HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks and Rec Advisory Board-Agenda Packets-1/4/1999
Texas
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA'
January 4, 1999
7:00 p.m.
I. Introduction of Vince Rosen, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Member,
Place 3
II. Approval of November 30, 1998, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes
lit Discussion and Consideration' of Approval to Use Voluntary Park Fund Monies
to Secure Professional Services for a Grant Application for Priority #1 of
Colleyville Pathways Citywide Trail System Plan
. .
IV. Discussion and Consideration of Park Issues Related to Zoning Case, Z-98-042,
Zoning Change from AG to PUD;.MXD, for Mixed Residential' and Commercial
Uses, 24.07 Acres
V. Discussion and Consideration of Request for Proposal (RFP)forParks and
Recreation Master Plan
VI. Update of Parks Projects:
a. Pleasant Run and Sparger Park Restroom Project.
b. Request for Bid for Shade Structures
c. Bransford Park Master Plan Committee
d. Sponsorship and Donation Policies Committee
VII. Citizen Comments/Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda'"
VIII. Staff Reports
"'(Thls time. Is allocated for citizens to Infonmiily address the Board on matters not on the agenda. that req. ulre no formal
action. Each presentation will be limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes. Board members may not respond to cltlze s who
speak regarding matters not on the agenda.) .
5109 Bransford Road
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034
656-PARK
Metro: (817) 498-4749
Fax: (817) 577-1986
. I certify that the above agenda was posted on the bulletin board at City H.all on December 31, 1998
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES
November 2, 1998
Chair Rich Hendler called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. on Monday,
November 2. 1998, at the Parks and Recreation office.
ROLL CALL:
Members: Chair Rich Hendler,
Councilman Nelson Thibodeaux,
William Recker, Joe Noorlag, Laura
Ann Travis, Ken Crooks, Mike
Billings and Dan Witte.
Absent:
Tanya Copple, Alan Linford, G-CISD
Liaison
Staff:
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City
Manager, Chris Steubing, Project
Engineer, Cynthia Singleton, Office
Assistant
Guests:
Bill Campbell, DFW Football
Association Representative
t Approval of September 14, 1998, Parks and Recreation Advisory
Board Minutes.
Mike Billings moved and Dan Witte seconded the motion to accept the
September 14, 1998, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board minutes.
II. Presentation to Rich Hendler
Bill Recker presented a plaque to Rich Hendler in appreciation for four
years of service as Chairman of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board.
III. Election of Officers
Mike Billings nominated Bill Recker for Chairman of the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Board and the vote was unanimous in favor of the
nomination. Mike Billings nominated Joe Noorlag for Vice-Chairman and
the vote was unanimous.
IV. Presentation by Colleyvllle PeeWee Football
Bill Campbell, Dallas Fort Worth Football Association Representative,
presented an overview of the Colleyville PeeWee Football Association and
outlined the needs of the association. The organization has practice each
week night and Saturday games at Colleyville Middle School. As a result of
a 20% to 30% growth, the association is requesting assistance to identify
additional lighted practice fields. Mr. Campbell presented several options
for consideration:
a. Add lighted practice field west of existing Colleyville Middle
School practice field
b. Add four lights to Colleyville Middle School game field
c. Add lighted practice field east of existing Colleyville Middle
School practice field
d. Develop a portion of the City of Colleyville practice soccer
fields for joint use by baseball, soccer and football
The Parks Board requested that staff schedule a meeting with
representatives of the Colleyville Youth Sports Associations and G-CISD
School Board Liaison, Alan Linford, to review and discuss these
alternatives.
V. Presentation by Jamie Thibodeaux, Colleyville Proud Chair, for Tree
City USA
Councilman Thibodeaux reviewed and discussed the four criteria for the
establishment of Tree City USA, which are as follows:
a. Volunteer Tree Board
b. Community Tree Ordinance
c. Forestry Program Supported by an Annual Budget of $2 Per
Capita
d. Arbor Day Celebration
Rich Hendler motioned that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
approve the use of Voluntary Park Funds, in an amount not to exceed
$400.00, to assist with the preparation of the Tree City USA application by
the December 31, 1998 deadline. Dan Witte seconded and the vote was
unanimous.
The Parks Board established a subcommittee consisting of Rich Hendler
and Mike Billings, to assist with Tree City, USA application.
VI. Discussion and Consideration of Park Land Dedication Ordinance
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager, reported that City Council has
requested that the Park and Recreation Advisory Board review the current
Park Land Dedication Ordinance to provide the City Council with a
recommendation for amendments, if necessary, to this ordinance. Joe
Noorlag, Bill Recker and Dan Witte will serve on this sub-committee.
VII. Discussion and Consideration of Bransford Park Master Plan
Dianne McWethy reported that on the basis that the realignment of
Bransford Road and the development of a site plan for Bransford Park have
been completed, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is prepared to
reestablish the Bransford Park Master Plan Committee. Dee Barker and
other members of the Historical Preservation Committee with Rich Hendler
and Mike Billings will serve on the Master Plan Committee.
VIII. Discussion and Consideration of Sponsorship and Donation
Policies for City Parks
Bill Recker, Mike Billings, Ken Crooks and Dan Witte will serve on a
committee with the Youth Sports Association representatives to facilitate
the establishment of sponsorship and donation policies for our city's park
system. The development of sponsorship and donation guidelines and
procedures will clearly define the requirements of the donor/sponsor
relationship and establish revenue allocations of these sponsorships.
IX. Discussion and Consideration of the Use of Voluntary Park Monies
for the Construction of the Pleasant Run and Sparger Park Restroom
Facilities
In consideration of the construction of the Pleasant Run and Sparger Park
restroom facilities, it will be necessary for the City to allocate funding in the
amount of $354,347. The identified funding sources are as follows:
Colleyville Economic Development Corp. FY99 CIP
Voluntary Park Funds
Utility Funds
Total Project Cost
$153,603
$150,239'"
$ 50.505
$354,347
*Includes Colleyville Soccer Association Contribution of $78,528
Rich Hendler made a motion that the use of Voluntary Park Funds up to the
amount of $150,239 for the project and the acceptance of a donation of
$78,528 from the Colleyville Soccer Association to be deposited in the
Voluntary Park Fund; and award of a contract to McWilliams Enterprises,
Inc. in the amount of $290,762.50 for the construction of the Pleasant Run
and Sparger Park Restroom facilities. Ken Crooks seconded the motion
and the vote was unanimous.
X. Update Parks Project
a. McPherson Dairy Site
Councilman Thibodeaux reviewed the status of the McPherson
Dairy site.
b. Woodbriar Park
Dianne McWethy provided a status of the Leadership
Colleyville XI class project.
c. Purchase of G-CISD Property Located Adjacent to Lutheran
Church on Pleasant Run Road
The City is working with G-CISD for the purchase of the G-
CISD school property.
XI. Citizen Comments/Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda
None
XII. Staff Reports
XIII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned.
i .
. '
Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 141318 . Dallas, Texas 75214-1318.214-828-2144. fax: 214-826-9222. e-maIl: Bike2wk@AOL.com
Date: December 29, 1998
To: Dianne R. McWethy
Assistant City Manager
City of Colleyville
5400 Bransford Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Re.: Assistance in Grant Application Process for Little Bear Creek Trail
Dear Dianne,
Herein is our proposed scope of work for assistance in the grant application
process for the Little Bear Creek Trail. (Priority One of the Colleyville Trails
Master Plan). Also enclosed are two copies of our "Authorization for Professional
Services" contract for approval by the City. After signatures have been provided,
please return to us one copy and retain one for your file.
We are very enthusiastic about this project and the continued opportunity to
work with you and the City of Colleyville.
Sincerely,
Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc.
t) / ~~-
W. . "Bud" Melton, Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: Larry O'Flinn, Carter & Burgess, Inc.
Proposal File
: r
Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc.
P.O. Box 141318. Dallas, Texas 75214-1318.214-828-2144. fax: 214-826-9222. e-mail: BowMel@AOL.com
PROPOSAL
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
for
Assistance in Grant Application Process
for Little Bear Creek T~ail
Colleyville, Texas I'
December 29. 1998 ,
I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc. and Carter & Burgess, Inc. will perform
professional planning services for developing strategies and preparation of
potential grant applications for the Little Bear Creek Trail from the Nature Center
to Sparger Park. The intent of this is to identify potential grant and other
funding sources for this trail and to develop the grant applications for these
potential sources.
This scope of work has been prepared based upon a preliminary scoping
meeting with the City of Colleyville on November 11, 1998.
II. SCOPE OF WORK
A. DATA GATHERING, DATA EVALUATION,4AND SITE REVIEW
1. Attend "kick-off" meeting (Meeting #1 ).with City Staff to discuss
overall goals and objectives for the project.
2. Obtain existing digital information from the City including
ownership maps, plats, easements, etc. along the corridor.
3. Prepare an overall base map from the recently completed Trail
Master Plan for the purposes of documenting the site visit and
developing the schematic plan.
4. Conduct a public meeting with interested citizens and landowners
to gather input relative to the location and design of the trail. The
City will conatct all appropriate parties for possible attendance at
the meeting (meeting #2).
5. Evaluate the data received with regard to potential ownership
versus trail development opportunities and constraints.
6. Perform a physical on site walk and site review of the Little Bear
Creek corridor from the Colleyville Nature Center to Sparger
Park. Record the site observations on the base map.
Page 1
! ,
B. SCHEMATIC PLAN
1. Develop a schematic trail alignment for the corridor with specific
options at key areas where cost or physical constraints dictate.
Develop preliminary cost analysis of the schematic alignment and
options.
2. Meet with the City Staff (meeting #3) to review the schematic
plan, options and cost projections.
3. Conduct a public meeting to review the proposed schematic
plans and receive input from interested citizens and landowners.
The City will contact all appropriate parities for possible
attnedance at the meeting (meetin~ #4).
4 Based on input from the meeting with the City Staff, finalize the
schematic plan and update the cost projections. This plan and
cost projections will guide the pursuit of the appropriate grant(s)
in subsequent steps.
B. FUNDING SOURCE APPLICATIONS
1. Review the various funding sources most appropriate for this
project. It is anticipated that the following sources will be
investigated and evaluated for funding outside of direct city
funding:
a. TxDOT TEA-21 Program
b. TPWD -- Recreational Trails Program
c. National Park Service - Land & Water Conservation Fund
d. Foundations & Corporations
2. Present the recommendations for funding applications to City
Staff (meeting #5). Prepare the grant and funding applications to
the approved funding sources. Present to the City Council, final
funding applications for signatures (meetings #6 & #7).
3. Prepare final funding applications and submit authorized
applications.
BASIS OF COMPENSATION
C. Data Gathering, Data Evaluation, and Site Review. . . . . . . . . $4,080.00
D. Schematic Plan ................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,830.00
E. Funding Source Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,130.00
D. Reimbursables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (As Required)
(Reimbursable expenses such as printing,
color copies, plotting, photography,
courier/delivery, postage and mileage will
be paid for at cost times a 1.0 multiplier)
Not to Exceed 800.00
TOTAL FEE $13,840.00
Page 2
! 1
III. ASSUMPTIONS
A. No site surveying, boundary work or legal descriptions will be prepared
under this scope of work.
B. City of Colleyville will provide digital files for all existing survey maps,
plats, boundary exhibits, ownership maps, utility exhibits, etc., to be
utilized in preparation of the trail routing and funding applications.
C. No construction documentation or engineering services will be performed
under this scope of work. f
D. Additional requested meetings will be outside of this scope and will
constitute additional services.
A
Page 3
j.
'i 1
BOWMAN-MELTON ASSOCIATES, INC.'
P.O. Box 141318, Dallas, Texas 75214 ' 214-828-2144 FAX: 214-826-9222
AUTHORIZATION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DATE
December 29, 1998
PROJECT
Assistance in Grant Application Process for Little Bear Creek Trail
CLIENT
City of Colleyville
ADDRESS
P.o. Box 185
Colleyville, TX 76034
This agreement hereby engages the firm of Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc. and its sub-consultant Carter &
Burgess, Inc. to perform the following tasks for the City of Colleyville in the above named project:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
As outlined in the attached proposal dated December 29, 1998
BASIS OF COMPENSATION
As outlined in the attached proposal dated December 29, 1998, to be paid monthly as work is completed.
The total amount for the services related to this authorization as indicated above shall be $13,840.00 including reimbursement for
related expenses (travel, copies, photographs, etc.). Services covered by this authorization shall be performed in accordance with
PROVISIONS stated below. ....
Title:
::'ePtedf~~L
Title: ___
Accepted for CLIENT
By:
Date:
Date:
~ ~ 3L), /99r?
/
Page 4
BOWMAN-MELTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
AUTHORIZATION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (continued)
PROVISIONS
1. AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED
Signing this form shall be construed as authorization by
City of Colleyville for Bowman-Melton Associates, Inc.
(BowMel) and its sub-consultants to proceed with the work,
unless otherwise provided for in the authorization.
2. COSTS FOR SERVICES
Bowman-Melton Associates' costs for services are based
upon the current billing rate of $85 per hour for Bud Melton,
its trail planning and design specialist, and $90 per hour for
Annie Bowman Melton, its principal.
3. DIRECT EXPENSES
Bowman-Melton Associates' Direct Expenses shall be
those costs incurred on or directly for the CLIENT'S
Project, including but not limited to necessary
transportation costs including mileage at BowMel's current
rate ($.325 per mile) when its automobiles are used, meals
and lodging, laboratory tests and analysis, computer
services, word processing services, telephone, printing and
binding charges. Reimbursement for these EXPENSES
shall be on the basis of actual charges when furnished by
commercial sources and on the basis of usual commercial
charges when furnished by Bowman-Melton Associates.
4. OUTSIDE SERVICES
When technical or professional services are furnished by
an outside source, when approved by City of Colleyville, an
additional amount of 10% shall be added to the cost of
these services for BowMel's administrative costs, as
provided above in this agreement.
5. COST ESTIMATES
Any cost estimates provided by BowMel or other members
of the design team will be on a basis of experience and
judgement, but since it has no control over market
conditions or bidding procedures BowMel cannot warrant
that bids or ultimate construction costs will not vary from
these cost estimates.
6. PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS
BowMel shall be responsible, to the level of competency
presently maintained by other practicing professional
consultants in the same type of work in CLIENT'S
community. BowMel makes no other warranty, expressed
or implied.
7. TERMINATION
Either the City of Colleyville or BowMel may terminate this
authorization by giving 30 days written notice to either of
the other parties. In such event BowMel shall forthwith be
paid in full for all work previously authorized and performed
prior to effective date of termination. If no notice of
termination is given, relationships and obligations created
by this Authorization shall be terminated upon completion
of all applicable requirements of this Authorization.
8. ARBITRATION
All claims, disputes, and other matters in question arising
out of, or relating to, this Authorization or the breach
thereof may be decided by arbitration in accordance with
the rules of the American Arbitration Association. City of
Colleyville or BowMel may initiate a request for such
arbitration, but consent of the other party to such
procedure shall be ~andatOry. No arbitration arising out
of, or relating to this.\l\uthorization may include, by
consolidation, joinder, or in any other manner, any
additional party not a party to this Authorization.
9. LEGAL EXPENSES
In the event legal action is brought by the City of
Colleyville, BowMel or its sub-contractors against the
other to enforce any of the obligations hereunder or
arising out of any dispute concerning the terms and
conditions hereby created, the losing party shall pay the
prevailing party such reasonable amounts for fees, costs
and expenses as may be set by the court.
10. ENFORCEABILITY OF PROVISIONS
In case anyone or more of the provisions contained in
this Agreement shall be held illegal, the enforceability of
the remaining provisions contained herein shall not be
impaired thereby.
11. PAYMENT
Monthly invoices will be issued by BowMel for all work
performed under the wrms of this agreement. Invoices
are due and payable on receipt. Interest at the rate of
1 Y2% per month will be charged on all past-due amounts,
unless not permitted by law, in which case, interest will be
charged at the highest amount permitted by law.
12. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
BowMel's liability to the CLIENT for any cause or
combination of causes is in the aggregate, limited to an
amount no greater than the fee earned under this
agreement.
13. ADDITIONAL SERVICES
Services in addition to those specified in the Scopewill be
provided by BowMel if authorized in writing by City of
Colleyville. Additional services will be paid for by City of
Colleyville as agreed upon at the time of authorization.
Page 5
I.,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board .J
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager~'~
December 27, 1998
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Discussion and Consideration of Zoning Case Z-98-042, Zoning
Change from AG to PUD-MXD, for mixed residential and
commercial use
I have attached the following information for your consideration and review
concerning Zoning Case Z-98-042, Zoning Change from AG to PUD-MXD, for
mixed residential and commercial use:
1) Planning and Zoning Commission, December 28, 1998, agenda
2) Planning and Zoning Commission Draft Minutes for the December 14,
1998 meeting; and
3) Staff Briefing for Zoning Case Z-98-042
Staff will provide the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board with the status of this
project at the January 4, 1999, meeting.
Attachments
//
Planning and Zoning Commission
December 28, 1998,Agenda
" I
P Janning & Zoning Commission
Agenda - December 28, 1998
Page 1 of 2
City Of
DIANNE
Mc1NETHV
nee
Texas
AGENDA
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CITY HALL - 5400 Bransford Road
December 28,1998
REGUlaR MEnING:
7:00 P.M.
Call to Order:
Roll Call:
Chairman Jody Short
Commissioners Rob Rutherford, Juneria Berges, William Tyler, Tom Hart,
Mike Collins, Jim Fletcher, Jody Short
Chairman Jody Short
December 14, 1998
Invocation:
Approval of Minutes:
~. Lot 1, Block 1, Burbank Addition, Combination Preliminary Plan & Final Plat, 2.60 acres out
of the Thomas J. Poulson Survey, Abstract 1248, Tracts 2S3G & 2FF; OWNER/APPLICANT: Joe
Burbank Case P-98-051
2. TABLED ITEM - Request for Appeal of Tree Mitigation Requirements, 4.1293 acres, Lot 1, Block
1, Twin Lakes Plaza; APPLICANT: John Dees (E. side of Colleyville Blvd.-4700) Site Plan File
SP-98-009
3. TABLED ITEM -- Zoning Change Request from AG (agricultural) & CC-1 (village retail) to
PUD-MXD (planned unit development-mixed residential & commercial use), 24.07 acres out
of the J.M. Looney Survey, Abstract 936, Tract 1, and the B.B.B. & C. RR. CO. Survey, Abstract
206, Tracts 3, 3E, 3D, 3C, 3B, 3B1, and a portion of Lot 1, Block 1 of City Nat'l Bank Colleyville
Add'n; OWNERS: Alton Foster & Jean Andrews, Billy & Shirley Petty, Harold Hall, Bransford Park
Land Trust, Burton & Carol McCullough, Verle Lee Brown, and Chase Bank of Texas;
APPLICANT: Richard Myers, Realty Capital Corp. (Pleasant Run Road & Colleyville Blvd.) Case
2-98-042
4. Staff comments, reports and discussion items.
5. Commissioners' comments and reports.
ADJOURNMENT:
\6. Adjournment
P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 577-7587
Planning & Zoning Commission
Agenda - December 28, 1998
Page 2 of 2
WORK SESSION:
7. Lots 2R-A & 2R-B, Block 2, Village Park Addition, 1.452 acres. being a replat of Lot 2, Block
2, Village Park Addition; OWNER: Ron Burman, Calland, Inc.; APPLICANT: Michael Peeples for
Montessori Unlimited, d.b.a. La Petite Academy (N.W. corner of Centerpark and Glade Creek
Drive) Case P-99-001
8. Zoning Change, AG (agricultural) to R-20 (single family residential-minimum lot size 20,000
s.f.), 20.059 acres out of the Harrell Hughes Survey. Abstract 656, Tract 2B; OWNER: Robert
Weese Estate; APPLICANT: John Hawkins, Rischon Development Corp. (North of Tinker Rd.,
east of Jewell Estates - at the end of Emerald Dr.) Case P-98-040-B
I certify that the above agenda was posted on the Bulletin Board at City Hall on Wednesday. Dec. 23, 1998 at 4:30 p.m.
agd/1228pz.agd
Jan Hofstrom, Planning & Zoning Assistant ~
If you plan to attend this public meeting and have a disability that requires special arrangements, please advise the Planning
& Zoning Secretary 48 hours in advance at 577-7587 and reasonable accommodations will be made to assist you.
Planning and Zoning "Draft" Minutes of
December 14, 1998
, (
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14, 1998
Page 1 of 10
DRAFT
The regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order by Chairman
Short at 7:00 P.M. on December 14,1998.
Roll Call:
Present:
Rob Rutherford, Juneria Berges, William Tyler, Tom Hart,
Mike Collins, Jim Fletcher, Jody Short
Tom Niederauer, Clayton Husband, Mike Soab, Jan
Hofstrom
Staff:
Invocation:
Mike Collins
Approval of Minutes:
November 23,1998
Commissioner Fletcher moved to approve the minutes as submitted. Commissioner
Collins seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Berges, Tyler, Hart, Collins, Fletcher, Short
Noes: None
1. Remington Park, a 4.636 acre portion of Phase II, Preliminary Plan, 4.636 acres out
of the R. H. McEwing Survey, Abstract 1154, Tract 2B1; OWNER: Marie Payne;
APPLICANT: Larry Cole, Foxcreek Residential Development, Inc., General Partnership
LCJJ, Inc. (South side of McDonwell School Rd., west of Remington Park) Case P-98-048
Staff presented the case to the Commission. Following discussion, Commissioner Hart moved
to approve the preliminary plan. Commissioner Berges seconded the motion. The vote
being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Berges, Tyler, Hart, Collins, Fletcher, Short
Noes: None
2. Remington Park, Phase II, Final Plat, 28.844 acres out of the R. N. McEwing Survey,
Abstract 1154, Tracts 2, , 2B, 2B1, and 2C; and the J.E. Withers Survey, Abstract 1748,
Tracts 1C, 1C1A, and 1C2; and being a replat of Lots A2A, A1F, & a portion of A1E, Block
3, Bettinger Place OWNERS: Foxcreek Residential Development, Inc. & V. H. Payne;
APPLICANT: Larry Cole, Foxcreek Residential Development, Inc. (South side of
McDonwell School Rd., west of Remington Park) Case P-98-049
Staff presented the case to the Commission. Following discussion, Commissioner Berges
moved to approve the final plat of Remington Park, Phase II. Commissioner Tyler
seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Berges, Tyler, Hart, Collins, Fletcher, Short
Noes: None
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14, 1998
Page 2 of 10
DRAFT
3. Request for Appeal of Tree Mitigation Requirements, 4.1293 acres, Lot 1, Block 1, Twin
Lakes Plaza (E. side of Colleyville Blvd.-4700) Site Plan File SP-98-009
Staff presented the case to the Commission. John Dees, 7200 Maranatha Court, was present to
represent the case. Following discussion, Commissioner Fletcher moved to approve the
mitigation plan by reducing the required caliper-inches to mitigate to 45"" Commissioner
Tyler seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Tyler, Fletcher
Noes: Rutherford, Berges, Hart, Collins, Short
Following further discussion by John Dees and the Commission, Commissioner Hart moved to
TABLE the request for appeal pending a report on the condition of the trees to be
mitigated. Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Berges, Hart, Collins, Short
Noes: Tyler, Fletcher
4. PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG (agricultural) w/SUP (special use permit
for primary &secondary schools) and R40 (single family residential, min. lot size
40,000 s.f.) to PU D-C (planned unit development-commercial), 14.79 acres out of the
A. Christian Survey, Abstract 339, Tracts 4, 4A2, and 4A, and Lot 1, Colleyville
Presbyterian Church; APPLICANT: John T. Lynch, IV; OWNER: Presbyterian Church in
America (715 Cheek Sparger Rd.) Case Z-98-047
Staff presented the case to the Commission. Chairman Short opened the public hearing.
John Lynch, 1903 Central Dr., #300, Bedford, was present to represent the case. He said that the
first phase to be built would be the gymnatorium and the existing residence would be converted
to Kindergarten class rooms. Also, the temporary buildings would be eliminated in the first phase.
The second phase would be the construction of the building to the south. They plan to construct
the buildings as far north on the property as possible in order to leave the open space nearer to
the residents to the east. Mr. Lynch said that they have met with the neighbors and the two
outstanding issues with the neighbors are their demand for a solid masonrywall and no access
from Wayne Drive. He stated that the cost of a masonry fence is cost prohibitive, however, the
church is willing to include a condition that no vehicular traffic would be permitted to access from
Wayne Drive and include a maintenance fund for a fence other than masonry screening fence.
Those present wishing to speak in favor were: Gary Staats, 308 Mill Crossing W.
Pastor Dale Smith, pastor of the church since 1976 and founder of the school in 1979. He said
the school offers an alternative to public schools for area residents. They currently have 400
students representing 51 churches and 300 families. There are currently 3 campuses and
eventually 700 students would be consolidated on the one site. Pastor Smith said that prior to
the change inthe Commercial Zoning Ordinance in 1995, the church would have been pennitted
, '
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14, 1998
Page 3 of 10
DRAFT
to expand their facilities without having to hold a public hearing. He also said that there would
(,
be no outside lighting on the athletic fields;
Don Hudson, 4109 Southwood E., involved with the Board of Directors and stated that he moved
to Colleyville because of the school;
Steve Stallard, 5100 Fry Lane, has four children in the school;
Brad Dixon, 5101 Overhill Dr., moved to Colleyville in 1991 and have since relocated to another
neighborhood in Colleyville in order to stay at the school. He stated that people will come to the
area because of good alternative schools;
Norm Cox, 4901 Behrens Rd., has been a resident of Colleyville for 8 years and has had a
student at the school for 4 years. He believes that the church and school have paid attention to
the concerns of the neighbors;
Mary Wyant, 4516 Alexandra Drive, stated that the school is the reason they moved to the area;
Steed Huggins, 4707 Behrens Rd., asked for consideration from a business aspect. He said that
this project will bring 3 campuses together and the church and school have taken time to plan the
project;
Those present to speak in opposition were:
Allan Werst, 3808 Wayne Drive, stated that two lots on Wayne Drive already cannot be used
because of flooding. He wants drainage addressed now by a licensed bonded engineer and
requested that traffic be prohibited on Wayne Drive;
Jill Laird, 3815 Wayne Drive, spoke regarding the potential decline of property values, the grade
of the land as the church is at a higher grade, and the current condition of the church property.
She said that the church does not currently take care of their property and that children leave the
school and roam in the fields. She said that access onto Wayne Drive is a problem;
Bruce Parker, 38115 Wayne Drive, stated that he is not opposed to development, but he has
never been advised by the church about future development plans;
Ellis Horn, 3805 Wayne Drive, is concerned about traffic and additional runoff of water impacting
the area. He said that the area is zoned for residential purposes and not for schools;
Judy Gooden 909 Cheek Sparger, had questions regarding the PUD zoning category. She stated
that she has experienced drainage problems and did not want them increased because of this
building. She will support the best economic development of the property for the area;
Doug Wagoner, 3716 Wayne Drive, spoke about the "grandfather clause" of the ordinance. He
recommended that the church look for another location for their school in a more commercial
location with better access. He did not want any access through Wayne Drive;
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14,1998
Page 4 of 10
DRAFT
John Colby, 4001 Mockingbird, is on the board of Saddlebrook Homeowners Association and is
opposed and has concerns about additional traffic, and lack of drop off and turn around areas.
He was concerned that once there was commercial zoning on the lot, other potential uses could
develop.
There being no one else present wishing to speak in opposition, the applicant, John Lynch
addressed the concerns of the neighbors. He stated the uses of the PUD and stated that it was
site plan specific. He said that a brick wall is not required by ordinance and a 10' high fence is
not allowed. The school property is higher so a fence would not eliminate the view of the building.
The school will not have windows on the east side of the buildings. In regards to drainage, he
stated that 95% of the water comes from Bedford and by state law, those issues would be
addressed and resolved at the time of applying for building permits. He said that it was illegal to
tie drainage to zoning. He said that they are willing to place a notice on the request that no
vehicular access would be allowed on Lot 3. He also stated that a requirement to sell Lot 3 was
not legal. Mr. Lynch said that parking and vehicular access will be adequate. With the
staggering of grades, traffic will be less obtrusive and will feed at one point. He said that there
will be a maximum of 700 to 750 students well into Phase 3. Phase I would be completed next
year and Phase II in approximately 3 years. There will be approximately 500 students in the 1 st
phase. Dirt bikes do not come from students at the school. The planned parking is substantially
more than the present and will provide a means of getting traffic off Cheek Sparger.
Richard Ki~kland, 5104 Shadowood Trail, spoke and recommended that the church sell Lot 3 in
order to have the funds to build a brick screening wall.
There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Discussion ensued about draining, screening and landscape requirements. Following discussion,
Commissioner Fletcher moved to recommend approval of the zoning change request
subject to the construction of a solid, durable (non-wood) eight foot (8') fence in
combination with landscaping along the eastern border along a portion of Lots 1 and 2 of
the Southgate Addition; and the prohibition of any access of vehicular traffic through Lot
3. Commissioner Collins seconded the motion. The vote being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Berges, Tyler, Hart, Collins, Fletcher. Short
Noes: None
5. PUBLIC HEARING -- Consideration of an amendment to the Colleyville Zoning Ordinance,
Section 21, Planned Unit Developments, to create a designation for PUD-MXD (Planned
Unit Development-Mixed Residential & Commercial Use) Case Z-98-046
Staff presented the case to the Commission. Chairman Short opened the public hearing. Those
present wishing to speak were:
George Jeffries, 512 Colleyville Terrace, opposed to mixed high density based on the density and
the need for residential and commercial-uses to be separated;
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14, 1998
Page 5 of 10
DRAFT
AI Zim, 7209 John McCain, opposed because it is not psychologically good for people to live at
their business and the businesses will deteriorate along with the owners' psyche;
Robert Figorora, 817 Central Drive, opposed because of security problems, height of buildings,
traffic, and too much flexibility;
Richard Kirkland, 5104 Shadowood Trail, plan needs better screening requirements and buffer
zones;
Clint Young, 811 Central Drive, opposed because of the high density and potential safety
problems;
Steve Groffman, 815 Central drive, opposed;
David Jones, 713 Central Drive, opposed - height of buildings;
Clint 8rown, 5005 Shadowood, opposed - safety;
Jerry Whitt, 513 Colleyville Terrace, opposed; and
Dee McNosky, 5108 Pleasant Run Road, opposed.
There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Following discussion by the Commission, Commissioner Hart moved to recommend approval
of the PUD-MXD Ordinance. Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The vote
being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Berges, Tyler, Hart, Collins, Fletcher, Short
Noes: None
6. PUBLIC HEARING -- Zoning Change Request from AG (agricultural) & CC-1 (village
retail) to PUD-MXD (planned unit development-mixed residential & commercial use),
24.07 acres out of the J.M. Looney Survey, Abstract 936, Tract 1, and the 8.8.8. & C. RR.
CO. Survey, Abstract 206, Tracts 3, 3E, 3D, 3C, 3B, 3B1, and a portion of Lot 1, Block 1
of City Nat'l Bank Colleyville Add'n; OWNERS: Alton Foster & Jean Andrews, Billy &
Shirley Petty, Harold Hall, Bransford Park Land Trust, Burton & Carol McCullough, Verle
Lee Brown, and Chase Bank of Texas; APPLICANT: Richard Myers, Realty Capital Corp.
(Pleasant Run Road & Colleyville Blvd.) Case Z-98-042
Staff presented the case to the Commission. Chairman Short opened the public hearing. Those
present wishing to speak were:
Tom Miller, applicant, stated that he has been a resident of Colleyville for 13 years and several
people saw ~he need for a gathering spot for the community. This project provides a means for
, f
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14,1998
Page 6 of 10
DRAFT
Colleyville to expand its identity and provides another option for destination entertainment.
Those present wishing to speak in favor were:
Kip Whitman, 3402 Corrsgate Circle, said that the project is pro-Colleyville. For entertainment
purposes residents leave the city and spend their tax money elsewhere. He said that this project
is next to an existing market and is the highest and best use of the property.
Those present wishing to speak in opposition were:
~eorge Naftis, representing the Kroger property, voiced concerns about lack of parking. He said
that they lease space to shop keepers who pay for parking and do not want their lots to be used
by a center who is under spaced. The project needs at least 1 space per 200' of building. He
does not believe that this is a good area for apartments and high end boutiques do not go well
with apartments;
Richard Kirkland, 5104 Shadowood, had questions regarding the amount of time needed to pass
before the preceding mixed use ordinance could be enacted upon. He said that multifamily did
not succeed in the past;
Cathy Young, 811 Central Drive, opposed to experimental development and potential empty
spaces over buildings. She is opposed to 3 stories next to residential and the lack of privacy it
creates. She is concerned about the noise level associated with the sale of alcoholic beverages
and the safety of driving after consuming alcoholic beverages;
Ty Trent, 5000 Shadowood Rd., opposed to any addition of a street which would feed into
Shadowood. He is opposed because of traffic concerns;
Robert Figueroa, 817 Central Drive, stated that he is representing citizens in his neighborhood.
He said that if the ABC is included in the project, he wants a barrier between the commercial and
residential areas. He is opposed because of the congestion of traffic on Highway 26 and
Pleasant Run Road and the problems associated with parking in adjoining developments when
parking lots are full. He is concerned about the negative impact on adjoining property values.
He wants sidewalks on Pleasant Run Road. He is opposed to false stucco, false brick, or false
stone. He is opposed to 3 1f:z story buildings. He asked questions about the status of Richard
Myers Highway 26 and Hall Johnson project, the tax abatement district, and the availability of
grant funding. He is opposed to alcoholic beverages sales so near a park and the negative
impact on the safety of children. He wants sound and site barriers;
Jim Banks, 715 Central Drive, stated that the applicants have not contacted the neighboring
residents. He is concerned about a shortage of parking and parking within 300' of the project
should not be an option. He said that he is not opposed to commercial development, however
he is opposed to this project until the important questions by the neighbors can be answered and
they are given more information;
Melanie Gable, 813 Central Drive, is opposed because of traffic. She said that roads are
insufficient to support additional traffic. Ms. Gable said that she was a victim of a violent crime
Planning & Zoning Commission
MII'lutlUI - Oeeember 14, 1198
Page 7 of 10
DRAFT
-
in Colleyville and was attacked by someone who did not live in Colleyville but worked in the area.
She has concerns for safety;
Vange Pueblo, 516 Eudaly, said that safety is an issue and a concern. He said that there must
be security provided for the development and the City does not currently have adequate staff to
address the security issues;
James Negler, 713 Thomas, spoke regarding concerns for fire safety and asked if our fire
department is ready to fight a fire in a 3 story building and an area with narrow streets and traffic
congestion;
Dee McNosky 5108 Pleasant Run, said that she has been in deliberations with the developers.
She said that her property is surrounded on three sides by the development and she has been
promised that a masonry fence would be constructed. She said that further thoughts needed to
be taken by the developer concerning the style of architecture. She said that Mediterranean style
is not representative of the character of Colleyville;
Beth Groffman, 815 Central, spoke with concerns about ABC being listed as an owner of the
project and wanted assurance that if they are, something should be done about the unsightly
metal buildings on their property; [Note: staff confirmed that an error was made by the
developer's engineer and ABC does not own property within the project. This did not affect the
notification requirements.]
Clint Brown, 5005 Shadowood, had questions about the possible connection of Forestwood Lane
to the Crossing of Colleyville Addition;
Donna Steen, 716 Central Drive, voiced concerns about fire and ambulance vehicle accessibility.
She said that restaurants should not be beneath residential dwellings for safety reasons;
Steve Groffman, 815 Central Drive, is opposed because of the potential uses behind the buildings
and the grade of 3 % story buildings being built so close to one story dwellings. He said that the
heights need to blend into the residential areas;
Robert Steen, 716 Central Drive, spoke about the unsightly buildings and use on the ABC
property. He had concerns about the height of the buildings as they relate to the height of
existing buildings abutting the project. He is opposed because of security, safety, property
values, and traffic problems. He said that certain types of developments bring in certain types
of people;
Richard Myers, the developer, 7400 Monticello Pkwy., spoke regarding the proposed
development. He said that Danny Walker's (ABC) property is not a part of the development. It
is a 150' wide parcel which would abut the project. He said that Forest Oak will not connect to
the Crossing of Colleyville and sidewalks would be constructed on Pleasant Run Road to
encourage pedestrian traffic. He said that a parking study was conducted by Parsons Design
Group. The presently plan 1005 parking spa'ces and the build out of the project would be 5 years.
He added that at 75% build-out, the City can assess the parking needs and make adjustments
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14,1998
Page 8 of 10
DRAfT
at that time. Mr. Myers said that regarding fire safety, every building will have a sprinkler system,
including the residential buildings. They plan to have more fire hydrants than required and the
buildings will be accessible from the front and back. He spoke about a masonry wall next to the
Kroger property and City Park. The north side of the project will be screened. Regarding the
concerns about the appearance of the rear of the buildings, Mr. Myers said that the alleys will be
as attractive as the fronts. The buildings will be full masonry with carriage lanterns and
decorative lighting. Garages are included for the parking calculations.
There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Discussion ensued by the Commissioners concerning security. Mr. Myers said that private
security will be provided by the development association with possible assistance by City of
Colleyville patrol officers. They have discussed the possibility of a city sub-station within the
development.
Mr. Myers said that his Hall Johnson and Hwy 26 project will be built before this project.
Mr. Myers said that regarding privacy concerns, the dwellings on Central Drive will be separated
from the project by the 150' ABC property. A typical building will occupy the front half of the lot
with a 40' - 60' space between the rear of the building and the property line.
Concerning the questions about the boundary next to City Park, vehicular traffic will be restricted
and it is unlikely that a retail business or a restaurant will locate near the park. Commissioner
Fletcher requested that the developer restrict the connection to the park for pedestrian traffic only.
Commissioner Short had questions about an impact study being done to address the additional
traffic in the area. Other questions were asked by the Commissioners regarding garbage
collection, the status of deliberations with the Park and Recreation Board, Fire Department
equipment, Thompson Terrace realignment, and traffic lights on Hwy. 26.
Commissioner Short moved to TABLE the case. Commissioner Tyler seconded the motion.
The vote being:
Ayes: Tyler, Hart, Collins, Fletcher, Short
Noes: Rutherford, Berges
7. PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG (agriculture), R40 (single family res., min.
lot size 40,000 s.f.) & R20 (single family res., min. lot size 20,000 s.f.) to PUD-R (planned
unit development-residential) on approximately 237 acres out of the S. Harrell Survey,
Abstract 798, Tracts 1J. 1J1, 1J4, 181,182, 1J2, 1F, 28, 2, & 2C; the H.L. Allen Survey,
Abstract 65, Tracts 1, 1 C, 1 B, 1A, 3D, 3E, 301, & 3; the D.J. 8eddo Survey. Abstract 232,
Tracts 1 C, 2A, 2B. 1A. & 1 B. and Lot 1, Block 1 of the Purcell Add'n; the Mary M. Freeman
Survey, Abstract 533. Tract 2A7 A; and the William E. Crooks Survey, Abstract 295, Tract 401;
OWNERS: Nonnan R. Cole. 11\ exec. Ruth G. Cole Est.; Norman Richard Cole, V; Khossrow
& Parviz Yazhari; Norwood National Corp.; N. R. Cole; Don E. Lee; Mary Louise Cole; & Mark
Gottfredson; APPLICANT: David Bagwell Case Z-98-031
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14, 1998
Page 9 of 10
DRAFT
Staff presented the case to the Commission. Chairman Short opened the public hearing. Those
present wishing to speak were:
David Bagwell, applicant, 8222 Douglas Ave., Dallas, representing the case. He spoke about the
conceptual issues regarding the case. He stated that the residential density would meet the 1.8
dwellings units per acre requirement. He spoke about traffic patterns, park areas, transportation,
lot sizes and open space;
Josh Coleman, 7204 John McCain, said that drainage is an issue. He had concerns about the
smallest lot being only 10,400 sJ. and the largest lot being 16,000 s.f. He said that the lots are
too small for Colleyville. He had concerns about traffic in the area and the impact 450 lots would
have on traffic and drainage;
Delbert Camel, 1012 W. Murphy Rd., has lived in area since 1951 and voiced concerns about
small lots and lack of roadways to service area. He had questions about fencing;
Carl Parker, 105 W. John McCain Rd., opposed to proposed roadway on the front of his property.
He spoke about current pollution of the waterway in the area and the negative environmental
impact of the sandpits have in this area;
Beth Battles, 101 John McCain Rd., had questions about a proposed roadway in front of her
property;
AI Zim, 7209 John McCain Road, raised questions about the City Master Plan and the Western
Gateway Study as they relate to the development. He said that R40 zoning and large open
parcels are more appropriate for the area. He said that it is essential to see that the trash is
buried on the property and kept very deep. He said that this is a very serious environmental issue
and a problem the City does not need.
There being no one else present wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Discussion by the Commission ensued regarding the number of issues needing to be worked out
and the need for a site visit. The Commissioners requested more information regarding traffic
studies, especially relating to easUwest flow in the area, drainage studies, and environmental
studies for the area.
Commissioner Fletcher moved to TABLE the item until traffic, drainage, and environmental
issues can be addressed. Commissioner Rutherford seconded the motion. The vote
being:
Ayes: Rutherford, Berges, Tyler, Hart, Collins, Fletcher, Short
Noes: None
The Commissioners requested that notification be sent to the surrounding property owners
when this item comes before the Planning and Commission again.
Planning & Zoning Commission
Minutes - December 14,1998
Page 10 of 10
DRAFT
8. Staff comments, reports and discussion items: There were none.
9. Commissioners' comments and reports: There were none.
ADJOURNMENT:
Chairman Short moved to adjourn the meeting at 11 :20 P.M. Commissioner Hart seconded
the motion. The motion passed by an "aye" voice vote.
Respectfully Submitted,
Jan Hofstrom
Planning & Zoning Assistant
Approved on:
Work Session adjourned at 11 :40 p.m.
NOTE:
As a matter of public record, an audio recording of the above Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting is available upon request.
[ jh/min/1214pi.min]
Staff Briefing for Zoning Case Z-98-042
PLANNING I ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA ITEM - ZONING CHANGE, AG and CC-1 to PUD-MXD
Agenda Date:
December 28, 1998
Item #:
3 - BUSINESS SESSION (will go to City Council 1/5/98)
Subject:
Zoning Change, AG and CC-1 to PUD-MXD, for mixed residential and
commercial uses, 24.07 acres, Case Z-98-042
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant:
Location:
Tract Size:
Current Zoning:
Existing Land Use:
Surrounding Zoning:
Master Plan Designation:
Thoroughfare Plan:
Richard Meyers, Realty Capital Corp.
Pleasant Run Road and Colleyville Blvd., across from
Thompson Terrace (see location Map)
24.07 acres
AG and CC-1
Single family from Pleasant Road west, and undeveloped
between Colleyville Blvd. and Pleasant Run Rd.
S=CC-1, W=AG (City Park), N=AG and E=CC-1
Single-family west of Pleasant Run, Commercial, east
of Pleasant Run
Pleasant Run Rd. (Minor arterial)
Zoning Request:
Density Per Acre:
Compliance wI Master Plan:
PUD for mixed uses on the whole 24 acres. The
applicant envisions a "village" concept with two to three
and one-half story housing over restaurants, offices and
shops, or in some cases the whole building would be
residential.
Density is undetermined at this point.
Unclear because of mixed use concept. It is consistent
with some of the Master Plan text which permits
"alternative housing" such as townhouses on small lots
(Issue #2). The Master Plan map however is not site
specific for these kinds of uses. The map does show
commercial uses. See below under Impact Issues.
UPDATE:
At the previous Commission meeting, this item was tabled to allow the applicant to address
a number of issues including parking demands, security, trash removal, fire protection,
masonry screening walls, and rear building elevations. Attached is a letter from the
developer responding to these concerns. A copy of the applicant's parking study is also
attahced. Staff will review the information and make a report to the Commission at the
December 28th meeting.
. Item #3
Item #3 II Z-98-042
P&Z Agenda 1/12/28/98 II pg. 2.
The applicant has also revised the site plan to show a masonry screening wall along the
northern boundary of the project and around the single family residence located near the
southeast portion of the project
COMMENT:
The applicant is seeking rezoning of a 24.07-acre tract of land near the intersection of
Colleyville Blvd. and Pleasant Run Road to develop a mixed-use neighborhood designed
around the "TND (Traditional Neighborhood Development)" concept. A mixed-use
development contains buildings that may have both residential and commercial business
activities within the same structure. The project has frontage on Highway 26 at two
locations (317' of frontage at one location and 148' of frontage at the other location).
Approximately 21 acres are currently zoned Agricultural and 3 acres are zoned CITY
COUNCIL-1 Commercial. The application is for PUD-MXD (Planned Unit Development-
Mixed Use) zoning. The project is consistent with the Future Land Use Plan, which shows
this area as future retail land use.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) identified several key issues associated with
this rezoning request and provided these to the developer. The DRC's comments are
described below, and the developer's response, where applicable, is underlined.
1. Zoning and Platting: the property is currently not platted and the ,developer is
aware that a plat will be required. The unique characteristics of this development
suggest that a preliminary plat and a final plat are necessary to complete the
platting process. Attached is a time-line estimate for the approval of this
development. With regards to zoning, the mixed use development is not consistent
with the current planned unit development regulations in the Colleyville Zoning
Ordinance even though the development is consistent with the Colleyville Master
Plan. As a related item to this mixed use development rezoning request, staff has
prepared an amendment to the PUD regulations to create a "Mixed-Use" provision.
This amendment will be presented to the Planning and Zoning Commission at its
December 14th meeting for consideration. The approval this zoning request will
require an ordinance specifically designed to meet the needs of this development.
2. Phasing and Land Use: a project as unique as a "Traditional Neighborhood
Development" is a considerable departure from the typical type of development that
cities generally see. There is always the constant concern about "if they build it, will
they come?" Another concern associated with these types of projects is finding a
proper land use mix and preventing the development from becoming just another
residential area. Options to consider include phasing the project or delineating
different levels of land use intensity. The draft ordinance divides the project into two
areas with the "core" area having a higher ratio of commercial to residential uses
than the area surrounding the core. The core area is limited to a maximum of 20%
of the structures on the ground floor being developed into residential units. The
surrounding area is limited to a maximum of 40% of the ground floor structures
Item #6 II Z-98-042
P&Z Agenda 1/12/28/98 1/ pg. 3.
developed as residential units. The developer is in aqreement with this two tiered
intensity approach. The developer has indicated plans to develop the project in one
phase, but will consider two phases if pre-leasing and pre-sales go slower than
anticipated.
3. T1F Zone: this project is located within the TIF boundaries and the developer has
indicated that upon approval of the zoning request, he will submit a separate
request to participate in the TIF funds for construction of some of the public
improvements within the project.
4. Pleasant Run Road: this roadway is shown as a two lane minor arterial on the
Master Thoroughfare Plan with an ultimate right-of-way width of 70' and a pavement
width of 41 feet. The intersection of Pleasant Run Road with State Highway 26 is
proposed for relocation to square-up the intersection during 1999. The proposed
mixed-use development contains two new intersections with S. H. 26 and their
locations may contribute to the traffic queuing problems being experienced where
Highway 26 intersects with Glade Road. In addition, the proposed development will
generate considerable pedestrian traffic across Pleasant Run Road between the
two portions of the development and pose a potential traffic hazard. Some type of
traffic mitigation needs to be considered where the proposed development is
impaCted by the vehicular traffic on Pleasant Run Road. The developer is
proposinq a traffic liqht and crosswalks at this location.
5. Parking: staff previously expressed concern about the limited number of parking
spaces shown on the plan. The developer has increased the number of parking
spaces to 1005 spaces. A staff analysis of the parking requirements (see attached
parking analysis) for this development still leaves some questions about the
adequacy of parking in the project. The developer has emploved a traffic enqineer
to review parkinq needs. The developer has also offered to convev certain portions
of the project to the Citv after the project is 75% complete to provide areas for
additional parkinq. This would need to be included in the ordinance.
6. Solid Waste Collection: alleyway garbage collection may conflict with other
activities taking place within the alleys. The developer indicates that the local
qarbaqe collection companv usuallv collects refuse in the morninqs when little
pedestrian or vehicular is occurrinq.
7. Fire Protection: staff has met with the developer to discuss fire protection concerns
related to access in the narrow 20 foot wide alleyways shown on the plan. The fire
department has suggested that alternative fire protection methods may be
necessary, such as additional standpipes, internal fire sprinkler coverage, fire
alarms or other methods to supplement the inability of the alleyways to provide
proper access to the rear of the buildings. The developer has agreed with this
approach. The development proposal shows structures as high as 3-1/2 stories (the
half story is actually a small footprint fourth floor). Currently, the Colleyville Fire
Dept. does not have equipment capable of handling emergencies in areas with
Item #3 1/ Z-98-042
P&Z Agenda //12/28/98 // pg. 4.
buildings at this height. The purchase of a new ladder truck is anticipated during
1999 that will have capability to handle buildings of this height. The develooer has
indicated that all buildinGs will have a fire sorinkler system and that fire hydrants will
be installed at 300 foot increments.
8. Alleyways: Some of the alleyways form 'T' intersections. This situation may create
problems for normal delivery trucks and for solid waste collection. The develooer
has indicated that he will install a small radius at each allev ItT" to enable delivery
trucks to maneuver in the allevs.
9. Masonry Screening Wall: Staff recommended a masonry screening wall where this
property abuts the single-family residence on the north side. The develooer olans
to build a masonry screeninG wall on the three sides where the orooerty abuts the
one sinGle family home.
10. Park Areas and Facilities: the proposed site plan shows several "mini-park"
locations within the development that will be dedicated to the city. Additionally, the
City of Colleyville owns a 59' strip of land (1.27 acres) that is located in the middle
of the developer's proposed project and extends from Pleasant Run Road to the city
park.'. Disposition of this strip of land needs to be resolved before the project begins
construction. The Colleyville Parks Board will be reviewinG the olan and makinq
recommendation reqardinq the oark areas. The develooer indicates that the Villaqe
Owner's Association willorovide maintenance. The develooer is orooosinG to trade
park land shown on the site plan for this strio of land.
Impact Issues:
1. Master Plan - since this is a mixed use project the proposal is compatible with the
Master Plan map which indicates commercial use of the property and with the Master
Plan text which permits "alternative housing" on small lots.
2. Surroundin~ Properties - the property to the west is the City Park, zoned AG, to the
north for R-20 and eN and developed with homes and a small commercial structure,
to the east and south zoned and developed commercial.
3. Development Trends -there is no recent trend in this area as it is an older part of the
City. There is a neighborhood of single family homes to the north and some individual
homes to the south, however. The only new development in the area is the Applebee's
Restaurant and Chase Bank - both to the south of the property.
4. Infrastructure -Pleasant Run Road will have to be rebuilt, and several nearby water
lines will have to be extended to this project.
5. Current Zonin~ Suitability - neither the current CITY COUNCIL-1 zoning along
Colleyville Blvd. nor the AG zoning on the remaining property is suitable for a mixed-
use development.
6. Economic Development - the addition of this project will have a positive economic
impact on the community.
Item #3 /I Z-98-042
P&Z Agenda II 12/28/98 II pg. 5.
Recommendation:
Approval
ATTACHMENTS:
Location map, zoning exhibit, supporting documentation, list of property owners receiving
notice of public hearing.
11[1;1
Realty Capital Corporation
Richard A. My.:rs
President
December 22, 1998
TO: Barry LeBaron
From: llichard A. Mye~
RE: Key Issues - The Village at Colleyville
Via Hand Delivery
Prior to the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on December 28th, I thought it might
make sense to comment further on some issues raised at the previous Commissioners' meeting
regarding The Village at Colleyville. We are quite happy to incorporate any of our following
responses into the zoning ordinance, if you deem it appropriate.
Parking Study: Parsons Transportation Group, Inc., a national traffic and parking engineering
firm, has already completed its parking study for The Village. We submitted this to you on
December 14th, Parsons is currently making rpinor revisions to the study due to minor changes
tn our concept plan that have been made as a result of City comments. We should have the
revised study tomorrow and will submit it as part of the re-zoning package.
Traffic Study: Parsons is also completing a traffic study which analyzes where traffic will come
from when it visits The Village, Th~ study will also show the impact on the various intersections
which will serve The Village. This study should be complete tomorrow and will be submitted as
part of our re-zoning package.
Parsons has told us that the proposed intersection of Highwav 26, Thompson Terrace and our
planned Main Street is the best traffic solution for the' City of Collevville. They have said that a
traffic signal will be required at that intersection, which is an acceptable distance from the
signalized intersection at Village Park and Highway 26. We are most interested in working with
the City to expedite this new intersection.
Security: The Village Owners' Association will provide for a 24-hour security service at the
point that The Village is 35% complete with occupied buildings. This security service will
supplement the police protection provided by the City of Colleyville.
Trash Removal: The Village Owners' Association will pay for additional trash pick-up at The
Village so that any buildings with retail, lodging or restaurant uses will have their refUse
removed six days per week, the maximum allowed in Colleyville at this time.
Sidewalks on Pleasant Run Road: We believe that these sidewalks are critical to the success of
The Village and will be a great benefit to the citizens in Colleyville. The homeowners on
Central Drive thought these were important, too. We will ask for these sidewalks in our TIF
request.
920 Soulh Main Street. Suite 170, Grapevine. Texas 76051 . (817) 488-4200 . Fax (817)488-5257
I1I1 ~I
Realty Capital Corporation
Richard A. Myers
PresIdent
The Village at Colleyville, cont'd.
Fire Protection: The Village should be the safest residential project in Colleyville and as safe,
or safer than every commercial project. Every residence will have an automatic fire sprinkler
system; in fact, every building in The Village will have such a system. In addition, virtually
every building has dual vehicular access from public streets in the front to alleys in the rear.
Finally, both the public streets and alleys will have fire hydrants every 300 feet.
Masonry Walls and Wrought-Iron Fences: As shown on our revised concept plan, we
propose installing six-foot masonry walls in the following locations: (1) the common property
lines between The Village and the McNosky's property; and (2) the northern property line of The
Village where it abuts Danny Walker's commercial property.
We plan to install a four-foot wrought-iron fence along the western border of The Village, where
it abuts the City Park. This fence would contai,n wrought-iron gates in specific locations to allow
pedestrian access between the City Park and The Village.
Buildings' Rear Elevations: Our building standards are as tough for the back of each building
as the front. Most of the detailed building restrictions will be in the deed restrictions filed by
The Village Owners' Association: I have attached some sample front and rear building
elevations for your review.
Barry, I hope that this memorandum answers most of the Commissioners' questions regarding
The Village. Please deliver this information to them and to the City Council. Please note that
we have met with several of the nearby homeowners and have presented this info~ation to
them. Thank you for your help and have a Merry Christmas!
920 South Main Street, Suite 170. Grapevine, Texas 76051 . (817) 488-4200 . Fax (817) 488-5257
n~
AGENDA BRIEFING
Texas
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SUBJECT: 0-99-1141 - Zoning change request from Agricultural
& CC-1 to PUD-MXD on 24.07 acres J.M. Looney
Survey, Abstract 936. and the B.B.B. & C. R.R. Co.
Survey, Abstract 206, req. by Richard Myers.
MEETING / AGENDA #
1/5/99 I -..1 2
/
I
January 5. 1999
First Reading and Public Hearing - Ordinance 0-99-1141
Backqround
The applicant is seeking rezoning of a 24.07-acre tract of land near the intersection of
Colleyville Blvd. and Pleasant Run Road to develop a mixed-use neighborhood designed
around the TND (Traditional Neighborhood Development) concept. A mixed-use
development contains buildings that may have both residential and commercial business
activities within the same structure. The project has frontage on Highway 26 at two
locations (317' of frontage at one location and 148' of frontage at the other location).
Approximately 21 acres are currently zoned Agricultural and 3 acres are zoned CITY
COUNCIL-1 Commercial. The application is requesting PUD-MXD (Planned Unit
Development - Mixed Use) zoning. The project is consistent with the Future Land Use
Plan, which shows this area as future retail land use.
The Development Review Committee (DRC) identified several key issues associated with
this rezoning request and provided these to the developer. The DRC's comments and the
developer's responses are included on the Commission Briefing attached to this summary
sheet. The developer satisfied all the comments of the DRC. The fol/owing are the
primary issues addressed by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
1. Zoning: the proposed project will contain a variety of mixed uses and such an
arrangement is not consistent with current zoning classifications. As 'a related item
to this mixed use development rezoning request. staff has prepared an amendment
to the PUD regulations to create a "Mixed-Use" provision which is a separate item
for City Council consideration and its approval will enable the attached "Village of
Colleyville" PUD ordinance to proceed for consideration.
(continued)
~~ ~~~
DE ARTMENV 1: D
r,~~,~
CITY MANAGER
FINANCIAL REVIEW (IF NECESSARY)
-- ,...z(...
City Council agenda 1/5/99
Item #12/1 0-99-1141/1 pg. 3
5. Screening Wall: the developer has modified the conceptual site plan to include a
six foot masonry screening wall along the northern boundary of the project and
around three sides of the existing residential structure at the southeastern corner
of the project. The approving ordinance also contains a requirement for a six foot
wrought iron fence with gate openings along the eastern property line where this
development borders the city park.
6. Park Areas and Park Land Dedication Fees: the proposed site plan shows several
"mini-park" locations within the development that will be owned and maintained by
the Village Owners Association. Additionally, the City of Colleyville owns a 59' strip
of land (1.27 acres) that is located in the middle of the developer's proposed project
and extends from Pleasant Run Road to the city park. The developer is proposing
to dedicate additional right-of-way for this strip of land which will be incorporated
into the project. The attached ordinance requires payment of applicable park land
dedication fees as building permits are issued.
The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this rezoning request at their December
28, 1998 meeting and has recommended approval of the attached ordinance 0-99-1141.
Recommendation:
Approval of Ordinance 0-99-1141
...
~
:........."~ II"""'" 1'Jl;1.....
!Hi "'. '.
.1 ",., ..
~ _.-'1 'J.~; :. i."
Realty Capital Corporation
Richard A. Myers
Presl/unt
The Village at ColJeyville, cont'd.
Fire Protection: The Village should be the safest residential project in Colleyville and as safe,
or safer than every commercial project. Every residence .will have an automatic fire sprinkler
system; in fact, every building in The Village will have such a system. In addition, virtually
every building has dual vehicular access from public streets in the front to alleys in the rear.
Finally, both the public streets and alleys will have fire hydrants every 300 feet.
Masonry Walls and Wrought-Iron Fences: As shown on our revised concept plan, we
propose installing six-foot masonry walls in the following locations: (1) the common property
lines between The Village and the McNosky's property; and (2) the northern property line of The
Village where it abuts Danny Walker's commercial property.
We plan to install a four-foot wrought-iron fence along the western border of The Village, where
it abuts the City Park. This fence would contai,n wrought-iron gates in specific locations to allow
pedestrian access between the City Park and The Village.
Buildings' Rear Elevations: Our building standards are as tough for the back of each building
as the front. Most of the detailed building restrictions will be in -the deed restrictions filed by
The Village Owners' Association. I have attached some sample front and rear building
elevations for your review.
Barry, I hope that this memorandum answers most of the Commissioners' questions regarding
The Village. Please deliver this information to them and to the City Council. Please note that
we have met with several of the nearby homeowners and have presented this information to
them. Thank you for your help and have a Merry Christmas! .
:, -.
......c. ..";;
920 South Main Sll'eel. Suile 170, Gr.lpevine, Texas 76051 . (817) 488-4200 . Fax (817) 488-5257
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. . A Unit 01 Parsons Transportation Group, Inc.
2630 West Freeway' Suite 132' Fort Worth. Texas' 76102 USA' (817) 8n-5803 . (817) 8n.3214 lax
PARSONS
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TO:
Richard Myers
Realty Capital Corporation
FROM: qJ 1.K' Brian Shamburger
DATE: December 22, 1998
SUBJECT:
The Village ofColleyville - Co//eyvi//e. Texas
Shared Parking Analysis
Parsons Transportation Group has completed its examination of the parking requirements for the proposed
Village of Colleyville in Colleyville, Texas. This memorandwn summarizes the shared parking analysis
results conducted for the site.
The current development plan for the proposed Villages of Colleyville was evaluated. Office, retail,
restaurant, and residential land uses are planned for the proposed site. A summary of the development types
and sizes are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Proposed Development ses and SIZeS
Quantity
Land Use Description
Gross Leasable Area (sq.ft.) Residences
Office 203,000 (a) 9 -
Retail 205,000 I02.S -
Restaurant 42,000 410 -
Residential - .,..--- . .. .~ 100
Total 450,000 1.0'-+ 100
u
z.}
J.
'" "
2"';
S
,...7-;
Shared Parking Analysis Summary
. -
The following sections provide a brief summary of the Shared Parking Analysis conducted for this site. Our
review of the parking requirements was based on the 1983 UU Shared Parking Manual and our parking
experience related to facilities like the Village of Colleyville. The shared parking model was run for the
summer (July) and winter (Dc:cember) peak seasons based on the land uses listed in Table 1 above. :
~
Richard Myers
Technical Memorandum
Page 3
Table 2.
Seasonal Parkin Demand Estimates
Time of Day
our)
Parking Demand
S aces)
Existing
Parking Supply
S aces)
Parking Surplus
S aces)
Season
Weekday Peak
Saturday Peak
02:00 PM
02:00 PM
~i~~$flfjli2~1fjlltf:m:
861
1,005
1,005
-118
144
Weekday Peak
Saturda Peak
02:00 PM
02:00 PM
@@ti~MHiP143.i~~i:~@ilt@.
986
1,005
1005
-138
19
The parking demand estimates shown in Table 2 are for a build-out scenario only. As this property develops,
the need for additional parking should be monitored. The additional 138 required spaces calculated by our
analyses can be accommodated by either replacing proposed office/retail uses with surface lots or by
acquiring an off-site parking area (i.e., the land adjacent to the Kroger site located in the soutwest comer of
the property). Direct access for these areas should be provided off of the proposed north-south C<TwcrWay
Street Boulevard" which bisects the property. Keep in mind that as proposed land uses are replaced with
parking, the need for additional parking is reduced.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on the results of the shared parking analysis for the proposed Village of Collcyville, the following
conclusions and recommendations can be made: -
· The peak demand occurs on a winter weekday at 2:00 p.m. with a demand of 1,143 vehicles
resulting in a deficit of 138 spaces (based on the existing supply of 1,005). The additional
138 required spaces can be accommodated by either replacing' proposed office/retail uses
with surface lots or by acquiring an off-site parking area.
i
~~~1~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~
0NM..G~~~~~~~.~~~~~M
!iI. ............. ....
~
:!
i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
a:
i
~oO~~g~~N~=~N~~~~~N~
. n ~N--""NNM~"NN....
.
a:
· ~MMMMMMN~....~....~O
.O~~~~~~~~~~eOMO.~~O
~ ~""-""-""""""NNN_
'"
~
~
~
8~~~~~g~;~~~a~:8~~N
0NNM~~~~GOG~~G~~~G~~
~
~
:!
c
~8888888888888888888
.NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
.
a:
i
~OGO~~~I~~~~:~I~~gIN
. -..............NNnM~NN
.
a:
· ~G~~NG_....~o8~.~~
.O~~MOMmM~~_. ~~G~io
~ ....N~M..~.~MNN__
c . j .
..2 8 O~"'~~---~~N~OO~~ 8O~"'~~Oi~~~~~~~~QOOO
,....... M.......NN:g "'''''M 00
j ....-M~~~~~ ~~N_..-"" ii ..W')........ca .... C"tM....___
i
ii ..
W W
.. ..
c c
~ >- ~~~~~~llllll~ll~l~~ :t! ~~~~~~~~~ll~l~llll~
.
0.. . aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 0..>- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
11~ 11 ·
... : 8S!8~~~oSa~88S!!~~~ ..'2 8S!8~~~oSa~88s!g~~~
!~ ~i
IIJIIJ
>-
'::o~t:
....~ ~~'#'#
: ~ i.! It) 0 00
~ o~ Itlltl
~.. :5 :!
l~~'#~~ i~'#~'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#~'#'#'#~t:'# i'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#,#,#,#
.81tl88 t~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IIL....,.......-
. ~ a: >- a:
IIJ ..
~ '2
. :J
~ ii
: l5 c IIJ C
. . j'#,#,#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#,#,#,#~~~,#,#,# , ..
~:S~]~8~8 l ~ ~'#'#t:t:'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#~~'#'#'#
oooooogooi iOO
gO iic:i"=~N ION~_NM~""O ~,... ___ ....~ :I; :ONMG~~~~~~~2i~...._~~~
... ...
.. _~ III .. a: .. a::
... ! -x. .. ..
>< ..- 0.. 0..
GI c... . '0 '0
I- ~ !D
:I . ..
g' 5 ~] 8 8 ~ 8 .. i'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#~'#'#'#'#'# co ~'#'#t:'#'#'#'#'#~~'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#
! ~ ..
~1Il l" e"II)' <<O~~~=~~~~~~~=_~:~~O !c ~QM~~~~~~...._i~~~~~~~o
. Q. eMM N it ,gr!
.!!w o..e ~ .... Q,a ..
-.... E 0.. Eo.. II
8~ ;:~ ;:~ t!-
' - ~ .:lj .:ll!i .s:
w.... 1:
-J13 ~~1~8 Ii ~'#'#~'#~~~'#'#'#~'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'# I~ ~'#'#'#'#'#;~'#'##'#'#'#'#'#'#~'#'# 0
-Jo jJ .s~ ~
~~ :50 N_ M~g~__ii~S~~~~~MMOO 'j O~22i__22~~~~~~oooo 1:
NN'" j If
Ww Cl .
jo ~~ ~~ Q.
:=0
00 0
=l 'ji~ (;
O~S::- en W:I; c
~~5 g'j ~~~~~~lllllllll~ll~ g'j ~~~~~~lllllllllllll ,g
wa.::!. ~i i!- ii
c _- aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ...!! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.aa 1:
CJoftj .,g I!~ . a. _ a.i 8.
.- c 8S!~~~~oSa~88~!g~~~ 8S!!~~~oSa~88S!8~~~
:sw::e ::l-c.=j-3 II 'a" ..
.. . c
::!~~ lUg.; - .. ~ l!
=8 : =: .0.
.c: .. .c:" ....
>1Ilc., ~o a: a: a: Cl)a: Cl)a: ..
c
0
~
..
0..
t/)
co
)(
Q)
....
Q)
-
-
'S; VI
Q)
Q)+J
-ca
'0 E
O:p
I VI
WW
..J"C
..Jc
-ca
$:E
wC1)
..Jc
...JC)
Qc
u:i2
u. ;
OQ.
Wca
(!)c
<0
...J rn
~m
>00
:z
o
en
<(
w
en
......
co "<:t'
or- "<:t'
or- or-
........
LO LO
o 0
o 0
or- or-
M
N
or-
or-
~
a.
o
o
N
o
~
m
Q)
a.
>.
m
"C
~
Q)
~
or-
CD
co
~
a.
o
o
N
o
~
m
Q)
a.
>.
m
"E
::J
...
co
en
~
m
Q)
a.
>.
m
"C
..llI::
Q)
~
~
co
~
N
~
N
T"""
......
co
(")
T"""
........
0)
or-
LO
o
o
LO
o
o
or-
T"""
M
"<:t'
T"""
T"""
CD
co
0)
~
a.
o
o
N
o
~
a.
o
o
N
o
en
m
x
Q)
l-
.c
~
o
~
t
o
1.1..
~
ro
Q)
a.
>.
ro
"E
::J
1ii
en
a.
::J
e
(!)
c
o
=
m
t
o
a.
CI)
c
m
.=
en
c
o
~
m
a.
1
N
'-w
I
-------,
V)
w
~
-J
-J
>
W
:c
I-
n
r
o
<
o
c:
o
g I
)I:
~ I
o
::::
in
w
U
z c
..~
..
/'
~
Q.
::>
o
a:
o
Z
o
~
~
a:
o
Q.
~
!I)
z
o
!I)
~
lil
Richard Myers
Technical Memorandum
Page 4
)
Site Traffic Assignment
Traffic volumes expected to be generated by the proposed development during the weekday and Saturday
peak periods were assigned to the site access points and area roadways using the estimated directional
distributions shown on Figure 2.
Because of the nature of this development, it is expected that there will be significant interaction between
individual land uses. That is, many of the trips generated by an individual office, retail, restaurant, or
establishment will come from another establishment within the development. Many of these trips will be
pedestrian trips rather than vehicle trips. For this reason, the total trips for each use were reduced based on
the following assumptions:
Office
· Five-percent (5%) internal trip reduction for weekday PM peak and
· 100% internal trip reduction for Saturday peak period (i.e., no office trips are anticipated
between 12:00 (noon) and 2:00 p.m. on Saturday).
Retail
· 50% internal trip reduction for weekday PM peak and
· 25% internal trip reduction for Saturday peak.
Restaurant
· 50% internal trip reduction for weekday PM peak,
· The Saturday restaurant peak will likely occur around 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. It was
assumed that approximately 50% of the restaurant peak period traffic will occur during the
Saturday site peak period (i.e., 50% reduction), and
· an additional 25% internal trip reduction for Saturday peak.
Residential
· No internal trip reductions were allowed for weekday PM peak and
· 50% overall trip reduction for Saturday peak because residential peak will occur outside of .
Saturday site peak period.
The resulting peak period estimates (accounting for interaction between uses) are presented in Table 4.
T bl 4
Eti tdT' Ge
ti
'th I t
IT' Rd t'
r
a e . s ma e rlf nera on WI n erna riP e uc Ions
Trip Generation Estimates
Land Use Saturday Peak Period (vph) Weekday PM Peak Period (vpb)
Enter Exit Enter EI.it
Office 0 0 50 242
Retail 543 501 242 262
Restaurant WI 70 , 105 52
Residential 27 23 69 39
Total Trips Generated 671 594 466 595
Richard Myers
Technical Memorandwn
Page 6
)
The location and operations at each of the proposed site entrances along SH 26 will have a major influence on
how and where traffic enters and exits the site. Each of the following asswnptions was considered when
assigning site traffic to the area roadways:
· Access to Pleasant Run Road from SH 26 will be eliminated (i.e., cul-de-sac) as part of this
project,
· No site access will be provided off of Shadow Wood Road,
· . Operations at the intersection of SH 26 and the south entrance will be limited to right-
inlright-out only (vehicles exiting to the north will be forced to turn left at the north entrance
along SH 26), and
· A traffic signal will be warranted at the intersection of SH 26 and the north entrance.
The results of the vehicle trip assignment for the weekday PM and Saturday peak periods are shown on
Figures 3 and 4, respectively.
~
"
-.to
c
<
0 w
1 c: cr
?i ::>
2 <-'
N ~ L:
z
<
V1
<
~
~
0 ...
,..., I
I 01
y co
------------------------1
r------------- I
I ,
I ~____________.
. I
I .
. I
I ,
. I
I UJ ,
'I- I
1__.
· en I
I .
· OW~ I
" UJ ; ~
,^ a: , ~
! 0 <{ L,._-..; I
I ~ ~
i 0 _----, '0/ ~
" a: r--- . II
CL . l,
, I . I
I . \ .
' , .1
I . I'
i r-------------...J
L_______________~ \
, .
I ,
,
.
,
I
,
,
I
.
I
,
,
.
! <....
l ''', ~
..'......... .........,! I
t ......... .so, ""
o ............ I.
(c) ........ ,
I I "v
"-
"'"
~
~
.
-------/.
,
I
,
I
,
/
,
I
,
I
.'
'"
~
..\,. ..
~"f'
~
~
~
,,'<f'
~
, :i:
~ >-
. ~ ~
Wo
~ :z
::J ::J
-10
~ CD ;t.
o ~ :z
o ILl Q
c: ~ en
-li:&~
-1 t.&..
~~~
Wwe::
0.. 0 ....
~
~
~
....,
.:::'
t
....,
et
v
o
z
w
<.:)
W
....J
x I
~ i ·
()O~
-0-,
LL_>
LLa:>-
<(UJw
a: 0..-'
~ 5
~u
~U5g
Cl)o..~
<-'
~:5
0..;:
~~
0......
~
UJ
UJ
~
n.
:l
o
a:
o
Z
o
~
I'"
a:
o
n.
~
I-
CI)
Z
o
1Il
~
~
Jason & Kimberly Haley
711 Central Drive
)Colleyville, TX 76034
Case Z!"98-Q47
. - . --~- ""'-
According to the TaX Records, individuals'AOO 0'M1 property which is within the 200' of the
propo~ zoning change request.are listed above. I certify that the .parties listed above
have been notified of the proposed zoning change request as required by Section
211 th~ Local Government Code. (No.tices dated: December 04, 1998)
~an Hofstrom
va . ~Ianning .&Zoning Assistant
.'-. --.._-
~";"';'.. .:.... .
-------------
The following form may be filled out and .mailed to the City of COlleyville, Planning and Zoning
Commission, c/o Jan Hofstrom, 5400 Bransford Road, Colleyville, Texas 76034. .
tee.. 1'2-\2,':)\,2
REFERENCE NO.: Z-98-042 - Richard Meyers
I am (in favor of)
~ . )r.'
LoT 9,/0(.1<6, (!/tOS&,I,vc;-
'vJ ITH l tV
d- 0 {) I A R.. Efj
----------
.-------=========
The following form may be filled out and mailed to the City of COlleyville, Planning and Zoning
Commission, c/o Jan Hofstrom, 5400 Bransford Road, ~olleyville, Texas 76034.
REFERENCE NO.: Z~98-o42 - Richard Meyers
~5(:,. I'L/Z, I ~
SIGNATURE:
(Please Print e) .L:!.LL.,/(,.;::;::;::r- p /5~Al-A /
ADDRESS: ~LC\~I(~~RJ.
Lor 9" ,e~o (].~DS5IA!(,- \tI /IH I N ~o 0 ,. A/CEIT
============'===========;~~=;~===;==='~=~==.='=====~-
The fOllowing form may be filled out and mailed to the City of Colleyville, Planning and Zoning
Commission, c/o Jan ~ofstrom, 5400 Bransford Road, Colleyville, Texas 76034. _ _' -c' _. .
REFERENCENO.: Z-98~:~- m~ha~;..;'eye~.~R c. V'D' -.~'~/i' ,,/ 1~ - ~
- . ... -.... . .: ....,. - .-;"".'. .-.-. -. -... ..
. . . .
A IC eA-
REFERENCE NO.: Z-98-042 - Richard Meyers J~ C. '.J I~ - 1 ").11 '"I I q CiJ I
OUTS / DC ~oo A f<.€1}
I am (in favor of) (Qpposedtg} (undecided about) the request for the following reasons:
t'lt%.f(;() c.t:'-,Js.t"/l"c:."f"'kW .., y,.da; WILL ()til4~U~ I~d/f~~. ,ALfO r6"Hi!t'If/'>' '1"~"t16' or
I~d:r~.:--r WILL f!c~Pfe '(l~w tt:"l/pL ~ I'I1tttft-UNll' /~"e(f/pt:-, $ ~EII~Ve t'#15 <'v/.tf"",,.:=
I'~Pe.r WILL IfIfY& J1f A/661f11vlS /,,~/}t:.-r "AJ C!'-U;Y~/U.c(5 /J;"~,j ..IfLL /4t/l-G'~,
. SIGNATURE:aJ~~~ .
(Please Print Name) VlL L /~;r If!. -::['d 1I'M.J't'A/
ADDRESS: t(() 8- c../lJt...L6YVlLLc. '7&/f~/p~t5"
REFERENCE NO.: Z-98-042 - Richard Meyers R e v'(.) r ~ / I C{ I q ~
o U-rS / lJ E ~OO.l AR.EIl
undecided abouij the request for the following reasons:
\Gl\
0<;'
-
-
.. -.-.-.-..... . "'---, --..-.1 ....-. ...
REFERENCE NO.: Z-98-042 - Richard Meyers
-----;=====:==~~-------
-------.-
REFERENCE NO.: Z-98
1< c... Y '0 I C).. / IS /9 ~
J?-"/ 15/9 ~
'if, tJ. '3,~
REFERENCE NO.: Z-98-042 - R~~!!ers R~" /) - I ')./ I 7 / q g
...
I am (in favor of) opposed to) (undecided about) the request for the following reasons: .
cot-/.., try vi '-LIE Cc"1"l77 ,..rU~
Q;. f"'1-~f. D (l. v E LC>>' rl t::N
TO '- 05 E ;:r:T 'S C au.rJT'f'l/'(
J-H'rPp $r1S .
.'-c--.e.....<--- /2..{;4- (~e
/2A.lSTlC t:EcL As f-f.oYZ.{/
SIGNATURE:
(Please Print Name) S.C07' A. PA5C(~E
ADDRESS: 57o?> pL.EASArNT R-U,1oJ (2.1>. I
.
NC5i'E ! (2. (eftt vi!J) (.... N /2-/14-/96 -ro f.., ~
C.-O;... '-IT ." VI- '-, e
J)t:"
ru ~D,.
. /),) r- <:. I /) I::::
...., c) r) //LR r;
ORDINANCE 0-99-1141
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
i I COLLEYV/LLE, TEXAS, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AND CHANGING
i 1 THE ZONING OF 24.07 ACRES OUT OF THE J. M. LOONEY SURVEY, ABSTRACT 936,
II TRACT 1, AND THE B.B.B. & C. R.R. CO. SURVEY, ABSTRACT 206, TRACTS 3, 3E,
I 3D, 3C, 38, 381, AND A PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF CITY NATIONAL BANK OF
I COLLEYVILLE ADDITION OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS, FROM THE AG
(AGRICULTURAL) DISTRICT AND CC1-COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO THE PUD-MXD
!! (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT-MIXED USE); PROVIDING A PENAL TV AND
j' AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION.
'I WHEREAS, an application for zoning change was filed by Richard Myers of Realty Capital
I Corporation, on October 16, 1998 under Case No. Z-98-042; and,
II
II WHEREAS,
II
notice of a hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission was sent to
real property owners within 200 feet of the property herein described at least
10 days before such hearing; and,
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing before the' City Council was published in a
newspaper of general circulation in Col/eyvil/e at least 15 days before such
hearing; and,
Ii
I
I WHEREAS,
Ii'
II WHEREAS,
I
,
notices were posted on the subject land as provided by the zoning ordinance;
and,
the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council have determined
that the proposed planned unit development as presented herein is
consistent with the goals and objectives of the Master Plan of the City of
COlleyville, Texas; and,
WHEREAS, public hearings to change the zoning on the property herein described were
held before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council,
and the Planning and Zoning Commission has heretofore made a
recommendation; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council is of the opinion that the zoning change herein effectuated
furthers the purpose of zoning as set forth in the Zoning Ordinance and is in
the best interest of the citizens of the City of Colleyville;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS:
Sec. 1. Purpose - The purpose of this planned unit development is to encourage mixed-
use, compact development that is sensitive to the environmental characteristics
of the land and facilitates the efficient use of services. This planned unit
I.
Ordinance 0-99-1141
Page 3 of 18
(a) NC Area: A maximum of 20% of the building sites in the,
Neighborhood Center area may contain a single-family residence use
on the first floor of its building.
(b) NG Area: A maximum of 40% of the building sites in the
Neighborhood General area may contain a single-family residence
use on the first floor of its building.
2. Retail: retail specialty shops including, but not limited to, the sale of
clothing, gifts, antiques, flowers and plants, books, jewelry, music,
electronic equipment, computers and software, tobacco and related
supplies, crafts, toys, cameras, souvenirs, greeting cards, artwork,
furniture, hardware, sporting goods, house and garden supplies, office
supplies. leather goods and periodicals.
3. Service: Personal service shops including, but not limited to, travel
agency, banks, airline ticket office, tailor, barber, beauty salon, spa,
health club, shoe repair, food catering, dry cleaners, studios for dance,
art, music, photography, radio, and television, or similar service uses.
4. Food and Lodging: Small hotels, bed and breakfast inns, restaurants,
cafes, coffee shops, bakeries, butchers, fish markets, delicatessens, ice
cream parlors, cookie stores, grocery stores (including beer and wine
sales), drug stores, bagel or doughnut shops, and soda fountain shops.
5. Entertainment: Entertainment venues including movie theatres, provided
the total number of all movie screens does not exceed four, playhouses,
comedy clubs, jazz/music clubs and pubs, provided no pub exceeds
3,000 square feet of floor area.
6. Office: Business offices including, but not limited to, software design
firms, business consulting, security and commodity brokerage, general
business offices, real estate sales, insurance sales, advertising, mailing
and stenographic services, professional offices for lawyers, engineers,
architects, doctors, dentists, psychiatrists, accountants, inv~stment
. advisors, orthodontists, or other office related businesses.
7. Educational: Churches, Private Schools, and Day-care centers.
8. Mixed-use: buildings or structures containing any combination of single-
family residences and other uses listed herein.
9. Public/Semi-public: Buildings or structures owned or operated by the City
of Colleyville or The Village Owner's Association. Semi-public uses such
as a neighborhood center, pool and related recreational facilities.
\
. !
Ordinance 0-99-1141
Page 5 of 18
I
I
II
II
7. Scrap yards for the processing or storage of waste materials;
8. Automotive repair businesses;
9. Telemarketing office with over 20 employees.
I
10. Uses not listed herein shall be considered by following the procedures I
outlined in the Colleyville Zoning Ordinance for new and unlisted uses. I
. I
D. General Lot Criteria - See Table 1 below: I
I
i
I
Table 1
General Lot Criteria
Neighborhood Neighborhood
General Zone Center Zone
Lot Min. Area 1 2,600 s. f. Min. Area I 2,600 s. f.
Dimensions Max. Area I 5 acres Max. Area 5 acres
. Min. lot Coverager 30% Min. lot Coverage! 45%
Max. lot Coverage! 100% Max. lot Coveragel 100%
Setbacks Front! 0' min. - 15' max. Front 0' min. - 15' max.
Sidel 0' min. . 15' max. Side 0' min. -15' max.
I
Rear -,Main Bldg. I O' min - 25' max. Rear - Main Bldg. I 0' min - 25' max.
Rear - Acr;y. Bldg. I 5' Rear - Acr;y. Bldg. 5'
Height Maximum Height; 48 ft. or 3.5 stories . Maximum Height! 48 ft. or 3.5 stories
Note: the one-half story above third floor Note the one-half story above third floor
shall not exceed 400 sJ. shall not exceed 400 sJ.
E. BuildinQ Exteriors - The exposed exterior walls 'of each building must contain
. 100% masonry. For purpos~ of this ordinance, masonry shall consist of any
combination of brick, stone, faux-stone, stucco or faux-stucco.
. .
.. .
F. RoofinQ -If a flat roof is constructed, all sides of the building shall have a
mansard or built-up par'apet wall roof at least four feet (4') in height, which
shall simulate the look of a pitched roof from street level, unless a roof
terrace is constructed, then railings may be. used which comply with
Paragraph F, Balconies. .
G. Balconies - Balcony r.ailings must be constructed with wrought iron or
. masonry balustrades. - . --
. '-
H.' BuildinQ Desion Requirements - Articulation of walls shall not be mandatory.
Buildings within this planned unit development shall be exempt from Section
}
Ordinance 0-99-1141
Page 7 of 18
B. Park Land Dedication Fees - Payment of park land dedication fees at the
rate applicable at the time of building permit shall be due and payable when
a building permit is issued for each non-residential structure or primary
single-family dwelling unit.
C. Street Riqht-of-Way Widths - These shall be established upon approval of
the Final Plat using the street and alley design standards contained in
Subsection G, below.
D. Sidewalks - Sidewalks shall be required for all lots in this development.
(1) Wall Signs - The size of a wall sign shall be limited to the size of the
building wall it is attached to: either 10 percent of the wall area or 1.5
square feet for each linear foot of the building's wall, whichever is less.
I
I
,I
! I
(2) Projecting Signs - These may not exceed 20 square feet in size, with a
clearance of at least eight feet above ground level.
(3) Awning Signs - Individual letters on awning signs shall not exceed 12
inches in height.
(4) None of the above signs shall be internally lit. These signs may be front
lit with lights that do not create an unreasonable glare on adjacent
buildings. . .
(5) Window Signs - Food and Lodging and. Entertainment uses may use
internally lit window signs (made of decorative neon) inside of their
businesses. Any business shall be limited to a maximum of two window
signs. Internally-lit box signs shall not be permitted.
G. Street and Alley Desiqn
(1) Two-way Street - The cross-section of the typicalllvillage streetll shall be
comprised of twenty-two feet of drive lanes (two, eleven-foot lanes), two,
seven-foot parallel parking spaces', and a ten-foot sidewalk on each side
of the street. The total public right-of-way shall not be less than 56 feet
wide., .
)
I
Ordinance 0-99-1141
Page 9 of 18
:1 Sec. 9.
i j
II
i I
I
I
I
II
I
! I
II
shall be front lit with a decorative lighting fixture. The signs shall contain
eight-inch letters.
ParkinQ Requirements - The parking requirements for this planned unit
development shall be as follows:
A. The parking shall be provided according to the parking requirements of this
section, provided that when 75% of the development is completed the city
shall have the authority to review the parking demands and reassess the
parking supply by the development. The developer shall reserve spaces
throughout the development to provide extra parking at the 75% reduced
development stage.
B. Parking spaces shall consist of a combination of parking spaces provided on
the street, on each building site, within a parking garage or in an open
parking lot. Approximately thirty (30) percent of the parking requirements will
be provided on the streets as streets are constructed within the development.
The remaining seventy (70) percent of the parking requirements shall be
provided as bUilding permits are issued for each structure in accordance with
the following requirements: .
1. Residential Uses - The parking requirements for residential units shall be
as follows:
(a). Ground floor - when a primary residence is located on the ground
floor, two (2) parking spaces shall be provided on the same building
site as the dwelling unit and one additional on-site parking space if
the building site contains an ancillary residential unit.
(b). Upper floor - when a primary residence is located on an upper floor,
two (2) parking spaces shall be provided either on the same building
site as the residence or in a parking lot or parking garage located
within 300 feet of the residence. Said parking spaces shall not have
been used in calculating parking needs for any other residence or
use within the planned unit development.
2. Non-Residential Uses - The parking requirements for non-residential
uses shall be at a ratio of one (1) parking space per 400 square feet of
floor area. Parking spaces shall either be located on the building site, in
a parking lot, or in a parking garage. Said parking lot or parking garage
shall be located within 300 of the use requiring the parking space. Said
parking spaces shall not have been used in calculating the parking needs
for any other use within the planned unit development.
3. Parkinq Space Records Retention - When off-site parking spaces are
provided to satisfy the parking requirements of this ordinance, the City of
i i
Ordinance 0-99-1141
Page 11 of 1 a
.... T ~~
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
,1999.
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, CMC
City Secretary
. Richard Newton
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
I
Ross T. Foster
I City Attorney
"
';' ".
, ..
i ~.,+
~...J ' ..
. '. "'"..".
" .
- _ .....,A
,'-' -- .~..
. ~~ ~_. ~...--
day of
. "
., .
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
TRACT 'A'
Being a tracl of land situated in the City of CoUeyville. Tarrant County, Texas In the 8.B.B. & C.R.R.
Survey. Abstract No. 206. said tract being more particularly described by metes and bounds as
follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the apparent West R.O.W. line of Pleasant Run Road, being West, 25.00
feet from the Northeast comer of a tract deeded to a Verlie Lee Brown recorded in Volume 11 n2.
Pag7 2164 of the Deed.Records ofTmant County, Texas:
THENCE South 00 degrees 01 minutes 33 seconds East. along said apparent West R.O.W.
line, a distance of n6.58 feet to the Southeast comer of a tract deeded to Billy G. Petty
and wife. Shirley A. Petty as recorded In Volume 3186, Page 60 of sakl Deed Records:
THENCE South 89 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds West, leaving said apparent West R.O.W.
line and along the South Ii!le of said Petty tract. a distance of 214.91 feet:
THENCE North B8 degrees 25 minutes 37 seconds West, continuing along the South line of said
Petty tract. a distance of 100.43 feet;
THENCE South 02 degrees 15 minutes 00 seconds East, along the West line 0( a tract deeded
to a Anthony TImOthy McNosky recorded In Volume 6786, Page 503 and Volume 1527,
a distance of 156.20 feet:
THENCE North 88 degrees 48 minutes 23 seconds East, along the South line of said McNosky
tract, a distance of 190.50 feet:
THENCE South 29 degrees 39 minutes 20 seconds West, leaving said South line of McNosky
tract and along a proposed property division /lne within Lot 1, Block 1. 1 st City National
Bank of Colleyvllle as recorded In Volume 388-182, Page 81 of said ~ ReCOl'ds. a
distance of 344.57 feet;
THENCE South 60 degrees 28 minutes 00 seconds East, continuing along said proposed
property division line, a distance of 253.30 feet:
THENCE South 29 degrees 32 minutes 00 seconds West, along Colleyville Boulevard (S.H. 26)
a distance of 148.68 feet;
THENCE North 60 degrees 28 minutes 00 seconds West, leaving said Colleyville Boulevard,
along the Northeast line of Lot 1 & 2. Block 1. Kroger Addition as recorded in Cabinet
A. Slide 1029 of said Deed Records, a distance of 416.70 feet; .
THENCE North, along the East line of said Lot 1 and also along the East line of Lot 4R, Block 1,
Kroger Addition as recorded In Cabinet A, Slide 1397 of said Deed Records, a distance
of 499.21 feet:
THENCE North 89 degrees 41 minutes 00 seconds West, along the North line or Foresl Oak
Lane, a distance of 414.65 feet to the Southwest comer of said Petty tract:
THENCE North 00 degrees 00 minutes 15 seconds West, along the West line of said Petty tract,
and the West line of the following tracts, Harold Hall recorded in Volume 9320, Page
1649, Bransford Park Land TNS!, Volume 10461. Page 1250. BNton O. And Carol G.
McCullough. Volume 11n2. Page 2174 & Volume 11n2. Page 2170, said Brown
tract. a distance of 773.75 feet to the Northwesl comer of said Brown tract:
THENCE East, along the North line of said Brown Tract. a distance of 919.00 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING and containing 20.36 acres of land.
The above legal description was compiled and written from lnfonnation obtained from Tarrant
County Deed Records. Tarrant Appraisal Oistrid, City of Colleyville and other sources. This legal
description Is to be used for zoning purposes only and Is not to be relied upon as a boundary survey
of any type.
0-99-1141
Exhibit "B"
':)NJ'SUVCO~ 01
---~- ----~
-~--- -......-.....
m:u~
~~JOafrgr.A Qf{L
IIJ
II 1111 · -;
I I .... I
Legend
I
I
.
I
(
.
I
i
.1
I
I
.
I
I
NC - Neighborhood Center
NG - Neighborhood General
I
!
i
--- -.. -;,;,';r.
J ,"--r-
! j
i . I ,.
i i'"
i . i .......:-.._.._.._.~_.._.
. 10"'"'
i . I .
ii
I I . i
II : . :
I,! ,.!
i . i .
i
l
0-99-1141
Exhibit ICe"
-,
The Village at Colleyville
Development Schedule
The following schedule is a rough approximation of key development dates:
1. Zoning Approval: December 1998
2. Preliminary Plat Approval: January 1999
3. TIF Approval: February 1999
4. Final Plat Approval: April 1999
5. Infrastructure Construction Start: June 1999
6. Infrastructure Construction Completion: February 2000
7. Initial Buildings' Completion: September 2000
8. . Grand Opening Celebration: December 2000
Statement of Proposed Ownership
The project will be owned by a limited partnership, with Realty Capital Corporation acting as the
general partner of the partnership. -.
0-99-1141
.. exhibit "0"
PARSONS
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. . A Unit of Parsons Transportation Group, Inc.
2630 West Freeway' Suite 132 . Fort Worth' Texas' 76102 USA' (817) 877-5803 . (817) 877-3214 fax
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TO:
Richard Myers
Realty Capital Corporation
FROM: ctl1 tf. Brian Shamburger
DATE: December 22, 1998
SUBJECT:
The Village ofCo/leyvi/le - Colleyvi/le. Texas
Shared Parking Analysis
Parsons Transportation Group has completed its examination of the parking requirements for the proposed
Village of Colleyville in Colleyville, Texas. This memorandwn summarizes the shared parking analysis
results conducted for the site.
The current development plan for the proposed Villages of Colleyville was evaluated Office, retail,
restaurant, and residential land uses are planned for the proposed site. A summary of the development types
and sizes are presented in Table 1.
T bl 1
P
el
a e . roposed Dev opment Uses and Sizes
Quantity
Land Use Description
Gross Leasable Area (sq.ft.) Residences
Office 203,000 -
Retail 205,000 -
Restaurant 42,000 -
Residential - 100
Total 450,000 100
Shared Parking Analysis Summary
The following sections provide a brief sununary of the Shared Parking Analysis conducted for this site. Our
review of the parking requirements was based on the 1983 Ull Shared Parking Manual and our parking
experience related to facilities like the Village of Colleyville. The shared parking model was run for the
summer (July) and winter (December) peak seasons based on the land uses listed in Table 1 above.
~
Richard Myers
T echnicaI Memorandwn
Page 2
The study was completed based on the following assumptions:
· Retail. It was assumed that 205,000 square feet of retail will be included in the project.
ULI uses a weekday factor of3.8 and a Saturday factor of 4.0 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of retail.
Given the suburban character of this mixed use development, our experience suggests that a lower
weekday factor of3.0 is more appropriate.
The weekday hourly accumulations recommended by ULI were modified. Typically, weekday retail
parking peaks at 2:00 p.m. We believe that the weekday peak parking period will occur later in the
day (i.e., 7:00 p.m.). The Saturday hourly accumulations used are those recommended by ULI. The
model was run for seasonal adjustments. ULI shows a seasonal adjustment factor of75% in July.
Logically, the site retail will be used by site patrons, namely office workers in the development. We
therefore assumed a 50% captive market for weekday and a 25% captive market was assumed for
Saturday.
· Office. It was assumed that 203,000 square feet of office will be included in the project.
The ULI weekday factor of 3.0 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. and Saturday factor of 0.50 spaces per 1,000
sq. ft. was applied. Hourly accumulations were also taken from ULI.
· Restaurant. The 42,000 square feet of restaurant space will be located throughout the
development The restaurant will be dine-in restaurants but are not anticipated to be the top
big draw restaurants.
ULI uses a weekday and Saturday factor of20 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Our past studies show that
restaurants in mixed use developments such as this average between 10 and 15 spaces per 1,000 sq.
ft., depending on time of week. For the purpose of this study, we assumed a weekday parking
demand factor of 15 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. and a Saturday factor of 10 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft.
Given the large amount of office planned for the site, a 50% captive market rate was assumed for
weekday and a 25% captive market rate was assumed for Saturday. Hourly accumulations were
taken from ULI.
The model was run for seasonal adjustments. ULI shows a seasonal adjustment factor of 80% in
July.
· Residential. It is estimated that 100 residences will be located throughout the development.
ULI uses a weekday and Saturday factor of one (1) space per residence. For the purpose of this
study, we assumed a weekday and Saturday parking demand factor of two (2) spaces per residence.
It was also assumed that all residential parking (i.e., 200 spaces) will be reserved.
The results of the shared parking analysis are presented in Table 2 below. Additional calculation summary
tables are presented in Appendix A. The current development plan has a proposed parking capacity of 1,005
spaces. Based on our analysis, the peak demand occurs on a winter weekday at 2:00 p.m. with a demand of
1,143 vehicles resulting in a deficit of 138 spaces.
Richard Myers
Teclmical Memorandum
Page 3
Table 2.
Seasonal Parkin Demand Estimates
Season
Time of Day
our
Parking Demand
(S aces)
SUMMER (JULY)
Weekday Peak
Saturday Peak
02:00 PM
02:00 PM
1,005
1,005
-118
144
02:00 PM
02:00 PM
1,005
1005
-138
19
The parking demand estimates shown in Table 2 are for a build-out scenario only. As this property develops,
the need for additional parking should be monitored. The additional 138 required spaces calculated by our
analyses can be accommodated by either replacing proposed office/retail uses with surface lots or by
acquiring an off-site parking area (i.e., the land adjacent to the Kroger site located in the soutwest comer of
the property). Direct access for these areas should be provided off of the proposed north-south "Two-Way
Street Boulevard" which bisects the property. Keep in mind that as proposed land uses are replaced with
parking, the need for additional parking is reduced.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on the results of the shared parking analysis for the proposed Village of CoIleyville, the following
conclusions and recommendations can be made:
. The peak demand occurs on a winter weekday at 2:00 p.m. with a demand of 1,143 vehicles
resulting in a deficit of 138 spaces (based on the existing supply of 1,005). The additional
138 required spaces can be accommodated by either replacing proposed office/retail uses
with surface lots or by acquiring an off-site parking area.
Appendix A
In
III
)(
1II
....
~
~1Il
.!!w
-I-
8~
~t=
.....13
:e
~z
wa
:Ie
Oel
03;):'
~;S5
w~::?.
e"effi
~~~
>1Il'"
~1i1~
~~1i...~;/!~;/!
G:lJ!I!ca-&Oooo
3:~U&! 11>11>
~~
~~~~~~
:iaf~~~~
::
III
! l; "
~:)~~~~~~
cC):>"O.S!N
.2g01ll
i! -~
..~Q,
c ~ .
tJ &. <>
'" 11111I
'5 <>1Il~88~8
't:" Ql.. II> .
.. 0- ~C')C')~N
a.~ ;>
:>
o
~~~88
O(08N~
JNN'-
C)
c _-
CD 0 5.19
II) :::= l! 1:
;'6CD=i~
c.~~ll'~
~OOO::O::O::
c
.2
ii
E
'fii
w
'"
c
=2
:. it
]~
III :B
ti3:
"'ON
~N~~
g
~
c
~888
'ilNNN
0::
C
l!
:>
to"'~
0::
~
U)ro~"":!~8~;e~~:g~~o~
~~~~~~~~~~"'''''''II>~C')
---..... ....
8888888888888888
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
N13I1>I8Ng:g:I8N;1;~~~;1;NI8
,." CD....N...._....NNMMMNN..-
'_S"O-_.~~MMMMMMN~-""""'-O
oc =.m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o
..
~~~~~~~~~i~i~a~~~~oo
~~~~~~~~~lll~~~l~~~
a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.~~~~~~~
8~~~S!~~~~a~~8~~~~~~
~
C~~~~~;/!;/!;/!~;/!~~~~~~~~~
~8888888888888888888
=---~--~----_...._-_....._-
0::
~
~
3l
3:
C
l!
:>~~~
~ONII>
..
0::
.
~
:>
o
:r:
~
:
a..
'0
..
Ol
.. ~
g ~
0. ..
Eo..
:>1;
~ l5
1~
..5 ~
, :>
~~
E~
i1 :s
w~
l~
III .l!
a.. i
] ~
.. 0-
r. ..
(1)0::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.....NMII).....r.D(OIl),.....m_~~cn......U1
s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~a
~oco~~CO"'~~~~II>II>"'m8...~NM~
1.1., ...,.- ,- .- ,- ,.... to- ,.... co .... co co M ...
~~~~~~8~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OM~~S__~~~~~~~~.....MMOC
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<l:<l:<l: <l:<l:<l:o..li: a.. a.. o..ll.o..ll.ll.li:li:ll. a..
a.a.a.aaaaa.a.aa~a~aaa~a
8~!8~~~oSS~~8~~~~~~
~
g~~~~~~~m~~~a~~8~~N
~NNM~~~~~coco""'~c~""''''''(OII).
~
g
Oi
~
~8888888888888888888
~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
..
0::
C
l!
;o~m~~~~~~~~m~m~~m~N
~ ~~~~~NN~~NNN
..
0::
~o~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~go
~ ~NMM~~.vMMNN_~
c
o
~
.5
;;;
W
'"
~
II
ll.>-
." II
eE
1~
III II)
8
=o"'co......~"'...co"''''m'''m'''OOOO
o _...,r-.....OJc;n.....U)~C")......_~_
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~l~ll
~~aaa~~a~aa.aaaaaa.8~
~b~~~~~oSS~~~~~g~~~
it
t!
:>
ii
1IJ
~
c~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0::
C
l!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~
~ON~~~~g~~~~g~~~~~~~
Ql
0::
~
:>
o
:r:
~
as
III
a..
'0
..
'"
II
~'E
.2 ~
ii.Gl
Ell.
:>>-
....a
~:s
1~
c :>
-E
':>
c u
o <>
;0:(
~~
'fiig
wJ:
"'Ql
c>
~;
:.~
..
."..
! !
,,0.
r."
III 0::
s~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~#~~
&o~~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
=0000088000000000000
o NU)COClO........COU)""l;f...NNNN
~~~~. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
<l:<l:<l: <l:Cl:<l: a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. ii:ii:o..li:ll.o..o..o..
aa.a~aaa~a~aaaaa~aaa
8~~~~~~cS8~~8~8g~~~
~
e!
N
~
..
~
I-
.si
't:
o
3:
't:
o
II.
.
0.
:>
e
C)
c
.S!
~
&.
..
c
l!
I-
..
c
o
I!
CD
a..
t;"a; ~ ~
'Ei!:= #"#.*'#.
~:i _:t!lO~~O
en U 0::
>-
{l1i.~*
'><i!:li. #*'#.#
i~ 1II~1tI~~0
~ Uo::
~
'1ii~*'#.'#.*
~af~~~~
!
(IJ
15 to
lie( 'E0888
0::...1 S::J 1tI 0
cC) QjC";S!N
ooOcn
=8~
; ~ 8.
c ~ I:
~ 8. u
CD I: ll{l 0
.5:uen""8880
..:.i: ca G).. iii .
l~ ~r)C'J.-N
VI
co
)(
II
I-
~
~1Il
~I!!
8~
u:,ti
...Iw
...10
~~
w:E
:H~~
OUlli!
03!:ilj
u..lSo
o:CllJ
WII.9.
~~~
.J~~
SVlS
::J
o
~~~1~8
c(MlnN-
..J~~'"
U
a cti
31= e'E
::Joc ::J Gl
"O~~s~~
; .. Ie .. .. Gl
...Joao::o::o::
~
"'U)N
enN~16
~
o
~
~~:gf::~t1~Na;~8~rn~~~
GO qqq..-:,"":. "":.8..ca co CO: r- (Q U') v M
----- .....-
]!
i8888888888888888888
~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Gl
0::
C
l!
10U)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0::
.~ ~m___....._ M.~CO~
~o~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~~o
c:
.2
"(;j
E
~
W
CD
c
=8
S. 1;-
"Oli!
; i
ti~
Gl
e"co"", aoma........-..... COII)NM
o-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oo
~~~~~~lllllllllllll
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~g~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~
1;-
li!
i
~
,
~
o
J:
""
=
0..
'0
Gl
CD
.. J!
.~ ~
a.Gl
E 0..
::J~
~.g
~~
"7 E
~j
o!;~
1i ~
wJ:
.~ ]
-;~
0.. Gl
" ..
~ l!!
III Cl.
ti~
]!
c'#.~'#.*~~#*~~*~~*~#'#.#~
l~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0::
C
l!
::J#'#.~'#.'#.'#.#*#'#.~~#'#.~~~##
~ONU)S!~g~~~~~~~~~~~~~
..
0::
s'#.'#.#'#.#'#.#'#.'#.'#.'#.'#.#'#.~'#.'#.~~
&o~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~o
~#*'#.*####'#.#~########
OM~16~~~~~~~~~~"''''MMOO
~~~~~~~~ll~~l~~~~~l
8888888888888888888
8~!g~~~~SS~~8~~~~~~
~
8~~~~~~~~r--8~~~~~~~~
~NNMVII)~COQm~mm~wco~~.M
...J
e(
~
o
~
}!
c
~8888888888888888888
lNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
0::
c
..
~ ~~~M~-~~NN~.~
~o~~~~~r-~~~~~~~~~~N~
'"
0::
~ ltI,..mM~ltIlt1..._om~~...
~O~~~~~N ~~~~o~~.~go
~ ~N~~ ~~~~.~MNN
c:
.2
"(;j
.5
1ii
w
Cl
c
=8
III
11.>-
"0 ..
",'E
~ ::J
<O-
s::. ..
encn
'"
u
~om~,..,..~~,..~mmmmmmoooo
o ......1,l),....."'O)m,......U')~M_......__......
~~~~~~ll~~~~l~l~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~mO......N_NMV~~~~~O~N
0000..................000000000......__
>-
..
'E
::J
"(;j
m
]!
c~~~~~#~#~'#.#'#.~*###~'#.
1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0::
C
l!
::J#~~~##~~###~##~~'#.'#.#
~ONM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'"
0::
~
::J
o
I
""
..
'"
0..
'0
'"
01
ca
~'E
o ~
:':::05
eo..
::J>-
gj.a
<5
::;""
Q..!!!
c: :::l
- E
. ::J
c: U
,g~
..~
E ~
.. ::J
.. 0
WI
"''''
c: >
:.;::.c
~ ..
ca-
Q.c
'"
"0"
.. '"
~ ~
.. Q.
s::. '"
mO::
S o;J!.;J!.tf!.;I!.tf!.t/!.ff!.,##.'#.#.,#,###,'#.*-
..~~001tlMltI1tI8801tl1tloltlO~MO
~ _M."'~m~_~~~~~~~_
~'#.~~~~~~~~~#~'#.#~#'#.##
50000000000000000000
o NrDCOCO__COCO......NNNN
~~~~~~ll~l~~lll~~~l
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
8b~~~~~oSa~~8~~g~~~
~
!!!
'"
~
..
!
~
€
o
~
1::
o
IL
Q.
::J
e
Cl
c:
o
'ai
1::
o
Cl.
..
C
..
i=
en
c
~
II
11.
tn
cu
><
Q)
I-
..
Q)
-
-
.-
> t/)
CD
~1U
oE
o~
It/)
WW
-1'0
-IC
~E
w CD
-10
-IC)
o .S
0.:.::
'-
u..cu
OD.
w'(U
C) C
<( 0
-I t/)
:::!:
>00
00
en
-
C\I
~
C\I
..-
en-
::JU)
.....JW - -
0..0 00 ""f" 00 en
0::<( ..- ""f" ('f) ..-
..- ..- ..-
::Ja. ---- ----
cnU)
>-
.....J
0-
0-
:JU)
cnw It) It) It) It)
00 0 0 0 0
W<( 0 0 0 0
cna. ..- ..- ..- ..-
OU)
0..
0
n:::
0..
OU)
zw
<{o
~<(
wa.
0U)
z
o
U)
<(
w
U)
CI)
('f)
N
..-
..-
~
a.
o
o
N
o
~
ro
Q)
a.
>-
ro
"'C
~
Q)
Q)
~
..-
co
co
::2:
a..
o
o
N
o
~
ro
Q)
a.
>-
ro
"E
::J
+J
ro
U)
a:
w
CO
~
W
U
w
o
0::
W
J-
Z
~
('f)
""f"
..-
..-
co
00
0>
::2:
a.
o
o
N
o
::2:
a..
o
o
N
o
C/)
ro
x
Q)
I-
.c
1::
o
S
1:::
o
LL
~
ro
Q)
a..
>-
ro
"'C
~
Q)
Q)
~
0-
::J
e
(!)
c:
o
:;::.
ro
1::
o
0-
C/)
c:
~
?-
m
c:
o
~
ro
a..
~
ro
Q)
a.
>-
ro
"E
::J
......
ro
U)
I
I
~
..
I
x
I ". _.__________
I
\
~
~&
~~
@~
.
.
~\
~~
@~ .
. .
____..~__...._._ ..---------1.....-----:..-----
1 I .. '1 I ! D 'I
J IIp , .
COLLEYVILLE VILLAGE
COLlEYVILLE, TEXAS
10 -. "._..~. '" - "'- "..~ ...~ 'NN
. . .., .__ ,.... ..... ""'1_
C'NKAssOCIATES. INC..
.1.
. ,
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board )
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager ~).
December 27, 1998 ~
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Parks and Recreation Master Plan Study
I have attached the Request for Proposal (RFP) for the City of Colleyville Parks
and Recreation Master Plan Study for your review prior to the January 4, 1999,
meeting.
Staff will review the scope and timing of the proposal at the January 4th meeting.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
Thank you for your assistance with this request.
Attachment
. .
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN STUDY
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
I. Introduction
The City of Colleyville is soliciting proposals for a Comprehensive Park,
Recreation and Open Space Plan study. The plan will address such topics as
land acquisition and development, recreation programs and existing and future
facilities. A Parks and Recreation Master Plan was completed in 1990, with an
update to this plan in 1996. To date, the city has initiated and/or implemented
priorities one (1) through four (4) of the Park, Recreation and Open Space Needs
Implementation of Priorities of the 1996 plan update.
Colleyville currently has 184 acres of park land, inclusive of 11 acres leased from
the Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District. With the continued
residential growth and population influx, the city will need to continue to provide
parks and recreation facilities to meet the needs of the community. In 1998,
Colleyville also completed the development of "Colleyville Pathways: A Citywide
Trail System Plan", which will provide an opportunity to incorporate a citywide
trail system plan into the its park inventory.
II. Purpose
The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is as follows:
A. To provide the framework for orderly and consistent planning and
development.
B. To provide detailed researched facts concerning the community
and the role of parks and recreation.
C. To establish priorities and statements of direction based on
researched and documented facts and a community based needs
analysis.
D. To provide direction in the area of acquisition and development of
, park land to meet future needs.
E. To conform to the preparation suggestions and/or guidelines for
Local Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plans prepared by
the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for Texas Recreation and
Parks Account local park grant program.
. ,
III. Goals and Objectives
Below are the goals and objectives for the Colleyville Parks and Recreation
Department:
A. Provide a parks and recreation program to meet the diverse needs
of the citizens of Colleyville.
1. Immediate and short term improvements of parks.
2. Long term planning of a parks system
3. Recreation facilities, opportunities, and programs for all ages
of the community.
B. Determine practical means of maintaining and upgrading existing
areas and facilities to a prescribed standard and purpose.
C. Acquire park land and develop outdoor recreational facilities,
including orderly development of existing park areas.
D. Enlist community interest by encouraging individuals and citizen
groups, funds, property, manpower and input for the development
and operation of parks and recreational facilities.
E. Provide new and traditional parks and recreation experiences for
current and future community residents.
IV. Scope of the Study
City staff will provide the following information and support in the preparation of
the Master Plan:
A. Supply Analysis
To identify the existing and potential parks and recreation
resources, facilities and programs provided to the citizens of the
community, staff will provide the following:
1.
2.
Public parks and recreation areas owned by the city.
Public parks and recreation areas leased by the city from the
Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District.
Joint use facilities with Grapevine-Colleyville Independent
School District.
Land that is targeted or proposed for dedication for parks,
recreation or open space.
Existing Youth Sports Associations and Organizations
i. Number of teams and children participating with each
association
3.
4.
5.
"
II. Facilities utilized by each Association
III. Projected annual growth of each Association
6. Existing recreation programs offered by the Parks and
Recreation Department and projected growth of programs.
B. Population
To determine the population characteristics of the community, staff
will provide the following:
1. Current and projected population and demographic data
The consultant will be expected to provide the following:
A. Standards Analysis
To compare parks and recreation resources to the nationally
accepted parks and recreation standards.
1. Determine park standards and principals, which will apply to
the nationally accepted parks and recreation standards.
2. Determine acceptable standards for this area.
B. Demand Analysis
1. A community needs assessment, based on a statistically
valid sample.
2. The holding of at least two (2) public hearings to assess
citizen input.
3. The development of focus groups to gather additional data
and input of the community needs assessment. Focus group
suggestions include youth, senior citizens and youth sports
associations.
4. Utilize standard analysis to determine needs.
5. Analyze recreation demand versus available facilities.
C. Agency Action Plan
To provide an agency action plan based on previous findings so that
a positive parks and recreation direction may emerge.
1. Development of a definitive program( s) for acquisition and
development of park land to meet future needs.
2. Development of a maintenance and operation analysis to
meet present and future needs.
3. Identify present and future recreational needs of the
community.
4. Development of planning maps coordinated with Planning
and Zoning, Economic Development, Parks and Recreation
and overall city planning.
5. Ordinance suggestions to implement the Master Plan, i.e.,
Park Land Dedication Ordinance
6. Identify grant resources to implement the Master Plan.
D. Expenditure Analysis
To provide an expenditure analysis presenting a financial cost
estimate for actions and suggested timeline.
E. Priority Criterion Analysis
To provide a priority criterion system.
V. Fees and Timing
The consultant should provide a realistic schedule for the completion of the study
and implementation of the recommendations identified therein, the city desires
that the cost estimate be given according to the time schedule provided for the
study.
The city requests that the study be completed by no later than September 1,
1999.
VI. Qualifications
The consultant will list all similar projects, or a maximum of ten (10) projects that
the firm has worked on, and specify who will be working on the study and their
qualifications including resumes. Additionally, a list of references will be required
listing a contact person(s) and a telephone number.
VII. Other
The purpose of this section is to allow the consultant an opportunity to explain if
there are additional factors, which should be taken into consideration to develop
the proposed study to meet the particular needs of the City of Colleyville.
VIII. Consultant Selection Process and Proposal Evaluation
City staff and representative(s) of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will
evaluate the submitted proposals and develop a short-list of firms. The short-list
firms will be requested to make oral presentations to the selection panel. The
selection panel will recommend one of the finalists to the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board and the City Council for final contract award.
'" -..
Proposals will be evaluated based upon the following criteria:
1. Content and technical approach and understanding of the scope of
the project.
2. Qualifications, background and prior experience of the firm in
conducting similar studies.
3. Overall project design and methodology.
4. Cost as compared with level of effort to be expended.
The city reserves the right to reject any and all proposals deemed in its best
interest.
IX. ContracUResponse Time
Three (3) copies of the proposal should be submitted no later than Wednesday,
January 20, 1999 to:
Dianne McWethy
Assistant City Manager
5400 Bransford Road
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Oral presentations will be scheduled during the time period of January 26 - 28,
1999. Following interviews, one firm will be selected and recommended for final
contract award. The target date for presentation to the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board is February 1st and to the City Council on February 16, 1999.
Questions regarding the scope of the assignment should be addressed to Dianne
McWethy, Assistant City Manager, at (817) 577-7575, extension 204.
() z
0 co ..... eft ell ".. Cot N ....0 0
<
:J (1)
en 3
c (): () O-i tT
;::;: 0 0 (1) II (1)
m ::l s:: (JI ~ ~\
:J ~ ::l cO' r
~ .... 2: ::l ~
s::
() Sl l>> ....
~ w
m o. w
.., ::l co
..... 0
(I) 0
.., ::l
m -
:J a
c.. Sl
(JI
OJ
c
..., c
co c
(I) i1
(IJ ....~
(IJ ......='
~
-------------------------------------------------------_.-.-
." fIi m
~ !II. !It.
0 3' 3'
::l II !!.
~ ii' lD
0.. 0..
<Jl () 0
i 0 0
::::I ::::I
c: ~ ~
0 c C
:::l n. n.
i ci" o'
""'C :::l ::l
m 0 en
0 Iii
CO 3 ;::I.
(I) -0 0
->. ~ II
o' ~
::::I
0 -
...
II ...
1if lB
m
'"U
..,
.9.
(I)
Sl
m
:J
CO
:J
(I)
(I)
:-1
()
::J'"
..,
(ii'
en
CD
c
Q:
CO
<-
C
:::l
........................................
o
n.
'1J
-
CD
;o~
CD m
(J) ::J
~~
a;o
o c
3 ::J
-m
3 ::J \
~a.
Ow
<"'0
CD m
3 ~
CD co
::J CD
~ ~
(J)
"..
:;
zg
~ III
i
...
'1J
m
~
"
o
lD
o
<-
AI
:::l
....
l!l.
.,,0
(D C
O'~
ell
...
~
!!l
>
'8W PBlu08 8SB81d 'UOnBWJOjU! IBUOn!ppB p88U JO SUo!lS8nb AUB 8AB4 nOA JI
'81BP 5Un88W lX8U a4llas 10U P!P aan!Wwo:> a41.
'Ma!AaJ 01 eawwwo:> 841 JOj SUBld IBnlda:>uo:> (€) aaJ4l dOlaAap II!M 'ss85Jns
~ JapB8 'aaJ1UnOH apAI8 ')jJBd pJOjSUBJS JO 5U!UUBld J81SBW a4l OlU! '8snOH
qq8M 841 SB 4:>ns 's8JnpnJ1S IB:>!J01S!4 jO asn 841 4:>JBaSaJ Ol ApBln:>!pBd 'SBIIBa
U! s)jJBd IB:>!J01S!4 jO sJn01 81!S-UO pnpuo:> II!M 88n!WWO:> 841 'AJBnUBr 5U!Jna
'UBld J81SBW 841 jO lU8wdolaA8p
84l JOj UBld B 8U!J8P 01 pUB )jJBd pJOJSUBJS jO S8sn 8Jnlnj pUB 1U8JJn:> AJ!lU8P!
01 ')jJOM jO ado:>s a41 Ma!AaJ 01 SBM 5unaaw a41 JO asodJnd a41. "aaU!WW08
UBld J81SBIN )jJBd pJOjSUBJS 841 41!M laW 'ss85Jns ~ J8PB8 '8aJ1UnOH apAIJ
'J8)jJBS 8aa pUB S5u!lI!S 8)j!1I\I 'JalPuaH 4:>!H
:SJaqw811\1 a8n!WWOJ
UBld JalsBII\I )jJBd pJOjSUBJS
:1.83rSnS
."^ 966 ~ 'Ll. Jaqwa:>8a
/'( ~ Ja5BuBII\I Al!8 lUB1S!SSV. 'A41aM81N aUUB!a
pJBOS AJOS!APV UOnBaJ:>aH pUB S)jJBd
: 31.Va
:II\IOH.:J
:01.
II\InONVHOll\l311\1