The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning and Zoning Commission-Agenda Packets-2/23/2004 city Of AGENDA PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION City Hall Council Chambers -100 Main Street Monday, February 23, 2004 REGULAR MEETING: 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Chairman Jeff Wall Commissioners Bruce Kelly, Earl Swift, Jeff Byerly, Mark Jones, Jeff Wall INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE RECOGNITION OF OUTGOING COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Jones Bob Culley, Place 5 Bud Sellers, Place 7 APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 26, 2004 February 9,2004 CITIZEN COMMENTS AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case P-04-008 - PUBLIC HEARING - Replat of Lots 1 R-1 A and 1 R-1 B, Block 1, O'Steen Addition, 1.91 acres located at 321 W. McDonwell School Road 2. Case P-04-009 - Minor Plat of Pleasant Run Baptist Church Addition, 3.15 acres located at 6001 Pleasant Run Road 3. Case P-04-010 - Minor Plat of Lot 12, Block 2, Heritage High School Addition, 1.45 acres located at the southwest corner of State Highway 121 and Gateway Drive 4. Case Z-04-012 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential on 41.8 acres located at 909 John McCain Road Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda - February 23, 2004 Page 1 of 2 5. Case Z-04-013 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential on 9.8 acres located at 600 Shelton Drive 6. Discussion of the Master Plan Update 7. Staff Comments, Reports and Discussion Items: The following items were received on the last case submittal deadline: . Case Z-04-014 - Special Use Permit for Alcoholic Beverage Sales on 1.97 acres located in the 5400 block of State Highway 121 . Case P-04-011 - Final Plat of the Redus Addition including a Replat of Lot 1 R & 2, Block 1, Redus Addition and Lot 1 ,Block 1, Chatham Addition located in the 4500 block of Bowman Drive and the 4500 block of Bill Simmons Road 8. Commissioners' Comments and Reports ADJOURNMENT ,. "" ,.". 00,"" lli" ,." _"'" ~, '00,", '" lli. "",.," '00. .. Cl<, e." 00 'Od',. 'OO. ",. ",'" .. .~ Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda - February 23,2004 Page 2 of 2 cc.~ TellS!! PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - January 26, 2004 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Wall called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. ROLL CALL Commissioners Bruce Kelly, Earl Swift, Jeff Byerly, Bud Sellers, Mark Jones, and Jeff Wall were present. Commissioner Culley was absent. Barry LeBaron, Clayton Husband, and Jan Levy from staff were present. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Commissioner Swift APPROVAL OF MINUTES January 12, 2004 Commissioner Kelly moved to approve the minutes of the January 12, 2004 meeting as written. Commissioner Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed by unanimous acclamation with Commissioner Swift abstaining. CITIZEN COMMENTS There was no comment. AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case Z-04-007 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from R20 to PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial on Lot 1, Block 2, Thompson Terraces Addition located at 5001 Thompson Terrace Clayton Husband presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. Sharon Smith, applicant, was present to represent the case. The Commission entered into discussion with the applicant about other potential uses of the proposed building. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Carol King, 5000 Oak Timbers, expressed concerns about parking, traffic flow onto Glade Road, fencing requirements along the east side of the property between the residential property, the fence that is currently in place, and a large dead tree located on the property with limbs that hang over her storage building. There was no one else present wishing to speak, and the public hearing was closed. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - January 26, 2004 Page 1 of 5 Draft Copy #1 Sharon Smith, applicant, returned to answer questions that were raised in the public hearing. Commissioner Byerly and Chairman Wall discussed requirements fencing between commercial and residential uses. Commissioner Swift recommended approval of the zoning change as submitted. Commissioner Sellers seconded the motion. Commissioner Byerly said he would like to see a fencing requirement included in the ordinance. The commissioners suspended the rules to talk with Ms. King about proposed fencing between the commercial lot and her property. There was discussion by staff, Ms. King and the commissioners. Chairman Wall recommended that the safety officials and Community Development staff make a recommendation. Commissioner Byerly offered a friendly amendment that a fence is placed at the northeast corner of the property ending fifteen feet from the property line. Commissioners Swift and Sellers accepted the amendment. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 2. Case Z-04-004 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG to PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial on 1.9 acres located at the southwest corner of Church Street and Colleyville Boulevard Clayton Husband presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. The commissioners and staff entered into discussion about the adjacent property to the west and the preliminary design of the roadway and the impact it would have on the future development of the property. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. There was no one present wishing to speak and the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Byerly moved to recommend approval of the zoning change. Commissioner Jones seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - January 26, 2004 Page 2 of 5 Draft Copy #1 3. Case Z-04-003 - TABLED ITEM - Zoning Change from CC1 to PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential on 8.782 acres located at 5850 Colleyville Boulevard Commissioner Jones moved to remove the item from the table. Commissioner Swift seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None Commissioner Jones asked staff if they have had any direct contact with the GCISD regarding the emergency access issue. Clayton Husband responded that staff has not had direct contact, but he noticed the School Board has an item on their agenda to discuss that matter. Chairman Wall asked staff if there have been any discussions with the Parks Department and the City Manager's office regarding this proposal. Clayton Husband responded that they are aware of the request. Gary Cantrell, 3400 Glade Road, was present to represent the case. He requested that his request be approved subject to an approval letter from the GCISD and a design of the emergency access easement from the fire marshal and the GCISD. He discussed why the property is not conducive for commercial development. He displayed an exhibit of commercial property in the area and talked about future development. He said if the property is left commercial it would probably be better suited for a church or a private school and it may be marketable for commercial in twenty years. He said rooftops and people are needed in the area to support commercial development. He explained the unique concept of the open space. The commissioners entered into discussion with the developer about density; the widening of Highway 26; center turn lanes; the current traffic problems in the area; and the future commercial use for the property the south that is not under contract by the developer. Mark Howe, 3108 Carisbrooke Court, real estate broker, spoke about the Master Plan and how this property will not increase the overall density of the City. He informed the commissioners about various conversations he has had with the GCISD and the trustees. The commissioners entered into discussion about the density of the subdivision; future commercial viability; tax generation on the property; the uniqueness of the parcel; the emergency access; the exhibit displayed by the developer regarding other commercial properties and setbacks in the area; the timing of changing the zoning on this property in relationship to current commercial developments; the traffic problems associated with more people dropping off students at the area schools; and, the density of other high density residential subdivisions. Commissioner Jones moved to recommend approval of the zoning change request. Chairman Wall seconded the motion. The vote being: Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - January 26, 2004 Page 3 of 5 Draft Copy #1 Ayes: Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: Kelly, Swift, Byerly Commissioner Byerly moved to recommend denial of the zoning change request. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Commissioner Jones said he is a member of the economic task force and he said this is a unique parcel of land and the developer has given a compelling argument that future commercial development of the property would require more footage directly on Colleyville Boulevard. He said he is moved by the developer who has a target market and the remaining property will not be a cookie cutter development with 1.8 diu. Chairman Wall called for the vote. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Byerly Noes: Swift, Sellers, Jones, Wall Commissioner Sellers moved to approve the zoning change request contingent upon the approval of the GCISD and the City of Colleyville Fire Marshal. Commissioner Jones seconded the motion. Chairman Wall offered a friendly amendment that the GCISD park layout and construction of the park include a walking path around it and there is a resolution with the Pecan Estates residents for a pass through to get to the school property. The friendly amendment was accepted. Commissioner Byerly stated that they are fracturing the rules, not bending them. He said he appreciates Mr. Cantrell's honesty regarding the economics related to the development, but he will recommend denial because there are too many problems to approve the project now. He said he disagrees with the proposed density and is opposed to fire trucks running between the schools to access the subdivision in an emergency. He said Bogart is as backed up as Highway 26. The commissioners entered into discussion about fire truck access if the property remained commercial; density; Economic Development Task Force discussions; and, density. Chairman Wall asked Gary Cantrell if he would consider moving the rear setback requirements on the lots that back up to Pecan Park Estates from 10 feet to having a 20 foot rear setback. There was discussion about restricting rear windows on two story homes that back up to Pecan Park Estates. Mr. Cantrell said he could change the rear setback requirements, but he did not want to commit to changes in building designs unless he talked to builders. He said his development would have homes valued between $300,000 and $400,000 and the homes in Pecan Park Estates have values of between $175,000 and $200,000 and have antennas and 'satellite dishes in the yards. He told the commissioners how the emergency access would only be used when the main access is blocked and that would probably never occur. The motion to approve was amended to include the provision that the rear setbacks on the lots that back up to Pecan Park Estates would have a 20' rear setback. The vote Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - January 26, 2004 Page 4of5 Draft Copy #1 being: Ayes: Swift, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: Kelly, Byerly 4. Discussion of the Master Plan Update: Staff announced an upcoming Work Session on Thursday night, January 29,2004 at 6:30 p.m. in the executive conference room. 5. Staff Comments, Reports and Discussion Items: There was none. 6. Commissioners' Comments and Reports: Commissioner Jones said he appreciated all of the input by the commissioners and their ability to not agree, yet have respect for each other. Chairman Wall said he received an e-mail that was also sent to the City Secretary and Barry from Albert Haff and Associates. He said he did not think it was appropriate for him as a Commissioner to respond, nor does he intend to respond. Commissioner Byerly said he would like to see the staff and City Council standardize the barrier requirements between commercial and residential properties. Clayton Husband said he would forward Commissioner Byerly's comments. ADJOURNMENT The Commission adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m. by acclamation. Respectfully Submitted, Jan Levy Planning & Zoning Assistant Approved on: Note: As a matter of public record, an audio recording of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is available upon request. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - January 26, 2004 Page 5 of 5 Draft Copy #1 cc.~ "re ~al'l PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES - February 9, 2004 CALL TO ORDER Chairman Wall called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. ROLL CALL Commissioners Bruce Kelly, Bob Culley, Earl Swift, Jeff Byerly, Bud Sellers, Mark Jones, and Jeff Wall were present. Barry LeBaron, Clayton Husband, and Jan Levy from staff were present. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Commissioner Byerly CITIZEN COMMENTS There were no comments. AGENDA ITEMS 1. Case P-03-038 - Minor Plat of Allen Estates, 0.997 acres located at 1204 John McCain Road Mr. Clayton Husband presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. Commissioner Jones moved to approve the minor plat. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 2. Case P-04-007 - Minor Plat of Riverwalk at Colleyville, 2.729 acres located at the northwest corner of Glade Road and Riverwalk Drive Mr. Clayton Husband presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. Following discussions regarding access on Glade Road and the design standards for the access, Commissioner Byerly moved to approve the minor plat. Commissioner Jones seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - February 9, 2004 Page 1 of8 Draft Copy #1 3. Case Z-04-008 - PUBLIC HEARING - Special Use Permit for an Accessory Building on Lot 5, Block 3, Highland Acres located at 305 Timberline Drive S. Mr. Clayton Husband presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. There was no one present wishing to speak, and the public hearing was closed. Mr. Dave Wallace, applicant, was present to represent the case. He answered questions from the commissioners and informed them that the new structure would be for the purpose of parking his motor vehicles. He said the existing 400 s.f. building may be removed at a future date, but he currently needs to use it for storage until the new addition is completed. He said the height of the building will not change and there will be no commercial use of the accessory building. Mr. Barry LeBaron explained the history of why a special use permit is required for some accessory buildings. Commissioner Culley moved to recommend approval of the special use permit. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 4. Case Z-04-009 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from R40 Single Family Residential to R20 Single Family Residential on Lot 5R1, D.P. Arrington Limited Subdivision located at 2016 Glade Road Mr. Clayton Husband presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. There was discussion about location of driveways on the lots and setbacks in the R20 zoning district. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Mrs. Janelle Hardisty, 5000 Montclair Drive, spoke in opposition. Mr. Wayne Hood, 2108 Glade Road, spoke in opposition. Mr. Joe Deupree, 5101 Montclair Drive, spoke about zoning change signs. Mr. John Thompson, 5017 Montclair Drive, spoke in opposition. There was no one else present wishing to speak, and Chairman Wall closed the public hearing. Mr. Ken Mask, applicant, was present to represent the case to the commissioners and answer questions. He informed the commissioners that he has spoken with Chad Bartee about the drainage and the function of the drainage channel. He responded to a question regarding if he purchased the lot as an investment and said he plans on building his home on Lot 2 and when Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - February 9, 2004 Page 2 of 8 Draft Copy #1 a house is constructed on Lot 1 it will not be closer than five feet of the drainage swale. He told them he has a building plan for a home that is 4,000 s.f. to 4,500 s.f. that will fit on Lot 1. The commissioners discussed the possibility of tabling the case to allow the applicant to provide drainage plans, and building designs. There was discussion about breaking a pattern of having overall one zoning district on a subdivision and how the R20 would split the R40 zoning of the D.P. Arrington Subdivision. Commissioner Jones moved to deny the zoning change request. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None NOTE: Commissioner Jones requested a break. The commission resumed the meeting at 7:55 p.m. 5. Case Z-04-010 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from CC2 Shopping Center Commercial to PUD-R Planned Unit Development Residential on Lot 4R, Block 1, Centerpark Addition located south of Centerpark, east of Colleyville Boulevard Mr. Clayton Husband presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. The commissioners entered into discussion with staff about the size of the lots in comparison to other higher density subdivisions that have recently been approved. They also talked about the uses of open space within the subdivision, the area that will be raised out of the flood plain, Fire Department concerns, and FHA requirements. Fire Marshal Jeff Jones responded to questions from the commissioners. He said he is not opposed to the street design, but if the houses are built six feet apart with eaves that overhang, he would request wider streets. He said if one house is on fire, it would be difficult -to prevent fires from spreading from house to house. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Mr. Phillip Charon, 4604 Clearwater Court. He said this proposal looks better than the previous proposal for apartments; however, he expressed concerns about the density; the height of the lots being reclaimed from the flood plain; ten foot rear yards on the lots that back up to Lakewood Estates; the appearance of a solid wall of roof tops; lack of common space; and potential damage to the Lakewood Estate wall. Mr. Don Wren, 4704 Lakeshore Court, raised concerns about this project not being upscale; no garages and street parking. There was no one else present wishing to speak, and Chairman Wall closed the public hearing. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - February 9, 2004 Page 3 of 8 Draft Copy #1 Mr. Dan Quinto was present to represent the case to the commiSSioners and answer questions. Mr. Quinto said he will be providing a revised plan that will have additional open space. He said the home will have garages, and the setbacks between homes will never be closer than ten feet. He said the subdivision is designed after the Bridges at Riverwalk and will have the same density as the Bridges at Riverwalk residential portion. He addressed current land uses in the area and how this will become a buffer for Lakewood Estates and commercial uses. Ms. Nancy Stuckey, Cambridge Homes, was also present to represent the case to the commissioners and answer questions. She explained the target market for Cambridge Homes' products and showed slides of garden homes they have built. Mr. Quinto gave a summary of the impact on the economics this development will have in Colleyville. Steve Coons, an owner of a house built by Cambridge Homes, addressed the Commission and talked about how he had to move to another community when he downsized to a home with little yard work and wished that Colleyville had Cambridge Homes developments when he purchased his garden home. The commissioners entered into discussion with the representative regarding open space; the .consideration of home sprinkler requirements; lowering the density; the plan for Cambridge to become a gated community; the stone wall along the Lakewood Estates common boarder; the sidewalk scheme. Commissioner Jones said there seems to be a market place for this kind of development and it may be wise and prudent to ask the developer to come back with changes to the density, the setbacks, the open space, a recommendation from the Fire Marshal, and comments on the drainage. He spoke about his tenure on the Economic Task Force. Commissioner Byerly said he wanted to keep the property commercial. He spoke about the good visibility the property has for commercial development. Commissioner Jones suggested they table the case to allow the developer time to address the outstanding issues. Chairman Wall moved to table the case. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Commissioner Culley said he doesn't want to overlook the prior project for apartments and this is the right type of development to put in that location. He said Cambridge Homes does well with this kind of subdivision and the Bridges at Riverwalk subdivision is close to build-out. He said this is a quality developer who knows the market for garden homes. .Commissioner Byerly explained his comments regarding supply and demand and said that Cambridge Homes is an excellent builder. Chairman Wall said his motion to table was made with open space and density in mind. There was discussion about planned restrictive covenants for the subdivision regarding garages and street parking. Commissioner Jones said he wants the developer to address gates. The vote being: Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - February 9, 2004 Page 4 of 8 Draft Copy #1 Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: Byerly 6. Case Z-04-011 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from CC2 Shopping Center Commercial to PUD-C Planned Unit Development Commercial on 15.10 acres located at the southwest corner of John McCain Road and Colleyville Boulevard Mr. Clayton Husband presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. He told the commissioners that they have a copy of an e-mail the developer sent requesting additional uses he wanted to include in the PUD-C. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. Those present wishing to speak were: Mr. Bill McCulley said he was a representative for the Cascades at Timarron Owners Association. He expressed concerns about the layout an objected to the entrance and exit onto John McCain Road. He said when it rains the area floods and requested an explanation of how the detention ponds will work. Mr. Sam Noel, 1901 Thames Trail, said he builds Monument Custom Homes and the applicant invited HOA representatives to a meeting. He said a gas station is okay if other quality development is around it. He said he has a problem with John McCain traffic; doesn't want the development built in phases; and, screening to prevent residents from Timarron from being able to see the development from their homes. Mr. Kipp Whitman, the developer for the commercial development across Colleyville Boulevard, said he sold the property to Conoco and the development was stalled for the John McCain redevelopment. He spoke about his membership on the Highway 26 Design Board and this area is the highest demographic area. He spoke against the plan for pad sites in a row with nor marketing plan and the only sure tenants being a gas station and tire store to kick off the development. Mr. Whitman said the applicant bought the closed down gas station and will demolish the gas station and deed restrict the property to prevent competition. He said they should be required to put in the entire infrastructure. He said the commissioners should not accept the proposal at face value. Mr. AI Silverberg said he lives at the end of Thames Trail and is concerned about the entryway onto John McCain. He said he would expect the Planning and Zoning Commission to not allow only a gas station and a tire store. He said they need to use the same kind of scrutiny as the previous case. There was no one else present wishing to speak, and Chairman Wall closed the public hearing. Mr. Dan Poremba, representing Service Star, from Denver Colorado, was present to represent the case to the commissioners and answer questions. He spoke about the kind of development Service Star plans and how they met with three homeowners' associations and explained the concept to them and the boards supported their plan. He explained how they Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - February 9, 2004 Page 5 of 8 Draft Copy #1 went through the tree mitigation process and they presented their phasing program at that time. He talked about underwriting to construct the development. The commissioners and Mr. Poremba entered into discussion about gas stations and underwriting; TXDOT's requirements for an entrance on John McCain; the number of closed gas stations; the image of a gas station for the gateway to northern Colleyville; the possibility of Shell leaving the site rather than fulfilling the twenty year lease; the design for turn lanes on John McCain Road; traffic patterns for the development; and, the design of the detention ponds. Mr. Jay Marsh, Pate Engineers, associated with the project was present to answer questions from the commissioners regarding the drainage for the project. Commissioner Culley and the applicant entered into discussion about Mr. Pappa's e-mail and the requested uses. The commissioners again expressed concerns about the project, especially the entrance onto John McCain Road. Commissioner Culley suggested they table the zoning question to allow the developer to bring back a picture of how the project will look so they can get a better scope of the project. The commissioners suspended the rules in order to allow Kip Whitman to speak. He said the City has been strict on PUD zoning in the past and he tried to build a kennel, but was denied. He said a blanket zoning is wrong. Mr. Sam Noel, 1901 Thames Trail, said he is building homes on Braemar Terrace and there will be more people to add to the traffic problems on John McCain. The commissioners entered into discussion about restrictions and phasing restrictions they placed on other PUD-C's in the past. Chairman Wall suggested they table the case. He said they need the tax base, but with a proper balance. Chairman Wall moved to table the zoning change request. Commissioner Swift seconded the motion. The commissioners said they would like a clarification of the appearance of the road design for John McCain; the developer to provide a list of materials and designs; a phasing schedule; a better explanation of the drainage design; pictures of other retail centers that have the proposed gas stations; a more limited list of proposed uses; and, a tax generation proposal. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 7. Case Z-04-006 - PUBLIC HEARING - Amendment to Chapter 3 of the Land Development Code regarding movie theaters Mr. Barry LeBaron presented the case to the commissioners and reviewed the staff briefing. The commissioners entered into discussion about how the number of six theaters was Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - Febfuary 9, 2004 Page 6 of 8 Draft Copy #1 determined to be used. Commissioner Jones spoke about a group of investors who are buying smaller theaters and adding tables and alcoholic beverage and food sales and are targeting smaller communities. Commissioner Byerly said that six may not be an appropriate number for a theater complex on Precinct Line Road. Mr. LeBaron said that if anyone wanted more than six theaters they could seek a special use permit. Mr. Clayton Husband suggested that a two tiered category be used in the Land Use table. Chairman Wall opened the public hearing. There was no one present wishing to speak, and the public hearing was closed. Chairman Wall moved to recommend approval with an amendment that over six projections screens requires a special use permit. Commissioner Culley seconded the motion. The vote being: Ayes: Kelly, Culley, Swift, Byerly, Sellers, Jones, Wall Noes: None 8. Discussion of the Master Plan Update: Mr. Barry LeBaron distributed a copy of a meeting notice for Thursday, February 12, 2004. Commissioners Byerly and Kelly said they may not be able to attend. Chairman Wall requested that the commissioners contact staff and if it appears there will not be four members in attendance, the meeting should be canceled. There was discussion about the calendar for upcoming neighborhood meetings. 9. Staff Comments, Reports and Discussion Items: There were none. 10. Commissioners' Comments and Reports: Chairman Wall said he asked staff for a report of attendance for the Planning and Zoning Commission. He said the reason he asked was to verify the statistics in the two memos from 'the City Manager to City Council regarding the Planning and Zoning Commission attendance and minutes. He said there will be a City Council work session on February 11th at 4 p.m. in the executive conference room and encouraged commissioners to attend. The commissioners entered into discussion about the memos, the charges of attendance problems, their service to the community, and how members have served after their appointments expired. They said there were three seats open for reappointment, two members did not apply, and only seven applicants from over 20,000 citizens were received to be considered for appointment. ADJOURNMENT The Commission adjourned the meeting at 11 :00 p.m. by acclamation. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - February 9, 2004 Page 7 of 8 Draft Copy #1 Respectfully Submitted, Jan Levy Planning & Zoning Assistant Approved on: Note: As a matter of public record, an audio recording of this Planning and Zoning Commission meeting is available upon request. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes - February 9, 2004 Page 8 of 8 Draft Copy #1 .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 23, 2004 P-04-008 - PUBLIC HEARING - Replat of Lots 1R-1A and 1R- 1 B, Block 1, O'Steen Addition, 1.91 acres located at 321 W. McDonwell School Road STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Lansing Brown is the owner of a 1.91-acre lot located on south side of McDonwell School Road, east of Remington Parkway. The owner has submitted a replat of the property for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The plat will create two lots, one of which is for the construction of a new single family residence. Zoning. The property is zoned R30 Single Family Residential. The R30 district requires a lot width of 125 feet, a lot depth of 125 feet, and a minimum lot area of 30,000 square feet. The proposed lots exceed these requirements. The lots are both over 40,000 square feet in size. Perimeter Street Improvement Requirements. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since McDonwell School Road does not meet the current roadway standards of the Land Development Code. The owner is required to construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City before the issuance of any building permits. The estimated cash escrow for this development is $16,480.13. Parkland Dedication Fees. The payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development since one new vacant residential lot is being created by this plat. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per dwelling unit. Public Hearing Requirement. This replat is scheduled as a public hearing as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code. When an existing residential lot is proposed for subdividing, notice of a public hearing must be sent to each property owner within 200 feet of the lot within the same subdivision. Notice of this public hearing was sent to one property owner in the O'Steen Addition. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Agenda Item No.1 - Page 1 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location map · Plat · Development Review Committee memo Prepared by: Agenda Item No.1 - Page 2 -.--......-IPJ....-... . .. ~--- .-~~~~, ~~ ! ~..~\I~-_.- i Ol ~l ,-._.I....._._.~...- ; I \ I \ v I I ; \ )( ~ l:J~tl-l:_1NJT~-\~t-~ 10 ! 'I I' I I ! ! CD ! , .. ". /CD!.... ~l""ol r::\ ~ ~ >/~, CD I CD 1 CD I CD I ....! I _' \ l..".....J' ..--...__-1__ ...~_.....,----lAA~---.-i.171Tj01NLrC:- _/ ~-''x~~ 01 "",m --.j 1 ~l ~ L_ i ;!: 1 CD ! ......~ ,...,; '" ~ ",0 ",0 ...."1 CD 1 iJ o p'rcJ p\ilC' \il'7cJ p:lc?\ _~:;;_4 ,..-,\fJ .? ----~---~\ r' 11 "-~l '-" p \ ~ L~ .... CD 10 I "";;', ._...._~--. z ~ :~.I ~._:_ J- <( ::r: . '" '" CD ~ iN I'" I I I ...lT~.__L , '"" ~\ u1 d) ~~.~~ ! -~7~ I 4 ~ c?\ I .--' n A' ^ . . -"F(j1 '~~1 ... ~ .~ ~ 1 ~ '"~ I"'~ .--.- .. ----.~--\1-~-~ - ~ t--=-f:~ -' ~ ~I..I _..Tf=-...~-~:.~-~_::-:==:=.~===-::;-~:::==::~:.~._._---~--...._....,.. _._--...-_.._--~ ! I\" i '--'T~-!-~\J ! i 10 \\. '" l-N - ~J --:e I . III '" I~ ~ ,A"M, NOI'7""" I 1 ~.... ! ~ '''' \0 k i !!J iL-i L=:==:=...._===~-==.._._..=.., 'Ij.as=~ ! i I .- 1 -- . .F~ t:: Z __.J n 1___ 52 ! :::2' ,'" ~ <( ...- .... ~_........ ~ ~ "'L~_ ill ~ 10 ~ ' I i ~~L\ ...____..1 5~ft :::2' . ...J 8 ::[ ~- ..~_ J 10 ...r4 (toO (toO ~.4.. 04' ~~ o (to . ...... ~- ...&:::-.&...-- ..)u.- (P '" u ~< '" "'- I-~ ~ .J ld :~ I~ .0 ... l~ u W < N ~ '" ~ .... <Xi , I'~ ,0 o II '0 I~ 5 g: . ~ i ~.---. o N<o ~~ ..... '" .--., , U UJ i < C'oI ~J u 0< '" 10 '" 10 .... "l '" GCI 3JN301^OCld ~ \ ~ .-- ~"b ~ ~'i~ ~<' ... 'i--.-IT: ! ! I", "'! '" I - \- ! i "t- . --4..~ ~"f, ..)0 ('oj ..)0 .. __.<LA.. yo '" 'i-i- . --"..~_....."~~--",-,,.._.._--,._----,,-----;." - < ,,~/ ICD ~ ',;>- 1- VI '-,,/....' u..- 1 a 4::" \ ~ !!!(l..'" 8 \,-----.--- \ ! 11) , I I ; , \ \ , , , /\ ~/ \ / \ '" \ '" \<c L........ ~H .-h-T I . ' I. - ,0 1.0 -1- \D ..~- ~ I I A- i : I .. ..~......~_. ...[-.1 _ ~ \!l " " . , Ii CD "( .---. ..-.... ......-: ... ~_ .t:: .- !!! ~ ~ -l <0 / I / I'" / 1 ""'<, "'-'--'--'--'-r--~""-" \-..~ /\ \ / \ \ ~ >'~:2 \~ ,/ \ / 0> ' / ,/ \ , \. ~ T \ \ \ ::: \ \ \ / ;!: . j '" ,. , I ~ . / ~:i . J~l IU; I~ Jf~~ 00& ; II '01 a I ~I Billl! Ib I ~Ii II ~; Ij I~ f .~ ~;I t :1 ~i~ In!! 'Il~ftlp ~l I' Ii I~ I 3 0 I Id i' 'I i ~" !;I U II 110 ;g I -I llmltf, 1,0 Sl. .If > . Ii ," 'I II Is ~ I!:;~!; It U1ilJC II~ ~<.I ~'3111;; !I fJ, i'. . ;~J 51 ~~ ~sl~ 10 ~~" ~dH.all . ji" dO;. !I!.I! .~ Jh 'I · .,1 ~ ~I "01 1ft . '2 (;11' !~! i! i~ il!111 i i~ .!!tfp,1 I~I I~ il ill!;: i.1 iliP:~d ~!i! ~! I; Ui~ I! I! d (!fl'uJ;i . "~'I "I.S .~J". =~.I Iu' J:J t !Ia~ !(!! !ili b !i !!~ ;~t::t1ti I ~ i!11 ~!~ !Ii~ Ii !; !!i ;~I!~1 i a ! h~ ~~ i~ il~ll: I! it! 11i~lc'a! ~ II~~~ 1111 I~:IIIIIIII ,u~!d1f I J ~1 'I h .~ 11 . Ii ,I it 11 11 . 'b' !!l I i~' I Ilq I I II t'll . ,In J ~! 5' lilt i ill ~ ~I 1;1 I I ~~ I ~ ~ i i ~ I ~ 0 ~I fi : z i ~~ ~ il I Z E I & 1~ ~ 51 j ~I:.: !~:I ~ I ~ EIlLE..~1l :: b6 ~b~l!i16 Ii J. Rr.l~E~ ~ 1l:3 l!i l!i ~ ~ !Ie U ..1 ~ I ~ m ~ I \ ... ~ ~~ ~9 ~~I ~ I S~: \ .~ E , ,~!,\~ ~~l!~~;", I 'l' '~fu ~;~~.f ~ h ~~T--=P~~=--.::rl-=f!~'-~-:~~=- s __-==:=--=-==--=---==:--:t-----Lh- I I I -'j I \ \ 'mI,01 - I I 11"11 I. I I \ 1\ l !I' !r1'(IF-"-;;= , \ \ \ ~ I " I I I I \ tel , I S ' \ ,o~ M .,..-----~ i~\ AI b, . II \ ;;_, J~ I 1 I,: :1 1"-1 <.. \ \ "'. ~, . !\ i (~, 1- I 1\ \ \3!~ ~: ;1 1 : ,I '.' I \ its I I 'I 10 'I \I \ ~ I I 'I \~ ~Owz ! I I \ \ ~ :! !: I I., \ \\ I I 'I ,\ i~'~ l!'~ I .., \ \ .. : I !: 'I, ! 00 ~ ~j[j --~-:-------\-~ -L..2~..2!--___44-__________..J :.; I I '1 ..l ~ " -n- = --~.:::-=--.::=r7:~~-~~:!=.::%:---------_...Jh~ I: ~g) : !'. \.. \ ~- \Tn'O,lH li ~ ~ I 1 ~___2'fIJ.!._ 01 ~ I ' I', \ \ \ ~ I I t::-h_h- IE ".1 I \ \ \ ~ : I I r----'-n,liT- , , 1 \ \ . '1 g .t ~I~~ I \ ~~~ \ ~ i i ! : o '; ~~~ \; a: 1):0. I I ~' '10 5 ~g I' \!i \ : ~i I : I ,II il;~1 \ '\\ ~ I, :: o ,q, ~~~ I' .. \ \ I! ~: lm I: I <g i'~1 ~ \ \ ~\ Id : 1 I U' t-~------lIr_---J.--~J---~r----~r-----..ul!l I: ~H I "'I ~ '''\"\'\'"'; 3 Tr:1"1J- :1: I 1"), [Q \ . \ 1- I , ~. ~ \.... \, \ r .;1 : t ," I :I~ I I . h'~~\B&\ : 'II I:~ .' , '. I !l=~~t~~l.\ , Z ", / D i:5li\..-l~\ I' , '. . , ~fdl".o ~l'. 'ill' I' " I ' ,.. ! I . 't' .~" , ~ , ' I . ~ I ,,~ I ' '~}IS I 1-, .u' : ' ~ /: ! (' : ~I I -----n-:------\~-tL----------~-j ! ~I! L>~~,=l:= ..'h l' ' ". ,If .- tli:(_ -----------~ -.......----.--------.;;~- '!.~]_.'=___..J" I ~ ~ " .oo"1lt 3\,a ,$ON ~. ].Ll.zt.lON~lS ? % ~~:S, ~ '.'; ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~~!S!~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ;" f r ... S. .~, .h (.f. , ~!':11 tOo ~ .. ..:it . !~~"7 g ~ L; ~ U III I '" e Iii! IIII1 ,II E q 'II,: 111= III! ! ~ .,;..: tI aioi . .> i :; I:: .hsS B~ig~ III.; . .U i;illl diH~ i'lo'l 11111i i~!ill dUi I I CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE FAX TO FAX NO February 11,2004 Rod Ekern 817-571-93315 ~ 817-428-5134 Lansing Brown FROM Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-04-008 Replat - 0' Steen Addition The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. PLAT DRAWING I. Check the spelling of the owner's name in the dedication statement and signature block. Revise the plat if necessary. 2. The Owner's Dedication statement needs to be revised on the plat. The required language is shown below. That We, (names), Owners, do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinbefore described property as (subdivision name), and addition to the City of Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate fee simple to the public use forever all streets, rights-of-way, and alleys shown thereon, and do hereby reserve the easements shown on this plat for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities desiring to use or using the same. Any public utility shall have the right to remove and keep removed all or part of any buildings, fences, trees, shrubs or other improvements or growths in which any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance or efficiency of its respective systems on any of these easements, and any public utility shall at all times have the right of ingress and egress to and from and upon the said easement for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, and patrolling, without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City of Colleyville, Texas. 3. Revise the approval block to include a line for date of approval. 4. It appears that this property be affected by a 30-foot pipeline easement. Information from City files is attached. 5. Revise the name of the property to the west to read "Tallman Addition" rather than "Tallaman Addition". 100 Main Street- Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-04-OO8 O'STEEN ADDITION ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PLANS 1. The sanitary sewer plans show an existing sewer service tied into a manhole. When the new sanitary sewer line is constructed, this service must be moved and tapped into the main line. The sewer service for the new lot cannot tie into the manhole. Revise the drawing accordingly. 2. Provide a sheet showing standard City details for sanitary sewer construction with the next submittal. OTHER INFORMATION 1. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the final plat. Since one new vacant lot is being created by this plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. A formal assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the plat. The fee for this plat is $1.802. 2. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since McDonwell School Road is considered an unimproved street and the plat contains a vacant residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City before the issuance of a building permit. Ordinance 0-01-1314 established a base linear foot fee of $138.78, with the actual escrow amount being percentage of the total cost based upon the actual street frontage. The amount due for this property is $16,480.13. The owner may request a waiver of this requirement from the City Council. Please contact the Community Development Department for information on this requirement. 3. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RFSIDENTIAL uses. Applicable to the new vacant lot created by this plat. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PAGE20F3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-04-008 O'STEEN ADDITION 4. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks along McDonwell School Road. The sidewalk must be constructed at the same time any new structures are built on the lots. The sidewalk must be at least 5-feet wide. Alternatively, the owner may escrow an equivalent amount of money for the future construction of the sidewalk at the time of building permit issuance PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, February 23,2004, 7:00 p.m. not required RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices, if necessary. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices: · 10 folded copies of the revised Replat drawing · one 8Yz" x 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit · 2 sets of revised engineering construction plans · a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived The revised drawings must be submitted no later than Wednesday, February 18,2004 in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or husbandc@ci.collevville.tx.us if you have any questions. I c: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE3oF3 ~~ 1'exas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 23, 2004 P-04-009 - Minor Plat of Pleasant Run Baptist Church Addition, 3.15 acres located at 6001 Pleasant Run Road STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS The Pleasant Run Baptist Church is the owner of 3.15 acres located at the southeast corner of Pleasant Run Road and Cooks Lane. The owner has submitted a minor plat of the property for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The plat will create one non-residential lot for the church property. Zoning. The property is zoned AG Agriculture. The AG district requires a minimum lot size of 3 acres, a minimum lot width of 200 feet and a minimum lot depth of 300 feet. The lot exceeds these requirements. A church is an allowed use in all zoning districts. Building Line. This property requires a street side building line of 40 feet. Several existing buildings on this site are closer than 40 feet to the property line. The applicant proposes a street side building line of 20 feet on Cooks Lane in order to avoid causing the building to encroach a building line. Under these circumstances, the DRC is not opposed to the 20-foot building line. Right-of-Way Dedication. This corner lot abuts Pleasant Run Road and Cooks Lane. The owner is dedicating additional right-of-way for both streets as required by the Land Development Code and Master Thoroughfare Plan. Pleasant Run Road requires a right-of-way of 75 feet, and Cooks Lane requires a right-of-way of 50 feet. The owner is dedicating 18,618 square feet (0.43 acres) of right-of-way on the plat. Perimeter Street Improvements. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Pleasant Run Road and Cook's Lane are considered unimproved streets and the plat contains a non-residential lot. The developer is required to construct one- half of the street or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. The estimated escrow amount for this property is $52,945.86 for Pleasant Run Road and $32,988.72 for Cook's Lane. The owner has not requested a waiver of this requirement at this time. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are required for this property. Non-residential uses are assessed $800 per acre. The fee for this plat is $2,524. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Agenda Item No.2 - Page 1 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location map · Plat · Development Review Committee memo Prepared by: ~--~ Agenda Item No.2 - Page 2 r'---~'--' i . l ; --~ I ~'-- . ~ --"j :, ;;:; 0$-1 '" "'<!/ "!t- 1<) ~Vd 0 If' ~ < I I \)l er" 0- i 0- I-e>> ~ '" '" '" I '" I- I (J1 I I I ; I I L__ *~ erO t-52 \ -l\'~- r ~ \ '" , , , I I ~I " lJ.. j::: 1IJ ... ... S >- 1IJ ... ... __~J - -. ,..;l ,..;l CJ 0> I~ ! l:P I <' &. ;0 _ 00 ~< ere>> 1-", :.... .... .... 0::'" >-": ~o ",!< :=s ~o < era> 1---: '" O<J i ..- <Xl <~ ",": I '" 1 () : < , '" I---~ [' ~ L~ j- -~ - 1 _, '" ____ ~L~: I ~-J-- -~ . < ' I tfi I c? '" . -----v.-.......-------r~----,--'-..-----..----.--..------ '7'~C'-) I : ~_~~ I I ~ u:: o :;;: '" ~~ - i r~ "~ ~\ '~~ ~ '6> ~m ~~ '.. ::s:. "81 .4-: u.l --1. -~~'&r'... ~.. ~ N ",....,! '" '" er " '" er " m " m '" <0 :!;< o erlt! >-~ ..~.. 19 ~ ~ T o l <. . ~ l if I!: j A.. ~ ~ 1 o - f- <( \J o --L .., < :;;: '" m :;;: < '" m :;;: CD :;;: a:: I . ~ I . I ~ \'l /' s ------l~ .l\ . I . ~ " ~ 'r+-------~"!.~~~:-----l---~flt --------7f ! r --~A~. ~\ !~" -I --r------------r- r-------i j ~}\ 111,,1 I i ~:I I: \ : .~Z J I II I ~~ 'I' : fI I ~ i Ii ------ I, I', ! ~ i i L \0 I~.~tl -!5 , """'1' 1\} I: .~ I ~ ~ ~; i %, I' ; 1 .rlr ' ~ ..: ~ ;;j i:i ,.. I ' :%I~'. I ~ g: - i \ I f<l~' I; ~ ii1 '?,. 0/, zt I ,. .... ... . ., I' :ill I. ?,. - - ~ I \ Iii ~ I '\ ~ : ~ 1:5 t.. /' '^ ~ f ~ j '(, I::" ~}i :' WiJ to '"1;;, If!; . '~fifl I ~. '~I 'i i8f. I .. ! I"!- ' () I " , i I. L1 , ! I! '1Jif: -_M, " '~ ------------r----Il I. : ,. I '~ :. " \ I~I I I Ilq'l x~ .,I!: 'If;ifi~1 101 "I ':, ;: ;,i Ii. ;; ;G I~ !~f'llf . I>>a ~. !~ ~;: !~ ~~ 13 ~i mld!(f II rill Iii 10 If I I.~ ~i h:~ fJt!lf!f II ~!II I!! I~ III ;!I I. I~II! g~!, JIP' ~I :;:, :11 i: ~Ix i~ ~r ~i: i;! J!ili':iJ :11 ifil Ii! !' !if! !;I !; ~ !:I .,~:~ Iii I ~ll riJ I! C~~ ~:; ,: fr '5 Iilftl: :1. III I!~.I ,'ii c' i: p' fws 'IOU" II" ~~ i!l lu~ ~ ,!. ~d,~ r ~~ Ill!!! !ir ~ ~ ~ ~ "'l'liS I i i!;!i t-1f n 10.; !~I! !!, ,;~ !II f!'I!tW ,I. ,. "~i! =11 ". "I~ Illl j!III~1 101 a I '11" ' i i ;;i9Iil: b. ;!;II;I~ GIIII~ III iljf~IU. si i . ~:i ------ --------- tavoa Nila .LNvSV:!l'1:d " h ::! :~ .. ---r---- ---T--------i r----j : : f:f z : ;\\ tot. ;i\ ,I' ~~ I \.. I~~ '1'1 el~: ~\ I '? ~ ., 1ii I "'. ~ I ~ I r <:P. '~~ ~_. ~ .. ~ I ~~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 S &izll~B I h ;I~~ :1; III! ~~~~ii!11 ~ I ~.Il e3 ~ ill::! ti p., I I II L ~ ~ ~ ~t eg II I ~ -------j--- ~----- , :1 , 21 ~ I \, : Y I , , I --------- . . = ! ~ ~ ! l t "';' ~ ~ ~ U ! . ill 111', III; ! ! -II: nl; 11(, !' 111,r ~.fil . xl r.1:~I. I !M i~I'li . i . Ii Ii Ii. I" If! .J f , I CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE FAX TO FAX NO FROM February 11,2004 Rod Ekern 817-571-9335 Clayton Husband, AlCP, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-04-009 Minor Plat - Pleasant Run Baptist Church The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRe) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. PLAT DRAWING 1. It appears that the original outside boundary of the property included portions of the streets. If so, revise the metes and bounds description to include the overall boundary of the property. In addition, show the bOlmdary with a heavy line, and show the square footage of the right-of- way dedication. 2. The building lines shown on the plat are acceptable as the lines are placed to avoid causing an encroachment of the existing buildings on the property. 3. The Owner's Dedication statement needs to be revised on the plat. The required language is shown below. That We, (names), Owners, do hereby adopt this plat designating the hereinbefore described property as (subdivision name), and addition to the City of Colleyville, Tarrant County, Texas, and do hereby dedicate fee simple to the public use forever all streets, rights-of-way, and alleys shown thereon, and do hereby reserve the easements shown on this plat for the mutual use and accommodation of all public utilities desiring to use or using the same. Any public utility shall have the right to remove and keep removed all or part of any buildings, fences, trees, shrubs or other improvements or growths in which any way endanger or interfere with the construction, maintenance or efficiency of its respective systems on any of these easements, and any public utility shall at all times have the right of ingress and egress to and from and upon the said easement for the purpose of constructing, reconstructing, inspecting, and patrolling, without the necessity at any time of procuring the permission of anyone. This plat approved subject to all platting ordinances, rules, regulations, and resolutions of the City of Colleyville, Texas. 100 Main Street - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMmEE P-04-o09 PLEASANT RUN BAPTIST CHURCH OTHER INFORMATION 1. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the final plat. Since new vacant commercial lots are being created by this plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for commercial development is $800 per acre. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. A formal assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the plat. The fee for this plat is $2524. 2. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Pleasant Run Road and Cooks Lane are considered unimproved streets and the plat is a non-residential lot. The owner is required to construct one-half of the streets adjacent to this property, or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. An estimate of the cash escrow amount provided by the Engineering Department shows that $52,945.86 is required for Pleasant Run Road, and that $32,988.72 is required for Cooks Lane. The owner may request a waiver of this requirement from the City Council. Please contact the Community Development Department for information on this requirement. 3. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $529 per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for RELIGIOUS INSTITUIlON uses. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 4. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. This property is subject to the provision of the Colleyville Pathways Plan, which requires construction of hike and bike facilities along Pleasant Run Road. The Pathways Plan requires a 10-foot wide trail along Pleasant Run Road adjacent to this property. The Land Development Code also requires the construction of a 4-foot wide sidewalk along Cooks Lane adjacent to this property. The owner is required to construct the trail and sidewalk as part of any building improvements to this property. 5. LANDSCAPE PLAN. Approval of a landscape plan is required before a building permit can be issued for the site. The application fee is $250. Please contact the Community Development offices at 817-503-1050 for information on this process. PAGE 2 OF 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-04-OO9 PLEASANT RUN BAPTIST CHURCH PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, February 23, 2004, 7:00 p.m. not required RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices, if necessary. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices: · 10 folded copies of the revised Minor Plat drawing · one 8Y:z" x 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit · a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived The revised drawings must be submitted no later than Wednesday, February 18,2004 in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or husbandc(ii!ci.collevville.tx.us if you have any questions. I c: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE30F3 .$ T'exaoS PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 23, 2004 P-04-010 - Minor Plat of Lot 12, Block 2, Heritage High School Addition, 1.45 acres located at the southwest corner of State Highway 121 and Gateway Drive STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Jim Mills is the owner of 1.45 acres located at the southwest corner of State Highway 121 and Gateway Drive. The owner has submitted a minor plat of the property for review and consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The plat will create one non-residential lot for the construction of a new commercial building on the site. This property is the last un-platted tract of land on the south side of Gateway Drive. Zoning. The property is zoned CC2 Shopping Center Commercial. The CC2 district requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet, a minimum lot width of 150 feet, and a minimum lot depth of 120 feet. The proposed lot exceeds these requirements. Parkland Dedication Fees. Parkland dedication fees are required for this property. Non-residential uses are assessed $800 per acre. The fee for this plat is $1,161.60. The owner's surveyor has addressed all Development Review Committee comments. This plat only requires approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location map · Plat · Development Review Committee memo Prepared by: Agenda Item No.3 - Page 1 lZ1 A'V'Mti9tH 3.LV1.$ LZl Mt,H 31 V 1S -- - ----.... ---- -- --- - -------.. -.. --..- --------.. N <! t-') : ...- all "'! := 14- ~~ : :..-: ~~:o}~ l~; I 4"' v.!-6 <.) ! "., <.:>g. < ....~~ ~4-t) ~! ~;c4l ~~~ ]~ -> ~ -> o o ~ <.) ~ ..- ~ <.:> ,.., o OJ r <' .... ~ v.! <.:> 4- y .... <:t- v.! ~ ~'" $"" ": .., '" - I- 1\ I (I) . , .... '" ! -I '" ' --""~Ol_ I~--- C'.l..,~11 It) Ii .... i ; -----@11 , ",' -\ .... ,... I ~ ~ ~ I ~~I; ~~ <' II ~s. i' ':l:--:S:- II -----~-------- i- o \ \ \ , .... \ ,., ~ ;, \ \ \ ~ , '" \ I,~ , \ , \ ~\ ~\ mJ, f.O<\ 0:::0\ .- ~ \.~/- ---- o o Oi 1"1 ~ I ~~\ I '" '" '" "'u ~< 0:'" 1-..-' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \" \ J \ <<I \. "'"., \ \ ~~\ \ \ Lm__.\ \ \ \ I "'u ~< 0:C! I-~ ,...U << '" ,... 0:.-: 1-"" Loc.A1\oN M.bo.f f). .'=.. \u: ~ L__ <::>..- 0 0.- :il \ ~~ ...._~._------- I ---~----~ o o , I ~! ~a; I _~__~_~'_J '" .... 0> ,... c-l ----~~! mo! ::::"" L____ "'0> ,... 0: . I-~ ~ 0 < '" '" ,... It: "'! I- ,., "" o .... ~O .... cO v- Ol 0' ,.., 10 <' --.. 0 Cl:: 4) It:", "''''' "! Ld o <l: __.J o o "'a; ,., "l ..- 3^ V 3ClVllCi3H ~ It Iff l Ii l; I I -3 toil I'~ if I I t" J<J ! ~ g B .1 .. ~ 0" ~.. ~ . o. "I " d'.. S ~ li~_ HI Ii ~~ j~;. !'J hi ~ . "I" ltc' ~ ll. ~~~ , fi f IS; J l . h ~. f · I! ." g . ~:I ii; i fif ~~1 ~ ~ f giI ~~t i ;I~ ii" i ~ i · .81 III l in ~~ I ~ t - I .~J; l. ~ k.. a5! ~ i 1 i ~il =ii ~ i~j -1";1 15 j 1 I ~., 'I ='! I' ,! f f ~If ~Jf ~ ~~~ ~i I! i II .~.. 5" ~ tt~ III l- t ~ ~ i!! ~!i a i.: tff tl 1 II ~ "III Ii; ~ tl;!u II j . I Ii Ih ~. iiI Ii! h oj J U~ HI ~ B.l o~~ "~ f. ! ;lg I~l fi ~ji I~. Ji ~! . . ~ ~!l Ifif i~ ~fi i!~ i~ ,i · H~ ~.. iO'h !f ~il f' j ! I f!f ~I~~ i~ r" ii~ i~ i~ i ! I M nh d ~d ul if if }u "- ~ ~o '" "''' ... I.C) . COCl"')4 II) ac'")"'t-"') . ..-.;;t- 0",,,, O)C\I "'1 V) 11111111 <JQ::-.l~ o :J:: ...'-.> " u " " n' ci ill [,j > ci !l': ~ 0 ~ . :' ~ }- ~ c:i ~ .., -<t: w '" ~ .... 3 ~ V) ill . i::i ~ I- _If :<1:j ~1; ~ i:' !it l' . JHt JE. .I~ lh: 'J~~ I "i " t~l IIh ~8!1 1'~'. .5H~ f;iif iUd !~!~l i~fn ~~.n ~~W II J!j UH ~,,:.{ iB;i i l!~t~~ ....- J"I~1 01 "&r ~ fi~t ~ f... ~'I mu 'I if Ii f~ Ii !I if ~ !! J if 11 ~i ~. ' H i u ~ -, € HI i ! .. tOf ~ .i Ie : h =LtJI i tj ;; ill I I "g u h ! ! Z:; oi ~ 8::> 0 "'. ~~ ~ o~.. '=!'j ..J Z"u t\I~~U) ....>:Cl: --...::r:O~lL ~~~ V U",o 0:"0 ~.J,.,...--=:J rz..E-i ....QU 0080 -Vlrol:l~~ ....O=>-!:~,,<"'i5 j-l c-:> tiz () ~>~ u o..m~ ~<(Q,Wh~ I'I;:lO ~>.f: ~ .= ",u Nll!$~ l'; zt\l~""",,"!::O)..ili _T"-OZVGo] ~. ::s :::I::::f-<<" )(~a I- z~..... 8~p O=o~ ".. ~;::...." :I:..S -1-:t::::; z Iii"i'; Eo-- - m).,N CtZ~ w <~ ~z m t::! :::r:::::< irl r ~ Ii < ~ I t z (J..VM-.:ID-H-ORi Hlaw. 31aiIijV^ .., .3nN3/\'I1 31'111 '0 W'I1llllm d'l1o~ 3JI/\~3S -lei "ON 'J..mH 31'111S ,r9'roo M.Lo.BO.OO s ~l! ~~ rJ. ~I~ INn ONlron~ .r>> (\I ! u ~ S u ~ OUJ Or<< .J~ m-< t\l (\I~ ,.. .5"1.1 I~ ~ I~ ~ ~ .~ I. ~ I ~ ~ ~ . 1; ~ 1 I ~. I ~; IH --f-----......-----___---1 ~r ----"~Sl .unIJJl . r.TY1Un/1l ,01 5'" i I I- o .J .6L"Lto 3.tO,n.oo N CVt!il9 .,S V "8V,) H3d DUOOS DNltNJEi} TOTH"d "sage Ens 'V l3Nua 'NOUI(I(h' 1OOH:JS HOIH ~lIt!3H 't )4:xJ'18 "II J01 nil . :~~ JItH . '.']1 I . ~1lftl ~:>t .Jft ~~<. lr ' p Ql1) itlBI n nl'l . I 11' I ~ db n I HIP I ~ Ii ( "1111 ~ i fern !~I': f ~II !ftl~ ~ i "'-H o !l II!I~'-: i ~'~3v.. ! =~ f . 0 !II I ..1 I i 1 I t ~ I i. ! ~~..: , ~ "'...:..;. gi: 'u. ~a~ !;;=~ ~~Q'; ~j... ...:..!:~ 00_ "" rfi ._~ ~~o !.i .!'is ~l~ hs ~ z~ OU ,,~ ,,~ ...:~a.: ~::Jr:: g~:S mow ...:~3 ~ 9~.( ~I;; !(~ 2~ CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE February 11,2004 Jim Mills 817-332-5400 John Morgan (Moak Surveyors) ~ 817-282-0401 FAX TO FAX NO FROM Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator SUBJECT P-04-01O Minor Plat - Heritage High School Addition, Block 2, Lot 12 The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your plat request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. PLAT DRAWING 1. This property is zoned CC2 Shopping Center Commercial. Revise the zoning designation in the title block area. 2. The required building for this property is 40 feet adjacent to each street frontage. Revise the plat accordingly. 3. The drawing shows a 10-foot wide drainage and utility easement adjacent to the south property line. The recording information for this easement is blank. This information should be completed prior to recording the plat with the Tarrant County Clerk's office. 4. Add a 10-foot wide drainage and utility easement adjacent to the west property line. OTHER INFORMATION L PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the fmal plat. Since new vacant commercial lots are being created by this plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for commercial development is $800 per acre. The fee must be paid before the plat is recorded with the County Clerks Office. A formal assessment of parkland dedication fees will be provided upon approval of the plat. The fee for this plat is $IJ61.60. 2. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are not required for this property. 3. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building permit is issued for a new structure on a newly platted lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide 100 Main Street - Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE P-04-010 HERITAGE HIGH SCHOOL general information on the fees that could be assessed for this project. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or other arrangements provided for by a City-Developer Agreement. ROADWAY $790 per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for GENERAL OFFICE uses. $2,582 per 1,000 square feet gross floor area for MEDICAIiDENTAL OFFICE uses. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size andlor if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size andlor if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER 4. SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS. The Land Development Code requires the construction of sidewalks along this property's frontage on Gateway Drive. The sidewalk is required to be five feet wide. The sidewalk must be constructed at the time building improvements are made to this property. 5. SITE PLAN. Approval of a site plan and landscape plan is required before a building permit can be issued for the site. The site plan review includes review of the site layout, landscape plan, all building elevations, and site civil construction plans. The initial review process takes approximately 14 days. The application fee is $500. Please contact the Community Development offices at 817-503-1050 for information on this process. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, February 23, 2004, 7:00 p.m. not required RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS A marked-up print is available for pickup in the Community Development Department offices, if necessary. Once you have completed the changes to the drawing, please submit the following to our offices: · 10 folded copies of the revised Minor Plat drawing · one 8y," x 11" reduced copy of the revised exhibit · a written letter addressing each comment stating the comment has been addressed or offering reasons why the requirement should be modified or waived The revised drawings must be submitted no later than Wednesday, February 18,2004 in order to make the scheduled hearings. Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or husbandc@.ci.collevville.tx.us if you have any questions. I c: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE20F2 ~'~' / ,,, David C. Yo ' '\ e,'Yi,',ors, Ine. LirenJ\l .' pistered \\ '" Profe~al ~ 'urveyors ~',:~~ Ta.xi\!> · New Ma.xit"o · Arizona . Nevada David W. Myers, L.S.L.S., R.P.L.S. John W. Morgan, R.P.L.S. Ricky L. Gentry, R.P.L.S. Jason B. Rawlings, R.P.L.S. . Acreage . Topography . Land Title Surveys . Subdivision Platting . Construction Staking . Investigative Surveys 02-12-2004 City ofColleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas, 76034 ATTN: Mr. Clayton Husband RE: Lot 12, Block 2, Heritage High School Addition, City ofColleyville, (P-04-01O) Dear Clayton; In response to the comments letter, Dated: February 11,2004, regarding Plat Drawing section, Items I thru 4 are addressed as follows: 1. Has been addressed on plat. 2. Has been addressed on plat. 3. The easement shown has not been recorded, therefore the recorded plat will establish that easement. 4. Has been addressed on plat. Thank You; U.a 0 I..) .uA----- John W. Morgan, ~. CC: Mr. Jim Mills IUS BtYdfol'tl Rontl · B<rdfur'd. T~'l160n.s20B . ww\\ul1i)t\ksurveyors.COID . Metro 817~26S-Z211 '. Fu 817-282-0401 M<lmoor TlmrS Soo~1j1 "I Pl1lwiol1lll SuN'llfors & AmlltiG'an COr(gross on SuN'llfir(g 1'100 Mllppir(g .~ l'exas PLANNmG&ZOmNGCOMM~~ON AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 23, 2004 Z-04-012 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential on 41.8 acres located at 909 John McCain Road STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Compass Realty is the potential developer of a 41.8-acre parcel of land located on the south side of John McCain Road, west of Shalimar Court. The applicant has submitted a request to change the zoning on the property from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential. The applicant is seeking a zoning change in order to develop the property as single family residences. The 41.8-acre tract of land has approximately 800 feet of frontage on John McCain Road. The tract is over 2,000 feet in depth, extending to the railroad right-of-way on its south boundary. The property generally slopes north and south from a high point in the front half of the property. There is an existing house and several barns and accessory buildings on the property. There is very little tree coverage. The applicant submitted a zoning exhibit showing how the property could be subdivided based on the proposed R20 zoning category. The exhibit shows two street entrances on John McCain Road and 71 single family lots. Several open space and detention areas are included in the layout. While this request does not include a preliminary plat or engineering design, staff has met with the applicant's engineer to discuss public improvement and drainage requirements for the subdivision. The surrounding property is generally developed as single family residences. The property to the north is zoned R20 and is developed as single family residences. The property to the east is zoned PUD-R and is developed as a single family residential . subdivision (Shalimar). Properties to the west are zoned AG, and consist of the Pleasant Run soccer fields, the Crown of Life Lutheran Church, and several large acreage tracts with residences. The property south of the tract, across the railroad right-of-way, is zoned R40 and is develop as a single family residential subdivision (Jewel Estates). IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. The Colleyvi/le Master Plan designates the future use of this area for single family type land uses. This request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Master Plan. Based on the zoning exhibit, the density of the proposed development is 1.69 dwelling units per acre. Agenda Item No.4 - Page 1 2. Surrounding Properties. Most of the surrounding properties are developed as single-family residences, either within a subdivision or on acreage tracts. 3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is for single-family development. The property in the area is suitable for that type of development. 4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer services are available along adjacent rights-of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of utilities to the lots if necessary. 5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the taxable value of the parcel is $34,558. Most of the individual tracts that make up the property have Agricultural exemptions from Tarrant County. If the Agricultural exemptions were not in place, the appraised value would total $1.58 million. The estimated City property tax revenue for the undeveloped property is $120 annually. The future property tax revenue would depend upon the value the building improvements to the property. 6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada since the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on average. Based on this average, the 71 proposed residences would add 679 vehicle trips per day to the surrounding roadways. 7. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 41 adjacent property owners regarding this request. A complimentary notice was sent to the Shalimar homeowners association. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. No correspondence has been received regarding this request. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: February 23, 2004 City Council: March 16 and April 6, 2004 RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS · Location and Zoning Map · Zoning Exhibit · List of Property Owners Notified · Development Review Committee memorandum Prepared by: ,~ Agenda Item No.4 - Page 2 1~ Location and Zoning Map Z-04-012 S 3+M N 1l..!1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &l, lio a 'I' 3 .bO~ ~ ~~ jo l>< P a . ~ ~~~~I~~8~r :.s ,g IS - ~ ..~ ~ ~ i'l e:! 1; t lil g. ~ IJ l~ .. -II , Ie ~ ~ I ~l I ~ Hi I h . . ..,. . ~:;;~: i ~h ~ ;:..~~.:fi ~..f~ ~ ;~~isi : :lUD":C~ c:i !. ~i; ~ i~'i:';~!:: .h::ci~~ :~m i mm ~~ mH ;; mm :~ i:~: ~t ~;:~;~ ~! ._<_< _, '.i._' .. im~ i; !~!~:~;; ;; ii;:i iE ~~;i:~i E ~,,:!'Ij!,; ~: .&~ "'-:ii ~! :~fg i! ij ;s Hii! i; : _._. ~~ i~ ..~...~~ -:, fiB,." ~.. ns:, ;.: ~:.;';. ~; "m g ~a:~5;~ ~. fiatr im ~!ii!i!: !~ ., .' ;~ ;~: ~~7 s:~: :~i ~~5. ~iD ~D~ ~...: o~i! ~;;; i~~ 3i~ gH .. mii 0" ~h ..~~ ~ J~s ~~n l>l .,. o ~ F> I'" ~ e ~~ i~d~ "'~ ogE" ~ll: "~~ I~! Z-04-012 Stevenson, Barbara J 7109 Cedar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Hamlin, Randy L 4524 South lake Pkwy # 302 Birmingham AI 35244 Hooper, Jeffrey L 7008 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Roberts, Duane R Etux Ann E 7004 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Adair, Thomas D 901 John McCain Rd Colleyville TX 76034 I\lholm, Roy L Etux Lydia M 3805 Pleasant Run Rd ::olleyville TX 76034 ::oon, Mark 3904 Shalimar Ct ::olleyville TX 76034 ::Ieff, David Etux Lisa >820 Shalimar Ct ::olleyville TX 76034 Jlike Dees Enterprises Inc, ~940 Lakewood Dr ;olleyville TX 76034 Genco, Frank R Etux Natalie 1104 John McCain Rd Colleyville TX 76034 Johnson, Jeff Etux Michelle 7105 Waldon Ct Colleyville TX 76034 St Mary's Coptic Orthodox Ch, 1110 John McCain Rd Colleyville TX 76034 Rauchenberger, D E Etux Janet 7101 Waldon Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Walker, Terry Thomas 7109 Jo Will St Colleyville TX 76034 Huff, Linda D Brock 7108 Jo Will St Colleyville TX 76034 Centurion American Cust H ms, 5100 Thompson Ter Colleyville TX 76034 Tirk, Joe V 1009 John McCain Rd Colleyville TX 76034 Dean, William Daniel 7000 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 McCune, Lee Ann Etvir Douglas 6916 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Poe, Jo A 7016 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Branson, Henry Dr Etux Sharon 7012 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Punjwani, Aftab Etux Shakila 6912 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 McGowan, Gregory J Etux Margar 6908 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Stover, Timothy L Etux Jean C 6900 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Mihelich, Robert B Etux Cathy 6812 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Culbertson, William L 6816 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Rose, Cynthia R 6804 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Colleyville, City Of PO Box 185 Colleyville TX 76034 Owsen, John D Etux Sharon 6800 Shalimar Ct Colleyville TX 76034 Goodner, Richard Etux Rita 6608 Emerald Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Pavey, Scott Etux Mary 6606 Emerald Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Crown Of Life Lutheran Church 6605 Pleasant Run Rd Colleyville TX 76034 Birdsell, Frank Nance 6610 Emerald Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Bransford Park Land Trust, PO Box 185 Colleyville TX 76034 Fisher, Michael Etux Patricia 6604 Emerald Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Trammell, Harold Jr Etux Lucia 6600 Emerald Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Sabonis, James Etux Kay Kareck 6504 Emerald Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Sharp, James T Etux Carolyn 6602 Emerald Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Good Shepherd Catholic Ch, 800 W Loop 820 S Fort Worth TX 76108 Board Of St Marys Ch Dallas, PO Box 851553 Richardson TX 75085 ComDI/men/aTY CODY Shalimar HOA Georgina Nowlin, President Po. Box 423 Colleyville TX 76034 ::ase Z-04-012. Notices dated February 6, 2004. \ccording to the last published tax rolls, individuals who own property that is within 200 feet of the proposed zoning change or ;pecial use permit request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above have been notified ofthe proposed zoning :hange or special use permit request as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development ~ode. ~Iayton Husband AICP CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE February 11,2004 FAX TO Eddie Eckart PE FAX NO 817-446-3116 FROM Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator SUBJECT Z-04-012 AG to R20 - Warwick Parc (909 John McCain Road) The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and zoning change request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING 1. No changes are required to the drawing. GENERAL ZONING/SUBDIVISION INFORMATION The following information is provided to make you aware of development requirements that may affect the future construction on the site. The requirements cited are based on the proposed R20 zoning classification. These criteria will be reviewed upon submittal of a subdivision plat. 1. The preliminary plat and final plat must be approved by the City before construction may begin on the site. 2. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION. John McCain Road is classified as a Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. A Major Collector requires a right-of-way width of75 feet. When the subdivision plat of the property is submitted, right-of-way dedication may be required along John McCain Road. 3. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since John McCain Road is considered an unimproved street. As part of the subdivision plat and construction process, the developer is required to construct one-half of the streets or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. 4. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the subdivision plat. Since one new vacant lot is being created by this plat, the payment of 100 Main Street- Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE Z-04-012 WARWICK PARC parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. 5. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on John McCain Road and the interior streets. The sidewalk on John McCain Road must be constructed as part of the public improvements to the property, and must be five (5) feet in width. The sidewalks on the interior streets must be constructed at the same time any new structures are built on the lots, and must be four (4) feet in width. 6. COTTONBEL T TRAIL. This property abuts a portion of the Cottonbelt Trail pathway. The DRC recommends that a sidewalk connection to the trail be provided through the open space lot to provide access to the trail for residents of the subdivision. A trail easement adjacent to the railroad right-of-way may be required to provide additional setback for fences next to the trail. 7. PHASING. The zoning exhibit indicates that the construction of the subdivision may be done in phases. A temporary turn-around or loop connecting the two streets would be required as part of the subdivision construction. 8. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building pennit is issued for a new structure on the lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general infonnation on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or conditions contained in a City- Developer Agreement, if applicable. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. The actual fee depends on specific use of the property. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, February 23,2004, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 16 and April 6, 2004, 7:30 p.m. RESUBMITT AL REQUIREMENTS None. Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or husbandc@ci.collevville.tx.us if you have any questions. I c: DEVElOPMEKT REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE 2 OF 2 .~ Texas PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA BRIEFING Agenda Date: Subject: February 23, 2004 Z-04-013 - PUBLIC HEARING - Zoning Change from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential on 9.8 acres located at 600 Shelton Drive STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS Pete Cline, with Talisman Homes, is the potential developer of a 9.8-acre parcel located on the north side of Shelton Drive, between Bransford Road and Pleasant Run Road. The applicant has submitted a request to change the zoning on the property from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential. The owner is seeking a zoning change in order to subdivide the property into lots for the construction of new single family residences. The 9.8-acre tract of land has approximately 350 feet of frontage on Shelton Drive. The tract is over 1,000 feet in depth, extending to the railroad right-of-way on its north boundary. There is an existing house and several accessory buildings on the property. The applicant submitted a zoning exhibit showing how the property could be subdivided based on the proposed R20 zoning category. The exhibit shows one street entrance on Shelton Drive and 17 single family lots. The proposed layout has two subdivision design issues that would need to be addressed at the time of platting. These issues include the number of lots with one entrance and the length of the cui de sac street. These two issues are further explained in the Development Review Committee memorandum, which is attached. The surrounding property is generally developed as single family residences on half- acre or larger tracts. The properties to the east, which are located on Hunter Lane, are .zoned R30 and R40, and they are developed as single family residences. The properties to the south, across Shelton Drive, are zoned R40 and are developed as single family residences on one-acre or larger tracts. Properties to the west are zoned AG, and are also developed as large acreage tracts with residences. The properties north of the tract, across the railroad right-of-way, are zoned R30, RE and AG and are developed as a single family residences. The general area around the subject property consists of single family residences, most of which are located on lots larger than one-half acre. This area includes the property bounded by Bransford Road, Beverly Drive, Pleasant Run Road, and the railroad right- of-way. This area contains approximately 101 acres of land and 64 individual parcels, of which all but two contain a single family residence. The resulting density is 0.63 dwelling units per acre. The average lot size in this area is 1.58 acres. Properties that front on Hunter Lane have an average lot size of 0.98 acres. Agenda Item No.5-Page 1 IMPACT ISSUES 1. Master Plan. The Colleyville Master Plan designates the future use of this area for single family type land uses. This request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Master Plan. The density of the proposed development is 1.73 dwelling units per acre. 2. Surrounding Properties. Most of the surrounding properties are developed as single-family residences on acreage tracts. 3. Development Trends. The long-term trend for this area is for single-family development. The property in the area is suitable for that type of development. 4. Infrastructure. Water and sanitary sewer services are available along adjacent rights-of-way. The developer is responsible for the extension of utilities to the lots if necessary. 5. Property Taxes. According to information available from the Tarrant Appraisal District, the parcel is valued at $96,096. The estimated City property tax revenue for the undeveloped property is $333 annually. A portion of the property has an Agricultural exemption from Tarrant County. The future property tax revenue would depend upon the value the building improvements to the property. 6. Traffic Generation. The Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation provides estimates of expected traffic generation based on land use. Data has been collected in the United States and Canada sinCe the 1960's, primarily in suburban locations. Single-family residences are expected to generate 9.57 trips per day, on average. Based on this average, the 17 proposed residences would add 163 vehicle trips per day to the surrounding roadways. Shelton Drive is classified as a Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. There are no available traffic counts for this area. 7. Public Notification. Staff mailed notices to 17 adjacent property owners regarding this request. Notice was published in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram as required by state law and the Land Development Code. Six letters in opposition to the request have been submitted. copies of the letters are attached. A petition in opposition. with 43 siqnatures. was also submitted. and a COpy of the petition is attached. SUMMARY The proposed zoning change is consistent with the Land Use Plan, which designates this area as a future single family area. The recommendation for approval is based on this issue. Given the existing density of lots in the area, the proposed development may be incompatible with the surrounding existing development in the area. However, the opportunity for subdivision development similar to the proposed development could exist along the north side of Shelton Drive as those properties are similar in character. Agenda Item No.5 - Page 2 PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: February 23, 2004 City Council: March 16 and April 6, 2004 RECOMMENDATION Approval A TT ACHMENTS · Location and Zoning Map · Zoning Exhibit · List of Property Owners Notified · Development Review Committee memorandum · Correspondence Prepared by: C~ J. C~b~nd~A:- Development Coordinator Agenda Item No.5 - Page 3 AG \/ Location and Zoning Map Z-04-013 IIi i1 IiI -1'1 ~'J~I! .- ill ,I J!II ! !18,!!; ~l'! .. ..!~ ~.a a f,l I' si Ii lilill Is 1-. i! ili II ~!1!8; is I .. II" I 1,"11- ~. ~.] il I i ~Ia f i I! I;j i'- II i~!; I il:I.) ]~\ f I j. .-.. .1111 - I~: ! 111 I~ lii!i llli..ti t~~ll . al .~ '.1'1 I "~l ~ ~ jt~ i! :~;!f I~f~all ll~ ! 1..1." . !'j I. i'''1-11- ". a"'.. I." tal !- - lil .S' ~f' I.llf .,. i~ fll ...:I,.~ l.~ AI' ~ hi .1 I~J!~, I," iJIJ ~!"I' I:! !!j -I!'~llli a1f .. .. 1" 1 ,'a 'J~", J !J~I !n ~Il ,Ii ~I~~l;l '11 .~i~ ;s! ~II ~j! i.I"i.1 ~!1 jl I II! i" :1. lt~~~~l 5~1 IIi II i~ I~J li~I;~~ I!j ~I t ~~ I ~ BQ t: ~Q ~ Iti~~; ! ~ grs I ~ ~ ",,0 ~ ... i ~~! . ! h i I~ I r l~ ~~ ~ ; .0 !fi~ ~H ,t-"f l~J; If]'8 ",-::;: r~(j ",~:!l ~~~ .. -~ ~ !';:~ S ll~ .~~ =.af-o't: I-.t'~ z 1t it' t J ~~ e- II " W) " ~ ~ " u ~~ ~i i~E) "~E ) ." } .U) iU~) T ii~E ) ~ .. gS~ . ~~ e~ h~1 ~.~ I , ~~"I r- I ~i~1 "!I- 9~< t ~~~~ I i~ I ~~ 90< 9 " u~ u~ ~ A ~" ~ ~ .~- .('m 0i !! .; ~ .. ! ~ e~ .. ~ I ...- -w....... - -.- Z-04-013 Combs, Bobby J Etux Christine 6106 Hunter Ln Colleyville TX 76034 Darrow, Kenneth R Etux Cheryl PO Box 1806 Colleyville TX 76034 Doody, Kevin Etux Kathy 1701 Park Place Ave Bedford TX 76022 Henslee, James D PO Box 863 Colleyville TX 76034 Lothrop, William & Beverly 607 Shelton Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Lothrop, William D & Beverly L 609 Shelton Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Love, Kevin D Etux Margaret M 6000 Hunter Ln Colleyville TX 76034 Madden, C L III Etux Ruth Ann 6112 Hunter Ln Colleyville TX 76034 Pan no, Stacy L 6110 Hunter Ln Colleyville TX 76034 Perkins, Timothy B 12208 Maplewood Dr Keller TX 76248 Pine, James W 5918 Hunter Ln Colleyville TX 76034 Quinn, Garry L Etux Helen J 511 Shelton Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Ray, Albert G PO Box 475 Colleyville TX 76034 Rettig, Mary K Etvir Howard A PO Box 17 Colleyville TX 76034 Vanderpool, Jeffrey Etux There 601 Shelton Dr Colleyville TX 76034 Young, Bradley A Etux Beverly 6100 Hunter Ln Colleyville TX 76034 Billy & Dinah Stephens 612 Shelton Drive Colleyville TX 76034 Case Z-04-013. Notices dated February 6, 2004. According to the last published tax rolls, individuals who own property that is within 200 feet of the proposed zoning change or special use permit request are listed above. I certify that the parties listed above have been notified of the proposed zoning change or special use permit request as required by the Texas Local Government Code and the Colleyville Land Development Code. Clayton Husband AICP CITY OF COLLEYVILLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DATE FAX TO FAX NO February 11,2004 Pete Cline 817-442-4832 ~ David Myers 817-282-0401 FROM Clayton Husband, AICP, Development Coordinator SUBJECT Z-04-013 AG to R20 - Chism Court (600 Shelton Drive) The Colleyville Development Review Committee (DRC) has reviewed your zoning exhibit and zoning change request submitted to this office. The following comments are for your consideration. ZONING EXHIBIT DRAWING 1. No changes are required to the drawing. However, changes may be necessary due to subdivision design requirements. Additional information is provided below. GENERAL ZONING/SUBDIVISION INFORMATION The following information is provided to make you aware of development requirements that may affect the future construction on the site. The requirements cited are based on the proposed R20 zoning classification. These criteria will be reviewed upon submittal of a subdivision plat. 1. The preliminary plat and final plat must be approved by the City before construction may begin on the site. 2. NUMBER OF SUBDIVISION ENTRANCES. Since the subdivision contains more than 12 single family lots, either a second entrance to the subdivision is required or other design requirements must be addressed. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the applicable section of the Land Development Code that addresses these requirements. 3. LENGTH OF CUL DE SAC. For all cul de sacs that exceed 600 feet in length, the Land Development Code requires that the right-of-way for the street be increased to 56 feet in width and the width of the street be increased to 36 feet, back-to-back of curb. 4. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION. Shelton Drive is classified as a Minor Collector on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. A Major Collector requires a right-of-way width of 75 feet. When the subdivision plat of the property is submitted, right-of-way dedication may be required along Shelton Drive. 100 Main Street- Colleyville, Texas 76034 - 817.503.1050 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMmEE Z-04-013 CHISM COURT 5. PERIMETER STREET IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS. Perimeter street improvements are required for this property since Shelton Drive is considered an unimproved street. As part of the subdivision plat and construction process, the developer is required to construct one-half of the streets or provide an equivalent amount of cash escrow for future improvement by the City. 6. PARKLAND DEDICATION FEES. Parkland dedication fees are assessed at the time of approval of the subdivision plat. Since one new vacant lot is being created by this plat, the payment of parkland dedication fees is required for this development. The fee for single-family residential development is $1,802 per new lot. 7. SIDEWALKS. The Land Development Code requires sidewalks on Shelton Drive and the interior streets. The sidewalk on Shelton Drive must be constructed as part of the public improvements to the property, and must be five (5) feet in width. The sidewalks on the interior streets must be constructed at the same time any new structures are built on the lots, and must be four (4) feet in width. 8. IMPACT FEES. Water, sewer and roadway impact fees are due at the time a building pennit is issued for a new structure on the lot. The fees listed below are intended to provide general information on the fees that could be assessed. The actual fee paid may be different depending upon the specific plans for construction or conditions contained in a City- Developer Agreement, if applicable. ROADWAY $1,589 per dwelling unit for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL uses. The actual fee depends on specific use of the property. Details are available in Chapter 13 of the Land Development Code. $2,666 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. $200 for a I-inch meter. Actual fee depends on water meter size and/or if a new meter is installed. WATER SEWER PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULE Planning & Zoning Commission: City Council: Monday, February 23, 2004, 7:00 p.m. Tuesday, March 16 and April 6, 2004, 7:30 p.m. RESUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS None. Please contact me at 817-503-1054 or husbandc@ci.collevville.tx.us if you have any questions. I c: DEVElOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE PAGE2oF3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMmEE Z~~13 CHISM COURT ATTACHMENT 11. Number of Subdivision Entrvwavs - Every subdivision shall be designed to provide sufficient access into the development to accommodate anticipated traffic demands and to provide for emergency public services using the criteria contained in this Section. (Old. 0-01-1280108-08-01) a. Where a proposed subdivision, or cul-de-sac street, contains more than twelve (12) lots, the development shall provide for two entryways as follows: i. The development shall provide one street entryway and one emergency access easement. The emergency access easement shall be located on an adjacent or opposite side of the subdivision from the main entryway. The widths of the right-of-way and driving surfaces of the street entryway and the emergency access easement shall be in accordance with the standards contained elsewhere in this Land Development Code, or ii. The development shall provide two street entryways separated not less than one- hundred (100) feet between the centerlines of the driving surfaces. The widths of the right-of-way and driving surfaces of the two entryways shall be in accordance with the standards contained elsewhere in this Land Development Code, or iii. The development shall provide a divided entryway and one emergency access easement. The driving surfaces of the divided entryway shall be separated by a median not less than ten (10) feet in width and provide for one-way traffic. The widths of the right-of-way and driving surfaces of the divided entryway shall be in accordance with the standards contained elsewhere in this Land Development Code. The emergency access easement shall be located on an adjacent or opposite side of the subdivision from the main entryway and be constructed in accordance with the standards contained elsewhere in this Land Development Code. b. If it is physically impractical or otherwise impossible to provide two entryways or to incorporate an emergency access easement into the development in accordance with the above stated requirements, the following alternative may be considered by the approving body: i. A single pavement width of forty-one (41) feet shall be constructed. Said pavement shall extend back from the intersecting street right-of-way a minimum distance of one-hundred (100') feet. All residences within the subdivision shall contain automatic fire-sprinkler systems. c. If it is physically impractical or otherwise impossible to comply with the above-stated requirements, an alternative design may be submitted to the City for consideration. The approving body may approve the alternate design if it finds that the above-stated requirements cannot be satisfied and that all efforts have been made by the developer to comply with said requirements. PAGE 3 OF 3 February 16,2004 6112 Hunter Lane Colleyville, Texas 76034 City ofColleyville: Re: Case Number: Z-04-0 13 This letter is in reference to the request by Pete Cline, Talisman Homes, for a zoning change from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential. We are opposed to the zoning change for the following reasons: 1. appears to be a major drainage problem effecting my property 2. all surrounding property that has been zoned recently has been required to be RJO 3. this section ofColleyville has remained rural and we would like for it to continue to be rural Sincerely, ~~,,~ ~ c.L. Madden, III Ruth Ann Madden RECEIVED" , , [ Hel 810~ CITY OF COllEYVllLE BY C9~I\'1U~_ITY DEVELOPMENT HI 39\1d February 18,2004 City of Colleyville We want to express our opinion about the plans for Lee R.oy Chil>m's 10 acres of property at 600 Shelton Drive and the proposed plot plan submitted by the new developer, a home builder from S()uthlake, to the city. We moved to this area of Colleyville in 1991 for the open spaces and mral atmosphere our neighborhood provides, OUf home site is on 1.26 acres which is the approximate size of our neighbor's. We enjoy the open spaces and the lack of gated and fenced subdivisions in our neighborhood. This area of Colleyville is the drawing card of many who move to our great city. Tbe citizens of CoJleyville appreciate the balance of mral areas in our city and I believe they would oppose the proposal also. Ideally Mr. Chisnl'S beautiful property would remain whole; however reality is it may not. The current proposal that is up for a review and approval is a very dense R-20 development. The proposal is for 17 lots on 9.81 acres which is less than a IJ.z acre in size each-our entire street, tx.Jth sides of Shelton Drive only has 18 homes! Sadly if this historic piece of property will be developed, does it have to be in such a manner thac hi so dense and full of concrete, roof tops, and fences? There will also be an effect on other issues: . Drainage . Curbs and gUt!e.l'S . Lighting . Traffic I understand the City's desire and need for lIlarger tux base but couldn't the builder relax the densiry to R-40 at 40,000 square foot minimum lots to allow for 1 acre home sites equal to the surround' area and satisfy the city need and the neighborhood? /-7 Regards, 'J ?-: ' --7- Bill Lothrop ~ Beverly Lothr~ G~~._ '. 609 Shelton Dnve - \ ,of ~ Colleyville, Texas 76034 817-498-9572 hm 817-410-1161 wk RECEIVED [FEB 1 ~200~ ] CITY OF COllEYVILLE BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 38N\1clnSNI dO~10l EGL6t(;I>Lt8 99:01 1>000/81/00 REZONING REQUEST AT SHELTON DRIVE February 18,2004 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 Re: Case Number: Z-04-O 13 With reference to the request by Pete Cline, Talisman Homes, for a zoning change from Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential. Weare opposed to the zoning change for the following reasons: I.The surrounding properties are, for the most part, AG or R 40. 2. The close proximity of this development to our home is very disturbing, and the noise and dirt this will create makes us wonder if we can continue to live here. 3. Many residents have had and continue to experience drainage and sewer problems. The addition of this many homes will certainly add to this problem. 4. We chose this location because of the rural atmosphere, the presence of horses, cattle, goats etc. We were hoping to build a new home on our land, but are now having serious reservations. 5. The traffic is heavy enough now, as Shelton is used by a number of vehicles, as a "cut thru" . Our street can't support the addition of many more homes, with 2 or more vehicles per household. Sincerely, ;9-~ ~~ ~~ Norma Henslee 608 Shelton Dr. Colleyville, Texas 76034 JREF~~8~~ED j CITY OF COllEYVIlLE BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Jack & Madelyn Norville 70 I Shelton Dr Colleyville, TX 76034-3109 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION City of Colleyville 100 Main St Colleyville, TX 76034 ECEIVED fES 1 82004 February 16, 2004 CITY OF COLLEYVtLLE BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Re: Case # Z-Q4-0 13 Zoning Change Dear Sirs: I want to voice my concerns about the zoning change for R20 Single Family Residential on 9.8 acres on Shelton Dr. Reviewing the plans, this would put 18 homes in this area. This is as many as we presently have on the entire street. I object to having the small lots and the area being enclosed, taking away the openness of the area. The other major concern is the drainage/run off from this area which would affect the properties east of it. I would be in favor of having this area zoned for R40 and not having it enclosed by a wall and gate. Most of the homes on Shelton Dr are on an acre +. Madelyn Norville ~~~~ ",'H 612 Shelton Drive Colleyville, Texas 76034 February 15, 2004 Planning and Zoning Commission City ofColleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, TX 76034 Re: Rezoning Request at Shelton Drive \ With reference to the zoning change request at Shelton Drive, while we would prefer this land be kept as agricultural land, we realize that it is inevitable that this site will eventually be rezoned for residential use. We feel very strongly, however, that it should be kept, at a minimum, as R40. This neighborhood is one ofColleyville's oldest and the historic Webb House is located at the west end of SheltoIL The street still retains its rural look and feel with horses, cows, goats and chickens in the immediate area, and to build 17 houses on the property will completely change the atmosphere of the neighborhood and double the number of houses. Most of our neighbors specifically chose to live in this area because of the rural feel and the open spaces. It is one of the few remaining areas where wildlife can still be seen and is still welcome. To build 17 houses will increase traffic and possibly cause response time delays for the Colleyville Fire Department, as Shelton is a cross street of preference of the firefighters stationed at the McDonwell School Road fire house. We also believe that to build that number of houses would cause drainage problems along Hunter and negate the drainage work done by the City several years ago to solve an existing problem. Finally, the City logo reflects the rural nature of Colleyville, and we feel that this neighborhood should remain that way. Very truly y ~ j() IJ /1'<JC- Bill&D~ Stephens rcelVED'. FEB 1 82004 CITY OF COlLEYVILLE BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TERI LYNNE WORKMAN Certified Shorthand Reporter P.O. Box 1463 Colleyville, Texas 76034 February 18,2004 Planning and Zoning Commission City of Colleyville 100 Main Street Colleyville, Texas 76034 'RECEIVED r~;~<~Z004 J CITY OF COLLEYVILLE BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Case Number: Z-04-0 13 To Whom It May Concern: I would like to express my concerns regarding the request by Pete Cline, Talisman Homes, for a zoning change from AG Agricultural to R20 Single Family Residential on 9.8 acres located on the north side of Shelton Drive, west of Hunter Lane. I live on Hunter Lane. I moved to Colleyville during the summer of 1991, just prior to my son starting the 1 st grade. As a single mother of two small children, the decision rested solely upon my shoulders to find a suitable location to raise and educate my children. After months of research, I chose Colleyville. I found an excellent school district and a cozy log home in a country-like setting. How perfect is that? The changes, however, that have occurred over the less than three years since I moved here have soiled my vision of what I thought I was providing for my family. My house payment, which I managed to get within $50.00 of my prior monthly payment, soon increased by 50010, $500.00 a month, as a direct result ofan increase in taxes, not principal and interest. This payment was out of my budget, but there was nothing I could do about it. Within months of moving in, a reclusive and territorial neighbor erected an ugly goat- wire fence directly on the line dividing our properties, literally cutting my driveway in half at one point and causing me to dig up a wall of landscaping that covered the entire north side of my house, just to be able to park in my garage. Access to the rear of my property is restricted, and my propane tank has to be filled from the other neighbor's driveway. Let's hope there's never a fire in my back yard. I've had two flat tires from squeezing through what space is left. I guess I should say "almost" squeezing through. Although the neighbor who erected the fence has since passed away, there's nothing I can do about it. My children and I love to pitch the tent and camp out behind the barn/garage. That, however, has changed as well. The Congregation Beth Israel is erecting a temple directly behind my property. Won't that be a lovely sight to add as we admire the beautiful sunrises we've come to cherish, and I'm sure the parking lot will reflect the moon nicely as we camp. Nothing I can do about it. There is, however, something I can do about the issue at hand. I finally have a voice in what's going on around me, and I intend to express it. Not only does the proposed housing addition not conform to the existing neighborhood, aesthetically and technically, but Shelton is not an adequate enough thoroughfare to support the additional traffic flow. The intersection of Shelton and Pleasant Run is tricky enough to maneuver with the current number of frequent travelers, much less adding potentially 30 more cars at peak times of the day. I've seen tires blown out and a skid steer dumped off of a trailer, into the ditch, because there's inadequate space to turn from Pleasant Run onto Shelton if a car on Shelton doesn't stop exactly on the white line. It's routine for cars on Shelton to have to back up in order to make the accommodation. Where will they go with cars stacked up behind them? With the additional traffic on Shelton, a tricky intersection would become a nightmare. I also feel that this proposed addition is an encroachment on the longstanding residents of Colleyville whose properties abut the 9.8 acres in question. These people have lived here for many, many years and do not welcome such a change. Many are, or will soon be, empty-nesters with no intentions of making another change of residence. I'm a relative newcomer and do not welcome further change. I moved into an established neighborhood with a rural feel because this is what I like. I want to look forward to many years in Colleyville, but I find myself counting the years until my children have finished middle school and I'll move. I had intended on planting roots. Please listen to and consider your current Colleyville residents. There's a warmth and charm to this part of the City ofColleyville, and we don't want to lose that. I strongly urge you to deny the request by Mr. Cline and allow us to retain our little slice of the country. Please help us hang on to what we love about Colleyville. Very truly yours, T~eW~ V- ~ Opposing The Rezoning Of 600 Shelton Drive From AG To RlO '8'---:-----. '~D. .l~[B 1 &Z004 ] CITY OF COLLEYVILLE BY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The neighborhood surrounding the proposed property located at 600 Shelton Drive, Colleyville, Texas would like to express their concerns regarding the proposed zoning change from AG Agriculture to R20 Single Family Residential. The neighbors of this property believe that the proposed R20 Single Family Residential is not in the best interest of the neighborhood or Colleyville for the following reasons: )- Density-R20 Family Residential would be a tremendous increase in density for this neighborhood. The number of homes proposed is one less than the entire number of homes located on Shelton Drive )- Loss of Rural Appealing Atmosphere ofColleyville-the entire street of Shelton Drive, and the next streets over (Beverly Drive and LD Lockett) have home sites on lots over an acre and are zoned R40 ~ Drainage-Shelton Drive and Hunter Trail currently have a serious water run off drainage problem with the addition of these homes the problem would increase greatly and impact the homes down hill from the proposed developement )- Fence-the current zoning ofR40 allows for open spaces, fencing in of the proposed development would negatively impact the rural atmosphere of this area of Colleyville ~ Water-is the available supply line sufficient enough to sustain pressure to current homes ~ Sewer-is the current system in place sufficient to service the new homes and sustain the current homes ~ Lighting-the addition of street lights and lighting of the exterior of the 17 homes would distract from the rural atmosphere ~ Location of Development Entrance-current proposal directs the traffic headlights into current home across from entrance ~ Increase Traffic-canlhe current street support the increase in traffic flow Our first desire would be to keep the Chism Tract as it is. We are urging the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider rezoning the property R40 instead of the proposed R20. This petition is supported by the citizens of Colleyville whom appear on the following attachment: February 17,2004 \pc...r"~ II G~...V\... \l' I-\~\~"-' t' Cl,,-\,~ . ~ ~AI."" f\NI..k~l!~ .. ~ IloZ ~.t.{.;.#- t/1- btJ~~c:J/6 If ::L..~~~'cl., \~-- (, l)~ \-\~.,<-,,,,.- <6 n' (,\J5--~\G.1 '<J."i,~~.-Jlf~C-J<V.q" ~{(}3 ~~hv 9'17 _S7?-C3'}) ~~~~(~ I~~~~ s.~~ ~oo~i{)r <3t7 tf<t'l 193{ c\.~~~. I]. -;-. .' iP<90~~ k. '6 i1 h6 ~ <t ~ 7 S~k~~l<l. ~J .~ ~/')~~ ?lIJ-'fCfr?-7b37 s~t:-~ f3. ~~k{](/v? OIL bhelf1Jn 7Jf1Je. 6'T -lji6 '-fb3l ~;;~4\tI\.VD' C-~~~ lo1~f;0.. 8/1-:A.1/ -;l'tJt .~-.l. eY.(d " ~.~. ' 6. "'/5"#&7f"o.6k. . 91.7-.7"/8-,57t'g ~'1(ttJt, ./J If(f: ,5/ d.. 6"/7- 4-Cft'--OI02.3 1+0 \>)(1.. r 1. . ~ R.:4+-~'r /3 . .. S /;( ~ '3/ I Lf 7J' .o/~ ~ ~c..~r 4. ~--i; ~ 70'1 fhe/fc1?))/7 f{17-6'S6~t7?/J ~~~oi/S-. . ~,_ 80~Shelro;tl7J(. ~/7-L/Yf!-/~27 l'I.orv,,\~(lb ,~~~ 7c:J/.Q'~7_d2. C5'r7---G:,~b-~7 / t. ~_a. ~ ril\(:: '1 "/fJ c,.- 0./ LhI- d/:, cO(),,'1 . II ' [~ f?~:;:>~~ $(llr~ /oA7 fY'''-th.lyl\. ( ~ <::...l ~ NCN.I\~ vt. 10 I --:lI\VL~~. 8/1 -bG'fo -- 0 7/~ 1~~~e.t_{(l. I bO&"5iel.J--~rv il7 Yf) 2- 3 ) '1 :rWv--l!..\\I\~ o. y~ .~ S9/"t f/Ut1/7ER. tg/7 '-{2 g g,O ~L/ ~\+"~Ikl\-p" ~r~'7If,d&-- 7t11 ~~JJA' f/7~,j.fl-~f:J/ r~nlUll(,~' I' . Wl')lwv-,~V'. velll rh-~\.</ ~ ~II 'I..{<1'? ';5;7(,. ~.~~ ie,' to 100 fI~ CA. 817-Y.2.:l.-7;;;G ;..., ~c"" L(. .~( 0 I \SO ~~ ~ - ~ /7 -Z{).)-7)..51 ~~~:l's. .?J~ D\U~ woq She-lion. <llq;4q~~q5'l~ d.~..~:>.\~1~' I'. . ~ fJJ08~W~1A..- rJ/7-t8S-d-.33? (!;, ill J' fA /' I " C1 . Lo~~::t. -7- '.. rfil /tV I ~. ~~ ., -, <6- ~ Sl L "'J~~~Ol\-~ j{~ ~-vJ 8{)1.5"he/~i1 8/7- ~5(.,~ SL(~'i (j - 571 SIU/J-l7tJ./)tt, (17) ~tfl--I/'1st? 'lI~ 511 ~ 8/7- 6&?/ - 'It! J2i> oh ~""b (;-1 ' 4?iO~ HL\I\.+erLaI\.~ Hu.~4 t. La.. "- e....- P k.c 1\ ~ ,:::if, "6 /l Llq'Z ?:14 g g (1 Lfq~ ~7lf.B ~ 1'7 - '12f-6 2..2./