HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-7/10/2006
City of Colleyville
Meeting Agenda
Planning and Zoning Commission
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
Monday, July 10, 2006
7:00 PM
City Council Chambers
6:15 P.M. - PRE-COMMISSION WORKSHOP
EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
THIRD FLOOR
LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANNING, ZONING,
PLATTING, AND LAND USE
REVIEW OF REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
REGULAR MEETING
7:00 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
Commissioners Robert McCormick, Dave Dudziak, Thomas Bartkowski, Mary Taylor,
John Blassingame, Denis Duffy, Jeff Byerly
3. INVOCATION
Commissioner Bartkowski
4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
June 26, 2006
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
7a Case P-06-032 - Approval of a Preliminary Plat of Lots 1-9, Block 1 of
the Chanel's Court Addition on 5.39 acres located at 209 and 301 Bandit
Trail
7b Case P-06-035 - Final Plat of Lot 7, Block 1 of the Heritage Office Parc
Addition on 2.1 acres located at 5205 Heritage Avenue
City of Cotleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/612006
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Agenda
July 10, 2006
8. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS
8a Case P-06-033 - PUBLIC HEARING -Approval of a Final plat on Lots
1 Rand 2R, Block 23 of the Highland Acres Addition and Tract 1G1,
Abstract 206 of the BBB & C RR Survey being a replat of Lots 1 and 2,
Block 23 of the Highland Acres Addition located at 405 and 409
Timberline Drive South
8b Case P-06-034 - PUBLIC HEARING - Approval of a Final Plat of Lot 1 R
and 1 R 1, Block 1 of the Starbucks Addition being a Replat of Lot 1,
Block 1 of the Starbucks Addition located at 5510 Colleyville Boulevard
8e Case Z-06-018- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from
AG-Agricultural to CN-Neighborhood Commercial on Tract 2W2,
Abstract 180 of the J.L. Byas Survey located at 6208 Colleyville
Boulevard
9. TABLED AGENDA ITEMS
9a Case Z-06-012 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from
AG-Agricultural to PUDR-Planned Unit Residential on 19.78 acres out of
the J.L. Byas Survey located in the 1600 block of Sanders Lane
9b Case Z-06-016- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from
AG-Agricultural and R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family
Residential on 20.15 acres on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail
Addition and Lot 1, Block 1 of the W.C. Newton Addition
1 o. STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS
11. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS
12. ADJOURNMENT:
Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant
City of Colleyville
Page 2
Printed on 7/6/2006
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
Meeting Minutes - Draft
Monday, June 26,2006
7:30 PM
City Council Chambers
Planninq and ZoninQ Commission
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - Draft
June 26, 2006
6:15 P.M. - PRE-COMMISSION WORKSHOP
EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM
THIRD FLOOR
LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANING, ZONING,
PLATTING, AND LAND USE
REVIEW OF REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
REGULAR MEETING
7:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Byerly called the meeting to order at 7:55 P.M.
2. ROLL CALL
Present: Commissioners Robert McCormick, Dave Dudziak, Mary Taylor, John
Blassingame, Denis Duffy, Jeff Byerly
Absent: Thomas Bartkowski
3. INVOCATION
The invoation was given by Commissioner Taylor
4. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Blassingame made correction in the 4th paragraph on page 11, to
change "appeals" to "appease",
Commissioner Duffy made correction on page 11, to remove the same motion noted
twice. On page 3, 5th paragraph, change the second "only" to "one",
Commissioner Dudziak made correction on page 10, 3rd paragraph from
"Commissioner Dudziak questioned if the open space includes the easement? Chris
Fuller replied the tree preservation easement increases the open space to 22 percent"
to "Commissioner Dudziak questioned if the open space includes the easement? Chris
Fuller replied the open space is 18.5 percent if the tree preservation area is not
included, with the tree preservation area, the open space increases to 22 percent. "
Commissioner Dudziak moved to approve the June 12, 2006 meeting minutes
with corrections. Commissioner Duffy seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - McCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy, Byerly
Absent: 1 - Bartkowski
City of Cotleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/5/2006
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - Draft
June 26, 2006
6. CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA
None
7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS
8. PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS
8a Case P-06-031- PUBLIC HEARING - Final plat of Lots 29R-1 and
29R-2, Block 1 of the Wescoat Place Addition being a replat of Lot 29-R,
Block 1 of the Wescoat Place Addition
Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners.
Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:05 PM.
There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:05 PM.
Commissioner Duffy moved to approve case P-06-031. Commissioner Taylor
seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - McCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy, Byerly
Absent: 1 - Bartkowski
8b
Case Z-06-016- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from
AG-Agricultural and R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family
Residential on 20.15 acres on Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail
Addition and Lot 1, Block 1 of the W.C. Newton Addition
Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners.
Commissioner Byerly questioned staff for clarity if those lots will face LD Lockett? Chris
Fuller replied the facing of those homes can be determined at the time the building
permits are issued. They could face the interior street or LD Lockett.
Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding if the developer has come in to discuss
the drainage and where will the overflow be received? He stated seeing lots of concrete
and contours, but no plan for drainage. City Engineer Robert Woods replied the
developer has talked with us briefly, however, the applicant may be able to give more
information,
Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8: 1 0 PM.
Dan Bryson, partner with the owner of the development, came forward to present the
case and answer any questions the Commissioners had, He stated having met with the
Emerald Park Homeowners Association's concerns,
Philip Robbins, 5907 Crescent Lane, stated he appreciated the fact that the developer
has worked with the neighbors, He stated having concerns with the plan changing from
what is being presented tonight.
David Ray, 5909 Sterling Drive, he stated he met with the developer and saw the new
City of Colleyville
Page 2
Printed on 7/5/2006
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - Draft
June 26, 2006
layout. He stated the developers did listen, however, how can we be sure that the plan
will not change? He stated he would prefer a Planned Unit Development Residential so
that the plan could be final. He stated he would support the development as long as the
plan submitted was followed, but not if it changes,
Marty Stajduhar, owner of 816 W. LD Lockett, had hoped for a transitional zone, he
stated liking the R20 or R30 development. He stated wanting the developers and
builders to be held accountable for what is promised,
Ken Damron, 5830 Crescent Lane, within 200 feet of the proposed subdivision, stated
he has met with the developer and feels confident in these people, He stated supporting
this idea, if the plat will stay as submitted,
There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:20 PM.
Commissioner Byerly questioned staff regarding if the developer should come forth with
a prelimianry plat to be able to stick with the plan as submitted, other than changing to a
PUD? Chris Fuller replied that being the only option,
Commissioner Duffy questioned staff if the homes would have to sprinkled because of
the fire access? Barry LeBaron replied this being too early to detemine that, staff has
not looked at it from a technical stand point, that is a platting issue. Commissioner Duffy
questioned staff for clarity, if the residential buffer is Emerald Park on LD Lockett? Barry
LeBaron stated the term trasition, as described in the Master Plan, is any area between
R20, half acre lot, with a density of 1,8 units per acre, as recommeded, anything higher
than that would be considered a transitional area, as Emerald Park.
Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr, Stajduhar, for clarity, if he does not want the
transition area from his lot to smaller lot sizes? Mr, Stajduhar replied the R20 is fine,
stick to that, but do not make the lots any smaller,
Commissioner Duffy stated to Mr. Stajduhar that there is no way we can hold this
developer to the drawing presented, becasue it is straight zoning, Mr, Stajduhar replied
he did understand that and like some of the other neighbors here tonight, they want,
some way, to be able to hold the developer accountable for the plan as submitted.
Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr, Bryson if he is part of the development group that
owns the land to the east? Mr. Bryson replied yes, Commissioner Taylor questioned
Mr. Bryson if he intends to develop this as one piece? Mr, Bryson replied yes, just as
shown on the plan. Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr, Bryson if he has bought any
other land in this area? Mr, Bryson replied he only owns the 20.15 acres.
Commisisoner Taylor questioned Mr, Bryson if he intends to buy any more property?
Mr, Bryson replied no, we have enough land,
Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr, Bryson, if the Commission tables this case, could
he then bring forth a preliminary plat to be able to stick to this design? Mr. Bryson
replied yes, he could bring forth a preliminary plat, he has no intention on doing anything
other than what is being presented,
Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Bryson, if he did bring forth a PUD, are there any
plans to put in a fancy entry way to this development on both ends? Mr, Bryson replied
they are planning an elaborate entry way, however, he stated not having the plans all
put together yet. He stated not being aware that those were required for the zoning
process. Commissioner Dudziak stated the plans were not required as part of zoning.
Commissioner Byerly stated he would support this, but only if a preliminary plat is
Page 3
Printed on 7/5/2006
City of Cotleyville
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - Draft
June 26, 2006
brought forth at the same time as zoning.
Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Bryson how long would it take to bring forth a
preliminary plat to staff? Mr, Bryson replied about 2 weeks,
Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Bryson for clarity if the plat would be ready for
staff in two weeks or for the Commission? Mr. Bryson replied to staff in two weeks.
Barry LeBaron stated it would go on the July 24th agenda. Commissioner Dudziak
questioned Mr. Bryson if he could wait that long? Mr, Bryson replied it will cost him
more money.
Commissioner Byerly moved to table case Z-06-016 and continue this item at the
July 24, 2006 meeting. Commissioner Taylor seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 6 - McCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy, Byerly
Absent: 1 - Bartkowski
9. TABLED AGENDA ITEMS
9a Case G-06-015 - PUBLIC HEARING - Consider amending the Master
Thoroughfare Plan to change the classification of Sanders Lane, Wyatt
Drive and Industrial Boulevard from a two-lane minor collector roadway
to a two-lane local street
Commissioner Byerly recused himself from this item and Commissioner Duffy took over
as Chair.
Commissioner Taylor moved to remove case G-06-015 from the table.
Commissioner Dudziak seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - MeCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy
Absent: 1 - Bartkowski
Abstain: 1 - Byerly
Case G-06-015 was heard with case Z-06-012.
9b
Case Z-06-012 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from
AG-Agricultural to PUDR-Planned Unit Residential on 19.78 acres out of
the J,L. Byas Survey located in the 1600 block of Sanders Lane
Commissioner Byerly recused himself from this agenda item and Commissioner Duffy
took over as Chair.
Commissioner Blassingame moved to remove case Z-06-012 from the table.
Commissioner McCormick seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - McCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy
Absent: 1 - Bartkowski
Abstain: 1 - Byerly
City of Col/eyville
Page 4
Printed on 7/5/2006
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - Draft
June 26, 2006
Commissioner Duffy opened the public hearing on both cases G-06-015 and Z -06-012
at 8:33 p,m.
Chris Fuller updated the Commissioners regarding this agenda item regarding two
letters being recended from opposition pending the requested changes that the
applicant has agreed. Those changes will be reflected in the ordinance,
Curtis Young, with Sage Group, the developer, came forth to brief the Commissioners
and present the rezoning request.
Jeff Avery, the builder, came forth to brief the Commissioners and present the rezoning
request.
Keith Neill, 2000 Reynolds Drive, concerned with making Wyatt Drive a two lane road,
what purpose would making that road into a two lane road in an industrial area serve?
Commissioner Duffy stated Wyatt Drive will not be effected by this development. Mr.
Neill stated being opposed to changing Wyatt Drive to a two lane road,
Paul Johnson, 6403 Meade Drive, stated being in support of residential, but not in
support to changing Wyatt Drive into a two road,
Nancy Johnson, 6403 Meade Drive, stated being in favor of this proposal, good use for
this land. She stated being concerned with what will happen to Wyatt Drive, doing
anything more with Wyatt Drive will increase the traffic.
Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding what will be done with Wyatt Drive?
Barry LeBaron replied in the future, the city would like to see Wyatt Drive, Sanders Lane
and Industrial a 75 foot right of way. Meaning, as properties develop along that route,
additional right of way would be added to create a minor collector street, a wide paving
section. With the widening of SH26, there would be a traffic light at Sanders and Tinker.
Wyatt Drive was at one time being considered to be done away with, however, the
residents of Ross Downs did not want it to be removed, The proposed zoning case
would not allow Sanders to be an open loop, Traffic would function just like it does now
on Sanders.
Michele Valdez, 6503 Meade Drive, a Ross Downs resident, stated having concerns
with the traffic and stated this development is something that Colleyville needs. She
stated fully supporting this plan, Her husband, Gary Kennedy had to leave, but he
would have spoken in favor of this rezoning request.
Robert Flynn, 7005 Whipperwill Court, stated being in favor of this project, this is an
ideal place for this use, stated being in full support for this project.
Scott Jostes, 6300 Wyatt Drive, spoke in regards to 9a first, there is heavy traffic cutting
through from Broughton, He stated in 2001, there should have been an emergency
access gate installed, but to now, has not. In regards to 9b, this would be a good use
for this land, He stated the project being very well planned and he stated he would like
to see this project voted upon tonight.
Dave McCormack, 6407 Meade Drive, spoke in favor of the residential proposal but
spoke in opposition to the changing of Wyatt Drive.
There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 9:20 PM
Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Young regarding if the proposed streets are going
to be gated? Will all of the streets be to city specs? Mr, Young replied yes, the streets
Page 5
Printed on 7/5/2006
City of Colleyville
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - Draft
June 26, 2006
will be constructed to city specs, As far as the gating of the development, he stated
they will be looking at that during the platting stages,
Commissioner Taylor stated liking the changes which have satisfied a lot of her
questions,
Commissioner Dudziak stated liking the changes, yet still having questions regarding
commercial use for this property. He questioned Mr, A very regarding, if commercial was
ever considered for this property since it is zoned commercial? Mr. A very stated he
originally wanted to put his personal home at the end of Sanders Lane, however, found
out at great detail, the property was master planned to be commercial, He stated he
then built in Riverwalk because the property on Sanders was not going to be easily
converted to residential. He stated the best use of the property is residential and to be
able to control the whole piece by developing into residential, commercial would not
work on these properties. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Avery regarding the
commercial liability, did you consider the SH26 redevelopment and how that would
effect the commercial? Mr. A very stated discussing with other property owners that this
would not be a prime commercial piece because it did not front Colleyville Boulevard, it
would always be hidden and it would be a disadvantage to commercial, Commissioner
Dudziak stated understanding the exposure on SH26, but still having a concern, that in
the long term, this is still a commercial piece of property. Mr. Avery stated this not a
viable piece of commercial property, but because he can not see in the future, it is an
unknown.
Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr. Avery, in the long term, could you see purchasing
the property fronting on Colleyville Boulevard to make office buildings? Mr. Avery stated
inquiring about the properties, but he would have to investigate that at some point
possibly.
Commissioner Blassingame moved to approve case Z-06-012 with the
recommendations made by Mr. Bagwell and accepted by the developer. Commissioner
Taylor seconded,
The motion failed by the following vote:
Aye: 3 - Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy
Nay: 2 - McCormick, Dudziak
Absent: 1 - Bartkowski
Abstain: 1 - Byerly
The motion failed due to lack of four affirmative votes,
Commissioner McCormick commented wanting larger lots, bigger homes with less
density, which would be more in line with the Master Plan, He stated not supporting this
project in the middle of town,
Commissioner Dudziak commented he still anticipates changes for this corridor and
stated not wanting to eliminate this as a commercial site,
Discussion was held between staff and Commissioners regarding what the possibilities
might be to hold a special meeting before the next regular scheduled meeting to get the
needed votes for either approval or denial,
Mr, Young made comments to the Commissioner's questions regarding the viability for
this property. He stated this will not be prime commercial property and it will not stay
undeveloped. It will either be a high quality development like presented tonight or it will
City of Colleyville
Page 6
Printed on 7/5/2006
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - Draft
June 26, 2006
be piece milled,
Mr. A very commented that if this were to go commercial, the citizens in Broughton will
not support it.
Commissioner Dudziak stated the Ross Downs residents, as well as I, use Wyatt Drive
as a cut through to get to Ross Downs, He stated this is for future Council members
and Commissioners to make this decision as to whether or not this is to be commercial,
The Master Plan was approved and commercial is what the Master Plan suggests. He
stated he respects the presented project but still thinks commercial will be there as the
Master Plan pledges,
Mr. A very questioned Commissioner McCormick if the residential use if what he sees for
this area? Commissioner McCormick replied the residential use is good for this land,
but not at this density.
Commissioner Blassingame questioned staff if a meeting outside of the normal
scheduled meetings is possible? Barry LeBaron replied a special meeting can be held.
City Attorney Matthew Boyle stated a special meeting can be called at the request of the
Chair,
Commissioner McCormick made motion to deny case Z-06-012,
The motion failed for lack of second.
Commissioner Duffy adjourned the meeting at 10:00 PM
Commissioner Duffy called the meeting back to order at 10:05 PM.
Commissioner Duffy moved to approve case G-06-015. Commissioner
Blassingame seconded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 5 - McCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy
Absent: 1 - Bartkowski
Abstain: 1 - Byerly
Commissioner Blassingame moved to table case Z-06-012 until a special meeting
ean be called by the Chair. Commissioner Taylor seeonded.
The motion carried by the following vote:
Aye: 4 - Dudziak, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy
Nay: 1 - McCormick
Absent: 1 - Bartkowski
Abstain: 1 - Byerly
ge
Case G-06-017 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request by Grapevine-Colleyville
Independent School District for a waiver request of the tree mitigation
requirements in the Land Development Code for Colleyville Elementary
School, located in the 5900 block of Pleasant Run Road
City of Colleyville
Page 7
Printed on 7/5/2006
Planning and Zoning Commission
Meeting Minutes - Draft
June 26, 2006
This item was removed from the applicant as stated in the letter dated June 21,
2006
10. STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS
Barry LeBaron told the Commissioners that the last item has been removed from the
agenda per the applicant's request. They are going to be submitting a new landscaping
plan.
Commissioner Blassingame questioned staff if Commissioner Duffy would have to call
the special meeting since Commissioner Byerly recused himself from item 9b? Attorney
Boyle replied Commissioner Duffy will be acting as the chair and will call the meeting.
11. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS
Commissioner Byerly commented that the public hearing items are listed on the notice
as public hearings, yet the public hearing was not reopened. Attorney Boyle replied we
will be working on adjusting the manner the agendas are posted in the future,
12. ADJOURNMENT:
The commission adjourned the meeting at 10:11 PM by acelamation.
Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant
Page 8
Printed on 7/5/2006
City of Colleyville
,'r":::'::~~;""
,." ">~?-rr:' ,~..
~A.~:.~~,!:l. : . j~:~.w~e~
".. '. -......
y~;;;~:;
City of Colleyville
Agenda Briefing
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
File Number:
File Type: Case
Status: Commision Action
Items
Controlling Body: Planning and
Zoning
Commission
Version: 1
Agenda Date: 07/10/06
Requester: Community ~genda No.: 7a Final Action:
Development
Department
File Name: Case P-06-032 - Approval of a Preliminary Plat of Lots 1-9, Block 1 of the Chanel's Court
Addition on 5.39 acres located at 209 and 301 Bandit Trail
~ttachments: Location and Zoning Map. Development Review Committee Memo · Applicant's Response
Dated July 6, 2006. Plat
History of Legislative File
Version: Date:
Acting Body:
1 07/10/06 Planning and Zoning
Commission
Title
Case P-06-032 - Approval of a Preliminary Plat of Lots 1-9, Block 1 of the Chanel's Court
Addition on 5.39 acres located at 209 and 301 Bandit Trail
Explanation
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Keith Kithsiri is the potential developer of a 5.39-acre parcel of property located on the
south side of Bandit Trail, east of Vanguard Court. The developer has submitted a
Preliminary Plat to divide the property into eleven (11) lots for the construction of nine (9)
new single-family residences and two (2) open space lots.
Zoning. The proposed lots are located in a R20-Single Family Residential zoning district.
The R20 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet, lot width of
100-feet and lot depth of 125-feet. The proposed lots meet the lot development
requirements of the R20 zoning district.
Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on public streets.
The sidewalk along Bandit Trail must be five (5) feet in width and constructed as part of the
public improvements to the property. Interior sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and
constructed as part of the public improvements to the property.
city of Colleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/612006
Agenda Briefing Continued
Drainage. This project provides two open space lots adjacent to Bandit Trail that will
contain detention ponds. A drainage analysis for the development has been reviewed by
the Engineering Department.
Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are
required since Bandit Trail is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more
than one residential lot. The developer is dedicating additional right-of-way along Bandit
Trail and is required to construct a portion of the street to current standards or escrow a
cash equivalent, as determined by the Engineering Department. The perimeter street
improvement fee is based on the projected roadway impact of the proposed development
and the amount of frontage along a public roadway. This development has a total of
approximately 450 feet of frontage along Pleasant Run Road.
Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the
final plat for new structures on newly platted lots. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per
residential lot. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks
Office.
Tree Preservation. The applicant was made aware of the tree preservation requirements
and provided a tree survey that located existing trees on the property. Trees not located
within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must be preserved during construction.
Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around the
dripline of all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The protective fencing may
be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing,
or other similar fencing. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction
period,
Summary. The applicant has addressed all Development Review Committee comments.
The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land
Development Code.
Financial Impact
It has been determined that there is no financial impact.
Recommendation
Approval
City of Colleyville
Page 2 Printed on 7/612006
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
TO
FAX NO
FROM
June 28, 2006
Keith Kithsiri
817.893.0033
Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT P-06-032 Bandit Trail preliminary plat
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRe) has reviewed your plat request
submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration.
The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant:
1. Provide a note on the plat defining a "Tree Preservation Easement."
2. Provide distances from the property line to the front building line on Lots 4 and 6.
3. The preliminary utility and drainage plans are available to be picked up for review.
Contact Robert Woods, 817.503.1094, Engineering Department, for more information.
In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information:
4. Additional requirements may be reviewed when plans are submitted. Contact Rob
McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of
approval of the plat. Perimeter street improvements are required for the newly created lots since
Bandit Trail is considered an unimproved street. The developer's portion of the costs for
infrastructure improvements may not exceed the amount that is roughly proportionate to the
projected impact of the proposed development, as determined by a professional engineer, licensed
in the State of Texas, and who is retained by the City of Colleyville. In making the rough
proportionality determination, consideration shall be given to the availability of adequate and
minimum levels of public facilities and accessibility to the site for the delivery of emergency
servIces.
PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the
plat,. As new vacant lots would be created by the plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is
required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per
new lot.
100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-06-032 BANDIT TRAIL
SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Bandit Trail and interior streets.
The sidewalk on Bandit Trail must be five (5) feet in width and constructed as part of the public
improvements to the property. Interior sidewalks must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as
part of the public improvements to the property.
TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must
be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must
be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be
located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange
vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The
fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period.
IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building pennit is
issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide
general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be
different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by
a City-Developer Agreement.
SEWER
Not applicable for lot with existing house on property. $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot.
$2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed
$200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed
ROADWAY
WATER
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, July 10,2006, 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, August 1,2006,7:30 p.m.
Please submit the following to our offices:
. A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the
requirement should be modified or waived;
. 12 full size copies of the revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 X 11).
The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, July 5, 2006, in
order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fullerc<mci.colleyville.tx,us or
817.503.1054 if you have any questions.
PAGE20F2
KELLIE
ENGINEERING, INC.
July 6, 2006
Chris Fuller
Community Development Department
City ofColleyville
100 Main Street
Col1eyville, TIC 76034
Fax: 817...503-1059
Re: P-06-032 Bandit Trail - Preliminary Plat Comments
Dear Chris:
I am writing in response to the<commentsreceived from the Development Review Committee on
the preliminary plat, Case No. P-06-032, for the Bandit Trail subdivision.
Revisions to the Plans:
1. Note defining "Tree Preservation Ea.<;ement" added to the Preliminary Plat.
2. Distances to the front buildil1g lineaqded to Lots 4 and 6.
3. Prelimil1ary Drainage and Utility Plans comments from City of Colleyville' s Engineering
Department incorporated into revised plat and plans.
Development Comments:
L Additional fire protection! police requirements may be required at the time of submittal
of COl1struction plans.
The developer, Vision Southwest, L.P. (VSW), acknowledges comment.
2. Perimeter Street Improvement fees will be due at the time of approval of the plat.
The developer, Vision Southwest, L.P. (VS"W), acknowledges comment and will pay lee at
time of plat approval.
3, Parkland Dedication fees will be due at the time of approval of the plat.
The developer, Vi.~i()n Southwest, L.P. (VS"W), acknowledges comment and will pay fee at
lime (>.f plat approval.
200 Rufe Snow Drive North, Suite 120, Keller. TX 76248 Tel: 817.379.1225 Fax: 817.379.1244
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS. PLANNING. DESIGN
r I ~~ f: R : N t~; ; ~(
Chris Fuller
July 6, 2006
Page 20f2
KJ; L ~lE
4. A 5' sidewalk will be required along Bandit Trail and 4' sidewalks will he required along
the interior street.
The developer, Vision Southwest, L.P. (VSW), acknowledges comment, Developer will
install sidewalk along Bandit Traitwith subdivision construction (this will be included in
Construction Plans). Builders will install interior sidewalks with each home,
5. Tree Preservation,
The developer, Vision Southwest, L.P. (VSW), acknowledges comment. Treepreservation
fencing and notes will be includedthe subdivision plans and the individual home builders
will be notified of their responsibilities under the City'S Tree Preservation Ordinance.
6. Roadway, Water, and Sewer Impact Fees.
The developer, VisionSouthwest, L.P. (VSW), acknowledges comment. Actualfees may
vary. Fees will be paid at the timeafbuilding permit application.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to calL
Sincerely,
KeUieEngineering, Inc.
Q PJ/~
Edward T. KeHie, P.E.
cc: Keith Kithsiri, Vision Southwest LP
~..v
<
o
z
~
~
0' iO')> ~:o <!:!:
~ '" 11 0 9 ~'i-M
<>>.~..~';t[t:
~~.ii~~I~
I ~ ,~.iD<<tlt
_ ..l~,
r~j
0' ~ \l:O ~ Q'i~
x.. 0 0 ~ 3 '2
i:::ei~golm,
"'";':S.l:!~a 1;;:>
(" ." . :
~~?~-~!
~..~i(J)~::1
Q;..g ~j(.:
3 ~:f!
2 ~~I
'.",
lim
iil'"'
IiI'"'
~I;;;
~~~~8
c.~!~i?
~;;~~;;;
~,~~ i
1:01 ~
Q
Z
&
;;T
-----_.
gt:
.,.. <.;'f;..
:if ,~
: ~ r: fJ ' t
: $ J, ~i '.
,; Ii if
I! <, ~
r H I, Ii l~
t"!~ l. Ii '.
.' l' !
-to' f $' 1: i
...,
!l " !,
, I, .: !
i; f l, ,
} !: f
3i
! ~ t
, i >
. !
.
I i
i t i
. I
~
! i
!
,
!
;
.
<-
c
!<
'"
8
0-
>0 ~
%~)>~
~~:~.~~. ~
g, ,',O~O." ..n ,"I~,,",,'.,'.'~.., .: ~",,:
:z; 2,:ZZ;V
=< P(j)....m
. " Qj ~ :1:(1)
iT! r UJ<: rn , .
~Fic.>~
(f)
o
::r:
)>
Z
m
1Rr-
~u>
o
o
c
~
-0
:;:v
m
r-
$
04
"TI)>
~
-0
~
"..U-l
I
~
I
I
t
~~~ ~~ ~~' H~ ug !,ik ~~,i'\I' UJ!~I~'
u", '", '", f~H h~ ~''''~~! ,'f" ~
t'r -, -, .'r ~.~ I~r ~-,~~~ g
.g;~ ~:i~.:i ;::::; f~~ ':;1I:.'~; . _,i~';19
~t8 I! i~ [Ig ;~~ ~%w :.,~ =I~~ ~
~t~ l~ l~ ~~~. ~j~ is~ ~~ ;~~~!~
t'8 .8 iq Jl~ ~!~ f~Q ~g ~R~i
;~i ~~ ~~ ~i i~i ;ii !~ Eiii
;f: * ~ ~~ ~l; :~: !~ ~!if
~[;:~ .. ~ li ~...~ -z::;. ..t, g~~'l'>
.~;~ ~ s ~~ ;.'j '''d ~; Ha;
:~ ~ ~ i~ ~!~ ~~.~ ;~ !:'~~
!~ ~ g ~~ t~ =~~ ~j ~!~~
~t 0 r8 i~ :~8 ~i ~~~;
~[ [ i Ii ~1~:1 ~i ~I!I
1 1 } ai d :~~ h tf'J~
~,~~~.__ i' ...., t ~ Nl .. ~ ~r.'i v
.' ~ " ~ff l(~1 ,. Kiv~
~I 1_"- I I~ ;1 ;I~ ~I ~.~~
- · ~~ II ~:! ~& I~~f
;~ ~ ;~;1 ~:t: ii t~~~
I; W_'_-, r r! ~& II. ?; K:"
1,:'<..: 1 ~ t~ ~~ ~~.~ti ~i ~t~~~
J-- i ~i i~' ~ l~ · ii
.n 6 . .l .. ~ "
:~:;~;:~t?!~::~.,.
.. ~..
((J~~~~~[J~e1
City of Colleyville
Agenda Briefi n9
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
File Number:
File Type: Case
Status: Commision Action
Items
Controlling Body: Planning and
Zoning
Commission
Version:
Agenda Date: 07/10/06
Requester: Community A.genda No.: 7b Final Action:
Development
Department
File Name: Case P-06-035 - Final Plat of Lot 7, Block 1 of the Heritage Office Pare Addition on 2.1 acres
located at 5205 Heritage Avenue
A.ttachments: Location and Zoning Map. Development Review Committee Memo . Applicant's Response
Dated June 28, 2006. Plat
History of Legislative File
Version: Date:
Acting Body:
1 07/10/06 Planning and Zoning
Commission
Title
Case P-06-035 - Final Plat of Lot 7, Block 1 of the Heritage Office Parc Addition on 2.1
acres located at 5205 Heritage Avenue
Explanation
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Jeffrey Bullard, the owner of the subject property, has submitted a final plat for 2,1 acres
located near the northeast corner of the intersection of Heritage Avenue and Gateway
Drive, The plat consists of one (1) commercial lot. The applicant has submitted the plat for
review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The following is an analysis of the issues associated with this final plat.
Zoning. The proposed plat area is located within the CC2-Shopping Center zoning district.
The minimum lot size in the CC2 zoning district is 20,000 square feet. The lot exceeds the
lot development standards for the CC2 zoning district.
Sidewalks and Trails. This development is not required to construct a sidewalk along
Heritage Avenue as there is an existing sidewalk adjacent to the subject property, The
developer will be responsible for replacing and/or repairing the sidewalk, should damage
occur during the construction process, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
city of Colleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/6/2006
Agenda Briefing Continued
for new buildings on the site.
Drainage. No public drainage improvements are required for this development. However,
a site drainage study shall be required prior to the issuance of any building permits.
Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are not
required for this property since Heritage Avenue is considered an improved street and
currently meets the design standards.
Tree Survey and Replacement Requirements. Aerial photos show a small gathering of
trees located along the east property line of the site. A tree survey will be required prior to
the approval of a lot clearing and grading permit. A tree replacement plan will be required
for the removal of these trees unless they are located within a building pad-site, which is
exempt from mitigation requirements,
Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the
final plat. The fee for non-residential uses is $800 per acre.
Summary. The developer has addressed all Development Review Committee comments.
The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land
Development Code.
Financial Impact
It has been determined that there is no financial impact.
Recommendation
Approval
City of Colleyville
Page 2
Printed on 7/6/2006
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
TO
FAX NO
FROM
June 27,2006
Jason Rawlings
817.282.0401
Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT P-06-035 Heritage Office Parc minor plat
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request
submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration.
The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant:
1. Provide a cross access easement along the frontage of the property. Section 9.17.H of the
Land Development Code states subdivision plats for new commercial developments shall
be required to provide cross-access easements.
Easement Dimensions - Easements for shared driveways shall be 16 feet in width and 35
feet in length, but may vary given the shape of the particular tract. Easements extending
across the entire width of the property shall not be less than 24 feet in width.
2. Buildings constructed on the same lot will require a 20-foot separation. Contact Rob
McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
3. Provide a 15-foot drainage and utility easement along the perimeter of the properties.
Contact Robert Woods, 817.503.1094, Engineering Department, for more information.
In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information:
PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are not required since
Heritage Avenue is considered an improved street.
PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the
final plat. The fee for non-residential uses is $800 per acre. An assessment of parkland dedication
fees will be provided upon approval of the fmal plat.
SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. There is an existing sidewalk located on this site along Heritage
Avenue. The developer will be responsible for replacing and/or repairing the sidewalks, should
100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-06-o35 Heritage Office Pare minor plat
damage occur during the construction process, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
for new buildings on the site.
PUBLIC WORKS IMPROVEMENTS. The City of Colleyville Engineering Department will provide
construction plans comments for public works improvements separately. Please coordinate
directly with Engineering Department staff regarding construction plans comments, 817.503.1091.
IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is
issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide
general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be
different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by
a City-Developer Agreement.
ROADWAY
The fee for non-residential uses depends on the proposed use of the property, Details are
available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code.
$2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
$200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed,
WATER
SEWER
TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way must be preserved during
construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around
all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of
the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction
fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must
remain in place during the entire construction period.
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
Monday, July 10,2006, 7:00 p.m.
Please submit the following to our offices:
. A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating
reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived;
. 12 full size copies of the revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 XII).
The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, July 5, 2006, in
order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fullerc@ci.collevville.tx.us or
817.503.1054 if you have any questions.
PAGE20F2
I.hvid W. !\lyers, L.S.L.S.. R.PJ...S.
John W. Morgan, R.P,L.S.
Ricky L. Gentry, RcPJ..S.
Jason B. Rawlings.R.P.L.S,
~
i
I
Texas . New Mexico . Arimna . Nevada
. Topography
- Forensic Surveys
. Land Title Surveys
. AnySi7cBou.odary
. Constrw::tiol1 Layout
. Platting/Land Planning
June 28,2006
Mr. CJhrisF@er
City..ofColleyville
100 Main Street
Collcyville. Texas 76034
Re: Lot 7, Block 1, Heritage Office Parc P-06-fJ35
Dear Chris:
This letter is to infonn you that I have made the following revisions Lo the above referenced plat as you
requested:
I) I have added a. 24' cross access easement across the frontage per your request.
2) The requirement of the distance between buildings has been duly noted.
3) A fifteeil foot (15') drainage and utility easement 11.1$ been added to the perimeter.
4) The information regarding the fee requirements has bccn duly noted,
As always, I deem it a pleasure to prepare plats in the City of ColleyviHe and should you have any
additional comments please do 110t hesitate to call, fax or e-mail me,
7' !i3.f)j
JasonB. Rawlings, R.P.L.S.
jbr@moaksurveyors.com
co: Dr, JeffBulJard
1105 Chet:J.: Road. CoHeyville, Texas 76034-4152 - www.llloaksurveyorS,<:Olll -Metro (817) 268-2211 . Fax (817) 282.040 I
-Me:mtx~: Te~;.IS Society of Profi.":~iJom\1 Surveyors &. American Congress on SurveYlng &. ~ltl:pi>ing
s' Hi ~ ~ fl ~.
i'th~;tit
~.lli'~~l
r dfrl i
- ! i. ,,~
} [I . I;'
! ~, t,
t g
il
tt
i
:
i
1
.~
~
!
~
,
,
l
i
!
i
}
J
i
i
~
t
[
t
,
~
'1
f
s-
f r I
I
l J
, J
I J I
1 t J
I II i'
f Ii J
~
.4
" I
i.
J
f
H.....
t
<.
l-
II
l>>!
Ii
~
,,)
~
'i
~
~
i~i I ~ ~~ JI n ~I U (! ii II ~
t.J~ ~i. ii I~ Ii flU II II I.~ a
lOt I" t $ I. .~.... u . ; t
W if f if b flf 'l P , .~
ai it "1.... t~ . fdi ,II
Ii! d I rl 'I Iii 'I ii. .
:t! -. "," t. . if ii-l j ~
lit Hit Ii I i.l 11 ~,i ~.
H I I' .. , . t1 i, J
H. 11 1 r (! r ,..1 .~. .. I .
m~ti. I r l~ l'~ if.. f~iI. i i
iU 1 ! I l tf !~ F f g
,f] U I I 1 hi ~pn ;
It.Ji[ l: tl.'. nt Ii h.1 :
I; fit ! ~ ~ Ii 'I j'& f ·
!.l,t E f! l !~~!.!~~~
."'t I I - ! . Ph" .
Bit ! i ,- I i ti.l l..,~ I
~i1 j I ~ f H~... ~'.n.j
I. ! I ( r I tj h 1.
,j f .t : I' "~rtt f..
I~ 1 t ~ ! It, 1fii
,~ f ft. ~ .I." 11 I,
f~ ~ "' t J f. ~~ 11 II
~i f f t ~ Hnt U
1" ~ z 1 [ ',0$ 11 t
~~ .; Ll !; rfll I
't r r ~ I.' !..!. f,' f
It ~ ~ : ! : it f (
ff ~ tit f l ~ I
i? t ~ ~ 1.1 r .
l' I l r ~ t'~ · r
de' t ~! Ii f ~
U' l I ~. ~ q< f }
lIi~'l~"~~.'
11 ! ~ [ ; ~ Ji 1 i
i <I ' ; i ". . I~ ! I
\1; , ii' ~ Jf
g;j
~ .~
t"">>
1.'!I!l"'.~S
~I ~..;i.~
t""a...9.~[*
t""~''''''..I.ol
~~ ~..~~
""i ("':':l-
tI!!.lii~
><
>- ""d
00 ~
~
----- ..~-.~l'lljf./(' ----'--
HERITAGE AVENUE
N IJO"tJl'04"1; 165,()(f
ii _+:=::~=-!5=-::;z:1i
~e t~
~.--.. .._~..._,,-a'...~~-P.!~_~f !LL!ll!E...f..l.1.T _++
, ".
I~
i,re-
~
III
18
~
~
'"
~
l:1
f:j
~
~;;
'f,t;
i~
e!
~.~
~'''''
:4P
~.~ ~S
~ ~ ""'il
). ,-.I
g-=
.~ t""
~o
'liln
~~
......
---------
Q
s
,
,
i
\
'" "
':= \
~\
~\
9t,\_
'fi\
~\
",'
)0:, I
\\
?\
'"
0.(\
..... 1
-;;1
'iA\
.. \
;',
'\ L-. ___ ___
tIt_ ~
" ~$l!i~.;]
~=::!~~ %
;e~~E<" !.'l
'~i:M~~S :>
~~~i~~ ~
~.,.~~~ ~
~~~~ .~
'" v
-~ s
~'"'
5)1':
5 00"09'21"W 121);lIj'
S<
t"l',-l
~~
i~
;j
~J
1::~
.-.
:"\
\
\
\
,
,
z
~
~
~
""
~
,
\
\
\
+
: ~~:~~t.~~~:
,'~''"'"'''':':':'~:'''''
.. 'fj,-~' >,..."'~."",.
.., . ..I."..........~.~...
~\..~i J' .~:~~~~At)
-r~-x:~::
City of Colleyville
Agenda Briefing
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
File Number:
File Type: Case
Status: Commission Public
Hearings
Controlling Body: Planning and
Zoning
Commission
Version: 1
Agenda Date: 07/10/06
Requester: Community ~genda No.: 8a Final Action:
Development
Department
File Name: Case P-06-033 - PUBLIC HEARING -Approval of a Final plat on Lots 1 Rand 2R, Block 23 of
the Highland Acres Addition and Tract 1 G1, Abstract 206 of the BBB & CRR Survey being a
replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 23 of the Highland Acres Addition located at 405
Mtachments: Location and Zoning Map. Development Review Committee Memo . Applicant's Response
Dated July 6, 2006 . Plat
History of Legislative File
Version: Date: Acting Body:
07/10/06 Planning and Zoning
Commission
Title
Case P-06-033 - PUBLIC HEARING -Approval of a Final plat on Lots 1 Rand 2R, Block 23
of the Highland Acres Addition and Tract 1 G1, Abstract 206 of the BBB & C RR Survey
being a replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 23 of the Highland Acres Addition located at 405 and
409 Timberline Drive South
Explanation
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Shelli Haas has submitted a replat to subdivide 2.91-acres of land located at 405 and 409
Timberline Drive South, The owner has submitted a final plat of the property for review and
consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission, The plat will revise the property
boundaries of two single family lots.
Both lots are currently platted in the Highland Acres Addition. The applicant proposes to
incorporate unplatted land into Lot 1 and to realign the property boundary between Lots 1
and 2. The revised property line will pass through two existing accessory structures located
on the property. The applicant has indicated that the accessory structures will be utilized
for storage while a new single family home is constructed on Lot 2, The applicant has
agreed to remove the structures prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the
new home. Notes have been added to the plat to ensure the removal of the structures prior
City of Colleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/612006
Agenda Briefing Continued
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy,
Zoning. The property is zoned R40-Single Family Residential. The R40 zoning district
requires a minimum lot width of 150-feet and lot depth of 150-feet, and a minimum lot area
of 40,000 square feet. The proposed plat meets the development criteria as stated within
the Land Development Code.
Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland fees are not applicable for this development as the
lots were previously platted.
Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Timberline
Drive South. The sidewalk on Timberline Drive South must be four (4) feet in width and
constructed at the time building improvements are made to the property,
Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are not
required for this development as no new lots are being created.
Tree Preservation. The applicant was made aware of the tree preservation requirements
and provided an aerial photo that located existing trees on the property.
Summary. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee
comments. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements of the Land
Development Code. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning
Commission.
Financial Impact
It has been determined that there is no financial impact.
Recommendation
Approval
City of Co/leyville
Page 2
Printed on 7/6/2006
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE June 27, 2006
TO
FAX NO
Starnes Consulting
817.265.4347
Shelli Haas
817.428.1911
FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT P-06-033 405 & 409 Timberline Dr - replat
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRe) has reviewed your plat request
submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration.
The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant:
1. Add the Planning and Zoning Commission signature block:
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ApPROVAL
WHEREAS The Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of CoIleyville, Texas voted aflirmatiwly on this _ day of
. 20-, to approve this Pial
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
Allest: Secretary, Planning and Zoning Commission
2. Add the following information to the plat document:
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:
That I, . a Registered Professional
Land Surveyor licensed in the Slale of Texas, do hereby certify that this Plat is true and correct and was
prepared from an actual survey made under my supervision on the ground. Further, this survey conforms
to the general rules of procedures and practices of the most current Professional Land Surveying Practices
Ad..
Signature
Dale
(AlIix Seal)
100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-06-033 405 & 409 TIMBERUNE DR
DEDICATION CERTIFICATE
WHEREAS. (o~ name), are the owners of a tract of land situated in the (name) Survey, Abstract N. (#), Tarrant County. Texas,
and being out of a (#) acre tract conveyed to them by (deed reference), and being more particular1y desclibed as follows:
(metes and bounds description)
NOW THEREFORE, KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS:
That We, (names), ONners, do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinbefore desclibed proper1y as (subdivision name), and
addition to the City of CoIleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate fee simple to the public use forever all streets,
rights-of-way, and alleys shooMl thereon, and do hereby reserve the easements shooMl on this plat for the mutual use and
accommodation of all public utilities desiring to use or using the same. Any public utility shall have the right to remove and keep
removed all or part of any buildings, fences, trees, shrubs or other improvements or growths in which any way endanger or interfere
with the construction , maintenance or eflicjency of its respective systems on any of these easements, and any public utility shall at
all times have the right of ingress and egress to and from and upon the said easement for the purpose of construding,
reconstructing, inspecting. and patrolling. without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone, This plat
approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City of Colleyville, Texas.
Wilness our hands this
day of
,20_.
Owners Name
STATE OF TEXAS H
COUNTY OF TARRANT H
Before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for said county and Slate on this day personally appeared
. known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and considerations therein expressed, and in the capacity therein
stated.
Given under my hand and seal of ofIice this _ day of
,20_.
Notary Public in and for Tarrant County
(aflixseal)
My printed name
My commission expires:
3. Remove all existing fence illustrations and references from the plat exhibit.
4. Revise the lot numbers to state, "Lot lR and Lot 2R."
PAGE20F4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-06-033 405 & 409 TIMBERUNE DR
5. Add a note to the plat that states, "Building permits may be issued for the construction of a
new residence on Lot 2R prior to the removal of the existing structures currently shown on
the lot line between Lots lR and 2R"
6. Add a note to the plat that states, "The existing structures currently shown on the lot line
between Lots lR and 2R will be removed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy by the City ofColleyville for any structures constructed on Lot 2R"
7. Revise the title block to state, "Final Plat of Lots lR and 2R, Block 3, Highland Acres,
being a replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Highland Acres..." This is a request, not a
requirement.
8. Clarify the limits of utility easements that affect the property (i.e. 6-foot utility easement).
Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, Engineering Department, 817.503.1094, for
more information.
In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information:
PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of
approval of the plat. The developer's portion of the costs for infrastructure improvements may
not exceed the amount that is roughly proportionate to the projected impact of the proposed
development, as determined by a professional engineer, licensed in the State of Texas, and who is
retained by the City of Colleyville. In making the rough proportionality determination,
consideration shall be given to the availability of adequate and minimrun levels of public facilities
and accessibility to the site for the delivery of emergency services.
PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland fees are not applicable for this development as the lots
were previously platted.
SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Timberline Drive South. The
sidewalk on Timberline Drive South must be four (4) feet in width and constructed as part of the
public improvements to the property.
TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must
be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must
be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be
located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange
vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The
fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period.
IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is
issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide
general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be
different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by
a City-Developer Agreement.
PAGE30F4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-06-o33 405 & 409 TIMBERUNE DR
SEWER
Not applicable for lot with existing house on property. $1,962 per dwelling unit for SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot.
$2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
$200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed,
ROADWAY
WATER
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
Monday, July 10,2006, 7:00 p.m.
Please submit the following to our offices:
. A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the
requirement should be modified or waived;
. 12 full size copies of the revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 X 11).
The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, July 5, 2006, in
order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fullerc@ci.collevville.tx.us or
817.503.1054 if you have any questions.
PAGE40F4
CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANNING SURVEYING
>> Tree Preservation
)> Impact Fees
))Roadway
Water
Sewer
4025 W<:lOdland parkB6\Jlevard, Suite 230. Arlington, TX 76013 . (MetfO) 817/265-2681.$ 17/277-6421 . fax 817/265.4347
~ i1 i ill... !;
iit~:-~.!
...q Ii i
H!f ii!
p~; I.... i
!~~i ~i: i
~~'~ -.. ~
!l. . i $
.i~' i s
! 8 t 1
U i ~
r . - I
1 ~ ~i
l;l.! (
!H!
~ ~ n~
'!. : .t .l'!
. t r I !;
t 'l.~ - t
~ H: ~ l
t ~ ! t
g .. .
1 ; i
r
Bt~i If If I
i 'I ~
. ..
(I i ~
rlrl~ i i ;;
i ..
! 1
iU q
~
i
i
..
J
Iftl
,I
g.-w
:!'~~ m
~~:a5
g~'~~
~m~;:
-<:..,-t" 0
~ ~.'~ rJ
~~~,.~
~~~>
~.~~a
%,>r>{j)
6'~~-~
g~.~..~
~ ~ ~$1'~
"' :: ,'~'~'.~
~ ~=~~
~Oto)
SCI05533 JU1.Y 6. 2006
i
t
i
"l
~ ~
~ rq
,.
...
.
'"
~ ~
>-
z
,..
'"
'='
.....3' =x:::
~~ w
S!a=~-n
~ ;!.. s;:: -So
0'" z l!.Qe?.
Co 0 !'lo.....
Jl~~ f 1[
-~"'" ~ .~
~om
'(j)g ,0>
~
m
~
,
..
1
i
1
S
i
1.
t
i
tJ) N <; Fi fu 331
!l;t ., r1~ 85 j~ ~~~;:;~~ <: ~:
1:.1. 5:! i~ J;'8 ~:::~';r,.~r' g::f.iI
r 1 i j<:j ~~ ~ 7- ~~dl~P; '~~~:1 ."
<< ": ~ :t'tj. qj ~tj~rn~f; ofg[;.
HI I U.., ~: Ci)....O; S:i1;;:o: r:(J)1/)' <: ~
U ~ i.. .. ~ ~~.LJ 0 ~ ' 0 ~! m. (")
[H i~tu.~?~rJ:!'S;~~.=:~ ~~..; i :o~~~s rrn
\ II :. ~!D r i ~; !: I;_~ ~L'6n;; "-?~I~ { ~ ~
~ i ~8.1 11#., 5:0 ~ $ ~I -_~I_.lfi~..1l'l !" lS ti~
i ~ ~i. .r~~... i g l:;~i: I UW'GSYiIlIOlONV.<rnxn. 2iti~i~ ~
. i . .19 . . lil I f 011<>"" I:E '. -.. - u ~
~ .. ~"",. .~ .~~4~. = r- "'-~_.S!~ -=- ,.... ... . ~ ,~
I. ; .11 :~ I .-. g U'iSIl..urnLllU'l I '" :.,. ,;
t i :g; .q , ,. l/l 2)> ^
n ! i : !l -. + i, ? ~J ~ ~
t ;: i ~ H. "oo.ro.oo N l(;ol~",- ~ si ~
; i : 6 . P-N+)1- ...: C
~. l I i' 't::iw' rn
" i . ~ (/) 1l~.t5 )>
j s~ ~I!I~!~~'\~ ~ ~~i
:::c :~ f 9 111:ll/l..~' l~ ~ ~ ~:c
~! I.~ ~ i'~s..~iQ).I'?)~jgg~
9'.! ;s !l:l .. l/l.... S; ~2 f'l in
~ l!; LuJ.:~u....u....u .u. u. u.: ..u.u .U.U.U ~".. ",s.;.:
'1b~ .00'(>> G 3 ..OO.trc:oOO N
i .~;;; I
Hili in !IIJ ~unln;!I PiP !I n;!l1 n n ! p nil HH HI iqUI i
H!~l !i'I~.I!riHal.~!I.n Ha!n HIH !~Pi ~i~iIH iqriilH HklH ..
.Ii . t.l 8 t. t- 1118 t- ."all ....118 :1111: 19 .1 11fosr !i '!'i,,- i
- . I ~ ~ I" . ; , I'" ~ . t · t r . . - ~ a ;: t t ~. 1 t t i'!-.!. . I. P ~ i ;; !
iL~. q~q l~f....PH l;~t q~i~~t ~p~t..," 'I !I"l.a..'l ,ht" fol -.~ .. e
Hl!1 ii~.!.. t.OI ..... iHJ 1J211 Uni 1rU! HH~ dj:'! . !l.~P.PI ~.JHU ;
p:i~ !!ii :H;iHl iili tJ:Pti H~i: ;i!! ~llq~ f~l;!l.ii ill~J'
q;.:liH.!! ~t;q!.l.l;i.ll i~tll.H! -;I..~jf'! !i....~" i l!iIU (Jill H lHit! g
! rr Ii U nH flU ii!l. lilM I ihi ~i;i HIP ~H1H i H dti
~ i l'i i : ;: I i l ~ a ~ . ~ i . ~ i i ~i . . i i . - ,JI '
S 1:~. . . It "-:t i 8 S" t
If U.;...iJ.1H
i 1l.Lu.'~
~i lV,! .UP
: : i tot ww
i i1idl J
i~ lH;i'i I
~ i i i i ; <<;
tilldi
ffl.
Jlq :
I. ..
! I BilHliilHH i.llHH
i It ~Jl t: ;;!,h IU!! ~ei i::
: n Hll.J!Hlirl....,iJHhii
I ..,.. "1 il. ~I...I g'.f!lt. ·
. ~ltli ~t !HH'.NT~rtJ
~ ~ I J j i ~ f I ~ II ! J ; I ~. i ! t U ,
In.! il. H 'I ~~~ I" ~ : I.~....~ ..'( .1..1
i; i ! II ~ d n d ~ ; O'I~ n il
""i- ... .-t,~ 5..
il i It t:..i! i!.~I-. ~ i ii if.! ii
f ..lli~ f "~i1.8;t
Ii'! :t~ t= -
I II Iq Iril HIPI
I lUl. ~lJ;lilllt(
~ Xii: ~ifJ 1~!Jt!l
! ni11 lIHPll!n
i .!d h;{ lHlt
!t !~J.' I'j= -t.....*
: ~ ~ i 8 !; i 8 ii it i
Ig p!1 ldl n~!.
. _ t,i ,.1
. i .It; -l!,"
11' t t i 1 1",,'
i It "
_CIlO_
I
-....- i
II
..
f!I'H !inr II ql~JlI U.F ,.ap<1
5J~i' I(d~ '.11tll,tni.i fl."",
~ P H tt iP Jli.!~~JllPq Hq
ti;t~ 1Ii.;l g.'i1_....i~ll..!...;3.1il ~jl.ll
~ :: - n II ~ t ;; ! ~ Pti , ; ~ i ; ~.9
~i i ~ h if h ,,.!t i.~ I t. III H.i
. t 9 I I r .. .t! !l.... t t ~ J 1.!l.}
{ti.. ~ ~; ~.I t!llilq l:hr!.~J
'lw1 :Jl't .nUtl:l:n'd!
L H i w i r i~ : H J h i 1 ~ ~
: i J ~. 0 .. & t .. . . .
!
r
o
()
~
o
z
,;
~
~I.. .... tol.
. 1.--
I I
I
~
-0
:.::.~t.:~~!".
. ~.
(~C~t:~J%m
::(~':~~
City of Colleyville
Agenda Briefi ng
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
File Number:
File Type: Case
Status: Commission Public
Hearings
Controlling Body: Planning and
Zoning
Commission
Version: 1
Agenda Date: 07/10/06
Requester: Community Ptgenda No.: 8b Final Action:
Development
Department
File Name: Case P-06-034 - PUBLIC HEARING -Approval of a Final Plat on Lot 1 R, Block 1 of the
Starbucks Addition being a Replat of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Starbucks Addition located at 5510
Colleyville Boulevard
Ptttachments: Location and Zoning Map' Development Review Committee Memo . Applicant's Response
Dated June 29, 2006 . Plat
History of Legislative File
Version: Date:
Acting Body:
1 07/10/06 Planning and Zoning
Commission
Title
Case P-06-034 - PUBLIC HEARING - Approval of a Final Plat of Lot 1 Rand 1 R1, Block 1
of the Starbucks Addition being a Replat of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Starbucks Addition located
at 5510 Colleyville Boulevard
Explanation
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
N3 Capital LLC has submitted a replat for 1.09-acres located at the southwest corner of
Church Street and Colleyville Boulevard, The plat will subdivide the property into two lots
and will accommodate the proposed realignment of Church Street. The applicant has
submitted the plat for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
City Council approved the Final Plat for this property on February 21, 2006.
Zoning. The proposed plat area is located within the PUDC- Planned Unit Development
Commercial zoning district. The PUD-C zoning designation, Ordinance 0-05-1550, was
approved by City Council in 2005, The proposed plat meets the development criteria as
stated within the ordinance.
Sidewalks and Trails. This property is subject to the provISions of the Colleyville
Pathways Plan, which requires construction of a 10-foot wide trail along Colleyville
City of Colleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/6/2006
Agenda Briefing Continued
Boulevard and the south side of the proposed Church Street. The developer has escrowed
the funds for the construction of the trail as part of the improvements for this property.
Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are not
required for this property as it is adjacent to Colleyville Boulevard. The developer has
escrowed funds for the cost of constructing the new realignment of Church Street along this
property.
Drainage. No public drainage improvements are required for this development. However,
a site drainage study shall be required as a condition of any building permits issued for Lot
1R1.
Tree Survey and Replacement Requirements. The applicant has submitted a tree survey
depicting the existing trees on the site. A tree replacement plan is not required since the
only trees being removed are in the right-of-way and do not require mitigation.
Summary. The developer has addressed all Development Review Committee comments.
The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land
Development Code, This plat is scheduled as a public hearing as required by the Texas
Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code.
Financial Impact
It has been determined that there is no financial impact.
Recommendation
Approval
City of Colleyville
Page 2
Printed on 7/6/2006
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE
TO
FAX NO
FROM
June 26, 2006
Mark Shelton
817.346.0520
Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT P-06-034 Starbucks - replat
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request
submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration.
The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant:
1. Remove the City Council signature block. The Planning and Zoning Commission are the
approval body for this plat.
2. Show existing structures on the plat.
In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information:
PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Perimeter street improvement fees are due at the time of
approval of the plat. Perimeter street improvements are required for the newly created lots since
Church Street is considered an unimproved street. The developer's portion of the costs for
infrastructure improvements may not exceed the amount that is roughly proportionate to the
projected impact of the proposed development, as determined by a professional engineer, licensed
in the State of Texas, and who is retained by the City of Colleyville. In making the rough
proportionality determination, consideration shall be given to the availability of adequate and
minimum levels of public facilities and accessibility to the site for the delivery of emergency
servIces.
TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way or within under the pad site must
be preserved during construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must
be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be
located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange
vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The
fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period.
100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
P-06-034 Starbucks - replat
IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is
issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide
general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be
different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by
a City-Developer Agreement.
SEWER
The fee for non-residential uses depends on the proposed use of the property. Details are
available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code.
$2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
$200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
ROADWAY
WATER
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
Monday, July 10, 2006, 7:00 p.m.
Please submit the following to our offices:
. A written letter stating that each comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the
requirement should be modified or waived;
. 12 full size copies of the revised exhibit and one reduced copy (8.5 XII).
The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, July 5, 2006, in
order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at fullerc@ci.collevville.tx.us or
817.503.1054 if you have any questions.
PAGE20F2
CivilSolutions Inc
P.O. Box 100247
Fort Worth, Texas 76185
(817) 423-0060
(817) 346-0520 fax
June 29,2006
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
RE: LOTS lR& lRl,BLOCK 1,
ST ARBUCKS ADDITION
P-06-034
ATTN.: CHRIS FULLER
Chris,
111 response to the Development Review Comments of June 26, 2006, we offer the
following:
1. We have
2. We have the Starbuck
On behalf of the developer, N3 Capi
. a1 block.
at is currently under construction.
we acknowledge the following:
1. Peril'Uete
S
PQ
Co dIe.
2. Trees wiUbepreserved according to the approved constrllction plans for the
Starbucks.site(Lot 1,Block I, Starbucks Addition).
3. Impact Fees are due att11etime ofbuildil1gpennit.
rovemellts are required for the lot frontage adjacent to Church
in escrow s to cover construction costs of the new
h Street. These are being d gned by the City of
Please.find enclosed 12 revised blueline copies ofthe plat, with an 8 W' reduction along
with 3 copies 9fthe sign.edmylars.
If we can be of further assistance, please call.
Sincerely,
RECEIVED
JUN 3 0 2006
Per ....--"~,
r i~~~~ ~
;~", ?
,~i~ i1
~U~i
'ESX!
?a~ s
_:(~ G
hH
/ill" ~
~~
sl;; \l
iil
j
.~i~
9':~..
~~". !'
'~~~ -
>r ~t
~ ~~ \
ro ,.~
,..1 ~~b"ll;'4 '1
?A~ \ - --- ~ '
~\,.~~\,- \ ---- -- -----,,'- ,.. -\ -- -----\'
~ ~~~:" ~ lj,~
.~4>-\;~<! t Et ~!:
'.~' ~~._-- 'jl..'
i --
\
\
!
---1
I
I HIOOEII
~OR.
r
'.
r__J;-'u
J' J!' I
~-~
',l ~~~ V
I 1"~~ J
~~I
gl
!'!II
ill, ~
~, :d~
I ;,;~d
, J.. H
l ~'i
I l t
--...., I ~
""" \ 1\:;
"" g~
~,,"'-~:..
~~
.,,~
"'-
"'~~,
'~
,..t<')~
.t~>-
$.....
~.\~fu
z I
:I
"'6~
~,g
rl! I
01 '
gj ~
- 0.;
I
il
II
II
l'
1,1
~
'~
~
,
/ /
''', j, I
, IN
'N
',~
ii\i "'-
~li~ "'-"
"jii~
"
I
I
E
<lll
"0 cn~z
<l!l~
3
~ "8
~%~~j:Q
f~~i~ v
,. >ImP
ri\~
_ $n:~
~i~r';-4
.~~r
~~~
it
n~ !!1~
h l\~fl
H.. JUS'
~il; ,.s~i~
. t 11 <
~ ~W
., t~& jil pi
Jli.( ~f1! H ilf
tit ~ If 1ro t
Ji3 .i ~ 1'" fa!
i[l flit ~l Ii;
iff th; if iii
h l'" .~ _.i
tH ill! ~l ~~~
"Ii .hi 'i ~~=
hi H;i ~! ;fi
, . h' ~~ .,
~ t , _. i. f~ 9ti:i
!'it ~i"" 11; ~ ~
_~ ~ _ '1 ~~j . -
. ..i""~:i:.t:':
City of Colleyville
Agenda Briefing
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
File Number:
File Type: Case
Status: Commission Public
Hearings
Controlling Body: Planning and
Zoning
Commission
Version: 1
Agenda Date: 07/10/06
Requester: Community ~genda No.: 8c Final Action:
Development
Department
File Name: Case Z-06-018- PUBLIC HEARING -Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural to
CN-Neighborhood Commercial on Tract 2W2, Abstract 180 of the J.L. Byas Survey located at
6208 Colleyville Boulevard
~ttachments: Location and Zoning Map. List of Property Owners Notified . Zoning Exhibit. Draft
Ordinance
History of Legislative File
Version: Date:
Acting Body:
1 07/10/06 Planning and Zoning
Commission
Title
Case Z-06-018- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural to
CN-Neighborhood Commercial on Tract 2W2, Abstract 180 of the J.L. Byas Survey located
at 6208 Colleyville Boulevard
Explanation
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Dr. Mayli Davis has submitted a request to change the zoning of 0,7 48-acres, located at
6208 Colleyville Boulevard, from AG-Agricultural to CN-Neighborhood Commercial. The
applicant is seeking a zoning change in order to develop the property for medical office
uses.
The CN zoning district is designed to be compatible adjacent to or near residential areas
and to provide goods needed by homeowners on a usual basis. The lot size maximum is
small to encourage small-scale developments, and hours of operation do not permit
businesses to be open at night.
The property is located on the west side of Colleyville Boulevard, approximately 550 feet
north of Hardage Lane. The applicant submitted a zoning exhibit with the application, which
is attached to this agenda briefing. The property is not platted, Approval of a subdivision
City of Colleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/6/2006
Agenda Briefing Continued
plat will be required at a later date, upon approval of the rezoning request.
The following is an analysis of the major issues associated with this rezoning request.
Master Plan. Although the rezoning request is not fully consistent with the goals and
objectives of The Colleyville Plan, which designates this property for future retail use, the
rezoning request would be consistent with the adjacent zoning designations,
Lot Sizes & Widths. The CN zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 10,000 square
feet. The subject property currently exceeds 10,000 square feet and meets the minimum lot
development requirements of the CN zoning district.
Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties primarily consist of residential and
office uses. Properties to the north are zoned PUDC-Planned Unit Development
Commercial (0-94-950) and are currently developed as office uses. Properties to the west
are zoned R15-Single Family Residential and consist of single family homes (Pecan Park
Estates). The property to the south is zoned CPO-Professional Office Commercial and is
developed as office uses,
Development Trends. The development trends along this portion of Colleyville Boulevard
primarily focus on office uses.
Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent
rights-of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sewer service
lines to the individual lots,
Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the
property is valued at $130,780.00. The estimated City property tax revenue for the
undeveloped property is approximately $454.33 annually. The future property tax revenue
would depend upon the value of the individual lot and the value of the use developed on the
lot.
Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation
provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been
collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations,
Medical offices are expected to generate 36.1 trips per 1000 square feet of gross floor area,
on average.
Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to fifteen (15) adjacent property owners regarding
this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state
law and the Land Development Code, Staff has not received correspondence regarding
this request.
Summary. Though the proposed zoning change is not fully consistent with The Colleyville
Plan, which designates the subject property as a future retail development area, the
proposed zoning is consistent with the existing zoning designations of nearby properties
City of Colleyville
Page 2
Printed on 7/612006
"",>"""."._~..,~__.__,,,..,,,,....,._~.,__._~~_~._.,,",~,",__..,.""~_..~._.".o_.,..._w_."."4'~~."__'~~"_ "______
Agenda Briefing Continued
along Colleyville Boulevard.
Financial Impact
It has been determined that there is no financial impact.
Recommendation
Approval
City of Colleyville
Page 3 Printed on 7/6/2006
Z-06-018
Burton, Eugene Etux Karen L
6112 Ponderosa St
Colleyville, TX 76034-6009
Entis, Stanley
6206 Ponderosa St
Colleyville, TX 76034-6011
Pmt Partners Ix Ltd
1585 Kapiolani Blvd Ste 1218
Honolulu, HI 96814-4526
Rohrs, Russel FEtal
17731 Sampson Ln
Huntington Beach, CA 92647-6790
Stembridge Ltd
104 Bridle Wood Ct
Aledo, TX 76008-4135
List of Property Owners Notified
Dr. Mayli Davis, applicant
3241 Horseshoe Dr.
Grapevine, TX 76051
Casteel, Gary Etux Donna K
6108 Ponderosa St
Colleyville, TX 76034-6009
Folkes, James J & Kimberly S
6200 Ponderosa St
Colleyville, TX 76034-6011
Realty Capital Colleyville Sq
99 Main St Ste 200
Colleyville, TX 76034-0000
Skaggs, A G
6208 Colleyville Blvd
Colleyville, TX 76034-6223
Thomas, Philip H Etux Mildred
6204 Ponderosa Ln
Colleyville, TX 76034-0000
No HOA information for Pecan
Park Estates
Emler Swim School Inc
2201 Lavern St
Arlington, TX 76013-1478
Pecan Gardens Estates Lp
901 John McCain Rd
Colleyville, TX 76034-6332
Reynolds, Myrel
6110 Colleyville Blvd
Colleyville, TX 76034-6221
Stembridge Ltd
104 Bridle Wood Ct
Aledo, TX 76008-4135
Touchstone, Gary Etux Julie
6208 Ponderosa St
Colleyville, TX 76034-6011
XJ.. 'amMauo:)
P.l8"'_It'log _IIIM.uo:) 80~9
~~.
J..181HO 9NINOZ
'-
~
'-
'-
a
'i I
~~~
'-.
'-,
"
".
~
ID
1
..,
"
,
,
".
"
",
~
~
'"'.
"
.,
HOl-
'.13aH$
oOO'l-OO'900Z
:oN .J:f-ilf':<>>U _HIl
:oN at 1<Y1d:
z
u
o
....
:
E
2
...
..
en
c
tIJ
.c:
U
en
c
-
c
o
N
...
.2
....
-
A
-
.c:
>C
III
en
c
...
c
o
N
C
,g Co
~ !a>
i... m-
.!-
1~~~
jiilx.!.
If-'~
.~.I~
~oJ.
rR~d...
ORDINANCE 0-06-xxxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE,
TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED; BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING ON 0.748 ACRES OF THE J.L.
BYAS SURVEY, FROM THE AG-AGRICULTURAL TO CN-NEIGHBORHOOD
COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE;
PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY
CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Dr. Mayli Davis, on
June16, 2006, under Case No. Z-06-018; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to
recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and
appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new
zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts
and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance
with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the
streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote
health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the
overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to
facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks. and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable
consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their
peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value
of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout
the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City
of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of
Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning
classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map,
having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after
holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the
property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in
Ordinance 0-06-xxxx
Page 2 of 3
the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City
of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
Sec. 2.
Sec. 3.
Sec. 4.
Sec. 5.
Sec. 6.
Sec. 7.
THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true
and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if
copied in their entirety.
THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing
the zoning of said property from the AG-Agricultural to CN-
Neighborhood Commercial zoning district, as depicted in the
attached Exhibit "A" and described in the attached Exhibit "B."
THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the
manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as
amended herein.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as
provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to
exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each
offense.
THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or
provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional,
the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or
any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or
unconstitutional.
THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City
shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations
of this ordinance.
THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions
in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given
the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper
development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and
general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect
immediately from and after its passage.
Ordinance 0-06-xxxx
Page 3 of 3
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2006.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2006.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
David Kelly
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Matthew C. G. Boyle
City Attorney
EXHIBIT A - ZONING MAP
EXHIBIT B - Property Description
1JB1!1IQ,.tu<<m.din'fARRANT County. T'exCUl and being a porti.on 01 a 4.65 acre
tTa.ct of Land out of the J.L. BYAS SURVEY, A-tDO, TARRANT County, Texas,
described by metes and bounds as follows:
BEf;INNJNC at (.l pmn.t whichstanct.s48(). 16 feet South Of degree 87 minutes West
.from the. Northwest corner of theJ.L. byas survey;
"ellS 3f) t'n.inutes.East 289.68 feet to corner in the Trest line
.f2!:
THENCE South 80 degrees 02 minutes West 146.8 feet atong sa.id West line oJ sa.id
state High:wcty No. 121 to a iron .pin. for comer;
'fHENCENQrth88dtfgrees 89 min1.ttes F'st220.3 feet to (it corner in the West line
0/ J.t. Byas Su'1'Vey; . _...
'PHo' North 01
the (JJNT' OF BEG
e minutes BfUJt 127.91 fed along said survey line to
G a.nd containi.ng 0.7488 acres 01 land. more or less.
hi.. , 1-' t -05
~ .'<:io- (~(
"~'''j .b,~:'~;;;;~~';"_'
':..'~~'.;~.';~."'~~.:<.'.':'f>>
W~j:~)~ : .:in~~';J;';1
. .::-~~~~:;
City ofColleyville
Agenda Briefi ng
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
www.colleyville.com
File Number:
File Type: Case
Status: Commission
Tabled Items
Controlling Body: Planning and
Zoning
Commission
Version: 1
Agenda Date: 07/10/06
Requester: Community Agenda No.: 9a Final Action:
Development
Department
File Name: Case Z-06-012 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural to
PUDR-Planned Unit Residential on 19.78 acres out of the J.L. Byas Survey located in the 1600
block of Sanders Lane
Attachments: Zoning and Location Map. Future Land Use Plan Surrounding Subject Tract. Statement of
Planning Objectives. Development Review Committee Comments Dated May 11, 2006 .
Applicant's Response Dated May 16 & 17, 2006 . List of Property Owners Notified. Letters
in Opposition to the Rezoning Request. Letter in Favor of the Rezoning Request Dated June
7,2006. Letter from David Bagwell Dated June 23,2006 Withdrawing Opposition. Letter
from Garabedian Properties Dated June 24, 2006 Withdrawing Opposition . Letter from
Applicant Dated June 26, 2006 Agreeing to Modify Plan. Revised Exhibit. Draft Ordinance
History of Legislative File
Version: Date:
Acting Body:
Action Text:
1
OS/22/06
1
1
07/05/06
07/10/06
Planning and Zoning
Commission
Planning and Zoning
Commission
Planning and Zoning
Commission
City Council
Planning and Zoning
Commission
06/12/06
06/26/06
Title
Case Z-06-012 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural to
PUDR-Planned Unit Residential on 19.78 acres out of the J.L. Byas Survey located in the
1600 block of Sanders Lane
Explanation
UPDATE 7/10/2006
At the June 26, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, no action was taken on
this item and it has been rescheduled for the July 10, 2006 meeting, Attached are letters
from David Bagwell and Garabedian Properties regarding the withdrawal of their opposition
City of Colleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/712006
Agenda Briefing Continued
to the rezoning request. Attached is the applicant's letter dated June 26, 2006 agreeing to
the modifications outlined by David Bagwell.
UPDATE 6/26/2006
At the June 12, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, no action was taken on
this item and it has been rescheduled for the June 26,2006 meeting.
The applicant has revised several aspects of the proposed rezoning request due to
comments made during the public hearing at the June 12, 2006 Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting. The agenda briefing has been updated to reflect the revised request.
. UPDATE 6/12/2006
Due to a lack of a quorum at the May 22, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting,
no action was taken on this item and it has been rescheduled for the June 12, 2006
meeting. Public hearing notifications were mailed to property owners within 200 feet
regarding the updated public hearing date. Two additional letters of opposition have been
received, and copies of these are attached.
Staff Review Comments
Sage Group, Inc., has submitted a request to change the zoning of 19,78 acres, located in
the 1600 block of Sanders Lane, The area to be rezoned is currently zoned
AG-Agricultural. The applicant is seeking a zoning change in order to develop the property
for 49 single family detached lots and 25 single family attached residential town homes.
The subject property consists of several parcels of land and has multiple owners, The
developer has obtained the written permission of each property owner to pursue the
rezoning request. The properties currently consist of single family homes and undeveloped
lots. The properties are not currently platted. In order to subdivide the property as
proposed by the developer, approval of a subdivision replat will be required at a later date,
upon approval of the rezoning request.
The following is an analysis of the major issues associated with this rezoning request.
Master Plan. The Colleyville Plan designates the subject property along Sanders Lane as
future office uses. This rezoning request for residential uses is inconsistent with the
2004-2025 Future Land Use Plan.
The developer has provided information regarding the 2004-2025 Future Land Use Plan for
this area (see attached Statement of Planning Objectives). The developer states that the
eastern portion of Sanders Lane lacks the exposure and adequate access from Colleyville
Boulevard to support the expansion of office uses. A residential development of single
family attached and detached uses would allow for a transition from the existing single
family uses located to the east with the existing office uses along Colleyville Boulevard.
City of Colleyville
Page 2 Printed on 7/612006
Agenda Briefing Continued
Residential Density. The Colleyville Plan suggests a maximum residential density of 1.8
dwelling units per acre in most situations. The proposed development of 74 residential
units on this 19.78 acre area will produce a density of 3.7 dwelling units per acre. However,
the 1998 and 2004 Colleyville Master Plans both stated that densities higher than 1,8 units
per acre would be acceptable in those areas deemed consistent with sound land use
planning principles, such as a transitional area situated between commercial uses and less
dense residential developments.
Lot Sizes & Widths. The PUDR regulations require a minimum lot size of 13,000 square
feet and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. However, there is a presumption that the
minimum lot size and lot width required by the PUDR regulations are intended to apply to
subdivisions platted for detached single-family developments.
The applicant is proposing a combination of single family detached homes and single family
attached town homes. The applicant proposes the following development regulations for
the proposed lots:
Sinole Familv Attached Lots
Lot Size 2,700 Square Feet
Lot Depth 90 Feet
Lot Width 30 Feet
Lot Coverage 90%
Setbaeks
Front 5 Feet
Rear 5 Feet or 18 feet for rear facing garages
Side 0 Feet
Maximum Height 35 Feet
SinQle Familv Detached Lots
Lot Size 6,608 Square Feet
Lot Depth 115 Feet
Lot Width 56 Feet
Lot Coverage 58%
Setbaeks
Front 15 Feet or 20 feet for front facing garage
Rear 15 Feet
Side 3 & 7 Feet *
Side Along Street 15 Feet
Maximum Height 35 Feet
* (10-foot minimum between structures)
Open Space. The PUDR regulations require a minimum of 20 percent of the development
be reserved for open space for use by the residents of the development. The proposed
development contains numerous open space areas, which are situated at various locations
within the development. The proposed site plan for the development shows 22.9 percent of
City of Colleyville
Page 3
Printed on 7/6/2006
Agenda Briefing Continued
the total development as common open space, In addition to the general common open
space areas, the developer has designated a thirty (30) foot buffer as a tree preservation
area located along the eastern and southern boundaries of the development and a twenty
(20) foot tree preservation area located along the northeastern boundary of the
development. The tree preservation easements are designated as common open space
areas and are included in the overall open space calculation of 22 percent. The applicant
has provided a description of the amenities that will be located in the open space, which will
include five (5) foot wide trails, seating areas, and ponds with fountains. The Homeowners
Association (HOA) will be responsible for the maintenance of the open space areas,
including the tree preservation buffer areas.
The applicant states that the purpose of the tree preservation area is to supplement the
fence buffer between the proposed and existing residential lots, as well as to ensure the
protection of existing trees, The tree preservation area will be designated as open space
and will not be incorporated into the rear yards of individual lots. Individual lot fences shall
not encroach into the easement. The developer has indicated the property deed
restrictions will prohibit the removal or damaging of healthy trees that are six (6) caliper
inches or greater,
Perimeter Fencing. The applicant is proposing three types of perimeter fencing for the
development. The lot layout exhibit shows a six (6) foot wooden fence along a portion of
the northern boundary line and a portion of the eastern boundary line, adjacent to Lots 22 -
24, Block 1. A six (6) foot masonry wall extends along the eastern portion of the
development and along the northern boundary line where it connects to the aforementioned
six foot wooden fence. The third type of proposed fencing is a six (6) foot wrought iron
fence that extends along the southern boundary line and a portion of the eastern boundary
line where it connects to the aforementioned six foot wooden fence,
Number of Subdivision Entrances. When a proposed development will contain more than
twelve lots, the Land Development Code requires two entrances into a subdivision. The
proposed development will contain 74 lots. Primary access to the development will be from
Sanders Lane. The intersection of Sanders Lane and SH26 will be realigned with Tinker
Road on the west side of SH26 when the highway is reconstructed in the near future,
The developer is proposing a 30 foot emergency access right-of-way on the eastern side of
the development, which will contain a 24 foot pavement section and an emergency access
gate. The gate will contain the appropriate opticom gate opening equipment required by
the Colleyville Fire Department to allow access in case of an emergency situation when
normal access via Sanders Lane may not be possible,
Master Thoroughfare Plan. The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows a future two-lane minor
collector roadway extending through this proposed development. However, the proposed
development does not show a street connection on the eastern side of the development.
The developer is proposing an emergency access easement on the eastern side of the
development to provide as a second entrance to the development. Approval of the
rezoning request as proposed should be coordinated with an amendment to the Master
City of Co/leyville
Page 4
Printed on 7/6/2006
Agenda Briefing Continued
Thoroughfare Plan, which is a separate agenda item for consideration by the Commission.
Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties consist of a variety of land uses,
Properties to the south and east are developed as residential uses. The property to the
west, adjacent to Colleyville Boulevard, is developed as office uses. The property to the
north is developed as industrial storage uses.
Development Trends. The development trends in this area have consisted primarily of
single family residential uses.
Tree Preservation. According to aerial photos of the site, the property is heavily wooded
with a variety of species of native trees. The developer will be required to provide a tree
survey of the site and prepare a tree mitigation plan at the time of lot grading,
Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer services are available along adjacent
rights-of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sewer service
lines to the individual lots.
Drainage. The developer has submitted a preliminary drainage analysis of the site, which
has been reviewed by the Colleyville Engineering Department and determined to be
consistent with the requirements of the Colleyville Land Development Code. Details of the
proposed drainage system and storm water retention pond will be submitted as part of the
platting process.
Gated/Private Street Development. The developer has indicated the proposed
development may be a gated/private street subdivision. The developer may propose to
gate the development at the time of platting. If gated, and as a condition of plat approval,
the developer will be required by Chapter 10 of the Land Development Code to submit the
necessary HOA documents for review by the City, The HOA documents must indicate that
the streets and drainage systems within the development are private, owned and
maintained by the HOA, and that the City has no obligation to maintain the private streets
and drainage systems. All HOA documents will be reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney to ensure conformity to applicable City policies prior to the plat being filed with the
County Clerk's office. The plat document will designate the private road as a lot and a note
will be provided on the plat stating the HOA is responsible for construction and
maintenance of the private road. The developer has acknowledged these requirements and
has indicated that the documents will be submitted to the City at time of platting.
Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the
19.78-acre tract is valued at $17,396,134. The estimated City property tax revenue for the
property is approximately $60,434 annually. The developer has provided an estimate of
$35,000,000 total value when the project is completed, which will generate $121,590 of tax
revenue for the City,
Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to twenty seven (27) adjacent property owners
regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required
City of Colleyville
Page 5
Printed on 7/6/2006
Agenda Briefing Continued
by state law and the Land Development Code. Ten (10) letters in opposition and one letter
in support have been received and are attached to this agenda briefing.
Summary. While the proposed development is not fully compliant with the 2004-20025
Future Land Use Plan, staff feels the location of the development is ideal for residential
development. The project is located between existing residential uses and existing office
and industrial uses. The proposed development transitions from single family attached lots
near the office and industrial uses to single family detached lots near the existing single
family developments, The recommendation for approval is based upon what staff feels is a
good land use for the site and supportive of economic development for nearby commercial
businesses,
Financial Impact
It has been determined that there is no financial impact.
Recommendation
Approval
City of Colleyville
Page 6
Printed on 7/6/2006
Zoning and Location Map
11
NORTH
Future Land Use Plan Surrounding Subject Tract
~ V~ ~ Oci/vPoiHlte;
coUe;yv~ -r~
stat~ofP~c9bjed:w€W
The subjeet of this zoning request is an assemblage of multiple existing parcels totaling
about 20 aeres, located approximately 600 feet east of Colleyville Blvd., behind the
"Colleyville Shopping Village" and "Kathleen's Art Cafe: additions, in the City of
Colleyville, Texas. The property is located along eith.w side of the existing Sanders
Lane, by which it gains access from Colleyville Blvd.
The individual traets are primarily under separate ownership, most of whieh contain older
residential struetures of varying degrees of eondition (many poor) and some are
unoccupied. Suecessful re-development of any of these tracts individually would be a
difficult challenge, given the adjaeencies. As a result, the development team has
patiently worked to assemble all the tracts along Sanders Lane, with the intent to
transform the area and improve the whole as a single and cohesive neighborhood of
quality homes, built around a core of common open spaee.
The adjacent existing land uses are primarily Commercial, along Colleyville Blvd. to the
West and Northwest (Office, undeveloped Commercial and developed Industrial (Self-
Storage)), and Residential in the neighborhoods to the East and South (individual homes
and the Broughton PUD-R). The subject property lies between these potentially
incompatible uses, and development as proposed would help to provide a transition
between those uses.
The property is currently zoned entirely as AG (Agricultural), and the only existing uses
are Residential. The future Land Use Plan, however, designates this area as "Office."
We believe that the potential for development of this property as Office is low,
however, primarily because the lack of exposure to, and good access from, Colleyville
Blvd., the only through road in the area. Development as Residential, as proposed here,
would also be a more compatible use with the adjacent existing Residential uses to the
East and South.
Therefore, this zoning request proposes to ehange the AG zoning to a Residential PUD,
for the development of a Single Family Residential Community. This change to
Residential uses would allow this development to be eompotible with and provide a
transition between the immediately neighboring properties.
The layout of the lots, roads and open space areas has been earefully crafted around the
significant large trees on the property, to highlight and save as many of these valuable
natural features as possible. As a result, approximately 18.5% of the site will be set
aside as permanent open spaee, owned and maintained by the Villas at Oak Pointe Home
Owners Assn. In addition, a 20' Tree Preservation Easement is proposed along the entire
perimeter where adjaeent to neighboring Residential properties, bringing the total Open
Space and Tree Preservation areas to over 22'0 of the property.
The scale and orientation of the development has been designed to provide for and
encourage a safe and inviting walking environment, passive recreation opportunities,
desirable architeeture and a high quality environment eompatible with the rest of
Colleyville.
Primary aceess will be from a connection with Sanders Lane, leading to the joint Tinker
Road/ Sanders Lane intersection, which will be built with the upcoming TXDOT
improvements to Colleyville Blvd. Supplemental aeeess is planned to be provided by a
gated access easement (emergency aceess only) to be built to the Sanders Lane/ Wyatt
Drive ROW at the Eastern boundary. This has been planned as emergency access in
respeet of the wishes of the owners of the neighboring properties to the Northeast,
who did not wish to have through traffic conneeting to and through those areas.
DeNelopJ'Jltet'1t S~
The Villas at Oak Pointe is intended to be developed in a single phase, with development
eommencing as soon as zoning, platting and other necessary approvals are obtained.
ECO"f\.O"Wtio Develop J'JItet'1t I nforJ1t'tat"L011I
The Villas at Oak Pointe will have a total of 75 homes, with an estimated average value of
between $400,000 and $500,000, resulting in an overall addition of approximately
$35,000,000 to the city tax base. At the current tax rate of 2.694677%, the total new
taxes generated for the city, school distriet and county would total $ 943,137 per year,
as a result of this development.
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE May 11,2006
TO Curtis Young
FAX 972.929.1241
FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT Z-06-012 The Villas at Oak Pointe AG to PUDR
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit for
your Special Use Permit request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your
consideration.
The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant:
1. Provide a written request to amend the Master Thoroughfare Plan in conjunction with this
rezoning request. The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Sanders Lane as an open and
uninterrupted roadway. The proposed lot layout and emergency access gate is not in
compliance with the Master Thoroughfare Plan.
2. Provide proposed building setbacks for front, rear and side yards.
3. Provide minimum lot sizes for the attached single family and detached single family lots.
4. Provide minimum lot depths and widths for the attached single family and detached single
family lots.
5. Provide the maximum lot coverage for the attached single family and detached single family
lots.
6. Street names must be approved by the Fire Marshal during the platting process. Contact Rob
McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
7. Will this be a gated subdivision? If so, gates must have Opticom access and knox key
overrides for both Colleyville Boulevard and Milton Drive. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire
Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
8. Submit a Preliminary Drainage Analysis to determine the need for drainage facilities. The
Preliminary Drainage Analysis shall be prepared in accordance with drainage analysis
100 Main Street - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-06-012 THE VILLAS AT OAK POINTE AG TO PUDR
requirements contained in Chapter 14 - Engineering Design Standards of the Land
Development Code. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more
information.
9. Provide the location and construction type of any proposed perimeter fencing.
10. Provide the location and description of any proposed subdivision signs.
11. Provide a written description or plan of amenities to be included in the open space areas,
including but not limited to sidewalks, gazebos and pond fountains.
12. Will individual lots incorporate the tree preservation easement area or will the rear fences be
located along the tree preservation easement boundary? If the lots incorporate the easement,
staff may recommend a condition of the PUDR ordinance that the homeowner's may not
remove the trees within the easement area.
13. Retention ponds within the development shall include at least one aeration device per pond, to
be maintained by the HOA.
14. Provide the total number of on-street parking stalls provided within the development.
15. Indicate the maximum height of the proposed PUD-R development.
16. Note that unless otherwise proposed by the applicant, all subdivision standards and zoning
regulations stated with the Land Development Code will be applicable.
17. Indicate the ability of service vehicles, such as those for solid waste collection, to be able to
negotiate the comers of the alleys shown on the site layout. Modification of the alley comers
may be required at time of platting.
GENERAL INFORMATION
18. If the proposed development is gated, review the entrance gate requirements within Chapter
10 - Private Streets and Entrance Gate of the Land Development Code prior to submitting a
plat application.
19. At the time of Preliminary Plat application a gated access fee will be required to defray the
cost of processing the application, and maintaining City owned electronic emergency
equipment. An application fee of $700 shall be paid prior to scheduling the application for
public hearing.
20. The staff report to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council regarding this
zoning change will include a proposed ordinance containing suggested conditions applicable
to this type of development. A copy of the staff report and proposed ordinance will be
PAGE20F4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-06-012 THE VILLAS AT OAK POINTE AG TO PUDR
available for review not less than 72 hours prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting date.
21. Development requirements not specifically cited by the applicant shall be required to meet the
PUD-R zoning regulations and development standards as stated within the Land Development
Code. Provide information on any special development standards requested by the developer
for inclusion in the PUD-R ordinance.
IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is
issued for a new structure on the property. The fees listed below are intended to provide general
information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending
upon the specific use of the property, proposed utility construction, or conditions in an existing
City-Developer Agreement. Details are contained in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code.
SEWER
$1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Details are available in
Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code.
$2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
$200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
ROADWAY
WATER
PARKLAND DEDICA nON FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the
subdivision plat. The fee for residential development is $1,802 per lot.
SIDEWALKS. Sidewalks are required along all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be
installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be
at least 4-feet wide.
TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way must be preserved during
construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around
all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of
the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction
fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must
remain in place during the entire construction period.
TREE SURVEY REQUIREMENT. A detailed tree survey of the property is required after final plat
approval, at the time of submittal for a clearing and grading permit. A copy of the approved
subdivision lot layout should be overlaid onto the tree survey in order to show the size and type of
existing trees within the building setback areas. Trees within with right of way and building pad
are exempt from the tree mitigation requirements and do not have to be shown on the survey.
Provide a table on the exhibit that lists the size, per caliper inches, and type of trees within the
building setback areas within each lot.
PAGE 3 OF 4
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-06-012 THE VILLAS AT OAK POINTE AG TO PUDR
TENTATIVE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Commission:
City Council:
Monday, May 22, 2006, 7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, June 20 and July 3, 2006, 7:30 p.m.
RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS
Please submit the following to our offices:
. A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating
reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived.
The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, May 31, 2006, in
order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning & Zoning
Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or
fullerc@ci.collevville.tx.us if you have any questions.
I c: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
PAGE4oF4
MASTER PLANNING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE SITE PLANNING
SAGE GROUP INC
16 MAY 06
Mr. Chris Fuller
Development Coordinator
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
RE: Z-06-012- The Villas at Oak Pointe- AG to PUDR
Dear Mr. Fuller:
In conjunction with the above referenced request for rezoning, we hereby also request to
amend the Master Thoroughfare Plan of the City of Colleyville, as it relates to Sanders
Lane.
Currently, it shows Sanders Lane as a future "Collector" type street, a through road
connecting Hwy. 26 with Wyatt Drive to the east of the property in question, and then on
to Industrial Blvd. Sanders Lane does not currently make this connection.
TEL
9
7
As we are proposing a Residential Development, we do not feel a through-road
connection to an Industrial! Commercial area would be beneficial. Also, the road
Sanders Lane is intended to connect directly with, Wyatt Road, is nothing more than a
single lane gravel road with an insufficient ROW for improvement to a Collector type
street. It is flanked by Residential uses (Ross Downs to the East, individual tracts to the
West). We discussed with those land owners (and the Ross Downs HOA representatives)
their possible interest in seeing Wyatt road expanded, as well as the Sanders Lane
connection being made. In both cases we were advised that they did not want to see the
expansion and connection made.
9 2 9
F A X
9
7
2
9 2 9
In fact, the neighbors have requested no open connection be made at all, and in
consideration of those requests, our plans include only an emergency access connection
at that location.
Thanks you for you consideration in this matter. Please call if you have any questions.
844S FREEPORT PARKWAY
SUITE 660
IRVING. TEXAS 75063
MEMORANDUM
Sage Group, Inc.
8445 Freeport Pkwy, Suite 660
Irving, Texas 75063
972/929-8443 Fax 972/929-1241
To:
Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator
CITY OF COLLEYVlLLE
Date:
17 MAY 06
From:
Curtis Young, AlA
Subject:
Z-06-012- The Villas at Oak Pointe- AG to PUDR
Job No.:
HS01-00
Message:
Please accept the following, in response to the questions posed by the DRC review letter:
The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant:
1. Provide a written request to amend the Master Thoroughfare Plan in conjunction
with this rezoning request. The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Sanders Lane as
an open and uninterrupted roadway. The proposed lot layout and emergency
access gate is not in compliance with the Master Thoroughfare Plan.
-Please see letter making the request, attached.
2. Provided proposed building setbacks for front, rear and side yards.
-Attached Single Family:
Front- 5 '
Rear- 3,5 '
Side- 0'
-Detached Single Family:
Front- 20 '
Rear-15'
Side- 7' and 3 ' (10' minimum between structures)
Side along street- 15 '
3. Provide minimum lot sizes for the attached single family and detached single
family lots,
-Attached Single Family: 30' x 90'
-Detached Single Family: 56' x 118'
4. Provide minimum lot depths and widths for the attached single family and
detached single family lots.
-Attached Single Family: Minimum lot width- 30 '; minimum lot depth- 90 '.
-Detached Single Family: Minimum lot width- 56 ',' minimum lot depth- 118 '.
5. Provide the maximum lot coverage for the attached single family and detached
single family lots.
-Attached Single Family: Maximum Lot Coverage- 90%
-Detached Single Family: Maximum Lot Coverage- 58%
6. Street names must be approved by the Fire Marshal during the platting process.
Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
We will contact the Fire Marshall.
7. Will this be a gated subdivision? If so, gates must have Opticom access and knox
key overrides for both Colleyville Boulevard and Milton Drive. Contact Rob
McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
At this point, we are testing the market to determine whether we will make a
request for this development to be gated. If so, we understand and are prepared
to meet these requirements,
8. Submit a Preliminary Drainage Analysis to determine the need for drainage
facilities. The Preliminary Drainage Analysis shall be prepared in accordance
with drainage analysis requirements contained in Chapter 14 - Engineering
Design Standards ofthe Land Development Code. Contact Robert Woods,
Project Engineer, 817-503-1094, for more information.
We have submitted a Preliminary Drainage Analysis to Robert Woods and he has
indicated his satisfaction with our submittal.
9. Provide the location and construction type of any proposed perimeter fencing.
Location type and height of all perimeter fencing has been noted on the revised
Zoning Exhibit, We are proposing a 6' wood fence where adjacent to Residential
properties, and a 6' Thinwall-type masonry wall where adjacent to Commercial
properties.
10. Provide the location and description of any proposed subdivision signs.
We are proposing a Monument Sign and Entry Feature be placed along the south
side of Sanders Lane, at the project entry from the west. Location is noted on the
Zoning Exhibit.
11. Provide a written description or plan of amenities to be included in the open space
areas, including but not limited to sidewalks, gazebos and pond fountains.
Most of the common open space areas within the project have been specifically
located to save and protect as many of the existing significant trees as possible,
Those trees will be preserved in afully landscaped setting, and complimented
with sidewalks, seating areas, and ponds, All ponds will have fountains, The
maintenance of these common open space areas will be the responsibility of the
Home Owners Association.
12. Will individual lots incorporate the tree preservation easement area or will the
rear fences be located along the tree preservation easement boundary? If the lots
incorporate the easement, staff may recommend a condition of the PUDR
ordinance that the homeowner's may not remove the trees within the easement
area.
The purpose of the Tree Preservation Easements will be to supplement the fence
buffer and provide for a permanent band of trees between the future homes
proposed in this submittal and adjacent residential properties; including the two
homes at the Northeast corner, and the (as of yet un-built) residential lots in the
Broughton subdivision to the East and South. Those easements will be
incorporated into the individual lots, and the rear fences w!ll be located along the
project boundary. Maintenance of these areas will be the responsibility of the
individual Homeowner. However, those homeowners will be prohibited, by Deed
Restriction, from removing or damaging any healthy tree within these areas, with
a caliper size of 6" or greater,
13. Retention ponds within the development shall include at least one aeration device
per pond, to be maintained by the HOA.
We agree and will provide such devise.
14. Provide the total number of on-street parking stalls provided within the
development.
The total number of on-street, inset parking stall provided within the development
is 29.
15. Indicate the maximum height of the proposed PUD-R development.
35'
16. Note that unless proposed by the applicant, all subdivision standards and zoning
regulations stated with the Land Development Code will be applicable.
We understand and agree.
17. Indicate the ability of service vehicles, such as those for solid waste collection, to
be able to negotiate the corners of the alleys shown on the site layout.
Modification of the alley corners may be required at time of platting.
The design of the alleyways has been reviewed with IESJ, and they have indicated
it complies with the turning requirements of their trucks.
Additional Self Storage Lp
7411 Hines PI Ste 100
Dallas, TX 75235
Broughton Ltd Partnership
8222 Douglas Ave Ste 605
Dallas, TX 75225
Cholla Grande Inc
6301 Colleyville Blvd
Colleyville, TX 76034
Heidel, Ruth V
1712 Gatehouse Ct
Colleyville, TX 76034
Loftin, Stacey B Etux Ronda
6306 Wyatt Dr
Colleyville, TX 76034
Neece, Charles
1905 Sanders Ln
Colleyville, TX 76034
Realty Capital Colleyville Sq
99 Main St Ste 200
Colleyville, TX 76034
Rohrs, Russel FEtal
17731 Sampson Ln
Huntington Beach, CA 92647
List of Property Owners Notified
Anderson, Ronald H
1162 Silverlake Dr
Grapevine, TX 76051
Cannedy, George Etux Joy M
2428 Brasher Ln
Bedford, TX 76021
Colleyville Square ptnrs II
99 Main St Ste 200
Colleyville, TX 76034
Jostes, Charles Scott
6300 Wyatt Dr
Colleyville, TX 76034
McPherson, Ronny D Etux Vicky
1501 County Road 1224
Cleburne, TX 76033
Pmt Partners Ix Ltd
1585 Kapiolani Blvd Ste 1218
Honolulu, HI 96814
Rickman, H E Jr
1813 Sanders Ln
Colleyville, TX 76034
Smith, Michelle Etvir Kim
1312 Hardisty Rd
Bedford, TX 76021
Bass, Gary Etux Brenda
1812 Sanders Ln
Colleyville, TX 76034
Capobianco, Ernie
PO Box 211626
Bedford, TX 76095
Garabedian, Michael Etux Cindy
PO Box 1038
Colleyville, TX 76034
Kac Colleyville Jv
4008 Cochran Heights Ct
Dallas, TX 75220
Moore, Bobby Family Ltd prtn
6113 Colleyville Blvd
Colleyville, TX 76034
Procaccino, Kevin A & K Denise
3406 Langley Hill Ln
Colleyville, TX 76034
Rogers, Kirk A Etux Maria
2001 Reynolds Dr
Colleyville, TX 76034
Stilson, Terrence L
1805 Sanders Ln
Colleyville, TX 76034
Stowe, Jennie Lou
1612 Sanders Ln
Colleyville, TX 76034
Stringer, David W
1701 Sanders Ln
Colleyville, TX 76034
Texas Longevity Housing Lp
PO Box 211374
Bedford, TX 76095
Ross Downs HOA
Michael Muhm, President
6607 Connie Lane
Colleyville, TX 76034
Letters in Opposition to the Rezoning Request
\...
.ljarabeatan properties
A Certified Master BuDder
P.O. Box 1038, CoUeyville, Texas 76034-1038 garabedianproperties.com
May 17, 2006
Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission
Barry leBaron, Director of Planning
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
RE: Zoning Case # Z-06-012
Mr. leBaron:
As the owner of Lot 39, Block A, I am writing in opposition to the proposed rezoning of the
property at 1600 Sanders Lane as currently submitted.
The concern I have is that the change of use and density will put the trees that back to my current
property in jeopardy. When we purchased this site, we researched the designated use for the
property in question and determined it had been designated' for commercial use. That use and that
use would require a landscape buffer between adjoining residential properties and the commercial
structures. With a residential development of the lot size proposed by the applicant, that buffer
would disappear and the trees would be removed as homes are constructed or die as the homes
encroach on their root system.
Any use of this property that does not preserve the natural buffer of the trees between the existing
residential and the proposed development as it would have been required by the current master plan
'andthe commercial zoning designations is something I disagree with.
I would hope the developer could develop a plan that would allow for the natural tree buffer to
remain and to be protected, maintained and cared for by a Homeowner Association.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit my concerns and objection to this zoning case.
Sincerely,
Michael D Garabedian CMB GMB
Garabedian Properties
Metro 817-748-2669
Mobile 817-637-7245
mike@garabedianpropertfes.com
Fax 817-749-0148
RECEIVED
MAY 1.8 2006
Pe, ....................
May 17,2006
Colleyville City Council
Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission
c/o Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning
100 Main Street
Colle~e,11( 76034
Mr. LeBaron:
I am writing with regard to the proposed land usage behind Broughton. I am the owner of
LOT 40A - which backs up against the proposed development.
I am absolutely opposed to the placement of with 75 units on 20 acres behind Broughton as
currendy proposed.
The current proposal of that land use is not objectionable in general but in particular with
respect to destruction of trees and visually encroaching on the space next to Broughton. I
request that the zoning be tabled urttil proponent submits a plan that opponents no longer
oppose which (a) prcserves 60 feet buffer around the south and east sides of property by not
excavating, filling, or crossing through with utilities of any kind, including not excavating,
filling, or crossing through in dle drip line west of the east buffer and north of the south
buffer; (b) create an affIrmative obligation to establish a maintenance association to
undertake preservation of the forested areas by replanting, etc. and hire a consultant who
will d1:aft acceptable standards for same to be incorporated into the zoning ordinance.
'Ibe preservation of trees is highly desirable, won't happen with 75 units on 20 acres, but can
be accomplished with plan described above AND sct an excellent example for all such
developments.
I should also state that offIce use would be as good as or better than what is proposed and
could be done in a way that accomplishes the same dling.
Plcase strongly consider the recommendation in this lctter as a way to preserve the
signifIcant investment and lifestyle the rcsidences of Broughton have made in the city of
Colleyville.
RECEIVED
MAY 1 9 2006
Per .............
BROUGl-ITON
May 19, 2006
Community Development Department
City of Colteyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
Honorable Mayor, City Council, Chainnan and Planning & Zoning Commission:
I write in opposition to zoning case Z-06-012.
The land use proposed risks nearly total loss of one of Colleyville's great assets,
a remnant of the andent Eastern Cross Timbers. However, in my judgment,
the verge of woods seen from virtually every vantage point outside the property
can be saved with modification of the proposed zoning without undennining the
economic viability of the proposed development.
I also oppose the rezoning because, without concrete and enforceable design,
materials, and landscape standards, it risks creation of another nondescript
neighborhood of cheaply built houses, the antithesis of sustainability in a
community.
I also see no justification for the density proposed. I expect it has nothing to
do with buyers' lifestyle preferences but with the applicant's high land cost
instead. Of themselves, I believe large houses and large lots are of no special
aesthetic value to the community. It is the low density historically associated
with large houses that matters. Small houses and small lots can be made
attractive and contribute to sustainability . But, like diamonds, the setting of
smaU homes is essential to appreciation of their intrinsic qualities. Allow small
lots and small houses, if you will, but not such high density. Cluster the small
lots and put leftover land into open space, thereby preserving the native forest
and the community's often-stated preference for low density.
Thank you for considering my views. If you would like me to elaborate, please
let me know.
Sincerely yours,
Broughton Limited Partnership
By: Th David Sa w II Company, .
By:
8121 DOUGLAS AVENUE. SUITE 60$, DAUAS,lTX,,$ Ti2L) METHO, iliJ,540,5500 lAX, 21.1.368774(J
~ 1>'~'rl~
'1>'.Q~611 H
~ 1
1
~ l ~l
..
~ ~ "
oK :II
':1
~'I
'>- g
0
~ "I
I
~ I
1
C ,
~ 1~
'"
, 0
. e
<::) I
1...
0 I~
18
I'"
A
T
z
o
f-<
::c
v
:::>
o
~
~
H . ~
. n ~i~
U !! ~h ~
-p~ BHp!v
~hBB!!iilh! i i I
..u~.~i1rl~~ ~_!II.$
. ~: 01
.---.--... ..........-
~ H ~ ~HHH~
H u<,o
l:l i tHrill
~ ~~ \~vuu]u
n ~~h~~n'
~ ~~ ~ lIIll_fQ_"'..fQlIIll
~ ~
~. -- ...- ..-....
~~ ~ ~~~fI3::::~;{j~
0
- ... ...... ...........
........,
;
;
sHii
~ ";~"I
t: ,~! ~ 1
~ ;;";
~ l!l"olia:
~~~i,1
- . .. - -- - -~'.
WUU~~5, ~~
- H--.aU
~ i !U\lj~~ YO
ItPtl I' ~HJii!H
I h~tdH1i tHrHn!:
i~~3~~~5~gl ~~~~~~.c..:t
1~ii4~i~i~
-.....
~ .."lq..<I(......."["t ..~r~~IIIll~_Ul~~~
II
.
~ ;~;~:;Sl~~:l ~!
0 _0..'" ""/tl'Ot.. tel Go
. =.==". ..--.. ..........-.
.. .. 'n InHiBit!!
i!;: ,~~~~~~~~~.~
~ li~i ~ ~~'~!~II!~I!
~ uaSu < i::;&i~&~I~~
~ili ~t~i~~gg~~;~
~i q4f~~
.
~ ......."l"(.."l<(q"qq
3 ~~~~ 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ _~.~~~
1
~ ~
E i
~ ,
S"
~~
~
'"
...
~
'"
l:~
~-l'O
~~~~
~ ~a ~ 8
"-,~. 111
~ e fi~'?
~~~;~~
()::i ~3t1i~
~ <J\1~-
~ -JO-.l!Q
1; dQti
g ~~
~~~
Co
~
..
Co
~.
00 a
~~ ;..;
~ ~ ~ !~~
~ i'.eij
.. · !I~~
.......
~q!l:
~.t i
.
iil
~".
:i"
~'I.
.'
.~
~il~
..I:
l~'~
t~n
d".
~9"'
hH
I~'
~ ,1l
~ t~~
~~::~
[~~~~~I
Ii' . i ~. . ~.
I CI ~.,.... CI \).. .
~., !HH~~
m~~r.
l>
~ ~<(lll:lll:llQCl
3~..:-~~..~ ]
! !!! i
~ ~ ~ .oJ
. q~'
i ~::!
'( :~:~
coo~~
!!!~~~
:l
~
!l~iti~ &::{iH ~~::~~::
.e~"~~~
~ !!-~!!t~ t: ~ ~ lS \~ ~ <3lls ~ &a~<!le~.3~
~ UBIU ::: H.Hip
.~~.r~t'~r ~ !]]S~!uS
.. .(<{~.."{q~ ..
n~Uh ~~~~~i~ m~~~~~
~ ...--.-...._..-_.-_.._-. ~
~
0 0 "l "( "l <{.. q.. "l "l"i(" q"l"l"l "l!
al al
~ ~ !t~!?~~..::~
3 ............'tI"'... 3 lIOodh<~~:!:!'l 0
'.'<
MAY 20,2006
JERRY BYERL Y, CHAIRMAN
PLANNING AND ZONING COM.
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
100 MAIN STREET
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034
KAC COLLEYVILLE JOINT VENTRE
ROBERT ELLINGTON, MG. PARTNER
4424 LOVERS LANE
DALLAS, TEXAS 75225
RE: ZONING CASE #Z-06-012
DEAR MR, BYERLY:
AS AN ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER, WE ARE ADAMANTLY OPPOSED TO
THE REFERECED PUDR SUBMITTED. WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF MORE
DETAILED INORMATION, OUR TWO MAIN OBJECTIONS ARE:
1. THE PROJECT IS NOT IN ACCORDANCE TO THE CITY'S MASTER
THOROUGHFARE PLAN, AND
2. SANDERS LANE IS NOT SHOWN TO BE WIDENED TO A 42-FOOT
COLLECTOR STREET AS REPRESENTED TO US BY THE CITY FOR
MANY YEARS.
ALSO, THE ALIGNMENT OF THE TINKER/SANDERS INTERSECTION WOULD
BE AFFECTED.
WHILE VISITING WITH SEVERAL CITY DEPARTMENTS LAST MONTH, THE
WORD WAS THAT THE LONG RANGE PLAN FOR COLLEYVILLE W AS ST~T.
HOPEFULLY, THE LONG RAGE PLAN WILL BE ADHERED TO, EXCEPTING
MAJOR PHYSICAL OBSTACLES.
YOUR CONSIDERA nON OF OUR OBJECTIONS IS APPRECIATED.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
ROBERT G ELLINGTON,
MANAGING PARTNER
cc: THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Zoning PUDR sanders
R E CEif\VIf1ID
MAY '2 ,:;2 ;;lUQf
Per, ...........lia.,
J.D. TANNER & ASSOCIATES
INSURANCE SERVICES
JON DONOVAN TANNER, J.D.
DIRECT DIAL 817-485-3800 EXT.III
E-MAIL JOTANNER@JDTANNERINSURANCE.COM
5017 COLLEYVILLE BLVD.
COLLEYVILLE, TX 76034
800-609-1010 BUS 817-485-3800
FAX 817-485-3805
May 22, 2006
Attn: City of Colleyville, TX
Mayor David Kelly and City Council Members;
Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission
c/o Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning
RE: Proposed Rezoning Adjacent to Broughton Subdivision
Dear Mayor Kelly, Members of the City Council and Planning & Zoning Commission:
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed rezoning of the land next to the
Broughton addition in Colleyville. From my understanding, a zoning application has been
submitted, that if approved, will put 75 housing units on less than 20 acres of land. First of all, as
a resident of the Broughton addition I am deeply disturbed by the thought of having such a high-
density addition next to my neighborhood. My neighbors and I have put forth a considerable
investment in order to live in Broughton because of the large lots, greenbelts, numerous trees, and
superior quality homes. Needless to say, the thought ofliving next to a large development of tract
housing which has been shoe-homed into a tract of land under 20 acres of land is nauseating.
Moreover, without a doubt the developer will have to destroy almost all of the old-growth
hardwood trees on the land. I am deeply troubled by this because of the fact that trees such as
these are rapidly disappearing all across the DFW area. I believe the trees are an asset not only to
Broughton, but to Colleyville as a community. Even ifthe developer were to try to save a number
of the trees, we alllmow that old-growth trees such as these have a very poor survival rate after
being subjected to the stresses of earth moving, and water run-off from the pouring of concrete
slabs, streets, sidewalks, etc.
In addition, I am concerned that this rezoning will encourage emergency traffic to drive
more often through Broughton. This concerns me from the standpoint of increased noise as well
as danger to the children of the neighborhood which play in the greenbelts and in front of our
homes.
Finally, I do not think that rezoning the land as it has been submitted is in the long-term
best interest of Colleyville. As a community, Colleyville is the envy of our neighbors due to the
lack of tract housing and high density neighborhoods. We need to preserve what has made us
unique. Weare at a crucial point where we as a city can shape the future growth of our
neighborhoods and commercial development in a way that will add long-term value and
desirability to our community. High density housing does not fit into that plan.
Hence, I am requesting that the proposed rezoning be tabled until the applicant submits a
plan which (a) preserves a buffer of 60 feet by means of platted open space around the south and
east sides of the property, and excavating, filling, and crossing through with utilities of any kind
and paved pathways be prohibited, including not excavating, filling, or crossing through in the
drip line of trees in this buffer; (b) creates an affirmative obligation to establish a maintenance
association to undertake preservation of the forested buffer by replanting, etc. and hire a
consultant who will draft acceptable standards for same to be incorporated into the zoning
ordinance.
-"
Barry LeBaron
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Meredith Matlock [meredith@bagwellcompany.com]
Friday, May 26, 2006 1 :37 PM
Barry LeBaron
David Bagwell
Rezoning of the land north of Broughton on Sanders Lane
Mr. LeBaron,
I am writing on behalf of the David Bagwell Company to ask for some information regarding
the rezoning of the land north of Broughton on Sanders Lane.
We are interested to know if twenty percent of the property owners within two hundred feet
have objected to this proposal. If so, we would like a list of these homeowners and their
addresses. If not twenty percent, what percentage have opposed it?
What has the applicant given to the city in writing about saving the native trees in the
area?
We would like to get a complete file of all that has been submitted by the applicant on
this, including the DRC comments. Please fax a copy of this information to our Dallas
office at 214-368-7740 and to my office at 601-944-9501.
Is the staff recommending approval of the rezoning?
We would like a full size copy of the lot plan proposed by the zoning applicant.
With respect to the proposal to downgrade the status of Sanders Lane, is a traffic study
available that supports the current status of Sanders Lane? Is there a traffic study that
supports the change in status of Sanders Lane? If no traffic study supports the current
status, what basis was Sanders given its current status and why is it no longer valid?
What are the staff's recommendations with respect to Sanders Lane? We would like a copy
of the ORC comments relating to this issue.
We would like to receive the Staff's written analysis of these two matters that was
provided to the P & Z, i.e. The complete summary about the zoning case and Sanders Lane
proposed changes given to the P & Z.
Is there any economic analysis of the impact of this property if it were garden offices as
opposed to garden homes?
We would like an up to date copy of the Master Plan of Colleyville that relates to the
area being rezoned.
Thank you for your help.
Sincerely,
Meredith Matlock
1
Michael and Elaine Bell
1913 Stratton Court
Colleyville, Texas 76034
817-251-9974
June 12,2006
Colleyville City Council
Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission
clo Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning
100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034
Dear Council and Mr. LeBaron,
I understand there is a zoning application to place 75 housing units on approximately 20 acres of
land immediately north of Broughton. I am opposed to the zoning as planned. I will explain
why and offer questions in regard to this request below.
First, I am concerned that the wooded area bordering Broughton would be destroyed if a broad
easement cannot be assured by a city enforceable ordinance to protect and sustain it as an
independent ecosystem. It would be beneficial to gather information from an arborist for
suggestions. In my opinion, these woods are God given and in fact are the offspring of a
forestation known as the Eastern Cross Timbers, which has been in existence for hundreds of
years and is diminishing. This is a precious resource for our city, our state and its residents. As
a citizen of this area for over 50 years and specifically a resident of Colleyville for 38 years, I
have seen natural habitat destroyed time and time again by developmental progression. I am not
opposed to growth and understand that it is imminent and necessary; however, I believe it can be
done with sensitivity to existing natural resources. If this plan cannot be revised to accommodate
these woods, I strictly oppose it in full. It is my belief that the trees can be preserved and
development successfully undertaken with proper independent professional advisement and
planning.
Secondly, I question deviation from Colleyville's Master Plan to develop this land for other than
commercial or office utilization. Are their compelling reasons to dismiss recommendations by
previous committees? Please note the plurality of "committees", as I believe the Master Plan
represents creation and review by multiple previous councils regarding use of this land. I do not
pretend to know what represents maximum benefit for the city with this land, but I give credence
to our previous planners. Further, it appears that professional office development, as Master
Planned would more easily allow protection of this representation of the Eastern Cross Timbers.
Thirdly, if the 20 acres is approved for residential use, which, by the way, seems very densely
projected, I would like for Planning and Zoning to require and enforce architectural
specifications and developmental quality control in such a manner that it would compliment
adjacent neighborhoods and thus the city. It would seem to me that a work session involving
qualified and interested parties on this project would be to everyone's benefit. Colleyville has an
exemplary reputation and has been written about numerous times. One of its greatest sustaining
assets is overall architectural appeal. I am sure each of us has driven through a city and formed
an opinion based upon architectural ambiance or lack thereof.
I submit to you that Colleyville can continue to prosper and develop with balance. A
compassion for the preservation and maintenance of our God given resources and sustainable
architectural charm will honor Colleyville's legacy for generations.
Respectfully,
1J&4A4tt)~ ~~~
Michael and Elaine Bell
'fJJ~g>~
6104 ~~~
~ <=0~ 76034
June 12,2006
Community Development Department
Planning and Zoning Commission
Mayor and City Council of Colleyville
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
RE: Zoning Case Number: Z-06-012
Sage Group, Inc application for 19.78 acres in Abstract 180 out ofthe J.L. Byas Survey
1600 Block of Sanders Lane
Dear Sirs,
In response to the Public Hearing Notice, I would like to have my opinion made a part of the
public hearing record, as I am unable to appear at the meeting set for June 12,2006.
Being a homeowner in the Broughton Subdivision and living within 200 feet of the proposed
development, I am opposed to the plan as established by the Sage Group. There are several
issues with the development footprint. There is not enough open space to comply with City
standards. The open space can be made more ecologically friendly. Density per acre does not
fit with the rules established by the P & Z Commission. And preservation of nature has not come
into consideration.
I propose the city require a minimum 60' to 70' buffer at subdivision boundaries, in order to
preserve the tree line. The development can make a unique greenbelt and park in their
neighborhood. Or could the City better benefit having this land be made public access space for
City parks.
Colleyville land is becoming scarce. We should evaluate what land we have left and make
logical decisions for its use. I would like to see the preservation of the trees and nature that have
taken hundred of years to mature. Please save the trees for they beautify our city and make
Colleyville a special place for all to enjoy.
~~
Denise Procaccino
Kevin Procaccino
6104 Burnham Circle
Colleyville, 1X 76034
June 12, 2006
Community Development Department
Planning and Zoning Commission
Mayor and City Council of Colleyville
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
RE: Zoning Case Number: Z-06-012
Sage Group, Inc application for 19.78 acres in Abstract 180 out of the J.L. Byas Survey
1600 Block of Sanders Lane
Dear Sirs,
As a resident of Colleyville and homeowner in Broughton Subdivision, adjacent to the
referenced property zoning issue, I would like to voice my disapproval for the above rezoning
request. I believe that the property should be held to the same standards set forth by the
Colleyville City Master Plan, and be subjected to the same structure of rules, with regards to
density requirements.
Furthermore, the development doesn't seem to appreciate the foliage and it's obvious attributes
to the city. A development of this type would destroy what has taken decades to mature. The
city should evaluate this proposal and request a larger amount of green belt and preservation
area. Would the developer consider using some of the 19.78 acres for a city park?
Thank you for your time and consideration,
Sincerely, n
~cA\{~
Kevin Procaccino
Mr. LeBaron,
My wife and I live at 1905 Stratton Court in ColleyviUe, Texas. One of the
key things that caused us to buy in Broughton was the trees that
surrounded the sub-division. We looked in Whittier Heights and
Westmont, but ultimately we liked the location and the proximity to 121
that Broughton offered.
My three biggest concerns are:
1. Preservation of the natural resources (trees)
2. Architecture of the proposed houses
3. Width of the buffer zone between us & them
It has been brought to our attention that the 20 acres to the north of
Broughton is on the selling block and is slated to have 75 homes on that
piece of real estate. Broughton represents about 1.5 units of housing per
acre which is much better than the normal density of 1.8 units per acre
that is supposed to be the maximum in the city of ColleyvWe. If my math
is correct, that wUI represent almost double the 1.8 unit per acre that is
the norm for the city.
I also have seen where the city has proposed a 20 foot buffer to the north
of Broughton which we do not feel is adequate for our sub-division. I
would highly recommend 60' as the buffer to preserve the natural beauty
of the trees adjacent to our neighborhood. Also there is no definition of
the easement provided. WUl it be taken out of private ownership once the
new sub-division is completed and put into the HOA ownership? What are
the minimum standards for the houses to be built there? Wasn't this
property set up to be garden offices originally in 2004 on the Master
Plan? What happened to that Master Plan? Who is policing it now? Is it
the developer?
Those are just a few of the questions I have for the city officials at this
time.
We plan to attend the Planning & Zoning Meeting Monday evening at 7:00
to see how the city plans to address these concerns.
Best Regards,
Ken & Cathy Addington
ChemCal, Inc.
817-913-8039
Letter in Favor of the Rezoning Request
Dated June 7, 2006
GREGORY T. ORRELL
June 7, 2006
City of Colleyville
Planning & Zoning Commission
i\ttn:Mr. Byerly
1100 !\hin Stree.t
Collcyville, TX 76034
RL.:: Zoning Change for Villas at Oak Pointe
Mr. Byedy:
As a resident in the City of Colleyville, I am familiar with the project being built along
Sanders Lane. The.re is a desire by tllC residents of the area to have high quality villa homes
and townhouses built in our area. These upscale single family dwellings on smaller lots will
complement the city's larger lot cOlD1nunities.
Please know that there is a need for quality single family commllflities on smaller lots in
Colleyville that will allow the residents the choice of diminished lot care '\."bile keeping the
upscale quality of homes that we expect in the City of Colleyville.
Since.rely,
..... ",;
Greg Grell
10(\5 CkJx T.~kl' Ct
Colleyville, TX 75244
(8] 7) 247-9505
1005 CLEAR LAKE COURT' COLLEYVILLE. TX . 75244
PllONE: 817-247-9505 . FAX: 817-503-9272
E-MAIL: GTO@LANCERFS.COM
Letter from David Bagwell Dated June 23, 2006
Withdrawing his Opposition to the Rezoning
Request
'.'
B R 0 UGH TON
June 23, 2006
Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission
C/o Barry leBaron
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
Mr. Chairman and Commissioners:
I withdraw my company's opposition to zoning case G-06-015 on the basis of the following
understanding that has been reached by the applicant and my company regarding the property
for whid1 the zoning Is proposed (the "Subject Property"):
1. Zoning Plan Modification to establish a 30 foot wide conservation area on the east side
of the Subject Property beginning on the south side of the point where Sanders lane
extends (or is presently planned to extend) west into the Subject Property from Wyatt Drive
and continuing south to the southeast comer of the Subject Property and from there west
across the whole south side of the SUbject Property, which conservation area will be
perpetually owned and maintained by the property owners association of the proposed
development in order to preserve and enhance the natural ecological condition of the buffer
area;
2. Obligation of the Property Owners Association of the Subject Property, by means of a
special condition in. the proposed zoning ordinance, that:
AS needed, but no less often than once annually, the Oak Pointe property owners
association (and its successors and assigns) shall cause a Texas-licensed arborlst, who
is expert In Cross limbers silviculture, (the "Expert") to provide a written general
evaluation of native hardwood and evergreen trees in the 30' Tree Preservation Buffer
(the "Buffer") and indude recommendations for sustaining and enhancing the natural
ecological Integrity of the .Buffer, with emphasis on preserving native tree species
growing therein. The Oak POinteproperty owners association shall be obligated to
promptly and faithfully carry out ead1 recommendation of the Expert at an aggregate
cost not to exceed twice the amount of the most recent unexpended contribution of
funds for such purposes received by it from the Broughton Maintenance Association,
Inc., its successor, and other contributing person or organization, if any.
We own the following lots in Broughton Block A, whid1 I believe are within 200 feet of the
property for which the applicant seeks rezoning: 34, 41, 43, 46, 47, 49, 50, 51 and 53.
By:
cc: James Thweatt
Curtis W. Young AIA
Hl"L' DOUCLAS AVl'NUF. SUITE 605. DALLAS. TEXAS 75225 METRO: HJ7.5.Hl.5500 LAX: 214.368.7740
Letter from Garabedian Properties Dated June
24, 2006 Withdrawing their Opposition to the
Rezoning Request
A Certified Master Builder
P.O. Box 1038, Colleyville, Texas.76~34-1038 garabedianproperties.com
June 24, 2006
Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission
Barry LeBaron, Director of Planning
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
RE: Zoning Case # Z-06-012
Mr. LeBaron:
As the owner of Lot 39, Block A, Broughton, I am writing to withdrawal my opposition and state
that I am in full support of the proposed rezoning of the property at 1600 Sanders Lane as it was
shown to me last week.
The concern I had about the community's impact on the trees has been availed. The developer has
put substantial thought into site placement, green belts, tree conservation, landscape features and
development layout. As it is apparent that they intend to bring an asset to the city and not just cram
some houses onto acreage, I believe it will benefit all to have this development move forward in a
timely fashion,
It appears that the current property owner/users are unable or unwilling to care for the trees which I
wish to preserve at the property's boundary so in a strange way, delaying this development may
create more hardships for the trees than moving forward.
As a firm believer of property rights and responsible development, I would ask the Planning &
Zoning Commission to allow this project to move forward. The addition of rooftops will not only
help Colleyville expand its commercial tax base but it will also take remove a negative that we have
heard from some prospective buyers about our site (and possibly other like sites in Broughton) that
backs up to land zoned commercial.
Please note I have no finaneial interest in this project. I may decide at some point and time to build
in the project, however, I have access to numerous building sites in the region so this project will
have no effect on my ability to work or provide for my family. My change in opinion is based upon
the evident efforts and energies the developer has placed into the plan and property owners have the
right to proceed in the responsible development of their property.
nity to submit my views on this zoning case,
Metro 817-748-2669
Mobile 817-637-7245
mike@garabedianproperties.com
Fax 817-749-6148
T f.
Letter from Applicant Dated June 26, 2006
Agreeing to Modify Plan
SITE PLANNING
SAGf GROlJP INC.
June 26, 2006
Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission
c/o BaITY LeBaron
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
In re: Zoning Case #Z06-12- The Villas at Oak Pointe (Subject Property)
Mr. Chairman and Commissioners:
Based upon our cfforts to work with our neighbors to address certain conccrns raised at the last
Commission meeting, and in this ca<;e specifically addressing concerns raised by the developer and
owners of those neighboring lots within the Broughton subdivision, we have agreed to modify our plan to
include a 30' Tree Buffer along our joint boundary. In addition, the Broughton developer and
Maintenance Association has jointly agreed with us to undertake a long term plan to assure the continued
health of the trees within the agreed upon 30' tree buffer. Specifically, we have agreed on the following:
I. A Zoning Plan Modification to establish a 30 foot wide conservation area on the east side of the
Subject Property beginning onthe south side of the point where Sanders Lane extends (or is
prcsently planned to extend) west into the Subject Property from Wyatt Drive and continuing south
to the southeast corner of the Subject Property and from there west across the whole south sidc of the
Subject Property, which conservation area wiII be perpetually owned and maintained by the property
owners association of thc proposed development in order to preserve and enhance the natural
ecological condition of the butfer area;
T [ l
9
I
2
9 2 9
2. Obligation of the Property Owners Association ofthc Subjcct Property, by means ofa special
condition in the proposed zoning ordinance, that:
As needed, but no less often than once annually, the Oak Pointe property owncrs association
(and its successors and assigns) shall cause a Texas-licensed arborist, who is expert in Cross
Timbers silviculture, (the "Expert") to provide a written general evaluation of native hardwood
and evergreen trees in the 30' Tree Preservation Buffer (the "Buffer") and include
recommendations for sustaining and enhancing the natural ecological integrity of the Butfer,
with emphasis on preserving native tree species growing therein, The Oak Pointe property
owners association shall be obligated to promptly and faithfully calTY out each recommendation
of the Expert at an aggregate cost not to exceed twice the amount of the most recent
unexpended contribution of funds for such purposes received by it from the Broughton
Maintenance Association, Inc., its successor, and other contributing person or organization, if
any.
f A X
9
l
,.
9 2 9
The Zoning Plan Modification identified in Item (1) above has already been included in the revised
Zoning Plan Exhibit before you tonight. It is our intent that the language in Item (2) be added to the
Special Conditions section of the zoning case, and be a part included as a part of your motion- should you
vote to recommend approval.
Sincerely yours,
SAGE GROUP, INC.
~t<:.-tJ, G~, ~~
CUltis W. Young IA \J .
Principal
8445 fREEPORT PARKWAY
SUITE 660
IRVING. TEXAS 15063
,
//'~- -~----------1-
/- c
/ .~
N
, , ~ n 1> " ....
, ~ " "
j ~ i ~ }
~~ "
, - - -'r.li 11': ] & ;3
0;.; .;!
, , ~~ U ~
oz z< z
~ ~~
} i~
8 "'~
P
o !
Zz
C;~~
H~
~~:f
~~d
~ ;,;
" E
h
H~
~h
~1:!
~;\
~j
z<
~.i
E i
"'~
"!::
j'''
d
H
.!X
~~
gj
r --, ~
\
I \
I \
\ I
\ I
\
I
I
, I
, /
I I
I I
~ !
J I
/j i
'J I
1101
, I
I
I
I
I
. I
E I
1____/
'"
),..r!
((
~ lJw<:",n.:nl))ffD~ : 'T1
and :SU!UOz 3u l~!JB-, - - - '
I
I
I
\
,
, If) ~
f..!!i\~~
~ (()-
,~ ~\~
Cii, '
:::Jv
""'.~z
!\
01 '
<X) ,
I
I
I
I
I
/
/
~..;.
...~:
)'~;;
. '
1
I
I
.... /
'"
'"
!:;'
'(f)~:r.'"
'-. ~---(--'\l~
g" ).:"'"
, ">;i~ n ,f
\ \ x
t' \"-l
I
J
/--
\
I
I
!
u
u
H
,/ ,
"
,
,
I
/
I
/
" I
, I
/'" I nll--~ ~==c,;'
i j.j 1 n ~ ~
~ I I ~ I
o
ORDINANCE 0-06-xxxx
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND
CHANGING THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 19.78 ACRES OUT OF THE J. L.
BYAS SURVEY, ABSTRACT 180, FROM THE AG-AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO
THE PUDR-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING
FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Sage Group, Inc., on May
1, 2006, under Case No. Z-06-012; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to
recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and
appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new
zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts
and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance
with a comprehensive plan designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to
secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health and
general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the
overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to
facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks, and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable
consideration, among other things, to the character of the districts and
their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the
value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land
throughout the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City
of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of
Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning
classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map,
having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after
holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the
property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in
the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City
of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made.
Ordinance 0-06-xxxx
Page 2 of 5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and
correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in
their entirety.
Sec. 2.
THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Co II eyville,
Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning of
said property from the AG-Agricultural zoning district to the PUDR-Planned
Unit Development Residential zoning district, as depicted on the attached
Zoning and Location Map, labeled as Exhibit "A", and described by Metes
and Bounds, labeled as Exhibit "B".
Sec. 3.
THAT the Official Zoning Map of the City of Colleyville be amended to
incorporate the zoning change approved herein.
Sec. 4.
THAT the above described tract of land shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. GENERAL
a. The purpose of this PUDR is for 24 single-family attached town homes
and 50 single-family detached lots, constructed at a maximum density
of 3.7 dwelling units per acre.
b. A maximum of 74 dwelling units shall be allowed within this PUDR and
no more than one dwelling unit shall be allowed per each platted lot.
c. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the Colleyville
Land Development Code, except where amended by this Ordinance.
2. CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND PLATTING
a. The street layout and arrangement of lots of the subdivision shall be
generally consistent with the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit
"C", which shall not be considered the preliminary plat. The actual
street and lot arrangement may differ from that shown on Exhibit "C" to
accommodate topographic, drainage or other conditions.
b. The developer shall submit and receive approval from the City a
Preliminary and Final Plat in accordance with the requirements of the
Land Development Code prior to development of this PUDR.
3. PERMITTED USES
a. Single-family attached-homes with no more than one dwelling unit
allowed per each platted lot
b. Single-family attached-homes with no more than one dwelling unit
Ordinance 0-06-xxxx
Page 3 of 5
allowed per each platted lot
c. Open space
4. RESIDENTIAL LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS
A. Single-family attached residential lot requirements and setbacks shall
comply with the following provisions. Building line setbacks established
by the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit "C", shall control where
such building line setback is different from the following requirements,
g. Maximum Lot Coverage
h. Maximum Height
2,700 square feet
30 feet
90 feet
5 feet
none
5 feet or 18 feet for
rear facing garage
90 percent
35 feet
a. Minimum Lot Size
b. Minimum Lot Width
c. Minimum Lot Depth
d. Front Building Line
e. Side Building Line
f. Rear Building Line
B. Single-family detached residential lot requirements and setbacks shall
comply with the following provisions. Building line setbacks established
by the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit "C", shall control where
such building line setback is different from the following requirements.
e. Side Building Line
6,608 square feet
56 feet
115 feet
15 feet or 20 feet for
front facing garage
3 and 7 feet
(maintain 10 feet separation)
20 feet
15 feet
58 percent
35 feet
a. Minimum Lot Size
b. Minimum Lot Width
c. Minimum Lot Depth
d. Front Building Line
f. Rear Building Line
g. Side Building Line
h. Maximum Lot Coverage
i. Maximum Height
5. OPEN SPACE
a. This development shall provide not less than twenty two (22.9) percent
common open space, which shall generally be configured as shown on
Exhibit "0". All open space areas shall be landscaped and maintained
by the Homeowner's Association.
b. No more than 25 percent of the open space areas shall be utilized for
storm water detention or retention.
Sec. 5.
Sec, 6.
Ordinance 0-06-xxxx
Page 4 of 5
6. SCREENING
a. A six (6) feet in height, wooden screening fence shall extend along a
portion of the northern boundary line and a portion of the eastern
boundary line of this PUDR, as shown on Exhibit "0",
b. A six (6) feet in height, masonry wall shall extend along the eastern and
a portion of the northern boundary lines of this PUDR, as shown on
Exhibit "0".
c. A six (6) feet in height, wrought iron fence shall extend along the
southern boundary line and a portion of the eastern boundary lines of
this PUDR, as shown on Exhibit "0".
7. OTHER
a. Retention ponds constructed in this development shall contain not less
than one aeration device, such as a fountain, waterfall or underwater
device, which shall be approved by the Colleyville Engineering
Department.
b. An emergency access right-of-way or easement shall be provided to
connect this development with Sanders Lane on the east side of the
development. Said emergency access shall be gated and constructed
in accordance with the requirements of the Land Development Code.
The gate shall include an Opticom automatic opening system.
c. As needed, but no less often than once annually, the Oak Pointe
property owners association (and its successors and assigns) shall
cause a Texas-licensed arborist, who is expert in Cross Timbers
silviculture, (The "Expert") to provide a written general evaluation of
native hardwood and evergreen trees in the 30' Tree Preservation
Buffer (the "Buffer") and include recommendations for sustaining and
enhancing the natural ecological integrity of the Buffer, with emphasis
on preserving native tree species growing therein. The Oak Pointe
property owners association shall be obligated to promptly and faithfully
carry out each recommendation of the Expert at an aggregate cost not
to exceed twice the amount of the most recent unexpended contribution
of funds for such purposes received by it from the Broughton
Maintenance Association, Inc., its successor, and other contributing
person or organization, if any.
THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner
and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of
the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or
terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for
in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and
Ordinance 0-06-xxxx
Page 5 of 5
upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of
Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense.
Sec. 7.
THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of
this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall
not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof
other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional.
Sec. 8.
THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall
have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this
ordinance.
Sec. 9.
THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the
above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above
zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order
to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires
that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2006,
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2006.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secretary
David Kelly
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Matthew C. G, Boyle
City Attorney
Exhibit A - Zoning and Location Map
Exhibit B - Metes and Bounds Description
FIELD NOTES
Description for a tract of land in the J, L Byas Survey, Abstract Number
180, City of Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, and comprising the
following tracts of land: that tract described In a deed to Michelle and Kim
Smith, recorded in Volume 16398, Page 320, Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas; that tract described in a deed to Charles E. and Pauline
Neece, recorded in Volume 3125, Page 326, Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas; that tract described in a deed to Ruth V. Heidel, recorded in
Volume 14630, Page 44, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; that tract
described in a deed to Ronny D. and Vicky A McPherson, recorded In
Volume 13285, Page 97, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; that tract
described in a deed to H. E. Rickman, Jr., recorded in Volume 3152, Page
463, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas, that tract described in a deed
to Terrance L and Dana L Stilson, recorded in Volume 6408, Page 211,
Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; that tract described in a deed to
Ronald Harold and Bobbie Jean Anderson, recorded In Volume 4729, Page
631, Deed Records, Tarrant County, Texas; that tract described in a deed
to David W. Stringer, recorded In Volume 15727, Page 156, Deed Records,
Tarrant County, Texas; that tract described in a deed to Jennie Lou Stowe,
recorded in Volume 5193, Page 721, Deed Records, Tarrant County,
Texas; that tract described in a deed to George Eledge and Joy M.
Cannedy, recorded in Volume 10638, Page 1388, Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas; that tract described in a deed to Ronny D. and VICky A
McPherson, recorded in Volume 12880, Page 221, Deed Records, Tarrant
County, Texas; that tract described in a deed to Gary and Brenda Bass,
recorded in Volume 16245, Page 340, Deed Records, Tarrant County,
Texas; and a portion of that tract described In a Right Of Way Easement to
Tarrant County, recorded in Volume 1819, Page 346, Deed Records,
Tarrant County, Texas; and being described as one (1) tract by metes and
bounds as follows:
BEGINNING at a 5If1' ilun pin found wIh cap marked, "DCJNOY" lor the occupied
nortt.aat comer of Mid Byu Survey, and tOr the noItheMt comer of Mid SmIh trad;
THENCE South 00 degree 26 rnInutea 211eCOnds Eatt a dl8tance of 199.34 feet to a
1/Z' Iron pin found with cap marked, "BMr for the 00Itt>>aat comer of aaId Heidel tract;
THENCE South 00 dogrcc 41 minutes 09 .ClOClIlda Eat adiatmcc 0(617.64 feet to. "8" iroa
pin fouad with 0-.. madtcd, "B0IIIIduy Made:" for tho aoathoaat OClmCll" o(.aid Hcidc1lrallt;
TIIENCE South 89 dqp'ec:a 12 miautca SS -0. Weat. diatmoc 0(262.34 feet to a SI8" iroa
pin f<llllld with 0-.. madtcd, "BMl" for the ~t oomcr of.aid Hoidol tragt and fort1oc
.outhcaat comer of.aid MaI'henoo tragt reaordcd in Volume 132BS, Paso 97;
TIIENCE South 89 dqp'ec:a 1:1 minutea 11 -0. Weat. diataDoo of333.S1 feet to a SIB" iraa
pin f<llllld with 0-.. madtcd, "BMl" for the aouthcaat oomcr of.lIid StiJaOlllrallt;
THENCE South 89 dcsr- 36 miautca 48.000DdI Wcat a diataDoo of26S.34 feet to a SIB" iraa
pipe fouad for the IOlIIhwcat comer of Mid StiJaoa Inct cd for tho IOldIIcMt oomc:r 0( Mid
Harold and Andcnon tract;
Metes and Bounds Description, (cont'd)
TIIENCE South89.dc&t- 44 minuta 20 lcooada Wcot a diotango of 88.09 feet to a 5/lr'iron
pipe fqupd.....IGUlIiMo&.___or~lIiQd/uMkqaa .....lI!I4fCl{....~
\lOmei' of Lot 4R-2-4, Block A, ~.Shoppiq v'.u.p AdditiOo; ~ to lIle'"
nlOOrdcd in Cabinat A, Slide 8387, Plat boonIo, TImIIt Coanly, T_;
TIIENCE North 432.91 feet to a 1/l"iron pipe foundforlhe aortheeot oomcrofLd 4R-2-1,
Block A, of oaid Collcyville Shopping Village Addition;
TIIENCE North 89 dcgnx:o 36111inuta 33 ICCOIIdo Wcot 8 cIiobmcc of 269.95 feet to the
louth_t 00DlCll' of oaid Stowe tnat aDd to the louthcut oomcr ofLd lR. BIook A, CoIJcyville
Shoppins ViDaac Addition, llOOllIding to lhe plat rcaordod in Cabinet A, Slide 5776, Plat
RcoorcIo, T8IJ'Et County, T_;
THENCE North 00 dcgrcc 34 minuta 33 lcoondo Wcot 8t 189.73 feet puling the ncx1luout
00DlCll' of laid Lot 1R. in all, 8 tota1 diotango of 219.96 feet to the IlCldlMat 00DlCll' of laid Stowe
Ind;
THENCE South 89 dcsrcco 48 minuta 13 ocooada Eool a diotacc of 146.64 feet along the north
linc of oaid Stowe tract to IIlc _t linc at oaid Elodgo and Caaaody net;
THENCE NORm 8 cIiotanac at 171.21 feet to 8 112" iron pin found fur lhe 1l<lI'Ih\wot oomcr of
oaid Elcdsc Illd Camtcdy net;
THENCE North 89 dcgnx:o 55 miaDtco 151CllCl11do Eut 8 diatanoc at 279.93 feet to 81/l" iron
pin foaadfor the ooodhwcotoomcrofLd R-I4-1, BIook I, Collcyvi1lc IDdaIlriaI pam, oooordina
to the plat nlOOrdcd in Cabinet B, Slide 606, Plat R.coordo, TlIIDIIl County, T_;
THENCE South 89 degrees 58 minutes 05 8llClOnds East a dI8lanoe of 389.28leet to a
sm- Iron pin found;
THENCE Nof1h 69 degrees 53 minJl:es 58 seoond8 East a dI8lance of 83.96 feet to a
sm- Iron pin found for the eouIhwe8t comer of Lot 1, Block " Fair Haven E8tate8,
according to the pIlIt recorded In Catnlt A, Side 'Zl73, PIlIt Records, Tan.nt County,
Texas;
THENCE North 69 degrees 54 mlool88 24 seoond8 East a dI8lance of 56.85 feet to a
sm- Iron pin found with yeIow cap for the northw8et comer of 88Id SmIh tract;
THENCE North 89 degrees 58 mlrUes 13 8llCOIlds East a cllslance of 262. 70 feet to the
POINT OF BEGINNING, said de8crIbed tract c:ontaInIng approximately 19.78 acres of
land, of which approxh.......1y 0.64 of IIn acre 1& contained wIhln said ~-d__y
eaaement.
____04IZ1If1llIlvAogorw. Hall, R.P.LS. _4414. _................__..-_
~,..A*S...._
Exhibit C -Conceptual Site Plan
:Ii ii I il~il
I I III
i .,
~..
"'lit
~. '.
r 'i
I it
~4+
11
1\
I';
. i~.JiiJ;
f
<
~.::'~t.~:(
.<..........:,;:.:
~.~r.:.~ /..-...~~<::~
e "\/~...:.:p~~...~.....~!1l."'>
1\)i~. : . ':j"..t'~'::~;;;i
. -r~~.;~:;
City of Colleyville
Agenda Briefing
100 Main Street
Colleyville, Texas 76034
(817) 503-1000
W'W'N. colleyville. com
File Number:
File Type: Case
Status: Commission
Tabled Items
Controlling Body: Planning and
Zoning
Commission
Version: 1
Agenda Date: 07/10/06
Requester: Community Agenda No.: 9b Final Action:
Development
Department
File Name: Case Z-06-016- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural and
R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential on 20.15 acres on Lots 2 and 3,
Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail Addition and Lot 1, Block 1 of the w.e. Newton
Attachments: Zoning and Location Map. List of Property Owners Notified . Proposed Lot Layout .
Development Review Committee Memo Dated June 5, 2006 . Applicant's Response Dated
June 14, 2006. Letter from Applicant Dated June 19, 2006. Draft Ordinance
History of Legislative File
Version: Date:
Acting Body:
Action Text:
06/26/06 Planning and Zoning
Commission
1 07/10/06 Planning and Zoning
Commission
Title
Case Z-06-016- PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from AG-Agricultural
and R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single Family Residential on 20.15 acres on
Lots 2 and 3, Block 1 of the Lavaca Trail Addition and Lot 1, Block 1 of the W.C. Newton
Addition
Explanation
U PDA TE 7/10/2006
At the June 26, 2006 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting this item was tabled until
the July 24, 2006 meeting in order for the applicant to submit a preliminary plat application.
Staff will renotify those property owners regarding the July 24, 2006 public hearing.
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
Keith Kithsiri has submitted a request on behalf of Invitation Park III, to rezone 20.15-acres
of land located on the south side of Lavaca Trail, on the north side of L.D. Lockett Road.
The property is currently zoned AG-Agricultural and R40-Single Family Residential.
Request. Rezone from AG-Agricultural and R40-Single Family Residential to R20-Single
Family Residential.
City of Colleyville
Page 1
Printed on 7/6/2006
Agenda Briefing Continued
Location. The 20.15-acres is located at 909 and 1009 Lavaca Trail and 908 LD. Lockett
Road.
Platting. Two of the properties are platted and one property is not platted. The properties
are currently developed as single family residences. The property owner has indicated
plans to subsequently plat the properties into 32 lots upon approval of the rezoning request.
Approval of a preliminary and final plat will be required prior to the issuance of building
permits.
Lot Sizes. The developer has submitted a conceptual layout of the property showing a
potential lot configuration. This site is sufficiently large enough to accommodate a 32 lot
development. The R20 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet,
lot width of 100-feet and lot depth of 125-feet. The proposed lots, as shown on the zoning
exhibit, meet the lot area and lot depth requirements of the R20 zoning district.
Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future use of this area for single
family residential type land uses. The R20-Single Family Residential zoning district allows
residential uses. The R20 zoning designation does not comply with the Colleyville Master
Plan recommendation that estate lots be developed adjacent to collector streets.
Surrounding Development Trends. The surrounding properties are primarily single family
residential in nature. Properties to the north and east are zoned R40-Single Family
Residential and are currently developed as single family residences. The properties to the
west are zoned PUDR-Planned Unit Residential (Emerald Park Addition) and R40-Single
Family Residential. The property to the south is zoned PUDR-Planned Unit Residential
(Reatta Place Addition).
Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all public
streets. The sidewalks must be installed when any new structures are built on the property.
Sidewalks internal to the development must be four (4) feet wide. Sidewalks along L.D.
Lockett must be five (5) feet wide as it is classified as a collector street.
Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation
provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been
collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations.
Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on average. Based
on this average, a 32 lot development would add approximately 306 vehicle trips per day to
the surrounding roadways.
Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 30 adjacent property owners regarding this
request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law
and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this
request.
city of Colleyville
Page 2
Printed on 7/6/2006
Agenda Briefing Continued
Financial Impact
It has been determined that there is no financial impact.
Recommendation
Approval
City of Colleyville
Page 3
Printed on 7/6/2006
Zoning and Location Map
D
Brice, Tony J & Mary B Brice
6021 Sterling Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Christman, Mark
5825 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Emerald Park H A Inc
6420 Remington Pkwy
Colleyville,TX 76034
Goodman Family Of Builders Lp
5808 W PIano Pkwy
Plano,TX 75093
Hultquest, Philip P & Lily J
5712 Texas Trl
Colleyville,TX 76034
Ly, Khanh H Etux Jennifer N
5911 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
McIntosh, Doyle & Mary Fam Lp
8333 Thornhill Dr
North Richland Hills,TX 76180
Moody, Jon Etux April
5935 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Palon, Jerry D
5918 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Perkins, Timothy B Etux Amber
6032 Sterling Dr
Colleyville,TX 76034
Bvesco Lp
25 Highland Park Vlg Ste 100
Dallas,TX 75205
Clark, Edward G
6016 Sterling Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Fleming, James W Jr Etux B F
5919 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Haber, Moshe
5846 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Isbell, Christopher Etux Kelly
6020 Sterling Dr
Colleyville,TX 76034
Mahmood, Ghazanfar
5833 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
McMurtrey, Wanda & D Issac
5838 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Neilson, Howard S Etux Shirley
5922 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Panchal, Prince H Etux Margari
6024 Sterling Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Plain, Verl Etux Ruth Ann
909 W Lavaca Trl
Colleyville,TX 76034
Chandler, Raman L
7001 Lismore Ct
Colleyville,TX 76034
Damron, Kenneth B Etux Melanie
5830 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Gandy, R Craig
1117 W Ld Lockett Rd
Colleyville,TX 76034
Haynes, Russell K Etux Susiana
PO Box 1602
Colleyville,TX 76034
Lombardi, Angelo Etux Lori
5915 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Martin, Stephen L Etux Nan C
813 W Lavaca Trl
Colleyville,TX 76034
Mittag, Andrew K Etux Janet A
901 W Lavaca Trl
Colleyville,TX 76034
Ogle, Danny G & Ruth A
1009 W Lavaca Trl
Colleyville,TX 76034
Periera, Vemon Etux Sharon
5842 Crescent Ln
Colleyville,TX 76034
Reatta Place Hmowners Assoc
777 Trails End Cir
Hurst,TX 76054
G;[
~
el:
,:m
['./
~i~.~
<[11'1
~~I~~
"'e:.,....~
:::;;::~13'"
W:;i" 3'
~c.~ ~
t~ i
z
g
"
o
z
~
~
eo
=;
o
;0
o
z
Z
G>
o
~
z
G")
m
;0
m
1D
c
m
'"
-I
..,.,
;0
o
s::
I~
o
!I~
I
I~
o
111'
Hz,.
po
1-1
!ll~
I~
.......
$:
)>
-<
N
~
~.;:o
h;z
z~
mm
-I ~.~
)>ooz
%~ZID!a
)>(1)(1>2
~ ~.~~)>
g8~~6
~.
~~
~
)>
~ 8
z
-i 0
N ;:a ~
9 )> -l
~~ .-oc
)>z (""""''''')>
~ G>(J") r-
gjc: s;;:
~. 6
t:J c
< -l
~
o
z
o
z
z
ill
~
::r:
CP
:::j
~~
ll\3i
~~
~-
~
1\
l~
I
!
I
I
I
I
!
I
i
[
I
1
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
DATE June 5, 2006 i
TO Christine Measday (Kelli Engineering)
FAX 817.379.1244
FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator
SUBJECT Z-06-016 Lavaca Trail- AG & R40 to R20
The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning request
submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration.
No Changes are Required for the Zoning Exhibit.
The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant:
1. Pending approval of the rezoning request, the property must be platted prior to development.
Refer to Chapter 8 of the Land Development Code for plat requirements.
2. If the zoning request is approved, the property shall be subject to the general provisions of the
R20 zoning districts.
3. Pending approval of the rezoning request, provide lot numbers for the open space lots and a
note on future plats stating that the open space lots will be maintained by the Home Owner's
Association.
4. Street names must be approved by the Fire Marshal during the platting process. Contact Rob
McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
5. If the roadway between the two blocks will be blocked, an emergency access gate with Knox
locks will be required. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more
information.
6. The Fire Department would prefer a controlled access gate with Opticon emitters that work
from both directions. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more
information.
7. The brick road shall be capable of supporting a minimum of 65,000 pounds. Contact Rob
McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
100 Main Street - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-06-016 LAVACA TRAIL-AG & R40 TO R20
IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is
issued for a new structure on the property. The fees listed below are intended to provide general
information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending
upon the specific use of the property, proposed utility construction, or conditions in an existing
City-Developer Agreement. Details are contained in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code.
ROADWAY
$1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Details are available in
Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code.
$2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
$200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is
installed.
WATER
SEWER
PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the
subdivision plat. The fee for residential development is $1,802 per lot.
TREE PRESERVATION. Trees not located within the right-of-way must be preserved during
construction. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around
all preserved trees located outside the right-of-way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of
the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction
fencing, chain link fence, erosion control fencing, or other similar fencing. The fencing must
remain in place during the entire construction period.
TREE SURVEY REQUIREMENT. A detailed tree survey of the property is required after final plat
approval, at the time of submittal for a clearing and grading permit. A copy of the approved
subdivision lot layout should be overlaid onto the tree survey in order to show the size and type of
existing trees within the building setback areas. Trees within with right of way and building pad
are exempt from the tree mitigation requirements and do not have to be shown on the survey.
Provide a table on the exhibit that lists the size, per caliper inches, and type of trees within the
building setback areas within each lot.
SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all public streets. The
sidewalks must be installed when any new structures are built on the property. Sidewalks internal
to the development must be 4 feet wide. Sidewalks along LD. Lockett must be 5 feet wide as it is
classified as a collector street.
TENTATIVE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE
Planning & Zoning Cormnission:
City Council:
Monday, June 26, 2006,7:00 p.m.
Tuesday, July 18 and August 1,2006, 7:30 p.m.
RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
PAGE2oF3
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Z-06-016LAVACA TRAIL-AG & R40 TO R20
Please submit the following to our offices:
. A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating
reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived.
The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, June 21, 2006,
in order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning &
Zoning Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or
fullerC@cLcollevville.tx.us if you have any questions.
PAGE30F3
Invitation Park III, LP
P.O. Box 1178
Grapevine, TX 76099
June 14,2006
Chris Fuller
Conununity Development Department
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
Fax: 817-503-1059
Re: Z-06-016 Lavaca Trail Zoning C()mmen~
Dear Chris:
I am writing in response to the comments received from the Development Review Committee on
zoning case Z-06-016 Lavaca Trail.
1. Pending approval of the rezoning request, the property must be platted prior to
development. Refer to Chapter 8 of the Land Development Code for plat requirements.
Comment acknowledged 'The developer, Invitation Park llL L.P. (IP3), 'will submit a
Preliminary Plat and Final Plat to the City upon approval of the zone change.
2. If the zoning request is approved, the property shall be subject to the general provisions
of the R20 zoning district.
Comment acknowledged Allprovisions of the R-20 zoning district will be met and
addressed in the Preliminary Plat that will be submitted to the City.
3. Pending approval of the rezoning request, provide lot numbers for the open space lots and
a note Qn future plats stating that the open space lots will be maintained by the Home
Owner's Association.
Comment acknowledged Lot numbers for open space lots and a note on future plats
stating that the open space lots will be maintained by an BOA will be provided on the
Preliminary Plat. IP 3 }'I!il/ establish an HOA responsible for maintenance of those areas
prior to the sale of lots to individual builders.
4. Streetmunes must be approved by the Fire Marshall during the platting process. Contact
Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for more information.
Commen/acknowledged. Street names will be submitted to Rob McKeown for approval
at the time ofplatting,
5. If the roadway between the two blocks will be blocked, an emergency access gate with
Knox locks will be required. Contact Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for
more information.
Comment acknowledged An emergency access gate with Knox locks will be installed
between the wvo block,<;.
6. The Fire Department would prefer a COl1trolledaccess gate with Opticon emitters that
work from both directions. ContactRob McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-251-8757, for
more infortnat16n.
Comment acknowledged IP 3 will research the Opticon system.. and will install it if it is
fiJund to be reasonably economical and ifelectric requirements can be met at the location
of the access gate. At a minimum, the developer will provide an access gate with Knox
locks.
7. The brick road shall be capable of supporting a minimum of 65,000 pounds. Contact Rob
McKeown, Fire Marshall, 817-25-8757, for more information.
Commen/acknowledged. $:ellie Engineering, Inc. will research the proposed pavers to
ensure that the minimum 65, 000 pounds can be supported, and will submit information
from the maltafaoturer supportj,1:rgtkatclaim. lfitisfoundthat the pavers cannot meet
the City's requirement, a concretedtive, meeti.11g City standards, will be installed for the
emergl3ncyaccess.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
.P.
A"~~~_'__.___~'~_'__________~
KELLIE
ENGINEERING. INC.
June 19,2006
Planning & Zoning Commission
c/o Community Development Department
City of Colleyville
100 Main Street
Colleyville, TX 76034
Re: Z-06-016 Lavaca Trail Zoning Application
Dear Commission Members:
The original Concept Plan and Zoning Request for the Lavaca Trail property was denied at the
May 8, 2006 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, After this meeting we revised the
Concept Plan and have submitted a new zone change request for your consideration. The new
request is for the entire 20.15 acres to be rezoned to R-20. We believe this new Concept Plan
addressed the three major concerns oithe Planning & Commission and the Emerald Park BOA
t..qat were expressed at the May 8, 2006 Commission meeting; specifically:
1. Cut-through traffic behind the Emerald Park subdivision f"i:om L.D. Lockett Road to
Lavaca Trail.
The proposed layout with two cul-de-sacs solves the cut-through traffic issue. A locked
gated emergency-access only driveway is proposed between the two cul-de-sacs.
Preliminary discussion l.....ith Rob McKeown, Fire Marshall, indicated this solution is
acceptable to Police/Fire as long the gate type and pavement rating meet City standards.
The developer also prefers this lay-out.
2. The Emerald Park HOA did not want a street irrunediately east of their subdivision
(especially a cut-through street).
Concern acknowledged. The new layout has centrally located streets with lots on both
sides of the street. Residential lots now adjoin Emerald Park The Applicant prefers this
new layout.
3. The Emerald Park HOA has expressed concerns about the surface drainage from the east
which current drains towards Emerald Park.
Concern acknowledged. The new layout proposes 2 HOA maintained Open Space areas
which will also provide areas for storm water detention. It is the Applicant's intention to
landscape these areas so both a landscape and drainage value can be derived from them.
200 Rufe Snow Drive North, Suite 120, Keller, TX 76248 Tel: 817.379.1225 Fax: 817.379.1244
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS' PLANNING. DESIGN
ifj:GltIEl1lNG 1NC
Planning & Zoning Commission
June 19, 2006
Page 2 of2
.~~.J;__~J.~.~J_..J;_
Invitation Park III (the Applicant) represented by Dan Bryson and Keith Kithsiri; and myself
met with the Emerald Park Homeowners Association (BOA) on Jlme 1,2006 to present the new
Concept Plan with two cul-de-sacs with an emergency access between them.
The initial response. of the BOA was very positive.
A week after the meeting, the Emerald Park BOA inquired if the Applicant would consider
resubmitting the zoning case as PUD (R -20 general criteria) to ensure the design is conformance
\.-'lith the Concept Plan. The BOA wanted a mechanism to ensure the project would be developed
as shown. The Applicant is committed to developing the site as shown on the Conceptual
Layout. Atthis time the Applicant would like to proceed with the current R-20 zoning request, a
pun is not the appropriate vehicle for "locking in" desired elements of the Concept Plan.
A PUD would require that all of the engineering and platting issues be addressed prior to your
consideration. As the site can successfully developed under R-20 criteria we would like to
proceed in this direction.
At this time the site is being field surveyed for platting and engineering design. Minor design
changes to lot lines, detention areas, and open space areas may become necessary during the
engineering design process to locate utilities, drainage structures, or other features. Additional
open space / medians may be added at the entranceways on Lavaca Trail and L.D. Lockett Road
when these entranceways are landscape designed. Some flexibility is needed in the design
process, which is also an opportunity to further enhance this design. The Emerald Park BOA has
asked for a landscaped area with park benches along L.D. Lockett adjacent to their open space.
The developer would like to accommodate this request but needs flexibility for the final design.
The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Conncil will have the opportunity to review both
the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat which will incorporate the engineering design and any
enhancements to the open space.
Sincerely,
Kellic Engineering, Inc.
t~aMf ~
Edward T, Kellie, P .E.
ORDINANCE 0-06-xxxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE
COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE,
TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED; BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING ON 20.15 ACRES OF THE
LOTS 2 AND 3 BLOCK 1 OF THE LA V ACA TRAIL ADDITION AND W.C.
NEWTON SURVEY, FROM THE AG-AGRICUL TURAL AND R40-SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO R20-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A
PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS
($2,000.00); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE
WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Keith Kithsiri on May 26,
2006, under Case No. Z-06-016; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the
health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning
ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to
recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and
appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new
zoning ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts
and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance
with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the
streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote
health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the
overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to
facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage,
schools, parks, and other public requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable
consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their
peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value
of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout
the City; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City
of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of
Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning
classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map,
having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after
holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the
Ordinance 0-06-xxxx
Page 2 of 3
property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in
the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City
of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1.
Sec. 2.
Sec. 3.
Sec. 4.
Sec. 5.
Sec. 6.
Sec. 7.
THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true
and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if
copied in their entirety.
THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing
the zoning of said property from the AG-Agricultural and R40-Single
Family Residential zoning district to the R20-Single Family
Residential zoning district, as depicted in the attached Exhibit "A"
and described in Exhibit "B".
THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the
manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as
amended herein.
THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions
or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as
provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of
Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to
exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each
offense.
THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or
provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional,
the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or
any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or
unconstitutional.
THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City
shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations
of this ordinance.
THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions
in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given
the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper
development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and
general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect
Ordinance 0-06-xxxx
Page 3 of 3
immediately from and after its passage.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2006.
day of
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2006.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Cynthia Singleton, TRMC
City Secreta ry
David Kelly
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Matthew C. G. Boyle
City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
R-40
EXHIBIT "B"
CURRENT ZONiNG AG
PROPOSED IOr~wG
PA~C,EL t
l.,tI!th~!)lad in Ih~R.N M(;,E,.i~lSy,.'e'v. Ab;slrQcl
'rcrf'<ml..C~flly. VI>>:<:!$ ond bt!n; a
alor Lo4t gild 3" LOV04;Q Troll
"'141.~ Pb~, of the PIal ~'ord~~
T , 1 I7!d b~ Mij;r~ pQrli,,,,of'l'f
Ph~ 11anH~~,f (.Q(~t . iJo<:k I,
_ ~5S2.q. PQi' 266. R. 'f' CT.
N~th89 ~ 5~ '~9# E"M~. di~IOOci! l:J'4Ui I~ feel otonq the
-w<J'I '" U'VO~Q TrQl; IQ -Cf p(llnJ ~Qr corn~y Qlso lfl9
. tortlel 01 Lo:l I. ~. t af titud ltlv~<:o froil Addl'
W~1Itl I lG6iL 04 leftlld ~
Ib~..ncr'ttb~'14~'" Qf W ,C t~e'N~<:l~
In V(jNm~ 3e6- 42, Paide a. P . r. c. r , .
. '." .._~_.~,--,.,.~_._,--~--~-,.,--~----=-~~...-.-------
PARCEL 2
9.96
CURREN r ZONING I R-
PROPOSEO ZOI1ING l ff'-20
L. Oe~(r~plltm
BeJt'19 f;j t,el oli;)'~dsmJa.ld if1tMW.C... NI'w~on liur'l.fiY I Ab$lr(l<:1
No ,He City ,~f c;t\)lfftV"iDe ~ ". Twr~N Cour1kV. r61lX~ cmdbeiog 0
S ,69Q<:rtt ll~rG~of .It)lld .~b~fng pttrt Of. lh~W , C , ,. New~~ 5ubd is
.~r"d \{01Ymil~S-42. l(ll 'hI P1at Rt"orl:1i 01 rOHof'll
I,P "R.. T "C. r ,'j ~ma"'1t piJf~Jt.I,'m-tl d'll~crH1t1d Om
BErnl~..IN(<t 01 Ul~ norlhf.lol' corf1(*,f oflhe Eml'rokl Poc~ ~dhri!HCti!\, ~f1
ookhHotlclhe Ci ~f. ~oKQ,vllt, '. T(lrffJrd CQ14rd', \ T~~qi.CS teC:rjrd~<!
iflV~ A. 9~1Q. f\R T. ,T li
TH6,CENort\ha9~4' ?!tq.Ea,I.. tJ tS~lhmc(1 Q( 314 ,3&, 'e~t to .'lJ pOH11 tor
~r~ ~" ,._nat ~~ dl~blinl n'iC OOfflt8t.1~1 (llIfnef' of !laid Y1', C,. Ne\"~f}n
S~"'.im'll .<l:$~ttl~' V~~.318""42" p.~ I, pre T .
lliENeE S~lJ'th (X)tl40!5~!I' Welt, ,~di$:l~~ 1310 ,,6 f~~t, ro 0 pOint tor
c::arMf .n.;lh~ nr!hf.lght~of ':"wGyme;f L"Q LI)(keH RJ.)OO ~
SQiJJh8911l W~ll.afJiih:n(;~ of! 19 , 12'
c~n. cil~ b~'~; t~ IQlirh~Qif (~r .:.1
THENCf Nl'.WFh OO.SI'f)O. E_l iJ 4t"tcft<:e (It j369 .81 5~cl Q('Itj rehifft~"9
b~tkh) poml of ba9Ioningcc:mh:lk1it1, t1n or~Q of t)c"*~.
(fl.(J I' {t ot