Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks and Rec Advisory Board-Agenda Packets-2/11/1999 TexaS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT . PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA February 11, 1999 7:00 p.m. Park Annex I. Discussion and Consideration of Consultant for the City of ColleyvilleParks and Recreation Master Plan Study II. Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Changes to City of Colleyville Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and Advertising Policy III. Discussion and Consideration of Glenwood, David Bagwell Development, and Park Related Issues IV. Citizen Comments/Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda* V. Staff Reports * (This time is allocated for citizens. to informally address the Board on matters not On the agenda that require nO formal action. Each presentation will be limited to a maximum of five (5) minutes. Board members may not respond to citizens who speak regarding matters not on the agenda.) . I ,..icy 'hatth. above a....a wa, po,'.. eo ... bulrello boa.. al City Hall 00 F."ua')' 5, '999 r~ c4~J~ 5109 Bransford Road P.O. Box 185 Colleyville, Texas 76034 656-PARK Metro: (817) 498-4749 Fax: (817) 577-1986 PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES February 11, 1999 Chair Bill Recker called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. on Thursday, February 11, 1999, at the Parks and Recreation office. ROLL CALL: Members: Chair Bill Recker, Laura Ann Travis, Ken Crooks, Mike Billings, Vince Rosen and Joe Noorlag Absent: Dan Witte and Alan Linford, G-CISD Liaison Staff: Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager, Barry LeBaron, Community Development Manager and Cynthia Singleton, Office Assistant Guests: David Bagwell, David Bagwell Development, Linda Baker and AI Zim I. Discussion and Consideration of Consultant for the City of Colleyville Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plan Mike Billings made a motion that the City retain Carter-Burgess to develop the Parks and Recreation Open Space Master Plan using Voluntary Park funds not to exceed $32,400, with a completion date of September 1, 1999. Vince Rosen seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous. II. Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Changes to City of Colleyville Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and Advertising Policy Dianne McWethy gave an overview of the proposed modifications to the Colleyville Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and Advertising Policy. Mike Billings made a motion to accept the proposed changes outlined in the Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and Advertising Policy agenda briefing, dated February 5, 1999. Ken Crooks seconded the motion and the vote was unanimous. III. Discussion and Consideration of Glenwood, David Bagwell Development, and Park Related Issues Barry LeBaron, Community Development Manager, provided an overview of Glenwood, the David Bagwell Development, which abuts the city-owned McPherson park site. David Bagwell, David Bagwell Development, reviewed the proposed development and answered questions. AI Zim made comments regarding this project. IV. Citizen Comments/Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda None V. Staff Reports VI. Adjournment i~ "",~ Texas PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA February 11, 1999 7:00 p.m. . Park Annex I. Discussion and Consideration ofConsult~ntfor the City of ColleyvilleParks and Recreation Master Plan Study II. Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Changes to City of Colleyville Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and Advertising Policy III. Discussion and Consideration of Glenwood, David Bagwell Development, and Park Related Issues IV. Citizen Comments/Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda* V. Staff Reports *(This time is allocated for citizens to informally address the Board on matters. not on the agenda that require no formal action. Each presentation will be limited to a maximum of five (5) minUtes. Board members may not respond to citizens- who speak regarding matters not on the agenda.) I c""fy t.at t.e a.oye age...a w.. posted 0. the .uUelI. boa,d at City HaU on F eb..a.. .; 19" f1 vd..... ~~ 5109 Bransford Road P.O. Box 185 Colleyville, Texas 76034 656"PARK Metro: (817) 498-4749 Fax: (817) 577-1986 MEMORANDUM DATE: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board ) Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manage~j February 5, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Request for Proposal for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Study At the February 1, 1999, Parks Board meeting Mike Billings, Ken Crooks, Laura Travis, Vince Rosen and Rich Hendler volunteered to serve on the selection panel for the Parks and Recreation Master Plan Study. City staff and the committee met on February 5 to develop a short-list of three (3) firms to make oral presentations to the selection panel on Tuesday, February 9. The short-list firms selected were: Carter & Burgess Huitt-Zollars Dunkin Sims Stoffels After the presentations, the selection panel will recommend one of the finalists to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and the City Council. The special meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will be held on February 11 at 7:00 p.m., at the Park Annex. This item will be placed on the February 16 City Council agenda for consideration. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. sponsorships for the spring 1999 season, which begins on March 27. The City Manager has sent the proposed modifications and request for consideration to the City Council. xx: Bill Kutka, President, Colleyville Girl's Softball Association Steve Houk, President, Colleyville Baseball Association Jim Cooley, President, Colleyville Soccer Association MEMORANDUM FROM: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board ) Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager ~ January 8, 1999 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan Study I am writing to provide you an update concerning the Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan Study. As per our discussions at the Board meeting, please note that the deadline for the submission of proposals has been changed to no later than Wednesday, January 2ih to provide adequate response time. On the basis of this change, the oral presentations for the finalist will be scheduled during the time period of February 3 - 5,1999. In order to meet the timeline for presentation to the City Council on February 16th, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will need to hold a special meeting for consideration of this item. Staff has tentatively considered February 8th for this special meeting. On February 1 st at the regularly scheduled Parks Board meeting, the Board would appoint their representative(s) to serve on the interview panel. Please review your calendar and provide me with any feedback regarding these proposed schedule changes at (817) 577-7589, extension 204. Thank you for your assistance with this request. xx: Cynthia Singleton, Parks and Recreation Assistant CITY OF COLLEYVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN STUDY REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL I. Introduction The City of Colleyville is soliciting proposals for a Comprehensive Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan study. The plan will address such topics as land acquisition and development, recreation programs and existing and future facilities. A Parks and Recreation Master Plan was completed in 1990, with an update to this plan in 1996. To date, the city has initiated and/or implemented priorities one (1) through four (4) of the Park, Recreation and Open Space Needs Implementation of Priorities of the 1996 plan update. Colleyvjlle currently has 184 acres of park land, inclusive of 11 acres leased from the Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District. With the continued residential growth and population influx, the city will need to continue to provide parks and recreation facilities to meet the needs of the community. In 1998, Colleyvjlle also completed the development of "Colleyville Pathways: A Citywide Trail System Plan", which will provide an opportunity to incorporate a citywide trail system plan into the its park inventory. II. Purpose The purpose of the Parks and Recreation Master Plan is as follows: A. To provide the framework for orderly and consistent planning and development. B. To provide detailed researched facts conceming the community and the role of parks and recreation. C. To establish priorities and statements of direction based on researched and documented facts and a community based needs analysis. D. To provide direction in the area of acquisition and development of park land to meet future needs. E. To conform to the preparation suggestions and/or guidelines for Local Park, Recreation and Open Space Master Plans prepared by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for Texas Recreation and Parks Account local park grant program. III. Goals and Objectives Below are the goals and objectives for the Colleyville Parks and Recreation Department: A. Provide a parks and recreation program to meet the diverse needs of the citizens of Colleyville. 1. Immediate and short term improvements of parks. 2. Long term planning of a parks system 3. Recreation facilities, opportunities, and programs for all ages of the community. B. Determine practical means of maintaining and upgrading existing areas and facilities to a prescribed standard and purpose. C. Acquire park land and develop outdoor recreational facilities, including orderly development of existing park areas. D. Enlist community interest by encouraging individuals and citizen groups, funds, property, manpower and input for the development and operation of parks and recreational facilities. E. Provide new and traditional parks and recreation experiences for current and future community residents. IV. Scope of the Study City staff will provide the following information and support in the preparation of the Master Plan: A. Supply Analysis To identify the existing and potential parks and recreation resources, facilities and programs provided to the citizens of the community, staff will provide the following: 1. Public parks and recreation areas owned by the city. 2. Public parks and recreation areas leased by the city from the Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District. 3. Joint use facilities with Grapevine-Colleyville Independent School District. 4. Land that is targeted or proposed for dedication for parks, recreation or open space. 5. Existing Youth Sports Associations and Organizations i. Number of teams and children participating with each association II. Facilities utilized by each Association III. Projected annual growth of each Association 6. Existing recreation programs offered by the Parks and Recreation Department and projected growth of programs. B. Population To determine the population characteristics of the community, staff will provide the following: 1. Current and projected population and demographic data The consultant will be expected to provide the following: A. Standards Analysis To compare parks and recreation resources to the nationally accepted parks and recreation standards. 1. Determine park standards and principals, which will apply to the nationally accepted parks and recreation standards. 2. Determine acceptable standards for this area. B. Demand Analysis 1. A community needs assessment, based on a statistically valid sample. 2. The holding of at least two (2) public hearings to assess citizen input. 3. The development of focus groups to gather additional data and input of the community needs assessment. Focus group suggestions include youth, senior citizens and youth sports associations. 4. Utilize standard analysis to determine needs. 5. Analyze recreation demand versus available facilities. C. Agency Action Plan To provide an agency action plan based on previous findings so that a positive parks and recreation direction may emerge. 1. Development of a definitive program(s) for acquisition and development of park land to meet future needs. 2. Development of a maintenance and operation analysis to meet present and future needs. 3. Identify present and future recreational needs of the community. " . 4. Development of planning maps coordinated with Planning and Zoning, Economic Development, Parks and Recreation and overall city planning. 5. Ordinance suggestions to implement the Master Plan, i.e., Park Land Dedication Ordinance 6. Identify grant resources to implement the Master Plan. D. Expenditure Analysis To provide an expenditure analysis presenting a financial cost estimate for actions and suggested timeline. E. Priority Criterion Analysis To provide a priority criterion system. V. Fees and Timing The consultant should provide a realistic schedule for the completion of the study and implementation of the recommendations identified therein, the city desires that the cost estimate be given according to the time schedule provided for the study. The city requests that the study be completed by no later than September 1 J 1999. VI. Qualifications The consultant will list all similar projects, or a maximum of ten (10) projects that the firm has worked on, and specify who will be working on the study and their qualifications including resumes. Additionally, a list of references will be required listing a contact person(s) and a telephone number. VII. Other The purpose of this section is to allow the consultant an opportunity to explain if there are additional factors, which should be taken into consideration to develop the proposed study to meet the particular needs of the City of Colleyville. VIII. Consultant Selection Process and Proposal Evaluation City staff and representative(s) of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will evaluate the submitted proposals and develop a short-list of firms. The short-list firms will be requested to make oral presentations to the selection panel. The selection panel will recommend one of the finalists to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and the City Council for final contract award. Proposals will be evaluated based upon the following criteria: 1. Content and technical approach and understanding of the scope of the project. 2. Qualifications, background and prior experience of the firm in conducting similar studies. 3. Overall project design and methodology. 4. Cost as compared with level of effort to be expended. The city reserves the right to reject any and all proposals deemed in its best interest. IX. ContracUResponse Time Three (3) copies of the proposal should be submitted no later than Wednesday, January 27, 1999 to: Dianne McWethy Assistant City Manager 5400 Bransford Road Colleyville, Texas 76034 Oral presentations will be scheduled during the time period of February 3 - 5, 1999. Following interviews, one firm will be selected and recommended for final contract award. The target date for presentation to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board is February 8 and to the City Council on February 16. 1999. Questions regarding the scope of the assignment should be addressed to Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager, at (817) 577-7575, extension 204. MEMORANDUM FROM: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board ) Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager~l' February 5, 1999 if TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Sponsorship and Advertising Policy - Proposed Changes On February 2 the City Council tabled the Parks and Recreation Department Sponsorship and Advertising Policy. As a follow-up to this meeting, Steve Houk, CBA President, and Bill Kutka, CGSA President, identified modifications to the proposed policy, which would meet the needs of the associations and the City. The proposed modifications are as follows: 1) Limit the maximum number of signs per field to eight (8); 2) Enter into an agreement for a one (1) year trail period; and 3) Consider property owners, abutting City Park, in placement of ball field signage. Since the associations will solicit the sale of signs and assume responsibility for installation, maintenance and removal of the ball field signs, at their expense, they feel that the proposed revenue allocation of 75% for the associations and 25% for the city is equitable. The proposed revenue split makes the project economically feasible for the associations and also continues to benefit the city. The associations plan to use the revenue from the sale of the signs to, not only offset registration fees, but also purchase equipment and provide for city approved park improvements, sports clinics and youth programs. The associations have requested considered of the proposed modifications at the February 16 City Council meeting to provide adequate time to solicit (Ce~ Texas PLANNING &. ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 8, 1999 Z-98-031 - Public Hearing to consider the request of David Bagwell to rezone approximately 237 acres of land from AG, R40 and R20 to i PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential. Located on the north side of McDonwell School Road, east of Herbert Street and west of Westcoat Road. Tabled Dec. 14, 1998 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS: During the latter part of 1998, Mr. David Bagwell submitted an application to rezone approximately 237 acres of land in the northwest portion of the city to a planned development for residential purposes with a church site and a major open space area. The property is generally west of the old McPherson Dairy property and north of McDonwell School Road_ The Planning and Zoning Commission considered this rezoning request at its December 14, 1998, but tabled action on the request to allow the applicant to provide additional information in response to citizen's concerns and from questions by the Commission. The following information was requested: · A traffic impact analysis. :re~~~ · An explanation about environmental issues. · An explanation of the drainage issues. The following information addresses the three major concerns raised by the Commission and includes additional information,related to the development of this property that should be considered by the Commission. 1. Traffic Study - One of the primary traffic concerns associated with this development involves the proposed routing of a new collector street through the development which connects McDonwell School Road with John McCain Road. Attached is a copy of the text portion of the traffic study completed by the consulting firm Kimley- Horn and Associates, of Dallas, Texas. The traffic study evaluated two different scenarios. One of the evaluations assumed that all existing and proposed traffic would remain on existing collector routes surrounding the proposed tract and the second evaluation assumed that 75 percent of the existing traffic would divert through the proposed development. According to the traffic analysis, the additional traffic generated by the proposed development would not have a very significant impacton the traffic system currently in place. The Pleasant Run Road/John McCain Road and Precinct Line Road/McDonwell School Road intersections are already operating poorly and both of these intersections should be considered for improvements in the near future. The traffic study suggests increasing the distance of Century Parkway through the development by creating a more "serpentine" route, which will help to discourage cut through traffic. Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 1 2. Environmental, Concerns ~ The second concern raised by the Commission at the December 14, 1998 public hearing was related to questionable environmental . issues. A portion of the 237 acre tract had been mined for sand and gravel in the 1960's with the mining operations ceasing in the 1970's. Dumping of construction debris is known to have occurred on this property. These two conditions raised questions about the suitability of this land for residential development. The developer secured the services of Reed Engineering Group from Dallas, Texas, to conduct a geotechnical investigation of the site as a prerequisite to obtaining financial assistance for development of this property. Attached is a copy of the geotechnical investigation regarding these issues. The study identifies the areas where construction debris was found and recommended excavation and soil replacement under controlled conditions will be necessary in these locations if development of structures is proposed over these areas. No hazardous materials were identified as part of the geotechnical investigation. 3. Drainage Issues ~ During the December 14, 1998 public hearing, citizens in the vicinity of this property expressed concerns about the runoff from this property when it becomes developed with rooftops, driveways and street surfaces. Attached is a memo from Mr. Jim Foster, Director of Public Services which addresses the drainage of the proposed Glenwood Subdivision. In summary, the property is situated in four different drainage basis. This situation will allow much greater flexibility for the developer's engineer to design drainage facilities. The site is adequate in size and has suitable terrain to support on-site detention, if necessary. Furthermore, it is the policy of the City of Colleyville to require drainage runoff conditions to not exceed the pre-development conditions. 4. Proposed City Park: The PUD-R regulations require 20% open space and the developer has shown an open space area as a city park in the northeast portion of the development. A portion of the proposed park area is within the location of the old sand and gravel mining operation and will require regrading and shaping of the tract to develop the area into useable park site. A meeting of the Parks and Recreational Advisory Board has been scheduled for February 11, 1999 to review this rezoning request and determine the suitability of the property for park purposes. 5. Phasing - A development containing 237 acres is a significant project and one that may involve some form of phasing by the developer. If the project is phased, the phases should be indicated on the plan so that major connections can be identified and constructed in a logical sequence to promote proper traffic circulation and to provide a looped water system for fire protection. ---. -- 6. Preliminary Plan - The zoning regulations state that a site plan may be required to include a drawing which is equal to that of a Preliminary Plan. A preliminary plat shows lot arrangements, lot dimensions, street circulation, etc. However, the documentation submitted so far is only in a conceptual plan format and only shows general land use arrangements. Staff is not opposed to the "conceptual" site plan approach so long as the locations of street connections with perimeter streets and with adjacent subdivisions can be identified. Approval of a conceptual site plan is a departure from the type of PUD submittals the City has approved in the past. Approval of the conceptual plan does not relieve the developer of the requirement to submit a preliminary plan Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 2 7. Lot Sizes and Overall Density - The developer's proposal request includes so~e lots as small as 13,000 s.f. with the average of all lots maintained at 16,000 s.f. Thi~-' is consistent with the PUD-R regulations. The developer indicates that the overall density of the development will not exceed 1.8 units per acre, but that certain areas may exceed the maximum density of 1.8 units per acre. The following table compares the "Glenwood" proposal with the PUD-R regulations contained in the Zoning Ordinance. 'oM ........H....._...m._._.~.._H_.._.__ ...M......... .H...._ ,.._.............._.__ .. _....M......._........._................ .-.-.-....._---_.~ -------...--.... ------.----- --_._-,---~._._- Min. Min. Min. Max. Min. Min. Front Rear Side Density Min. Lot Ave. Lot Lot Lot Bldg Bldg Bldg. Per Area Area Width Depth Line Line Line Acre P U D-R Regulations 13,000 16,000 1 00 ft. 120 ft. 30 ft. 25 ft. 10 ft. 1.8 D.U. s.f. s.t. "Glenwood" 13,000 16,000 80 ft. * 100 30 ft. 25 ft. 6 1.8 D.U. Proposal s.f. S.t. ft.** ft *** .H__ ...........-......-....-............. ..--- ..........,...-.......-...........--..... .._............_..__.........H.. ..._....__....___m_._....___ .__.___._"'___'_M. ..._._..__.....____h_. ..__~______ _..._______J Comparison of Lot Dimensions Lots with less than 16,000 s.f. may have 80 ft. lot widths. These lots will have extra depth to bring the area up to the 13,000 s.f. minimum. Lots with less than 16,000 s.f. may have 100 ft. lot depths. These lots will have extra width to bring the area up to the 13,000 s.f. minimum. *** Lots may have one side yard of 6 feet, provided the two side yards total not less than 20 feet. In addition, the distance between structures on adjacent lots must maintain a minimum separation of 20 feet. 8. Side Yard Set-backs - A ten foot side yard set-back is required in the PUD-R regulations. The developer is proposing to use a 6 foot side yard, provided that 20 feet of separation is maintained between structures. Staff has reservations about this approach because it can penalize a lot when the two adjacent lots utilize the 6 foot side yard opportunity and force the middle lot to have two 14' side yards. Recommendation: Since the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board will be meeting on February 11, 1999. the Commission may want to consider tabling action on this request to al'low the Parks Board to review the suitability of the proposed open space for recreational use. Table action until February 22, 1999 P & Z meeting. Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 3 General Proiect Information Sheet 1. Compliance With Master Plan: The Colleyville Master Plan shows this area to be a, ,- low density single family residential area. 2. Existing Land Use: The property is currently undeveloped. 3. Proposed Land Use: The submitted site plan shows the area to be developed as primarily single family residential with a church site on McDonwell School Road and a park site in the northeast corner of the development. 4. Surrounding Zoning: The property to the south is zoned RE, R-30 and AG. To the west, the property is zoned R-20 and AG. To the east, the property is zoned PUD-R. To the north, the property is zoned AG. The requested zoning change is compatible with current zoning in the area. 5. Density: The overall denisity will not exceed 1.8 units per acre. Portions of the development may have areas which exceed 1.8 units per acre as provided by the PUD- R regulations. 6. Thoroughfare Plan: This development has frontage on both McDonwell School Road and John McCain Road. McDonwell School Road is designated as a 2-lane Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Currently, McDonwell School Road is an existing 2-lane asphalt surface. John McCain road is also designated as a 2-lane Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Currently, it is a 2-lane asphalt surface road. The developer will be required to pay Perimeter Street Fees when the property is platted. The developer has the option of improving these roads to current city standards. Current standards for this type of road are a 40 foot wide roadway surface with curb and gutter and a minimum 60 foot wide right-of-way. 7. Parks Master Plan:The Colleyville Parks Master Plan, adopted in 1996, recommends that a neighborhood park be located in an area impacted by this proposed development. The developer is showing a park area of approximately 35 acres that will donated to the City of Colleyville for ultimate development as a public park. This is consistent with the Colleyville Parks Master Plan. 8. Open Space Requirement: The PUD-R regulations require the developer to reserve 20% of the development's area for open space. This development contains approximately 237 acres which requires an open space of 47.4 acres. The developer is showing an open space of approximately 35 acres. This is 12.4 acres below the minimum required by the PUD-R regulations. However, the regulations allow a the Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend a reduction in the open space area when there are other open space areas available in the vicinity of the project. The McPhereson Park property is adjacent to this development to the south. 9. Park Land Dedication: The Park land Dedication Ordinance, Section 12 of the Subdivision Regulations, requires dedication of one acre of parkland for every 36 residential dwellings or a cash payment of $1,260 per residential dwelling in lieu of the parkland dedication. This park land dedication is in addition to any open space requirement imposed by the PUD-R regulations unless the amount of open space Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 4 dedicated exceeds the 20% required. The proposed development does not exceed the 20% threshold to reduce additional park land dedication. . This development contains approximately 237 acres and after subtracting the 7 acre church site and the 35 acre park site, the balance of the project will contain approximately 195 acres for residential purposes. Assuming that the development will be developed at the overall density of 1.8 units per acre, this will produce approximately 351 new dwelling units. The parkland requirement of one acre of parkland per 36 dwelling units will require the developer to donate either 9.75 acres of parkland or make a payment of $442,260 to the city's park land fund. 10. Trail System Plan: The Colleyville Pathways Plan recommends extension of the trail system through this property. This will need to be incorporated into the final design of the project and be constructed by the developer. (see attached copy of proposed pathways plan) Agenda Item No. 4 - Page 5 ~. .f ~g~ ! '-; f'ff-::O: . R .\.",~o"'~.Q./ ~"'.... ~ ~~./ . . rl'~ ~"'~I-~~ 'U T ". ,t (, "Ii \L\:~ ~ ~ ,::;;L.I . J l'~! A-i~I"'\' II ~~~9'~.."".," tvr ( ~:J/~I ~ ~!/ /. v-,",\~ 1\~~"'::I\~JBb ~ C l,~~~:~I/ -?,/I,J::S'l~~\&~~.~ ~~ ~>" '\11"-" -.- ,r 1/ ~ \ ~~~ ~. -i.;;; ~ ...l . 1:\ :---...~ Q;">( '"' ~ 7' ,~j~ ~~ 1f ~. ~ '\ '" -.,~ o ~ l;J' ~~' '- ~ ff1 ~. ~ . II:' :-t >\~~\\V ~ ~~ ,- ''^ .. ,.g ~1m~ \~ %~ ~~'.~ I ~ ~T 0~ - ~b ~ J ~ (g i 7.<1Jt~ ....~~ " I P"*' :.r,~ ()" 'r~ .J ,c.J~ ~Ea ,,., !; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ r,> ~..~ ' ~., ,~ P 7 ~ ~ riZ 6 j ,\ '" i ~i ~ I ~. tli e '-' .- ~ ~ it' '. . ~W:7~ Ft'2.. -' ,I ", ( ~" If''~ '" ~ """~r~Hlll'IS~~ l!l .,j ~ ~ ~.i..--J'~.i'.~. ~ ;---:./,:a V~LC.~ t (~~J I ~ _ !~.~~ ~/"!~ ~~\'?;(? _ ~ 'j/ l3r ~n f ~ '.~~:~~~IA ~~ !~~;~f~/~~. ' r J.., "\ 0 ---- ~ ~_ \ ;' ~ ct ~/ E ( ~ Il!I ---- ~) .,.( M"\ '-=;::"- ; ; . ~ !!.~ " \I....... /-:::: ~~if)(' "~':s:M ~~ < V=..c::::::::. M1F--. ,. -it \.'- "( ~=./~ ~ . J ~ 'n." >.,'-d.,.i . ~-...s:M ~ ~ ~- /" . r1\ D 1i:I . ~-.)-Y' / / . ~i ../il U ~fI( 1 . ' . ~~ - ~ ( ~. - ---- ' I J.i=~ ' ......-.........."" . ><17"" ~ LJ. ::::--......~"\ i b{ 5? ~ ~ ::;.) I \. ~ .....- A' [.Y- ~ \. q - .~: ~)~f . '-~ ~Jij~h~~f? '~\~ D ,ilfti?IW / ~~J(, ~ -~~~~~~ i./'S r1X ~I r0 v;~'"<JS~~;'\~-i //1 ii, ,tt r\~-i.: ~ ... '" /" y- ~ j \0 .......' "' '\;;::. ..-- ~ ;.-:: /.:2}.-bZi~~"/ ~~ " ~ ,,~~. '" .~ c::--- ~. ~T :r~P--~~/ _ ~F ,'-.. ~:r',,-"'" 1'--.. ~ ~.A~''':::>.r JA.... ')) r ""1: "-':::,... . ~~./ij".....F" -2/ . r . l-- I'-')} ..i.._ ~ y~~v ~ -' i. e::,. -=i 1-rI\ 1D ...-......, .r-t- "" Q -< .. J1 II'..~ n T /""". J.-..' -1<.. i.J l..~ J F-~ 4 i", ,,..h. r- /--'"":::.....:. I ~ ~ it;2 J'__ . ~ -....: ;;JIf...; l2. . ~U' -PC.\j .'\, . /"-_ ~,.;.a..tJ ~ ~ F-'"' .......~""N'~ ""'I--. A ~.....!!g ~ (~<-=::;; -....::: ~ ~ --=... - 0 1f"~~ -:: :j' :.:-. ~r--- _________ -f>o ~ ~~ r" .. -=-::-::~ _' w ... =..-- ~ - ""I f ~s:" 'lJ' '> J ~=-: ~' ~~ .V'I(, .0;:" rl'-''l'';;;B :-- .' ~./ ~:r .\ II:l ~ ~ ~ . - ~._ _- ;;--...- =---=--- ~ ~t--....i:- \.., .J.! ..-1'V -an' , ~ ~ ~ ~"~~ ~ '--~~~ ~ / ~///. _~. "!'-. ~ .'-.........-.. _l;;;;.~.r -.. _ II ~~, EB Q Oj~ .. O~~ " ~ ~~; ~ z :3$:~ ~ ry1 !;: t..:l ~ w..J U..J -J ~ 0 . OUU. C - ......a ~ A: .tJ --t.a .... '" >- Z <( ~ ~ 8 ~ m :j '!l., w z < ~ .." " ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~,o (5 ~' ~ !- ~ " .,. o Q.. Q i... Q. :~:: U:~F?.:~';:" m~r :-:.:.:' f f ~ ~ ~ ..... ..~_.......... .. .. . .._........ u...._.......... .. . :rih\rU\~~~~~~ ~ ...................... 2 'or o 1 t ., . .I I I t -' , l . t \ -'!---~..-., . ~ l: L\ I ,\ n I 2/2 " """ - iT 1 il ..._\ ./~~ J ..~,.--- -------- --;~~_: ~I " . ,f ",,!-,:: ..-.... ~ .~,' 2/2 l-- ..., '" " ",' , , , U' I , t, ---; :. ..f 1~ ~ f ~~~~~2:~ ~rim 2/2 ........ . . I . II N. .... f'l h '(\\ ~ ..: I ; " , . t\~H~~:~~~ ~~~~~~ ::: ~ ~ :::: : : : : : : : : : : : E:::::::::: :::::: .......-----.......----... "Glenwood" relative ,to the Colleyville Thoroughfare Plan L '~ Ii: F ~,~ ~~~~"~ 2/2 l .----- , ,~ , , , \ " ,j '.: -- ~ ~ ~ --~---'~ ' -- -------- ---------E~ :::: > ~~ -:.-~r~ ~~:~~~~~Tmmn~ .~ o '!. ~--.1 CRJo ..' NOTES "f6 P-;l/'lcs Mils te,r pi;;!/! I. Plan CI reflects those Iy ot Colleyvlll pal c. Ph 2. Please rete Recreation ~ to Plate : of open oster Pial locations sgtce opportu private po Schrickel R . Landsca ,olllns a d pe Architecture . PI . n Associate annlng . E . S ngmeering , Inc. II ,. . III III III III III III ..:' :":.- \"!j \ \}. s 'J's t~nI To: Barry LeBaron, Community Development Manager From: Jim Foster, Director of Public services' e ~ Subject: Glenwood Addition Drainage Date: February 1, 1999 David Bagwell has submitted a request for a zoning change on approximately 237 acres in northwest Colleyville. The property is currently undeveloped and. has been used as farmland, except for approximately 40 acres which was previously mined for gravel and sand_ Much of the area is identified in the "Soil Survey of Tarrant County, Texas" as a "Silstid loamy, fine sand." This deep, gently sloping, sandy soil is located on high stream terraces and the side slopes of ridges. Typically, the surface layer is loamy fine sand about 27 inches thick. The upper part of the subsoil, from a depth of 27 to 67 inches, is sandy clay loam that has yellowish red and red mottles. The lower part of the subsoil, from a depth of 67 inches to 74 inches, is reddish yellow fine sandy loam that has red and strong brown mottles. This soil is well drained. Permeability is moderate, and available water capacity is medium. Surface runoff is slow, and the hazard of water erosion is slight. The hazard of soil blowing is severe when the soil is bare of vegetation. The Silstid soil is well suited to most urban areas. The main limitation is corrosivity to . uncoated steel and concrete. This soil is moderately suited to most recreation uses, soil blowing being the main limitation. This soil can produce an abundance of woody and herbaceous plants. Paralleling the ill-defined streambed of Beddo Creek, a soil type identified as "Gasil fine sandy loam" dominates much of the remainder of the subject property. It has many of the same characteristics as the "Silstid," except erosion potential is greater. This soil is well suited to most urban uses, although low strength and erosion potential are considerations in the design of urban developments. This soil is also well suited to most recreation uses. Slope is a limitation for playgrounds_ The drainage area of the 237 -acre Glenwood Addition is actually divided into four sub-basins. Detailed studies of this area have been cOmmissioned by the City's Engineering Department. Following is a preliminary analysis of the drainage associated with the Glenwood Addition. The northwest portion, approximately 69 acres, drains northward into Keller. The southwest portion, approximately 35 acres, drains southward into the City of Hurst, ultimately entering Little Bear Creek in that city. The central portion, approximately 45 acres, drains southward into the channel that has been preserved and enhanced as part of the Remington Park Addition. The eastern o ,.. . f t1 crtCje A ,. ctl'f S; S portion, approximately 115 acres, drains northeasterly toward John McCain Road and ultimately into Big Bear Creek. . The volumes of surface water generated by these areas under existing conditions are estimated as follows: Drainage Area Acres I. Q. 1100 Q100 In/hr cfs inlhr cfs A 69 5.6 155 9.6 331 B 35 5.6 78 9.6 168 C 45 5.6 101 9.6 216' D 115 5.6 258 9.6 552 Drainage Area "A" flows northward into several existing stock ponds before reachin Big Bear Creek in Keller. Drainage Area "B" flows southward toward McDonwell School Road. but being relatively small, its crossing of that roadway will be minor in impact. Drainage Area "C" flows southward into the system in Remington Park, a development that was designed to accept these overland flows. Drainage Area "D" is potentially the most problematic of these four. At least 40 acres of Drainage Area "0" has been previously mined for gravel and sand. Much of this drainage area is occupied by soil type "Gasil fine sandy loam." Being the largest of the four drainage areas, and initially being designated as future open space and/or park land, the drainage area has great potential for surface water detention or retention. It seems probable that the amount of water crossing John McCain Road can be held to pre-development conditions, or even reduced due to this detention. As engineering plans are developed. this detention feature will be incorporated into the design. Inasmuch as the majority of the Glenwood Addition is relatively high in elevation when compared to the surrounding properties and considering the size of this development, I believe that drainage can be easily accommodated and will potentially become an aesthetic enhancement to the area. r.._o._oo. Cl,,"~ . wz~ t-.:I,.../j r.//. ~ "'-.........r--,.TO~ lL. ./"'- L II ~ :.r rl ~ \)\~'r 9;::--__~ v 7'>(.Y:!:..L "\ ';, .~ ~I ,(~\~ ~:.\( C I ( \~~~~._ ~ ;~ :'1\'1 ~~.~;')1~ ~l ~\ '~~f3::2..:~~~ =. I( . ~ ~di~~--k '~~ V~~\\iS~~ ~" ~ \~ \~;::;~------~ ,'/ Pr~\~~~~~ 1\ '- ~ ,,- l vi\. \ ~ 0; ~~ l \'fIr- I p~ -=~ ~5' ~ '"' '-- ~ ~ r-----g~ -:::::\~\'-.. \.. '--.-So ! 'i~;~ .(l;4li~' ))~ ~~~ : 5 ~-- --- ~ ts . V.I\. ~ -)- -- 'I '/ '~ .~ .~~~ ~~ . '5~~ ~~ ~ ft;~cr5 ~ ~ ~ ~I ~~ to... ...I~N~)'-- ~ ~ :;r~ ~ 5-')U I .Ir...'-;.J, r.- ~ ~ v~ ~ z.Jf,) r.f)r-]l\~ I', \'(. ~_ l:f~~ ..k'~ .; ~ -'Q y '-;,,'.:;,<' C, r;-\." . I ~_ ~~~~ 'J ~ . ~., ~j, ''''''''~~~ ~ ~ '[ c; ~,.- A'/ 'O~_: .. r...: ~ ~ ), ~~~t f ;/~~ ~LGPA~f/rr:i _ _LrlC "";~~ './j'(;: --..::... ">Y~../.J u.I.~.... --)\'\:::l"?~"J rft~,~ v~ ~~~~~.~ '~fY~ j~!l:f/L ~ PJ. ';}fll!I "::: ~ J . '! ~ ~ ~' ~ ~/ "Ef \ . TIll ~_/ /' ~;=:zt3 ~ d')d ~ ~ ' Vi ~~--=c 'D ~~ ~~")<'-' ,~'K~~ ,'"' '""""'~ <1.- /'~~ -.J;~... '" ~ f--..~~~,-.: ?r::- y n ~c::. (~~ ~~~,-Ir t~~~ ~}l1 - I..l'~'. RJ ,~ '"f....y /: ~ .~ yl \.., (j !.RJ \:: If' - ~,X ~ '" " ~ ~ i:.7\i fr' ~..>-;:-~ ,/ (') N. -=~ I~ ;';~7< -: ~~~~~D ~~f~~n~\lt ~ l?' ~~ ~ = ,\ kS <)~~ In IIB~~ ~"" ~~ ".A ;,' \ ",. t\~4 (' ), . \2 ~';O"7 "..... . u ~ ,,\'., '\~.:h--~ ' W!J~ ~~h~e,~ --' ?--'~ ' ~ -"l.~l,iv, ,,~ 1\ A~ ~~ ~ '?/- /'. ~ _~ ~-.. ~\~ ~~,\~ '\ '}" ~ '/I,~ ~ ~)I '\ r I~'~ " ,At: "Y ~~ /" .- ........J)\. ~'J+i'\ ~ -~l""" ~~ l';~ct L- ~ ~D ","..<--101'11 '0, ~ 'P ")k'<t;~ J:Z n v ~~ r-L- . ~..::-jl .[, I'tSl ~ ~ $- g~i.....h. _' _,-... '-'/, ;:; " J(U ~ r- -"'- I !i? '- ~ ".d' f..- ~_. . [~~" ~ .~ r> !5 ~ .. ../ P -. '- ......-~"',...,,- 'c::- . S""J /::i::: "" '''--:---- J ~ '- ,-= / !...- j - ( ~ r:::::=-'./" ~ ~ -:;>:....- T./.~ v-t...".... __ ~-::: _ 0 ~'Jtri Ir~ ~~~-- - ~ ~ '.-- "'-- --- Z L :~" I --""\ j ..... ~ ./v ldlC'o ~~ ) ~ _ ~ ~~" 1'---1 '1 tiS;, ~ ~ ~'-S.~\--Cr;""~ -----~:x..t:I " ~'~( ~~::"~- ~~{~~:.~~ ......... I. ~ ~ >- z < ~ F: 8 ~ 9 :l !:I.. UJ "' ~ ::= w.. t.J ~ I:! :i ~ ~ 9 g ~ > .~ ~ , .~ t- Il~i, EB o o j~ ...x O t.ol t.rJ ~~. . ~ c -, zt.rJ_ :)..JCi Z. ..Jd! <>~ r.' t [;j """""l t.ol...J , !i...J --.....l 00 uu o , . ~' ~\_:i., .~ ~ 11 .', 'l-.. .' '., : .~. . j Le- , J0 '\. ~~ 6) )O~ , "~ t1 Drainage Area Acres I, Q,. 1100 0100 In/hr cfs inlhr cfs A 69 5.6 155 9.6 331 ~ B 35 5.6 78 9.6 168 ~ Co: C 45 5.6 101 9.6 216 0 258 9.6 MEMORANDUM DATE: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board ) Dianne McWethy. Assistant City Manage~' February 5, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Parks and Recreation Manager - Monica Sue Walsh I wanted to inform you that Monica Sue Walsh has accepted the position as the Parks and Recreation Manager for the City of Colleyville. She plans to begin her employment with the city of February 22. Monica has served as the Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation for North Richland Hills since 1994. She served as the Project Manager for the state's first municipal family water park, "NRH20 and is responsible for new capital improvement projects such as the Tennis Center and Soccer Complex. We are looking forward to having Monica as a member of the Management Team. Attachment MONICA SUE WALSH, CLP 6880 Hickory Hollow Lane, North Richland Hills, Texas' 76180, 428-0643 (Home) 581-5761 (Office) EXPERIENCE , , ' .' ~ . I' . Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation -: City of North Richland Hills,Texas June 1994 - Present Admini$tration and management of all community services in recreation, athletic;:aquatic, tennis' and senior adult programs and facilities of the city. Personnel management of over fifty regular' city employees and hundreds of numerous volunteers: ' Responsible for the prep'aration !'Ind", .,' administration of a maintenance and operations budget of approximately $2 million 'annually. Assisted in a park development capital improvement program in excess of $40million. " Responsible for long range planning efforts and policy development in coordination with the Parks and Recreation Board under the direction of the City Adrninistration and City CounciL' Assisted in the development of the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open'Master'Plan, City/School Cooperative Agreement, ,and responsible for a successful,' dedicated ,: sales tax ' , referendum for park and recreation facility development. I served as the 1997 National Iron Kids Bread Triathlon Race Director which included organization of 550 volunteers who worked more than 4,600 hours total. Over 360 youth ' participated traveling as far away as Korea. Served as Project Manager for the state's first municipal family water park. "NRH20'~ is a $8 million enterprise facility with water slides, wave pool, "endless river", and children's leisure pool. Also served as Project Manager for Richland ,Tennis Center and Athletic 'Complex which was a joint development with the ,local school district. Other projects developed include a community park/soccer complex, handicapped accessible playground built by volunteers, and' fast pitch softball complex. Future projects include a baseball, athletic complex. The City of North Richland Hills was the first city in Northeast Tarrant County to implement" innovative "youth at risk" programming, including school site based programs, dances 'and tdps. Recreation Manager - City of North Richland Hills, Texas September 1992 - June 1994 Responsible for. new capital' improvement projects including 'maintenance, operation and programming related to parks and recreation such as Family' Water Park, TenhisCenterarid Soccer Complex, Assisted in preparing Texas Parks and Wildlife Grant applications for' recreation facilities. Coordinated and administered Community Development, Block Grants related to Parks and Recreation projects. Project Manager for renovation of Community Center, ," Dan Echols and Bursey Senior Adult Centers. ' -. - ' Recreation Coordinator - Cityof North Richland Hills, Texas October 1987 - January 1989 ' < ' Monica Sue Walsh Page 2 Recreation Superintendent - City of North Richland Hills,Texas January 1989 - September 1992 Administration and supervision of all recreational and athletic programs,'facilitf~s"ands't~ff.:' ' Budget preparation, facility planning, policy development and implementation; interaction 'with' ", community service organizations. Responsible for the addition of a Se'nior Adulfcenter through',:'~' joint funding from the city and Community Development Block Grant Prograrrf.:' ' / .-. " , . " " Respon'sible for management and supervision of the Community: Cente'r; huma';",; serVi~es programs, and the development of adult' athletic' programs, ,,' R.ecru.itment~nd contracting .'of recreation program instructors as well as' training ,and contracting " ,of: sports ':6fficials':, Development of athletic program policies and guidelines. Marketing ofleisurese'rvicesand organization of special events. Facility and program planningfor'a new 381000 square foot ,'" community recreation center. Development and management of contracts for, youth, sports associations using city facilities. Developed first extensive recreation program for the 'City. of North Richland Hills. ' , , Recreation Superintendent - City of Burleson, Texas October 1986 - October 1987 ' Developed recreation, athletic aquatic and senior adult programs..' Supervised all' employees, , instructors, officials and recreational staff. Prepared budget forthese programs. Implemented the first recreational and athletic programs for the City of Burleson. Assistant Recreation Supervisor - City of Fort Worth, Texas April 1985 - October 1986 , , Performed necessary work in coordinating, developing and directing the programmed activities~ of a recreation community center. Coordinated youth, athletic' special events for eleven recreation centers. Recreation Instructor...;.., City of Fort Worth, Texas August 1981 - April 1985 , , Planned, organize'd and scheduled a 'wide variety of recreatlonala~tivities including special, ' events. Instructed classes in pre-school, exercise and conditioning for adults. Recreation Aide - City of Fort Worth, Texas December 1980 - August 1981 I .,' Programmed recreation activities, prepared reports and performed, maintenance work: as ' required. Supervised free play activities and walk-in usage of community center. , EDUCA TION Monica Sue Walsh Page 3 . ", ' Pool Manager/Swim Instructor/Lifeguard -' Panthe'r goys June 1975 - August 1981 , Swimming pool manager, swim instructor and lifeguard at'Panther Boys Club. R~s'pcmsi~iIIties, , included lifeguard supervision, scheduling, fee collection, coordination and fnstruCtionof ~wim classes, supervision of pool maintenance and patron safety. Developed swim team ,which, competed on a statewide basis. ' , , , , University of North Texas Bachelor of Science, August 1986 Recreation Administration Minor in Business Administration PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS National Recreation and Parks Association Certified Leisure Professional Texas Amateur Athletic Federation State Softball Commissioner, 1993 -1994 State Suspension 'and Review Committee, 1992 -:- 1994 State Youth Sports Committee, 1993 - 1994 ' State Games of Texas Liaison Committee, 1990 -:- 1993 . ~ " Texas Recreation and Parks So~iety Member since 1980 TRAPS Awards Committee, 1995 - present TRAPS CEU Committee Chair,1998 TRAPS Legislative Committee, 1987 TRAPS Ways and Means Committee, 1986 - 1987 TRAPS Region 6 Representative for STRAPS, 1986 -1987 TRAPS Region 5 & 6 Conference Committee, 1985,- 1986,1998 ' NRPA Conference, Special Events Committee, 1985 TRAPS Conference, Committee Chair for Student Involvement, 1984 Amateur Softball Association Deputy Commissioner, Metro Fort Worth National Youth Sports Research Committee, Northern Kentucky University' National Youth Sports Coaches Association Texas Coordinator, Hook A Kid on Golf Program, 1993 - Present District Coordinator, 1992 - Present . Chapter Director, 1990 - 1992, Monica Sue Walsh Page 4 ACTIVITIES AND HONORS Profession'al: 1998 National Parks and Recreation Association "Gold Medal Award" Finalist 1998 Texas Recreation and Park Society "Lone Star Programming Award" ReCipient 1998 Texas Recreation and Park Society "Park Design Excellence Award" 1998 Texas Amateur Athletic Federation "T.A.A.F. Region 4 Decade Award" 1997 National Parks and Recreation Association "Gold Medal Award" Finalist 1997 Texas Recreation and Park Society "Gold Medal Award" Recipient I ~ . ..1 1997 Tennis Industry Association Municipal Facility of the Year Richland Tennis Center 1996 Athletic Business Magazine "Facility of Merit" - NRHzO 1996 Texas Recreation and Park Society "Lone Star Programming Award" Recipient 1996 Texas Recreation and Park Society "Promotional Award" Recipient " I." 1996 Texas Recreation and Park Society , "Innovations in Park Design and Development Award" Recipient 1996 Texas Recreation and ParkSociety "Park Design Excellence Award" Recipient ' 1994 Nominee for Fort Worth Star Telegram "Woman of the Year" , 1994 Texas Recreation' and Park Society "Young Professional Award" Recipient 1994 Texas Recreation and Park Society, "Lone Star Programming Award" Recipient Professional: (Continued) Monica Sue Walsh Page 5 ACTIVITIES AND HONORS 1994 Texas Recreation and Park Society "Service Club Award" Recipient 1994 Texas Recreation and Park SoCiety "Gold Medal Award" Recipient , 1993 National Youth Sports Coaches Association State "District Coordinator of the Year" , 1993 National Youth Sports Coaches Association National "District Coordinator of the Year" 1993 American Association of Retired Persons ' "Woman of the Year" 1993 Texas Amateur Athletic Federation "President's Award" Recipient 1992 National Youth Sports Coaches Association State "Chapter Directorof the Year" 1992 National Youth Sports Coaches Association "Chapter Productivity Award" 1992 National Youth Sports Coaches Association "Most Improved Chapter Award" 1990 Texas Amateur Athletic Federation "Member City Award" Recipient Public Speaking Presentations: National Recreation and Parks Association National Conference ',' Texas Recreation and Parks Society Region V and VI Workshops . North Texas Recreation Association Meetings, ' , National Youth Sports Coaches Association National Conference National Youth Sports Coaches Association Clinician Training Video' " .1".. Continuing Education: National Recreation and Parks Association Western Revenue Management School' Texas Amateur Athletic Federation Sports Management School ' , Leadership Northeast, Northeast Tarrant County Chamber of Commerce