HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks and Rec Advisory Board-Agenda Packets-4/3/2000
City of
Texas
AGENDA
NUMBER
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
. I
J>ARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
, ,
- -. - ,
PARKS AND RI;CREATIONADVISORY BOARD AGENDA,
Monday, April 3; 2000
7:00 p.m.
For the meeting conducted atthe park Annex
located at 5109 Bransford Road' ,
AGENDA ITEM
Call to Order
Approval ofthe March 6, 2000 Minutes
Discussion and Consideration of David Bagwefl's Request Re[ated to
McPherson. Park Development
Discussion and Consideration of Proposed McPherson Park Master, Plan
Discussion and, Consideration of Amending the Parkland Dedication
Ordinance
Discussion and Consideration of Approval for thel)se of Parkland
Dedication Monies, in the Amoynt of $35,000, to Purchase Trail Right-of-
Way for the CottOnbelt Trail ' '
Recreation, Athletics, TennIS and Seniors' Report
, '
Park Operations and Capital Improvement Statlls Report
Citizen Comments/Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda*
Other I nformationalltems
Adjournment
, ' ,
, *(This time is allocated for citizens to informally address the Board on lTIattersnot on the agenda that requir&noformal
action. I;ach presentation wm be limited to a maxi,mum of five (5) minutes. Board, members may not respond to citizens
who speak regarding rriattersnot on the agenda.) , ' , .
5109 Bransford Road
P.O. Box 185
, CQlleyville, Texas 76034
656-PARK
Metro: (817) 498-4749
Fax: (817) 517.1986
I certify that the above agenda was posted onthe bulletin board at City Hall on March 29. 2000
CitY~f
\~,
Texas
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES
Monday, March 6,2000
7:00 p.m.
Chairman Rich Hendler called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. on Monday, March
6, 2000 at the Parks and Recreation office.
Roll Call:
Members: Rich Hendler, Roger Nelson,
Karen Birkes, Vince Rosen, Dan Witte, Joe
Noorlag, Steve Magee and Mayor Pro Tern
Nelson Thibodeaux
Absent:
Ken Crooks.
Staff:
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager,
Monica Sue Walsh, Parks and Recreation
Manager, Craig Dishman, Recreation
Supervisor and Cynthia Singleton, Office
Assistant
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of the February 7, 2000 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Minutes
Vince Rosen moved and Joe Noorlag seconded the motion to approve the
February 7, 2000 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board minutes. The vote was
unanimous.
3. Discussion and Consideration of the Parkland Dedication Ordinan<;e
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager gave an overview of the Parkland
Dedication Ordinance. . Joe Noorlag, Roger Nelson, and Steve Magee agreed to
serve on a subcommittee to review the current provisions and fee structures of
Park Land Ordinance 0.;.98-1129 and provide a recommendation to the Board and
the City Council.
5109 Bransford Road
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034
, 656-PARK
Metro: (817) 498-4749
r-...~.. 10>4 -,0\ ~-,-, -c nnc
. '
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes
March'6, 2000
4. Recreation, Athletics, Tennis and Seniors' Report .
Craig Dishman, Recreation SuperVisor, provided ,an overview of the current and
proposed recreation programs and Clctivitiesavailable to the citizens of
Colleyville and surrounding areas.
5. Park Operations and Capftallmprovement Status Report
Monica Sue Walsh, Parks and Recreation Manager, presented a status report of
current projects.
6. . Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda* .
7. ' Otherhlformatiorialltems
8.. Adjournment
, .
At 8:45 p.m. Dan Witte moti(:med to adjourn, Joe Noorlag seconded and the vote
: was unanimous.
2
DRAFT
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
MINUTES
Monday, March 6, 2000
7:00 p.m.
Chairman Rich Hendler called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. on Monday, March
6, 2000 at the Parks and Recreation office.
Roll Call:
Members: Rich Hendler, Roger Nelson,
Karen Birkes, Vince Rosen, Dan Witte, Joe
Noorlag, Steve Magee and Mayor Pro Tern
Nelson Thibodeaux
Absent:
Ken Crooks
Staff:
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager,
Monica Sue Walsh, Parks and Recreation
Manager, Craig Dishman, Recreation
Supervisor and Cynthia Singleton, Office
Assistant
1. Call to Order
2. Approval of the February 7, 2000 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
Minutes
Vince Rosen moved and Joe Noorlag seconded the motion to approve the
February 7, 2000 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board minutes. The vote was
unanimous.
3. Discussion and Consideration of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager gave an overview of the Parkland
Dedication Ordinance. Joe Noorlag, Roger Nelson, and Steve Magee agreed to
serve on a subcommittee to review the current provisions and fee structures of
Park Land Ordinance 0-98-1129 and provide a recommendation to the Board and
the City Council.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes
March 6, 2000
4. Recreation, Athletics, Tennis and Seniors' Report
Craig Dishman, Recreation Supervisor, provided an overview of the current and
proposed recreation programs and activities available to the citizens of
Colleyville and surrounding areas.
5. Park Operations and Capital Improvement Status Report
Monica Sue Walsh, Parks and Recreation Manager, presented a status report of
current projects.
6. Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda*
7. Other Informational Items
8. Adjournment
At 8:45 p.m. Dan Witte motioned to adjourn, Joe Noorlag seconded and the vote
was unanimous.
2
Oty of
Co//eyvi//e Parks and Recreation Department
_-Mt
--
Meeting Agenda #
4/03/00 3
Department:
Subject:
Parks and Recreation
Discussion and Consideration of David Bagwell's Request Related
to McPherson Park Development
See Attached
ACT10N TO BE TAKEN
D Discussion Only
D Information Only
o Procedural Change
at Possible Oty Coundl Policy Recommendation
Page~of~
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board /
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager~
March 30, 2000
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Discussion and Consideration of David Bagwell Request Related to
McPherson Park
On March 3, 2000, David Bagwell, of the David Bagwell Company, submitted a
preliminary and final plat request (P-00-022) for Glenwood Addition. The
proposed plat shows an SO-foot right-of-way on the city-owned property of
McPherson Park. (See attached). On March 24, 2000, the city received a
proposal from Mr. Bagwell to build a road along the West Side of the park. As
per the attached letter, he states that the road would be built at his expense,
which would save the community more than $200,000. According to Mr.
Bagwell, this road would also facilitate the selling of an elementary school site
within Glenwood to the Keller Independent School District. (See attached letter).
Barry LeBaron, Community Development Manager, will review this proposal at
the meeting. Mr. Bagwell will also be provided an opportunity to provide
information and answer questions. Since Karl Von Bieberstein, of Jackson,
Newman, Bieberstein, assisted the City with the development of the McPherson
Park Master Plan; he has prepared comments for consideration.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
817,577.7589, extension 204.
Attachments:
Map of proposed plat and McPherson Park
David Bagwell letter of March 24, 2000
Comments provided by Karl Von Bieberstein, of Newman, Jackson Bieberstein
JDA '-'liD BAGVlELL
COMPANY
March 24, 2000
Mr. C. Robert Stripling
City Manager
City of Colleyville
P.O. Box 185
Colleyville, Texas 76034
Dear Bob;
The last Mcpherson Park plan that I sa,\' had a street running from near the
southeast corner of the park land north from McDon"vell School Road through
the southeastern quadrant of the park and then curving to the northwest and
ternlinating at surface parking in the northvvestern quadrant.
As a part of our Glenwood development, we propose to build a similarroad
along the west side 0 f the park. This road would apparently accomplish the
same purposes as the other road, and it \vould use a similar amount 0 f park
land. However, it would be built a t our expense, saving the community ,vhat
our engineer estinlates to be more than $200,000.00. It vvould also facilitate our
selling a n elementary school site within Glenwood tha t the Keller IS D is
interested in. -
I would like to present this idea to the City Council and request that vve be
given the next available opportunity to do so.
David S. Bagwell
DSB I js
COV~'I1UNlTY DEVELOPMENT
8222 DOCiGL....S AVF..
Sum; 770
D,...u,...s, TE-x...s 75225
214 368-7711
MITRO 817 540-5500
F...x 214 368-7740
r ..'-Ie:...
Newman, Jllek,,()ll, Hie.berBtein
Land~elilw Anhitecture
Bonne( J>lor.e North
12770 Coil Rood, Suite 210, Dol\os, Texo~ 75251
tel: 972,233.2033 fox: 972,233.2022
VIA FACSJMILR & MAll.
M .m,:h ~),(l" 2000
Ms, MonIca Walsh
Park-:; and I{cl,;n.:ation Manager
Clly ot'Coll<.:yvilk:
1',0, Box 1~5
Colk'yvlllc TX 76034
RF.: COLLEYVILLE - McPHERSON IJARK
RF.V1F.W OF GI.ENWOOD DEVELOPMENT
Monica:
Per your request, we have evaluated the road ali b'TIlll (.:nl through Mc'Ph\"T~(m Park as pnlpost,,;J hy the
Preliminary Plat ofthe Glenwood D~:vclopmenl. We ~ec both advamagcs and di~ad....aT1lages in thi"
al1gnnwTlI related to McPherson Park and would offer the following comments;
1, The most obvious a.dvantage is that the city will get a roadway in the park at another's expense,
<llthollgh I question the $200,000 s:avings noted in the I3agwell Company's letter. Our very
pre~iminal)' (~slimalc,; for b'Tadin~ and paving for the park road was more in the $125,000 range.
2.l"hl.: park road iii removed from the center of the park to the park cdgl::, thu.~ tuming that area back
mlo opcn :,;pacc rather than vehicular circulation,
111ere are a nllmb~,;r of di:,;advantages that a road with this ,dignm\...111 will c,;n;;Hc:
I, "ibis propos,lI \.:ITcctivcly removes an 80' corridor for the park. Whik: ckrn~nt~ ()f the park could
he acce~sed from this ali!:,rnmcnl, its major fUnction remains to provide (lcee,~ to a J;<;hool site and
the sLlhdivi~ion, Its straight ali!,'TIml.'nt is al~o more responsive to the nc~:ds of the,; SUllllivi.,ion
than the n<,'e(ls of the park. While this scheme would remove a road from the middle of the park
(ref. advantage no. 1). part of the strategy in recommending the park, road (as it is 5110\\>11 on Ihl.:
master pl<m) is to immerse park visitors into thl.: sil<.: and surround them with the open spal..'c and
tne Old DairY" ThIS can be a very !)oweJi'lll and exciling cxp\,..TIence, ~"hich would be lost und('T
lhc Bagwell Company's plan,
2, ThIS road alignment takes utH the park service center. As you know, the service center llse was
propo:-;ed because it was an acceplable use for the existing dairy farm bLlildiIlgS. There i!' 110 olher
good area for this use on this site. In our opinion, i r this road alignment wa~ acc(..lltcd then the
sl'rvi~e center would nced to he relocated to anlllher site in the city.
3. This road ahgnm<.'11l will claim a number armature trees, unless thl.: road is carefully cngmel:n::d
tt) preserve thcm,
4, The proposed road alignment will require relocation of the h-ee farm to either another location l)n
,hi,,, !\ill:, or mllst prohahly, another site adjacent to a park servic~ CeT1tcr smce Ihl~ i1h~'11m~nt
would also require relocation ofthat element (see disadvantage no, 2 ahove). While the lr<:c farm
l.:t1uld ....'\)rk a~ a ~tand alone clement, our di,,,cussions with others that navl.: ~imilar racllitl(;~
recommend that they he develofled adjacent to existing park maintenance and operations
facilities,
5. The hikc and bik<.: Lrail along the western edge of the property would need to he.: n:-altgnt.:d and
perhaps moved further into the park. At lhe kast, it woultl need tu bi: c.;.tn~rlllly dcsil:,'rll:d 10
provide adequate separation from the roadw<1)',
6. Other elements of the current p()rk master phm that would nc\:d to be n.:locatcd indudc lh~~
pavilions and playground at the Dairy MuseLlm, and the parking north of the Dalry ~l11seum,
u~{ me know I r Y~lU ha vc any questions or need additional intormalion,
Sincere I y,
NEWlI'/AN. JACKSON, B1EB};"RS1EIN,lNC
~vw--~{rM
Karl V(ln Bieberstein, ASLA
Vi\,:(; Presidl,nt
Jjmw
, .
Oty of
;Je Parks and Recreation Department
Meeting
04/03/00
Agenda #
4
Department:
Subject:
Parks and Recreation
Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Master
Plan for McPherson Park
Since October 1999, the McPherson Park Master Plan Committee has been
meeting with Karl Yon Bieberstein of Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein Landscape
Architecture to develop a Master Plan. Concept plans were developed from the
committee's input discussed during the meetings.
In developing the proposed Master Plan, the committee reached the consensus
to preserve, in some manner, the historical dairy aspects of the site. Toward this
goal, several committee members toured the Southwest Dairy Museum, which is
located in Sulphur Springs about 80 miles east of Dallas.
The development of this Master Plan will assist the City to meet the park needs
identified in the recently adopted Parks and Recreation Open Master Plan,
identify preliminary cost estimates, future grant opportunities and partnership
opportunities, both public and private.
Karl Yon Bieberstein will review the planning process, the proposed Master Plan
including park elements, phases for development and preliminary cost estimates
of the park. (See attachments).
Recommendation
Staff recommends Park and Recreation Advisory Board consider McPherson
Park Master Plan for approval and recommendation to the City Council.
ACT10N TO BE TAKEN
o Discussion Only
o Information Only
Elf Procedural Change .
D Possible Oty Coundl Policy Recommendation
Page ---1- of ~
Parkr-----
~ )vice,~
Center II
/
(
~
, .
iree
)
-
t.AcDonwell School Road
City of Collevville, Texas
o 2~ :.0
~
"'"
-EB
McPherson Park Master Plan
NORlH
, ,..--'
. ,
...~ I'.
~-' "
II
'~~'-;-
Picrilc Area
Tree Farm
.\
;,.J
.,ti,
,
I
1/. _
>, ..:"9fOUP Picnic Pavilion
,',.' X" '1 Retreats
. "';";">.~I- Group F:Uflctions
\
-I
Unstructured Open Space
II
I
I.
...>
l
Amphitheater
Park
-krvice
Center
--~'. '--=~===---:::-:""'l il
[I,
..Exlsllng - , j' i
-Metal ,',i'
J,BUildings 8' '. ,'.1
. I Pole Barn: i'.
;1
'..../ H_--,..,jl1\
-r--- ,---81 t
O r:J~}~;
.""".'.t'
. . . 9 , .,'\...1,"
\ CO,ncr:,~g ,/
\ /(1 BUlld,n!lr_::r';
\ ' . .'
\' :
.
:1: .
ij/:
7', ,
1
E~i~~tib. .
F re . n
-'
,
-
...,
McOonwell'School Road
(,
, :?
..;~
,/ - ~
/'. -~
,. -
'. ~
./
.~)
;-:':,'1
'"._.:..0--
Pond
E9
~
II
McPherson Park Master Plan . Possible Phased Implementation
('if\ of Colle\ \ lile. Te\dS
~-
'J;:.;"'"
_..-;,j -..; >"If'
McPherson Park Master Plan
i Analysis of Inclusion of Requested Park Elements
P = Elements provided by this plan
o = Elements not suited for this site
Remarks
March 29,2000
Elements Discussed by Task Force for the McPherson Site
Dairy Museum P
Natural Open Space P
Arboretum I Tree Display P
4H Facilities 0
Arena 0
Parking P
Tree Farm P
Pet Farm 0
Vegetable Farming Exhibit 0
Picnic Shelters I Pavilions P
Hike I Bike Trails P
Amphitheater P
Priority Elements Identified in Colleyville Comprehensive
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan
Playgrounds P
Hike I Bike Trails P
Outdoor Performing Arts Facility I Amphitheater P
Recreation Center 0
Practice Soccer Fields 0
Playgrounds I Play Equipment P
Open Spaces P
Natural Areas P
lighted Football Fields 0
Tree Farm P
Practice Baseball Fields 0
lighted Soccer Fields 0
Picnic Shelters I Pavilions P
Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein. Inc.
McPherson Park Master Plan
Possible Phased Implementation
February 29, 2000
Phase I
. Entry Road
. Large Pond
. Security Enclosure for Water Tower
. Parking for 40 cars
. Picnic Area
. Restrooms
. Upgrade and secure Park Service Center including new access road
. Hike and Bike Trail
. Tree Farm
Phase II
. Amphitheater
. Group Picnic Area
. Expanded Parking
Dairy Museum Phase
. Museum Building
. Restore Dairy Outbuildings
. Demolish Brick House
. Expand Park Entry
. Additional Parking
· Bus Drop-off
- 1-
COST ESTIMATE
McPherson Park Master Plan
0042-99
Master Plan Phase I
March 22, 2000
CLS
JOB NAME:
JOB NO:
PHASE:
DATE:
BY:
PHASE I
ITEM I
NO.
A.
1,
I QTY.
UNIT I
I CATEGORY
SUBTOTAL
UNIT
COST
ITEM
TOTAL
ITEM
I Demolition
,Allowance
$1.00
$10,000,00
.._----
$10,000
,-,-",--", -------"- "--------
I 10,000 s,f.
B. Grading and Drainage
1, Strip and stockpile topsoil
2, ! Site grading
3, Pond liner
4" 30" RCP
-~-
5, 15" RCP
____ __0'- _____ _______
6, Drain structures
-" --.-..--
7, Erosion protection
,"-------
$6.00
$3.00 ~
$35,000,00
$60.00
$30,00
$7,500,00
$25,000.00
$6,000,00
$81,000,00
$35,000,00
$14,400,00
$6,000,00
$75,000,00
$25,000,00
,----------
$242,400
1,000
27,000,
1
240,
200
10
-------------,~------ ---~----
1
cy
cy
ea,
ea,
ea,
ea,
ea,
,"-
---"- --"--
-,-------
--,"-"-
, Utilities
i Sanitary sewer
Water
. Lighting
Service allowance
. Park entry
: 30' lights
: 12' lights
C.
1,
2,
f--- ---
3
$15,00
$9.00,
$18,000,00
$4,500,00
1,200 ea,
500 ea,
1 ea,
---
1 ea,
12 ea,
20 ea,
"
--
C---_
$15,000,00.
$5,000,00
$3,500,00 !
$2,500.00 ;
$15,000,00
$5,000,00
$42,000,00
$50,000.00
a.
--
b"
--
c,
d,
$134,500
_ Q:" n_~c:>nstruction and Equipment_____ __
__.....-L_ Concrete roadway and parking
2. Concrete walks
~.._-
a, 10' wide sidewalk
b, ! 8' wide sidewalk
3, i Enhanced paving at drop off
4, i Fencing at water tower .
"
____ ~___':'ark service center improvements
· Renovate block house
. · Renovate pole barn
; · Fencing
! · Re-pave yard
i New restroom facilities
'Tree farm improvements
Restore old barn
,Park entry sign
: Fencing at McDonwell School Road
i Picnic areas
i Playground
.
$23,50
$94,000.00 ,
4,000
sy
$3,OO!
$3,OO!
. $6,00'
I $40,001
i $125,000,00,
s,f.
s.f.
s.f,
If
$150,000.00
$75,000.00
$108,000,00
$12,000,00 I
$125,000.00 1
50,000
25,000
18,000
300!
,
1 '
ea,
--
.
--
ea. . $150,000.00!
ea, $75,000.001
ea, $60,000.00;
ea, $50,000.00:
If $40,00:
ALLOW · $20,900.00 i
ALLOW! $100,000.001
6"
7,
8,
9,
10,
11,
12,
$150,000,00
$75,000,00 :
$60,000,00
$50,000.00
$12,000,00
$20,900.00 i
$100,000.00 !
,
l'
1
1
1
300
$1,031,900
Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc.
Page 1
COST ESTIMATE
PHASE I
JOB NAME:
JOB NO:
PHASE:
DATE:
BY:
McPherson Park Master Plan
0042-99
Master Plan Phase I
March 22, 2000
CLS
ITEM I 1 I I UNIT I ITEM I CATEGORY
NO. ITEM QTY. UNIT COST TOTAL SUBTOTAL
E. I Planting and Irrigation
------_.._-~------ -"
1, I Site trees 200 ea, $450,00 $90,000,00
.. n____
2, Tree farm trees 60, ea, $100,00 $6,000.00
_. --- ---- -~---- . ---
3, Sod 180,000 ea, $0,50 $90,000,00
_.~---~ -_._--_.._-_.~- ,n
4, i Hydromulch 810,000 s.f, $0.05 $40,500,00
'-------------
5, . Shrubs 50 ea, $12,00 $600,00
-on
6, I Groundcover 7,000 s,f. $3,00 $21,000.00
7, iWildflowers 195,000 s.f, $0.15 $29,250.00
8, I Irrigation 50,000 s.f. $0.50 $25,000.00
~---
on- $302,350
---------------
-..- -.._--. ----------_._- -~----- ~----------_. -.--------------'--------
----------- ~~--~_.._--- ,--
Subtotal $1,721,150
10% Fees, Survey, etc.. I $172,115
15% Mobilization/lnsu ranee . $258,173
I 20% Contingency $344,230
V PHASE I ESTIMATE TOTAL ; ! I $2,495,668
_'U__
... -- ----- _____ ___u __. .__.,____ __
--. ~-
i
I n_
i I
, I
i
--
------- --'-. --
,
I !
I
! ,
, ! ..-
I i i
I
! i I I
-- I , i
,
~-- -----------~- ----------
---- -- ------ ---_._-~---------~--------- -.------- _..__o____._n_ --
-- ----- - --_._-- -------.---.-- ---. - . ---- ---,. -_.- --.-. ---~~--.,...
I
I ~ ! i
i
, I I ;
I I
i I
, !
-. ! I ,
u. --- --_._----_._--~~-- ---~-- --_.~ .,-
- -----_.._._---~ .-.
,
i i
! i .
I
; I
I I
I
Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc,
Page 2
COST ESTIMATE
PHASE II
JOB NAME:
JOB NO:
PHASE:
DATE:
BY:
McPherson Park Master Plan
0042-99
Master Plan Phase II
March 20, 2000
CLS
ITEM UNIT ITEM CATEGORY
NO. ITEM QTY. UNIT COST TOTAL SUBTOTAL
A. Demolition
1, Allowance 1 s.f, $10,000.00 $10,000,00
$10,000
B. Grading and Drainage
1, Strip and stock pile topsoil 0 cy $6.00 $0.00
2, Site grading 0 cy $3,00 $0,00
3, Erosion protection I 1 ea, $25,000.00 $25,000,00
$25,000
C. Utilities
1, Lighting 10 ea, $2,500.00 $25,000,00
2, Service allowance 1 ea, $15,000,00 $15,000,00
$40,000
D. Construction and Equipment
1, Expanded parking 1 ea, $50,000.00 $50,000.00
2, Amphitheater 1 ea, $50,000,00 $50,000,00
3, Large pavilion 1 ea, $150,000,00 $150,000.00
4, Expanded entry drive 1,000 sy $23.50 $23,500,00
5, Concrete sidewalk 1,700 s.f. $3.00 $5,100,00
$278,600
E. Planting and Irrigation
1. Site trees 100 ea, $450.00 $45,000,00
2. Sod 15,000 ea. $0,50 $7,500.00
3, Hydromulch 150,000 s,f. $0.05 $7,500,00
4, Wildflowers 15,000 s,f. $0,15 $2,250,00
5. Irrigation 10,000 s,f. $0,50 $5,000.00
$67,250
Subtotal $420,850
10% Fees, Survey, etc. $42,085
15% Mobilizationllnsurance $63,128
20% Contingency $84,170
PHASE II ESTIMATE TOTAL $610,233
Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc,
Page 1
"COST ESTIMATE
PHASE III
JOB NAME:
JOB NO:
PHASE:
DATE:
BY:
McPherson Park Master Plan
0042-99
Dairy Museum Phase (Phase III)
March 20, 2000
CLS
ITEM UNIT ITEM CATEGORY
NO. ITEM QTY. UNIT COST TOTAL SUBTOTAL
A. Clearing and Demolition
1, Demolish brick house and barns ALLOW $50,000.00 $50,000,00
2. Miscellaneous site demolition ALLOW $15,000,00 $15,000,00
$65,000
B. Grading and Drainage
1, Construct pond #2 7,000 cy $4.00 $28,000,00
2, General grading 4,000 cy $2,00 $8,000,00
3, Drainage structures ALLOW $50,000.00 $50,000,00
4, Erosion protection ALLOW $7,500.00 $7,500,00
$93,500
C. Utilities and Lighting
1, Sanitary sewer 150 If $15.00 $2,250,00
2, Water 200 If $9,00 $1,800,00
3, Gas 250 If $25,00 $6,250.00
4, Lighting in museum area (12' lights) 12 ea, $2,500.00 $30,000,00
$40,300
D. Construction and Equipment
1, Construct new museum building 15,000 sf $120,00 $1,800,000,00
and meeting facility
2, Renovate rock house 1,320 $75.00 $99,000,00
3, Restore barn 1,728 $50.00 $86,400.00
4, Restore concrete block dairy barn 1,044 $50,00 $52,200.00
5, Renovate silo, barn and trough ALLOW $100,000.00
6, Construct bus drop-off 1,000 If $30.00 $30,000,00
7, General site improvements 50,000 sf $10.00 $500,000.00
8, Pasture fencing 1,025 If $40.00 $41,000.00
9, Playground/open space development ALLOW $150,000.00
10. Outdoor exhibits ALLOW $100,000.00
$2,958,600
E. Planting and Irrigation
1, Site trees 100 ea, $450.00 $45,000.00
2. Lawn area 100,000 sf $0.10 $10,000.00
3, Re-establish pasture grass 150,000 sf $0.05 $7,500,00
4, Irrigation 100,000 sf $0.50 $50,000.00
$112,500
Subtotal $3,269,900
10% Fees, Survey, etc. $326,990
15% Mobilizationllnsurance $490,485
20% Contingency $653,980
PHASE III ESTIMATE TOTAL $4,741,355
I
Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein, Inc.
Page 1
Oty of
Co//eyvi//e Parks and Recreation Department
Mt
Meeting Agenda #
4/03/00 5
Department:
Subject:
Parks and Recreation
Discussion and Consideration of Amending the Parkland
Dedication Ordinance
See Attached
\
ACT10N TO BE TAKEN
o Discussion Only
o Infonnation Only
D Procedural Change
at' Possible City Coundl Policy Recommendation
Page~of~
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board _,)
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager V' oJrC
Clayton Husband, Community Development Coordinat~rl)
TO:
DATE:
March 30, 2000
SUBJECT:
Parkland Dedication Ordinance - Proposed Changes
As referenced in the Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Open Space Master
Plan, the City would need to acquire an additional 146 acres of parkland, based
on its build-out population of 25,540. On the basis of the adoption of the revised
Master Plan, a subcommittee of Parks Board members, consisting of Joe
Noorlag, Steve McGee and Roger Nelson, met with City staff to review the
current provisions and fee structure of Ordinance 0-98-1129 to incorporate
projected park land needs. (See attached excerpts from the Comprehensive
Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan).
Comparisons were made to the cities of South lake, North Richland Hills and
Keller. (See attached). In reviewing the Parkland Dedication Ordinance, the sub-
committee considered the following three theories that may be used in the
development of future parkland dedication needs for the City.
Theory I
Currently the City has 184 acres of parkland and a population of 19,250. The
Comprehensive Parks, Recreation and Open Space Master Plan recommends
330 acres of park land for a build-out population of 25,540, which equates to
12.93 acres per 1000 people. To obtain the necessary 146 acres of new park
land to give a total of 330 build-out acres would require increasing the park land
dedication to 1 acre/ per 14 housing units, or 23.21 acres per 1000 new
population, and would require collection of $3,248 per housing unit.
Assumption of Theory I is that the new population will provide acres or monies to
make-up current park acreage shortfall and provides for the additional parkland
needed at build-out.
Theory 2
The 12.93 acres per 1000 people recommended in the Parks Master Plan is the
target for future parkland dedication. This would require increasing the park land
dedication to 1 acre/ per 25 housing units, which equals $1,802 per housing unit.
This dedication rate would only increase the total number of acres of park land by
81 acres at build-out giving a total of 265 acres or 10.38 acres per 1000 people,
2.55 acres per 1000 people short of the desired level.
Assumption of Theory II is that the new population will provide acres or monies to
provide for the current parkland deficit with no additional parkland to
accommodate new growth.
Theory 3
Parity with area cities
To remain consistent with other area cities by implementing a rate comparable to
the Southlake $1,500 per housing unit would equate to 1 acre/ per 20 housing
units, which would equal $1,579 per housing unit. At build-out the total parkland
would be increased to 255 acres, which is 9.98 acres per 1000 people, which
would be consistent with the 1996 Parks and Recreation, Open Space Master
Plan Update projections.
Assumption of Theory III is that the City of Colleyville would like to remain
comparable with the current City of South lake Parkland Dedication Ordinance.
(See attached comparisons)
On the basis of the above, the subcommittee recommends that the Parks and
Recreation Advisory Board consider the following amendments to the Parkland
Dedication Ordinance:
· Adopt Theory II
Residential Dwelling Unit Fees: Fees paid in lieu of dedication shall be based
on the determined cost of 1 acre of land divided by twenty-five (25), for a
resulting residential dwelling unit fee of $1,802.
This increases the residential dwelling unit fee from $1,260 to $1,802.
In comparison of the difference between Theory II and III, the subcommittee
considered the total potential parkland monies that could be collected based
on each scenario. Theory II would result in the collection of $3,645,466 and
Theory III would result in the collection of $3,194,317, for a difference of
$451,129. With a projected increase of 2,023 new residents to reach the
build-out population of 25,540, at an average of 3 persons per household, the
total per person cost difference between Theory II and III of $74 was
considered to be minimal.
· Non-residential developments: The fee payment alternative for non-residential
development shall be calculated by dividing the determined cost of one (1)
acre of land by fifty-six, for a resulting fee per non-residential acre cost of
$800 per acre.
This increases the non-residential (commercial) fee from $400 to $800.
· Parkland dedication fees in lieu of dedication shall be paid before the final plat
is recorded with the County Clerk's office. A plat containing two (2) or fewer
lots may pay parkland dedication fees at the time of issuance of any building
permit for a DU within the subdivision.
This change allows the City to collect parkland dedication fees earlier in the
development process.
On the basis that the City has no control over private parkland and only the
citizens, who are property owners in the subdivision, will have legal access, the
subcommittee recommended the following:
· Revised the formula for PUD-R credits to allow zero credit for private open
space over twenty (20) percent and to allow a dollar per dollar credit against
open space dedicated as a public park,
(See attached draft amended Ordinance).
Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board accept the
recommendation of the subcommittee and approve the proposed changes to the
City of Colleyville Parkland Dedication Ordinance.
The City Council will consider the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board on April 18 and May 2.
Excerpts of the Comprehensive Parks, Recreation
and Open Space Master Plan
Recommendations for Land Acquisition
During the needs assessment phase, a common theme of "more land acquisition" was expressed by
participants of focus groups and also members of the Master Plan Advisory Committee. The citizen
survey listed Open Spaces, Additional Neighborhood Parks and Natural Areas among the top
twelve priorities. (See page 80)
Currently Colleyville owns/leases 184.43 acres of land. As compared to NRPA guidelines, with a
population of 19,250, the City has a current short fall of 79.76 acres. Based on the NRPA Park
Classification System (page 51) the City specifically needs to acquire the following acreages in three
(3) of the park categories to meet the current population needs in Colleyville.
Mini-Park
Neighborhood Park
Community Park
7.75 Acres
7.64 Acres
6437 Acres
79.76 Total Land Acquisition
(To meet 1999 population of 19,250, see page 56)
As the City continues to grow towards its ultimate buildout population of 25,540, the shortfall in park
land acres will increase to 145.81. Specifically, the City will need to acquire the following acreages
in 3 of the park categories to meet the buildout population needs in Colleyville.
Mini-Park
Neighborhood Park
Community Park
10.90 Acres
20.22 Acres
11469 Acres
145.81 Total Land Acquisition
(To meet 2020 population of 25,540, see page 56)
The City of Colleyville is unique because in most of the residential subdivisions, private open space
has been set aside for the use of residents who live there. Though the City has been unable to
quantify the amount of open space set aside, the Future Land Use Map (page 91) shows private open
space to be well distributed throughout the City limits. (For a list of sub-divisions with private open
space, see page 44). Because the City includes well distributed private open space, the need for
additional neighborhood park sites is not as prevalent. Therefore, the focus of land acquisition should
shift to larger land acquisition tracts that could accommodate community parks, greenway corridors
and natural open spaces.
Open spaces and natural areas, as already mentioned, were also high priority items. This type of park
land is important, particularly because preservation of greenway corridors helps maintain riparian
habitats, reduces the danger of flooding, and protects the natural environment. Open spaces and
natural areas can also become connections from residential neighborhoods to schools, parks,
shopping centers and other destinations.
The City of Colleyville, like other cities, has a Parkland Dedication Ordinance (see Appendix C) which
helps to acquire needed park land acres. Currently a formula is used to calculate acreage or dollar
equivalents that developers must donate to the City when their developments are platted.
December, 1999
92
C~._~r
c~n~
ie-;;;
1999 Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
_ Carter- Burgess
The City of Colleyville has the opportunity to adjust the formula to increase the amount of park land
dedication required. This change would result in park land dedications that are more consistent with
acreage ranges published by NRPA (see page 53).
The City of Colleyville should begin to acquire available park land tracts which are 10 acres or larger
in size. These larger tracts would meet the primary need of community parks, greenway corridors and
natural open spaces. Additionally, the City should concentrate its efforts to provide more park land
and recreation opportunities to current residents in the eastern portion of the City. Also, the
recommendations in the Colleyville Pathways Plan (see Appendix D) should be used as a guideline
when considering new acquisition and connections to existing parks, schools, neighborhoods and
shopping centers.
December, 1999
93
CiY,_<!{
c~~n$
ic-;~~
1999 Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
_ Carter- Burgess
IV. Standards and Guidelines
The adequacy of existing parks, recreation facilities and open spaces is determined by comparing the
needs of the present and forecasted populations of Colleyville to specific goals and standards. This
Master Plan includes the standards established by the National Recreation and Park Association
(NRPA) as included in the 1990 printing of Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and
Guidelines. "The NRPA standards have generally been the most widely accepted and used standards
of their type, especially by local government." (Recreation, Parks and Open Space Standards and
Guidelines, p. 7) This section includes a comparison of Colleyville to national standards based upon
park acreage per population and facilities per population and selected Peer Cities park acreages per
population and facilities per population.
Criteria for Standards
The most common standards for park planning guidelines, as recognized by park and recreation
professionals, are the published standards by the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA).
As written in the introduction, the NRPA "recognizes the importance of establishing and using park and
recreation standards as:
1. A national expression of minimum acceptable facilities for the citizens of urban and
rural communities.
2. A guideline to determine land requirements for various kinds of park and recreation
areas and facilities.
3. A basis for relating recreation needs to spatial analysis within a community wide
system of parks and open space areas.
4. One of the major structuring elements that can be used to guide and assist regional
development.
5. A means to justify the need for parks and open space within the overall land use
pattern of a region or community.
The purpose of this document is to present park and recreation space standards that are applicable
for planning, acquisition, and development of parks, recreation, and open space lands, at the
community level. These standards should be viewed as a guide. They address minimum, not
maximum, goals to be achieved. The standards are to be coupled with conventional wisdom and
judgement relating to the particular situation to which they are applied and specific local needs"
(Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines, p. 11).
Park Classification System
When evaluating existing or future parks in Colleyville, it is necessary to classify each park by type,
size, service area, and acres per 1,000 population. The following six classifications for parks will be
used in this Master Plan:
December, 1999
51
C~,_f!(
Crll~
ic"';.-~~
1999 Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation. and Open Space Master Plan
_ Carter. Burgess
Mini-Park
The mini-park is used to address limited, isolated or unique recreational needs of concentrated
populations. Typically less than % mile apart in a residential setting, the size of a mini-park ranges
between 2,500 square feet to one acre in size. These parks may be either active or passive, but
speak to a specific recreational need rather than a particular population density.
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood parks serve a variety of age groups within a limited area or "neighborhood." They
range in size from 1-5 acres and generally serve residents within a %- to ~-mile radius. The
neighborhood park is an area for active recreation such as field games, court games, playgrounds,
picnicking, etc. Facilities are generally unlighted and there is limited parking, if any, on site. NRPA
standards for these parks are 1.0 - 2,0 acres per 1,000 population.
Community Park
Community parks are larger than neighborhood parks and serve several neighborhoods. They range
in size from 16-99 acres and serve the entire city. The community park may be a natural area or
developed area for a variety of outdoor recreation such as ballfields, playgrounds, boating, fishing,
swimming, camping, picnicking, and trail systems. NRPA standards for these parks are 5-8 acres per
1,000 population.
Regional Park
Regional parks are very large multi-use parks that serve several communities within a particular
region. They range in size from 500 acres and above and serve those areas within a one-hour driving
distance. The regional park provides both active and passive recreation, with a wide selection of
facilities for all age groups. They may also include areas of nature preservation for activities such as
sight-seeing, nature study area, wildlife habitat, and conservation areas. NRPA standards for regional
parks vary due to the specific site and natural resources.
Special Use Areas
Special use areas and parks are for specialized or single purpose recreation activities. NRPA defines
these as areas such as historical areas, nature centers, marinas, zoos, conservatories, arboretums,
arenas, amphitheaters, plazas or community squares. There are no specific standards for size or
acreage since each community will vary.
Linear Park/Linkages
Linkages and linear parks are built connections or natural corridors that link parks together. Typically,
the linear park is developed for one or more modes or recreational travel such as walking, jogging,
biking, in-line skating, hiking, horseback riding, or canoeing. NRPA does not have any specific
standards for linear parks other than they should be sufficient to protect the resource and provide
maximum usage.
December, 1999
52
c..~_f!-'
C~ItQ?
Tc~ llS
1999 Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
_ Carter. Burgess
NRPA PARK ACREAGE GUIDELINES
Type Size/Acres Service Area Acres per 1,000
Population
Mini-Park 2,500 SF - 1 Acre Less Than % Mile 0.25 - 0.5 ac/1 ,000
Distance in Residential
Setting
Neighborhood Park 1 - 15 Acres One Neighborhood 1.0 - 2.0 ac/1 ,000
% to Y; Mile Radius
Community Park 16 - 99 Acres Several Neighborhoods 5.0 - 8.0 ac/1,OOO
Metropolitan Park 100 - 499 Acres Several Communities 5.0 - 10.0 ac/1 ,000
Under 1 Hour Driving
Regional Park 500 + Several Communities Variable
Within 1 Hour Driving
Special Use Areas Varies Depending on No Applicable Standard Variable
Desired Size
Linear Park/Linkages Sufficient Width to No Applicable Standard Variable
Protect the Resource
and Provide
Maximum Usage
TOTAL 11.25 - 20.5 Ac
/1,000 Population
Standards from Recreation, Park and Open Space Standards and Guidelines, p. 56-57 and p. 68-69,
4th Printing, 1990, a publication of the National Recreation and Park Association.
December, 1999
53
--~~.- ~.~~
crjI.IJ~ln$
\.~.~/
rCI~'
1999 Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
- Carter- Burgess
Comparison of Park Land Acreage and NRPA Guidelines
Based upon the NRPA standards for each of the previous park classifications, the recommended park
acreage per 1,000 population ranges from 11.25 to 20.5 acres, The City of Colleyville includes a total
of 184.43 acres for a ratio of 9,58 acres per 1,000 population at its current population of 19,250.
When evaluating Colleyville's total park acreage as compared to NRPA Standards, it reflects that the
City is currently below recommended standards. The City currently has a total of 184.43 acres of park
land, and is below the recommended park acreage standard by 79.76 acres. By the year 2020, the
shortage of park acres will increase to 145.81 acres. More specifically, by the year 2020, with a
projected population of 25,540, the City of Colleyville will have a shortfall of 10.90 acres of mini-park
land, a shortage of 20.22 acres of neighborhood park land and a shortage of 114.69 acres of
community park land.
The tables on the following pages summarize the NRPA acreage standards and the standards applied
to the existing parks in Colleyville.
December, 1999
54
5~--(!f
C~llJ~
Telu
1999 Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
C"~ Carter. Burgess
NRPA PARK ACREAGE GUIDELINES
APPLIED TO COLLEYVILLE
NRPA Guidelines for NRPA Guidelines for NRPA Guidelines for
1999 Population of 2005 Population of 2020 Population of
Park Facility Existing 19,250 A 22,245 A 25,540 A
Acreage
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Mini-Parks 1.87 4,81 9.62 5.56 11.12 6.39 12.77
Neighborhood 30.86 19,25 38.50 22.24 44.49 25.54 51.08
Community 89.63 96.25 154.00 111 ,23 177.96 127,70 204.32
Parks
Special Use 62.07 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Parks
Linear Parks N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
TOTALS 184.43 120.31 202.12 139.03 233.57 159.63 268.17
A. Population numbers provided by City of Colleyville Parks & Recreation Department.
Mini-Parks Bransford Park 1.77 acres
McCain Park 0.10 acres
1.87 acres
Neighborhood Kimzey Park 20.45 acres
Sparger Park 8.47 acres
Woodbriar Park 1.94 acres
30.86 acres
Community City Park 40.13 acres
McPherson Park 27.50 acres
Pleasant Run Park 22 00 acres
89.63 acres
Special Use Parks Colleyville Nature Center 46.00 acres
L.D. Lockett Park 4.60 acres
Pleasant Run Practice Site 11 47 acres
62.07 acres
TOTAL 184.43 acres
December, 1999
55
_C:~-~/~
C~)n~
r~-;.~~
1999 Colleyville Comprehensive Parks. Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
~,c Carter. Burgess
NRPA PARK ACREAGE GUIDELINES COMPARED
TO 1999 POPULATION IN COLLEYVILLE
NRPA Guidelines for 1999 Difference Between NRPA
Population A Guidelines and Existing
Zone Existing of 19,250 Colleyville Parks
Acreage
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Mini-Parks 1.87 4,81 9.62 (2.94 ) (7.75)
Neighborhood Parks 30.86 19.25 38.50 11.61 (7,64)
Community Parks 89.63 96.25 154.00 (6.62) (64.37)
Special Use Parks 62.07 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Linear Parks N/A N/A N/A N/A
TOTALS 184.43 120.31 202.12 2.05 (79.76)
A. Population numbers provided by City of Colleyville Parks and Recreation Department
(NCTCOG).
NRPA PARK ACREAGE GUIDELINES COMPARED
TO 2020 POPULATION IN COLLEYVILLE
NRPA Guidelines for 2020 Difference Between NRPA
Population A Guidelines and Existing
Zone Existing of 25,540 Colleyville Parks
Acreage
Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum
Mini-Parks 1,87 6.39 12.77 (4,52) (10.90)
Neighborhood Parks 30.86 25.54 51.08 5.32 (20.22)
Community Parks 89.63 127.70 204.32 (38.07) (114.69)
Special Use Parks 62.07 N/A N/A N/A N/A
Linear Parks N/A N/A N/A N/A
TOTALS 184.43 159.63 268.17 (37.27) (145.81)
A. Population numbers provided by City of Colleyville Parks and Recreation Department
(NCTCOG).
December, 1999
56
C .~~..LOI
C~~[I~
TClas
1999 Colleyville Comprehensive Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Master Plan
- Carter. Burgess
Parkland Dedication Comparisons
. . .
:z:n(J)
;0 0 0
:Cro~
a~' ~
"'8 ro .!D
Ul cr :z:
ro OJ
0.. ~ ;0
o Ul :c
a.. "0 OJ
S' ~ 5-
OJ ^ -r
~ - ,....
n OJ ro
ro 5- ro
n ~ .,
Si ro
., ro
ro 0-
~ Ul
-0
"< ~
S \.D
0..0
ro 0
.,
n OJ
o n
~ (ti
Ul Ul
0:_
ro .......
~ 0
ct.. 0
o 0
~ ~
crro
"< ::E
st-g
ro "0
nc
~~
no
o ~
c
~
o.
cr
OJ
Ul
ro
"0
OJ
.,
^
OJ
~
0-
~
ro
ro
0..
Ul
o
~
.......
lT1
'-l
lT1
OJ
n
.,
ro
Ul
-
.......
o
o
o
~
ro
::E
"0
o
"0
C
OJ
r-t"
o'
::l
"'0 "'0
CD m
, ,
n::I:
o 0
3 c
3 (J)
CD :J
,to
n C
OJ :J
crt'
:J
rt'
~~
...
00 01
o 0
o 0
~~
OJ OJ
n n
, ,
CD CD
-- --
01 ..t:-
o 0
~
.......
...
zg
)>0
~~
.......
...
..t:-N
o 0'1
o 0
.......
~
m
..0
c
<
OJ
CD
:J
rt'
(J)
)>
"'0 "'0 q
CD CD CD
, , (J)
n::I:O
o 0 CD
3 C Cl..
3 ~. n
CD .~ ~
, ....... CD
n C Cl..
OJ :J
crt
:J
rt'
....... .......
-- --
01 ..t:-
o 0
....... .......
-- --
01 ..t:-
o 0
.......
--
Zw
)>0
.......
--
Zw
)>0'1
iJ
OJ
,
7'
OJ
:J
Cl..
--
.......
o
o
o
"'0
m
o
"'0
CD
N
.......
.......
N
.......
w
N
01
;0
CD
(J)
Cl..
CD
:J
rt'
(J)
--
C
:J
rt
w
o
01
N
-.....J
.......
w
o
N
w
.
.......
......
OJ
C
Cl..
o
C
rt'
iJ
o
"'0
C
OJ
rt'
o
:J
n
C
,
,
CD
:J
rt'
iJ
o
"'0
C
OJ
rt'
o
:J
W
01
...
01
00
o
00
01
...
o
o
o
..t:-
W
...
..t:-
W
00
N
U1
...
01
..t:-
o
N
.......
...
o
U1
o
(J')
o
c
"'
:::T
-
Q)
~
01
..t:-
...
00
01
o
z
~
n
:::T
~. OJ
-:J
iii"o.
N
..t:-
...
W
01
o
"
(1)
-
iD
""'!
......
\0
...
N
U1
o
n
o
-
n;
'<
:5.
-
-
(1)
-0
OJ
.,
~
-
OJ
::I
C.
o
tD
C.
-.
n
OJ
fill-
-.
o
::I
I
tv
o
o
o
."
-
m
:J
n
o
3
"a
m
..,
-.
fn
o
:J
fn
d
r-T
Q)
"0
Q)
...,
^
Q)
n
...,
ro
Q)
1.0
ro
Q)
r-T
cr
c
0:
o
C
r-T
:E
o
C
0..
g-
LV
LV
o
Q)
n
...,
ro
Vl
o
...,
r-T
::r
ro
ro
.0
C
<"
Q)
m
:::I
r-T
o
"'"'1'l
.......
N
\0
LV
Q)
n
...,
ro
.5:Q.
.......
o
o
o
"0
o
"0
C
OJ
r-T
O'
:::I
r^~I-IG)llmonOJ)>
. ... .. ..
-tA-
m
..0
c
<
OJ
ro
::J
r-t'
(J')
"0
ro
.
*IT
W
....
N
~
00
o
ro
0...
n
OJ
r-t'
ro
0...
"0
ro
.
<:) NCl'
. ........
<:) t----'- <:) N
'-J~N\O
NCl'W<:)
...-...
11
X
~
........."
--
1-1
~
--
1-1
...-...
G)
--
t----'-
o
<:)
<:)
..........
m
x
"0
ro
n
r-t'
ro
0...
"'0
o
"0
C
OJ
r-t'
o
::J
G)
.
o
~
::r
...-...
W
"<
.
--
G)OJJ-L
\0
\0
n)>'-J
o
nI
o 0
(J') C
r-t' (J')
o ::J
-1'totO
t----'-
)>c
n ::J
. r-t'
ro (J')
"0
ro
.
""0
OJ
.
^
OJ
::J
0...
)>
n
.
ro
(J')
"0
ro
t----'- ·
OJ
<
ro
.
OJ
to
ro
..........
)>5
n <:)
(rl <:)
0"'0
ro 0
0..."0
C
n OJ
OJ
d:r-t'
o 0
::J ::J
-tA-
~
U1
....
<:)
<:) t----'-
<:)~
...-...
t----'-
o
<:)
<:)
w__
-<n
ro..........
~--
~o
ro
,
OJ
to
ro
N
W W
. .
N t----'-
J-L t----'-
;;0
ro
(J')
Q.
ro
::J
r-t'
(J')
"0
ro
.
"'On
o C
"0 ·
C (rl
OJ ::J
d:r-t'
o "'0
::J 0
OJ "0
r-t' C
OJ~
C 0
Q. ::J
o
C
r-t'
I
o
c
(J')
::J
to
C
::J
r-t'
N t----'-
Ul \0
.... ....
Ul N
~ Ul
<:) <:)
t----'- t----'-
\0 \0
\0 \0
00 00
3:3:
OJ OJ
(J') (J')
r-t' r-t'
ro ro
. .
"'0 ""0
OJ OJ
::J ::J
:J>-a
(ft I>>
(ft -c
c=-=-
3-
-a I>>
tt::s
00.
~C
,...tD
00.
o --
ern
,...1>>
01,...
-- --
::I 0
....::s
~N
0\0
~O
tilO
(ft I
o
...,
::I
tD
:e
'"C
01
-c
;lII:;'"
-
OJ
~
C.
oJ
or
"0
QJ
'""'l
^
QJ
n
'""'l
(l)
QJ
lC
(l)
QJ
~
0-
C
0:
o
c
~
~
o
C
0-
g
N'
0'\
U1
QJ
n
'""'l
(l)
Vl
o
'""'l
~
-:::s
(l)
(l)
.0
C
<'
QJ
ro
:::l
~
o
-tI
......
o
w
00
QJ
n
'""'l
(l)
~
......
o
o
o
"0
o
"0
C
QJ
~
O'
:::l
,AL..II-fG)"mO(')OJ)>
. . . . . . . . . . .
-vt
m
..c
c
<
OJ
(t)
:::J
1"'1"
Ul
"'CJ
(t)
"\
-vt
........
...
CO
o
N
o
ro
0..
n
OJ
1"'1"
ro
0..
"'CJ
ro
"\
m(')
x 0
"'CJ Ul
ro 1"'1"
n 0
1"'1"-t\
ro
0.. ........
-0)>
o n
"'CJ .......
c ro
...--...
~W
-. "<
o "\
:::J
G) ~ )>
"\ CO n
o "\ ro
~~ 0
::r ro ro
............ 0..
n
OJ
C!:
o
:::J
-vt
~
o NCl'Ol
. ...............
o 0 N 0
~CON\.OO
0........ WOO
...--...
"
X
L..I
............
---...
L..I...--...G)OJ........
---...G)---... \.0
---... \.0
I-f n)>-......J
........
o
o
o
............
...--...
........
o
o
o
w__
-<n
ro............
~---...
I-f
o
)>0
<
ro
"\
OJ
to
ro
I
o
c
Ul
:::J
to
C
:::J
1"'1"
Ul
"'CJ
CO
"\
-0
OJ
"\
^
OJ
:J
0..
)>
n
"\
ro
(f)
"'CJ
ro
........ "\
........
N W
. .
N \.0 ........
01 W ........
........
o
o
o
-0
o
"'CJ
C
OJ
C!:
o
:::J
;::0
ro
(f)
0..
ro
:::J
1"'1"
(f)
"'CJ
ro
"\
-on
o C
"0 "\
C "\
ro
OJ :::J
C!:1"'1"
o
:::J
OJ
1"'1"
I
o
c
(f)
:::J
to
C
:::J
;=t:
-0
o
"0
C
OJ OJ
C 1"'1"
o
0..:::J
o
C
1"'1"
N ........
01 \.0
... ...
01 N
~ 01
o 0
........ ........
\.0 \.0
\.0 \.0
co co
3:3:
OJ OJ
(f) (f)
1"'1" 1"'1"
ro ro
"\ "\
-0 -0
OJ OJ
:::J :::J
~-a
(n I>>
(n ~
c~
3-
-cl>>
,....::S
-.
OQ.
~C
,...tD
OQ.
o --
ern
,...1>>
01,...
-. --
:s 0
...::s
~i'J
\00
Wo
~o
., I
to
(n
..........
...
C
C
c
:s
to
~
-C
o
-c
c
-
01
,...
-.
o
:s
r ^ L..I ....... G) " m 0 n OJ )>
. . . . . . . . . . . >-0
-fit )> )> Z m n I ""0 ;:0 ""0 n (I) DI '
m () () m x 0 0 OJ m 0 c (I) ..,
---,; ---,; ~ "'0 Ul C ---,; Ul "'0 ---,; I:~
.0 m m m r-t' Ul ^ Cl. C .,
C Ul Ul ~ 0 OJ m 3-
;:0 ::J m OJ ::J -cDl
< 0 0 m m --1'\ to ::J ::J r-t' r-t'
OJ m -tl Ul Cl. ...... Cl. r-t' 0 ~:J
-0 - Cl. Z -. C Ul ""0
OJ m Cl. )> )> ::J 0 0 Q.
., ""0
^ ::J m m ::J "'0
OJ () 0 () n OJ "'0 ::::J
r-t' OJ ~ ::J ---,; r-t' """1: m c
:J Ul "'0 r-t' C
0- r-t' n m Ul m ., (I)
"'0 CD ""0 m c Ul OJ OJ
0 CD Cl. OJ Ul OJ ............ "'0 I c r-t' ,... tD
0- W CD "'0 0 0
or ., ., r-t' -. 0 Q.
"'0 ^ r-t' -. "< ---,; CD C Cl. ::J
:J C CD 0 o ., """1: Ul 3 -.
(l) OJ ...... I
0- ::J ---,; I ::J ...... 0 n
::J OJ )> ::J e!.DI
OJ r-t' C Cl. 0 G) < 0 to C
,...,. n 0 r-t'
OJ ::J C """1: ro """1: ::J!:t
c r-t' Z Ul 0 """1: ro 0 c
0- m m ~ OJ ""0 ::J 6To
0 m G) r-t' to 0 0 r-t'
C Cl. ::r m m -.::::J
,...,. "0 ::J
0- m """1: '-"" Cl.
:::::!. Cl. 0 c -v.t\J
:J ~ n
~ OJ OJ mO
VI ::r r-t' d:
,...,. 0 .cO
::T 0
(l) ::J
,...,. ::J 1:0
0
or -.
< I
,...,. -fit OJ
0
N -fit ~ N ...... -
111 ...... 0 N 0'\ U1 ...... U1 \.0 m
111 ... . ... ... ... ...... w ... ... ::::J
OJ U1 0 0 N 0 . . U1 N ,...
n ........ W ........ N \.0 0 N N ...... ~ U1
., (I)
(l) \.0 U1 ...... W 0 0 \.0 U1 ...... 0 0
VI
\0 -a
\0 OJ
co ............ L..I ............ G) OJ ...... ............ ...... ...... .,
-.
-.... " G) \.0 ...... \.0 \.0 ,...
....... -- -- 0 '<
0 X \.0 \.0 \.0
0 t--I -- n )> ........ 0 00 00
0 L..I ...... 0 ~
1:1 '-"" 0 w__ :s: :s:
0 -.
1:1 -- 0 -< OJ OJ ,...
c ....... 0 n Ul Ul ::T
Qj" '-"" CD '-"" r-t' r-t'
,...,. OJ ro CD
0" 0 ., -- .,
::J """1: ., m
)> 0 ""0 ""0 ~
< OJ OJ -.
ro ::J ::J 0
"""1:
OJ ::::J
to
m
- CD -o~ III III III JT1 - CD -o~ III III III JT1
m x () () () m x () () ()
(') 52" m ... ... ~ (') 5r+ ..... ... ..... ~
ro ro ro ro ro
CD 00 00 00 CD :::o~ 00 00 00
(j) :::OQ.l ... a. S' ~ (j) ... 0. -. ~
(j) ~ ro ro (j) ~ ro ro ::J {:t:7
@- .D a. "'CJ " @- .D o."'CJ "
, c c)" ..... i' .... c _0 ., i' ~
=;' .Q. -. () 0
CD Q. ro III ro JTI CD Q. m Ill~' JTI -.
(j) ,')" a. ro (j) o' o.ro~ 00
~ ...., 0. U Z Q.l ...., 0. - Z
0 III 0 r+ 0 III 0 0
0' ... 0' .....
a. 00 -000 N
~ ro "'CJ N ::J c"'CJ .....
a. c 05- I
0' cr
~ 0' YI :::u=
YI () "'tJ
0' "'CJ o."'CJ ,....--,
..... ::J III ..... ro III ,,-.. ..,
~ ~ c.... tr1 0
-" O'l 0' ^
~ O'l ~ "C
<D 0 N N <J'1 ~
0 ()) N -" ~ to -..j o' 0
-..j N W W (J) -..j ::J (')
0 .I>- (J) ,J:>. N ()) -..j en
(t) CD
-.: -.: r:/'l a.
~ ~ r:/'l "
s:::: -" (J) s:::: N > 0
0 N -" 0 <J'1 ())
.-+ ~ .-+ , -..j' (') ..,
o' N -" o' -..j, ()) 3
w W -..j-..j.l>- ~
::s ::s
0 0 (t) c
- - ~ -
(Jq Q)
YI YI -It
(t) 0
..... 0 ..,
O'l ~
~ <D "'tJ
(:, N <:
0 O'l "'C Q)
.., (t) ..,
0 ~ "
'C N
0 r
.., - ~ ~ ~ - CD -o~ III III III 3: (fl 0 Q)
~m m x () C"l () (!)
0 .-+ (') 5r+ ... ..... ..... - c. 'cf( :J
ro ro ro i'
s:::: m s:::: CD :::o~ 00 00 00 a.
0 eL (j) ..... a. -, i' ."
.-+ VI ~ (j) ~ ro ro ::J () (!) c
o' c.. @- .D o."'CJ (!) '-"
.., ~ .... c -...., ;tI
::s -, () 0 () CD
m CD Q. m Ill~' J"l1. .
0 (=)' (j) o' o.ro~ J"l1. Q) a.
- ,,-..
~ ~ ...., 0. - ~ (') -.
0 III c: 0 0
o' 0' .....
0.00 Q) . Q)
::s ::J ro"'CJ !:!': 0 ~
o.c
-, 0- 0 +:::.. 0
l> 11 l> :::u l> () -
YI III -, ::l
3 ro 0. ro () _C"l 0 :J
0 ro 0. .D C O''''CJ
C () - c Q!.. ::J III
~ :::r o' ... ..... "
III ::J ro III ^ '-"
0- <<3 Q!.. a. 3 CD
III ro i1l 0 0 . CD
00 0. "'CJ C
ro ::J ro ~ ,,-.. I
...., "'CJ a. ::J ,J:>. N ~
ro ro a. 00 0 U1 ()) <J'1 -.
ro ... "'CJ ...., ,J:>. (J) W .I>- "'tJ
9: ro w 00
..... a. III i1l <0 ()) 0 c:
ro 0' C"l ::J ..... ()) -" CD 0
a. S' ro ()) N CD
C III a. C
C"l 00 ..+ 0. a. N
ro
ro ro a. ro ro -.: I
0. III a. 0. AJ
0- a. ~ 0' o' ~ -" '-"
'< 0 ~ ~ III s:::: N.I>-N
0. ...., o' ro 0 <J1~(J)
ro
c i1l x ::J a. .-+ W CD <J'1 L..-......J
ro ::J () "'CJ 0- o' o CD ->. II
0 a. ro ro '< ::s
a. ro ...
ro ro a. 0. 0
X 00 -0 ro ~
C"l a. C < -
ro 0' ""0 0 ro (t)
00 ~ c :::u 6'
00 o' 0 "'CJ (t)
a. :::u ... ro YI
ro ::J ro ...
... co .-.. .....
0. ro c ...., ~
0' .D m: x'
~ c ro ,J:>.
... o' a. ......
o' ro ::J III (:,
::J 3 00 3 CD
ro 0
~ c
2:
Draft Amended
Parkland Dedication Ordinance Q-QQ-XXXX
ORDINANCE NO. O-OO-XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE AMENDING ORDIN1\NCE
091 923 AND REPLACING ORDINANCE 0-98-1129, REVISING THE
ENTIRETY OF THE PARK AND RECREATION DEDICATION
REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS CUMULATIVE OF
ALL OTHER ORDINANCES; PROVIDING SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR
PUBLICATION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville, Texas is a home rule city acting under its
charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5
of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government
Code; and
WHEREAS, the City of Colleyville has heretofore adopted a Parkland Dedication
Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the City has zoning classifications which require open space; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that in order to provide for
adequate land for parks, recreation and open space, it is
appropriate and in the best interest of the City to amend and
replace Ordinance 0-91-823, to authorize the appropriate parkland
dedication requirements, or facilities, or improvements, or fees in
lieu of said dedication requirements,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS AS FOLLOWS:
Sec. 1.
THAT Section 12 of Chapter 9 of the Colleyville Code entitled
"Dedication of Parkland or Payments in Lieu Thereof' is amended
in its entirety and replaced by the following text:
PARKLAND AND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS
A. STATEMENT OF POLICY
The requirements for open space, park and recreational areas contained
in this section are intended to ensure that there will be sufficient land
dedicated or otherwise set aside to meet the demand and need of the
future residents for open space and parks. In determining the size, shape
and quality of open space and park areas that should be set aside and
reserved in the manner set out in this section, the City has considered the
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 2 of 11
projected growth in population and development within the municipality
and the amount of open space and park and recreational facilities needed
to accommodate such growth as stated in the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan.
B. APPLICABILITY:
(1 ) Unplatted Property: This section applies to all property for which a
final plat has not been formally submitted to the City for approval,
unless otherwise noted herein.
(2) Exempt Property: Any tract or lot occupied by an existing
residential dVv"elling unit at the time of adoption of this ordinance
shall be exempt from the dedication requirements of this section
herein if the residential dVv"elling remains on the lot This exemption
pertains only to the tract or lot with the existing residential dwelling.
Any additional lots created by further subdivision of the property
shall be subject to the requirements herein.
(3) Date of Assessment: All requirements contained in this section
shall be assessed at the time of approval of the final plat of any
applicable property.
C. LAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS:
(1 ) Standards
In reviewing proposed dedications of parkland, the following criteria
shall be imposed; provided, hOVv"ever, the approving body may vary
or waive any of the following criteria on a finding that the proposed
dedication of parkland is in accordance with the development of the
City, complies with the statement of intent of the Parkland
Dedication Ordinance and because of the uniqueness of the
property, requires a variance:
(a) Parkland shall be clearly visible from the public rights-of-way
and shall be located so as to give maximum possible exposure
throughout the neighborhood.
(b) Access to the parkland shall be available from public rights-of-
way.
(c) Where the proposed parkland is a flood plain area which is
proposed as a linear park, the following shall also be
considered:
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 3 of 11
(i) Whether the proposed site contains significant
environmental features representative of a pre-urbanized
Colleyville, including trees, plants, wildlife, topography,
geological outcroppings, unique water features or any
combination thereof.
(ii) Whether the proposed site currently provides, or will
provide in the future, an effective linkage to other
existing or anticipated public park sites which will allow
movement to and from places where residents live, work
and play.
(iii) Whether the proposed site is easily accessible, visible
and identifiable.
(iv) Whether the proposed site has street frontage along its
entire length.
(v) Whether the proposed site is designed to be used and
function as a natural waterway with minimal site
alteration.
(d) A minimum of fifty percent (50%) of any dedicated parkland
shall have grades of less than three percent (3%) and shall be
well drained and suitable for development of parkland
improvements.
(e) Parkland shall be provided with access to all utilities, including
water and sewer, along the street frontage of the park.
(f) Parkland shall not be burdened with easements, rights-of-way,
deed restrictions or other limitations which prohibit or inhibit the
use of the parkland for park purposes.
(2) Amount and Location
Residential Developments
Based on the population projected to reside in the City of
Colleyville, as stated in the 1998 Master Plan adopted by the
City Council, the City desires to provide 12.93 94=acres of
parkland for every new 1,000 residents in an ultimate condition.
Parkland meeting the requirements contained within this
section shall be dedicated to the City at a ratio of one (1) acre
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 4 of 11
of parkland for every twenty-five (25) thirty six (~6) residential
dwelling units or a prorated portion thereof.
The subdivider shall dedicate to the City a minimum of 0.040
O.02~O acres of parkland in fee simple for each DU (dwelling
unit) within the subdivision; provided, however, no tract of
parkland shall be less than 7 acres in total area unless
approved by the City Council.
Non-Residential Developments
(a) Although non-residential development does not generate
residential occupancies per se, it does create environmental
impacts, which may negatively affect the living environment of
the community, These impacts may be ameliorated or
eliminated by providing park or open space areas which buffer
adjoining land uses, prevent undue concentration of paved
areas, allow for the reasonable dissipation of automotive
exhaust fumes, provide natural buffers to the spread of fire or
explosion, and provide separation of lighting, waste disposal,
and noise by-products of non-residential operations and
activities from adjacent residential areas. The City has
therefore determined that non-residential developments must
provide dedicated parks and/or reserved open space at a ratio
of one (1) acre of parkland for every fifty-six (56) non-
residential gross acres of development or prorated portion
thereof.
Off-site Dedications
(b) A developer may dedicate the required parkland for a
development at another location owned by the same developer
within the City with the consent of the City, provided that the
off-site dedication is in accordance with this ordinance.
(3) Documents AccompanyinQ Final Plat
Where the subdivider proposes to dedicate land to the City for
parkland purposes, the following additional documents shall be
submitted to the City with the submission of the final plat of the
subdivision:
(a) An environmental study, audit or assessment demonstrating
that the property is in a condition which \IVOuld allow the City to
utilize the property for park purposes without expenditures to
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 5 of 11
remove environmental waste or hazardous materials, that the
property is suitable and safe for use as a park and is free from
environmentally related problems.
(b) If a developer chooses to dedicate the land or to build the park,
a site plan of the park property containing a conceptual plan of
the type, nature, and extent of improvements which could be
made to the property and identifying the property as to type,
i.e., neighborhood park, linear park, special purpose or
community park,
(c) A statement as to the number of proposed DUs within the
subdivision.
(4) Condition of Property and Acceptance by the City of Collevville
Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the erection of any
house within the subdivision, the subdivider shall apply to the City
for written acceptance of the parkland, which shall be accepted
upon completion of the following conditions:
(a) The subdivider shall permanently mark each corner of the park
site with a three-quarter inch (3/4") iron pin set in concrete.
(b) The subdivider shall provide the City with a survey acceptable
to the City reflecting each corner monument, showing and
locating any encroachments, easements and providing a metes
and bounds description of the parkland.
(c) All rubbish, trash, junk and other offensive materials shall be
removed from the parkland and the property returned to its
natural condition except as to approved construction and
improvements thereon.
(d) All improvements or construction on or within the parkland to be
installed by the subdivider shall be completed in accordance
with approved construction plans.
(e) All other applicable ordinances of the City have been complied
with.
D. ALTERNATIVES TO LAND DEDICATION:
(1) Authorization
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 6 of 11
In any case where a dedication is required, the City shall have the
right to accept the dedication, as submitted for approval, or in the
alternative, to refuse dedication of the same, and in lieu thereof to
require payment of cash under the formula contained in this
Section. The City may permit a combination of dedication and fees
to be used to fulfill this requirement.
(2) Fee Payment Alternative
Approval of Fee Payment Alternative: The City Council shall upon
recommendation of the Park Board, determine the acceptability of a
developer's payment of fees in lieu of land dedication requirement
of this section.
(3) Calculation of Fees
The City Council shall establish an acreage land value cost figure
to be used in calculating park fees.
(a) Residential Dwelling Unit Fees: Fees paid in lieu of
dedication shall be based on the determined cost of 1 acre
of land divided by twenty-five (25) thirty sixo (~6), for a
resulting fee per residential dwelling unit of $1 ,802 ~.
(b) Non-Residential Development Fees: The fee payment
alternative for non-residential development shall be
calculated by dividing the determined cost of one (1) acre
of land by fifty-six, for a resulting fee per non-residential
acre cost of $800 $4QQ per acre. In tho ovont tho non
rosid9ntial dO'Joloprnont is loss than fifty sb{ (196) Geros, tho
total acnKlgo shall eo dividod by 196 to dotorrnino tho
proratod fC)Q paymcmt.
(4) Collection of Fees
(a) Park land dedication fees in lieu of dedication shall be
paid before the final plat is recorded with the County
Clerk's office. A plat containing two (2) or fewer lots
may pay park land dedication fees Tho payrn9nt gf tho foo
in liQl;;;I of eodication shall bo a eendition procedont to tho at
the time of issuance of any building permit for a DU within
the subdivision.
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 7 of 11
(b) By agreement approved by the City Council, the City and the
subdivider may alter the time and method of payment and
fees in lieu of dedication,
(5) Physical or Equipment Improvements to Parks
Compatibility with Parks and Recreation Master Plan: A
developer may have the option of improving existing facilities
within municipal parks or improving dedicated parkland in
lieu of parkland dedication or payment of cash, based on
recommendations made in the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan, Should any of these options be exercised, the City
and the developer shall prior to initiation of work on such
improvements, enter into an agreement for credit of
expenses for authorized park improvements. In no case
shall the municipality be required to reimburse the developer
if he chooses to improve parklands at an amount greater
than required. Such a proposed agreement to provide
facility improvements in lieu of dedication shall be submitted
in writing with the subdivision plat.
(6) Approval Process
(a) Land Dedications
(1) Park Board Recommendation: The Parks and
Recreation Manager or their designee shall report to
the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board regarding
any parkland dedication issues arising from
development applications submitted to the City for
approval. The Park Board may then make a formal
recommendation to the Planning and Zoning
Commission to accept or refuse any proposed
dedicated land prior to the Commission's action on
the development.
(2) Planning and Zoning Commission: The Planning and
Zoning Commission shall consider the
recommendation of the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board in determining the acceptability of any
land dedications proposed on any development. The
Commission recommendation shall then be forwarded
to the City Council for final approval where applicable,
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 8 of 11
(3) Final Plat Dedications: Where review or development
applications have resulted in the City's desire for land
dedication, such land dedication shall be shown on a
final plat and shall contain a clear fee simple
dedication of that land to the City.
(b) Fog PaymontfJ in Liou of Dodication
(1) P:Jrl<: B03rd R9commend:Jtion: The P:JrkfJ :Jnd
Rocroation ^dvifJory BO:Jrd fJh:J1I m:Jl<o :J formal
rocommombtion to tho City COblncil :JfJ to tho
:Jccoptability of any propofJod :JltomativofJ to parl<:bnd
dodicationf).
(2) City Council COnEiidgrntion: Upon roceiving :J form:J1
rocommondation u-om tho ParkfJ and Rocro:Jtion
I\dvifJory BO:Jrd, tho City Cmmci! fJh:J1I entor into :In
:Jgroomont 'Mth tho dg'lolopor for tho pHJvi€:ion of foof)
in liou of dodicntion, or :J coml3in:Jtien thoroof.
(c) PUD-R Zoning or Other Zoning Classifications Requiring
Dedication of Open Space
The obligation of the sub-divider to dedicate parkland or
make payments in lieu thereof shall be in addition to and
independent of the obligation of the sub-divider to dedicate
open space under the PUD-R zoning ordinance, provided, to
the extent that the open space in the PUD-R exceeds twenty
(20) percent of the project area (the "excess acreage") the
requirements hereof may be modified as follows:
1 ) If the open space is dedicated to and accepted by the
city as public park land
(i) the required dedication of park land may be
reduced by the amount of the excess acreage, or
(ii) if the sub-divider is allowed to pay fees in lieu
of dedication, the fee for each lot in the project
may be calculated, as follows:
(numbor of 10tfJ in proioct)( $1290) (OXCOf)f)
0.02Q )( numoor of lotfJ in I3rojoct)
:Jcroaqo
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 9 of 11
$1,802 - [(excess acreage over 20%) x
(0.040) x ($1,802)] = fee
provided fee shall never be less than $1 per lot
(2) If the open space is not dedicated to or not accepted
by the city as public park land, the required
dedication of park land shall not be reduced or
the fee in lieu of dedication shall not be reduced.
(i) tho roquirod dodic3tion of p3rl< 13nd m3Y bo
roducod by ~{ amount of exoClSS 3creage, or
(ii) if the sub divider is 311ClWOd to P3Y foos in liou
of dodicatiCln tho foo $or 03ch lot in tho projoot
m3Y be calculated as $oIlClVJS:
(numbor of lets in pr~joot x $6~O) (OXCOS&
3oroaQo
O.02g x number of lots in projoct)
(7) Use of Fees
(a) All funds collected as fees in lieu of dedication shall be
deposited in a special interest bearing account dedicated to
the accumulation of monies required by this section,
Interest earned on fees in lieu of dedication shall be
considered funds of the account on which it is earned and
shall be subject to all restrictions placed upon the use of
fees in lieu of dedication.
(b) Expenditures of fees in lieu of dedication shall be made
only for one or more of the following purposes:
i) The acquisition or improvement of park sites or
other sites which are available for park purposes.
ii) Inappropriate expenditures
Monies placed in this fund may not be utilized for any other
general business activity of the City or for maintenance of
park facilities,
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 10 of 11
E. PARKLAND DEDICATION COMMITTEE
(1) The City hereby creates the Parkland Dedication Committee. The
Parkland Dedication Committee shall be made up of two members of the
Planning and Zoning Commission and two members of the Parks and
Recreation Board, The Parkland Dedication Committee shall have the
following duties:
(a) Review proposed parkland dedication fund expenditures and
make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission
and the City CounciL
(b) Review the Parks and Recreation Master Plan every three years
and make recommendations for modification or alteration.
(2) The City Council shall appoint the members of the Parkland Dedication
Committee and the terms of the members of the Parkland Dedication
Committee shall coincide with their respective terms of the Planning and
Zoning Commission or the Park Board, as applicable,
Sec. 2.
THAT if any section, paragraph, clause or provIsion of this
Ordinance shall for any reason be held to be invalid or
unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section,
paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining
provisions of this Ordinance.
Sec. 3,
The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause
publication of the description caption and penalty clause hereof as
an alternative method of publication provided by law,
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
The first reading and public hearing being conducted on the
2000.
day of April
The second reading and public hearing being conducted on the
May 2000.
day of
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLLEYVILLE
Jean Harris, TRMC, CMC
City Secretary
Donna Arp
Mayor
Ordinance 0-98-1129
Page 11 of 11
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY:
Ross T. Foster
City Attorney
- CD -u~ I>> I>> I>> [11 - CD -u~ I>> I>> I>> [11
~ X 0 0 0 ~ X 0 0 0
() 6.-+ ..... ..... ..... ~ () 6c ..... ..... ..... ~
(1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1)
CD ::otii II) II) II) CD II) II) II)
VI ..... a. :5" ~ VI ::oru .... a. -. ~
VI ~ (1) CD VI ~ CD (1) :J -EI7
D. ..c a. "0 '1J D. ..c a. "0 '1J
, CD ~, 0' ..... r- , CD c -. -, f;i ...........
0 :::;. 0 0
CD Q, ..... I>> 'cD' fit CD Q,
CD CD I>> '-. ~
VI (I a. lii VI () o.lii~ 00
0 z z
~ - a. r+ ~ _o.r+
0 0 g I>> 0 0
0 ..... I>> 0
a. II) ""Oil) N
::l CD "0 N ::l c"O -
a. c 05- I
(')' g
I>> ;:u=
.... r+ 0 .... 0 "'0
o' "0 0."0 ;....-~
.... :J I>> .... ~I>> .,
~ ..... (,) -, ..... tI1 0
7' 0 7'
~ al I>> "C
co 0 N N 01 d: X
(:) co tv ~ ~ (0 ...... ...... 0 0
...... N (,.) en :J ()
0 ~ en ~ N co ...... CJ)
(0 (1)
~ ~ r:n 0-
8- 8- r:n '"T1
c 0) C N > 0
n N ...... n 01 co
- tv (,.) :..... - . ....... () .,
(5' :..... (5' ......, co 3
(,.) (,.) ............~ ~
~ ~
0 0 (0 c:
- - p:l -
(JQ S>>
.... - .......
(0 0
.... 0 .,
Q) ~
~ co "'0
0 N <
0 Q) ""0 (0 S>>
"" .,
0 ~ "
'0 N
0 r
~ - (1) ~ ~ - <t> -u~ I>> I>> I>> 3: rn 0 S>>
8-~ ~ ~ x 0 0 0 (1)
- (') 5.-+ ..... CD ..... - c. ~ ::1
CD CD r-
c ~ c CD ::otii II) II) C/l 0-
n ~ VI CD a. -. r- ."
- (fl ~ VI ~ (1) :J () (1) 0
(5' ~ D. ..c a. "0 (1) "-'"
c -. -.: ;:0
~ ~ , CD ~. g~. 0 (1)
~ CD Q, fit .
0 l")' VI (I o.lii~ fit D) 0-
- ".-."
a ~ ......o.r+ ^ n -.
0 I>> C 0 0
(5' 0 .....
0.(1) D) . S>>
~ ::l CD "0 ~ 0 .....
o.c -.
-. 0- 0 ~ 0
)> " )> ;:u )> o _
.... I>> -. :s
3 (1) a. (1) 0 _0 0 :J
CD a. ..c - o. "0
0 C
C 0 ;:;: c !!!. :J I>> '"T1
0' :::;. .....
~ ::::J" 7'
Q) :J CD Q) "-'" (1)
0- ..... !!!. a. 3
co . (1)
Q) CD Dl 0 0
II) a. "0 c
CD :J CD :J '1-.......... I
- "0 a. :J r+ ~ N
CD CD a. II) 0 en co 01 ~
CD ..... m ~ -0
CD "0 - ~ w w 00
.... 0- Q, Q) Dl Co CD 0 C
CI> - 0 .... CD ...... (0 0
a. ::;- 0 CD :J CD N co
C Q) a. C
0 C/l r+ a. a. N
r+ CD
CD (1) a. (1) CD ~ I
a. Q) r+ a. Q, 8- ::0
c- o. ::r o' 0 "--"
'< 0 Q) ~ Q) r:::: N~ N
a. - r+ lii 01(,.)0)
(1) 0 n
c: m )( :J 0- r+ WCOUl L......-I
CD :J 0 "U c- ~. C> <0 ...... II
8" a. (1) (1) '< :s
0.. CD ..... 0..
CD CD a. ""0 (1) 0 ~
x II)
0 a. C < -
CD (')' ""0 0 (1) (0
C/l Q) c 0-
C/l 0:. 0 ;:u "0 (0
a. 0 ;:u ..... !!1 ....
:J (1)
CD ..... co "...., ....
Q, CD f:. - W
0 ..c Q) x'
Q) C r+ (1) ~
d: :::;. o' a. ......
0 CD :J I>> (:)
:J 3 II) 3 co
CD 0
:J C
r+ :J
.e;
oty of
Co//eyvi//e Parks and Recreation Department
Mt
Meeting Agenda #
4/03/00 6
Department:
Subject:
Parks and Recreation
Discussion and Consideration of Approval for the Use of Parkland
Dedication Monies, in the Amount of $35,000, to Purchase Trail
Right-of-Way for the Cotton Belt Trail
See Attached
ACT10N TO BE TAKEN
D Discussion Only
o Information Only
D Procedural Change
ri' Possible Oty Coundl Policy Recommendation
Page~of~
. ,
MEMORANDUM
FROM:
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board )
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager ];
March 29, 2000 )
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Cotton belt Trail Phase I - Trail Right-of-way Easement
On March 27, the Park Land Dedication Committee met to consider a request for
the use of $35,000 of Park Land Dedication Fund monies for the purchase of a
trail right-of-way easement and construction of 1,100 linear feet of fence to
facilitate the construction of the Cotton belt Trail. (See attached March 22, 2000
staff briefing). As per the attached minutes, the Park Land Dedication Committee
voted unanimously to recommend the use of the Park Land Dedication Fund
monies for this purpose. Total available Park Land Dedication funds, as of
February 29,2000, is $98,000.17.
Staff requests that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board accept the
recommendation of the Park Land Dedication Committee and approve this
request.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Monica
Sue Walsh, Parks and Recreation Manager, at 656.7275 or me at 577.7589,
extension 204.
Attachments:
Staff briefing, dated March 22, 2000
Park Land Dedication Minutes, dated March 29, 2000
Financial Status of Park Land Dedication Fund as of February 29, 2000
Park Land Dedication Committee
Staff Briefing
March 22,2000
. ,
MEMORANDUM
TO: Park Land Dedication Committee
FROM: Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager
Monica Sue Walsh, Parks and Recreation Manager
Keith Fisher, Engineering Project Manager
DATE: March 22, 2000
SUBJECT: Cottonbelt Trail Phase I - Easement
In April 1999, the Park Land Dedication Committee approved an allocation of
additional monies, in the amount of $76,297.26 to serve as a local match for
submittal of grant applications for the continued enhancement of the Cottonbelt
Trail. In December 1999, the North Central Texas Council of Governments
(NCTCOG) approved grant funding for the development of Phase II of the
Cottonbelt Trail for the cities of Colleyville and Hurst.
City staff has continued to work with Mesa Design Group, Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDot) and Dallas Area Regional Transportation (DART) to
complete the design of the trail within the monies allocated for Phase I. After
reviewing the cost constraints associated with the design and construction of
three railroad crossings (John McCain Road, Pleasant Run Road and Bransford
Road), it was determined that the entire length of the Cottonbelt Trail within the
City of Colleyville be constructed on the north side of the DART rights-of-way.
The projected cost estimates for construction of the Cottonbelt Trail from John
McCain Road to Pleasant Run are as follows: (See attached Mesa Design
Group Estimated Project Costs).
$1,188,419.30
$1,060,000.00
$ 128,419.00
Estimated Project Cost
Available Monies (Grant and Local Share)
Funding Shortfall
Unfortunately, due to current construction costs and due to extensive drainage
work that would need to be performed within the DART right-of-way, the City
would need to cut the budget by $128,419 to build the trail from John McCain
Road to Pleasant Run Road. In consideration of available funding and review of
the proposed design, staff determined that the acquisition of a small strip,
approximately 15 feet in width along the southern boundary of property owned by
Mr. Joe Tirk, adjacent to the railroad right-of way would assist the City with this
funding shortfall. (See attached February 16, 2000 letter).
The revised cost estimates with the easement are as follows:
$1,060,000.00
$1,055,318.30
$ 4,681.70
Available Monies (Grant and Local Share)
Estimated Project Cost With Easement
Balance
The difference in the total estimated construction costs with the easement is
$133,101.
In response, Mr. Tirk has made an offer to the City to sell the City 16,040 square
feet of right-of-way, contingent upon the City constructing 1,100 linear feet of
fence along his property for an estimated cost of $35,000. (See attached). To
reduce the Cottonbelt Trail, Phase I, grant project budget by $133,101 the City
would need to expend $35,000 of city monies, which brings the project within the
available budget allocation.
On the basis of the above, staff requests that the Park Land Dedication
Committee approve the use of $35,000 of the Park Land Dedication Fund for the
purchase of a right-of-way easement and construction of a 1,100 linear feet of
fence. As of January 31, 2000, the unencumbered balance in the Park Land
Dedication Fund was $53,704.81. (See attached).
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me.
xx: Robert Stripling, City Manager
Re-Alignment Cost Estimate
MESA Design Group,lnc.
COLLEYVILLE (Portion 'A' - John McCain to Pleasant Run)
Cottonbelt Trail
97070
TOTLAL LEN UNIT ORIGINAL TOTLAL LENGNEW EASEMENT
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY PRICE COST NEW ESMT.QT COST
Trail Construction
Clearing, grubbing, prep I Is $21,506.20 $21.506.20 I Is $21,506,20
Excavation 7,000 cy $9,00 $63,000,00 7,000 cy $63,000,00
Fill Material 2,300 cy $15,00 $34,500.00 l,100 cy $16.500,00
Retaining wall 60 cy $375,00 $22,500,00 60 cy $22.500,00
Handrail (54") 250 If $65,00 $16.250.00 250 If $16,250.00
Drainage I ]s $118,000,00 $118,000,00 1 Is $25,000,00
10' concrete path (5" depth)(Within 3,986 sy $25,00 $99,650,00 3,986 sy $99,650,00
10' concrete path (5" depth) 4.077 sy $30,00 $122.310,00 4,077 sy $122.310.00
Handicap Ramps 0 ea $750,00 $0,00 0 ea $0,00
Shoulder Fill 1,365 cyd $16,00 $21,840.00 1,365 cyd $21,840,00
SUBTOTAL $5] 9,556.20 $408,556.20
Additional Costs
Utility adjustments 1 Is $9,490.35 $9,490.35 I Is $9,490,35
Walkway paint, striping I Is $5,536,02 $5,536,02 1 Is $5,536.02
Traffic Barricades ] Is $9,000.00 $9,000,00 I Is $9,000.00
Erosion control I ]s $9,490.35 $9,490.35 ] 1s $9,490.35
Signage * 46 ea $440,00 $20,240,00 40 ea $17,600,00
Remove/replace fencing 200 If $12,00 $2,400,00 200 If $2,400,00
BoIlards 0 ea $400,00 $0,00 0 ea $0,00
Utility Sign Relocaltion (1/20 If. A 364 SlgnS $35,00 $12,740.00 304 signs $10,640,00
SUBTOTAL $68,896.72 $64.]56.72
TOTALS
Total Trail Construction Cost $588.452.92 $472.712.92
Mobilization fee (10% construction) $58,845.29 $47.271.29
Contingency (5%) $29,422,65 $23,635.65
SUBTOTAL $676,720,86 $543.619,86
NE Fees (Contract) $133,633,00 $133,633.00
Add Services (Surveying)(Includes $1,896,20 for Hurst) $8.553.80 $8,553.80
Add Services (Expanded Scope) $13,425.00 50 $13,425.00
NE Fees (Re-A1ignment) ..... $14,530.00 $14,530,00
TxDOT Review Fees (2% of budget proposed by Colleyville) $21,201.60 $21,201.60
TOT AL COST PORTION A ** $ 868,064.26 $ 734.963.26
· -Infonn.lion supplied by DT A *. ~Docs not include trail extensions to meet proposed trails or the 2.1 ) 0 IfTimarron portion.
*.*-Within 500' of roadway intersection. Does not include pricing on Terminal Facilities
This cost projection is based on infonnation obtained from subconsultant and MESA. This inform.ation does not j
of the trail. Prices.are subject to change without notice after 30 days due to constrUction cost increascJdecrease.
.... Fees farmis section are included in Section A ifB is done simultaneously. As an independent project.. one
fees of12.5%.
These cost projections are not valid as an independent contract amount. only on complete project length.
These prices .are formul.ated only on current data based on complete nil contract amount.
ColleyvilleA2.23-<lO
2/24/00
PAGE 1
Cost Projection
MESA Design Group,lnc.
COLLEYVILLE (Portion 'B' - Pleasant Run Park to DART 33
4516 LF (14206 LF. Total Trail Length)
Cotton Belt Trail
97070
TOTLAL LEN UNIT ORlGINAL ORlGINAL ORlGINAL
DESCRlPTION QUANTITY PRlCE COST SUBTOTALS SUBTOTALS
Trail Construction
Clearing. grubbing, prep I Is $12,966,90 $12,966,90
Tree Clearing 1.8 ac $5,100.00 $9,180,00
ExcavatIOn 3.500 cy $9,00 $3L500.00
Fill Material 100 cy $15,00 $1,500,00
Retaining wall 35 cy $375,00 $13,125,00
Handrail (54") 0 If $65,00 $0,00
Drainage 1 Is $28,300,00 $28,300,00
10' concrete path (5" depth)(Within 2.081 sy $25,00 $52,025.00
10' concrete path (5" depth) 2.264 sy $30,00 $67.920,60
Handicap Ramps 3 ea $750,00 $2,250.00
Shoulder Fill 670 cyd $16,00 $10,720,00
SUBTOTAL 5229.487.50 5229.487.50 5229.487.50
Additional Costs
Utility adjustments I Is $5,722,10 $5,722.10
Walkway paint, striping I ls $3,337,90 $3,337,90
Traffic Barricades I Is $4,000,00 $4,000,00
Erosion control I Is $5,722,10 $5,722.10
Signage · 48 ea $440,00 $21,120,00
Remove/replace fencing 100 If $12,00 $1.200,00
Bollards 6 ea $400,00 $0,00
Ut,ility Sign Relocaltion (1/20 If. A 228 signs $35,00 $7,980,00
SUBTOTAL 549,082.10 549.082.10 549.082.10
TOTALS
Total Trail Construction Cost $278,569.60 $278,569.60
Mobilization fee (10% construction) $27,856,96 $27,856,96
Contingency (5%) $13 ,928.48 $13,928.48
SUBTOTAL $320,355,04 $320,355.04
AlE Fees (Re-Alignment) " $0,00 $0.00
TOTAL COST PORTION B** $320,355.04 $320,355.04
SUMMARY ORIGINAL NEW EASEMENT
TOTAL COST PORTION A** $868,064.26 $734,963.26
TOT AL COST PROTION B** $320,355.04 $320,355.04
TOTAL COST PORTION A&B ORIGINAL ALIGNMENT $1,188,419.30
TOTAL COST PROTION A&B NEW ALIGNMENT $1,055,318.30
BUDGET PROPOSED BY COLLEYVILLE TO TXDOT $1,060,000.00 $1,060,000.00
* .Information supplied by DT A ...Does not Include tratl extensions to meet proposed trails
* * * -Withm 500' of roadway intersection Docs not include priCing on TerrmoaJ Facilities
This cost projection is based on information ohQined from subconsulunt ill1d MESA. This information does not include any re-alignment
of the trail. Prices are subject to change without notice after 30 days due to construction cost increase/decrease.
These cost projections are not valid as an independent contract amount, only on complete project length.
These prices are formulated only on current data based on complete trail contract amount.
These numbers will change with the re.alignment.
ColleyvilleB2.23~O
2/24/00
PAGE 1
city of
~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Texas
February 16, 2000
Mr. Joe V. Tirk
909 John McCain Road
Colleyville, TX 76034
Re: Cottonbelt Trail System.
Dear Mr. Tirk:
The City of Colleyville has an interest in acquiring a small strip, approximately 20 feet in
width along the southern boundaries of your properties, adjacent to the railroad right-of-
way, for the multi-use Cotton belt Trail system. This trail system will provide a venue for
recreational hiking and biking and will connect many of the communities in our area.
You may have noticed the construction of a portion of that trail system along Highway
26 adjacent to the railroad track. That same trail will extend along the tracks through
Colleyville toward North Richland Hills. Please contact me as soon as possible to
discuss this matter. My fax number is (817) 577-7562. My telephone number is (817)
577-7587. I look forward to hearing from you.
Cc: Diane McWethy, Assistant City Manager
Bob Whitehead, Director of Public Services
Keith Fisher, Engineering
Cotton belt Trail System file
P.O. BOX 185 COLLEYVILLE, TEXAS 76034 (817) 577-7575
Me1110randmn
To: Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager
CC: Troy Gray, Engineering Tech / ROW
From: Keith Fisher, Project Manager /AJf.r
Date: 03/22/00
Re: Turk Trail ROW
I received a confirmation from Mike Konold of Mesa regarding the proposed ROW
take on the Turk tract. He verified the original numbers of 16,040 sf ROWand 1100
If for the installation of the fence. For your funding request, please use the
following numbers for this project.
Property take:
$26,000
$5,000
$4,000
$35,000
Fence installation:
Contingency:
Total
Call me if you have any questions concerning this issue.
FINANCIAL STATUS OF PARKLAND DEDICATION FUND AT 1-31-2000
TOTAL REVENUES
$374,663.18
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME REC'D
$56,940,90
LESS EXPENSES:
KIDSVILLE DONATION
LANDSCAPING NATURE CENTER
NATURE CENTER TREES
KIMSEY PARK APPRAISALS
CITY PARK SOD
TPWD KIMSEY PARK GRANT
COTTONBEL T TRAIL I
$1,000,00
$1,169,07
$1,035,00
$4,700,00
$72,881,20
$8,800,00
$20,932,76
TOTAL EXPENSES
$110,518,03
LF~- ENCUMBERANCES
)
L roNBELTTRAIL I
COTTONBELTTRAIL II
$191,083,24
$76,298,00
TOTALENCUMBERANCES
$267,381,24
TOTAL AVAILABLE AT 1-31-2000
$53,704,81
REVEMJES fROM FEES PAID FEE PAlO DATE PAlO
ASHMOlIE 2A $2.170.77 8I2OIIl2
L "NGWQOO PH I 5DJO.3l 2/,g,;gl
LONGWOOD PH II $11.7&4.18 712JQl
M(""" , AIR PARe 52',8oe80 IlIMll
I $1.2"0..40 llJ23I9l
Rl iNNS IV
ASHa.cORE 116 SVDOD9 8123/91
HIGHlAND MEADOWS v $5,581.98 Dt7/9l
ROSS DOWNS v $17,886.38 11!2~3
KINGSWOOO $15,81561 12117/93
SHAOO'.\WOOO PHASE II $13.56731 112SJg.<
LOHGWOOO PHASE III & N $10,853.85 MlI94
CAl[)Ih'ELl CREEK $18,196.49 711QriM
ASHMORE N $4,).(1.5-4 I~
LAKEWOOO PHASE I 52,'8088 3/1/95
y,.IQQOBR.IAR WEST S5.561.98 7/12/95
LAKE\VOOO PHASE II Sl.2.40<< &'11195
VILLAGE PARK $4.3415-4 8/16/95
HERITAGE COLONY $10.853,85 8/28/95
LAKEWOOO PHASE III $4.031,"3 3119196
lONGWOOO C ROSS DO~S PHASE v $8.1583,06 6I26I!l6
AR60R ESTATES PHASE III $<,:1<154 8122196
GLEN HOPE ADDITION $3,721.32 llJ23I96
LAKEWOOO ESTATES PHASE IV $1.4,885.2B 11118/96
BRIOLE'WOOD $38.178.53 12120196
OAKBROOK HILLS $11.474.07 12/26196
OAK KNOLL OR (ONE LOT) $310.11 1n197
STOVER CONST (ONE LOT) $'310.11 1/31197
ASHMORE PHASE V S3.411.21 D/8J97
..'" ..."" (ONE LOT) $310.11 1212197
I
TIM" .oj PHASE 1 $11,47.4.07 12/15/97
CALDWElLS CREEK PH IIA $<.651.65 1/6196
580e PLEASANT RLt-l ' LEOSEM'" $310.11 1I1iU'9B
MADDEN, 170< RENFRO $310.1\ 2/13198
H.6.lL - 5606 AMADOR $310.11 2/13/ll8
REMINGTOO PARK PH 1 &2 $2',808.81 3/17198
SPRING GAR DEN $13,334.73 3124/'Q6
A660Tr~7oo JIM "lTCHELL E. $310.1\ <113198
SEXTON-<800 BEHERNS CT 5310,1\ <l2M/8
STRATTQN..5309 MONTCLAIR 53101\ 516198
SHALIMAR 59,613.<1 D/J0/98
LEYTON GROVE 51',185.28 1212/l18
7010 ORCHARD HILL $1,180.00 3/1199
4400 BILL SIMMONS $310.11 <J5I99
WOODS OF COLLEYVILLE $10.eS3.85 <128199
'318 HARDAGE 51,260.00 5110/99
TtMMARON PH II $1.4.e8S.28 5/1 "99
'7120A.K KNOLL 51,26000 5117199
6EN & ELlZA6E'Tli AOOIT'ON $1,2'0 .. 8I25IIl9
loe aLACK ORNE 51,28000 7f2MlD
O.STEEN ADDITION $l.2tlO_OO ll/2/99
EMLER. SWIM SCHOOL 53115 00 W/!/9
REMINGTON PARK PH II $11."74.07 10/llI99
2300 GLADE ROAD 5310.11 1t/3/ll9
Mil' l PH.<SE · 52.08100 '2/1199
471' _RN~BAC.4. 51260.00 1111100
TOTAL R~NUES SJ74.8e3.18
Park land Dedication Committee Minutes
March 27, 2000
Park Land Dedication Committee Minutes
Monday, March 27, 2000
The meeting of the Park Land Dedication Committee was called to order on
March 27, 2000, at 5:45 p.m.
Members present: Rich Hendler, Joe Noorlag and Tom Hart
Members absent: Jim Fletcher
Staff Attendees: Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager, Monica Sue
Walsh, Parks and Recreation Manager, and Keith Fisher,
Engineering Project Manager
The Park Land Dedication Committee voted unanimously to recommend that the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and the City Council consider approval of
the use of Park Land Dedication funds, in the amount of $35,000, for the
purchase of a trail right-of-way easement and construction of 1,100 linear feet of
fence to facilitate the construction of the Cottonbelt Trail.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m.
Minutes submitted by:
~=w~~
Assistant City Manager
March 29, 2000
Financial Status of Park Land Dedication Fund
As of February 29, 2000
FINANCIAL STATUS OF PARKLAND DEDICATION FUND AT 2-29-2000
,TOTAL REVENUES
$418,958,54
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME REC'D
$56,940,90
LESS EXPENSES
KIDSVILLE DONATION
LANDSCAPING NATURE CENTER
NATURE CENTER TREES
KIMSEY PARK APPRAISALS
CITY PARK SOD
TPWD KIMSEY PARK GRANT
COTTONBEL T TRAIL I
$1,000,00
$1,169,07
$1,035,00
$4,700,00
$72,881.20
$8,800,00
$24,110.68
TOTAL EXPENSES
$113,695.95
LESS ENCUMBERANCES
ICOTTONBEL T TRAIL I
COTTON BEL T TRAIL II
$187,905.32
$76,298,00
TOTALENCUMBERANCES
$264,203,32
TOTAL AVAILABLE AT 2-29-2000
$98,000,17
REV;NUES FROM FEES PAID FEE PA'D DATE PAID
ASHMORE 2A 52,17077 6(20192
LONGWOOD PH , 593033 2119193
LONGWOOO PH II $11,784.18 7/2193
MONTCLAIR PARe $24,808.80 B/6/93
\\055 DOWNS IV $1.240.40 8/23(93
ASHMORE liB 52.790 99 8/23/93
HIGHLAND MEADOWS V 55,5BI98 gn193
ROSS DOIfw'NS V 517 .9B838 11(24/93
KINGSVJOOD $15,81561 12/17/93
SHADOWNOOD PHASE II $13,567.31 1/25/94
LONGWOOD PHASE III & IV $10.853.85 6/9/94
CALDWELL CREEK $18.296.49 7/19/94
ASHMORE IV $4,34154 10128/94
LAKE\'VOOO PHASE I 52.4BO,B8 3/1195
WOODBRIAR WEST $5,58'.98 7112195
LAKEWOOD PHASE II 51.240,44 8/11195
VILLAGE PARK $4,34154 8/16/95
HERITAGE COLONY 510,B5385 812B/95
LAKEV\IOOD PHASE III $4.03 '.43 3/19/96
LONGWOOD @ ROSS QOVVNS PHASE v S8,683.08 6/26/96
ARBOR ESTATES PHASE III $4.341.54 8/22196
GLEN HOPE ADDITION $3,721.32 8/23/95
LAKEWOOD ESTATES PHASE IV $14,885.28 11118/96
BRIDLEWOOD 53B,178,53 12120/96
OAKBROOK HILLS $11,47.4.07 12126/96
OAK KNOLL DR (ONE LOT) 531011 WI97
STOVER caNST (ONE LOT) $310.11 1131/97
ASHMORE PHASE V S3,411.21 9/8/97
4404 BOWMAN (ONE LOT) $310.11 12/2197
TIM MARON PHASE I $11,47.4.07 12115197
rLDWELLS CREEK PH IIA $4,651.65 1/6/98
6808 PLEASANT RUN. lEDSEMA 5310,11 1119198
MADDEN - 1704 RENFRO 5310,11 2/13/98
HALL - 5606 AMADOR 5310,11 2113/98
REMINGTON PARK PH 18.2 524,808.81 l/17(ge
SPRING GARDEN 513,334,73 3/24/98
ABBOTT -4700 JIM MITCHELL E 5310,11 4/13/98
SEXT0N-4800 BEHERNS CT 531011 4129/9B
STRATTON-5309 MONTCLAIR S310.11 5/8/9B
SHAUMAR 59,613,41 9130198
LEYTON GROVE 514.BB5,28 1212/98
7010 ORCHARD HIll 51.260,00 311199
4400 Bill SIMMONS $310.11 4/5(99
WOODS OF COlLEYVtlLE $10,853.85 4128/99
1316 HARDAGE $1,280,00 5/10/99
TIMMARON PH 11 $14,885.28 5114199
1712 OAK KNOLL 51,260,00 6117/99
BEN & ELIZABETH ADDITION 51.240.44 6/25199
30B BLACK DRIVE $1.260,00 7f26/99
Q'STEEN ADDITION $1,260.00 B/2/99
EMLER SWIM SCHOOL 5395,60 9nlS9
REMINGTON PARK PH II $11.474.07 1016/99
2300 GLADE ROAD $310.11 11/3199
MILL CREEK PHASE 4. 52,6B1.oo 12/1/99
5600 MONTCLAIR DRIVE $310.11 114/00
4719 BEHERNS-BACA 51,260.00 1111/00
~FUND OF CALDWELL'S CREEK FEES ($4.65165) 2110100
MONTERRA $47,378.90 2110/00
4900 JIM MITCHEll W 51,260,00 2125/00
TOTAL REVENUES $41B,958.54
Oty of
_" ;Je Parks and Recreation Department
Meeting
04/03/00
Agenda #
7
Department:
Subject:
Parks and Recreation
Recreation, Athletics, Tennis and Seniors' Report
I. RECREATION
A. The department and the Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation
sponsored "Kid Fish" on March 5 at the Colleyville Nature Center,
350 people participated.
II. ATHLETICS
A. The department and the City of Southlake Parks and Recreation
Department, co-hosted a portion of the Texas Amateur Athletic
Federation State Basketball Tournament March 18 at Colleyville
Middle School, approximately 94 teams participated.
B. City of Colleyville will participate in the annual Corporate Challenge
to be held in North Richland Hills April 29 to May 13. Events
include Tug of War, Softball, Horseshoes, Miniature Golf, Table
Tennis, Basketball, Golf, Bowling, Tennis, Billiards, Volleyball, and
a 5-K Run.
C. The City of Colleyville Parks and Recreation Department along with
other area cities (Hurst, North Richland Hills, Grapevine, Euless
and Bedford) will host the 2003-04 Texas Amateur Athletic
Federation Games of Texas, which will take place at local venues,
including City of Colleyville sites. Events will include soccer, sand
volleyball, tennis, baseball, softball and other various sports.
D. Colleyville Baseball Association, Colleyville Soccer Association and
Colleyville Softball Association seasons are all underway. The
department has been working with the associations to begin their
seasons.
ACT10N TO BE TAKEN
o piscussion Only
rgI' Information Only
o Procedural Change
o Possible Oty Coundl Policy Recommendation
page~of~
Recreation Report
April 3, 2000
Page 2 of 2
III. TENNIS
A. March tennis classes had 19 participants.
B. The Mid-Cities Tennis Tournament was held at City Park on March
25, forty-two participants competed in the tournament.
C. City Park is host to league matches for Northeast Tarrant Tennis,
United States Tennis Association and Tennis Competitors of
Dallas.
IV. SENIORS
A. Staff is working with local seniors, churches and other groups to
recruit volunteer instructors and leaders for senior drop-in activities
at the L.D. Lockett facility on Mondays. Activities considered are
exercise classes, dominoes, cards, etc.
D. Metroport Meals on Wheels monthly luncheon and activity program
is held the first Friday of each month at the Colleyville Community
Center from 10:00 a.m.-1 :30 p.m. Seventy-six participants enjoyed
March's luncheon.
-i r- en z 0 " < z s: ~ -i -i en en en en -0 -0 LI -i z:; 0
CI> 0 ] III ~ ii' 0 0 III iil CI> -c CI> ~ 0 c; 0 iii' c: :l :::T
:l e- o: c :l :r ~ 0 :l CI> :l ii' :l :l 3 a. S'
:l r- ::c :l 0 g. :::T 3 '<
jjj' 0 <a til LI :l lD ,.. jjj' iiI ~ :l 0 2: CI> III
0 ~ ~ ;0 lD ~ 0 ii. 0 iD
,.. 0 CI> lB :l -0 ~ CI> ..... C :f -0
0 lD -0 ,.. lG ~ III a -0 m ,.. )> CD '€. III III
0 ::l: CI> c: :l S ~ s VI 0' a. a
c: III :l LI :< :r CI> 0 0 en a. III Q '<
~ ;0 x ~ III 0 ;a CI> III iil :l iil < UI '< 5'
CI> ~ !a c: 3 3 iil fii "8 lD ,.. 3 <a
::0 rn LI 0' (il c 3 3 :l ~
CI> CI> ~ LI 0' c lG -c UI ~ e- O' :l
UI :< III ::l :l UI UI VI ii ~ III
CI> ~ UI CI> (il 0 se.
:< !a 0' 0' (il III o'
!a o' :l :l 3 UI
0' :l -c
:l UI UI
UI
-4 r (Jl Z () 'TI (Jl Z s: < -I -0 -0 -0 -I D- ()
ll) 0 -0 III ~ (ij' -0 0 III !2. iil iil 0 ir c: :J ;;r
:J r III ~ c: 0 :J 5' CD 0 3 :J :J 3 c. :=f
:J <0 :J :h '<
or g -0 Ul iD '< ;><;'" 0 2: ll) III
~ II> III ;0 0- ~. () iil
() ~ () X II> 0 ~ :J ~ -0 C 5' -0
-0 Ul ::t III 0 OJ (Q AI III
0 ;:; (I) ll) (Jl a: :J 0- ~ C. a
c: III :J -0 :< <<5' ll) 0 () (Q III '<
;:l- ;0 x ~ ~ ~ II> III iil Ul :J
~ :J ;><;'"
;0 ll) 'TI 3 3 ll) 3 (Q
Ul -0 -0 cr 5' 'TI 'TI II> -0 ;:l- ET :J
ll) ll) III II> II>
III :< ~ III :J :J II> ll) (I) Ul ~ III
ll) ~ Ul Ul !!\.
~ 5' Ul Ul ()
:< 5' III 0'
~ o' :J :J 3 Ul
0' :J -0
:J Ul Ul
Ul
Oty of
Co//eyvi//e Parks and Recreation Department
Mt
Meeting
04/03/00
Agenda #
8
Department:
Subject:
Parks and Recreation
Park Operations and Capital Improvement Status Report
BRANSFORD PARK MASTER PLAN
Project description: Development of Master Plan for site
Consultant: Carter & Burgess
Contractor: N/ A
Status: Researching historical grant opportunities
Substantial completion: Completed
KIMZEY PARK
Project description: Design for redevelopment
Consultant: Carter and Burgess
Contractor: N/A
Status: Design development
Substantial completion: Summer 2000
PLEASANT RUN AND SPARGER PARK RESTROOM PROJECTS
Project description: Restroom/Concession building at Pleasant Run
Soccer Complex. Restroom building at Sparger Park
Consultant: Carter and Burgess
Contractor: McWilliams Enterprises
Status: Final punch list
Substantial completion: Completed
ACT10N TO BE TAKEN
o Discussion Only
IKI Information Only
D Procedural Change
D Possible Oty Coundl Policy Recommendation
Page~of~
Park Operations and Capital Improvement Status Report
April 3, 2000
Page 2 of 3
COTTONBEL T TRAIL
Project description:
Design of Cottonbelt Trail
Consultant:
Mesa Design Group
Contractor:
N/A
Status:
First submittals sent to TXDOT
Substantial completion:
Fall 2000
PLEASANT RUN PROPERTY
Project description: Design of Master Plan
Consultant: Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein Landscape
Arch itectu re
Contractor: N/A
Status: Design process
Substantial completion: Completed
MCPHERSON PARK MASTER PLAN
Project description: Design of Master Plan
Consultant: Newman, Jackson, Bieberstein Landscape
Arch itectu re
Contractor: N/A
Status: Design process
Substantial completion: Summer 2000
Park Operations and Capital Improvement Status Report
April 3, 2000
Page 3 of 3
Other Park Projects:
L.D. Lockett Park - Plans are being developed for the parking lot, lighting
and landscaping improvements.
Colleyville Proud Trash Off/Tree City USA/Arbor Day - Celebration will be held
on Saturday, April 8 at noon at City Park pavilion.
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes
April 3, 2000
Roger Nelson moved that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board defer action
on this item until Item 4, Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Master Plan
for McPherson Park is considered. Joe Noorlag seconded and the vote was
unanimous.
4. Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Master Plan for McPherson
Park
Karl Von Bieberstein reviewed the planning process, the proposed Master Plan
including park elements, phases for development and preliminary cost estimates
of McPherson Park.
Dan Witte motioned that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommend
denial of the proposal presented by David Bagwell to build a road along the West
side of McPherson Park. Joe Noorlag seconded and the vote was unanimous.
Joe Noorlag motioned that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board approve the
proposed Master Plan for McPherson Park. Dan Witte seconded the motion and
the vote was unanimous.
5. Discussion and Consideration of Amending the Parkland Dedication
Ordinance
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager, presented the proposed amended
Parkland Dedication Ordinance.
Joe Noorlag motioned that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board approve the
proposed Parkland Dedication Ordinance as proposed by staff with the additional
change: delete from Section 6C, second paragraph, fourth line, the wording after
"PUD-R zoning ordinance, provided," to the end of Section 6. Dan Witte
seconded and the vote was unanimous.
6. Discussion, and Consideration of Approval for the Use of Parkland
Dedication Monies, in the Amount of $35,000, to Purchase Trail Right-of-
Way for the Cotton belt Trail
Dianne McWethy, Assistant City Manager briefed the Parks and Recreation
Advisory Board regarding the proposed purchase of the Trail Right-of-Way for
construction of the Cotton belt Trail.
Joe Noorlag motioned that the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board approve the
use of Parkland Dedication monies, in an amount not to exceed $35,000, to
purchase Trail Right-of-Way for construction of the Cottonbelt Trail and Dan Witte
seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous.
2
Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes
April 3, 2000
7. Recreation, Athletics, Tennis and Seniors Report
Craig Dishman, Recreation Supervisor, provided an overview of the current and
proposed recreation programs and activities available to the citizens of
Colleyville and the surrounding areas.
8. Park Operations and Capital Improvement Status Report
Monica Walsh, Parks and Recreation Manager, presented a status report of
current projects.
9. Citizen Comments/Presentations Regarding Items Not on the Agenda*
10. Other Informational Items
11. Adjournment
At 9:45 p.m. Dan Witte motioned to adjourn, Ken Crooks seconded and the vote
was unanimous.
3