The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutParks and Rec Advisory Board-Agenda Packets-4/19/1990~S~' ~,~ Gity of .~v .w~= _ ~~;.c~°~~ a ~ o ~ Il~ Texas AGENDA PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD = MEETING i April 19, 1990 7:00 p.m. I. Call To Order II. Approval of 4-5-90 minutes City Hall 5400 Bransford Rd. III. Joint work session with City Council and the Planning and Zoning Board to review the draft of the Park Master Plan. IV. Review of proposed PUD-R, Z-90-814 zoning case for possible open space and recommendation of open space to City Council. V. Other concerns VI. Adjournment P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 281-4044 AGENDA BRIEFING Parks and Recreation DEPARTMENT clt o~ Approval of minutes SUBJECT MEETING 4-19-90 II rex~r AGENDA ~ Approval of 4-5-90 minutes DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE DISPOSITION APPROVED ^ OTHER L:ul: 7/tl4 CITY MANAGER STAFF REVIEW frul Guoh~u ^1 F`+'tt-k5 •zn+3 F_ecrea#.ion Ad~'i~+,t-~~ ~++1tZx-+3 I~tIir~utES of April 4, 19~~ k'I~=.?t:irx?_ ~_call~d t.r, ni-+3at- bsT +;ti+~irrri+zn Alan Linf~,t-d rtt. ~-~at~1 PPe`I i`Ier_ ~_-r=- rx-e_ent: .•.I=zr~f Lou Eri~ex-, ~=~'ii=., Fcain LF'fxrk- ;n3 F x-e_a i_ ~~-1_=2-~~inCi#Or;, ~_Y-ier~~1 Li-rin~~_+.-=gin, Idicl~ I~rIe~r#.in~, 'a='~il Hills cared L:~aU~~n <~uin1:+-- ,_ j°~jtnLjjc.c _:i Tti:T.=~t-+~~"1 ~ =t rl~rr?+.jj]:? pp~:r:lSiP+3 +=i= Fx-r_~n#~•~. ++~ ::~7ri +•~'711T~}l :: n7,t7 +3r? ~7 rl'Y:~t.ia_:I't #.i i t7 t_t_Nri#. trly ~r t]rti t_1'iI tlf ~.~'SP n~!tjti t7-fj i-:1'iL-ic.{.i„ri ~_-7'tllx"CCl ~.~jt7fi. t.17?12- ~~11llx-+rli Ftrfy~jerf.sr ttr 11#•lI1ZF`+3 Ca=. +~ F++11:'11 1#-~? I~.I=_tion +aggr=~si:.d <<:rith ~ +~ifix-n~Ca#-i~Te 47otc_• cand i +~Y~~#-enti~n. ~srier ~i 1 Li :~ in=s#.ort made a rr,.+~tior,. to x-e+,t+r.~ri~en+3 agF,x-+~ ti. ~Zl or ttie AAF:F L+=cae Avreenzenk. c:.~i#-ri t•he fr+llp~;.:irig chan4e_: l;+ I~Io h~+url~: I«_.? ~~:rill b~. +=tlrtr}e+3. L,+ `The?t-.? ~.~Tlll Otis t;z "~511.IILf ~:1~?Qnin° d?p+~~lt~ I"p~~1n~a131$ tlFtrtrl in~pecta,on. The ;,,.~rd "financing" be .triclsen from the 5#•h line c+f rn~T-t~ x-+~r+~! thx"rP. '.~,,t ~'Yi ~Si i=i+.+n= f+]r t~ i~ I t~+=14` +=Can+Q1L7ti[+D. ~75: Pltl'i~'x- ~+t7r#.SF ~i% ad+ie+3 i:+ Tate leae +-a~=reerfi?rxt =1'iould 1c+a Yes~iz~.~,'Fd an+3 rFnes,,.e+3 zTF.c~rl~'. i'i=~#.i>_,n c~F+proS~ed tin+.nimou~.l~;r Lil+a ' :4i.c ~~ riiade +.a rii!%ti~ Sri thCat. the F+caY"~~ [at ~ 15 L. I:~. i.~ ~~ :lie#.} t+e _ ~~ i i+_ ICall ;i nC1lYied "L~ ++_ lit'#. t. F'CLY11" T.ri,-.rinri .jr..t.=ra#.ed ~ ?t7 ~hQlx-n~+~r, Lindf+~rd app+~inte+3 tdi~.;l-~ PIa.rtine, P.'I~~r ~~ L+~~~ Brii~eL- ari+3 j}ta.:~I+-I F+-,.in #-+, +~ +--tJrllrlalt.~.re ~.tl 1r1Z:t=•_i.i#;ate a Tr+?~ '-_!I-dincari+.e- +_=:~_.irra=~xra Lindioz-+3 at+F+ninted F=rier~rl Li:~in~_ton, L=~n-•ti~n ~u~uinb~~ +_ar:+3 L't"a ~~ Lj I' isili i-+ i Ca C:+]rliriLlt#•+?e t+J lrti~ ?=tl?'TGate Ca YCax-11 ~_'x"+31r1+rtnL":e. C1-:ej--=? Li-Tin~_#c~n n~a~.e +.x rt-lotl+~n tt rec+?nznzend cue#.ic+n an ~•Cllx-1Gl.el, Aalllr~- rer:c+rcirr~erdc+tian thct un1c~2 F pla y ,;round equlprnerxt t+e rerno-~ed '"}-+~ria ~~it :;' Farl.s . iS~Io#.it~r~ rappx-nsied uiY+anirra+-+u~-ls, April 1?#-h ca±:. ?:CIC~ p.rfi. -:~,ca_ =e#. for ca .coin#- 1e_=ic+n c+i the F'cax-11 Esc+car3 Cared c i+~arililri:? +:arid .J+~niri._ Tri! ~ 1JU~+lU~ vi 111 ~+-_' Ln'v'LtC~t tq ti-il~ ni~'t'tlri~?. j._7aa#.l.n¢ •Zt~jrt1x-rYpt~ Cat. y :1~ ~+.Ir1. R~~pactf7311, aubn-aitted, ~ ppi .~"1J Lilca ~~+-+1~= 'a' e+_re±ar~r. Parks •znd fiecrent.ic+n Ad M 1sVr y Boar G~ ~ C;l~, Ua~'i+3 _ Parks and Fecreatian Gaordinator AGENDA BRIEFING Parks and Recreation DEPARTMENT Review of Park Master Plan SUBJECT MEETING 4-19-90 AGENDAS III t-~ Terry Cheek during the review of the master plan to answer questions. DEPARTMENT HEAD SIGNATURE DISPOSITION APPROVED ^ OTHER [i1')/M4 CITY MANAGER STAfF REVIEW CIS o~ Texan J ir~~ C..~nh.c. •~'iN7 AGENDA BRIEFING j DEPARTMENT SUBJECT MEETING Parks and Recreation Possible park land donation 4-19-90 AGENDAS IV Attached is.a zoning case in which the developer desires to dedicate open space to the City for consideration as possible park land. Also included is a staff analysis. CITY MANAGER STAFF REVIEW Clt o~ \ ~ 7'e:~• MEMORANDUM TO: David Fain, Parks and Recreation Coordinator FROM: Dave Draz, Assistant City Manager SUBJ: Proposed PUD-R, Z-90-814 Please find attached a copy of the site plan and some related documents for a proposed PUD-R zoning case. At the April 3, 1990 City Council meeting the Council instructed staff to forward the site plan to the Parks and Recreation Board for review and comment. Please be advised that 3rd and final reading on this proposed zoning change is currently scheduled for May 1, 1990. If possible, it would be helpful if comment could be received by the City Council before 2nd reading which is scheduled for April 17, 1990. This proposed zoning change would have originally been sent to the Parks and Recreation Board at the time of initial review by the Planning and Zoning Commission, however at that time the developer indicated that the open space was to be held privately (please see attached staff comments prepared for the March 12, 1990 meeting). Based on the contents of the attached letter from the developer, that has changed and the City is being asked to consider this open space as pos- sible park land. If you need further information please let me know. Att. cc. Mayor / Council City Manager Z-90-814 File PLANNING & ZONING COMMI88ION AGENDA ITEM - ZONINGLBPECIAL USE Agenda Date: 3/12/90 Item #~ 81 Subject: Z-90-814, AG to PUD-R, Tracts 2E# & 2E, C.C. Doss Survey, Abstract 439. GENERAL. INFORMATION Applicant: Location: Tract Size: Current Zoning: Existing Land Use: Surrounding Zoning Master Plan Designation: Thoroughfare Plan: Richard Ware Carter Please see Location Map 9.478 Acres AG Tract 2E, Single Family Residen- tial, Tract 2E3, Undeveloped N-GPVNE S-AG E-AG, W-R20 Low Density Residential <.5 DU/AC Glade Road, Major Arterial Upgrade Zoning Request: PUD-R Density Per Acre: 1.79 DU/AC Compliance w/ Master Plan: No PENDING ISSUE8 OF EXCEPTION AND~OR VARIANCES REOUESTED: STAFF RECOMMENDATION / COMMENTS: Please see attached staff comments. Please find attached a review letter from the City Engi- neer and a response letter from the developer's engi- neer. The City Engineer would li;'ce to brief the Commis- sion on any outstanding concerns based on the responses from the developer's engineer. Application, Planning Objectives, City Engineer's Letter, Developer's Response Letter, Staff Comments, Location Map, Site Plan Staff Commeata Z-90-814 Planning i Zoning Commission Maroh 12, 1990 The Commission will recall tabling this item at the February 26, 1990 meeting because of outstanding concerns about the screening of this property from the Grubbs property immedi- ately to the east. Significant concerns were also raised about the handling of drainage and the status of the proposed "open space". ' Relationships to Adjoining Property This proposed development will tie into "Glade Manor", a recently final platted R-20 development immediately to the west. This PUD-R development, as proposed, will compliment "Glade Manor" with a gradual density increase. Staff would like to suggest to the Commission that the type of perime- ter fencing being planned along Glade Road should be clari- fied and added to the Planning Objectives statement. It is important that the fencing being proposed for this subdivi- sion be consistent with fencing being proposed for Glade Manor. Staff would also like to suggest, as discussed at the February 26th meeting, that the Commission consider having the applicant amend the deed restrictions to require a common type of fencing along the property line adjoining the Grubbs property. Open Space The "open space" being proposed is approximately 1.8 acres. This is approximately 20~ of the acreage in this proposed development. Although the percentage meets the PUD-R open space requirement, the location of the open space in a drain- age easement may not be favorable for the development of any park features. Staff understood, based on comments at the February 26th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting that the "open space" would be held privately and be the responsibil- ity of the homeowner's association. Staff would like to remind the Commission that the open space is also a drainage easement and the City would have some responsibility to main- tain the area. However, a drainage easement would not be maintained at the same level that a park would be maintained. Tree survey In the Planning Objectives statement, the applicant noted that the proposed open space included "numerous trees". The Commission may want to request the applicant to complete a tree survey of the property to clarify the location and num- ber of trees. March 26, 1990 Commissioner Tom Michaels City of Colleyville Planning and Zoning Commission 5400 Bransford Road Colleyville, Texas 76034 RE: Brown & Fuqua Property to Mr. Richard Ware Carter Case Z-90-814 Dear Mr. Michaels: After being turned down by the Planning and Zoning Commission on the referenced case, and based on a tremendous amount of discussion relative to the fence issue between the subject property, and the Grubbs property, we have reluctantly approached the Seller to assist us in bearing the cost of the fence. Having come to this agreement with the Seller, we at this time can commit to build a masonry brick fence, similar to the fence built along Bedford Road for the Lakes of Summerset Subdivision. The fence will be the same fence along Glade Road as the Glade Manor Subdivision so it will appear to be one Subdivision and will run ?55' between this property and Mr. Grubbs Property. Please know that we have in the past and continue to express interest in working with the City concerning the 20% open space area. We will dedicate this area to the City for a public park, or we will maintain the park as part of a homeowners association, which ever is the desire of the City. In either case, we intend to have a very nice open area for the residents to use and plan on trimming the existing trees, planting grass where necessary, to leave the property in as natural a state as possible after the engineering work is complete. Hopefully, this will gain your support for the zoning proposal, please let me know by following up either verbally with the city council or in writing, if possible. Sincerely, chard Ware Carter RWC: pd Ordinance 0-90-?65 Page 5 EXHIBIT "C" ~I~ Y.OO,JY. «.~ Fq~ .!~ i~ .~. w'~:rw.~a cr. .[.m F d9 wry n,•. -- - -- -- - -- i a - _ .aa w YYYYn - ~~~' ~ I / i I l i r ~Ql~i ~(~==~c~ ~ i ~~ ~;.Y~ ! cif !li~~~ f~~~~ lF~i' i~~lY'~` I ~ ~ s ~`f ii=!€; [iii: ~~`_~ i ~!1` i I ~ ~ Vi`i' '~~lsi ~i.rs ~~~! ~~~.=i~ ~ ~ I ~ ~- 1 ~ s~ of .f~c C.l. kii~ .(Fj~l! `1 \ ~~ I ~~ 1 `~ .t \ _. ~; i s f _I ~ i ~~ I ~ •~ ~~ ^ ~~ ~ ~ ~ `~ --~' ~ ~~ ~ ~~`~ ~~ ~ I ~r 1 / ,.. I ~ ~ / ~ [< ;~~ ' ~ /-'~. ~~---~-- ~ ~~~` ~~~~~ g~~3 ~~~~C ~~ ~3 ii ~Ei~~~ ~~3'~ ~ c~$~ ~ ~'~~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~R ~~~~ s~~~ ~~~ t ~' r o ~o ~ ~` ~83- n C~t~Na~~ ~ h• ~~amCa'y ti ~. ~ ~ ~~ m Y ~~ L" a y Q , ~ i i - - ,,, w ~~ .!V I 1 i-~' ~ t ' ~~ 1 :ti I ter' ~ Im ....' I ~~ ~ i ~ 1 0_,~, r--~~ = --~+1-t-- ~ / • f I 1 -- ~~ I PARKS AND RECREATION STAFF ANALYSIS PROPOSED PARK LAND ADDITION SITE The site is located on the north side of Glade Rd. The development is a 9.478 acre tract of land out of the C.C. Doss Survey, Abstract Number 439. SIZE 1.89 Acre DESCRIPTION The property is a rolling tract of land bordered by residential units to the north which are located in Grapevine. The land slopes downward to a creed which runs north and south. FEATURES The property is mostly wooded with several large and small trees and brush with small pockets of open spaces. A sizeable portion of the property is a drainage easement and most of the property will flood during heavy rains. POTENTIAL USES Because of the park's features, the best possibility is to develop the land as a small neighborhood park. The area's high percentage of floodplan land would not allow the area to be utilized for practice fields, or develop- mental components. Possible park improvements could include native botanical areas, picnic area, playground equipment, and landscaping to enhance the beautiful nature setting. ACCESS Access to the property can be provided two ways. One road will be developed with the subdivision, and another road will connect with the development of an adjaining subdivision. Parking would have to exist along the street due to the fact that off road parking would not be feasible because of the lack of .park land. MAINTENANCE IMPACT The addition of this 1.89 acre tract will require both initial clean-up activities and on-going maintenance. It is estimated that the initial clean-up project would require a crew (2 people) on week of work. Tasks would include cleaning out debris, removing vines and undergrowth from the trees, and preparing the area for mowing. Ongoing maintenance would include 2 hours of tractor mowing once each week and occasional weedeating along the creek and around trees. Trash removal would be an ongoing effort. ADVANTAGES -Provides a park in an area of town that is difficult to acquire land for such a purpose. -The park, although small, will serve an immediate need for leisure opportunities for the small community next to the park (16 lot subdivision). -There is an immediate need for more public park land. DISADVANTAGES -Parking will be located on the street; no park space for allocation of a parking lot, -Economic reality of maintaining the park.. Although the park is small, the budget will need to reflect the cost of maintaining the park. However, the cost of maintaining the park initially will be small. At present, there are no identifiable funds to develop the park. -The size of the park does not meet the minimum standard size for a neighborhood park. Therefore, the park has the possibility of being "over-used" as the City continues to grow. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the proposed 1.89 acres of land in question be considered as park land. 1 ~ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 lI 12 13 14 15 16 1? 18 19~ 20 21 22' . 23 24 25 26 RESOLUTION R-90-573 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING PARK BOARD RECOMMENDATION IN PUD ZONING CASES AS THEY RELATE TO PARK POTENTIAL USING OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS. WHEREAS, the Park Board has been created to address Park and Recreation needs and opportunities for the City, and WHEREAS, PUD Zoning requirements call for open space which may prove beneficial as public parks, and WHEREAS, Council desires comment from the Park Board recommending appropriate utilization of PUD open space as potentially desirable public park facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Sec. 1. THAT the City Council does hereby direct the City Manager to: a) Provide the Park Board a copy of each PUD zoning case at the same time it is distributed to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Staff members for review; b) Advise the Park Board that such site plan will considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission, at its Public Hearing at their regularly scheduled' meetings; c) Advise the Park Board that any comments regarding the site plan should be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to that date. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. Passed aAd approved by a vote of _ ~ to ~ on this the ~ day of April, 1990. ATTEST: LaVada Johnson City Secretary L/D/43 CITY OF COLLEYVILLE ~4-~-~~ Chris Hawkins Mayor