The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-2/28/2005 cc~~ Texas AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chambers - 100 Main Street Monday, February 28, 2005 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Commissioners Thomas Dolan, David Dudziak, Thomas Bartkowski, Jeff Byerly, Luann Edwards, John Blassingame and Denis Duffy INVOCATION Commissioner Bartkowski PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES February 14, 2005 CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case P-05-006 - Final Plat of Pine Hill Estates Addition, 3.67 acres located on Abstract 331, Tract 2C of the A.J. Caldwell Survey at 1209 Tinker Road PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 2. Case G-05-006- PUBLIC HEARING - Proposal to amend the Master Thoroughfare Plan as outlined in the City of Colleyville Master Plan 2004-2025 3. Case Z-05-002- PUBLIC HEARING- Request for a zoning change from AG to R20 on 24.108 acres, Abstract 404, Tracts 1, 3A and 3C of the William Dunn Survey located at 6805 Pleasant Run Road 4. Case Z-05-007 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request by Dallas Baptist University Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -February 28, 2005 Page 10f2 for a Special Use Permit for a satellite facility on Lot 1 R, Block 1 , Town Center Colleyville Phase I, located at 5611 Colleyville Blvd, Suite 240 TABLED ITEMS 5. Case P-OS-004 - TABLED - Final plat for Cambridge Place Addition, 9.181 acres on Lot 4R, Block 1, Centerpark Addition located south of Centerpark Drive, east of Colleyville Boulevard STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS The following items were received on the last case submittal deadline: COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Amy Shelley, Planning and Zoning Assistant Posted: Thursday, February 24, 2005, 4:30 p.rn. Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -February 28, 2005 Page 2 of 2 .$ l'exa8 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - February 14, 2005 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Byerly called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The motion wa Aye: Dolan, Dud Nay: None Commissioners Thomas Thomas Bartkowski, Blassingame, Denis D present. Dave Dudziak, Edwards, John Jeff Byerly were ROLL CALL Barry LeBaron, Woods and Je INVOCATION Commissioner Byerly. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Byerly introd Coordinator for the City 0 t? \I~ve the minutes of the January 24, 2005 meeting sloner'~Duffy seconded. following vote: ki, Edwards, Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case P-05-004 - Final plat for Cambridge Place Addition, 9.181 acres on Lot 4R, Block 1, Centerpark Addition located south of Centerpark Drive, east of Colleyville Boulevard Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 1 of 10 Barry LeBaron presented the case and briefed the Commission. Commissioner Edwards questioned if all comments have been addressed and is this plat the most current? Javier Jaramillo, the applicant's engineer, responded this plat is the most current. With regards to the street name, we are waiting to get something approved. Commissioner Edwards questioned if the base floor and flood elevations have been addressed because there is not any information pertaining to either. Mr. Jaramillo responded the base floor and flood evations are still being processed and we will have that information to Mr. s, City of Colleyville Engineer, on Thursday, February 17, 2005. Commis' Edwards questioned if those numbers will be shown on the plan? amillo responded yes. Commissioner Edwards questioned if some of the' as the water flooding were resolved? Mr. Jaramillo responded yes, the current Lomor plans and are going to show those cross se 'ssioner Edwards questioned staff when this case is going ron stated on March 1, 2005. Commissioner Edward en if these issues are not addressed? Barry LeBa his case will go to city council. Commissioner Edwards question mmission can still pass this plat? Barry LeBaron responde is plat can oved subject to the conditions stated. t is complete and have all dressed? Mr. Jaramillo to complete but it will be a repr be two Woods. hould be in order at the final plat stage; signs, sanitary sewer, or any elevation 004, meeting questions were asked to esponse made to any of those issues. Jones and Boyd, stated staff made recommendations is what remains to be finalized. The base flood line, delineated per the Lomor December 2004. This omm ndations. Once we have graded the site, all lots will od plain. We still need to provide that information to Mr. uestioned the water impact on the existing wall for this development? ankin responded there are no net changes in the numbers to the base flood elevation with the current flood model and new cross sections. Commissioner Duffy questioned if there is adequate drainage for the water that comes from Colleyville Boulevard down across this property to the creek? Mr. Rankin responded as far as grading, we have done what needs to be done for the water coming across our property. Commissioner Duffy questioned after having placed the two foot pad elevation, where is the water projected to drain down, through this lower loop shown on the plat? (At this point, can not take notes due to not beina able to hear. The applicants Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 2 of 10 are not speakina into the mic.l. Commissioner Duffy stated at the November 8, 2004, meeting a question was asked about, while you will not increase the numbers of the 100 year flood, what is your increase flow affect to the downstream property owners? Commissioner Duffy stated wanting to know so that city does not become liable for the increase in water to those properties down stream. Mr. Rankin responded the city ordinance allows the release of water into detention. licants ightly greater number igher, not much. It oject is so close water coming been establisH a by FEMA ed with having met with staff, ut of the way before the water cting the area in the flood cause of already having ut the lots along the south side; will all of uldn't that area behind those lots be aron responded area is already a flood ether or not that open space would be a draina asement? Barry LeBaron responded, a articular project. Mr. Rankin stated the easement ends staff can determine needing a drainage easement on t Co ioner Dudziak questioned if the drainage area is cal pace ercentage? Mr. Rankin stated this is what was agree PUD zoning. Commissioner Dudziak stated at this point nothing upon. Barry LeBaron stated this plat is consistent with the preliminary zoning exhibit that was included in the zoning process to show the lot ation, there are no inconsistencies. Commissioner Dudziak stated the PUD es not allow open space to be used as a drainage easement. Barry LeBaron responded the ordinance that establishes this PUD does allow for open space to be used for drainage. Commissioner Duffy questioned applicant about lot 16, is there enough room to build a house on that lot even with the drainage easement? Mr. Rankin stated there is enough room to build a house on that lot because of the space in front. Commissioner Edwards questioned if any improvements are being planned for the open space? Mr. Dan Quinto, 602 Northwood Trail, Southlake, the developer, Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 3 of 10 responded a landscape plan is included in your packet. Commissioner Edwards questioned if landscaping is all that is planned? Mr. Quinto responded correct. Commissioner Edwards questioned if benches would be used? Mr. Quinto responded no, no benches. Commissioner Dudziak questioned if the trees along the easement are all new plantings? Mr. Quinto replied they are not new trees, they are existing trees. Commissioner Dudziak questioned who will maintain or m.. w the area behind the fence? Mr. Quinto stated the strip between rear fence an .. s would be mowed by the Homeowner's Association. Commissioner Dudziak questioned staff abou responded there would be a five foot side homebuilders will be responsible to build a fi lot. Commissioner Edwards stated the ordi street to have sidewalks. s? Barry LeBaron enterpark and the er street on each oner Edwards, yet in the ey are not required. Barry along each lot and the home lat was passed by City LeBaron replied you may ront of you in two weeks. aff if the developer has addressed all arry LeBaron stated you may approve per that these issues or items will need the Commission could table this item and push it back ested tabling this request until additional information is e re t. Commissioner Edwards questioned staff they coul Baron replied yes, but it will be back in two weeks. Comml stated tabling would not really help in two weeks; the applicant , met all requirements. Commissione stated with having some inconsistencies, to table would not be out of line of the mmission. Commissioner Duffy replied the developer has not read the November 8, 2004 minutes and didn't address our questions to satisfy all issues. Mr. Quinto stated apologies to Commissioners for not having all issues addressed. He thought they were resolved on all issues and will have these items corrected. Commissioner Dolan stated to staff, in the Land Development Code, open space is for leisure and recreational purposes to be used by all residents. The open space in this project is not usable by the people purchasing these lots. Mr. Quinto stated the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 4 of 10 open spaces are to add beauty to the development. It is not the intent to have open parks, only natural areas. Commissioner Duffy questioned the applicant the price of the proposed home? Mr. Quinto replied $450,000. These homes would be the same kind that is in the Riverwalk project, patio homes. Commissioner Duffy questioned if there are any demographics. Mr. Quinto stated in the 23 homes, there is one adult child, and the average age is over 50. Commissioner Edwards stated to applicant that age an that can be controlled. Mr. Quinto replied correct ri and children but these houses are not structured predominantly two - three bedrooms and living.. a no play rooms. They will accommodate the Ie' questioned if they will be handicap access' be modified. Commissioner Edwards individual homes built? Mr. Quinto res ren are not something ey can not control age 'es. These homes are ominating, there are issioner Edwards yes they could c homes or lots will be p sed. d be nice. Mr. Quinto stated ebo, but some builders stated erence, but if the Commission what the people, who are pen space, this open space In the past. e P-05-004. Commissioner Bartkowski 2. Ca Additio Barry LeB BLI HEARING - Replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Cooper f Abstract 295 of the William Crook Survey the case and briefed the Commission. Commissione as questioned if the Right of Way (ROW) on John McCain was tied to the west se of the street? Barry LeBaron responded that the ROW is taken from somewhat the center of the street. Commissioner Edwards questioned staff if they know where the new street will be? Barry LeBaron responded Mr. Draper has dedicated his half of a 75 ROW, which would be about 37 % feet and his frontage varies. Commissioner Edwards questioned staff if a 16 foot utility easement is required? Barry LeBaron responded, normally a 7 % foot utility easement is needed but for a lot this deep, staff suggested a 16 foot utility easement, in order to have enough room to bring in proper equipment to do repairs or work. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 7:58 pm. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 5 of 10 There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:58 pm. Commissioner Duffy moved to approve Case P-05-005. Commissioner Dolan seconded. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Dolan, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Edwards, Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly Nay: None Barry LeBaron presented the case and brie Commissioner Bartkowski questioned meets the requirements for fire access. pavement section, however, the Fire Mars questions. Jeff Jones, Fire Marshal, stat outside and a 35 foot inside, this requires an additional overhead 1 preserve those tree doing through those two Commissioner:: those lots? J lots. Commissio would ve repl" e from R20 to PUD-R on e J.J. Newton Survey 3. Case Z-05-004 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zonin 1.898 acres of Abstract 1176, Tracts 1A3, 1A3A located at 5612 Bransford Road cul-de-sac n responde t with the Ie to answer those types of clear turning radius on the uirements. The apparatus veloper stated wanting to be enough clearance to get pub to city intention want to pre those collecto hal how would equipment get down to park on Bransford road to access those is a 180 foot drive, the fire department water down there, correct? Jeff Jones Iy to provide fire protection, but also access for an s would still require the same overhead clearance. uest staff the differences between private street and s? B ry LeBaron replied the street would have to be built missioner Byerly questioned if in the Master Plan, is the rd with estate lots? Barry LeBaron stated many citizens al atmosphere and keeping the estate type developments on would be consistent with the Master Plan. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned staff if under the current PUD ordinance, a private drive needs to have 20 lots? Barry LeBaron stated correct. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff about sidewalks and easements for Bransford? Barry LeBaron stated the provisions of the Land Development Code would take precedence over this development and the developer has not stated anything about sidewalks. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff about easement dedication along Bransford? Barry LeBaron stated % of 75 feet would be required for dedication at the time of platting. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 6 of 10 Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 8:10 pm. Ocie Vest, applicant and Civil Engineer representing the Wyatt Family Trust, briefed the Commissioners about the request. Mr. Vest stated the PUD-R zoning would give more flexibility for this development. Commissioner Duffy questioned applicant about the structural strength of the street? Mr. Vest stated this street would meet all city requirements for a public street except for the width. It will allow for a dead end fire lane at 180 ~ Commissioner Duffy questioned the applicant if the dedication of easem 37 % feet from the apparent center line of Bransford? Mr. Vest respond his time, not sure about where easement dedication is but will know once th . completed at platting. Commissioner Byerly questioned the applican these s, under this plan, would equal or exceed the size for R20 wh e proposed .zes are 18, 000 square feet and R20 requires 20,000 s eet? Mr. Vest d the lots are under the requirements for an R20, but lot req irements for D. Mr. Vest stated these two front homes w ford Road an ould have the estate feel as what is desired in the Ma and these homes would look good from all four sides. Commissioner Bartkowski ques drive down and back out of this 1 on to Bransford Road, which woul also the tree trimmi It will tj who is to say 1 the ro resources are nforce back to thos en pe impossible. If t propo ill Co 's possible to train crews to replied having to back out e backing out issue, but th ' ning of this development but se trees will still be maintained? The arking on the street; and in order to get are parking on the street, are nearly n additional fire hydrant like is being ment as well. tioned how would it be possible to fight those structure to park on Bransford and drag hose. elton ve, spoke in opposition to this request with regards al feel. Dinah S Iton Drive, spoke in opposition to this request with regards to wanting ral feel and concerns for the fire department. Mark McCrary, innie Drive, spoke in opposition to this request and submitted written opposition. He stated having 85% of frontage on Bransford Road and wants to keep the rural feel of the neighborhood. Mr. McCrary does not want the higher density. Twyla Kerlee, 800 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition to this request in regards to the density. Wade Evans, 800 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition to this request in regards to the density. Paul Kramer, 312 White Drive, spoke in opposition to this request wants to keep the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 7 of 10 dimensions on the building? Barry e the building 1,440 square foot, the clarify t 1 'onsistency for the ordinance. questioned staff if there are any materials required for Barry LeBaron stated none. estio (j staff, for clarity, the only reason the applicant is e permit is because the size of the building for this lot is arry LeBaron replied correct. The applicants are allowed requesting 1,400 square feet. The applicants could build a ing and only have to get a building permit. Commissioner D questioned staff if the placement inconsistencies on the briefing and the drawing are typos? Barry LeBaron replied staff called the applicant and suggested moving the building over two feet because of the height of the building. Commissioner Duffy stated having concerns with the materials to be used, the appearance of a five car garage and the placement of the building. The building needs to be behind the home. Commissioner Byerly opened the public hearing at 9:00 pm. Kim Nash, 5512 Valley View Drive West, the applicant presented the request and rural area and open space. James Day, 805 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition to this request. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 8:46 pm. Commissioner Bartkowski commended the developer for wanting to save all the trees that could be possibly saved, however, it would not be very comforting to a homeowner who's home just burnt because the fire truck cou d not get to their home. The fire marshal has already stated having issues. Commissioner Byerly concurred with Commissioner this is conducive for this area. Mr. Vest responded that most the issues broug addressed at that time. He stated wanting and fire department. Commissioner Duffy made motion to d seconded. issues and will be ments of the city er Dudziak 4. Case Z-05-005 - PUBLIC H SUP of an accesso 5512 Valley View c Barry LeBaro ill and Kim Nash for an 'c Oaks Addition, located at Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 8 of 10 briefed the Commissioners. Mrs. Nash stated the previous building had to be torn down because of faulty construction; it was an eye sore and unsafe. She stated needing the additional space for storage. The building will not be able to be seen from the street since it will be moved over two more feet. The building will only be a three car garage. I have neighbors who are in favor of our building. Commissioner Edwards questioned the applicant if bricking the front of the building was an option. Mrs. Nash replied she had checked with the city first about the restrictions, and bricking was not a requirement. Commissioner Bartkowski questioned the applicant building? Mrs. Nash replied it was 1, 050 squa properly. Commissioner Byerly questioned the appl' requested? Mrs. Nash responded 1, 400. Tom Beard, 5508 Oak Hills Drive, s opposition of the materials to be used to c There being no one wishing to s eak, the pub Commissioner Edwards questi re exact Mr. Beard stated this property 0 th neighbors are across the street fro Commissioner Du ed sta the 1,400 squar the ap LeBaron replie ode, t approved by t oning C e size of the previous t was not constructed the building the buildin ding. g was closed at 9:10 pm. . Beard lives to this property. bors back fence and the spoke in ers can allow them to build s need go before the ZBA? Barry re required the get a special use permit ission and City Council. if she could put a brick facade on the , we do e the funding for the brick. d according to code, she would only have to apply for a uild a 1, 000 square foot building. Barry LeBaron Com stated having concerns with the size of the building request Commissio ated none of the surrounding neighbors had an issue with this request. Commissioner Edwards stated a three car garage is pretty common in Colleyville. Commissioner Dolan stated the materials for this building are of good quality and there are not any requirements, in the code, on the materials to be used to construct this building. Commissioner Byerly made motion to approve Case Z-05-005. Commissioner Dolan seconded. The motion was approved by the following vote: Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 9 of 10 Aye: Dolan, Edwards, Blassingame, Byerly Nay: Dudziak, Bartkowski, Duffy STAFF REPORTS Barry LeBaron reminded Commissioners about the workshop for Monday, February 21, 2005. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Dudziak stating needing a copy of the PU Place and needing the Home Occupation readings for Edwards stated wanting to get ahead of issues 0 Commissioner Byerly stated needing to look at acce s Respectfully Submitted, inance for Cambridge rkshop. Commissioner ccupation regulations. aterials. ADJOURNMENT The Commission adjourned the meeting at Amy Shelley Planning and Zoning As Approved on: ---------- Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Februray 14, 2005 Page 10 of 10 .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 28, 2005 P-05-006 - Final Plat of Pine Hill Estates, 3.67 acres located at 1209 Tinker Road STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Dean DeCavitte is the developer of 3.67 acres located on the south side of Tinker Road, just east of Emerald Drive. The property also has frontage on Hardage Lane. Mr. OeCavitte has submitted a Final Plat to divide the property into five lots for the construction of five new single-family residences. Zoning. The City Council approved the rezoning of this property from AG-Agricultural to R40 and R20 at the January 18, 2005, City Council meeting. Two of the proposed lots front onto Tinker Road and are zoned R40. The three lots fronting onto Hardage Lane are zoned R20. The proposed lots meet the dimensional standards for the applicable zoning districts. Preliminary Plat. The preliminary plat of Pine Hill Estates was approved by City Council February 15, 2005. The final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. Open Space. No open space is required for the R40 and R20 districts and none is provided on the Final Plat. Right-of-Way Dedication. Tinker Road is classified as a Minor Arterial roadway on the Master Thoroughfare Plan, which requires an ultimate right-of-way width of 75 feet. The developer is dedicating approximately 14.6 feet of additional right-of-way along Tinker Road in order to provide the required 37.5 feet of right-of-way dedication on the south side of Tinker Road. Sidewalks and Trails. The Land Development Code requires the construction of sidewalks along the street frontage on each lot. The sidewalk is required to be five feet wide adjacent to Tinker Road and four feet wide adjacent to Hardage Lane. The sidewalk must be constructed as building improvements are made on each lot. Alternatively, an escrow for the sidewalk along Tinker Road may be included with any escrow for the perimeter street improvements described below. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Tinker Road is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the unimproved streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. No additional street improvements are Agenda Item No.1 - Page 1 required for Hardage Lane since the street meets current standards, except for the sidewalk improvements described above. Impact Fees. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on each lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction. SEWER $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. $2,666 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a 1-inch water meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. ROADWAY WATER Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. SUMMARY The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This final plat also requires approval by the City Council. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements of the Land Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location Map · Development Review Committee Memo · Developer Correspondence · Plat Prepared by: ~~ ~ ft----- Chris Fullef Development Coordinator Agenda Item No.1 - Page 2 Location Map \ I / I ( ~~ ~ ~ ]5 il-- I ~ \ IT-- t---- n- ~ ~ SIIT~ ~ J = ~ II I I - - ;: 1W0/r ~/== - ~ ~ iI,\ ~,,~5/ \\\ ~ I I 11 f N /1 ~ :ii f-- f------ I--- I--- '-- Agenda Item No.1 - Page 3 Development Review Committee Memo DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE February 18, 2005 TO Dean DeCavitte FAX NO 817.416.0206 FROM Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator SUBJEC P-05-006 Final Plat - Pine Hill Estates, Lots 1-5, Block 1 T The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. The Following Comments Require a Response from the Applicant: PLAT DRAWING 1. Revise the title block to state final plat. The plat contains more than four lots and will be processed as a Final Plat, requiring approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. The Following Comments are Informational and Do Not Require a Response: 2. The side yard setback lines are as follow: Zoning District Each Side (feet) R40 (Lots 1 & 2) 15' R20 (Lots 3 - 5) 10' 3. The rear setback lines are as follow: Zoning District Rear Yard (feet) R40 (Lots 1 & 2) 25' R20 (Lots 3 - 5) 25' Agenda Item No.1 - Page 4 OTHER INFORMATION . The engineering construction plans have been reviewed by the Engineering Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department. Questions concerning the construction plans should be directed to Robert Woods, Engineering, at 817.503.1090 or Jeff Jones, Fire Marshall, at 817.488.6277. 1. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires the construction of sidewalks along the street frontage on each lot. The sidewalk is required to be five feet wide adjacent to Tinker Road and four feet wide adjacent to Hardage Lane. The sidewalk must be constructed as building improvements are made on each lot. Alternatively, an escrow for the sidewalk along Tinker Road may be included with any escrow for the perimeter street improvements described below. 2. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on each lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or conditions contained in a City-Developer Agreement, if applicable. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Applicable to the new vacant lots created by this plat. $2,666 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a 1-inch water meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 3. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Tinker Road is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the unimproved streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the Engineering Department upon request. No additional street improvements are required for Hardage Lane since the street meets current standards, except for the sidewalk improvements described above. 4. PARKLAND DEDICATION. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per residential lot. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, February 28, 2005, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 15, 2005 Agenda Item No.1 - Page 5 Developer Correspondence fT. WOATH, TEXAS76'f11 8344471 FAX $3'1..ge16 INC. 'f ffj.f .,...........~ Agenda Item No.1 - Page 6 Plat ... .. ..... .. .. 'l\li'M .". w_ . ...- . ..- It ....-.---. ...-- .... - l . . fi'~ .. . ~... "!!t... -,--- -- I t j ..:!L1- - - i --~ -~_._---- ~ -<>>;'J;r fill......... 11 :au.... ........... flIlI\l. fllJIt " U1t!$ " ..t;, ..t;, .. ... f. ... I PINE HILL ESrATBS .IO""'''~~ ~I"r~....-"'."- 1l'I$NT I'UJ) Ill: l:Ilo$. _ .. _.l\Imt_ Agenda Item No.1 - Page 7 .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 28,2005 G-05-006 - Public Hearing - Consideration of amendment to the Master Thoroughfare Plan STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS The Master Thoroughfare Plan is used as a guide to show the location of the future major roadway network that will serve Colleyville upon ultimate build-out of the community. The current Master Thoroughfare Plan was adopted with the approval by the City Council of Resolution R-98-1408 on September 1, 1998. The Master Thoroughfare Plan is enforced through the subdivision platting process. As properties - develop, additional right-of-way is obtained and incrementally, the roadway network is put in place. During the preparation of the Colleyville Master Plan update, there was considerable discussion regarding a future un-named north-south collector roadway that would extend between L. D. Lockett Road and McDonwell School Road and running parallel with Precinct Line Road. Discussions by the Planning and Zoning Commission and from comments received at the series of neighborhood meetings during the development of the Master Plan update in 2003 and 2004, questioned the need for the four-lane roadway and the alignment on the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan. The reduction in the depth of the future commercial area along Precinct Line Road from approximately 1,500 feet on the previous future land use plan to approximately 900 feet on the most recently adopted future land use plan serves as an opportunity to relocate the north-south collector street, yet still provide adequate circulation which will support the Precinct Line Road commercial area, while serving as a physical separator between the future commercial area on the west and the residential areas on the east. Additionally, during the development of the recent Master Plan update, there was some concern regarding the need for a four-lane roadway, since a two-lane facility constructed with a 60 or 70 foot right-of-way should satisfy the traffic circulation needs for this area. Sufficient right-of-way width should be required to accommodate a future trail route through this area. The current trail route shown on the 1999 Colleyville Pathways Plan is located immediately adjacent to Precinct Line Road. One of the goals being considered in the update to the trails plan is to relocate the trail route away from the busy traffic along Precinct Line Road. There are two actions for consideration at this public hearing - first regarding the alignment of the future roadway and the second action regarding the number of driving lanes. Agenda Item No.2 - Page 1 Action One - The attached Exhibit 1 shows the general location (Alignment "A") of the proposed north-south collector street as shown on the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan. Shown on the attached Exhibit 2 is an alternate route designated as Alignment "B". Exhibit 3 shows the general location for the alternate route designated as Alignment "C". Action Two - Determine whether this roadway should be a four-lane collector or a two- lane collector (see Exhibit 4). Staff mailed notices to 16 property owners potentially impacted by the existing or proposed alignments. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star- Telegram. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: February 28, 2005 City Council: March 15 and April 5, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Existing and Proposed Alignment Maps · Right-of-way information · List of Property Owners Notified · Correspondence · Draft ordinance Prepared by: Agenda Item No.2 - Page 2 Exhibit "1" Location of future four-lane collector street as shown on current Master Thoroughfare Plan Alignment "A - U;1d (j = ffiE 'l~ ~ " II l~ I MUS " /\TR~ ~ · ~\F I ~ · · · .. ~ ~ Alignment "A" t= ~ j) lJi" I I I ~I--~ t f-' --, T S e.-- 1l _ f--- ~ L ~ ~~ N~_ ~~~ l-I;:<; - 1 H IT 1 - L- /'IT -'---' -I- _ ~ /- -I--- II \ , -= - - - IL . . . . . . . f- I =i --.--J rn J:1] n 21 \ / "-. "~E ttr- r,,- I---~~\ t=! -'<~ { I J- - RE - 1l,1. -{ c -I III ~~# 1Il__ I - ~ - - - ~- - ~= 1 I I , ~. ~ ~ ~ ~* ~ -~ /[,0 -# l/ ~,\ ,.. ::;: ~ t,I.~'1 -i1n -J 1 ~ Agenda Item No.2 - Page 3 Exhibit "2" Proposed relocation of future collector street Alignment "B" - - -- I r--:::: L r' I~ 0'; c. wu,JcL, 0"" ~ ~ ~ flTIJ~ 1 ~ N ~ r--- DIIJ~ ~~ I )-v II ~'>!C ~ I ~//\ ~<; r---= = MUS TR~' '\ r-; 1\ L 'r-M1;l .1 . .11 Alignment "8" tir- IT--- Rl.t GST r- W r-r- If",~ /r:; lt1 .~~. \ l.Jd ~ r- UJI~~IIII -= t W h ST ;;; S - 1 r- - ~ IlllllIlGOD'ltr-- - I---: c; iA1N!-- I rJ::. < 12 '- :;>~ f- :i J y---- I" ..- I. /. I-- ~ '\..- E=J P D~if~ L /;:{: ~ ~ - ~-~4 = ~ ~ ~ (?c - '----, ~~ y;1J--- ~Rlwl I =; 1 ~ H I - - ! roJ.uh \/ ).1 I'): !~ v~ I \ - f-- I-- f--I ).... f--I-- - f/ I f-- :'= - - L- f- Ii R ! tIII~. · · .. ... i l w III I r. r- ~k'1 ~~ L---;- j "'- Ll - I ~ - I r- I . - r- I I - IT" t~ ~~ r- 'I-- r- II-- r- v~ I11II t- r- r- RE r-- ( ~ - W WI--_ r- f-- - Agenda Item No.2 - Page 4 Exhibit "3" Proposed relocation of future collector street Alignment "c" II i- v/ f-- I - Yo II 'I T I :::I L- \ RE f-- .I, I>-{ "( I I- Mi 1 "-- ~lr bel I - - -'-- ,\ - -".~-- I--- I--- - ,/, I I ffi~ I--- r- U o'e. 011-_ ~ ;== '= f--- : - 01 I I ~ ~:-.-- - tHE 'i_____ "-~ f--- = ~~~IA~ f-- . I--- . - . . -1!:1 "'-~ -;1. I--- ctl " /\ -~~ l- I--- r= MUS \-l~/ L ~ '\ III !"-.I/1 ~ I R rr~-;- I I -I Alignment "e" j~NGST1E J- - - LD ~"I fl - - ~ - w- T HA S - f---1 -IV' - -.-J I. .01 ~r. 00 - - -, ''----.{ r~ WN~ u I ~( ,- T - ~ ~ ----- ..~ / [ .~ ~ ~ ~* f< 1dI rtl ,~ I ~ J Ll ~ IT I "-.. ..1 -~ ~~ : n" r: ~ /.L [ - \= ~ 1/ ~ 1/ 1/ Il\ \'\ ~ 1 ,I.. tJ Agenda Item No.2 - Page 5 Exhibit "4" Right-of-way Information ~~ ~. . . 15' Parkway 80' R.O.W. I I 50' Back to Back l~ 15' Parkway :::E 5' Min. 10' Max. Varies Typ. .02 TYPICAL SECTION MAJOR COLLECTOR 4-LANE UNDIVIDED STREET I . 75' ROW t ~ 0:: . . 16.5' 42' Back to Back 1S.5' Parkway Parkway s: o 0:: TYPICAL SECTION MINOR COLLECTOR 2 LANE UNDIVIDED STREET I SO' ROW I s: 10' 36' Back to Back o Parkway 0:: 14' s: Parkway ~ . . 5' Sidewalk . . . 10' Trail TYPICAL SECTION MINOR COLLECTOR 2 LANE UNDIVIDED STREET (With Trail) Agenda Item No.2 - Page 6 List of Property Owners Notified Keller ISD Attn : Tom Myers 100 Main Street Fort Worth, TX 76102 Lavaca Trail, LLC 3930 Glade Road Ste. 108 Colleyville, TX 76034 Ruggere, Judy 1013 W Lavaca Trail Colleyville, TX 76034 Mittag, Andrew K etux Janet A 901 W Lavaca Trail Colleyville, TX 76034 Emerald Park Residence Dev. Ltd. 6420 Remington Pkwy Colleyville, TX 76034 LDDS Communications Inc. Attn: Property Tax Dept 500 Clinton Center Drive Clinton, MS 39056-5630 Jones, Jerrell W 11111 Abbeywood Oklahoma City, OK 73170 Martin, Lewis E etux Bonnie J 1101 W Lavaca Trail Colleyville, TX 76034 Plain, Veri etux Ruth Ann 909 W Lavaca Trail Colleyville, TX 76034 Goodman Family of Builders LP 5808 W Plane Pkwy Piano, TX 75093 William D Souder Investments 305 Brookridge Court Hurst, TX 76054 McIntosh, Doyle & Mary Family LP 8333 Thornhill Drive North Richland Hills, TX 76180 BVESCO LP 25 Highland Park Village Ste 100 Dallas, TX 75205 Ogle, Danny G & Ruth A 1009 W Lavaca Trail Colleyville, TX 76034 Agenda Item No.2 - Page 7 ORDINANCE 0-05-XXXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION: WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a Master Thoroughfare Plan on September 1, 1998 by approval of Resolution R-98-1408; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing, received citizen input and has made recommendation regarding the proposed amendment to the Master Thoroughfare Plan; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 10 days before such hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the City Council was published in a newspaper of general circulation in Colleyville at least 10 days before such hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the Master Thoroughfare Plan adopted by Resolution R-98-1408 is hereby amended to incorporate the following changes: A. The un-named Major Collector extending between L.D. Lockett Road and McDonwell School Road as shown on the current Master Thoroughfare Plan, attached as Exhibit "A" is hereby relocated to the general alignment shown on Exhibit "B". B. The un-named collector roadway shown on the attached Exhibit "B" is hereby changed from a four-lane Major Collector roadway to a two-lane Minor Collector roadway with a 50-foot right-of-way width and a 36-foot wide pavement width as shown on the attached Exhibit "C". See 2. THAT the Master Thoroughfare Plan, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. See 3. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternate method of publication provided by law. Ordinance 0-05-XXXX Page 2 of 2 AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary Joe Hocutt Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT" A" Location of future four-lane major collector street as shown on current Master Thoroughfare Plan IT - I lli~* G \.. \ J\'\~o CD HI ::e:' 0,. ITllJ \11 ~ ,DTIJ ~ / 1f}' '-..::: t/, :.. ..... ~ 7/\ C\:'~ I MUS TR Lk I r\ :r\c /l \---,~ H T ~ ~~} ]) iJI'I 11\ ~I----'- - J( I-- _v' lOIN" 0 0 L f--, ''--1 ~ -, \ r'J:', 2 ~---- - ~ ~~~ ~ " J lL )1 l ~ _ F I~f-J _ I rJ-i :_ -fu I,L,~ =r*' T ~ 11 \ ~ I-- ____ .-J = -: '-- I-- f-' --I ---' ~. JT n '-{ _ro.,-- -' "-- I \ ---...'./>- \ '- - =. -I IL I I I I I. I I I ~ 3- ! !.--J , ~~-,\1';,1- ! ~ f-J I iJiro f---J r--<.. '" c-----,- y '<<)\ ! b 'I I .II ~ :J RE -I II ~~ ~::c i r - ::::j f--- =>= ."';- /' ;<5' '- !--- I C-j --L--1 - 1--=:: Ai GSTU ~:= ~ :1 [L I-- --- T M~ - \-- -~ I'dN~- ;1\ I ~= ~ ~ ~ - \Q~';l- C? =~ir--I-- ..-.. c--l~-I _~j~ r~~ 1 fj~~~-l-... YJi / -fJ' = v: ~ ~~' _, lJ...1 i\- i[L- '~ EXHIBIT "B" Location of future collector street (insert map of recommended roadway alignment) I EXHIBIT "e" Right-of -Way Information SO' ROW I S 10' o Parkway a:: " . 5' Sidewalk 3S' Back to Back TYPICAL SECTION MINOR COLLECTOR 2 LANE UNDIVIDED STREET (With Trail) 14" S Parkway ~ " . . 10' Trail .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 28, 2005 Z-05-002 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning change from AG to R20 on 24.108 acres, Abstract 404, Tracts 1, 3A and 3C of the William Dunn Survey located at 6805 Pleasant Run Road STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Stonebridge Development is the potential developer of a 24.1-acre parcel of property located on the east side of Pleasant Run Road, south of John McCain Road. The applicant has submitted a request to change the zoning on the property from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential. The owner is seeking a zoning change in order to develop the property as single family residences. The developer proposes to construct 36 single family lots and 3 open space lots. The density of the proposed development is 1.49 dwelling units per acre. There is a street entrance proposed on Pleasant Run Road, continuing to a proposed street connection with the Warwick Pare subdivision, which is currently under development to the east of the site. The property is not currently platted and will require approval of a subdivision plat at a later date, upon approval of the rezoning request. The surrounding property is single family residential in nature. Property to the north is zoned R40 and AG, and is currently used for single family residences. Property to the east is zoned R20, and is under development as a single family subdivision. The property to the south, which is owned by the City, is zoned AG and is used for practice soccer fields. Property to the west, across Pleasant Run Road, is zoned AG and RE and is developed as single family residences. The existing property has 580 feet of frontage along Pleasant Run Road and is approximately 1,489 feet deep. The R20 zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 100 feet, a minimum lot depth of 125 feet, and a minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet. The developer has submitted a conceptual layout of the property showing a potential lot configuration. The proposed lots, as shown on the zoning exhibit, appear to meet the R20 zoning requirements, with the exception of Lot 21. Lot 21 is a flag lot that lacks the requisite lot frontage along John McCain Road. Approval of the rezoning request does not constitute approval of the proposed lot layout and does not bind the developer to any particular lot arrangement. The following is an analysis of the major issues associated with this rezoning request. Master Plan. The Colleyville Plan contains as a goal to "preserve the superior quality of Colleyville's residential neighborhoods". This particular goal includes several objectives relative to this zoning change request: Agenda Item No.3 - Page 1 · Promote greenbelts and buffer areas in front of subdivisions adjacent to major thoroughfares. · Maintain the current level of housing quality and density. Residential Density. The Master Plan suggests a maximum residential density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre in most situations. The maximum residential density for the R20 zoning district is 2.1 dwelling units per acre. Based on 36 residential lots, the applicant's proposed density is 1.49 dwelling units per acre. Lot Sizes & Widths. The R20 standards allow for a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. The applicant proposes to create 36 single family lots, each adhering to the lot area required by the R20 zoning district. Lot 21 does not meet the lot width standards of the R20 zoning district. Lots within the R20 zoning district must have a minimum lot frontage along a public roadway of 100-feet. Lot 21 is a flag lot, which is not permitted by the Land Development Code. Additionally, there are concerns regarding emergency services access and the ability to provide water and waste water services to the lot. Open Space. This project provides 3 common open space lots. Two of the lots are located along the frontage of Pleasant Run Road and will serve as a landscape buffer between the road and the neighborhood. The remaining open space lot will be located within the neighborhood, designated as Lot 18, Block 1 on the zoning exhibit. A detention pond will be placed within this lot. Sidewalks and Trails. Sidewalks are required to be constructed on each individual lot within the development at the time houses are constructed on the lots. The Development Code requires these sidewalks to be four feet in width. The Trail Plan shows a 10-foot trail along the frontage of Pleasant Run Road; however the precise location of the trail will be determined at the time of platting. IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. This request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Master Plan. 2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are developed as single family uses. 3. Development Trends. The development trends in this area primarily focus on single family development. 4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer service are available along adjacent rights-of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of water and sewer service lines to the individual lots. 5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the 24.1-acre parcel is valued at $1,051,900. The estimated City property tax revenue for the undeveloped property is $3,654 annually. The future property Agenda Item No.3 - Page 2 tax revenue would depend upon the value of each individual lot and the value of the house built on the lot. 6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on average. Based on this average, the 36 proposed residences would add 344.5 vehicle trips per day to the surrounding roadways. 7. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 20 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: February 28, 2005 City Council: March 15 and April5, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. ATTACHMENTS · Comparison of Existing & Proposed Zoning District Regulations · Zoning and Location Map · Information and Drawings from Applicant · List of Property Owners Notified · Draft ordinance Prepared by: ~~ -/~_.- Chris Fuller / Development Coordinator / Agenda Item No.3 - Page 3 Comparison of Existing & Proposed Zoning District Regulations REGULATIONS EXISTING AG PROPOSED R20 Maximum Density 0.3 DUlAC 2.1 DUlAC Minimum Lot Area 130,680 SF 20,000 SF Minimum Lot Width 200 FT 100 FT Minimum Lot Depth 300 FT 125 FT Minimum Front 40 FT 30 FT Yard Setback Minimum Rear Yard 40 FT 25 FT Setback Minimum Side Yard 25 FT 10 FT Setback Maximum Lot 20% 30% Coverage Maximum Number 2.5 2.5 of Stories Maximum Building 35 FT 35 FT Height Agenda Item No.3 - Page 4 Zoning and Location Map D NORTH AG Agenda Item No.3 - Page 5 Information and Drawings from Applicant +- bl.l!1' -,~~ Agenda Item No.3 - Page 6 List of Property Owners Notified Stonebridge Development, applicant 800 Brown Trail, Suite E Bedford, TX 76022 Crown of Life Lutheran Church 6605 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Roybal, Robert E PO Box 893 Colleyville, TX 76034 Spurlock, Joe" Etux Cheri L 6816 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Meadows, Timothy P Etux Becky 6901 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Quinn, Thomas F Jr 6817 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Adair, Thomas DEux Margie Tom & Winnell Adair L1V Trust 901 John McCain Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Tirk, Joe V 909 John McCain Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Tirk, Joe V 1009 John McCain Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Gade, Michael J Etux Regina C 6808 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 McCormack, Bobby Jack 6802 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Scott, David A Etux Jennifer 6704 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Brown, Howard H PO Box 396 Colleyville, TX 76034 Erwin, Roy D Etux Danette 6908 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Pool, Robert A 6905 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Brown, Coalby F PO Box 220 Colleyville, TX 76034 Denson, Albert W 813 John McCain Rd Colleyville, TX 76034 Denson, AI & Tracie 813 John McCain Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Adair & Brown LP 901 John McCain Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Alholm Family Limited Partnership 6805 Pleasant Run Road Colleyville, TX 76034 Agenda Item No.3 - Page 7 ORDINANCE 0-05-xxxx AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 3, LAND USE OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING THE ZONING ON 24.108 ACRES OUT OF THE WILLIAM DUNN SURVEY, ABSTRACT 404, FROM THE AG- AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO THE R20 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by John Fegan on February 10,2005, under Case No. Z-05-002; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in the best interests of the City of Colleyville. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. Sec. 4. THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, and the Official Zoning Map are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas, as shown on the Zoning Map, attached as Exhibit "A", and described by metes and bounds, attached as Exhibit "B", by changing the zoning of said property from the AG-Agricultural district to the R20 Single Family Residential district. THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause Ordinance 0-05-xxxx Page 2 of 2 publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Sec. 5. THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary Joe Hocutt Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT A - ZONING MAP EXHIBIT B - METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FIELD NOTE DESCRIPTION ALL of that certain tract or parcel of land situated in the WILUAM DUNN SURVEY. Patent No.366. Volume 41. Abstract No.234 and containing a portion of the tract described in the deed to The Alholm Family Limited Partnership as recorded in Volume 14159. Page 261. Deed Records. Tarrant County. Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2 inch steel rod with cap stamped ..MOAK SURV INC.. set for the southwest corner of Lot 5. Adair & Brown Estates. an Addition to the City of COlley\'ille. Tarrant County. Texas as recorded in Volume 388-121. Page 55. Plat Records. Tarrant County. Texas; THENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes 24 seconds East with the southerly boundary line of said Lot 5 a distance of 430.00 feet to a 1/2 inch steel rod with cap stamped "MOAK SURV INC.. set for the south east corner of same; THENCE North 00 degrees 08 minutes 48 seconds West with said easterly boundary line of same. 612.09 feet to a nail set in the approximate centerline of John McCain Road; THENCE North 89 degrees 51 minutes 24 seconds East with said approximate centerline. 40.26 feet to a nail set for the northeast corner of same and also being the northwest corner of the tract described in the deed to Lyndia M. Alholm. et al as recorded in Volume 12386. Page 23Ml of said Deed Records; THENCE South 00 degrees 11 minutes 59 seconds East with the easterly boundary line of said Alholm tract. 1465.50 feet to a 5/8 inch steel rod found for the southeast corner of same; THENCE North 89 degrees 41 minutes 01 seconds West with the southerly boundary line of said Alho1m tract. 1489.32 feet to a nail set for the southwest carner of same and being in the approximate centerline of Pleasant Run Road; THENCE North 00 degrees 36 minutes 05 seconds West with said approximate centerline. 580.25 feet to a nail set; THENCE South 89 degrees 21 minutes 16 seconds East. 669.96 feet to a 1/2 inch steel rod found for the most southerly southeast corner of Lot 4. Adair & Brown Estates. an Addition to the City of Colleyville. Tarrant County, Texas as recorded in Volume 388-120. Page 8 of said Plat Records; THENCE North 60 degrees 50 minutes 22 seconds East with the southerly boundary line of said Lot 4 a distance of 402.93 feet to 5/B inch steel rod found for the most easterly southeast corner of same; THENCE North 00 degrees 08 minutes 36 seconds West with the easterly boundary line of said Lot 4 a distance of 75.00 feet to the PLACE OF BEGINNING and containing 24.108 acres of land. mare or less. .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 28, 2005 Z-05-007 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request by Dallas Baptist University for a Special Use permit for a satellite facility on Lot 1 R, Block 1, Town Center Colleyville Phase I, located at 5611 Colleyville Boulevard, Suite 240 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Melvin and Martindale, A Texas Limited Partnership, is the owner of Town Center shopping center located at 5611 Colleyville Boulevard. Dallas Baptist University, the prospective tenant of a suite located on the property, has applied for a Special Use Permit to allow a satellite educational facility within a portion of the building. The Land Development Code states that a college or university within the CC2 - Shopping Center zoning district, is only permitted by approval of a Special Use Permit The Town Center development fronts on Colleyville Boulevard and primarily consists of commercial tenants. The applicant is proposing to lease space within the shopping center in order to conduct educational classes. Information provided by the applicant indicates that operating hours would be from 9 a.m. until 8 p.m., except during the fall and spring semesters when hours will be extended until 10:30 p.m. when classes conclude. The majority of classes would be conducted during evening hours. The peak hours of traffic would be from 5: 15 p.m. until 10:30 p.m. on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday evenings. The peak number of number of vehicles would vary between 30 to 50 vehicles. There are currently 112 parking spaces available in the northern portion of the shopping center near the proposed location. Additional information will be provided by the applicant at the meeting. The surrounding property is primarily zoned for retail uses and is developed. Property to the north is zoned CC2, but currently undeveloped. The proposed facility will be located in one of the vacant commercial spaces in the Town Center development, which is currently zoned CC-2 - Shopping Center Commercial. The property to the east is zoned R20 and is developed as single family residential. The properties to the west and to the south are zoned CC2 and developed as a portion of the Town Center development. The Master Plan designates the future use of this property for retail development. Staff mailed notices to 12 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff has not received any correspondence regarding this request. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 1 IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future use of this area for retail land uses. The property surrounding the Town Center development is planned for comercial development. 2. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is retail development. The surrounding properties are primarily developed as commercial uses. Property in the area is generally suitable for that type of development. 3. Parking. According to information provided by the applicant approximately 30 to 50 parking spaces may be required to accommodate peak hour attendance. The Land Development Code states the parking standards for this use are 1 space for each classroom or teaching station, plus 1 additional space for each 3 students accommodated in the school. There are currently 112 parking spaces available in the northern portion of the shopping center near the proposed location. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: February 28, 2005 City Council: March 15 and April 5, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Approval, with the following condition: 1. The Special Use Permit is applicable for only the current lease space. Any future expansion or acquisition of additional lease space sought by the applicant will require approval an amendment to the Special Use Permit. A TT ACHMENTS · Zoning and Location Map · Information and Drawings from Applicant · List of Property Owners Notified · Draft ordinance Prepared by: ~~.pL--. ..- Chris Fuller Development Coordinator Agenda Item No.4 - Page 2 Zoning and Location Map Agenda Item No.4 -: Page 3 Information and Drawings from Applicant February 22,2005 Chris Fuller, Development Coordinator City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Dear Mr. Fuller: We have received your request for information pursuant to the Special Use Permit for a Satellite Facility at 5611 Colleyville Boulevard, Suite 240. Responses to the questions are in italics below. 1. Approximately how many cars will be parking at the facility during peak operational hours? a. Approximately 30-50 cars will be parking at the facility during the DBU facility's peak operational hours. 2. When are the anticipated peak days and times? a. It is anticipated that DBU's facility (DBU-Colleyville) will experience peak attendance on Monday, Tuesday, and Thursday evenings between the hours of 5:15 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. These peak days and times relate to attendance during the fall semester (generally late August through early December) and the spring semester (generally late January through early May). 3. What is the duration of attendance during peak times? a. The duration of attendance during peak times is approximately five (5) hours. 4. What are the hours of operation for this facility? a. DBU-Colleyville will initially operate Monday-Friday, from 9:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m Beginning with the fall semester (late August), the hours will be extended to conclude at approximately 10:30 p.m. Please advise me if there are any additional questions or concerns. Sincerely, Ozzie Ingram, Ed.D. Associate Vice President for Administrative Affairs cc: Dr. J. Blair Blackburn Ric Nelson Agenda Item No.4 - Page 4 /~--- --,-- ---~ i ! II t<1 it 1 I ! H4 ~.. --,.....,...~,-- ~:.-_.............., '- I I I I I I I. 1_ : I I Agenda Item No.4 - Page 5 List of Property Owners Notified Wolf Camera 5611 Colleyville Blvd. Suite 100 Colleyville, TX 76034 President Robert M. Farrall Melvin and Martindale, Ltd. 8235 Douglas Avenue, Suite 950 Dallas, TX 75225 Great Clips 5611 Colleyville Blvd. Suite 290 Colleyville, TX 76034 Sue Berries 5611 Colleyville Blvd. Suite 200 Colleyville, TX 76034 Mr. Charles M. Hodges Hodges & Associates 13642 Omega Dallas, TX 75244 Mr. Ric Nelson Centerpoint Advisors Galleria Two 13455 Noel Road, Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 75240 Central Nail Salon 5611 Colleyville Blvd. Suite 280 Colleyville, TX 76034 Scrapbook Warehouse 5611 Colleyville Blvd. Suite 140 Colleyville, TX 76034 Mr. J. Blair Blackburn Dallas Baptist University 3000 Mountain Creek Parkway Dallas, TX 75211 Glorias 5611 Colleyville Blvd. Suite 300 Colleyville, TX 76034 Pack -N- Mail Plus 5611 Colleyville Blvd. Suite 260 Colleyville, TX 76034 Quick Thai 5611 Colleyville Blvd. Suite 120 Colleyville, TX 76034 Agenda Item No.4 - Page 6 ORDINANCE 0-05-II1II AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, BY AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A SATELLITE UNIVERSITY FACILITY ON A PORTION OF LOT 1R, BLOCK 1, TOWN CENTER COLLEYVILLE PHASE I; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application for a Special Use Permit was filed by Dallas Baptist University on February 10, 2005, under Case No. Z-05-007; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in the best interests of the City of Colleyville. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. Sec. 2. Sec. 3. THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, and the accompanying Zoning Map (Exhibit "A") are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas, described as Lot 1 R, Block 1, Town Center Colleyville Phase I, by authorizing a Special Use Permit for a satellite university facility, subject to the following condition: a. The Special Use Permit shall be applicable for only the current . tenant space addressed as 5611 Colleyville Boulevard, Suite 240 (Exhibit "B") and shown on the attached site plan, Exhibit "B". Any future expansion of additional space for this use will require approval an amendment to the Special Use Permit. THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. Ordinance 0-05-)OOp~ Page 2 of 2 Sec. 4. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Sec. 5. THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication. AND IT 15 50 ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary Joe Hocutt Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Matthew C.G. Boyle City Attorney EXHIBIT "A" - ZONING MAP CC-2 ~ KfNGSWOOD EXHIBIT "B" - SUITE 240 /.~-- -- -- --..". j ! j II $! I! ! iU tH ~.."""" ~',_. caece Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 14, 2005 P-05-004 - Tabled 02-14-05 - Final Plat for Cambridge Place Addition, 9.181 acres on Lot 4R, Block 1, Centerpark Addition located south of Centerpark Drive, east of Colleyville Boulevard Update 02/28/05 The Commission tabled this item at the February 14, 2005 meeting to allow the developer to provide additional information regarding the proposed subdivision. Engineering and Community Development Department staff met with the developer and the developer's engineer on Wednesday, February 16, 2005 to review the remaining issues associated with this Final Plat. The following is a summary response for each outstanding item. Construction and Drainaqe Plans - On Thursday, February 17, 2005, the developer's engineer re-submitted the final construction plans and drainage plans to the Colleyville Engineering Department, which included all corrections from prior comments made on the initial submittal. Engineering Department staff has reviewed the latest submittal and determined that these documents comply with the design standards contained in the Land Development Code. Engineering Department staff will be present at the Commission meeting to answer questions. November 8, 2004 Questions - The developer has provided a written response to each question raised by the Commission during the review of the Preliminary Plat at the November 8, 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Attached is a copy of the developer's response. Finished Floor Elevations - The Final Plat drawing has been revised to incorporate the minimum finished floor elevation for those lots situated adjacent to the 100 year flood plain. A copy of the revised Final Plat is enclosed with this agenda briefing. Street Name - The developer has submitted the street name Creekview Lane, which has been placed on the Final Plat drawing. Community Development and Fire Department staffs are satisfied with this street name, since it does not conflict with any existing street name in Colleyville. Sidewalk Plan - The developer has submitted an exhibit showing the location of the proposed sidewalks in this development as per the requirements of the PUD-R ordinance. The ordinance requires a 5' wide sidewalk along the south side of Centerpark, which is to be constructed by the developer at time of other public improvement construction. The ordinance also requires a 5' wide sidewalk along the north side of the interior street. The developer is required to construct the sidewalk Agenda Item No.5 - Page 1 adjacent to the common open space and the homebuilders will construct the sidewalk on each lot as improvements are made to each lot. Attached is a copy of the sidewalk plan. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS 02/14/05 Arcadia Land Partners 30, Ltd., is the developer of 9.181 acres of land located on the south side of Centerpark, just east of Colleyville Boulevard. The developer has submitted a Final Plat of the property for review and consideration by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The plat contains 36 lots for the construction of new single family residences. Zoning. The property is currently zoned PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential. The PUD-R ordinance was approved by the City Council on July 6, 2004, by Ordinance 0-04-1467. Residential Lots and Density. The minimum lot size in the subdivision is 4,720 square feet, and the average lot size is 6,359 square feet. The lot sizes, dimensions and setbacks meet the requirements of the approved PUD-R zoning for the property. The density of the development is 3.92 dwelling units per acre. Open Space. The plat contains five open space lots within the development. The open space lots are located adjacent to Little Bear Creek on the south side of the property, on the north side of the interior street, and within three others of varying sizes. The open space lots range in size from 1.014 acres to 518 square feet. The homeowner's association is required to maintain the open space areas. Sidewalks and Trails. The developer will construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk along Centerpark. On the north side of the interior street, each homebuilder is required to construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk on each lot as houses are built on those lots. The developer is responsible for the construction of the 5-foot sidewalk on the open space lot. Sidewalks are not required along the south side of the interior street. Height Restrictions. The PUD-R ordinance restricts the location of windows on the second story of house constructed adjacent to the Lakewood Estates subdivision. On Lots 26-29, second story windows may only be allowed on the front of the house and facing the street. Fences, Walls and Screening. The developer is required to construct a 6-foot tall screening fence along Centerpark. The fence may be constructed of masonry, ornamental iron, or a combination of the two materials, and the fence must be constructed as part of the improvements to the subdivision. The residential fences that face the street must also be constructed of masonry or ornamental iron. Dwelling Unit Construction Requirements. The PUD-R zoning regulations for this property have specific design requirements for houses built within the subdivision. All chimneys must be constructed of compatible material with the exterior walls of the house. All houses must provide an attached or detached 2-car garage, and the garage doors must have wood exteriors or trim. The exterior of all houses must be constructed Agenda Item No.5 - Page 2 of brick, stone, stucco or cement fiber board. All roofs must provide a 12:12 pitch. These criteria will be reviewed at the time building permits are requested in the subdivision. Site Features. The PUD-R zoning prohibits the construction of overhead utility wires. All utility services internal to the development and adjacent to the perimeter of the development must be buried underground. The ordinance also requires the installation of decorative light poles and street signs, which must be maintained by the homeowner's association. Additionally, the ordinance requires the planting of street trees within the development. The developer has submitted a copy of the proposed landscaping plan for the development showing the general location of the proposed trees. A copy of the landscape plan is attached. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments, except for the proposed street name within the development. Staff and the developer are working together on a proposed street name. This Final Plat also requires approval by the City Council. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements of the Land Development Code and the approved PUD-R ordinance for the property. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location map · Plat · Proposed Landscape plan · Sidewalk plan · Development Review Committee memo · Developer correspondence Prepared by: ~ ~.:.". Alep Development Coordinator Agenda Item No.5 - Page 3 Location Map OK A!> w~ '.Nt ~ ~\ III roo . .- ,.. I!l ONt i ~ l .... . ...,... \l~ )'1'&.... TIt .. oM Nt i i c.: .n\ i i i , _(A~~ '. ~ 7"U".., _ -../ \ .. 6....-.1 .........-- -::::':'~- .-h___..........-......-.....-.......... ;:..... - :-J .. . ~...._~...... 'Q \ 14 . . 11 .. .....~.. \>.~",\",.... ........, f ft a .. 21.......... c\\ .. .~ : fC:'~ -6 =---...:. .."", l ..." ..' to \ 01 ." 31 .. .. .. ~Jr:~:~:OO "" ..... .. . ~' ~>> .. "" ~ ""....'" ~ ~ : : : ~. ~ . .; · . . ---: / : r-...: .. 07 .. ...-;:.:..:........~:...,........., " .._ i ~ J 412 I ~ -~ .. \ '. r .\ I I Iii i ! ,) i ,- ,I \i \i , ;, i 1:~. ( '1: '-"'r;-' ~1r1,1o TIt 01 , ........,.. 2ol2 ".... At ....... . .... I .. "'WI .~~ ,-' ~- " /.:- '\~. Plat Agenda Item No.5 - Page 4 Landscape Plan Showing Street Tree Layout i ~ ,~ f Iii J (r j J Sidewalk Plan . J......."...... ;;... ... . ~: ./' ., . .~"t1_ t ,~,- '" Agenda Item No.5 - Page 6 Development Review Committee memo DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE January 26, 2005 FAX TO Arcadia Land Partners FAX NO 972-774-9111 Jones & Boyd Inc. 972-248-1414 FROM Barry LeBaron, AICP, Development Director SUBJEC P-05-004 - Cambridge Place, Final Plat T The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. PLAT DRAWING 1. The dashed lines indicating the pad sites do not coincide with the building setback lines shown in the detail note at the top of the page. The pad sites lines should be removed and the setback lines redrawn noted on each lot with sufficient dimension to avoid potential problems obtaining a form-board survey at time of building permit. 2. Add the names of the streets. Staff will compare any proposed street names for duplication. 3. The PUD ordinance prohibits second story windows facing Lakewood Estates on Lots 26,27,28 and 29. Place the following notation on the plat: Lots 26, 27, 28, and 29 abutting Lakewood Estates shall be limited such that no second story windows will be allowed unless they are on the front of the home and face the street 4. The case number may be added to the drawing: P-05-004. 5. Add the following signature block for City Council approval. City Council Approval Whereas the City Council of the City of COlleyville, Texas voted affirmatively on this day of , 20_, to approve of this Plat. Mayor, City of Colleyville Attest: City Secretary Agenda Item No.5 - Page 7 ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PLANS The engineering construction plans have been reviewed by the Engineering Department, Fire Department and Public Works Department. The following comments are related to the construction plans. Questions concerning the engineering construction plans should be directed to Robert Woods at 817-503-1090. 1. FINAL PLAT - SHEET 1. A. Need t 0 show the minimum finish floor elevations on affected lots. S. F.I.R.M. Pa nel Number appears to refer to property located along the south side of Big Bear Creek. 2. PAVING PLAN - SHEET 3. A. How will the water cross over to the inlet located at Station 3+96.80-Street C? 3. GRADING PLAN - SHEET 7. A. It ap pears that fill is being placed in Lots 23-26 which encroaches into the designated floodplain as shown in note pertaining to L.O.M.R. prepared by Halff and Associates. B. Th ere will need to be additional study performed to show the affects of the placement of this fill. C. F.I.R.M. Panel Number appears to refer to property located along the south side of Big Bear Creek. D. How will the retaining wall shown located running along the easterly property line affect the stream conditions? E. Th e minimum finish floor elevation shall be elevated two feet above the established base flood elevation. 4. DRAINAGE AREA MAP - SHEET 9. A. Need t 0 provide information for pre-development and full development conditions. B. How will the off-site water from property located along Colleyville Blvd. (State Highway 26) be handled? 5. STORM SEWER PLAN/PROFILE. A. W hat is the radius of pipe located in Line "A" beginning at Sta. 1 +15.73? Agenda Item No.5 - Page 8 B. Th e curves shown in Line "B" will not be allowed due to maintenance problems. The line could be rerouted to discharge between two lots directly into the channel. 6. WATER LAYOUT PLAN - SHEET 12. A. Connec tion to water main located at the intersection of Glade Creek Drive and Centerpark Drive indicates a 6-inch main this will need to be an 8-inch main. 7. SANITARY SEWER PLAN - SHEET 13. A. Line uB" in dicates several curves and one reverse curve located at Sta. 4+49.81. Please be advised that reverse curves will not be allowed in the sanitary sewer line. B. If horizontal curves are utilized then a manhole will be required at PC and PT of the proposed line and maximum spacing between manholes will be 300 feet. OTHER INFORMATION 1. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per dwelling unit. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the final plat. 2. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. PUD-R Ordinance 0-04-1467 requires the developer to construct a five foot sidewalk along the north side of the interior street along the common open space and a five foot sidewalk adjacent to Centerpark. These improvements are shown on the submitted construction plans for public improvements. The PUD-R ordinance requires sidewalks along each lot frontage, which must be installed when as building improvements are made to each lot. The internal sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. 3. FENCING AND WALLS. The PUD-R ordinance requires the developer to construct a six-foot tall screening fence along this property's frontage on Centerpark. Refer to the PUD-R ordinance for the specific construction requirements for this screening fence. 4. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. The PUD-R ordinance for this property requires that all overhead utility wires internal to the development and adjacent to the perimeter of the development be buried underground. 5. DECORATIVE SIGNS AND LIGHT POLES. The PUD-R ordinance requires the installation of specific decorative street lights and street signs. Contact the Engineering Department staff member Robert Woods at 817-503-1090 for any specific details 6. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this Agenda Item No.5 - Page 9 project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a 1-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, February 14,2005, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 1,2005 RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS The marked-up engineering construction plans and a marked-up copy of the plat is available for pickup in the Community Development Department office. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our office: · return the marked-up copies with the re-submittal · 10 folded copies of the revised Final Plat drawing · one letter-size or ledger-size reduced copy of the revised exhibit · a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived The revised drawings must be submitted no later than noon, Wednesday, February 9, 2005 in order to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting agenda. Please contact me at lebaronb@cLcollevville.tx.us or 817-503-1052 if you have any questions. I c: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Agenda Item No.5 - Page 10 Developer correspondence Date: February 22, 2005 To: Barry Lebaron, Director of Development, AICP Planning Dept City of Colleyville 100 Main St. Colleyville, TX 76034 Re: Z-04-010 CC2 to PUD-R Cambridge Place Dear Mr. LeBaron, I have reviewed the meeting minutes from the 11/08/04 P&Z meeting and have enumerated what I understand to be the Board's questions from that meeting. If there are other questions that you think I have not addressed, please let me know. 1. Is the Community Gated?: The community will have no gate at the entry (east end) but will have a gate at the exit (west end). 2. Do the lots have to be 2' above the flood line?: The finished building pad elevations have been submitted and approved. The pad elevations will be added to the Final Plat. 3. Is drainaqe directed south-to-north. and what happens to that water?: The drainage plan does not direct runoff south-to-north. 4. If land is reclaimed, would Lot C have to drain forward rnorthl?: No, reclaimed land would not have to drain to the north. 5. At what point in time would the 100 year flood reach its peak staqe?: The point of the peak flooding varies with each the storm, so can not be predicted without more data. 6. Would the peak occur at this property or downstream?: Applicant can not answer the question for the watershed, but can state that the flood level does not increase anywhere as a consequence of this development. 7. Is the open space to be used for entertainment or recreation?: The open space provides beauty, privacy, natural habitat, views, and an enhanced approach to the homes. 8. Is there a plan for the improvement of the open space?: A plan has been submitted. 9. Open space on the Plat does not add UP to 22%; what is the correct number?: The numbers on the current plans are correct, showing 22% open space. 1 O.ls there a study that explains the water flow?: The study has been submitted. 11 . What percentaQe of the lot is concrete?: The percentage of impervious area of the lots vary from 31.7% to 77.5%. but the entire development is well within the drainage standards used by the City. It is also significantly less impervious surface area than a commercial development on this site would require. Sincerely, Daniel Quinto Agenda Item No.5 - Page 11 Correspondence received after P&Z packets assembled Agenda Item # 2 Case G-05-006 February 22, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission Gty of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, As part owner of a 15 acre track of property zoned commercial by the City of Colleyville, we are opposed to options B & C of the proposed road between L. D. Lockett and McDonwell School Road. While a road connecting the North and South parts of Colleyville may be needed, the proximity to a six lane street less that 400 plus feet from that proposed in these two alternative does not benefit either the city or individuals that would access it. Gu-rent roads in existence, already link these two roads in question approximately two miles from the proposed alternatives and linkJohn McCain Road as well. There is no business purpose for the road which would cost the taxpayers of Colleyville valuable tax dollars while decreasing the future returns on the properties without the road. Proposals B & C would be detrimental to the current proposed use of the 15 acre parcel. It would eliminate a significant portion of the proposed usage and limit the amount of development that could be placed on the property. Because development would be hindered, this would devalue the remaining property and be detrimental to the amount of tax dollars that could be generated from the site to the city. Proposals B & C does not benefit those individuals accessing the new school. Most of the individuals East of these proposals attend Grapevine-Colleyville not Keller.ISD schools. The limited use by any individuals for this short road would not address more urgent road issues in Colleyville. With any of these proposals, individuals using the road would still have problems at L D Lockett and at McDonwell School Road. Sincerely, , / ( , 'vYl,' ''',;~, fL' .j..-- t." ..L l .I i U Norma Jones February 22, 2005 Planning and Zoning Conunission City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Dear Planning and Zoning Conunission, As part owner of a 15 acre track of property zoned commercial by the City of Colleyville, we are opposed to options B & C of the proposed road between L. D. Lockett and McDonwell School Road. While a road connecting the North and South parts of Colleyville may be needed, the proximity to a six lane street less that 400 plus feet from that proposed in these two alternative does not benefit either the city or individuals that would access it. Gu-rent roads in existence, already link these two roads in question approximately two miles from the proposed alternatives and link John McCain Road as well. There is no business purpose for the road which would cost the taxpayers of Colleyville valuable tax dollars while decreasing the future returns on the properties without the road. Proposals B & C would be detrimental to the current proposed use of the 15 acre parcel. It would eliminate a significant portion of the proposed usage and limit the amount of development that could be placed on the property. Because development would be hindered, this would devalue the remaining property and be detrimental to the amount of tax dollars that could be generated from the site to the city. The limited use by any individuals for this short road would not address more urgent road issues in Colleyville. With any of these proposals, individuals using the road would still have problems at L D Lockett and at McDonwell School Road. Options B & C would only benefit one land owner on the proposed road and no owners on the South side of L D Lockett. Sincerely; ...-, r ,......,"- ./ Jl::~~/f/ rR/ /f~J../ Richard Jones February 22, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission Gty of Colleyville 100 :Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, As part owners of a 15 acre track of property zoned commercial by the Gty of Colleyville, we are opposed to options B & C of the proposed road between L. D. Lockett and McDonwell School Road. While a road connecting the North and South parts of Colleyville may be needed, the proximity to a six lane street less that 400 plus feet from that proposed in these two alternative does not benefit either the city or individuals that would access it. GIrrent roads in existence, already link these two roads in question approximately two miles from the proposed alternatives and link John McCain Road as well. Proposals B & C would be detrimental to the current proposed use of the 15 acre parcel. It would eliminate a significant portion of the proposed usage and limit the amount of development that could be placed on the property. Because development would be hindered, this would devalue the remaining property and be detrimental to the amount of tax dollars that could be generated from the site to the city. Proposals B & C does not benefit those individuals accessing the new school. Most of the individuals East of these proposals attend Grapevine-Colleyville not Keller.ISD schools. The limited use by any individuals for this short road would not address more urgent road issues in Colleyville. With any of these proposals, individuals using the road would still have problems at L D Lockett and at McDonwell School Road. Access through Reminington Park Subdivision is also available between these two roads There is no business purpose for the road which would cost the taxpayers of Colleyville valuable tax dollars while decreasing the future returns on the properties without the road. Sincerely, ('ill' il(tfdA ' . I . ~j{LJtt(J ':-'" !j~1{ rl-w--- David & Diana Markham February 22, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission Gty of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, As part owner of a 15 acre track of property zoned commercial by the Gty of Colleyville, we are opposed to options B & C of the proposed road between L. D. Locken and McDonwell School Road. While a road connecting the North and South parts of Colleyville may be needed, the proximity to a six lane street less that 400 plus feet from that proposed in these two alternative does not benefit either the city or individuals that would access it. Current roads in existence, already link these two roads in question approximately two miles from the proposed alternatives and linkJohn McCain Road as well. There is no business purpose for the road which "WOuld cost the taxpayers of Colleyville valuable tax dollars while decreasing the future returns on the properties without the road. Proposals B & C "WOuld be detrimental to the current proposed use of the 15 acre parcel. It would eliminate a significant portion of the proposed usage and limit the amount of development that could be placed on the property. Because development "WOuld be hindered, this "WOuld devalue the remaining property and be detrimental to the amount of tax dollars that could be generated from the site to the city. Proposals B & C does not benefit those individuals accessing the new school. Most of the individuals East of these proposals anend Grapevine-Colleyville not Keller.ISD schools. The limited use by any individuals for this short road "WOuld not address more urgent road issues in Colleyville. With any of these proposals, individuals using the road "WOuld still have problems at L D Locken and at McDonwell School Road. Options B & C "WOuld only benefit one land owner on the proposed road and no owners on the South side of L D Locken. Sincerely; . ~l . k ~ J) tl,YI ~ r~~~../ 'll t (t' . I ( . (y Ricky and Nancy Parvin February 22, 2005 Planning and Zoning O:munission Gty of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Dear Planning and Zoning Commission, As part owner of a 15 acre track of property zoned commercial by the Gty of Colleyville, we are opposed to options B & C of the proposed road between L. D. Lockett and McDonwell School Road. While a road connecting the North and South parts of Colleyville may be needed, the proximity to a six lane street less that 400 plus feet from that proposed in these two alternative does not benefit either the city or individuals that would access it. G.rrrent roads in existence, already link these two roads in question approximately two miles from the proposed alternatives and linkJohn McCain Road as well. There is no business purpose for the road which would cost the taxpayers of Colleyville valuable tax dollars while decreasing the future returns on the properties without the road. Proposals B & C would be detrimental to the current proposed use of the 15 acre parcel. It would eliminate a significant portion of the proposed usage and limit the amount of development that could be placed on the property. Because development would be hindered, this would devalue the remaining property and be detrimental to the amount of tax dollars that could be generated from the site to the city.. Sincerely, RctvJ r Robert Jones q~~ To: City of ColleyviIle Planning and Zoning Commission February 22, 2005 Subject: Future Proposed Alignments from LD Lockett Road to McDonwell School Road Alignment "A" This proposed street location will best serve the general public when furure residential Sj'k are built north and east of the Emerald Park Addition. The need for a residential thoroughfare will certainly be required to access ill Lockett Road and McDonwell School Road by west bound traffic without having to go further wesr to access Precinct Line Road. This "shortcm" road between LD Lockert Road and McDonwell School Road will thereby eliminate additional traffic our on to Precinct Line Road, (1400 feet away), but still allow drivers to obtain access to the newly built KeIJer Elementary School. This "shortcut" road will also be beneficial for those chi vers needing to go east bound on ill Lockett Road and on McDonwell School Road without having to access Precinct Line Road to the west. The City of Colleyville wj)J be placing this proposed street in a more common location where it wouL benefit more of the general public more so than Alignment "B" or "C". No commercial land will be disturbed therefore a minimal impact to tax dollar revenue will be caused due to this road consuuctiOJi Alignment "B" This proposed street location will not benefit the general public as much as Alignment "A" because it will be located too close to Precinct Line Road. By being so close to Precinct Line Road a "potential" traffic jam could be caused for east bound traffic on LD Lockett Road turning north onto proposed "B" street due to the newly built Keller Elementary School on McDonwelI School Road. This proposed street will also create a large funding impact to the City of ColleyvilIe because of placing this street on COmmel'cialland only 900' from Precinct Line Road. The commercial land will be divided by this street and thereby limit the amOUnt of commercial business available for commercial rax dollar revenUe to be collected by the city. Alignment "C" This proposed street location will not benefit the general public as much as Alignment "A" because it will be located too close to Precincr Line Road. .By being so close to Precinct Line Road a "potential" traffic jam could be caused for easr bound traffic On LD Lockett Road ruming north onto proposed "e" street (same as Alignment "B"). A "potential" traffic: jam could also occur. for east bound traffic on Lavaca Trail tuming north onto proposed "e" street due to the newly built Keller Elementary School on McDonwelI School Road. Pagf ' This proposed street will create a funding impact to the City of Colleyville larger than Alignment HB' due to placing of this street on more commercial land than that in Alignment "B", The more commercial land that becomes divided means that less commercial business will be available for coml'hercial tax. dollar revenue to be collected by the city. Respectful I y, ~eLtJ.~ Jerrell W. Jones Owner of Tract A 1182 of WC Newton Survey 8150 Precinct Line Road Winport Property Group Keller Williams CommerciallResidential Investments 2425 E Southlake Blvd Southlake, Tx 76092 C A Sukigara 214-923-0372 Please find attached a draft of the proposal that will be presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City ofColleyville on Monday, February 28, 2005 at 7 :OOpm As owners of the 15 Acre Commercial tract at the comer of W LD Lockett and Precinct Line Road, we would like to request your support in voting against the proposed road that would run on the East boundary or across the center of the entire 15 Acres. A 2 to 4 lane road would be detrimental to the development of the 15 Acre site. The site is now zoned commercial with an accepted conceptual development plan by the City of Colleyville which provides full access and adequate fire lanes to service the development and provide for a free flowing traffic environment. To maximize the land potential at all Sites in Colleyville and thus provide the greatest revenue for tax dollars for income to the City is important and the City has approved the current concept for development that would provide for the maximum and most efficient use of land at this site. The State of Texas and City of Colleyville now have a 6 lane newly improved road that serves the entire west area of Colleyville and a secondary road only yards away would be a poor use of tax dollars for building such a roadway. As noted by previous studies and Commercial Real Estate Developers, the greatest need for traffic flow improvement are the East/West roadway arteries that move traffic into and across Colleyville and access the Town Center and Village shopping areas and providing access to those traveling to Highway 26, State Hwy 121 and north to Hwy 114. Of the three locations for the proposed roadway, the location of the roadway to the East side of the new Emerald Park subdivision, as now provided in the current Master Plan, would be the most direct route with full extension from McDonwell School Road to W LD Lockett Road and would be of greater benefit by providing access to traffic traveling due South, and then East on W LD Lockett into Colleyville. Most of the Colleyville students and family traffic going to and from the new Keller School live in close proximity to the School and would not need or have use a North-South access. It is my understanding that consideration is now being given for installation of a traffic light at W LD Lockett and Precinct Line Road with development of the 15-35 Commercial Acres that are available in the area. It is also of note that there is discussion that plans are being made to extend W LD Lockett Road on through N Richland Hills to Davis Blvd. and the City of Colleyville has made plans for improving and widening W LD Lockett Road. Upon review of the proposal for locating any north-south proposed road, especially on the West side of Emerald Park Subdivision does not provide value or benefit to the citizens of Colleyville, nor is there a justified need for usage or spending of taxpayers money. The real value to Colleyville is in having a good road system that moves traffic on the East-West thoroughfares which are in great need of improvement with the Hall Johnson expansion being the best example of how this can enhance the City of Colleyville. It is with respect that a recommendation for eliminating the proposed north- south roadway on the far West edge ofColleyville in favor of giving attention to the more important and urgent roadway needs. Should after all discussion, proof be made for the dire need of a short north-south passage then a location which would appropriately carry traffic to the east up LD Lockett Rd, should be located to the East, at an appropriate distance, great enough to be of efficient service. Any traffic traveling North or South to a destination, would most certainly take the already improved 6 lane Precinct Line Road We would appreciate you thoughts and comments and support by letter or by attendance. You may speak at the public hearing, provide a card with your written comments or provide a letter that we may include with other letters .r expressing your input and concerns. Although there may be other concerns, especially drainage concerns on the West side of Colleyville, unless the roadway has further negative impact on the drainage in your area, we would like to focus on the issue of the road stated in a positive way that will provide insight for the Planning and Zoning Commission and where possible, suggest alternative ideas that may bring improvement to the City of Colleyville. Thank you for any support you can provide. You may fax any letter to: Carol Sukigara, Winport Property Group Keller Williams Commercial Investments, 817-251-1522 with a cover sheet. for your letter or comments to be included together or you may mail directly to the Planning and Zoning Commission, City of Colleyville, 100 Main Street, Colleyville, Texas 76034. Norma Jones and Family-Owners Jerrell Jones- Owner Carol Sukigara 214-923-0372 POIN i OF BEGINNIN "'0 ;;U m (') Z (') ~ C z m ;;U o )10 c 71.2' o ':l '" :z -< 5 :z -" o :z o no' L l------------------- -~______________________ _ '" EXIS liNG ROAD CUT z o q ~C:> G~ ~ ~ 0;,' <\' Tract A (JJ o q tn ~I I\J ~. N ...~(; ..~ ~ tn (Xl t.J to. JERREL If'p~ON1~S74 YOLo 991U, ' V.R.T.C.T. OJ to CD ~I I~ q tn .... N N. ~. z o q ~ 2" I.R.S. 503.09 N 89.07'24" W roJ_ o ~. Tract B N .p. tn tn to NORMA JEAN JONES YOLo 11398, PC. 141 D R.T.C.T. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (JJ o q tn .... I\J I\J :E- 'tl...( 'It.2 o q N o ~ OJ OJ CJl CD LH OJ OJ ! Cf,,,...p.. N O. ~C:> G~ ~ X:>~ <\' <Q EXITING BUILOINGS o o GRAVEL DRIVE T1lIlOT --..:::-..--..... LH J) +- N 2' .... '/2...:!'!,~ 1/2" I.R.S. 603.~7 N 8S L.l\ ~ '\i...) ,~ . . \\) .~) ~\ >-\ ~/ - .,,\.Y I \.~J .'" Clv~. '. ~ ).YM1IV\J\ . 0 ). il"- ',V ~~~~'Cj o . J' CLEAIIING BLOCK 1 LTD EMERALD PARK RESID. DEV., VOL. 1 6175. PG. 1 65 D.R.T.C.T. ~L. , '"" ..C".... . 0{j-' ,.. ()' 1 " 4- :.J I.. R I I I' '..1 I I. 1 0' h!1 s ; · J , ~I 0' ~I 81- z ------- . , .. ~,.. --~. ill ~ ; ~ e ~ I = ! C) c::-- I c::::r ~ g I ii!1 .. ~ .. ,,1 _. ,~1 ,,- ~ ... g -1 -.--. u c-:=; C). L.._ __ T ' --' J ..i . ; . . ''''1. '0 ", :: b ..J I In I n-;T d ..;e i~ ~! C) ~ ..iv, ";~l:l\ Al'li. '-~ d . - -, ;? ~ i ~ ! :,'jo Ill: I 9.;--)\ .-iL---- ~ ~-----'-..- (".10" ;,-.r ....fil ";l:la ~~... "'~.. . ". l> ~) ': 03d\':>5-' ! ~ I" ,,_. Sll]fN)"tJ ~ -.=~ ~ 'J'S 000" ~ .or- .9Z.9ZZ 3..0.\:>:.69 S 't>. ~. L ~ :-, !'"';.., ~- ~,! .... z o <0( o Q: l'~ Z ::J t- () ------r U w Q: Cl. 53111V^ ."'.O.ll - ./