The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council-Agenda Packets-12/13/2005 Texa 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 100 MAIN STREET DECEMBER 13, 2005 5:30 P.M. - PRE COUNCIL AGENDA EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM THIRD FLOOR PC-1. Discussion of Appointing a Citizen Committee to review and develop a street Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) PC-2. Update of the Workforce Development Sustainability Project PC-3. Presentation of the Monthly Financial Report - November 2005 PC-4. Discussion of the December 13, 2005, City Council regular agenda items 6:20 P.M. - PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AND SH26 ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICANT INTERVIEWS REGULAR AGENDA 6:45 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D Sec. 551.071 - Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda Brian K. Meroney vs. City of Colleyville Sec. 551.071 - 100 MAIN STREET COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 503-1000 Sec. 551.071 - George Hencinski and Rose Mary Hencinski vs. David C. Banning, Tamara S. Banning, Tamara S. Banning and City of Colleyville, Texas Property Acquisition Economic Development Conference with City Manager and staff to discuss and deliberate commercial and financial information received from business prospect(s) the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand within the City; with which business(es) the City is pursuing and conducting economic development negotiations Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.087 - 7:30 P.M. - RESUME REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS INVOCATION: Neda Moayad, Colleyville Baha'i Community PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: City Attorney Matthew Boyle EXECUTIVE SESSION: 2. CONSIDER AND TAKE ANY ACTION(S) NECESSARY RELATIVE TO ITEMS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION - Resolution R-05-2629 3. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS OR PRESENTATIONS CONSENT: 4. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2630 - Consent Items: a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of December 6, 2005 b. Approval of an Interlocal Agreement with North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) for a drainage study for the Bear Creek watershed c. Approval of a donation of lockers for new firefighter personnel from B&W Cabinets, in the amount of $1,050 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1555 - Approval of a Special Use Permit for a contractor office with an outside storage yard on Lot 11, Block 1, of the Colleyville Industrial Park Addition located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard, Case Z-05-030 6. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1556 - Approval of a Special Use Permit to allow for horses on Lot 8, Block 7, of the Brighton Oaks Addition, located at 2705 Sherwood Lane, Case Z-05-031 7. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1558 - Approval of an Amendment to Chapter 14 - Engineering Design Standards of the Land Development Code regarding detention/retention ponds, Case G-05-012 8. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1559 - Approval of Zoning Change from AG Agricultural and R40 Single Family Residential to PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential on 3.756 acres, located at 5204 to 5212 Pool Road, Case Z-05-033 9. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2631 - Consideration of appointments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 10. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2632 - Consideration of appointments to the SH26 Advisory Committee 11. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2633 - Approval of support for the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition's Regional Transit Initiative CITIZEN COMMENTS: 12. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA This item is provided for citizens to address the City Council on matters not on the agenda. Each presentation will be limited to five (5) minutes. State law requires that before the City Council can discuss or take action on an item, the specific subject must be posted in advance. Therefore, while the City Council is interested in your comments, the City Council cannot enter into discussions or take action on your request at this meeting. REPORTS: 13. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES - November 14, 2005 ACTION/RESOLUTION: 14. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING COUNCIL AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2005- Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-05-2635 ADJOURNMENT 15. ADJOURNMENT I hereby certify the above agenda was posted on the bulletin boards at City Hall on Friday, December 9, 241;& 'p Cynthia Singleton, TRM City Secretary Any matter on this agenda may, at the discretion of the governing body, be opened for public comment and discussion. If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special accommodations, please advise the City Secretary at least 48 hours in advance at 817.503.1133, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. PRE COUNCIL cUYor ~ CC~m~nce ~ . AGENDA BRIEFING c.'X;:'!::> ............~ MEETING DATE: 12/13/05 CITY MANAGER 1q21--' ITEM#: PC-1 DEPARTMENT HEAD I FINANCE REVIEW j Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Discussion of appointing a citizen committee to review and develop a street Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Update This item is provided as requested by the City Council to allow further discussion concerning the format, issues and potential members to serve on a citizen's street CIP study committee. During the November work session, the general consensus of the City Council was for the committee to concentrate on project funding being provided by a debt financing. Additionally, the City Council discussion was for the focus of the group study to be concentrated specifically on roadway improvements only. During the 2006 Budget Worksession, the City Council identified an interest to appoint a citizen based committee to explore developing a street capital improvement plan for capital street improvements. Staff recommends that the committee be charged with developing also a financing plan based on the prioritization of projects. This Pre Council agenda item provides an opportunity for the City Council to begin the discussions on forming this committee and defining its goals and purpose. This work effort is in support of the 2006 Work Plan goal of improving streets within the City. The number of individuals serving on the committee is less critical than the credibility and background of the members. However, it is suggested that the committee have seven to thirteen members. Since the committee is singularly focused on developing only a proposed street CIP, a larger committee is not needed. In considering the committee membership, the City Council will want to consider members with a broad background related to developing a proposed street capital plan. To achieve this, it is recommended that the City Council consider among other background/profiles for membership: Banking/finance Business person Citizen Civil engineering Developer/Broker Former elected official General street contractor HOA representative Planning and Zoning Commissioner Urban planning/public administration In moving forward with this initiative, a supporting element missing will be not having currently a permanent Director of Public Works. Recognizing the attention given by the City Council, it Pre Council Briefing PC-1 Page 2 of 2 is recommended that the City Council proceed at least with discussing forming the committee, identifying the work assignments and developing the background/profile of members. It is anticipated that the Director position will be filled by January. Based on allowing adequate opportunity for the City Council to consider the various elements into forming the committee, and adjusting for the holidays, an item can be scheduled by the January 3 meeting for committee appointment. As part of the overall discussion, the City Council will need to begin a discussion on how the report will be used and action plan/calendar for implementation. Staff recommendation is that following the submittal of the report, the City Council engage in a series of community meetings and other avenues to ascertain the interests of the public in formalizing a street CIP and corresponding financing plan. Included with the briefing material is the presentation used during the November 1, 2005, Pre Council meeting. In addition, a draft resolution is provided for the appointment of the committee. Staff recommendation is for the City Council to select the appointment of members to this committee similar to the process for the Citizens Charter Review Committee by identifying members to ensure the appropriate backgrounds and familiarity of issues anticipated to be addressed by the committee. Attachments . Developing a Citizen Based Plan - PowerPoint . Draft Resolution Streets Capital Planning ~ '" 111___ .......1,2111 . => K ellDllI_d IDIdltIVI During the 2006 budget worksesslons, the City Coundlldentlfled a goal of Organizing a cItIZen based committee to review potential projecb for capital street Improvements to address both thoroughfares and residential streets. .. e...IU'. e....smt. D Seven to thirteen members D Be broad-based within the community, Including as example .au- . Former elected omdal . .usln_ ~ntaUve . HOA re~ntaUve . CIvil engineer . Urban planner . Developer IBroker . Planning. Zoning Commissioner . G_ral street contractor D Have Immediate credibility . .200B.IIlPln IiJW Enhant:e the maintenance and rec:onstruct1on of dty roads and streets. Objective: Develop a f1v. yea. street pllln IcIentlfylng flHllllng ._reo menta for botIt p.....ntIve m.mte...nca and reconstruc:tloll n..... for IMllghborhoocl streets and thoroughfllns and scheduling of In~ons. Funding opportunities Include, among others, _liable Fund Balanca cash, f_, capital bond f1nandng and new f_ 0. taxes. The pian will provide fOCUMCl attention to street Improv_ opportunities for :lOCHS. .. .r...... "ICess ~ ..-.+~ .--- I '" . .-.==-- "A. ._-- .-.. . ......,.~....... '---.w ............ ..... -- -- .. Se.., .,.. e...mel IJ Council determine date the report is due IJ Committee budget (engineering. surveying. etc.) IJ Aspects of the study . ::"=t".::Ic::" only or recommend specific . IncI..... trails . slclewallca . eo........ any tr.mc calming techniques (L.. tnfflc drcles) . Should any ~ landscaping be considered . LOok et only.str_ and 0. lnterMCtlona . ~:=any._ P._ of other cities for project . u.. cItIz_ surveying to gauge attitudes and support IJ Evaluate financing options . Pay.. you go, . Debt financing, and 0. . Current cash 1 . PUIIllc Imln.,. c Town Hall meetings . Geographic areas, or . Community wide D Special focus group meetings . HOA representatives . Realtors and brokers . CItizen volunteers c Telephone surveying ........ .......... ., boIII'" ~ ..... co..dI .. ... do.. IIUllel. c Determine to move forward at this time c Appoint Committee by December c Committee completes work c Council accepts report c Call for election and or Initiate funding within allowable limits by Council ... W.rlPlal c Initial joint meeting with Council c Committee work ..Communlty Input meetings . Evlliluate possible projects . Determln. flnandno capabilities . Select projects within funding ayailabillty . Community Input on projects and flnandng c Present summary findings tOCouncU. c Council conduct community meetings .. DlneO'1 2 RESOLUTION R-05-XXXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS ESTABLISHING AND APPOINTING A TEMPORARY STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANNING COMMITTEE, IDENTIFYING THE GOALS OF THE COMMITTEE, ESTABLISHING A DATE FOR THE REPORT SUBMITTAL, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to establish a temporary committee to evaluate and prioritize transportation infrastructure needs and identify possible funding by allocation of available cash balance and or through the issuance of long term debt; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires the temporary committee to consist of a broad representation of citizens from all areas of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. THAT a temporary Street Capital Improvement Planning Committee is formed. The Committee will be composed of members appointed by the City Council. Committee members shall be residents of the City of Colleyville. The following citizens are appointed: (Insert Committee Appointment Names) THAT is appointed as temporary Chair to convene the first meeting at which time a permanent Chair is to be selected by the Committee members THAT the City Manager and or his designee shall provide administrative support services to the temporary Street Capital Improvement Committee THAT the Committee shall use it best efforts to issue a final report to the City Council by ,200_. Upon issuance of the final report, the work of the committee will be completed and the terms of the Committee members will be concluded. THAT the Committee responsibilities will include, but not limited to the: 1. Promotion of the active involvement of the general citizenry through the use of, but not limited to focus groups, town hall meetings and surveys. Resolution R-05-XXXX Page 2 of 2 2. Review of streets and thoroughfares in need of reconstruction within the next ten years with the prioritization of proposed projects. 3. Evaluation of alternative traffic calming techniques such as traffic circles for enhancement to traffic management. 4. Identification of projects requiring asphalt or concrete reconstruction and corresponding costs including ROW, engineering and construction. See 6. THAT the Committee will have as its purpose the prioritization of the needs of the Colleyville community with respect to capital improvement projects funded by allocation of available cash balance and or the issuance of general obligation bonds and repaid through ad valorem taxes. Sec. 7. THAT this resolution is in effect immediately from and after its adoption. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. PASSED BY A VOTE OF THE DAY OF AYES, NAYS AND 200 ABSTENTIONS ON THIS ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor PRE COUNCIL (Q~n<1J AGENDA BRIEFING Il'....l\:; MEETING DATE: I ITEM#: 1 12/13/05 PC-2 CITY MANAGER : DEPARTMENT HEAD I FINANCE REVIEW I N/A Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Update of the Workforce Development Sustainability Project The purpose of this item is to provide a mid-project update of the Workforce Development Sustainability project from the Mejorando Group. The project began in October 2005, meeting with key personnel, the management team and several Council Members. Information was provided for analysis of workforce demographics, turnover, retirement, recruitment, retention and employee development. On November 29,2005, three focus groups were scheduled for the adoption of competencies, which must be demonstrated for excellent job performance at all levels in the organization. Patrick Ibarra with the Mejorando Group met with three employee groups: front-line employees, supervisors and department directors. The next phase consists of designing a succession plan that includes these competencies; as well as providing recommendations for enhancing employee selection, recruitment and retention efforts, and strategies and implementation methods for the succession plan. The project is scheduled for completion in early February, which provides plenty of time for planning and implementation for the FY07 budget. Attachment . Mid-Project Update, Patrick Ibarra, The Mejorando Group City of Colleyville Workforce Sustainability Plan Mid-Project Update Patrick Ibarra The Mejorando Group December 13, 2005 PrOQress to Date: Meetings were held with several key stakeholders including Mayor Kelly, Council members Hart, Hendler and Licata, city manager, assistant city manager and each department director. In addition, a group meeting of the city's executive management team was held. The purpose of these meetings was to gather perspectives about the future trends that will impact the delivery of city services, the work (Le. skills and knowledge) requirements that will be needed by members of the city's workforce to ensure the delivery of city services, and observations about current efforts at recruiting, retaining and developing employees. Several themes emerged from the meetings including: ~ Growth will continue and with it, increased need for city services. ~ Citizen expectations for high-quality public services will continue. ~ City budgets sensitive to natural ebb and flow of economic cycles. ~ Pace of technological change will accelerate. ~ Recruitment practices impacted by changing workforce demographics and local market conditions. ~ Retirements and attrition will continue throughout all city departments and at all levels. (Next phase of project targets which positions are the most crucial and a/so most vulnerable to turnover.) ~ A majority of training focuses on improving individual employee's technical capabilities. ~ Performance appraisal process is viewed as overly mechanical, cumbersome and offering insufficient attention paid to employee's individual goals. ~ Generally speaking, internal candidates pursuing promotions present strong performance records, but many lack supervisory/managerial experience. These themes are being combined with an analysis of several related sources including recent attrition data, workforce demographics, and city policy and procedures related to the recruitment, selection and retention of employees. The other major activity that's been completed is the adoption of competencies. Competencies are the combination of skills, smarts, attitudes and behaviors employees must demonstrate to perform at a high level. Essentially these competencies are the centerpiece of the succession planning program. These were established via meetings on November 29th with three groups of employees: front-line, supervisors and department directors. Interestingly, each group independently adopted the same three competencies: Communication, Focus on the Customer and Decision-Making. This would seem to reflect a consistent theme about employee performance at the City of Colleyville and that is for employees to achieve a high-level of performance they must execute each of those competencies regardless of their role in the organization. This sets-up the succession planning program very well. Other competencies groups adopted include Technical Knowledge, Building Teams, Facilitating Change and Initiating Action. Next Phase... The key activities involved in the next phase of designing the succession plan program are to: ~ Finalize the analysis of the data collected and identify the most critical positions (Le. city jobs) in both the short- and long-term that the succession planning program should spotlight. ~ Provide recommendations which focus on augmenting current efforts at Recruitment, Selection, and Retaining members of the workforce. ~ Offer suggestions to improve the process to select candidates for succession planning. The typical process to select candidates is via the performance appraisal process. ~ Provision of various pre-assessment (Le. 360-degree) tools for succession planning candidates to identify strengths and areas for improvement as they relate to competencies. ~ An Individual Training and Development Plan (ITDP), which outlines planned activities that will help narrow the gap between what the succession planning candidate can already do and what they should do to meet future work requirements of one or more positions, shall be recommended and a tool suggested. This instrument is to be used in tandem with the pre-assessment process for individuals. ~ Recommended strategies and methods available to help succession planning candidates improve their competencies and thus, prepare more effectively to assume greater responsibility. The schedule for the balance of the project, factoring in the upcoming holiday season, is as follows: ~ Submission of Draft report - January 9th ~ Comment period - January 9th to January 23rd (this time period allows the city manager and his designees ample time to review and comment on the draft report) ~ Submit Final Report and present to Mayor and City Council - February 7th ~ Provided training to city staff - TBD I would be pleased to answer questions you have regarding progress to date and/or the balance of work remaining on this project. PRE COUNCIL CC@n", AGENDA BRIEFING ;("x~$ MEETING DATE: 12/13/05 CITY MANAGER ITEM # : PC-3 DEPARTMENT HEAD I FINANCE REVIEW I Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: FINANCE SUBJECT: Presentation of the Monthly Financial Report - November 2005 General Fund The percentage of current year taxes collected is slightly behind that of November 2004. Sales tax revenue received in November was accrued in Fiscal Year 2005 per accounting rules as the revenue is collected by merchants in September. Thirty-one residential building permits were issued in November, as compared to sixteen issued in November 2004. Municipal Court revenues are down due to a fewer number of citations issued. The average amount expended by the departments at the end of November is 12.4% Utilitv Fund Water usage increased over the amount in November 2004 due to continued dry conditions. The average amount expended by the Utility Fund at the end of November is 5.1 %. Attachments . November 2005 Monthly Financial Report MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - NOVEMBER 2005 Current Taxes Delinquent Taxes Penalty & Interest $7,440,760 65,000 45,000 $421,739 16,464 3,571 $435,000 $6,583 $3,750 $451,733 19,353 4,783 -6.64% -14.93% -25.34% ...... ................................................................ ....................................................... ....................................................................... ...................................................... ml:;jtAGAgMAt~f{l;M:t~F.$:~t;~;t9.P: TXU Electric $814,003 $25,922 $0 $0 100.00% Tri-County Electric 76,000 0 0 0 0.00% TXU Gas 200,000 0 0 0 0.00% Southwestern Bell 107,165 0 0 26,913 -100.00% Verizon/Others 60,600 5,785 5,750 13,869 -58.28% Refuse/Recycling 99,000 11 ,486 6,188 12,831 -10.48% Cable TV 135,000 38,455 33,750 31,601 21.69% ...................................................................... ....................................................................... 'tdTAt~gANCHISE'tAXe$.:) ..................................................................... . ............................................................... .. .....-.-.-.-.....-.........-.-.-.-.-...-......... ................................................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................... ......................... .. ..................... ................. ...-.-.-.-...'.-.......'.'.......'.'.............'... .................................... ... ~t;~~;Z~::,:$.~1;~#~::::~~:~~~:. Sales Tax Mixed Beverage Tax $1,927,661 63,000 $0 18,944 $0 15,750 $0 10,926 0.00% 73.38% ........,........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ................................................... .]...O....T..A......t.......S...At........S...S......T..:AX............................ .... .. .. . .......... ....... ... . .... .... . ......... ...... . ... . .. . .... . .......... ......." .. ... ......... ::::..:::.....:::..::.;::.....:.:;:...:.:.:::.....:...:.:.:.....:::::..:..:;;...;;;..:;:;:;:::::::::::: ....................,.................-. ......................................... ........................................ ......................................... ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........................................ ......................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... ........................................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...................................... .. ..... ..... ............................... :11;~;iI~ Building $850,000 $214,410 $141,667 $139,038 54.21% Plumbing 145,919 28,090 24,320 24,211 16.02% Electrical 91,000 16,256 15,167 12,338 31.76% City License 55,000 7,670 9,167 5,310 44.44% Building Plan Review Fee 150,000 28,614 25,000 46,457 -38.41 % New Business 3,000 517 500 752 -31.25% Animal 2,000 28 333 60 -53.33% Sign Permit 7,500 780 1,250 1,060 -26.42% Fence Permit 7,000 700 1,167 850 -17.65% Fire Permits 9,000 1,850 1,500 1,450 27.59% Yp[Aw(;lm;N.$.~$:~:e~iI1ffi$i,::.::~1;~g9;!1! :.,:~@~~i~j~,:i@?Q;P1Q Fines False Alarms Library Fines $650,000 35,000 14,500 $59,947 50 2,587 $108,333 o 2,417 $75,512 o 2,389 -20.61 % 100.00% 8.29% .................................... .... ............................... :$~g;~~i'.:j11Q;!~q MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - NOVEMBER 2005 Re-zoning $11,059 $3,035 $1,843 $3,019 0.53% Plat Fee/Site Plan 15,000 1 ,450 2,500 3,529 -58.91 % Board of Adjustment 1,500 250 250 250 0.00% Sale of Material 2,000 1,318 333 668 97.31% Weed Mowing 3,740 200 623 150 33.33% Animal Impoundment 2,889 435 482 0 100.00% Ambulance 190,000 25,614 31,667 28,196 -9.16% Recreation Program 134,695 8,036 8,500 7,657 4.95% Non-Resident Fee Parks 18,530 7,640 9,265 4,050 -100.00% Field Use Charge 21,760 9,355 10,880 5,515 -100.00% Engineering & Inspection 100,000 208 16,667 35,383 -99.41 % Chgs & Reimbursements 6,000 30 1,000 2,070 -98.55% Colleyville Center Rental 183,000 30,995 30,500 34,060 -9.00% Library Building Rental 300 0 50 0 0.00% Lot Drainage Insp Fee 28,625 6,500 4,771 3,625 79.31 % .......................................................................... ]m[$~qHii@g$jtQR:~JRVj:qg: ............................................... ................................................................. ........................................................................ i1!~:I;mf::!:::::::$,~~;9~~:::::::11j~i:~~1: DARE Officer Reimb $77,565 $0 $0 $0 0.00% ..................................................................... ........................................................ mq[lf.giN!iR$qVJRNMime;g:::::~?ii. Sale of Surplus Property Interest Income Miscellaneous Use of Available Cash Celebrate Colleyville Revenue Antenna Lease $10,000 276,250 53,000 200,000 o 56,500 $0 1,409 5,832 o 2,500 9,045 $0 1,000 5,000 o o 7,000 $0 1,762 33,309 o 5,900 6,919 0.00% -20.03% -82.49% 0.00% -57.63% 30.73% mQT.A~Mi$Q~~.gQQ$:/ ............................... ................................ ............................... ................................ ............................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................... ................................ ............................... ................................ ........................... !gi7~ .................................... ::::U:~1:~~9PQ Transfer from Utility Fd $491,025 $0 $0 $0 0.00% mQT.A~jRAN$.F~R$.:::::::::..:::.:.:::'i~;gi mQmA~GgN~RAijfj9NQ:ggy~MJg$ .. .. ..... ................ ......... ..................................... ............................................. . .::::~ji;gl;.::::~MPjl;lj:l.::~~~~;~~1r:~j;Q~r;'~~.i~#~% MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - NOVEMBER 2005 TOTAL PERCENT FY 2006 THROUGH THROUGH INCREASE INCREASE BUDGET 11/30/2005 11/30/2004 (DECREASE) (DECREASE) % OF CURRENT TAX ROLL COLLECTED 99.0% 10.27% 10.72% -0.45% -4.20% RESIDENTIAL BLDG PERMITS 229 58 26 32 123.08% COMMERCIAL BLDG PERMITS 10 5 (4) -80.00% PLUMBING PERMITS 900 247 214 33 15.42% ELECTRICAL PERMITS 400 109 83 26 31.33% CITATIONS ISSUED 8,400 977 1,130 (153) -13.54% CITATIONS APPEALED 390 82 92 (10) -10.87% City Manager Building Inspection Economic Development City Council and Secretary Finance Legal Library Engineering Community Development Fire Police Parks Streets & Drainage Recreation Communications Colleyville Center Municipal Court Fleet Maintenance Building Services Information Services Capital Equipment Reserve fu~%iii*i~Hi$$:......? $631,924 311,744 166,280 508,295 482,769 103,323 505,819 475,021 261,357 3,352,077 3,202,334 1,175,444 1,606,457 289,046 144,709 343,276 243,630 187,188 247,898 169,848 155,840 371,863 :.~j4;gl;1#~ $91,371 39,599 28,830 43,807 66,906 4,507 73,699 75,445 40,136 515,256 481,897 107,665 106,872 17,603 18,043 44,062 21,156 27,427 28,800 14,128 o o ~j;~~?;gQg ..........: $96,052 39,832 29,150 44,222 71,305 8,610 30,349 79,329 41,216 519,250 482,184 108,555 114,846 18,788 18,531 44,523 23,072 27,648 30,100 15,017 o o .............................. .$1;~g;~r~ 14.5% 12.7% 17.3% 8.6% 13.9% 4.4% 14.6% 15.9% 15.4% 15.4% 15.0% 9.2% 6.7% 6.1% 12.5% 12.8% 8.7% 14.7% 11.6% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% $540,553 272,145 137,450 464,488 415,863 98,816 432,120 399,576 221,221 2,836,821 2,720,437 1,067,779 1,499,585 271,443 126,666 299,214 222,474 159,761 219,098 155,720 155,840 371,863 ..................~..............-....~ ................................. . ...............$.. .....2... ....1..38. .........'}.. .8...5. .... .. .......... .. ... .. .. J); MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - NOVEMBER 2005 Water Sales $6,967,199 $1,721,027 $1,041,596 $1,050,988 63.75% Sewer Sales 2,111,144 315,869 351,857 347,516 -9.11 % Sewer Installation 16,000 6,800 2,667 7,210 -5.69% Water Installation 44,800 13,240 7,467 5,600 136.43% Sewer Tie-on Charges 10,000 6,459 1,667 2,004 222.31% Engineering Charges 35,000 2.475 5,833 14,894 -83.38% Penalties 181,567 31,233 30,261 30,610 2.04% Miscellaneous 9,300 2,381 1,550 1,226 94.21% Interest Income $285,000 n' ......... ................. ............... ................................. ...... ................................... m9]e#.i,N9gM$::::::::.::::::::::~~;ij~;~H~t TOTAL PERCENT THROUGH THROUGH INCREASE INCREASE 11/30/2005 11/30/2004 (DECREASE) (DECREASE) GALLONS OF WATER SOLD 560,623,300 340,968,700 219,654,600 64.42% NUMBER OF WATER CUSTOMERS 8,290 8,098 192 2.37% Administration Billing Operations Debt Service Merit Adjustment Transfer to General Fund $195,692 280,775 6,540,854 1,356,738 67,975 491,025 $27,855 28,098 342,902 58,856 o o $28,934 29,918 356,804 58,856 o o 14.2% 10.0% 5.2% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% $167,837 252,677 6,197,952 1,297,882 67,975 491,025 PRE COUNCIL CC&C1l AGENDA BRIEFING 1(":.;<\::> MEETING DATE: 12/13/05 CITY MANAGER :fP ITEM#: PC-4 DEPARTMENT HEAD , FINANCE REVIEW N/A Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT : Discussion of the December 13, 2005, City Council regular agenda items This item provides the opportunity for the City Council to discuss the regular City Council agenda items. cce(/} AGENDA BRIEFING l(":-;<\$ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: i ITEM#: 12/13/05 CITY MANAGER 1 DEPARTMENT HEAD ;)1' FINANCE REVIEW IN/A Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Executive Session - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.087 - Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda Brian K. Meroney vs. City of Colleyville George Hencinski and Rose Mary Hencinski vs. David C. Banning, Tamara S. Banning, Tamara S. Banning and City of Colleyville, Texas Property Acquisition Economic Development Conference with City Manager and staff to discuss and deliberate commercial and financial information received from business prospect(s) the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand within the City; with which business(es) the City is pursuing and conducting economic development negotiations RESOLUTION R-05-2629 A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION REGARDING EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2005 WHEREAS, following discussion in Executive Session, and in full accordance with the requirements of the Open Meetings Act, the City Council determines that the following action is in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the following actions of the City Council are hereby adopted and approved: a. THAT AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. APPROVED THIS DAY OF AYES, NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS. 2005, BY A VOTE OF ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor CITY COUNCIL CC@nCll AGENDA BRIEFING ;C'~a:; MEETING DATE: ITEM#: 12/13/05 3 CITY MANAGER i DEPARTMENT HEAD i FINANCE REVIEW! N/A Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS OR PRESENTATIONS RESOLUTION R-05-2630 A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION UNDER CONSENT ITEMS AT THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 13, 2005 WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Consent Items. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Consent Items as follows are hereby adopted: a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of December 6, 2005 b. Approval of an Interlocal Agreement with North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) for a drainage study for the Bear Creek watershed c. Approval of a donation of lockers for new firefighter personnel from B&W Cabinets, in the amount of $1,050 APPROVED ON THIS OF AYES, DAY OF NAYS AND 2005, BY A VOTE ABSTENTIONS. ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 6, 2005 The Pre Council meeting of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor David Kelly on December 6,2005, at 6:15 p.m. ROLL CALL: Councilpersons George Boll, Tony Licata, Rich Hendler, Tom Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Jon Ayers were present. Mayor David Kelly, City Manager Bill Lindley, Assistant City Manager Paul Frederiksen, Police Chief Tommy Ingram, Interim Public Works Director Chad Bartee, Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron, Budget and Administrative Services Manager Stephen Seidel, Communications Manager Mona Gandy, Management Intern Lorenzo Sanchez, Computer Technician Chris Pena, City Attorney Matthew Boyle and City Secretary Cynthia Singleton were also present. PC-1. Presentation of the NeighborWoods Tree Planting Program Management Intern Lorenzo Sanchez provided an overview of the Neighborhood Tree Planting Program and answered questions of the Council. Discussion ensued regarding the placement of the trees, future funding sources for the program, joint efforts with the Local Urban Forestry Council and the Metroport Teen Court program. Council requested that staff provide a map of locations for tree plantings. PC-2. Storm water Update Interim Public Works Director Chad Bartee provided a storm water update, the process for obtaining a general permit authorizing discharges from small municipal separate storm sewer systems into surface water and answered questions of the Council. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 Discussion ensued regarding potential fees, the purpose of the permit and methods of identifying permit violations and educating the public regarding program requirements. PC-3. Presentation of the Economic Development Quarterly Report There was no discussion of this item. PC-4. Discussion of the December 6,2005, City Council regular agenda items There was general discussion regarding Item 8, related to the request by the applicant to withdraw the item. There being no further business, Mayor David Kelly declared the meeting adjourned at 6:53 p.m. The regular meeting of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor David Kelly on December 6, 2005, at 6:57 p.m. ROLL CALL: Councilpersons George Boll, Tony Licata, Rich Hendler, Tom Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Jon Ayers were present. Mayor David Kelly, City Manager Bill Lindley, Assistant City Manager Paul Frederiksen, Police Chief Tommy Ingram, Police Lieutenant Rodney Ingram, Sergeant Tom Schneider, Fire Chief Mike Johnston, Interim Public Works Director Chad Bartee, Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron, Community Development Coordinator Chris Fuller, Human Resources Director Kelly Cooper, Library Director Mary Rodne, Adult Services Librarian Erica Gill, Parks and Recreation Director Monica Walsh, Budget and Administrative Services Manager Stephen Seidel, Communications Manager Mona Gandy, Computer Technician Chris Pena, City Attorney Matthew Boyle and City Secretary Cynthia Singleton were also present. 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D Sec. 551.071 - Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda Property Acquisition Property - Proposed Sale of Land - 5400 Bransford Road Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.072 - 2 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 Sec. 551.087 - Economic Development Conference with City Manager and staff to discuss and deliberate commercial and financial information received from business prospect(s) the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand within the City; with which business(es) the City is pursuing and conducting economic development negotiations Mayor Kelly explained that the Executive Session had been called in accordance with the Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D, Section 551.071, Legal, Section 551.072, Property and Section 551.087, Economic Development. He further explained that there would be no decisions made or action taken during this time. The meeting was recessed at 6:57 p.m. and reconvened at 7:35 p.m. The invocation was given by Councilman Tony Licata and City Attorney Matthew Boyle led the Pledge of Allegiance. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 2. CONSIDER AND TAKE ANY ACTION(S) NECESSARY RELATIVE TO ITEMS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION - Resolution R-05-2626 There was no action taken on this item. 3. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS OR PRESENTATIONS Mayor Kelly announced that the second City Council meeting in December has been rescheduled to December 13, 2005. Mayor Kelly, on behalf of the City Council, expressed appreciation for the planning efforts of the ih annual Celebrate Colleyville event by the Celebrate Colleyville Steering Committee members Jamie Thibodeaux, Linda Baker, Ed Baker, Leslie Frazier, Stanley Hall, Allison Hinman, Michael Muhm, Richard Myers, Judy Myre, Mike Taylor and Tom Westerman and Mayor Pro Tem Jon Ayers, Council liaison to the Committee, Communications Manager Mona Gandy, Parks and Recreation Department staff, Police and Fire personnel and Public Works Department staff. Councilman Hendler commended the Lions Club for hosting the Breakfast with Santa event. Mayor Kelly invited the public to attend the Metro Cinema/IMAX groundbreaking ceremony to be held December 8,2005, at 11 :30 a.m. at Colleyville Town Center. 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 Mr. Steve Banta, Verizon Group President of the Northwest and Southwest Region and Bob Curtis, Director of External Affairs presented a donation, on behalf of the Verizon Foundation, of $20,000 to Carol Wollin and Susan Taylor on behalf of the Friends of the Colleyville Public Library for the purchase of computers and carts for a computer learning center in the Colleyville Public Library. Ms. Carol Wollin expressed gratitude to the Mayor and the City Council for the opportunity to make this presentation. Ms Wollin spoke regarding the benefits of a computer learning center and expressed appreciation to the Verizon Foundation for the donation of $20,000, in addition to three previous donations for a total of $69,230, to the Friends of the Colleyville Public Library. Library Director Mary Rodne expressed appreciation to the Verizon Foundation for the generous donations and to the Friends of the Public Library for their support of the Colleyville Public Library. Mayor Kelly presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Mr. Jason Guanlao, proprietor of Ambiance Accents. Mr. Guanlao expressed appreciation to the community for the support and recognition. Mayor Kelly presented Certificates of Recognition and Appreciation, for years of service, to City employees John Schanot, Erica Gill, Chris Pena, Tommy Ingram, Robert Stewart, Tommy Schneider and Rodney Cunningham and recognized those employees unable to attend: Chad Beasley, Justin Doegey, Amy Shelley, Chris McCord, Deon Dumas, Don Baker, Dorcas Kirk, Sammie Bolling, Bill Hudgins, Kevin Maddux, James Watkins and David Majors. CONSENT: 4. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2627 - Consent Items: a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of November 15, 2005 b. Approval of a temporary asphalt sidewalk on McDonwell School Road c. Approval of a donation of labor and materials, by The Lawn Firm, Inc., for a project at Sparger Park Mayor Kelly read Resolution R-05-2627 in its entirety. Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing. 4 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. Parks and Recreation Director Monica Walsh reported that the proposed donation of labor and materials by The Lawn Firm, Inc., is valued at approximately $3,000 and provided information regarding the Sparger Park project planned by the Garden Club. Mayor Pro Tem Ayers moved to approve Resolution R-05-2627, with the modifications to the minutes as provided by the City Secretary, and commended Mr. Fred Monks and Mr. Tommy Monks of The Lawn Firm, Inc., for the generous donation of labor and materials. Councilman Hendler seconded the motion. Ayes: Councilpersons Boll, Licata, Hendler, Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Ayers Nays: None Mayor Kelly declared the motion carried The City Council unanimously agreed to consider Item 8 at this time. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1554 - Approval of a Zoning Change from AG Agricultural to R40 Single Family Residential on Lot 1, Block 1 of the Newgren Addition located at 200 John McCain Road, Case Z-05-029 Mayor Kelly read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1554. Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing. There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Ayers moved to approve Ordinance 0-05-1554. Councilman Boll seconded the motion. Ayes: Councilpersons Boll, Licata, Hendler, Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Ayers Nays: None Mayor Kelly declared the motion carried. 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 6. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1555 - Approval of a Special Use Permit for a contractor office with an outside storage yard on Lot 11, Block 1, of the Colleyville Industrial Park Addition located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard, Case Z-05-030 Mayor Kelly read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1555. Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron provided an overview of the request for rezoning, the proposed ordinance and reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the request by a unanimous vote. Mr. Brad Land, 813 Holly Bridge Court, Keller, Texas stated that Mr. LeBaron accurately represented his intentions for this facility and was present to answer questions of the Council. Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing. There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. 7. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1556 - Approval of a Special Use Permit to allow for horses on Lot 8, Block 7, of the Brighton Oaks Addition, located at 2705 Sherwood Lane, Case Z-05-031 Mayor Kelly read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1556. Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron provided an overview of the request for the Special Use Permit and stated that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request with certain conditions. Ms. Linda Collins, 2705 Sherwood Lane, applicant, spoke regarding the country atmosphere in a city setting and the quality of life in Colleyville and regarding fly control and odors associated with the boarding of horses, safety concerns and the quantity of land necessary for boarding horses. Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing. Ms. Kathy Hadley, 204 Timberline North, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance and regarding the quantity and maintenance of land required for boarding horses. There were no others present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. Ms. Linda Collins, applicant, answered questions of the Council. 6 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 Councilman Licata requested that staff provide the square footage of the area designated by the Planning and Zoning Commission, for keeping the horses. Councilman Hart requested that staff provide a video of the property with the permission of the applicant. 8. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1557 - Approval of a Zoning Change from R40 Single Family Residential to CPO Professional Office with a Special Use Permit for a privately operated school on Lot 1, Block 3, of the Southgate Addition located at 909 Cheek Sparger Road, Case Z-05-027 Mayor Kelly read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1557. Due to a Conflict of Interest, Mayor Kelly recused himself and requested that Mayor Pro Tem Ayers preside during consideration of this item. Mayor Pro Tem Ayers stated that the applicant requested that this item be withdrawn and moved that the City Council comply with the applicant's wishes and allow Ordinance 0-05-1557 to be withdrawn. Councilman Hart seconded the motion. Ayes: Councilpersons Boll, Licata, Hendler, Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Ayers Nays: None Mayor Pro Tem Ayers declared the motion carried. Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron stated that when an application is withdrawn by an applicant, the application has no standing, and the applicant must resubmit the application, which triggers the process of hearings by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. Mayor Pro Tem Ayers stated that if Council had taken action on this item, there would have been a public hearing tonight and a second public hearing at a future City Council meeting and after the public hearings, if Council voted to deny this ordinance, then the applicant could have resubmitted the request with minor modifications. Mr. LeBaron stated that notification of the withdrawal will be provided to the property owners that received notification of the request for the zoning change. 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 9. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1558 - Approval of an Amendment to Chapter 14 - Engineering Design Standards of the Land Development Code regarding detention/retention ponds, Case G-05-012 Mayor Kelly read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1558. Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron provided an overview of the amendment to Chapter 14 - Engineering Design Standards of the Land Development Code regarding detention/retention ponds and reported that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval by a unanimous vote. Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing. There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. CITIZEN COMMENTS: 10. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Ms. Kathy Hadley, 204 Timberline North, spoke regarding the health and care of the trees located in front of Market Street and regarding the requirement for protective fencing. City Manager Bill Lindley stated that the protective fencing is placed around trees during construction projects. REPORTS: 11. COLLEYVILLE CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MARKETING SUBCOMMITTEE MINUTES - April 11, 2005 COLLEYVILLE CENTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES - August 29, 2005 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES - September 13, 2005 COLLEYVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD MINUTES - October 10, 2005 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 24, 2005 There was no action taken on this item. ACTION/RESOLUTION: 12. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING COUNCIL AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF DECEMBER 6, 2005 - Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-05-2628 8 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 6, 2005 This Resolution was not needed. ADJOURNMENT 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the City Council, Councilman Boll moved to adjourn. Mayor Pro Tem Ayers seconded the motion. Ayes: Councilpersons Boll, Licata, Hendler, Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Ayers Nays: None Mayor Kelly declared the meeting adjourned at 8:39 p.m. APPROVED THIS AYES, DAY OF NAYS AND 2005, BY A VOTE OF ABSTENTIONS. Minutes taken and prepared by: Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary 9 CITY COUNCIL (Ce'" AGENDA BRIEFING IC'X":; MEETING DATE: 12/13/05 CITY MANAGER I ITEM#: 4b DEPARTMENT HEAD !C~Bo~ RESOLUTION # : R-05-2630 FINANCE REVIEW I Vll \ . . l PrevIous Action: None DEPARTMENT: ENGINEERING SUBJECT : Approval of an Interlocal Agreement with North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) for a drainage study for the Bear Creek watershed - by consent Reading and Public Hearing The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) is preparing a Bear Creek Project Plan for the Bear Creek Watershed. As part of this plan, NCTCOG has contracted with Halff Associates to develop a fully urbanized 100 year floodplain for Big Bear Creek. Since a large part of the watershed for Big Bear Creek is in Colleyville, this study will provide useful information for future development and floodplain administration. The rapid development in Northeast Tarrant County has altered the Big Bear Creek floodplain. A floodplain update based on build out conditions will help more accurately determine which residences and other structures are at risk for future flooding, and help develop a more detailed capital improvement program for streets and drainage facilities. Financial Impact Colleyville and the other 13 cities and governing bodies in the Bear Creek Watershed will share the cost of this project based on percentage of land area within the watershed and frontage along Big Bear Creek. Colleyville's share will be $8,494. NCTCOG has received signed agreements from 6 of the 14 entities planning to participate. NCTCOG has also received verbal commitments from all entities. All projects from the 1995 drainage bond funds are complete. The fund balance is $177,000 from interest income. Recommendation Approval Attachment . Interlocal Agreement THE STATE OF TEXAS THE COUNTY OF TARRANT BEAR CREEK WATERSHED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THIS INTERLOCAL Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into between the North Central Texas Council of Governments ("NCTCOG"), a political subdivision of the State of Texas acting by and through its Executive Board; and , a local government duly incorporated or established under the Constitution and the laws of the State of Texas acting by and through its governing body; and other government entities consenting hereto, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas Government Code, (the "Act"), cities, counties, special districts and other legally constituted political subdivisions of the State of Texas are authorized to enter into interlocal contracts and agreements with each other regarding governmental functions and services as set forth in the Act; and, WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement recognize that the Bear Creek Watershed is a unique regional resource in the heart of a growing Metroplex; that local governments and other community organizations are responsible for the overall health, safety, and welfare of their citizens and thus must take the lead as stewards of the watershed; and that the actions of upstream and downstream communities within the watershed directly affect each other; and, WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement support the pursuit of a COMMON VISION for the Trinity River, which includes objectives of flood damage reduction, transportation, greenway, waste management, conservation, development and other appropriate elements to achieve a safe, clean, enjoyable, natural, and diverse Trinity River. WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement have been cooperating and intend to continue cooperating with each other, in pursuit of a Bear Creek Project Plan for the Bear Creek Watershed; and, WHEREAS, local government parties are participating members of the National Flood Insurance Program and recognize the importance of accurate floodplain mapping and other tools to assist in making sound development decisions; and, WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement understand that entering into this Agreement in no way obligates any party to implement any portion of the project, and that separate agreements may be negotiated and executed; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, agree and bind them as follows: ARTICLE 1. - DEFINITIONS For purposes of this Agreement BEAR CREEK WATERSHED - means the area of Tarrant County and Dallas County in which all land drains to Bear Creek, upstream of the point where Bear Creek joins the Trinity River West Fork. The Watershed begins in northern Tarrant County in the southeastern portion of the City of Haslet and continues in a general southeast direction until reaching the Trinity River West Fork in western Dallas County in the City of Irving. The Watershed consists of two sub- watersheds, Big Bear Creek and Little Bear Creek, which join on the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport property, forming Bear Creek. BEAR CREEK PROJECT PLAN - means the plan that will provide the framework to develop the hydrologic and hydraulic technical data for the Bear Creek Watershed. BEAR CREEK PROJECT COST SHARING - means the arrangement negotiated and executed by the North Central Texas Council of Governments, as Project Plan sponsor and acting on behalf of the participants, each sharing the cost of conducting the project as outlined in the detailed Bear Creek Project Plan. BEAR CREEK WATERSHED COMMITTEE - means the committee that provides technical and policy guidance to NCTCOG regarding the Bear Creek Watershed Project Plan, being comprised of one member and a designated alternate from each of the participating parties. TRINITY RIVER COMMON VISION - means the cooperative management and comprehensive approach taken to create intergovernmental partnerships by NCTCOG and other entities to address flood damage reduction, transportation, greenway, waste management, conservation, development and other appropriate elements to achieve a safe, clean, enjoyable, natural, and diverse Trinity River. ARTICLE 2. - PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT The purpose of this Agreement is to accomplish the following objective: Develop hydrologic and hydraulic technical data to delineate a Bear Creek urbanized 1 DO-year floodplain through Tarrant and Dallas Counties, an effort that is consistent with the objectives of Trinity River COMMON VISION. The Bear Creek Project Plan designed to accomplish these purposes is attached to this Agreement as "Exhibit A" Provide an administrative structure through this Agreement for NCTCOG to execute the Bear Creek Project Plan in association with NCTCOG's consultant, to obtain cost-sharing funds from the participating parties to accomplish the Project Plan, and establish the mechanism to obtain necessary funding and in-kind services from other parties to this Agreement. The Bear Creek Project Cost Sharing is attached to this Agreement as "Exhibit B." ARTICLE 3. - ADMINISTRAIVE AND POLICY STRUCTURE The administrative and policy structure under this Agreement is as follows: A Bear Creek Watershed Committee will provide technical and policy guidance for the cooperative project and make recommendations to NCTCOG; each party that provides funding support to the project, except NCTCOG, will be entitled to appoint one member and a designated alternate to the Bear Creek Watershed Committee. NCTCOG will be the administrative agent under this Agreement, will contract the technical services outlined in Exhibit "A" to NCTCOG's consultant, and will coordinate the work program with the Bear Creek Watershed Committee. Unless modified by the Bear Creek Watershed Committee, each participating party will contribute it's share to NCTCOG for funding and allowable in-kind support as provided in Exhibits "A" and "B." The cost sharing arrangement is based on the percentage of land area within the Bear Creek Watershed and frontage along Big Bear Creek "main stem." Fifty percent of the cost share will be invoiced by NCTCOG upon execution of the Agreement and will be payable within thirty (30) days after receipt, while the remaining cost share will be invoiced upon submittal of the land use data to NCTCOG as outlined in Exhibit "A." This Agreement is recognized as a supplemental level of service, and is not intended to duplicate or diminish the products, assistance, representation, or services received by participating entities through NCTCOG membership. In accordance with the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the parties will make payment for services rendered under this Agreement from available current revenues. ARTICLE 4. - RENEWAL AND AMENDMENTS This Agreement will be effective for one year from the effective date of the Agreement, and will be considered automatically renewed for each succeeding year. A party may withdraw from this Agreement, through a vote of its governing body, provided it has notified the Executive Director of NCTCOG of such action in writing at least 60 days before its intended withdrawal date. Amendments may be made to this Agreement upon the approval of the governing bodies of all parties to this Agreement. ARTICLE 5. - SEPARABILITY CLAUSE If any provision in this Agreement of any application hereof shall be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions and the applications shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. ARTICLE 6. - GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Texas. ARTICLE 7. - INDEMNIFICATION It is agreed that no party to this Agreement shall be responsible for the acts of another party to this agreement, and each party participating herein indemnifies, releases and holds all other participating parties harmless for all acts of its own officers, officials, agents and employees acting hereunder, to the full extent permitted by law. ARTICLE 8. - MISCELLANEOUS It is expressly understood and agreed that in the execution of this Agreement, neither the parties to this Agreement nor NCTCOG waive, nor shall be deemed to waive, any immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to each against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions. The undersigned officers and/or agents are properly authorized to execute this contract on behalf of parties hereto, and each hereby certifies to the other that any necessary resolutions extending such authority have been duly passed and are now in full force and effect. By entering into this Interlocal Agreement, the parties do not create any obligations, express or implied, other than those set forth herein, and this Agreement shall not create any rights in parties not in signatories hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and their respective seals to be hereunto affixed and attested, as of the date and year noted below. (Signature) (Signature) (Printed Name) (Printed Name) (Title) (Title) (Local Government Participant) North Central Texas Council of Governments Date: Date: Attachments: Exhibit A - Bear Creek Project Study Plan Exhibit B - Project Study Cost Sharing Agreement Exhibit A: Bear Creek Project Plan Proiect Obiective: NCTCOG will coordinate the development of technical data to delineate a Bear Creek urbanized 1 OO-year floodplain through Tarrant and Dallas County. Halff Associates: $53.000 (Hvdroloov: $10.335 and Hvdraulics/Mappino: $42.665) · The Bear Creek hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) models being developed for FEMA for the Tarrant County FIS will be the baseline condition models utilized for Tarrant County. · Bear Creek H&H modeling for the Cities of Irving and Grand Prairie will be the baseline condition models utilized for the Dallas County portion of this study. . Hydrologic modeling will cover the entire Bear Creek watershed, including the drainage areas of Big Bear Creek and Little Bear Creek. . Hydraulic modeling and floodplain mapping will be for the Big Bear Creek "main stem" only . Hydrologic loss rates will be updated to represent future land use conditions. The routing and lag times in the existing Bear Creek hydrologic model will remain unchanged for future condition hydrology. . Peak discharges will be computed for the future 1 OO-year frequency event only. . A future 100-year flood profile will be computed utilizing the existing HEC-RAS hydraulic model. Changes will not be made to the existing hydraulic parameters, cross section geometry, and f1oodway. . The future 100-year floodplain coverages will be mapped in Tarrant and Dallas Counties as the concluding step. NCTCOG: $37.000 (Hvdroloov: $18.500 and Hvdraulics/Mappino: $18.500) . NCTCOG is the primary contractor and will provide overall coordination/management for the project including engaging consultant services. In fulfilling these obligations, NCTCOG will utilize the Bear Creek Watershed Committee for technical and policy guidance. . The future land use plan of each participating community will be complied by NCTCOG and used to develop an acceptable future (2050) land use dataset for the entire watershed. . NCTCOG will assist in the generation and/or presentation of GIS-based maps and graphics for use during meetings. NCTCOG will also provide GIS assistance with respect to the following data layers: digital orthophotography; digital topography; digital elevation models; vector files such as roads and political boundaries; hydrologic features such as streams and watershed boundaries; soils; Census data and demographic data. . NCTCOG will consider accepting specific land use products in the required digit formats from communities as part of their participation for up to 10% of the participant's cost share. Total Proiect Cost: $90.000 (Hvdroloav: $28.835 and Hvdraulics/Mappina: $61.165) Exhibit B: Bear Creek Project Cost Sharing Bear Creek Project Cost Breakdown Jurisdiction Hydrologic Cost Share Hydraulic I Mapping Cost Share Total Cost (% of Acres in Watershed) (% of frontaQe on "main stem" of BiQ Bear Creek) Share Unincorporated Tarrant County 2.53% 2.97% $2,545 Bedford 2.38% 0.00% $685 Colleyville 13.84% 7.36% $8,494 Euless 6.55% 0.00% $1,888 Fort Worth 5.84% 13.27% $9,800 Grand Prairie 4.32% 10.40% $7,610 Grapevine 7.40% 12.71% $9,908 Haslet 0.15% 0.00% $44 Hurst 1.08% 0.00% $312 Irving 9.62% 12.55% $10,450 Keller 15.48% 21.71% $17,745 North Richland Hills 4.70% 0.00% $1,354 South lake 9.77% 4.77% $5,734 DFW Airport 16.34% 14.25% $13,429 Total $28,835 $61,165 $90,000 city Of ~ CITY COUNCIL CC~~~nce il:x~$ AGENDA BRIEFING MEETING DATE: I 12/13/05 ITEM #: i 4c RESOLUTION #: i R-05-2630 CITY MANAGER I i DEPARTMENT HEAD I I FINANCE REVIEW I Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: FIRE SUBJECT: Approval of a donation of lockers for new firefighter personnel from B&W Cabinets in the amount of $1,050 - by Consent Reading and Public Hearing The FY 2006 budget includes three (3) new firefighter positions. In order to provide accommodations for the new personnel, three (3) personal lockers must be added in the quarters of the Fire Station on Hall Johnson Road. As staff was obtaining quotes for the purchase of additional lockers in October, B&W Cabinets submitted their quote and expressed a desire to donate the lockers to the Fire Department. Their estimate of the lockers is $1,050. Financial Impact None Recommendation Approval Attachment: . Donation Form from B& W Cabinets 12/138/213135 14:29 8174289495 COLLEV\II LLE ST 3 PAGE 131 ,;, 21 a~/ A:OO? 1~: 0[\ tl 7 ....~~~I,.. 29J ":: ,~oL..E','',/IL:..E f']f;'l:c DIY P'IG€ 01 em ~ COlLE'v'VILlE DON,t.1ION AND -nw..FER OF TIlLE .~ffl~~ .,.by give, asat;n, trBn$fer. anc e rna~f)l1a.s desetlbed bell1W: ~ ~---:-f.,.~ !".-o I/...-$" Flindl~~ ~ C{"(v I c>~~~) A-M.~ lA~ . .,..." I Stipul8tiOM (11 MY) ~ AJoJJ e . ..... 4l.- .4. --~_.'"' -_.~/ S"ecifiQltionllPlansfPh~~nnWII COlt to CIty; AttIC'*' ___~..___.___ ~M~,<..b (!A ('! \ hive I'8Id lna underst1tl'ld 1h, OcnBtion Policy of th. C'I\y of CoUeyvll1e. and aec.~'t the provIsions cJ :hat I)OIicf. /7 ~ S'~'I~~~~')~~ <' --=:-~~f Add,....A f Oonor ~~, ~~ ( . ~ ' -..---- ---..-.-. cIty _\ 'j...fftJJttJ-__n. . _ s.... ~...-..-- ZIP~gO ___ Pl'\o~ Nul""lbera; HCll'ne _. _... .___ OffIce ..2L'l.:l!K5.::-"CJt;PId.- ~eCE IVEO by o.p~t or -.. . '.- 8c8nr.----.. By _ .._... .. __.._ o.t. .__ Cou.,~t ~pt't)~.l 0___-_ R.oIullon/Ol'OltlanCII Nl.iITl~r_____v__ .ACCEFT~O for ano Ir, behlllf of the City of Coll.~h By __...___.___ _ Mayor. City of Collevvll/e __ 0#\1' _____.__ .._ A~$~onNumbe~~____ Z{)(l~ S,13"l J 9~:> _II ~tL~gi.il~ IVJ 01 :.1 gOO~/VO!Zt ._----,_._--"--'~~..,- 84 I j I 1 I 1 I 1 :J 1 I 1 J 1 1 I 1 I J CO 1 ~t- .1 I J J I I J 1 I I I I I I I I J .. I I I I I I _. 1 ,.,;. QJ ...,.- (L') ~ Q.) 1 ~ .s o ~. U fh JI ...... ~ ilL \ ~ o a> o .~ ~ u... ~\ CITY COUNCIL cc@rn", AGENDA BRIEFING 1<,'X:l$ MEETING DATE: ITEM#: ORDINANCE # : 12/13/05 5 0-05-1555 CITY MANAGER I DEPARTMENT HEAD, FINANCE REVIEW: Previous Action: 12/06/05 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: Approval of a Special Use Permit for a contractor office with an outside storage yard on Lot 11, Block 1, of the Colleyville Industrial Park Addition located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard, Case Z-05-030 Second Reading and Public Hearing Update 12/13/05 The correct vote by the Planning and Zoning Commission was for unanimous approval of this rezoning request and not 4-1 as stated in the December 6,2005 agenda briefing. First Reading and Public Hearing Brad Land is the prospective owner of a 0.89-acre vacant lot located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard. The property is zoned ML-Light Manufacturing and Mr. Land is requesting a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow outside storage of landscaping materials in conjunction with the operation of a landscaping contracting business. One letter in support of the request has been received and a copy of the letter is attached. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the request by a vote of 4 to 1, with special conditions, which are explained in this agenda briefing and incorporated into the proposed ordinance. The following are the issues associated with this request. Request. SUP for contractor office with an outside storage yard Proposed Use. Brad Land, the prospective owner of the property, has applied for a SUP to allow outside storage of landscaping materials on the property located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard. The applicant has submitted a letter addressing the request, which is attached to this agenda briefing. The property owner is aware of the SUP submittal and has co-signed the rezoning application. Existing Conditions. The property is currently vacant. The property is located within the ML-Light Manufacturing zoning district. A Special Use Permit is required for a contractor office with an outside storage yard in the ML-Light Manufacturing zoning district. Location. This is a 0.89-acre vacant lot located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1555 Page 2 of 3 Platting. The property is platted as Lot 11, Block 1, of the Colleyville Industrial Park Addition. Adjacent Zoning and Development. The surrounding property is primarily industrial, with the exception of a single family residential dwelling unit located to the south of the property. Property to the north, east and west is zoned ML-Light Manufacturing and is developed as nonresidential uses. The property to the south is zoned AG-Agricultural and is developed as a single family residence. The Master Plan designates the future use of this property for industrial development. Development Analysis. The applicant proposes to build an office and warehouse that will total 5,656 square feet. Illustrations of the proposed site plans and building elevations are included as attachments to this agenda briefing. Information provided by the applicant indicates that there will be no retail services provided at this location. The primary use of this facility will be classified as a contractor office with an outside storage yard. The applicant intends to use the yard for outside storage of landscape materials, including "trees, shrubs, mulch, compost, and different types of stone." Fencing and Screening. The applicant proposes to construct a six (6) foot tall cedar fence along the perimeter of the property. However, it should be noted that the Land Development Code requires an eight (8) foot tall fence along the southern property line where the ML-Light Manufacturing zoning district abuts residential uses. The applicant is aware of the eight (8) foot tall fence requirement, which has been incorporated into the attached proposed ordinance. Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future use of this area for industrial land uses. The proposed use is in compliance with the Master Plan. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are mostly developed as industrial uses, with the exception of a single family residence located to the south. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is nonresidential development. Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer services are available along adjacent rights-of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of utilities to the property, if necessary. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the 0.89-acre parcel is valued at $97,500. The estimated City property tax revenue for the undeveloped property is approximately $339 annually. The future property tax revenue would depend upon the value of the individual lot and the value of the building improvements on the property. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1555 Page 3 of 3 Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 11 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff has received one letter in favor of this request. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at the November 14, 2005 meeting and recommended approval, with the following conditions, by a vote four to one: 1. The portion of the perimeter fence located along the southern property line be eight (8) feet tall, per the Land Development Code. 2. No commercial vehicles may be parked in front of the building overnight. 3. The gate that will access the storage yard shall be constructed with solid screening materials. Recommendation Approval, as conditioned. Attachments · Zoning and Location Map · List of Property Owners Notified · Information and Drawings from Applicant · Letter in Favor of Rezoning Request · Ordinance 0-05-1555 Zoning and Location Map Z-05-030 Geneva Realty Management 1808 Industrial Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 1904 Industrial Ltd. PO Box 742346 Dallas, TX 75374 Small, Robert C Etux Sheila PO Box 1787 Colleyville, TX 76034 List of Property Owners Notified Sparks Southwest Inc. 1804 Industrial Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 Gore, Charles E Etux Vera 3905 Allendale St. Colleyville, TX 76034 Loftin, Stacey B Etux Ronda 6306 Wyatt Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 Dica Properties Ltd. 1812 Industrial Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 New Synergy Inc. 3901 Airport Fwy. Ste. 312 Bedford, TX 76021 Luers, Dennis R 1419 Thislewood Lane Grapevine, TX 76051 Horn, Billy J 1500 Royal Pkwy. Euless, TX 76040 Additional Self Storage LP 7411 Hines Place Ste. 100 Dallas, TX 75235 P.O. Box 93383 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 421-0884 FAX: (817) 251-0859 RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2005 AllScclpa Lawn ScmIicc2 Information and Drawings from Applicant PAr ... October 12, 2005 To: Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission and Colleyville City Council Subject: Special Use Permit for 1813 Industrial Boulevard My understanding is that for yard use of outside storage, a special use permit is required. I am applying for a special use permit for the property at 1813 Industrial Boulevard, Colleyville, Texas. The plan is to use this property for what is classified in the Colleyville Land Development Code as a Contractor Office with Yard. Statement of Planning Objectives: I operate/own a Landscape Installation and Maintenance Company. My company designs, installs, and maintains Sprinkler Systems and Landscapes. We serve commercial and residential clients in Colleyville and surrounding areas. My plan is to purchase the property at 1813 Industrial Boulevard and to build an office/warehouse for use by AllScapes Lawn Service. We will need the yard space that is shown on the site plan to store landscape materials for our installation use. I describe landscape materials as trees, shrubs, mulch, compost, and different types of stone. A cedar screening fence will be installed around the entire yard. The fence will be six feet tall with a two inch by eight inch cedar cap and a one inch by four inch cedar face trim board. There will be a sliding gate to access the yard that will automatically close upon entering or exiting the yard area. We will access the warehouse areas from the yard area. There will not be retail sales at this location. This location was chosen for the ease of access to our service areas. It appears to me, that my business use is permitted in this light manufacturing zoning area. Development Schedule: I am planning a January 1, 2006 start date for the construction schedule. Excavation of all soil work will begin immediately following permit approval. I feel that the entire project will take approximately six months to complete. As soon as construction is completed and certificate of occupancy is granted, AllScapes Lawn Service will occupy and operate from this location. Economic Development Information: The total square feet of the building will be approximately 5656 square feet. The property is currently appraised at the Tarrant County Appraisal District Office at $ 97,500 for the year 2005. This appraisal was reduced from the 2004 value of $ 117,000. Upon completion of the improvements and construction that I am proposing, I would anticipate the appraised value at approximately $600,000. Traffic Impact Analysis: The proposed use of this site by AllScapes Lawn Service will not generate more than 1000 vehicle trips per day. Sincerely, Brad Land AllScapes Lawn Service (817) 688-8824 1I&/7412E!l5 12: 38 ,811292l:j4<l1 ,.._ ""-kNt.V\.)oC:i r-....Ut. 1'31 ro ALAMO "rn:Ll: <XW.aJl1' c;,. 'CV-OO~9380'j~ :fM.s i. to a.rtirll ~hae file b.~, tb.i/J lUte, 1Ilollfe .. c:a.:-~ul end "CC\Or.ace Gurv;!\;' on ~ gTO..:r.a ot ~M OZOPUr':l lo:aCed at 1813 1;:u1..f:.r~.1 SlvdiJ) tM Ci~y of Col1.l/~;le, :'arrant COUN2'Y, TEXAS a8Seri~ u EolJgw, tot: lLlIlo.~lc]. "CcHayvilJ.1.nCi...trul f.t...... AJI AnDI'l'lOU !I'O 2'l!i' Cit!' of C".ll~!1?i':le, 2'a.rClIllt. C~, 2'!'US, ..ccor~ing to the Fl.a: of salflli reoor"e~ in Vol. J8"-14~., :>iJ<;/e 33 !"laC ~ord8 of tar....."'t cot1l'n', :!'UAS INOU$TE IAL 8CUiEVdeD . . oM <~.....;~~~ - 6:>' ~."tv. I ,~~ PJ(e",,,,,,r.. P.~A. tJf:)~'tO~~. 1'JO.OO ~/ ----- ~t ?-''U7 (""':J -() I ...I G"I WI . I ,- ~t bl,..O<.I.. 1.1iJe- ~'l!;I.~r: '1 ~L ! @' ~ ~ S ~ $ .. wr 11- ~t.OG~ 1 ( VACAl--l\ 1..01') ~ ~ ,!l.l 1- - ~ . c ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ o ~ ~ c1 ~ 'it' ~/' i - ~-----,--..,..-- . /'!i.C' vnL/,y ',ElSe~t.~~&.- , ~M@"".""~ ~r "t>t:I''Zo . W, I'=' .CO .A(,'tUAl,'~Wl,,111~W. fJrq. ~I ~'- . >- .t. .J.~~\J~'~.~1'l":o,~,0.l&."',c...i'. ..", p...a~ .....l'fIOn s.. t~l.Ie, ::Ol'rect JIM Itcr:Ui..,;. Npr..ent~"liIo;,:if t1li prop.ny oil' cleti!rlllJn.d b!, $U~lI, t:.btI 11_11 aIlei' d.!._mJ!ol28 0: sd.d prope~t.!1 belz,g as :indir:llte' by the 1'....1:, th. SJ %~ Joeat:io" .me t:r;~ cd };ujld~ns.r; aJl4 hllPrOYerllll'llU .re as shaWl, ..U .t~rO""Nnl:. bli!nl:" wit.h1n t:hl1 bCIl."Icf4!'!e. Q~ t:lle p~rtlJ, _pt oil' ~ ,..t: ~CJc frt>>! the proprtr.; lintl/J tal! 4t s tll'-:=5 in4i.colt':ed, and ~~t the! 1fi.s;tarKe rreD the 12..:11.1: i.n-c.r_"ti.">g ,ern!; 0: rc.~ 1.11 oil. iJb'JHll Con Mid Pl.t. 2'here Uti TIO "ncL'Oltchrw,Df:,... confJi.r;:l:s, prot.rlJ~am., or "pp..a,r:t Q,uerrents, exciiI/?c .JS;$."~. sc;.u /'. * I' . Z,5G~1ID OAVIO C. MOAK SmrVCY'tJlr$ IN&. IlSOitTWD I'UllL;! SIMVEl'CR p.o. 1I01I 103<1 2". U \I 1f\JItST, TOCAs CA;t 01'~'lo)o,o" I'I',~:,,, . . FOUNt> S'!'lIBL ROfJ o . SE'J.' srBEL /foe ~ .FOUN/) PIPS c: .t*JNP ;,cIS D'.Me S~ -'<'.-. .POwt;R 01/ n;uPBOn~ ::.INE ..,- . F"SNer: 'Y!'E 1 1 . d ~??~-r82-~18 'Oyl 'sa~etOOS~8 ~ J~Jl~d RECE1Vf::O OCT 1 3 Z005 Pef ............. Cf ........, \'- ?'-' ~ \'- \\. ~ :\ \ ~ r dSl:SO so 6~ unr -' ~~Qi ~ ~~~ ~~i ~ ~~~ :s~l- :I: (i' -~ t (\ ~ I~~. ~~ r:~~ ~~. ~ i;! ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i -I 8 ~ R ' I I i bil (\ ii iJaU 't' ,In IJ ~ il. a i . III! ~;< 5 ~ 1- ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~lln ~ I ~ U IiI C;. I II ~ 2: .'.~ I II ~ .................... - I i \}) IJ lHJ\ ~m ~(j\ ~F /iZ Ii~ m ~ r m m < \J )> ~ 11 5 r )> ~ Z Z Cl 11 l \ll ~ (j\ Z I i ~ < ~ z ~ 3: 'U t: ~ ! e: IUUIIII! I ilHun !PnplU I I;i;i;' ~ I; Pil i Pi ~ j i I I I -< q.nHPunnn~~~pn ! 'j"H'll11'1! ' , 'I i:),I ~ ~, , . . i ~ It .. I , I , I , I , I , I , I , I , I , ~ jz ~,~ ~I~ ,r Il! ,< I~ iU.~ ~~~i e !_ i l i B ~ I I iH~ ~~i5 i J ~_ . ~ ~ ~ ~ " iil~ ~ - " fi~ I i ~ ~ m nl IKI AU.SCAFES L~ SE~CE OFFICE / ~ 1&13 1tQJS1'RL'L IlL VD Ga.LE'M1.I.E TX ..& Blake ArchUects -- 1202 S. WIllI CIW'El. RIWl . SlIlE A SOUI'IUKE. 1EXAS 7l!(lg2 . 1117-4811-0387 .....- t~~ ~ N .;,~ i -n ~ ~ ~~ ! ~ ~ I~~ l~ ~ r:1~ ~e" ~~ o m ~ i.;~ "~ . ~ -i l\:i!! ;n ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ -t ~ ~ - ~ ItiP ~ liR!li;i ! f ill ~J ~ hI I q. ~ i ! ~ ~ I 'I ~ R ~ i ~ ~ ~.. 111 III ~III ~;lI II a ~ if ~ ~ !lln at! ........,. ~ Ie I , , I , , I , , ~ si~ ~:~ l~ :~ l~ ~ lll!iillllllll 0 r ~I I lInn )> ! ~~ ~~ Ij~hil z Iii I II II r ~ ~~~Jlli !~zj ~ ~ifi ~ ~ Q .. 6~ ~ ~ VI x g-;~..~!j 3< .~-{; \II (\ !!i =r \J3 uuui1il ~ ~b~ r~~~II~ 0)> . . )> ili C\~ ~ (\ II ~ ~(Il~r-iiJ~ l:~ .m [: ~ 111 "'~ i1 ~ r IUUh i ~ ~ ~di~;l~J~I~i ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~... ~ ~ ~ IJ 11l~ ~ !~jl ~~ l> Ie ~~ ~ W!11("'~..-4""11 ~ nl .~~~i~ ~j ilii~ lJ Q Ill> 11I ... .'pl~lliin ... :II:~ ;ij:JB!j~ ~ g~ ~ \) : ; ."~'1, l> ~ i i i ~H ~ "n~~~ti;;~lInll ~uI !:: "II ~"II < ~J~ J5 ~ls I 11I m o () )> , ~!j ~ ~e ~~ ::! )> ~ ~ 71 i i , 'I I I , ---~----~-1 h ~ l' f: ~ r, ~ I' ~ I: ~ ~=~-~ ;f' I: '-.:il ALLSCAPES LAViN SERVICE OFFICE / vtAAEHOUSE ~lllNlm'IRIAL ELVD CdI.e'MJ! TX ..... Blake Architects -- 1202 S. WHIlE CIW'EI. RIIfO . SIll[ II SOUlHIN<E. lEXAS 7601l2 . 817-4118-9387 .... - ........... u.&. ~~/LO/LVV~ L~.~I U~ Letter in Favor of Rezoning Request CB Prudential ,. . 1''' 1M ......ltEAI:i'OIr 203 E. NoIfWIIllSt Hwy. Grapevine. 1)( 1&051 8US817481.257J Fax817481-1113 Toll Free IlOO 9ll6-3!J54 www.pruderl1ilII-louhiltm.l.COOl FACSJMIU~~ ~AIO'NAMI:: C. ('-,...~(~ f!t--'1 4- .:4~ A'ITENTlON: FAX#: liD] - ,of"1 PHONE II: 'So~ - IO'F( FROM: DeIulB Luers-TBE ~ESTATE GUY MOBILE: '17-131-. DfAIL:~"'tW 1owII~1"~ DATE:~ TIME: 'PAGES(w~) ( IN IW'EJWfCI: 1'0: S L\ P 2 - oS" - 6>' 0 MEMO: :r nlDN ~ ~.."D~_., ,J~ ~ a.+ (~l ~. ~....... rl.v;<<~ecl Ht. ~.l" fl"~s LtuL ~{l~Ll ~ w.ctA.. ~+t. Q~ f--U.,;". __ ~ _ ..l! ,.~ {M. ,,~~~~ -.&.. ~ ~L ~ ~ ~ -...c ~ 1- J. 5c:......c.. ~ IJ..f.L ,.c A I _YIA.. A).IlA.;~6n Gt\. ~ ~ IJlvcl. ~ :6--~ g-' ~-::t::~ ~~, tt-~ -- W; (-- - -=~ (lftrallAiilliM it ..~.pIete, pIeue call oareftice at It7-411-2573.) ... 'Ill J 1. -- -...... ........1. """*-oI1lIii E_ ~ ft. ORDINANCE 0-05-1555 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED; BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CONTRACTOR OFFICE WITH AN OUTSIDE STORAGE YARD ON LOT 11, BLOCK 1, COLLEYVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION, LOCATED AT 1803 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Brad Land on October 13, 2005, under Case No. Z-05-030; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in Ordinance 0-05-1555 Page 2 of 3 the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow a contractor office with an outside storage yard on the premises on Lot 11, Block 1, of the Colleyville Industrial Park Addition, located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: 1. The portion of the perimeter fence located along the southern property line be eight (8) feet tall, per the Land Development Code; 2. The exterior building elevations conform to "Exhibit A" as attached, but may be modified in order to meet the minimum building design score as prescribed by the ML - Light Manufacturing zoning district. 3. The site and landscape plan conform to "Exhibit B" as attached. 4. No commercial vehicles may be parked in front of the building over night. 5. The gate that will access the storage yard shall be constructed with solid screening materials. THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance 0-05-1555 Page 3 of 3 Sec. 6. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. Sec. 7. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT A - BUILDING ELEVATIONS EXHIBIT EXHIBIT B - SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ~~(; "b CITY COUNCIL cirr or CCem", AGENDA BRIEFING IL~:\:<l$ MEETING DATE: 12/13/05 ITEM # : 6 ORDINANCE #: I 0-05-1556 CITY MANAGER , DEPARTMENT HEAD I FINANCE REVIEW . Previous Action: 12/06/05 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT : Approval of a Special Use Permit to allow for horses on Lot 8, Block 7, of the Brighton Oaks Addition, located at 2705 Sherwood Lane, Case Z-05-031 Second Reading and Public Hearing Update 12/13/05 The correct vote by the Planning and Zoning Commission was 4-1 for approval of this rezoning request and not unanimous as stated in the agenda briefing for the December 6, 2005 meeting. At the December 6,2005 City Council meeting, questions were raised regarding the amount of area on the lot designated for the horses. Staff has determined that the area encompasses approximately 20,910 square feet. Also at the December 6, 2005 City Council meeting, a citizen presented information from the Colleyville Code of Ordinances which states that no more than two large grazing animals shall be allowed per 15,000 square feet of contiguous land area and not less than 7,500 square feet of paddock area. A copy of the information provided by the citizen is attached. There is no defined paddock area on the exhibits provided by the applicant. The ordinance for this request has been drafted to permit two horses on the lot. Staff has arranged to meet the property owner to make a video of the area where the horses will be kept. The video will be available for the December 13, 2005 meeting. First Reading and Public Hearing Mr. and Mrs. Michael Collins are the owners of a residential lot located at 2705 Sherwood Lane, situated in the Brighton Oaks Addition. The property is zoned R20-Single Family Residential and the owners have submitted a request for a Special Use Permit (SUP) to allow horses on the property. The R20 zoning district only allows horses on the property with the approval by the City Council of a SUP. Three letters of opposition have been received regarding the request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the SUP by a unanimous vote, provided the horses are limited to a specific location on the property, which is shown on the exhibit attached to the proposed ordinance. The following are the issues associated with this request. Request. SUP for horses within a R20-Single Family Residential zoning district. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1556 Page 2 of 2 Proposed Use. Michael and Linda Collins have applied for a SUP to allow two horses on Lot 8, Block 7, of the Brighton Oaks Addition, which is located in a R20-Single Family Residential zoning district. The horses are currently being boarded at an off-site location. The applicant has submitted a letter addressing the request, which is attached to this agenda briefing. Location. This is a 1.2-acre parcel of property located at 2705 Sherwood Lane. Adjacent Zoning and Development. The surrounding properties are zoned R20-Single Family Residential and developed as single family residences. Fencing and Screening. A six (6) foot tall wooden perimeter fence surrounds the property. The applicant proposes to construct a rail fence within the backyard to separate the residence and the area the horses will inhabit. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 13 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff has received three letters in opposition and one letter in favor of this request. The owners of the properties who provided the written letters of opposition represent only 11 % of the area within the 200 foot notification area, which is not sufficient to require a super majority vote of the City Council. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at the November 14, 2005 meeting and recommended approval, with the following condition, by a unanimous vote: 1. To require the horses be kept within the area as shown on "Exhibit B" (as shown in the ordinance ). Recommendation Approval Attachments · Zoning and Location Map · List of Property Owners Notified · Letter in Favor of the Rezoning Request · Letters in Opposition of the Rezoning Request · Information and Drawings from Applicant · Information Provided by Citizen at December 6,2005 Meeting · Ordinance 0-05-1556 Zoning and Location Map D NORTH Z-05-031 Hartman, Michael J 2708 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Taylor, Chris J Etux Jean-Ann 4101 Spring Hollow S1. Colleyville, TX 76034 Gibson, J P 2604 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Kirkham, Kenneth D 4109 Spring Hollow Colleyville, TX 76034 List of Property Owners Notified McGee, Donald M Etux Barbara 2800 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Gotcher, J L Etux Cynthia A 4105 Spring Hollow Colleyville, TX 76034 Reddick, Randal Etux Shawn 4200 Allendale S1. Colleyville, TX 76034 T eger Inc. 2704 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Guzman, Jose Etux Monika 2709 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Brancel, Dale Etux Susan 2700 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Collins, Michael Etux Linda J 2705 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Wernicke, Rodney K 4208 Allendale S1. Colleyville, TX 76034 Ramirez, Larry Etux Alicia H 4204 Allendale S1. Colleyville, TX 76034 Michael and Linda COlliI Page I of I Letter in Favor of Rezoning Request Amy Shelley From: Gotcher, Jim 1 Monday, November 14, 2005 1 :12 PM Amy Shelley Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Michael and Linda Collins zoning hearing tonight I am sending this in case I am not able to make the hearing in person tonight. Our family is in support of the Collins' request to allow their horses in the back of their property on Sherwood. Our property adjoins theirs on the southwest comer. We have lived at this location for 14 years, and the owners before the Collins kept horses just across the fence from us. We never had a problem and hardly knew the animals were there. I actually believe the ability to have horses on our property would enhance property values in our neighborhood. Weare in favor of the Collins' zoning request. Jim and Cindy Gotcher 4105 Springhollow Colleyville 817-283-7334 Sent from my mobile device. 11/14/2005 Letters in Opposition of Rezoning Request ~---."_.".,.,....._-,..".,..._- , ":;~'" . 0 . <: ~..... ... "",',"{, .. ~ Q4.~.:;J . ..'\'f'<;'.':': ..' "~':'.r""..,. . NOVEMBER 14, 2005 To: COLLEYVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Subject: Z-05-031 RE: Special Use Permit Request for Horses within R-20 Zoning- Single Family Residential District for Lot 8. Block 7. Brighton Oaks Addn.. or 2705 Sherwood Lane. Dear Commissioners: I am opposed to the Re-Zoning of this property for the Special use applied for in application on the above referenced property. ~;;f 2905 Sherwood Colleyvile, Texas 76034 NOVEMBER 14, 2005 To: COLLEYVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Subject: Z-05-031 RE: Special Use Permit Request for Horses within R-20 Zoning- Single Family Residential District for Lot 8. Block 7. Brighton Oaks Addn.. or 2705 Sherwood Lane. Dear Commissioners: I am opposed to the Re-Zoning of this property for the Special use applied for in application on the above referenced property. ~~ 4205 Allendale Colleyvi~, Texas 76034 Information and Drawings from Applicant Special Use Permit Application - 2705 Sherwood Lane In 1997, we purchased our property (approximately two acres) at 2705 Sherwood Lane, Colleyville in the Brighton Oaks Subdivision from Gerald and Linda Simpson. One of the desires we have had is to return horses to the property. The previous owners had kept two horses there and the stable still remains in the rear of the yard (see attached plat and photographs ). Horses have been a part of the Brighton Oaks subdivision since its inception in 1975. At different times (in addition to the Simpson's), there have been horses on the Fuller's property at 3016 Sherwood, the White's property at 2904 Hickory Hill and the Rounds Property at 3004 Sherwood Lane. Both my daughter and I (Katie and Linda) show our two horses (Zip and Kari) that we have owned for three years. In that time, they have been boarded at three different co-op locations, one as far away as Southlake (involved a 30 minute drive each way). Having Zip and Kari with us on our property would save a great deal of travel time and associated boarding fees. A six-foot high wooden fence surrounds the entire perimeter of the area, which is where we would keep Zip and Kari. A rail fence would be added to a portion of the back yard to keep the horses from encroaching on the pool. The proposed layout is shown on the attached plat and associated photographs. Our method of horse care includes: 1. Stalls are cleaned daily and waste is not allowed to accumulate. 2. Fly control is achieved by a continuous feed additive called "Solitrol" which prevents flies from hatching in the waste. A flytrap product called "Fly Predator" is attached around the stalls, which entraps the insects in a container. These are removed and replaced every two weeks. 3. Nutrition for Zip and Kari is provided by twice daily feedings of grain, supplements and hay. The land is not intended.to supply their primary nutritional needs. 4. The wooden fence provides both security and screens the horses from direct viewing and contact from adjacent locations. 5. It is not our intention to allow Zip and Kari to be used for neighborhood amusement (pony rides, etc). Page 1 of2 Special Use Permit Application - 2705 Sherwood Lane (continued) In conclusion, horses are inherently good neighbors due to their quiet, friendly nature. We feel that the addition of Zip and Karl will not negatively impact the esthetics of the neighborhood. We ask for your approval of a special use permit so we may return two horses to the property. Thank you for time and attention in this matter. Mike and Linda Collins Page 2 of2 THE PJIOPERTY LOCATED AT 1. .,a. s ft.. wc.D LA.... IN THE cm OF BEIHCi L01' ~ BUleK". or '8............ ()a At ( THE CITY or """.-rI" COUNTY. TEXAS. ACCORDING 10 nil RECORDED IN "DLllI'fC 3.18" ...~ AT PACE q OF nil "Dam RECORDS or TMaANT' TEXAS. TWS.AND AN ADDrrJON TO PLAr COUHTY. , 5'1-'30 blllf WIM. .~T. .~ S f"J 1 '"" t ~ <' .. -.- ----* -- r~ J r -..... f.:,. ..--... t:.D.P." .;" _...--~---- ~. .,..:......--_.'11.- t.tM... ,~;~ . I 1. DOW STElART PEEBLES. DO HEREBY DECIARB OOT ~ PLAT SHO'N HEREON ACCURATELY IlEPRISENTS AN ON THE GROUND SURVEY IUDE UllDIR MY Dlm:nON AND SUPERYISJON. AMD THAT AU. CORNERS HAVE BED SET OR LOCATED AS SHOIN HIREOJI. ALSO TH. ARE NO DICRlW:HMD1"13 THE PlOPERn' LOCATED AT l"Ja. s ft... w.D L"~ IN THE em OF BEIHC LOT 4i. BLOCK" OF 'B.~ ()lait ( THE em OF ~.- COUNTY. TWS. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED IN "OL~ ],18- ",q AT PACE q or THE '"DRn RtXQR1)S OF "TAaaA1IIT ~. ~ .,..~~. ~.~ ~V . ~ mAS. AND AN AIIDmON TO fILAr COUHTY. 3 j f"I 1 .. t ~ ~ -... - --- ..... - r- 1 f-.........- I -:,. ........,~.-~- r:(JP'~ . . . ~.. -"-.-:_''''-- -",,',.. ,', ',..." 't..&a';, ~. . _.' .' . . . . t'V'':1iif ;,; . '_1 ....: _. .~. .,."".. ',' . . ,. .. .1'..' -' ~ ." " I I. DOlWD smART PEEBLES. 00 HEREBY DEClARE THAT nu: PlAT SHOO HEREON ACCURATELY REPRlSENTS AN ON TIll GROUND SURVEY WADE UNDER MY DlRfL'TJON AND SUPERVJSJOH. AHD THAT AU. CORNERS HAVE BEEJt SET OR LOCATED AS SHOIN HIREOI. ALSO THERE ARE lfO EJfCJIW:HIIENTS APPLE 8/12/05 Information Provided by Citizen at December 6, 2005 Meeting Sec. 42-27. Acts declared nuisances. The following acts or conditions are specifically declared to be nuisances. However, these declarations an not exclusive and any act or condition which is dangerous to human life or health, or which renders the grounc water, air, or food a hazard or injury to human life or health, or that is offensive to the senses, or that threatens tl become detrimental to the public health shall be a nuisance even though not specifically declared a nuisance in thi section: --- c~C7 PAGE. # (1) Keeping of animals under certain conditions. a. Accumulations of manure. The keeping or harboring of any horses, cattle, sheep, goats or any other animal, and allowing the manure or liquid discharges of such animals to collect 0 accumulate in an unclean or unsanitary manner is hereby declared to be a nuisance provided, that nothing in this subsection shall be construed as to include manure deposit: upon any private property for the purpose of cultivating same, when such deposits an maintained so as to prevent the breeding of flies. b. Keeping of hogs. The keeping or harboring of hogs or swine is hereby declared to be ( nuisance, with the exception of four adult registered potbellied pigs kept as domesticate( pets. c. Dog kennels within 300 feet of residences. Allowing more than four dogs to be housed kept, raised or boarded at one time within 300 feet of any residence, other than the residenCE of the owner of the dogs, is hereby declared to be a nuisance. d. Keeping of horses, cows, sheep, and goats. The stabling, pasturing, or keeping of an~ horse, cow, sheep or goat which does not meet the following criteria is hereby declared to bE a nuisance: The total number of grazing animals shall not be more than two large or fou small grazing animals per 15,000 square feet of contiguous land area the animal keeper own~ or controls, on the ~2ndition that a ll.addock area is provided which is not less than 7.50( square feet 'per larQe QrazinQ animal or 3,750 square feet per small grazing animal, for eact 'animal which is turned out and that a minimum of 7,500 square feet of paddock area bE provided in any case. e. Keeping of grazing animals. The keeping of any grazing animal other than a horse, cow sheep or goat is hereby declared to be a nuisance. f. Keeping of chickens. The keeping of a chicken or chickens within 50 feet of any residenCE or inhabited building is hereby declared to be a nuisance. g. Keeping of pigeons. The keeping or harboring of more than 75 pigeons, or failing t( confine pigeons in proper cages or lofts maintained in a clean and sanitary condition, i~ hereby declared to be a nuisance. Provided, however, pigeons bearing a seamless leg bane issued by a recognized association of pigeon fanciers may be released for exercise 0 performance, upon the condition that the owner or person having possession of such pigeon~ shall not permit them to alight on any building whatsoever on the property of others. ORDINANCE 0-05-1556 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED; BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW TWO HORSES ON LOT 8, BLOCK 7, BRIGHTON OAKS ADDITION, LOCATED AT 2705 SHERWOOD LANE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Michael and Linda Collins on October 14, 2005, under Case No. Z-05-031; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in Ordinance 0-05-1556 Page 2 of 3 the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. Sec. 7. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow two horses on the premises of Lot 8, Block 7, Brighton Oaks Addition, located at 2705 Sherwood Lane as depicted on the attached Zoning Exhibit, labeled as Exhibit "A" subject to the following condition: 1. To require the horses be kept within the area as shown on "Exhibit B". THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. Ordinance 0-05-1556 Page 3 of 3 AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT A - ZONING EXHIBIT EXHIBIT B - ZONING EXHIBIT Border For Horse Area , 5 '-.11:1 b$lf ""tAL fi~r, ... i ,~ I /", . / /--.~ L/ .' }'- .' ~ 'I ' I . I . ) I ' 7t.r.::t J 't (f.I;f"~ tl..f) I-~:O..Q:Z;'''''' , .-.!:!' ~ ~. .....~'-c~ :t1-~()C) -- e:cp.) .1tfl.W ,,,,Mte CITY COUNCIL CC@n0 AGENDA BRIEFING .,..~ ;\:,,$ MEETING DATE: ITEM#: ORDINANCE # : 12/13/05 7 0-05-1558 CITY MANAGER i DEPARTMENT HEAD i FINANCE REVIEW : Previous Action: 12/06/05 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT : Approval of an Amendment to Chapter 14 - Engineering Design Standards of the Land Development Code regarding detention/retention ponds, Case G-05-012 Second Reading and Public Hearing First Reading and Public Hearing Within Colleyville, there are a significant number of subdivisions that have developed in the past that have utilized detention/retention ponds to facilitate drainage flows associated with the development. While a retention pond is a critical component to the drainage system, it can also function as a valuable amenity for a development by improving the appearance and aesthetics of the subdivision. Many retention ponds in Colleyville contain attractive fountain features, which additionally improve water quality and help to prevent oxygen depletion of the water source, a major contributor for foul odors and ugly vegetation growth on the pond's surface. Code Enforcement Department staff and Engineering Department staff frequently receive complaints from citizens living near a foul smelling retention pond. Citizen complaints are also received regarding mosquito problems during summer droughts, which promote stagnant waters in retention ponds that do not have any mechanism to replenish the water supply or to keep the water moving. Staff is proposing an amendment to Chapter 14 of the Land Development Code to require all new retention ponds constructed in the future to provide for continuous water movement, aeration facilities or other process approved by the City that is designed to prevent surface accumulation of aquatic vegetation. The proposed ordinance does not contain any specific design standards. The proposed regulations require the developer to provide a design that will prevent the accumulation of aquatic vegetation. The ordinance also includes a requirement that if the design fails to prevent the surface accumulation of aquatic vegetation, the owner of the pond must provide additional facilities to correct the problem. Attached is a copy of Chapter 14 of the Land Development Code showing the proposed changes to the regulations. Also attached is a copy of the proposed ordinance for consideration. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this amendment to the Land Development Code at the November 14,2005 meeting and recommended approval by a unanimous vote. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1558 Page 2 of 2 Recommendation Approval Attachments · Current Regulations Showing Proposed Changes · Ordinance 0-05-1558 Current Regulations Showing Proposed Changes A. General - This section pertains to general design requirements for drainage and storm sewer construction in the City of colleyville. All drainage facilities shall be sized and designed in accordance with the City of colleyville Drainage Master Plan or as determined by the Director of Public Works. B. Runoff Calculations - The selection of which method to use for calculating runoff depends upon the size of the contributing drainage area at the most downstream point of the project. The "Rational Method" is acceptable for designing projects in which the drainage area is less than one-hundred (100) acres. A unit hydrograph method is required for projects with larger drainage areas. 1. No matter which method is used to calculate runoff, a developer or builder of residential property greater than one (1) acre in size, or any property that was platted as a part of an overall tract which was greater than one (1) acre in size (including churches and schools), shall develop the property so that the rate of runoff created by the development as it leaves the property does not exceed the rate of runoff that is currently occurring in the existing conditions. A developer or builder of commercial property greater than one-half (1/2) acre must follow the above guidelines. 2. Runoff computations shall be based upon fully developed watershed conditions in accordance with the land use projections in the latest comprehensive land use plan for the City of colleyville. The design engineer shall size drainage facilities by disregarding the detention effects of upstream property and calculating the runoff as if the off-site property was developed without any detention. If an approved regional detention/retention facility is in operation, the design engineer may size downstream drainage facilities based on consideration of the detention effects of the regional facility. C. Drainaqe Areas Less Than one-hundred acres 1. Computation of Storm water Runoff for drainage areas less than one-hundred (100) acres shall be by the "Rational Method," which is based on the principle that the maximum rate of runoff from a given drainage area for an assumed rainfall intensity occurs when all parts of the area are contributing to the flow at the point of discharge. m .f'?r~?rEl?~~N<:>(jElYEl'()PElcJl?r1cJ ..... m Developed Park sites .... . .......... ...................$j6gl~f~6iilyB~~i~~6Ii~I............... Duplex on , . ,.........:::::to:~}!~pf~...E.~.~!..I.Y....... ........"...-............... ..... Schools ..........Churches. m N~igh~grbgl:)~q~6i6i~f~j~imm Office Commercial .... ........... .'...........-.............................,........ . ... ... .................".............--.-...... Commercial .. mmm. ..m liidusliialmm 0.60 0.70 ..............~..,. 0.70 ......................... ...... .......-...... ... 0.70 0.70 0.70 ...O.8Sm 0.85 2. Time of concentration is the longest time, without interruption of flow by detention devices that a drop of water takes to flow from the farthest point of the drainage area to the point of concentration (i.e. the point of design). The time of concentration is composed of the inlet time and the flow time in a conduit or channel to the point of design. The inlet time shall be 10 minutes for property zoned multiple family, churches, schools, local business, central business, commercial, or industrial. An inlet time of 15 minutes shall be used for property zoned for parks, cemeteries, agricultural, and single family residential. When designing inlets and laterals, the time of concentration is equal to the inlet time. The design engineer will compare the above specified inlet times to the actual calculated inlet time by computing the flow time overland and along the gutter to the first inlet. Manning's Equation shall be used to determine flow time to the inlet. The design engineer may use the actual calculated or specified inlet time. In no case shall a longer inlet time be used than 10 minutes for multiple family, commercial, churches, schools, industrial and business areas and 15 minutes for parks, cemeteries, agricultural, and single-family areas. D. Drainaqe Areas of one-hundred (100) acres or More 1. For drainage areas of one-hundred (100) acres or more where the use of the "Rational Method" does not provide reliable results, the use of a unit hydrograph method shall be made. The use of a unit hydrograph calculation will be based upon standard and accepted engineering principles subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. Acceptable methods include the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Technical Release Number 55 or the Corps of Engineers HEc-1 models for drainage areas one-hundred (100) acres or more. 2. The unit hydrograph method shall be based upon fully developed watershed conditions assuming no effects from the small on-site detention facilities for maintaining the rate of runoff as if the property was undeveloped. The detention effects of large regional detention facilities can be taken into account in unit hydrograph methods. 3. Circumstances that may require the use of a unit hydrograph method include sizing open channels, reclaiming floodplains, creating lakes, or building other types of drainage-related facilities on major drainage courses. Design engineers of these types of facilities should be aware that the requirement of designing for fully developed watershed conditions will mean that they will have to calculate these fully developed flows instead of using the flows calculated in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) flood insurance studies for colleyville or Tarrant County or from studies performed for or approved by the City of colleyville. E. Desiqn Storm Frequencies - All developments submitted must provide data for the following design storm frequencies: 2- Year / 5- Year / 10- Year / 25- Year / 50-Year / 100- Year. 1. Drainage facilities shall be designed in accordance with the following table: i 5-year with 1 DO-year positive overflow in streets i such that the depth of flow in the street does not ! exceed the right-of-way or drainage easement mmmmmmmJg?p?gi!Y'.m.m.. Closed Storm Sewer Systems : 1 DO-year with positive overflow and Inlets at Street Low Point ()T~?9.mmmm ..glJIYfilrt~..?rl.~..!:lri~9..fil~.... ............... Concrete-lined Channels Earthenctlannelsm m .................................................... .. . .mm,1QQ:y~?!m.. ........L....~QQ:y~?r...... ; 100- ear 2. The approved drainage system shall provide for positive overflow at all low points and these areas must be denoted on the plans as such. The term "positive overflow" means that when the inlets do not function properly or when the design capacity of the conduit is exceeded, the excess flow can be conveyed overland along a grassed or paved course. Normally, this would mean along a street or alley, or shall require the dedications of special drainage easements on private property. F. Street and Alley Capacity 1. Streets - Streets and storm drains within new developments shall be designed so that storm water runoff resulting from a design storm of a one-hundred (100) year frequency is contained within the available right-of-way and/or drainage easement. The capacity of the street and right-of-way and/or easement and the storm sewer pipe working in combination must be designed for a capacity to safely contain storm water from a design storm of one-hundred (100) year frequency. 2. Alleys - The flows created by the one-hundred (100) year storm shall be contained within the capacity of all paved alleys. G. Inlet Placement and Capacity - The storm sewer system is to begin at the point where the storm water from a five (5) year frequency storm reaches curb depth, with the exception of collector streets on which storm sewer facilities must be designed to prevent one-twelve (12') foot wide lane from ponding and on major streets on which storm sewer facilities must be designed to prevent one-twelve (12') foot wide lane in each direction from ponding. At such point where the combined capacity of the street and storm drain system satisfies the five (5) year street capacity criteria (as previously described) but the one-hundred (100) year frequency storm runoff can not be contained within the right-of-way additional pick-up points (inlet capacity) shall be provided along with an increase in storm sewer capacity so that the one-hundred (100) year frequency storm runoff will be contained within the right-of-way. 1. Inlets shall be placed upstream from an intersection whenever possible. At any intersection, only one street shall be crossed with surface drainage and this street shall be the lower classified street. When an alley intersects a street, inlets shall be placed in the alley whenever flow down that alley would cause the capacity of the intersecting street to be exceeded. 2. The minimum inlet size shall be ten (10') feet. No more than twenty (20') feet of inlet shall be placed along one gutter at any given location. Minimum sizes of laterals shall be twenty-one (21 ") inches for use with ten (10') foot inlets, and twenty-four (24") inch laterals with fourteen (14') foot, twenty (20') foot inlets, and drop inlets. Where laterals tie into trunk lines, place the laterals on a minimum angle forty-five (450) degrees and a maximum angle of sixty (600) degrees with the trunk line and connect them so that the longitudinal centers intersect. 3. Manholes are required every three hundred feet (300'). Junction boxes are required at every change in flow line direction, change in pipe size, and where a convergence of more than two pipes occurs. Manholes are to be five feet (5') square and can be precast or cast in place. H. Pipe Desiqn Standards 1. Storm sewer conduit shall be sized to flow full. Manning's Equation shall be used to determine the conduit size. 2. Design Velocities a. Minimum - two and a half feet (2.5') per second. b. Maximum - twelve feet (12') per second. c. The maximum discharge velocities in the pipe shall also not exceed the permitted velocity of the receiving channel or conduit at the outfall to prevent erosive conditions. The maximum outfall velocity of a conduit in partial flow shall be computed for partial depth and shall not exceed the maximum permissible velocity of the receiving channel unless controlled by an appropriate energy dissipater (e.g. stilling basins, impact basins, and riprap protection). 3. In general, storm water shall be carried in concrete pipe conduit within the right-of-way but other types of conduit can be used to carry storm water in areas other than the right-of-way. However, prior permission to use other conduit materials must be obtained from the Director of Public Works. 4. Hydraulic Gradient (also refer to the Ft. Worth Drainage Manual) a. Conduits must be sized, and slopes must be set, such that runoff flows smoothly down the drainage system. To insure this smooth passage, the hydraulic gradient must be at the proper elevations. The hydraulic grade line shall be established and shown on the plans for all storm sewer design. b. The hydraulic grade line shall in no case be closer to the surface of the ground or street than one foot (1'). The HGL must not exceed the neck into the inlet. c. Hydraulic gradient calculations shall account for all head losses that may occur in the storm sewer line. Friction head loss shall be determined by direct application of Manning's Equation. Minor losses due to turbulence at structures shall be determined using Appendix A of this section. 5. Inspection I Testing a. The compaction of backfill shall meet or exceed 95% Standard Proctor density. b. All storm sewer conduits shall be inspected prior to acceptance by the City. All conduit forty-two inch (42") or less shall be inspected using television inspection. Conduits larger than forty-two inch (42") may be inspected visually. c. A City representative shall be present during the television inspection. d. Televised Inspection Criteria (1) All television equipment used shall have a minimum of two-hundred-twenty (220) lines of horizontal resolution. The picture shall be in color. (2) All video information on tape must have good picture quality. (3) As a title heading on the tape and during the televising, the operator must: i. Note the project name and Contractor name. ii. Note the name of the company and the operator performing the video inspection. iii. Note line size and material, joint type and length. iv. Line segment to be televised including beginning and ending station numbers. v. Note page of plans used and year plans were stamped. vi. Note date and time of inspection. vii. A footage counter must be displayed on the tape during the filming. viii. Show the above title block before and after each line segment. Show the title block at one-hundred (100') foot intervals while filming the line segment. ix. All defects should be shown on film for a minimum of 10 seconds before proceeding with the televising. (4) The Contractor shall supply a log sheet used in conjunction with the video tape for written documentation. All written information gathered must be legible and clearly understandable. i. Note the project name, Contractor name and contract number. ii. Note the name of the company and the operator performing the video inspection. iii. Note pipe size and material, joint type and length between joints. iv. Note the VCR tape footage counter, start to end. v. Note line segment to be televised, station numbers from and station numbers to length of line segment as indicated on plans. vi. Note page of plans used and year plans were stamped. vii. Note date and time of inspection. viii. Indicate by sketch the line segment to be televised in relation to surrounding road intersections and street addresses. Identify manhole station numbers. Show direction of flow with arrows and direction the camera is going. Indicate direction of north on the sketch. ix. Note the water depth at the beginning, every fifty (50') foot station, every change in grade, and at the end of the line segment. x. Identify the clock location, direction, size and type of laterals entering main. Indicate laterals as saddles, punched, or glued fittings. xi. Indicate final footage televised at end of the log sheet. (5) One tape per visual televised inspection project shall be furnished to the Project Inspector. (6) Tapes must be VHS format, one (1") inch wide T-120, high quality tape. Tapes are to be recorded on SP (2 hours) play. (7) All tapes and run sheets shall be submitted to the City. All tapes and log sheets shall become the property of the City. I. Culvert Desiqn - Culverts must be designed using standard engineering practices and engineering judgment. Culverts shall be designed in accordance with the latest edition of the City of Fort Worth Drainage Manual. If the City of Fort Worth Drainage Manual does not incorporate the necessary standards please refer to the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Hydraulic Design Manual. 1. One (1') foot of freeboard is required between the one-hundred (100) year water surface elevation and the top of curb elevation. Exceptions must be approved in writing by the Director of Public Works. 2. Culvert hydraulic grade line calculations shall consider both inlet and outlet control. 3. Culverts shall be aligned to provide the minimum resistance to the flow of water during the 10, 50, 100 and 500 year events. 4. The maximum velocity through a culvert shall be fifteen (15') feet per second. 5. Stream stability shall be assessed when determining the number of barrels, height and width and culvert skew. Potential for scour shall be accounted for in the design. 6. Hydraulic jumps shall not be allowed from face of culvert to ten (10') feet from the culvert, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. J. Bridqes - Two (2') feet of freeboard is required between the one-hundred (100) year water surface elevation and the low chord of the bridge. Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the Director of Public Works in writing. 1. The skew of the bridge piers and abutments shall be oriented as close to the normal or flood direction of flow resulting in an angle of attack as close to zero (0) degrees as possible. 2. Bridge piers shall be aligned to provide the minimum resistance to the flow of water during the 10, 50, 100 and 500 year events. 3. Computer modeling programs used for the hydraulic analysis of bridges shall be HEc-RAS, Version 2.2, or HEc2. 4. Stream stability shall be assessed when designing the abutments and interior bents of the bridge. Scour shall be accounted for in the design. 5. Where flows are supercritical, erosion control measures shall be used in an area from one-hundred (100') feet upstream from a bridge to twenty-five (25') feet downstream from a bridge. K. Channels - Open channels may be used instead of an enclosed system when a pipe greater than an eighty-four (84") inch diameter (or other shape equivalent to more than thirty-eight and a half (38.5) square feet) is required to carry the design storm event. 1. Design Criteria: a. All open channel design must follow the Corp of Engineers Guidelines. b. Channels may be left in their natural state provided that the channel velocities are six (6.0') feet per second or less and that one (1') foot of freeboard is available during the design storm event. c. If the natural channel is to be replaced by an improved channel, the flow from the one-hundred (100') year design flood must be contained within the improved channel while allowing for one (1') foot of freeboard. d. Improved channels shall be trapezoidal shaped and include a lined section if the design velocity is greater than six feet per second. Lining types such as concrete, rock walls and gabions may be used upon approval of the Director of Public Works. The maximum velocity allowed in concrete lined channels is fifteen (15') feet per second. e. Unless shown to be feasible in a soils report sealed by a licensed professional engineer in the State of Texas, and approved by the Director of Public Works, improved channels shall have minimum side slopes of: (1) 4 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical for earthen, grassed-lined side slopes. (2) 2 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical for concrete-lined side slopes. f. Where practicable, all unpaved channels should have sufficient grade to avoid ponding. A minimum slope of 1.00% is required for earthen channels and swales, except those used as part of a wetlands area. In areas where 1.00% cannot be obtained a pilot channel approved by the City may be used. All lined channels are to have a minimum slope of 0.50% and earthen channels a minimum slope of 1.00%. g. The developer or owner shall use low maintenance vegetation for vegetative cover, as approved by the Director of Public Works prior to planting. The selection of materials shall comply with the current ground cover listing for North Central Texas furnished through the Texas Agricultural Extension Service. 2. Manning's Equation can be used to design channels and determine water surface elevations and velocities when backwater effects are negligible, subject to approval by the Director of Public Works. Channels where backwater effects occur must be designed using models accepted by FEMA. 3. All channel sections must consider and account for channel stabilization in their design. This requirement pertains to all sections whether they are left in their natural condition or are modified in any manner. The design of all drainage channels and swales shall assure adequate capacity and minimum maintenance to overcome the result of erosion, silting, sloughing of bends or similar occurrences. 4. When performing hydraulic analyses for channel or drainageway design, the one-hundred year (100) year starting water surface shall be based on the following: a. Known water surface elevations should be used where possible. Known elevations are available for some creeks and channels from previous studies approved by the City. b. When known water surface elevations are not available the slope-area method or a rating curve may be used. (1) A rating curve approximates the starting water surface elevation for a given flow by using the relationship between known flows and water surface elevations for the creek. This is an excellent method for determining starting conditions if good data is available to develop the rating curve. (2) The slope-area method approximates the starting water surface elevation by calculating the normal depth for the channel. To calculate normal depth the slope of energy gradient for the channel is required. The energy slope can be approximated using the average slope of the channel or the average slope of the water surface. 5. The design of the channel lining shall take into account the super-elevation of the water surface around curves and other changes in direction. In general a radius that is three (3) times the top width of the water surface during the design storm event is recommended for channel bends. 6. A chain link fence six (6') feet in height, or other improvements as approved on a case by case basis by the Director of Public Works, shall be constructed on each side of the lined channel. 7. Gabion or other forms of channel lining may be used in lieu of reinforced concrete lining with the approval of the Director of Public Works. L. Detention / Retention Facilities IJssi~n - Detention or retention facilities mav be used to reduce peak discharaes where conditions prevent convevina storm water to an adequate discharae point. Detention or retention facilities shall be privatelv maintained unless the Citv of Collevville has aareed to accept public dedication of the facilitv. Rl;Ir;J8ff nates fer @II lar;ts l;Ises SRGlII B8 Iiffiitea t8 tRe Fates tRat w€ll;ll€l Be Jar8Sl;I€SS freffi sir;t~IEl faffiily resisentiGI Gress. TRis re€ll;lireffiEmt al~e aJaJali€ls t8 tRe sS'/eleJaffiEmt €If sit€ls !as eRl;Ir€.RBS, S€iR88Is, ar;t€l €ltRer ir;tstitl4ti€m!all;ls€ls. QeteAtier;t.'r€lt€lr;ttiBr;t fa€iilities SRGII Be aesi~r;tes fer the fylly €l€l'/818~BS €Ins Rl;Ir;tSres (1 99) year sBsi~A fl@8S a€i€i@n,liFl~ t@ tRe fell8'NiFlQ €iriterin: 1. Runoff rates for all land uses shall be limited to the rates that would be produced from sinale familv residential areas. This requirement also applies to the development of sites as churches. school. and other institutional uses. Detentionlretention facilities shall be desianed for the fullv developed one-hundred (tOO) vear desian flood accordina to the criteria contained in this Section. 2. The minimum amount of storage volume of the detention basin shall be that volume required to reduce runoff rate during the one-hundred (100) year event to the undeveloped rate. The outflow structure shall be sized to reduce the 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 year discharges to the undeveloped rate. Dedicated detention/retention basins shall also include an additional one (1) foot of freeboard and two (2) feet of sediment storage. The volume of runoff storage for drainage areas greater than one-hundred (100) acres shall be computed using unit hydrograph procedures. Acceptable unit hydrograph procedures are provided in Section 14-170.D.1 of this document. For drainage areas less than one-hundred (100) acres, the above methods are recommended; however, an approximate routing method based on the modified rational method is allowable. 3. All detention facilities designed shall consider the timing of the flood peak in the main channel into which the detention facility drains. Delaying the peak from a site in lower portions of a watershed may result in a higher peak on the main channel. The Director of Public Works may require that upstream and downstream ponds be included in the detention design model. 4. A detention facility shall have enough gradient to ensure positive drainage to the outlet structures so as to avoid nuisance conditions such as standing water, odors, insects, and weeds. A minimum slope of 0.50% towards the outlet structure is required for all grass lined detention facilities. 5. Detention areas in parking lots shall not be: a. In required parking spaces. b. Behind speed bumps unless the speed bumps are made with reinforced concrete. c. Deeper than six (6") inches unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 6. Drainage easements shall be provided for all regional detention/retention facilities and for other detention/retention facilities where two or more owners are involved. 7. Individual detention facilities shall be designed to empty in less than three (3) hours, unless it is also serving as an erosion control facility. 8. Detention facilities used as a sediment control facility shall meet the following requirements: a. The sediment control facility shall be designed with minimal velocities such that sediment is dropped and not picked up by flows at any time during the storm event. b. The basin shall be designed with two (2) feet of sediment storage area so that sediment removal is not required more than twice a year. Expected removal periods greater than twice a year must be specified in the maintenance plan and approved by the Director of Public Works. c. Sediment control facilities cannot be used to meet detention requirements unless the volume of sediment is included in the calculations for the detention basin design. 9. The owner shall maintain detention/retention facilities unless the facilities are dedicated to the City of colleyville. Detention facilities must be properly maintained if they are to function as intended over a long period of time. The following measures are required to ensure the facility functions properly. a. Facilities should be mowed at least twice a year to control weeds and discourage woody growth. b. Debris, litter and accumulated sediment should be removed from detention facilities at least twice a year. Particular attention should be given to removal of debris, litter and sediment around outlet structures. The Director of Public Works may require that the property owner remove said debris when in the Director's determination that property damage or a flood hazard may exist. c. Detention basins designed for sediment removal shall be maintained as specified in the maintenance plan and approved by the City with construction plan submittal. 10. Retention facilities shall provide for continuous water movement, aeration facilities or other process approved bv the City that is desianed to prevent surface accumulation of aquatic veaetation. M. Flumes - The use of flumes is not recommended for widespread use. Flumes shall not be permitted when the purpose of a permanent flume is to carry runoff down the sides of earthen channels. 1. A flume may be used to direct overflow runoff along property lines until the runoff can be intercepted by streets or conduits. A flume shall not carry more than ten (10) cubic feet per second during the one-hundred (100) year storm event with a slope of 1.00%. 2. All flumes crossing sidewalks shall be covered or bridged such as to minimize danger to pedestrians. 3. All edges are to be protected with rock rip-rap or other form of protection for erosion control and scour purposes. N. Lakes - Approval to develop in any area subject to inundation by a lake must be obtained from the appropriate agency responsible for that particular lake before the city grants its approval. Agencies that should be contacted include U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tarrant County Water Control Board, TcEQ, the Trinity River Authority, and FEMA. Regardless of approvals obtained from those agencies listed above, no filling, development or construction in any area subject to inundation by a lake shall occur without the approval of the City Manager. The City Manager may require any studies necessary to determine that filling, development or construction will not have a detrimental effect on adjacent, upstream or downstream properties and buildings. This subsection in no way diminishes other requirements of this section. O. Lot Drainaqe and Gradinq - Grading and drainage of all residential lots shall be designed in a manner which will allow one lot to drain across an adjacent lot and into a permanent structure, such as a concrete flume, lined channel, or proper inlet to an adequate drainage facility, or to a street right-of-way. If an approved drainage structure is not present, it will be required of the developer to construct the necessary facilities. (0-00-1261/12/19/00) 1. Sheet flow techniques shall be used for lot to lot drainage where possible. (0-00-1261/12/19/00) 2. Single lots shall accommodate their own drainage into an approved structure where topographic elevations allow this to occur. (0-00-1261/12/19/00) ORDINANCE 0-05-1558 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 14, ENGINEERING STANDARDS, OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING DETENTION/RETENTION POND REGULATIONS; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE; AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Colleyville approved Ordinance 0-00-1214 on April 18, 2000, adopting the Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to amend certain portions of the Land Development Code regarding detention/retention pond regulations; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 15 days before such hearing; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. THAT Chapter 14 - Engineering Standards of the Land Development Code, is hereby amended in its entirety to read as shown in the attached as Exhibit "A", THAT Ordinance 0-00-1214, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, as amended, shall remain in effect, except where amended by this ordinance. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. THAT any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. THAT addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. THAT this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. Ordinance 0-05-1558 Page 2 of 2 Sec. 7. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternate method of publication provided by law. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney Exhibit "A" A. General - This section pertains to general design requirements for drainage and storm sewer construction in the City of colleyville. All drainage facilities shall be sized and designed in accordance with the City of colleyville Drainage Master Plan or as determined by the Director of Public Works. B. Runoff Calculations - The selection of which method to use for calculating runoff depends upon the size of the contributing drainage area at the most downstream point of the project. The "Rational Method" is acceptable for designing projects in which the drainage area is less than one-hundred (100) acres. A unit hydrograph method is required for projects with larger drainage areas. 1. No matter which method is used to calculate runoff, a developer or builder of residential property greater than one (1) acre in size, or any property that was platted as a part of an overall tract which was greater than one (1) acre in size (including churches and schools), shall develop the property so that the rate of runoff created by the development as it leaves the property does not exceed the rate of runoff that is currently occurring in the existing conditions. A developer or builder of commercial property greater than one-half (1/2) acre must follow the above guidelines. 2. Runoff computations shall be based upon fully developed watershed conditions in accordance with the land use projections in the latest comprehensive land use plan for the City of colleyville. The design engineer shall size drainage facilities by disregarding the detention effects of upstream property and calculating the runoff as if the off- site property was developed without any detention. If an approved regional detention/retention facility is in operation, the design engineer may size downstream drainage facilities based on consideration of the detention effects of the regional facility. C. Drainaqe Areas Less Than one-hundred acres 1. Computation of Storm water Runoff for drainage areas less than one-hundred (100) acres shall be by the "Rational Method," which is based on the principle that the maximum rate of runoff from a given drainage area for an assumed rainfall intensity occurs when all parts of the area are contributing to the flow at the point of discharge. ..............E'C1~~.C1~~.C1~...:...I'J.<?._~f?\!~I<?.p~~..IClI1~....... . . .. .............................l?~y~I.<:>.P~q...J='.Clr~5..i.t~.5............................................ .~iI191~~C1rTlily'3~~iqf?l1tiClI ... . .ml?lJpl~)(mm. .. . m~lJltipl~~ClrTJilym . Schools .......................................................... . Churches . .-.-..-................................................................................,..............,....................................... .. . mm ..I'J~ig~~<:>.~h<:>.<?q<::<?rTlrTlf?Tc:i<lI... Office Commercial . ........................................................., ,.. ........... Commercial Industrial , 0.30 . .mmmlg.4Qm 0.60 0.60 .-.............................-........ 0.70 ................................ 0.70 0.70 mmmmLQ,T9m . ..... .. .. .mmLm9:X9. J9:~?_m.. 0.85 2. Time of concentration is the longest time, without interruption of flow by detention devices that a drop of water takes to flow from the farthest point of the drainage area to the point of concentration (i.e. the point of design). The time of concentration is composed of the inlet time and the flow time in a conduit or channel to the point of design. The inlet time shall be 10 minutes for property zoned multiple family, churches, schools, local business, central business, commercial, or industrial. An inlet time of 15 minutes shall be used for property zoned for parks, cemeteries, agricultural, and single family residential. When designing inlets and laterals, the time of concentration is equal to the inlet time. The design engineer will compare the above specified inlet times to the actual calculated inlet time by computing the flow time overland and along the gutter to the first inlet. Manning's Equation shall be used to determine flow time to the inlet. The design engineer may use the actual calculated or specified inlet time. In no case shall a longer inlet time be used than 10 minutes for multiple family, commercial, churches, schools, industrial and business areas and 15 minutes for parks, cemeteries, agricultural, and single-family areas. D. Drainaqe Areas of one-hundred (100) acres or More 1. For drainage areas of one-hundred (100) acres or more where the use of the "Rational Method" does not provide reliable results, the use of a unit hydrograph method shall be made. The use of a unit hydrograph calculation will be based upon standard and accepted engineering principles subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. Acceptable methods include the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Technical Release Number 55 or the Corps of Engineers HEc-1 models for drainage areas one-hundred (100) acres or more. 2. The unit hydrograph method shall be based upon fully developed watershed conditions assuming no effects from the small on-site detention facilities for maintaining the rate of runoff as if the property was undeveloped. The detention effects of large regional detention facilities can be taken into account in unit hydrograph methods. 3. Circumstances that may require the use of a unit hydrograph method include sizing open channels, reclaiming floodplains, creating lakes, or building other types of drainage-related facilities on major drainage courses. Design engineers of these types of facilities should be aware that the requirement of designing for fully developed watershed conditions will mean that they will have to calculate these fully developed flows instead of using the flows calculated in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) flood insurance studies for colleyville or Tarrant County or from studies performed for or approved by the City of colleyville. E. Desiqn Storm Frequencies - All developments submitted must provide data for the following design storm frequencies: 2- Year / 5- Year / 10- Year / 25- Year / 50-Year / 100- Year. 1. Drainage facilities shall be designed in accordance with the following table: Closed StormSewerSystems: and Inlets at Street Low Point i ....?r...~?9.........._.......mm...............m................ . ....c::'=!I\lE3~?n.g...~.rig9E3.~.................. Concrete-lined Channels .........,.............................................................. . Earthen Channels i 5-year with 1 DO-year positive overflow in streets i such that the depth of flow in the street does not , exceed the right-of-way or drainage easement ...c::.?P?c::.it.y.:.....................................mmm.m............................. 1 DO-year with positive overflow : 100- ear r DO-year 2. The approved drainage system shall provide for positive overflow at all low points and these areas must be denoted on the plans as such. The term "positive overflow" means that when the inlets do not function properly or when the design capacity of the conduit is exceeded, the excess flow can be conveyed overland along a grassed or paved course. Normally, this would mean along a street or alley, or shall require the dedications of special drainage easements on private property. F. Street and Allev Capacity 1. Streets - Streets and storm drains within new developments shall be designed so that storm water runoff resulting from a design storm of a one-hundred (100) year frequency is contained within the available right-of-way and/or drainage easement. The capacity of the street and right-of-way and/or easement and the storm sewer pipe working in combination must be designed for a capacity to safely contain a storm water from a design storm of one-hundred (100) year frequency. 2. Alleys - The flows created by the one-hundred (100) year storm shall be contained within the capacity of all paved alleys. G. Inlet Placement and Capacity - The storm sewer system is to begin at the point where the storm water from a five (5) year frequency storm reaches curb depth, with the exception of collector streets on which storm sewer facilities must be designed to prevent one-twelve (12') foot wide lane from ponding and on major streets on which storm sewer facilities must be designed to prevent one-twelve (12') foot wide lane in each direction from ponding. At such point where the combined capacity of the street and storm drain system satisfies the five (5) year street capacity criteria (as previously described) but the one-hundred (100) year frequency storm runoff can not be contained within the right-of-way additional pick-up points (inlet capacity) shall be provided along with an increase in storm sewer capacity so that the one-hundred (100) year frequency storm runoff will be contained within the right-of-way. 1. Inlets shall be placed upstream from an intersection whenever possible. At any intersection, only one street shall be crossed with surface drainage and this street shall be the lower classified street. When an alley intersects a street, inlets shall be placed in the alley whenever flow down that alley would cause the capacity of the intersecting street to be exceeded. 2. The minimum inlet size shall be ten (10') feet. No more than twenty (20') feet of inlet shall be placed along one gutter at any given location. Minimum sizes of laterals shall be twenty-one (21") inches for use with ten (10') foot inlets, and twenty-four (24") inch laterals with fourteen (14') foot, twenty (20') foot inlets, and drop inlets. Where laterals tie into trunk lines, place the laterals on a minimum angle forty-five (450) degrees and a maximum angle of sixty (600) degrees with the trunk line and connect them so that the longitudinal centers intersect. 3. Manholes are required every three hundred feet (300'). Junction boxes are required at every change in flow line direction, change in pipe size, and where a convergence of more than two pipes occurs. Manholes are to be five feet (5') square and can be precast or cast in place. H. Pipe Desiqn Standards 1. Storm sewer conduit shall be sized to flow full. Manning's Equation shall be used to determine the conduit size. 2. Design Velocities a. Minimum - two and a half feet (2.5') per second. b. Maximum - twelve feet (12') per second. c. The maximum discharge velocities in the pipe shall also not exceed the permitted velocity of the receiving channel or conduit at the outfall to prevent erosive conditions. The maximum outfall velocity of a conduit in partial flow shall be computed for partial depth and shall not exceed the maximum permissible velocity of the receiving channel unless controlled by an appropriate energy dissipater (e.g. stilling basins, impact basins, riprap protection ). 3. In general, storm water shall be carried in concrete pipe conduit within the right-of-way but other types of conduit can be used to carry stormwater in areas other than the right-of-way. However, prior permission to use other conduit materials must be obtained from the Director of Public Works. 4. Hydraulic Gradient (also refer to the Ft. Worth Drainage Manual) a. Conduits must be sized, and slopes must be set, such that runoff flows smoothly down the drainage system. To insure this smooth passage, the hydraulic gradient must be at the proper elevations. The hydraulic grade line shall be established and shown on the plans for all storm sewer design. b. The hydraulic grade line shall in no case be closer to the surface of the ground or street than one foot (1'). The HGL must not exceed the neck into the inlet. c. Hydraulic gradient calculations shall account for all head losses that may occur in the storm sewer line. Friction head loss shall be determined by direct application of Manning's Equation. Minor losses due to turbulence at structures shall be determined using Appendix A of this section. 5. Inspection / Testing a. The compaction of backfill shall meet or exceed 95% Standard Proctor density. b. All storm sewer conduits shall be inspected prior to acceptance by the City. All conduit forty-two_inch (42") or less shall be inspected using television inspection. Conduits larger than forty-two_inch (42") may be inspected visually. c. A City representative shall be present during the television inspection. d. Televised Inspection Criteria (1) All television equipment used shall have a minimum of two-hundred-twenty (220) lines of horizontal resolution. The picture shall be in color. (2) All video information on tape must have good picture quality. (3) As a title heading on the tape and during the televising, the operator must: i. Note the project name and Contractor name. ii. Note the name of the company and the operator performing the video inspection. iii. Note line size and material, joint type and length. iv. Line segment to be televised including beginning and ending station numbers. v. Note page of plans used and year plans were stamped. vi. Note date and time of inspection. vii. A footage counter must be displayed on the tape during the filming. viii. Show the above title block before and after each line segment. Show the title block at one-hundred (100') foot intervals while filming the line segment. ix. All defects should be shown on film for a minimum of 10 seconds before proceeding with the televising. (4) The Contractor shall supply a log sheet used in conjunction with the video tape for written documentation. All written information gathered must be legible and clearly understandable. i. Note the project name, Contractor name and contract number. ii. Note the name of the company and the operator performing the video inspection. iii. Note pipe size and material, joint type and length between joints. IV. Note the VCR tape footage counter, start to end. v. Note line segment to be televised, station numbers from and station numbers to length of line segment as indicated on plans. vi. Note page of plans used and year plans were stamped. vii. Note date and time of inspection. viii. Indicate by sketch the line segment to be televised in relation to surrounding road intersections and street addresses. Identify manhole station numbers. Show direction of flow with arrows and direction the camera is going. Indicate direction of north on the sketch. ix. Note the water depth at the beginning, every fifty (50') foot station, every change in grade, and at the end of the line segment. x. Identify the clock location, direction, size and type of laterals entering main. Indicate laterals as saddles, punched, or glued fittings. xi. Indicate final footage televised at end of the log sheet. (5) One tape per visual televised inspection project shall be furnished to the Project Inspector. (6) Tapes must be VHS format, one (1") inch wide T-120, high quality tape. Tapes are to be recorded on SP (2 hours) play. (7) All tapes and run sheets shall be submitted to the City. All tapes and log sheets shall become the property of the City. I. Culvert Desiqn - Culverts must be designed using standard engineering practices and engineering judgment. Culverts shall be designed in accordance with the latest edition of the City of Fort Worth Drainage Manual. If the City of Fort Worth Drainage Manual does not incorporate the necessary standards please refer to the Texas Department 01 Transportation (TxDOT) Hydraulic Design Manual. 1. One (1 ') foot of freeboard is required between the one-hundred (100) year water surface elevation and the top of curb elevation. Exceptions must be approved in writing by the Director of Public Works. 2. Culvert hydraulic grade line calculations shall consider both inlet and outlet control. 3. Culverts shall be aligned to provide the minimum resistance to the flow of water during the 10, 50, 100 and 500 year events. 4. The maximum velocity through a culvert shall be fifteen (15') feet per second. 5. Stream stability shall be assessed when determining the number of barrels, height and width and culvert skew. Potential for scour shall be accounted for in the design. 6. Hydraulic jumps shall not be allowed from face of culvert to ten (10') feet from the culvert, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. J. Bridqes - Two (2') feet of freeboard is required between the one-hundred (100) year water surface elevation and the low chord of the bridge. Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the Director of Public Works in writing. 1 . The skew of the bridge piers and abutments shall be oriented as close to the normal or flood direction of flow resulting in an angle of attack as close to zero (0) degrees as possible. 2. Bridge piers shall be aligned to provide the minimum resistance to the flow of water during the 10, 50, 100 and 500 year events. 3. Computer modeling programs used for the hydraulic analysis of bridges shall be HEc-RAS, Version 2.2, or HEC2. 4. Stream stability shall be assessed when designing the abutments and interior bents of the bridge. Scour shall be accounted for in the design. 5. Where flows are supercritical, erosion control measures shall be used in an area from one-hundred (100') feet upstream from a bridge to twenty-five (25') feet downstream from a bridge. K. Channels - Open channels may be used instead of an enclosed system when a pipe greater than an eighty-four (84") inch diameter (or other shape equivalent to more than thirty-eight and a half (38.5) square feet) is required to carry the design storm event. 1 . Design Criteria: a. All open channel design must follow the Corp of Engineers Guidelines. b. Channels may be left in their natural state provided that the channel velocities are six (6.0') feet per second or less and that one (1') foot of freeboard is available during the design storm event. c. If the natural channel is to be replaced by an improved channel, the flow from the one-hundred (100') year design flood must be contained within the improved channel while allowing for one (1 ') foot of freeboard. d. Improved channels shall be trapezoidal shaped and include a lined section if the design velocity is greater than six feet per second. Lining types such as concrete, rock walls and gab ions may be used upon approval of the Director of Public Works. The maximum velocity allowed in concrete lined channels is fifteen (15') feet per second. e. Unless shown to be feasible in a soils report sealed by a licensed professional engineer in the State of Texas, and approved by the Director of Public Works, improved channels shall have minimum side slopes of: (1) 4 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical for earthen, grassed-lined side slopes. (2) 2 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical for concrete-lined side slopes. f. Where practicable, all unpaved channels should have sufficient grade to avoid ponding. A minimum slope of 1.00% is required for earthen channels and swales, except those used as part of a wetlands area. In areas where 1.00% cannot be obtained a pilot channel approved by the City may be used. All lined channels are to have a minimum slope of 0.50% and earthen channels a minimum slope of 1.00%. g. The developer or owner shall use low maintenance vegetation for vegetative cover, as approved by the Director of Public Works prior to planting. The selection of materials shall comply with the current ground cover listing for North Central Texas furnished through the Texas Agricultural Extension Service. 2. Manning's Equation can be used to design channels and determine water surface elevations and velocities when backwater effects are negligible, subject to approval by the Director of Public Works. Channels where backwater effects occur must be designed using models accepted by FEMA. 3. All channel sections must consider and account for channel stabilization in their design. This requirement pertains to all sections whether they are left in their natural condition or are modified in any manner. The design of all drainage channels and swales shall assure adequate capacity and minimum maintenance to overcome the result of erosion, silting, sloughing of bends or similar occurrences. 4. When performing hydraulic analyses for channel or drainageway design, the one-hundred year (100) year starting water surface shall be based on the following: a. Known water surface elevations should be used where possible. Known elevations are available for some creeks and channels from previous studies approved by the City. b. When known water surface elevations are not available the slope-area method or a rating curve may be used. (1) A rating curve approximates the starting water surface elevation for a given flow by using the relationship between known flows and water surface elevations for the creek. This is an excellent method for determining starting conditions if good data is available to develop the rating curve. (2) The slope-area method approximates the starting water surface elevation by calculating the normal depth for the channel. To calculate normal depth the slope of energy gradient for the channel is required. The energy slope can be approximated using the average slope of the channel or the average slope of the water surface. 5. The design of the channel lining shall take into account the super-elevation of the water surface around curves and other changes in direction. In general a radius that is three (3) times the top width of the water surface during the design storm event is recommended for channel bends. 6. A chain link fence six (6') feet in height, or other improvements as approved on a case by case basis by the Director of Public Works, shall be constructed on each side of the lined channel. 7. Gabion or other forms of channel lining may be used in lieu of reinforced concrete lining with the approval of the Director of Public Works. L. Detention / Retention Facilities - Detention or retention facilities may be used to reduce peak discharges where conditions prevent conveying stormwater to an adequate discharge point. Detention or retention facilities shall be privately maintained unless the City of colleyville has agreed to accept public dedication of the facility. 1. Runoff rates for all land uses shall be limited to the rates that would be produced from single family residential areas. This requirement also applies to the development of sites as churches, schools, and other institutional uses. Detention/retention facilities shall be designed for the fully developed one-hundred (100) year design flood according to the criteria contained in this Section. 2. The minimum amount of storage volume of the detention basin shall be that volume required to reduce runoff rate during the one-hundred (100) year event to the undeveloped rate. The outflow structure shall be sized to reduce the 2, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 year discharges to the undeveloped rate. Dedicated detentionlretention basins shall also include an additional one (1) foot of freeboard and two (2) feet of sediment storage. The volume of runoff storage for drainage areas greater than one-hundred (100) acres shall be computed using unit hydrograph procedures. Acceptable unit hydrograph procedures are provided in Section 14-170.0.1 of this document. For drainage areas less than one-hundred (100) acres, the above methods are recommended; however, an approximate routing method based on the modified rational method is allowable. 3. All detention facilities designed shall consider the timing of the flood peak in the main channel into which the detention facility drains. Delaying the peak from a site in lower portions of a watershed may result in a higher peak on the main channel. The Director of Public Works may require that upstream and downstream ponds be included in the detention design model. 4. A detention facility shall have enough gradient to ensure positive drainage to the outlet structures so as to avoid nuisance conditions such as standing water, odors, insects, and weeds. A minimum slope of 0.50% towards the outlet structure is required for all grass lined detention facilities. 5. Detention areas in parking lots shall not be: a. In required parking spaces. b. Behind speed bumps unless the speed bumps are made with reinforced concrete. c. Deeper than six (6") inches unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 6. Drainage easements shall be provided for all regional detention/retention facilities and for other detention/retention facilities where two or more owners are involved. 7. Individual detention facilities shall be designed to empty in less than three (3) hours, unless it is also serving as an erosion control facility. 8. Detention facilities used as a sediment control facility shall meet the following requirements: a. The sediment control facility shall be designed with minimal velocities such that sediment is dropped and not picked up by flows at any time during the storm event. b. The basin shall be designed with two (2) feet of sediment storage area so that sediment removal is not required more than twice a year. Expected removal periods greater than twice a year must be specified in the maintenance plan and approved by the Director of Public Works. c. Sediment control facilities cannot be used to meet detention requirements unless the volume of sediment is included in the calculations for the detention basin design. 9. The owner shall maintain detention/retention facilities unless the facilities are dedicated to the City of Colleyville. Detention facilities must be properly maintained if they are to function as intended over a long periOd of time. The following measures are required to ensure the facility functions properly. a. Facilities should be mowed at least twice a year to control weeds and discourage woody growth. b. Debris, litter and accumulated sediment should be removed from detention facilities at least twice a year. Particular attention should be given to removal of debris, litter and sediment around outlet structures. The Director of Public Works may require that the property owner remove said debris when in the Director's determination that property damage or a flood hazard may exist. c. Detention basins designed for sediment removal shall be maintained as specified in the maintenance plan and approved by the City with construction plan submittal. 10. Retention facilities shall provide for continuous water movement, aeration facilities or other process approved by the City that is designed to prevent surface accumulation of aquatic vegetation. Failure to prevent surface accumulation of aquatic vegetation will result in additional water movement, aeration facilities or other processes approved by the City being required. M. Flumes - The use of flumes is not recommended for widespread use. Flumes shall not be permitted when the purpose of a permanent flume is to carry runoff down the sides of earthen channels. 1. A flume may be used to direct overflow runoff along property lines until the runoff can be intercepted by streets or conduits. A flume shall not carry more than ten (10) cubic feet per second during the one-hundred (100) year storm event with a slope of 1.00%. 2. All flumes crossing sidewalks shall be covered or bridged such as to minimize danger to pedestrians. 3. All edges are to be protected with rock rip-rap or other form of protection for erosion control and scour purposes. N. Lakes - Approval to develop in any area subject to inundation by a lake must be obtained from the appropriate agency responsible for that particular lake before the city grants its approval. Agencies that should be contacted include U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tarrant County Water Control Board, TcEQ, the Trinity River Authority, and FEMA. Regardless of approvals obtained from those agencies listed above, no filling, development or construction in any area subject to inundation by a lake shall occur without the approval of the City Manager. The City Manager may require any studies necessary to determine that filling, development or construction will not have a detrimental effect on adjacent, upstream or downstream properties and buildings. This subsection in no way diminishes other requirements of this section. O. Lot Drainaqe and Gradinq - Grading and drainage of all residential lots shall be designed in a manner which will allow one lot to drain across an adjacent lot and into a permanent structure, such as a concrete flume, lined channel, or proper inlet to an adequate drainage facility, or to a street right-of-way. If an approved drainage structure is not present, it will be required of the developer to construct the necessary facilities. (0-00-1261/12/19/00) 1. Sheet flow techniques shall be used for lot to lot drainage where possible. (0-00-1261/12/19/00) 2. Single lots shall accommodate their own drainage into an approved structure where topographic elevations allow this to occur. (0-00-1261/12/19/00) CITY COUNCIL cc0lll AGENDA BRIEFING il~X~$ "'- MEETING DATE: 12/13/05 CITY MANAGER I d ,.~ ITEM#: 8 DEPARTMENT HEAD i "I ORDINANCE # : 0-05-1559 FINANCE REVIEW i N.A. Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: Approval of a Zoning Change from AG Agricultural and R40 Single Family Residential to PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential on 3.756 acres, located at 5204 to 5212 Pool Road, Case Z- 05-033 First Reading and Public Hearing Mr. David Staley is the owner of a 3.756 acre tract of land located on the west side of Pool Road in the 5200 block. The property is currently zoned AG-Agriculture and R40-Single Family Residential and the owner has submitted a request to rezone the property to Planned Unit Development-Residential for the purpose of developing the property as a single-family residential subdivision. No opposition from the surrounding property owners has been expressed regarding the proposed rezoning request. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning request by a unanimous vote. The following are the issues associated with this request. Request. Rezone from AG-Agricultural and R40-Single Family Residential to PUD-R Planned Unit Development-Residential. Proposed Use. The applicant is requesting to rezone a 3.756 acre tract of land located on the west side of Pool Road in the 5200 block. The site is adjacent to the proposed site of the future Colleyville Fire Station, which is located to the south of the subject property. The applicant is aware of the City's plans to build a new fire station on the adjacent City owned property. The subject property is also adjacent to the City-owned property situated to the west that has recently been purchased for development of a senior center, with additional acreage for future park and/or public use. The applicant is aware of the future use of this property. The applicant is seeking a zoning change in order to develop the property as seven single family residences, with lot sizes ranging from a minimum of 13,564 square feet to a maximum of 28,078 square feet. Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future use of this area for single family residential type land uses. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1559 Page 2 of 4 Surrounding Development Trends. The surrounding properties are single family residential and institutional uses. The property to the north is zoned AG and is developed as O. C. Taylor Elementary School. Property to the south is zoned R40 and is the future site of the City of Colleyville Fire Station. Property to the west is zoned AG and is owned by the City of Colleyville and currently developed as a church, which will eventually converted to a senior center. The properties to the east are zoned AG and R20 and are developed as Ashmore Addition. Residential Density. The Master Plan suggests a maximum residential density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre in most situations. The Master Plan also suggests that higher-density projects should be located on smaller parcels that make less dense development economically difficult. The density of the proposed project is 1.86 dwelling units per acre. The PUD-R regulations require a maximum residential density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre. Lot Sizes. The PUD-R standards allow for lots as small as 13,000 square feet in area, provided the average lot size is 16,000 square feet. The lots in the proposed development range in size from 13,564 square feet to 28,078 square feet. The average lot size is 16,149 square feet. The PUD-R regulations require a minimum 100 foot lot width. The minimum lot width in the proposed development, excluding lots located along the cul-de-sac, is 99.9 feet. The developer is requesting that the lot sizes and lot widths be approved as shown on the zoning exhibit. Open Space. Open space areas comprising 0.5 acres are provided in the development. The open space area proposed by the developer equals 15% of the total development. The PUD- R regulations require that a minimum of 20% of the land area be dedicated as open space for the use of the residents in the development. The concept of the PUD regulations is to allow modified lot sizes from those required in the typical straight zoning districts, but to require open space areas in a PUD-R. The proposed open space primarily consists of three areas, two open space lots along Pool Road and a single lot located at the western end of the cul-de-sac. The two 25 foot wide open space greenbelts adjacent to Pool Road will include a ten (10) foot wide sidewalk, permanent landscaping and areas where plants will be rotated four times a year to display the appropriate seasons. The planting and maintenance of seasonal plants will be the responsibility of the Homeowner's Association (HOA). The western most open space area includes a detention pond to handle the drainage from this development. The open space lot will also include an open area for field sports. A trail system will be constructed along the perimeter of the open field and will lead to a waterfall and koi pond. The trail system will contain a four (4) foot tall lighting system. Two benches with a table will also be located within the open space lot. The HOA will be required to maintain all of the amenities located within the open space lot. These features are described in the Common Area Amenities letter from the applicant attached to this agenda briefing. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1559 Page 3 of 4 The PUD-R regulations require open space areas adjacent to street rights-of-ways to be landscaped with one-three inch caliper tree per each 50 feet of street frontage. This development has 287 linear feet of frontage on Pool Road, which will require the planting or retention of six trees. This requirement has been added to the proposed PUD-R ordinance for this development. Detention Pond. The current PUD-R regulations limit the amount of open space area that can be used for retention or detention ponds to a maximum of 25% of the open space. The PUD-R regulations require a retention pond to include at least one aeration device, such as a fountain, water fall, etc. The developer proposes to include a detention pond in the development, which will not require any aeration device, since storm water will only be detained during peak rainfall periods. Drainage. The applicant's proposal includes on-site detention, which will discharge to a twelve-foot wide drainage easement located along the western boundary of the adjacent church property. The Pleasant Glade Assembly of God Church property was platted on June 20, 1989, and contains a twelve-foot wide public drainage easement around the east, north and west sides of the property. The applicant has submitted a drainage plan to the Engineering Department. The capacity of the detention facility and the exact type of drainage improvements will be determined at time of platting. Any off-site public improvements required for the subject development will be a cost to the development, as specified by the subdivision platting standards contained in the Land Development Code. Fences, Walls and Screening. The developer proposes to construct a seven (7) foot tall masonry and stone screening wall along the open space lots adjacent to Pool Road. Site Plan. The developer has provided a site plan, which is incorporated into the PUD-R ordinance for the subject property. A copy of the proposed site plan is attached to this agenda briefing. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Single- family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on average. Based on this average, the seven proposed residences would add approximately 67 vehicle trips per day to the surrounding roadways. Statement of Planning Objectives. The developer has provided a written Statement of Planning Objectives, which has been used for drafting the proposed PUD-R ordinance for the subject property. A copy of the Statement of Planning Objectives is attached to this agenda briefing. The Statement of Planning Objectives describes the nature of the proposed development, includes a development schedule, a statement of development goals and economic development information. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 13 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1559 Page 4 of 4 the Land Development Code. At the time of agenda preparation, no letters of opposition to the request have been received. Summary. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the Land Use Plan, which designates the western portion of the subject property as a single-family residential area. Although the development does not provide 20% open space, it does propose 15% open space with amenities, including an open field for sports, waterfall and koi pond, a lighted trail system and a table with benches. The Land Development Code permits a smaller amount of open space so long as it includes amenities. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at the November 28, 2005 meeting and recommended approval by a unanimous vote. Recommendation Approval Attachments · Zoning and Location Map · Site Plan from Applicant · List of Property Owners Notified · Statement of Planning Objectives · Development Schedule · Economic Development Information · Common Area Amenities · Ordinance 0-05-1559 AG 2512 Zoning and Location Map 5300 ~5212 ~ D NORTH AG 5213 5209 5108 ~@~~~ ~ -f",~ --..f ~ g;;..~r. d ~~~~~ '!' ~2:lo~ -i.. ~ m ~I~i ;~ -rl .., q " ;;:..~~ .: ~-, U~ ~ ,. 0., '".l " ~,,~ .ti n '~~ p U ,- P i ~ ,,-'~ {"j' 4:., H :i ll.~ H ~ ! fi ~ t< " ~ ;4 " <> p l ,. , m :i' z J P N g 6 !:l H n~ ~ e ~ nl Sl1 5;; i ... :? i f;;-; l:'i~ ~ Site Plan from Applicant ~~ ';! ~. ~~ ~ I . Ii:': I!,~ '~ ,--- Jim Dewey, Jr. 2500 Texas Drive #100 Irving, TX 75062 Dzura, Michael Etux Patricia 2704 Highgrove Ct. Colleyville, TX 76034 Gilbert, Maudie Faye 5212 Pool Rd. Colleyville, TX 76034 King, Hayley Marie 2700 Highgrove Ct. Colleyville, TX 76034 Texcan Ventures V11.Ltd. 5100 Pool Rd. Colleyville, TX 76034 List of Property Owners Notified 1st Assembly of God Church Inc. 4309 Colleyville Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 Feemster, Michael Etux Kenja 5209 Pool Rd. Colleyville, TX 76034 Grapevine Colleyville ISD 3051 W. Hwy. 26 Grapevine, TX 76051 Madewell, Brent A & Kimberly 5213 Pool Rd, Colleyville, TX 76034 Bohl, Gregory Etux Tracie G 2701 Highgrove Ct. Colleyville, TX 76034 Folger, William P Etux Paige D 2701 Red Oak Ct. W. Colleyville, TX 76034 Hall, Charles W Etux Helen F 4200 Glade Rd. Colleyville, TX 76034 Robertson, Delma 0 5204 Pool Rd. Colleyville, TX 76034 CAPITAL CORP REAL ESTATE · CONSTRUCTION · INVESTMENTS Emily Place Addition STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES Emily Place is envisioned to be a comfortable and family-friendly street of seven custom homes. The owner of CapitalCorp, Inc. will be building his personal home there and moving his family there approx May 2007. CapitalCorp will be building all the homes and does not plan on selling any lots to outside builders in order to maintain quality on the street. Dan Tankersley, AlA will be the architect on all homes built on the street. We plan to have a variety of styles that will be individual, but tie in to the street. A HomeOwners Association will enforce deed restrictions and maintain the streetscape amenities on Pool Rd and will maintain the front yards of each home. 3435 FINLEY RD. A private park in the SW corner of the property may be constructed for the use of all residents. This is still in the planning stages. If it does come about, the HomeOwners Assocation will also maintain it. RECEIVED OCT 2 8 ZM~ TEL: (972) 259-8787 Per ............. IRVING, TEXAS 75062 FAX: (972) 258-8162 The size of the homes will vary depending of the buyer. Minimum sizes will be established. The projected living area of the homes is 4200sf - 4800sf. In addition to professional landscaping and design, we plan on wrought iron electric gate access at the building line to the garage area. Screening of playground equipment behind the building line will be required. Since the builder will be living on the street with his family, every aspect of the design and construction process will be scrutinized more. Currently there is a 1700sf older house on the SE corner of the property and a 1000sf old house on the N E corner of the property. We believe this project will be an enhancement to the neighborhood and to Co II eyville . RECEIVED OCT 2 8 Z005 ~ Per ............. \ CAPITAL CORP REAL ESTATE · CONSTRUCTION · INVESTMENTS Emily Place Addition DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Our plan is to produce a quality seven lot subdivision in a cost effective and expeditious manner. Once we have received a positive response from Planning & Zoning, we will start the platting process. Based on the timelines from the city regarding cutoff dates for submissions, we hope to have final 2nd reading from the City Council by February 2006. We will immediately start street construction and would predict street acceptance by June 2006. We will also start the first house July 2006 and the 2nd house November 2006. The construction of the final and 7th house is projected to start December 2007. RECEIVED; OCT 2 8 2005 3435 FINLEY RD. IRVING, TEXAS 75062 Per ...-.......~--::1 TEL: (972) 259-8787 FAX: (972) 258-8162 CAPITAL CORP REAL ESTATE · CONSTRUCTION · INVESTMENTS Emily Place Addition ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Currently the two houses and land are on the tax rolls in a taxable amount of $228,400. Our plan is to increase the taxable amount to $4,500,000 within 30 months of street construction. The following is our estimate of times, size, price/sf and taxes to Colleyville for each lot: Lot # Start Date Living Area Sales Price/sf Taxes 2 4 1 5 3 7 6 7/06 11/06 1/07 6/07 8/07 10/07 2/08 4200sf 4500sf 4200sf 4500sf 4500sf 4200sf 4500sf 3435 FINLEY RD. IRVING, TEXAS 75062 $148.81 $144.44 $148.81 $144.44 $144.44 $148.81 $148.81 RECEIVED OCT 2 8 ZBBS Per ............. $2171 $2258 $2171 $2258 $2258 $2171 $2171 TEL: (972) 259-8787 FAX: (972) 258-8162 CAPITAL CORP REAL ESTATE · CONSTRUCTION · INVESTMENTS EMILY PLACE ADDITION Common Area Amenities The addition will feature three Common Areas that will be maintained by the Home Owners Association. We believe that we are providing an abundance of common space in our development plan based on the fact that only seven families will be living on the street. The two Common Areas at Pool Road will consist of approx 7,000 sf ft. This area is planned to have a seven foot masonry and stone fence running along Pool Road adjacent to the lots adjoining them to the West. From the fence improvement to Pool Road, which is approx 25' plus R.O.W., the Common Area will feature a winding 10' sidewalk trail, numerous trees, boulders and flowering hedges. In addition, this sprinklered area will feature several areas for seasonal color that will be changed out four times per year by the Home Owners Association. The SW Common Area at the end of the cul-de-sac will be the main Park Area for the seven owners. The plan is to provide a park that is a visual asset to the owners PLUS is a useable area for families. Our plan is to provide in this area a depressed detention area for drainage and to make use of this usually dry area with a place for kids to play kickball, 3435 FINLEY RD. TEL: (972) 259-8787 FAX: (972) 258-8162 IRVING, TEXAS 75062 football and golf putting. A trail system will circle that area and will provide the main feature of a waterfall cascading into a koi pond. Two commercial style benches, a covered area with a Key West I tropical theme with picnic table will also make the area useable. An area will be set aside for a possible shuffle board court. Four foot high trail lighting will highlight the area, make the area secure but not cause light pollution that pole lighting would. All of this nearly 17,000 sf ft Common Area will be landscaped and sprinklered to tie in with the plantings and rock work of the Pool Road Common Areas. ORDINANCE 0-05-1559 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CbLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING OF APPROXIMATELY 3.756 ACRES OUT OF THE S.C. H. WITTEN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 1740, FROM THE AG-AGRICUL TURAL AND R40- SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS TO THE PUD-R PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by JDJR Engineers & Consultants, Inc. on October 28,2005, under Case No. Z-05-033; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. Ordinance 0-05-1559 Page 2 of 5 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning on a 3.756 acre parcel of land situated in the S.C.H. Witten Survey, Abstract 1740, from the AG-Agricultural and R40-Single Family Residential zoning districts to the PUD-R Planned Unit Development-Residential zoning district, as depicted on the attached Zoning and Location Map, labeled as Exhibit "A", and described by Metes and Bounds, labeled as Exhibit "B". THAT the Official Zoning Map of the City of Colleyville be amended to incorporate the zoning change approved herein. THAT the above described tract of land shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. GENERAL a. The purpose of this PUD-R is for single-family residential development, constructed at an approximate density of 1.86 dwelling units per acre. b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the Colleyville Land Development Code, except where amended by this Ordinance. 2. CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND PLATTING a. The subdivision shall be generally consistent with the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit "C", which shall not be considered the preliminary plat. The actual street and lot arrangement may differ from that shown on Exhibit "C" to accommodate topographic, drainage or other conditions. b. The developer shall submit and receive approval from the City a Preliminary and Final Plat in accordance with the requirements of the Land Development Code prior to development of this PUD-R. Any off- site public improvements shall be at the expense of the developer, in accordance with the provisions of the Land Development Code. 3. PERMITTED USES a. Single family residences, detached b. Parks and open space Ordinance 0-05-1559 Page 3 of 5 4. RESIDENTIAL LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS Residential lot requirements and setbacks shall comply with the following provisions. Building line setbacks established by the Conceptual Site Plan, labeled as Exhibit "C", shall control where such building line setback is different from the following requirements. a. Minimum Lot Size b. Average Lot Size c. Minimum Lot Width d. Minimum Lot Depth e. Front Building Line f. Maximum Lot Coverage 13,564 square feet 16,000 square feet 99 feet 140 feet 30 feet 60% 5. OPEN SPACE a. This development shall provide a minimum of 15% common open space, as shown on Exhibit "C". All open space areas shall be landscaped and maintained by the Homeowner's Association. b. Two (2) twenty-five (25) foot wide greenbelt areas shall be provided at time of platting along the eastern boundary of this PUD-R. Said greenbelts shall be landscaped and contain one-three inch caliper tree per fifty (50) feet of street frontage along Pool Road. c. The open space areas on the southwestern part of this PUD-R may be utilized for storm water detention. d. The amenities will conform to the Common Area Amenities statement, labeled as Exhibit "D". 6. SIDEWALKS AND PATHWAYS a. Sidewalks along lot frontages shall be constructed by each homebuilder. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Colleyville Land Development Code. 7. OTHER a. The minimum square footage for all houses in this PUD-R shall not be less than four-thousand two hundred (4,200) square feet. b. If a detention pond is constructed in this development, it shall contain a minimum of one (1) aeration device, such as a fountain, waterfall or underwater device, which shall be approved by the City of Colleyville Engineering Department. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. Sec. 7. Sec. 8. Sec. 9. Ordinance 0-05-1559 Page 4 of 5 THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor Ordinance 0-05-1559 Page 5 of 5 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney AG Exhibit A - Zoning and Location Map 2512 5300 AG 5213 ~5212 5209 5108 Exhibit B - Metes and Bounds Description l"md Boon.a s Doscrlption (Overall Tract) {)r ()lland in the VViUtm Survey, Golleyville, T armnt rexas and being a portion land Mortgage Company limited Subdivision by t 14, Page 240, Deed Records, Tarrant County, of that certain tmet (",{Hlve)'ed to Earl Gilbert by ()eed Reoord$, Tarrant County. tract oonvey<id to Herbert M.Snlder at1d Vt)lume 5922.. Page Deed Records, ANOEXCEPT those pOlllOl1l$ {;on\feYf;~d the City in Volumet0122, Page 2149 Oe~ Records, Tartant Calmly, Texas. being nrore partlcular1y described by metes and bounds (J$ plastic cap stamped "JDJR' st:ttlnr Pool Road (variable width rlght of way point), Sl:1mO poirlt balrl~~ SOlitheast comorof the T fact: West tho south ()l Lot Blockt, rninLJtes. 48 seconds fllong \Z(xnmon Tract, at Sl the corrunr of behlg is{)ulhwest comer of the along Ile oomn1On litH~ <>f 1 aoo said f~f;t If) a3/8-.inch rod bund for oomet in 1 Pool Rooo Additcn, an dctordino to the plat recorded in Volume 388-201, County, Texas, said point heft)!) northOflst comer Glade Ass1:Jlubly ()f God ,<\ddllion and ttl':1 l-\<:ltd 43 minutes 54 seconds Easlalong tho common line 'I, Pool Road Elernentar}l School Addition arid said Gilbort the southeast eomer of said Lot 1, and continuing 110l1h said Gilbel1 Tract, a total distance of 499.39 feet to a 5/g~ with plastic cap stamped "JDJR" set for oomer in the west right of Pool (28,(1 feet 10 centerline at this point); :llong right of way ofS:lid Pool Road the followin{j six GGUfSOS: a distance ol74.45 feet to a 3f6~lnch steel rod found for Corn()r; << distanCll of feet to a 5t8.inch steel rod with plastic cap stamped set for comer, same point being the beginning ofa curve to the right a 665.00 feet. a tangent of 10.58 feet and a long chord that minutes seconds West. a distance of 21.16 feet curve to the right, through a angle of 01 degree minutes an are length of 21.t1feet to a r"8~inch steel md with stamped" JOJR" for corner; 51 minutes 22 seconds West. a distanc(% of 102.68 feel to a 1/2- found for corner. same point being the beginning of a curve to the of 135.00 feet a tangent of 11.74 feet and a long chord that minutes 27 seconds West. a distance of 23.50 feet; Southwesterly. 50 curve to the left, through tt t-entral anglo of () 1 degree an am length of 2~H;o feet to a 318~jnch steel rod found r.omt:!r; 24 seconds East. at 28.20 feet pass a 1 !2*inch stoel corner of said Gilbertfract and also being the said Snider Tract. and continuing for a total distance of PLACE Of BEGINNNG, a computed area 01163.627 square teet or 3<756 acres of lanet i '" '" ~i ~ I ~'i~~, ~ ~~;~: M c~~m:: ~. ~~rn~ ):<~ ~?:l ::s Exhibit C -Conceptual Site Plan ~ ~ <' p , ~ ,. ~ ~ d J d ~ili J[~" '''. ''S i,~ i l"t ~ ~ ,. ! r--~ ~~ ;: ';" ~ ":<, ,~ H H " i~ f~ ;1 ;; ; ~ h:" , ,J :! ~ , p s ~ ~ , q t.'- n : Exhibit D -Common Area Amenities Statement C. LCORP 1# .. C()NSTRUC'rION · INVESTMENTS EMILY PLACE ADDIT N Common Area Amenities addition witt feature three Common Areas that will be maintained by the Home Owners Association, We believe we providing an abundance of common space in our plan based on the fact that only seven families be Hvingon street, two Common Areas at Pool Road wUI consist of approx ft This area is planned to have a seven foot and stone feooe running along Poot Road adjacent lots adjoining them to the West. From the fence improvement to Pool Road. which is approx 25' plus RO.W., Common Area will feature a. winding 10' sidewalk trail, boulders and flowering hedges., In addit.ion. sprinklered area will feature several areal for _alona.1 that will be changed out four times per year by the Home Owners Assooiation, Common Area at the end of the cul-de-sac witl be main Park Area for the seven owners, The plan is to a park that a visual asset to the owners PLUS is a area for families. Our plan is to provide in this area a depressed detention area for drainage and to make use of dry area with a place for kids to play kickball, 143::' Rn H~~'; ,\S L"m,y FAX. IftL football and golf putting. A trail system will circle that area will provide the main feature of a waterfall cascading into a koi pond. Two commercial style benches, a covered area with a Key West' tropical theme with picnic table will also make the area useable. An area will be set aside for a possible shuffle board court. Four foot high traU lighting will highlight the area, make the area secure but not cause light poHutionthat pole lighting would. All of this nearly 17,000 sf ft Common Area will be landscaped and sprinklered to tie in with the plantings and rock work of the Pool Road Common Areas. CITY COUNCIL cc@~'" AGENDA BRIEFING ll~X<:lS MEETING DATE: ! 12/13/05 ITEM #: i 9 RESOLUTION #: i R-05-2631 CITY MANAGER I DEPARTMENT HEAD ! FINANCE REVIEW ! N/A Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT : Consideration of appointments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Reading and Public Hearing In October 2005, Mr. Gil Turner, whose term expires December 2005, and Mr. Jerry Birkes, whose term expires December 2006, resigned from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board effective immediately. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board positions are normally advertised during the month of November and appointments considered by City Council in December; therefore, all open positions were advertised and applications accepted November 8 through December 8, 2005. There are five (5) positions to be filled on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board; four (4) positions whose terms expire December 2005 and one (1) position with an unexpired term of December 2006. The incumbents were notified that their term was expiring and asked to submit an application if they wished to be considered for reappointment. There are three (3) applicants whose names are listed below and their applications are attached. . Connie Hampton* . Robert Leininger* . Peter Riis* Interviews will be scheduled for the applicants with Council prior to the meeting. On the basis that there are five openings and three applicants, the advertising period will be extended to January 9, 2006. *Incumbent Attachments: . Parks and Recreation Advisory Board roster . Applications for Appointment . Resolution R-05-2631 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meets First Monday of the Month at 7:00 p.m. at the Park Annex Director: Monica Sue Walsh Office: 817.503.1180 PLACE 1 VACANT PLACE 2 Connie Hampton 5804 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 H: 817.281.5965 conhampton1@yahoo.com TERM: December 2003 - 2005 TERM: December 2004 - 2006 PLACE 4 VACANT PLACE 5 Pat Horn 110 Bartram Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.849.1085 H: 817,503.2385 pat.horn@esibka.com TERM: December 2004 - 2006 TERM: December 2003 - 2005 PLACE 7 Steve Oalri 1314 Hardage Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.849.1882 H: 817.481.8782 F: 817.427.9894 sdalri67@hotmail.com TERM: December 2004 - 2006 PLACE 8 Peter Riis 6902 Upland Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.352.6530 H: 817.329.5220 F: 817.421.6843 TERM: December 2003 - 2005 COUNCIL LIAISON Tom Hart 1717 Avondale Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.975.3671 H: 817.540.1171 F: 817.835.0392 hartt@ci.collewille.be.us COUNCIL LIAISON Tony Licata 5600 Creekside Court Colleyville,TX 76034 H: 817.545.4211 licatat@ci.collewille,be.us Revised 06-08-05 PLACE 3 Vince Rosen 1313 Chatsworth Court East Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.307.0563 H: 817.577.4862 F: 817.788.1767 vince@rosenhome.com TERM: December 2004 - 2006 PLACE 6 Bob Leininger 5406 Janet Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 972.856.5771 H: 817.498.2030 F: 972.856.8366 TERM: December 2003 - 2005 GCISD LIAISON Nancy Coplen 3051 Ira E. Woods Grapevine, TX 76051 H: 817.545.5145 nancy .coplen@GCISO.net ,,\/"1 @: ,vI 1..-" .n~ l"exaB NQV 2 1 LOU] Ms. @V () Mr. Name: II ;1/11 pro;jl (;O IV tY I J3 (Last) (First) Address: 5"</01 I~-<M~~~.; ~//ell////e.- Home Telephone: r/?-:J!?/- 5'9 t,? Work Telephone: By providing your e-mail address in the space below, you are consenting to the release of your personal e-mail address by the City. E-mail Address: e "'17 h rlp:;rfft,n .J G) 7 ~ /00, t'ol77 Fax: Board, Commission or Committee A ointment Desired: E (MI) 'i i t .r ~ CiY'YSEC1~LfA'RY'S OFFICE Application for Appointment Planning and Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment applicants are required to file Financial Disclosure and Business Conflict of Interest forms two (2) business days after the application deadline as advertised in the Public Notice. These forms are available on the City's website at <http://www.collevville.com/boards/aoolication.aso>orbycontactingtheCitySecretaryat817.503.1130 Z/~/~~4-/rM14~A'-/~&, (!tL,fL,:h Lpc.~tt) ~/'1ft?, Reasons for Serving: (state briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee) J -':he I' ~ t ~. Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee? -+ yes no Date: II~ ~/-?JS- Signature: Once the City Council has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and you must reapply for future openings. This information will become a Public Record. City Secretary, 100 Main Street, Colleyvil/e, Texas 76034, Phone: 817.503.1130 Fax: 817.503.1139 / ." /14 ~ C/e/););(/(}e,1" _I'-~/.J~q (La~~j] .-rA --r (First); _~~ddr~ss-=--_ .$ %J({ __..j fr.-v€ J ~;rI/v. Home Tele"p-~one: h 7- ci?/ ~ J) d- fI Work Telepho By providing your e-mail address In the space below. yo 91 your e!t_fsDnal e-mail address by the CltL_____ E-maii Address: BoE.ie/A/,:icJlie ..(.,. ~JLf~~k-- Bbard, Commission or Committee ~ntr.!.!~i'11 D~sired: Qualifications: (list educational background or experience o~.t the duties of thIs appointment) ~.... -r I. fl4-iZ//thl,J /9J1'J1#//Jf~/ ~ de 1I;(}tJJd~r ---- . I . lZi-<<I-1/,dlic.lllC/i;} IJr II-;;;M__~"A /~~ Reasons for Serving: (state briefly the contribUti~S you can make to this appointment and you~ reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee) :ftJ j)p .P, jlttnf /,.r.) {'e~A;f _:II~ C4 Y; , J ..... ~ 2~1A./l>N;ffJiIJV--;f ~T~~ ~ ~4~~ &,e1"j;-,z,1) ;tJ ~~DS: : _ v __ I_~ tand that a~nce and active 6UPPOlt is required for each appointee? yes no += --- :;..- ~___ Date: _ /~ - .r:- oj Once th i C~I has fi~n, your application willl>e removed from the file and ~ou rnus'.t!.~~ for future openings. Thi. informiltion will become a Public Record. CitySeGretary, 100 Main Street, CoileyvllJ., Texsa 76034, Phon.: 817.603.1130 Fax; S17.503.11~ .U~:..J. :]. .~I_iU~: ~: ~:(itN1 GVK!~~';1 ~AAH ~ ibJCitl~ , ~ Ch" 0' ....---... 1~~n,'A\ \....~~.\\01 'te~.. Application for Appoln Planning and Zarling Commission and Zoning Board of Adjuslm Financial OisclO$ure :and Business Conflia of Interest forms two (2) bu ~'~ advertised in the Public Noti~. These forms are a ...h~N_eoUeyvi1le.CQrntboardl!JlaDDlleatlo".aso:> or by cootac~ng th Me. ~. ~.Y Name: i"F,. ~i i.,~ 1 r.; -- ~@~DW~ ~ DEe 5 - 2005 tment :..J CITY S~sCBfTARY'S ant applic In.'' ....... E sin"5s days after the appljca~ion deadline vailablt on the CIty', wibSiite at e City Secretarv at 817.503.1130 r- _ '1 (MI) I 't;;' (., t A~ {/,I ,#:e. ne27~ -1:'511 ~ S 771 - u are consenting to the release --.-..... ax: 97~- PSI - 6 2(~-- fiw;t.' r _!fec/!e~;.v .4tVI S'~~ . ( that would assist you in carrying ~' 5ec; , "'- M IZ~ ;J:;/In-7'-________ ~ ~ , v caerra l'cxaS @~ow~ CITY SECRETARY'S Application for Appoint Planning and Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment applicants are required to file Financial Disclosure and Business Conflict of Interest forms two (2) business days after the application deadline as advertised in the Public Notice. These forms are available on the City's website at <htto://www.colleyville.com/boards/apolication.aso> or by contacting the City Secretary at 817.503.1130 Ms. Mrs. ~ CMD Name: I ~ ' \5 (I!.ast) Address: CD ~ 0 ~ PE.\'ER- K (FirsQ (MI) \j~\~F\N~ L~ C.(H..\.-~Y\')\L\.-'i:: \')( 1~(}~J.t- , ~ Home Telephone: ~ n -~;:t<"\ - S .2..2.() Work Telephone: "t \., .- ~~ f - i..t.f "i,4- By providing your e-mail address in the space below, you are consenting to the release of your personal e-mail address by the City. E-mail Address: ~ K R:" ~ ~ y ~ \-\~O . (.. <:l fV"' Fax: <t, l - I-\-:l. \ - Co "i 4- 3 Board, Commission or Committee Appointment Desired: Pf.\R'K<~""t ~ cP"t.m','" t) \\\)\1 '''''II..'{ rsMl,~ Qualifications: (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointment) ~~~~~~~~--. ~ ~.~ ~I ~ ~ \(~o~~ ,~W~~~ l~~~~ ~ ~~~ Vr.~a( Q~ ~ ~ }\,~ -Ak1A ~~,~ t "Q -l ~ "'q.....-.=-.:.... ~ .. I'.-=... ~ ~. ~~ tJ o:t<: R asons for Serving: (state briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee) --r.; ~---:- t ~ ~ CEW'~ ~ ~ t: t ~ ~~~~~w-.'~~'~~ B ,~. ~ ~Q;,;u. '-~ ~ -, t .. Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee? X- yes no Signat~~~_r~~_~____________ Date:_l~t~l~s__________ Once the City Council has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and you must reapply for future openings. This information will become a Public Record. City Secretary, 100 Main Street, Co/leyville, Texas 76034, Phone: 817.503.1130 Fax: 817.503.1139 , q._...~~"-_.....----.._.~"_..,,,._~".,.,,,.. RESOLUTION R-05-2631 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD WHEREAS, four positions on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board have expiring terms; and WHEREAS, one position on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has an unexpired term of December 2006. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the Colleyville City Council hereby appoints the following persons to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board for a two-year term expiring December 2007: Sec. 2. THAT the Colleyville City Council hereby appoints the following person to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to fill an unexpired term of December 2006: Sec. 3. THAT the remaining open positions will be readvertised. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. PASSED BY A VOTE OF ABSTENTIONS ON THIS AYES, DAY OF NAYS AND 2005. ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor CITY COUNCIL cc@m", AGENDA BRIEFING Il'X:,!$ MEETING DATE: 12/13/05 ITEM # : 10 ; RESOLUTION #: R-05-2632 . ..., CITY MANAGER i F DEPARTMENT HEAD inJ1- FINANCE REVIEW IN/A Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Consideration of appointments to the SH26 Advisory Committee Reading and Public Hearing There are five (5) positions on the SH26 Advisory Committee whose terms expire December 2005. The positions were advertised and applications accepted through December 8, 2005. The incumbents were notified that their term was expiring and asked to submit an application if they wished to be considered for reappointment. There are three (3) applicants whose names are listed below and the applications are attached. . Dee McNosky* . Joe Allen* . Curtis Young* On the basis that there are five openings and three applicants, the advertising period will be extended through January 9, 2006. *Incumbent Attachments . SH26 Advisory Committee roster . Applications for Appointment . Resolution R-05-2632 CHAIRMAN Joe Allen 6413 Colleyville Boulevard Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.481.1077 H: 817.318.8211 F: 817.488.4866 nellahound@yahoo.com drallen@blvdanimal.com TERM: December 2003 - 2005 SH26 Advisory Committee Ronald Edington 505 Sagebrush Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 214.871.3311 H: 817.281.0110 F: 214.871.0757 edinqton@huitt-zollars.com TERM: December 2004 - 2006 Joyce Hammill 6307 Edinburgh Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 H: 817.481.6337 ioycehammill@comcast.net TERM: December 2004 - 2006 Louis C. Miller 7800 B Tillman Hill Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.485.2111 H: 817.577.8546 F: 817.656.5704 millerlouis@sbcqlobal.net TERM: December 2004 - 2006 Ernest Hedgcoth 6012 Ponderosa Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.831.7711 H: 817.488.0170 F: 817.831.6368 ehce1@charter.net TERM: December 2004 - 2006 Robert Potter 1104 Chatsworth Court West Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.846.3782 H: 817.514.0190 RPotter31 @SBCqlobal.net TERM: December 2004 - 2006 Butch Wallace 1709 Industrial Boulevard Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.421.2414 F: 817.416.8436 butchw@mvvardart.com TERM: December 2004 - 2006 COUNCIL LIAISON David Kelly 905 I nwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.410.3715 H: 817.656.1862 F: 817.410.3716 kellvd@ci.collevville.tx.us Revised06-08-05 Curtis W. Young 8003 Jefferson Circle Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 972.929.8443 H: 817.498.2011 F: 972.929.1241 cyounq@saqe-dfw.com curtis. younq@comcast.net TERM: December 2003 - 2005 John Gober 1309 Somerset Court Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.428.8575 H: 817.577.0816 F: 817.427.9121 TERM: December 2003 - 2005 Dee McNosky 5108 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.788.3101 x5606 H: 817.656.3727 M: 817.824.9860 dtmcnosky@aol.com TERM: December 2003 - 2005 Chris Strittmatter 5601 Ponderosa Street Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.605.3250 H: 817.488.2644 F: 817.656.1528 TERM: December 2003 - 2005 COUNCIL LIAISON Rich Hendler 2100 Highland Meadows Colleyville, TX 76034 W: 817.421.8165 H: 817.421.8164 F: 817.428.8966 M: 817.821.0005 hendlerr@ci.collevville.tx.us Clly of ccen~ fl @;@~DW@:~ Application f:;'APPointmentl~ NOV 2 8 2005 CITY SECRETARY'S U OFFlcF" Planning and Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment applicants are required to file Financial Disclosure and Business Conflict of Interest forms two (2) business days after the application deadline as advertised in the Public Notice. These forms are available on the City's website at <htto:/lwww.collevville.com/boards/aoolication.aso> or by contacting the City Secretary at 817.503.1130 Ms. ( Mr~~)' Mr. Name: ~C>5~ t)e~ (Last) (First) (MI) Address: 5 J [) "r 12.1-" lJ.. s. 0.. ...." + Q.. u- k.. Home Telephone: ~ I, ') b $ b -~ J .11 Work TelephonJ )?'O) J ~'i -' 3 \ D J eX. S~ By providing your e-mail address in the space below, you are consenting to the release of your personal e-mail address by the City. E-mail Address: d+ M C Y\ 0 5 lL \ I G> L\. 0 l. r () ~ Fax: I Board, Commission or Committee Appointment Desired: 4 i.-v 1 ]. ~ C-tT'k- '-' ," ,,~ Qualifications: (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointment) J., h~ '()O/Ll~) f"~~ ~ - .~ ~ll. .D ~ ~..:.. "--.J' Reasons for Serving: (state briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee) }('~~~~' ~~~4 -<J..e.L- ~~~~. ~ Do you understand tha~ance and active support is required for each appointee? yes _ no Signature: J;j, A. 1">1, ~(J - Date: ) 11/1 / D .;: Once the City Council has filled a pOSition, your application will be removed from the file and you must reapply for future openings. This information will become a Public Record. City Secretary, 100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034, Phone: 817.503.1130 Fax: 817.503.1139 o~ - caen~ Texas DEe 7 - 2005 Application for Appointment Planning and Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment applicants are required to file Financial Disclosure and Business Conflict of Interest forms two (2) business days after the application deadline as advertised in the Public Notice. These forms are available on the City's website at <httO:/Iwww.collevville.com/boards/aoolication.aso> or by contacting the City Secretary at 817.503.1130 Ms. Mrs. Mr. Name: A ll6v\ ~e -e.. b (Last) {'\ 1(1)..:, .11 iZ... (Fir~t) (MI) Address: bLU~ kO~~ '.Jlve!. Home Telephone: ~ II ~ (<6 CZ5 2.--l ( Work Telephone: 1> 11-=-t<i? \ , Oll By providing your e-mail address in the space below, you are consenting to the release of your personal e-mail address by the City. E-mail Address: ne.llQ.YlD\AvJ ~ L(m~ .Co IAI\ Fax: <6 (( 't<?<6" t.{ <6(0 (0 Board, Commission or Committee Appointment Desired:S~ 210 AJv'$~ ~ ~~I1t-~ Qualifications: (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointment) OW~E.-( B>ou'le-yo..4 AV\,; ~ +-\0<; p'l ~l ~ si-\ z-fo ~N'J~~u N\,tANvbc.-r e~ ('~~ VY\.~\.~ Reasons for Serving: (state briefly the contributions you can make to this appointment and your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee) Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee? yes no Date: Signature: Once the City Cou cil has filled a position, your application will be removed from the file and you must reapply for future openings. This information will become a Public Record. City Secretary, 100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034, Phone: 817.503.1130 Fax: 817.503.1139 Dee 07 05 03:33p Cur-tis 'r'o<Jnt 9729291241 p. 1 c!n GJ ~-:?-. fae. ~~' , 1(3 ~ . ""- r~x.'il'Ft ~ ~@.~OW(]: DEe 7 - 2005 Application for Appo ntnlerny SECRETARY'S OFFI E Planning and Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment applicants are leqUlred to file Financial Disclcsure and Business Conflict of Interest forms two (2) business days after t,e appliCCltion deadline as advertised in :he Public Notice. These forms are available on the City's website at <httD://www.collevville.com/boards/apolication.a1>p> or by contacting the City Secretary at 817.50.3.1130 Ms. ~ Name: YDl>>J'1 6J~~ W. _ (Last) ) (First) (MI) _Address:_eOog Jf;:FF~ON a~-t~~vlu.e:-J-1)L_____ Home Telephone: el1- ~. 201) Work Telepho~~3-.___ By providing your e-mail address in the space below, you are consenting to the release _~~ur personal e-mail address by the Ci~.__ . ~mail~g9!eSs~.tyOI)tt1~~e'Ifw.:ftM. Fax: q12..t12.1-1~____u. Board, Commission or 90mmittee Appointment Desired:~>> U, Mw..t)~ t.Dtf1tft,~ Qualifications: (list educational background or experience that would assist you in carrying out the duties of this appointment) a.~~~u. J ~ Fb~- ~ ~ ~l$ r I~ . _ ~ Ar.atl'reDf" 6IItt- t4!3-.::_tA"!E7"- '-e~_i_NA-nW~_~~_ 25.... 'ff!N.6 ~~ II., ~~,~) J~ I69't~ ~~_To ~ ~Trr>>4/~~~d'l ,.., Ar>JAt8JT ~)~ ~ Reasons for Serving: (state briefly the contributions you can make to t~is apPoin~ an ~ your reasons for wanting to serve on the Board, Commission, or Committee) I ~ ~ all ~ve}ot~ ef1f4)S ~,fiee ~ (~I,:> ~ t~ 1 ~ ~~ ~ ~~ "'Y- ~-.1l'~ I~~ 1k.. ~ +~ l ~9"1 ~ :/II:-a..:!J8l.-= ~troi:ho.V ,f ~. t4~~I~ . _ _ Do you understand that attendance and active support is required for each appointee? .x. yes __._ no Signature: ' !~ .__ Date:.1k~s..:"p5" . Once the City Council hk &J;; a position, your application will be removed from the file and you must reapply for future openings. This information will become a Public Record. City Secretary, 100 Main Street, Colleyvi/le, Texas 76034, Phone: 817.503.1130 Fax: 817.503.1139 J RESOLUTION R-05-2632 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE SH26 ADVISORY COMMITTEE WHEREAS, five positions on the SH26 Advisory Committee have expiring terms. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the following persons are hereby appointed to the SH26 Advisory Committee for a two year term expiring December 2007: Sec. 2. THAT the remaining open positions will be readvertised. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. APPROVED THIS AYES, DAY OF NAYS AND 2005, BY A VOTE OF ABSTENTIONS. ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor City Of CITY COUNCIL CC~'" AGENDA BRIEFING Tt.~x~d MEETING DATE: ! 12/13/05 CITY MANAGER I ITEM #: ! 11 DEPARTMENT HEAD I RESOLUTION #: 1 R-05-2633 FINANCE REVIEW I Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Approval of support for the Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition's Regional Transit Initiative Reading and Public Hearing The term "Regional Transit Initiative" or "RTI" refers to a year long study by DFW-area local government officials and others interested in regional mobility. The study occurred during 2003 and 2004 and focused on financial, institutional and legislative arrangements for providing seamless rail services in Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, Johnson and Tarrant Counties. The North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) Transportation Department and its consultants provided staff support for the RTI. The RTI addressed the questions of who should provide regional rail service, how it should be funded and what legislative authority would be needed to fund and operate the service. The RTI concluded that regional rail service should be provided by DART, DCTA, the T and one new agency that would encompass the balance of the urbanized area beyond the service area of the three existing transit providers. The RTI examined a wide range of alternative means of providing the additional $165 million of annual funding that will be required to build and operate regional rail service. The general sales tax was found to be the preferred funding source. A rate of one half cent is required to generate the revenue needed. The tax would be subject to voter approval in the new service area. Because most local governments in the new service area have fully committed their sales tax authority to other uses, there is no remaining sales tax authority to fund regional rail service. The RTI concluded that seamless regional rail service implementation would require legislative authority to create a new entity and to have a regional option sales tax vote to exceed by one half cent the current two cent local limit. The Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition (TRTC) Executive Committee has recommended to local governments to adopt a resolution supporting the RTI. Vic Suhm, TRTC Executive Director, will be available to answer questions regarding this item. Financial Impact There is no current financial impact to the City. This resolution supports a one half cent increase above the current two cent local sales tax limit only for regional transit service funding. However, Section 4 of the resolution states that if drafted or adopted legislation Agenda Briefing Resolution R-05-2633 Page 2 of 2 adversely affects the City's financial well-being, the City reserves the right to repeal the resolution. A one half cent sales tax is expected to generate approximately $980,000. Recommendation Approval Attachments . Email from Vic Suhm, TRTC Executive Director . Resolution R-05-2633 From: Vic Suhm [mailto:vic@ntc-dfw.org] Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 5:41 PM To: Subject: Regional Transit Initiative In follow up to our discussion on the RTI (regional transit initiative) at the November 2 TRTC (Tarrant Regional Transportation Coalition) meeting, we have decided not to redraft the sample resolution that was distributed to members at the meeting, for the reason that concerns about content will vary from city to city. Rather, we've decided it best if I just make myself available to any city who would like help in redrafting the resolution. So, please feel free to call me if you have any questions or would like any assistance in redrafting the resolution. What is important is that as many cities as possible pass some resolution expressing support for providing seamless rail service to serve the region and that the resolution be sent to Senator Shapiro's Capitol Office (ATTENTION Sarah Bagwell, P.O. Box 12068, Austin, Texas 78711-2068) by November 22. Equally important is that our mayors, council members and city managers attend the meeting of the Regional Transit System Review Committee. It is at 10:00am Tuesday, December 6, at the Irving Arts Center, 3333 North MacArthur Boulevard. Thank you. Vic Suhm 972-621-0400 ext 120 972 -92 9-0 916 fax 214-641-3341 cell 817-488-7374 home vic@ntc-dfw.org RESOLUTION R-05-2633 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE TARRANT REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COALITION'S REGIONAL TRANSIT INITIATIVE WHEREAS, the urbanized area in the North Central Texas region needs seamless rail service in order to sustain regional mobility, a strong economy, and a high quality of life; and WHEREAS, DART, DCTA and the T are existing regional transit service providers with established service areas and funding sources; and WHEREAS, much of the current and projected regional growth is occurring beyond the service areas of the existing transit service providers; and WHEREAS, seamless regional rail service should be provided by the existing three transit agencies and a single new entity working in cooperation with one another to achieve optimal efficiency and effectiveness; and WHEREAS, the provision of regional rail service outlined in adopted MPO planning documents will require a new annual revenue stream of approximately $165 million; and WHEREAS, legislative authority is needed to create an entity and funding source to build and operate regional rail service as outlined in adopted MPO planning documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. THAT the City of Colleyville expresses its support for establishing a regional rail authority and levying an additional one half cent sales tax to fund construction and operation of seamless regional rail service on the corridors identified in the MPO-adopted regional rail plan. THAT the City of Colleyville requests the Texas Legislature to grant authority to local governments to submit, to their constituents, a ballot issue to consider establishing a regional rail authority, and levying an additional (beyond the two cent cap) one half cent sales tax to fund construction and operation of seamless regional rail service. THAT the City of Colleyville commits, in the event authority is granted by the Legislature, to submit to its electorate a ballot issue to consider establishing a regional rail authority, and levying an additional one half cent sales tax to fund construction and operation of seamless regional rail service. Resolution R-05-2633 Page 2 of 2 Sec. 4. THAT the City of Colleyville reserves the right to repeal this resolution if drafted or adopted legislation adversely affects the financial well-being of the City. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. PASSED BY A VOTE OF THIS THE DAY OF AYES, NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS ON 2005. ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor cae'" Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - November 14, 2005 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Byerly called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. INVOCATION Present: Commissioners, Robert McCormick, Dave Dudziak, Mary Taylor, Denis Duffy and Jeff Byerly Absent: Commissioners Bartkowski and Blassingame Barry LeBaron, Chris Fuller and Amy Shelley from staff were present. The invocation was given by Commissioner Taylor ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Duffy moved to approve the October 24, 2005 meeting minutes with the following corrections: Page 5, 2nd sentence, change "closed" to "adjourned"; page 5, 3rd sentence, change "re-opened" to "reconvened"; top of page 7 insert "no operations allowed between 1 0 pm and 6 am"; page 12, change "post pone" to one word "postpone"; and page 13, 1st paragraph, change "the" to "there". Commissioner Dudziak seconded with corrections. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: McCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Duffy and Byerly Nay: None LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY ON AGENDA ITEMS None CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case Z-05-030 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a Special Use Permit for contractor office with an outside storage on Lot 11, Block 1, Colleyville Industrial Park Addition, located at 1813 I ndustrial Boulevard Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:15 p.m. Brad Land, the applicant, came forward to present the case and answer any questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr. Land in regards to if the items to be used in the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 14, 2005 Page 1 of 7 landscaping business will be available for retail sales to potential walk up customers? Mr. Land replied no, the landscaping items will be used for completing the jobs, not for sale from the site. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Land regarding the access to the building via the yard, is there going to be more than one access to the building? Mr. Land replied there being more than one access for the building. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Land regarding what type of items would be stored inside the building? Mr. Land replied machinery for the business, trucks and trailers. He stated he would be in compliance with fire code. Van Hubbard, business address 1812 Industrial Boulevard, stated having concerns with the appearance of the street; the storage of the equipment, whether it be behind the proposed building or in front of it; the coming and going of vendors for deliveries and the number of employees creating traffic. Randy Cross, 1808 Industrial Boulevard, concurred with Mr. Hubbard and stated having concerns with the parking for employees. He stated not having an issue with the business as long as all of the equipment will be stored behind the building. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing closed at 8:20 p.m. Commissioner Taylor concurred with the speakers concerns and questioned staff regarding how can the Commission be assured that the vehicles will be placed behind the building? Commissioner Byerly stated the Special Use Permit can have conditions attached as necessary. Commissioner Taylor stated wanting those conditions attached. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Land regarding if the equipment will be placed behind the building or in the building? Mr. Land stated some will be inside the building for safe keeping of the equipment. The only thing that will be stored outside, that would be seen, would be the trees. He stated he employees about 20 people which leave in the morning and come back in the evening. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Land regarding if the sliding gate would be solid? Mr. Land replied he intends to match the screening fence. Commissioner Taylor questioned if the facility will be landscaped? Mr. Land replied yes. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Land regarding the parking space in front, will those places be used for parking some of the equipment or will all of the equipment be stored in the rear? Mr. Land replied all company vehicles will be stored in the rear. Those parking spaces will be used for vendor parking or for an occasional customer. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Land if there will be a design center for some of the customers? Mr. Land replied no, the landscaping out front will show what we can do for landscaping. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Mr. Land regarding the hours of operation? Mr. Land replied the employees start at 7 a.m. and return a little before dark. The hours depend on what time of the year it is, right now with dark coming sooner, the workers are back around 6 p.m. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 14, 2005 Page 2 of 7 Commissioner McCormick questioned Mr. Land regarding what type of vehicles will be used, and will they be noisy? Mr. Land stated the tractors have back up alert censors that can be noisy. Commissioner McCormick questioned Mr. Land regarding if deliveries to the facility would be during the day? Mr. Land replied yes, during the day. Commissioner Duffy made motion to approve case 2-05-030. Commissioner Byerly seconded with friendly amendments: 1. An eight (8) foot fence on the southern property line; 2. The gate to be constructed of a solid surface; and 3. No company vehicles parked out front over night. Commissioner Duffy concurred. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: McCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Duffy, Byerly Nay: None 2. Case Z-OS-031 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a Special Use Permit to allow for horses on Lot 8, Block 7, Brighton Oaks Addition, located at 2705 Sherwood Lane Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff if the 20% rule for opposition had been calculated? Chris Fuller replied the opposition is less than 20%. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:30 p.m. Linda Collins, the applicant, came forward to present the case and brief the Commissioners. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mrs. Collins regarding the bold area on the drawing provided; would the horses be kept in that area? Mrs. Collins replied correct, we would have to add fencing around the pool to keep the horses out. Sandra Fuller, 3016 Sherwood, spoke in favor of the request and stated knowing the family. Commissioner Taylor questioned Ms. Fuller if there is enough room for horses on the Collins' property? Ms. Fuller replied yes, these horses are show horses, therefore they are housed most of the time. J. Pat Gibson, 2604 Sherwood Lane, spoke in favor of the request and stated knowing the family. He stated being surprised there being a need for a permit to have horses in Colleyville. Jim Gotcher, 4105 Spring Hollow, spoke in favor of the request and stated knowing the family would take care of the horses and stated the horses would enhance the property values in the area. Phil Kelly, 2808 Sherwood Lane, questioned if the same rules would apply for anyone buying the home for the future? He questioned the amount of space required to have the horses? He questioned why not use the boarding schools in the area to keep the horses? There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:50 p.m. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 14, 2005 Page 3 of 7 Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding if there is any requirement for open land for horses? Chris Fuller replied the Colleyville Code of Ordinances requires 15,000 square feet of grazing area per horse. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding if the Special Use Permit (SUP) would terminate if the use is abandoned for a period of six months? Does the land revert back to the original zoning? Would the SUP have to be reapplied for? In other words, if the land is sold and there is not a horse there for a period of six months, does the SUP go away? Barry LeBaron replied yes it would. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding if the Collins will need to reapply for a SUP for the stables since the stables have not been used for longer than six months? Barry LeBaron replied they would have to reapply for the building to be used as a stable; currently, the stable is an accessory building. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mrs. Collins regarding the large building beside the pool? Mrs. Collins replied it is a 3 car detached garage. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mrs. Collins regarding the use of the upstairs? Mrs. Collins replied it is a game room for their children. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding the use of the streets by the horses, is there any ordinance that can preclude that? Barry LeBaron replied no, they can use the street. Commissioner Byerly questioned City Attorney Matthew Boyle regarding if the Commission could make not using the street a fair condition in the SUP to the applicant, by not loading the horses on the street? Attorney Boyle replied the request being for the parcel, all four corners, but nothing off site. He stated the Commissioners can not forbid the applicant from walking the horses off site of the SUP. Commissioner Taylor stated these horses are not taken out and ridden on the streets, they are show horses. Commissioner Byerly had discussions with staff and Mr. Gotcher regarding the property owner's in the area around the Collins. Commissioner Taylor made motion to approve case Z-05-031. Commissioner McCormick seconded. Commissioner Byerly made a friendly amendment with the condition that the horses be bound by the area noted by the bold lined area on the drawing provided. Commissioner Duffy questioned Attorney Boyle regarding if the area can be limited or if the SUP would apply to the platted property. Attorney Boyle stated a specific defined area of the parcel is acceptable. Commissioner Taylor accepted the amendment. Commissioner McCormick seconded. Commissioner Dudziak stated having issues for the future homeowner's not taking care of the horses as well as the Collins. He stated there not being enough room for the horses. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mrs. Collins in regards to why not use the close facility to board their horses? Mrs. Collins stated not wanting to use the facility because of the care of the facility. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mrs. Collins if she would keep the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 14, 2005 Page 4 of 7 landscaping in the back yard? Mrs. Collins stated wanting to keep their property neat and landscaped. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mrs. Collins if an exercise ring would be placed in the yard? Mrs. Collins stated not at this time. She stated she and her daughter will be riding in the back yard. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: McCormick, Taylor, Duffy and Byerly Nay: Dudziak Commissioner Duffy stated noting the area for the two animals is insufficient but that the Commissioners are not setting a precedent. 3. Case G-05-012 - PUBLIC HEARING - Amendment to Chapter 14, Engineering Design Standards of the Land Development Code regarding detention/retention ponds Barry LeBaron presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Byerly stated having concerns with there not being any standards the developer would have to use, or some process or approval to be used by the city. Barry LeBaron stated there are standards that could be used as a reference, however the Engineering Department would approve just as they do now. Commissioner Byerly stated there are standards regarding the amount of water flow the pond can have. The calculations can be checked to see if they meet those standards but, he questioned staff what is it the Engineering Department will be checking or checking against and can that be incorporated in the ordinance? Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding if there are some calculations that could be used for determining the oxygenation and re-oxygenation per thousand cubic feet of water that would stop the growth of algae? Barry LeBaron stated the combination of temperature, depth of water and square feet are calculated but the developer can design so that there would be minimum aquatic vegetation. If not, they would have to come in and add another device. Commissioner Dudziak stated several times during the year at Kimzey Park, there is still growth even though another fountain was added. The Parks Department will come out and do a chemical treatment that will take care of the growth. Barry LeBaron used pictures of some ponds where there have not been any problems with growth in those areas. He stated there must be something they have done that works and that can be used in other areas to be used as a guideline. Commissioner McCormick questioned staff if some wild life animals or vegetation could be used for aquatic vegetation so that the eco system could be self sustaining? Barry LeBaron replied yes, the Texas Parks and Wildlife website does provide some ideas. Commissioner Byerly questioned Attorney Boyle if these recommendations are too vague to be enforceable? Attorney Boyle replied having looked at staff's initial analysis, by putting the issues in staff's hands is about the most reasonable way to approach these types of issues. This will provide a sufficient amount of flexibility for the property owner and defers it to staff to make a reasonable determination of what might address Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 14, 2005 Page 5 of 7 the problem. Commissioner Duffy suggested on Section L, number 9 of the Drainage and Storm Sewer Improvements should include: a. Failure to prevent surface accumulation of aquatic vegetation will result in additional water movement, aeration facilities or other processes approved by the City being required. Barry LeBaron replied that being a good proposal. If the first one does not work, then add another one. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 9:20 pm. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 9:20 p.m. Commissioner Duffy made motion to approve case G-05-012 as presented with the condition. Commissioner McCormick seconded. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: McCormick, Dudziak, Taylor, Duffy and Byerly Nay: None STAFF REPORTS Barry LeBaron reminded the Commissioners about the last meeting in December being the day after Christmas. He suggested postponing any of the items submitted for that meeting to be moved to the first meeting in January 2006. The Commissioners all concurred. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Duffy thanked staff regarding their helpfulness. ADJOURNMENT The Commission adjourned the meeting at 9:30 p.m. by acclamation. Respectfully Submitted, Amy Shelley Planning and Zoning Assistant Approved on: November 28, 2005 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - November 14, 2005 Page 6 of 7 RESOLUTION R-05-2635 A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION UNDER BUSINESS AT THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 13, 2005 WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Business. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Business this date and not otherwise adopted by Ordinance and/or separate Resolution as follows are hereby adopted: a. THAT AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. APPROVED THIS DAY OF AYES, NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS. 2005, BY A VOTE OF ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor