at a nominal or no fee} land for building two (2) lighted baseball fields for Bronco (ages 11-12) & Pony (ages 13-14) to play on. Most of the materials to be used were to be salvaged by CBA from City Park just prior to demolition in June 1997. The Crown of Life Lutheran Church on Pleasant Run, has been approached with the idea and is open to a mutual agreement, that allows both CBA use of the fields for practice and play everyday of the week, except Sunday and Wednesday, when the church has field rights. The plan looks good in theory, but falls short in practicality for the following reasons: 1.) CBA does not have the funds to build the fields. 2.) CBA does not have the equipment to maintain fields. 3.) CBA does not have the personnel to maintain fields. 4.) CBA needs to concentrate funds and energy on running a baseball program for the youth of Colleyville, not building and maintaining fields. Proposed Solution 1.)The City of Colleyville and Crown of Life Church enter into an agreement on land use by parks department. 2.) The City fulfills it's commitment to build interim ball fields at this site, with From: Ed Duncan To: Skip Keller uate: ,v, ,o,~~ wi,c:..J.~.:. „ CBA helping in the salvage of materials and transport to the location site. October 18,1996 Skip Keller Page 2 Proposed Solution cont. 3.) City parks department to maintain the fields at this site, as park personnel is already at the same location maintaining soccer fields. Skip, this proposal to be made at the parks board meeting is a more feasible and practical solution to our problem and could possibly present itself as an opportunity for future park land acquisition. Would you please look into what are the obstacles, if any, that would need to be overcome to make this opportunity work for all of us. I will need your written reply by November 7, 1996 before I meet with the parks board on this subject. Thank you for your continued support of Colleyville's youth baseball program. YOUTH SPORTS PROGRAM ASSOCIATION CONTACTS COLLEYVILLE FOOTBALL BOYS BASEBALL DANA ELLIOTT, PRESIDENT ED DUNCAN, PRESIDENT 609 HUNTER TRAIL 3903 STONEHAVEN COLLEYVILLE, TX 76034 COLLEYVILLE, TX 76034 HOME: (817) 788-9198 HOME: (817) 267-3044 FAX.' (817) 656-5623 FAX.' (817) 571-9307 INFO LINE: 540-2776 X-36 (Sam 858-0427) AMERICAN EAGLES SOCCER COLLEYVILLE BASKETBALL STEVE GARMEIAN, PRESIDENT MIKE SHELTON, PRESIDENT 4005 BOWDEN HILL LANE COLLEYVILLE, 76034 COLLEYVILLE, 76034 HOME: (817) 485-0436 HOME: (817) 571-2265 HOME OFFICE: (817) 577-0387 OFFICE: (817) 545-3792 OFFICE: (800) 965-5411 BEEPER: (817) 858-4568 COLLEYVILLE SOCCER GIRLS SOFTBALL JOHN KANE, PRESIDENT LORI NAPIER, PRESIDENT 2804 COTTONWOOD LANE 2808 COTTONWOOD LANE COLLEYVILLE, 76034 COLLEYVILLE, 76034 HOME.' (817) 283-3132 HOME: (817) 545-3804 OFFICE: (214) 453-7311 RAIN # (817) 545-1613 FAX: (214) 453-7377 ', ~ 12.1 GENERAL RULES: BOYS' AND GIRLS' .01 Boys must play in the Boys' Divisions (I or II). .02 Girls must play in the Girls' Divisions(I or II). Exception: a) A member city must file in writing that they do not have enough girl participants to send separate girls teams. b) Upon doing this, the member city may send a mixed team to the appropriate age Boys State Tournament, if they qualify. c) NOTE: If there is one boy on a roster, that team will be classified as a Mixed team eligible to play in the Boys Divisions (I or II). .03 Age is determined by the participants age on September 1 of the current school vear for winter basketball and September 1 of the current calendar vear for summer basketball. .04 National Federation Rules and UIL Guidelines will apply with the exception of the T.A.A.F. Rules published here. 12.2 DIVISIONS OF PLAY: BOYS' AND GIRLS' 01 WINTER BASKETBALL 18 ~ Under 16 8~ Under 14 & Under 12.3 PLAYING RULES: .01 ROSTERS: The regular playing roster shall not exceed twelve (12) players. .02 DRAFTING PLAYERS: A team is allowed to draft 2 players for post season play. a) Drafted players must be from a team registered in the same age division and b) From the same member city as the team drafting the players. i 1997 T.A.A.F. SPORTS RULES 26 .02 SUMMER BASKETBALL Summer Basketball will follow ALL UIL Guidelines. .03 GAME LENGTH: All to have a running clock with the exception of final two (2) minutes of each half and; a) 8 & Under Divisions of play to have four (4) six (6) minute quarters. c) The clock stops only on time outs and free throws. The game officials may use their discretion to stop the clock for injury, ball retrieval, etc. d) POINT SPREAD RULE: If one team is ahead by fifteen (15) or more points during the last two (2) minutes of each half, the clock will remain a running clock, except for time-outs and free throws. e) OVERTIME: If the score is tied at the end of regulation play in the 8 & Under and 10 & Under divisions of play, a two (2) minute overtime will be played. In all other divisions a three (3) minute overtime period will be played. The clock will stop on each whistle by the officials. .04 BASKET SPECIFICATIONS AGE HEIGHT FREE THROW DISTANCE 18 8~ Under 10' 15' 0" 16 8~ Under 10' 15' 0" 14 Sz Under 10' 15' 0" 12 8~ Under 10 >~;::::::<::~::<:>::>::>::::~5:<:... .::::.:.::.::........... 10 8~ Under 8'6" 13' 6" 8 8~ Under 8'6" 13' 6" 05 BALL SIZE: The official ball size for divisions: a) 18 & Under, 16 8 Under, 14 & Under and 12 & Under BOYS' will use the regulation size basketball as specified by the Federation Rule Book. b) 10 & Under and 8 8~ Under BOYS' will use the official women's basketball. c) All GIRLS' divisions will use the official women's basketball. .06 LANE VIOLATIONS: a) 18 8 Under, 16 8~ Under, 14 & Under and 12 & Under will play by official rules. b) 10 & Under and 8 & Under will have five (5) second lane violations. .07 FULL COURT DEFENSE (PRESS): b) 10 8~ Under may play full court defense during the last two minutes of each half and any overtime period(s). c) 8 8~ Under may not press at any time. d). VIOLATION: The whistle is blown and the offended team brings the ball in play on their offensive front court at the mid court opposite the scorers table and team benches. .08 Uniforms: Each team must have jerseys the same color with a permanent four inch (4'~ number on the front and a six inch (6") number on the back. Legal basketball numbers only are permitted, refer to the Federation Rule Book. 12.4 CHAMPIONSHIP GUIDELINES -REGIONAL AND STATE TOURNAMENTS .01 All tournaments will be single elimination with a consolation bracket. 1997 TA0.F. SPORTS RULES 2T .02 WINTER PLAY: Any registered team may participate in the Regional Toumament as space allows, or according to berths specified and allowed by regional guidelines. .03 WINTER PLAY: The State Toumament shall be open to all regional champions plus one host team per division.. .04 Proof of age is required prior to the start of each tournament. .05 Rosters may carry a maximum of twelve (12) players. 12.5 TOURNAMENT DATES -WINTER PLAY: .01 Regional Tournaments will be held the first weekend of March. .02 The State Toumament will be held the third weekend of March. 12.6 TOUR NAMENT DATES -SUMMER PLAY: .01 The State Toumament dates will be announced. 12.7 REGISTRATION DEADLINE: .01 February 1 for Winter Play .02 July 1 for Summer Ptay.