Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council-Agenda Packets-7/19/2005 Te xa 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 100 MAIN STREET JULY 19, 2005 5:30 P.M. - PRE-COUNCIL AGENDA EXECUTIVE CONFERENCE ROOM THIRD FLOOR PC-1. Discussion of the draft 2006 Work Initiatives PC-2. Discussion of parking access via Shadowood Drive at City Park PC-3. Update of the 1998 Colleyville Pathways Plan - A Citywide System PC-4. Presentation of Monthly Financial Report - June 2005 PC-5. Discussion of the July 19, 2005, City Council regular agenda items REGULAR AGENDA G:45 P.M. - CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.071 - Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda Brian K. Meroney vs. City of Colleyville Legal - Potential Litigation - Pecan Village Partners Sec. 551.071 - 100 MAIN STREET COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 503-1000 Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.087 - Property Acquisition Proposed Sale of Property - 5500 Colleyville Boulevard Proposed Sale of Property - 5100 Colleyville Boulevard Economic Development Conference with City Manager and staff to discuss and deliberate commercial and financial information received from business prospect(s) the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand within the City; with which business(es) the City is pursuing and conducting economic development negotiations 7:30 P.M. - RESUME REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS INVOCATION: Reverend Carter Foster, Colleyville Christian Fellowship PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: City Attorney Matthew Boyle EXECUTIVE SESSION: 2. CONSIDER AND TAKE ANY ACTION(S) NECESSARY RELATIVE TO ITEMS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION - Resolution R-05-2570 3. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS OR PRESENTATIONS PROCLAMATION - In recognition of Nelson Thibodeaux and the Colleyville Lions Club for coordinating the Hometown Heroes Day event PROCLAMATION - In recognition of Parks and Recreation month - Monica Walsh, Parks and Recreation Director PROCLAMATION - In recognition of "National Night Out 2005" - Lieutenant Rodney Cunningham CONSENT: 4. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2571 - Consent Items: a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of July 12, 2005 b. Approval of minutes of the Joint City Council and Colleyville Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting of June 28, 2005 PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1531 - Approval of a Special Use Permit for a covered carport on Lot 4, Block 1, Community Home Addition, located at 1508 Cherry Lane, Case Z-05-018 G. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1532 - Approval of an Amendment to Chapter 3, Section 3.24 of the Land Development Code, regarding Planned Unit Development side and rear yard set-back regulations, Case Z-05-017 7. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1533 - Adopting an annual budget for Fiscal Year 2006 for the Colleyville Crime Control and Prevention District 8. SECOND READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1534 - Denial of Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) Rate Request by Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division 9. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2572 - Approval of the Utility Relocation Design Contract for SH26 - Phase II, with Teague, Nail and Perkins, in the amount of $373,600 REPORTS: 10. TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE - April 11, 2005 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES - May 2,2005 CITIZEN COMMENTS: 11. CITIZEN COMMENTS/PRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA ACTION/RESOLUTION: 12. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING COUNCIL AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF JULY 19, 2005 - Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-05-2573 ADJOURNMENT 13. ADJOURNMENT .~ Any matter on this agenda may, at the discretion of the governing body, be opened for public comment and discussion. If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special accommodations, please advise the City Secretary at least 48 hours in advance at 817.503.1133, and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you. ----_..._-,-~------_._._..--..__.~-_._,-~~----- -- PRE COUNCIL CC@niB AGENDA BRIEFING IL-X~$ MEETING DATE: 07/19/05 CITY MANAGER ;t'!'" ~ - ITEM#: PC-1 DEPARTMENT HEAD ORDINANCE # : FINANCE REVIEW Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Discussion of draft 2006 Work Initiatives Update Attached is the draft for the 2006 Work Initiatives discussed during the last City Council meeting reflecting requested changes. Once the Work Initiatives are approved, staff will identify various working tasks for the year to accomplish the City Council identified initiatives. Backqround This item is provided to allow an opportunity for the City Council to review for modifications the draft 2006 Work Initiatives developed during the City Council planning session held on June 16 and 17, 2005. The list of initiatives is scheduled to be approved by the City Council at the August 3, 2005 meeting. Attachment . Draft 2006 Work Initiatives DRAFT CITY OF COLLEYVILLE 2005 - 2006 Work Initiatives Make Colle wille more prosperous throuah economic development efforts . Prepare a plan addressing redevelopment opportunities with the goal of increasing commercial viability and creating a sense of unique destination for properties along SH26 while addressing challenges property owners will be confronted with associated with highway construction. Enhance the maintenance and reconstruction of the city roads and streets . Develop a five year street plan identifying funding requirements for both preventive maintenance and reconstruction needs for neighborhood streets and thoroughfares and scheduling of intersections. Funding opportunities include, among others, available Fund Balance cash, fees, capital bond financing and new fees or taxes. The plan will provide focused attention to street improvement opportunities for 2006. . Prepare a study to develop a commuter rail center in conjunction with regional planning for the Cotton Belt Commuter Rail Line with a focus on retail development and/or cooperative partnership opportunities. Ensure fiscal intearity and stewardship of the City's financia/p/annina . Continue development of a five year financial plan identifying anticipated revenues and corresponding expenses for both operations and capital. The plan will identify needed adjustments to staffing, programming and operations and corresponding identified adjustments to user fees and taxes, as needed. Effectively utilize and promote Colle wille's paid and volunteer human resources . Develop a workforce development plan focusing on a competitive compensation- benefits plan while addressing needs for succession planning and addressing ways to promote greater citizen volunteer participation and recognition. Expand community relations of the Mavor & City Council with citizens and Boards . Develop a plan promoting elected officials credibility with the general citizenry by promoting the active involvement of citizens to participate with Board and Commission opportunities, creation of a Colleyville Presidents Council and the hosting of annual meetings with key community groups and City boards. Develop. expand and promote leisure activity opportunities for the citizens . Identify opportunities to focus on the development of city parks and private developments by creating an "urban oasis" for citizens to relax and enjoy family times thru enjoyment of trails, open spaces, theaters, shopping, etc. PRE COUNCIL cur Of ~<B AGENDA BRIEFING ;C':(0l:; MEETING DATE: 07/19/05 CITY MANAGER !~ I~ ITEM # : PC-2 DEPARTMENT HEAD I LIJi:l FINANCE REVIEW I NIA Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT : CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Discussion of parking access via Shadowood Drive at City Park The City Council requested that staff look at alternative access to the parking lot located adjacent to Kidsville and the basketball courts within City Park. Staff has prepared a drawing and cost estimate for the proposed access road. Staff has met with the resident making the initial request and with the property owner immediately adjacent to the proposed road extension. Funding for the project could be considered from either available cash balance, CEDC funding, an adjustment to the 2006 proposed budget, or a debt Issuance. Attachments . Cost estimate for proposed access road . Drawing for proposed access road Total Item Descri tion Qt Unit Unit Cost Total 1 Mise Grading 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 2 Remove Concrete Pavement 1,150 SF $5 $5,750 3 8" Cement Treated Subgrade 800 SY $3 $2,000 4 Cement (30# I SY) 12 TON $95 $1,140 5 6" Concrete Street 7,000 SF $5 $35,000 6 Retaining Wall (4' average height) 175 LF $80 $14,000 7 6' Black Vinyl Fence 435 LF $40 $17,400 8 Landscaping 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 ._-~--_._-- 9 Parking Lot Striping 1 LS $1,000 $1,000 Subtotal $96,290 20% .c;;_ontingency Monzingo Screening 6' Wooden Fence 140 LF $40 $5,600 Landscaping 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 Subtotal $10,600 20% Contingency $2,120 Total ~---- _.-+~- Grand Total $128,268 PRE COUNCIL CC~<B AGENDA BRIEFING "'l~.'I: ~ $ MEETING DATE: ! ITEM#: : 07/19/05 PC-3 CITY MANAGER I DEPARTMENT HEAD : FINANCE REVIEW I Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: PARKS AND RECREATION SUBJECT: Update of the 1998 Colleyville Pathways Plan - A Citywide System Since October 2004, staff has been working on updating the 1998 Colleyville Pathways Plan - A Citywide System. Staff has reviewed the Data Collection and Assessment of Current Conditions Phases. Currently, the Sidewalk Committee is reviewing the first draft of the Colleyville Trails Plan update as part of the Community Involvement Phase. The next two phases are Plan Development/Refinement and Plan Adoption. The final document will be presented to City Council for approval prior to the end of the year. Attachment · 2005 Colleyville Trails Plan- Draft city Of llcg Texas b~.A -1~,. Colleyville Trails Plan June - 2005 An Update to the 1998 Colleyville Pathways Plan - A Citywide System Colleyville Trails Plan A Citywide System l. Introduction and Background 3 2. Goals and Objectives 4 3. Scope of Work and Methodology 5 4. Trail System Resources 7 5. System Development Issues 10 6. Future Trails Network 14 7. Trail Standards 25 8. Plan and Implementation Strategies 27 Appendices 30 Tables 1. Existing Colleyville Trails 8 1 Colleyville Trails Plan A Citywide System Acknowledgements City Council David Kelly, Mayor George Boll, Place I Tony Licata, Place 2 Rich Hendler, Place 3 Jon Ayers, Mayor Pro Tern T om Hart, Place 5 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Jerry Birkes, Place 1 Connie Hampton, Place 2 Vince Rosen, Place 3 Gil Turner, Place 4 Nancy Coplen, GCISD Liaison Pat Horn, Place 5 Bob Leininger, Place 6 Steve Dalri, Place 7 Peter Riis, Place 8 Colleyville Sidewalk Committee Judy Atwood Deena Dendy Earline Kennedy Nancy Jane Langford Gail Manion Dulce Moore City Staff Bill Lindley, City Manager Paul Frederiksen, Assistant City Manager Keith Fisher P.E., Public Works Director Monica Sue Walsh, Parks and Recreation Director Barry LeBaron AICP, Community Development Director Dixie Cawthorne, Communications Manager Colleyville Trails Plan - 2005 An Update to the 1998 Citvwide Svstem Plan 2 Colleyville Trails Plan A Citywide System INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND On September 15, 1998, the City Council approved Resolution R-98- 1414, which adopted the document Colleyville Pathways: A Citywide System, prepared by Bowman- Melton Associates, Inc., and established a plan for the long-range development of a sidewalk and trail system for the community. The 1998 plan represented one of the first efforts to develop a city-wide trail system that was configured specifically to coordinate with the network of neighborhood sidewalks in order to provide pedestrian connections with schools, parks and commercial centers. Over the past seven years since the adoption of the 1998 plan, there have been a number of segments of new sidewalks and trails constructed in the community. In certain locations, these new trail and sidewalk segments have been constructed due to new residential and commercial developments that were required by codes and ordinances to construct new portions of these facilities adjacent to the new developments. Additionally, the City of Colleyville has constructed a number of sidewalks and trails in various locations around the community in response to neighborhood concerns for pedestrian traffic, particularly in those areas where school children walk to nearby school facilities. These sidewalk and trail facilities were constructed using funds available as a part of the City's annual budgeting process or through special project funding that was provided by the City Council. During the latter part of 2004, it became apparent that an update to the 1998 plan was needed to address new locations where future trail segments should be constructed in areas that were not originally identified in the 1998 plan. The new or additional trail routes have become necessary as a result of changing conditions, such as unanticipated residential developments or due to overall planning policy revisions associated with the adoption by the City Council of the 2004 Colleyville Master Plan. 3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES One of the primary goals of the 2005 Colleyville Trails Plan is to identify the future trail network that will serve pedestrians, bicyclists, and other trail users within the various neighborhoods of Colleyville. Potential trail routes previously identified in the 1998 plan have been re-evaluated and revised where applicable based on current information. The 2005 Colleyville Trails Plan will be used as a guide by the community for advising developers of future trail routes that may be required by new developments. Through the use of this document, it is anticipated that local officials will be able to ensure the future availability of trail and sidewalk connections from residential neighborhoods to local schools, parks, and other key destinations within the community, such as shopping areas, work centers, or for recreational purposes. This plan will also serve to coordinate trail projects which cross city boundaries, such as the Cottonbelt Trail, which continues through Hurst and North Richland Hills to the southwest, and through Grapevine to the northeast, further enhancing recreational opportunities for trail users in Northeast Tarrant County. Additional opportunities exist for connecting Colleyville's trail system with trails planned in the cities of Euless, Keller and Southlake. The purpose of this document is to supplement the 1998 plan, not to replace it. This document represents an effort to update the 1998 plan by incorporating those additional sidewalk and trail segments that have been completed and to identify those new locations where trail routes are proposed in order to meet the overall objective of establishing a trail system network that serves the entire community. 4 SCOPE OF WORK AND METHODOLOGY Project Team In the latter part of 2004, City staff determined that the most cost effective method for updating the 1998 Colleyville Pathways Plan was through the use of current staff to perform the necessary tasks, rather than the expenditure of funds to employ a private sector consultant. Initially, the reduced cost of using City staff to update the plan provided a definite advantage over hiring a consultant, since available funding for a private sector consultant was limited. It was felt that the local knowledge and on-site resources available from senior City staff-members would also produce a superior planning document over one prepared by an out of town consultant. The project planning team consisted of representatives from the Parks and Recreation Department, Engineering Department, Community Development Department and the City Manager's Office. The initial effort consisted of determining a scope of work. Subsequently, a planning schedule was prepared and work elements assigned to the various team members. The team began the process by reviewing related documents, such as the 1998 trail plan, Colleyville Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plan and the 2004-2025 Comprehensive Master Plan. Additionally, reviews of trail system plans from other communities were conducted, which provided further information on trail system development proposals. Sidewalk and Trails Inventory An updated inventory of the existing system of sidewalks and trails was made as a part of this update effort. Engineering Department and Community Development Department staff conducted a field survey to update the inventory of sidewalks and trails. From field observations and review of trail resources, the team added new trails and ideas to the plan. Shown on Table 1, Existing Colleyville Trails, is a list of the updated existing trails system. These facilities are shown graphically on the Trail System Map contained in the Appendix section of this report. The project planning team subsequently completed an on-site review and evaluation of each of the future trail routes identified in the 1998 trail plan. Where appropriate, minor adjustments to the trail system plan were made based on the additional input from the on-site evaluations. Citizen Participation and Priority Setting An important element of this trail planning effort is the inclusion of input from the public regarding the needs for future sidewalks and trails. Toward the completion of the final draft document, the planning team met with the Sidewalk Committee to solicit comments on the proposed plan update, particularly regarding the minor changes to the plan that have been incorporated into the final report. Additionally, the planning team met with the Colleyville Parks and Recreation Advisory Board to obtain comments and input regarding the plan and to discuss how the plan coordinated with the overall park and recreation planning efforts for the future. 5 Finally, the plan was presented to the City Council for consideration and adoption as the official trail planning document for the City of Colleyville. During the development of the 1998 plan, the various trail segments comprising the future trail network were ranked and prioritized according to a logical plan for implementation. The proposed trails contained in this updated plan have retained their numerical ranking in order to provide continuity with the 1998 plan. New trail segments that were not on the 1998 trail plan have been placed at the bottom of the priority order. The Trail System Map, contained in Appendix A, illustrates the location of each trail segment and the priority ranking is affixed to the applicable section of trail for reference. A complete system-wide evaluation matrix is reflected in Appendix B. Each trail is listed by a priority and also includes a cost estimate for the trail. Priorities can be adjusted as deemed necessary for needs of the updated plan. 6 EXISTING TRAIL SYSTEM RESOURCES The pathway system in Colleyville basically consists of sidewalk and trail facilities. The majority of the sidewalks are located within residential subdivisions and each section of sidewalk was constructed along the street frontage at the time the home was built on the lot. Most of these sidewalks are four feet in width and are situated adjacent to the residential property line as far from the street pavement as possible. Occasionally, it is necessary to place the sidewalk immediately adjacent to the curb due to narrow parkway widths or due to some other development constraint. When the sidewalk is constructed adjacent to the curb, the sidewalk is widened to five feet to minimize safety concerns. In recent years, there has been some construction of concrete trail section in various locations around the community. Trail segments are typically eight or ten feet in width. Colleyville offers a variety of existing trails that are accessible to many areas, but the trail network is largely incomplete and the lack of continuity is a problem for most trail users. In some locations, existing subdivision sidewalks have been incorporated into the trail network, which has received continued local resident support, as expressed at various neighborhood meetings and public hearings associated with new residential development proposals. In some cases, the alignment of the future trail network is not specifically identified due to inaccessibility or the absence of adequate trail right-of-way. For example, choices will need to be made in the future as development occurs as to which side of a collector roadway or creek channel will accommodate a trail segment. The existing trail system is represented on the Trails System Map with a solid dark blue line. The Trails System Map is contained in the Appendix of this document. At the present time, there are twenty-seven trails, both public and privately owned, totaling approximately 22 miles, which have been identified in this plan and are shown in the following Table 1. 7 TABLE 1 - EXISTING COLLEYVILLE TRAILS PUBLIC TRAIL CONNECTIONS AND KEY REF* DESCRIPTION OR LENGTH PRIV A TE ATTRIBUTES A Schoolyard Shortcut Public 0.04 mile Colleyville Elem. and Middle School-north access B Colleyville City Park Public 1 mile access to central city-wide recreation area paths C Sparger Park trails Public 0.5 mile key east/west linkage along Little Bear Creek D Colleyville Nature Center Public 3.5 miles combination of concrete and natural surface trails E Chisholm Park pathway Public 0.04 mile access to Bedford's Chisholm Park F Kimzey Park loop Public 0.25 mile city park recreational loop path G McDonwell School Road Public 0.8 mile trail connects subdivisions along McDonwell trail School Road to the new Keller Elementary School H CottonbeIt Trail Phase I Public 2.3 miles along former CottonbeIt RR, from Bettinger to John McCain I Pleasant Run soccer walk Public 1 mile access to major youth recreation area J Tara Plantation trails Private 1.5 miles key east/west link K Lakes-of-Somerset trail Private 1 mile Sparger Park access will require bridge L Monticello Lake loop Private 0.25 mile subdivision recreational trail M Big Bear Creek Private 1 mile subdivision recreational trail Monticello trail N Pebble Hill Lake loop Private 0.5 mile subdivision recreational loop path 0 Heritage Colony loop Private 0.25 mile subdivision recreational loop path P Thornbury Clubhouse Private 0.5 mile subdivision recreational path loop Q Brook Meadows path Private 0.5 mile subdivision recreational path R Woodland Hills/Melrose Private 1 mile subdivision recreational path loop S Woodland Hills/Windsor Private 0.5 mile subdivision recreational path loop T Woodland Hills trails Private 1.25 miles subdivision recreational path U Heritage School street Public 0.5 mile wide sidewalk access for Heritage School complex scape V Shalimar Pathway Public 0.33 mile subdivision recreational path W Timmaron Pathway Private 1.5 miles subdivision recreational path X Monterra Pathway Private 0.5 mile subdivision recreational path y Summertree Pathway Private 0.5 mile subdivision recreational path Z Remington Pathway Private 0.5 mile subdivision recreational path AA Emerald Park Pathway Private 0.4 mile subdivision recreational path * Noted on Trail System Existing and Proposed Map, referenced by the numerals indicated 8 Existing, planned and proposed sidewalks Existing sidewalks have been identified as part of the inventory process completed during the early phase of the trail plan update. The existing sidewalks are shown on the Trails System Map contained in Appendix "A" of this report. For the past several years, the City Council has budgeted approximately $50,000 annually for sidewalk construction in areas determined as high priority sidewalks by the Colleyville Sidewalk Committee. The sidewalks constructed with these funds have been generally in those areas previously developer prior to the adoption of ordinances requiring sidewalk construction as properties develop. Creek Corridors Little Bear Creek and Big Bear Creek are two significant creeks that are opportunities to tie in to for trail connections for the Cottonbelt trail. City-owned property There are trail opportunities within close proximity to L.D. Lockett House, Little Bear Creek, Big Bear Creek, Sparger Park and the Colleyville Nature Center. 9 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Trail Planning Objectives Typically, the layout of a trail system within a City will connect areas of concentrated populations, such as residential subdivisions, schools, economic developments, and parks. These trails make it convenient for residents to safely travel from one location to another using these systems. Major trail facilities are generally designed to be located to be between one and three miles apart with minor trails and sidewalks no more than one mile apart completing the network near schools. Corridor Widths Trails are located in designated areas referred to as corridors. These are typically defined by easements of widths varying from 10' to 20'. The wider the easement or corridor, the more buffers that can be created of the surrounding areas. These areas will accommodate trail networks consisting of hard surfaces, usually concrete in nature. The hard surface trails require less maintenance and can accommodate emergency vehicles. Trail Development Along Creeks The City of Colleyville has two major creeks that meander through the City. Little Bear Creek is located on the southern part of the City and flows west to east from North Richland Hills to Euless. Big Bear Creek serves as the northern border between Colleyville and Southlake. These creeks can provide a natural laboratory of wildlife and aquatics. They can also link major population nodes by using the creek as a natural corridor for the trail systems. Trails along the creeks can also be useful as maintenance access points. Creek cleanup and erosion protection are byproducts of good planning and design. They also enhance the creek corridors by accommodating people, wildlife and trees. Incorporating Existing Trails in Established Subdivisions A consistent theme among the citizens in Colleyville is the theory of connecting neighborhoods by using the Little Bear Creek corridor. This would also serve as a connection to the citywide trail network. A careful and strategic plan of cooperation will be required by the citizens to be able link the currently developed areas with each other. Also crucial are the lands that are not publicly owned or managed. At several locations, these areas are critical for linkage to neighborhoods and the overall trail network. 10 Guidance for Land Developers When planning residential and commercial developments, land planners, developers and engineers need to be very aware of the current park master plan. Connectivity to these new developments should be addressed early on in the planning and design process. Coordination with city staff is critical to the success of the trail network. 4 3 3 11 11 14 3 2 2 10 10 2 Open Space 9 9 Buffer Estate Homes 1 2 (-I - '-l I~' I.-r I;' ,..-) (. ( _f Integrating Trails with the Street and Sidewalk System Trails, at several locations throughout the City, will end at major roadways. Special consideration will need to be made to safely design these connection points. The trail plan provides access to all city parks and facilities. The construction of sidewalks along these major roadways will help with the connectivity of the network. Where possible, trails should be safely designed into new projects where adequate right of way is available. The safest points of crossing are areas located at intersections where traffic has to stop in all directions. This provides the safest and most predictable movements of both vehicles and pedestrians. Sometimes, it is not feasible to have trail crossings at intersections. In this case, mid block crossings would be required. The crossings need to be located in areas where the unobstructed site distances are greater than 200' in each direction. Proper signage and lighting is crucial to the safety of the citizens using these crossings. 11 Typical Rural Roadway Cross-Section with Trail Pathway At-Grade Crossings for Pathways and Trails Where trails and roads intersect, at-grade crossings are needed. Key crossings will be located on SH26. These conflict points need to be designed to safely move pedestrians across large roadways. Signage, lighting, and striping will be critical in the project designs. There is currently planned to have two below-grade lighted crossings at both Little Bear Creek and Big Bear Creek. Both will be funded by TxDOT. Sign age and Trail Amenities The addition of signage to a trail route greatly enhances the interest and enjoyment of using a trail, not to mention improving trail safety for those using the trail. Trail signage comes in many forms, such as trailhead and junction signs, which are used to identify trail names, directions, destinations, and distances. Adopting a uniform trail signage design within a community helps to quickly recognize the trail system in all parts of the community. Naming a trail route that has unique and interesting characteristics is another opportunity to generate interest in the trail by applying a customized trail marking system that promotes the unique features of a trail. PLEASE STAY ON EXISTING ROA.DS AND TRAILS There are a number of choices to consider when selecting the materials to be used for a trail signage system. The most typical trail signage system is a routed wood sign, which is usually mounted on a wooden pole. Wooden trail signs appear more natural than metal signs. However, wooden signs require more maintenance than do metal signs. Consideration should be given to provide certain amenities along trail routes or at significant trail junctions. Amenities include benches, restroom facilities, covered shelter facilities and workout stations. The Colleyville trail system contains a large amount of long distance trail segments where the addition of water fountains and benches would add benefits to the trail user. Since many of the long distance trail segments are also adjacent to major roadways, access to existing water lines is relatively easy and would not 1 12 I -1" -" '. require the extension of long service lines. Water fountains corne in various architectural styles in order to meet the different design interests of a community. Trail User Safety and Security Concerns One of the greatest concerns of the citizens is the safety of the trail layouts. Good design principles and thoughtful planning can reduce or eliminate many of these concerns. The frequent use of trails is one of the best deterrents for crime. Little used trails could potentially be a source of concern and need to be patrolled as much as possible. This can be accommodated by volunteer groups of police bicycle patrol units. The proper care and maintenance of the vegetation adjacent to the trails also serve to reduce the potential of hiding places and help maintain long sight lines for users. This will help create a sense of safety. However, it is important to maintain or establish vegetative screening to ensure privacy for nearby residents. Signage and proper lighting are other elements that can increase security along a trail. Posting trail guidelines/rules at trail heads with reminders along the trail lets people know what is expected. For example, trails in an urban environment ultimately intersect and cross the public street system, creating potential safety concerns for trail users caught up in their walking or jogging routines. As the popularity of urban trail systems grows, greater emphasis is being placed on trail signage and safe street crossings. Many communities are installing signal systems, which are designed to warn oncoming vehicles that trail users are near. The design of warning and regulatory signage is very important to the safety of the trail network. The Manual of Uniform of Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and the ASHTO green book will serve as good resources when designing a good trail system. One should note that the use of warning signs should be kept to a minimum or they can lose their effectiveness. Liability concerns Liability lawsuits related to the construction of trails is rare. Although serious injuries on trails are unusual, an overriding fear of lawsuits makes liability a concern for entities that build trails. Regardless of how well a trail has been designed, there is always some risk associated with its use. Poor maintenance, management, and failure to recognize hazardous situations are typically the main cause of lawsuits. Other citizen requests or concerns 13 FUTURE TRAILS NETWORK Trail Priorities When the fully completed trails system is completed in the future, there will be approximately 47 miles of trails that will ultimately comprise the trail network in Colleyville. In order to provide a mechanism for the orderly development of the trail system, each trail segment was prioritized in the 1998 plan based on the following criteria: . Linking residential neighborhoods to parks, schools and other key destinations . Appearing to have development potential based on topographic features . Providing potential connections to other pathways . Public support exists for making the corridor more accessible to foot and/or bike travel Using the above stated criteria, trails were categorized as having a high, medium or low priority, as depicted in the Trail Corridor Evaluation Matrix contained in the Appendix portion of this document. High priority trails would be developed first, with lower priority trails constructed later as funds become readily available. Some trail priorities were accelerated if they serve as critical links to schools or to other higher-in- priority trails, such as the Taylor School Trail that connects students from the Montclair development to a.c. Taylor Elementary School. Trail System Descriptions Each trail segment is named and numbered corresponding to the map, with the lower numbered projects targeted for earlier implementation. The following trail segment descriptions identify the width of the particular trail segment and its overall approximate length based on measurements obtained from City base maps. The anticipated user groups are indicated together with a brief description, including key destinations such as schools, parks, and access to other trails. Key features and locations with significant development issues are indicated where appropriate. 14 Also noted for each trail segment description is a comment regarding the amount of the trail segment that existed at the time the 2005 trail plan update was prepared. The following trail segment descriptions include a brief comment regarding any known major impediment for construction of each particular trail section. 1. Little Bear Creek Trail - West - A 1.0-mile long, 12.5- foot wide trail. This trail links the neighborhoods surrounding Sparger Park to the Colleyville Nature Center trails (D) and provides access from the surrounding neighborhoods to Bransford Elementary School and the Colleyville Boulevard commercial area. . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - the proposed trail will extend along the north side of Little Bear Creekfrom Bedford Road to Mill Wood Drive . Constraints - no right-ol-way or trail easement exist, drainage, and creek erosion . //'\ ~. /;:;A~..../ "~ //~ ~! ~::';// ~I ~/ ./ : ;.----- :"- \ . ...~.. \. .~" ~~ ~,.., J""." \ " v' ! ~t~~ / ~r.; /\ / ~ k:::'///';- / ....... Proposed Trail - the proposed trail will extend from the . . ~/./' /" J ) Cottonbelt Trailway pass underneath SH26 at the Big Bear Creek bridge and connect to the sidewalk at Kimzey Park and the internal path system within the park area Constraints - the greenbelt area situated to the east of Longwood Drive is owned by the City of Colleyville and will accommodate the route of this proposed trail section 2. Longwood Trail- A O.4-mile long, 10-foot wide multi-use trail. This trail provides access from the neighborhoods around Kimzey Park (F) to future shopping areas along Colleyville Boulevard and provides a connection with the Cottonbelt Trail (H). . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail segment currently exists . . 3. Glenhope Pathway - A 0.2-mile long, 10-foot wide trail. This pathway enhances pedestrian safety for the Glenhope Elementary School students in the neighborhood. . Existing Trail - this trail currently exists as a 5-foot sidewalk on the west side of Pool Road . Proposed Trail - the existing sidewalk would be upgraded to a J O-foot trail section in the future along the west side of Pool Road and extend between Twelve Oaks Lane and Independence Road . Constraints - additional right-ol-way will be required and costly retaining walls 15 4. Taylor Trail - A 0.6-mile long, 1 a-foot wide paved trail. This trail provides student access from the Montclair neighborhood to O.c. Taylor Elementary School. , r ...... ,,~,~~ -!-- I I I \ \ u,1 I, \. I I~~ ~ I I~ h !---, \-- >-- I v> ~3JA' J , ~ ' , , . , .' -- Ie--, ~ --....: I I I - !-- - - 'I-- ,- . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - the proposed trail will require an upgrade to the sidewalk through the Ley ton Grove Addition and will extend from the east side of Montclair Drive to Pool Road and along the north side of the 0. C. Taylor campus . Constraints - there is not sufficient right-ol-way through the Ley ton Grove Addition 5. Pool Road Trail - A 0.7-mile long, la-foot wide trail. This trail provides a safe sidewalk environment for students of O.c. Taylor Elementary School. ~ . Existing Trail - portions of the trail route currently exist as a sidewalk . Proposed Trail - this trail will extend along the west side of Pool Road between Hall Johnson Road and Meadowview Drive . Constraints - additional right-ol-way may be required where existing platted developments have not taken the trail into account 6. Colts Neck Spur Trail - A O.l-mile long, la-foot wide trail will extend from Colts Neck Drive to Van Oaks Drive and provide access to the Remington Park Development from Bettinger Drive. · Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - the proposed trail will be located on the south side of Van Oaks Drive . Constraints - right-ol-way is not currently adequate to accommodate the trail route 16 7. Schoolyard Path - A 0.7-mile long, 10-foot wide trail from Pleasant Run Road, through the campuses of both the Colleyville Middle School and Elementary School, connecting with Colleyville Boulevard. . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - the proposed trail will require coordination with GCISD . Constraints - right-of-way along Pleasant Run Road will have to be obtained, drainage issues, GCISD approval needed, pedestrian crossing at railroad will be needed 8. Glade Road Pathway - A 4.7-miles long, 10-foot wide trai 1. . Existing Trail - various small segments of this trail currently exist . Proposed Trail - this trail will extend along the north side of the Glade Road right-of-way from the Madison Place Addition at the western city limits to SH 121 at the eastern city limits . Constraints - creek crossings, tree removal, retaining walls, and insufficient right-of-way 9. Cheek Sparger West Pathway - A 0.9-mile long, 10-foot wide trail. This trail will provide student access to Bransford Elementary. It also will provide access to Sparger Park via the existing Tara Plantation Trails (1). . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - this trail will extend between Colleyville Boulevard and Bedford Road . Constraints - drainage, tree removal and additional right- of- way needed 10. Webb House Crossing - A O.ll-mile long, 10-foot wide trail that provides safer student crossing of the railroad tracks along this busy roadway. . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - this trail along the west side of Bransford Road provides a connection with the Cotton belt Trail . Constraints - costs associated with providing a rail crossing 17 11. Little Bear Creek Trail - East - A 1.3-miles long, 10- foot wide trail. . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - this trail will extend from the northeast corner of the existing Tara Plantation to Jackson Road. Destinations from this trail include Heritage Middle School, Heritage High School, and Sparger Park . Constraints - no right-of-way exists for this trail, 100 year flood plain will require consideration to prevent erosion of the trail, tree removal and retaining walls needed. 12. Church Street Greenwalk - A 0.9-mile long, 12.5-foot wide trail. This trail provides student access to Colleyville Elementary and Middle Schools, and the commercial district along Colleyville Boulevard. . Existing Trail - a portion of this trail currently exists along the south side of Church Street adjacent to Colonial Bank and Lifetime Fitness . Proposed Trail - when completed, the trail will extend from Riverwalk Drive to Colleyville Boulevard, then turn northward along the west side of Colleyville Boulevard and connect with Hardage Lane . Constraints - Permitting through TXDOT along SH26 13. Town Center Greenwalk - A 0.7-mile long, 12.5-foot wide trail. This trail joins the Glade Road Path (8) and the Church Street Greenwalk (12) and provides pedestrian access to the Colleyville Center and Colleyville Justice Center. . Existing Trail - a major portion of this trail currently exists along the west side of Riverwalk Drive from Glade Road to a point just north of the intersection of Riverwalk Drive and Kingswood Lane . Proposed Trail- the only portion remaining is from Kingswood Lane to Hall Johnson . Constraints - none 18 14. Pleasant Run Pathway - A 1.2-miles long, 10-foot wide trail, from Big Bear Creek at the north city limit to the Schoolyard Path (7) at Colleyville Middle School. The Cutter Ridge Pathway (16), the Schoolyard Path and the Cottonbelt Trail (H) also connect to this trail segment. . Existing Trail - a portion of this trail currently exists as a sidewalk along the frontage of the Colleyville Soccer Fields . Proposed Trail - this trail provides access between Pleasant Run Park and Soccer Walks, and the Colleyville Elementary and Middle Schools . Constraints - no right-of-way along Pleasant Run Road 15. Walk to City Park - A 0.6-mile long, 12.5-foot wide trail from Colleyville Boulevard, extending westward along the south side of Church Street to Pleasant Run Road. The trail route then turns south along the east side of Pleasant Run Road and connects with sidewalks in the Village at Colleyville. This trail provides access to Colleyville Elementary and Middle Schools, the Colleyville Boulevard commercial area, and the Town Center and the Village at Colleyville. . Existing Trail - a portion of this trail along Church Street, adjacent to Colonial Bank and Lifetime Fitness, is currently constructed . Proposed Trail - the proposed trail route will follow the realignment of Church Street on the west side of Colleyville Boulevard . Constraints - drainage along Pleasant Run Road and insufficient right-of-way 16. Cutter Ridge Pathway - A 0.5-mile long, 10-foot wide trail. This trail will provide access to Pleasant Run Park and the practice soccer fields. . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail section currently exists . Proposed Trail - this trail will extend from Westcoat Drive to Pleasant Run Road . Constraints - right-of-way will need to be obtained. Construction of this trail may occur as the property develops 19 ~ - 17. Nature Center North Trail - A 0.9-mile long, lO-foot wide trail between the neighborhoods just south of the Cottonbelt Trailway and the trails of the Colleyville Nature Center (D). This trail provides access to the Nature Center, Bransford Elementary School, Colleyville Middle School and the West Little Bear Trail in Hurst. · Existing Trail - no portion of this trail section exists · Proposed Trail - this trail will connect the Nature Center with the Cotton belt Trail · Constraints - no right-of-way exists, street crossing and drainage issues 18. Stafford Trail (ST) - A 0.6-mile long, lO-foot wide trail. This trail will provide access between Sparger Park Trail (C) and the Colleyville Boulevard commercial areas. · Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists · Proposed Trail - this trail will extend from from Glade Road to Little Bear Creek · Constraints - no right-of-way exists 19. Cheek Sparger East Pathway - A 1.6-miles long, 10-foot wide trail along the north side of Cheek Sparger Road linking the southeastern segments of the Tara Plantation development, east of Bedford Road, to Heritage Avenue. · Existing Trail - no portion of this trail exists · Proposed Trail - this trail section will extend from Jackson Road to Heritage Avenue · Constraints - Street crossings, drainage issues, and right of way will be needed at various locations 20. McPherson Loop - A 0.6-mile long, 10-foot wide trail around the east, north and west sides of the City-owned McPherson Dairy. The Dairy Loop also connects with the McDonwell School Road Trail (G), Old Grove Trail (28) and the Westmont Trail (31). · Existing Trail - no portion of this trail section exists · Proposed Trail - the trail will be constructed within the boundaries of McPherson Park · Constraints - no known constraints 20 21. Oakbrook Shortcut - A D.2-mile long, 8- foot wide trail, from Bridge Street that will connect with the Cutter Ridge Pathway (16). . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - this trail will connect from Bridge j> Street to the Cutter Ridge Trail I ~ . Constraints - no right-of-way exists and drainage I I issues 22. L.D. Lockett House Path - A D.2-mile long, 8-foot wide trail extending from the Remington Park Trail (23) at L.D. Lockett Road through L.D. Lockett Park to the Cottonbelt Trailway (H). . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - the trail route will utilize property currently owned by the City of Colleyville . Constraints - the 100 year flood plain will require special consideration to prevent erosion oj the trail 23. Remington Park Trail - A D.6-mile long, lO-foot wide trail, extending from the inner part of the Remington Park Addition to L.D. Lockett Road and provides access to McPherson Park and the McDonwell School Road Trail (G) via sidewalk connections within the Remington Park Development. . Existing Trail- a small portion of trail exists along the western edge of the Remington Park Addition . Proposed Trail - the trail route will extend along the western edge of Remington Park . Constraints - no right-of-way currently exists 21 ~ 24. Heritage Trail - A l.2-miles long, 10- foot wide trail. This trail will help provide a buffer between the residential area to the west and the commercial areas to the east. . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - the proposed trail route will extend from Glade Road to Cheek Sparger Road and will complement a future greenbelt area associated with Little Bear Creek . Constraints - no right-of-way exists and the proposed route will require a costly creek crossing, drainage issues and retaining walls 25. Woodland Hills Extension - A O.1-mile long, 8-foot wide trail extension. . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail segment currently exists . Proposed Trail - this trail will extend from the north end of the existing Woodland Hills Twin Trails to the I Heritage Trail and Heritage Avenue . Constraints - this trail section will require co- ordination with local property owners and the homeowners association to obtain a trail access 26. East Little Bear Creek Extension - A 0.2-mile long, 8- foot wide trail. . Existing Trail - no portion of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - this trail segment will extend along the north side of Little Bear Creek from the Pembrook private trails to the Heritage Trail . Constraints - this trail section will require co- ordination with individual property owners and the local homeowners association to obtain a trail access 27. Power Line Loop - This trail has been deleted from the Trail Plan. 22 28. Old Grove Trail- A O.S-mile long, 10-foot wide trail. . Existing Trail - no part of this trail currently exists . Proposed Trail - this trail section will be constructed by the developer of the Old Grove Addition and will extend from the northeast corner of the Old Grove Development and connect with the McPherson Loop Trail at Providence Road . Constraints - no known constraints 29. Beddo Creek Trail - A 0.7-mile long, 10-foot wide trail. This trail will utilize the sidewalk network within the Whittier Heights Development to provide a connection with the Old Grove Trail (28) and the McPherson Loop (20). . Existing Trail- no portion of this trail exists . Proposed Trail - this trail will extend from Precinct Line Road to the common open space located within the Whittier Heights Development . Constraints - flood plain crossing required 30. Precinct Line Trail - A 2.0-mile long, 10-foot wide trail. This trail will provide inter-city access for Colleyville, Keller, North Richland Hills and Hurst residents to the Cottonbelt Trail (H). . Existing Trail - portions of this trail exist along the frontage of the Bear Valley Community Church . Proposed Trail - this trail will extend from the Beddo Creek Trail at the Keller city limits to the Hurst city limits, located to the south . Constraints - TxDOT permitting will be required 23 31. Westmont Trail - A 0.8-mile long, 10-foot wide trail extending from the northwest comer of the Westmont Addition, the south side of John McCain Road to Westcoat Drive, then south along the west side of Westcoat Drive and intersects with McDonwell School Road. West along the north side of McDonwell School Road and connects with the McDonwell Trail (G) and the McPherson Loop Trail (20) at the southwest comer of the Westmont Addition. · Existing Trail - this section of trail is complete · Proposed Trail - no additional improvements proposed · Constraints - none 32. Windview Clubhouse Path - A 0.2-mile long, 8-foot wide trail. · Existing Trail - no portion of this trail exists · Proposed Trail - this trail will extend from the Little Bear Creek Trail - East and connect with the Windview subdivision clubhouse · Constraints - this trail section will require coordination with the local homeowners association to obtain an easement for trail access, a creek crossing will be required 33. John McCain Trail - A 0.3-mile long, 1O-foot wide trail from Westcoat Drive to Pleasant Run Road. · Existing Trail - no portion of this trail section currently exists · Proposed Trail - the trail route will be situated on the south side of John McCain Road · Constraints - no right-of-way has been dedicated for this trail section, drainage and a creek crossing will be required as a part of this project 34. Stonebridge Trail - A O.3-mile long, 1O-foot wide trail from John McCain Road to the Cottonbelt Trail (H). · Existing Trail - no portion of this trail section exists · Proposed Trail - trail route situated between Warwick Park Addition and the Stonebridge Parc Addition · Constraints - majority of trail will be constructed with development of the Stonebridge Parc Addition 24 CHEEK SPARGER TRAIL STANDARDS Trail Surfaces When the 1998 trails plan was adopted, it included surface design recommendations based on the anticipated use of the trail. For example, there were provisions for natural surfaced trails for certain pedestrian or equestrian trail routes. However, conditions appear to have changed over the past seven years and consideration for equestrian trails has taken a much lower priority than in the past and the need for equestrian trails has essentially been deleted from the 2005 trail plan update. At the present time, all trails constructed in accordance with the City's requirements are poured in place concrete facilities. The adoption of the Colleyville Land Development Code in April 2000 established concrete as the minimum for all trails constructed in Colleyville as a part of the trail system or as a requirement of subdivision development. There still exists in the community a small number of trails constructed with crushed gravel or cinders. Concrete trails are preferred by the Colleyville Parks and Recreation Department because they require minimum maintenance when compared to other surface materials. Minimum concrete thickness is five inches of concrete over a two inch sand bed. This amount of thickness is necessary to accommodate park maintenance vehicles and to provide access for emergency vehicles when necessary. Trail Widths The current requirements for sidewalks and trails are found in the Colleyville Land Development Code. Minimum development standards contained in the Land Development Code require all sidewalks be at least four feet in width, except when the property is adjacent to a collector roadway depicted on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. A sidewalk situated adjacent to a major roadway is required to be five feet in width. The extra one foot of sidewalk helps to accommodate the additional pedestrian traffic along busy thoroughfares and provides and extra sense of safety to those using the walkway. Trail widths in Colleyville are quite generous in comparison to some communities where a four foot asphalt trail may be considered an acceptable standard. The minimum trail widths established in Colleyville have been intentionally set with additional pavement width in order to 25 allow multiple use of the trail by pedestrian and bicycle users in combination, a very common situation in Colleyville. Colleyville's major roadway collector system is primarily an old two-lane county road system with pavement widths of approximately twenty-two feet, leaving very little room for use of the roadway for purposes other than automobiles. Where possible, no trail section should be less than eight feet in width in Colleyville. Furthermore, each section of trail should be situated within a trail easement or right-of-way having sufficient width to provide an earthen section on each side to serve as a buffer. Trails should have a minimum of three to five feet of clear zone shoulder on each side of the trail. For wider trails, the shoulder width should be extended to allow a wider clear zone on each side of the trail. Trail widths and easement widths are shown in the following table. Trail Widths Pavement Width EasementlRight-of-Way Width 8.0 ft. 15.0 ft. 10.0 ft. 20.0 ft. 12.5 ft. 20.0 ft. 26 PLAN AND IMPLEMENTATION Current Sidewalk and Trail Policies Hike and bike trails are a top priority for the cItIzens of Colleyville, according to the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plan. Furthermore, during the development of the 2004 Comprehensive Master Plan, a series of neighborhood meetings confirmed the widespread community support that exists in Colleyville for completion of the trail system. Virtually every neighborhood in Colleyville identified the need to have trail connectivity with other neighborhoods and with the overall trail network. It is essential to implement this updated plan for the benefits of the citizens of Colleyville. The current ordinance for sidewalk and trail requirements is contained in the Colleyville Land Development Code, which was adopted by the City Council on April 18, 2000. It is the policy in Colleyville that every new development, whether it is a residential subdivision or a commercial development, is required to construct sidewalks. Each new segment of sidewalk helps to complete the network of trails and sidewalks that will eventually serve all neighborhoods in the community. Over the past seven years, there has been a large amount of linear footage of sidewalks constructed in Colleyville since the previous Colleyville Pathways Plan was approved in 1998. Those sidewalks that currently exist are identified on the Trail System Plan, contained elsewhere in this document. Subdivision plats submitted for approval are subjected to a thorough review process for compliance with applicable platting standards and development requirements. This process identifies public improvement requirements of the development, including sidewalks and trails. New subdivision plats impacted by a future trail route are required to dedicate either a trail easement or trail right-of-way and construct the applicable section of trail. Occasionally, at the discretion of the City, the developer may escrow funds for the applicable section of trail or sidewalk. The escrow provision allows for larger sections of the trail system to be constructed at one time, rather than having small scattered sections of non-connected trail segments. There have also been considerable segments of the trail network constructed over the past seven years. Many portions of the trail system constructed in Colleyville in the past have generally been built as a result of new development, which has occurred through the application of the Colleyville Land Development Code. Some segments of the existing trail network have also been constructed using funds from the Parkland Dedication Fund. 27 Undeveloped Lands A significant obstacle preventing maximum implementation of the trail and sidewalk network is the uncertainty of knowing when the undeveloped lands located in the northwest part of the community will eventually develop and provide the opportunity for the construction of additional trail segments. This uncertainty creates great concern for the ultimate completion of the trail network. Compounding this issue is the scattered nature of those small vacant tracts that prevent connectivity of the trail system. Many of the available large tracts of land in Colleyville have already developed, leaving numerous smaller and more difficult parcels for future development. While the availability of vacant rural tracts continues to diminish in Colleyville, due to the rapid urbanization of Northeast Tarrant County, there is also a growing trend by a few property owners of small acreage tracts to hold on to the rural qualities and character that tract acreage brings in the heart of the DFW Metroplex. It may become necessary in the future for the City of Colleyville to utilize the eminent domain authority to purchase trail easements in order to complete a missing segment of the trail network. Trail development along undeveloped land The staff team that worked on this document is continually working with developers, homeowners associations, park land dedication funding and sidewalk requirements to implement the plan. Operations and Maintenance Maintenance of a trail is critical to its service life. Trash removal, mowing and edging schedules as well as repairs are required to enhance the life of the trail. Estimating Costs Actual construction costs for a typical concrete trail is estimated to be approximately $8.00 per square foot, which calculates to $422,000 per mile, provided there are no obstacles. Many experienced trail construction professionals, such as those associated with state and regional planning agencies state that concrete trails can cost as much as $22 per square foot or 1.2 million dollars per mile for a ten-foot wide trail, when bridge facilities, retaining walls, drainage structures and major environmental work are involved in a particularly complex trail project. 28 Funding Strategies There are a variety of funding opportunities at the federal, state and local levels. Transportation Enhancement Act- A Legacy for Users (TEA-LU) Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Enhancement Act (SAFETEA) Statewide Transportation Enhancements Program (STEP) - next call for projects is anticipated for 2005 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) - next call for projects is anticipated for 2005 Surface Transportation Program (STP) - next call for projects is anticipated for 2005 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) Foundations and corporate grants General obligation bonds General Fund expenditures Sidewalk fund Parkland Dedication Funds V oluntary Park Fund 29 APPENDICIES A Map of Trails System ~ Existing and Proposed B Trail Corridor Evaluation Matrix C Bibliography 30 ~= Q . g:~ '" . rJJe - '" Q U ." ~ .. e ;::: '" ~ oS bll " '" .J '" " .! '" ... " " Q '" oS .. c. :! -= ~ Q Ilo< ." '" ." > = To. '" ~ ';;'" .:.: .. ; ~ c.'" .'; '" .- "0 ~ Q ... ..c e ~ e Q '" x 'C ..... ~ ~ = o .... ..... ~ =' - ~ > ~ :... o "0 .... 100 100 o U - '" .. '" ~ '" ... " Q 's ..c To. ;~ Q rJJ ... '" ... ~ ; "'" .5 ~E 't~ Q Z - .... ~ :... E-- ~ X :e = (l,) Q., Q., < ~~ c.'lt .- ~ '- ~ ~ ~'C Ilo< :r: 's co ~ E ~~ t ~ e!'.:.: ~<; Vl ~ $I:;3 ,- '" 1'!." - .... ti ~ 'E2 ... '" ~~ .... . '" '" ~~ ;Z:b '0 ~ ,g ~ 'e u '" '" Vl c e ~U g -= d) U sa] ~z~ ~"'''' .,,-- ~ '~.~ ~~.2 ~oo o:lUU ... e .. z '" .... ~ ~ .::: .... ~ Q. ..... C 'j:; o 'j:; ~ .; To. E- oS '" Ilo< ~~ :r: i7J2 0] 's ..;- o ." 1a -$- ,,- p,~ ;>," '" 0 N~ 6 0 ,- u ~ 0 C()- ,S 6 'in '" '~ 't; '" >- '" € ~ ~ '" " ::: g ~:::: 8~~ ~ la Il.. ;>, '" i E ~ ':2 U.;l " la 'Cd a... U " u '" :2~ ~-= '" " '" ~ " '" 0::0: ~ " Il.. .... '" e!' " p, Vl ~ " Il.. i7 N 8 :;2 '" .... '" <;; ;z: ~ '~ is ~~ o ... uU ~ ... ... u ~ t:; ... ... o:l~ ...- B '<;j :.:l~ 's '" o c ... 6 " o .... ';; " '" ~ '" ::: ... ." "'0 '" 0 ...,;:: u u 1a '" ..c .... '" " ~ ~ OIl Oi -.;.: -" ... '" >- ... -"" " .... " ::: u .8:-;:: t;a '0 e (l) u,...o:l '<;j .... ,... ." o o ::: 'S' o -l '" :r: :t: 's '0 o ~ ~ '" ~ o o ,;:: u Vl .... o >. ~ o o ,;:: u Vl t' " c ... 8 ... w ... p, o ,;:: " ... 6 ." " o ~ ... u " '" ." " ... 0. .:s .= '" 1a -l '" ~ o '" > "i) ::: ,... >- " ::: -s " Il.. ... 0. o ,;:: " ... 6 t<", :t: 's r-- o .::: <;; Il.._ ." ,- .... i:! ~f- g.g ,;:: ,. ~f- o o ,;:: , u - rJJ 0 t',g " u _rJJ " '" "'- 6'" d):'2 w:2 .... '" 0_ ~~ f-;>' , '" u::= , 0 ou ." " ~ o o Il.. '" > 'C o .... '<;j u C o :2 ';; ~ 5 ~ ,... ..;- :t: 's o -:'0 o 0 0,;:: ,;:: u UVl Vl '" 8'0 ...." ~~ o ... >.2 ~ ~ . ... u::= , 0 ou ::: ... ";:;: ::: .g '" " > ~8 " ~ ~ oii ~.Q .,,- ,,- o " ~:r: g g Il..<l:: ';; ~ ." " o ~ o o Il.. <r) :t: 's r-- o :t: 's r-- "'" >- " ~ ~ :::: . ~ _ ~~oo;::: r. U ~~l-";jro~ .$ ~",f-:::~" ... ,;:: :::,;:: "..c::: ~ t:g-g%S~~ r/1 ~~~o~::-=-o '" 0 ... .... " 0 ,- ,g ::s+-,=~::soEu ~~...,,~{Jf-Vl ......:::Uu-(/J(l)(l) ~(/)~t=~5~~ " ,8 El ::: ,,- 'C 'C ~cd~O~~iUdo) Il..:2Zf-Il..f-:r::t: '<;j .... f- ~ " Il.. '" o on " 's ... ~ o 0 o 0 ~ -5--5-=-u (/J g (/) 8 t ~{J ~{J ~ ~~=~8 E~ E~] ~~@~~ ~~~~~ .~'~.~.~.~ ~~~.2~ '0'0000 uuuuu ... > 'C o '" ~ '" o " '" > '" > 'C o ~ U ... Z j!J '0 u '<;j .... f- .... '" 0. Vl ~ U ... Z ." -:S a'~ '" ...~ 0.... co.:: .,,"'- ;;~;] i'~ t 0""":"'0 ,;:: U " " " 0 (/) :"='-0.. j!J '0 U '0 '0_ o 0 ,;:: 0 u';:: U) " _ >> Vl, 8.....:.... {J8~~ (/)"8e1:: ~ [/) ... g ::g,;::wl3 ~,S!l....w ... ~~"2 ~5~~ '5'E ~ ~ :r::r:Oo:l ." > co ~ ';:;: >- ~ '0 u ... '" " ... > <: ~ ~ ';::: '" :t: ~ " ~ ~ '" " '" 0:: ... ;- 8 -'" ... '" u ... ." '" 6 >- '" ::: ..c <;; Il.. ." '" o 0: ... ] 6 r-- co :r: 's 0\ o '<;j .... f- '" .S ~ ~ ~ "'Il.. ~ ~ Il.. OIl " .... .... '" " p, f-Vl '" -=-'u o \3 o 8 ...c 8 ~bl 0 1: ~ ~ "'."." E::2g ~:2~ ~... ... .,,-- 2'~'~ ~~~ ~oo o:lUU ." '" o 0: "2 <S ." ... o:l -d > co ~ } '0 U :r: 's o '" -'" -;; ~ :>:.t " u ~ g '~ (/J ~ 3 ,,0: ~E o 1Jl ~ '" 85: '0 o ..c . u- U) 0 o ~{J <3 _ Vl 0 ~~'"5 8::g[/) @ ~ ~-'g ~~:2~ .-.- (l) '-' ~~5~ ;::::::='C ~ o 0 do) \- uu:r:o:l o ('<) C() +-' .5 - '" '" '" -"" 0 " .... oU 16>- u ~ ,,-- o'a (I)~ OIl .:= .~ ... '" -"" 0 " .... ou 16 ~ u ::: "-- o ,- '" :i~ - '" ... 3: .... ... e!' '" rE~ ~ ::: ...-s ,;:: '" Ull.. ~ '" ~'S' .f:J'Vi ~ e 3:u 0-, ~ "Cl .. "Cl E: ; ~ ~ ~ ; ~ Q..'" .-; '" .- "0 ~ o .. .c E rJ:J E o " ~ ... .. ..... ~ ~ = o ... ..... ~ = -; > ~ .. o "t:l ... .. .. o U .... '" ~ ~ ... c ~ Os = ~ 0.... en .... '" .. ::: ~ J... .5 ~ E t:~ o Z - - .; .. E-- ~ ~ :s = QJ Q. Q. < ~ Q..;j; .f ~ ~ ; ~ a:';: Q., 1::$' o . g;~ " . en~ .... '" o U "Cl ~ '" ~ '" ~ .c "Sj, c .. ...l '" c ~ " .. c c o " .c -:; Q.. :3 -= .. '0 Q., .. E '" Z .; ... I- '5 '" Cl. :r: 's '" ~ '@ ,- .>< ~ " ~"" ~~':::-d'~a ..c 'a E ~ t: ~ g~I-~~~ C/)!::::: I- 0;;;> =.9 ~ E I- t: ::s Cti ~ 0,) E ::l ~<=COU~~ ~O:-EBU~ ~~;J:a~~ O:::~ui~~P: :r: 's 0-, 6 :r: :r: :r: 's \0 6 :r: 's <n 6 ~ ~ ~~..d' ~ ~ ~~~ :r: ~ c:~ ~ ~ ~~ og~z~~t ~ 'C = ~ ~ a'3 5':~J;l.=:co ~g=g~~ ..c: B ~...J g.~ 'b~~ot:-: ~~O:::-i8~ :r: 's 0-, 6 :c :r: 's r-- 6 's "1 'g \0 6 's '" -" -; i$ " . '" .c '" ~o "Et) " ~ ;>,- ~ r/l g ,5 .c " rJ:J::E .. ~ <Zi .c ~ " .c ~ U oj '" "' ro i$ ~ .;g ';; ~6-B~~ o..e&:_o... ~E-""d]"E "'~ ""0,::::""" ro~= c:21Sb~~~U k) goo.. 0 c:: = ~ ~ ~ ,e ~ ~ g UUr/lUr/lOI- ::E 's \0 6 <Il .. .~ ;>,- ".- i$ " .cl- --" " '" Cl. ~ "U ~ ~ - '" "CO ill '" ,,- .. t: O:::;J " 0. " u "'~~ ~ ~ 'a 'e ~ ....: ~ ~ t- E- r./) '-..s:: ...::: ~~o ::iE-:tt3Cti - 0 e E- 'C; 0... 0... .~ti:-5]E-~~ ~~ ="'OCI)[-~~E:-g~ ~a~~:::Uo~~ Cl.:a""ooE........ roo.B.B "Ot)~E ~oQ)Q):9~o::s'5 1-~:r::r:oco~UU g ~g ~ g g g ~ "0 ~ g ~ ~ g ~ ~ g ~ g ~ g t g g .~ ~"' g~. c.cEc.cE c"<=c"<= c"<=5 fjfjE rJ:Jg....:::: ~2 ~~~~~~.><~~~~ ~.><~~~~~~~ ~~2~ ~rJ:J 5:g"gE:g"g~E:gE:g o.~E:gao:g:g"g 5~rJ:Jg ~~-"~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~z~~~~-"5~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~ OJ OJ '-'-'-'-'-'-......'-'- -.- I- ~ ......'-'-'- u._._._ OJ OJ U OJ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ " '" a ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ __~iUQ)ll)I1)l1)iUU'lI1)ViUQ)O"'s:flOOQ)Q)Q) d)11Jll.)'C____ ~~~888888~8888G~~888J888~~~~~ '@ '- " .... o ~ E- .... I- " E Ol),S o .5 E U t} = ~.~ 0: '" >. ~ ::: -= ..... ~ Q. M >. ..... .j;; o OJ;; ~ " " o ~ c: o <Il -" U ~ <Il <Il '- '" o " o ~.~ -;>~ :a ~ E " '" ,- <:.-1- ~.~ ~ c:2 s..;J <Il " u..l '" '" ....-" Ci5~ ..<= i$ u " .... " ;:;l .. ..<= .... UO .... ,- " ~ ~I- ",-" - " :3~ - - B -0 ;> iii ~ :-: 11) ~g) ~"E o " u:r: ("'oj " " " ...l " o o i$ <Il Ol) " Q - 0:; >> on " c: ~ 0_ t: ,- o ~ UI- " o <Il " ..<= o ....., " '@ U u ~ " ..<= .s; -; :r: .... '" == '" " U i$ " " i$ ~ o .... 1-0 c: " 0: <= 1:; ill ~ "..<= '" - - " 0...0... .... :! -0 ;> iii ~ '~ ~ '0 U " " 0: E " <Il " '" p: -1:: " 0... o o B -" -; ~ <n ~ "" " o 0: " " 0: E " <Il " '" p: '" .:: o ~ o ~ <Il .. ~ .. Ol) " C2 1:; a:; i$ - ..<= '5~ UCl. \0 ~ " a " z ~ '~ .... .. 2 = c o '" UU 0:; ;>, on " " ~ 0_ t: ,- o ~ UI- ..<= t:: o Z .... '" <= '" U ~ ::s:-;::: ~~ r-- -" '" ~ U a t:j '" " co~ "'- ~ 'e ...ll- '" " " '" > <: '" Ol) 'E '" :r: "" " o 0: .. "" " 6 ~ o -~ 'e "E 1-<.8 """ .... '" "co I-~ '@ ~ "2 <E '- " <Zi '" " u..l .... '" 2!l " ~~ ~~ ]~ Uo... 00 0-, ~ '0 o ..<= u"": r/l 0 , 0 c"<= .s~ ::: " "'- E:g '" ,- ~::E '0 o ..<= ~8 c"<= .s ~ ~ ..2' ~ ~ ~ ~5~~ ,,~ ~ t: ~~~] ....._._ u ~ ~ ~3 ~::a::aq o...UU...l ~~ ';;: '> ;>,;>, 22 '0'0 UU .. ,:: o ~ o ~ .. ~ 'e I- .. ;> ::: o "" i5 0. o o ...l " :il .... '" ..<= 0... u ::E o ("'oj ::E 's ("'oj 6 '0 o ..<= u r/l 0:; i$ " 8"g ~~ tl ~ <Zi '" Ol) :g c:i5 ::; u t:: o ..<= r/l -" o ::: on -" " o ("'oj ::E ::E 's ("'oj 6 's \0 6 ..<= . ~ ~ 'e ~ ] ~ "I-~ .I-:g ~-1::Z 0.....0 " " '@ g i5.:r: ~Cl.~ ...lr/l~ ....=_a.r=...::..::v "ilB~6~~~ .g~.g....a:;Z3 0'- 00"<= <Il ~E:t::"OOo.;::ci 8~8i5~8-i o ~ " 6~ ''" ~ CI~ c .. 0-" <Il U .... 0 ~...l Cl. ' uCl ::E-i " " o ~ 0:; ;>, on " C i$ g::: o ~ UI- tl -" u o ...l o -i "g o ~ '0 o ..<= u r/l 0:; i$ " o ca"g ::E~ '" -" u o ..J o -i " <Il " o :r: t: '" -" u o ...l 0-5 . " ...lCl. '@ ~ -1:: " Cl. c: o bb c: 's '" ~ ("'oj ("'oj .... ("'oj .....~ ...:c Q . ~~ =' . CIl~ ..... '" Q U 'C '" 'C; 'S ~ :2 :2 :2 ...l ...l ...l ...l ...l ...l ...l ;S 'Ej 'Ej 'Ej 'g 'Ej 'Ej 'Ej 'Ej 'Ej '8 ~ = ~ - N V) r- 0 00 N "1 !"'1 '" ...l - 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 '" = ~ '" '" = = Q '" .c 'C; Q, :3 ;: ~ Q =- 'C '" -g t '" ~ ,;; '" .:.: '" ; ~ Q,'" .~ '" .- -; ~ Q '" .c = ciJ = Q '" ~ .... .. .... ~ ~ = ~ .... .... ~ = - ~ ... ~ .. ~ ~ .... .. .. o U ..... '" '" '" ~ = ... = Q '2 ;S ... = ~ Q [Jl - '" '" ~ ~ ... = Q '2 .c ... t:~ CI z - .... ~ .. ~ ~ ~ :a = ~ Q., Q., ..( - -~ ;-~ .~ ~ ~.;: =- ,,' .~ - " ~ ~ UJ x _UJ:-::: ,- " ~~r: ~ r- 8 '" '" '" ~:::co u:r:'" ~-g:g '" "...l a:l_ '" ","0 '" _ 0 '" j:j 0- :J~~ o o .c . u- r/Jg....:-:::: c.c o.;g .;g~~~ 5~b5 ~ 5~ ~ ~ Gi~:r:< ~~~~ i3,ggg 'C 'C 'C 'C 11) Q.) a; Q.) :r::r::r::r: .... '" bJJ l; "'- r/J i'"d '" " .c 0 u~ -g o ~ '" -g 6 '" = '" z rI) ~ ~ ~ .:= ..... tIS Q. l"I ~ ..... .... - o ... - ~ '(;; ~ '" bJJ .~ '" :r: '" ... E-< ;S '" =- " o 'in '" " -.t'Q ..-:... Q) ~~.- 0,) .. t< "0 -.- bJJ:-::: UJ ~~~:g~~ :;:-'<1;"2....~ --11)Q.)~a'3~ ~~co:-=co::: "u","",:r: ~l;E~'E"O ",,,,:J,,,:J@ 5~~5~;a 'C - 11) ,- Q.) 0 :c3~~~~ '0 0 o 0 .c . .c . rJS8_rJ58_ c-5 g c-5 g roCl:l..cro(l1~ 5~~~2~ 5:sl~ 5:sl~ Gi:2::cGi:2::C ~~~~~~ S;SSg;SS 1-0 ~ 1-0 ... """ l- Q) l1) Q.) <I.) Q.) Q) :r::r::r::r::r::r: '" ::l = '" ;> <( '" bJJ z; 'C '" :r: bJJ ,5 ~ ,~~ "'"0 ..... " o " "0- ="0 vo:: o " i~~ ~ ::c "0 = = 0 " ,- - '" "0 = o '" 0- ~&j "<T N V) N '" ::l = '" > <( '" bJJ 'E '" :r: >- " :;: ~ " I>- = '€ " :2 = o 'in = .... ~ " x "'UJ a:l_ -E .~ ,_ E- ...l-,< _ '" '" '" " .... UJU 'C! N '" .c ~ E :;: 0 -<.l: 't; "'0 j:; '" :E~] E-"OI>- "'- o .3 '" = ',.3 .... '" ~ o I>- r- N ';$ 0.. ~ g -,<...l ~ g U ~ .g~ 13~ a:lZ -'< .... " I>- = o '" .... '" .c I>- u :2 8s .c bJJ u = ~ '6 ~~ ,,- ~ o " :;: ~]~ z~d': "0 8 c ';; 3 :8 '(;; ~ = ~~ ~ :2 gj '" .EE:~~ g. ~,"~z.3 .~ E- '" > o o "0 <5 00 N '@....:-9-0 E- '(;; 0 ~~...J ;J ~ 5 t) 8 t ,:: o.c ~~~ ~o:2 ~ " I>- = ~ '" .c I>- u Z 'OJ ~ '" ;> o o "0 <5 '@ E- '" = :J 1:) = 'u '" ~ 'OJ ;3~ f ~ E-< '" .;<:a:l ~~ U,<;:: o...l "0- "0 '" ~~ 1il ~ :r: B .... ~ " ::.: E o <.l: o 'y .... ~ ..= ::? '" .- '" E .... ,- U ...l .... >-" _ '" (5a:l -~ ~ j:j ::l ,- :r::::- 'OJ ~ ..:.: '" '" u o "0 "0 '" a:l 'OJ ~ -'< '" 1:: U o "0 "0 '" a:l 0'> N >- " :;: '.c "'-- o " 01>- ...l '" = bJJ ~~ ] ti 1>-- ~8 o o .c u- r/J g c.c .s~ = '" "'- -iE:g ~ Q.).- I>-Giz = '" '" 0-- ~ '~'~ .c '" '" 1>--- .goo ""UU o o .c u r/J 0:; :;: '" 8-g u 0 z~ -g o ~ = '(;; U u Z = .c ~ 'e E- '" = :J 'OJ .... E- E o ~ ~ '" " UJ '" 'e ~ E-,g -'<.0 ~-5 U '" .... '" ~ .~ a:l is.. ~E .-::: 0 ...l<.l: ;;::, " :;: = '" 1:: o~ .... " i"J1>- a:l ~ ~ ~ j:j " ,- "'- ...lr/J :;: 1A '" ::l ,- 0 >.c ].g ~O ..:.: '" '" u .... " - d5~ "'- :E .~ ...lE- '" '" ::l o .c .0 ::l U :;: '" '> "0 =.c ~~ N '" 'OJ ~ 1:! o E 1il '" ~ >- " Z 'OJ ~ - 0:; .0 = o 15 U u " 'u 1:: I>- o '" - '" ~ " I>- = o ~ '" ..c I>- u :2 ~ 0:; ~ .... '" u u o r/J = ::l ~ E " '" " '" a: o M "0 " o ~ = ::l ~ E " '" " '" a: 0:; >- .0 " '" ~ .9;::: - " o .... UE- '" o B '" '" ~ "0 " o ~ = 'OJ U u Z '" .c o -. 'OJ .... E- = 'OJ U u :2 = .c .s: 'OJ ~ '" bJJ "0 'C .0 '" " o Ul '" '" "<T !"'1 ...___................_..._._. _m,_"__~,,,__,___,_,_,,'_"M'__.~_'.~~ .-- APPENDIX C. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Colleyville Pathways A Citywide System - January, 1999, Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc., in association with: Carter and Burgess 2. The Colleyville Plan-A General Plan for Growth and Development 2004-2025 - September 2004 - City of Colleyville 3. Colleyville Land Development Code - April 18, 2000, City of Colleyville, Texas 4. Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan - December, 1999, Carter and Burgess 5. Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan Update - July, 2002, Carter and Burgess 30 PRE COUNCIL CC@miB AGENDA BRIEFING 14::,>:,\$ MEETING DATE: 07/19/05 CITY MANAGER: ITEM # : PC-4 DEPARTMENT HEAD FINANCE REVIEW I Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: FINANCE SUBJECT : Presentation of the Monthly Financial Report - June 2005 General Fund The percentage of current year taxes collected is slightly below June 2004 collections by .10%, and delinquent tax collections are greater than the prior year's delinquent collections. Sales tax revenue received in June was down $8,284/6.42% over the amount received in June 2004. Thirty-one residential building permits were issued in June as compared to twenty-five issued in June 2004. As was noted in the May report, Municipal Court revenues are now down due to a lower number of citations written in May and June. The average amount expended by the departments at the end of June is 66.0%. Utilitv Fund Year-to-date water usage is now greater than the prior year's usage due to dry conditions during the spring months. The average amount expended by the Utility Fund at the end of June is 61.8%. Attachments · June 2005 Monthly Financial Report MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - JUNE 2005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................................ 1~~:~~_~]II!i!iii R!liNRig$.P9R~g i:iiii::i:: ','.',',',',',' '::<:<'\\::.:...,.i,:REe.EiivEDii:::::RRQJ:gP.T~P:: "" ,::i:agpSlVgP: ::ii:i':i:i::i ',",',',', .,','..i,:.:,:..,:.:,:.:,:.:.:.:,...,..."..,I.I,I.I,1.1,1.1.1.:.I.i.B::Ft,:;L':':,.Di,200,:'~,:"i.;i..~,.~.'.:.:.I.I.:.i,I.I.I.I.i.i,i.:,I.I,I.I.I.II.I,i.I,:.,I,I.1,1.1,1.1,!.j,i.,:I..:l.,:I:m,'~,::::~$.,:;,t,IQ.::.L,f=,::,:II~i:,:..,..I.!.I.!.i.!.i.!.I.:.:.:.I.:::::;:. ~,:,:,:',:.i,!,i'As.,.",'~,,:.,'.,','.,'O",",,'.,.,':,~'i"~:P,::,.'::O,'...,~:".O",.,'..:,.,'~,:.,!.",:@:.",,:',iA~':~F::'.,:' ..'.,'.',',',,,'.'.'.'.'.'..,....'.....'....,,,,,,,,'.....'.'.'.'.' "'-f. ...:11;:;.:1.. ' w.:o;H;l{'~~ '" lat.., f,":;" . <;l: .:..,.:.,.,:":,:".,:"':,.,:,.,..:,,.,:,,..:,..'...,"..i..i,:.".,:,..:".,_..,..',.,...',,:,:,:,.,:,.,:,',:,.,:,',,',:,2,',',':,,004,:,:,,',:,:,,':,,:,::,:,':,::,',::,..,', ......................................:...:......................................:.:..........,.........................:.: .......................................... ......................................... ......................................... . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... . . .. . . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ......................................... ...........,............................. ::::::::::::::::::::;:;:;:;:;:;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ......................................... ""'...""'.'.......p....e...R... C" "S...N'''[:''''''..........'' ........... . . ........ ........... .. .. ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........, ........... . . .. . ........ '::.~.~[ Current Taxes Delinquent Taxes Penalty & Interest $7,280,321 60,000 38,000 ...................................'.........................................',.......,..'....,.,...,...,.,.,.............,...,.. mqie;~:~Q,Me.~QR~.!t~gl;l. ..... .... $7,227,879 60,093 43,931 $7,141,995 55,000 34,042 $6,804,111 57,219 38,819 6.23% 5.02% 13.17% '''''''. ::.:,,::::.:::.:.:::::.: :::.::.:::::17;~7~;~'.:.::.:::.:::.:::::~z;j@.j;iq~::::::..:~f;l~':~g~~:i:.~:.':.::..I;~Q;."~; TXU Electric $780,000 $775,974 $780,000 $765,142 1.42% Tri-County Electric 65,000 69,654 65,000 57,513 21.11% TXU Gas 175,000 235,814 175,000 253,519 -6.98% Southwestern Bell 107,165 80,649 80,374 79,351 1.64% Verizon/Others 60,000 44,964 45,000 42,809 5.03% Refuse/Recycling 88,000 70,214 69,500 68,357 2.72% Cable TV 119,500 102,485 89,625 70,076 46.25% TOTAtFRANCHJ:sETAXES:; . .'.~.~.~.~ .~.'.'.:.:.:. ~.:.'. ~.'.~.~,:.~.~. :'~ .~,~,~.:.~.:.:.~.~.~ .....~...~. ~.\ '.', ........ ',' .',' .......~.' ...... .......... . '. :':::::.:.:.:.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.:' .........,............... .'.'.'.'...........-.-.....-...-.-.-.-.-.-.-.....-.-........-.-.-. .;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;...;.....;...;.;.:-:-;.;.:.:.:.;.;.;.;.;.;.;...;..... 11)~;~:::::::::::::;::::j:fi.Wl~i.t~#.1ji)ii:i:::::i~M~Q\1;:f:'~t j. ::[$M~~1;1~1 . ....... . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............................., ................ .............. Sales Tax Mixed Beverage Tax $1,695,600 50,000 'T......O.......T......AL'..."..,'}S.....iAL.,..."..,.,g......S......""T......~,..."..,..."'" ....... ... . .... .... . ..' ............. ....... . .... . ....... '. ...... ::;:..;:;.....;:;..:;.;:;.....:.:::...:...:::.......:...:.:.....:::::..:..:::...:;:..;:::: ."., ::::.[:[:[::::..:i..ii1:iZ4.iiB': $1,320,354 36,426 $1,186,920 37,500 $1,168,156 27,601 13.03% 31.97% .............................. ......... ..... . ..... ...... ............ ...... ..... .... i::i.i:iiM!:i~~il~9..: :::::::::::::::::.IMg~#i;#~W:./:!,::,:,:..::.:..:$.1:;:~i$~jl~~.. ...........................;-:.:.:.:.:.:.: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::':':':'" Building Plumbing Electrical City License Building Plan Review Fee New Business Animal Sign Permit Fence Permit Fire Permits $705,186 $667,702 $528,890 $753,165 -11.35% 112,923 99,219 84,692 125,038 -20.65% 71,628 93,280 53,721 78,090 19.45% 47,551 45,225 35,663 46,860 -3.49% 160,000 100,667 120,000 134,650 -25.24% 2,900 2,820 2,175 2,021 39.53% 3,120 1,736 2,340 1,680 3.33% 7,000 4,155 5,250 5,790 -28.24% 5,400 6,075 4,050 5,565 9.16% 7,500 8,350 5,625 9,050 -7.73% +Pi#;g::@P$.N$,~$,i:i~:iiiiRMrr~::i:i.'.:"..,.,....,',.,':::.,..:i:i::ili;:j:l;gl.::::::!::::::$ti.q~ii.g!~:j: Fines False Alarms Library Fines $510,000 7,500 8,500 4.%+j;(:EIj(~f;S""'" ~~~~~~R~~~~M~~~t~..~'~., :...~ .......:.:.:.:.:.:... " $332,501 o 12,159 .......................... ... j:.':::J.ili~lq~: $382,500 5,625 6,375 :::i1;Ji1:;~Qi $336,812 1,300 5,030 -1.28% -100.00% 141.73% ........:.:.:.:.:.:. :i.::.:~~m;.':.m$~f.li89~M;.:'ij~i~~QQ ...:,::':m~;1#? .:.:.:.:.........,.:.:. .::;::::::::::::::::.:.:..' ......................................... .....'.................................... --_.__...._.._----_..._~"_..~'--.,,~..._..~.~.,-,-~'....................~................~,--~---....__..~.." MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - JUNE 2005 ~J:~:r.~ Re-zoning Plat Fee/Site Plan Board of Adjustment Sale of Material Weed Mowing Animal Impoundment Ambulance Recreation Program Non-Resident Fee Parks Field Use Charge Engineering & Inspection Chgs & Reimbursements Community Center Rental Library Building Rental Lot Drainage Insp Fee $14,000 13,500 1,500 2,000 3,500 2,889 95,214 124,895 23,000 20,000 80,000 9,000 175,000 300 21,250 Tmit~g:~mfllii.:.f;lg::ii!m~i:::.::::: .... $8,053 16,000 1,500 2,177 1,395 3,426 89,011 97,912 14,270 21,535 79,610 5,711 144,359 250 24,125 _:' . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............................. :':':':':':ee.OeiVEO:' ::::::::::::::::: _Ii 10,500 10,125 1,125 1,500 1,000 2,167 71,411 103,000 17,250 20,000 60,000 6,750 131,250 225 15,938 $9,850 16,031 750 1,549 3,072 1,663 91,228 105,654 18,380 24,120 88,105 4,741 143,749 75 29,375 " .... ............................. .................................. ........................................... :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.;.:::::::::::;;::::;:::1jQi;~!~::::::::::::::::~~~;j19:::::.:~~j;1I~: DARE Officer Reimb $73,872 T9it~Y!N~~RgYiBNM~fli;@:: ~~~~~~~j~]~~f~j~j~j:j::~f:f~~:j;;;;;;;;:;:;:::::::::::::: $0 $0 $0 ......................................................'.............. :;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:::::::::;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:;:;:;:: !!!il~~I~~~'i ......."""I;;I:lI<:M~E.......... :~:}}i:i::yl:~:~:~..:.:.)?::r:::: -18.24% -0.19% 100.00% 40.54% -54.59% 106.01 % -2.43% -7.33% -22.36% -10.72% -9.64% 20.46% 0.42% 233.33% -17.87% 0.00% :::imij,iI.: . ........,.... ........... ..........,'...'"..............,.,'...................'. Sale of Surplus Property $10,000 $0 $0 $11,600 0.00% Interest Income 170,000 96,878 70,000 82,404 17.56% Miscellaneous 33,000 43,913 36,115 22,528 94.93% Use of Fund Balance 1,019,744 0 0 0 0.00% Celebrate Colleyville Contributions 11,000 8,950 11,000 8,100 10.49% Tower Rental 49,000 71,368 45,000 49,909 43.00% TQrAIili:M1$Q~4.~P.Q$::;::::::: .... .. ....,.,'... . . , , :::::::::;;;;;::::::::::;:::::;:;:;:::,:.:.' , $1,2.9;2,7.44. Transfer from Utility Fd $475,000 TPrAlilixlVj$.gggi,::::: ............................. . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .............................. ............................. .............................. ............................. . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . ....... ................. ::::::::J.!~:~:;19.i:: i::: ::::i1:i.!~1:1.~: $0 $0 $0 0.00% ::'-~I"imm: :!9T~::@im~~ijfj9Ng::iiM€N9g~::::::::::::::::::::::::'1iigi#fi!:: .............................. ..........."............,....... .................................................... ....... ..... ...... . ...... ::i1:g:al;l~:: ::::::::~1:1;j,11;gl~::::~1:1;~~g;~t(.4M~% MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - JUNE 2005 TOTAL PERCENT FY 2005 THROUGH THROUGH INCREASE INCREASE BUDGET 6/30/2005 6/30/2004 (DECREASE) (DECREASE) % OF CURRENT TAX ROLL COLLECTED 98.9% 98.18% 98.28% -0.10% -0.10% RESIDENTIAL BLOG PERMITS 160 193 220 (27) -12.27% COMMERCIAL BLOG PERMITS 10 6 11 (5) -45.45% PLUMBING PERMITS 900 1,121 1,132 (11 ) -0.97% ELECTRICAL PERMITS 400 454 517 (63) -12.19% CITATIONS ISSUED 8,800 4,998 5,260 (262) -4.98% CITATIONS APPEALED 150 197 280 (83) -29.64% disNERAiI#UNo.!:ixPSN$Es?::::::::::::::!i!:t ... ..... .'...........;... :::::.. .. ..... .:::........ .....:::::::::::::::::::::: ....... ~: City Council and Secretary City Manager Finance Legal Engineering Economic Development Building Inspection Community Development Fire Police Parks Recreation Library Communications Colleyville Center Streets & Drainage Municipal Court Fleet Maintenance Building Services Information Services Capital Equipment Reserve ~ii;ii~i~$::\::: .. /(::::::::/...:. $308,531 623,091 470,257 70,000 461,279 152,835 301,988 282,684 3,017,388 3,135,076 1,313,213 287,648 475,470 145,221 345,334 2,086,026 237,688 181,246 232,680 165,518 45,740 256,158 !::::::::::i1:~;.;pt!:!::: $224,419 428,466 347,272 60,382 299,757 114,528 195,179 189,595 2,259,602 2,307,769 800,212 190,870 312,653 112,610 219,582 1,041,952 147,309 126,746 118,311 87,772 45,740 o :::;m~~~~ut~~!: $234,420 429,688 348,190 50,879 305,387 114,992 194,169 190,198 2,246,895 2,310,966 839,277 195,452 314,889 114,988 221,943 1,117,919 148,886 128,611 126,178 92,932 45,740 o :::::::::::::~~~tfg~!I~:!: 72.7% 68.8% 73.8% 86.3% 65.0% 74.9% 64.6% 67.1% 74.9% 73.6% 60.9% 66.4% 65.8% 77.5% 63.6% 49.9% 62.0% 69.9% 50.8% 53.0% 100.0% 0.0% .;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... .................................... ..............."................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :"'!IIII~IIII ::}teMAlNINSi .................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $84,112 194,625 122,985 9,618 161,522 38,307 106,809 93,089 757,786 827,307 513,001 96,778 162,817 32,611 125,752 1,044,074 90,379 54,500 114,369 77,746 o 256,158 :.M;l1ifi! MONTHLY FINANCIAL REPORT - JUNE 2005 Water Sales $6,474,194 $3,754,199 $3,794,218 $3,581,501 4.82% Sewer Sales 2,016,996 1,476,433 1,512,747 1,475,725 0.05% Sewer Installation 16,000 29,200 12,000 28,000 4.29% Water Installation 44,800 50,535 33,600 53,668 -5.84% Sewer Tie-on Charges 10,000 9,452 7,500 18,603 -49.19% Engineering Charges 35,000 36,114 26,250 50,204 -28.07% Penalties 173,566 99,318 130,175 99,171 0.15% Miscellaneous 9,300 28,641 4,500 8,678 230.04% Interest Income TOTAL PERCENT THROUGH THROUGH INCREASE INCREASE 6/30/2005 6/30/2004 (DECREASE) (DECREASE) GALLONS OF WATER SOLD 1,165,966,666 1,114,162,313 51,804,353 4.65% NUMBER OF WATER CUSTOMERS 8,181 7,950 231 2.91% Administration $200,753 $138,014 $138,875 68.7% $62,739 Billing 259,133 162,233 162,440 62.6% 96,900 Operations 6,360,581 3,891,971 3,899,872 61.2% 2,468,610 Debt Service 1,135,287 1,040,692 1,040,692 91.7% 94,595 Performance Pay 38,173 0 0 0.0% 38,173 Transfer to General Fund 475,000 0 0 0.0% 475,000 PRE COUNCIL CC@miB AGENDA BRIEFING Il'X:l$ MEETING DATE: ITEM#: 07/19/05 PC-5 CITY MANAGER I DEPARTMENT HEAD I FINANCE REVIEW I NIA Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Discussion of the July 19, 2005, City Council regular agenda items This item provides the opportunity for the City Council to discuss the regular City Council agenda items. cc~@ AGENDA BRIEFING IL'X<l$ CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ITEM#: 07/19/05 1 CITY MANAGER I DEPARTMENT HEAD ! FINANCE REVIEW I NIA Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: Executive Session - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.087 - Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda Brian K. Meroney vs. City of Colleyville Legal - Potential Litigation - Pecan Village Partners Property Acquisition Proposed Sale of Property - 5500 Colleyville Boulevard Proposed Sale of Property - 5100 Colleyville Boulevard Economic Development Conference with City Manager and staff to discuss and deliberate commercial and financial information received from business prospect(s) the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand within the City; with which business(es) the City is pursuing and conducting economic development negotiations RESOLUTION R-05-2570 A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION REGARDING EXECUTIVE SESSION ITEMS AT THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 19, 2005 WHEREAS, following discussion in Executive Session, and in full accordance with the requirements of the Open Meetings Act, the City Council determines that the following action is in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the following actions of the City Council are hereby adopted and approved: a. THAT AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. APPROVED THIS DAY OF AYES, NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS. 2005, BY A VOTE OF ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor CITY COUNCIL CC@n<:ll AGENDA BRIEFING IC'X:'o$ MEETING DATE: ITEM#: 07/19/05 3 CITY MANAGER , DEPARTMENT HEAD I FINANCE REVIEW, NIA Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS OR PRESENT A TIONS PROCLAMATION - In recognition of Nelson Thibodeaux and the Colleyville Lions Club for coordinating the Hometown Heroes Day event PROCLAMATION - In recognition of Parks and Recreation month - Monica Walsh, Parks and Recreation Director PROCLAMATION - In recognition of "National Night Out 2005" - Lieutenant Rodney Cunningham roclamation CITY OF Colleyville, Texas WHEREAS: the National Association ofTown Watch (NATW) is sponsoring a unique nationwide crime, drug, and violence prevention program on August 2,2005, called "National Night Out"; and WHEREAS, the "22nd Annual National Night Out" provides a unique opportunity for Colleyville to join forces with thousands of other communities across the country in promoting cooperative, police-community crime prevention efforts; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville plays a vital role in assisting the Colleyville Police Department through joint crime, drug. and violence prevention efforts in Colleyville and is supporting "National Night Out 2005" locally; and WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Colleyville be aware of the importance of crime prevention programs and the impact their participation can have on reducing crime, drugs, and violence in Colleyville; and WHEREAS, police-community partnerships, neighborhood safety, awareness and cooperation are important themes of the "National Night Out" program. NOW, THEREFORE, I, DAVID KELLY, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE. TEXAS, on behalf of the Colleyville City Council, do hereby proclaim Tuesday,August2,2005,as NATIONAL NIGHT OUT IN THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE and do hereby call upon all citizens of Colleyville to join the Colleyville Police Department and the National Association of Town Watch in supporting the "22nd Annual National Night Out" on August 2. 2005, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I do hereby set my hand, and seal of the City of Colleyville affixed this 19th day of July 2005. .Lb~ ayo , ce1e 'TexaS RESOLUTION R-05-2571 A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION UNDER CONSENT ITEMS AT THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING JULY 19, 2005 WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Consent Items. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Consent Items as follows are hereby adopted: a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of July 12, 2005 b. Approval of minutes of the Joint City Council and Colleyville Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors meeting of June 28, 2005 AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. APPROVED ON THIS OF AYES, DAY OF NAYS AND 2005, BY A VOTE ABSTENTIONS. ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 12, 2005 The Pre Council meeting of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor David Kelly on July 12, 2005, at 5:34 p.m. ROLL CALL: Councilpersons George Boll, Tony Licata, Rich Hendler and Mayor Pro Tem Jon Ayers were present. Mayor David Kelly, City Manager Bill Lindley, Assistant City Manager Paul Frederiksen, Police Chief Tommy Ingram, Fire Chief Mike Johnston, Economic Development Manager Scott Welmaker, Public Works Director Keith Fisher, Public Works Manager Kelly Howell, Utility Superintendent Ken Tywater, Financial Analyst Kacey Bess, City Attorney Matthew Boyle and City Secretary Cynthia Singleton were also present. Councilman Tom Hart arrived at 5:40 p.m. Mayor Kelly announced that the first City Council meeting in August would be held Wednesday, August 3, 2005, to provide for "National Night Out" on Tuesday, August 2, 2005. PC-1. Discussion of selecting a date for a Joint City Council and SH26 Advisory Committee meeting Council tentatively selected August 10, 2005 or August 17, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. at the Colleyville Library, second floor, for a Joint City Council and SH26 Advisory Committee meeting. Staff will coordinate the meeting dates with TxDOT representatives and advise of a specific meeting time. PC-2. Discussion of selecting a date for a Joint City Council and Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District Board (GCISD) meeting CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 2005 Council determined that a Joint City Council and Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District Board (GCISD) meeting would be held August 29, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Colleyville Public Library, second floor. PC-3. Discussion of selecting a date for a City Council Worksession with various community groups to discuss common goals and work initiatives Council determined that a City Council Worksession would be held August 30, 2005, at 7:00 p.m., in the Colleyville Public Library, second floor, with various community groups for the purpose of discussing common goals and work initiatives. PC-4. Discussion of irrigation and water usage and consideration of educational initiative to conserve water Mayor Kelly expressed appreciation to Public Works Director Keith Fisher, Public Works Manager Kelly Howell, Utility Superintendent Ken Tywater and Public Works staff for managing the City's water supply during a power outage. Public Works Director Keith Fisher, Public Works Manager Kelly Howell and Utility Superintendent Ken Tywater provided a summary of events leading up to the water conservation plan and the recovery process and provided an overview of the water delivery system by Texas River Authority (TRA). Mr. Fisher expressed appreciation to the City of Hurst for providing water to the City. Discussion ensued regarding the need for an additional ground water storage tank, electric generators for emergency situations and a process for educating the citizens related to water usage and conservation. PC-5. Discussion of the draft 2006 Work Initiatives Mayor Kelly requested that this item be placed on the July 19, 2005 Pre Council agenda. PC-6. Discussion of 2006 - 2010 BAF projects for accelerated purchase City Manager Bill Lindley provided an overview of the list of FY 2006-2010 BAF projects identified for accelerated purchase during the current fiscal year. There was general discussion regarding the Workforce Development Study and the Agenda Manager software. 2 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 2005 PC-7. Discussion of the July 12, 2005, City Council regular agenda items The meeting was adjourned prior to this item being discussed. There being no further business, Mayor Kelly declared the meeting adjourned at 6: 17 p.m. The regular meeting of the Colleyville City Council was called to order by Mayor Kelly on July 12, 2005, at 6:49 p.m. ROLL CALL: Councilpersons George Boll, Tony Licata, Rich Hendler, Tom Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Jon Ayers were present. Mayor David Kelly, City Manager Bill Lindley, Assistant City Manager Paul Frederiksen, Police Chief Tommy Ingram, Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron, Community Development Coordinator Chris Fuller, Public Works Director Keith Fisher, Economic Development Manager Scott Welmaker, Financial Analyst Kacey Bess, Parks and Recreation Director Monica Walsh, Administrative Secretary Dixie Smith, Sports Turf Technician Troy Crawford, City Attorney Matthew Boyle and City Secretary Cynthia Singleton were also present. 1. EXECUTIVE SESSION - In accordance with Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.071 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.072 - Sec. 551.087 - Consultation with Attorney on Legal Issues Raised by Public Hearing or Action Items on the Agenda Brian K. Meroney vs. City of Colleyville Legal - Potential Litigation - Pecan Village Partners Property Acquisition Proposed Sale of Property - 5500 Colleyville Boulevard Proposed Sale of Property - 5100 Colleyville Boulevard Economic Development Conference with City Manager and staff to discuss and deliberate commercial and financial information received from business prospect(s) the City seeks to have locate, stay, or expand within the City; with which business(es) the City is pursuing and conducting economic development negotiations 3 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 2005 Mayor Kelly explained that the Executive Session had been called in accordance with the Texas Government Code Chapter 551, Subchapter D, Section 551.071, Legal, Section 551.072, Property and Section 551.087, Economic Development. He further explained that there would be no decisions made or action taken during this time. The meeting was recessed at 6:50 p.m. and reconvened at 7:45 p.m. The invocation was given by Pastor Lloyd McCutcheon of Colleyville Assembly of God Church and City Attorney Matthew Boyle led the Pledge of Allegiance. EXECUTIVE SESSION: 2. CONSIDER AND TAKE ANY ACTION(S} NECESSARY RELATIVE TO ITEMS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE SESSION - Resolution R-05-2566 This Resolution was not needed. 3. CORRESPONDENCE, MISCELLANEOUS REPORTS OF MEETINGS ATTENDED BY THE COUNCIL AND CITY OFFICIALS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS OR PRESENTATIONS Mayor Kelly announced that the City of Colleyville has been named the 40th best place to live in the nation and the number one place in the state by Money magazine. Mayor Kelly presented a Proclamation to Tyler Browning in recognition of fulfilling a Soldiers Wish List. Tyler thanked all those who donated to the cause. Mayor Kelly presented a Proclamation to Samir Patel In recognition of tying for 2nd place in the 78th Scripps National Spelling Bee. Samir expressed appreciation to the City Council for honoring him with a Proclamation. Mayor Kelly presented a Proclamation to Mr. Butch Ethridge in recognition of Butch Ethridge Day on July 15, 2005. Mr. Ethridge commended City Council for their work and proclaimed the City a great place to live. Mayor Kelly presented a letter of Lifetime Achievement and City mementos to Mr. Jim Moore in recognition of his service to the City. 4 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 2005 Mayor Kelly recognized employees Kacey Bess, Financial Analyst; Scott Welmaker, Economic Development Manager; Dixie Smith, Administrative Secretary; Troy Crawford, Sports Turf Technician; Malinda Spence, Police Officer; Greg Hipps, Utility Operator; and Brandon Randall, Utility Operator, for their one year anniversary and service in the City. Councilman Hart stated that the Hometown Heroes Day was a memorable event and expressed appreciation to everyone that assisted in the planning of the event. Mayor Kelly recognized the following individuals and organizations for mobilizing and addressing the emergency situation created when a TXU power outage affected the ability of the water pumps to deliver water: Keith Fisher, Public Works Director; Kelly Howell, Public Works Manager; Ken Tywater, Utility Superintendent; Department staff; Mike Johnston, Fire Chief; Fire Marshall Jeff Jones; Fire Department staff; Chris Pena, Computer Technician; Bill Lindley, City Manager; Paul Frederiksen, Assistant City Manager; Richard Ward, Mayor of Hurst; the Flower Mound Fire Department; Tarrant County Fire Control District, and the citizens and businesses for conserving water during this emergency. CONSENT: 4. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2567 - Consent Items: a. Approval of minutes of the regular City Council meeting of June 21, 2005 b. Approval of minutes of the City Council Worksession of June 16-17,2005 c. Approval of minutes of the Joint City Council and Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting of June 6, 2005 d. Approval of the donation of $1,000, by Bob and Mary Ward, to the Colleyville Police Department Fund e. Approval to authorize the City Attorney to trademark the Celebrate Colleyville name and logo, and adopt a use policy as recommended by the Celebrate Colleyville Steering Committee Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-05-2567 in its entirety. There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Ayers moved to approve Resolution R-05-2567. Councilman Hendler seconded the motion. 5 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 2005 Ayes: Councilpersons Boll, Licata, Hendler, Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Ayers Nays: None Mayor Kelly declared the motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 5. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1531 - Approval of a Special Use Permit for a covered carport on Lot 4, Block 1, Community Home Addition, located at 1508 Cherry Lane, Case Z-05-018 Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1531. There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. Mr. Jesse Cobb, 1508 Cherry Lane, applicant, expressed appreciation for the Council's consideration of the request and spoke regarding the reasons for the delay in the request for a Special Use Permit. 6. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1532 - Approval of an Amendment to Chapter 3, Section 3.24 of the Land Development Code, regarding Planned Unit Development side and rear yard set-back regulations, Case Z-05-017 Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1532. There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. Community Development Manager Barry LeBaron provided an overview of the proposed amendments to Chapter 3, Section 3.24 of the Land Development Code regarding Planned Unit Development side and rear yard set-back regulations and the reasons for the proposed amendment. 7. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1533 - Adopting an annual budget for Fiscal Year 2006 for the Colleyville Crime Control and Prevention District Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1533. There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. 6 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 2005 8. FIRST READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Ordinance 0-05-1534 - Denial of Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) Rate Request by Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing and read the caption of Ordinance 0-05-1534. Ms. Mary Mahoney, Atmos Energy Corporation representative, spoke regarding the proposed rate increase request and requested denial of the rate increase request to allow the Railroad Commission to consider and rule on the request. There were no others present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. 9. READING AND PUBLIC HEARING - Resolution R-05-2568 - Consideration of an appointment to the Historical Preservation Committee to fill an unexpired term Mayor Kelly opened the public hearing and read Resolution R-05-2568 in its entirety. There was no one present wishing to speak concerning this item and Mayor Kelly closed the public hearing. Mayor Kelly opened the floor for nominations. Councilman Boll moved to approve Resolution R-05-2568, appointing Mark Johnson to fill the unexpired term on the Historical Preservation Committee. Councilman Licata seconded the motion. Ayes: Councilpersons Boll, Licata, Hendler, Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Ayers Nays: None Mayor Kelly declared the motion carried. REPORTS: 10. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - May 9, 2005 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES - May 10, 2005 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES - May 23,2005 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES - June 13,2005 There was no action taken on this item. 7 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 2005 CITIZEN COMMENTS: 11. CITIZEN COMMENTSIPRESENTATIONS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA Mr. James Moore, 1416 Glade Road, spoke regarding the funding and construction of a Senior Center and Council action taken on June 21, 2005, related to the purchase of property and a facility to be used for a Senior Center and the development and use of youth athletic facilities in the City. Ms. Rena Marson, 5145 Stonebridge Drive, spoke regarding the condition of the pond that backs up to the Justice Center and requested Council's assistance in the clean up of the pond. Mr. Vince Panzera, 5001 Stonebridge Drive, spoke regarding the condition and safety of the pond that backs up to the Justice Center and requested assistance of the City for the clean up of the pond. Mr. Erwin Patch, 5144 Stonebridge Drive, spoke regarding the condition of the pond between the Justice Center and the Colleyville Center and requested assistance to clean up the pond. Ms. Kate Smith, Attorney, representing Ms. Kathleen Hennessy, 5013 Stonebridge, spoke regarding health issues related to the pond. City Manager Bill Lindley reported that the Homeowner's Association has been notified of the ongoing efforts by the developer to clean up the pond. ACTION/RESOLUTION: 12. DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION RATIFYING COUNCIL AGENDA ACTION FOR THE MEETING OF JULY 12, 2005 - Reading and Public Hearing - Resolution R-05-2569 This resolution was not needed. ADJOURNMENT: 13. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the City Council, Councilman Boll moved to adjourn. Councilman Licata seconded the motion. 8 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 12, 2005 Ayes: Councilpersons Boll, Licata, Hendler, Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Ayers Nays: None Mayor Kelly declared the meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. APPROVED THIS AYES, DAY OF NAYS AND 2005, BY A VOTE OF ABSTENTIONS. Minutes taken and prepared by: Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary 9 MINUTES OF THE JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND COLLEYVILLE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JUNE 28, 2005 The meeting of the Joint City Council and Colleyville Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors was called to order by Mayor Kelly on June 28, 2005, at 8:05 a.m. ROLL CALL: Councilpersons George Boll, Tony Licata, Rich Hendler, Tom Hart and Mayor Pro Tem Jon Ayers were present. Mayor David Kelly, Assistant City Manager Paul Frederiksen and Records Management Coordinator Nicole Minder were also present. Mayor Pro Tem Jon Ayers was absent. Colleyville Area Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors Lynn Stillman, Elsie Gunter, Ret Stansberger, Mark Henderson, Danielle Arnett, Paul Meinen, Steve Jacob and Steve Ewing were present. Colleyville Area Chamber of Commerce members Renova Williams, Brad Rice, Shirley Schollmeyer were present. 2. OPENING REMARKS BY MAYOR DAVID KELLY AND CHAIRPERSON LYNN STILLMAN Mayor David Kelly and Chairperson Lynn Stillman welcomed the group and stated the purpose of the meeting is for open discussion between the Council and Chamber of Commerce. 3. DISCUSSION OF CURRENT AND FUTURE PARTNERING OPPORTUNITIES Mayor Kelly provided an overview and update of the Village at Colleyville Development progress and information related to possible future development with Henry S. Miller. Mayor Kelly also provided an update on TxDOT and SH26 construction. Councilman Licata discussed two Critical Success Factors related to developing partnerships. Discussion ensued regarding Council attendance at Chamber of Commerce monthly luncheons and ribbon cuttings, new resident welcome letters, new business brochures and creating a volunteer list to be included in new resident packets. CITY COUNCIL WORKSESSION MIN JUNE 28, 2005 Councilman Hart discussed attendance at events, county projects, community projects, and the future development of SH26. He also congratulated the Mayor and Council for working well together. Councilman Hendler complimented the Mayor and Council as well as the Chamber for their service and good dialogue. He also discussed the importance of citizen involvement, street maintenance and proposed a joint meeting of City Council and Community groups for the purpose of discussing common goals. Discussion continued related to the development of a program which recognizes local businesses for landscaping, building design and other aesthetic qualities and a similar program in the City of Hurst. Councilman Boll stated that communication and information gathering IS key and complimented the Council and staff on team work. Mr. Nelson Thibodeaux provided information related to the Hometown Hero's event to be held July 2, 2005. 4. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business Mayor David Kelly adjourned the meeting at 9:20 a.m. APPROVED THIS AYES, DAY OF NAYS AND 2005, BY A VOTE OF ABSTENTIONS. Minutes taken and prepared by: Nicole Minder Records Management Coordinator 2 CITY COUNCIL CC@miB AGENDA BRIEFING j('x~S MEETING DATE: ITEM#: ORDINANCE # : 07/19/05 5 0-05-1531 CITY MANAGER I DEPARTMENT HEAD I FINANCE REVIEW : ; N.A. Previous Action: 07/12/05 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT: Approval of a Special Use Permit for a covered carport on Lot 4, Block 1, Community Home Addition, located at 1508 Cherry Lane, Case Z-05- 018 Second Reading and Public Hearing First Reading and Public Hearing Mr. Jesse Cobb, the owner of a single-family residence located at 1508 Cherry Lane, has submitted a request for a Special Use Permit for an existing attached carport on the property. The applicant constructed the carport without a permit and is requesting approval of a Special Use Permit to allow the carport to remain in place. However, the carport deviates from several development regulations stated within the Land Development Code, as discussed in this agenda briefing. To comply with the carport regulations, the owner would be required to dismantle and reconstruct the existing carport. The property owner has applied for a Special Use Permit to permit the carport as constructed. The property is currently used for single family residential purposes. The property contains an existing house and the carport. The property is located within a R40 Single-family residential zoning district. This is a 0.92-acre parcel of platted property located at 1508 Cherry Lane. The properties surrounding on all sides consist of R-20 Single-family residential zoning designations. The size of the carport exceeds the maximum size regulations. The Land Development Code permits carports up to 480 square feet. The existing carport is approximately 600 square feet, which exceeds the maximum size requirement by 120 square feet. Similarly, the Land Development Code regulates the length of carport material dimensions. The longest dimension allowed for a carport is 24 feet. The longest dimension of the existing carport is 30 feet, exceeding the regulation by six (6) feet. The Land Development Code requires that carports be considered on a case-by-case basis, and must be approved by a Special Use Permit. A comparison of the regulations and the proposed carport is shown below. The items indicated with bold, italicized characters do not conform to the carport regulations. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1531 Page 2 of 3 Carport Zoning Comparison Category Zoning Requirement Applicant Proposal 1. Maximum Size 480 square feet 600 square feet 2. Longest Dimension Allowed 24 feet 30 feet 3. Maximum Height 15 ft. to highest point of roof 8 feet 3 inches 4. Side Setback 1 5 feet 9 feet 5. Maximum Number per Lot 1 1 6. Paved Parking Surface Concrete, asphalt or pavestone Concrete 7. Roof Pitch 2:12 minimum Less than 2:12 8. Construction of Posts brick, stone or decorative metal 4 inch steel supports between 12" and 48" in width The existing carport encroaches upon the side yard setback required by the zoning district. The Land Development Code states that carports located within ten (10) feet of the principal building shall comply with the front, side and rear yard setbacks of the zoning district. The R40 zoning district requires a 15 foot side yard setback. The existing carport encroaches approximately six (6) feet into the 15 foot side yard setback. The post supports do not meet the minimum size standards required by the regulations. The Land Development Code states the dimension of each post as viewed from each primary elevation shall not be less than twelve (12) inches. The posts of the existing carport are four (4) inches. The Land Development Code requires a pitched roof of at least 2:12. The existing carport does not meet this requirement. Staff mailed notices to 11 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. Summary and Conclusion Though the carport constructed by the applicant deviates from the development standards put forth by the Land Development Code, the carport is aesthetically similar to existing carports in the neighborhood and along adjacent streets. Since the request is a Special Use Permit, the City Council may establish conditions different than or in addition to the normal requirements of the Land Development Code. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this request at the June 27, 2005 meeting and recommended approval of the request as submitted by the applicant by a vote of 4-1. No additional construction standards or conditions were recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1531 Page 3 of 3 Recommendation Denial, due to technical non-compliance with the Land Development Code. Attachments · Location and Zoning Map . Information and Drawings from Applicant · Ordinance 0-05-1531 Location and Zoning Map D NORTH Information and Drawings from Applicant ",'W ....._'"', e,.u ..,.... f...... 1\0,,. ~, It j~_< N 8"""1 "" ~O' oo"E:.. -- ue!oo....., tali)!." Oft. Y 1>4 '2, SO' r_"lc:......,ft.,.. I C')o' :!o ..., \......., .. U I) rJ If) r-J :So , o {) o !i'l ,~ <' .r:. """'o.. I!>\,tlo<o. .".. 'iI,.,..... r I:~:I _or ...-~--. " ~) n 1 I.jL....."" ^, tl >II . L&.J,.J._ ., Co OMit. t I} "" ; I1rs.", -"..1"'.... .. .'~.Ill P'''i; ::; <t=\I"'" ~ ~.,". j~ po . <1' (w..c........ t'~lll ',,\hi " V4 14 'l ~,Q I ---'-'--'If ~<.. -'-'<".- - -- H e.RR<'T A'ie.....uE;.. G:. 0' 12.,0 W o o {:J (1 C" u! o o (} /,'1 a U o 111 ,..,,," 'to L.",<YS ORDINANCE 0-05-1531 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A CARPORT ON LOT 4, BLOCK 1, COMMUNITY HOME ADDITION; PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application for a Special Use Permit was filed by Jesse Cobb on May 27,2005, under Case No. Z-05-018; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in the best interests of the City of Colleyville; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning classifications under the Zoning Ordinance Regulations and Zoning Map, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the property owners generally, and to the persons interested and situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 2. THAT all matters stated hereinabove are found to be true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference as if copied in their entirety. THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit "An) are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas, described as Lot 4, Block 1, Community Home Addition, (1508 Cherry Lane), by authorizing a Special Use Permit for a Carport, as shown on the Elevation Plan (Exhibit "B") and the Site Plan (Exhibit "C". Sec. 1. Sec. 3. THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof Ordinance 0-05-1531 Page 2 of 2 Sec. 6. shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. THAT except as amended by this ordinance, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, shall remain in full force and effect. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternative method of publication provided by law. THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT A - ZONING MAP EXHIBIT B - ELEVATION PLAN ------~---_.._--^"_.__.-..._~-~--_....__.__.,.....--_.~'-'-"-''"-''''~'.'~-_.~'~-"--'~-"-"''."'-''''''-- ^" ,.-- /'~- M. t':. tl\.04o ~... ',.""Oft { ,,,J',L:L_,* fIlNn f;:.o.f' ",.." To... ""c" .,..!<_ N B-.O 30' 00" E:.".". ....Wl' L..,."t 4 o o rJ OJ (", c:" f ~ :> ~ o o o tll .. u <) L Site of CarpOl.t C-O.H<: Uftl.,,, ;; 't~ , ;;"', :;0"'f"3 ."...... .. .. C}a ". . VJT " '.1'.. --_...",,,,--- ~ r-l e. R p., .,.. G.o'!Z.OW EXHIBIT C - SITE PLAN U&O''''tolo:::."" Oft, T 14 '2. 'Sa' r....r..jc:-.,n... o o tJ ({J (.'001 u.l o o U (1) o {] o ;{l ..,.r".....-~. 1] L ....J._ . .... .J'., ..' ~ ~ "'G to. 4 --.-. :.:..:..=!..::.. _.c!Q~ t ! ! , Leo"'f S (':0""''"'" Ir""""11.- "~IW; 14'l f.OI o.rz. t",. ~-~~,,~,ti~~,~_.~~:?"..~+ -,_...-.v-- f'.'I'" ---"tf -------,-- A'-JE.t4uE-. CITY COUNCil CC~<B AGENDA BRIEFING (ex:)$ MEETING DATE: 07/19/05 CITY MANAGER i ITEM # : 6 DEPARTMENT HEAD ORDINANCE # : 0-05-1532 FINANCE REVIEW N.A. Previous Action: 07/12/05 DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT : Approval of an Amendment to Chapter 3, Section 3.24 of the Land Development Code, regarding Planned Unit Development side and rear yard set- back regulations, Case Z-05-017 Second Reading and Public Hearing First Reading and Public Hearing Until approximately 1999, ordinances establishing planned unit development zoning relied on the regulations contained in Section 3.24.G-Schedule of District Regulations, which is a table contained in the Land Development Code that specifies the minimum lot area, maximum height and minimum front, side and rear set-back requirements for all zoning districts, including planned unit developments. Planned unit development ordinances approved within the past several years, now contain specific front, side and rear yard set-back distances, which has allowed the City Council and the developer to address the unique characteristics that each development site offers. Ordinances establishing planned unit developments that contain specific front, side and rear yard set-back requirements are much easier for staff to administer, due to the elimination of the additional step of referring to the confusing and conflicting tables and footnotes contained in old Colleyville zoning codes, that had to be incorporated into the Land Development Code when it was adopted in April 2000. Planned unit development ordinances approved prior to 1999 did not contain any specifications for front, side and rear yard set-backs. When subdivision plats and building permit applications were submitted in years past, for subdivisions zoned as planned unit developments (PUD-R), staff relied upon the table referenced as Section 3.24.G and the related footnotes contained in Section 3.24.F to determine compliance with minimum front, side and rear yard set-back requirements for planned unit developments. Attached is a copy of Section 3.24.G and Section 3.24.F, which is taken from the Land Development Code. The specific language that has generated considerable concern, and often times confusion among staff-members performing building permit plan reviews, are the regulations contained in footnotes "G/H" and "J/K", which establish side and rear yard set-backs in residential, commercial and industrial planned unit developments. Footnote "G" requires no side yard set- back in a residential planned unit development when there are no window or door openings which face the side yard. Footnote "J" is similar for rear yard set-backs in that no rear yard is required in a residential planned unit development when there are no window or door openings Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1532 Page 2 of 2 which face the rear yard. This regulation would allow an addition to a home that meets the aforementioned requirements to be constructed adjacent to a side or rear property line. Staff became aware of the problem code language during a recent rear yard variance request that was considered by the Zoning Board of Adjustment on May 10, 2005. It was while the case was under discussion by the Board that it was determined that the property being considered for a rear yard set-back variance could, under the current code, build right up to the property line, provided that the structure being constructed did not contain any window or door openings. The property in question before the Board did not have a utility easement across the back of the yard, as is the case in most residential properties, which explains why these types of situations have not surfaced in the past. The members of the Zoning Board of Adjustment offered comment to staff to consider amending the Land Development Code to prevent this situation from occurring in the future. Attached is a proposed ordinance, which will amend Section 3.24.G - Schedule of District Regulations regarding the footnotes for planned unit developments. The attached ordinance will also amend Section 3.24.F, paragraphs G, H, J and K regarding the side and rear yard set- back requirements for planned unit developments. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Land Development Code at the June 13, 2005 meeting and recommended approval by a unanimous vote. Recommendation Approval Attachments . Section 3.24.F - District Regulation Notes (Paragraphs G, H, J and K) · Section 3.24.G - Schedule of District Regulations · Ordinance 0-05-1532 3.24.F District Regulation Notes (Paragraphs G, H, J and K (Strikethrough text to be deleted and bold-italics to be inserted) G. ~Je siss yars rS€ll::lirss \f:l=1srs Re '.viRse'us er etl=1sr el3sRiR~s fer 1i~l=1t er eRt!?! faes tl=1s siss yars. There shall be a ten foot (10') side yard set-back, unless an ordinance approving a planned unit development for the property in question specifies a different side yard set-back; however, where abutting a lot zoned for commercial or industrial use, no side yard shall be required, provided there are no window or other openings for light or entry in the encroaching walls facing the side yard. H. 'J'Jl=1ers aBl::IttiR~ a let ~eRss er l::ISSS fer siR~ls family I3l::1r~eses (R5 tl=1rel::l~1=1 R1 ~) eemmsFeial er iRsl::lstrial ~l::Irl3esss tl=1srs There shall be a ten (10') foot side yard set- back, unless an ordinance approving a planned unit development for the property in question specifies a different side yard set-back,. J. ~Je rear :tars rS€ll::lirss \.:l=1srs Re ':/iRsews er €ltl=1sr e~sRiR~S fer li~l=1t er eRt!?j faes tl=1e rsar yam. There shall be a minimum twenty-five (25) foot rear yard set-back, unless an ordinance approving a planned unit development for the property in question specifies a different rear yard set-back; however, the rear yard set- back may be reduced to ten feet (10'), provided there are no window or other openings for light or entry in the encroaching walls facing the rear yard. K. Where abutting a lot zoned or used for siR~ls family residential purposes ~ tnrel::l~1=1 R1~) Bemmsreial er iRsl::lstrial ~l::Irl3esss there shall be a minimum twenty- five (25') foot rear yard set-back, unless an ordinance approving a planned unit development for the property in question specifies a different rear yard set- back, however, the rear yard set-back may be reduced to ten feet (10? where abutting a lot zoned or used for non-residential purposes. i .(,!) ~l: ~i I I ~ ~ o ~w i i ~ >C) ~ II: ..J .~ .E 'I 6 i~ j ~ W Zit: ~ !5 ~ ~2 t ~ t ;~ i ~ I~~ ~ -! ~ ~ u. ~~~~ ~ ~Uj Q 9.8 w ::>>:cs ::c :11:101 ~ i~ ~ ~ h I cw) z! i ~ ~~ I ~ !"5 at w will ~ tn Q. fa. ;; . ; !t ~~ t r I ~ l I II I if II II. __ ~!! I it! .f! J ~ - J .J e! I hI ~jl ~ fl I r ! J "~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ '~~I~I~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ", ","", ", ", ", ", N N N N N N N b b in in in in in ~ ~ N N N N C'>I iQ iQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $i! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ iQ Ili iii ai iii ai ai iii C c: c c c c c ~ ~ b in in in in o C'>I N C'>I .... ................ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 ", 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q: 0 N C"l N NNNNNNC"lOC"l C"l ...... ....... .-.. -. -. .-.. 2 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ 2 2 ~ in _ in 11.11.11.11.11.11.___ C'>I ::!. N i;;bbbbi;;::!.::!.::!. ... ... ... ... .... ... _ G:'G:'G:'G:'G:'G:'_c-_ % ~ , ~ ~ , , % . % ~ - ~ !!!.!!!.l:!!.!!!.!!!.!!!.--- Q. ill in in in in in Q. Q. Q. ....................... iQ iQ ~ ~~QQ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g~!~I~~~~ .... ... ", ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~8a~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ... ...................... liii~~! ~ i ~ ~i~~ii~~i .... ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~g~~~~~ .... ~ ~ ~ N ... 0 C'>I iii iii iii iii iii C C C C C iii iii iii iii C C C C ~"'!~"'!"":~ClO ClO ClO .... o 0 .,.: .... N .....C'J iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii iii C C C C C C C C C .H . . .II .II .II II. ~1~1 11&'[ ~ c c?~!lll~j!j!liQ.. ~1':5'a!ll ~~ ~~~~i ~ ~ j g~88g~~~~ Ii ~ I.~ .r ~ ~~ .- .5 ~l ; f I ~ i! 8'S i; '0 ~ Ii Ii 1 .21 II. f~ ! i & i III l!! 'I,g ~ t ~ Hi : ORDINANCE 0-05-1532 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING SECTION 3.24.F, PARAGRAPHS G AND J, OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, REGARDING SIDE AND REAR YARD SET-BACK REQUIREMENTS IN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS, PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY OF FINE NOT TO EXCEED TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($2,000.00); AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville deems it necessary, for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals, or general welfare of the City to enact a new zoning regulation; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Colleyville approved Ordinance 0-00-1214 on April 18, 2000, adopting the Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Colleyville desires to amend certain portions of the Land Development Code regarding Planned Unit Development regulations; and WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed a Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the zoning regulations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 15 days before such hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission, has given reasonable consideration, among other things, the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the City; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Colleyville and the City of Colleyville City Council, in compliance with the Charter of the City of Colleyville, and State Law with reference to changes to zoning regulations, having given the requisite notices by publication and otherwise, and after holding due hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all the persons interested, the governing body of the City of Colleyville is of the opinion that said change in zoning regulation should be made. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT Section 3.24.F - District Regulation Notes; Paragraph G, of the Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as shown: Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. Sec. 7. Ordinance 0-05-1532 Page 2 of 3 G. There shall be a ten foot (10') side yard set-back, unless an ordinance approving a planned unit development for the property in question specifies a different side yard set-back; however, where abutting a lot zoned for commercial or industrial use, no side yard shall be required, provided there are no window or other openings for light or entry in the encroaching walls facing the side yard. THAT Section 3.24.F - District Regulation Notes; Paragraph H, of the Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as shown: H. There shall be a ten (10') foot side yard set-back, unless an ordinance approving a planned unit development for the property in question specifies a different side yard set-back. THAT Section 3.24.F - District Regulation Notes; Paragraph J, of the Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as shown: J. There shall be a minimum twenty-five (25) foot rear yard set-back, unless an ordinance approving a planned unit development for the property in question specifies a different rear yard set-back; however, the rear yard set-back may be reduced to ten feet (10'), provided there are no window or other openings for light or entry in the encroaching walls facing the rear yard. THAT Section 3.24.F - District Regulation Notes; Paragraph K, of the Land Development Code, is hereby amended to read as shown: K. Where abutting a lot zoned or used for residential purposes there shall be a minimum twenty-five (25') foot rear yard set-back, unless an ordinance approving a planned unit development for the property in question specifies a different rear yard set-back, however, the rear yard set-back may be reduced to ten feet (10') where abutting a lot zoned or used for non-residential purposes. THAT Section 3.24.G - Schedule of District Regulations, of the Land Development Code, is hereby amended regarding the side yard and rear yard footnotes for planned unit developments to read as shown on the attached Exhibit "A" THAT Ordinance 0-00-1214 adopting the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, as amended, shall remain in effect, except where amended by this ordinance. THAT any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions or terms of this ordinance shall be subject to the same penalty as provided Ordinance 0-05-1532 Page 3 of 3 for in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Colleyville, and upon conviction shall be punishable by a fine not to exceed the sum of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Sec. 8. THAT any section, paragraph, subdivision, clause, phrase or provision of this ordinance shall be judged invalid or unconstitutional, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance as a whole or any portion thereof other than that portion so decided to be invalid or unconstitutional. Sec. 9. THAT addition to and accumulative of all other penalties, the City shall have the right to seek injunctive relief for any and all violations of this ordinance. Sec. 1 O. THAT this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage. Sec. 11. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternate method of publication provided by law. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEALlTY: Matthew C. G. Boyle City Attorney 00 z o ~ ...J ::> C) w rr: I- u 0:: I- 00 a LL. o W ...J ::> c w :L U 00 C) "'Ii N M z o i= u w 00 fil ~ z w &1.:) ~!i ! ::;) w .. o~ '!j ~ (,,) .!! 6!~ ~ ;!:I.:) ~ &~ ~ ::;) 0 0 I~ II iE" ~ & 0 := filg ~ ~z ~ ~ w::;)z'" &00" ~ un: ~ ~~ffi~ ~!S! ~'~ wOu..~ N(,,)O;:; ViE;~~ ~...l::;)"" g & o'~ &::;):C~ ::;)&Q~ 1~~02 iE & .. &.. .2: ~~ ! Vi jjj I/: Z::I: :! ~~ ~ ~9 I !Z:s ... w co I~ 61& ~ VI::;) ... ~I ~ &~ ~ i& ~ & '0 & ...I ~ .. III .. ~ lEu 1:11 'il :I: 1:11 C :i 'S = = lE ~ III C ~ 'S l:l' ~ 'E .. >- c = C '2 E ii ~~ III ~i '5~ .. .... ~i .t~ ..'O~ i...lu; 1/1 '! III C III ... 'S l:l' III " III N u; '0 ...I C = C '2 E =i1l EIIl.! Cl ,5 . .c 1l .5 45 .! lE ~ ,5 '; 2' '0 Ii' I- .!. :; b ... ill'S <~.. ... .. to i' i~& ~ 'i: 1;; is 1:11 c '2 o N Exhibit "A" '! II> .. ... III ~ ~1 ~1 ~ ~~ ffij ~ 1l II> ... 1/1 III 'i: o t;l ~! ~I M! (\')1 01 cd lJ'Jl Nl N!_j u ~ = Cl 0: 0 01 0: 0: 0 co: 0 0: 0: 0: 0 (.O! o. OJ OJ 0; 0 ....~I....~l.=,l...... ~l W-i ~ o~ cd c:d 0: 0 ~'!,""~'I,'''''''R....t. 0 CO! 0: 0: 0: 0 _ _ _ 0 (0; 0: 0: 0: 0 0; 0; ""'- l.f)_ ~;n ~q gj ~-I ~- ~-j ~j N- ~1-~.-~~~:!~H:r:~--~~j'~iT;-: "' 13' 13' 13' 13' ]li]l ~i ]l ~, 5 ~i ui :-u~~o~:"."i.. ~: .,,' .,,' .,,' .,,' 13: 13 ~: 13 .,. E ..,. , ~l ~! ~I ~j ~\ ~l ~ ~l ~ ~I i il g! 031 -Q)i Lo' ? &' .?:. cr::, 0:: tis! cr::: 0: Q) Q): (ij! 0: -!i-~-l~l~-~!~\-~l~uual ~ c:( : cr: : ~: '7: ~: ~: 0::= 4= ; 4= ~ ~ 5 , : lk:: lk:: lk:! lk:: : lk: : lk: u Cl Cl Cl c5 ~ Cl Cl Cl c5 N c o 'i .. Ii 1/1 1/1 .. U in i in! Mj Mi i:n: 0; rni b Mi ('I')! M; M ~l ~l o 0; N M: co M t........ gl g ......t.'......t..... IIi! aii ~ cj c:! c: ~: -u'i!5" .i",.!. ~ il ~ ~! 0.. Ii '1 J;;; . ., ~i". > > > o~ E' ~ ~I ~!. ., . 1:u" i. u; I"~ "" ' 0 ;j . :"5;~! ~l ~ lk:i ",' >-' c' ::li ::li ::l 4.'11 '~o~i,:... ~i ~l ~l -gl ~ =.",_0.1. --. .c~ :c1 2l El 2 ~.i...~.l...~l...$i...~.l...~.l...~. ul 01 ~I ....1 ~l ~I d Uj u, u: :lEi ~j ~j ~ c 1/)- E II ::l " E i; 'x '" '" E c '" '6 c ::l 3i u .!;; 'OJ .c 0 ~ c "- .,- I/) b .. c '" ::l ~ :; a. .g I/) .. c 0; ::l '" OJ :5 u:i lB 5: ., '" c: "0 ::l -:0 ~ ~ .c 'l:' E '" ::l '" C ., ., c: :5 0 ,!!1 N .... >- :lE .. 0:: I/) c ., cD ." (J 0; '" ., '€: a. '" I/) '" ., .~ ~ ." '(ij :0 > ~ ::l '" a. ...: E 5 .; ::l E 1/)- Cl Cl 'x >- Cl '" ~ <Ii :lE 0; ~ . . CITY COUNCIL CC@m<1l TI:':O:"::; AGENDA BRIEFING MEETING DATE: ITEM#: I ORDINANCE #: I I 07/19/05 7 0-05-1533 CITY MANAGER: I ~ DEPARTMENT HEAD: ! FINANCE REVIEW: I Previous Action: 07/12/05 DEPARTMENT: FINANCE SUBJECT : Adopting an annual budget for Fiscal Year 2006 for the Colleyville Crime Control and Prevention District Second Reading and Public Hearing First Reading and Public Hearing In accordance with the Local Government Code, the Colleyville Crime Control and Prevention District Board (CCCPD) shall propose an annual budget. The budget must contain a complete financial statement; including a statement of outstanding obligations, the amount of cash on hand, the amount of money received by the district during the previous year, the estimated amount of money available to the district, the amount of money needed to fund approved programs, the amount of money requested for programs that were not approved, the tax rate for the next fiscal year, the amount of the balances expected at the end of the year in which the budget is being prepared, and the estimated amount of revenues and balances available to cover proposed budget. This budget will be presented to the CCCPD Board of Directors at the July 12, 2005 meeting. Financial Impact The CCCPD's projected revenue for FY 2006 is $899,120 with expenditures of $689,205. Proposed expenditures are for administrative board and audit expenses ($850), police officer ($65,567), purchase of four replacement police vehicles ($98,000) and debt service ($524,788). Recommendation Approval Attachments . CCCPD FY 2006 Budget . Ordinance 0-05-1533 COLLEYVILLE CRIME CONTROL DISTRICT FY 2006 BUDGET PROJECTED PROPOSED FISCAL YEAR 2005 2006 BEGINNING FUND BALANCE $193,458 $314,530 REVENUES: 1/2 CENT SALES TAX REVENUE $817,000 $833,340 INTEREST INCOME $6,000 $6,000 USE OF FUND BALANCE $134,291 $59,780 TOTAL REVENUES $957,291 $899,120 EXPENDITURES: ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD/AUDIT EXPENSES: $500 $850 PERSONNEL: POLICE OFFICER $63,020 $65,567 CAPITAL: POLICE CARS $0 $98,000 DEBT SERVICE: 1999 CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION $638,408 $524,788 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $701,928 $689,205 EXCESS REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES $255,363 $209,915 * ENDING FUND BALANCE $314,530 $464,665 * MUST HAVE A 1.4 TIMES COVERAGE RATIO ($209,915) FOR DEBT SERVICE PAYMENT ORDINANCE 0-05-1533 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 FOR THE COLLEYVILLE CRIME CONTROL AND PREVENTION DISTRICT, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2005 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, A COpy OF SAME BEING ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY SECRETARY, TO BECOME EFFECTIVE UPON PASSAGE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. WHEREAS, the laws ofthe State of Texas require the Board of Directors ofthe Colleyville Crime Control and Prevention District to adopt a budget of projected revenues and proposed expenditures, cash on hand at the start of the year, the amount of money received during the prior year, the tax rate and the projected ending fund balance; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Colleyville Crime Control and Prevention District approved the following budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2005 and ending September 30, 2006 for the Colleyville Crime Control and Prevention District, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Secretary, is hereby made a part of this ordinance by reference and is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Colleyville, Texas, as the official budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2005 and ending September 30, 2006 and that the City Manager is authorized to execute all contracts and agreements approved as a part of the budget. Sec. 2. THAT the budget of the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2005, and ending September 30, 2006, for the Colleyville Crime Control and Prevention District with a sales and use tax rate of .5%, is hereby fixed as follows: Projected Revenue Received in Fiscal Year 2005 $957,291 Projected Cash on Hand as of October 1, 2005 Expenditures $314,530 $899,120 $689,205 Revenues Ending Fund Balance at September 30,2006 $464,665 AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. Ordinance 0-05-1533 Page 2 of 2 The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE: Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney day of day of CITY COUNCIL ((V,~ ~~e~n~ IL~X,,$ AGENDA BRIEFING MEETING DATE: 07/19/05 CITY MANAGER , ~ ITEM#: 8 DEPARTMENT HEAD I U>:> ORDINANCE # : 0-05-1534 FINANCE REVIEW i Previous Action: 07/12/05 DEPARTMENT: OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: Denial of Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) Rate Request by Atmos Energy Corp., Mid- Tex Division Second Reading and Public Hearing First Reading and Public Hearing In December 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division, formerly known as TXU Gas, filed with the City of Colleyville, a request for an annual Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (GRIP) rate increase, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code S 104.301. On January 4, 2005, the City Council approved R-05-2494 suspending this rate request. The reason for suspending the request, as opposed to granting approval or denial, was to allow the Atmos Cities Steering Committee (ACSC), of which the City is a member, adequate time to review and analyze information provided by Atmos to justify its filings. ACSC's counsel believed that implementation of the proposed rate increases would allow substantial overearnings by Atmos. Upon review of the Company's filings, ACSC's counsel has determined that the rate increase is unjustified, unreasonable and not in compliance with the GRIP statute. Defects found in the request include, but are not limited to, the following: (a) the Company improperly calculated its 2003 rate base; (b) the Company included, in its calculation, projects unrelated to system improvement; (c) the Company failed to recognize the increased revenues it is now receiving due to increased rates approved by the Commission in Gas Utilities Docket (GUD) No. 9400 and due to customer growth; (d) information supplied by the Company indicated that the Company actually decreased its per-customer investment in infrastructure in calendar year 2003; (e) approval of the Company's GRIP request would result in over-earnings by the Company in the year of implementation; and (f) the Company has failed to demonstrate that it meets the statutory prerequisites to qualify for a GRIP rate increase or that its proposed method of implementation of the GRIP statute constitutes a constitutional application of the statute. ACSC has requested that its members approve an ordinance denying the rate increase by August 12, 2005. In consideration of ACSC members taking action to deny the request before August 12, Atmos has agreed not to file any additional GRIP rate requests before September 15, 2005. In the interim, ACSC, Atmos and other affected parties will delay briefing in pending dockets while global settlement discussions in pending Atmos matters are pursued. Agenda Briefing Ordinance 0-05-1534 Page 2 of 2 Financial Impact None. ACSC absorbs the costs of the rate case and these costs are subject to reimbursement by Atmos at the end of the case, pursuant to the Texas Gas Utilities Regulatory Act. Recommendation Approval Attachments . GRIP Handout . Resolution R-05-2494 . Ordinance 0-05-1534 Gas Reliability Infrastructure Program (Go Ro I. Po) Texas Utilities Code S 104.301 - Interim Adjustment for Changes in Investment What is it? Rate adjustment that allows utilities to recover additional invested capitallvitl10ltt (ilill~ {[ full rate case Who can use it? Gas utility with new invested capital not already included in existing rates But only ifutility has filed rate case in last two years What customers are affected and how? All customers · Applied to monthly customer charge or initial block rate Allocated among customer groups in same manner as current rates (GUO No. 9400) How is adjustment amount calculated? Intended to capture new investment costs in excess of normal plant replacement due to agmg Cannot include annual investment anticipated and included in existing rates as depreciation expense Costs that can be included are return (profit) on investment, depreciation expense and certain taxes Factors used to calculate costs must be the same as those reflected in order, ordinance or settlement agreement approving current rates What is required of utility? · Tariff or rate schedule must be filed with appropriate regulatory authority (City and/or Railroad Commission) 60 days before proposed implementation date Notice to all affected customers must be provided within 45 days of filing with regulatory authority After implementation, utility must file the following information annually: - Reports describing all new investments and retired plant - Costs, need and customers benefited by the new investment must be stated - Annual earnings monitoring report showing earnings in past year - If earnings are more than 75 basis points (.75%) above currently approved rate of return, utility must explain why earnings are not just unreasonable · Adjustment must be recalculated annually · Full rate case must be filed no later than five and one-half(5Y2) years after implementation What is role of cities? · Within 60 days after filing, a city may suspend implementation of proposed adjustment · Until incremental increase in rates has been reviewed as part of a full rate case, regulatory authority may disallow adjustment and order utility to refund any amounts collected Regulatory authority may open inquiry under Texas Utilities Code 9 104.151 and set new rates if rates are found to be unreasonable 1668\ 12\Handoul RESOLUTION R-05-2494 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE TEXAS, SUSPENDING THE PROPOSAL BY ATMOS ENERGY CORP. TO IMPLEMENT INTERIM GRIP RATE ADJUSTMENTS FOR GAS UTILITY INVESTMENT IN 2003; AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION WITH OTHER CITIES SERVED BY ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID- TEX DIVISION, IN A REVIEW AND INQUIRY INTO THE BASIS AND REASONABLENESS OF THE PROPOSED RATE ADJUSTMENTS; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION IN ADMINISTRATIVE AND COURT PROCEEDINGS INVOLVING THE PROPOSED GRIP RATE ADJUSTMENTS; DESIGNATING A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY TO SERVE ON A STEERING COMMITTEE; REQUIRING REIMBURSEMENT OF REASONABLE LEGAL AND CONSULTANT EXPENSES WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville, Texas ("City") is a gas utility customer of Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division, ("Atmos Mid-Tex" or "the Companyn) and a regulatory authority with an interest in the rates and charges of Atmos Mid- T ex; and WHEREAS, Atmos Mid-Tex made filings with the City and the Railroad Commission of Texas ("Railroad Commission") in December, 2004, proposing to implement interim rate adjustments ("GRIP Rate Increases") pursuant to Texas Utilities Code 9 104.301 on all customers served by Atmos Mid-Tex; and WHEREAS, Atmos Energy Corporation has reported a twenty percent increase in profits for its fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, and projects further increases in profits in 2005; and WHEREAS, in May, 2004, the Railroad Commission entered its Final Order in GUD No. 9400 authorizing a rate increase that will produce additional annual revenues of $11.5 million for Atmos Mid-Tex; and WHEREAS, Atmos Mid-Tex has projected that it will experience annual cost savings of at least $40 million over the costs included in rates approved in GUD No. 9400 and said savings are likely to greatly exceed the annual revenue requirement associated with any reasonable increases in invested capital that form the basis of the proposed GRIP rate increases; and WHEREAS, ratepayers of Atmos Mid-Tex, including the City and its residents, will be adversely impacted by the proposed GRIP Rate Increases; and WHEREAS, the City and its residents could benefit from coordination with other cities served by Atmos Mid-Tex ("Cities") in a review of the reasonableness of the proposed GRIP Rate Increases and joint Resolution R-05-2494 Page 2 of 3 participation in any proceedings at the Railroad Commission related to the proposed GRIP Rate Increases; and WHEREAS, the reasonable costs associated with the participation of Cities in this rate proceeding are reimbursable from Atmos Mid-Tex. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. THAT the February 15, 2005, effective date of the GRIP Rate Increases proposed by Atmos Mid-Tex is hereby suspended to permit adequate time to review the proposed increases, analyze all necessary information, and take appropriate action related to the proposed increases. THAT the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities to create and participate in a Steering Committee to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, to negotiate with the Company, to make recommendations to the City regarding the proposed GRIP Rate Increases, and to direct any administrative proceedings or litigation associated with the proposed GRIP Rate Increases. THAT the City is authorized to intervene in any administrative proceedings or litigation associated with the proposed GRIP Rate Increases, including GUD No. 9560, the Company's proposed GRIP rate increase for its pipeline system filed at the Railroad Commission. THAT the City hereby designates Financial Analyst Kacey Bess as a representative to a Cities' Steering Committee that shall direct the efforts of counsel and consultants. THAT Atmos Mid-Tex shall promptly reimburse the City's reasonable costs associated with the City's activities related to the proposed GRIP Rate Increases. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. PASSED BY A VOTE OF S AYES, 0 NAYS AND (') ABSTENTIONS ON THIS THE ~ DAY OF r~- 2005. Resolution R-05-2494 Page 3 of 3 ORDINANCE 0-05-1534 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, DENYING THE REQUEST OF ATMOS ENERGY CORP., MID-TEX DIVISION, FOR AN ANNUAL GAS RELIABILITY INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM ("GRIP") RATE INCREASE; AUTHORIZING INTERVENTION AS PART OF THE COALITION KNOWN AS THE A TMOS CITY STEERING COMMITTEE IN ANY APPEAL OF THE CITY'S ACTION TO THE RAILROAD COMMISSION; APPROVING COSTS INCURRED AS REASONABLE AND REQUIRING PROMPT REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS; FINDING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS ORDINANCE IS PASSED IS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AS REQUIRED BY LAW; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE OF THIS ORDINANCE TO A TMOS ENERGY CORP., MID- TEX DIVISION. WHEREAS, on or about December 17, 2004, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division, (the "Company") filed with the City of Colleyville ("City"), a request pursuant to Texas Utilities Code S 104.301 for an annual gas reliability infrastructure program ("GRIP") rate increase for the Company's gas utility customers located within the City, effective February 15, 2005; and WHEREAS, the City has exclusive original jurisdiction to evaluate the Company's request as it pertains to the distribution facilities located within the City, pursuant to Texas Utilities Code SS 102.001 (b) and 103.001; and WHEREAS, the City timely acted to suspend the effective date of Atmos' proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, the Gas Utility Regulatory Act grants local regulatory authorities the right to intervene in rate proceedings filed at the Railroad Commission ("Commissionn); and WHEREAS, the City can most efficiently participate in any appeal of this Ordinance to the Commission as part of the Atmos Cities Steering Committee ("ACSCn); and WHEREAS, the Texas Utilities Code S 103.022 provides that costs incurred by the City in ratemaking activities are to be reimbursed by the regulated utility; and WHEREAS, ACSC's rate case expenses incurred in this proceeding are reasonable and should be reimbursed by the Company; and WHEREAS, counsel for ACSC, upon review of the Company's filing and upon consultation with various consultants, recommends finding that the Company's proposal is unjustified, unreasonable and is not in compliance with the GRIP statute (Texas Utilities Code S 104.301) either in fact or in law; and Ordinance 0-05-1534 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, information provided by the Company indicates that the Company has decreased per-customer investment in infrastructure and substantially increased shareholder profits above the levels approved by the Commission in Gas Utilities Docket No. 9400; and WHEREAS, in consideration of the city taking action before August 12, 2005, on the currently pending GRIP request, the Company has agreed not to file any additional GRIP requests before September 15, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. Sec. 5. Sec. 6. Sec. 7. THAT the Company's GRIP rate increase request is found to be unjustified, unreasonable and in violation of the GRIP statute and is therefore denied in all respects. THAT the City is authorized to cooperate with other Cities within the Company's Distribution System that have formed ACSC to hire and direct legal counsel and consultants, negotiate with the Company, make recommendations to the City regarding reasonable rates and to direct any necessary litigation associated with an appeal of this ordinance to the Commission. THAT the costs incurred by ACSC in reviewing the Company's GRIP request and representing ACSC in this proceeding are hereby found to be reasonable and, upon submission to the Company, shall be promptly reimbursed by the Company. THAT the City is authorized to intervene in any appeal of the City's action filed at the Commission, and to participate in any such appeal as a member of ACSC. THAT the City Manager, on behalf of the City Council, is authorized any contracts and agreements related to the GRIP request. THAT this Ordinance shall become effective immediately from and after its passage, as the law and charter in such cases provide. THAT it is hereby officially found and determined that the meeting at which this Ordinance is passed is open to the public as required by law and that public notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting was given as required. Ordinance 0-05-1534 Page 3 of 3 Sec. 8. THAT a copy of this ordinance, constituting final action on the Company's application, shall be forwarded to the appropriate designated representative of the Company within 10 days as follows: Richard Reis, Manager, Gas Regulation, Atmos Energy Corp., Mid-Tex Division, Lincoln Center II, 18th Floor, 5420 LBJ Freeway, Dallas, Texas, 75240. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney CITY COUNCIL ell)' Of 4m<B AGENDA BRIEFING T(';(;:d MEETING DATE: ITEM#: RESOLUTION # : 07/19/05 9 R-05-2572 CITY MANAGER I DEPARTMENT HEAD FINANCE REVIEW I Previous Action: None DEPARTMENT : ENGINEERING SUBJECT : Approval of the Utility Relocation Design Contract for SH26 - Phase II with Teague, Nail and Perkins, in the amount of $373,600 Reading and Public Hearing The Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT) requires that all City water and sanitary sewer lines and all franchise utilities be relocated from existing locations that conflict with future road expansions. The new locations for these utilities will be either in the future SH26 parkway or in easements outside of the proposed right-of-way. No utilities will be allowed under the future pavement. This requirement will allow the highway to remain undisturbed in the event of a need for a repair or routine maintenance on a City of franchise utility. The utility relocation project is being administered in two phases. The first phase, which consisted of a schematic design to assess and evaluate the current facilities and infrastructure, is complete. The Phase II contract will consist of the detailed design and final construction plans and specifications. The consultant will utilize the current water system model completed by Dannenbaum Engineering Inc. in 2002. In February 2002, City Council approved Resolution R-02-1912, which approved a design contract for Phase I, with Teague, Nail and Perkins for the schematic design and assessment of utility relocations on SH26. Staff has been negotiating a contract for Phase II with Teague, Nail and Perkins for the past several months. The estimate for the utility relocation is $4,255,000. The design contract is for $373,600, or 8.8% of the construction estimate. Financial Impact Funding is available in the Utility Fund. Recommendation Approval Attachments . Resolution R-02-1912 . Resolution R-05-2572 RESOLUTION R-02-1912 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF A DESIGN SERVICE CONTRACT WITH TEAGUE, NALL AND PERKINS, INC., FOR PHASE I UTILITY RELOCATIONS FOR THE STATE HIGHWAY 26 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation requires that all City and franchise utilities be relocated for the future development of State Highway 26; and WHEREAS, these mandatory relocates of utilities must be constructed within the parkway or outside of the right-of-way of State Highway 26; and WHEREAS, Phase I of the utility relocations on State Highway 26 will include the schematic drawings to assess and evaluate the current facilities, infrastructure and proposed improvements of the City's utilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the design services contract with Teague, Nail and Perkins, Inc., in the amount of $70,500, for Phase 1 of the utility relocations on State Highway 26, is hereby approved. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. PASSED BY A YOTE OF ..5 AYES, 0 NAYS, AND 0 ABSTENTIONS ON THIS THE /9~ DAY OF ~..I.6A~~AAj 2002. ATTEST: ~~ ynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary CI:. o~ JLEYVILLE ~~ Mayor RESOLUTION R-05-2572 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE APPROVAL OF A DESIGN SERVICE CONTRACT WITH TEAGUE, NALL AND PERKINS, INC., FOR PHASE II UTILITY RELOCATIONS FOR THE STATE HIGHWAY 26 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the Texas Department of Transportation requires that all City and franchise utilities be relocated for the future development of State Highway 26; and WHEREAS, these mandatory relocates of utilities must be constructed within the parkway or in easements outside of the proposed right-of-way of State Highway 26; and WHEREAS, Phase I of the utility relocations on State Highway 26, which included the schematic drawings to assess and evaluate the current facilities, infrastructure and proposed improvements of the City's utilities has been completed; and WHEREAS, Phase II of the utility relocation project will consist of the final design and construction plans and specifications for the relocation of all of the city's water and sanitary sewer lines. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the design services contract with Teague, Nail and Perkins, Inc., in the amount of $373,600, for Phase II of the utility relocations on State Highway 26, is hereby approved. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. PASSED BY A VOTE OF THIS THE DAY OF AYES, NAYS AND 2005. ABSTENTIONS ON ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor TRAFFIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes of April 11, 2005 1. CALL TO ORDER. The meeting of the Traffic Safety Advisory Committee was called to order on April 11 th, at 7:05pm in the courtroom of the Colleyville Justice Center at 5201 Riverwalk Drive. Attending were: Bill Hodges Steve Knight Jody Short Sue Kijowski Brian Leding Councilman Rich Hendler-Council liaison Tommy Ingram (Police Chief/COC Staff Rep) 2. Approval of February 21 st meeting minutes. Motion to accept by Steve Knight, seconded by Bill Hodges and approved by committee 3. Staff reported on city Truck Route designations and collections for damage to City- owned property. 4. DISCUSSION ITEMS. A. Martin Parkway-traffic survey and speeding enforcement. B. Intersection of Hwy. 26 and Longwood signal installation. C. Traffic issues related to Cross Timbers Middle School. 5. ADJOURNMENT. The TSAC meeting adjourned at 8:50pm city Of nCB Texas PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES Monday May 2,2005 6:30 p.m. Bob Leininger called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. on Monday, May 2, 2005 at the Parks and Recreation office. ROLL CALL: Bob Leininger, Councilperson Tom Hart, Jerry Birkes, Vince Rosen, Pat Horn, Steve Dalri and Pete Riis. ABSENT: Connie Hampton, Councilperson Elaine Dolan, Gil Turner, and Nancy Coplen. STAFF: Monica Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation, Paul Frederiksen, Assistant City Manager and Craig Dishman, Recreation Supervisor. 1 . Call to Order 2. Approval of the April 4, 2005 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes Jerry Birkes moved to approve the April 4, 2005 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes. Pat Horn seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. 3. Tennis Court Reservation Process In response to a citizen complaint about not being able to reserve courts after hours, Craig Dishman, Recreation Supervisor, reported on the reservation process for the City of Colleyville tennis courts. The Department does have a drop box for reservations to be deposited, it does have a fax machine that can be utilized and one court is always open for public play. Court reservations are on a first-come, first-serve basis. A bulletin board has been installed on the maintenance building behind Court 4 which details courts that are reserved. It is updated bi-weekly. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Meeting May 2,2005 Page 2 4. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Attendance Requirements and Attendance Reports for FY 2004/2005 Monica Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation, reported on the attendance requirements, referring to the latest Ordinance 0-04-1446, Item 7. A discussion ensued questioning what other City Boards/Commissions required. Jerry Birkes requested feedback on those requirements. Paul Frederiksen, Assistant City Manager, stated that a comparison with other Board/Commissions requirements would be made and reported back to the Board. A request was made by a Board member to change the attendance report form so that "not appointed" does not show as a missed meeting. The terms for Pat Horn and Steve Dalri were requested to be changed to 2004 - 2006. Monica Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation, stated the changes would be made. 5. Update of Park Land Monica Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation, updated the Board on the available parcels of land 10 acres or larger in size in the City of Colleyville. The City is currently 5 acres short of park land according to its population. Parcels 1, 4 and 6 will be reviewed by Monica Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation, along with any 8 or 9 acre parcels and the land owned by the Assembly of God. This item will be placed on the July agenda. 6. Recreation, Athletics, Tennis and Seniors' Reports Craig Dishman, Recreation Supervisor, provided an overview of the current and proposed recreation programs and activities available to citizens of Colleyville and surrounding areas. 7. Park Operations and Capital Improvement Status Reports Monica Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation, presented a status report on current projects. 8. Adjournment Pat Horn moved to adjourn at 8:10 p.m. Jerry Birkes seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Respectfully submitted and approved: ( --\ (-~' ,,-~\ " )- ....\ -, ) ~-V~u /. -' .... . dL Dixie S. Smith, Administrative Secretary RESOLUTION R-05-2573 A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNCIL ACTION UNDER BUSINESS AT THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 19, 2005 WHEREAS, Council has taken action on certain items on the agenda under Business. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the agenda decisions approved by Council action under Business this date and not otherwise adopted by Ordinance and/or separate Resolution as follows are hereby adopted: a. THAT AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. APPROVED THIS DAY OF AYES, NAYS AND ABSTENTIONS. 2005, BY A VOTE OF ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary David Kelly Mayor