The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Resolutions (R-96-1232)-09/03/1996 RESOLUTION R-96-1232 A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE WORK OF THE PRECINCT LINE CORRIDOR TASK FORCE AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IN THE STUDY OF THE PRECINCT LINE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORRIDOR AND ADOPTING THE COLLEYVILLE WESTERN GATEWAY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS AN UPDATE TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COLLEYVILLE MASTER PLAN. II Ii I I I I ,I II I I !I i ,I i' I I I I; 'I I, II I' II !i WHEREAS, The City Council on April 2, 1996 appointed a Precinct Line Corridor Task Force to conduct a land use study and prepare a report for presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding land use development issues in the far western sectors of the City which might be impacted by the expansion of Precinct Line Road; and WHEREAS, The Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the work of the Task Force, conducted a public hearing on the planning issues involved, and recommended adoption of a final draft plan titled the Colleyville Western Gateway Development Plan; and WHEREAS, this large task was completed in a very short period of time; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEYVILLE THAT: SEC. 1. The City Council wishes to publicly thank the persons who served on the Precinct Line Corridor Task Force, Steve McKain, Chair Gary Cantrell Cliff Holliday Doug Blemings Dawn Quinby Mark Howe Bob Kohsmann Afiz Hudani Cheryl Feigel and the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Steve Lebo, Chair Tom Westerman Tom Hart Greg Austin Marie Powell Jody Short Sam McCollough for the magnificent effort shown in the timely preparation of the Colleyville Western Gateway Development Plan. I I! L I I I L Sec. 2. The Colleyville Western Gateway Development Plan is hereby adopted as an amendment to the Colleyville Land Use Plan and assumptions adopted by Resolution R-93-957 on February 1, 1994. AND IT IS SO RESOLVED. Passed by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 nays, and 0 abstentions, on this the ~~b dayof c-CSt!.p+tllibtr ,1996. ATTEST: CITY OF COLLEYVILLE 7/4 Ed Baker Mayor I I I I I I I I .1 'I I I I I I I I , i I ! I ! l I' II Ii The Colleyville Western Gateway Development Plan Definition and Vision of the Western Gateway The proposed gateway district, also referred to as the Precinct Line Corridor, is an area containing all of the most westerly 200 acres in the City of Colleyville. This area serves as the face that Colleyville presents to the outside world entering from the north and south on Precinct Line Road, and from the west on L.D. Lockett and McDonwell School Road. It extends from the South city limit at the Hurst ET J line, south of L.D. Lockett Road, to the north city limit just south of Bandit Trail. The western boundary is Precinct Line Road. The eastern boundary follows generally some existing man-made as well as natural land use edges which run parallel to Precinct Line Road at an offset distance of 500 to 1000 feet east of the arterial. These edges include the eastern border of the Fairway and River Valley Additions on the north side of McDonwell School Road and a flood plain extending from the south city limit to McDonwell School Road. Following the concept of UGateway" , the right-of-way for L.D. Lockett from Precinct Line Road to Lowrie Road and the right-of-way for McDonwell School Road from Precinct Line Road to Westccat are also considered to be part of the district. Development of the corridor will be gradual, but demand will be great for individual parcels. The natural tendency of any corridor development is to develop haphazardly as parcels become available to the market. In the absence of a plan, such a corridor will eventually be developed as a commercial strip with a dangerous frequency pattern of automobile turning movements and an inefficient use of properties along the rear of the corridor. It is important for the future of Colleyville to identify those areas along Precinct Line Road which are most appropriate to serve as well functioning commercial nodes, and encourage planned residential development in those areas outside the commercial nodes. As the city matures it may be possible for the commercial nodes to expand outward, but always with a proper buffer adjacent to any residential development which might exist. It will also be necessary to preserve access easements between commercial uses and maintain strict limited access to Precinct Line Road. The most noticeable characteristic of the gateway will be a 40 foot future landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. This greenbelt will soften the impact of the seven lane roadway on adjacent properties and help the community put its best face forward. In order to implement the Western Gateway Development Plan, it will be necessary to adopt this plan as an update to the Colleyville Land Use Plan, and eventually adopt a planned unit development zoning district reflecting the plan's guidelines. Development could then occur on a parcel by parcel basis, subject to the conditions stated in the district's ordinances. Aug12,1996 1 General Development Issues and Objectives Issue 1. The industrial development in the Hurst Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ET J) is not compatible with the traditional residential development envisioned by the City Zoning Map or the Master Plan. Proposed Policy Statement: 1 A. Some form of buffer must be developed between the industrial uses and what ever physical or imagined line that might serve as the western edge of residential development. 1 B. Office zoning adjacent to the industrial would provide the opportunity to construct residential style buildings which would in turn be more compatible with residential development. 1 C. The area between the south city limit and L.D. Lockett is too large to be developed totally as "neighborhood" oriented retail. However, regional oriented retail would generate more traffic than is desired for the existing sparsely developed neighborhood. Therefore a planned mixture of "neighborhood" oriented retail and low traffic impact office uses is desired as a first phase development. 1 D. Transitional uses ranging from offices at the south city limit to retail uses on the southeast corner of L.D. Lockett, would balance the demand for retail but keep it small enough to serve a limited area. All uses permitted in the CC-1 district are appropriate. The surrounding offices and retail uses with high quality design standards would provide a better backdrop for residential development east of the area. Issue 2. The existing commercial and industrial development just south of McDonwell School Road on Precinct Line Road does not conform to standards of the Commercial Building Design District Standards defined by Section 24.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. This area is also too large to be neighborhood or village retail, but not attractive enough for residential development. This intersection has been identified as a commercial node by the City of North Richland Hills. Aug 7,1996 2 Proposed Policy Statement: 2A. Some form of buffer must be developed to screen the unattractive commercial and industrial uses existing near the corner from future development. 2B. There are some existing commercial zones located east of the intersection, including Nine Acres, a development which is very much out of character for the area. A commercial stable is located across the street on the northeast corner. These uses must be buffered from future uses. 2C. Retail uses could be allowed in limited use on the southeast corner, and some form of transitional, office use might be appropriate for the surrounding properties, as well as for the property on the northeast comer. Limits on height and roof designs could buffer the office uses from adjacent residential areas. Issue 3. Fairway Addition I Tate Addition is an older but stable residential neighborhood with opportunities for continued new residential development as well as some limited opportunities for redevelopment. Proposed Policy Statement: 3A. There is an overriding need to protect the integrity of the Fairway Addition neighborhood. This will be difficult because several residential lots front on the new road. 3B. The lots in Fairway which front directly on Precinct Line Road should be rezoned to a PUD-R which would also allow office uses within residential style buildings. These buildings when viewed from the rear would appear to be residential dwellings, so the impact on the remainder of Fairway would be minimized. 3C. To further protect the majority of home sites in the Fairway Addition from noise and other intrusive impacts, an 8 foot masonry wall should be developed along the east edge of Tate Addition, the rear of Lots 15A through 26 and along the north side of Lot 2, Block 2, Fairway Addition as properties re-develop. The design of this wall should be included in the district zoning ordinance. Aug 7. 1996 3 Issue 4. Precinct Line Road is being developed by Tarrant County and the State of Texas as a 7 -lane principal regional arterial. Precinct Line Road will generate traffic volumes and noise which is incompatible with existing residential development in Fairway Addition. In the sections of the corridor between McDonwell School and L.D. Lockett, the future residential development envisioned by the Zoning Ordinance and the Master Plan to border the arterial will also be negatively impacted. Proposed Policy Statement: 4A. To prevent traffic congestion and reduce the intrusion created by strip commercial development, the area between LD Lockett and the existing commercial district at the southeast comer of McDonwell School should be developed in large phases, whether residential or commercial. The size of the commercial nodes at L. D. Lockett and McDonwell School Road is unknown. However, areas closest to the comers should be developed first. 48. Precinct Line Road will be a busy street so a buffer of at least 40 feet such as the buffer used by Timarron Addition in Southlake should be required for all future residential and commercial development. In a PUD-R district the buffer would give the development open space credits allowing for a smaller lot size, while still maintaining a traditional density of approximately two units per acre. 4C. Where residential development exists, office districts or other non residential uses might be possible on adjacent tracts if adequate buffers are provided. It is almost certain that some form of buffer use will be required at the northeast corner of L.D. Lockett and Precinct Line Road to protect any nearby residential development from the noise and visual confusion of the intersection traffic. 40. The dividing line between any potential PUO and the remainder of the City could be the existing flood plain running parallel to Precinct Line Road or a similar, man-made 50 to 100 foot landscaped buffer. Issue 5. Tarrant County and the Cities of Fort Worth and North Richland Hills with the help of the State of Texas are developing an east-west regional arterial known as Aug 12. 1996 4 North Tarrant Parkway, currently planned to terminate at the intersection of McDonwell School Road and Precinct Line Road. A similar regional thoroughfare is planned to intersect at L.D. Lockett and Precinct Line Road. Proposed Policy Statement: SA. The idea of a landscaped buffer should be continued along each side of McDonwell School Road and L.D. Lockett Road from Precinct Line Road to Westcoat. The buffer would be 30 feet wide along the Fairway Addition frontage. Where possible, all other areas of these streets would have a 40 foot landscaped setback on each side of the road. This would help define the gateway. Aug 7, 1996 S Implementation Plan To implement the Western Gateway Development Plan as envisioned, it will be necessary for the City of Colleyville to adopt this plan as an update to the Colleyville Land Use Plan. Following that would be the adoption of a nine- sector planned unit development (PUD) zoning district reflecting the plan's guidelines. Development could then occur on a parcel by parcel basis, subject to the conditions stated in the district ordinance. The map at the right shows each of the nine sectors outlined in a bold dashed line. The bold solid lines indicate the location of the proposed landscaped setback which is planned for current and future roadways in the corridor. The district ordinance should include the adoption of stringent cross section, dimensional and material design standards for landscaping, berms, walls, serpentine walks, irrigation and lighting along the setback. The nine specific sedor development plans are detailed on the following pages. Aug 7.1996 1-'1 :Ill .. lD , .w +J~ u:rT4 I ,~ w/ ~ t~ w.l ~~ ,,.. , IoU 1 'il /:c 1m: 6 1\ " ALLS"< R\ vER AN Cr1 f< 1 1 J1 A 1J.3 1 10 1E 1H 1J4 2 10 9. 8 ~1q' 7- 6 ~~~~ 5 \0 23 4 24 50::: 25 4I .3 2A 2 26 .3 L .3 2 J1 1A2 7 Western Gateway Sector 1 Plan Current Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Conditions: 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Aug 7, 1996 5. The area is that row of residential lots in Fairway Addition and Tate Addition which directly abut Precinct Line Road and the intersection of Precinct Line and McDonwell School. The current zoning is R-40. Mixed use residential I office (PUD-R) All uses allowable in the R-20 and C-PO districts. Area requirements in accordance with the R-20 district. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 30 foot landscaped setback from Murphy street and McDonwell School. 8 foot brick wall along the east side of Tate Addition, the rear of lots 15A through 26 and the north side of Lot 2, block 2, Fairway Addition as properties re-develop. City staff to determine wall design and brick color standard. 200 foot minimum distance between driveways and between driveways and street intersections, center to center. New permits conditioned upon granting of cross access agreements to the benefit of all properties in the sector. All roofs to be pitched at 5: 12 or steeper. No roof mounted air-conditioning equipment can be visible from any point five feet above the ground. One-story buildings only. No driveway shall be more than 24 feet wide. All residential and office buildings shall have a CPO district design score 8 5A J000 ~~S \ I 5C I 3 50 C 5F =- 5M 31 5 2 3C 27 2 2 ---,-.--------sn:s ! ~ ~~ ~~\~~ ~G 9 Western Gateway Sector 2 Plan Current Land Use: Proposed Land Use: Conditions: 1. CY 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Aug 7,1996 Sector 2 is cU17ently zoned CC-1 and CN. Two non- conforming industrial buildings housing industrial uses front on Precinct Line Road. The remainder of the sec~or is vacant. This commercial node faces both Precinct Line and McDonwell SchooL Retail and Office (PUD-C) All uses allowable in the CC-1 district,. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 30 foot landscaped setback from McDonwell School Road. 300 foot minimum distance between driveways and between driveways and street intersections, center to center. New pennits conditioned upon granting of cross access agreements to the benefit of all prol=erties in Sector 2 and any non-residential properties existing at the time of the permit on properties adjacent to Sector 2. All roofs within 100 feet of a residential use or district to be pitched at 5: 12 or steeper. No roof mounted air-conditioning equipment can be visible from any point five feet above the ground. Buildings within 100 feet of a residential use or district limited to one-story only. 8 foot masonry wall or maintenance of a 100 foot landscaped buffer yard along the eastern edge of the sector and along the common boundary with Sector 4. Minimum lot width of 150 feet. Minimum lot depth of 300 feet. Any retail or office building within 400 feet of Precinct Line Road shall have translucent openings facing in at least 3 separate compass directions. As measured on a compass, the 3 separate directions shall be separated frcm one another by not less than 60 degrees. - All building shall have a CC-1 minimum design score No driveway shall be mcre than 24 feet wide. 10 88 50 8 5F 5M 31 5 81 8FI 5K 80 5H , 1A9 r... ---, ~-_. I I 4 _. II 4- I I 1H 11 Western Gateway Sector 3 Plan Current land Use: Zoned R-40, Sector 3 is generally the front portion of an agricultural estate on the northeast corner of Precinct Line and Lavaca Trail. The dividing line betvveen sectors 3 and 4 could be either the flood plain which crosses the property or the substantial stand of native oaks surrounding the homestead. Proposed land Use (Alternate A): Retail and Office (PUD-C) Conditions(AIt. A):1. Precedented upon (a): the development of 75 percent or more of the land area in Sector 2 with non-residential uses. 2. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 3. 30 foot landscaped setback from Lavaca Trail. 4. 400 foot minimum distance between driveways and between driveways and street intersections, center to center. 5. New permits conditioned upon granting of cross access agreements to the benefit of all properties in Sectors 3 and 2. 6. Roofs within 100 feet of residential pitched at 5: 12 or steeper. 7. No roof mounted air-conditioning equipment can be visible from any point five feet above the ground. 8. Buildings within 100 feet of residential to be one-story only. 9. All uses allowable in the CC-1 district. 10. 8 foot masonry wall or maintenance of a 100 foot landscaped buffer yard along the eastern edge of the sector and along any property line shared with a residential use property. 11. Any new building shall have translucent openings facing in at least 3 separate compass directions. As measured on a compass, the 3 separate directions shall be separated from one another by not less than 60 degrees. 12. All building shall have a CC-1 minimum design score 13. No driveway shall be more than 24 feet wide. Proposed land Use (Alternate B): Residential (PUD-C) Conditions (Alt. B): 1. Aug 7, 1996 2. 3. 4. Detached single family dwellings at 2 dwellings per acre with no minimum lot width, depth or area. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 30 foot landscaped setback from Lavaca Trail. 300 foot minimum distance between street intersections, center to center. No driveways on Precinct Line Road. New residential development conditioned upon 8 foot masonry wall or a 50 foot landscaped buffer with 6 foot screen surrounding the new development. 5. 12 .--------. I _~_ _~~ " I, , ~ ~_. ---. ;--------5~--1~1 '~ . . . & ~ \~ r~ S ~ .. '. "- r ~\~U . ~ 1~~Ct: - \ ~~ I I I '- 13 Western Gateway Sector 4 Plan Current Land Use: This sector is the eastern, homestead, portion of the agricultural estate located at the northeast comer of Precinct Line Road and Lavaca Trail. The dividing line between Sectors 3 and 4 could be either the flood plain which crosses the property or the substantial stand of native oaks which surround the homestead. The current zoning is R-40. The trees on this property serve as a landmark for the surrounding community. Proposed Land Use: Residential (PUD-R) Conditions: 1 . 2. 3. Detached single family dwellings at 2 dwellings per acre with no minimum lot width, depth or area. 30 foot landscaped setback from Lavaca Trail. Preservation of 75 percent of native trees as measured in caliper inches. A tree survey would be required prior to approval of any redevelopment of the property. Maintenance of a 30 foot landscaped building setback along the eastern edge of the sector. 4. Aug 7. 1996 14 8E 5 4 LAVA 88 5 t. 1 A~ ~ 5E ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . I I I ~------ I I 1------------11 I I ..., I 31 A 15 Western Gateway Sector 5 Plan Current Land Use: Composed of 4 separate unplatted land parcels, this sector is located at the southeast comer of Precinct Line Road and Lavaca Trail. The property is primarily agricultural with two small, older homes fronting on Precinct Line Road. Sector 5 abuts Lavaca Trail Addition, which is developed with lots of 5 acres and larger. There is a need to provide some form of transitional development between these large residential lots and the proposed arterial. A new road could be built to intersect with Precinct Line Road somewhere midway between Lavaca Trail and L.D. Lockett Road. This road could also coincide roughly with the southern boundary of Lavaca Trail Addition and serve as the line dividing Sectors 5 and 6. The current zoning is R-40 Proposed Land Use ( Alternative A): Retail and Office (PUD-C) Conditions(Alt A): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Precedented upon the development of 50 percent or more of the land area in either Sector 3 or Sector 6 with non-residential uses. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 30 foot landscaped setback from all other perimeter roads. 600 foot minimum distance between driveways and between driveways and street intersections, center to center. New permits conditioned upon cross access agreements to the benefit of all properties in Sectors 5 and any non-residential properties existing at the time of the permit in Sector 6. Roofs within 100 feet of residential to be pitched at 5:12 or steeper. No roof mounted air-conditioning equipment can be visible from any point five feet above the ground. Buildings within 100 feet of a residential use or district limited to one- story only. All uses allowable in the CC-1 district. 8 foot masonry wall or maintenance of a 100 foot landscaped buffer yard along the eastern edge of the sector. Any new building within 400 feet of Precinct Line shall have translucent openings facing in at least 3 separate compass directions. As measured on a compass, the 3 separate directions shall be separated from one another by not less than 60 degrees. All building shall have a CC-1 minimum design score No driveway shall be more than 24 feet wide. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Proposed Land Use (Alternate B): Residential (PUD-C) Conditions (All. B): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Aug 7, 1996 Detached single family dwellings at 2 dwellings per acre with no minimum lot width, depth or area. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 30 foot landscaped setback from all other perimeter roads. No drives on Precinct Line Road. 400 foot minimum distance between street intersections, center to center. New residential development shall be precedented upon development of an 8 foot masonry wall or a 50 foot landscaped buffer with 6 foot screen surrounding the new development. 16 11-\ wLIM -. -- ;B AI I 1/\ DON&:: --6 r c< a ~ I I I I I I I ~t~ &~\\U ~ ~\ ~ ~(J)\~ -l1li --.-C- ~ ---a ~o 0 0 I \ I /I 17 ~'_._.._,____.._m____'__'___'___'~"""'_"""-'_'__"^____'___.__.__~___'__n..+,.,._.____._+.4'.'"+__'___,~"_,,,,_,_,,.".._.,.."____.__._....".._.,..,_,_~__..,.....___,...---.--...-.--,.--.-----......-....,..-.-.,......--.-,.........--..---.-.---.--........-------.-....-.--.-....---... Western Gateway Sector 6 Plan Current Land Use: Sector 6 is a single large agric:.lltural tract located approximately midway between Lavaca Trail and L.D. Lockett Road. The eastern edge of the sector coincides roughly with a flood plain which helps define the eastern boundary of the study area. The current Zoning is R-40. Proposed Land Use ( Alternative A): Retail and Office (PUD-C) Conditions(Alt A): 1. Precedented upon the development of 50 percent or more of the land area in Sector 7 with non-residential uses. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 30 foot landscaped setback from all other perimeter roads. 600 foot minimum distance between driveways and between driveways and street intersec+Jons, center to center. New permits conditioned upon cross access agreements to the benefit of all properties in Sectors 6 and any non-residential properties existing at the time of the permit in Sectors 5 and 7. Roofs within 100 feet of residential pitched at 5:12 or steeper. No roof mounted air-conditioning equipment can be visible from any point five feet above the ground. Buildings within 100 feet of a residential use or district limited to one- story only. All uses allowable in the CC-1 district. 8 foot masonry wall or maintenance of a 100 foot landscaped buffer yard along the eastern edge of the sector. Any new building within 400 feet of Precinct Line shall have translucent openings facing in at least 3 separate compass directions. As measured on a compass, the 3 separate directions shall be separated from one another by not less than 60 degrees. All building shall have a CC-l minimum design score No driveway shall be more than 24 feet wide. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Proposed Land Use (Alternate B): Residential (PUD-C) Conditions (Alt. B): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Aug 7, 1996 Detached single family dwellings at 2 dwellings per acre with no minimum lot width, depth or area. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 30 foot landscaped setback from all other perimeter roads. No drives on Precinct Line Road. 600 foot minimum distance between street intersections, center to center. New residential development shall be precedented upon development of an 8 foot masonry wall or a 50 foot landscaped buffer with 6 foot screen surrounding the new development. 18 <., ~ - iV\~ ;N:C7 C I I I 4 I 1EO 1C LL 48 ~ t~2 40 19 Western Gateway Sector 7 Plan Current Land Use: This agricultural tract is located at the northeast corner of L.D. Lockett and Precinct Line Road. This intersection has been identified as a commercial node by the City of North Richland Hills Land Use Plan. A flood plain generally defines the eastern edge of the sector. Proposed Land Use ( Alternative A): Retail and Office (PUD-C) Conditions(Alt A): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. All uses allowable in the CC-1 district. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 40 foot landscaped setback from L.D. Lockett road. 600 foot minimum distance between driveways and between driveways and street intersections, center to center. New permits conditioned upon cross access agreements to the benefit of all properties in Sectors 7 and any non-residential properties existing at the time of the permit in Sector 6. All roofs within 100 feet of a residential use or district to be pitched at 5: 12 or steeper. No roof mounted air-conditioning equipment can be visible from any point five feet above the ground. Buildings within 100 feet of residential to be one-story only. 8 foot masonry wall or maintenance of a 100 foot landscaped buffer yard along the eastern edge of the sector. Any new building within 400 feet of Precinct Line shall have translucent openings facing in at least 3 separate compass directions. As measured on a compass, the 3 separate directions shall be separated from one another by not less than 60 degrees. All building shall have a CC-1 minimum design score No driveway shall be more than 24 feet wide. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Proposed Land Use (Alternate B): Residential (PUD-C) Conditions (All. B): 1. Aug 7, 1996 2. 3. 4. Detached single family dwellings at 2 dwellings per acre with no minimum lot width, depth or area. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 40 foot landscaped setback from L.D. Lockett Road. No drives on Precinct Line Road. 600 foot minimum distance between street intersections, center to center. New residential development shall be precedented upon development of an 8 foot masonry wall or a 50 foot landscaped buffer with 6 foot screen surrounding the new development. 5. 20 10B 40 I II II 401 1 C~1 p...R y p... 1..2 1 I 17 3 _---III , 1AA I . .....- I I n . 48 I 21 Western Gateway Sector 8 Plan Current land Use: Sector 8 is a platted but undeveloped subdivision called McNary acres at the southeast corner of L.D. Lockett Road and Precinct Line Road. This intersection has been identified in the North Richland Hills Master Plan as a commercial node. The current zoning is R-40. Proposed land Use: Conditions:1. 2. 3.. ~/} 5. (6:) 7. @ Aug 7. 1996 Retail and Office (PUD-C) All uses allowable in the CC-1 district. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 40 foot landscaped setback from L. D. Lockett Road. 600 foot minimum distance between driveways and between driveways and street intersections, center to center. New permits conditioned upon granting of cross access agreements to the benefit of all properties in Sectors 8 and 9. Any new building within 400 feet of Precinct Line shall have translucent openings facing in at least 3 separate compass directions. As measured on a compass, the 3 separate directions shall be separated from one another by not less than 60 degrees. All building shall have a CC-1 minimum design score No driveway shall be more than 24 feet wide. 22 40 ~D1 3 2 2C 28 1 E:ADO' lAKE: 1AA TR 23 Western Gateway Sector 9 Plan Current Land Use: Sector 9 is generally a collection of undeveloped properties which surround Sector 8 and which are bordered on the east by a flood plain and on the south by the City Limit. The adjacent unscreened manufacturing uses just outside the south City Limit negatively impact these properties. Proposed Land Use: Office I Retail (PUD-C) Conditions: 1. All uses allowable in the CPO and CC 1 district. 2. 40 foot landscaped setback from Precinct Line Road. 3. 40 foot landscaped setback from L. D. Lockett Road. 4. 600 foot minimum distance between driveways and between driveways and street intersections, center to center. 5. New permits conditioned upon granting of cross access agreements to the benefit of all properties in Sectors 8 and 9. 6. All roofs within 100 feet of a residential use or district to be pitched at 5: 12 or steeper. 7. No roof mounted air-conditioning equipment can be visible from any point five feet above the ground. 8. Buildings within 100 feet of residential to be one-story only. 9. 8 foot masonry wall or maintenance of a 100 foot landscaped buffer yard along the eastern edge of the sector. 10. Any new building within 400 feet of Precinct Line shall have translucent openings facing in at least 3 separate compass directions. As measured on a compass, the 3 separate directions shall be separated from one another by not less than 60 degrees. 11. All building shall have a CC-1 minimum design score 12. No driveway shall be more than 24 feet wide. Aug 7, 1996 24 ij~<9J4 MAST[E~ ~LA~ ~=~~=~51 July 2. 1996 ,.,.. --jf< ~'"' III ~ I -n ~.pt ~1 7, '. , , JaLUR crtr,,1,.nnrs 1~ \ " ~~~ ~~ .... ~~. ~, ~ II f.# __....JI~ . 1&1 'I' . " lollA TJJ ,e 11 1 1111 lA 2 ~:::l-WI I~ ,. I ,. n I. 1 'I I 13 ,. I 12 ~ ..'7 I 12 17 I 12 1111 1111 I" 1.I.J1 ..~ · .. I ,alZ . ,'.... 2111. 7 au,,," :II:l.- 21 JI .~ .......... 21 I 7 ZI I 7 . GROW ZI I.f ZI I . I" a I ~~ 24 I S -. :IS I." ..,. :s >> 21 --IJ "I~ - I -~~:::JJ-7-"':~ ~~ ~ IA' I ,AI,AI lA7f jJ- ~ ,... I I I .-I...... I ?co~ ~ ~OM -,- \. J I ~ 2 ."" lMl C) "'t.::- ~ .....d '!Il~"'-" lID Jl:l SI ~~ i~ lfI!'. :=os. SI n.., ~...- 0 !III UIT e -4 : ~ tAVAb TUII IE =tS U1TA o:mn" _0. ",q~ _G..~'" a ~~.- )0 . 3: JI a fU 3 '1 - ~-~-t '"1 ~L ~! '0' ."" - ~I_ I S .~C,.2 II I .i~i 1 V",. ......., .o.;Sl".;;' -, ~~ I RES. lD ..., sa ~ I · ~ ':' ~! ~)\'\ ~..;I ~ ... ~..I c.. \-" ~ ,,.. '''' 1,\3 ~ !i ".... ~ . - -~ ~ IEC tCJ 1 ctsJ i- a. JA ..... ... lII\" 'P "a&l '~ 40 leUl .D~~JJ ~'~lni~ll. . rcn ~~:l1~7f'~ 1 ~ 171 J -~U ~ Ice 1 , , 1 ~.. Cl.~ s.l s.....5r ,..:1 ,.... "';' ~ ~'~ I. ~ i 'I f.; 1111, ~ lMl~ 11: !: --':.. ~ I ,........ IMI I .......-r I I I HUJISJ' cn71.1.iin ~ ,..I II I ";,, '... .. - 1 ~'1t 'ltI ,... 1 .-; - :II - 11+ ,&1 1. II = ~~17lt '~~ l.:F: r~ 11 lZ lIlIf.;- " " .s: IlIII 25 WESTERN GATEWAY CURRENT ZON~NG 7-1=96 July 2. 1996 , Ira II I RJJJ m \ \ IJ I 1.Ll1 I I I I I I I i I II ! n '~I".rm ,or 2nl' g i~I~~~rl~ '1~I~lJ:l~ T - - -- 1~ \ lJ "1 '\~ --n I...... ........" 1.1.1 _ 1 ~ ~ 1 II AG ~ A40 I I~ 1 1.l4 IIlIt 'A 2 II ~ I'" cnA~ iT ____.JII~ :llr""'" ---- I llj' IF '11 112 IW I 11 lJ II IJ 10 !-f'" ~ 7~1712 . lID t...!!.... 1&J /MJ_"f :'1'!'6 9Ji-" 1:;' a !!::!.., I_""F '~I lam ~ a. ~ 1-- 2lI . ~ ~ 21 ..... 21 I SHA!: D 7 21 7 ....!..- + )- r.l:rrN D I.. a I AZO ,- :N sF .J4 5 - -.. a .= a . -.!..-. ... 2 : .1 -:lII- .1 :II J _12 'D 2 JI: oJ .., _ I 21 I 1 WcO N'~ SCH Y1L "DAD IM1 lA IMI~9 r~ 10 1M lA11 IoU ->> :lIl a ~ ~~ w: ~ 1 iil7' '"'m1 III IA2 .- CC2 I ~ AG lA1A1 ....,1iI: MAl ~ CCJ 2 I C> (J 1Ii~ I....' ~ _~9 'f: II.) '" Irf'o' II Jl 5 ~ ==it !II ~ 0 ~ III ~... 0 ~ '-AVAil DA" II: 1~ It -.l ~ .. AG J---;iiJ ~ll ~ t: 1Dl fI..11 I." iI:: -. 5 V'r"~' 1 I"""" 1 "'i~ 1 ~ I 1 II "A;5t1~ --'E ~~ c:=r 1 lD 114 1113 112 W,C')t ' ~ w ~?- ~~~ ~1 ~i$ ~ ~(~ q .-. 3i ... 'tJ c. T- ~* ~ 1M 1Ai 1M -,... '. ~ ." ,1/ I - fa lEe -;c 1 L...- __f- IE R-4O LD LOCICETT ROAD JAl ,.,., ... ~'\,I ,'~ 12 ~ 'IT '~ ,.. <II 4IIl 1lI~":: I I~ i-- 1 t'jiI& 17 .1 R-4O "" R-40 if ~ SAt-_ I. 2 1M ~1~ ~ II. ~ ~ ~ IMII , Ie 1111 " ="'! --- ~..iJiil' IMII 111~ 26 IiPi -, I I JIURST r:rrr I.DIln I COllEY~~ll[E W~SrE~~ GArEWAY ~rU~Y A~EA ~ ~ 1: ~[EPO~l AU(GU~l ~~~~ I:m:!:j.!:.:!:i::!.::l RfSmENiiAl . COMMERCIAL RIES I COM MD{ TOTAL AC~ES ~Za& ~}~a2 (6~o~ ~~~a~ , 1\ J'\ I __---J , =d I I ~ ~ H ~ COlllEYV~ll~ WESTE~N GATEWAY STU[O)Y A~fEA MAS1E~ rlA~ ~~~~~~51 AC--'"' .,1: ;:) ............. ~.... . .. . .. . .. . . . ................ ................ '::::::::::::::.'. ~ES U DENT~Al ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ ................ . COMMIE~CIAL RES I COM M~X ~~o5 ~~o~ (Qo(Q) TOTAL ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ - , \ J~ I II ~, -- .............. , :.:':':':.:.'-:.:.:':.. ......0.... ......... "'4 ..... . ..... .:::::... . :::::1 .. .............. ...... ......!I!'~~~~!I!'~ I ................. ......................... :~{{{{o}}~~~~}} r L