The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-8/22/2005 Texas AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chambers - 100 Main Street Monday,August22,2005 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Commissioners Thomas Dolan, David Dudziak, Thomas Bartkowski, Jeff Byerly, Luann Edwards, John Blassingame and Denis Duffy INVOCATION Commissioner Bartkowski PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES August8,2005 CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case P-OS-027 - Final plat for Castleton Manor Addition on 24.108 acres located at 6805 Pleasant Run Road 2. Case P-OS-033 - Final plat for Alianne Estates Addition on 14 acres located at 512 and 600 Shelton Drive 3. Discussion of Master Thoroughfare Plan PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 4. Case P-OS-036 - PUBLIC HEARING - Replat on 2.592 acres on Lot 4, Block 1 of the Pleasant Oak Estates Addition, located at 608 Beverly Drive TABLED ITEMS STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -August 22, 2005 Page 1 of2 COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS Amy S e ey, Planning a Zoning Assistant Posted: Thursday, August 18, 2005, 4:30 p.m. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -August 22, 2005 Page 2 of 2 .~ Texas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - August 8, 2005 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Byerly called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Present: Commissioners Th Bartkowski, Luann Edwar Byerly Absent: Commissi Blassingame Barry LeBaro Woods and Dolan, Thomas enis Duffy and Jeff ROLL CALL INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Duffy moved to approve ': Commissioner Bartkowski d. The motion was approv Aye: Dolan, Bartkow Nay: None ON THE AGENDA GENDA ITE -05-029 -' liminary plat for Preston Oaks Addition on 83.7 acres locate 816 Murp oad Barry LeBaron ente case and briefed the Commissioners. it' Commissioner Du :~~'" stioned the applicant how long the back taxes have been owed and the amol}Rl owed? Ron Shirley, the applicant, replied there being less than $50 dollars owed. Mr. Shirley and John Boone, Engineer for the applicant, presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Jack Lyle presented the land plan for this development. David Witt, with Land Pro, presented the landscape plan for the development of the park and addition. Commissioner Duffy stated having concerns with the width of Murphy Road being too narrow and with the 50 foot right of way with landscaping. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 8, 2005 Page 1of6 Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Lyle if the trees on the drawing to the left are real or conceptual? Mr. Shirley replied they are trying to gather an easement to the left of the property to help with the right of way. It is very important for us to maintain the look with the trees as much as possible. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Shirley if there is an aerial overlay with the streets? Mr. Shirley replied staff has a copy of the aerial. Chris Fuller presented the overlay on the projector screen. Mr. Shirley stated his oal is to maintain the beautiful trees that are already in the property. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Shirley on the those trees will be replaced when putting in the pa trees and then replace with like trees or are you trees? Mr. Boone replied to work around thos Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Bo opportunity? Mr. Boone replied they ha put the trees they have to replace and th Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Boone i will have to be removed? Mr. replied no however, the builders will hav . 24 cali those taken away. Commissioner Duffy are you going to be . Boone replied 25 lots on the drawing, if oing to bull doze those . d work around those ossible. replacement uilders may ; architect. o the percentage of trees that g able to speak for the builders, ches of trees when replacing . an n Park, how much water ; u have available for it? Mr. Commissione are in place? copy tomorrow. Bar al .~ if the Homeowner's Association papers hirley replied Mr. LeBaron will have a the width of the pavement and the trees nting some assurances that the trees will be tate anting to keep the trees and preserve the area as e worked on this project. preliminary plat has taken time to present to the Planning ers. These developers have taken a great deal of time and effort to prese maintain the open space and tree areas. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Shirley if the public access easement along Bandit Trail has been approved? Mr. Shirley replied correct, the easement has been filed. Barry LeBaron stated that document will be noted on the final plat with the volume and page number representing the easement. Commissioner Duffy questioned if the new Keller school would be able to handle the new homes. Mr. Shirley replied the schools have been contacted and they stated being able to handle the new addition. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 8, 2005 Page 20f6 Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Shirley in regards to the upgrade of Murphy Road to 30 feet wide on the western end of the property, will that be sufficient? Barry LeBaron replied staff suggested that it continue to Herbert and they have agreed to that. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned Mr. Shirley in regards to Block B, Lot 9 what is on that lot? Mr. Shirley replied a detention area. Commissioner Edwards questioned Mr. Shirley if this dev one phase? Mr. Shirley replied yes. Commissioner Ed in regards to the expected time frame? Mr. Shirley re and be completed by January or February. Commissioner Edwards questioned Mr. Shirle, replacement opportunities being all open spa " Association? Mr. Shirley replied correct. Commissioner Edwards questioned Mr.' other residents of other communities. H HOA? Mr. Shirley replied correct. Commi' how they are going to facilitate hat? Mr. maintain the park. Commis. wards s restrictions and guidelines to m LeB enforce those guidelines. If it is 0 facility. Commissioner E the streets. B would include Commissioner end to,j~,j(~~f!? .,,~;:~~~~~*~~~;:<~>:~;~;-' .,~ Cogsiori . . ned staff in regards to the 30 foot section of Murphy, are 'ing to req ring the street to code? Barry LeBaron replied yes, ill go all the 0 He . with city standards. Com . 'oner Edwar 'uestioned staff in regards to the width from where the new part wi in and w it will end at Herbert? Barry LeBaron replied about 650 feet. Co ioner < ards questioned staff in regards to the city completing the remaining p rphy Road 0 Barry LeBaron stated staff considered this developer payi those improvements, however, those residents will have more than one way to nter and exit. Therefore we didn't require them because it is not on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Commissioner Dolan stated having some of the same issues that the other Commissioners have, however, traffic getting on to Precinct Line is dangerous. Has there ever been talk about putting in a light? Mr. Shirley stated there being some discussion, but it would take Colleyville and North Richland Hills as well to coordinate a light. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Shirley in regards to the preconstruction prices ment will be done as questioned Mr. Shirley ping to start in October II the lots for tree he Homeowner's . g used by will be main Ined by the wards questioned Mr. Shirley stated having separate staff to typically those parks have stated the public could not on and parks may use the walk through what will be expected for oad will be built to city standards which the pavement width would be 31 feet. is would be all the way from the east . 'rect with a transition at the intersection. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 8, 2005 Page 3 of 6 of the lots? Mr. Shirley replied ballpark around $150,000. Commissioner Dolan stated wanting to know to be able to figure the size of homes that would be on these lots because normally a builder will not go more than 20%. Mr. Shirley stated these homes will mirror the Clairemont homes. Mr. Boone stated the lots are designed for a 90 x 90 pad. Commissioner Dolan stated for clarity to Mr. Shirley, a 4,000 square foot home? Mr. Shirley replied correct. Commissioner Duffy questioned Mr. Shirley in regards to th what does that mean? Mr. Shirley replied the architect deed restrict those lots to be used for the trees the buil Commissioner Edwards questioned staff in regards Master Thoroughfare plan, considering this large change to the Master plan before the final pi funds from that to improve that area? Barry prior to the approval of this plat or not. I those rates, not with this plat. Howe' factors that you would want to use to upda Commissioner Duffy made m to appro amendments: 1. The Home ' Associa before presenting the final plat ncil; 2. final plat will be consistent with relj have no trees, the Ho Owner's will be noted on Comm amendments. The motion Aye: Dolan, B Nay: None 35 lots that deed trees, '. ontrol committee will ill need to replace. Road not being on the 'f we were to make a he city to use the ttering whether act fee and ontributing n. MS HEARING - Amendment to Chapter 3, Land Use Commissi viewing roo developer woul seat maximum. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff if by amending the movie theater regulation each time there is a need is the best way to do so or should a Special Use Permit be used instead of amending the code? Barry LeBaron replied staff did see this as the right way to go. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff if the new code would be six screens with 2 viewing rooms or eight screens? Barry LeBaron replied essentially eight or you could have 2 executive viewing rooms with 50 seat maximum. City Attorney, , ki questioned staff in regards to the need for executive LeBaron replied that being a term used to describe what the to have for the viewing rooms and the criteria would be the 50 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 8, 2005 Page 4 0(6 Matthew Boyle concurred with Barry LeBaron. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned staff if this is strictly a movie theatre or also a dining facility or something else special about this movie theatre? Barry LeBaron replied not being case specific tonight, however, Scott Welmaker, Economic Development Director, can give the Commission more input about the project. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:31 p.m. Scott Welmaker, Economic Development Manager, pres the case and briefed the Commissioners. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned Scott Welm needing six screens to make this project viable are not part of the business plan because the so does this developer only need the six s viewing screens are in the business pia can rent those rooms. ards to this developer two viewing screens lIy viable screens, replied the two . ble. Groups ~ mbers of patrons that might ave adequate parking? Barry uilding, yet, this property has cation of Market Street? g was closed at 8:36 p.m. if the Commissioners are creating an iness, six screens, two viewing rooms, e original ordinance was created; the any i . ut the specifics needed for this particular an example of some one else's ordinance and now we . need it for this project or use. issioner Edw ;Dtion to approve case Z-05-019. Commissioner Bart .ki seconded. The mo; ''N'/as appr by the following vote: Aye: Dol '~:?~rtk . , Edwards, Duffy and Byerly N . N ;;$:..::;~. ay. one "'~";;";~;V'''V , :~~:~~$~;;~:Y "~~*X/'\~ 3. Case P-OS::024 - PUBLIC HEARING - Final Plat of Lot 1, Block 1, Colleyville Hibernia Addition being a replat of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Andy Felps Addition on 2.18 acres, located at 3907 and 3913 Colleyville Boulevard Chris Fuller presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. Barry LeBaron stated being excited to see something happening on this property. Commissioner Duffy stated having concerns about another bank coming to Colleyville. Barry LeBaron replied this property has deed restrictions that go back over 50 years old. Commissioner Byerly stated those deed restrictions concern the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 8, 2005 Page, 5 of 6 STAFF REPORTS Barry LeBaron reminded the Commissioners in'. August. . sale of alcohol. Commissioner Dolan questioned staff in regards to removing those deed restrictions? Barry LeBaron replied several years ago it was attempted but never went forward. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:47 p.m. Joe Riccardi, representing Hibernia National Bank, presented the case and briefed the Commissioners. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing w Commissioner Duffy made motion to approve case P-O Dolan seconded. The motion was approved by the following vote' Aye: Dolan, Bartkowski, Edwards, Duffy and . Nay: None to the workshop in Hurst in irs. . plicant in regards to the 'oner Edwards questioned in ing consl ered. Commissioner Byerly banks? Commissioner Duffy questioned se notify Commissioners so that we can eeting at 8:51 p.m. by acclamation. Amy Shelley Planning and Zoning Assistant Approved on: -------,.----------- Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - August 8, 2005 Page 60f6 city or CCe~ PUWNING&ZONINGCOMM~~ON AGENDA BRIEFING l'exas Meeting Date: j August22,2005 I Prepared by: I Chris Fuller i Development Coordinator Subject: I P-05-027 - Final Plat for Castleton Manor Addition on 24.108 I acres, located at 6805 Pleasant Run Road I STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Stonebridge Development is the potential developer of a 24.1-acre parcel of property located on the east side of Pleasant Run Road, south of John McCain Road. The developer has submitted a Final Plat to divide the property into 34 lots for the construction of twenty-nine new single-family residences, three open space lots and a private street designated as a lot. The proposed name of the subdivision is Castleton Manor Addition. The development was preliminary platted as Stonebridge Pare Addition, which was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on March 28, 2005 and by the City Council on May 3, 2005. The layout of the development is consistent with the preliminary plat. The preliminary plat was approved as a gated subdivision with an entrance on Pleasant Run Road. The street, Fegans Path, will continue through the development to a proposed street connection with the Warwick Pare subdivision, which is currently under development to the east of the site. An emergency access gate will separate the two subdivisions. Zoning. Eight lots on the west side of the property are zoned R40 Single Family Residential and the remaining lots are zoned R20 Single Family Residential. All proposed lots meet the dimensional standards for the applicable zoning districts. Open Space. No open space is required for the R40 and R20 districts; however this project provides three open space lots. The primary open space lot will be centrally located within the neighborhood, Lot 16, Block 1, and will contain a detention pond. The other two open space lots will extend from John McCain Road to the southern boundary of the property and will contain the 10-foot required trail. Gated Development. The proposed development is designed to be a gated subdivision with a private road. The plat document designates the private road as a lot and a note has been provided on the plate stating that the Home Owner's Association (HOA) is responsible for construction and maintenance of the private road. The applicant has submitted HOA documents that are in conformance with Chapter 10 of the Land Development Code. The HOA documents indicate that the streets and drainage systems within the development are private, owned and maintained by the association, and that the City has no obligation to maintain the private streets and drainage systems. All HOA documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney to ensure that they conform to applicable City policies prior to being filed of record at the County. Agenda Item No.1 - Page 1 Drainage. The applicant has submitted a Drainage Plan that has been reviewed and approved by the Engineering Department. Right-of-Way Dedication. Pleasant Run Road is classified as a Minor Arterial roadway on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, which requires an ultimate right-of-way width of 75 feet. The developer is dedicating approximately 50 feet of additional right-of-way along Pleasant Run Road in order to provide the required right-of-way dedication. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Pleasant Run Road and John McCain Road are considered unimproved streets and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires a 10-foot wide trail along Pleasant Run Road, and sidewalks along John McCain Road and all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. The sidewalk along John McCain Road is required to be 5-feet wide, and the developer is required to construct the sidewalk as part of the public improvements for this property. The Colleyville Pathways Plan shows a 10-foot wide trail along the east side of Pleasant Run Road, which extends across the frontage of this development. Staff recommends the required 10-foot wide trail be placed within an easement on the eastern border of the property, adjacent to Warwick Pare. The developer has agreed to construct an equivalent amount of linear footage (approximately 560 feet) of the trail along the eastern boundary of this development, because it will provide greater public access to the trail system from the adjacent residential neighborhoods than the route along Pleasant Run Road. The agreed upon route will ultimately connect the trail system from John McCain Road and extend through the subdivision to the City of Colleyville soccer fields located to the south of the development. The plat exhibit designates the open spaces as a public access easement, which will allow construction of the trail in accordance with the Land Development Code standards. The Preliminary Plat was approved in accordance with staff's recommendation. SUMMARY The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This final plat also requires approval by the City Council. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements of the Land Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval Agenda Item No.1 - Page 2 ATTACHMENTS · Location Map · Development Review Committee Memo · Applicant's Response · Plat Agenda Item No.1 - Page 3 Location Map D NORTH AG Agenda Item No.1 - Page 4 Development Review Committee Memo DATE June 27,2005 TO John Fegan FAX NO 817.282.1444 FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJEC P-05-027 - Final Plat - Stonebridge Pare T The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. On the plat, darken the lines indicating the limits of the floodplain. 2. How much of the trail is the developer constructing on the east side of the property? Contact Monica Walsh, Parks and Recreation Director, 817.503.1182, for more information. 3. Need to identify 15' strip of land located between Lots 11 & 12 of Block 1 as drainage easement to cover the proposed drainage improvements. This item could be addressed by showing Lot 16, Block 1 as a drainage easement. Contact Robert Woods, Development Review Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. 4. Add the following notes to the final plat document: Lot 1, Block 3 denotes the private access and private drainage easement owned by the Homeowners Association (HOA) of Stonebridge Pare. No building permit will be issued for Lot 1, Block 3. The landowners and any subsequent owners of lots shown herein (the Lot Owners), jointly and severally, shall be responsible and liable for the construction, operation and maintenance of any private common areas or facilities in the addition created herein (the Addition), including but not limited to private streets, private entrance gates or structures, private walls and fences, private pedestrian access, private storm drainage systems, private lake, private open space and landscaping, and emergency access. Agenda Item No.1 - Page 5 5. Provide a draft copy of HOA documents with language referring to the HOA being responsible for the common areas. In The Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: 6. All restricted access entrances shall be equipped with the Opticom gate opening system. The system shall be maintained by the HOA in good working condition at all times. 7. The following information is applicable to this project: Homeowners Associations (HOA) Required - A subdivision developed with private streets must have a mandatory HOA which includes all properties served by the private streets. The association shall own and be responsible for the maintenance of the private streets and appurtenances. The association's document must indicate that the streets and drainage systems within the development are private, owned and maintained by the association, and that the City has no obligation to maintain the private streets and drainage systems. The documents shall be filed of record prior to the approval of the final plat. Lot deeds must convey membership in the association and provide for the payment of dues and assessments required by the association. The association must not be dissolved without the prior written consent of the City. No portion of the association's documents pertaining to the maintenance of the private streets and assessments thereto shall be amended without the written consent of the City. Reserve Fund - The HOA shall establish a reserve fund for the maintenance and reconstruction of the private streets, drainage facilities, and related appurtenances. The reserve fund should be accounted for separately from other funds maintained for annual operating expenses of the association in order to better demonstrate that the amounts deposited therein are intended for capital improvements. The HOA shall, no later than January 31 sl of each year, submit to the City a copy of the reserve fund statement for the preceding calendar year. The annual contribution to the reserve fund shall be a minimum of $75.00 per lot, or as otherwise determined by the City Council. The City shall have authority to inspect all streets, drainage facilities, and related appurtenances on a periodic basis to determine the need for repairs to these capital facilities. The HOA shall repair all drainage and street facilities when instructed to do so by the City, subject to appeal to the City Council. Failure by the HOA to make repairs to streets or drainage facilities which impact drainage up or downstream from the development may result in the completion of needed repairs by the City with an assessment of all costs plus interest accrued from the time the City installs the improvements until all funds are collected. HOA documents must detail this City authority and shall not be amended without City approval. Private Street Lot - Private streets must be constructed within a separate lot owned by the HOA. This lot must conform to the City's standards for public street and alley right-of-way. An easement covering the street lot must be granted to the City providing unrestricted use of the property for utilities and the maintenance of same. This right shall extend to all utility providers including telecable companies operating Agenda Item No.1 - Page 6 within the City. The easement must also provide the City with the right of access for any purpose related to the exercise of a governmental service or function, including but not limited to fire and police protection, inspection and code enforcement. The easement shall permit the City to remove any vehicle or obstacle within the private street lot that impairs emergency access. Construction and Maintenance Cost - The City shall not pay for any portion of the cost of constructing or maintaining a private street. OTHER INFORMATION · The engineering construction plans have been reviewed by the Engineering Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department. Questions concerning the construction plans should be directed to Robert Woods, Engineering, at 817.503.1090 or Jeff Jones, Fire Marshall, at 817.488.6277. · Construction plan comments are available; please contact Robert Woods, Engineering, at 817.503.1090 to arrange for pick up. OTHER INFORMATION PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per dwelling unit. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the final plat. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Pleasant Run Road and John McCain Road are considered unimproved streets and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the Engineering Department upon request. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires a 10-trail along Pleasant Run Road and sidewalks along John McCain Road and all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. The sidewalks along John McCain Road are required to be 5-feet wide, and the developer is required to construct the John McCain Road sidewalk as part of the public improvements for this property. Agenda Item No.1 - Page 7 PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, July 11, 2005, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 2, 2005 & August 16, 2005 RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to ou r office: . A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived. . Twelve (12) folded copies of the plat drawing with the title block facing out and one (1) reduced copy (8%" x 11 ") · One (1) letter-size or ledger-size reduced copy of the revised exhibit The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Tuesday, July, 5, 2005 in order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Please contact me at fullerc@cLcolleyville.tx.us or 817-503-1054 if you have any questions. Agenda Item No.1 - Page 8 Applicant's Response Re: P.o5.fJ27 Stondridge Pare Final PJat Dear Cbris: This letter is in response to the comments f_ed to me today and to inform you tbat I have made tile following revisions tbe above referenced exhibit as you requested: 1) \Ve have found that. showing the fiQod data dwing zo.ning and prelimmmyplat is quite helpful and necessal)' at tr stage of development review. However,. wetind it n~ and custotnaty during the Final Plat to remove tl1is data avoid filing a plat with such data that is certainly to change. In addition, we an know that once development isoomplc1 this type of data changes based on · design, construction and nnprovements.. . sow leave this type of soon.to--be irreleva data on a plat that becomes of rooord only confuses and clouds surveying and title issues later. Therefore. 1 have remov. this flood infofrumthe face of the plat as on previous plats. 2) My understanding in talking to JaM Fegan. is that be and the City had verbally agreed that the developer would bu.J 580 linear feet (matching the width of the property at Pleasant Run) and the City would build the remaining. 3) Lot Hi. Block 1 has been uoted as being a drainage easement. 4) The notes have been added as requested. 5) A. copy of tile HOA win be provided by the developer with this resubmittal. As always. I deem it a pleasure to work with tbe City of CoUcyviUe in these matters and should you have a; additional comments please do not hesitate to call, fax or e~mail me.. Sincerely, --~.. '0 t ~-W-~~ David W. Myers dwm@fnoaksurveyo. . ..... .... Agenda Item No.1 - Page 9 f! Ii i, if I " Ii{ II Ii 11P,Z.t,Jjl fJl I, l~ ;'.;" ; I ", · if '. ",', . ,,' 111 · """ " ;. · "~ t11 ili qpl; I! IlqU I'D~( i/J , //80 HI/IuD iluUlt,q/ I mi ,111Iltfllllllllltlli'1 II r.l · .1 . g ~. iI/h, ~ 2; r: ~ ~ hi; '~9B ~'; If 11/, o ~~S~ ~~,.. 'I" .~~i~Ne!ib :"Iil/ ~ ~ Q 8 "" ~ · 1;/' t: ~ ! ~ F-i a: ',"/' ~ '" ~ :s fI.} ;,.. III Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ '1" (7) ~ -< s ~ 1,1/ If ~ ~: ~ ill, ~ I u ~ III ~'ll g ~ IIrJ l fi I .....If I'h'lll I ~~(M I~UHI I llli! tl I · · .. 11't I,j~i' I I'II/! i i; '1 1 ~I, I Ji 1 I I fA! I !II 11 I", ~ & Ii) E> @ e e e e I) II> .. I) . $ e €I i II "/"11 ;/ 1'1' illbilq Ji~ fl I,l Ii' Iii 1'/'//1 JI Iii iT it! Illr1' 'fl It it' 'ft, ! Iii 1/1 LHkI/ilJ I ~65 Iii! 111 !il,illf ~ ~ B I i 'II J fI/J 'Ii ''/ I~ H 11 /I f Bfj I[ I 6[" 1 jll r. II f jE j ~ j I t ~ · 'l ,1 t i ;'9 f " " 1 : . ~1 \, 't i 1:1 I :t:.; " I j ~r i !., ii, I 5 I DtU -1i'If ~ 'ei~' i!jf ~ '" ~- " I 1 1 ~ !L I 'i I Ii) 'II J; ;;~ J ~:b~~~~~. .....~St~;t:~ 'iiiiiiifi << t" .. ~ t" It: .. .. ... IHlltJ!H 'I ~ ~ t ~ t t t t t !'i~~"i., 181111;888811 IHQttu l(Joa~eeoce city or cceu~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Texas Meeting Date: August 22, 2005 I Prepared by: I Chris Fuller Development Coordinator Subject: P-05-033 - Final plat for Alianne Estates Addition on 14 acres located at 512 and 600 Shelton Drive STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Jeff Vanderpool is the potential developer of a 14-acre parcel of property located on the north side of Shelton Drive, west of Hunter Lane. The developer has submitted a Final Plat to divide the property into 12 lots for the construction of new single-family residences. The Preliminary Plat was approved by City Council on June 21,2005. The layout of the development is consistent with the preliminary plat. Zoning. The proposed lots are located in the R40 Single Family Residential zoning district. The proposed lots meet the dimensional standards for the R40 zoning district. Right-of-Way Dedication. Shelton Drive is classified as a Minor Collector roadway on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, which requires an ultimate right-of-way width of 75 feet. The developer is dedicating approximately 35 feet of additional right-of-way along Shelton Drive in order to provide the required right-of-way dedication. The cul-de-sac street has a 56-foot right of way and a 36-foot pavement width, which is required by the Land Development Code for a cul-de-sac street exceeding 600 feet in length. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires a sidewalk along Shelton Drive and all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. The sidewalk along Shelton Drive is required to be 5-feet wide, and the developer may escrow the funds for construction of the sidewalk. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Shelton Drive is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one- half of the streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. Drainage. The construction plans for the referenced improvements have been reviewed by the Engineering Department and have been determined to be in general conformance with the minimum requirements of the City of Colleyville Code. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's Office. Agenda Item No.2 - Page 1 SUMMARY The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This final plat also requires approval by the City Council. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements of the Land Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Zoning and Location Map · Development Review Committee Memo · Plat Agenda Item No.2 - Page 2 Zoning and Location Map 11 NORTH Agenda Item No.2 - Page 3 Development Review Committee Memo DATE July 25, 2005 TO JEFF VANDERPOOL FAX NO 817.577.5564 FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJEC P-05-033 - Final Plat - Alianne Estates T The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. On the plat drawing, designate a Block 1. The plat currently shows two Block 2s. 2. Add a dimension for the portion of the cul-de-sac adjacent to the railroad right- of-way. The Following Comments are Informational and Do Not Require a Response: 1. Trees not located within the right-of-way must be preserved during the construction of the subdivision. Before construction begins on the site, protective fencing must be installed around all preserved trees located outside the right-of- way. The fencing must be located at the dripline of the preserved trees. The protective fencing may be comprised of orange vinyl construction fencing, chain link fence or other similar fencing with a four-foot (4') approximate height. The fencing must remain in place during the entire construction period OTHER INFORMATION PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per dwelling unit. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the final plat. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Shelton Road is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one- half of the streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the Engineering Department upon request. Contact Robert Woods, 817.503.1094, for more information Agenda Item No.2 - Page 4 IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along Shelton Road and all interior streets. The internal sidewalks must be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. The sidewalks along Shelton Road are required to be 5-feet wide, and the developer is required to construct the Shelton Road sidewalk as part of the public improvements for this property or may provide an escrow for the perimeter sidewalks. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, August 8,2005, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, September 6, 2005 Agenda Item No.2 - Page 5 'II 0000 000 0 ................. .......... J"W WOW _ b . ; I,... ..~.: -'-!Q ~ W '. ~ If!ll~!i~ ifi!illf H~~;:Jlfh l;:=:.ill;f~ . i I' f J ~ ~ j if 1 j: Jlii1~~ i .. f; f "<:IH~ !! i! ~ " 'IfNI :r l ~&.- ~ I:::::=- ~ '" . ~ 8 - Q i ~ ~ i rllll J f uf ! J 'JjI ~ l j:,l II.{ II '$ '1 Lot 1. IlALPH Il'E1&ow.w ADOITIoH. Vol""", 388-45. P"ge 66. P.R.T.C.T. g \. "- \. \. I, "/lr z f}hl!, lflff! If h ~jlll 1,1 "I ~Jl .:, U I. I: !l ~l (I .11'::-___ f. \. 1 I I f~ \. j Lot 2. BIle. "1 lot 2 i Lot 1 I lot 2 i lot t-R f \. COl1.fy AllOH.. I Cob. A. Slkle/ / I I \. . '27, P.R.T.C.T.. 6fock f. COwas AOomoN. . Block!. J(NNlNGS ESTATEs. \. 1 I Cabinet A. Slide 7009. P.R.T.C.T./ Cobmet,... Slide 6'<<, P.R.T.C.T. f ~ J ~~.t;11 ~ ....:. ~: ~ ::;-J f ~l< ~ ,,~~ ~ W ! ~ :'" ct ~ J 1 g 8 f i eJP ,.' ~ Nd i'lf ,/ H ,~ " I: f U~ fPfilPr ! IlU'l! IlIla 'a If I U U f E r~ af~ ,i ~ foQl r ]It'~! l;:~ ~ h f. H.- ~ lil (~ f H ! f 11 j g r 4111 Ii ! if r: 11 if f i J.. ~I~ : Ii I 1 I l" ill 'r rrj!'r ~ If ~" , I It ,1 1'1-- Jf f. I I ~ . h _ _ ' J ' ., f" ,; If /' I .. f" il.. 'I i J I Bl Ii/lIt ~ I t il I 1 ii I r '.. I $ ~f: $ ~'r, j l t I, . f 1 f~ r II ~ .~ll" · I -. I I II ,I f , I~ a , I ~ ~ f .- [ 'f 'i"ll 3. 1 f J g f If i; ~ It I '. t .., Ill!!, f I , f t il if ,. f 't t f1li I I i ~ 1 1 ~i ~l ~ f Iii 'I i li'... ~ t I It L J. i & I . l~ . ttltl' ! ill I j! Jl I I' 111111 I 1 I i I ,1 II B j f d , II fliT II I I I ! I 'I If ! i tr JJ~l/l t t l ~ I 1"9 I I ,. I i,ll i' ~ : i ~ f.~ i H 1}1&I' ~! I lIt f I It I - Q I t I 'K i T I ': ~l:lfl I ~ i Q I "J' ~ ;:0 1 It ,.!, . if ~ ... c: ,.,., 9( fl' 1 'i! .' I r- . , " C) " l j ~Jlll1 I!: i ! J " ITJ " j " - 1 1111 I J ! if; " " < . " " ,.,., " " 0 , -.W I~ ;;~iC~1 II Il , I li' ~ 5' ~ .. :!i~ > lil~ "-$" l..LJ ~ 111~ I !~~ 00 '-"" ;t .,1.:r~R- ~ e l"l:lC1'J~'a!l .... 'U ~ ~c::: ~ F;!l.. t-+ ~ Ii ~'~3,c_~ ::s 10.-':::: _ ~ g 8 t,ej fi i"D. i'll!.,,",< ~';;oo If1ifo. ..e;;: ~ -- 'II -..ala5 i~l V!~ ~'l af~f":l I ~-"------'-_.-..,---......."- .~ TexaS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Meeting Date: Subject: August 22, 2005 Prepared by: I Barry LeBaron I Oevelo ment Oirecto Discussion of Master Thoroughfare Plan This item has been placed on the agenda for discussion at the request made by the Commission at the August 8,2005 meeting. Staff will be available to answer questions from the Commission and provide information regarding the update of the roadway impact fee ordinance and the work currently underway to revise the roadway capital improvement plan. This effort is being undertaken by Kimley-Horn and Associates, the private sector consulting firm employed by the City to conduct the work associated with this task. Agenda Item No.3 - Page 1 city OT caen~ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Texas Meeting Date: August 22,2005 I Prepared by: I Chris Fuller Develooment Coordinator P-05-036 - Public Hearing - Replat on 2.592 acres on Lot 4, Subject: Block 1 of the Pleasant Oak Estates Addition, located at 608 Beverly Drive STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Castlegate Homes has submitted a replat for 2.592-acres located on the north side of Beverly Drive between Bransford Road and Pleasant Run Road. The plat will subdivide Lot 4, Block 1 of the Pleasant Oak Estates Addition into two lots. The applicant has submitted the replat for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Zoning. The proposed plat area is located within the R40 Single Family Residential zoning district. The R40 zoning designation requires a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet, a minimum lot depth and a minimum lot width of 150 feet. The proposed plat meets the development criteria as stated within the Land Development Code. Sidewalks and Trails. Lot 4R2 is subject to the provisions of the Land Development Code, which requires construction of a 4-foot wide sidewalk to be installed when any new residence is constructed on the property. The developer is required to construct the sidewalk as part of the public improvements for this property. Lot 4R1 is exempt from the general sidewalk requirements as it had an existing house located on the property at the time the plat application was filed. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Beverly Drive is an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The developer shall pay, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City, the applicable perimeter street charge for the initial one hundred feet of street frontage. The applicable perimeter street charge shall be reduced 0.2% per linear foot of frontage in excess of one hundred feet, not to exceed fifty percent of the applicable additional street frontage. The fee is applicable to the new lot and must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's Office. The lot with the existing residential dwelling is exempt from this requirement. Parkland Dedication. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. The fee only applies to the newly created lot and must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerk's Office. The lot with the existing residential dwelling is exempt from this requirement. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 1 SUMMARY The developer has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. Since this final plat contains less than five lots, only the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission is required. The proposed development appears to satisfy the platting standards contained in the Land Development Code. This replat is scheduled as a public hearing as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location and Zoning Map · Development Review Committee Memo · Applicant's Response · Plat Agenda Item No.4 - Page 2 Location and Zoning Map Agenda Item No.4 - Page 3 Development Review Committee Memo DATE August 8, 2005 TO PAUL KRAMER Mark McCrary FAX NO 817.329.8822 817.329.8822 FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-05-036 Pleasant Oak Estates -- Replat The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: 1. Revise the front building line to state 40-feet. The R-40 zoning district requires a 40-foot front yard setback, a 25-foot rear yard setback, and 15-foot side yard setbacks. 2. Show and label all existing permanent structures on the exhibit. The following information should be included: location and general outline of any existing permanent structures with sufficient dimensions to determine building line encroachments. Any permanent structures which encroach any building set- back lines that will remain after completion of the development shall be shown on the drawing with appropriate dimensions. Contact Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator, 817.503.1054, for more information. 3. Provide a statement on the plat exhibit indicating if existing structures will remain or be removed from the property. 4. Provide 15' wide Drainage Utility Easement along the entire length of east property line of Lot 4R2 and the west property line of 4R1, and rear lot lines of both lots. Contact Robert Woods, Project Engineer, 817.503.1094, for more information. In Your Response Letter, Acknowledge the Following Information: PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Beverly Drive an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The developer shall pay, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City, the applicable perimeter street charge for the initial one hundred feet of street frontage. The applicable perimeter street charge shall be reduced 0.2% per linear foot of frontage in excess of one hundred feet, not to exceed fifty percent of the applicable additional street frontage. The fee only applies to the newly created lot and must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. The lot with the existing residential dwelling is exempt from this requirement. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the Agenda Item No.4 - Page 4 Engineering Department upon request. Contact Robert Woods, Engineering Department, 817.503.1094, for more information. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY Not applicable for lot with existing house on property. $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses for new lot. $2,666 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PARKLAND DEDICATION. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1 ,802 per residential lot. The fee only applies to the newly created lot and must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. The lot with the existing residential dwelling is exempt from this requirement. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, August 22,2005,7:00 p.m. Not Required Please submit the following to our offices: · 11 folded copies of the revised Final Plat drawing · One 8%" x 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit · A written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or stating reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived. Please contact me at fullerc@cLcollewille.tx.us or 817-503-1054 if you have any questions. The above requested items must be submitted no later than noon on Wednesday, August 17, 2005 in order to make the scheduled hearings. The item will not be scheduled for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting until all items are submitted. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 5 Applicant's Response ATIN: CbrmJ? . t.be improVeolMts on the propeJty were removed. (see pl~) 3. See No.2 4. Addeda.15 i>>twJ:(te draillage. andotiUty ~ent as requested. (see plat) If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to call Thank Yon; Agenda Item No.4 - Page 6 i~ i Ji'l ;;, ;a~ Ii & ~li A BRANSFORD ROAD , . ~,. IJ i 1\ I l ~, ;\ : ~f' 11 I I .- T. ..-.... Wft. ...-:EllA II. ...-.. ..- .... 121" .... 1417, 0Jl.1,C.T. lOllED: R-4Il t s .. I p iro ~ l ~ -, II -t ~ Ja " t IIi" ~. ~JI N ~,. U! .!, ... ~" . he" ~ ~\ ~ soUTH 373,74' ~ W 1 ell \ 0 ~ a ~~ 1 ~ \~ t;! P r; \ ~ .. fa i i\ ~. \'4 t~, i~ \ v __-~----------_J '1 ,.. DIL It llt'lL- .sll'r. soUTH 373.74' . . ~ ~ i~ ~. ~~ ~ I~ w ~~ 0 !% ~ ' ~ ~ \1 DUANE ~ ~ 'I ~i I i jl ~'I ~ " ,\~ \i ~" . , !, ~~ l~ 13 iJ l i I , !S -1 i ~ ~ ~ I Ii ~:'" I ~ II ~ J' t~ ~:t' "I , l" ~, ~ J, ! ;, & ~, !: " , -..._...QW&DL........",.,I-....- oJl.T,C.T. ZONED: R-4Il ~ IJ I \ \~\\\\\ ~ ~\~ll ~ \ t. (\ ~ I"~ o "iji ~ ~'I I ~ ,;~\I ~ ~i ~! ~l" ., r~ li\ ~, ,I, \~, _It a z ~ ~ $ "'0 i 1 I is t t t \ I I i J i I , \ Vol ti I I Vo~ ri I I. i\1 '- 1 ~. 1 Sit \ \ \t, h ~ \ t UI \ ~ \1,.,\ I nn'~ \ i \1 \0 11\, U'. l\\ ill \ ~ ~.llflfqqll.llti I\~,U it".h:\II\q~ H \\H ~ \l,1 \lii 'Q t ,llll il \i\ \!! i\ \ I i \ i U ~ ~ \ h\ i 1 {1 . il t 1,",- ,it i i\ ~ ~ ~ t '\i 1'1' ~ ., II ., l \ tll II I I \.. \i,e~ \ ~~! I, \! \l; ,il il: \ lit ltl11 ~ ! U U ,~,l\ it, i ni % ~\i ,l{\ \~ \\",\\ 1 i 1~ it '~i\~' Il~ !ii ~ I i' \1 ! · il n l' It I ii '-\' Z \\I}I\\t\ .. \ \\ \i \\ \\\ \\\q 1 \ I I I tl~\ \ It \\ I' Iii \\J \i ' !\ \\l\ \ Ii t! i\ ~~ ii\ i:l \\ \\il i I \\ \\ \1 \\1 i\' h '!Ii ! i l\ II 1I..1 \~ t. I,.. , ~ .. .. .; It! J r :" ~~ ~ i% Nl~~\ ! ~~~i8!Q ~ ~I ~ ~~ 9! It' "-li I ',\ii lll~!..l ~ \lilt \t'~" \<1 ~t U,\,\\\ .%ii"i~ g~ ~ ~i · ',\1 ~,~lli ~~ l"l is" "1\\ l~\',~ .tli\ ~fl!!i l~n h'~' ~~ , ,fit !iI.' ~:::t~ t !'l ~ . .__-='k~"" ,'N