The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-11/14/2005 AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chambers - 100 Main Street Monday, November 14, 2005 REGULAR MEETING 8:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Commissioners Robert McCormick, David Dudziak, Thomas Bartkowski, Jeff Byerly, Mary Taylor, John Blassingame and Denis Duffy INVOCATION Commissioner Taylor PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 24, 2005 LEGAL BRIEFING BY CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING PLANNING. ZONING. PLATTING. AND LAND USE ISSUES CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case Z-05-030 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a Special Use Permit for outside storage on Lot 11, Block 1, Colleyville Industrial Park Addition, located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard 2. Case Z-05-031 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a Special Use Permit to allow for horses on Lot 8, Block 7, Brighton Oaks Addition, located at 2705 Sherwood Lane 3. Case G-05-012 - PUBLIC HEARING - Amendment to Chapter 14, Engineering Design Standards of the Land Development Code regarding Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -November 14, 2005 Page 1 of 2 detention/retention ponds TABLED ITEMS STAFF COMMENTS. REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS Discussion to consider changing the last Planning and Zoning Commission meeting date in December 2005. COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant Posted: Thursday, November 10,2005,4:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -November 14, 2005 Page 20(2 .~ Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - October 24,2005 CITIZEN COMM None Chairman Byerly called the meeti CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners, Dudziak, Tom Bartko Blassingame, Denis Du Barry LeBaron, Am Jones from staff Dave John INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Blassingame moved t as written. Commissioner Duffy secon The motion was approved by the followin ' Aye: McCormick, Dudzia wski, Ta Nay: None LEGAL BRIEFIN None Commiss' Special loca Bye The mo Aye: Mc Nay: None on to m led Case Z-05-028 - Request for a rses on Lot 29, Block 4 of the Western Trails Addition , 0 item number three on the agenda. Commissioner e foil ing vote: kowski, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly , ARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case Z-05-027 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a zoning change from R40 Single Family Residential to CPO Professional Office with a Special Use Permit for a privately operated school on Lot 1, Block 3 of the Southgate Addition located at 909 Cheek Sparger Road Barry LeBaron presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 1 of 14 David Meadows, the applicant, came forward to present the request and answer any questions the Commissioners had. Arthur Pengelly, the trustee for Covenant Christian Academy, came forward to present the request and answer any questions the Commissioners had. Keith Costello, Headmaster for Covenant Christian Academy, came forward to present the request and answer any questions the Commissioners had. " Bill Anderson, President of Covenant Christian Academy, orward to present the request and answer any questions the Commissioners h Commissioner Taylor questioned Mr. Costello in regar. land where the temporary buildings are? Mr. Co '0 replied c Taylor questioned Mr. Costello in regards to w s the church property? Mr. Costello replied not knowing. Commissioner Duffy questioned Alan Hu hristian Academy, regarding what are the plans for length of Che Sparger Road and turning down Wayne Drive, what is r that area? Mr. Huckabee deferred to the school to answer question. 'ssioner Duffy questioned Mr. Huckabee if the open land behin ent schoo ,ovenant Christian Academy's property? Mr. Huckabee replied . sioner questioned Mr. Huckabee what the ingress into that property ie r ,urrently the entrance to that property is off of eek Spar 'ssio. r Duffy questioned Mr. Huckabee if that Ian used f abee replied in the current PUD ordinance th t dem e building.' The school has some room behind the curr hey oc but currently behind that building is a detention struc' r Duffy tioned Mr. Huckabee in regards to how the increase in fl Ch parger Road? Mr. Huckabee replied there not ing any t of way allowed for the dedication to incre arg Huckabee ed they have been working with the city on cur din widening of Cheek Sparger Road. tio ff regarding if money had been escrowed to the city fo aron ed they have the right of way. When the plan was appr 01 put In a left turn lane on Cheek Sparger Road. There is a plan for submitted at the time of building permit. That study will be used to d e of roadway improvements would need to be made at that time. Barry d a Traffic Impact Analysis is only required if there are 1,000 new trips per are not going to be 1,000 new trips at this time, the school is simply wanting t locate existing students. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Huckabee or somebody to answer what is the plan to take care of the traffic on Cheek Sparger and Wayne Drive? Mr. Pengelly replied with 18 to 20 classrooms in the new building, we plan to address the traffic on Cheek Sparger Road and Wayne Drive once the traffic study is complete and we will pay for the cost of the study. Commissioner Duffy stated not the cost of the study, but the cost of the improvements. Mr. Pengelly concurred. ied to purchase the Commissioner to do with that Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Pengelly what the maximum enrollment will be Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 2 of 14 when the building is complete? Mr. Pengelly replied the maximum enrollment could place between 450 and 750 students. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Pengelly what does he think the capacity will be upon completion of the new building? Mr. Pengelly replied about 700 to 750 students. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Pengelly if the property behind the school would sit empty? Mr. Pengelly replied the property behind is restricted f m their intended use according to the PUD ordinance, the land is to be used for a r school not a lower school. Commissioner Duffy questioned if an upper sch isting of 8th thru 1 ih grades could be constructed on that empty property? M Iy replied yes but only if there is enough room. Mr. Costello, stated for clarity, the 750 number grades, Pre-K thru 12th grade. The grammar sc class rooms necessary for 54 students per the class rooms we have currently, we will grammar school to fully complete a 750 st currently being used for the athletic programs 0 Commissioner Duffy questioned ostello regar example not being able to use t . at nigh. restrictions have been reviewed., r Duffy restrictions would work for the use 0 r. C this time. Com the facl field for so Mr. Meadows larity that the goal of the school is to have three buildings with 250 students pe Ing. To look at the math, the current building is at that 250 mark. The three buildings ould put the school at 750 students. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m. Ed Moore, 124 Timberline North, commended the school for the academics but stated being opposed to the rezoning request with concerns with the traffic on Cheek Sparger Road. Donald Hudson, 4109 Southwood East, Saddlebrook Addition, stated having been . 54 students per 'uld house the dition, with Iy for the n lot is e CPO zoning restrictions, for r. Costello replied all of the 'oned Mr. Costello if those replied not knowing at Commissioner Dud this property, is t of students? allowed. Com facility because it Mr. M lied total ng if in UD that currently exists for ing referenced for the maximum number mbering about the number of students o number would not apply to this new , ordinance. Barry LeBaron concurred. 01 would not be larger than 750 students Attorney Boyle regarding if limiting the enrollment to y Boyle stated the condition could be crafted. stioned Mr. Meadows regarding if there is some city use of tated having been approached by the city for the use of the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 3 of 14 involved with the school since they moved here. He stated he is a parent with students of the school and has two students that have graduated with there. He stated the Homeowner's Association president of the Saddlebrook Addition has suggested being opposed to the rezoning request; however the whole neighborhood has not been addressed. He stated having a petition in favor of the rezoning request. He stated having concerns with traffic, but the school has provided answers to some of the concerns and he is overall pleased with the school. Jim Sherrill, 6804 Kennedy Drive, spoke in favor of the r having students currently in the school and stated the . Colleyville. Allan Werst, 3808 Wayne Drive, spoke in oppositi area is deed restricted to residential use only. Helen Werst, 3808 Wayne Drive, spoke i stated having issues with drainage and tra Steven Fryer, 4300 Briar Ridge Drive, stated 0 Saddlebrook Homeowner's Associ ion, being in stated having polled 10 neighbor ck up to C answer, 8 against and all havi ,with nOI Saddlebrook Addition, an increase studen Saddlebrook Addition and lighting iss d structures once the s tgrows t traffic study done. how t Tom Ragsdale, being an atte school is building' " stated tra i~ alw8 take r to a g request. He stated ,is a positive asset to e Board of Directors for the to the rezoning request. He Sparger Road, 1 in favor, 1 no ize, traffic, parking inside 'version of traffic through the future use of these ted he would like to see a potentia oblems down the road. or of the rezoning request and stated this my to take care of space issues. The . s. This is positive for Colleyville. He tary schools. The school is seeking to s interest. Greg Drive, stated the school is in violation of the PUD ordinance for phas He stated there is plenty of room for the expansion of the school on t' e stated this would go against the Master Plan which states protecting the serenity of Colleyville. He stated having issues with traffic, flooding and cri trol. Bruce Frankie, 5704 Bransford Rd, owner of Daisy Hill Academy, stated being opposed to the expansion of Covenant Christian Academy. Greg Jones, 903 Inwood Lane, spoke in opposition to the rezoning request. He stated having issues with drainage, noise, lights and traffic. He stated the school has no concerns for the neighborhood. He stated not understanding why the school could not use the land they currently have. He stated having issues with encroachment on neighbors. He stated the rezoning will have a negative impact on the value of the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 4 of 14 homes. He stated being opposed to the gym the school has because of the proximity to his home. Commissioner Byerly closed the public hearing for a break at 8:45 p.m. Commissioner Byerly re-opened the public hearing at 9:00 p.m. Elaine Wagner, 3716 Wayne Drive, stated it has been difficult be a good neighbor. She stated the best use of the land is residential. She stat osing the rezoning request. Douglas Wagner, 3716 Wayne Drive, spoke in oppo stating the land is deed restricted. He stated the s request. He stated having issues with traffic, sewer. Kristin Williams, 708 Saddlebrook Drive, spok stated her son attends Covenant Christian She stated not seeing the traffic issues as of ways to get in and out of the Saddlebrook zone anywhere is slow. She stated the schoo instead of having to drive back an h. Judi Sherrill, 6804 Kennedy Drive, ny property values dropping in regards to the school. She sta eavy for about 15 to 20 minutes. She stated the school h ' . sal to help with traffic issues. She stated tr an issu aving home for work and coming home from stated ng lane s built by the school. She stated the schoo . 'ghbors < k the color of paint for the fence. She stated the sch d neigh She stated the school is not allowed to have scrimmag house ju public schools. She stated the issues discussed tonight 'tary school. She stated the water and sewer i re is the Clord. She stated it being common to have after ms children to be mentored, not being used as a day care. S < police for Grandparents day, parent teacher functions, a rect. Jim hollo poke in favor of the rezoning request stating his daugh and are involved with sports. He stated the parents paid for the turn school is trying to help the city with traffic. He stated there is traffic, b only problem on Cheek Sparger. He stated a traffic study would be gre' < He stated there are not any scrimmages allowed. The field is used for socce'" tice and the school has been very consistent upholding the understanding of t e use of the property. He stated the precedence on the rezoning, there are some multi-family dwellings, which at one time the city was against, but they are adding to the congestion on Cheek Sparger Road. He stated the water and drainage issues are coming from the property to the west. He stated there is not any crime or any trash. He stated the parents take pride in the property and they pick up any trash that may be in the area. Keith Chatham, 4413 Bowman Drive, builder and developer in the city, moved here to <, < equest. She < he school. are lots Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 5 of 14 be a part of Covenant Christian Academy. He stated an engineering study was done for the water issue; the water comes from the property to the west. He stated a traffic study does need to be done and the drainage study needs to be reevaluated. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing closed at 9:25 p.m. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned Mr. Meadows and Mr. Pengelly regarding the deed restrictions, if the deed restrictions state residential u . nly? Commissioner Byerly stated the deed restrictions are not a part of th oning request being discussed. Attorney Boyle concurred. Commissioner Blassingame questioned Mr. Meadows. e 1999 plan stating the building south of the newest building, could you you have chosen to pursue this current project before the completi that plan? Mr. Meadows replied originally this would not ut with the encouragement of removing the portable b . follow the plan and still preserve the functioning of th the athletic p m. The school does intend to build the third building, this building for e lower school is built. That building would be the highe f the school. Commissioner Bartkowski questi . Pengelly I roperty to the east, pending a favorable zoning outcome, is unde . Mr. Pen eplied correct, Lot 1. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr.. ding I is a detention pond on the photo provided? Meadows . dl tly south of the current building. Commissio uestion olle he water from the concrete of the gym area?" replie e is drainage in place that goes to the detention pond. Commissioner upper school wou buildin eado stat s u .'n regards to the 1999 plan stating the e the school decide to do a two story d they 'pate a one story building. Mr. Meadows all of the requirements from the 1999 plan. Mr. Meadows if all have been informed of the CPO Meadows stated having acknowledged all of the ner questioned Mr. Meadows in regards to the tree informed as to the replacement of trees removed? Mr. gated all the trees. Commission tified some of the issues that have been stated regarding the limitations on.. ial Use Permit: the first being reducing from the 60% lot coverage to only. 0 lot coverage, second limit the number of total students to 750 with all buildings combined, third an eight (8) foot tall masonry screening fence be erected before construction begins on the south boundary, fourth a traffic study completed with necessary cueing lane, fifth the required shielding of all the lighting in the neighborhood and sixth to limit the parking on Wayne Drive. Mr. Meadows replied concurring with all of the issues. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff if the CPO zoning district would allow for late night operation? Barry LeBaron stated the CPO zoning district states daytime operation Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 6 of 14 only, 10pm to 6am. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff in regards to if they have any concerns for the future, if the school was to sell this property, because of the property being zoned CPO in a neighborhood? Barry LeBaron replied an office could be allowed if meeting all the requirements and stated it would fit right in the area. Commissioner Bartkowski stated not being comfortable with the how the traffic will impact the neighborhood. Commissioner Taylor concurred with Commissioner Bart Meadows regarding why the second set of buildings school has now and build the third building at a I doing that, all of the traffic would be on one road Meadows is not that what will happen once t Meadows replied there would be an altern third set of buildings off of Wayne Drive wit Commissioner Duffy stated regarding the cha ntry way will be on Wayne Drive. Mr. Meadows stated the sc 01 wants to h iple entries and eventually the school wants to stack all cars 'r property eed from the north into that property. There will be an entry rth side ike the one on the current building, it being the main drop off this is (lceptual foot print, it may not be depicted on the drawings provl . g r > t. '1:!. Commissioner Duffy ting th t > in writing before approving the rezoning requ only 7 (jents total or the school, second issue removal of the e 2006, . d issue a traffic plan for the 750 total students for C 0 the iss e of building permits and based on the traffic study the r an yne Drive will be commenced prior to the issua of the urth issue being all items stated in the Land t ection 3-3 .' e completed and fifth issue being no co >>entity in the school. Mr. Meadows replied he would be Duffy's requests in writing. Duffy's fifth request is not a proper land use based and suggested discouraging using it in any motion. red with Attorney Boyle and withdrew the fifth issue. rity the portable buildings issue was for the school to develop approved by city council. Commissioner D questioned Mr. Meadows regarding the development schedule? Mr. Meadows replied hoping to have it ready for classes in the fall of 2007. Commissioner Byerly made motion to approve case Z-05-027 with the following conditions: first lot coverage at 40%; students in both areas not to exceed 750; eight (8) foot tall masonry screening fence to be placed at time of construction; a traffic plan suitable to the city engineer, at the cueing line, prior to the issuance of building permits and work completed before the issuance of the certificate of occupancy; all lighting should be shielded from the neighborhood; no parking on Wayne Drive, this being ning without seeing nd also questioned Mr. built on the land the eadows replied in . questioned Mr. 's built? Mr. built the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 7 of 14 restricted to this user only and the portable buildings are to be removed within 60 days of the issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Motion died for lack of second. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff regarding if the traffic study could be submitted at the time of preliminary plat submittal? Barry LeBaron replied this property is already platted. Commissioner Bartkowski made motion to deny case Commissioner McCormick seconded. The motion to deny was approved by the following vote: Aye: McCormick, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame, D Nay: Dudziak, Byerly nformation does the fire code s? Fire Marshal, Jeff Jones Ie family. The lot must no specific driveway I Commissioner Duffy ts for nce from a fire plug? Jeff quired but only on the public road based y distance from the public road and it is hydrant. There may be additional fire if t yes it Com miss back for pia to the new st Commissioner Du questioned staff regarding the direction of the flow for drainage, on Lot 2 on the western side, it appears about a third of the lot is above the flood plain. Therefore, if on Lot 2 any more of the land is disturbed, Lot 1 will get more water. Barry LeBaron stated the lot may require specific grading in order to get a good pad site that would meet the two foot requirement above the flood elevation. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff regarding if Mr. Newgren understands that the new lot could change the drainage flow creating more water on his property? Barry LeBaron replied not having talked about drainage information to Mr. Newgren at this time. This is primarily a ed sta 'ng what percentage is the east lot in the ron replied the entire eastern property is in the 100 year west contains about the back third or even half of the ea. Commissioner Taylor questioned staff regarding . ain area and is it occupied? Barry LeBaron replied oned staff regarding any requirements for when they come Barry LeBaron replied the flood area would affect and apply Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 8 of 14 zoning request and at the time of platting, the drainage issues will be addressed. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff regarding the lot frontage requirements; does Lot 2 meet the frontage requirements for R40? Barry LeBaron replied they have 226 feet of frontage on John McCain. When the applicant comes back for the platting, the Commission would have to consider two waivers, the first being Lot 1 R would not meet the frontage requirements for the R40 zoning, second, it is a fI lot by definition and the code has a flag lot provision. However, from a plan' erspective, a large acreage flag lot is much different than a developer doing ision with minimal lot sizes and simply using flag lots ton increase their yield 0 Commissioner Byerly questioned staff in regards t requirements, if the Commission approves this approved. Barry LeBaron replied no, the flag I platting; the Commission is simply approvin zoning use. Commissioner Byerly questi come in and want to divide that two acre lot I though it would be creating another flag lot? would be facing another waiver at t t time. Commissioner Duffy questioned s request, the Commission would correct? City Attorney, Matthew Bo lot restriction does no ncur wit Commissioner Duffy 'th Atto wanting to give th hope not being appro Commissioner of the splitting of th Com r1y 0 , pph e q . ned Mr. Newgren regarding if he has talked to any lot? . Newgren replied having talked to some developers, y one to build. ioned Mr. Newgren regarding how much flooding occurred Mr. Newgren stated not having any flooding issues or did the y flooding issues. McCain, adjacent property owner, spoke in favor of the rezoning ...Of the lot frontage ,.the waiver also at the time of or the R40 were to lots, could he so even on replied the Commission t restriction is waived for this . g the flag lot restriction, 'th the question, the flag e , it is a platting issue. e s re e, however, he stated not when he does submit a plat, the flag lot , "on the back part of Lot 2 is prohibitive Commissl last year on . previous owne Brent Neff, 204 Jo ' request. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 10:16 p.m. Commissioner Taylor stated not having an issue with the flag lot, especially since it is large acreage. Commissioner Duffy made motion to approve case Z-05-029. Commissioner Taylor seconded. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 9 of 14 , The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly Nay: None TABLED ITEMS 4. Case Z-05-028 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for a Special Use Permit to allow for horses on Lot 29, Block 4 of the Western Trai dition located at 500 Wagonwheel Court Commissioner Bartkowski made motion to remove case Commissioner Duffy seconded. The motion to remove from the table was approve Aye: McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Taylor, Nay: None Barry LeBaron presented the case and brie Larry and Susan Austin, the applicants, came Commissioners. if they have talked with their ere tonight have been out s to how many square feet d a little er 81,000 square feet. Mr. is not used for grazing. Commissioner s to what is the square footage of the th replie area. space for Commissione ned the public hearing at 10:30 pm. Larry and Susan tin, the applicants, stated, for the record, their request and briefed the Commissioners for the public hearing. Gene Lord, 501 Wagonwheel Court, spoke in opposition to the request and stated having issues with the smell from the horses. Jimmie Lord, 501 Wagonwheel Court, spoke in opposition to the request and stated having issues with the smell from the horses. Carol Mason, 504 Wagonwheel Court, talked in regards to the horses in front of the n regards to how would they keep the ? Mr. Aus replied he would use a thin wire in front of s away. .. .e Austins regarding the fence being right up against ning ove the fence to contain the horses? Mr. Austin the bushes along the fence line and then away from that t planning to move the fence, but stated he can control the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 10 of 14 house. Stated the bushes in the front would not be sufficient. Chris Mudge, 505 Wagonwheel Court, spoke in opposition to the request. Stated wanting the horses in the back yard. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned Ms. Mudge in regards to the guinea hens roaming the area? Ms. Mudge stated the hens have been in the area for six years. Donald McAllister, 508 Wagonwheel Court, spoke in oppositio e request. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing w ed at 10:55 p.m. Commissioner Bartkowski stated Wagonwheel Court becoming a petting zoo; however, horses are consistent with the rural f e Horses occupy a special place in Colleyville, even in the city se e rural feel the citizens are looking to have. Commissioner Dudziak, concurred with Co agreeing with the concerns of the odor sugg Commissioner Blassingame concurred, howev be met between the neighbors, w er the hors yard. Commissioner Byerly concurred, st are against the horses in the front regards to limiting the to partic Barry LeBaron repli 'ded ae the yard, howeve having grazing. Commissioner B could be regulate reque ma con imp u t against the horses, they , rly questioned staff in I the Special Use Permit. s to sh e Commission the layout of gestion as to where or the time limit for ards to if the appearance of the fence n replied this is a special use permit condition, however, he suggested the enough for staff to be able to enforce and C ' ed t rses run parallel with Colleyville, is there a way to pull' way fr m the neighbors and run shrubs down that side? Mr. Austin", g a problem, the space can be controlled. However, he replied, t' be the issue, it complies with city standards and as property owners, we 0 put up a fence and keep our property the way we choose. Commissioner ame questioned the Austins in regards to how many square feet is between the fen s beside your house on the east side in regards to the neighbor's? The Austins replied about 125 to 130 feet. Commissioner Blassingame questioned the Austins in regards to if they could split the distance there with the neighbors? Commissioner Byerly questioned the Lords in regards to what would be a suitable distance from your property for the horses? Mrs, Lord replied more than 20 feet. Commissioner Blassingame questioned Mrs. Lord in regards to what would be a suitable distance other than 20 feet? Mrs. Lord replied the horses have been kept in the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 11 of 14 back yard since the Austins came forth with the original request. Mrs. Lord stated putting the fence beside the Austin's house would give them more space because the side yard is a good size and by doing so it would keep the horses primarily in the back yard. Commissioner McCormick questioned the Lords in regards to how could the smell be an issue when their property is to the south of the Austin's prop 't and the winds are predominately out of the south? Mr. and Mrs. Lord repli 'e odor is an issue regardless of their property being to the south. Commissioner McCormick questioned the Lords in acceptable set back? Mr. Lord replied not knowing ex Commissioner Blassingame questioned the Lor Lords did not reply. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff in applicants have the chance to go to city replied the applicants have 10 days to submit the request. Commissioner Byerly suggested, neighbors before going to city coun Commissioner Byerly made motion keep the horses behi e even perpendicular with perty II questioned Com if the compromise e? recommendatio sure to h what would be an ; do the something out with the with the conditions to part of the house and mmissl Duffy seconded; however ants are to meet with the neighbors to missioner Byerly replied correct; a e exact line. , Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly HEARING - Amendment to Chapter 14, of the Land Development Code regarding Barry LeBar' November 14th, the Commission to post pone and continue this case at the anning and Zoning meeting. Commissioner Bartkowski made motion to post pone and continue case G-05-012 at the November 14, 2005 meeting. Commissioner Byerly seconded. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: McCormick, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Taylor, Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly Nay: None Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 12 of 14 STAFF REPORTS Barry LeBaron told the Commissioners at the November 14th meeting, the will be a Capital Improvements Advisory meeting before the regular Planning and Zoning meeting. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS None Amy Shelley Planning and Zoning Assistant Approved on: -------------------- ADJOURNMENT The Commission adjourned the meeting at 11:15 p.m. b Respectfully Submitted, Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - October 24, 2005 Page 13 of 14 city Of ccen~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Texas Meeting Date: I November 14, 2005 I Prepared by: I Chris Fuller Development Coordinator I Z-05-030 - Request for a Special Use Permit for contractor office Subject: i with an outside storage yard on Lot 11, Block 1, Colleyville !Industrial Park Addition, located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard Request. yard Special Use Permit (SUP) for contractor office with an outside storage Proposed Use. Brad Land, the prospective owner of the property, has applied for a SUP to allow outside storage of landscaping materials on the property located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard. The applicant has submitted a letter addressing the request, which is attached to this agenda briefing. The property owner is aware of the SUP submittal and has co-signed the rezoning application. Existing Conditions. The property is currently vacant. The property is located within the ML-Light Manufacturing zoning district. A SUP is required for a contractor office with an outdoor storage yard in the ML-Light Manufacturing zoning district. Location. This is a 0.89-acre parcel of property located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard. Platting. The property is platted as Lot 11, Block 1, of the Colleyville Industrial Park Addition. Adjacent Zoning and Development. The surrounding property is primarily industrial, with the exception of a single family residential dwelling unit located to the south of the property. Property to the north, east and west is zoned ML-Light Manufacturing and is developed as nonresidential uses. The property to the south is zoned AG-Agricultural and is developed as a single family residence. The Master Plan designates the future use of this property for industrial development. Development Analysis. The applicant proposes to build an office and warehouse that will total 5,656 square feet. Illustrations of the proposed site plans and building elevations are included as attachments to the agenda briefing. Information provided by the applicant indicates that there will be no retail services provided at this location. The primary use of this facility will be classified as a contractor office with outdoor storage yard. The applicant intends to use the yard for outside storage of landscape materials, including "trees, shrubs, mulch, compost, and different types of stone." Fencing and Screening. The applicant proposes to construct a six (6) foot tall cedar fence along the perimeter of the property. However, it should be noted that the Land Development Code requires an eight (8) foot tall fence along the southern property line Agenda Item No. 1- Page 1 where the ML-Light Manufacturing zoning district abuts residential uses. The applicant is aware of the eight (8) foot tall fence requirement, which has been incorporated into the attached proposed ordinance. Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future use of this area for industrial land uses. The proposed use is in compliance with the Master Plan. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are mostly developed as industrial uses, with the exception of a single family residence located to the south. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is nonresidential development. Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer services are available along adjacent rights- of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of utilities to the property if necessary. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the .89-acre parcels are valued at $97,500. The estimated City property tax revenue for the undeveloped property is approximately $339 annually. The future property tax revenue would depend upon the value of the individual lot and the value of the building improvements on the property. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 11 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: November 14,2005 City Council: December 6 and December 13, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Approval, with the following condition: 1. The portion of the perimeter fence located along the southern property line be eight (8) feet tall, per the Land Development Code. ATTACHMENTS · Zoning and Location Map · List of Property Owners Notified · Development Review Committee Memo · Applicant's Response · Information and Drawings from Applicant · Letter in Favor of Rezoning Request · Draft Ordinance Agenda Item No.1 - Page 2 Zoning and Location Map Agenda Item No.1 - Page 3 Z-05-030 Geneva Realty Management 1808 Industrial Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 1904 Industrial Ltd. PO Box 742346 Dallas, TX 75374 Small, Robert C Etux Sheila PO Box 1787 Colleyville, TX 76034 List of Property Owners Notified Sparks Southwest Inc. 1804 Industrial Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 Gore, Charles E Etux Vera 3905 Allendale St. Colleyville, TX 76034 Loftin, Stacey B Etux Ronda 6306 Wyatt Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 Dica Properties Ltd. 1812 Industrial Blvd. Colleyville, TX 76034 New Synergy Inc. 3901 Airport Fwy. Ste. 312 Bedford, TX 76021 Luers, Dennis R 1419 Thislewood Lane Grapevine, TX 76051 Horn, Billy J 1500 Royal Pkwy. Euless, TX 76040 Additional Self Storage LP 7411 Hines Place Ste. 100 Dallas, TX 75235 Agenda Item No. 1- Page 4 Development Review Committee Memo CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE October 21,2005 TO Brad Land FAX 817.251.0859 FROM Barry LeBaron, AICP, Development Director SUBJECT Z-05-030 1813 Industrial Special Use Pennit The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit for your Special Use Permit request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. GENERAL INFORMATION L If the Special Use Permit request were approved, the property would be subject to the general provisions of the ML-Light Manufacturing district and any conditions affixed to the Special Use Pennit imposed by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Detailed review for compliance with the regulations will take place during the site plan/landscape plan and construction phases of the project. 2. The staff report to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council regarding this zoning change will include a proposed ordinance containing suggested conditions applicable to this type of development. A copy of the staff report and proposed ordinance will be available for review not less than 72 hours prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting date. 3. The Special Use Pennit regulations require submittal of architectural drawings, such as elevations, concept sketches or renderings depicting building types and other significant proposed improvements including the treatment and use of open spaces, etc" where the submission of such drawings would more clearly portray the nature and character of the applicant's land use and development proposals. 4. The zoning exhibit shows a proposed monument sign, All signs proposed for the building or the property require a separate permit. The location and dimensions of the sign will be in accordance with the Colleyville Sign regulations at time of pennit issuance. Contact the Building Inspection Department at 817-503-1030 for sign pennits and requirements. 100 Main street - Colleyville , Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-05-o30 1813 INDUSTRIAL BLVD. SUP 5. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along all public streets, A sidewalk is required on Industrial Boulevard. The sidewalks must be installed when any new structures are built on the property. The sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. 6. Staff will recommend that any outside racks for storage of materials not exceed six feet in height, the height of the side yard fences shown on the site plan. COMMERCIAL DESIGN DISTRICT 1. Buildings constructed on this property must meet the minimum architectural design standards contained in Chapter 6 of the Land Development Code. All buildings constructed on this property must meet the design requirements of the ML-Light Manufacturing zoning district, which requires a minimum design score of 30 points, The score is based on an evaluation of the following criteria: fa9ade articulation, sloping roofs and surfaces, shade coverage, horizontal and diagonal roof planes, and fenestration. If the Special Use Permit application were approved, a separate site plan and landscape plan is required prior to submittal of a building permit application. The site plan must include a building footprint and building elevation drawings for the City to determine compliance with the Commercial Building Design Guidelines, ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING 1. Change the height of the cedar fence along the southern boundary line to 8 feet, which is required by the Land Development Code where the ML-Light Manufacturing district abuts the residential use to the south, OTHER INFORMATION 1. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on the property. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific use of the property, proposed utility construction, or conditions in an existing City-Developer Agreement. Details are contained in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. ROADWAY $1,017 per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for WAREHOUSING uses. Fee is based on specific use of the property. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a I-inch meter, Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 2. FIRE DEPARTMENT INFORMATION. The curved entryway must be striped as a fire lane prior to receiving a certificate of occupancy for the building. Specific requirements will be shown on PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-oS-o30 1813 INDUSTRIAL BLVD. SUP at time of site plan approval. Any questions related to fire code issues may be directed to Jeff Jones, Fire Marshal, at 817-488-6277. TENTATIVE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, November 14,2005, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, December 06 and December 20,2005, 7:30 p,m. RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS Correct the site plan drawing and submit the additional information per the above comments Please contact me at 817-503-1052 or lebaronb<w.ci.collevville.tx.us if you have any questions. I c: DEVElOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE3oF3 AllScapes lawn IeIVice Applicant's Response AllScapes Lawn Service P,O. Box 93383 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 42Hl884 FAJ<: (817)251~9 email: brad-jenland@Prodigy.net October 31, 2005 1813 Industrial Special Use Permit Z-05-0303 Barry LeBaron City of Colleyville Development Director I have enclosed 12 copies of the front elevations of the building to be constructed at 1813 Industrial, Colleyville, Texas. I have also enclosed 12 copies of the revised site plan including the front sidewalk and the south fence notes. Below are my responses and thoughts to your questions and concerns. 1. I understand the review process and the construction process that you have listed in this section. Plans will be submitted accordingly. 2. I will review the staff report and proposed ordinance. 3. I need you to look at the elevation plan that you requested and respond back to me. 4. I understand the sign ordinances and construction process. 5. I have included a 4 feet wide sidewalk along Industrial. 6. I have no intentions of any rack storage. I do have intentions of storing Landscape Canopy Trees and Landscape Accent Trees ih the yard area that will exceed the height of the six feet tall fence. I would think the trees would offer additional buffering for qur use versus causing an issue with the height being above the fence. If you have any more questions about this use just let me know. 7. Commercial Design District design is understood. 8. Zoning Exhibit Drawing. There is an existmg 8 feet tall fence on the property currently. My intentions are to put another fence in front of this fence. The notes are on the revised site plan. If you have any more questions about this just let me know. 9. I understand the impact fees and the striping of the fire lanes. Let me know if you need any more information or if you have any questions. Thank you, Brad Land RECEIVED NOV 0 2 2005 Per ............. P.O. Box 93383 Southlake, TX 76092 Phone: (817) 421-()884 FAX: (817) 251-0859 RECEIVED OCT 1 3 2005 AllScapes Lawn Service Information and Drawings from Applicant PAr October 12, 2005 To: Colleyville Planning & Zoning Commission and Colleyville City Council Subject: Special Use Permit for 1813 Industrial Boulevard My understanding is that for yard use of outside storage, a special use permit is required. I am applying for a special use permit for the property at 1813 Industrial Boulevard, Colleyville, Texas. The plan is to use this property for what is classified in the Colleyville Land Development Code as a Contractor Office with Yard. Statement of Planning Objectives: I operate/own a Landscape Installation and Maintenance Company, My company designs, installs, and maintains Sprinkler Systems and Landscapes, We serve commercial and residential clients in Colleyville and surrounding areas. My plan is to purchase the property at 1813 Industrial Boulevard and to build an office/warehouse for use byAllScapes Lawn Service. We will need the yard space that is shown on the site plan to store landscape materials for our installation use. I describe landscape materials as trees, shrubs, mulch, compost, and different types of stone. A cedar screening fence will be installed around the entire yard. The fence will be six feet tall with a two inch by eight inch cedar cap and a one inch by four inch cedar face trim board. There will be a sliding gate to access the yard that will automatically close upon entering or exiting the yard area. We will access the warehouse areas from the yard area. There will not be retail sales at this location. This location was chosen for the ease of access to our service areas. It appears to me, that my business use is permitted in this light manufacturing zoning area. Development Schedule: I am planning a January 1, 2006 start date for the construction schedule. Excavation of all soil work will begin immediately following permit approval. I feel that the entire project will take approximately six months to complete, As soon as construction is completed and certificate of occupancy is granted, AllScapes Lawn Service will occupy and operate from this location. Economic Development Information: The total square feet of the building will be approximately 5656 square feet. The property is currently appraised at the Tarrant County Appraisal District Office at . $ 97,500 for the year 2005. This appraisal was reduced from the 2004 value of$117,000. Upon completion of the improvements and construction that I am proposing, I would anticipate the appraised value at approximately $600,000. Traffic Impact Analvsis: The proposed use of this site by AllScapes Lawn Service will not generate more than 1000 vehicle trips per day, Sincerely, Brad Land AllScapes Lawn Service (817) 688-8824 6&/24f2EB5 11:38 ~17292ij4tll M"_ "'-"Nt.VU<::i t""~uc. fj i ro ~ 'nn.'t <nn'An r;,. tCV-002931lO~m Xh1s is to c.rtifV that file lLove, th.i/J tUlt., Nd'e .. ca:eful Uld 4CC1JratQ Gurvl!!; OM ~ grour.d of t;he W'operr:y ~o::at~,..t lel3 I.odlllltr.i.ill 1I19diJI the Cir:'1 o~ COll....v.ill., , ='arrant COUl'i7'Y, TEXAS desc:ribotd u EollC'W, I.;qt: lL31o,~k '''CQna:.vil'J~- lo'd.\I.I'crul .!'at,~'., AJ,' ADDITION 2'Cl 2'1fE Cit!, of COJ.l~gvj.;,le, fa "rmt " CCXJN'J'Y, 2'EUS, .accor~in9' to the P..la~ oE 5a_ recort1etI in V.;;l. .J68-1"'~_, :>age' 13 .tol..t .~ord6 of T..r.re"e cotl/Vrr, TEnS INOU'Sr2IAL ec:ut.EV41! [) . , ...., (~";(~.,f~ - 6:J' ~."',IV. I !i'~~ P3!e.,,__,r., P.~A. l.Jf')f5'ZO~~' 1oo,CO ".7ft;'~.~r. ~i!/ ""'''''7 (~ -~ I, ~ V ~ ~1 ~L.~: l.IlJ~ . I {f '0 I -~ I l5, N :z l~ 5i 1~ .J '01; o it ~ l~ ~ I~ >>8 I - I ~l ~I ~\ ~' " ~;/ ~ ~---~-'--"'7'- ': la~ vm..d'f' . .E'S'€.1E;lvh-~~&.- , ~M~l'-~,""~ ~r- ~e>t7'Z . W. I~ .(X) ,AC,'tUAt,. ~ WI c:; '1'2' ~W. 1 ~. e;x-., I ~.. " P' ..... i ..l,~~\J~'~,M.:./'R,Pr,,'~IO.lC,I.c..T'. "",,,II ..It:; ......-.on $" tz"l.Ie, "'O:rect ilM accldate rltpr...neiil:lcir. '07 e1li prop.ny ilS' detenrUned by 5U~V, t.b6 1.J.~$ and d.!._ns!on8 0:; 8al.d propert.y bflL.g ... iM.i,catelf by t:M Plat:, t:h. 51 ZIt> JOCllt:!OTl 4nC t:r}~ ~ l;u.11d~nS$ 1JIl4 bqprovemt'n~ /tre .to ShoWll, all J.;r.prc""",.nt:6 loci.!n!=, within th., bc:u."ltIlfl"ie.cr t:Ile P~Zi;9, turCWl't: II' $bofm ,see b:;tcJc frOlll the Pnlprt:r} lUlU tJJl! d1 stances il'J<fi.c"::vd, and thAt ~ d1.stance rUn the n./!:_st. ine.r_r:t.!..7V Jer_e 0: read !~ a. tJboom on ..id Plat, 2'llerl! are no "l'JCL'O<<ChlwDt:S;. confl.ir.t:s, prc>f::ru$Jam., OT "PP..:-~r:t 8It.SfI~nt:s, exct;Jpt as; s.'lCOtnl. -L ! Wi t 1 - eLOG~ 1 ( YAGAl-Jf wi ) sc;.u / t" _ *' I' . ZSCEND oS'> ~ jJ 1:- ~ . c ~ ~ <l 8 S t'l ~ 8 ~ €. - o ~ c: -~, ....,-- .70UND S'.!'llBL ROD . SE'Z' S'rEEL ROP ,ror;ND PIPE .rocJND DOn D'AJI.C S~~AJIZ .Pr>>IlJ? OR rELEl'eoRl: ::.INE . FENCl! OAVIO C. MOAK SiJ/fVCY'()(fS, INt:. RIlGjtT&N1l 'USLlC SUIIVEl'CR P.O,!IOll10'Jo< U~.a211 ..fl.JIlST, TOCl>.S CATe O\.~, '''J''l~ PI',~:,~ ':t!'E 1 1 . d 2vv2-182-~18 'OyI 'S~~~IOOSS~ ~ ~~jl~d RECEIVt:D OCT 1 3 Z005 Per ............. ,CJ-~ '" t ~ '" r ~ dSI:SO so 62 unr N lI()N ~~~ 3:~~ ~~~ om~ JQ-i ~mll "lJ@O . m jO (J\ -t 8 ~ I liliil - ii iiU ~i.J ~lln ~ 2 ,Ill' II I . v ~~~ ~ ~=- ~ fi~~ ~iiJ ~ ~~ w ~~ ~g ~l!! ~i>' ~ 8 ~ ~' iU! ~~~~ ~ e- j i D ~ J .1&1 ~ ~ Iftdi~i ~ ~ il q D II~ CJ -!, I ~ ~ ::T .. i~~ i II ~ \J) tJ ~ :<0\ :<rn I ~.er..~ < :(i\ :" l 'iZ li~ z m i ~ r (JI I rn rn 3: < CJ lQ )> ; 11 i <5 r z )> z () II III (i\ z ~ t: ~e: 1'I111111I 1 I1111I11 dqU1J!U I Ipn;J ~ 21 ;~ ~I ~~~I n1~ i~ Pi ~~ r ~ ~ ~ ! I ~ ~ J -i ~i~i~~~~~~~l~~i~~~~tiji~~ '1~n~'1C~ ~~~~_ 'I 'I 'I; ~ f;; la .' ~ . "! ~ l! ~ ~~ i .u~ ~~ 'I. . i ~ '1'1 I i~~~ lij~;; - ~E~ ~ I- E ~ if i B ~ ~ ~i~ ~,~ )I~ ,r IP' ,< I~ m m I~i .--..........~-~.&.: ,,'&IUlI.Pl... UtC. . I ------______________, 1 I 1 I 1 1 I. I~ I~ II l- ii ii I -t I l' I it i~ i ~il~ - f ~~ ~ ~ > -. ~ q I I I I I I I I I I ----I in~ ~-r (~~ i ~ i ~ ~ ...~~.... ALLSCAFES L~ SERVICE OFFICE I ~REH0U5E teI3 NlUSTRIAL a. VD GCUEYVILl.f TX .....~ .. Blake Architects -- 1202 S. WHIlE CIW'El RlWl . SU1E A SOUIlf.AK[, 1DrAS 76092 . 1117-488-t.!97 "~N ~-~ :I:~:Z: - (\ ij\ ~I~ omQ! ,jO-i ~m,. "11~() 'rnjO -i 2!i<ii ~ ~~i ~ - ~>l II; ~. lj - 4)> ~~ ril ~:!1 ~ ~i>' ~ ~ ~ =; ~ ~ j'I~I"'II!!!'1 0 0,; ~ ; Bun ~ ~hi~~I~U ~~ z it~R "~- ~ffi z z ~ H ' lpn (Ii ;~h~~~I~~~!{~l'i III III 6:I :I :I U\ " (I ~~ PI x .r '11 ~ r ~ HZ'l I~' ~ i1l~ Q)> )> )> ~ Il~~~~ iij~iiiij 0~ (\ I' \l UIiUiai z ~ >- >- rn ~ ~~r.t: ~~ ~l::~ . III r r "'~ ~ ;B r liB I Ii i ~~ UiJ~~~~~i rn )> if .;:~ ill III (j\ ril ;! "Ill ~ ~ rn \J .. ~!!~ili ~l;~1 ill-- "" z ' )> .. ~i~~;iji~~ ~f~ ~lll c ~ t.J5:J:~"'_"d:"':~ :; ;;1 1. 3:~ III ~ .'pl-::ld~~ -< ~lI:~ I m~llib I'Ill ~ ~ ; Ii",....)> clll ~ · i I ~H ~ ..i1~~~~~ifi~"..R: ~~ r <: 11 ~ ~~ ~"rnlll:l I III ~ ll'l ~ ~<l ~ ~~ Q 0 ~ -l III l! Z ~ i i ~ . 'C I , , I , , I , , I , , I , , I , , I , , ~ ~i~ ~,~ ): ')II I~ :j! I~ I , , ~~~=~~~~~=~~~~~ 1 I, J l' " I' ~ l' ~ I' i ~ i' ~=~~~ - I I~i ~ R : i aI fll!il r i! ~ ~ liil Ii III n ~ ~ ;II ~U II q i Iii ~ji :In :l> !II~~ t.J ~IS .. "'8 () .JC:e~~J:IC. i . ::r III i ALLSCAPE5 ~ SERVIC.E II ~ .... Blake Architects () OFFICE / ViAAEHOUSE -- .. 1202 S. WHITE CIW'El RIWl . SUIt A G) ~3 INOOS'IRIAL IlLVD GdJ.EM.Lf, TX SOUIHLN<E. lEXAS 76092 . 817-488-9:l97 .JOe "<leI!l2 111l11/:ltltl~ l.:I:~f l:jl. Letter in Favor of Rezoning Request r~ V~ ~ Prudential "" t ..........., REAl:iOJIS4' 203 E. NIdwest Hwy. Grapevine. 1)( 76051 8us817481.2573 Fax817481-1113 Toll Free 800 966-3954 www.prudemjaI-louhillnwt.com FACSIMILE lRANSMIITAL ~~ANl'N'-' C. (~';,.(~ Pl....~ 4- .::4......, ATrENTION: FAX#: ~D.J -,DS'"'1 PRONE If: 9:>.7 - 10i7( FROM: Dennis Luers-THE REAL ESTATE GUY MOBILE: '11~ EMAIL~........~ DATE:~ TIME: IIPAGES(w/ceYu) ( IN REl'l:RENaTO: S L\ P 2 -<)$"- 91 C) MEMO: :r nlnlfl ~ ~.I."~_~ ~~ ~ ..+ (~\ ~.~, ~..c.. .rt.vt".c~.cacl. M,.. ~J', fCAM 4,...{ (.c.{";"'~ ~ +vl w.eU. ~-f( 6~ l- -U~.$"'" ~ _ .:P F;..::f- /AM r'f! ~.~ .fJ,. ~ r;~L ~ ~~~..-'=. ~ L-.J 5c=...~ ~ ~ --. I --:! JJu.. A.Jb..1t.6n ~ ~ ~ 8(vJ. {Z..JI.. ~'t. &-1 ~::l::~~~1 :.:l ~ If- - (-~ ~:> (If trallAllSlioa is DOt complete, pIeue aft our .ffice at 817-481-2573.) -All imlIr L.L <<. -.ed"~""""..f lIlII f'mIi::tIiar!lEl fslaAflll:lllo. k Draft Ordinance ORDINANCE 0-05-xxxx AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED; BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CONTRACTOR OFFICE WITH AN OUTSIDE STORAGE YARD ON LOT 11, BLOCK 1, COLLEYVILLE INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION, LOCATED AT 1803 INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Brad Land on October 13, 2005, under Case No. Z-05-030; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in Ordinance 0-05-xxxx Page 2 of 3 the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow a contractor office with an outside storage yard on the premises on Lot 11, Block 1, Colleyville Industrial Park Addition, located at 1813 Industrial Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: 1. The portion of the perimeter fence located along the southern property line be eight (8) feet tall, per the Land Development Code; 2. The exterior building elevations conform to "Exhibit A" as attached, but may be modified in order to meet the minimum building design score as prescribed by the ML - Light Manufacturing zoning district. 3. The site and landscape plan conform to "Exhibit B" as attached. THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. Ordinance 0-05-xxxx Page 3 of 3 Sec. 7. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT A - BUILDING ELEVATIONS EXHIBIT ~.<r~"".""",":_ \'''.,i<4~.,;iNIIfi L~~~,.~. EXHIBIT B - SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN m_~ CUy or ccern~ PLANNmG&ZONmGCOMM~gON AGENDA BRIEFmG Texas Meeting Date: I November 14, 2005 I Prepared by: I Chris Fuller I Development Coordinator i Z-05-031 - Request for a Special Use Permit to allow for horses Subject: I on Lot 8, Block 7, Brighton Oaks Addition, located at 2705 I Sherwood Lane Request. Special Use Permit (SUP) for horses within a R20-Single Family Residential zoning district. Proposed Use. Michael and Linda Collins have applied for a SUP to allow two horses on Lot 8, Block 7, of the Brighton Oaks Addition, which is located in a R20-Single Family Residential zoning district. The horses are currently being boarded at an off-site location. The applicant has submitted a letter addressing the request, which is attached to this agenda briefing. Location. This is a 1.2-acre parcel of property located at 2705 Sherwood Lane. Adjacent Zoning and Development. The surrounding properties are zoned R20-Single Family Residential and developed as single family residences. Fencing and Screening. A six (6) foot high wooden perimeter fence surrounds the property. The applicant proposes to construct a rail fence within the backyard to separate the residence and the area the horses will inhabit. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 13 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff has received one letter in opposition regarding this request. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: November 14, 2005 City Council: December 6 and December 13, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Approval Agenda Item No.2 - Page 1 ATTACHMENTS · Zoning and Location Map · List of Property Owners Notified · Letter in Opposition to the Request · Information and Drawings from Applicant · Draft Ordinance Agenda Item No.2 - Page 2 Zoning and Location Map D NORTH Z-05-031 Hartman, Michael J 2708 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Taylor, Chris J Etux Jean-Ann 4101 Spring Hollow St. Colleyville, TX 76034 Gibson, J P 2604 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Kirkham, Kenneth D 4109 Spring Hollow Colleyville, TX 76034 List of Property Owners Notified McGee, Donald M Etux Barbara 2800 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Reddick, Randal Etux Shawn 4200 Allendale St. Colleyville, TX 76034 Guzman, Jose Etux Monika 2709 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Collins, Michael Etux Linda J 2705 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Ramirez, Larry Etux Alicia H 4204 Allendale St. Colleyville, TX 76034 Gotcher, J L Etux Cynthia A 4105 Spring Hollow Colleyville, TX 76034 Teger Inc. 2704 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Brancel, Dale Etux Susan 2700 Sherwood Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Wernicke, Rodney K 4208 Allendale St. Colleyville, TX 76034 Letter in Opposition to Rezoning Request . Information and Drawings from Applicant Special Use Permit Application - 2705 Sherwood Lane In 1997, we purchased our property (approximately two acres) at 2705 Sherwood Lane, Colleyville in the Brighton Oaks Subdivision from Gerald and Linda Simpson. One of the desires we have had is to return horses to the property. The previous owners had kept two horses there and the stable still remains in the rear of the yard (see attached plat and photographs). Horses have been a part of the Brighton Oaks subdivision since its inception in 1975. At different times (in addition to the Simpson's), there have been horses on the Fuller's property at 3016 Sherwood, the White's property at 2904 Hickory Hill and the Rounds Property at 3004 Sherwood Lane. Both my daughter and I (Katie and Linda) show our two horses (Zip and Karl) that we have owned for three years. In that time, they have been boarded at three different co-op locations, one as far away as Southlake (involved a 30 minute drive each way). Having Zip and Karl with us on our property would save a great deal of travel time and associated boarding fees. A six-foot high wooden fence surrounds the entire perimeter of the area, which is where we would keep Zip and Karl. A rail fence would be added to a portion of the back yard to keep the horses from encroaching on the pool. The proposed layout is shown on the attached plat and associated photographs. Our method of horse care includes: 1. Stalls are cleaned daily and waste is not allowed to accumulate. 2. Fly control is achieved by a contin,uous feed additive called "Solitrol" which prevents flies from hatching in the waste. A flytrap product called "Fly Predator" is attached around the stalls, which entraps the insects in a container. These are removed and replaced every two weeks. 3. Nutrition for Zip and Kari is provided by twice daily feedings of grain, supplements and hay. The land is not intended to supply their primary nutritional needs. 4. The wooden fence provides both security and screens the horses from direct viewing and contact from adjacent locations. 5. It is not our intention to allow Zip and Kari to be used for neighborhood amusement (pony rides, etc). Page 1 of2 Special Use Permit Application - 2705 Sherwood Lane (continued) In conclusion, horses are inherently good neighbors due to their quiet, friendly nature. We feel that the addition of Zip and Karl will not negatively impact the esthetics of the neighborhood. We ask for your approval of a special use permit so we may return two horses to the property. Thank you for time and attention in this matter. Mike and Linda Collins Page 2 of2 . PLAT SHOIING THE PROPERrv UlCATED AT 1..,0. SH.IlWGDD LA"" IN THE CITY Of BEIHC IDT ~ BLOCK i Of B.I~ ()liUt< THE cm Of . -n..._ COUNTY. TEXAS. ACCORDING TO mE RECORDED IH . "OL.lll'lf\€ 3.88- ",q AT PACE q Of THE 1)Rn RfX:ORDS or lliwlAfIIT" TEXAS. TBXAS. AND AN ADDmON TO PtAr COUHTY. , 5'",'30 c,tIIf w t~ 5~T. to ......~: ~ <' / . "0,'-1. ... ~ -.- _ .-ik' ." ~ -- r- 1 1.. ~b.p.'~ ~- ..--........- . ..~~.I .:.. ~., .'.M5' d.'W~.O,,' ~,- ...., ,;.~..'i. ;~.;.~.~ ," .",,' I I. DOKAW smART PEEBLf.S. DO HEREBY DECLARE mAT ~ PLAT SHOIN HEREON ACCURATELY REPRESENTS AN ON THE GROUND SURVEY IWlE UNDER MY DIRftTION AND SUPERVISION. AHD mAT AIL CORNERS HAVE BEEN SET OR LOCATED AS SHOI" H!REOII. AlSO THtu ARE NO ENCROACHKEN'fS PLAT SHoriNG THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1")0. S ".11 ""CleO LA.... IN THE em OF BElHC LOT ~ BIDCK" Of '8.J~ ~at< THE CITY or ,...-- COUNTY. TEXAS. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED IN VOL.lll'f\€ 3.&8- ...q. AT PAGE q OF THE 1)~ RECORDS Of ilutuN'r TIm ..~ ..,6'( ~ ~ --:.' ",~~~.~y ~ TBXAS. AND AN !DDmON TO PLAr . COUlfl'Y. / 5'",10 (,1IIf "1M. 5~T. , " f'J 1 .. t' o . ,. ::t- ~ ~ ...... ~ --- ......... '" ~ - -- r- 1 ~1-0~QQ ~_.~ .........-.---- ~'-~-..- '.. "'~'" '."-15" ... ,.,4>Vt~.....'~~" ..... ;J.i.,~j,"", .. '., '.., . ...~_.I..<,.. .~....- ~b.p." I J. DOHAW STEWART PEEBLES. DO HEREBY DECLARE 001 rnt PLAT SHOIN HEREON ACCURATELY REPRlSENTS AN ON THt GROUND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DlRtX:TJON AND SUPERYJSJOH. AND THAT AU. CORNERS HAVE BEEM SET OR LClCATtil AS SHOIN HEREON. ALSO THtRE ARE NO ENCRO.U:HIIENTS Draft Ordinance ORDINANCE 0-05-xxxx AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED; BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW HORSES ON LOT 8, BLOCK 7, BRIGHTON OAKS ADDITION, LOCATED AT 2705 SHERWOOD LANE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Michael and Linda Collins on October 14, 2005, under Case No. Z-05-031; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in Ordinance 0-05-xxxx Page 2 of 3 the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. Sec. 7. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by authorizing a Special Use Permit to allow horses on the premises of Lot 8, Block 7, Brighton Oaks Addition, located at 2705 Sherwood Lane as depicted on the attached Zoning Exhibit, labeled as Exhibit "A". THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyvilleas heretofore amended, and as amended herein. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Ordinance 0-05-xxxx Page 3 of 3 The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT A - ZONING EXHIBIT city or ccen~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Texas Meeting Date: November 14, 2005 I Prepared by: I Barry LeBaron Development Director G-05-012 -Amendment to Chapter 14 - Engineering Design Subject: Standards of the Land Development Code regarding detention/retention ponds STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Within Colleyville, there have been a significant number of subdivisions developed in the past that have utilized detention ponds to facilitate drainage flows associated with the development. Often times, a detention pond becomes an important amenity for a development by improving the appearance and aesthetics of the subdivision, such as when the detentionlretention pond contains an attractive fountain feature. An additional advantage of a fountain feature is its ability to prevent oxygen depletion of the water, a major contributor for foul odors and ugly vegetation growth on the pond's surface. Code Enforcement Department staff and Engineering Department staff frequently receive complaints from citizens living near a foul smelling detention/retention pond. Citizen complaints are also received regarding mosquito problems during summer droughts which promote stagnant waters in detention/retention ponds that do not have any mechanism to replenish the water supply or to keep the water moving. Staff is proposing an amendment to Chapter 14 of the Land Development Code to require all new detention/retention ponds constructed, in the future, are to provide for continuous water movement, aeration facilities or other processes approved by the City that is designed to prevent surface accumulation of aquatic vegetation. Attached is a copy of Chapter 14 showing the proposed changes to the regulation and a copy of the proposed ordinance for your consideration. The City Council discussed this item at the October 18, 2005 Pre- City Council Meeting and requested input and comments on the proposed new regulation from the Planning and Zoning Commission. A public hearing on the proposed change is not required by State law or Colleyville ordinance. However, staff recommends a public hearing to allow input from the public. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: November 14, 2005 City Council: December 6 and December 20, 2005 Agenda Item No.3 - Page 1 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Current Regulations Showing Proposed Changes (Exhibit "An) · Draft Ordinance Agenda Item No.3 - Page 2 Section 14-170 Drainage and Storm Sewer Improvements [ Formatted: Left: 0.5", Right: 0.33" Exhibit "A". ---------------------------------------------------------------~:~':----1 ~~: ~(~;: \\ Left: (No border), Right: (No border), .... ... Pattern: Clear .. ' A, General - This section pertains to general design requirements for drainage and storm sewer construction in the City of Colleyville. All drainage facilities shall be sized and designed in accordance with the City of Colleyville Drainage Master Plan or as determined by the Director of Public Works. Fonnatted: Font color: Auto Fonnatted: Namal, Border: Top: (No border), Bott~: (No border), I Left: (No border), Right: (No border), ! Pattern: Clear i B. Runoff Calculations - The selection of which method to use for calculating runoff depends upon the size of the contributing drainage area at the most downstream point of the project The "Rational Method" is acceptable for designing projects in which the drainage area is less than one-hundred (100) acres. A unit hydrograph method is required for projects with larger drainage areas. 1. No matter which method is used to calculate runoff, a developer or builder of residential property greater than one (1) acre in size, or any property that was platted as a part of an overall tract which was greater than one (1) acre in size (including churches and schools), shall develop the property so that the rate of runoff created by the development as it leaves the property does not exceed the rate of runoff that is currently occurring in the existing conditions. A developer or builder of commercial property greater than one-half (1/2) acre must follow the above guidelines. 2. Runoff computations shall be based upon fully developed watershed conditions in accordance with the land use projections in the latest comprehensive land use plan for the City of Colleyville. The design engineer shall size drainage facilities by disregarding the detention effects of upstream property and calculating the runoff as if the off- site property was developed without any detention. If an approved regional detention/retention facility is in operation, the design engineer may size downstream drainage facilities based on consideration of the detention effects of the regional facility. C. Drainaae Areas Less Than one-hundred acres 1. Computation of Storm water Runoff for drainage areas less than one-hundred (100) acres shall be by the "Rational Method," which is based on the principle that the maximum rate of runoff from a given drainage area for an assumed rainfall intensity occurs when all parts of the area are contributing to the flow at the point of discharge. 2. lime of concentration is the longest time, without interruption of flow by detention devices that a drop of water takes to flow from the farthest point of the drainage area to the point of concentration (I.e. the point of design). The time of concentration is composed of the inlet time and the flow time in a conduit or channel to the point of design. The inlet time shall be 10 minutes for property zoned multiple family, churches, schools, local business, central business, commercial, or industrial. An inlet time of 15 minutes shall be used for property zoned for parks, cemeteries, agricultural, and single family residential. When designing inlets and laterals, the time of concentration is equal to the inlet time. The design engineer will compare the above specified inlet times to the actual calculated inlet time by computing the flow time overland and along the gutter to the first inlet. Manning's Equation shall be used to determine flow time to the inlet. The design engineer may use the actual calculated or specified inlet time. In no case shall a longer inlet time be used than 10 minutes for multiple family, commercial, churches, schools, industrial and business areas and 15 minutes for parks, cemeteries, agricultural, and single-family areas. D. Drainaae Areas of one-hundred (100) acres or More 1. For drainage areas of one-hundred (100) acres or more where the use of the "Rational Method" does not provide reliable results, the use of a unit hydrograph method shall be made. The use of a unit hydrograph calculation will be based upon standard and accepted engineering principles subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. Acceptable methods include the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Technical Release Number 55 or the Corps of Engineers HEC-1 models for drainage areas one-hundred (100) acres or more. 2. The unit hydrograph method shall be based upon fully developed watershed conditions assuming no effects from the small on-site detention facilities for maintaining the rate of runoff as if the property was undeveloped. The detention effects of large regional detention facilities can be taken into account in unit hydrograph methods. 3. Circumstances that may require the use of a unit hydrograph method include sizing open channels, reclaiming floodplains, creating lakes, or building other types of drainage-related facilities on major drainage courses. Design engineers of these types of facilities should be aware that the requirement of designing for fully developed watershed conditions will mean that they will have to calculate these fully developed flows instead of using the flows calculated in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) flood insurance studies for Colleyville or Tarrant County or from studies performed for or approved by the City of Colleyville. E. Desian Storm Freauencies - All developments submitted must provide data for the following design storm frequencies: 2-Year I5-Year 110-Year I 25-Year ISO-Year 110o-Year. 1. Drainage facilities shall be designed in accordance with the following table: Closed Storm Sewer Systems and Inlets at Street Low Point or Sa Culverts and Brid as Concrete-lined Channels Earthen Channels 5-year with l00-year positive overflow in streets such that the depth of flow in the street does not exceed the right-of-way or drainage easement ca city. l00-year with positive overflow 100- ear 100- ear 100- ear 2. The approved drainage system shall provide for positive overflow at all low points and these areas must be denoted on the plans as such. The term "positive overflow" means that when the inlets do not function properly or when the design capacity of the conduit is exceeded, the excess flow can be conveyed overland along a grassed or paved course, Normally, this would mean along a street or alley, or shall require the dedications of special drainage easements on private property. F. Street and AIIev CaDacitv 1. Streets - Streets and storm drains within new developments shall be designed so that storm water runoff resulting from a design storm of a one-hundred (100) year frequency is contained within the available right-of-way and/or drainage easement. The capacity of the street and right-of-way and/or easement and the stonn sewer pipe working in combination must be designed for a capacity to safely contain a stonn water from a design stonn of one-hundred (100)yearfiequency. 2. Alleys - The flows created by the one-hundred (100) year stonn shall be contained within the capacity of all paved alleys, G. Inlet Placement and Caoacitv - The stonn sewer system is to begin at the point where the stonn water from a five (5) year frequency stonn reaches curb depth, with the exception of collector streets on which storm sewer facilities must be designed to prevent one-twelve (12') foot wide lane from ponding and on major streets on which stonn sewer facilities must be designed to prevent one-twelve (12') foot wide lane in each direction from ponding. At such point where the combined capacity of the street and stonn drain system satisfies the five (5) year street capacity criteria (as previously described) but the one-hundred (100) year frequency stonn runoff can not be contained within the right-of-way additional pick-up points (inlet capacity) shall be provided along with an increase in stonn sewer capacity so that the one-hundred (100) year frequency stonn runoff will be contained within the right-of-way. 1. Inlets shall be placed upstream from an intersection whenever possible. At any intersection, only one street shall be crossed with surface drainage and this street shall be the lower classified street. When an alley intersects a street, inlets shall be placed in the alley whenever flow down that alley would cause the capacity of the intersecting street to be exceeded. 2. The minimum inlet size shall be ten (10') feet. No more than twenty (20') feet of inlet shall be placed along one gutter at any given location. Minimum sizes of laterals shall be twenty-one (21") inches for use with ten (10') foot inlets, and twenty-four (24") inch laterals with fourteen (14') foot, twenty (20') foot inlets, and drop inlets. Where laterals tie into trunk lines, place the laterals on a minimum angle forty-five (45") degrees and a maximum angle of sixty (60") degrees with the trunk line and connect them so that the longitudinal centers intersect. 3. Manholes are required every three hundred feet (300'). Junction boxes are required at every change in flow line direction, change in pipe size, and where a convergence of more than two pipes occurs. Manholes are to be five feet (5') square and can be precast or cast in place. H, Pioe Desion Standards 1. Stonn sewer conduit shall be sized to flow full. Manning's Equation shall be used to detennine the conduit size. 2. Design Velocities a, Minimum - two and a half feet (2.5') per second. b, Maximum - twelve feet (12') per second. c. The maximum discharge velocities in the pipe shall also not exceed the permitted velocity of the receiving channel or conduit at the outfall to prevent erosive conditions. The maximum outfall velocity of a conduit in partial flow shall be computed for partial depth and shall not exceed the maximum pennissible velocity of the receiving channel unless controlled by an appropriate energy dissipater (e.g. stilling basins, impact basins, riprap protection) . 3. In general, stonn water shall be carried in concrete pipe conduit within the right-of-way but other types of conduit can be used to carry stonnwater in areas other than the right-of-way. However, prior pennission to use other conduit materials must be obtained from the Director of Public Wor1<s. 4. Hydraulic Gradient (also refer to the Ft. Worth Drainage Manual) a. Conduits must be sized, and slopes must be set, such that runoff flows smoothly down the drainage system. To insure this smooth passage, the hydraulic gradient must be at the proper elevations. The hydraulic grade line shall be established and shown on the plans for all stonn sewer design. b. The hydraulic grade line shall in no case be closer to the surface of the ground or street than one foot (1'). The HGL must not exceed the neck into the inlet. c. Hydraulic gradient calculations shall account for all head losses that may occur in the storm sewer line. Friction head loss shall be detennined by direct application of Manning's Equation. Minor losses due to turbulence at structures shall be detennined using Appendix A of this section. 5. Inspection I Testing a. The compaction of backfill shall meet or exceed 95% Standard Proctor density, b. All stonn sewer conduits shall be inspected prior to acceptance by the City. All conduit forty-twojnch (42") or less shall be inspected using television inspection. Conduits larger than forty-twojnch (42") may be inspected visually. c. A City representative shall be present during the television inspection. d. Televised Inspection Criteria (1) All television equipment used shall have a minimum of two-hundred-twenty (220) lines of horizontal resolution. The picture shall be in color. (2) All video information on tape must have good picture quality. (3) As a title heading on the tape and during the televising, the operator must: i. Note the project name and Contractor name. ii. Note the name of the company and the operator perfonning the video inspection. iii. Note line size and material, joint type and length. iv. Line segment to be televised including beginning and ending station numbers. v. Note page of plans used and year plans were stamped. vi. Note date and time of inspection. vii. A footage counter must be displayed on the tape during the filming. viii. Show the above title block before and after each line segment. Show the title block at one-hundred (100') foot intervals while filming the line segment. ix. All defects should be shown on film for a minimum of 10 seconds before proceeding with the televising. (4) The Contractor shall supply a log sheet used in conjunction with the video tape for written documentation. All written infonnation gathered must be legible and clearly understandable. i. Note the project name, Contractor name and contract number. ii. Note the name of the company and the operator perfonning the video inspection. iii. Note pipe size and material, joint type and length between joints, iv. Note the VCR tape footage counter, start to end. v. Note line segment to be televised, station numbers from and station numbers to length of line segment as indicated on plans. vi. Note page of plans used and year plans were stamped. vii. Note date and time of inspection. viii, Indicate by sketch the line segment to be televised in relation to surrounding road intersections and street addresses. Identify manhole station numbers. Show direction of flow with arrows and direction the camera is going. Indicate direction of north on the sketch. ix. Note the water depth at the beginning, every fifty (50') foot station. every change in grade, and at the end of the line segment. x. Identify the clock location, direction, size and type of laterals entering main. Indicate laterals as saddles. punched, or glued fittings. xi. Indicate final footage televised at end of the log sheet. (5) One tape per visual televised inspection project shall be furnished to the Project Inspector. (6) Tapes must be VHS format, one (1") inch wide T-120, high quality tape. Tapes are to be recorded on SP (2 hours) play. (7) All tapes and run sheets shall be submitted to the City. All tapes and log sheets shall become the property of the City. I. Culvert DesiQn - Culverts must be designed using standard engineering practices and engineering judgment. Culverts shall be designed in accordance with the latest edition of the City of Fort Worth Drainage Manual. If the City of Fort Worth Drainage Manual does not incorporate the necessary standards please refer to the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) Hydraulic Design Manual. 1. One (1') foot of freeboard is required between the one-hundred (100) year water surface elevation and the top of curb elevation. Exceptions must be approved in writing by the Director of Public Works. 2. Culvert hydraulic grade line calculations shall consider both inlet and outlet control. 3. Culverts shall be aligned to provide the minimum resistance to the flow of water during the 10, 50, 100 and 500 year events. 4. The maximum velocity through a culvert shall be fifteen (15') feet per second. 5. Stream stability shall be assessed when detennining the number of barrels, height and width and culvert skew. Potential for scour shall be accounted for in the design. 6. Hydraulic jumps shall not be allowed from face of culvert to ten (10') feet from the culvert, subject to the approval of the Director of Public Works. J. BridQes - Two (2') feet of freeboard is required between the one-hundred (100) year water surface elevation and the low chord of the bridge. Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the Director of Public Works in writing. 1. The skew of the bridge piers and abutments shall be oriented as close to the normal or flood direction of flow resulting in an angle of attack as close to zero (0) degrees as possible. 2. Bridge piers shall be aligned to provide the minimum resistance to the flow of water during the 10. 50, 100 and 500 year events. 3. Computer modeling programs used for the hydraulic analysis of bridges shall be HEC-RAS, Version 2.2, or HEC2. 4. Stream stability shall be assessed when designing the abutments and interior bents of the bridge. Scour shall be accounted for in the design. 5. Where flows are supercritical, erosion control measures shall be used in an area from one-hundred (100') feet upstream from a bridge to twenty-five (25') feet downstream from a bridge. K. Channels - Open channels may be used instead of an enclosed system when a pipe greater than an eighty-four (84") inch diameter (or other shape equivalent to more than thirty-eight and a half (38.5) square feet) is required to carry the design stonn event. 1. Design Criteria: a. All open channel design must follow the Corp of Engineers Guidelines. b. Channels may be left in their natural state provided that the channel velocities are six (6.0') feet per second or less and that one (1') foot of freeboard is available during the design stonn event. c. If the natural channel is to be replaced by an improved channel, the flow from the one-hundred (100') year design flood must be contained within the improved channel while allowing for one (1') foot of freeboard. d, Improved channels shall be trapezoidal shaped and include a lined section if the design velocity is greater than six feet per second. Lining types such as concrete, rock walls and gabions may be used upon approval of the Director of Public Works. The maximum velocity allowed in concrete lined channels is fifteen (15') feet per second. e. Unless shown to be feasible in a soils report sealed by a licensed professional engineer in the State of Texas, and approved by the Director of Public Works, improved channels shall have minimum side slopes of: (1) 4 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical for earthen, grassed-lined side slopes. (2) 2 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical for concrete-lined side slopes, f. Where practicable, all unpaved channels should have sufficient grade to avoid ponding. A minimum slope of 1.00% is required for earthen channels and swales, except those used as part of a wetlands area. In areas where 1.00% cannot be obtained a pilot channel approved by the City may be used. All lined channels are to have a minimum slope of 0.50% and earthen channels a minimum slope of 1.00%. g. The developer or owner shall use low maintenance vegetation for vegetative cover, as approved by the Director of Public Works prior to planting. The selection of materials shall comply with the current ground cover listing for North Central Texas furnished through the Texas Agricultural Extension Service. 2. Manning's Equation can be used to design channels and determine water surface elevations and velocities when backwater effects are negligible, subject to approval by the Director of Public Works. Channels where backwater effects occur must be designed using models accepted by FEMA. 3. All channel sections must consider and account for channel stabilization in their design. This requirement pertains to all sections whether they are left in their natural condition or are modified in any manner. The design of all drainage channels and swales shall assure adequate capacity and minimum maintenance to overcome the result of erosion, silting, sloughing of bends or similar occurrences. 4. When performing hydraulic analyses for channel or drainageway design, the one-hundred year (100) year starting water surface shall be based on the following: a. Known water surface elevations should be used where possible. Known elevations are available for some creeks and channels from previous studies approved by the City. b. When known water surface elevations are not available the slope-area method or a rating curve may be used. (1) A rating curve approximates the starting water surface elevation for a given "ow by using the relationship between known "ows and water surface elevations for the creek. This is an excellent method for determining starting conditions if good data is available to develop the rating curve, (2) The slope-area method approximates the starting water surface elevation by calculating the normal depth for the channel. To calculate normal depth the slope of energy gradient for the channel is required. The energy slope can be approximated using the average slope of the channel or the average slope of the water surface. 5. The design of the channel lining shall take into account the super-elevation of the water surface around curves and other changes in direction. In general a radius that is three (3) times the top width of the water surface during the design storm event is recommended for channel bends. 6. A chain link fence six (6') feet in height, or other improvements as approved on a case by case basis by the Director of Public Works, shall be constructed on each side of the lined channel. 7. Gabion or other forms of channel lining may be used in lieu of reinforced concrete lining with the approval of the Director of Public Works. L. Detention f Retention Facilities .-:_ Detention or retention facilities mav be used to reduce peak discharges where _-----{ Deleted:~ conditions prevent convevinQ stormwater to an adequate discharQe point. Detention or retention facilities shall be -'----I Deleted. 0 . privately maintained unless the City of Collewille has aQreed to accept public dedication of the facilitv. l' ~ LRunoff rates for all land uses shall be limited to the rates that \/\/Quid be produced from single family residential areas.' -, .., ,( Fonnatted: Indent: Left: 0.25" This requirement also applies to the development of sites as churches, schools, and other institutional uses. ~et~;~~~~~t~e~~~~i~e~li~e~~h~~~~o~:~~g_~~ _f~~ ~~~ _~~~l~ ~ev~~~p~~, o_~e~~u~~~~~ _( 1 ~~) _ye~r ~~~_i~_n _"()()d_ a_cC~~~ing_ _~-:,- ::-1 :::: fcllCM1ng ~.. ..Th.El.rn!njrnlJ!!L~rnC)I,lI1.U){ ~t~~~9.El. Y5?turne.gf thEl. ~El!liln.~9!!J?!l.~!r1.~h~!U)lil.!f1!l.! x9!lJ!!l.El.rElqlll~~.J9 !.EldlJ~~.Il.!Il~ff.@J~ ....... ro;.;-ted: 1 during the one-hundred (100) year event to the undeveloped rate. The outflow structure shall be sized to reduce the 2,5, 10.25,50, and 100 year discharges to the undeveloped rate. Dedicated detention/retention basins shall also include an additional one (1) foot of freeboard and two (2) feet of sediment storage. The volume of runoff storage for drainage areas greater than one-hundred (100) acres shall be computed using unit hydrograph procedures. Acceptable unit hydrograph procedures are provided in Section 14-170.0.1 of this document. For drainage areas less than one-hundred (100) acres, the above methods are recommended; however, an approximate routing method based on the modified rational method is allowable. 2, All detention, facilities designed shall consider the timing of the flood peak in the main channel into which the detention facility drains. Delaying the peak from a site in lower portions of a watershed may result in a higher peak on the main channel. The Director of Public Works may require that upstream and downstream ponds be included in the detention design model. 3. A detention facility shall have enough gradient to ensure positive drainage to the outlet structures so as to avoid nuisance conditions such as standing water, odors, insects, and weeds. A minimum slope of 0.50% towards the outlet structure is required for all grass lined detention facilities. 4. Detention areas in parking lots shall not be: a. In required parking spaces. b. Behind speed bumps unless the speed bumps are made with reinforced concrete. c. Deeper than six (6") inches unless otherwise approved by the Director of Public Works. 5. Drainage easements shall be provided for all regional detention/retention facilities and for other detention/retention facilities where two or more owners are involved. 6. Individual detention facilities shall be designed to empty in less than three (3) hours, unless it is also serving as an erosion control facility. 7. Detention facilities used as a sediment control facility shall meet the following requirements: a, The sediment control facility shall be designed with minimal velocities such that sediment is dropped and not picked up by flows at any time during the stonn event. b. The basin shall be designed with two (2) feet of sediment storage area so that sediment removal is not required more than twice a year. Expected removal periods greater than twice a year must be specified in the maintenance plan and approved by the Director of Public Works. c. Sediment control facilities cannot be used to meet detention requirements unless the volume of sediment is included in the calculations for the detention basin design. 8. The owner shall maintain detention/retention facilities unless the facilities are dedicated to the City of Colleyville, Detention facilities must be properly maintained if they are to function as intended over a long period of time, The following measures are required to ensure the facility functions properly. a. Facilities should be mowed at least twice a year to control weeds and discourage woody growth. b. Debris, litter and accumulated sediment should be removed from detention facilities at least twice a year. Particular attention should be given to removal of debris, litter and sediment around outlet structures. The Director of Public Works may require that the property owner remove said debris when in the Director's detennination that property damage or a flood hazard may exist. c, Detention basins designed for sediment removal shall be maintained as specified in the maintenance plan and approved by the City with construction plan submittal. 9. Retention facilities shall provide for continuous water movement. aeration facilities or other process approved bv the-" m t Formatted: Indent: left: 0.25" Citv that is desiQned to prevent surface accumulation of aquatic veQetation, M, Flumes - The use of flumes is not recommended for widespread use. Flumes shall not be permitted when the purpose of a permanent flume is to carry runoff down the sides of earthen channels. 1. A flume may be used to direct overflow runoff along property lines until the runoff can be intercepted by streets or conduits. A flume shall not carry more than ten (10) cubic feet per second during the one-hundred (100) year storm event with a slope of 1.00%. 2. All flumes crossing sidewalks shall be covered or bridged such as to minimize danger to pedestrians, 3. All edges are to be protected with rock rip-rap or other form of protection for erosion control and scour purposes. N. Lakes - Approval to develop in any area subject to inundation by a lake must be obtained from the appropriate agency responsible for that particular lake before the city grants its approval. Agencies that should be contacted include U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tarrant County Water Control Board, TCEQ, the Trinity River Authority, and FEMA. Regardless of approvals obtained from those agencies listed above, no filling, development or construction in any area subject to inundation by a lake shall occur without the approval of the City Manager. The City Manager may require any studies necessary to determine that filling, development or construction will not have a detrimental effect on adjacent, upstream or downstream properties and buildings. This subsection in no way diminishes other requirements of this section. O. Lot Drainaqe and Gradinq - Grading and drainage of all residential lots shall be designed in a manner which will allow one lot to drain across an adjacent lot and into a permanent structure, such as a concrete flume, lined channel, or proper inlet to an adequate drainage facility. or to a street right-of-way. If an approved drainage structure is not present, it will be required of the developer to construct the necessary facilities. (~1261 / 12/19/{)()) 1. Sheet flow techniques shall be used for lot to lot drainage where possible. (~1261 / 12/19/{)()) 2. Single lots shall accommodate their own drainage into an approved structure where topographic elevations allow this to occur. (0-00-1261/12/19/00) Draft Ordinance ORDINANCE 0-05-XXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 14, ENGINEERING STANDARDS, OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING DETENTION/RETENTION POND REGULATIONS; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE; AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Colleyville approved Ordinance 0-00-1214 on April 18, 2000, adopting the Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to amend certain portions of the Land Development Code regarding detentionlretention pond regulations; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 15 days before such hearing; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec, 5. Sec. 6. THAT Chapter 14 - Engineering Standards of the Land Development Code, is hereby amended in its entirety to read as shown in the attached as Exhibit "A", THAT Ordinance 0-00-1214, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, as amended, shall remain in effect, except where amended by this ordinance. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. THAT any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. THAT addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. THAT this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. Ordinance 0-05-XXXX Page 2 of 2 Sec. 7. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternate method of publication provided by law. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney