Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-1/10/2005 city or ccen~ Texas AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chambers - 100 Main Street Monday, January 10, 2005 REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Commissioners Thomas Bartkowski, John Blassingame, Jeff Byerly, Dave Dudziak, Luann Edwards, Denis Duffy, Thomas Dolan INVOCATION Commissioner Duffy PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF MINUTES December 13, 2004 CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case P-05-001- Minor plat of Glade Points Addition, 1.1 acres located on Lot 6, Block 1 at Glade Road and Heritage Avenue 2. Case P-05-002- Minor plat of Luxmont Estates Addition, 2.11 acres located on abstract 1692, Tract 1 B4 of the T. White Survey at 6304 LD Lockett PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ITEMS 3. Case P-04-027 - PUBLIC HEARING - Old Grove Addition, Phase 2, being a Replat of 2.20 acres located at 103-105 John McCain Road 4. Case Z-05-001 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for an amendment to the PUD-R for Strathmore Addition, Lots 10-16, Block 1 located at the 3200 Block of Glade Road Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -January 10, 2005 Page 1 of 2 TABLED ITEMS 5. Case Z-04-042 - TABLED ITEM - Zoning change from AG to R40 and R20 on 4 acres located at 512 Shelton Drive 6. Case Z-04-043 - TABLED ITEM - Zoning change from AG to R40 on 10 acres located at 600 Shelton Drive STAFF COMMENTS, REPORTS AND DISCUSSION ITEMS The following items were received on the last case submittal deadline: Minor Plat of Pine Hill Estates Addition, 3.67 acres located on abstract 331, Tract 2C of the A.J. Caldwell Survey at 1209 Tinker Road Zoning change from AG and R40 to R20 on 10.2 acres located at 909-1009 W. Lavaca Trail COMMISSIONERS' COMMENTS AND REPORTS ADJOURNMENT P sted: Thursday, January 6, 2005, 4:30 p.m. Amy elley Planning and Zoning Assistant Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda -January 10,2005 Page 2 of 2 .~ '1'exas PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - December 13, 2004 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Byerly called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <: Page 5,'1 INVOCATION ROLL CALL Commissioners Thomas Thomas Bartkowski, John Duffy were present. Dave Dudziak, ingame, and Denis PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE , ""'~'<<~:;:;'< Commission~t:~;: ffy moved pprove the minutes of the November 22,2004 meeting with suggested<~.. . J~es. C.~ "~ issioner Dolan seconded. '-'. $'<~"'.,- " <<~'}::;::. The motion was appr the following vote: Aye: Dolan, Dudziak, <. kowski, Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly Nay: None CITIZEN COMMENTS REGARDING ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA None REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case P-04-043 - Minor Plat of Huggins Addition, 0.79 acres located at 700 Shelton Drive, Abstract No. 1692, Tract 2F6 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - December 13, 2004 Page 10(9 Clayton Husband presented the case and briefed the Commission. Commissioner Duffy made motion to approve Case P-04-043. Commissioner Dudziak seconded. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Dolan, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly Nay: None Ms. Bromley has "r property. Ms. Bromley Ms. Bromley the applicant about how the property would be split e addressed? applicant, stated wanting to split the property in to two ano responded the water issue would be addressed by the op e did not have an answer at this time. Commissione(\: ' owski questioned staff about the tree preservation being relevant to this ca'Se. Clayton Husband responded all trees are protected because the property is vacant, once there is a house on the lot, trees can be removed at will. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff and stated the master plan states keeping one acre lots on major streets. Barry LeBaron responded large lot image for collector streets and Westcoat would not fit that criteria. Commissioner Byerly stated this type of zoning would fit the criteria of the Master Plan. Commissioner Duffy questioned staff if a plat would come before the Planning and Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - December 13, 2004 Page 2of9 3. ~ from AG to . and R20 . No. 331, Tract 2c of the A.J. that the water flow would not increase t of his property. Commissioner Duffy 18 of water, sewer and drainage, etc. '. e in opposition of this request and stated i.....".yf! Dalworth, f:: ~{-iar ~. ..Lane, spoke in opposition of this request and stated dra1~e, water run &l~idew ";;' and speed are all issues. Ther~;<~ij~~g no one wi:lng to speak, the public hearing was closed at 7:34 P.M. ..:::;..;.'.... .:;;:...., Commissl' . Byerl estioned staff if all the issues presented tonight would be addressed a ..". f platting? Clayton Husband responded correct, all issues of drainage and ~Iks will have to pass all the requirements of the Engineering department. Commissioner Byerly stated this case for zoning also fits in the master plan. Commissioner Byerly made motion to approve Case Z-04-041. Commissioner Bartkowski seconded. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Dolan, Dudziak, Bartkowski, Blassingame, Duffy and Byerly Nay: None Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - December 13, 2004 Page 3 of9 , Commissioner Duffy noted needing TOPO and water treatment information from developer at the time of platting. 4. Case Z-04-042 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning change from AG to R40 and R20 on 4 acres located at 512 Shelton Drive co guar during. the area. .. in this neigh Bill Lothrop, 60, nd 609 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition of this request and stated R20 is not the right zoning for this neighborhood. He stated picking this area to live because of the rural feel and the school district for his children. James Day, 805 Shelton, spoke in opposition of this request and stated having issues with drainage, sewer, water pressure, flat ditches and increased traffic concerns. Mr. Day questioned Commissioners about who will be responsible for fixing problems with flooding, the city or the homeowner? Fred Rice, spoke in opposition of this request and stated having issues with traffic, the Public Hearings have motions made Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - December 13, 2004 Page 4 0(9 drainage, sewer and crowding of homes. Bill Stephens, 612 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition of this request and stated having issues with traffic, drainage and the R20 zoning. He stated wanting the Commission to vote for the R40 zoning. Wade Evans, 800 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition of this request and stated having issues with sewer, water and drainage. Larry Yafa, 608 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition of this issues with water and the proposed layout. CL Madden, 6112 Hunter Lane, spoke in having issues with water. Twyla Curly, 800 Shelton Drive, spoke having issues with drainage and utilities. Ann Huggins, 700 Shelton Drive, que zoning cases. Barry LeBaron responde notified. . est and stated having stated rocess of '0 feet are Beverly Et, 605 S issues with traff vote for the R Gary Quinn, 51 issues .ewer, R40 ~\~~:"'. '. ~~; :::-:/ - ~'<<~;~>:;:.,>,. ~'Stephens',. Sh , ville becaus~:~t,",Jhe . req'\:;t..'~::.' t. .;:;;:::;;;. CI:. .-'. ','.'.',--.\ """..-<:-' -<.>>>~- ., /., -. , . ,....~' Jerryer" 1m, 600 S' '{; on Drive, spoke in favor of this request. He chose David Bagwell velop ~ and because he would maintain the feel of the area. Mr. Chisolm as ',tQ. " . mmissioners to please approach this case in the most appropriate waw,::j:ji!i:;;:;:;:}:" J\-::,,;;;~::~~" Beverly Lothrop, 't,07 Shelton Drive, spoke in opposition of this request and stated wanting Commissioners to vote for the R40 zoning. There being no one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed at 9:05 P.M. Commissioner Byerly made motion to adjourn for a ten minute break at 9:05 P.M. Motion passed by acclamation. Commissioner Byerly called meeting to order at 9:15 P.M. Commissioner Byerly questioned staff about the fencing requirements and the tree ition of this request and stated ilities. Once these lots are oper or the homeowners? "res . sibility. v <C'X:<~;;;:;::;;'>"'" osition:1,lflils request and stated having Et stated wanting the Commissioners to ~\ '. ~,. John Paul Barnett, 601 Beverl . having issues with lot sizes, developed who will take care of j' Mr. Barnett stated the homeowner '. sition of this request and stated having Inn wants Commissioners to vote for the Drive, spoke in opposition of this request. She picked ...::}~tmosphere and wants Commissioners to deny the .<~~<-,. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - December 13, 2004 Page 50f9 preservation. Clayton Husband responded no specific requirements, fencing is allowed in front yards, just shorter and it really depends on how the lots face. The tree preservation requires replacing trees removed except in the ROW. Barry LeBaron responded to the question about the assurance of what the developer is proposing to do, will he stick to the plan? Barry LeBaron stated there are no guarantees. Commissioner Dudziak questioned the 13 lot scenario pr, "'~nted by Mr. Bagwell; would he be able to fence along Shelton Drive if the. s faced Forest Lane? Barry LeBaron responded there is a provision in the.'~ Development Code that allows for perimeter fencing and there are certain re.~.Ls for that fence. ~~~:;;~~,/ ~:xi:~~:~, Commissioner Byerly questioned staff about t <'. fencing dl~.~.ce. Barry LeBaron responded, could be built on the ROW, mini.< "'0 ft., 30 ft. ff~'Jhe, center line of Shelton Drive. ~~\. v>>~, Barry LeBaron stated the developer wil.... to addr. i the draina ~~ues at the time of platting. He also stated staff will'. ith.. ~'blic works deJj~rtment and the engineering department to address all 5 . . water pressure needs of this neighborhood. Commissioner Duffy questione . esponsible party for knowing what the 6 inch water line can t r of people and so forth? Barry LeBaron responded code on ch ; however, cities use a 4 inch sewer line in . ccomm iCI. . the 6 inch line needs to be updated, the cit ~ a W8 nd se nd that could be used to accommodate those people.;;:~:~ ':mission uffy st needing to know what is currently there and what nee~1l9. be upd. . Woul '~~ be the city or the developer's project? Barry LeBaron re~'v.> .:;;"~,.'" IT,lbirt,'' on of both to improve those lines. . ",:m ~~ Com~ttr " ~-;,Qu it being" 'dent for the Commissioners to allow an ar '~~incr.without knowing whether or not the area can handle it. issioner anting to see if there is a study available? Barry [ on responde ff w . check to see. Commissioner Duffy questioned the iss \~J drainage m ned; oes staff have any thoughts in the area of drainage? Barry .,~ ron statetaff would also check, does not think so at this time. CommisSt r Duffy d wanting to see documentation about the March 8, 2004 meeting re' ame case. Barry LeBaron responded staff would provide that informatio Commissioner D dziak concurred with Commissioner Duffy with it being imprudent for Commissioners to make a decision without having more information about the impact on the entire street. What are the differences on the 13 or 14 lots as far as impact? Are there any improvements for Shelton? What is the precedent for R20 in this neighborhood? Barry LeBaron responded the master plan does not make a distinction between residential as high or low density, just residential area. All cases are considered individually. Commissioner Dudziak stated again, some of these issues need to be known before an accurate decision can be made. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - December 13, 2004 Page 60(9 Commissioner Byerly questioned staff about the engineering process? Barry LeBaron responded engineering makes notations at the time of platting and who would be responsible for such improvements, whether it is capital improvements or ones that the developer has to incur are then decided upon. Commissioner Byerly stated to look at this case as zoning, not by these other issues. Those issues can be addressed at the time of platting. All of the R40 zoning are proposed along the side of already R40 zoning. The .:-~40, R20 configuration gives the open space feel along Shelton Drive. Theret~"%ommissioner Byerly stated being in favor of this proposal. Commissioner Duffy made motion to table case Z- seconded. The motion was approved by the following v,v"q q~, " Aye: Dudziak, Bartkowski, Blassingame, Q.:.' Nay: Dolan, Byerly ,.~:fl~~~::;'" ,.:~~~!~;::.., 5. Case A-04-043 - PUBLIC HEARING -' . acres located at 600 Shelton Dr" Clayton Husband presented the ". .,.~riefedt ';.::;:.~mmlsslon. Commissioner Byerly made moti~'1~~0 C~::::;:~:::;l ..J9ne;~~~;;::tlave the Public Hearings for Case Z-04-042 .,Case Z~I..~04 but' to have motions made separately for eac ion pa ccla in. Commissioner. e pubh. ring at 8:03 P.M. Commissioner~ ~ . 'on to ta ase Z-04-043. Commissioner Dudziak seconded. Commissioner Dudziak ';'''''\,-, , ,.,~:i~~t1~;~: ~:ange from AG to R40 on 10 STAFF RTS .; Barry LeBaf~l\;;.,stated s~.; is preparing sign up sheets for citizens to use for the Planning and'Xt:m,~ g Gffilhission meetings. These sheets will help staff to have the proper spelling (j~i 1~ltizen's name. He also stated staff will schedule a date in January to have a' :;.. shop in regards to PUD regulations. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Commissioner Byerly stated he does not like to table items. He wanted to be able to decide on the zoning cases presented so that the applicant would have a better understanding about what concerns need to be addressed. Commissioner Duffy stated not being comfortable with making a decision with hearing the concerns of the citizens. Commissioner Dolan stated wanting to make a decision as well for the zoning and then the other issues would be taken care of at the time of platting. The majority of the Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - December 13, 2004 Page 70'9 people stated they could live with the R40 zoning and then this would be resolved. Commissioner Dudziak stated the R40 zoning was a compromise, but the water issues these people had, far out weighed the zoning compromise. More information needs to be provided about the sewer and water issues. ADJOURNMENT The Commission adjourned the meeting at 9:45 p.m. by acclar1l~~?n. ".@~, i:-X~--':; .<~~~:~@y ~,,>:;~::~ ' /-:~::::;~:;:_::~' '-.~~:~~::;> Approved on: -------------------- ~-. , ,~ Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - December 13, 2004 Page 8 0(9 .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: January 10, 2005 P-05-001 - Minor Plat of Glade Points Addition, 1.1 acres on Lot 6, Block 1 located at Glade Road and Heritage Avenue STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Greenway-Glade Partners LP is the owner of a tract of land located at the northeast corner of Glade Road and Heritage Avenue. The owner has submitted a Minor Plat of the property for review and consideration by the Planning & Zoning Commission. The plat will create one lot for the construction of a new bank. Zoning. The property is currently zoned CC2 Shopping Center Commercial. The proposed lot meets the requirements of the CC2 zoning district. Banks and financial institutions are allowed uses in this district. Right-ot-Way Dedication. Additional right-of-way for Glade Road is being dedicated as part of this plat. The 2,003 square foot dedication will accommodate a portion of the intersection improvements. Sidewalks. The developer will construct a 1 O-foot wide sidewalk along the north side of Glade Road as part of the public improvements to this property. The sidewalk is part of the hike and bike trail system in the area. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. Since this final plat contains less than five lots, only the approval of the Planning and Zoning Commission is required. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements the platting standards contained in the Land Development Code. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location Map · Plat Prepared by: ~ usband, AICP nt Coordinator Agenda Item No.1 - Page 1 Location Map AG Agenda Item No.1 - Page 2 .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: January 10, 2005 P-OS-002 - Minor Plat of Luxmont Estates Addition, 2.11 acres located on abstract 1692, Tract 184 of the T. White Survey at 6304 LD Lockett STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Gary Friedman is the owner of a parcel of land located on the north side of L. D. Lockett Road, just west of Pleasant Run Road. The owner has submitted a Minor Plat of the property for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The plat will create a lot for the construction of a new single family residence. Zoning. The property is zoned AG Agricultural. The AG district requires a minimum lot size of 3 acres, a minimum lot width of 300 feet at the front building line, and a minimum lot depth of 300 feet. The proposed lot does not meet the 3-acre lot size requirement of the AG district. The lot is 1.945 acres in size. However, the lot is considered a lot of record and may be platted under the current zoning designation. Lot ot Record. The proposed lot is a lot of record. A lot of record is a parcel that has existed in its current configuration since May 1978. The parcel is allowed to be platted in its current configuration without having to change the zoning because it has existed in the current configuration since at least 1978. This property is subject to all other development requirements of the AG district, such as building setbacks, land use, impact fees, and utility standards. Right-ot-Way Dedication. The owner is dedicating additional right-of-way for LD Lockett Road adjacent to this property. The total right-of-way requirement for this street is 75 feet. The owner is dedicating approximately 12.5 feet of right-of-way along the frontage of this property (6,440 square feet). Parkland Dedication Fees. The payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development since one new vacant residential lot is being created by this plat. The fee for this plat is $1,802. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required for a portion of this property since LD Lockett Road does not meet the current roadway standards of the Land Development Code. The owner is required to construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City before the issuance of any building permits. The cash escrow amount for this property is $71,815.57. The owner has requested a waiver of this requirement from the City Council. Agenda Item No.2 - Page 1 Fire Coverage. A fire hydrant must be installed as part of the construction of the house. The property is located outside of the required fire hydrant coverage area. The plans for the fire hydrant construction will be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Fire departments. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. The proposed development appears to satisfy the requirements of the Land Development Code. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location Map . Development Review Committee memo · Plat Prepared by: JtU J. Clayton Husband, AICP Development Coordinator Agenda Item No.2 - Page 2 Location Map L--- i I I I L-----// I I -~-~ I i I I I I I i I i // :/ / / / //' /' // ,,~ dl ~ ~ ~~R. tCOO I \ 1 I 1 / // ts- place va" r ---r------- R-40 ~15 :.j( ~1~3 Agenda Item No.2 - Page 3 CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE December 21,2004 TO FAX NO Steve Miller Gary Friedman 817.577.0972 ~ via mail FROM Clayton Husband AICP, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-04-002 Minor Plat - Luxmont Estates The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. PLAT DRAWING 1. Based on conversations with the applicant, the subdivision name should be changed from "Lexmont Estates" to "Luxmont Estates". 2. The approval block for the City Council may be removed from the drawing. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. 3. The case number may be added to the drawing: P-05-002. OTHER INFORMATION 1. FIRE PROTECTION. A fire hydrant must be installed as part of the construction of the house. The property is outside of the required fire coverage area. Engineering construction plans for the fire hydrant construction must be prepared by a professional engineer. Construction plan requirements and specifications are contained in Chapter 14 of the Land Development Code. Contact Chad Bartee at 817-503-1090 with any questions about plan submittals and review. 2. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the final plat. Since one (1) new vacant lot is being created by this plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for residential development is $1,802 per lot. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. A formal assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the plat. The fee for this plat is $1,802. 3. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since LD Lockett Road is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains a vacant residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the street P.O. Box 185 - Coli eyvill e I Texas 76034 - 81 7.577.7587 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-05-002 LUXMONT ESTATES or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City before the issuance of a building permit. Ordinance 0-01-1314 established a base linear foot fee of $138.78, with the actual escrow amount being percentage of the total cost based upon the actual street frontage. The amount due for this property, based on street frontage, is $71,815.57. The owner may request a waiver of this requirement from the City Council. Please contact the Community Development Department for information on this requirement. 4. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Applicable to the new vacant lots created by this plat. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 5. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along LD Lockett Road. The sidewalk must be constructed at the same time any new structures are built on the lots. The sidewalks on both streets must be at least 5-feet wide. Alternatively, the owner may escrow an equivalent amount of money for the future construction of the sidewalk at the time of building permit issuance. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, January 10,2005, 7:00 p.m. not required RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices: . 15 folded copies of the revised Minor Plat drawing . one letter-size or ledger-size reduced copy of the revised exhibit . a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived The revised drawings must be submitted no later than Monday, January 3, 2004 in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at husbandc@ci.collevville.tx.us or 817-503-1054 if you have any questions. PAGE 2 OF 2 .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: January 10, 2005 P-04-027 - PUBLIC HEARING - Old Grove Addition, Phase 2, being a Replat of 2.20 acres located at 103-105 John McCain Road STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Old Grove Limited Partnership is the developer of 2.20 acres of land located on the east side of Cast Iron Forest Trail in the Old Grove subdivision. The Old Grove subdivision is generally located northeast of the Whittier Heights development, located on McDonwell School Road. The developer has submitted a Replat of the property for review and consideration by the City. The plat contains four lots for the construction of new single family residences and one open space lot. Public Hearing. This development is a replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Neidholt Addition. Since existing residential lots are proposed for revision, the Texas Local Government Code requires a public hearing prior to approval of the replat. Zoning. The property is zoned PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential. The PUD-R ordinance was approved by the City Council on September 28, 2004, by Ordinance 0-04-1475. The proposed lots meet the requirements of the PUD-R ordinance approved by the City Council. The minimum lot size in the subdivision is 18,565 square feet, and the average lot size is 22,923 square feet. Open Space. The plat includes an open space lot that is part of the existing Old Grove subdivision. The lot is 3,920 square feet (0.09 ac.) in size which is 4% of the 2.23-acre tract. The approved PUD-R ordinance for the property allows the open space in the overall Whittier Heights/Old Grove project area to be calculated as a single project. Thus, the total open space provided in the project area is 25.22 acres, or 24.6% of the total development. The open space lot provides a buffer between the northern lot and the emergency access drive to John McCain Road. Sidewalks and Trails. The developer is dedicating a trail right-of-way adjacent to John McCain Road to accommodate the continuation of the hike and bike trail through this development. The developer will also construct a portion 10-foot wide hike and bike trail along John McCain Road as part of the public improvements to this property. Each homebuilder is required to construct a 4-foot wide sidewalk along the frontage of each lot as houses are built within the subdivision. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. The proposed development appears to satisfy the development standards contained in the PUD-R ordinance that established the zoning for this property. The development also meets the requirements and platting standards contained in the Land Development Agenda Item No.3 - Page 1 Code. Since this replat contains five lots, the plat must also be approved by the City Council. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location map · Development Review Committee Memo · Applicant's Response Letter · Plat Prepared by: J c..8 J. Clayton Husband, AICP Development Coordinator Agenda Item No.3 - Page 2 Location Map Agenda Item No.3 - Page 3 CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE FAX TO FAX NO FROM September 2, 2004 David Bagwell 214.368.7740 Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-04-027 Replat - Old Grove Phase II The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Since almost all of the property proposed for platting is already part of a recorded subdivision, the plat may be revised to meet the requirements of a replat. The comments noted below pertain to this change. Since the plat contains five lots (four residential and one open space), the plat will require approval by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City COlUlCil. 2. The review of the plat is based on the proposed rezoning of the property from R30 to PUD-R, as submitted by the applicant under a separate request. 3. The plat contains a portion of property that is part ofthe [mal plat of Old Grove. The final plat for Old Grove has not b~en recorded with the Tarrant County Clerk, and the plat must be filed prior to the proposed plat being finalized. PLAT DRAWING 1. The approval blocks for the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council should be added to the drawing. The preliminary plat approval block may be deleted from the drawing. 2. The title block should be revised as shown on the marked-up set of prints. 3. The owners acknowledgement and dedication statement should be revised. A copy of the standard dedication language is attached. 4. The right-of-way for John McCain Road needs to be verified at the northeast comer of the site. It appears that this property has a small amount of frontage on this street. Tie down the existing right-of-way with monuments on the opposite side of the street. Additional right-of- way dedication may be required depending upon the existing right-of-way width. 100 Main Street - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-04-027 OLD GROVE PHASE 2 5. John McCain Road is classified as a Minor Collector roadway on the Thoroughfare Plan. A Minor Collector roadway requires an ultimate right-of-way width of 75 feet. The required right-of-way dedication along the frontage of the property is 37.5-feet from the centerline of the existing right-of-way. 6. Additional right-of-way adjacent to John McCain Road, at the northeast comer of the property, is required to accommodate the construction of the hike and bike trail on the perimeter of this property. 7. Label the open space lot with a lot number. 8. The chord bearing in the northwest comer of the plat does not match the legal description. Verify and revise the plat accordingly. 9. Show the recording information on all adjacent platted properties. 10. Label the point of beginning on the drawing. 11. The typical lot detail and the site data table may be removed from the plat drawing. OTHER INFORMATION 1. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may b~ different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. Applicable to the new vacant lots created by this plat. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 2. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along Cast Iron Forest Trail. The sidewalk must be constructed at the same time any new structures are built on the lots. The sidewalks must be at least 4-feet wide. This property is also subject to the provision of the Colleyville Pathways Plan, which requires construction of a 10-foot wide hike and bike facilities along John McCain Road. The developer is required to construct the trail as part of the improvements for this property. 3. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are due at the time of approval of the final plat. The fee for residential uses is $1,802 per dwelling unit. An assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the final plat. PAGE20F 5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-04-027 OLD GROVE PHASE 2 4. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since John McCain Road is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains more than one residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the width of the street adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount can be provided by the Engineering Department upon request. The actual escrow amount may depend upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE City Council: Monday, September 13,2004,7:30 pm (pending action on zoning change request) Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 7:00 p.m. (pending action on zoning change request) Planning & Zoning Commission: RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices, if necessary. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices: · 10 folded copies of the revised Replat drawing · one 8W' x 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit · a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or husbandc@ci.collevville.tx.us if you have any questions. I c: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE30F5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-04-027 OLD GROVE PHASE 2 Owner's Acknowledgement and Dedication Certificate WHEREAS, (owners name), are the owners of a tract of land situated in the (name) Survey, Abstract N. (#), Tarrant County, Texas, and being out of a (#) acre tract conveyed to them by (deed reftrence), and being more particularly described as follows: (metes and bounds description) NOW THEREFORE, KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That We, (names), Owners, do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinbefore described property as (subdivision name), and addition to the City of Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate fee simple to the public use forever all streets, rights-of-way, and alleys shown thereon, and do hereby reserve the easements shown on this plat for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities desiring to use or using the same. Any public utility shall have the right to remove and keep removed all or part of any buildings, fences, trees, shrubs or other improvements or growths in which any way endanger or interfere with the construction , maintenance or efficiency of its respective systems on any of these easements, and any public utility shall at all times have the right of ingress and egress to and from and upon the said easement for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, and patrolling, without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City ofColleyville, Texas. Witness our hands this day of ,20_ Owners Name STATE OF TEXAS }{ COUNTY OF TARRANT }{ Before me, the undersigned Notary Public in and for said county and State on this day personally appeared , known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the purpose and considerations therein expressed, and in the capacity therein stated. Given under my hand and seal of office this day of ,20_. Notary Public in and for Tarrant County (affix seal) My printed name My commission expires: PAGE40F5 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-04-027 OLD GROVE PHASE 2 Revised Title Block information Minor Plat of Old Grove Addition, Phase 2, being 2.23 acres situated in the D.l. Beddo Survey, Abstract 232, and being a Replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Neidholt Addition, an Addition to the City of Colleyville, Texas, as recorded in Volwne 388-123, Page 64, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas, and being a Replat of Lot IX, Block F, Old Grove, Addition to the City of Colleyville, Texas, as recorded in Cabinet A, Slide _, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas PAGE50F5 GOO{)WKN~ M r\RS]HLt\LL~ CIVIL ENGINEERS - PLANNERS - SURVEYORS December 8, 2004 Mr. Clayton Husband, AICP Development Coordinator City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Re: P-04-07 Replat - Old Grove Phase II Dear Clayton: In response to your review comments concerning the above referenced project, we offer the following changes and explanations for the replat. For ease of reference, the following are organized in the same order as your letter dated September 2,2004. Plat Drawing 1. Approval blocks have been added and the preliminary plat approval block has been removed. 2. The title block has been revised. 3. Revisions have been made to the owner's acknowledgment and dedication statement. 4. Additional right-of-way is not required. 5. In conjunction with the Old Grove Phase I Final Plat, G&M tied down the existing centerline for John McCain Road adjacent to Old Grove Phase I and east of our project. The centerline for the road was established as requested by the City of Colleyville and a new curve radius based on a 35 MPH design speed was then computed and approved by the city. Based on this revised centerline curve, no additional right-of-way is necessary relative to the platting of Phase II of Old Grove. 6. Additional trail right-of-way has been provided. 7. The open space has been labeled. 8. The chord bearing and the legal description have been reconciled. 2405 MUSTANG DRIVE / GRAPEVINE, TX 76051/817-329-4373/817-329-4453 (FAX) 3131 EAST CAMELBACK, SUITE 200/ PHOENIX,AZ 85016/602-606-5760/602-606-5759 (FAX) City of Colleyville Old Grove Phase II Rep/at December 8, 2004 Page 2 of2 9. All recording information has been shown. 10. The point of beginning has been labeled. 11. The typical lot detail and site data table have been removed Thank you for your assistance with this project. Please advise should you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Goodwin and Marshall, Inc. cc: Eddie Eckart, P .E., Goodwin and Marshall, Inc. .~ l"exas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: January 1 0, 2005 Z-05-001 - PUBLIC HEARING - Request for an amendment to the PUD-R for Strathmore Addition, Lots 10-16, Block 1 located at the 3200 block of Glade Road, Case Z-05-001 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Glade Road Estates LP is the developer of the Strathmore subdivision, located on the north side of Glade Road, west of Roberts Road. A zoning change to PUD-R was approved by the City Council on April 3, 2001, and an amendment to the PUD-R was approved on May 18, 2004, by Ordinance 0-04-1460, to make this development a private gated subdivision, to reduce the minimum lot size from 15,500 square feet to 13,980 square feet and to change the front building line from 40 feet to 30 feet. The subdivision contains 18 single family lots. The developer has submitted an application to amend one of the fencing conditions in the ordinance to allow the construction of a solid fence along the east side of the subdivision instead of the ornamental metal fence currently required. The approved ordinance contains a requirement for a metal ornamental fence adjacent to the east property line of the development. The ordinance does not allow the construction of any other type of fence, such as a wood fence, adjacent to the rear lot line. This requirement is contained in Section 7-d of the approved ordinance, and a copy is attached. The proposed amendment to the ordinance would allow the construction of a solid fence instead of a metal fence along the rear property line of Lots 10 through 16. These lots are adjacent to a large acreage lot to the east, which is the residence of a single property owner. According to the information furnished by the applicant, the solid fence would provide screening and privacy for the back yards of the lots in Strathmore, and provide privacy for the owner of the adjacent house. Attached is a letter from the applicant, which explains his request. Staff mailed notices to 26 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. One letter has been received regarding this request from the adjacent property owner to the east expressing his opposition to the applicant's request. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 1 PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: January 10, 2005 City Council: February 1 and February 15, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location Map · Letter from Developer · Letter from adjacent property owner · Ordinance 0-04-1460 · List of Property Owners Notified · Draft Ordinance Prepared by: Y\l5L Barry LeBaron, AICP Development Director Agenda Item No.4 - Page 2 Location Map Agenda Item No.4 - Page 3 I." MADY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 545 E. John Carpenter Freeway Suite 1500 Irving, Texas 75062 Telephone: (214) 630-0481 Telecopier: (214) 630-9560 December 8, 2004 Mr. Clayton Husband City of Colleyville Development Coordinator 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Dear Clayton: RE: Ordinance 0-04-1460 Revision Request Mady Development is requesting a revision to Ordinance 01-04-1460, Paragraph 7-d which states: "Metal ornamental fencing shall be the only fencing material allowed on the rear property line of each residential lot. The metal ornamental fence shall consist of 4 'inch posts, spaced no greater than 8 feet on center, with horizontal rails a minimum of 1 % inches and vertical bars a minimum of-% inches spaced every 6 inches. The fence shall be black in color and be a minimum of 6 feet in height. Said metal fence shall be similar to that shown in Exhibit "D". We are requesting this revision of this paragraph to allow an 8' wood fence along the easterly property line of lots 10 through 16. This request is based on the fact that the rear of lots 10 through 16 is adjacent to Mr. Gary Cantrell's property. Mr. Cantrell is concerned with having the open metal fence facing his property and being able to see into his neighbors back yards. By allowing a wood fence on this boundary, we would be able to screen our homeowners from his sheet metal fence and other out buildings as well as screening Mr. Cantrell from our homeowners rear yards. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (214) 630- 0481 ext. 136. Thank you. Yours truly, MADY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ./C,__~ C. 5~' yru:-~~ Scasta Development Manage Enclosures January 7, 2005 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 . Gary and Karen Cantrell 3400 Glade Rd. Colleyville, TX 76034-4821 Re: Case Number Z-05-00 1 Dear Commission Members: As the only resident affected by the requested revision to the PUD Ordinance 0-04-1460, I must respectfully request that you please deny the amendment allowing a wooden fence at the rear oflots 10-16. When I spoke in favor of the Strathmore Addition zoning case a few years ago, I was pleased with the wrought iron fencing because it is appropriate and permanent. However, 1 admit that I misunderstood about screening becal,lse I,thought it would be identical to the Heritage Glen Addition on the east side of my home (developed by the same developer) in which the PUD Ordinance required live screening (Leyland Cypress trees) along the wrought iron fencing. But, even though live screening was not required in the zoning ordinance for Strathmore, I still would rather have wrought iron instead of wooden fencing. In my opinion, a wooden fence looks bad after 3-5 years and is not permanent. I am concerned about being able to see into my neighbor's back yards, but I will take my chances that my new neighbors in these new houses will screen their own back yards to their'benefit and mine also. For your information, I had proposed that I would allow the developer to remove my existing metal screening fence if he would screen the new wrought iron fence with 30 gallon NRS Hollies on 5 foot centers just like was recently done on the property line at 2900 Glade Road Gust west of Ashmore Subdivision). However, the developer's first response was that it was too expensive, and he would get back to me. . . so far, no answer. Therefore, in summary, I would rather the Ordinance not be amended and everything develop in accordance with the existing PUD Ordinance in effect. Thank you for your consideration. I will probably see you at the meeting. ~~u,.. cf(~ c.~ ~ a~en Cantrell, 3400 Glade Road (between Heritage Glen and Strathmore) 817-571-4834 ORDINANCE 0-04-1460 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, AMENDING THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, BY AMENDING ORDINANCE 0-01-1277 IN ITS ENTIRETY; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, an application for a zoning change was filed by Glade Road Estates Limited Partnership on March 16,2004, under Case No. Z-04-016; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in the best interests of the City of Colleyville. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT the Master Plan, the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, and the Official Zoning Map are hereby amended insofar as they relate to certain land located in Colleyville, Texas, as shown on the Zoning Map attached as Exhibit "A", and described by legal description attached as Exhibit "B", by amending Ordinance 0- 01-1277, the PUD-R for Strathmore Addition, including any other conditions and restrictions imposed and approved by the City Council, which are incorporated herein. Sec. 2. THAT Ordinance 0-01-1277 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 1. GENERAL a. The purpose of this PUD-R is for single-family residential development, constructed at an approximate density of 1.66 dwelling units per acre. b. This property is subject to all the regulations contained in the Colleyville Land Development Code, except where amended by this Ordinance. 2. CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND PLATTING Ordinance 0-04-1460 Page 2 of 4 a. Prior to the issuance of any development permits within this PUD-R and as a condition to the development of the subject property, the developer shall obtain approval of a final plat of the property in accordance with the procedures and requirements of the Colleyville Land Development Code. b. The subdivision shall be generally consistent with the conceptual site plan attached as Exhibit "C". which shall be considered the preliminary plat. The actual street and lot arrangement may differ from that shown on Exhibit "C" to accommodate topographic, drainage or other conditions. 3. PERMITTED USES a. Single family residences, detached b. Parks and open space 4. RESIDENTIAL LOT REQUIREMENTS AND SETBACKS Residential lot requirements and setbacks shall comply with the following provisions. a. Minimum Lot Size b. Average Lot Size c. Minimum Lot Width d. Minimum Lot Depth e. Front Building Line f. Front Building Line cul-de-sac g. Side Building Line h. Rear Building Line 5. OPEN SPACE 13.980 square feet 16.500 square feet 100 feet 120 feet 30 feet 30 feet 10 feet 25 feet west side 15 feet east side a. This development shall provide a minimum of 20% common open space, as shown on Exhibit "C", which shall be for the leisure and recreational use of the development's residents. The open space shall comply with the provisions contained in the Land Development Code. All open space areas shall be landscaped. b. Open space may be utilized for storm water detention. 24 Ordinance 0-04-1460 Page 3 of 4 6. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS a. Sidewalks shall be constructed along all interior streets in accordance with the Land Development Code. b. The developer shall construct a ten-foot (10) wide hike and bike trail along the north side of Glade Road adjacent to this property. 7. OTHER a. Each main residence within the development shall have a fire sprinkler system conforming to the City of Colleyville Fire Code. b. If the subdivision is developed as a private gated community, the subdivision must contain a minimum of fourteen (14) single-family residential lots, and all other requirements of Chapter 10 of the Land Development Code shall apply to the development of this property. c. Entry features and screening walls may be located within the open space lots. The entry features and screening walls shall be exempt from the building line and height requirements provided the entry features and screening walls are located on the open space lots and comply with applicable vehicular visibility triangles required by the Colleyville Land Development Code. d. Metal ornamental fencing shall be the only fencing material allowed on the rear property line of each residential lot. The metal ornamental fence shall consist of 4-inch posts, spaced no greater than 8 feet on center, with horizontal rails a minimum of 1 % inches and vertical bars a minimum of % inches spaced every 6 inches. The fence shall be black in color and be a minimum of 6 feet in height. Said metal fence shall be similar to that shown in Exhibit "0". e. A metal ornamental fence, built to the above stated specifications, shall be constructed along the western, northern and eastern lot lines of Lot 9, Block 1. Said fence shall be constructed along the entire eastern lot line of Lot 9, Block 1, within 60 days of Cit acceptance of the subdivision. f. A metal ornamental fence, built to the above stated specifications, shall be constructed along the rear property line of lots located on the east side of the development. Said fence shall be constructed at the time a new residence is built upon the lot, and shall be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the residence. Ordinance 0-04-1460 Page 4 of 4 g. Garage entrances may face the front property line only if they are constructed such that the garage entrance is a minimum of thirty (30) feet to the rear of the front face of the house. Otherwise, garage entrances shall face the side or rear property line of the lot. h. The developer shall install decorative street lights and street signage, which shall be maintained by the homeowner's association of the development. Sec. 3. THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. Sec. 4. THAT the Land Development Code of the City of Colleyville, Texas, shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. Sec. 5. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Sec. 6. THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the ~~ day of P,- ~ 2004. The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the /,f ~ day of b-_2004. ~~~{k Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary APPROVr;D,Aff_:O FORM AND LEGALITY: ffft-:::;; EXHIBIT A - ZONING MAP Z-04-016 - Zoning Map EXHIBIT B - LEGAL DESCRIPTION Being Lots 1-18, Block 1, Strathmore Addition, an Addition to the City of Colleyville, Texas, according to the subdivision plat recorded in Cabinet B. Slide 2607, Plat Records, Tarrant County, Texas. EXHIBIT C - CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN --- ~_J"'-' ~i : \ en it \ \ III I \ :t ~ a --- " , ~ '~ .....- /Ii~ r "i \ : } : ./ : -~ !~ 1~ I'" ~ e -l ..' ~ _"OK' j; 5 , .' iI 'I g 1 R 0 8;1 - I " u' t .iN;i'", (I, I - 8:~ $ - -'I ~ , - -:-~., -'I .i: N '-., -"-- .f;&1K:'~ co --~-- J"oo --~--- \Q I--- - - .c;.; ~ re co oq " .. :i oq lil ~, ..~--- --- ,\0"1 l"I It) ~-- ",,'b'. ,.. -:-..., 5 o (I) N e' """.. ~,. .lS'wt. _ _ ...~ _ _ _ _::::: ~"~~A.;~.I~_:.--.~ ;17.=(J _ c:::::-:,,:..::,--,- ,op , :: - :=::J ., "-, , ------- EXHIBIT D - TYPICAL METAL FENCING Z-05-001 Harada, Seiji etux Maria L 3309 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Chen, Larry L 3307 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Sullivan, William etux Shirley 3305 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Martin, Ricky etux Virginia 3303 Huntinton Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Bostrom, Roger etux Virginia 3301 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Abs, Joseph E & Carolyn H 5200 Fox Trail Lane Colleyville TX 76034 Cawley, Charles R etux Candace 3300 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Bishop, Macklin etux Hildegard 3302 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Yoor, Caroline 3400 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Ropp, Larry A 3314 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Bullard, Michael M & Christine 3312 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Nye, Steven & Carolyn 3310 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Miller, Jacqueline K 3308 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Ray, Austin L etux Carolyn S 3306 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Sawtelle, William J etux Linda 3304 Huntington Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Hubbard, Van 6221 Colleyville Blvd Ste 150 Colleyville TX 76034 Karen Cantrell 3400 Glade Road Colleyville TX 76034 Glade Family Ltd 3400 Glade Road Colleyville TX 76034 Bryant, Zack T etux Lynn W 3302 Saint Albans Circle Colleyville TX 76034 Phillips, Tommy D etux Carole 3300 Saint Albans Circle Colleyville TX 76034 Smith, Johnny E 3206 Saint Albans Circle Colleyville TX 76034 Sheppard, Jeffrey etux Chrisri 3204 Saint Albans Circle Colleyville TX 76034 Hansen, Craig M etux Rahni 3202 Saint Albans Circle Colleyville TX 76034 Ream, Gene etux Stephanie 3200 Saint Albans Circle Colleyville TX 76034 Gale, R Bradley etux Sharon K 3106 Saint Albans Circle Colleyville TX 76034 Woodland Hills Homeowners 350 Westpark Way Ste 205 Euless TX 76040 Case Z-05-001, Notices dated December 17, 2004. According to the last published tax rolls, individuals who own property that is within 200 feet of the proposed zoning change or special use permit request ar, listed above. I certify that the parties listed above have been notified of the proposed zoning change or special use permit request as required by the Texas Loce Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code. Amy Shelley, Planning & Zoning Assistant ORDINANCE 0-05-XXXX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 0-04-1460, BY REPLACING SECTION 2, PARAGRAPH 7.f, WITH A PROVISION TO ALLOW A SOLID FENCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ADJACENT TO THE REAR PROPERTY LINE; PROVIDING FOR THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council approved Ordinance 0-04-1460 on May 18, 2004, to establish the zoning for the Strathmore Planned Unit Development-Residential located in the 3200 block of Glade Road; and WHEREAS, the developer has requested an amendment to Ordinance 0-04- 1460 to modify language regarding the regulations contained in Section 2, paragraph 7.f, under Case Z-05-001; and WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has complied with the notification requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and requirements of the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has held a public hearing and made a recommendation on the proposed zoning amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed zoning amendment is in the best interest of the City of Colleyville. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS: Sec. 1. THAT Section 2, Paragraph 7.f, of Ordinance 0-04-1460 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: Section 2, Paragraph 7.f. - In lieu of the fencing requirement contained in Paragragh 7.d above, no metal ornamental fence shall be required along the east property lines of Lots 10 through 16, Strathmore Addition. A solid fence, not exceeding eight (8') feet in height shall be allowed along the east property lines of these lots. Sec. 2. THAT any person, firm, or corporation violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00). Each and every day such violation continues shall constitute a separate offense and shall be punishable as such. Sec. 3. THAT Ordinance 0-04-1460, shall remain in full force and effect, except where amended by this ordinance. Ordinance 0-05-XXXX Page 2 of 2 Sec. 4. THAT the City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause publication of the descriptive caption and penalty clause hereof as an alternative method of publication provided by law. Sec. 5. THAT this ordinance shall become effective immediately upon publication. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the 2005. day of ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE Cynthia Singleton, TRMC City Secretary Joe Hocutt Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Ross T. Foster City Attorney .~ TexaS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: January 10, 2005 Case Z-04-042 - TABLED - Zoning change from AG to R40 and R20 on 4 acres located at 512 Shelton Drive Update The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this item at the December 13, 2004 meeting to allow the collection of additional information associated with the long-range development of properties in the Shelton Drive area. There were questions from citizens and from several Commissioners related to the capacity of the existing infrastructure to take on additional development. Additional questions were raised regarding whose responsibility it would become to upgrade the infrastructure, if any upgrades are required in conjunction with the proposed development. The questions that have been raised regarding the proposed development are related more to the technical engineering aspects than to the land use compatibility concerns. From the perspective of the 2004 Master Plan, the area along Shelton Drive is shown as a future residential area. The Master Plan also recommends a density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre as a guide in evaluating requests for rezoning. Typically, the answers to engineering questions are generally addressed at the time property is platted into lots and blocks and engineering construction plans are prepared. However, staff is providing the following additional information to help the Commission better understand the infrastructure and issues in the Shelton Drive area. Water pressure - During the December 13, 2004 public hearing, there were questions regarding the water pressure along Shelton Drive and Hunter Lane. There is an existing twelve inch water line located along Shelton Drive, which connects to the 1.0 million gallon elevated water storage tank at the intersection of Shelton Drive and Bransford Road, which should provide more than adequate capacity for new development in this area. There is also a six inch water line serving the residents along Hunter Lane. Attached is a copy of a part of water system map showing the existing water lines in the vicinity of Shelton Drive. The Colleyville Public Works Department is not aware of any low water pressures in this area. Sewer capacity - Questions have been raised regarding the capacity of the existing sewer line on Shelton Drive and its ability to handle additional loading from new development. There is an existing six inch sewer line located along Shelton Drive. This line originates at the Webb House, located on the west side of Bransford Road and flows to the east, connecting with an eight inch line at Pleasant Run Road. The Colleyville Public Works Department has received only one sewer complaint along this line and has installed a back-flow device to prevent future problems for this resident. Agenda Item No.5 - Page 1 The existing six inch sewer line should be sufficient to serve this area according to the build-out scenario shown on the Master Land Use Plan. Attached is a copy of a portion of the sewer system map for the Shelton Drive area showing the existing sewer collection system. Drainage - There is no underground storm drainage system serving the Shelton Drive area. All storm-water runoff is handled by the existing system of bar-ditches, which collects all runoff and channels it to Pleasant Run Creek, located to the east of Pleasant Run Road. There is no area in the vicinity of Shelton Drive situated within any FEMA designated 100-year floodplain. The Colleyville Public Works Department is not aware of any homes being flooded in the Shelton Drive area. Attached is a copy of the topographic map of the Shelton Drive area. Infrastructure Responsibility - The costs for upgrading public facilities is generally a requirement of the development that creates the impact to the infrastructure, which in most cases is a fairly simple calculation. However, when an existing system is either undersized or inadequate to accommodate additional capacity, other factors may come into play that may involve some cost-sharing between the developer and the public. An additional factor is determining if any improvements may be eligible for cost-sharing from funds available from impact fees, such as those regulated by Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. The Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans are based on the future development needs of the community over the next ten years and do not show any additional new lines serving this area. Therefore, it is assumed that the existing water and sewer lines are adequate to meet the needs of the area, based on the future land use plan adopted in 2004. 5T AFF REVIEW COMMENTS The Lotsmith is the potential owner and developer of a 4.0-acre parcel located on the north side of Shelton Drive, between Bransford Road and Pleasant Run Road. The applicant has submitted a request to change the zoning on the property from AG Agricultural to the R40 and R20 Single Family Residential districts. The owner is seeking a zoning change in order to subdivide the property into lots for the construction of new single family residences. There is a related zoning change request on the December 13, 2004 agenda on property immediately to the east of this tract. While the zoning cases were submitted separately, the proposed development on the property will encompass the entire tract of land. A copy of the zoning exhibit of the property is attached. The 4.0-acre tract of land has approximately 175 feet of frontage on Shelton Drive. The tract is over 1,000 feet in depth, extending to the railroad right-of-way on its north boundary. There is an existing house on the property. This tract of land will comprise the western side of a larger development. The zoning exhibit shows a cui de sac street with 11 single family lots. Three additional lots, which are 40,000 square feet in size, are shown on Shelton Drive. Agenda Item No.5 - Page 2 The surrounding property is generally developed as single family residences on half- acre or larger tracts. Properties to the east, located on Hunter Lane, are zoned R30 and R40, and they are developed as single family residences. The properties to the south, across Shelton Drive, are zoned R40 and are developed as single family residences on one-acre or larger tracts. Properties to the west are zoned AG, and are also developed as large acreage tracts with residences. The properties north of the tract, across the railroad right-of-way, are zoned R30, RE and AG and are developed as a single family residences. A zoning map of the area is attached. The Colleyville Plan contains as a goal to "preserve the superior quality of Colleyville's residential neighborhoods". This particular goal includes several objectives relative to this zoning change request: . Continue development of luxury residential areas while maintaining the "country feel" along major collector streets . Encourage redevelopment of older properties located along major collector streets into estate settings . Preserve larger lot sizes, i.e., 30,000 sq. ft. and up, and promote the redevelopment or combination of smaller lots into larger estate lots IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. This property is in Neighborhood 5, as identified in The Colleyville Plan. The property is designated for future use as single family residential land uses. This request is consistent with the goals and objectives of The Colleyville Plan. The density of the overall 14-acre development is 1.0 dwelling units per acre. 2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are developed as single- family residences on acreage tracts. 3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is for single-family development. The property in the area is suitable for that type of development. 4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer services are available along adjacent rights-of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of utilities to the lots. 5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the taxable value of the parcel is $85,100. The estimated City property tax revenue for the undeveloped property is $295 annually. A portion of this property has an Agricultural exemption from Tarrant County for property taxes. The future property tax revenue would depend upon the value the building improvements to the property. 6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips Agenda Item No.5 - Page 3 per day, on average. Based on this average, the 14 proposed residences would add 134 vehicle trips per day to the surrounding roadways. Shelton Drive is classified as a Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. There are no available traffic counts for this area. 7. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 8 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff received four letters and a petition in opposition to the request. Copies of the letters and petition are attached. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: December 13, 2004 City Council: January 4 and January 18, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location & Zoning Map · Zoning Exhibit · Water System Map · Sewer System Map · Topographic Map · List of Property Owners Notified · Correspondence Prepared by: JtH J, Clayton Husband, AICP Development Coordinator Agenda Item No.5 - Page 4 Location & Zoning Map Zoning Exhibit SHELTON FOREST COII&yvIle. Texas The Lotsmlth. DeveI:.lper for IftIOfmflUOd: Cd &.Ian fobd 214-673-6154 R40 R20 Sheltan FClf'eit Is located In Colleyvlle on Shelton Drive, between Bransford Rd. and Plesant Run Roact LOT 8 IIbft ..10 _ LOT 4- ~ ..10 IIloPl IlI..CICK A LOT S tIIIId'& II4IIl ~ LOT 2 WIlIIID'lJ 4IIIIaII . Nt LOT 6 'IIODGO 4tIZIII MIlt. LOT 6 1IIIIIlIIIO ...,., ~ LOT 4 1IrIDIIIl 4IlIlIlI IIIIIt. ~ I LOT 3 'IIdIlIIII 4IIIlIIIII MIlt. ~. LOT 2 ~ 4fIlII iIIIJL LOT 1 -- ...... III!JI. LOT 1 ftdI'llo .... III!JI. ~TQ'f QI\l\IIi> Water System Map Sewer System Map Topographic Map 665.5 *~ 6 ( Z-04-042 Garry L' & Helen J Quinn 511 Shelton Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 o Leroy Chism 3754 Tamarack Court Fort Worth, TX 76116 Notices dated November 19,2004. According to the last published tax rolls, individuals who own property that is within 200 feet of the proposed request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above have been notified of the proposed variance request as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Collewille Land Develooment Code, Brian & Stacy Markwood 6212 LD Lockett Road Colleyville, TX 76034 James H & Susan L Wood 6001 Bransford Road Colleyville TX 76034 Kenneth R & Cheryl Darrow PO Box 1806 Colleyville, TX 76034 Howard A & Mary K Rettig PO Box 17 Colleyville, TX 76034 Vanderpool, Jeffrey Etux There 601 Shelton Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 Kevin & Kathy Doody 1701 Park Place Ave. Bedford, TX 76022 Amy Shelley Planning & Zoning Assistant December 9,2004 RECEIVED DEe 0,9 2004 City of Colleyville Planning and Zoning Commission 100 Main Street Colleyville, TX 76034 ~ Per ..:.a:e:.---......ut......._.... . RE: Case Number Z-04-042 Z-04-043 Dear Commissioners, We would like to reaffirm our objection regarding the rezoning ofR40 to R20 in our neighborhood, on our street. The previous request to rezone this property, case #Z-04-013, on February 23,2004 was denied and again denied on April 26, 2004. The reason for the 4 to 1 denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission was due in part by the overwhelming opposition of the proposal from the neighbors. The two (2) previous rezoning proposals were met with a strong resistance because of the request for lots less than R40. The same resistance remains today from the neighbors as documented by the petition dated December 7, 2004 forwarded to the City of Colleyville on December 9,2004 reflecting the 48 citizens and neighbors who request your consideration to zone R40 only. This area of Colleyville from the LD Lockett Road area south is unique and historic to Colleyville. The neighborhood and homes are situated on large tracks or acreage of land without the infill of small tightly fitted new subdivisions popping up detracting from the rural atmosphere. This rural atmosphere is what is projected and exploited by the City's Logo and Chamber of Commerce website. The current neighbors like us chose this particular area of Colleyville for the setting that exists here. When each of the current property owners bought or built their homes they relied on the current zoning to protect the integrity of this neighborhood. Please protect this unique neighborhood of rural Colleyville by denying zoning less than R40. ~ December 8, 2004 RECEIVED DEe 0,,9 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville Texas 76034 Per ............. Reference Case Numbers: Z-04-042 and Z-04-043 Dear Sirs: My name is Darryl Heath and I was one of the residents who spoke at the P&Z meetings a few months back related to the land situation on Shelton Road. I am writing the commission today (again) because I believe that the new plan being submitted for this property is still unacceptable for this area of Colleyville and for the rural feel that we as residents are trying to keep. And I hope you will work with the developer to help ensure that the sentiments described in the previous meetings are not lost. Though I cannot attend the meeting on November 13th due to business travel, and I am certain that this plan will be put forth as a another compromise, but for the neighbors and citizens of this part of Colleyville, it is clearly not. Realistically, it attempts to put 14 lots in a space that should likely have much less. The issue I have, like most, is with the R20 proposal, not the R40 proposal, yet I believe the overall plot will have to be modified to create something that is reasonable. Basically, I am very concerned about the precedence that will be set by allowing R20 lots to be created in this area of town. We did not move to this part of Colleyville to have 14 homes replace 2 and have yet another neighborhood built next to our rural setting investments. Though I respect the need for development to continue, I would personally like to see this land settled into 2+ acre plots, but I also recognize that the builder will probably not see that as profitable enough for his venture. However, I do believe that a zoning designation smaller than R40 would certainly result in a change to the entire landscape and feel of the area. And the precedence it would set would surely allow other smaller lot neighborhoods to soon follow. I think you know the many concerns that the neighbors have over this proposed re-zoning, so I will not cover them in this letter. I only ask that you consider the long term masterplan and resulting impact that this decision could have on this area of Colleyvile. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, @+~~ Darryl Heath Darryl Heath 6200 Bransford Road COlleyville, Texas 76034 612 Shelton Drive Colleyville, Texas 76034 RECEIVED DEe 0,9 2004 December 7, 2004 Per .:._.:.._..~........_._..\ Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Re: Rezoning Request at Shelton Drive Case No. Z-04-042 Case No. Z-04-043 With reference of the zoning change requests at Shelton Drive, while we would prefer this land be kept as agricultural land, we realize that it is inevitable that this site will eventually be rezoned for residential use. We feel very strongly, however, that if it is to be developed, it should be at a minimum of R40. This neighborhood is one of Colleyville's oldest and the historic Webb House is located at the west end of Shelton. The street still retains its rural look and feel with horses, cows, goats, sheep and chickens in the immediate area, and to build 14 houses on the property will completely change the atmosphere of the neighborhood and almost double the number of houses. If the five requested R20's were changed to one R40 and two R30's, this would give a maximum of 12 houses, which would still impact the neighborhood, but not nearly as badly. Most of our neighbors specifically chose to live in this area because of the rural feel and the open spaces. It is one of the few remaining areas where wildlife can still be seen and is still welcome. It is one thing to develop land that is apart from existing housing, and quite another to develop land in the middle of existing housing. Experience tells us that new housing developments take years to complete and, therefore, this quiet neighborhood is going to be subjected to the noise and inconvenience of new building for many years to come. In fact, Mr. Bagwell broke ground in 2001 at his Broughton development, and the pamphlet available at that site, as of now, shows only about 11 lots have been sold. While we do not know, at this time, what size houses Mr. Bagwell is proposing to build, having looked at some of his other developments it appears that he builds large houses on fairly small lots. Of necessity, the houses are rather close together, thus posing a fire hazard especially in an older neighborhood with many trees. Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2004 Page -2- The Shelton/Hunter neighborhood has been experiencing serious drainage and sewer problems for years, and to build 14 more houses would cause even more problems and negate the drainage work done by the City several years ago. Earlier this year, a traffic study of Shelton was conducted and it was found that 1650 cars used Shelton in a 24 hour period. The traffic counter was placed just south of the Hunter turn and therefore, did not take into account cars coming down Hunter and turning west on Shelton, or cars going south on Shelton and turning onto Hunter. To build 14 more houses is obviously going to impact the traffic greatly. Shelton is a fairly narrow street and during construction, the construction vehicles will inevitably block the street from time to time and possibly cause serious response time delays for the Colleyville Fire Department, as Shelton is a cross street of preference of the firefighters stationed at the McDonwell School Road fire house. Finally, the City markets itself as being rural, and in fact, the City logo reflects the rural nature of Colleyville. We feel that this neighborhood, which is one of the few remaining rural areas in the City, should remain that way. ve, ',y, tru,lY YO;;;r,U, rs" Pff~ fJUaIA~ Bill and Dinah Stephens Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-042 RECEIVED DEe 0.9 2004 Per ............. . The neighborhood surrounding the proposed property located at 512 Shelton Drive, Colleyville, Texas would like to express their concerns regarding the proposed zoning change from AG Agriculture to R20 Single Family Residential. The neighbors of this property believe that the proposed R20 Single Family Residential is not in the best interest of this neighborhood or Colleyville for the following reasons: ~ Density-R20 Family Residential would be a tremendous increase in density for this neighborhood. The total number of homes proposed is three less than the entire number of homes located on Shelton Drive ~ Loss of Rural Appealing Atmosphere of Colleyville-the street of Shelton Drive, and the next streets over (Beverly Drive and LD Lockett) have home sites on lots over an acre and are zoned R40-over 50 existing residences ~ Drainage-Shelton Drive and Hunter Lane currently have a serious water run off drainage problem with the addition of these large homes the problem would increase greatly and impact the homes down hill from the proposed development ~ Fence-the current zoning ofR40 allows for open spaces, fencing in of the proposed development would negatively impact the rural atmosphere of this area of Colleyville ~ Water-is the available supply line sufficient enough to serve 14 additional very large homes and sustain pressure to current homes ~ Sewer-is the current system in place sufficient to service the large new homes and sustain the current homes ~ Lighting-the addition of street lights and lighting of the exterior of the 14 homes would distract from the rural atmosphere ~ Increase Traffic-can the current narrow shoulder less street support the increase in traffic Our first desire would be to keep the track as it is. The current neighbors chose this particular area of Colleyville for the large lot, rural setting that exists here. When each of the current property owners bought or built their homes they relied on the current zoning to protect the integrity of this neighborhood. Weare urging the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider rezoning the property R40 instead of the proposed R20 lots. This petition is supported by the citizens of Colleyville whom appear on the following attachment: December 7, 2004 Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-043 S~i\Okt ~~ fu.9~ \ ~ 5 -rota. \ ~'Sna.h.tY<tS '5'0 ~ RECEIVED DEe 0,9 2004 'p ., sr ............. : ) \V Address J,~~n}ed ~;~.(~pS ~~ Phone ~ 10\2 shelwt'\ 1).-, ljlna.tA.)~~ ~fAKc' -- ;3(}-l.I/if:{6~ 9- 151 J7 J~'tv C~ c(Jtot.YtV II//t-N . 1J17~&S- ?()~ i 5'117 fJ ""'~ l.) 9.&:: tl?lot.J 9 {:, ~ '( o-J 85"7;9:;> ~ 6/00~&. ~ Bra.J~/..('t gI7-Z~n(3 ) 61()(' A 'MI/x- ~ ~r/f5 Com ~l7-I./RtJ-Q~Lf/ ) Ie lOr;, f,/uAv/>>c U, . CD 0J b5 . m. /Ih.-, ,90 Jft j- -S-3 f/ U(o<(; ~-m..~ ~Ewt~ie'<L ~~~ <l\l-l{d-~-O~7:f0 I&, \\d-.. ~~Lv-.. --(tL,.fv\l\~Ol::N/\\:L -~ ~\l-.~S-()\<O~ I ~ 1 J~HMti-lA ~n I "K~+~-Al\ft ~V\ ~~04-- g~1-/PoS;-O'bt I C I /:3 If tuJf e rel-,.J f\ It ,f-G-I'J Rei 't bE. 5 "'1<-\ "-1-,v.-<f)J~ '.r 17 <' If 9~ ,,-cp t. ,)0 \ \\-lA'" \-t. ---- Lv--- '::2 \,J o~,~"", ~ '" ~~ g \"1 '-\ q 'i: '" '71. . 1Jz:' 1fJ V //Odol-vC15<1:'fIVs ~ <6(1441: d'Dq~ VJ /, .D,f v: :s -4 '">>..-,t k?.~1Y2/'1f2>-.:2-~~ lb t 13 flUP76/{ bJ.:s !rIf~ 'f;:,b::fla{pTrt:f> ~ 87" Cpr?) '1'22. o~ ) b/P g tfl.lJ.};BL L \ J ff"'~ //~ <g/7- 42<i-<7099 I I . LN . Am ES LJ. ,7 ~ D.5-cIl9 rr liNTEl:.. 9'200 &/NJ~ lJi..RR1/L /h?rmt ~ 2?17~'I9?-f1t66 ~~200 &4xJs~ {36-r;v6 ~t-I ~~ ~l7-Y<:12-'lt~ VS-O~ r3-ev8r- /,--; L.e ~ r< / fVl/"~ ;t ~ <6"1 7-)~71'-7.. 'Er~l ,(.,2-\(" !--T)~tf fJ C~L 1)~.. ru qn ,~LS-b2Z( )19Zlv l...t:d.<3ctiP-W. KIlV1~~ bJrvow ~~I>7'l??.t7~( Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-043 ~-'3Y'6+U{($ tu31' 2 ~ 5 10+0.\ ~ljna*u(~S ~ Address Printed Name Signature Phone 'f) a.,r ~G<1i.A1 .1lf. 76k.. f'4<lL 1l~",,6[ 'fP~ ;r/72$/.1'1::1.'{. ~ Q?ol ~ever-tI'lPR Oh~\[;,J,n~"&A.Y1f/}j- 'iJ-J~~ ~/7-D2&-1-J1&l9 r;>.:?1d.. ~3 bA. ~('1st;~4 C.h\\drC55 C!AvI ~ J11- -198 - g/00 ~ !fOg r~ 1CA .. :Ye~{c.. R.........:ev ~ -.': < ?/17577-J767 J .&, 01 bhel-toVl 'Or 11%V<esa- VOJIId-u f'J I ~ a, 'i?17. ~'1'3 '37~ ~ b 0 I ~ Or- lVJer€~, VOvYlderr;oJ fill tfl I <6'\7. 49~-s7~ ~ -fuy- Jeff VQ\'l1J€tv rXl ~ ~ h71 . , t:::r. \S"'- L.~ \ ~ ~,_~~-4S1-2 D .5'1;). &.vuL~ lX. ::r;,h~ rYl. a~u,.~.s"s B 17 - '19 g - 81t.!!. RECEIVED DEe 09 2004 Per ............. ! Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To RlO Case # Z-04-043 ~3~U'(~ ~(lg<t- 3 J S -r~oJ ~'5V'04-U~(h5 ~ Address Printed Name Signature Phone @ 80S ShelToN Dr. JArn<ss 13. DlI'f ~~il~A 1:?/?_'I9Il-lo27 @ ftoS-~/+EL7o"u'U1L C;krHEAIJ-'lG~ltr ?/~;)~QI.~ 9l7'/9/I(:>~ 7 t9 1 "f P ;1",.(.;1,1<1 P II <XII- ('>1'1 e e t - $,LM e.:k ~ ,.,......, rf .g '7' :J-f, I' Wid I ~ ~O'f she./'/M '.bY' J)/)1l1l1J WII-II<Lr jJ)~W~ "811' t.(fS.jKtJ3 @ ? 04 ~~ e {foN DR !tLflf /'1. IJL{~AI ~. aM >1tt2/.&r" 6"17-J.~/-ot93/ @ 800 5!-/E:L~j.(J)R... /IIADE E'IAN5 aI~&'~ 8B/7-L:J~-S;Jt,~ @ @J6 r)dfM [J/l. -r;;;'I1a 4h~ J~ d~ t//J"y.,/.sU; ~, 5,q\Io?~ R'^-" 'R!,. GLOl u,u..sc;J ~tK~ ~n-7~sq""" ~SGj[(P \>~-ev...lU. ~Cr-u.s"",, ~~ t\I.\'l.~-S'\Io"2 RECElVED DEe 0,,9 2004 . Per .....~._............ Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-043 3'13Y\a~U ~s;, ~ 4 ~5 --r 0-10.\ S-s l'6-1u vetS :fe- ,'\~~e.J~Y"\ ~o\"\;.ll-{, ~ '1\~ '701"S, ne.-l+o", 05(,-07/3 ~ ~C!--f( ~~ILL<::-,a~ '76J/~k)s./c9/7--bSt: -.& 7/~ ~ ~1 ~.Jh{cp &a4 r$- fJ J;o;Jt/iM fl/;I;J?- r;5'1~ rtJr/!j !?/il^ Ie "'-'1/J'jfl bOrz Q/f;"'liJ,), flJ 577 .t;;d-8-J @ 641<'1 ti(~It~ K ~~ L.o Lvcf=F.'7f fsr) ~'f- {,<f23 ~ ~ ..At\l2.rJ L<>T~f> iDcA j~4 u{. -fq'U1Sh... RECEIVED DEe 0\9 2004 'p - er ........-~ Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-043 Address P . rmted Name S' e 7lJ[; 'Sh€l.:I-DtJ /) f'. ~ ~ ' fj W 1/<e1f"; II ~ -r~ 1-1 ; ell e ilL .{/obL€J&..'~ W)r$ S).,e{J-MJ 1r. Sfephe<-N 6~ ~LL 1\ Cd/~vjJl<!- I). ~ @ ){J-/J.}I1!7BlYL '.' n .1/ &aM 14/"--TY pfjU/ j(1?ii-ff.IL ~ fb 8.1. r. 'IJIt/l~1 j71~t~ '\?\ ~ lJ ftl/V/T -1-% ~29f\a-\u(ts _ \::ngt; 5 at' 5 10-t0. \ ~13ro\-u lL S so ~ Phone (~/+ )51+-3d3~ ~ CBM-)51-1- 3?3i €;z) 7 /7 -?'7'?' 2- ~/;)S17r1f'V- REC::~".'.r:-D " I;;. .'". DEL 0,9 2004 Per ...,.,.......,u:.:o. .~ TexaS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: January 10, 2005 Case Z-04-043 - TABLED - Zoning change from AG to R40 on 10 acres located at 600 Shelton Drive Update The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled this item at the December 13, 2004 meeting to allow the collection of additional information associated with the long-range development of properties in the Shelton Drive area. There were questions from citizens and from several Commissioners related to the capacity of the existing infrastructure to take on additional development. Additional questions were raised regarding whose responsibility it would become to upgrade the infrastructure, if any upgrades are required in conjunction with the proposed development. The questions that have been raised regarding the proposed development are related more to the technical engineering aspects than to the land use compatibility concerns. From the perspective of the 2004 Master Plan, the area along Shelton Drive is shown as a future residential area. The Master Plan also recommends a density of 1.8 dwelling units per acre as a guide in evaluating requests for rezoning. Typically, the answers to engineering questions are generally addressed at the time property is platted into lots and blocks and engineering construction plans are prepared. However, staff is providing the following additional information to help the Commission better understand the infrastructure and issues in the Shelton Drive area. Water pressure - During the December 13, 2004 public hearing, there were questions regarding the water pressure along Shelton Drive and Hunter Lane. There is an existing twelve inch water line located along Shelton Drive, which connects to the 1.0 million gallon elevated water storage tank at the intersection of Shelton Drive and Bransford Road, which should provide more than adequate capacity for new development in this area. There is also a six inch water line serving the residents along Hunter Lane. Attached is a copy of a part of water system map showing the existing water lines in the vicinity of Shelton Drive. The Colleyville Public Works Department is not aware of any low water pressures in this area. Sewer capacity - Questions have been raised regarding the capacity of the existing sewer line on Shelton Drive and its ability to handle additional loading from new development. There is an existing six inch sewer line located along Shelton Drive. This line originates at the Webb House, located on the west side of Bransford Road and flows to the east, connecting with an eight inch line at Pleasant Run Road. The Colleyville Public Works Department has received only one sewer complaint along this line and has installed a back-flow device to prevent future problems for this resident. Agenda Item No.6 - Page 1 The existing six inch sewer line should be sufficient to serve this area according to the build-out scenario shown on the Master Land Use Plan. Attached is a copy of a portion of the sewer system map for the Shelton Drive area showing the existing sewer collection system. Drainage - There is no underground storm drainage system serving the Shelton Drive area. All storm-water runoff is handled by the existing system of bar-ditches, which collects all runoff and channels it to Pleasant Run Creek, located to the east of Pleasant Run Road. There is no area in the vicinity of Shelton Drive situated within any FEMA designated 1 OO-year floodplain. The Colleyville Public Works Department is not aware of any homes being flooded in the Shelton Drive area. Attached is a copy of the topographic map of the Shelton Drive area. Infrastructure Responsibility - The costs for upgrading public facilities is generally a requirement of the development that creates the impact to the infrastructure, which in most cases is a fairly simple calculation. However, when an existing system is either undersized or inadequate to accommodate additional capacity, other factors may come into play that may involve some cost-sharing between the developer and the public. An additional factor is determining if any improvements may be eligible for cost-sharing from funds available from impact fees, such as those regulated by Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. The Water and Sewer Capital Improvement Plans are based on the future development needs of the community over the next ten years and do not show any additional new lines serving this area. Therefore, it is assumed that the existing water and sewer lines are adequate to meet the needs of the area, based on the future land use plan adopted in 2004. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS The Lotsmith is the potential owner and developer of a 10.0-acre parcel located on the north side of Shelton Drive, between Bransford Road and Pleasant Run Road. The applicant has submitted a request to change the zoning on the property from AG Agricultural to the R40 Single Family Residential. The owner is seeking a zoning change in order to subdivide the property into lots for the construction of new single family residences. There is a related zoning change request on the December 13, 2004 agenda on property immediately to the west of this tract. While the zoning cases were submitted separately, the proposed development on the property will encompass the entire tract of land. A copy of the zoning exhibit of the property is attached. The 10.0-acre tract of land has approximately 350 feet of frontage on Shelton Drive. The tract is over 1,000 feet in depth, extending to the railroad right-of-way on its north boundary. There is an existing house on the property. This tract of land will comprise the eastern side of a larger development. The zoning exhibit shows a cui de sac street with 11 single family lots. Three additional lots, which are 40,000 square feet in size, are shown on Shelton Drive. All the lots that will be adjacent to property on Hunter Lane will be 40,000 square feet or larger. Agenda Item No.6 - Page 2 The surrounding property is generally developed as single family residences on half- acre or larger tracts. Properties to the east, located on Hunter Lane, are zoned R30 and R40, and they are developed as single family residences. The properties to the south, across Shelton Drive, are zoned R40 and are developed as single family residences on one-acre or larger tracts. Properties to the west are zoned AG, and are also developed as large acreage tracts with residences. The properties north of the tract, across the railroad right-of-way, are zoned R30, RE and AG and are developed as a single family residences. A zoning map of the area is attached. The Colleyville Plan contains as a goal to "preserve the superior quality of Colleyville's residential neighborhoods". This particular goal includes several objectives relative to this zoning change request: . Continue development of luxury residential areas while maintaining the "country feel" along major collector streets . Encourage redevelopment of older properties located along major collector streets into estate settings . Preserve larger lot sizes, i.e., 30,000 sq. ft. and up, and promote the redevelopment or combination of smaller lots into larger estate lots IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. This property is in Neighborhood 5, as identified in The Colleyville Plan. The property is designated for future use as single family residential land uses. This request is consistent with the goals and objectives of The Colleyville Plan. The density of the overall 14-acre development is 1.0 dwelling units per acre. 2. Surrounding Properties. The surrounding properties are developed as single- family residences on acreage tracts. 3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is for single-family development. The property in the area is suitable for that type of development. 4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer services are available along adjacent rights-of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of utilities to the lots. 5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the taxable value of the parcel is $108,953. The estimated City property tax revenue for the undeveloped property is $378 annually. A portion of this property has an Agricultural exemption from Tarrant County for property taxes. The future property tax revenue would depend upon the value the building improvements to the property. 6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips Agenda Item No.6 - Page 3 per day, on average. Based on this average, the 14 proposed residences would add 134 vehicle trips per day to the surrounding roadways. Shelton Drive is classified as a Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. There are no available traffic counts for this area. 7. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 18 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Staff received four letters and a petition in opposition to the request. Copies of the letters and petition are attached. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: December 13, 2004 City Council: January 4 and January 18, 2005 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location & Zoning Map · Zoning Exhibit · Water System Map · Sewer System Map · Topographic Map · List of Property Owners Notified · Correspondence Prepared by: JCU J. Clayton Husband, AICP Development Coordinator Agenda Item No.6 - Page 4 Location & Zoning Map Zoning Exhibit SHEL rO!N FOREST CoIl&yvIle, Texas The Lotsmllh. OeYeI;:)per For ~ Cd~ f0lilfl214-673-6164 R20 LOT 8 IIIdrIlI ...10 ..,.. LOT 4- IIIbIn .IIIaG ,..a I!1.OCKA ~RaM LOT S 'I:IIIdn IMR'I ~ $helm ForesIls loc:ate(f In Colleyvlle Ofl Shelton Drive, between Bransford Rd. end Pmtlnt Run Road. LOT 2 WOIlIlfIII .tIIIIaII . ~ I LOT 1 'II'b:III'V ....1III!Jl. ~TOlIlRMi LOT 8 -- ...... -.Jt. LOT 6 WIDCIO ......, ~ LOT 4 1IIDDIIIII 4IlIIIII ~ LOT 3 'IIIXIIIIII 4IIIIIIII -.Jt. IllllAXJl;I LOT 2 -..sDD 4fQIt I4lJI,. LOT 1 'IIIIIlIIIII ..... IIII!Jl. t North Rwv.oC 1"~ Water System Map Sewer System Map Topographic Map 6615.15 ~~ 6 Z-04-043 Stacy L Panno 6110 Hunter Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 o Leroy Chism 3754 Tamarack Court Fort Worth, TX 76116 Kevin & Kathy Doody 1701 Park Place Ave. Bedford, TX 76022 Bradley A & Beverly Young 6100 Hunter Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Timothy B Perkins 12208 Maplewood Drive Keller, TX 76248 Garry L & Helen J Quinn 511 Shelton Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 Notices dated November 19, 2004. According to the last published tax rolls, individuals who own property that is within 200 feet of the proposed request are listed above, I certify that the parties listed above have been notified of the proposed variance request as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Collevville Land Develooment Code, Gary Friedman 6304 LD Lockett Road Colleyville, TX 76034 C L & Ruth Ann Madden III 6112 Hunter Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Kenneth R & Cheryl Darrow PO Box 1806 Colleyville, TX 76034 Howard A & Mary K Rettig PO Box 17 Colleyville, TX 76034 Troy & Jana S Burchfield 6108 Hunter Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Billy G & Dinah Stephens 612 Shelton Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 James W Pine 5918 Hunter Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 Bobby J & Christine Combs 6106 Hunter Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 James D Henslee PO Box 863 Colleyville, TX 76034 Kevin D & Margaret M Love 6000 Hunter Lane Colleyville, TX 76034 William & Beverly Lothrop 607 Shelton Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 Vanderpool, Jeffrey Etux There 601 Shelton Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 Amy Shelley Planning & Zoning Assistant ( December 9, 2004 RECEIVED DEe 09 2004 City of Colleyville Planning and Zoning Commission 100 Main Street Colleyville, TX 76034 l Per ......:...................... . RE: Case Number Z-04-042 Z-04-043 Dear Commissioners, We would like to reaffirm our objection regarding the rezoning ofR40 to R20 in our neighborhood, on our street. The previous request to rezone this property, case #Z-04-013, on February 23,2004 was denied and again denied on April 26, 2004. The reason for the 4 to 1 denial by the Planning and Zoning Commission was due in part by the overwhelming opposition of the proposal from the neighbors. The two (2) previous rezoning proposals were met with a strong resistance because of the request for lots less than R40. The same resistance remains today from the neighbors as documented by the petition dated December 7, 2004 forwarded to the City of Colleyville on December 9, 2004 reflecting the 48 citizens and neighbors who request your consideration to zone R40 only. This area of Colleyville from the LD Lockett Road area south is unique and historic to Colleyville. The neighborhood and homes are situated on large tracks or acreage of land without the infill of small tightly fitted new subdivisions popping up detracting from the rural atmosphere. This rural atmosphere is what is projected and exploited by the City's Logo and Chamber of Commerce web site. The current neighbors like us chose this particular area of Colleyville for the setting that exists here. When each of the current property owners bought or built their homes they relied on the current zoning to protect the integrity of this neighborhood. Please protect this unique neighborhood of rural Colleyville by denying zoning less than R40. S~r~, Bil\/~ '" P 609 Shelton Drive Colleyville, TX 76034 /j /---7 " /) If 7Q~ (~Uv Beverly Lothro~ ( /' ( December 8, 2004 RECEIVED DEe 09 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville Texas 76034 Per ............. Reference Case Numbers: Z-04-042 and Z-04-043 Dear Sirs: My name is Darryl Heath and I was one of the residents who spoke at the P&Z meetings a few months back related to the land situation on Shelton Road. I am writing the commission today (again> because I believe that the new plan being submitted for this property is still unacceptable for this area of Colleyville and for the rural feel that we as residents are trying to keep. And I hope you will work with the developer to help ensure that the sentiments described in the previous meetings are not lost. Though I cannot attend the meeting on November 13th due to business travel, and I am certain that this plan will be put forth as a another compromise, but for the neighbors and citizens of this part of Colleyville, it is clearly not. Realistically, it attempts to put 14 lots in a space that should likely have much less. The issue I have, like most, is with the R20 proposal, not the R40 proposal, yet I believe the overall plot will have to be modified to create something that is reasonable. Basically, I am very concerned about the precedence that will be set by allowing R20 lots to be created in this area of town. We did not move to this part of Colleyville to have 14 homes replace 2 and have yet another neighborhood built next to our rural setting investments. Though I respect the need for development to continue, I would personally like to see this land settled into 2+ acre plots, but I also recognize that the builder will probably not see that as profitable enough for his venture. However, I do believe that a zoning designation smaller than R40 would certainly result in a change to the entire landscape and feel of the area. And the precedence it would set would surely allow other smaller lot neighborhoods to soon follow. I think you know the many concerns that the neighbors have over this proposed re-zoning, so I will not cover them in this letter. I only ask that you consider the long term masterplan and resulting impact that this decision could have on this area of Colleyvile. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, (:]/! eY~ Darryl Heath Darryl Heath 6200 Bransford Road Colleyville, Texas 76034 ( ( 612 Shelton Drive Colleyville, Texas 76034 RECEIVED DEe 0 9 2004 December 7, 2004 Per .-.....-...-.......... \ Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Re: Rezoning Request at Shelton Drive Case No. Z-04-042 Case No. Z-04-043 With reference of the zoning change requests at Shelton Drive, while we would prefer this land be kept as agricultural land, we realize that it is inevitable that this site will eventually be rezoned for residential use. We feel very strongly, however, that if it is to be developed, it should be at a minimum of R40. This neighborhood is one of Colleyville's oldest and the historic Webb House is located at the west end of Shelton. The street still retains its rural look and feel with horses, cows, goats, sheep and chickens in the immediate area, and to build 14 houses on the property will completely change the atmosphere of the neighborhood and almost double the number of houses. If the five requested R20's were changed to one R40 and two R30's, this would give a maximum of 12 houses, which would still impact the neighborhood, but not nearly as badly. Most of our neighbors specifically chose to live in this area because of the rural feel and the open spaces. It is one of the few remaining areas where wildlife can still be seen and is still welcome. It is one thing to develop land that is apart from existing housing, and quite another to develop land in the middle of existing housing. Experience tells us that new housing developments take years to complete and, therefore, this quiet neighborhood is going to be subjected to the noise and inconvenience of new building for many years to come. In fact, Mr. Bagwell broke ground in 2001 at his Broughton development, and the pamphlet available at that site, as of now, shows only about 11 lots have been sold. While we do not know, at this time, what size houses Mr. Bagwell is proposing to build, having looked at some of his other developments it appears that he builds large houses on fairly small lots. Of necessity, the houses are rather close together, thus posing a fire hazard especially in an older neighborhood with many trees. ( Planning and Zoning Commission December 7, 2004 Page -2- The Shelton/Hunter neighborhood has been experiencing serious drainage and sewer problems for years, and to build 14 more houses would cause even more problems and negate the drainage work done by the City several years ago. Earlier this year, a traffic study of Shelton was conducted and it was found that 1650 cars used Shelton in a 24 hour period. The traffic counter was placed just south of the Hunter turn and therefore, did not take into account cars coming down Hunter and turning west on Shelton, or cars going south on Shelton and turning onto Hunter. To build 14 more houses is obviously going to impact the traffic greatly. Shelton is a fairly narrow street and during construction, the construction vehicles will inevitably block the street from time to time and possibly cause serious response time delays for the Colleyville Fire Department, as Shelton is a cross street of preference of the firefighters stationed at the McDonwell School Road fire house. Finally, the City markets itself as being rural, and in fact, the City logo reflects the rural nature of Colleyville. We feel that this neighborhood, which is one of the few remaining rural areas in the City, should remain that way. ve" ry, trul",y", YOU", "rs:?" _ ~f %j/.P/?b' 1JU-a1"- ~~-tDJ Bill and Dinah Stephens Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-042 RECEIVED DEe 0 9 2004 Per ............. The neighborhood surrounding the proposed property located at 512 Shelton Drive, Colleyville, Texas would like to express their concerns regarding the proposed zoning change from AG Agriculture to R20 Single Family Residential. The neighbors of this property believe that the proposed R20 Single Family Residential is not in the best interest of this neighborhood or Colleyville for the following reasons: ~ Density-R20 Family Residential would be a tremendous increase in density for this neighborhood. The total number of homes proposed is three less than the entire number of homes located on Shelton Drive ~ Loss of Rural Appealing Atmosphere of Colleyville-the street of Shelton Drive, and the next streets over (Beverly Drive and LD Lockett) have home sites on lots over an acre and are zoned R40-over 50 existing residences ~ Drainage-Shelton Drive and Hunter Lane currently have a serious water run off drainage problem with the addition of these large homes the problem would increase greatly and impact the homes down hill from the proposed development ~ Fence-the current zoning ofR40 allows for open spaces, fencing in of the proposed development would negatively impact the rural atmosphere of this area of Colleyville ~ Water-is the available supply line sufficient enough to serve 14 additional very large homes and sustain pressure to current homes ~ Sewer-is the current system in place sufficient to service the large new homes and sustain the current homes ~ Lighting-the addition of street lights and lighting of the exterior of the 14 homes would distract from the rural atmosphere ~ Increase Traffic-can the current narrow shoulder less street support the increase in traffic Our first desire would be to keep the track as it is. The current neighbors chose this particular area of Colleyville for the large lot, rural setting that exists here. When each of the current property owners bought or built their homes they relied on the current zoning to protect the integrity of this neighborhood. Weare urging the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider rezoning the property R40 instead of the proposed R20 lots. This petition is supported by the citizens of Colleyville whom appear on the following attachment: December 7,2004 Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-043 S~5f\3ktV~ 'Pn3~ \ O'~ 5 'lolo.. \ ~'3 n oj u. 't'<tS S'c? ~ RECEIVED DEe 09 2004 : Per ..............~ Address Printed Name Ji!!iJSi~~ D \V 13,. II 5t=",tf~ Ph 4i2 P.5 :;) let 2, sh<21'tt> 1'\ 1> r . 15i rt6-\A -'s{.Q\JVUlflS. J ( 1- (/1 f 1"6 t, 1- ~ 5q J7 /~f!vv C~ cfYtO~Yt'dl//C-N (317-L((i'Sc.70Q] ~ 5'111 (Jo,"~fl L10 qb: at/&J 9{;.~ '(O.J85=7.9:;:< ~ bloo~Lt..~!f Er~J~~'t 8/7-'6);).7((3 br7 -"5'01.-039) ~ 61 L") ~ A ~I/x-. ?/,1U.4 C{/71t!U/ C!.hr/S Cern? ~ t 7- 1.f;Rti"- 6--3 if/ ~ IDlo6 ~f.t~u; ',Co0Jbj-, 'Bk, ~- 9(7J(g>j-~S~3f/ 'U(O<6 f"4<Lr:tQ~ ~Ewt<Y+ie'<i. M~~ <lll.4;}9,-o~'$ ) (, \\d-.. ~~l-....- ~ctL.Mf\\)Dt:rV/~ \ -~ '6\I-(,oS-O\~C:\ > ~ J J~ H-iVYt+tA k-n IK\t.+h-Al\f\ ~MzV\ PdJ:a..)~dOtt-- 8)1-&o~-oJl?t ) G / /3 Ii l{,tv1e ((l-;vI fll1 ,ftG A Rn 't bZ)'Y\. a:J0u4 j"~ <;J 17 <' tf ~~ 'J-93 . __) . \1- t-.t v- ,~ '"T-e -./ W 0 v-\... '.tV'- to. ^' ~~. '6 \, "-\ <-\ 'ii: ~ :::, f 10 1~;J~i;#d ~A 15dJ;CI"),~11rs ~' 'b174qf}DQtp (f; /" ' D ~ v: ::S ~~ /l . -1?~1!Il/~72,-2i!?2>~ ~61J3 flU.IV%AhJp&!r1-li~ 'ft:fLC,(Fletff ~.87u /'.p,?)lI'2R.o~ ) bit) g tfU/lJTeIL LN\ J' ,fIJVC /7~ cg, 7- i.j2'9-<;,o9$/ , L.lv Am ES LJ, /' ~ D .5' q I 9 1-/ v N TEl!:... ,"\, '" ". 0(.'.00 /3~4;t)~ "Dt-t0e'IL HrMr1t 0.fr~ flJ7-'I'1?-7lt66 y~200 ~SFif,~ /36liY6 Uv-rnfl ~~ 'd17- YqJ-'1t~ )~"O ~ f3() ve,r i \j L f ~ K;' III ill2:- ;f p,<---> 7 J 7 - )-7'7 - 7- (d 6/ i l2.-\ (y 1--- T) eK,Kdl f) C Hc11if L }J"Jtt'tw 5-b':?:vv.,u q n .4 z2 . ~ 22 ( . l19Z\ Y 1--.1) !Acl4.W- KaVln:tl, D1rvow ~~~Jr; f 2-k',O'?z( Phone { \ ( Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To RlO Case # Z-04-043 ~. '3V'Olu{{s ~91 2 ~ 5 TC+u\ J'jY\d \U ftS ~ Address Printed Name Signature Phone 'D '" ( ~~rE-'<<- 'f ll~ ~6~" I'A<<t.. P.,."" 61 't-B-P~ %/7 2ft 19;1. 'J . ~ (bo/ 'J3ever:tl; DR CJ1~\6+'nv ~A.I1~H-C!f-J~C8~ ~/7-02'i}/-J1;;(9 : ~: ;;:i ~. ~;_:4,< ,~:~~es5 (9tj~ ;;;- ;:~~::; ~ iP 01 ::;heHo\'\ Or T\%v{',sO- VOJ/\df,V fdO I c:::ru..-,>-- a, .' '617. 40/6 ,37\ ~ b 0 l~, tm Dr- lVle ~~ VOvYld~~ J tf/Il 1/", J I <t \ 7. 4 9 ~-5f . ,\ for Jeff VQVl1dev ~ ~ ~;~ <S\~ ~ \Su- Lo~ \ ... a, -~8-4~2 y 51;2 &.ve.-yt1- IX. ::I;,k", rY't. a:k!,.ttfS B 17 -'(9 ~ -8/t.!. RECEIVED DEe 0 9 2004 Per ............. ~ -' Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-043 Address Printed Name Signature @ 805 ShelToN Dr. JArnas 73. v,qr ~~JlH @ ~DS---r/.fEL7DtLI0K- C;4njE:/(/~; GlJ/tY t/~;)~ Qf ~, 1.?/j f/II#LM.I PI? d;;'''Me. t-/L,LM e~~~ ~ f@ rO'l S~e.ltM])(' })OI1I1A Wn-//<Lr jJ)~W~ @J ? ot/ ~ j, e l fUN DR A Lfll ;t1. /}Lt~N ~. aHa- >Ita&,." @ 800 .5 tiE L~}(PK" fl./ADE EyAN5 a/~ ~~ @ ~v ~elIoH ,0;7. -r;;<f h 41t~ J~ x. ~ sqllo \'U'ft.-K R'-'^ RI>. GLbl 6ys<f'J ~{K~ ~Sq[v \>~~ lU. ~&u.soY\ ~ ~3~U'l~ ~(l<gCL 3 & s "IZrt<l\ ~'cV"'a..\u {cD q; ~ ---- Phone Er/?,'195',/o27 911 'rift le:>;A 7 .$ 17' :;..81':{ 93 f '811 ' t.('iS . 3803 5"17-Jtfl-c2-93/ e /7-~~-.:5;v, 4- R/7 . ff/- S~ ~1l-7?~v 5~Ho~ t\1-\q,~-S,\\o '& RECEIVED DEe 0 9 2004 Per ............. Opposing The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-043 ( ~13Y\6~U'Jl S. ~ga ;) J0 -1010.\ J'gro~Yil0 ~ ~ '\\~e-I~", ~O,,,)'.i'{, ~~, .~f\g,~. '101 -S~e.)+OA 0:('~7/3 ~ :..L4 c- t::; !lfaJ~ V r L [c:.- C)~U2-/~ ~ ~ 76' / S;L€j;co~rM ',' b/ 7-- 6..s "& -c 7/3; ~. '~1 Lo.JhrL(J &4 ~. f/J j,ofJ&/h J~7Afl ~S1~ ~rfd,~ fr/I" A ~'! Y1,l1,,-, 0o<z .01EL';fu,) ~1577,S:~j , (0 (i4l<'1 ~(~If~ ~,_ b~ L.o Lt/c~71 (8/1) SS1- ~<f23 ;) /J @ f'>>e(~ <Al\12.u.l L"'~~f> (001 J1l1J:7l1J<! 81j.-1Cj'?QS1z.- RECEIVED DEe 09 2004 'p - er ........-:::::" ( o · pposlng The Rezoning Of 512 Shelton Drive From AG To R20 Case # Z-04-043 Address Printed Name S' -:2'r r~ T1J"J ~hec+();0 Dr ,-,-' f} Lol/{!i.{"; l/ {.Jy" '1-1; c:h d/.e..- J)abLe~ . ..... . ub f@r{)S- 5he!..J-tNJ 1 r, .s+ e.ph cuiJ 6 ri::U..... "" \ ^, . \, i Col/I(Z,'-j v; Jl~ I).. ~ @ )(J-/J.}I1I1B/YL ',; ," ,'T'').i / &P I/o/tilt 7Y yttVl /0111' ff..1... ~ fJ; ~f 1df3fj flaiul:l$/h "A ~ :)-23\'\a-\u(~ _ -<" \:u~ 5 J 5 . J o-\a \ j'3rotu tL.s ~ Phone (~Ii-)51+-$d-:S~ ,~~ (6,1.)51-7-'3 :23i f/zl 5/7-'77'7'2 (g/VSIJr'lf'V R E C::':~.:'r,;.O DEL 09 2004 Per ....... .... e....... '-..:.