Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-9/25/2006 City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com Agenda Monday, September 25, 2006 7:00 PM City Council Chambers Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville Meeting Agenda Planning and Zoning Commission 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com Monday, September 25, 2006 7:00 PM City Council Chambers 6:15 P.M. - PRE-COMMISSION WORKSHOP " EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM THIRD FLOOR. LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANNING, ZONING, PLATTING, AND LAND USE REVIEW OF REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL Commissioners Robert McCormick, Dave Dudziak, Thomas Bartkowski, Mary Taylor, John Blassingame, Denis Duffy, Jeff Byerly 3. INVOCATION Commissioner Blassingame 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES September 11, 2006 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7a Case P-06-042 - Preliminary Plat of Lots 1x-4, Block A, Lots 1x-5, Block B, Lots 1-11, Block C, Lots 1-6, Block 0 of the Preston Oaks Addition on 16.8 acres, located at 805-901 Lavaca Trail 7b Case P-06-046- Final Plat of Lots 1-9, Block 1 of the Chanel's Court Addition located at 209 and 301 Bandit Trail City of C~lIeyville Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda September 25, 2006 7c Case P-06-047 - Preliminary Plat of Lots 1-32, Block 1, Lots 1-45, Block 2, Lots 1-11, Block 3, Lot 1, Block 4, Lot 1, Block 5 of The Villas at Oak Pointe on 19.7 acres, located in the 1600 block of Sanders Lane 7d Case P-06-048 - Minor plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Ford Addition, 1.0 acres located at 2406 Glade Road 7e Case P-06-049 - Preliminary Plat of Lots 1x-12, Block A, Lots 1x-12, Block B, Lots 1-16, Block C of the Covington Addition on 23.4 acres, located at 704-800 L. D. Lockett Road 8. TABLED AGENDA ITEMS 8a Case Z-06-019- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential on 16.870 acres on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Miller Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lancaster Hill Addition & Lot 1 J Block 1 of the Giacomini Addition at 805 to 901 Lavaca Trail 9. STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS 10. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS 11. I hereb ertify the ab agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Thursday, September 21, 2006 by 5:00 p.m. Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 9/22/2006 City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com City Council Minutes - Draft Monday, September 11, 2006 7:00 PM City Council Chambers Planninq and Zoninq Commission Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11, 2006 6:15 P.M. - PRE-COMMISSION WORKSHOP EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM THIRD FLOOR LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANNING, ZONING, PLATTING, AND LAND USE REVIEW OF REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of the City of Colleyville was called to order by Chairman Byerly on September 11, 2006, at 7:05 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Robert McCormick, Dave Dudziak, Thomas Bartkowski, Mary Taylor, John Blassingame and Jeff Byerly Absent: Commissioner Duffy 3. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Commissioner Bartkowski. 4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Byerly made a correction on item 7b, page 4 and stated the motion was to re-open and continue the case at the September 11, meeting. Commissioner Dudziak stated the comments section needs to reflect that as a board, we need to pay closer attention to our decisions and how they affect our streets. Commissioner Dudziak moved to approve the August 28, 2006 meeting minutes with the corrections. Commissioner Bartkowski seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame, Byerly Absent: 1 - Duffy 6. CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Greg Winslow, Colleyville citizen, spoke in regards to the Commissioners keeping the R40 zoning in Colleyville. He discussed drawings in regards to Covenant Christian Academy. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 9/2112006 Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11, 2006 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 7a Case P-06-044 - Final Plat of Lot 8, Block 1 of the Heritage Office Pare Addition on 2.32 acres located at 5209 Heritage Avenue Commissioner Byerly recused himself from this agenda item. Commissioner Bartkowski nominated Commissioner Dudziak to Chair the meeting. Commissioner Taylor seconded. Approved by acclamation. Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Blassingame moved to approve case P-06-044. Commissioner Taylor seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame Absent: 1 - Duffy Abstain: 1 - Byerly 8. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 7b Case P-06-045 - Final Plat of Lots 1-4, Block B of the Heritage High School Addition on 2.13 acres located at 5108 and 5140 SH121 Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Bartkowski moved to approve case P-06-045. Commissioner Blassingame seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame, Byerly Absent: 1 - Duffy Sa Case Z-06-016 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural and R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential on 20.15 acres on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail Addition and Lot 1, Block 1 of the W.C. Newton Addition Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 7: 18. John Myers, 504 Lavaca Trail, corner of Lavaca Trail and Remington Park, spoke in opposition to the density of the development with regards to traffic safety and the esthetics. Judy Ruggere, 1013 W. Lavaca Trail, spoke in favor of the rezoning request. Jeffery Zimmerman, 501 Lavaca Trail, stated not being opposed to development, however, wants the right kind of development. He stated having issues with the density and traffic. Page 2 Printed on 9/21/2006 City of Colleyville Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11, 2006 There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:30 p.m. Commissioner Dudziak stated having concerns for the traffic on Lavaca Trail. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding if Lavaca Trail can handle this capacity of traffic now and if the traffic were to increase? He questioned the Fire Marshal, as well, if the fire trucks have issues getting around the traffic. Fire Marshal McKeown stated there is an issue on Lavaca Trail for yielding to the right of traffic. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Fire Marshal McKeown regarding which fire station responds to this area and what is the response time? Fire Marshal McKeown replied Station 3 services this area and the response time is around a couple of minutes. Depending on the condition of traffic, the fire department goes through Remington Park to get a quicker response time. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if a traffic study has been conducted on Lavaca Trail? Barry LeBaron replied no. Commissioner Taylor stated Lavaca Trail is not a safe street. She stated something needs to be done on Lavaca Trail. Barry LeBaron stated the developers will pay for their portion of the unimproved street. Commissioner Taylor stated needing a traffic study done on Lavaca Trail before any more development is approved. Commissioner Dudziak stated the Commission looked at the Capital Improvement study earlier this year and Lavaca Trail is not in the report to be improved. Commissioner Byerly stated this development is cul-de-sacked at both ends to avoid the cut through traffic. He stated it would not be fair to this developer to have a traffic study completed. Commissioner Taylor stated the Commissioners did not take this amount of traffic into consideration when looking at this development. Commissioner Blassingame stated finding it difficult to approve or not approve a development, when the city has to guess at when the street would be improved for potential development. He stated the neighbors would not want the city to develop a road, if there is not going to be any development. He stated the developments have to come first before the streets can be improved. Commissioner Taylor concurred, however, there has to be money to pay for the improvements. Commissioner Byerly moved to approve case Z-06-016. Commissioner McCormick seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - McCormick, Bartkowski, Blassingame, Byerly Nay: 2 - Dudziak, Taylor Absent: 1 - Duffy 8b Approval of a Zoning Change from AG-Agricultural and CN-Neighborhood Commercial to PUDR-Planned Unit Development Residential on 3.87 acres of the G. Minter Survey and 1.79 acres of the Page 3 Printed on 9/21/2006 City of Colleyville Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11, 2006 Habra Addition located at 3798 to 3804 Glade Road, Case Z-06-020 Commissioner Byerly recused himself from this agenda item. Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Dave Hannah, the applicant, presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Hannah if he has considered any commercial use for this property? Mr. Hannah replied there are uses in the Neighborhood Commercial zoning that could be placed in this area, however, the residents in this area want residential, not commercial. Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr. Hannah if a pool in this development could be considered? Mr. Hannah replied it could be considered in the large open area. Commissioner Blassingame commended Mr. Hannah for sticking with this project and listening to the community. Commissioner Dudziak opened the public hearing at 7:57 p.rn. Bruce Miller, 3609 Wexford Court, Secretary of the Prestwick Park Homeowners Association, stated being in favor of the rezoning request. Ron Rickman, 3604 Cotswood, stated being in favor of the rezoning request. Gary Lecoq, 5113 Roberts Road, stated being in favor of the rezoning request and stated this is what the neighborhood needs. Ken Sauer, 5017 Roberts Road, state being in favor of the rezoning request and stated this is the best use for this property. Ben Goodrum, 3800 Glade Road, stated being in favor of the rezoning request. Greg Puklicz, 5105 Auburndale Avenue, stated being in favor of the rezoning request. He stated Mr. Hannah is a quality developer for this area. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:10 p.m. Commissioner Blassingame questioned if the green space is in compliance with the code? Barry LeBaron replied according to the plan submitted, the open space is fairly close, but until we have the construction plans in place, it is hard to gauge what the percentages would be. According to this plan, he has 25 percent. Commissioner Blassingame stated being comfortable with the staff findings. Commissioner Dudziak stated there could be no more than 25 percent of open space in a retention/detention area, this project contains 48 percent within areas three and four, close to the entry. Also, this Commission has worked with developers to get as much contiguous open space as possible. The features have been chopped up before and the residents can not use those open spaces. He stated the parking spaces are not usable open spaces. Commissioner Blassingame questioned Mr. Hannah regarding if he will comply with the rules about the open space and water or will a waiver be requested? Mr. Hannah explained which detention areas would hold water. He stated the mature market will not be using the open space for ball games. Mostly the open spaces are used for buffering and beauty. He stated there will be a 10 foot trail outside the wall. Commissioner City of Colleyville Page 4 Printed on 9/21/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11, 2006 Blassingame questioned Mr. Hannah regarding if the wall outside of the detention area will be a solid wall? Mr. Hannah replied it will have articulation in the design, but the majority will be masonry. Commissioner Taylor stated this is a very practical layout, having the extra parking spaces. Commissioner Bartkowski stated not being in favor of gated communities. He questioned Mr. Hannah if he has considered having gates for vehicular traffic but placing pedestrian gates throughout the neighborhood? Mr. Hannah stated not having a problem with that, the Riverwalk has those types of gates. Commissioner Bartkowski stated being in favor of the layout of the development. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Commissioner Taylor regarding who is buying this type of home? Commissioner Taylor replied empty nesters or singles. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding when will Glade Road be widened? Barry LeBaron replied the project has been bid, and most of the funds are coming from TXDOT, and will probably start between 60 and 90 days. Commissioner Blassingame moved to approve case Z-06-020. Commissioner Taylor seconded. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Commissioner Blassingame if the open space waiver is being approved as well? Commissioner Blassingame replied it not being necessary. Barry LeBaron stated the percentages would be verified before the preliminary plat is brought to the Commission. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - McCormick, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame Nay: 1 - Dudziak Absent: 1 - Duffy Abstain: 1 - Byerly 8e Case Z-06-022 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural to R20- Single Family Residential on .97 acres out of the S. Cotrail Survey located at 2406 Glade Road Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if the differences between building on a R40 lot and an AG lot is the set back requirements? Chris Fuller replied correct, the front yard set back is the same for R40 and AG, 40 feet. The side yard is 15 feet for R40 and 25 feet for AG. The rear is 25 feet for R40 and 40 feet for AG. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:22 p.m. Scott Ford, 1629 Willowbend, Keller, the applicant, stated requesting the R20 zoning because of the narrow width of the lot. He stated wanting to build a single home on this lot. The R20 side set back would work better for this narrow lot. There being no one wishing to speak. the public hearing was closed at 8:24 p.m. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Ford if he wants to build one house on this lot and if the side set back requirement is all that is holding him back? Mr. Ford replied correct, City of Colleyville Page 5 Printed on 9/2112006 Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11, 2006 staff suggested to do this. Commissioner Taylor stated she would be willing to grant the waiver of the set back requirements as the AG zoning instead of rezoning the lot to R20. Commissioner Byerly concurred and suggested the applicant go before the Zoning Board of Adjustments and request a waiver on the set back requirements. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if the applicant could get the waiver through the platting process? Chris Fuller replied the set back requirements could be waived or reduced if the plat were to come forth in the AG zoning district and it would still be zoned AG. Commissioner Byerly moved to deny case Z-06-022 with a note that the Commission could consider a plat under the AG zoning district as a single family lot. Commissioner Bartkowski seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 6 - McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame, Byerly Absent: 1 - Duffy 8d Approval of a zoning change from R40-Single Family Residential to R20- Single Family Residential on 23.4 acres out of the Isaac Carodine Survey, C. newton Survey and the W. C. Newton Subdivision located at 704-800 L.D. Lockett Road, Case Z-06-023 Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:29 p.m. Will Walton, the applicant, presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Curtis Young, land developer for the project, presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. The Commission took a 10 minute break at 9:00 p.m.. The Commission reconvened at 9:10 p.m. Marty Stajduhar, 101 Williamsburg Court, stated he enjoys the rural setting and still in favor of R40 zoning in this area. Jeff Zimmerman, 501 Lavaca Trail, stated this development looks great and the set backs look great off of LD Lockett. Vince Wells, 5909 Colts Neck Drive, the Oaks and Briarwood HOA President, stated being in favor of the rezoning request, but stated having concerns for the extra traffic through the area. Paul Moore, 613 Hunter Trail, stated being in favor of the rezoning request. He stated being in favor of the opticom gate at Hunter Trail. There being no one wishing to speak, the publiC hearing was closed at 9:20 p.m. Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr. Young regarding what is the largest lot in the development? Mr. Walton replied, almost 26,000 square feet. Mr. Young replied, the Page 6 Printed on 9/21/2006 City of Colleyville Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11 , 2006 one in the southeast corner. Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr. Young if some R30 lots could be used in the project? Mr. Young replied, it's always a possibility, however, the R20 would apply to this project. There are some aspects of this project that would apply in a Planned Unit Development. Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr. Young if some of the lots that face the Stajduhar's property, could be R30? Mr. Young replied, it would be possible, however, we have not planned for it. Mr. Walton concurred with Commissioner Taylor and stated the extension of the open space is as close to the riding arena as possible. The primary concern is the activity closest to the barn and we have tried to provide the necessary buffer. Commissioner Dudziak stated a hybrid R20 is not a term he is comfortable with, that is why the PUDs are in place. He questioned staff regarding what is in place that the Commission can use to encourage him to develop? Barry LeBaron replied the applicant is asking for straight R20 zoning, he does not have to provide the open space, however, when the plat comes forward, there may be a need for a retention/detention area for the run off. The PUD zoning requires a 25 percent open space which may cause this developer to have to use less desirable lots for that space than R20 to make the development work. The PUD zoning also allows for lots as small as 13,000 square feet, and in this case, the developer could get more density than what he is proposing in the R20 district, therefore he chose the R20 but with amenities and features as shown tonight which is really not required. Commissioner Blassingame concurred with Mr. Stajduhar with R40 or even R30 lots, however, the neighbors support this project. This plan is well thought out and there is an estate feel along LD Lockett. Commissioner Bartkowski concurred, having the neighbors to support the project is a great hurdle. Commissioner Byerly concurred however, he stated he would be better, even in the straight zoning, to be able to make the developer stick to the plan presented. Barry LeBaron and Chris Fuller replied a preliminary plat has been submitted, however, there was not enough time to evaluate the plans for this agenda. It will be ready for the September 25, 2006 meeting. Commissioner Dudziak stated the PUD tools have been created to allow the Commission to have guidelines for developments such as this. If for some reason this developer chose to sell the property, then this is zoned R20 and the Commission would have to approve a plat that fit into those R20 zoning district guidelines. Commissioner Bartkowski suggested the Commission see the preliminary plat before a decision is made. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Walton if it would be a hardship for him if the Commission were to delay the zoning to see the preliminary plat? Mr. Walton stated not at all, the timing was an issue when submitting the preliminary plat. However, it was not ready for this meeting. He stated they are going to develop as they have stated. Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr. Walton if his preliminary plat is exactly what is being presented tonight? Mr. Walton replied yes. Commissioner Byerly again questioned Mr. Walton if it would be a hardship on them for the Commission to delay the zoning to see the preliminary plat? Mr. Walton replied given the information that has been presented here tonight, we would like a decision. Commissioner Blassingame questioned Mr. Walton if there are any contracts on file that City of Colleyville Page 7 Printed on 9/21/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11, 2006 will be delayed? Mr. Walton replied yes, there is an effect on time delays. Fire Marshall McKeown stated all was well until he talked about the city street to the northeast being blocked. He stated it would go against the Fire Code for that street to be blocked. The only provision in the code is if the developer were to make the development a private subdivision. Commissioner Byerly questioned Fire Marshall McKeown if an opticom gate would be acceptable? Fire Marshall McKeown replied no, since it is a city street, he can not block it. Barry LeBaron there are situations like it around Colleyville and the City Council could approve it as part of the platting process. Staff does not like or support the gates, and staff would like to have connectivity between subdivisions. Fire Marshall McKeown concurred and stated the less obstacles to go through, the better. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned staff regarding if the preliminary plat is on file? Barry LeBaron replied yes, however, it was not ready to go before the Commission for this meeting. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff regarding what dates will this zoning request go before City Council? Barry LeBaron replied on the 3rd and 17th of October. City Attorney Matthew Boyle stated the Commission recommend the approval of the zoning change subject to the development being consistent with the preliminary plat on file and as shown and described to the Commission. Commissioner Dudziak stated the PUD guidelines are there for the Commission to use for developments such as this. We have allowed the developers to tell us what open space they are willing to put in the developments. Commissioner Blassingame moved to approve case Z-06-023 as stated by City Attorney Matthew Boyle with approval of the zoning change subject to the development being consistent with the preliminary plat on file and as shown and described to the Commission. Commissioner Byerly seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - McCormick, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame, Byerly Nay: 1 - Dudziak Absent: 1 - Duffy 9. TABLED AGENDA ITEMS 9a Case Z-06-019- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential on 16.870 acres on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Miller Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lancaster Hill Addition & Lot 1, Block 1 of the Giacomini Addition at 805 to 901 Lavaca Trail Commissioner Taylor recused herself from this agenda item. Commissioner Bartkowski moved to remove this item from the table. Commissioner Blassingame seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 5 - McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Blassingame, Byerly Page 8 Printed on 9/21/2006 City of Colleyville Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Minutes - Draft September 11, 2006 Absent: 1 - Duffy Abstain: 1 - Taylor Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. He stated the traffic impact analysis was submitted today, around noon, but staff has not had time to review it for this meeting. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned staff if this case was tabled, at the last meeting, to give the applicant time to revise his plan? Chris Fuller replied yes, the applicant has remained with the R20 zoning request, but has given a different conceptual layout. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if the conceptual layout is dramatically different than the previous? Chris Fuller replied yes, but it does not show connectivity to the adjacent subdivision. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned staff if the connectivity was there before? Chris Fuller replied yes. Commissioner Byerly moved to continue the public hearing and case Z-06-019 to the September 25, 2006 meeting. Commissioner Bartkowski seconded. The motion carried by the following vote: Aye: 4 - McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Byerly Nay: 1 - Blassingame Absent: 1 - Duffy Abstain: 1 - Taylor 1 O. STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS Barry LeBaron reminded the commissioners that the new commissioners will be appointed during the October 3, 2006 city council meeting and will be seated at the October 9, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting. 11. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS None 12. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Planning and Zoning Commission, adjourned at 9:57 p.m. Approved by acclamation. I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Thursday, September 7, 2006 Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant City of Colleyville Page 9 Printed on 9/21/2006 City of Colleyville Agenda Briefing 100 Main Street Colleyville. Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Commision Action Items Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Version: 1 Agenda Date: 09/25/2006 Requester: Community Agenda No.: 7a Final Action: Development Department File Name: Case P-06-042 - Preliminary Plat for Preston Oaks Addition on 16.870 acres of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Miller Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lancaster Hill Addition and Lot 1, Block 1 of the Giacomini Addition Attachments: Zoning and Location Map. DRC Memo . Applicant's Response . Plat History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 09/25/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Case P-06-042 - Preliminary Plat of Lots 1 x-4, Block A, Lots 1 x-5, Block B, Lots 1-11, Block C, Lots 1-6, Block 0 of the Preston Oaks Addition on 16.8 acres, located at 805-901 Lavaca Trail Explanation STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS RWS Management, Inc., is the potential developer of 16.8 acres located on the south side of Lavaca Trail and approximately 1,450 feet east of Precinct Line Road. The developer has submitted a Preliminary Plat to develop the property into 26 lots for the construction of 23 single-family residential lots, two open space lots and one storm water retention lot. Zoning. The properties are currently located within the R40 - Single Family Residential zoning district. A request to rezone the properties to the R20 - Single Family Residential zoning district is also on the agenda for consideration. The R20 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet, lot width of 100-feet and lot depth of 125-feet. The proposed lots meet the lot development requirements of the R20 zoning district. Platting. The proposed development consists of several properties that are platted as large acreage lots. The properties are currently developed as single family residences. The applicant has indicated plans to subsequently plat the properties into 26 lots upon approval of the rezoning request. Approval of this preliminary plat, and subsequently a final plat, will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2006 Agenda Briefing Continued Setback Buffer. The proposed development includes two 25-foot wide open space lots adjacent to Lavaca Trail. The open space lots are not required by the Land Development Code, but are being proposed by the developer to enhance the entrance to the development. The greenbelt also promotes the rural atmosphere along Lavaca Trail, which has been a concern of the existing residents. Access and Connectivity. The primary access for the proposed development will be located along Lavaca Trail. An internal street will connect to the proposed subdivision to the west, providing access for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. In order to accommodate the street connection, the proposed street right of way is 40-feet in width, which is less than the required 50-feet of right of way required for public streets. However, 40-feet of width is sufficient to accommodate the 31-foot pavement width of a typical residential street and the placement of sidewalks. Staff supports the narrow right-of-way and believes that the reduced right of way width is appropriate for these developments and will not be detrimental to public safety. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all public streets. The sidewalks must be installed when any new structures are built on the property. Sidewalks along Lavaca Trail and internal to the development must be four (4) feet wide Drainage. This project provides an open space lot within the subdivision that will contain a retention pond. The R20 zoning district regulations do not limit the amount of open space used for detention as mandated within a PUDR zoning district. A drainage analysis for the development has been reviewed by the Engineering Department. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required since Lavaca Trail is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The developer is required to construct a portion of the street to current standards or escrow a cash equivalent, as determined by the Engineering Department. The perimeter street improvement fee is based on the projected roadway impact of the proposed development and the amount of frontage along a public roadway. This development has approximately 613 feet of frontage along Lavaca Trail. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat for new structures on newly platted lots. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. Summary. The applicant has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land Development Code. Recommendation Approval City of Co/leyville Page 2 Printed on 9/22/2006 Zoning and Location Map CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE September 19, 2006 817.571.7564 Ron Shirley (RWS Mgmt Inc) N/A TO FAX NO Thomas Hoover FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-06-042 Preston Oaks preliminary plat The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Show the lots lines along both street frontages on Lot 5, Block B and Lot 1, Block C. City Council must approve a waiver request for any proposed setback lines that are less than as required by the proposed R20 zoning district. 2. Street E shall align with proposed Chantal Lane in the adjacent development to provide connectivity. If alignment is not accomplished, Street E will not be allowed. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: 3. Additional hydrants will be needed. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251- 8757, for more information. 4. Street names will require review and approval by the Fire Marshall at the time of final plat. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of approval of the plat. Perimeter street improvements are required for the newly created lots since Lavaca Trail is considered an unimproved street. The developer's portion of the costs for infrastructure improvements may not exceed the amount that is rougWy proportionate to the projected impact of the proposed development, as determined by a professional engineer, licensed in the State of Texas, and who is retained by the City of Colleyville. In making the rough proportionality determination, consideration shall be given to the availability of adequate and minimum levels of public facilities and accessibility to the site for the delivery of emergency servIces. 100 Main street, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P06-042 PRESTON OAKS PREUMINARY PLAT PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the plat.. As new vacant lots would be created by the plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Lavaca Trail and interior streets. The sidewalk on Lavaca Trail must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as part ofthe public improvements to the property. Interior sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the drip line of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. Please note the revised impact fee schedule as adopted by City Council. The new rates will go into effect for building permits issued on or after April 1, 2007. SEWER $2,187 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,491 for a 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $643 for a 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER The following impact fee schedule is applicable for building permits issued on or before March 31,2007. ROADWAY Not applicable for lot with existing house on property. $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, September 25,2006,7:00 p.m. Tuesday, November 6,2006,7:30 p.m. PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P06-Q42 PRESTON OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT Please submit the following to our offices: A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived; . 15 full size copies of the revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 XII). The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Thurssday, August 21, 2006, in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fullerc((V,ci.collevville.tx.us or 817.503.1054 if you have any questions. . PAGE3OF3 H THOMAS HOOVER ENGINEERING, LLC September 20, 2006 Ron Shirley RWS Management, Inc. 5611 Colleyville Blvd, Suite 260 Colleyville, TX 76034 Re: P-06-042 - Preston Oaks Addition Preliminary Plat Comments Dear Mr. Shirley: We have completed the review of the Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) comments regarding the preliminary plat submitted for their review and comment. The following comments address their issues: 1. Show the lot lines along both street frontages on Lot 5, Block B and Lot 1, Block C. The City Council must approve a waiver request for any proposed setback lines that are less than as required by the proposed R20 zoning district. Response: We have added the lot dimensions as requested. We are not requesting a waiver for the front yard setbacks. We propose for all fronts to remain 30-foot. 2. Street E shall align with proposed Chantal Lane in the adjacent development to provide connectivity. If alignment is not accomplished, Street E will not be allowed. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. Response: We have coordinated the alignment of Street E with the proposed Chantal Lane. The design engineer for the adjacent property will be modifying his alignment to accomplish the connectivity. 3. Additional fire hydrants will be needed. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshal, 817.251.8757, for more information. Response: We have revised the fire hydrant locations to comply with the directions of the Fire Marshal. 1361 W. Euless Blvd., Suite 99, Euless, TX 76040 817-571-7574 ph. 817-571-7564 fax RECEIVED c; P) '), 1 ~~,~ ..,~.. 1 *"" j(. Per ............. 4. Street names will require review and approval by the Fire Marshal at the time of final plat.. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshal, 817.251.8757, for more information Response: We will complied with this request. The following items will need to be addressed by the Owner. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of approval of the plat. Perimeter street improvements are required for the newly created lots since Lavaca Trail is considered an unimproved street. Response: We are aware of the perimeter street improvement fees and are prepared for payment at the approval of the final plat. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the plat. As new vacant lots would be created by the plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for the development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. Response: We are aware of the parkland dedication fees and are prepared for payment for 22 new single-family lots at the approval of the final plat. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Lavaca Trail and interior streets. The sidewalk on Lavaca Trail must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as a part of the public improvements to the property. Interior sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as a part of the public improvements to the property. Response: We will include the sidewalks along Lavaca Trail and all HOAlOpen Space lots in the development plans. The sidewalks at the individual single-family lots will be required as a building permit. TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. Response: We will comply with the tree preservation requirements of the city. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. Response: We will comply with the impact fees of the city. If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely; Copy: Chris Fuller, City of Colleyville ~~,,~'\\ _ ~ OF Tp:- \, t8Ii> ~ '1\0- ......... <;.tAj a.. tIP"-r ...... :tllo d' r:'" 000 . .It_. tV w; 1!!1' -J. ..1 . .A. ... A1 -I. . '.'.J . 1It' lIi 'I }1( 0" .~ '. ~.. * f, *': -...... ...:...~} 6. Q.1iI0~~~~'~~"."_(d:'..~lOtl I 'OOVER . 17. Th\;,;.~ L 'I Q OOOQQOU~ .~-:.; C~'.; (". :,::.(\0000 (IoO"Q 0:.... U, 4" G:~4'j3,:~ !Jr. .~'. I) ,~ ..~~ "Ii; '(t'..;. ',f"'I/t''iI\t~~ '.'fi€. # ';1f.. $~ii~:c~oM, .; fI \. .ooore~ 6;: '~(L"'~:'{f'l"~'a,,oo~. (.~V<,:.J "'~\\:~/ew1t . ,~:s."))po<:UI . '-..:;~':~2.?:.f.~"$-\l:.O~i' : a . & . . w . r--- . I ~ I > . . "...... . I I . W ~ . ill ~ I . (.) . ill Q ~II . w '- I g III 0::: l:/') <D I I <;) I a.. L~~."I ! a ~ 1 liQ . ... ~ ~g<ow.,~ p~~~t') l()C\!c\!"ltl) '1111 II II II ':1-0: fg l::o t3i:lu~ lo .. f9, 9.00 ~; T o~ ~ ~tj ~(:) OZ t-z z<!; -(:) ~lil J.HflO:J S, VWPl3 GSSOdOHcI liQ liQ 1- ~~; ," :',0 w:' ~; ,; z o e::: (-0 is ~ ~ >- III ~~~ l!:: <eC ~ 0 ~ z ~ ~ C1:l r>ol ~ Q., . J t I~ , i :i frBi it ~ I~ I~. 12~ l ~Ir I'~ ~ il l~ ~ ~ II S 01'06'08" E-384.50' ~ ,Wl<< - - fzl . "l. ~;! 10 . ~g ll:l'" of:! z City of Colleyville Agenda Briefing 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Commision Action Items Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Version: Agenda Date: 09/25/2006 Requester: Community Agenda No.: 7b Final Action: Development Department File Name: Case P-06-046- Final Plat of Lots 1-9, Block 1 of the Chanel's Court Additon located at 209 and 301 Bandit Trail Attachments: Zoning and Location Map' DRC Memo' Applicant's Response · Plat History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 09/25/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Case P-06-046- Final Plat of Lots 1-9, Block 1 of the Chanel's Court Addition located at 209 and 301 Bandit Trail Explanation STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Keith Kithsiri is the potential developer of a 5.39-acre parcel of property located on the south side of Bandit Trail, east of Vanguard Court. The developer has submitted a Preliminary Plat to divide the property into eleven (11) lots for the construction of nine (9) new single-family residences and two (2) open space lots. Zoning. The proposed lots are located in a R20 - Single Family Residential zoning district. The R20 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet, lot width of 100-feet and lot depth of 125-feet. The proposed lots meet the lot development requirements of the R20 zoning district. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on public streets. The sidewalk on Bandit Trail must be five (5) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. Interior sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. Drainage. This project provides two open space lots adjacent to Bandit Trail that will contain detention ponds. A drainage study for the development has been reviewed by the Engineering Department. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2006 Agenda Briefing Continued Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required since Bandit Trail is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The developer is dedicating additional right-of-way along Bandit Trail and is required to construct a portion of the street to current standards or escrow a cash equivalent, as determined by the Engineering Department. The perimeter street improvement fee is based on the projected roadway impact of the proposed development and the amount of frontage along a public roadway. This development has a total of approximately 450 feet of frontage along Bandit Trail. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat for new structures on newly platted lots. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's Office. Summary. The applicant has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land Development Code. Recommendation Approval City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 9/22/2006 R~O R~O R~O R~O mrn AG R40 R~O CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE TO FAX NO FROM September l, 2006 Ed Kellie 817.379.1244 Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-06-046 Chanel Court final plat The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Remove the second note on the plat regarding the HOA procedures for removing trees in the Tree Preservation Easement. As written, it may be inferred that the City of Colleyville is responsible for the enforcement of the HOA procedures. Staff recommends that this language be inserted into the HOA covenants. 2. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094 or Mike Tekaucic, Public Works, 817.540.0609 regarding the water taps on the 6-inch main and not on the 12-inch feeder mam. 3. Contact Mike Tekaucic, Public Works, 817.540.0609 regarding the stormwater inlets at the intersection of Bandit Trail and Chanel Court. In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: 4. Additional requirements may be reviewed when plans are submitted. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information. 5. Markups are available for pickup. Contact Robert Woods, 817.503.1094, Engineering Department. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of approval of the plat. Perimeter street improvements are required for the newly created lots since Bandit Trail is considered an unimproved street. The developer's portion of the costs for infrastructure improvements may not exceed the amount that is roughly proportionate to the projected impact ofthe proposed development, as determined by a professional engineer, licensed in the State of Texas, and who is retained by the City of Colleyville. In making the rough 100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-06-046 CHANEl COURT FINAl PLAT proportionality determination, consideration shall be given to the availability of adequate and minimum levels of public facilities and accessibility to the site for the delivery of emergency servIces. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the plat.. As new vacant lots would be created by the plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Bandit Trail and interior streets. The sidewalk on Bandit Trail must be five (5) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. Interior sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as part ofthe public improvements to the property. TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. Please note the revised impact fee schedule as adopted by City Council. The new rates will go into effect for building permits issued on or after April 1, 2007. SEWER $2,187 per dwelling unit for SlNGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,491 for a 314-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $643 for a 3!4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER The following impact fee schedule is applicable for building permits issued on or before March 31,2007. ROADWAY Not applicable for lot with existing house on property. $1,589 per dwelling unit for SlNGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-06-046 CHANEL COURT FINAL PLAT Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, September 25,2006,7:00 p.m. Tuesday, October 17, 2006, 7:30 p.m. Please submit the following to our offices: . A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived; . 12 full size copies of the revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 XII). The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, September 20, 2006, in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fuHerc(a),ci.colleyville.tx.us or 817.503.1054 if you have any questions. PAGE30F3 KELLIE ENGINEERING, iNC. September 21, 2006 Chris Fuller Community Development Department City of ColleyviUe 100 Main Street ColleyviUe, TX 76034 Fax: 817-503-1059 Re: P-06-046 Chanel Court - Final Plat Dear Chris: I am writing in response to the September 1, 2006 comments received from the Development Review Committee on the Final Plat., Case No. P-06-046, Chanel Court. On behalf of the applicant, Vision Southwest LP 10, the following items are acknowledged: Revisions to the Plat: 1. Comment concerning HOA tree removal procedures has been removed from the Final Plat. 2. Kellie Engineering has met with Robert Woods, Project Engineer, concerning the water line connection. The Construction Plans are being modified per City comments. 3. Kellie Engineering has met with Robert Woods, Project Engineer, concerning slom1 drain inlet locations 011 Chanel Court. The Construction Plans are being modified per City comments. 4. The applicant acknowledges that the Fire Marshall may have additional requirements during the construction plan review process. Development Comments: 1. Perimeter Street Improvement fees will be due at the time of approval of the plat. The developer, Vision Southwest LP 10, acknowledges comment andwi/l pay fee allime of pial approval. RECEIVED ~.\ f 4' 200 Rufe Snow Drive North, Suite 120,Keller, TX 76248 Tel: 817.379.1225 Fax: 817.379.124'1 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS. PLANNING' DESIGN er ............. f:f.q; ~H.Ef?ip{;. Pd Chris Fuller September 21, 2006 Page 2 of3 K.J;..........J.....J; 2. Parkland Dedication fees will be due at the time of approval ofthe plat. The developer, Vision Southwest LP J 0, acknowledges comment and will pay fee at time (J.f plat approval. 3. A 5' sidewalk will be required along Bandit Trail, 4' sidewalks will be required along the interior streets. The developer. Vision Southwest LP 10, acknowledges comment. Developer will install sidewalk along Bandit Trail and in front of HOA areas with the subdivision construction (these sidewalks are included in the subdivision Consttuction Plans). Home Builders will install interior sidewalks with each home. 4. Tree Preservation. The developer, Vision Southwest LP ] 0, acknowledges comment. Tree preservation .frncing and notes are included in the subdivision Construction Plans s and the individual home builders will be notified of their responsibilities under the Ci~y '8 Tree Preservation Ordinance. 5. Roadway, Water, and Sewer Impact Fees. The developer, Vision Southwest LP J 0, acknowledges comment. Actualfees may vwy. Fees will be paid at the time of building permit application. If you have allY questions, please do not hesitate to calL Sincerely - , Kellie Engineering, Inc. f}w~d ~ Edward T. Keltic, P.E. cc: Keith Kithsiri, Vision Southwest LP 10. !~Ij~ ~'G~',,,<j j~~l~ :~: }~ .~ '""';r..;tJ:lSl~ ~ ~'i: 9&:~ ~ :::; ~ 8' l<'\~ ~~i~~';~ ~ h ~l: ~:::11 01 ...... Di ~ . i S e <l'r>!!?'tl. ~iO ~.. "'0 0 .,:; .. ""?-g' 'it ~:;;~<~ft.'~ ,;.,g;:r~ -.CI)> !lli'o. ;;;;:fp' . ~ile''''~i~ ~g;S:9 ~! - g ~I~ :s 0: r~ t:m i,... boo ,:;;; ~~~58 - ()) II) tf) ;0 ~~~~i ~~~ ~ N~&; t. ~'" ~ .. ~ (/) m -0 ..., m s:: C;X:l m ;0 tv 8 e;.. ~() ~ %~>~'" ~o~;a2 ........,,;::om> ()()i')~;;:l 00....>0 ~~zz- L Ou>Z :< . c.... . ..:: g:::v :r ;:riFw~m ~f" :< {b Ii .1 ! S~-" ,0: ;c'.' r i :~l i <~f~ l' ~,~ i I ~ ~,~ t ~:f '2'5 ~t ~: 'j:: . . . \--------- - ( , il 0 ~ >(~~ ~'~ 1 t~ ;~! :1; .~~ '! ! , if ., g ~ .' {~' ~i ! ~~. h", j ~.~ t :... tl b fJ , ,.1':; , t'> \':'" .~z ~ ,~ ! t ~ ; ~~ ,'" I ~ i, ; $ " , <i ;j ~j:'~"" ~~'~ . ~q .......~lc- mi;; ~~~ 5~;' ~;l ~Ii ~it ~i~ lllg ~:! ~* !l.t!~ II~ b:~ t( ~,~ Ii ~ .~ ~.~ ~: .f $ I i ~ I . ; l , : , 1 l' Hlf i~~i I ~,,!~ ~Q" I, ',4 ' ri ! !' It."." """ f It.'l ~~ , 1 1". - I ;i; 1 , ll-' !{'l:,::,,: ~' t:i;! ~ ill! . .1' 1 qi1i! tJ ~l;; 1 i~{f .r,. i':~! ~. ~lr .t~ 1 f 1~~, ~i $~ t:& Fi m ~~i mn It, A .~ .~ u~ .,v... h, it ~'I" '...- ... 1f ." ..., f:",'I<' ~ !!r <( :! !~ H ~i' hI H' .". _!. .'8 's ,'0 i g ^'~ -.~ !< ~..l ll:i Iii Ii ',i,; li~ F,~ I; ~,~~t,' ~l!g nl ." ih >.~ ' i~ t! ';'i1 .~ v . "" .J .. ~t f'~.!" . 'Iii j~ E:~ E.~ ~;1 ~f A~. !f~ .~ . f 'l~ ~{; ;f~ l~ Ifl idl ! !, f :'IJ ;.1 k J'iir f ';.. ! t..i.. >>tc!. :...,,~ . t P'~'i '.~ ~ ~ I ~ ~:5 .~s il;l-~ . '" " '.. .,. ~ '" f ",,'. ~ ~ ,. - ". <18 ., ;,<. ,.. -", I "1-' r i < ~I ; ! !! t,. .:.1 rJ ~;t ~ ':j l i H t1 IJl {l 1;'1 ~1 ! i tJ~i;~ i ~i ./tf .! i ! .tis !f' \; !~;~ If f I ~! 'f [.f 1'1 ""I i: t;. i. tf f~ {~~ r!;1Zjr; "I I ~ 1 :1 11' ;;i H< h ~ ! 1 'f" 1 i 'f! , i J ~ ~ .i!f~l- ~ iH~ji.~ . i '1J.I;'! t hit~~!. Ht Ilt!i:;jfI~J t<..l.. II If : 1il Iji , l' 1 o I )> :J."J E Z z)> -o~mor ~zr--+.-o ffi00 S; o -i C ;;0 --l f . :;::'''' ~--~.. ~ :,'. : i ' ~~ i %i ) '.; if t. I I { ""1# ~ """ :;u m Q m < f'l1 o . . , , . . . . . , . ~ , t~,,:: 'rt~...t-:';' City of Colleyville Agenda Briefing 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1 000 www.colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Commision Action Items Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Version: 1 Agenda Date: 09/25/2006 Requester: Community Agenda No.: 7c Final Action: Development Department File Name: Case P-06-047 - Preliminary Plat for The Villas at Oak Pointe on 19.78 acres out of the J. L Byas Survey located in the 1600 block of Sanders Lane Attachments: Zoning and Location Map . DRC Memo . Applicant's Response . Plat. EXHIBIT A . EXHIBIT B History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 09/25/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Case P-06-047 - Preliminary Plat of Lots 1-32, Block 1, Lots 1-45, Block 2, Lots 1-11, Block 3, Lot 1, Block 4, Lot 1, Block 5 of The Villas at Oak Pointe on 19.7 acres, located in the 1600 block of Sanders Lane Explanation STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Hearth Stone Partners LLC, is the owner and developer of 19.7 acres, located in the 1600 block of Sanders Lane. The developer has submitted a preliminary plat, which will subdivide the property into 90 lots for the construction of 25 single-family attached townhomes, 49 single family residential detached dwelling units and 16 open space lots. In a town home development, each dwelling unit is situated on its own platted lot to allow for individual ownership. An individual townhome is a part of a larger building that contains three or more attached town home dwelling units. The applicant has submitted the preliminary plat for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The preliminary plat will also require the approval of the City Council, since the plat contains more than four lots. The following is an analysis of the issues associated with this preliminary Plat. Zoning. The proposed plat area is zoned PUDR- Planned Unit Development - Residential. The PUDR zoning was approved by the City Council on August 2,2006 with the approval of Ordinance 0-06-1584, which contains several development standards. The Preliminary City of Colleyvi/le Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2006 Agenda Briefing Continued Plat has been reviewed for compliance with the regulations of the Land Development Code and the standards contained in the PUDR ordinance for this development. The minimum lot size required in this PUDR is 2,700 square feet. All of the lots satisfy this requirement. The development is required by the PUDR ordinance to provide not less than 22 percent common open space. The proposed site plan for the development shows 22.9 percent of the total development as common open space. In addition to the general common open space areas, the developer has designated a 30 foot buffer as a tree preservation area located along the eastern and southern boundaries of the development and a 20 foot tree preservation area located along the northeastern boundary of the development. The tree preservation easements are designated as common open space areas and are included in the overall open space calculation of 22.9 percent. The Homeowners Association (HOA) will be responsible for the maintenance of the open space areas, including the tree preservation buffer areas. Access and Roadway Improvements. Primary access to the development will be from Sanders Lane. The plat exhibit does not currently show the development as being gated. The applicant has requested to defer the decision to gate the property until consideration of the final plat, as the decision will be dependant upon market factors. The intersection of Sanders Lane and SH26 will be realigned with Tinker Road on the west side of SH26 when the highway is reconstructed in the near future. The applicant has submitted exhibits illustrating the proposed off-site roadway improvements. The proposed off-site roadway improvements have been reviewed by the Engineering Department, however, the final acceptance of the improvements associated with SH26 is contingent upon approval by the Texas Department of Transportation. The developer is proposing a 30-foot emergency access right-of-way on the eastern side of the development, which will contain a 24-foot pavement section and an emergency access gate. The gate will contain Opticom gate opening equipment, as required by the approved zoning ordinance, to allow access to the development in case of an emergency situation when normal access via Sanders Lane may not be possible. Drainage Improvements. The applicant has submitted a preliminary drainage analysis for the development which has been reviewed and accepted by the Engineering Department. Construction plans for the drainage improvements will be included with the submittal of the final plat. The preliminary drainage analysis indicates that the development will utilize on-site detention to accommodate stormwater related to this development. Tree Survey and Replacement Requirements. Aerial photos of the site show considerable tree coverage on this property. The street layout and arrangement of lots on the preliminary plat have been configured purposely to preserve the significant trees on the property. Upon approval of the final plat and prior to any site grading, the developer will submit a survey and tree replacement plan for the non-exempt trees that are scheduled for removal. Parkland Dedication Fees. The developer has acknowledged that parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the Final Plat. The fees for non-residential uses are City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 9/22/2006 Agenda Briefing Continued $1,802 per residential lot. Summary. The developer has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land Development Code and the special requirements of PUDR Ordinance 0-06-1584. Recommendation Approval City of Colleyville Page 3 Printed on 9/22/2006 CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE TO FAX NO FROM September 5, 2006 Jeff Avery 817.577.7000 Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-06-047 Villas at Oak Pointe preliminary plat The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRe) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Label the 30 foot wide Tree Preservation Buffer as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit "C" within approved ordinance 0-06-1584. 2. Provide a note on the plat stating that all open spaces and amenities therein will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. 3. Will the development be gated? The application fee for a gated development subdivision is $750.00, which shall be paid at time of Preliminary Plat submittal. 4. What off-site roadway improvements are proposed between SH26 and the entrance to the development? 5. Town homes require residential sprinklers and alarms. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information. 6. What type of fire protection will the homes on zero lot lines have? I would suggest residential sprinklers. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information. In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: 7. Comments are available on markups. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. 8. Additional hydrants may be needed. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251- 8757, for more information. 100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1 050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-06-047 VILLAS AT OAK POINTE PRELIMINARY PLAT 9. Emergency access gates will need Opticom sensors for both directions with battery backups and Knox key backup. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of approval of the plat. Perimeter street improvements are required for the newly created lots since Sanders Lane is considered an unimproved street. The developer's portion of the costs for infrastructure improvements may not exceed the amount that is roughly proportionate to the projected impact of the proposed development, as determined by a professional engineer, licensed in the State of Texas, and who is retained by the City of Colleyville. In making the rough proportionality determination, consideration shall be given to the availability of adequate and minimwn levels of public facilities and accessibility to the site for the delivery of emergency sefVlces. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the plat.. As new vacant lots would be created by the plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Sanders Lane and interior streets. Sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the drip line of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. Please note the revised impact fee schedule as adopted by City Council. The new rates will go into effect for building permits issued on or after April 1 , 2007. SEWER $2,187 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,491 for a 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $643 for a 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER PAGE20F3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-06-047 VilLAS AT OAK POINTE PRELIMINARY PLAT The following impact fee schedule is applicable for building permits issued on or before March 31,2007. SEWER $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a i-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, September 25,2006, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, October 17,2006,7:30 p.m. Please submit the following to our offices: . A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived; . 15 full size copies ofthe revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 X 11). The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, September 20, 2006, in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fullerc@ci.colleyville.tx.us or 817.503.1054 if you have any questions. PAGE30F3 HAMILTON DUFFY, P.c. Civil & Environmental Engineel's . Planners' Construction Managers September 13, 2006 Mr. Chris Fuller Development Coordinator City of Colleyville IOO Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 RE: IJreliminary Plat Comments #1 Villas at Oak Pointe (P-06-047) City of CoUeyville, Texas Dear Chris, Attached herewith are fifteen (15) full size copies and one (l)reduced copy of the revised preliminary plat. We have made revisions to the exhibit per your comments dated September 5, 2006, as follows: 1. Label the 30 foot wide Tree Preservation Buffer as shown on the Conceptual Site PIau, labeled as Exhibit "c" within approved ordinance 0-06-1584. Done. 2. Provide a note on the plat stating that all open spaces and amenities therein will be maintained by the IIomeO\vner's Association. Done. 3. Will the development be gated? The application fee for a gated development subdivision is $750.00, which shall be paid at time of Preliminary Plat submittal. The development is not being planned as a gated community at tbis time, however, per our conversation we would like to bave tbe option of making it a gated community prior to final plat. It is our understanding that the simll1er route would be to go from "non-gated" to "gated" as we have intentions on constructing the str~ets to .Citystandards either way. Reasons for the subdivision being "gated" or "non-gated" are dependent upon tbe market. 4, What ofT-site roadway improvements are proposed between SH26 and the entnmce to the development'? See attached exhibits as to possible improvement scenarios. 5. Town homes require residential sprinklers and alarms. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information. A note has been added to the preliminary plat addressing the need for fire sprinklers. 601 Harwood Road - Hurst, Texlls 76054 (817) 268-0408 Fax (817) 284-8408 " Mr. Cltris Fuller Villas at Oak Pointe Preliminary Plat (P-06-04) Pllge 2 of2 September 13, 2006 6. What type of fite protection will the homes on zero lot lines have? I would suggest resicl$ntial sprinklers. Contact Rob McKeown, Fite Marshall, 817-25T-8757,fbr n'lOre information. HQUleSOnZero lot lines will not have fire sprinkler systems. 7. Comments are available on markups. Contact Robert Woods., Project Engineer, 817503.1094, fot more information. Noteel- comments were not avaUable for pick-up untii\Vednesday afternoon (9113/06). 8. Additional hydrants may be needed. Contact RobMcKeown~ Fire Marshall. 817';251-8757, for more information. .add additional h)'drants (if required) durIng final construction plan preparation. 9. Emergency access gates will need Opticom sensors for both directions with battery backups and Knox key backup. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information. Noted - we are not planning a gated community at this time. We hope we have satisfactorily answered all of your comments. Please call to discuss any concerns that you may have. Sincerely, HAMILTON DUFFY, P.C. ~/ Keith Hamilton, P .E. xc: Mr. Jeff Avery Mr. Harry Purdom , ~ i . 't.~(;l!N'l!i'!"l~~;~nl'.lll'Ji1Q;!I3." ~I..'1il1 .i ~: .~~; L. . ~:.~~i3 ~ ~ ~ ~. ~. ~ i ~ '_'~:":~;'~:':':~:::':~'~';:~~~:'=:~aJ.::.:.f~ :c: r ~ \.N.r ~ _AY j,j ~ "")i~ ~~ "i ---,_ ~ it 11'; ,';1 ~ 2C '. I '. ~. Ii' . ;!;t IJ ~ :~ ~'t.4 ".,"'"' 9, ~i ~ i ~ m! {,1,' ~ ""'I N ;:::"1' ~ <>1 ~ ,-", I' i:.1 ;:;.j I f I'" "1 f' . ^"Cf'>,~ ~ !' 'j '"t ~ \~ "IT 'T T. m m: "') r~ I ~'" ~"ti rJ}~, 1 I .{ ( . :1 1I _'r-~- -',r!;i" ~ ~~\~I .';; to .':, :t'~~...::~.J=";':L~:l:.:=~~.-j:f' ...:l:.~",/l'-"',~ t :" ",,,,.1 t ~.'....\ L .yr., I::! ~ttr~ )~~-i~~ 'I' r;'Y~F:'..~.~:~~.j~~ · , g; r~ /P~'. O"j l!\I'~." . ~I OIl;;. Ni'.'~' tnt- -, ,-- ." '...... ~ z ,~,_" _. r'~ - - '1, rf'1'1l !:'"I.fl ,'"l ,1 "I Ii. \,_..!mL..I:I'. I', ~J ,.! '.: _ > 1.::..':" . ,~...',~ 3!",J.. - - J L ~_.Jt~___ j' . ~p~tk:~r~~~"~) ;:;[ ~-H7i . . ,. . -"~: '., L ~ ~ ,I lltr-- '0'1 " f ml till!; <:; .I 'M d g~,.1 "';:. "M ~ %, s- -M 1'~/,;r-'..i.1 r- ..........; " \::"1 'j !,;---,,- #.1.; "'" ....... -- - ,~\ II . . lP' 111- ....... .:~jt -.... - f' . 1- ~ . .i ~~I _. ----r- ~'ll-"'f - ..1..-. ..... - - I ,~t: ",,* J. .-..... -"""--.. ';J ...~ ~/"':-A~" ..~':~ ::- ,... ~ . t;-.."";-.-LI I '" {---' ------- tl"~ ~. J ,... '" " . I .ilI ' ll'F'" ..... ..-... ~" (-1' it I')' . I ._..:3.. ' I . . , #"c:"" :-..".. ..~ :-A..,......... \ i .:'" B "I If_ ..t ~ I I 4-!' -, I;) -""""~' - loi ) 'I }-'-:'""I;r,L IE I'" ~ .~~.._\..~. I : " . ~ ,I; l~ 'j. ;;< ~ r ~,. : ~ .;J~ a !~I' >i ,S:r:11 i I I "11 2;i~ ;;;,,'1 001';' l-'-i~ ,,)il~ I fl. ",,11 hi il iloi;1"''';i'' "IE . . f~ II iI i il ~I h~ .: !' " ~.; .,h.:...~-L~ll',.oll I' I'm' :ilL __I~, I:L J.,. i':~1 I, r-,' 1,'1 . 1'. -.f. f ,<" ,,,,' z I J ,,----'l . J 2::1'" (' il .. I" (; I~ 'r- .. .. WI : . r- .IL. - . - .. ,a.. . -... -f!"2- ..... . () . L .. ;;l :i I~ 21 ~I ~I I '1' -,:: . Wi ... ,~...,Jl,.....! !--- f8:---..._...~, tr . . l. L~ J J-I' ""'~!'. !3-lll _. ID,jOI . .ffi '! C. ~E;, ~ ,-II lit I i4l;;-" '1" ~.~! ! ! ~ !""Tor'-" 'f -tf. -"r 1.'S'-1l' -l g:1 I .l\~":~ l!l \ iT~"~;i"~! >1 ! i U1 i~ >. '~;f' I~ :. ": ~ i ~I h ~i ~ ~: \ :,!r:;;'(:=. i ! I :t'1 ~I ". ~ Oliii 'f,'ti~ 'nil': "~f~'~~ . us II .~ :J t-I' p.,.f , J (~' ,\0 I " <:'".' ....?' :d'_"_:~,,,~ I i'D "i,' I k<-" "t)M., :_'N "~'l(-- Jl,H I tT.~!J1 .1; if . I". :-:;;1 ~' I . ,> -'I.~ . I _.1'11_. 'f''lo- ......~-^-' . 1 - "-1'\ . .",.----_ r-'.-.'-~ ~ . I '--- 'Ii I Ilfl ;:; d~' .1.a 01 ~_".I .,., 9 .~ II -_____ ---------~ " I VJ., I. . 't..~ .I.~..~....;.: I . \.) I ~ -:t...J <'<"<< ." . ":,' M' I\. .*., I '<:;;~ I '-r.,.,...,-."'- .-:Io.........-l.':/V.... ~x...~. {II I , {t"', __.~)1 Ie., " I ~"_.. .,.,_7'fU~<P~f "...._"" / ~~. . ";>>, _it" /lli-..-""W~ I' 41 I / lit~"j ,t;; ~ i*~ " A"If' t.( -"1).,,,. .~ci RilL f :1.' l' ,I I .'i,('J; ,L n~ (I, Ii 1 --", ,. -:. r~- t...- ('" --l r i ( "j l I I ~.... 'y.' .. g,,,,, 11'. J 1.'i .., . "l ....'-J ,,~. , . 1 :' g ,,- . .. ."'" (i < JJ \)<fi '--:1 ':.. ':l ji' ."~'" -r; . -/' --I ' . ~~ ~i,l-""",,, \ \ .../ /~: :>igb' ~;!" ~.~ 'j"~ -t ~\ : ~(li<i: , f~ "'" I . ~ - t ll';',/>' '---. "". ..J '"' 15;' " 1.: 'j . g; ,,;-- ..: ~~ ~i I i;-" -1"" ~', 1--.. . in ~...- .- ^-:J;:-...'.~L ':;;;;:'~'. ...:....;."~"~. _~;;...J'._l.w'n ::~-: a,"," ,lI 1)' ......... ......-.".-*....... I .,.~ l:tl1l" .,..'f ,,9;.'00 N e;,_4tl. iT' ....- '-"fl., \.7-----,.. -"" I.il~v.;; ~Illr 'I ~I'h f""\ \ C.... 'I'" "GHtJ(Jl .,g; :.::,:;;-":-"1- !-S' ':,~~"'Ttll' "'" 1.0: >-t.".101': :::;:; 11lC.......L_1 . 1. ,,' I :'-.. .. ,'g; 'l')',.g'd .[Se& JQnS .,. l""liw.l 'lJo:J>rtllA 0 o~ ,.' . '::='::='::"'--1 : Ii:: : 0, !tr..-.....il :'" ' ~~ '"'j~tt~M'fJJ~"i1 i ""! ~I :t ...:.!..j: i !;;, g j"" 1 I~ I:;: )t'::. -j :1i WI :'21, .~ t:!A ..''''j .....' In'''-'''-''''MII~, .:!llr,;,:I~, .tloi..._..~:II~ ..t q Q o->.tn )Ii. <, . (" 5 "- l" " Ll'<:8"J 'HDI1,NJ,. 1'--' . ",.!!II ." " ,,:11';" Il)) UN S HaT'''.'" . ;"t' t..::; Mil~"'" ...... - . _'11"" .lxm"""lO' ,,' """ol~ ,= '. 'it: , .,' " i '2 (1).....~LJII: . f~h--" "'....\....:::.",1 I- <~ ~ ~'-.:;.- - .:: ::...: . ......r. ,,"U1i. ;JR_.. , <J .bl, 1\ ,l'f: l>$.$lJ N ; t I I ~ 19 if! iii ) i 1 J ~ ,t 1'1 If-I ~, " HI. ~I ( it I 5! ! Il.h 'llIIiiU'- e!!!!!!I It! ,ii tl, :11 -t -I in ~it Sil !i111 !I In I!! I!! I!III !I ! ~ II ~ .. ! I ~ <( to ~ M N co CD o o C\J -- C"l ~ -- en c OJ -0 r-: ~ CL w 0:: CL . ~ o o ,- , ~ w ~ Z - ... In ~ W Q Z c( U) o ~ CD ~ W Z-IOO 0:::-10::: c( ~S:~ .... t~~ w-loo - -lOCI IlIA 0 <..:> Z ... ZO::> - = Zo :3: ~6~ >< o?~~ Ol-w W ~6~ woo I-::E o 0::: u.. Z 0 OOZ(/) NIl !C(1-4:ffi ... NZO:::o OWz I- ~~~C7j = e>O:::l-o ... (/)~oz - >-I-Z:::> ... ~lt5g .. O:::--1aJl- >< ~~~~ W ::2:u..3: W I- ,-- (/) ....J 4: Z e> (/) ~ ~ o a.. ::2: W I- (/) ....J 4: Z e> (/) ~ ~ o a.. ::2: W I- City of Colleyville Agenda Briefing 100 Main Street Colleyville. Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Commision Action Items Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Version: 1 Agenda Date: 09/25/2006 Requester: Community Agenda No.: 7d Final Action: Development Department File Name: Case P-06-048 - Minor plat of Lot 1, Block 1. Ford Addition, 1.0 acres located at 2406 Glade Road Attachments: Zoning and Location Map. DRC Memo. Applicant's Response. Plat History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 1 09/25/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Case P-06-048 - Minor plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Ford Addition, 1.0 acres located at 2406 Glade Road Explanation STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Scott Ford is the owner of a parcel of land located at 2406 Glade Road. The owner has submitted a Minor Plat of the property for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The plat will create a lot for the construction of a new single family residence. Zoning. The property is zoned AG Agricultural. The AG zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 200 and lot depth of 300 feet, and a minimum lot area of 130,680 square feet. The proposed plat does not meet the development criteria as stated within the Land Development Code. However, at the September 11, 2006, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting the Commission advised the applicant to submit a plat that conforms to the R20 zoning district setback standards. The applicant has submitted a plat exhibit that conforms to the R20 zoning district regulations, which include a 40 foot front yard setback and 10 foot side yard setbacks. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are not required for this development since an existing house was located on the lot at the time of plat application. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2006 Agenda Briefing Continued Tree Preservation. The applicant was made aware of the tree preservation requirements during the rezoning process, and provided an aerial photo that located existing trees on the property. Trees not located within the right-of-way must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. Summary. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Recommendation Approval City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 9/2212006 o <( 111 N m r..... 111 (T) ...- r..... 111 (T1 ...- Cl 0 0 Cl 0 Cl 0 0 0 ...-- ...- ...- ...- ...- 0 0 0 0 lJl l.D l.D LD lJl lJl lJl lJl l.D ..q- 0. ..q- N ("IJ o ..q- N o o ..q- ("IJ CD o (T1 N :) J "") "" "") J "") "" J ") '-l ") J '-l '-l }{ O~8~3lAJViJ S lJl o ~ gj o (T1 111 o ..q- N lD o (T1 N ..q- o (T) N N o (T1 N o o (T) N CD o \'-~ N ill ""f" N 0 0 0 ...- ...- ..-- l.D L.f) l.D ""f" o o 111 ...-- o ""f" N rn o (T') N t"- o (T') N o <( N 0 o 0 o 0 L.f) 111 lD o -..:;t N -..:;t 0. -.:;:t N o o -.:;:t N o o (T1 ("IJ ("IJ ..-- ("IJ ("IJ CD o r-.l ("IJ L.f) o (T') ("IJ (T1 o (T1 ("IJ CD o (T) ("IJ ~ o (T1 N "'- o o 111 111 o o 111 rn o N N ~ o o m o o l,[) ~ l,[) CD o o I,[) o 'it 'I' l11 n: r'~ CD o rn -.:;:t o o m -.:;:t (T) ...- m -.:;:t l11 o m -..:;t ("IJ ...- m ""f" -..:;t o m -..:;t (T') ...- en -.:;:t l11 o m -..:;t J, LL O~617 -..:t a rn -..:t o o m -..:;t o ("\/ I n: (T) ...- (T1 ("IJ rn o (T) N l11 o (T) N ...-- ..-- CD -..:;t ...- o (T1 en o N N o o en ""f" Lf) o N N o C)I CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE TO FAX NO FROM September 18,2006 Scott Ford 817.428.2472 Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-06-048 Ford Addition Minor Plat The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Submit a minor plat application, signed by the property owner, and the application fee of $250. 2. Show lO-foot side yard setbacks on the plat. At the September 11,2006, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting the Commission indicated that the applicant should submit a plat showing the R20 zoning district setbacks. 3. Show a 40-foot front yard setback on the plat. At the September 11,2006, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting the Commission indicated that the applicant should submit a plat showing the R20 zoning district setbacks. 4. Remove the City Council signature block. This item only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 5. Provide a 7.5-foot easement along the northern property line. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. 6. Provide a 7.5-foot easement along the eastern property line. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. 7. Provide a 15-foot easement along the western property line along the western property line. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. 100 Main street I Colleyville I Texas 76034 - 81 7.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-06-048 FORD MINOR PLAT In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are not required for this property as an existing house is located on the lot. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are not required for this property as an existing house is located on the lot. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Glade Road. The sidewalk must be five (5) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the drip line of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. Please note the revised impact fee schedule as adopted by City Council. The new rates will go into effect for building permits issued on or after April 1 , 2007. SEWER Not required for this property as an existing house is located on the lot. $2,491 for a 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $643 for a 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER The following impact fee schedule is applicable for building permits issued on or before March 31,2007. SEWER Not required for this property as an existing house is located on the lot. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: Monday, September 25,2006, 7:00 p.m. Please submit the following to our offices: PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-06-048 FORD MINOR PLAT · A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived; · 10 full size copies of the revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 XII). The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Thursday, September 21, 2006, in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fuHerc((Vci.collevville.tx.us or 817.503.1054 if you have any questions. PAGE30F3 .. =~.^ __., 0'0_._"."'."""''>';'' ,-^" LOYD BRANSOM SURVEYORS INC. CHARLES B. HOOKS JR. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 1028 NORTH SYLVANIA AVE. FT. WORTH, TEXAS 76111 (817) 834-3477 FAX (817) 831-9818 E-MAil: lBS@SWBELLNET September 22, 2006 City of Colleyville Development Review Committee REF: FORD ADDITION MINOR PLAT P-06-48 Response to Development Review Committee Comments 9-18-06 2. shown on plat 3, shown on plat 4. removed from plat 5, shown on plat 6. sl1o\vn on plat 7. show 7.5' easement along the west lot line and a proposed 7.5' easement on the east of adjoining tract. Owner is in the process of purchasing adjoining property Thank you, ~1l~LS I : I I ' $.CJI. .Jt.1'fNISVIfl'U I 1 ............/fA. ,,~--- --_- -r--- --------------"3.~~ftr.lrt'n ~ .A~I/O.3U ~ I : I I , I , I--~- ---TIi-----nr-==-:-i- - - - -' - - -- -- -- - --i J~ iH-- ---___,+.-- ~'~ 1 'i' : I :I<~ ! 1 : I : -I~ '1 I'" '" ~ i q \ l -Ii, \ U jl;~ !I-~' ,;I!~: :: !I~? :tl:: ;;I~: ~.. ~I~ ~I I ~ .t: ;.. !l ~ ~ ~ i) ~I !i ~ :- -: I ~ ~ : I i : 1 1 I Iff ____________j. L____~,-.;;.:;.------ --'14'ff~""~-----. _.____.._________d . I :::::::.:..-=-~~..-=-;:::..:-:::.:;.-::.:.-::--:::=--;;;:.=-~.-=..~-~.!'~-,::...--,;-;;::.?!!!;:;.:-------:::..---:::.:--:::.------ I - , I ) "I 'I I , !-!:""-=-- ,,-.,=--==-- =--=-- ""-"'-=--"'-=- ------ 3~.o:..1_ _ _ ______ _._ ___,.._ __._ _ .M.~_"''''''__ _'____ j . I I II I ~ ~ I I , ~ I '. ~I ill" i'~~ .1<: ~!t ... -Ii 21 !~ ~ 4': q . Lf~ ~J ~I,IIJ · II I I,,: i I_ I ~~'I ~, !SfJltlleRBROOK. DR!Ve .......:i ~Ii i Ii.; di~ i'. -~ b===-....... Y'-'''' ------- .. . --~..--------------- r-'-'-- - ~------_._- --.------ t. ! i ! I' -~! I 'I: 1111:1 , ')'" . . jIO ~t ir I I .1 '" 'I I '~~j ., . -I i . I r::; ~ -"'- . ' ~ ~ Ii ~I .~. ~ ~.~I r :H C fa-If l:t.. 'I !Y~ UI I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ i~ , 11 It " ., U.I. ~~ ~I~I ~.i..J ,Iilll! ,...... ----1--~ I : 1 il' ;tl~lI~ -11\..: I J~ 1 L_ 11 I~' .ta JIM It!TCHEU, I:,(ST ,- I . I 81' I ! ;~ I ~!.~ I !~ I I -- - - "E.i: "'___jr.:'_ 1 I · ., .~, !.. . ~ .~ ~ ~I~~ I '!~' I ~ L_ JIll NITCHELL "eST ....... r-- I I I _,~ ~: !iig -:~ir I u__ ~____'" 'r_...... Yi : I;~ I Iii; J CU!~E fl;.i~~ I~!ilaa U!US! I 1! .,,; it ~ i 3 I \ . I I I ~ I I ~ I a I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ; l ( v%, 3.... n;~..\:..:. City of Colleyville Agenda Briefing 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com File Number: File Type: Case Status: Commision Action Items Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Version: 1 Agenda Date: 09/25/2006 Requester: Community Agenda No.: 7e Final Action: Development Department File Name: Case P-06-049 - Preliminary Plat for the Covington Addition on 23.4 acres out of the Isaac Caradine Survey, C. Newton Survey and the W.C. Newton Subdivision located at 704-800 L.D. Lockett Road Attachments: Zoning and Location Map . DRC Memo . Applicant's Response. Plat History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 09/25/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Case P-06-049 - Preliminary Plat of Lots 1x-12, Block A, Lots 1x-12, Block B, Lots 1-16, Block C of the Covington Addition on 23.4 acres, located at 704-800 L. D. Lockett Road Explanation STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Will Walton is the potential developer of a 23.4-acre parcel of property located on the north side of L. D. Lockett Road, west of The Oaks subdivision. The developer has submitted a Preliminary Plat to divide the property into 40 lots for the construction of 36 new single-family residences and four (4) open space lots. Zoning. At the September 11, 2006, Planning and Zoning Commission the Commission recommended approval of a request to rezone the property to the R20 Single Family Residential zoning district. The R20 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet, lot width of 100-feet and lot depth of 125-feet. The proposed lots meet the lot development requirements of the R20 zoning district. The Land Development Code requires front yard setbacks along both roadway frontages on corner lots. The R20 zoning district requires 30-foot front yard setbacks. The applicant is requesting a waiver to reduce the building line to 25-feet along one side of the corner lots. Staff supports the building line waiver request. Setback Buffer. The proposed development shows open space lots adjacent to L. D. City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2006 Agenda Briefing Continued Lockett Road at the entrance to the development. The open space on the east side of the entrance to the development is over a half-acre in size and the open space on the west side of the development contains three-fourths of an acre. Each open space will contain a detention pond. The open space areas are not required, since this is a R20 zoned development. The open space area along L. D. Lockett Road will help to promote the rural atmosphere along the roadway. Access and Gates. The entrance to the development will be located along L. D. Lockett Road. A street connection will be made with Hunter Lane within The Oaks subdivision. The applicant is requesting to place an emergency access gate between the proposed development and The Oaks subdivision. Staff does not support the placement of an emergency access gate at this location. However, the residents along Hunter Lane have long enjoyed Hunter Lane as a dead-end street and do not want additional traffic through their neighborhood. Approval by City Council is required to construct the emergency access gate. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on public streets. The sidewalk on L. D. Lockett Road must be five (5) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. Interior sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. Drainage. This project provides two open space lots adjacent to L. D. Lockett Road and two open space lots within the development that will contain detention ponds. A drainage study for the development has been reviewed by the Engineering Department. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required since L. D. Lockett Road is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The developer is dedicating additional right-of-way along L. D. Lockett Road and is required to construct a portion of the street to current standards or escrow a cash equivalent, as determined by the Engineering Department. The perimeter street improvement fee is based on the projected roadway impact of the proposed development and the amount of frontage along a public roadway. This development has a total of approximately 470 feet of frontage along L. D. Lockett Road. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat for new structures on newly platted lots. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's Office. Summary. The applicant has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land Development Code. Recommendation Approval City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 9/22/2006 o o CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE TO FAX NO FROM September 18,2006 Will Walton 214.279.0800 Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-06-49 Covington Preliminary Plat The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Revise the 25-front yard setback along comer lots to state 3D-feet, per the Land Development Code. A waiver will request will be required to approve 25-foot setbacks. 2. Identify the unlabeled lines within Lots 7, 11, 12, Block A; Lots 2,3,4,5, Block B; Lots 1,2,3,4, 7,8, 15, 16 Block C. 3. Remove previous lot lines. 4. Provide a note on the plat stating the location of an emergency access gate on Hunter Lane. 5. Provide a note on the plat stating that the emergency access gate will be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: 6. Engineering mark-ups are available for review. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of approval of the plat. Perimeter street improvements are required for the newly created lots since LD Lockett Road is considered an unimproved street. The developer's portion of the costs for infrastructure improvements may not exceed the amount that is roughly proportionate to the projected impact ofthe proposed development, as determined by a professional engineer, licensed in the State of Texas, and who is retained by the City of Colleyville. In making the rough proportionality determination, consideration shall be given to the availability of adequate and 100 Main Street, Colleyville , Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMmEE P-06-049 COVINGTON PRELIMINARY PLAT minimum levels of public facilities and accessibility to the site for the delivery of emergency servIces. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the plat.. As new vacant lots would be created by the plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on LD Locket Road and interior streets. The sidewalk on LD Lockett Road must be five (5) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. Interior sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as part of the public improvements to the property. TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. Please note the revised impact fee schedule as adopted by City Council. The new rates will go into effect for building permits issued on or after April 1, 2007. SEWER $2,187 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,491 for a 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $643 for a 3/4-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER The following impact fee schedule is applicable for building permits issued on or before March 31,2007. SEWER $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: Monday, September 25,2006,7:00 p.m.t PAGE20F3 City Council: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-06-049 COVINGTON PRELIMINARY PLAT Tuesday, October 17, 2006, 7:30 p.m. Please submit the following to our offices: . A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived; . 15 full size copies of the revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 XII). The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Thursday, September 21, 2006, in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fullerc({V,ci.colleyville.tx.us or 817.503.1054 if you have any questions. PAGE 30F3 COVINGTON... a Cotswold Village ~,,,,,,,,,,,,,""':ln ~""":";':"l:"""'i11llll'flt>l~_~~="'''''-'''':::::''':''Im'''''I~~:''"'''''::'':=<:=':" September 21, 2006 Mr. Chris Fuller City of Colleyville, Development Coordinator 100 Main Street Colleyville, TX 76034 Re: Response to Development Review Committee Comments P -06-49 Covington Preliminary Plat Dear Chris, This letter is in response to the Development Review Committee memorandum dated September 18, 2006. Please find attached a letter from our engineering firm which provides specific and direct response to all of the issues identified in the memorandum. Additionally, I have also provided you with the requisite 15 full size copies of the revised exhibit as well as the reduced 8.5 X 11 copy. I look forward to addressing the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Staff on Monday, September 25 in the City chambers. Thank you for your assistance with processing the entitlements for the Covington project. Sincerely, WlU~ Will Walton Covington Partners, LLC THOMAS HOOVER ENGINEERING, LLC Sep(ember 20, 2006 Mr. William Walton Covington Partl'Hara. LLC t 505 Oak Knoll Drive CoJl&yv1n~. TX 76034 Rtf P..00-49 - Covington AddltIDn PrMlminary fllat Commerlits oc~ Mr_ WaltOn: We ns...e CQmpleted the ~ew of (he Cofleyvile DeYelopment Review Committee (ORe) comments regardmgthe prellm4nal)' .plat Stlbmltted f{)J their reYIe\Y andoomment. The fol.kt'lnng eommsnts addtsss their i:ssUl;ls: 1. Re'iise the 25-front yard setback aloog comer kits to state afJ.ofeef:, per ttla Land Oevef(l~ Code. A waivef reqUe3t 'Mil be feQl,lired to approve 25-foot a~~$. Resp0I1&9:We are requas1ing a waiYGf to tl'm> tequifSlmltr'lt for 6 of the lots. We have modified the lot layout tQ 5ih~ ttlat 1he front yard i$ to ramain 3IJ-fooi and onlfy thle side would ~ le~$ened t(l the 25-foot 2. Identify the unlabmed Iin$lS within Lots 7, 11, 12, BlOCk A.; lo~s 2.3.4,5. Block B: Lots 1 i 2.3. 4. 1, 8. 15. 1(1 BkIck C. RMponH: W& have added the labels for the 1m" tQ the fjrat abeet of the $Ubmitt.al. The lab. were on fhe utility plans' 1'0( the vartiow; dralnag& and utilil11 e~mel1it$ Wf!. alto have tlIpedestri8fl ~cce$S eMament that will b<J utilitJ!ld to connect the wat$r ffJattl/"el .areas with .a trail system 3. Rel'J'liO!J@t Pr6VlOUS lot lines Retiliponu: We haVe 1'I!ml<lved the prevlou$ prcpert)' lines. 4. Pro~..i<kl a note Or! ttle pial stating the location of an em~rgtIncy acoeS$gete on Huntsr nait Re~pona8: Wa flava complied with 1114s request. 1381 W. E.ules& Blva.. Sufte99, ElJlesB., TX 10040 817--571-7574 ph. 817<571-7564 fa>: 5. Provide a note (11"1 th& ~t stating that the emergency access gate will 00 mainia:ined by .h8 Homeowner's AssociatiOfl R..$flOrnie: We' hav& com~ied wIth thiS reque~t 6. Er.gineeoog mark-ups .are available for nwiaw. COfltad Robert Woods, Project Engineer. a 11.003.1094, for mOM infr:;mTl.n, R.pomJ:Er' WfJ:, have incCWT'..orated Engiooering commenm into the re- Siubmitta~. Th,g following items witt rtc!Joo ta t>e addrCS$lX1 by the OWner, PERIMETERsmEET IMPROVE:M'E:NTS PerImeter street improvement fees Bre due at the eime of appl'()Val .of the plat Perimert,grstraet improvements are raqui1ad for the newty ~.d' lott; sirlce lD Lockett Road is considered an \Jf1impr'OlJf3d street. Resporl.e: We:;we aware of lt1a perimeter street ImprolJStmBnt fees and a~e pi'aparedfor paymefTt at ttie appl"O'llal Of the lVlalplal:. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Part.land dedication fee!) are due at the time of approval of the plat. A;s. new vacant lots wou4d be cre:atedby the plat, the pa~I"It of plillidandd~tion fees i$ required for th~ da'\fEllopment The fee fOf sirlglo~family reSidential da....alapment ~ $1.002 per fiG'^, klt. Rl!'I$pOnM: We are aware of the ~rkland dedication fees ~nd are pf~pmad for payment for 36 $lng~.fM'lil')' lots at U1!e appr~l of 'the final pia!. SIDEWALKS.Tm Land D~l()pment Coda requires $ide'IiVal~~ on I-D Lockett Road and interior st~. The .sidewalk 00 lO l~ett Road must b€t n'l/$ (5) feat in width and cooSU'ucted as a perl of the pr...btic Imp~mcmts ro It*' property, Interioor sidewa4ks mU6t be four (4) feet in wid~h and coostructed ~ a part (If the pUblic improvements to the property. RilI.ponse: We IM.I include the sldewalks310ng LO Lock~t Road and adl HOAIOpen Space tots In 'lhe d~lopmem plans. T~ sidewalks at toe individual 5ingl~fami!ly [<OtIS will boa required fin a building permit TREE PRESERVATfON. Tf~$ not h;::.catad within the right-of-VJ'aI( or withIn "meter the pad Me rnlJ&t be pt"'0m3rved dunng construction Before constructron begin:s on the site, protecli'le fendng must be installed around all pr~riltld trees loceted outside the right-<:Jf-way. The fencing mlAt be loc:at~ at the driplina of thepcElsel1i'ed trees. The pn:;itedive fencmg may ~ oomp~d of orangs yinya QOnstru~i(X1 fencing. chairs aink. fenee, eroslOf'l control ~nang, Of other simil. fencirsg, The fen~ng must remain in ~ce during 1tte \!l!l"Itirl$ ool1&uuclion period. RG&J)o",e: We lNi~ comply with the tree preservation r&qulremBllte: of ttJe cIty. JMPACT FEESt Wat&r,iewer and roadway impacCfees are d~ at thEl' time: a building permit is q,$ued for anMV slructure 011 a newly platted lot Relporlse~ We will comply wl1tt the impect fees of the cll'}( If you have illny quG$tions or req",ire taddlt.kmal ftIformartion. please feel tree to oontact this office, Sil"lC~rely: ThOf1'l,fj.~ ". v~r El"lgmeeoog, lLC '7 "7- /. ~~L /;/ If I ,I" l' " I. '. Thomas l:11Oover Plat I ZONED N-<O I I ZONED N-40 I J PmI< .....- Wl. 11711. M;( 411 IUlT.c.r. , ZONED N-40 I J.StWF Z. l5IWC \Q., 14'". N<< %11 ur.c.r. It I _--1 ....... ....- - L.D. LOCKE'IT _ROAD PI II _ i~ ~ ~ T ~,l" ~ : i~ ~ !I;q ~ (3 ~ ; :'1 . . ~i I ~ ~~ ~ ~ \~ -~ \ rq.. ~tii'''Ja~!l :E: h :\~\ E~!i en ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~..-J -.....". ': 11"1 ~,~<',> ..d 'f' I' I ~ "'Q .., \ ,\ Jl~' 6) r ~II "... tf." "i~ "'a 1 l:l'-l q ~\,."" ~~ \\. ~ ~XIo;j. ~ ' .-./J.. ~! ~il ~"\\;; ~ ~~ _1fj1,L.~JP:$\ ~~~tf.~ .;" !);~...,j \.~o- l sa ",1- 'L . II ~ \ t --- " "'".1 -. . ~~ "% '" ~ d~ '\ ~,<1' .).:v~i;;'<' I , i~r. III ,.!S':/- it~.... ~. \ --'\ (>- Jl Ii' . _S-,. ~! 1::'; ..,,~ \ \ a~ '~I -...., L ~,,~: G ,. 2J.. '_ ~..----(P~?L<>\ \ \~ '*- t :u {:1 1"~<"i ., ~ ~ ,,!. 7..~. :"li ~ 1\, ~I: 1, j' ~\Q \.-l_1:i~'i""-'IJI "!I!l~ ' I ,~ll - ~ ~'l II t oil \ , ~ ;a;~~' la ~ e.. ~~ f! ~- i~ ~,~ :.. II I - '_l: L!q~ lii'~ s':' .~~a~ ~! ~ fa I< It 'i ~ ~ I I I~" P~g:.. I~' :6tt! nG ~.~.. f. P'" ~t"'~" IZ ~a I!'I..... /" "-- fa q ~ ___..J J ~ It'" ~.... I Q )~_~ l" 'ii'U~.!".../.;.0(;. .......~ -1- ---- ~ . ;;., '6~'l_.!.il-ttil..., g a '~">;: . .~:III 81..;1 ~ S' .Vln ,tlt'tC _- 0.45 '7'~'i f ("or S' ~~-.ciinfT1 ~ ~"~ ~ Jl '''') .~. ~ '" J~,'...t.-'!! .' ~- ai:- 'q ~h _ e ~~ ,'t 1T.'~",~~s ..... .......... ~~9 '1~ II II'" 3.~ en ~ ':' ~.. ~" :~ ~- ..,.,9 ,,-,.' ...... ...... r ...... I1rj?, . /~ ~ ~!~,~. ~ ~!.___li.'\ ~ 1..~ (r--- _,;;-.......__-\----:.-~...40 ,,~~ ..... 1;"/". g II}'OI' ~ '/" i i :.:\ CIs::: - ,~~-.. J i _~-:z..:...:-.:~ I ~1'W;''Oi'W-r; I i~~ ~ ~i~ it ~~ Q~ ~~! "~L.-.J" ~___. ___ .__~~~~' __..~ B ~~ I' '~~!'ll ~J: ;.~;A 0 2 ~I~~ ~"~i f~'~ III """,f' ~ J ...." ,'! : . ;1& il.. . ot.. ;,' 6~ ,e'I'--" ~ / lil 11 " J ~ I /1..._ ~ I .~...,.,-:= I '" i _ : .., ,..,.. 1 ~.. - N~::Ilm- .!D1f'1~1' ~ ~ (3;a!l~ I $, ~ __.____+_ ~I'" \ r II II ..~o ~ z~ I ~ ~I 1 II I, _ !1::3 ~ e Jl II 'L"~'" ~ \ 2 lA, I 1 E~ : ~ e~ ,i ~\ tIS 1l1, i;~ ~!.I ~~ ~l~ lo:ll'iu 'l'l_,,-~I' 1 b- - ~.~!, ~~~ iI& III ' ~;I I ~ 14 ~ 1Il~ ~\\"'" "':'-:11\':' I ~~""-~Ir'" .i '1 ... I~ !I.\()l ~~~j~~_-:"'~~~~- 'l< tf'>-:j"'4f "'" I 1 1 : '7114' I " I ~ I r ~ \' I : .N" -,----...... .' '''!!_ ,- "...; .'.2:,," l>t II I ,2;0 I 'Ii _.' ~..., ..,~!.'~ ,~ P ~l!~ -' ,_",0 Jl~ I I; ..oR- ~.'::-''f.'h~-.. ..L::J .L:!I:!IH.L~ :z ru ~'f ". i ~ ~g~:; I f ~ ,-:..b "UO. -1\- J"1i'f'I .+~"'~,'"' /'>1. ~ 14<> , .1 : ,!,,8 III I .t'"'' ..I'r "......... -l ~ - - ..,-_.r ~~ L --- ~"'" ~ · ~ 'Q m.lr. I, ~f;:1 ,I ~ '\ II m ~ +""".. il: i (. :, II 7.'1 i$~ - "c ~~ ~!~ ~~ aj~ 5~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I I! ill :, _ , ,,~ II l! t1~ ~ ~ ~;; il!~ ll_ ~l. 14~ s :1- IN <.. d ,~ il~ it J ~ J ~U ~ I;"~' a ..! \ ~ & I 14~ , C), ~l I. - '..... I 11\' il: _ ._._.. 'II I:: c.r.-.~"':""'-. ..... ":1> _.-=-...;<......$1 HNW,,,.---.JzuJ . ~ I I . I \ H ..,... 01"'* _ 131.'71-"-:"':T'- ".-p~ I pclit\ \ \ '.,. 4 1dST!1 la alg I--.,..w,~...-r'~ '~I .1' "" '~ll ~~}i . 11~ I ~S~i ~" I ~\!~'~ ~~'\~ ~~ t Jl ~ ;~ - ~~ ~~ 'I l ' i A! ~: 'il!~ I ~~:: ~~ E~~ ~.. ~ /.t~.'/ ~ \ 9 J;j R~ ~ lL !S. lQa ~ III /" r..... / ~yr/ "4.. , 'I~ III.... ~ .. _....J< j:~ / . Y / / _".........._~, U_$-~.~l< t! ~ '-"" ---- ~~~-l<'\" ''t x: / II I' " .....". _ .... -t!1~ '2.tJ' _ 5O.'J' .'l"tt 71 (; /\ ..ij 'Ul ,,,,~. ;:'10 Ii - - OG"4L u"9t - - t ::,~ , IllatA II IDO' ".....! 1_l.1t.L.." H 1 I ...- _ _ ..... .Li:!IH.LsL '!: ....t..if'i ...I'~giLLS. I III I: ..... "" a 1"'" ,..... 1-' - ii>~.L::J a '.,., fI>I ")1"\' '. \ 1.J2.U' -- . JlSn 1, ':lief / ...-!t.,lg- II r----~--:-LJ.".. __ ...-l.----t-i---_ ..,,11; _.....~ >t.... ,.' / ''''~I I It: q- - '. ~ II ,!. -. - -~""""'~'1 -- - -\/ Ii .~ ',_. ll~~ III~ . ~ ~I. II II II S, II ~,..' \~ ~ IlIa Ii k~ I i~ ~i~ ~N ~~ ~~ I; . ~~ I;~ h ~:t'to. ~~ :=1 '" f !~ 'In I [l~<>___4 _~_ 1- ~ :~ 14 ~, ~.. ~l\ ~.. I~, f r::::::,:::::'" F~'lo.'.:-t-.--li.'~.::- . -.. ,,~...~--~_}~!.,;;;...-1-:=;~I~-:"='~-=-1~~-1I( ~ 1\, I h I; "N 890722 E LOr. 'I l--T---820.16!...--- ;--;----ut'iiWGr-,-,.---. , I I ; 'j: . w......_ I d GU.~r;.o!Jl" ,j .\' d ....,..,........;1 .i '" "",......, . "II ~~ -=.-~: c ~~ !;: Ie ...e'!N'l!!. C j:; '. ~":i~' . I ZONED R-40 I .;..../ I I ZONED R-~O I I.,', I I ZONED R-'. ,I I:: " . . ~. I ZONED R-~ol I;:; " , ~ Ug ~IH !! un Ii Ii ~mf5 !WH!HU, i ~ B1 11:'- ;~II'. Ii! hl!.1I HH n r! huf! ii!!!!~tH!J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ;J~ ii;~ t~ ll~i I~ ~1 If!~'f li~'fIIijl~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ It I~I {,fl h [I P ~Q ~,,'h lipl~SIIS~i~ '6 ! t-o a al ~ ~ '" U!8"' 18 i~ "jlrtll't1"I"l" g ~ B I i ,,,~.,J~ :H ll~~ l~ m 1~ ~ il".;i !i!~~I[:}irll Z i '-l ~ M 10.....,.,..,. ~l. 'l~~ I- 1st i~ F ~;,: ;fI'~ i;;It! s: I" CIloo -:bl hl!u 1 if' ii.j iililli'tl,,:sl'JI '-< ! !' lilt ~ il; f". II' , . i f I Ii"l' 11 ail"~ t o I!:! r.~ ~.is m fit I I i j'~ II. ojli' ,'.,iSt!! INI ~ ! ~ ~ if' ff f 'J- 1 · "1 ,~! "iHi' ".SlllUTSUSCflOQ( II: ,i' , f~! Ij IIi :ip IH ~[a;"f~ 't' ,Ii i (oi ,. l l'-'i 'rl~ft'i;~" SIRW...'"....,,''''' ii~ Hi i .(j' 5 J .:gi I, i~ip~,f 3 Q ... .&.!llt ".S'R.lls;r!Pll ~~ 25 C"'.l o ~ 'tl Z :0 c;) t'l ~~I E; ~ t::l 'tl ..... s: ~ '-l o ~ n~ !! g ~~g g ! "U :S ~!I'."~ j ~ ~ 5 ~s~ ~ ~ -4 ~",5o z 0 ......11I0 )0. :z ~~CIlI< i::O . ..,<m Q -<)>. Op :rJ J ~ ~ s~ ~ g ~~ z m :JJ Z P 1= o ~:ga I.'.. s: ~ ,.. ~"''''::l ~ ~ &; ;0( .. I ~h~~~: I go~~~cia~ I :>;"Z!;;ZZ ::I ~g!"o?",'>:S:: . t:"'~~!ii~~ i ~hi."'iOlO;:; 0 ti~"'",II>~ ... ~!ii ~ . ~ ~ City of Colleyville Agenda Briefing 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 (817) 503-1000 www.colleyville.com file Number: file Type: Case Status: Commission Tabled Items Controlling Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Version: 1 Agenda Date: 09/11/2006 Requester: Community Agenda No.: 8a final Action: Development Department file Name: Case Z-06-019- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential on 16.870 acres on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Miller Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the La Attachments: Zoning and Location Map . List of Property Owners Notified . Development Review Committee Memo. Revised Zoning Exhibit . Traffic Study History of Legislative File Version: Date: Acting Body: Action Text: 1 08/28/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission 1 09/11/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission 1 09/25/2006 Planning and Zoning Commission Title Case Z-06-019- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential on 16.870 acres on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Miller Addition, Lot 1, Block 1 of the Lancaster Hill Addition & Lot 1, Block 1 of the Giacomini Addition at 805 to 901 Lavaca Trail Explanation UPDATE 9/25/2006 The Commission tabled the rezoning request at the September 11, 2006, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in order for the applicant to develop a revised zoning proposal. The applicant has indicated his intent to continue to pursue the R20 zoning designation. A revised zoning exhibit and preliminary plat application have been submitted that show a conceptual lot layout with lots that exceed the R20 lot size requirements. The preliminary plat is also scheduled on this agenda. Although a revised lot layout has been submitted, the R20 zoning district does not provide assurance of conceptual or proposed subdivision designs. The applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed development. The Engineering Department has reviewed the TIA and found the results acceptable based City of Colleyville Page 1 Printed on 9/22/2006 Agenda Briefing Continued upon the supporting documentation contained within the TIA report. The perimeter street fees will not be waived based upon the findings of this report. The Lavaca Trail will need to be constructed to city standards. UPDATE 9/11/2006 The Commission tabled the rezoning request at the August 28, 2006, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in order for the applicant to develop a revised zoning proposal. The applicant has indicated his intent to continue to pursue the R20 zoning designation. A revised zoning exhibit and preliminary plat application have been submitted that show a conceptual lot layout with lots that exceed the R20 lot size requirements. The preliminary plat was not submitted in time for staff to review and is not available for consideration by the Commission. Although a revised lot layout has been submitted, the R20 zoning district does not provide assurance of conceptual or proposed subdivision designs. Approval of the R20 zoning designation would permit the property to be subdivided as originally proposed. At the August 28, 2006, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting the applicant indicated that a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) would be submitted in order to determine the effects of traffic patterns along Lavaca Trail and the Remington Park subdivision. As of this writing a TIA has not been submitted for review. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS RWS Management, Inc., has submitted a request to rezone 16.87-acres of land located on the south side of Lavaca Trail and approximately 1,450 feet east of Precinct Line Road. The property is currently zoned R40-Single Family Residential. Request. Rezone from R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential. Location. The 16.87-acres is located at 805 to 901 Lavaca Trail. Platting. The proposed rezoning request consists of several properties that are platted. The properties are currently developed as single family residences. The applicant has indicated plans to subsequently plat the properties into 28 lots upon approval of the rezoning request. Approval of a preliminary and final plat will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. Lot Sizes. The developer has submitted a conceptual layout of the property showing a potential lot configuration. This site is sufficiently large enough to accommodate a 28 lot development. The R20 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet, lot width of 100-feet and lot depth of 125-feet. The proposed lots, as shown on the zoning exhibit, meet the lot area and lot depth requirements of the R20 zoning district. Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future use of this area for single family residential type land uses. The R20-Single Family Residential zoning district allows residential uses. The R20 zoning designation is in compliance with the Colleyville Master Plan recommendation. Surrounding Development Trends. The surrounding properties are primarily single family City of Colleyville Page 2 Printed on 9/22/2006 Agenda Briefing Continued residential in nature. Properties to the north are zoned R40-Single Family Residential and are vacant. The properties to the east and south are zoned R40-Single Family Residential and are currently developed as single family residences. The properties to the west are currently scheduled for the September 5, 2006, City Council meeting for consideration of a request to rezone the properties to the R20-Single Family Residential zoning district. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all public streets. The sidewalks must be installed when any new structures are built on the property. Sidewalks along Lavaca Trail and internal to the development must be four (4) feet wide. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on average. Based on this average, a 28 lot development would add approximately 268 vehicle trips per day to the surrounding roadways. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 17 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star- Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. Recommendation Approval City of Colleyville Page 3 Printed on 9122/2006 Zoning and Location Map Z-06-019 30etting, Karen K 311 Timber Ridge Ln ::;oppell, TX 75019 V1clntosh, Doyle & Mary Fam Lp 3333 Thornhill Dr \Jorth Richland Hills, TX 76180 Parker, Eddy R 708 W Ld Lockett Rd Colleyville, TX 76034 Stajduhar, Martin Etux Lisa 101 Williamsburg Ct Colleyville, TX 76034 RWS Management Inc. 5611 Colleyville Blvd. #260 Colleyville, TX 76034 List of Property Owners Notified Craig, Wallace PO Box 308 Hurst, TX 76053 Gohr, Martin Etux Lorraine 809 Lavaca Tr Colleyville, TX 76034 Mittag, Andrew K Etux Janet A 901 W Lavaca Trl Colleyville, TX 76034 Plain, Veri Etux Ruth Ann 909 W Lavaca Trl Colleyville, TX 76034 Zimmerman, Jeffrey K 501 Lavaca Trl Colleyville, TX 76034 RWS Management Inc. 5611 Colleyville Blvd. #260 Colleyville, TX 76034 Giacomini, Stephanie A 805 W Lavaca Trl Colleyville, TX 76034 Martin, Stephen L Etux Nan C 813 W Lavaca Trl Colleyville, TX 76034 Nordling, Ronald E Etux Tammy 715 Lavaca Tr W Colleyville, TX 76034 Pratt, Leonard E 711 W Lavaca Trl Colleyville, TX 76034 Bvesco Lp 25 Highland Park Vlg Ste 100 Dallas, TX 75205 RWS Management Inc. 5611 Colleyville Blvd. #260 Colleyville, TX 76034 CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE August 8, 2006 TO Ron Shirley (RWS Mgmt Inc) FAX N/A FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT Z-06-019 808-901 Lavaca Trail R40 to R20 The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. I. Revise the name of the project. "Preston Oaks" has been submitted by another development. 2. Submit a copy of the legal description on an 8.5 x II sheet of paper. 3. Submit 15 copies of the rezoning exhibit for the Planning and Zoning and City Council public hearing processes. 4. If the zoning request is approved, the property shall be subject to the general provisions of the R20 Single Family Residential zoning district. 5. Pending approval of the rezoning request, the property must be platted prior to development. Refer to Chapter 8 of the Land Development Code for plat requirements. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on the property. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific use of the property, proposed utility construction, or conditions in an existing City-Developer Agreement. Details are contained in Chapter 13 ofthe Land Development Code. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the subdivision plat. The fee for residential development is $1,802 per lot. 100 Main Street - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-06..Q19808-901LAV ACA TRAlLR40 TO R20 TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way must be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period. TREE SURVEY REQUIREMENT. A detailed tree survey of the property is required after final plat approval, at the time of submittal for a clearing and grading permit. Provide a table on the exhibit that lists the size, per caliper inches, and type of trees on the lot. Trees within the right of way and building pad are exempt from the tree mitigation requirements and do not have to be shown on the survey. TENTATIVE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, August 28,2006, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 19 and October 3,2006,7:30 p.m. RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Please submit the following to our offices: . A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived. · Exhibits and documents as requested. The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, August 23, 2006, in order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or fullerc@cLcollevville.tx.us if you have any questions. PAGE2oF2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,I 0 A Z z i!ii~ ~ = 18:' W ~ ~ ~Z~~ . ~ 6 > h Cl lsa~~gl~ !il:: ~ E ..... ~ Cl ~e~~~ ~Ia !~ ~ ~ ~ t W l:N "<C (,) CL ~ ~ ~i$~o~~i ~8~ J ffi~~ <II ~ I w ... c z ~ ~ I:k., :>~it ~ .0( LtJ Q) I ~f:l"<C ~it;"':S"'~ Cc I ~r~ 0 ~ 0:: V) a.. ~ 0 ~~Siiii~"'~5i J ~~~~ g i ~ ! ~ z C> bl~lQ ~~ r~ <II I g: 2 Ill....; Q ...~!:! i ~ Ii! i ~ ~ .. ~ ..."'0...... --0- ... ...3......15 25 ~D ~ ~ ... ... ... , s 3~ III . 5 Ie l~ t~.. ~ IllI il~ !It ':) I~ ~bl~ ~1Il ~Ir "g m il 'I ijS II l!SI IZl ~ ~lf S 01"06'Oa" E-S84.50' ~~ _.. ..- .......tC-. -- I II oll I~~ i~~U TRAFFIC STUDY . PRESTON OAKS. ADDITION COLLEYVILLE, TX SUBMITTED: SEPTEMBER 11, 2006 PREPARED FOR THOMAS HOOVER ENGINEERING, LLC 1361 W. EULESS BLVD., SUITE 99 EULESS, TX 76040 PREPARED BY GlrEENLIGHT SOLUTIONS Ramana Chinnakotla, P.E. Principal 3201 Loyola Drive Flower Mound, TX 75022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impact on Lavaca Trail and the adjacent streets due to the proposed Preston Oaks Addition residential subdivision. Specifically, the study addresses the impact of rezoning the subject subdivision ti'om an R-40 zoning to an R-20 zoning. Trip generation and specific intersection evaluations were performed as a part of this study. The Preston Oaks Addition, as proposed, consists of2] single family homes. The subject development proposes a new access point (Street A) along Lavaca Trail. The results of this study show that the proposed subdivision, with the proposed rezoning, will have minimal .impact 011 Lavaca Trail and the surrounding streets. The level of service at the access point, and the intersection of Lavaca Trail and Precinct Line Road even under the build-out condition is excellent. In addition, the subdivision as proposed will have minimal traffic impact on the adjacent Remington Park Addition subdivision. In fact, the traffic data and analysis indicate that the majority of the existing (and future) traffic volume on Lavaca Trail is from the Remington Park Addition. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Preston Oaks Addition is a 16.8 acre tract within the City ofColleyviIle and Tarrant County. It is proposed to be developed into a 21 lot single family residential subdivision. The subject tract is currently zoned as R-40. The subject plat is proposed to be rezoned to R-20. The only street access that is proposed to this tract is to Lavaca Trail which is on the north property line of this tract. The east, west and south property lines border existing undeveloped tracts that are also zoned as residential land. The proposed plat for the subject property is shown in Figure 1. The existing zoning for the surrounding area is shown in Figure 2. There is no posted speed limit on Lavaca Trail. Since it is a residential street, the prima facie speed limit on the street is 30 mph. 2 ADJACENT STREET NETWORK The following discussion gives a brief description of the surrounding roadways around the Preston Oak Addition. Figure 3 provides an aerial view of the adjacent street network. Lavaca Trail is an existing two-lane, asphalt, east-west, local street along the subject traces northern boundary. It is approximately 21 feet wide over mostofits length with no curb, sidewalk or shoulder. Lavaca Trail runs from Precinct Line Road to Mustang Trail. Approximately 250 feet of Lavaca Trail (west of Mustang Trail) is improved - it is a 29 feet wide concrete street with curb and sidewalks. The proposed access street to the Preston Oaks subdivision (Street A) is located approximately 1,200 feet from the intersection of Mustang Trail and Lavaca Trail. Precinct Line Road is a major arterial street while Mustang Trail is a residential street that serves as one of the access points to the Remington Park Addition subdivision. Figure 4 provides some photographs of road conditions on Lavaca Trail and Precinct Line Road. The nearest major street intersection to the Preston Oaks Addition subdivision is the intersection of Lavaca Trail and Precinct Line Road, which is approximately 2500 feet to the west ofthe proposed intersection. Other major streets in proximity to this subdivision are McDonwell School Road and LD. Locket Road. Bothe these streets are two lane streets, however, they are designated as major collectors in the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan (Figure 5). However, the most convenient way to access these streets is via Precinct Line Road. Although these streets can also be accessed from Mustang Trail (and through the residential neighborhood of Remington Park Addition), the routes are circuitous and take longer than if accessed from Precinct Line Road. TRAFFIC CONTROLS The proposed intersection between Street A and Lavaca Trail will be controlled by a Stop sign facing Street A. The other intersections that are in proximity to the proposed subdivision are . Lavaca Trail and Precinct Line Road - Controlled by a Stop sign on Lavaca Trail . Lavaca Trail and Mustang Trail- Controlled by a Stop signs on Lavaca Trail 3 . McDonwell School Road and Precinct Line Road - Traffic Signal . LD Lockett Road and Precinct Line Road - Controlled by a Stop sign on LD Lockett Road On urban streets, the level of service is often determined by the delay and stops experienced at traffic controls. Therefore, traffic studies that deal with the impact of developments focus on the impact of the developments at these tramc controls. ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC VOLUMES Existing traffic count data on Lavaca Trail was collected using tube counts and is listed in the Appendix. Based on this data, Lavaca Trail carries approximately 50.0. vehicles per day. There are only 5 existing residences on Lavaca Trail and the count was taken closer to Mustang Trail. Therefore, almost all the traffic currently on Lavaca Trail is generated by the Remington Park subdivision. Current and historic traffic count data on Precinct Line Road was obtained from Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Traffic volume data on LO Lockett Road and McOonwell School Road was obtained from the City of Colleyville. Table I-Current and Historic Traffic Volume Data Location Year A verage Daily Volume Precinct Line Road (Near Lonesome Dove July 20.0.5 23,20.0. Trail) Precinct Line Road (Between LD Lockett & 20.0.4 20.,0.0.0. N. Tarrant Pkwy) Precinct Line Road (Between LO Lockett & 1999 10.,30.0. N. Tarrant Pkwy) McDonwell School Rd 20.0.4/20.0.5 5,0.0.0. 4 TRIP GENERATION & DISTRIBUTION Projected traffic volumes were established for The Preston Oaks Addition based on trip generation equations found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publication entitled Trip Generation, 7th Edition. This Manual uses data from actual traffic count surveys of similar developments and is recognized as a standard manual for computing trip generation. The trip generation equations used for the analysis of the subject property have been summarized in Table 1. T bl 2 T' G E a e - rip eneratlOn GquatlOns Land Use Time Period Equation Inbound/Outbound Description Split (%/%) Single Family AM Peak Hour T = 0.70(X) + 9.43 25/75 Detached PM Peak Hour Ln(T) = 0.90 Ln(X) + 0.53 63/37 Housing (210) Weekday Ln(T) = 0.92 Ln(X) + 2.71 SO/50 The variable T in the equations refers to the number of trips while X represents the number of Lots. Based on these equations, the total trips generated for the subject subdivision were estimated. A trip is essentially a trip-end, Le., it has an origin or destination to the subject property. Therefore, if a vehicle makes a trip to work and back, that is actually counted as two trips. The inbound/outbound split was used to calculate the distribution of trips going into the subdivision and the number of trips coming out of the subdivision. Trip Generation was estimated for both the current zoning (R-40) and the proposed zoning (R-20). Table 3 - Total Trips Generated (R-20 Zoning) Land Use Time Period # of Lots Trips Inbound Outboun Description Generated d Single Family Weekday 21 200 100 100 PM Peak Hour 21 21 13 8 Detached Housing AM Peak (210) Hour 21 16 4 12 5 It is assumed that approximately that the current property can be platted into 13 lots with an R-40 zoning. Table 4 - Total Trips Generated (R-40 Zonine) Land Use Time Period # of Lots Trips Inbound Outbound Description Generated Single Family Weekday 13 130 65 65 Detached Housing PM Peak Hour 13 13 8 5 (210) AM Peak Hour 13 10 3 7 Based on the trip generation estimates, the proposed re-zoning of the subject property will generate approximately 70 additional daily trips. During the PM peak hour, an additional 8 trips are generated and during the AM peak hour, an additional 6 trips are generated. TRIP ASSIGNMENT Trip assignment deals with the assignment of the site generated trips to the adjacent street network. Since the only connection to the proposed subdivision is to Lavaca Trail, all the trips are assigned to this street. It is estimated that about 80% of the trips will be to the west towards Precinct Line Road and the remaining 20% of the trips will be to the east towards Mustang Trail. This is an obvious and logical conclusion since Precinct Line Road is the only major arterial that connects to Lavaca Trail. A majority of the home based trips are either work related or shopping related. The major shopping centers near the proposed subdivision are located on Precinct Line Road, State Highway 26 and Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709). Similarly residents traveling to employment centers use the same arterials to access freeways. Precinct Line Road provides the easiest and most direct connection to all these arterials and freeways. On the other hand, Mustang Trail does not provide easy access to either shopping or employment centers. McDonwell School Road and LD Lockett Road can both be accessed via Mustang Trail through the Remington Park Addition neighborhood but it is much easier to access both these collector streets from Precinct Line Road. In addition, McDonwell School Road 6 and LD Lockett Road do not connect to any major arterials to the east. Neither street has shopping or employment centers that attract vehicle trips. Figures 6 and 7 show the assignment of trips based on these assumptions for the AM and PM peak periods. The trip assignment indicates that traffic volumes on Mustang Trail will increase by about 15 trips/day as a result of the proposed rezoning. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS Level of service is a qualitative and a quantitative measure that indicates the level of congestion or delay on a specific roadway segment or intersection. At unsignalized intersections that are Stop controlled, the level of service is dependent on the availability of gaps in the major street traffic. As gaps get shorter, the delay for minor street motorists increases. Qualitatively, this is expressed with a grade of "A" through "F", with "A" representing the best possible condition and "F" representing the worst condition. A level of service analysis of the intersection of Lavaca Trail and Street A was conducted using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Unsignalized Intersections methodology. Analysis was performed for both zoning scenarios and the results are shown in Table 5. The intersection perfonned at an excellent level of service at build out of the site. Appendix C lists the detailed reports for each scenario and for both peak periods. Table 5 - Level of Service Analysis Results For Lavaca Trail and Street A Scenario AM Peak PM Peak R-40 Zoning A A R-20 Zoning A A A level of service analysis was also conducted for the intersection of Lavaca Trail and Precinct Line Road. AM and PM peak hour volumes on Precinct Line Road were obtained from TXDOT. Turning movements at the intersection were estimated based on 24 hour traffic volume data collected on Lavaca Trail and the directional split on Precinct Line Road. The estimated AM and PM peak turning movement counts are provided in 7 Figure 8. Only the site build out conditions were analyzed (since the site generates minimal traffic compared to the overall intersection volumes) and both the AM and PM peak periods show a level of service of A. LA V ACA TRAIL & PRECINCT LINE ROAD BUILD OUT SCENARIO A majority ofthe property next to Lavaca Trail is zoned as R-40 residential. The available land for residential development was estimated using Tarrant Appraisal District maps. Most of the tracts have not been platted and few have acreage information. Therefore, a best guess estimate based on similar size tracts, shows that there is approximately 50 acres of land available for development. Based on the existing R-40 zoning and assuming 80% land to be used for lots and an average lot size <;>f 50,000 sq feet, it is estimated that there will be approximately 35 homes built that will have direct access to Lavaca Trail. This will generate an additional 350 daily trips (for a total of 850 daily trips) on Lavaca Trail. Ifthezoning is changed to R-20, then an additional 700 trips (for a total of 1,200 daily trips) will be generated. The magnitude of traffic volumes indicate that even at full build out of all land along Lavaca Trail, signalization will not be needed at the intersection of Lavaca Trail and Precinct Line Road. However, Lavaca Trail, at its intersection with Precinct Line Road should be widened to accommodate an exclusive left and an exclusive right turn lane with adequate storage. CONCLUSIONS Based on the traffic analysis, the traffic impact of the proposed Preston Oaks Addition subdivision is very minimal. The existing traffic volumes on Lavaca Trail are very low and the proposed subdivision adds very little traffic to Lavaca Trail. The majority of the traffic generated by the site will access Lavaca Trail towards Precinct Line Road and not towards Mustang Trail and the Remington Oaks Addition subdivision. The level of service at the two intersections (Lavaca Trail! Street A and Lavaca Trail/ Precinct Line Road) at build out of the site is excellent. Even with full build out of all the land along Lavaca Trail, the intersection of Lavaca Trail and Precinct Line Road will not need signalization, only a street widening at the intersection to accommodate a left and right- turn lane. 8 FIGURES ~.JIJ)f ~ ..jl~J '-1. ~ _=;,___ L_ ~-'- U__ --r -....f "'-- ---= --==--,. Ilr'~ . ~ - ~ ~~~~-,p=- . 1 I ~ 'a --~=- J II . . - ==~1 i :f __~.~~ ~ _'~~~~ ,. ! I o:t I " ~_. .v ,0-,,',,- >- 'I =-~ I l'~ I I I ~ ~ ~~. c~L"MC. ~~ I I g, . ';";, ~: I I I 'l~~-- .=~_. ~_. .1 ~ '-. ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ r:: 1 1t I (l~-) I . ,rr ;-~c~:;:l>~~~,,- I "I ~ I ~~ I ;gft-v/g I ~ I ~ " .", -Tr..c~~=",oc--_J. I J L 1 ,,<: I? C cI 'II ,"' ....,. _~_..~_~o-- ..._' -j "'- ~ I c. J "'. , ~ r---.l,c-T~:::::O~'~" +oc=.L,,-," j , )11' . c" .... ~ ,,,,'r-~ . ~~. -. ~. j.... I ,_____..._~~I \ p; /1 I' \~-.i~..L' -7=--='4" ' . ~ "ii J ~i!Jf I " '---- ..... ", --. h' .. I 1!-J I " ., I I l1il a I ,) ;p, -.,- _........L - re :-""'__ ._ ~ /. I I J.. I " '" ;; ~t--. 1 O~1 1-<11' ... . ~. _.."^,,,,~+," c c _, 'J r- l:" 0: '< ~ F~;~~-~~'tI'~~~:::~~;F~';J.! f). \. --"'-'11311\ ~ I ~~ I I ~ rll~Jr---~\L_,--~--~,~{,_:,-=);;=~~:::::.:~~:;::il ~ II 'f I :::; '> < r I' ;< c J '- .... ~ f-~ II ~:r~7O<o"'-~ ~1. I )oi,-"" \...;;/ T --- -"'I:l~ ;'1 ~ ..~__ n J 1 .vcL-f ' .r/" " ,~ · " . ?"''!'''''~'r-"'''<= ' r.....;:;~v~~11 5Jl sll'/IIg: ~II _~j ~ I' \ ~c=. I .. C~' I~ ~~ =. ,.... . , _'.. <:0 I~l. c.,! ~ ~ ' ., ,.;'~ . _u_ ._ '" ' 0 OJ C:: /~ !; ~ -/<0' ~g~~ ',- sWo"W E,';;:;:'-:-='C~~-"'III~ ., / _ .. Sn"" .. . , '. ~ .- I ~ '" c'-. ~~ \ --. 1 ) / i: ~l.~~' """ ~" \\ ./_/,.r-,.J'~~^-^A.---1/ " D " .g ."~ . rrr....r/ I c, . ";<,.~, ,..".--,~,. '. II OS'~ " · .0 .. , ",_."' __ .~__ 1.~' , .. I . ,DO.TO S - .__~~__ .~__ ~ II r ==~~~~=_~=-,-_=m_u J I I c~m-- ~-- --or, I + -- ~- T I 'lJ . Figure 1 Preston 0 aks Addif Ion Plat L ayout -r'" ------------ ---- o :r: ~ ~ a ~ ;c ~ ~ -'<! ~ ~ nR_2.6,1o:t(reux Av;: MildJHJ.sellOOl Hd v~ -,~ h: :~ a 0 ,it :J: "l: ""oal.j L1i ;JJ. n. t!> f.? ~_ :J: <b ~ !? ~ ;;) R.40 l () t,oCKEU Rd ;l;i ~ Ii ~ 0; -----_....._-_._------_._..._-----------_._..._....~_._.....-. CJ AG Aurlollltural iii CC.1 VUlage Retail IiiI CC.2 Shopping Center IiiI CC.3 High",a,. Commeroial I!iJ CN Neighborhood Commerolal D CPO ProfesslonJlIOffioe _ ML Ught Manllf"owrlng IiiiJ PUD.C Planned Unit Development, Commercr,,1 o PUD.R Planned Unit Development, Residential [ii'iJ R.10 Single famllit Resldentilll (10.000 sq. ft. min) o R.15 Single family Ruldentill. (15.000 sq.1t. mln) 10 R.20 Single F ami'" Residential (20,000 sq.1t. min) . R.SO Single Family Residential (30.000 sq. ft min) I D R.4Q Single Family Residential (40.000 sq. ft. min) ~1iiI R-MF Mulll.f .amlly R esldentl.al lIiI RD Two F8mlly Residential ~~~__ _ _s~~g~e_~_~~~~~~_~_:~e~_~:~~_~~__________ r~ ~ !a s ti i S' ~"'- g i'\ ~ .~ ~ 8' !! l/'i ::< :E ~elT1lI,gtO!1 PkWY o ~ <'.; -~ ;j" :r 4 ~ <? o ~ r. ~ -:: i. Pud.r AQ :r: it >, 0' ..; I Mull" \.n ~ ~ .t; ?J a v"" d>(t . ~ . Van.oa~s Or , I Morr,.r.gslaf-Cl C_"" , Ha,o-Gl n ::r :l:. :; c: ... :r: !t i. ~ ... ~. t:= n:: .l;; :r f w Ii o ~ ,;) ;.9 $< ~ '" ~ N w E s Figure 2 Lavaca Trail Area Zoning N W()E S Figure 3 Preston Oaks Addition Adjacent Road Network Lavaca Trail WB at Precinct Line Road Precinct Line Rd NB at Lavaca Trail Figure 4 Area Photographs Precinct Line Road SB at Lavaca Trail Lavaca Trail at Mustang Trail Figure 4 (cont) Area Photographs or.:; ~ 5t{)~ 00 'r) o~9 i>ai0 '0: ~ ~'c ~ on_ e. <( .;:: ~ ~ Q) l-4 l-4~ 2fn@ (/)M"""" cdr-J~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ; ~ ~~i ~ ~i~~~~ ~H~~i ~ j\.1? 5/;;: lidiO~, .. -"E ..~ 1;'< ~li'.)~ to( ~ j II " - (l)1 .....-ll ~. ~ '-i-4 ~ .-t::. 0 ~ () .....-l o () ~t;,l ". I - - :111HI 1IIIi'! ! ,1Mlil lavaca Trail Figure 5 Ileyville Ciy of Co Plan Thoroughfare Master 80% EXISTING J ~ R-40 ZONING r 80%d ~ ::t> () :f> STREET A -j 20%~ ~ r 1 ~ 20% 2 14 6 22 TOTAL OF J ~ TOTAL OF J ~ 10 TRIPS 13 TRIPS DURING DURING AM PEAK PM PEAK ~ r Cd d ~ ~ )> () () 6 )> 4 )> -; STREET A -i STREET A ~ ~ 1 ~ r 1 '-u r <-----1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 29 2 15 l - 1 [---------~ AM PEAK ASSIGNMENT PM PEAK ASSIGNMENT .~._----_._-._----_._---------_._---_._~-_..._---_._--- ---_..._---_.._.._-_...._._--_._.---~---_._---_._---_._-- Figure 6 Preston Oaks Addition Trip Assignment(R-40 ZONING) I AM PEAK ASSIGNMENT I PROPOSED R-20 ZONING PRECINCT LINE ROAD 651 ~-". <:---4....--..., 992 --.---' 8 c------n lrf F9 ~ (0 N "" 0:: l- e:( o ~ :5 I PM PEAK ASSIGNMENT I PRECINCT LINE ROAD 1130 r--.-.---r---"":> ..........-- -<~ 971 17 l_ 11 l~ rf J r--------J 15 "-/ o "" "" "" 0:: l- e) ~ <( ...J Figure 8 Lavaca Trail & Precinct Line Road Estimated Turning Movements at Site Build Out APPENDIX Sap 07 06 01:06a Accurate Counts 972-641-4034 p.2 Accurate Coum;s (972: 293-3818 TWO CHN'lNEL SUMMARY 09/05/2006 TO 09/ 6/2006 rage: Site Reterence: 000009050609 Site 10: 000009050609 Locatjon: Lavaca-EaBt of Precinct Line FHe: D0905003.prn City: Colleyvil1e County: TIME lJ\NE 1 EAS'r IJ\lU:; 2 WEST TOT)I.!, am pm am pm am pm DC:15 1 3 2 3 3 6 OC :30 2 4 2 1.? 4 16 OC:45 0 4 0 10 0 14 01:00 o 3 4 IS 0 4 4 29 0 7 !IoU 01:15 0 3 0 5 0 B 01 :30 0 3 0 3 0 6 01:45 0 0 0 '1 0 4 02:00 0 0 5 11 0 0 :\ 17 o 0 10 28 02:15 0 3 () 5 0 e 02:3C 0 :I 0 3 0 6 02:45 0 2 0 5 0 7 03:00 o 0 3 11 () 0 3 16 0 0 6 27 03:15 0 3 C 5 0 e 03:30 0 7 " 3 0 10 03:45 0 6 0 '1 0 10 04:00 o 0 3 19 o 0 :3 15 0 0 6 34 04:15 0 4 " 3 0 7 .. 04:30 0 5 (j a 0 13 04:45 0 4 0 1. 0 5 05:00 1 1 5 16 0 0 o 12 _ 1 5 30 05:1.5 1 6 2 3 J 9 05:30 1 5 0 2 1 7 05:45 0 7 6 5 6 12 v6:CO 0 2 -4 22 1 9 5 15 1 11 9 37 06:15 0 3 1 5 1 6 06:30 0 4 4 3 4 7 06:45 2 5 6 4 8 9 J"/:OO 0 2 6 16 0 11 4 16 0 13 10 34 :n: 15 0 2 5 2 5 4 07130 1 6 6 0 1 6 07:45 1 Z 6 5 1 7 08:00 2 4 6 16 12 29 3 10 14 33 9 26 08:15 7 2 6 1 13 3 08:3;:1 2 2 6 2 8 ~ 08: 45 3 4 5 1 8 [, 09:00 0 12 Z 10 2 19 1 5 2 31 3 15 09:15 2 2 -/ 2 9 " 09: 30 1 Z 6 0 7 2 09: 45 1 5 1 0 2 5 10:00 5 9 J 12 3 17 0 2 8 26 J 14 10: 1S 5 0 7 0 12 0 10:30 2 2 4 2 6 " 10:45 a 0 2 0 2 0 11:00 4 11 o 2 9 22 0 2 13 33 0 4 11: 15 2 C 7 0 9 0 11:30 4 0 2 0 6 0 11: ~5 6 0 5 0 11 0 12:00 4 16 0 0 " 16 0 0 8 34 0 0 ___ _... _... __ _ _ ___ __ -' _ __ _______________ ........._....,..________ _ _ _ _ _ n_ _ _ ____ _______ ..._ _ ___ _____ ____ _ _____ _ -- _ ___ TOTALS 214 26B 462 AM Times 11:00 07:30 08:00 AM Peak.s 16 30 43 Factors PHf': .66 PHr: ,62 PHt': .76 P)1 Times 17:00 12:30 12:30 P:>l Pea ks 23 31 46 Factors P}IY: .62 PHF: .64 PJlF; .n HeM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Lavaca Trail & Street A 9/7/2006 --+- ~ -f +- '\ I'" _-., .-........ ..."""" !Ie!!!_" ....._....._.~_.""'!~~' ~ ~;~~rrft~~:r~f~~H,~)j~!2'ct:;~~fftJ;jlilligl2.~:~~'j:;~~~~:i~~~R;~ffr.gl:!:;f{~J~jf'1~fi:J:Vi~:~:,';\!':;?';N;3~'~~~;::':')('';;;;::":?~:';:::'i';~:;i;!;,:;:;;;:';',. Gra'de . .... 0%" . . 0% 0% '. .. . ... ~iID.<<m~ly:gPlfi)":g:~~iI!;~\;:~~i:i~;H~~!~n!;,~ll;1!~g;;:i:~!i;ffi;;.~1:~)f~;~;~9,.(~~".f~~'~;~\;;~\"'~~tjigit~.~~!.\;mf~i}1;;;:~~;~;::;:::~:(;~~:JF;C';\'~:;'\::i}b;:~:~':C~:: '::::iii;:'~,~:J:':: Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 eI.~flY))U~~~t~~J{'-ieh~:;r;,;t~~':~~ti:~;{i~!~~\i~~~~~~~ti~~Jf~j~t:Z~;f\t$~;;~)~:~ili~ll;:~@;;;:~~~~;U~;t:;;:jf.:;)i::;~a;~'S~~f;ii'i~::;,;~t::,,:S;i.,;:~.~j'.;.:~~:t:i~N$i;;.'~~N:':\;'~::(;: Pedestrians s~r~~~::~::~~::::::::::;:~~:~;;::::~:~~:~::~;:::,~::'i;:';;;; Right turn flare (veh) . ~I@.Jgn;;ty'p'~i~;l\*-~111~:tiHj~24::::f~~i;~i~:~~i{:~!:kTi:i~W}j;t:r~if~;~~~~~:m:~~;'~;iill!itilj;i5.l:!;!g~:<f.1tr~;t8;:!~~i;jr~~!~)i:";H;!R~fJR:~~;1:1!:~~.~~~~:';;~:~:i,;:~i;:i;~;;;:;:~;:;'1:\;:.i:.;:)i;f,:'~:: Q;~~~:~i;i.lr~~?~iil~~1~1~iEi:iJ:fJ!f;~;:~;j!~J~:i;jii!.iE~G~$~~~i~'~i,~i~;;:!;Wl~i~hWriii~m~~~~~;:l~~~mt;i~i~;::~.f@~ii;1gi[~,~;;U;:~!;'?~s.~:~;E!it::?;;~;,;;~;?:'.:,;<, pX, platoon unblockedq ..... . .' . . . .... '. ... .. ~=~;r::"~:;::::::~~~~::~::~:~~~~:~:(::,"~::::'::;~f'~':"'~"'i\~""'" vcu, unblocked vol ". .. . '..17. . .. . .'50 16" . . !!~:::::::::i~:::i~i~:~:::~~~~~:~~:.'~~:;"'\ji;Y';;' o 7 972 \7;ffl@1~};1g!.Q~p.~iDjW;~;~:f~;~;'Q~~)tf:~i;i;'[~q;fjf;i;Z~~~;t~~~~;*f;;e:t)~:~~~ii~1J~;!:;~:~Ei~~!i~~~l:i:;;~:iij;:;,i:~::~i~:m;;;i::Wi,W;:;,;';j;;~;~W::{::""}.:". ....:... .,,':'."::: :,:;..' .... Queue Length (ft) 0 0 1 q1?r.itfQl~~~!~Y~.@~N\I~J~\m?~;tj;;~P~o.;,!tj:\~iQ~~~Iill:~;1(~f't!im:~ff~~i:::~i.!~I:::;if~~;;f1;~:%'~:;~f,:~f:~i~:~;}~i.;~~~i1~f~jgi~f:jii:';:~;!':;t~;:::,:';;'0:;\::j~')'-:(J,:\~;: :.i:'.-;: ,;: ",::,:::: Lane LOS A A ~P.P.J.~~~Q~Q~!~jlr~)i~:ti.i~ij~:'Hm~k~!,;&il~j;:!~Th~~tr-:!i,f~j:;'~~f!~.;i.\.~:~:ifi!::'~:}:i;~n~it~:.fii!~;,];:!~:f!1':~?;f~;;ik-~,~)'k;;;P:;::,~~~~''.~i:'i';;;::;:},;:;:;~t':t':./;;..~,,;": Approach LOS A n, .U$..~~."'. .;,..... .. W.J.~~~~I~:'~~p.~MY:JQ~1lI~~,tiOij:.':;;tr)!H*;i~~iJ~;;~.::i{t0::;}jf~~;:~~&~fBti$$(\il~j:.:):~~~:t';.';~::-;t?i\:;1:h~!:;~;;,:.~;:': ......:.;,:i",,(i.,.;;. ii"" ..... ~:~r:~~t:if.:~~f~:~~;j~~;~;~~~~ii;. :X;f;d'~J:~!~;D0;f"~:.&.:,t:~;1;i~t~.~1:~:G~>,:~;:t~; ':';~:\~";~\';;.::';i:.;.;}~;D,".~i':';"!c:':::' . ". ... ...., , .......- Preston Oaks Addition Traffic Study 7/4/2006 AM PEAK Analysis R-40 Zoning HeM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Lavaca Trail & Street A 9/7/2006 -+ .....,. of ...-""\ I'" ~~~ lane Configurations 1+ 4' V S)gg~~lf~t:~~c~:~~)';~v.rg;;!'~:t~:fF,'fi!~t~~w.[r*~~i~f\~~f~~~~(Rf#;~t0:~JAAi!:;t~~~i'i;::'~~I~~~ii~;~;~U!i~:~~;:;j]i!Eg~{:.i:;ti::'S;~!~:~;f,~;;:;i3+):\i;~~.f2,\!{; Grade 0% 0% 0% ~.~mi1M~~lP)~I1;;~I~;:fi~~0V:f~~~~t1~:fj~f,f$tW~)~$~~<;~~~3:~;~i~jj'ffi!I~~~~VGl~~#~~\@\;~~~:~,~Jg~t,~:i~l;:~\~:'~;f~r{;!~!f~~\?'ilf::;;::~:!iM;?;~~:\ij:l;~:?''::~ Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ~:!!!~:~~~~~Hv:pnIi~~;:t~%1~~if:tH0~*:r4~i~;~,'ii~[~~~~}~;:~~~~6&}~!I:i;~'T~j;~~t{j;~';~1t;;;;~~g~~~1:~,ff%;~ii~!;~@;;p,,;j~;;i:~!;;~t{:;Li:;~.l;;:jY;:;:,')!:lt;l:;;l:':;\ pX. platoon unblocked ~~~~~~~t:~,:i~=i:.::~~~~:~~::;:~:';~:::::,:~:;:;::~:;',::~'~i;:'::~:,:~;:'~;'<',; vCu, unblocked 1/01 .' '30 '48' . 27 .... .... [!l~::::::::~i:~:ii~=:~:::~:::~:=':~:,::,: \t. 'C:L.. Volume left O' 2 4 \l;9Jg,l:h~j~i@~\f\W:~';:;':;~;;:iK01,'~::j~:L;'J;ftiIiDj'lli~~~j~j;~~~f:!';!g;~!;',I\~r(::i:i::n::H}!"~~;:':i::':r::' cSH 1700 1582 977 'ilqli!tm~J~lG.~RMitW~;:Rt;\\}~(;g~:\~'~j;jP:ip.~:f~r~i:~~tJ~1.':'.':;!:::;;;j;i;L;..~jj:j.,::}:;;~':,':';"';:,.(';,c;;::;~':;:~;tjf:,i;;;;,;"3';:i;':;'.'\.; "c';:, ~~;Q~,~~~;~~)\~~::;:@:~m::;~;j~~~;j;;5j~Q;~~ffi.i~~l~&.a.;~i;;gj2o:~~,~:.i:S_~;-;~;.~';..'~s:f;,i.:j~.',:,;;;~-:,(1:';;~;,;:i::. ,':;:q:~:'::"::;j:\~"':c:::L~:;?i"';.;':i\:'<' ... . '....:;.;;j.~..:,:;:.,;. Lane lOS A A . . AP.p.r9.ffi.':[nR~~~Mt~}}if,S'1~~!,*,:i:BQJ;f)ii!~gis~}gj~;l~~~~~tii:~~~f.;~~~i:;.;;;;~::~%iili::;~\~;;:,0!::.;;2;fit{~~ii~;~~i~gi;;i;;~\f,t~}~;~:;::.~>':fW<;~,',~-;'~':'~:::"':',:;L::,:t"'~.'..::. Approach LOS A WS~t~~~~ti'~~~~~~ AI/erage Delay 1.2 ~~E~~~J;:~:~Q~~~:~t~~~::::::;,~::;~;:~~~:!:.~~1;:-"~~,"',,"'~',{cr~,'_ Preston Oaks Addition Traffic Study 7/4/2006 PM PEAK Analysis R-40 Zoning HeM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: lavaca Trail & Street A 9/7/2006 -+ ... .f .of- "" ~ -~..~ $j';~;a~<<i~*~i;'L~~~JEt.:it:Rv'~1li~t[;i1t~.~~~i1~~'~M~lt('~~l~~~~10S~~S~Y,[~(\J~~~TI~:fg~1:fu,j\;[~M:~i~~~'~}~:1.~:f,:):t\j'\1~'i;:}{;,~'i~;':tc:~::~: Grade. ... 0% .... ....... 0%' '0%' '. . '" .. , \r~i:ffi1!U~~:wtit*~'iJ;tf.&,~;E~~J:~~~::![;:~J~~~;:'~'i.fgit~~~~1.'f;~~~~~;g.;;jrk.t~:!)'ii:'H~~~]~i'{f;';~~J1i~:t:~;:;j;::~\::~Ej~tr';~{-i'U6~:~:i:~t~}f~S!';:';:~~:;.Cii\~ii:~;':;~. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ~~~~m~~:1i1'~~(NjnJ1jT:~~::I:'t:-f~1i:~!@':~'}~!~~:~~~:~1\'1i~1j~~:ij~~:~~~"'1fi;1j:r~E;;;:;~~;::~~i:,;':~::,:"tl.\ft~'\'.\::,:':ii.i:;';': '!;(:';j:';i:;~';\;~'j;1';:;;::'.:t";"";c~;:.,-:\; \,:',' pX, platoon unblocked .... . .... . .... .. . . , . v.,G.'~I~g~Vl~flijg,W.9J\l:o:I~i[4~tfl!flif'!:;[~~S:~~~;~1~~~~~:;~~Ji~~'~~:~~!;~~i;;(fj~i~m~J;~~j~t1,Y:~'i,f;jR;j21jl~)t1W![l;2~~~t;;~t;j;~;;~;:2::~i;:~!1t.:~;~;;~t,'Jj'fJ~~;:'~:!?;~2:=;:?=" 1t1!~~:::~:::~~::~:1;~:::::::~:~::~:~~:;: pO queue free % . 100 99 100 6~t~p~~Wa;~~~lJjJ"lf~~;~2:i.\:t~;i!~;~]~~'[iGir~~g~~m'jifl.~~~~):.:l};:~*~;~'i~@g,$]1~r~iR~g;~;,;~I~;ii;f{Hi;;::.i!;(\';i'~_.;!;I{';'~;f;-';;'i?!;:;;:,~~;I::;;::;::2~;';!;';~";~h:~;;;;':;,; 11 cSH 1 974 ~lrit:~~~~;;:~:t:::~;::::::,:~j,~;:::;::~(:~;':~~5:;;:::':~:;:;~,,; Lane LOS A A @Rf~1~nlP:e,J,~X~(~):~:~~~it~g~~~~I:q~~~[:~f~~f*~1a~7>)i~W4L~~lli~m~~~t;Tg~~!$'~~~i;;;r~;~~;;;;;;S!~:;~~:Hi~~t~;;;i",;h~;1f.!}:i~;,i~Mi:'fE;~Ji~~;~,~.WX~~~!~t,;".~;~,<J'i!Y Approach LOS A .,.~ Average Delay 1.9 ioI~'~~~JjQ'if~~p,:~~1:W;;Qlj,l.i~:~~f9'i:;'0\'\~~~F1:tlfa?lJ.fE\~~i;~';fgW~n~rV9.tt~t~~i:9rc.~~:;:~tS%~r:5~{~-;;t''i~~cJ,~~i&{.;;~%\1i!i;;t:~:;7:~:~;EL~f\:\:f.,:' f.,,~ly~i~E~rj~d tr:ni~). ..~, :,. ~,..:j~.. ..__. . _ . ,. '''. , ~t?~:~~~;\~~~~:i'~~~~~::;f~}~~~f;i;~:!-;~~:~~ii~~~~j;~.;-.::.~ 1.~~~~.~~~~~~~J-~1~~.;~; '~~;~1~~;f~:~~~~:~~ :-~ ,~~:~~:~3t~~:~ ;. ~"~.;:-:. \ ~ ':':,~ .~-=',_:~ -.:'~5:;?- ; :~'. _>:-: ~:'~l. -, : ~- ~ ~.~ ~:\:::.:,.:::i':,,:;::;;;;~~;r.W':::~';' >.;ii\5Hi~~~; Preston Oaks Addition Traffic Study 7/4/2006 AM PEAK Analysis R-20 Zoning HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Lavaca Trail & Street A 9n12006 -to .. .(" +- .... /"" Lane Configurations t. . 4' 'If ~i9fu~A!il.r91f;:Y:r2:;!X!;;,~',;;;&a~e.Yi!Et~i;ir~.!~::;;~~m!?~i'i;JJjJ:...rn~J;:;~$.fQP~;;'~hl~;:':~";". ;..i-;'");;;;:0:,,};.,':>::;j;;;~;:; ""':.':'::~::;,.,. .,.... ...:'" 'i;,:':" Grade 6%' . 0% bOk . . \t91giijgf(~~1l.1tji~!:~i1i:~gi1~~~~j~m;#~:iljf!fr~~M~~~t81~%~~~~f:fr'if~;~':~]~!2:;;;;~~"fi~\:i~~h~y,~~~~\f;W:\;~N;:;i;i!:~~:~:,;:'X:;~~i'~"i;i~Mi~l;;i,L).:;f,,': .:..,'....-::;',<;:;:.: Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 ~:~!~~!!~~1~YP.J:ij7f.~~f~;;~i'@~~~~~~i~1t1~~~'~~l~~~l~fJ:!~~~;wt~Ji:::~~i;W,~~';;WlK~\i~~1f:i~i:J~:@:~:iltB*;;H~1.:fu~E'~\i:~~':;;:E;~i:6it)!:i.i:t.~W:~;L,;::i!r;:\(::;'::,); i!I~~E:::~:;=2~::::;::::;:::l::::::::~~: MedIan storage veh)" . ... .. ... .. . . . .' . !J:e']~f~~r.n~~itj~li{ftr~Thffr;~r:,~~i~ffij~W;1~~tri;1~Jg~1~~~~~0i~0~~i0~i,~\~~~i,i!;;~~~~~~j!~{}{g~IT!:8~i(~~;~v%Wi;i!l!i~;i;~~~;:!~f~;~~i~~':~t~;.\i~i,i:.f~~j~'!{t~~::;, pX, platoon unbiocked '" . .. . .... .. . .-.. .. .. . . . . .' ... . Y~~~1).fi.I~'lff91Y.91~m,~t~j;;Jifl;:~~~i~ib~~~~ig~~tf~~:$.#I~it~:iif+tf~~~\~}t$~;~f.j[~ili~~}~~[;~\~mpf~f~K~'~~~4.i;~~:~i;\j"~;~t1;'Et:t~ls;?~;~1.;;':~p~{;"gt~:;.:;,:;';': :,:i;":~1t;;-j_.;.~ -::;~.:::~~:r ":. .....n'-.;-,::.:,.::... y',91tjm~~'Wi Volume Left o 3 7 1700 [91~iiTI'~lq~~~~IJy'~~~f,~f;f~~~;{j:i~i~;P.~~f~l~~19~1~!~~1~:::~~~~~t~,;;;;~~~j;:'~~W$~,~~'S~ij~~t:i};2~~)ti2~it(~;~id,~i~~;;21;~{J,:U~:'fl!~:;;l;~!W;~:~J~~;;,;ii;5!;;.~~ Queue Length (ft) 0 0 1 !;1QnJrol~t>.~1~YW~)~~\~t~~~!:iR~~~~1~1~~*;!4Wg~~R~tTlj~~f~~i~'t5~;~?*~jt1J~~~~~jii~~i~iErS~~~~,~~&lTl~~fJ~~:~jii~~~~i;~j;~~tj;i!~,~~~i~~Ei.;~!.$';:;:y~~;:,js~;i':'i Lane LOS A A . . ~R~i[~@l~&\~J.X~~i~~~~';i~t~i~;~~iiI~l~i'Nt~i1ffi~~1.i~~~~~,lji~~~~:}~t~~i~:~~~~l.1f,~:;;~;;k'iH~!';~t:~f!t~iiii~,::;J;~~!:t(';::itf.~,'i;~~:;;\:~::~:~;:17;ii!;~;'S;t;:~;;;:;:: Approach LOS A Average Delay 1.6 1h1\ft~i~~,~o};~~~~~~11,il~~119nU:[t,[~~~i!~;1:@il"!!Z~~f~t~~~;;2"~~J2;';W~~~lt~(~gmlm~i~'1:)N)]i~l)'if.~LF;.'i~~,;!t;:,~:a;~i;c?!N;::~r~..:;:~::::,;:~",;~:>;'~.:'~' f':~.jl,r~~~,;;:"j~~~~h.~::i~~;:,:;;:~:':..~;i,j.:~.~,";ih",':'!{,d;:i1;i:~~~;:;,:::,:,t.. ..... ."",,_.;,," . ..-:;::'::i;:2;.:~}':-:::' . ." :,:~..::;:.;,,~;:;. '.' ,.,;.:'..L.>,i,. T\: Preston Oaks Addition Traffic StUdy 7/412006 PM PEAK Analysis R-20 Zoning Synchro 6 Report Page 1 HeM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Lavaca Trail & Precinct Line Rd 9/7/2006 "" " t I'" ~ ~ ---~~ Lane Configurations V tt. ,++ $.JgQt~:gQ:t(Qtq~!~~1J~k~;4${it~i~J(jji~*~i;~A~~2fj1JB~~j[g!i~~g1)i~~~~;[~;i~~l~}~E(~g1~~~~:j~~i~~~#,'~;S{ii~;tt~,~~ii;~;~~f;;~?;~t]j2~:.ii}~;:;;ii!~~~~;~~~?it:!;; Grade . . OO/~ '0% .. '" n. nO% " n. .. ~m;@~;(~~lifijIt;~~~t1Kr:l~~!0'd~~gl~i%'}~~:B;!~~~~~~~~;~1li;i~~;~~~~~i~)iK~~~~~~~0:!;'~i~j;E~tY;f{.~;~~~~~~~;t~~j;f:l~i~:t\S:;i1~f:i::\~i0.1?~t:E,~iii:\:. Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 . FtQ~r,ty[.~~l~l;l/1.i,P)Wt'i,~:~~~~~~~@;@f{;~f.ir$w@:~&~i~r~;~~:~,~i:*;~~~f~;j~jlff~~~~;;;t~i~;i;.'\iti,,{;!Jff.i!;{;}~,gii~:;::~~U~?f;ii.;t~~:';;Y;;;:~;Y~~\;~::;;; Pedestrians !EI~:::::::::~~::::~::~:~:~::::~::~:::::;;~~:':',~;'< !r~:~;:,:r:::::;:;~:;:=1:~::':;::~::;~:~:~:~~;,C;~; pX, platoon unblocked VgiqPQG'fll~!lng!~QJQ.ffi~~0;l~;t2%1,'\i:~~i:i~~;~~U~~~Jk~;~~;';~ii~~,\{~:,1lg~~~ji~!);B.0)@i{~~.~~H~~i5!~1E~;i~m~}!!;,;j)j{J;.iri,e):['::2::;:t?:~':;!''.'E~.j:::':;Y:::';' vC1,stagefconfvoi' .... ..... ... '" .... .. ..... . .. .. ~;Ii!:~:Y1~~;:;~::~~~:~~l:~:~:~~:=:;;::~::::~::::~:j:;,:'~;"~i' t~~~)~i~~;~~t~~~:f;;~4~~(~~2{~1~;NJ~$.~!f!H0i~~~;~?i~;;i~f&1~~;;11l~i@~i!i~~~1ili~;~~j!!.~i;\:i;;i;~Bt~i~Bi~M~\i~1it:~\~ifms\'6i"~~t~~~;fii'~.~~~B:'i?:t!;~,t":;:i1;f2:~;';i.~:~;~:,. pO queue free %. 83 97'" . ". '99 . . .. . . . . aM;~p.I~@;l~m!L~J~~;~g~~~~4J~1~~~1'~;;g~'a~;M~ji~~it~~W~~;%~~Bn~\~~~~Qj~~;I;~l;~~~~tM~~~%f~!;~Y,Aii~~~;;~~~j~jffl!;~,tJI~xj~.~f~tf.~![::i~~~~.i!t;f.Kq}{ii};: r~ .. Volume Left 26 0 0 10 0 0 YplQm~~f:{'9Pt;':.jb~.jS::":'?~;~;:;'~;~1:i~):f:':'i.L;:;p.~ii'~~1t~~~lt.~;:.::~'~ Yc;:;:<:,~;::~r:i~';:;;;:i:.I)i,;:;:>:;'::'.':::~;::,;.:;.;;';'i'.::;:..::i:;:;:)'.:::~"::';";::;;:~,; ..... cSH . 226 1700 1700 . 880 1700 1700 \lQIgm;eJtgi~p.~~l1Yi~;1i~[i~.t~:,~;~~'~1~Kf~~gfu!i~~~~\.4~11iillPl~.W~i~)R~'~~~~!~(~i~~!:1~:1,.S';;;E)C'~;~;f:1~i';:;~~;;;f,,\;;i;i:n::;~i;:~~:0:~~;~!:':.;:i:iL:::~..:{;'iL: Queue Length (ft) 17 0 0 1 0 0 r~~lr,t~~!~~~}~t;Lh~~~~~)k~~~0!;(:!~!.~J)tp~~,ft~~ro.~~jt;';~h{:~~!0~{~iti,~blil~~:;J~~;~:';Q)T~3~i~~t;;l~fJ;~ifJ:;:::i;~;;,S1:::f;p.!!n}:~;;;;;'~K~[f;;~:;;~\'~~7f'~E~c.;Ji::Y\ ~p.R'fif~qn71;1~1~Y;,ls:)!;;CS;t;~l~~~~~:7i~:i~~:\A~;P;~~~;:~:;~~~'iif;)~~;~~~1::I,tri:';:i';::[;~~i;;';;~~k~?;':t:i1(~';;~;~;:ePiH!;';!~~l~,;~:(C::~j;~;~j!{(;'.;,;:!~:::~";:~i:';;:;;,;l~!;::.;:.' Approach LOS C 1f<ll~~~li~..!~ll!l!!!ilil"~!ijj!'!ffiJ!gj"",~~~~~i!li~ ~ Average Delay 0.6 ~1~;!!~=::::~~;:::::::;j::::::~:;;;'::;:::~~':::':::""; Preston Oaks Addition Traffic Study 7/4/2006 AM Peak Lavaca & Precinct Line Site Build Out HeM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: lavaca Trail & Precinct Line Rd 9/7/2006 . '- t I'" \. ! ~~_r.. ." '~..Ii~l!t~~~~~~~~ ~ $&h:~Q.mflll~f~~~:i~'J:}";~~).~\~1~~~:~~f~#tf.J!tt14;~;f.;j~;l};Ni:';,';$ri~~~~Jf~;;'i~;f:{t.:!~:;;i:(~&~:.7::';,,~1'(;::~~:')Mg:iii';~;:~;:U?\}';"::i::;:<:/.;; Grade 0% 0% 0% ~iifm~J,(v~il.rn}Nij'~~'i%1;:f);:~t):%~J)iffi~Ej~~'ill~~t~:~lft~g~f1!:~Si;,1~'tW;~s!:;~ffl{:i~tf)~r;3::;i\i;t<:H~:;'~:.jfi~:~'1;~;i;;fu,;.~;:j,;i;;;t:;;'t~;2\:~~;;:~:::'~;;;:~'.";:=':i::~:',.,....'., Peak Hour Factor' 0.92 0.92' 6:\)2 0.92' 0~9i 0.92 ..... ..... .. fif~iifly.~~IJ;iw:gj1~~tii;\nF~@jI~:~1.jj1r;i;:}~@:~.;ilt;l~@;:;~]!fA;?J';a.~~~4fjii~lt':~1~?9:,i;'f;;~::~~;.~,:~it;~~~;~~~?;;~~;;j;~;.:;.'H:!n~:tj!i;!iS~j.~;,:\;i\;\~;:;~:::i;;; Pedestrians i1!li:~:::::::::~~=::~:~=::::::::::::;~~::;:;~ Median storageveh) . ...... ..... . . .. '. .... . P.fBi~~~tD;t~)iij~li@.lll{~;i:~,~~\~ij~~FE~1~};rt~~{~j\;l1~k~fj'}itB;i~;:\;#;~~j~~;ii~~WItiJ~(tr};.i~~:!'II~;,;:~~t;;;;~1;:t~E1;;~!i~h;;~t.!.'.;0.;;t'i8;;~ii;~:::~t;k!\i~i~)\1:;;C;t(ri'::;,;~:;.~;' pX, platoon unblocked ~~:~nlql(Q.gJYRl.y:i~1t@!~;t~~t21~t;l?~~igtii#;~~~\~j~i.~~!~~Ji~$~@tr.~ii;~#f::j$\;m~~~'Pl(!t]~~%~m4i:i~:;t;;{i:t~!~t~i:it\~;i\~;}f.D\';\i;;~;;;;'~~~;;;;:;.. vC 1, stage 1 conf vol vQg~~~~~~~B~~9~f~~91~~W~~~~ffi~~f~~~~~~~~~{~~'&.~'i~'~{[1~:.~~:~~t~~~~i1~t~~t~l~f~:~~~f~;~;~~i~~g[~~:~.~~b~~j~~~;~i~~~j\~f\t~~~{~~}~tJ~Wb~~i~~~0~I~~~:~:f[~i~~~~;1~f~{j:,.~:.';;~.; vCu, unblocked vol 1798 623 ... 1247'" . . . !~!t:!:::~:~iE:i:::=;:E~:::~::~:~:::',~~~':::::~:::'~,',~"~:,' ~At~m~~t-9.l?,. Volume Left 11 0 0 16 0 0 'it~i~m~'jB!~fjt):~;;~':Hi~d:'i;;!;.;;:;:;0;';;:~~~T;iiEi;:i;~~~Ks~;;':;~;;~le;l;(B~;",~:~;_~J2;~Z:~;~~Q~,;i;:;~;ri;;\QAi;':;;it):;::::,.:::;~:m'2;;S:t:'2;:;;:':" .to::;.i;;:X!';f:::\i:?t{;'.\.;;~~,;;.~\;. :i'i,; cSH 123 1700 1700 554 1700 1700 \l9.)qm~it9.,;Q,~P.~9iW;'J~;~;i~~f~g{',~~~1ff,IQl~~/i~tTI\tg:Q.;fl1:.~~~~~:!~~:!~~'~~;:;i~~'9!~~i{.i~'~f~j:0::::Jfi;~f,:~;~:~%f',;:;i3~):~:JF:h)i:~f.X.:.{:;.:t~:::2j~;i':'iii';;':i" Queue Length (ft) ,16. . 0 .. 6 2 o' .. .0 ,... , , . B,W.~!t9Ni~:@~~~,~ji~f~'ii!:~:~j~i;~*~9.;~ir~i~;):At~~J~~0tO,\~J.W;~~i~;W41%.i[~l~;P~%t~t~~\j~~s;~r:~;,:t:;)1t:;;:['~ti!;:s~t:;:;:f(tt~)!~!ii~\1~;:i:'/:~~:~i;;;t;=;;~iiL:,:;.;: Lane LOS E B NiiiiP.:~~)l~~1~Y,jts)~i.~fBi}i&~Q1~:2t~,,~~~'ip.~#:i%.(~\*~8.Eil~~~~~~~!if~f1~~iEfHt.tiGW~it;::j~~~}i~&~n~~i:;~;c:~)g~~i!;;1;H~tSj~~:;~~,;t"h:fl::U/,'i;\:: Approach LOS E ~~B~"1!lllif~~~~"tll';'l~~~~~ ~~~:W~~ Average Delay 0.5 ~~;i~~;~~~::;;~:~~;~;~;:::~:l;;~~~~cWt~"":"~":;"i~}'i"CF"i,:';~', Preston Oaks Addition Traffic Study 7/4/2006 PM Peak Lavaca & Precinct line Site Build Out