The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-9/12/2005 Texas AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chambers - 100 Main Street Monday, September 12,2005 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Commissioners Thomas Dolan, David Dudziak, Thomas Bartkowski, Jeff Byerly', Luann Edwards, John Blassingame and Denis Duffy INVOCATION Commissioner Blassingame PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 22, 2005 CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case P-OS-028 - Final plat for Meadows Creek Plaza Addition on 1.336 acres located at 8190 Precinct Line Road PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 2. Case P-OS-03S - PUBLIC HEARING - Replat on 1.34 acres on Lot 48R, Block 4 of the Western Trails Addition, located at 607 Frontier Court 3. Case Z-OS-024 - PUBLIC HEARING- Zoning change from CN Neighborhood Commercial to R20 Single Family Residential on 1.31 acres located at 413 Timberline Drive South TABLED ITEMS 4. Case P-OS-027 - Final plat for Castleton Manor Addition on 24.108 acres located at 6805 Pleasant Run Road Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -September 12, 2005 Page 1 of 2 STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS ADJOURNMENT ~and Zoning Assistant Posted: Thursday, September 8,2005,4:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -September 12, 2005 Page 2 of 2 .~ Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - August 22, 2005 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Byerly called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Present: Commissioners, Th Dudziak, Luann Edwards, < Duffy and Jeff Byerly Absent: Commission r. Barry LeBaron, G Woods from st The invoca Bartkowski. Bartkowski, Dave Blassingame, Denis ROLL CALL and Robert INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Bartkowski moved to ap written. Commissioner Du ded. The motion was approv Aye: Dudziak, Bartk Nay: None meeting minutes as ON THE AGENDA REGU 1. Ca locate al pia for Castleton Manor Addition on 24.108 acres Run Road es himself from this agenda item. Chris Fuller presente se and briefed the Commissioners. John Fegan, the applicant, presented the request and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff in regards to page 6, the Homeowner's Association requirement not to be resolved without prior written consent of the city. What does the city entail, city council, p&z, or staff? Barry LeBaron replied the city council and they are consistent with the language used in the past. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Fegan in regards to the annual contribution fund of $75 per lot or as other wise determined by the council. Why are they allowed to appeal to city council if they are instructed by the city to repair the streets? Barry LeBaron Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 22, 2005 Page 10f7 stated that being a safety measure because those complaints would come to staff. Staff would then have to notify the HOA and if there were some conflicts then the city council would become the safety vest for the HOA to appeal that staffs decision. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff in regards to page 7, an estimate of the cash escrow for perimeter streets can be provided by the engineering department by request, this is the final plat, should not that have been done? Barry LeBaron stated Robert Woods, Engineering Department for the City of Colleyville wou be able to answer the question in regards to the escrow funds for the perimeter str provements. Robert Woods responded (was unable to put his response bee e did not talk in to the microphone ). Commissioner Duffy questioned staff in regards to comes in to affect? Barry LeBaron replied if th that also affect the city impact fees then the determine the terms of that, those are Commissioner Duffy questioned staff if that the first building? Barry LeBaron replied b building and Robert Woods concurred. Commissioner Duffy questioned David Myers indicates taking the explain on item #2 David Myers sta that the developer woul i1d 580 Pleasant Run) and th Id buil LeBaron replied th plan s property along PI. fter ha was decided tha unction LeBaron stated Mr. portion, t foot city wo i1d t s . Co. . wou Walsh working s' Commissione . are still needed. eveloper agreement ay improvements .and in order to agreement. 1, showing the flood data. I understand why, please an have verbally agreed t width of the property at in! hat does this mean? Barry the trail going across the front of this discussions with the Parks department; it r if at the back of this project. Barry only required to have to build only a would n built along Pleasant Run, therefore the aining footage. taff in regards to where that trail would go and how il? Barry LeBaron replied Keith Fisher and Monica s wi the Lutheran Church and they are interested in se of the benefits of the trails. ted that the staff approval should also include the items that Commissioner Du ated to Mr. Fegan to let his engineer know to include those items missing, not to send a letter referring to those items being deleted. Commissioner Edwards questioned staff in regards to the access to the Warwick Pare addition where would that be? Barry LeBaron replied at the John McCain entrance and Fegan's drive entrance. There will be a gate to this addition but there would be a pedestrian gate to gain access. Commissioner Byerly stated having approved the preliminary plat to not be gated, however now it is a gated community. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Fegan as Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 22, 2005 Page 2 of? to why that is? Mr. Fegan replied the neighbors wanted this to be a gated community and when brought forth to city council, they approved it as a gated community. Commissioner Byerly questioned Mr. Fegan if it would be ok for it not to be gated. Mr. Fegan replied it being ok to him if it were not gated but that is what the neighbors want. Commissioner Edwards stated to Commissioner Byerly that not being an option. City council approved as a gated community. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff in regards to the ga at the Warwick Pare entrance from this project; would that be an emergency ac gate with a pedestrian gate? Barry LeBaron replied correct. Commissioner Edwards questioned staff in reg automatically? Barry LeBaron replied correct off of e ptima s Commissioner Duffy questioned staff in regard urn around 0 being indicated on the plat? Barry LeBaro ed those features with the construction plans. Robert Wood ed thos atures have in the grading plan. Commissioner Duffy stated wanting 0 see what i Commissioner Dudziak questione an if the . tenance of the long sidewalk area, the 580 feet, will be the HOA' . '!y? M. an replied it being donated to the Parks Department all the way t Commissioner Byerly City ~ straight zoning, wh missi Attorney Boyle re elimina approved the pia the priv Barry LeBaron state could m om the ga d b city g. City the s ration here and the reason why, is to point out the provisio the C apter 10 provisions; is that the Chapter 8 provisions which are. I provisions, is your approval is ministerial only with no discretion as apter 10 which is an entirely discretionary provision subject to the requirem' ter 10 being adhered to as a prerequisite to your exercise. Commissioner Bye tated being confused as to how the Commission can use any discretion at all in a straight zoning case. Barry LeBaron replied regardless of how this is zoned, which is not what is before you, you still have the platting issues that are before you, if it had some PUD requirement that gave you some latitude, then you could use discretion, but this is not the case. The zoning does not have any play in this decision. leasant Run not be provided n provided yle in regards to this being a tions for the gated community? City lat went to city council for approval, they treet. hnical requirements and possibly you n that rove the plat but you do not approve of e Planning and Zoning Commission approval out in the Commissioner Duffy stated the Commission discussed and voted on a case and this particular case does not match with the preliminary plat that was voted on by this Commission. Commissioner Byerly stated the Commission was overruled by the city Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 22, 2005 Page 3 of 7 council; they did not follow our recommendation. City Attorney Boyle stated the Commission could approve the plat with the removal of the gated entrance to city council. Commissioner Dudziak questioned Attorney Boyle in regards to item #4 under Bearing Source on the plat and the notarized section on the plat if those two sections are in conflict with each other? Attorney Boyle replied correct. Barry LeBaron replied that would be corrected. Commissioner Byerly suggested to Commission in regard, Commission could get more definitive answers. . Attorney Boyle questioned staff the date on the pia July 18, 2005. Barry LeBaron responded as wel ting the L states the clock for this plat would start tonight e this is the I and Zoning Commission is hearing the plat a e action. Attorney Boyle stated the plat application w the Land Development Code were met, and' August 18, 2005 meaning you have lenty of time Commissioner Blassingame state . ot sure plat with the recommendation not ated been decided by city council to have I . mu Commissioner Byerly s to city council that th' out from the Wa May 3, 2005 du see what the Comm Commisso ard option' co Co pOSSI Attorney Section 5 s Commission, standard of revie Chris Fuller replied evelopment Code . e the Planning he prerequis f 8 9 b of was not final and filed until o day window. he Commission would send a unity when the issue has more than willing to do the research, however, Chapter 10 ingle decision process made by the Planning and Zoning from the plat, and the approval for the gate has a different Commissioner Duff uestioned Attorney Boyle if he has approved and signed off on the HOA documents? Attorney Boyle replied no. Commissioner Duffy stated that being a requirement. Commissioner Byerly questioned Attorney Boyle if this case could be tabled for a future date or does the date have to be mandated? Attorney Bole replied mandated for the next meeting. Chris Fuller stated the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is scheduled for September 12, 2005. Commissioner Blassingame questioned staff if there could be some sort of Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 22, 2005 Page 4 of? recommendation that could be decided tonight for the applicant? Barry LeBaron replied staff would have the surveyor remove the street language in the dedication part to correct that error, however staff would recommend the Commission to approve the plat as submitted and if you wanted to remove the gated part to do so in the motion. Commissioner Duffy stated not being a question of being gated or not gated, it is a question of whether or not this plat is ready as is to go forward, is it complete. Commissioner Duffy stated hearing a lot of tap dancing, no cert 'nties. Commissioner Dudziak concurred with Commissioner Duffy ommissioners want to approve complete documents before submitting to city c , and therefore he stated having no issues with tabling this case. Commissioner Byerly made motion to table seconded. Chris Fuller suggested to the Commission to to address. Commissioner Byerly stated the following: 1. Mark "Floodplain" on Lot 16 2. Remove the language in reg 3. Include an engineer drawing 0 4. Provide the doc r the review. 5. Mark Lot 1 eets to city. sant Run. Commissioner Bye gate that he oes not Commi . k s look e a Com drawin drawings. the plat. John Fegan res wanting the Commissioners to make a decision and passing the plat. He state homeowner's wanted the gated community and the city council approved as a gated community. Commissioner Blassingame stated for clarity the items needed to change would be mark lot 16 as flood plain and mark lot 17 as city maintained because gated access has already been approved. Commissioner Edwards stated to the Commission having been present at the time that city council approved the preliminary plat. She stated there being a lot of neighbors that attended the meeting that wanted the gated community. She stated that there is a lot of misconception about gated communities slowing down the traffic and that was the Iicant to have to provide drawings of a unity. if the case is going to be tabled, the Commission should make certain of the recommendation to city council. '. . with Commissioner Dudziak, if we look at the cil WI knowing that the Commission has looked at the Ie to us, we should look at them. Technically, it is part of Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 22, 2005 Page 5 of? reason they were very vocal about the gates and that is why council followed their request. To cut off this connection, will have a large impact on the thoroughfare plan because the intersection at John McCain and Pleasant Run Road can back up and to not have an alternate route could be detrimental. It is good planning to connect the streets. The motion to table was approved by the following vote: Aye: Dudziak, Edwards, Duffy and Byerly Nay: Blassingame Barry LeBar updated ^' Co rent traffic . n on 14 acres located 2. Case P-05-033 - Final plat for Alianne Est at 512 and 600 Shelton Drive Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Jeff Vanderpool, the applicant, came forth to Commissioner Duffy questioned staff in re' . paragraph regarding trees, has that statement' stated does not need to be added te plat, it is Commissioner Edwards made motl Dudziak seconded. The motion was approved Aye: Dudziak, Bartko Nay: None riefed the Commissioners in regards to horoughfare Plan. . being a good idea for the city council to consider the d it to the Master Thoroughfare Plan to ease the elopment of the new addition. mention to the impact committee in regards to updating the PUBLIC HEARIN NDA ITEMS 4. Case P-05-036 - PUBLIC HEARING - Replat on 2.592 acres on Lot 4, Block 1 of the Pleasant Oak Estates Addition, located at 608 Beverly Drive Chris Fuller presented the discussion and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff in regards to the perimeter street improvements, why wouldn't the two new people share in the development of the perimeter of the road. Barry LeBaron stated the code states an exemption for the existing house and the owner did not take down the house until after the plat had been filed. Commissioner Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 22, 2005 Page 6of7 Duffy stated understanding, however, does the grandfathering go for the new owner as well as the lot? Barry LeBaron replied the grandfathering goes with the lot. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff in regards to how long ago was that language placed in the code? Barry LeBaron replied about 4 years ago for the one lot exemption for the existing house. The existing lot does not create an impact on the system, the new lot will. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:02 pm. Paul Kramer, the applicant, came forth to answer any ques . There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearin Commissioner Duffy made motion to approve c seconded. COMMISSIONER CO Commissioner Duff Attorney Boyle re . ed at 8:03 p.m. mmissioner Byerly The motion was approved by the following vo Aye: Dudziak, Bartkowski, Edwards, Blassi Nay: None STAFF REPORTS Barry LeBaron reminded the Com August 29,2005 in Hurst. in regards to the "Grandfather Clause"? ss at the next briefing session. p.m. by acclamation. Amy Shelley Planning and Zo Approved on: ------.:. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 22, 2005 Page 7 of 7 cUy or ccen~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Texas Meeting Date: I September 12, 20051 Prepared by: I Chris Fuller Develooment Coordinator Subject: I P-05-028 - Final plat for Lot 3, Block 1 Meadows Creek Plaza I Addition on 1.336 acres located at 8190 Precinct Line Road ! STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS FDB Architects is the potential developer of a 1.336-acre parcel of property located at the northeast corner of Precinct Line Road and Lavaca Trail. The developer has submitted a Final Plat for Lot 3, for the construction of an office building. The preliminary plat for this ten lot development was approved by the City Council on June 7, 2005. Zoning. The proposed plat area is located within a CC2 Shopping Center zoning district. The CC2 zoning designation requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, a minimum lot depth of 120 feet and a minimum lot width of 150 feet. The proposed lot meets the development criteria as stated within the Land Development Code. Phasing. Phase One of the overall development includes the final platting of Lot 3, situated in the northwest corner of this property. This is in conformance with the proposed phasing plan presented with the preliminary plat. Drainage. The developer was required to construct all associated drainage improvements with the development of Phase One. The applicant has submitted a Drainage Plan that has been reviewed and accepted by the Engineering Department. The Drainage Plan has been determined to be in general conformance with the minimum requirements of the Land Development Code. Water and Sewer. Utility services are available to the site. The developer is extending water and sewer lines within the development to serve the proposed building. The developer has included the extension of the water and sewer lines within the development as a part of the construction plans that have been reviewed and accepted by the Engineering Department. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires a 20-foot wide easement and construction of a 10-foot wide trail along Precinct Line Road. The trail, along Precinct Line Road, shall be constructed as each lot is developed with a new structure. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for non-residential uses is $800 per acre. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's Office. Agenda Item No.1...,. Page 1 SUMMARY The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. Since this plat contains fewer than four lots, only the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission is required. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements of the Land Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Zoning and Location Map · Development Review Committee Memo · Applicant's Response · Plat Agenda Item No.1 - Page 2 Zoning and Location Map D Agenda Item No. 1- Page 3 Development Review Committee Memo DATE TO FAX NO FROM August 1, 2005 Fred Ballinger 817.268.3523 Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-05-028 - Final Plat - Meadows Creek Plaza Lot 3, Block 1 The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Final plans will need to be submitted covering the public improvements associated with this plat. Questions concerning the construction plans should be directed to Robert Woods, Engineering, at 817.503.1090. 2. Add the 40-foot front setback line to the final plat. The portion of the preliminary plat containing Lot 3 is attached. 3. Revise the common access easement to conform to the preliminary plat. The final plat, as submitted, does not contain the internal circular common access easement as shown on the preliminary plat. The portion of the preliminary plat containing Lot 3 is attached. RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our office: . A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived. . Twelve (12) folded copies of the plat drawing with the title block facing out and one (1) reduced copy (8%" x 11 ") The item will not be scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Agenda Item No. 1- Page 4 JPH L~ 1858 E. Applicant's Response [lg, Inc. Texas 76248 1-4631 August i 2, 2005 Mr. Chris Fuller Development Coordinator City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Tel. - 817-503-1050 Email-fuller@ci.colleyville.tx.us RE: "Comment Resoonse Letter" P-OS-028 - Final Plat - Meadows Creek P~ Lot 3. Block 1 Mr. Fuller: The following is the response to the comment associated to the above mentioned plat, according to the Colleyville Development Review Committee's (DRC) response letter dated August 1,2005. ORC comment number one (1) "The plans will need to be submitted covering the public improvements associated with this plat." Response: Every effort was made, through contacts with architects and engineers working on this project, to show the off-site common access and temporary drainage easements. Once these easements are finalized, the instruments describing these easements will be forwarded as to complete the platting process. DRC comment number two (2) "Add the 40-Foot front setback line to the final plat. " Response: Complied with the request; added the 40-Foot front, lO-Foot rear, and the IS-Foot setback lines to the south and east sides. DRC comment number three (3) "Revise the common access easement to confirm to the preliminary plat. The final plat, as submitted, does not contain the internal circular common access easement as shown on the preliminary plat." Response: Complied with the request; internal circular common access easement, and confirmed the common access easements are 24 feet in width or a half-width of 12 feet. Please find the following items included in this re-submittal: . Twelve (12) folded copies ofthe revised plat drawing . One (1) letter sized reduced copy of the revised plat drawing Fell free to call with questions. ,,3:L~ Jewel Chadd, R.P.L.S. JPH Land Surveying, Inc. Tel. 817-431-4971 ext.307 Email iewel@iphls.com cc. Jimmy Archie Fred Ballinger RE..CElMEO Ami t I Jm1Uj Agenda Item No.1 - Page 5 ! 1 ~ ~1 ij l.!~ 31)1 ll1t ;!~t. i~ . fi 3l1~ .: fIB"t' I !fH~\ H~ HI f~-, " I ! 1 L__~.:::;_____...., ~ J. 1ft ,'I"'--""'!I ...... .......--:> I;:)" A fJ l /-l I ~t ........ " ,/ r.... H I ---..-.--., ....------- [t ------~---- '--, I t r'-'---=:,L:::'-:':==-~-:':=::~ l: 3,ooso.ooS ;-_~! '----11 ._'f~ ..':.7':" I d----:l------------ 1 ~j~~~7~- ~;-- lit , 1 ) 1 ( I ~ I) ~ !!1 ~ ! 1 II 1 :~ jl ~ n , Vli\..i.'I" - ! os h' 1(" ! "p [;j Iii 1 I ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ e ':. <t"_ M:;; e I -1= ..::; ~ ~--I---- jl] )1 I .'" ~ '0 g u. .~ \ .1 h f . cIlli ..:l - '" ; l! ~ ~ , · ........ tJ . I .! 1 ~ () 11l ~ "I"" · --.--., '1It It j ~ '1:. ~" =1--- n ---- 'I J It ! ~ o. ~ ~/1 I~~ " 1 0 ':0 I,A Iyl - ~ . - fll :t ! 1 L ~~ ----.-.-.-.-fa.-.-.-----.-.~ m" '" '-'-'---'-'-",-'-' -.. V~ 1 ~ ~ ---------------------~--T-----T !l z ~ __......~~ 1 , ' 'I J . = )1 ~!jl 11ft I ~ ~i I, eg l]~ i' f II~J lit; !i~ 'I; i! f~ i 'il !! !I }'4] '111 -.j i 0 1~ t I I ' h 'il ~f!! 1~1 i =1 i} i Jj; )1 ," IJ;1 1.li l.- ,I ~i - t '] j 1f Ill! t!-IJ ~ii it 'J~l~: !_ !~i'l!i ~l 'J.t .~. o.l l' E'}' " · 11 II . ] jl! J: so : 01 f 0 I 1-" 1 .. I C..!i ~.. l!; . 1" -', l' 4 i}' 't . oj., I" i. ~~11 -li"l i!e el itl I's ~ i~"jJ ;'j" .~ lJ-~ 1== ~;; :, =. ~ : J; i ]. .1'1 ."'. i~' 11 off J "'~.l~ -. i 111 II-j i~! ~b ;'1 I~ ). i~ ~ il 11 -}ffi l:~ !m l~ Ilt i'~l-g,l !.-H Hi! flU! ~1-11I'J~ ~1~; ih If 51"! :l'illj 'l"h }~ I'.i I . h I = 11 Ii: , J I t ~. ',PI!1 Hi~ 1~1" I~ P !!:I "' "tf il~ if fC'!"tit~n .~.., I J;~I".I1' ~~ill i!ri! ;4'"1' !Jl lll, ll~ !I ~i~! ;l! !i - - ifi)l d~l! IH ,~: r~ E.11, '-H Ii' If i"1' Illf:' IS:. It' -II -I> I. 11;" u~ r-. t I ~ ~ Ii' =I~t !tf i.' i!~ !~ !~~j !.: ~. ~if~1 '~,ii ~~~~ ~!r i~~ ii~ ~~ ~!!I ~~~ )i hilt I!h I iiid f;~ in i.~ ii iih iH i] ~v~li . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I. H" l~". i~ r . It" ~i; !ja I~ ~E > ! c ~ -..~ i, ~. ~~ ~ ~. g ;~ S ~ F im/ J cc:. o~H "~~:I: ~W ~~~ H" ", . ~ ~ ~l;~l;p ~!jlH ';';;'k Hih "'~1; <i~J ! u ~ i~a;;=;3 ~ l! o~:l~; ~ a~ H ~ !: :: c:nh !H:~;~; .q~.H= , ~ t o2~~~~ ,. i u;:~=~ nd. " ;:; :t i . s i~~~:i:iS5 ~ Q~~~~~~~ i f-4 .. iJl: iI:...__ :l kkkHk. ~HHHH 0= ~ !:;:J:]J:3::5:i ~ ~ - ;. f ~ ~i ..~EI ;a5!.. ~ u~=~~i ur::(~:zt ti:!_=;.. B III o ~ s = A " . ~ . ~ ~ 51 , < . ,t U UI H! Ut l'l lh 1~, 1.. hi !,:1 . 'f91 . ~..... rt. I ~I a 1:1 ; f~ t hH ~ i~j I ~ i fl ;l , _ [t I i ur 1 : ..J . ~ q1 I ~ m! ~. H n i~ 'I ]1 i n - . H , i: t .J I.. H ~ i fl ~ ~ d1 · ,. I' t = !1 - - l}! ~ 1 ~ -11 ~ ~ 3 5 Iii ; ,I :: ~ ~~ 1 i !,i. H HI ~ :0 8:1 6 I 'i I il ! '1 ij if z-+-. .10'8,1 "J.-:JJ.TQ "1~'tlOl:I""'^ -lJ1l.... -- (pIlO1I ~1rn l"lI!=.:!) 6Z0( .w.1!S!H ....:1 , "I h t 1~'Ji'l ! !l!I 11 ilft!li if ~t flfl: i]11t I. ! I II 'i1HJ {itIt!1 !i 11 lil~i jiilitl il JI 'I!~l !Iir;-I.[ z~ !1 ~ ;;J -- ..l51i.8 .1....1 :;1::"1 ~ i HHNt II ~IIlH' 5; ~ ~ ~ ~ jilt,j i 'il h 'lul! iJHril1 I~ g h~1 ~ I !]1~Hit~ ~~ H iH i I-. b U I I J I &! f I' iL f .1',.011 5 n n; ~ 1'!jl~ljt~lf I~I h IH~~ J .Il! ;1 !!Jl' ~ = ~ Jlil li~ j;: 1'1 m..! - '" ~ . "11". ] = 'I"" ~ u;.. :1".1."11 J'i.lj'l = ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ n rq!:::i j. Ii 11.t1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 !JH; Ifi ~ i ~! ~_ if j rn _:![[If!, ..t- ~.. ....I1[.~. I i . I i f 1 J i I ! i ~ j i It I if ~ 11 . oJ I ., I. ~~ H I ;i : !! ~i (f :.1 :t C E~ $~~S ~~~E ~~~, :I:~3e ~5Fa l ! U et!. 1 ' I , H i 1 ~ u ul to 1'1 lj ul': H ~! ~I ,. 31 i~..; h~ UI.: ~~Q u. ~J if ifi 15 If 1 ~ l 8 i ~ l 1I,~ lit! t; ,.1 . II': f 1. : 1 If f ~~ " ~l ~ 1 ,. 2 oIt H !!; . ~ ~ s::- ..10:..10: ..Q)O .!!e.9 ll<UC%:l iii c:l <ll ~ ii:~: 00 ~d Q) ~ ,< EE .,,,. ~i fI''' ~ " "0 E= .0 01 ~= m ,~, ~e~ "0" ~=~ .g. gl. :za: il I" :J 11 I' 11 ,. . :! Il I ~:J r :: ~ ... ~ i I ~ ~i h Wgui] j~.~ ,t.. < ~ Ii t I: . 0,1.) t>... ~ J' SON ;: ~~8 i~ .i ~ ~ ! ~ u.l_~.E, :1 ~'o~~~ :i .~ i ! =,u - ~~~~. 8r::::;::;a hrn j~!!~ III II. c:l ~fl o i" -;:I "I III i ~ in 8 d: .. 111 "" hi o 0Il'i.t ~m <ll!f[ I" i ~ Id ilh 'ii ~I :l jS Q IdJ ~ LY Y LU a: I ! o' .si ...,! bOo .s; ;>.& Q). ~~ I rIl'i ~ "tl~ i C ~ t ~...:ltd if. .... .. '" 0 t~i """ ~ !~- ~ ..... . ~$i !3 o..! !5= rn t-i g a ! ~; ul~ ~~ ii ~ h I a ~ ~~ f u 1 II if ~ '; ~ I{ 0 If~ i~ ~ city O{ cceu~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Texas Meeting Date: September 12, 20051 Prepared by: I Chris Fuller Development Coordinator P-05-035 - Public Hearing - Replat on 1.34 acres on Lot 48R, Subject: Block 4 of the Western Trails Addition, located at 607 Frontier Court STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Pedram Pahlavan has submitted a replat for 1.34-acres located on the north side of Overland Trail, on the south side of Frontier Court. The plat will subdivide Lot 48R, Block 4 of the Western Trails Addition into two lots. There is an existing house on proposed Lot 48R-2 and proposed Lot 48R-1 will be vacant. The applicant has submitted the replat for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Zoning. The proposed plat area is located within the R20 Single Family Residential zoning district. The R20 zoning designation requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, a minimum lot depth of 125 and a minimum lot width of 100 feet. The proposed plat meets the development criteria as stated within the Land Development Code. Sidewalks and Trails. Lot 48R-1, and the newly created vacant lot, are subject to the provisions of the Land Development Code, which requires construction of a 4-foot wide sidewalk to be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The developer is required to construct the sidewalk as part of the public improvements for this property. Lot 48R-2 is exempt from the general sidewalk requirements as it has an existing house located on the property at the time the plat application was filed. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are not required for this property since Frontier Court is an improved street. Parkland Dedication. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. The fee only applies to the newly created lot and must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's Office. The lot with the existing residential dwelling is exempt from this requirement. Agenda Item No.2 - Page 1 SUMMARY The developer has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. Since this final plat contains less than five lots, only the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission is required. The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land Development Code. This replat is scheduled as a public hearing as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location and Zoning Map · Development Review Committee Memo · Applicant's Response · Plat Agenda Item No.2 - Page 2 Location and Zoning Map Agenda Item No.2 - Page 3 Development Review Committee Memo DATE August 8, 2005 TO DAVID MYERS FAX NO 817.282.0401 FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-05-035 Western Trails Addition -- Replat The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Revise the title block to state Replat. This may not be classified as an Amending Plat as a new lot is being created. A residential replat requires a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Contact Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator, 817.503.1054, for more information. In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: 2. Water and Sanitary Sewer are available in Frontier Court. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are not required for this property since Frontier Court is an improved street Contact Robert Woods, Engineering Department, 817.503.1094, for more information. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY Not applicable for lot with existing house on property. $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,666 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size andlor if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PARKLAND DEDICATION. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. The fee only applies to the newly created lot and must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. The lot with the existing residential dwelling is exempt from this requirement. Agenda Item No.2 - Page 4 PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, September 12, 2005, 7:00 p.m. Not Required Please submit the following to our offices: · 11 folded copies of the revised Final Plat drawing · One 8%" x 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit . A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived. Please contact me at fullerc@cLcollevville.tx.us or 817-503-1054 if you have any questions. The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, September 7, 2005 in order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Agenda Item No.2 - Page 5 Applicant's Response Agenda Item No.2 - Page 6 ~j 1 ~ 1 ~'1 I Jf ~I :~ J; Jf ~~ i! )1 1~ i 1 ;t.~ 1 it ~L ~J II if I~ ~~. .J t~ ~Iih f~ ~ ~ J~f 1! !; ~ J1"1'~ lj . 'II ! ~jJ 1- 1~ I]!.; 11 ~ i J ~~ Ji II~. ~ e~:<~ II II .ft! f. u h n fl}lf ~~ !~ JI~lI{ i ill1 ~t It !ll 1i li It fl jll II 'i ~flf J ~ili ~! ti t~! t~] J1 li i~ f~J t~j f~ jjilr I ~~p I' ,.r!J .S" f', i fl -I l~ 11 .1!1~ I !~~J ~i~! 1~~ ~~! J~~! . ~ ~ii ~~~ ]1! Ii!,! j jHt !I Ii Ii.! iH. .'11 H il~ Hi 1!1~1 !H filiI ~ ]~~i H)l ~1' RJJ h" ~1 91 .~I 8 · 18~ f~tl! ill !!Ill! 11 II! II! 'ill! Ii Iii Iii jij !!illl Ii i mill !1. m III III I!.!! ill ill Iii 1111111 ~~~ ~If ri ~i~ I ) I j ~ I --- ----J-- Eo. ~ e ~ ~ c ~ II a ~ '''''011 DS ~ ! i I \" ~ "<i-. 0 0-, '" '" 9 "6" '" I 0-, 9 \:~ l'> 0: .. ..\ c z it, '7 ~ 1- .. 0: 1~1'V'~ 1IJrI_~ T~:rJ.:~ro 'L8~ 3eVd 'Q96S 3MlO^ NVNNVH08 .., '9'NNOO pue "H ~300M Ii I~ It h . 'I ~I in 1 {H ~ HI J ~h ~ .. HI ~ J 1,'[. 1 l ~ Ji I ~ ~~ ji. i i ~~ Iil! f 1lI1! II!I! ~ ~ s ~ ~..' ,~ /s , N = 00" ....'" ~~ o ..:l I ~~ .. ~~~.~ ea J ~~~~ ~r;; ~ -~h~ !~ ~ · IS ~~t;~ ~ 11 ~~~m~~g ~~ .. e ~~~5 - . .$1..:g~~~~! I~. .!3...:J~~~~!f ~~ .f!E=~I!~~~ ~I -i . ~ H..3 Ii! ...Jowo t= -i. ~'l!i!:l! a .,;;;: ~I-O o::E <~ 8!~i ~~ .. ~o3 ~ il~~ J~I 'I I .1 lJ I ilw. I 1 1 I 11Itl I j I!I! I I 3'TllAUTJlX) .f() A.l.I:J II a ~ j III ~ ilL. ! fUI tll'i It I "t"', hit ",1I, lih ](u 11ft Iilll I ;lUti -II ..II" . II I ~ ..J.. I J . h..H ~ ~ \". ~"<i-. ~:i. ">t"o-, ~:\ ~" \~ ..'?t. it, '7 1- '" '" 9 CUy Of ccen<s PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Texas Meeting Date: I September 12, 2005 \ Prepared by: \ Chris Fuller I Development Coordinator I Z-05-024 - Zoning change from CN Neighborhood Commercial to Subject: I R20 Single Family Residential on 1.31 acres located at 413 I Timberline Drive South STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Dino Idoski has submitted a request to change the zoning of 1.31-acres, located at 413 Timberline Drive South, from CN Neighborhood Commercial to R20 Single Family Residential. The applicant is seeking a zoning change in order to develop the property as single family residences. The property is currently vacant and located on the south side of Timberline Drive South, and on the west side of Bransford Road. The property is platted as Tract A, Block 3 of the Hjghland Acres Addition. In order to subdivide the property, approval of a subdivision replat will be required at a later date, upon approval of the rezoning request. The R20 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet. The property exceeds 20,000 square feet and meets the minimum requirements of the R20 zoning district. The developer has submitted a zoning exhibit illustrating the area to be rezoned. The subject lot, as shown on the zoning exhibit, appears to meet the R20 zoning requirements. The following is an analysis of the major issues associated with this rezoning request. Master Plan. The Colleyville Plan contains as a goal to "preserve the superior quality of Colleyville's residential neighborhoods". This particular goal includes objectives relative to this zoning change request: . Maintain the current level of housing quality and density . Encourage redevelopment of older properties located along major collector streets into estate settings . Continue development of luxury residential areas while maintaining the "country feel" along major collector streets Master Plan. Although this rezoning request is not fully consistent with the goals and objectives of The Colleyville Plan, which promotes large estate development along the collector thoroughfare system, approval of the rezoning request would bring the property into conformance with the Land Use Plan. Agenda Item No.3 - Page 1 Residential Density. The Colleyville Plan suggests a maximum residential density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre in most situations. The subject property is located in the Neighborhood Two area as designated by The Colleyville Plan. The overall residential density within the Neighborhood Two area is 2.18 dwelling units per acre. The maximum residential density for the R20 zoning district is 2.1 dwelling units per acre. The applicant's proposed density is in compliance with The Colleyville Plan. Lot Sizes & Widths. The R20 standards allow for a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. The applicant proposes to create single family lots that adhere to the development regulations required by the R20 zoning district Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are a combination of single family residential, office, and agricultural zoning districts. The property to the north is zoned CN Neighborhood Commercial and is currently developed as office uses. Properties to the northwest are primarily zoned R20 and are developed as single family residential uses. Properties to the south and west are primarily zoned R40 and are developed as single family residential uses. Properties to the west are zoned AG, and consist of City of Colleyville parks and recreation facilities (City Park). Development Trends. The development trends in this area primarily focus on single family development. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights- of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sewer service lines to the individual lots. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the 1.31-acre parcel is valued at $15,000. The estimated City property tax revenue for the undeveloped property is approximately $52 annually. The future property tax revenue would depend upon the value of the individual lot and the value of the house built on the lot. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on average. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to eight (8) adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. Agenda Item No.3 - Page 2 SUMMARY The proposed zoning change is consistent with the Land Use Plan, which designates the subject property as a future single family residential development area. The proposed density is consistent with the existing residential development within the Neighborhood Two area. Although the proposed zoning district in inconsistent with the goals and objective of The Colleyville Plan regarding residential development along collector streets, the recommendation for approval is based upon bringing the property land use designation into compliance with the Land Use Plan. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: September 12, 2005 City Council: October 4 and October 18, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Zoning and Location Map · Zoning Exhibit from Applicant . List of Property Owners Notified · Draft ordinance Agenda Item No.3 - Page 3 Zoning and Location Map 11 NORTH AG '--~GE Agenda Item No.3 - Page 4 Zoning Exhibit from Applicant SOUlJI -1----------~----------~ . . ~ I I I i i I : Ir:" I TRACT A I 9:11 ;o. .. Bt.OOJ( 3 .. ~IT~ i"ll i' ~tS I r- : I I I I I I I I I , I I . I _. .....- --.....- -. - . ....w .- ""....... Q. ~ t: a: .. a 2 I i RECEIVEO AU6 11_ flr1li."\oI'I L lUb.~ Agenda Item No.3 - Page 5 Hilliard, Jerry L 5112 Bransford Road Colleyville, TX 76034 John Friedli, owner 2072 Placita De Vida Santa Fe, NM 87505 John L. Slater 404 Timberline St. S. Colleyville, TX 76034 List of Property Owners Notified Friedli, Peter F Ch De La Fontaine 68 1260 Nyon Switzerland 00000 Hatfield, Raymond 409 Timberline St. S. Colleyville, TX 76034 Shinn, Frances L PO 80x 61 Colleyville, TX 76034 Dino Idoski, applicant 1224 Indian Road Roanoke,TX 76262 Church of Jesus Christ LOS 50 East North Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84150-0001 Agenda Item No.3 - Page 6 ORDINANCE 0-05-xxxx AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AS HERETOFORE AMENDED; BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING ON 1.31 ACRES LOCATED AT TRACT A, BLOCK 3 OF THE HIGHLAND ACRES ADDITION, FROM THE eN NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TO R20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Dino Idoski on August 12, 2005, under Case No. Z-05-024; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the various original zoning districts and appropriate regulations be enforced therein and to recommend a new zoning ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accordance with a comprehensive plan and designed to lessen congestion in the streets; to secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers; to promote health, general welfare; to provide adequate light and air; to prevent the overcrowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in Ordinance 0-05-XXXX Page 2 of 3 the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. Sec. 7. THAT all the foregoing premises and findings are found to be true and correct and are incorporated into the body of this ordinance as if copied in their entirety. THAT the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, Texas, be, and the same is hereby amended by changing the zoning of said property from the CN Neighborhood Commercial to R20 Single Family Residential district, as depicted in the attached Exhibit "A". THAT the above described tract of land shall be used only in the manner and for the purposes provided by the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville as heretofore amended, and as amended herein. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. THAT if any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. THAT in addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. THAT it has been found that there has been a change in conditions in the above described property, it is now necessary that it be given the above zoning classification in order to permit its proper development and in order to protect the public interest, comfort and general welfare, and requires that this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. Ordinance 0-05-XXXX Page 3 of 3 AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT A - ZONING MAP AG OPAL ETHRIDGE cc6~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING 1'exas Meeting Date: I September 12, 2005/ Prepared by: I Chris Fuller Development Coordinator Subject: i P-05-027 - Final Plat for Castleton Manor Addition on 24.108 I acres, located at 6805 Pleasant Run Road Tabled 08/22/05 ; REVISED (8/31/05) This item was tabled by the Commission at the August 22,2005, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The Commission requested that the 100-year flood plain boundaries be shown on the plat document and that the plat dedication language be revised per the Land Development Code. The applicant has provided a revised plat that specifies the location of the 100-year flood plain (Lot 16, Block 1). The applicant has also added the plat dedication language as required by Chapter 10 of the Land Development Code. The Commission requested that the applicant provide a detailed exhibit of the driveway approach in order to ensure the construction plans comply with the private streets and gated community standards and regulations per the Land Development Code. The driveway pavement detail has been provided by the applicant. The driveway construction plans, as well as the proposed gate location, have been reviewed and accepted by the City of Colleyville Fire Department. The Commission requested information regarding the future maintenance of the proposed trail improvements associated with this development. The developer will construct approximately 560 feet of trail along the eastern boundary of the development. Since the trail is a required public improvement, the maintenance will be the responsibility of the City of Colleyville. In addition, the Commission requested that the City Attorney review the Home Owner's Association documents. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Stonebridge Development is the potential developer of a 24.1-acre parcel of property located on the east side of Pleasant Run Road, south of John McCain Road. The developer has submitted a Final Plat to divide the property into 34 lots for the construction of twenty-nine new single-family residences, three open space lots and a private street designated as a lot. The proposed name of the subdivision is Castleton Manor Addition. The development was preliminary platted as Stonebridge Pare Addition, which was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 28, 2005 and by the City Council on May 3, 2005. The layout of the development is consistent with the preliminary plat. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 1 The preliminary plat was approved as a gated subdivision with an entrance on Pleasant Run Road. The street, Fegans Path, will continue through the development to a proposed street connection with the Warwick Pare subdivision, which is currently under development to the east of the site. An emergency access gate will separate the two subdivisions. Zoning. Eight lots on the west side of the property are zoned R40 Single Family Residential and the remaining lots are zoned R20 Single Family Residential. All proposed lots meet the dimensional standards for the applicable zoning districts. Open Space. No open space is required for the R40 and R20 districts; however this project provides three open space lots. The primary open space lot will be centrally located within the neighborhood, Lot 16, Block 1, and will contain a detention pond. The other two open space lots will extend from John McCain Road to the southern boundary of the property and will contain the 10-foot required trail. Gated Development. The proposed development is designed to be a gated subdivision with a private road. The plat document designates the private road as a lot and a note has been provided on the plate stating that the Home Owner's Association (HOA) is responsible for construction and maintenance of the private road. The applicant has submitted HOA documents that are in conformance with Chapter 10 of the Land Development Code. The HOA documents indicate that the streets and drainage systems within the development are private, owned and maintained by the association, and that the City has no obligation to maintain the private streets and drainage systems. All HOA documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney to ensure that they conform to applicable City policies prior to being filed of record at the County. Drainage. The applicant has submitted a Drainage Plan that has been reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. Right-of-Way Dedication. Pleasant Run Road is classified as a Minor Arterial roadway on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, which requires an ultimate right-of-way width of 75 feet. The developer is dedicating approximately 50 feet of additional right-of-way along Pleasant Run Road in order to provide the required right-of-way dedication. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Pleasant Run Road and John McCain Road are considered unimproved streets and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires a 10-foot wide trail along Pleasant Run Road, and sidewalks along John McCain Road and all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. The sidewalk along John McCain Road is required to be 5-feet wide, and the developer is required to construct the sidewalk as part of the public improvements for this property. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 2 The Colleyville Pathways Plan shows a1 O-foot wide trail along the east side of Pleasant Run Road, which extends across the frontage of this development. Staff recommends the required 10-foot wide trail be placed within an easement on the eastern border of the property, adjacent to Warwick Pare. The developer has agreed to construct an equivalent amount of linear footage (approximately 560 feet) of the trail along the eastern boundary of this development, because it will provide greater public access to the trail system from the adjacent residential neighborhoods than the route along Pleasant Run Road. The agreed upon route will ultimately connect the trail system from John McCain Road and extend through the subdivision to the City of Colleyville soccer fields located to the south of the development. The plat exhibit designates the open spaces as a public access easement, which will allow construction of the trail in accordance with the Land Development Code standards. The Preliminary Plat was approved in accordance with staff's recommendation. SUMMARY The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This final plat also requires approval by the City Council. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements of the Land Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Driveway Pavement Detail · Location Map · Development Review Committee Memo · Applicant's Response · Plat Agenda Item No.4 - Page 3 Driveway Pavement Detail ~ ""- I:\i ~ f{,' g- ! ~.'I e ~.,~~ !~~"'iJ ~ 1-:. 'rt" . e5 If!: S I .n ---a, , 'H NJlll .tNVsr.nd I~...,. ' cm~ i "" m ::J p .... ____. ____ ,_., ...i!E.".........-....]- __ ,'.....,.....,.,.....'.'.. - _~ - __ _;..:i..,..... _ T .C. _ .... ,-' ' . -lltiiiiC. a.",. " "~.. , ..... . e ,g.... .' . - . . ""'.' '.;c "" In i... 0 a.. liD .,. ........'........'.,....,....!" -.'". ..' . , . ......1. " . · -+ z lID' .' ' ...- ~'.",. '." ::;).' ;:;:,. '. '. .~,. <',R.'~ n= . ~<d .~ Itl .... .,...... ... 'c.)C ''- . ,." , ,C,)'f 's 1.IJ !it., < In, ; .f:WI C:JoI U Agenda Item No.4 - Page 4 Location Map 11 NORTH AG Agenda Item No.4 - Page 5 Development Review Committee Memo DATE June 27,2005 TO John Fegan FAX NO 817.282.1444 FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-05-027 - Final Plat - Stonebridge Pare The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. On the plat, darken the lines indicating the limits of the floodplain. 2. How much of the trail is the developer constructing on the east side of the property? Contact Monica Walsh, Parks and Recreation Director, 817.503.1182, for more information. 3. Need to identify 15' strip of land located between Lots 11 & 12 of Block 1 as drainage easement to cover the proposed drainage improvements. This item could be addressed by showing Lot 16, Block 1 as a drainage easement. Contact Robert Woods, Development Review Engineer, 817.503.1094, .for more information. 4. Add the following notes to the final plat document: Lot 1, Block 3 denotes the private access and private drainage easement owned by the Homeowners Association (HOA) of Stonebridge Pare. No building permit will be issued for Lot 1, Block 3. The landowners and any subsequent owners of lots shown herein (the Lot Owners), jointly and severally, shall be responsible and liable for the construction, operation and maintenance of any private common areas or facilities in the addition created herein (the Addition), including but not limited to private streets, private entrance gates or structures, private walls and fences, private pedestrian access, private storm drainage systems, private lake, private open space and landscaping, and emergency access. 5. Provide a draft copy of HOA documents with language referring to the HOA being responsible for the common areas. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 6 In The Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: 6. All restricted access entrances shall be equipped with the Opticom gate opening system. The system shall be maintained by the HOA in good working condition at all times. 7. The following information is applicable to this project: Homeowners Associations (HOA) Required - A subdivision developed with private streets must have a mandatory HOA which includes all properties served by the private streets. The association shall own and be responsible for the maintenance of the private streets and appurtenances. The association's document must indicate that the streets and drainage systems within the development are private, owned and maintained by the association, and that the City has no obligation to maintain the private streets and drainage systems. The documents shall be filed of record prior to the approval of the final plat. Lot deeds must convey membership in the association and provide for the payment of dues and assessments required by the association. The association must not be dissolved without the prior written consent of the City. No portion of the association's documents pertaining to the maintenance of the private streets and assessments thereto shall be amended without the written consent of the City. Reserve Fund - The HOA shall establish a reserve fund for the maintenance and reconstruction of the private streets, drainage facilities, and related appurtenances. The reserve fund should be accounted for separately from other funds maintained for annual operating expenses of the association in order to better demonstrate that the amounts deposited therein are intended for capital improvements. The HOA shall, no later than January 31st of each year, submit to the City a copy of the reserve fund statement for the preceding calendar year. The annual contribution to the reserve fund shall be a minimum of $75.00 per lot, or as otherwise determined by the City Council. The City shall have authority to inspect all streets, drainage facilities, and related appurtenances on a periodic basis to determine the need for repairs to these capital facilities. The HOA shall repair all drainage and street facilities when instructed to do so by the City, subject to appeal to the City Council. Failure by the HOA to make repairs to streets or drainage facilities which impact drainage up or downstream from the development may result in the completion of needed repairs by the City with an assessment of all costs plus interest accrued from the time the City installs the improvements until all funds are collected. HOA documents must detail this City authority and shall not be amended without City approval. Private Street Lot - Private streets must be constructed within a separate lot owned by the HOA. This lot must conform to the City's standards for public street and alley right-of-way. An easement covering the street lot must be granted to the City providing unrestricted use of the property for utilities and the maintenance of same. This right shall extend to all utility providers including telecable companies operating within the City. The easement must also provide the City with the right of access for any purpose related to the exercise of a governmental service or function, including but not limited to fire and police protection, inspection and code enforcement. The Agenda Item No.4 - Page 7 easement shall permit the City to remove any vehicle or obstacle within the private street lot that impairs emergency access. Construction and Maintenance Cost - The City shall not pay for any portion of the cost of constructing or maintaining a private street. OTHER INFORMATION . The engineering construction plans have been reviewed by the Engineering Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department. Questions concerning the construction plans should be directed to Robert Woods, Engineering, at 817.503.1090 or Jeff Jones, Fire Marshall, at 817.488.6277. . Construction plan comments are available; please contact Robert Woods, Engineering, at 817.503.1090 to arrange for pick up. OTHER INFORMATION PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per dwelling unit. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the final plat. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Pleasant Run Road and John McCain Road are considered unimproved streets and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the Engineering Department upon request. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. SEWER $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires a 10-trail along Pleasant Run Road and sidewalks along John McCain Road and all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. The sidewalks along John McCain Road are required to be 5-feet wide, and the developer is required to construct the John McCain Road sidewalk as part of the public improvements for this property. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Agenda Item No.4 - Page 8 Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, July 11, 2005, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 2,2005 & August 16, 2005 RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our office: . A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived. . Twelve (12) folded copies of the plat drawing with the title block facing out and one (1) reduced copy (8%" x 11") . One (1) letter-size or ledger-size reduced copy of the revised exhibit The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Tuesday, July, 5, 2005 in order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Please contact me atfullerc@cLcollewille.tx.us or 817-503-1054 if you have any questions. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 9 Applicant's Response Be: P,,(JHJ2"1~.ParcFlIl8J Plst Dear Chris: This letter is in response to the commen1S.f8xed tome today and toinfonn you that 1 have made the following revision: the aboverefereneed exhibit as you toqUestc:d: 1) We have found tnat sho~ the flood data during zoning and prelirniDary plat is quite helpful and necessary at j stage of development review. However, we find it necessary and customary <luring the Final Plat to remove this dab avoid filing a plat with such data that iscertainJ.y to change. In addition, we all know that once developbleJlt is. compl this type of data changes based on design, coD$t1Uotionand improvements.. so to lea.vetbis typo.of sooo..tQ..be irrele, data on aplatthatb<lcomosofrocord only .COtlt\Jsesandcl()uds surveying and title issues later. Therefore. lhave remo' this flood info 1tool the fuoe of the plat as QnpnMousplats. 2) My~'inUl~8to 'oimFoganisthat1te@titheelty hadved>a11yagreed1hatthe~oper would bl S801in_.feOt(~tho vddth.oftheproperty atPleasamRun)a11dthe Citrw0l11dhUildthe tcrnaitthig. 3) Lot 16. Block 1 has been noted as being a drainage easement. 4) 'I11onoteS have been ad<Md as req,uested. 5) A copy of the BOA will be provided by the developer with thisresubmiual. As always, I deem it a pleasure to work with the City of Collcyville in these matters and should you have, additional comments please do not hesitate to oaIl. fax or Comail me. Sincerely, - l ""--:) r: DavidW. ~.. ..... ".j~. .- dwm@nlQaksurvcyO: ., Agenda Item No.4 - Page 10 II, U If I; Ii! Ii i i,l 1 1 III J : .. "1..1. i I I) J I .... !It ,III I, I, Ii; I 1 h .Ii I I. Iti i till- I, 11 i f J JI I if 1( J i ill IIjUI U 1\ 1,1\ \!~ IIII P/i J I lit, II 11,111,"11. ill! H,"'lll ij I ~!I j i i in If '1 'I ,I If 11 U 1 .11 It h I 'Iii I 1 Hb j'lil D ~ Iiliilrlll' II/! I 'Iii 111111 !b '! II ," " 'I'et , 'I,Ll "1,1,'11 rs J 1-.' ,- 'i · J I hi' J ,- ,- .' J · II !b II II b II II Ii In 11111111. du I S' 0\ S 0\ UI III II! I IIi I ill. 111 t Jill , _II I i h! 11 J -I IIi 1 · ia I I -I ~ · I rs rs H t I ,IIUIII = i~ o >' i~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~r~~~!A J~~hi~iL ~~~;8~~~~ li:r-l~~ ~~ PJ = ~~=:S;6: ~ :j<e: Cf:J. .... Ii'" < ~ e: U i; --.-------------.-.-.---.---------.------ Kill I e e e 0 e e e e e e Hdll I I i! 0 ,,@ " I hili alII f I it .Id II ') \I) 4;) f) f) \I) II f) $ \I) e Il e e. II~I M 1i1! ~ ----.-.--------aiiilii~._'-----I---;------;- Illll!! ~ """l'i !l " I ~ ...... ~ !l II III t : iI ~"\; : ! ~ \ ~ ; 'I: \ ~!II ; - : I;' II- ' r rr.oo ~I ~ + ,I !~ II . ~ jIl~ II !l r :.l ... ! ~ ,~ r~ I ~ C .I~ · e. t. II · · !: ~ t;: t;: I nH$~ : I...... ," ;, h k ~ . . d nnn IDo z z .. z Z 2' m Itil!!!!i~ 16~ '!2 I 2 ~ . ~ I I I It. 8 ,'!3~;8:;t.$" .. ~ III, q ~ n n p I H il Id 5 · i ! ~ ~ ~ ~ , z . I ail I GOO ~ C C tee ! " , , II :1 Ilk II ,i .~ ~ i II :h ;1;, III' -I -i-, -~I' II! I 'zil tl' b"! i'. Iii I ; '\ ~ I "i IU ~ j J lilt a tb. filii lill' . .f I h,s till 11.1 dll 11,. nl 1111 ~ I! idl./II;III Ii!] t GIll I .....H 1 · I' I I Cl .1 j ~ I ~ ! Ill! lllli \ \ "i "!r!I1 ( I I ,') f " _ . I . -~. i I~. ~